►
From YouTube: Bloomington Redevelopment Commission, January 3, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Are
there
any
comments
or
questions
from
Commissioners?
If
not
I'll,
entertain
a
motion.
E
A
A
A
C
As
briefly
about
presently,
excuse
me
make
sure
I'm
on
here,
Happy
New,
Year
Commissioners,
wanted
to
just
briefly
mention
that,
as
I've
mentioned
before,
the
city
was
allocated
is
being
allocated
about
two
million
dollars
in
funding
from
the
American
Rescue
plan
through
the
home
program.
The
HUD
administers
and
part
of
that
process
is
the
development
of
an
allocation
plan
for
those
funds,
and
we
are
moving
through
that
process.
C
Now
I've
been
getting
different,
Community
input
from
the
required
organizations
and
and
things
like
that,
we
will
have
a
public
hearing
on
that
plan
in
February
at
one
of
these
meetings,
so
we'll
get
the
proper
notices
prepared
and
all
of
that,
but
that
will
have
to
be
up
for
public
comment
during
the
first
half
of
March
and
submitted
a
HUD
by
the
end
of
March,
and
so
we'll
make
one
of
these
meetings
of
public
hearing.
For
that.
So
just
want
to
give
you
a
heads
up
that
was
coming
down
the
pike
for
February,
so.
C
For
so
this,
this
two
million
dollars
has
to
be
used
to
serve
for
qualifying
and
defined
populations
of
those
who
are
at
risk
of
homelessness
or
who
are
experiencing
homelessness,
so
sort
of
homeless,
as
defined
by
Hud
at
risk
fleeing
domestic
violence
or
human
trafficking,
or
a
member
of
a
population
that
would
have
other
risk
factors
that
could
put
them
at
risk
for
homelessness.
C
So
veterans
is,
as
an
example,
is
one
of
those
so
I've
been
reaching
out
to
you
know
the
veteran
service
officer
met
with
Beacon
just
Community
groups
around
there's,
there's
a
list
of
books.
You
have
to
get
input
from,
but
I'm
trying
to
go
beyond
that
a
little
bit,
and
so
those
are
the
folks
that
the
funds
have
to
be
used
to
help
in
some
way
or
another,
so
reduce
the
risk.
So
we're.
C
And
so
one
of
the
big
pieces
of
that,
as
you
know,
is
the
heading
home
initiative
of
South
Central
Indiana
that
the
United
Way
and
Community
Foundation
that's
kind
of
the
basis
for
how
the
plan
will
come
about
just
using
all
the
data.
That's
been
gathered
for
that
and
looking
at
how
we
can
how
we
can
allocate
the
resources.
C
C
C
Then,
because
there
are
five
categories,
then
the
administration
of
the
program
which
the
city
would
use
that
Administration
money.
So
there's
a
budget
there's
a
actually
a
template
plan,
so
we're
putting
that
together
and
you
have
to
outline
a
budget
for
those
different
categories
of
what
it
can
be
used
for
or
what
you're
planning
to
use
it
for.
And
then
that
goes
through
a
process
of
approval
with
HUD.
C
C
F
A
All
right
is
there
a
legal
report,
please
this.
G
Is
our
first
meeting
of
the
year
just
to
remind
commissioner,
so
you
all
need
to
come
in
and
sign
a
bond
and
oath
that'll
be
part
of
that
application.
Those
are
usually
handled
by
our
risk
department,
so
somebody
should
be
reaching
out
to
you
shortly
just
to
schedule
time
at
your
convenience
to
come
in
and
sign
those.
The
second
is
a
conflict
of
interest.
F
G
B
G
A
G
A
G
G
The
306
Kirkwood
is
not
yet
closed
to
my,
but
they
have
engaged
the
title
company
to
get
that
close,
that's
the
hand
Department
doing
that
under
the
the
name
of
the
hand,
Department
you're,
acting
in
the
oversight
capacity.
That
deal
is
pretty
much
done.
It's
more
they're,
actually
literally
waiting
on
notarization
of
signatures,
just
to
make
sure
that
we
can
move
forward
with
that
process.
A
Thank
you
all
right.
Moving
on
to
new
business
first
item
is
election
of
officers,
so
go.
D
Ahead,
I'd
like
to
nominate
Cindy
canardi
as
president.
A
We
have
a
first
and
a
second
all,
those
in
favor,
hi
and
I
abstain
from
voting
for
myself.
So
thank
you.
Moving
on
to
secretary
I
believe
we.
E
A
Moving
on
the
next
item
of
business
is
resolution.
23-01
approval
of
2023
commission
schedule.
F
G
Always
has
to
be
basically
a
quorum,
that's
physically
present,
so
at
least
percent
of
the
members
have
to
be
physically
present,
which,
since
there's
five
voting
members,
there
always
has
to
be
three
members
at
least
three
members
physically
present.
So
that
means
at
any
one
time
two
of
you
could
potentially
participate
electronically
to
participate
electronically.
We
need
to
be
able
to
see
and
hear
you
simultaneously
so
same
with
the
room
just
to
so
that
you
can
be
observed.
Just
like
a
regular
public
meeting,
you
are
able
to
participate.
G
G
Plans
and
that's
a
good
question
so
just
to
make
sure
I
will
also
since
I'm
I
need
to
send
out
an
email
to
everyone.
I
also
attach
our
electronic
meeting
policy,
because
it
is
a
it's
based
off
the
statute
that
was
passed
by
the
general
assembly,
but
it
does
have
those
rules
run
down
and
if
you
have
any
questions
about
it
ever
please
reach
out
to
me
I'm
happy
to
dive
into
the
lovely
wording
of
that
particular
policy
as
it's
as
it's
such
I
will
I'll
just
note
just
generally.
G
It's
something
that
a
lot
of
municipalities
are
hoping
that
the
general
assembly
would
consider
revisit
again,
because
electronic
meetings
worked
pretty
well.
We
saw
actually
increased
participation
in
the
public,
and
so
we
are
hoping
for
somewhat
of
a
loosening
of
those
rules,
but
no
promises
I
mean.
Obviously
it's
going
to
be
a
budget
year
in
the
general
assembly,
so
it
might
be
a
little
bit.
A
Right
any
other
questions
regarding
resolution
23-01,
if
not
all,
entertain
a
motion.
The
button.
A
G
G
Just
so
that
you
could
ratify
those
costs
and
kind
of
explain
it
to
you
and
if
there's
a
utility
bill
specifically
that
exceeds
twenty
five
hundred
dollars,
which
would
be
unusual
for
any
of
these
properties.
Then
we'll
also
present
that
to
you
at
a
meeting.
Otherwise
we
pay
that
out
of
the
What's
called
the
we
call
it.
The
444
account
because
that's
how
it's
numbered
in
our
internal
New
Hope
accounting
system.
It
is
the
unrestricted
account
for
the
RDC,
so
as
opposed
to
Tiff
funds
which
have
significant
restrictions
on
them.
G
H
H
And
so
I
just
wanted
to
just
ask
like
how
frequently
do
you
reach
that
maximum
threshold
versus
how
much
is
it?
Is
there
a
cushion
in
that
account.
G
We
try
to
leave
a
little
bit
of
a
cushion.
Obviously
if
we
get
close
to
that
maximum,
we're
going
to
come
to
you
and
and
kind
of
explain,
what's
going
on
what
what
had
happened
a
couple
years
before,
we
actually
realized
that
we
were
pretty
significantly
exceeding
it,
so
that
was
that
was
having
to
be
approved
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
So
that's
why
we
increased
it
a
couple
years
years
ago
to
just
account
for
all
the
additional
property
in
in
an
event
that
the
RDC
owns
less
property.
G
F
H
F
You,
sir,
that
was
one
of
the
questions.
I
was
going
to
ask
it's
like
if
we
could
have
a
list
of
what
we
actually
own
or
you
know,
because
there's
those
as
we
talked
previously
at
times
about
the
bmfc
and
such
and
how
that
Consolidated
over
and
what
the
art
Redevelopment
actually
owns
in
regards
to
you
know,
what's
under
redevelopment's
name
yeah,
so
we
have
an
idea.
G
B
G
Will
just
just
as
a
way
of
there
are
two
ways
that
the
RDC
has
is
entered
as
owners
of
property,
so
sometimes
it's
the
Bloomington,
Redevelopment,
commission
and
then
per
statute.
There
is
a
way
of
the
the
commission
could
also
own
property
in
the
name
of
the
department,
the
Redevelopment
department,
so
the
Bloomington
Redevelopment
department,
so
you'll
see
both
ways
sometimes
noted
in
the
gis
system,
but
I'm
happy
to
prepare
a
list
there.
There's
properties
that
I
think
you
all
are
aware
of
that.
G
We
talk
about
on
a
regular
basis,
but
there
are
some
others
that
you're,
probably
not
aware
of
that,
were
part
of
either
right-of-way
acquisition.
So
we've
talked
about
that
on
Cottage
Grove
a
little
bit,
there's
still
pieces
of
right-of-way
that
you
all
own
there's
parts
of
other
developments
that
became
common
spaces
that
actually
are
technically
still
in
the
RDC
name,
that
you
will
still
own
just
in
general,
but
they're
fairly
is.
G
So
that's
we've
kind
of
been
doing
that
with
the
Cottage
Grove
situation,
where
that
was
probably
obtained
as
to
the
best
we
can.
You
know
we
have
discerned
that
was
obtained
about
40
years
ago
or
a
little
bit
more
for
a
project
that
never
ended
up
coming
to
fruition.
So
the
way
we
try
to
I
don't
know
about
cleaning
it
up,
but
the
way
we've
tried
to
reintegrate
that
is,
we've
offered
those
for
just
a
contiguous
landowners.
G
We
had
one
landowner,
take
us
up
on
that
to
which
enables
them
at
that
particular
area
to
subdivide
their
Parcels
and
that's
been
advantageous
to
also
Habitat
for
Humanity
has
utilize
that
process
in
that
neighborhood,
and
so
those
are
the
kind
of
opportunities
we're
looking
for.
We
want
to
be
strategic.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
it
aligns
with
your
mission,
still
we're
not
just
getting
rid
of
property.
F
To
get
rid
of
the
property
right
that
it
follows
what
we
need
to
be
done
as
a
community
without
just
curious
to
get
a
list,
that'd
be
great
yeah.
One
other
question
regards
to
when
we're
Dean
the
four
four
Cat
four
account,
which
is
a
non-tiff
fund
when
collected
rents
is
deposited,
is
that
where
we've
got
the
buildings
that
are
owned
by
Redevelopment
is,
is
there
other
allocated
dollars
that
go
into
the
444
Count
versus
specifically
rental
deposits
that
come
to
the
to
the
Redevelopment
I?
Don't
I.
G
I
don't
want
to
misspeak,
so
it
is
definitely
where
the
rents
are
deposited.
So
the
idea
is,
if
you
have
property,
that
you're
renting
out
it's
kind
of
self-sustaining
and
paying
for
that
there
there's
a
there's,
been
a
budget
that's
carried
over
from
year
to
year,
so
I'd
want
to
just
consult
with
Jeff
Underwood
to
make
sure
that
I'm,
not
speaking
out
of
school,
about
the
historical
places
where
we've
we've
obtained
that
money.
But
it's
not
like.
We
just
moved
Tiff
money
over
it.
It
has
to
be
come
from
a
very
particular.
F
G
A
A
second
I
have
a
first
in
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
passes
unanimously.
Next
item
of
business
is
resolution:
23-03
approval
of
funding
for
appraisals
for
property
within
the
allocation
areas
for
the
purpose
of
possible
acquisition
and
Redevelopment
they'd
like
to
speak
to
this.
G
So
I
could
also
speak
to
this,
so
this
is
another
one
of
those
annual
resolutions.
I
will
just
point
out
that
there's
an
increase
this
year
to
the
amount
in
this
particular
resolution
so
last
year
you
ought
to
prove
about
25
000
as
a
cab
money,
and
that
was
enough
for
last
year,
except
for
a
couple
of
one-offs
that
we
had
to
specifically
approve
the
outside
of
that
particular
budget.
G
However,
this
year
we
have,
we
have
doubled
that
to
fifty
thousand
dollars
and
there's
a
very
specific
reason.
Why?
So
the
reason?
Why
is
hope?
Well,
so
we
are
now
moving,
so
we
have
the
demolition
at
Phase
One
East.
We
are
now
anticipating
moving
toward
the
offering
those
for
development
in
this
calendar
year,
which
means
that
we
need
to
obtain
updated
appraisals
for
those
properties.
There
are
significant
number
of
parcels
on
those
properties.
We
anticipate
that
being
a
little
bit
expensive,
and
so
we
wanted
to
leave
a
little
bit
of
a
cushion
here
now.
G
You
would
all
you
all
still
will
receive
reports
for
those
specific
individual
appraisals
we'll
do
that
in
executive
session
since
it'll
be
part
of
the
negotiations
for
the
sale
of
that
particular
property
or
property
transaction.
But
this
would
allow
us
to
pay
for
those
appraisals
up
front
and
get
those
going.
We
anticipate
all
some
of
the
bills
for
the
Hopewell
appraisals,
which
have
already
begun
to
come
in
this
calendar
year.
So
this
would
help
cover
some
of
those.
A
Okay,
all
right
any
other
questions
regarding
resolution
23-03
any
public
comment
hearing
any
I'll
entertain
a
motion
for
resolution
23-03.
A
C
To
that
Madam
president,
as
you
all
know,
we
are
working
on
funds
or
we
are
developing
them.
Sorry,
I'm
trying
to
share
a
screen
here,
so
we
are
working
on
develop
redeveloping
the
Hopewell
site
and
as
part
of
that
different
irons
in
the
fire
with
housing,
development
infrastructure
funding,
I
also
want
to,
while
I'm
thinking
I
mentioned
Patrick
dierkes
from
engineering's
on.
Here
too,
it
was
helping
us
with
this.
So
in
the
interest
of
funding
the
necessary
infrastructure
at
the
at
the
site
which
you'll
see
on
this
map
up
here.
C
That
which
has
a
red
dot
is
unfunded
infrastructure
that
which
is
coded
in
blue,
is
funded
infrastructure.
If
you're
looking
to
orient
yourself
the
square
round
number
four-
or
this
is
the
parking
garage
right
here.
Okay,
on
the
site,
the
in
the
fall
of
this
year,
we
applied
for
a
ready
Grant.
As
you
know,
the
ready
program,
which
is
fun
with
the
rescue
plan
is
this
was
indicated
in
the
resolution.
C
We
applied
for
a
ready,
Grant
to
fund
the
construction
of
a
new
section
of
Jackson
Street,
which
would
go
from
First
Street
to
University
Avenue
right
here.
So
this
section,
which
is
in
the
oval
that
is
just
west
of
the
core
building
the
core
building,
is
right
about
here
at
number
five,
and
so,
as
we've
indicated
here
before
and
you'll
hear
more
this
year,
the
core
buildings,
the
goal
for
the
core
building
is
to
redevelop
it
into
affordable
housing.
C
The
number
of
targeted
units
for
this,
this
group
of
parcels
Parcels,
four
five
and
six-
is
about
400,
which
is
one
of
the
is
in
the
master
plan.
So
the
goal
of
the
grant
was
to
ask
for
funds
to
build
infrastructure
that
would
be
in
support
of
Housing,
and
so
that's
this.
This
construction,
this
300
or
so
foot
section
of
Jackson
Street,
would
support
the
housing
on
these.
These
adjacent
Parcels,
as
you
know,
we
applied
for
1.1
million
999
920.
C
We
have
gotten
preliminary
good
news
back
that
we
are
looking
at
awarding
1.8
million,
which
will
fund
the
Jackson
Street
section
the
residual
there
we
count
on
being
a
contingency.
There
were
some
side
streets
and
there
are
side,
alleys
and
things
like
that
that
we're
working
with
the
developer
on
that
would
hopefully
make
up
the
difference.
C
So
what
we're
asking
tonight
there
was
a
match
component
to
the
grant,
and
so
what
we
did
was
pulled
historic.
The
match
component,
let
me
say,
is
not
match
funds
to
pay
for
this
construction,
but
it's
sort
of
what
is
the
skin
in
the
game
here.
What
has
been
the
investment?
The
thus
far
from
the
community,
the
ready
program,
there's
a
very
strong
component
of
local
investment.
You
know,
there's
the
state
is
putting
in
this
much.
C
You
know,
what's
the
skin
in
the
game,
for
the
local
government,
so
as
you'll
see
in
the
project
review
form
that
Larry
put
together,
we
have
about
six
million
dollars
in
match.
That's
largely
includes
the
the
construction
of
First
Street
with
a
reconstruction
of
First
Street,
which
is
already
funded
through
the
state
and
federal
Grant.
C
If
you
will
for
the
rest
of
the
project,
we
don't
yet
know
what
the
other
developments
look
like
we're
just
not
there
yet
so
we're
enabled
I'm
not
able
to
include
that
match,
but
Larry
put
together
a
resolution
here.
That
indicates
the
match.
What
we're
asking
you
to
do
tonight
is
sort
of
acknowledging
that
that
match
was
included.
It's
like
I
said
there's.
C
The
next
step
of
approval
is
to
go
through
the
state,
the
state
approvals-
it's
been
approved
locally
here,
but
it
needs
to
go
through
some
more
approval,
so
this
is
sort
of
a
blessing.
If
you
will
that
we
use
the
project
review,
form
layer,
if
you
characterize
it
any
other
way
chime
in,
but
this
is
again
not
money.
We're
asking
you
to
to
chip
in
as
much
as
understanding
recognize
that
we
will
acknowledge
that
we
here's
what
here's,
what
we've
put
in
thus
far
through
other
community
Investments
and
for
the
hopeful
project.
C
Clearly,
there's
a
25
million
dollar
commitment
from
the
city
on
Tiff,
but
this
that
doesn't
impact
we
couldn't
use
all
of
that
for
a
lot
of
reasons.
But
what
is
what
is
most
directly
impactful
of
Jackson
Street,
so
that
which
is
around
Jackson
Street,
which
is
why
we
kind
of
divided
the
match
out
like
we
did.
So
it's
don't
include
all
of
it.
That's.
G
The
same
reason
why
there's
also
a
separate
project?
We
did
this
in
the
past
for
other
federal
grants
just
to
keep
it
nice
and
tidy.
This
is
for
this
type
of
Grant.
Some
of
these
funds
obviously
are
covered
on
the
Hopewell.
The
broader
Hopewell
project
review
and
approval
form
so
you're
not
just
to
be
clear,
you're,
not
approving
double
the
funds
or,
theoretically,
double
the
funds.
G
We're
just
really
trying
to
have
this
nice
and
tidy
so
that
John
can
present
it
to
ready
and
and
the
state,
and
just
say
you
know,
here's
what
we
are
putting
into
this
project:
here's
where
your
ready
Grant
will
fit,
and
this
is
the
project
it's
for,
and
it
does
exclude
some
of
the
extraneous
stuff
that
we're
not
using
for
match.
So
the
phase,
one
East
items
that
you'll
normally
see
during
a
Hopewell
approval
that
we're
bringing
you
back
for
any
specific
approval
of
funds
so
may.
D
I
ask
a
clarified
question
so
from
what
you
said.
It
sounds
if
you
can't
say
oh
25
million
for
the
whole
Hopewell
project.
It
has
to
be
related
to
Jackson.
Street,
therefore
say
something
on
Morton
or
the
one
two
three
Parcels
on
Hopewell
East
infrastructure,
They,
Don't,
Really
impact
Jackson
at
all.
Right.
C
F
C
It's
a
piece
of
it,
so
it's
the
the
match
again.
I
want
to
be
make
sure
I'm
distinct
and
you
know
some
match
can
be.
You
know
you
need
you
know.
The
whole
project
is
two
million
dollars
where
the
grants
four
hundred
thousand
you've
got
to
come
with
1.6
to
complete
the
project,
the
the
grant
will
fund
all
of
the
Jackson
Street
constructions
to
sort
of
what
else
are
we
doing
to
show
that
the
community
is
investing
in
this
project?
Is
we
want
to
see
the
whole
project
go?
C
Obviously
the
infrastructure
can't
you
know
the
core
building
can't
be
in
service
without
infrastructure,
so
we're
counting
that
projected
budget
as
a
match
and
it's
sort
of
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
distinguishing
that
you're
correct
Randy.
It's
it's
just
we're
not
using
not
asking
for
money
to
go
into
the
construction
of
Jackson
Street
that
will
be
funded
by
the
grant.
That's
just
what
else
are
we
doing
out
there
that
says?
Oh
here's,
here's
additional
money,
investment
that
the
community
is
making
to
get
this
housing
developed.
C
So,
that's
why
the
core
building's
counting
checks,
are
first
streets
being
counted
as
well,
so,
okay,
I
think
to
answer
your
question
is.
G
F
Already
putting
in
as
an
overall
basis
that
we
break
out
of
the
25
yeah
okay,
now
I
have
one
last
question,
because
the
already
funded
infrastructure
which
First
Street
Second
Street
and
then
our
red
dots,
is
the
large
Blue
portion
at
section
two
in
there
is
that
our
main
walkway?
This
is
the
greenway.
G
F
B
C
The
match,
what's
included
in
the
budget,
is
basically
the
current
performa
okay
of
the
core
building
construction.
That's
if.
C
C
Okay,
so
that
was
a
discussion
of
well,
you
don't
know
you've
gotten
tax
credits
yet,
but
they're,
okay
with
that
and
they
understand.
This
is
a
good
if
this
project,
as
we've
projected
it.
If
this
is
the
project
we
use,
it
has
a
good
chance
of
getting
tax
credits,
and
so
they
were
willing
to
accept
that.
But
the
performer
includes
as
if
it
does
okay,
so.
C
Depth
the
grant
proposal
itself,
yeah,
no
I,
think
just
we
we're
just
trying
to
be
efficient,
so
we
can
send
that
to
you.
If
you'd,
like
okay.