►
From YouTube: Bloomington Utilities Service Board, August 14, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
A
C
Hello,
my
name
is
Maggie
I'm,
a
long
time,
Bloomington
resident
Hi
Megan.
We
live
in
Broadview
neighborhood
and
we
are
working
to
get
our
septic
system
trans
changed
over
to
city
sewer
and
we
have
a
system.
That's
like
50,
60
years
old.
We
knew
that
coming
into
the
property.
C
Since
we've
been
on
in
this
house
this
last
seven
years,
the
city
put
in
a
main
down
the
road
and
put
Connections
in
for
as
far
as
I
know,
most
of
the
neighbors.
So
when
we've
been
communicating
my
husband
and
I
with
Nancy
about
getting
our
our
septic
situation
worked
out,
we
were
told
that
we
need
to
cover
the
cost
of
the
stub
in
the
road,
the
road
cut,
which
is
an
expense
that
wasn't
a
consideration
for
a
lot
of
our
neighbors.
So
it's
sort
of
surprising
to
us
and
we
do.
C
We
live
kind
of
far
off
the
road,
so
the
cost
for
us
is
already
going
to
be
pretty
expensive,
which,
like
I,
said
we
knew.
We
knew
that
that
was
going
to
happen,
that
that
would
be
quite
an
expense
when
it
came
to
that.
But
but
the
city's
asking
us
to
pay
an
additional
expense
that
I'm
hoping
we
can
have
the
city
cover
as
they
have
for
our
other
neighbors.
So
yeah,
I
I,
know
that
you
guys
got
some
information
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
or
go
into
more
detail.
A
So
so,
yes,
we
did
receive
some
information
from
you
and
your
neighbor
communicating
with
Nancy
and
Frank
explaining
the
situation
so
you've
been
in
your
residence
seven
years
and
this
it
came
through
in
2019
and
you
were
not
given
a
stub
at
the
end
of
the
drive.
Yes,
a.
C
Few
different
things
we
were
told
Gina,
my
neighbor
was
told
over
the
phone
that
we
were
simply
forgotten.
Other
people
have
said
that
we
weren't
able
to
connect
at
that
time
with
because
they
thought
we
were
going
to
need
a
pump
because
we
are
set
back
off
of
the
road
which
actually,
with
our
estimate,
they
did
the
the
great
evaluation
and
we
actually
don't
need
a
pump.
C
It's
already
such
a
huge
cost
for
us
that
it
makes
it
almost
impossible
for
us
to
move
forward
at
this
point
and
because
we're
in
city
limits
I,
don't
know
that
there
are
options
for
putting
in
a
septic
system
I,
don't
think
that
would
be
approved
in
the
city.
I
think
the
cost
would
be
probably
comparable.
I
don't
know.
C
Our
estimate
from
the
contractor
was
seventy
three
hundred
dollars
for
the
road
cut
portion,
which
is
what
we're
hoping
we
don't
have
to
pay
we're
happy
to
pay
the
connection
fee,
which
is
I,
think
2000
something
and
we're
prepared
to
pay
the
contract
bid,
which
is
you
know,
18
to
20
000
on
our
personal
cost,
but
that
that
additional
payment-
and
it
depends
on
whether
Dave
and
Gina,
depending
on
where
they
go.
C
A
E
Philippine
assistant
director
engineering,
so
this
was
a
project
that
we
received
a
grant
for
in
2019
the
CBU
tnd
Crews.
We
designed
it
in-house
in
engineering
and
then
tnd
Crews
were
the
contractor
and
we
were
limited
by
the
grant
funding.
So
we
we
tried
to
expand
it
through
as
much
of
the
neighborhood
as
we
could
and
We
examined
the
most
efficient
way
to
serve
as
many
houses
as
possible
with
the
money
that
we
had.
So
we
extended
it
to
the
east.
E
F
E
E
To
serve
those
lots,
there
was
some
unknowns
there,
whether
or
not
they
could
be
served
by
gravity
or
whether
they
were
going
to
have
to
have
a
pressure
made,
but
we
were
also
out
of
money,
so
we
stopped
at
that
point.
Obviously,
if
we
went
a
little
further
west,
we
could
get
that
house.
That's
in
front
of
hers,
that's
adjacent
to
the
road
and
probably
the
next
one
up.
That's
just
before
you
get
off
the
page
there.
E
So
well,
we
stopped
there
due
to
the
funding
and
if
you
look
if
their
Lots
were
to
be
served,
it
looks
like
it
would
have
to
go
across
a
couple.
Other
properties
to
get
to
the
green
line
is
the
sanitary
sewer,
that's
depicted,
and
then
the
stars
are
the
lots
we
thought
we
could
serve,
and
so
there
were
just
quite
a
few
unknowns
on
whether
or
not
by
extending
the
main.
That
was
what
those
homes
would
actually
be
served.
So
it
was
stopped
short
of
that
property
at
the
time.
A
E
G
E
E
A
significant
process
to
go
back
through
the
Grant
application,
but
we
have
not
asked
when.
G
We
do
you
know
when
the
city
approves
a
cdbg
grant
I'm
just
speculating,
because
I
wasn't
familiar
with
this
one.
It's
a
certain
amount
of
money
for
a
project
in
sometimes
when
you
actually
get
to
the
project,
it'll
cost
more
or
less,
and
it's
it's
a
priority
for
municipal
government
to
get
off
of
septic.
E
G
E
Yeah
I
think
I
think
from
a
staff
and
perspective
that
we
would
love
to
see
everyone
in
this
neighborhood
get
on
sewer
and
off
the
septic
I
think
that
would
be
a
goal.
That
was
the
goal
of
the
project
and
it's
just
unfortunate
that
the
funds
ran
short
to
where
we
could
get
there.
But
I'm
trying
to
say
how
to
word
this,
but
I
would
say
that
that
was
a
200
000
project
that
we
extended
all
the
way
up.
That
was
one
component.
E
We
did
the
design
and
the
construction,
so
there
was
cost
Savings
in
that
as
well,
and
then
we
do
cover
the
cost
of
the
connection
fee.
I
think
Maggie
mentioned
that
that
they
were
willing
to
pay
that
that's
actually
covered
because
we'll
offset
the
payment
for
that
through
our
storm
water
budget,
so
that
it's
it
removes
the
the
potential
contaminants
from
the
storm
water
system.
So
those
those
costs
for
septic
transfer
or
a
decommissioning
of
the
of
the
septic
are
covered.
E
Think
I
think.
Another
point
is
that
I
don't
think
the
Snaps
are
posed
for
to
the
board
approving
the
funding
for
these
connections.
It's
just
not
in
our
standard
practice.
So
this,
the
the
lateral
is
owned
by
the
customer
from
the
main
connection,
all
the
way
to
the
home
and
and
those
other
laterals
were
only
extended
because
they
were
part
of
a
Construction
contract
and
so
once
the
once
that
con
that
construction
Project's
over
then
that
laterals,
the
the
homeowners,
and
so
it's
unfortunate
those
weren't.
E
E
Yes,
yeah,
we
knew
we
knew
that
there
was
other
places
that
might
be
able
to
be
served,
but
it
was
unclear
whether
they
could
be
I
will
say
that
so
we
talked
about
the
gravity,
is
serving
the
Lots
by
gravity
and
was
going
to
have
to
cross
those
other
properties
to
the
North
or
to
the
east,
potentially,
unless
they
had
an
easement
down
their
driveway
and
then
Nancy.
Could
you
hold
up
that
device?
E
That's
under
that
chair
back
there
at
the
time
we
did
not
have
a
design
approved
for
fitting
a
pressurized
line
to
our
gravity
laterals,
so
it
was.
It
was
against
our
construction
specification
for
a
pressurized
line
to
tie
into
a
gravity-fed
sewer
ladder.
Well,
this
this
was
designed
by
our
engineering
team
a
few
years
ago
after
this
project,
so
prior
to
that,
if
they
were
going
to
have
a
pressurized
line,
it
had
to
tie
into
a
manhole.
E
So
that
also
was
another
reason
why
we
didn't
extend
a
lateral,
because
if
they
were
going
to
be
using
a
pump
and
a
pressurized
line,
then
they
would
have
to
tie
into
a
manhole.
And
then
we
would
just
be
extending
a
lateral
to
the
edge
of
the
right-of-way
which
which
we're
estimating
is
around
five
thousand
dollars
per
lateral.
To
do
that
at
our
expense.
During
the
project,
when
the
budget
was
very
tight,
so.
B
E
The
neighbors
to
Maggie
and
then
there's
a
home
on
the
north
side
of
the
road
you
see
where
it
lies
and
it
comes
up
to
Ralston
I,
think
it
ended
up
being
served.
But
if
you
look
back
to
the
right,
there's
a
house
behind
a
house
with
a
blue
line
to
the
right
to
the
right
again
and
two
more
lots
and
then
there's
a
house
further
north
that
one
that
one
was
not
served
because
we
weren't
sure
how
they
would
cross
the
creek
with
the
gravity.
G
E
G
E
E
G
This
isn't
a
quick
solution
but
I
think
to
me.
It
makes
more
sense
for
us
to
look
at
it
like
a
phase
two
cdbg
grant
for
this,
because
it
would
stay
in
line
with
our
practice
and
not
set
precedent
of
going
outside
our
normal
procedures.
It's
going
to
take
a
while
to
do
that,
because
we
need
to
get
through
the
next
cdbg
round
of
funding
and
it's
iffy,
but
do
you
think
have
we
got
anything
else
working
with
cdbg
to.
E
G
H
G
G
H
H
E
You
are
you
aware
of
any,
but
it's
interesting
after
the
project.
You
start
to
hear
God
this
one.
You
know
I,
think
Nancy
did
research
and
we've
had
13
that
have
connected
so
not
as
not
34,
yet
13
have
chose
to
connect
so
but
but
as
they
start
to
fail
and
that's
they're
getting
to
that
age
and
then-
and
you
know
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
chose
this
neighborhood
too,
was
that
the
health
department
said
the
Lots
were
too
small
to
build
another
septic
field.
There
was
no
there's,
no
alternative
solution
for
them.
Yeah.
H
I
I
G
I
G
Right,
well,
we
would
would
like,
maybe
is
you
know,
some
additional
staff
investigation
and
give
us
some
more
firm
numbers
about
where
we
are
and
options.
Okay,.
J
Well,
I
mean
so
when
I
read
when
I
before
I
saw
the
map
and
and
before
the
map
was
explained
and
I,
read
that
the
materials
and
the
the
you
know
the
assertion
that
the
the
customer
was
told
that
they
were,
you
know,
passed
over
forgotten.
J
You
know
to
me
and
the
way
that
this
was
explained,
that
wasn't
the
case.
Rather
the
project
boundaries
were
drawn
and
it's
unfortunate
I
apologize
on
behalf
of
whoever
may
have
said
that
that
you
were
forgotten
or
or
passed
over.
It
looks
like
that.
You
know
we
drew
the
boundaries
to
accommodate
as
a
big
a
project
as
we
could
fit
with
the
funds
available,
so
it
just
reading
the
materials
I
I
now
have
a
different
understanding.
J
Having
looked
at
the
map,
and
having
explained
to
me
so
I
appreciate
that,
but
I
I
agree
looking
for
any
other
funding
sources
or
or
trying
to
expedite
getting
some
type
of
Grant
would
be,
would
be
good
to
help
alleviate
the
the
real
world
problems
that
our
customers,
having.
D
A
Thank
you
so
much
for
coming.
Thank
you!
Phil.
Sorry,
Jeff!
Okay,
just
okay!
All
right!
Yes!
Are
there
any
other
petitions
in
Communications
from
the
public
all
right,
so
we'll
continue
on
with
our
agenda,
starting
with
approval
of
the
minutes
from
our
previous
meeting
on
July
31st.
Do
we
have
a
motion
or
do
we
have
any
questions.
A
I
A
A
K
We
have
a
contract
for
for
19970
yakagawa
for
thirteen
thousand
nine
hundred
and
fifty
in
Patriot
engineering
for
four
thousand
nine
hundred
and
ninety
nine
would
any
board
member
like
to
pull
any
of
these
items
from
the
consent
agenda
and
discuss
them
individually.
K
Hearing
them,
if
there
is
no
objection,
then
the
consent
agenda
will
be
approved
as
presented
and
hearing
none.
The
consent
agenda
is
to
prove
it
as
presented
thanks.
A
L
Jason
winning
pre-treatment
coordinator,
so
you
have
before
you
mou
for
seven
Subway
locations
here
in
town
at
the
beginning
of
the
year,
they
were
all
purchased
by
the
same
group
under
various
entities
and
it
was
found
that
of
the
nine
locations
purchased
seven
needed
upgrades
with
their
grease
retention
devices.
L
Normally
we
work
on
One
restaurant
at
a
time,
one
FC
at
a
time
they
came
to
us
and
asked
for
more
time
just
to
be
able
to
manage
the
you
know:
scheduling
of
the
installation
of
seven
different
devices
at
seven
different
locations,
a
few
of
the
locations
they
had
planned
to
move
in
the
near
future
and
ask
for
some
kind
of
dispensation
with
that
as
well.
A
All
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
opposed
I
am
I'm
approved.
Sorry,
okay,
the
motion
for
the
approval
of
the
subway
fog
compliance
is
approved.
Thank
you
all
right.
Next,
on
the
agenda,
requests
for
approval
of
a
mou
between
the
city
of
Bloomington
utilities
department
and
the
Bloomington
Redevelopment
Commission
Catherine
zeiger.
M
We
are
offering
to
contribute
310
000
towards
the
installation
of
this
green
roof
at
the
tech
center
who
take
any
questions.
J
A
few
questions
first,
is
this
funding
already
present
in
our
green
infrastructure
budget.
M
It
is
from
the
green
infrastructure
budget.
Yes,
we
looked
at
our
green
infrastructure
budget
and
made
sure
that
we
could
accommodate
this
and.
M
M
This
is
the
most
substantial
funding
we've
made
towards
green
infrastructure
in
the
city,
thus
far.
J
And
so
what?
What
are
the
opportunity
costs
here
in
terms
of,
obviously,
we
can't
do
other
things
with
that
three
quarters
of
the.
B
J
Budget,
so
what
are
we
given
up
if
we
move
ahead
with
this.
M
Were
so
we
do
fund
a
smaller
amount,
like
we
set
aside
a
smaller
amount
every
year
for
smaller
rain
garden
projects,
green
infrastructure
and
we're
just
going
to
continue
to
do
that.
The
funding
for
this
we
looked
at
how
much
we
spent
every
year
and
we
did
have
some
left
each
year,
and
so
we
were
going
to
use
that
towards
this
as
well.
I,
don't
think
we're
really
giving
up
any
projects
as
far
as
like
giving
up
other
projects
to
do
this.
J
Something
so
who,
who
else
is
contributing?
Who
else
would
be
contributing
to
this.
M
For
the
green
roof
itself,
so
the
total
cost
of
the
green
roof
is
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
we
agreed
to
pay
for
the
cost
difference
between
the
green
roof
and
what
it
would
cost
them
to
not
have
the
green
roof
and
do
the
required
detention
and
water
quality
treatment
which
would
have
likely
been
underground
with
an
aqua,
swirl
I'm.
Assuming
so
there's
a
cost
difference
to
have
this.
But
it's
something
that
we
really
wanted
to
support.
M
We're
actually
really
happy
that
they
came
to
us
because
they
were
considering
taking
it
out
of
their
project
and
wondered
if
we'd
be
able
to
contribute.
I.
Just
think.
It's
something
really
exciting
that
we
can
put
our
name
on
it'd,
be
the
first
of
its
kind
in
Bloomington
in
the
city
of
Bloomington.
J
What
are
the
potential
of
O
M
costs?
Was
there
a
tail
that
we
would
be
responsible
for
in
any
way?
No.
J
And
do
we
have
do
we
already
have
a
company
in
mind
that
we've
been
working
with
on
the
planning
and
and
getting
the
the
estimate
I
mean?
Do
we
know
who
would
install
this
this
roof.
M
J
Are
the
so
to
me,
yeah
in
Bloomington,
it's
a
fairly
new
thing.
I
know
they
do
this
in
other
communities.
Do
these
structures
hold
up
well
over
time,
yeah.
M
G
J
G
G
Green
roof
yeah
Works.
What
do
you
have
planned?
You
know
I
have
to
what
kind
of
Maintenance
does
it
need
and
pardon.
M
All
right,
so
we
have
I,
think
slides
here
that
show
the
standard
modules.
This
is
the
this
is
actually
from
the
specs
that
we
were
provided.
M
This
is
a
you
could
call
it
a
blue,
green
roof.
The
top
layer
is
the
traditional
green
roof.
They
will
have
cells
that
will
have
a
variety
of
native
plants.
A
lot
of
the
plants
that
have
been
specked
for
this
are
Stone
crop,
which
are
native
succulents,
there's
also
some
native
grasses
and
forbs
as
well.
The
bottom
section
you
see
there
in
blue
is
actually
how
it
retains
water.
So
if
you
scroll
down
a
little
bit,
there's
another
diagram
of
it
and
keep
going.
M
Then
the
medium
one
or
the
middle
one,
not
medium,
sorry,
the
middle
one
right
there,
where
it's
circled.
So
that
is
that's
the
model
that
I
think
they're
still
hoping
to
put
on
there,
at
least
that's.
M
So
you
know,
if
you
have
an
average
rainfall,
you
probably
won't
even
see
anything
coming
out
of
the
downspout
and
so
basically
yeah
it
rains
it
rains
on
the
roof
and
instead
of
shedding
like
a
typical
roof
and
going
down
the
downspout
and
shedding
whatever
the
roof
the
shingles
are
made
out
of
into
the
storm
system.
It
is
captured
on-site
on
the
roof
filtered
through
the
soil,
substrate
and
then
captured
in
the
blue
cells
underneath
and
then
overflow
is
goes
through.
The
downspout.
H
M
G
So
we're
we're
being
asked
to
fund
the
additional
cost
from
a
standard,
Roof
System
that
that
this
building
would
normally
have.
And
then
we
take
funding
for
these
kind
of
projects
from
storm
water
or
which
budget.
G
M
Yeah
and
I
think
there's
also
the
added
benefit.
In
addition
to
it,
be
you
know,
causing
less
tax
on
the
storm
water
system
and
being
environmentally
friendly.
Part
of
the
mou
allows
us
to
have
access
to
the
roof
whenever
we'd
like
and
I
Envision
it
being
a
big
part
of
our
education
and
outreach
program.
G
M
So
that's
why
I'm
really
happy
that
in
the
mou,
the
RDC
is
a
great
agreed
to
take
care
of
Maintenance
and
necessary
repairs.
There's
also
a
part
of
the
mou
that,
if,
for
any
reason,
they're
no
longer
able
to
maintain
it
or
have
a
have
the
green
roof,
they'll
have
to
pay
to
install
the
features
that
would
make
up
for
the
detention
and
water
quality
that
they'd
be
losing.
A
Follow-Up
question
of
that,
because
that
was
one
of
my
questions
so
like
if
it's
not
maintained,
they
have
to
pay
for
the
the
to
make
up
for
it,
but
that
wouldn't
have
cost
them
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
begin
with,
though
right.
A
M
Yeah,
okay
yeah,
so
they
would
have
to
they
have
to
meet
detention
and
water
quality
requirements.
No
matter
what
right.
This
just
seemed
like
a
really
good
opportunity
to
have
this
kind
of
green
infrastructure
and
part
of
the
way
that
we
see
it
is
that
we
encourage
private
developers
all
the
time
to
include
bnps
like
this
in
their
infrastructure,
and
so
this
is
a
really
good
opportunity
for
us
to
kind
of
walk
that
walk
and
say,
like
look
we're
doing
it
too.
This
is
what
we
want
to
see
for
the
city.
A
Because
that
was
my
next
question
was
so
like
what
about
the
next
project
like
if
another
building
wanted
like
we
can't
give
300
I
mean
I,
wouldn't
think
we
can
give
300
000
every
year
for
somebody
else's
roof.
But
why
is
it
I
guess
this
project?
Because
they
were
first
to
approach
us
and
somebody
else
didn't
or.
M
So
we're
approached
all
the
time
we
work
with
City
engineering
for
a
lot
of
those
like
smaller
Greenways
right-of-way
projects
where
we
add
green
infrastructure.
This
just
happens
to
be
the
largest
project
that
we've
been
approached
with,
and
it's
also
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
Chris,
but
this
is
this-
is
also
city,
property
and
I,
assume
I.
F
D
A
Come
back
to
it
in
a
minute
Seth
did
you
have
a
question?
No.
Was
there
anybody
else
who
had
a
question?
Yes,
I.
J
Misspoke
item
five
says:
should
the
RDC
choose
to
remove
the
infrastructure
or
permit
the
infrastructure
to
no
longer
operate
as
attended?
Then
the
RDC
agrees
to
design
and
submit
plans
to
CBU
for
alternative
stormwater
features
and
install
the
same
in
order
to
replace
the
Lost,
stormwater
detention
and
treatment,
qualities
provided
by
the
infrastructure.
So
it's
not
necessarily
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
worth.
D
Yes,
okay,
thank.
A
You
my
I've
remembered
so
this
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
since
it's
in
your
budget.
If
the
money
that's
rolled
over
each
year,
it's
not
able
to
be
shifted
to
another
budget.
That's
just
lost
to
be
rolled
over
or
how
does
that
work
like
if
we
knew
a
more
pressing
project
needed
three
hundred
thousand
dollars?
And
then
here
we've
got.
This
is
I.
H
K
J
F
J
Any
way
to
to
to
judge
that
sort
of
benefit
for
for
what
we
we've
you've
done
it
for
the
for
the
the
roof.
It.
M
I
mean
I,
think
you
could
you
could
compare
it
to
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
worth
of
rain
Gardens.
If
you
wanted
to
look
at
detention
capacity,
some
of
the
rain
guard
most
of
the
rain
Gardens
that
we've
funded.
M
We
actually
ran
into
this
recently
as
we're
starting
to
put
them
into
our
asset
management
systems,
but
because
they're,
so
small
often
the
same
drainage
report
isn't
generated
because
it
they
have
such
a
small
footprint
and
their
detention
isn't
as
large
as
obviously
this
very
large
roof
that
holds
somewhere
around
to
what
was
it
two
cubic
two
cubic
feet?
First
per
square
foot
yeah
so.
M
Let's
see
I
guess
what
I,
what
I
meant
was
that
we
don't
have
the
same
drainage
calculations
for
all
the
rain
Gardens
that
we've
currently
put
in,
but
you
could
probably
put
that
together,
based
on
the
detention
capacity,
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
worth
of
rain
Gardens.
Typically,
our
rain
garden
projects,
for
example
the
one
we
most
recently
funded
on
West
Allen,
was
two
rain
Gardens
with
oh
and
I'm
gonna
try
to
Ballpark.
You
know
what
they
have
much
less
detention
capacity.
I
don't
want
to
put
a
number
out
there.
M
J
I
understand
that,
but
if
but
if
you
came
to
me
and
said
that
there's
that
benefit
that
added
benefit
of
doing
this
and
it's
a
showcase
project
and
we
kind
of
have
access
to
it
with
24
hours
notice
and
it's
gonna
you're
gonna
have
a
lot
more
people
likely
build
roofs
like
this
and
you
said,
and
we're
getting
a
lot
more
bang
for
the
buck.
For
with
this
300
000.
If
you're
able
to
say
that
to
me,
then
then
it's
kind
of
a
slam
dunk,
but
right
now,
I'm
like
wow.
B
J
Support
you,
because
this
sounds
like
something:
that's
that
we
we've
already
allocated
money
for
we're,
not
using
all
the
money.
It's
it's
something
new
that
we
can
showcase.
It
sounds
like
it
gives
a
lot
of
benefit
and
likely
gives
more
than
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
with
the
rain
Garden,
but
yeah,
but
I'm,
just
saying
if
you
came
to
us
with
that
information
as
well,
at
least
that
would
that
would
help
me
help
convince
me,
but.
M
More
than
you've
already
yeah,
no
I
think
it's
great
and
I'm
just
trying
to
think
like
okay.
So
if
we
had
six
of
the
rain
Gardens
we
just
built,
that
would
be
the
same
price
as
this
green
roof
and
I
think
at
best
it
would
be
comparable.
I
think
the
green
green
roof
probably
has
a
little
bit
more
I
think
at
best
it's
comparable.
J
B
A
A
B
B
Her
discussion
included
gscs
where
it
fits
into
the
Indiana
code
and
where
it
could
be
used,
it
gives
more
flexibility
to
a
contract
and
can
be
used
in
a
single
project
or
a
larger
program.
Contract
new
GSC
contracts
can
build
off
the
City's
standards
and
get
potential
savings
back
to
the
utilities.
B
Saving
types
were
explained
with
examples
of
measured
measures
compared
to
stipulated.
Savings
seems,
like
our
engineering
department,
says
that
this
keeps
projects
moving
along
better
and
the
flexibility
is
attractive
as
well.
K
Just
wanted
to
give
everybody
a
heads
up
about
the
property
and
planning
subcommittee
meeting
before
our
next
board
meeting
a
couple
things
that
will
be
on
there
is
a
deeper
dive
into
the
financial
analysis
for
the
new
building.
There
were
some
questions
about
that,
but
it
got
presented
at
the
finance
subcommittee,
so
we're
planning
on
going
on
that
and
then
also
bring
to
your
everybody's
attention
about
where
we
are
in
our
storm
water
in
Wastewater
bond
process
for
this
year,
so
that'll
come
in
in
two
weeks.
K
The
only
other
item
I
have
is
sad
news
is
that
our
Superintendent
at
butcher,
pool
passed
away,
I,
think
August,
2nd,
so
I
think
there's
a
service
for
him
in
Washington
Indiana
a
week
from
today
in
the
evening.
A
We're
very
sorry
to
hear
of
the
passing
and
we'll
be
thinking
of
their
family
and
all
of
our
staff
that
worked
with
them.
Thank
you.
Yes,
Kirk.
G
Yes,
that
we
do
I,
don't
know
if
this
has
been
past
practice
or
not,
but
a
resolution
from
the
board
for
his
years
of
service
recognizing.
That
would
be
a
good
thing
for
us
to
do,
because
when
you
have
a
long
employee,
that's
done
a
lot
of
good
work.
It's
it's
good
for
us
to
recognize
their
service.
G
Some
of
their
family
can
know
that
we
we
recognize
that,
on
behalf
of
all
those
folks
that
that
he
served
over
the
years.
Yes.
D
J
Financial
analysis
of
the
new
service
center,
my
understanding
was
that
there
was
a
handout
two
weeks
ago.
Can
we
get
that
for
those
of
us
that
weren't
here
in
any
other
information
ahead
of
the
property
and
planning
committee?
In
fact
that
handout,
if
we
can
get
it
like
fairly
soon
rather
than
on
the
Thursday
before
that,
would
be
be
helpful
yeah
we
can
make
that
happen.
Thank
you
or
if
you
have
one
printed
out
now
that.
J
A
I
read
about.
We
have
some
staff
members
who
are
working
overnight
on
Fountain
Drive
doing
an
installation.
Is
that
correct?
So,
oh
you
that
was
last
week.
Well,
thank
you!
So
that's
out
of
routine,
though
right
like
so
thank
you
to
those
folks
who
are
doing
that
and
changing
up
their
schedules
and
I
know.
We've
got
a
lot
of
things
going
on
that.
We
don't
even
know
about
that.
People
are
doing
every
day
here.
So,
thank
you
all.
A
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments?
Harry?
None.
Do
we
have
a
motion
to
adjourn
I'm?
Sorry,
I'll.
Do
it
again
sure,
having
heard
all
the
meeting
today,
do
we
have
any
additional
petitions
or
Communications.