►
From YouTube: June 8, 2021 HRA Commission Regular Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Thank
you.
I
would
like
to
call
the
june
8
2021
housing
and
redevelopment
authority
meeting
to
order
our
first
order
of
business
is
approval
of
the
agenda.
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
june
8
2021
hra
commission
meeting
agenda.
C
A
Thank
you.
We
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
by
commissioner
olson
second
by
commissioner
beloka.
I
will
now
call
a
vote
on
the
motion
to
approve
the
agenda.
Those
in
favor
of
the
motion
say
aye,
so
suppose
no
myra.
Can
you
take
the
roll
call
vote.
Please.
A
We
will
go,
we
are
here,
but
let's
go
back
and
make
it
official
myra.
Could
you
do
the
roll
call
please?
Okay,.
A
E
A
Thank
you
all
right
now,
moving
on
to
number
three
on
the
agenda
approval
of
the
minutes
of
may
25th
2021.
Are
there
any
additions
or
corrections.
A
D
C
E
A
D
H
All
right
great
well
good
evening,
everyone,
I'm
julie,
farnham
senior
planner
and
I'm
going
to
provide
an
overview
of
the
lindell
avenue
retrofit
strategy
that
was
adopted
by
the
city
council
on
april
5th,
and
I
think
you
were
given
an
update
on
this.
I
want
to
say
last
fall,
perhaps
so
you
might.
There
might
be
some
similarity
here,
but
but
this
is
really
the
the
final
plan,
so
I'm
gonna
just
go
through
that.
If
I
can
figure
out
my
controls
here
to
move
this
forward.
H
Okay,
I
also
wanted
to
say
that
the
so
the
plan
was
adopted
by
the
city
council
on
april
5th,
and
it
has
since
been
formally
incorporated
into
our
comprehensive
plan
as
well.
So
what
is
the
retrofit
strategy?
Well,
it's
a
plan
to
shape
the
future
of
the
corridor
and
it's
it's
really
outlines
of
vision
and
a
set
of
principles
and
targeted
strategies
to
help
guide
redevelopment
in
the
corridor
and
position
it
for
the
future.
H
So
why
lindale
well,
first
of
all
a
few
years
back,
some
of
you,
I
know
not
all
of
you
were
on
the
hra
at
that
point,
but
the
council
on
the
hra
directed
staff
to
do
a
study
of
the
neighborhood
commercial
nodes
in
bloomington,
the
older
ones
and
and
lindell
came
up
or
at
least
central
lindell
was
identified
as
one
it
didn't
rank
that
high
actually
compared
to
the
other,
eight
or
nine
that
were
reviewed.
H
However,
when
our
former
community
development
director
eric
johnson
came
in,
he
started
asking
a
lot
of
questions
because
he
he
drove
around
and
he
looked
at
lindell
and
he
said
you
know,
lindell
is
looking
a
little
worn.
Are
we
doing
anything
about
that?
So
so
that's
really
kind
of
where
the
root
of
it
was.
But
it's
one
of
the
oldest
commun
commercial
corridors
in
the
city.
Most
of
its
development
happened
during
the
60s
and
it
still
while
there
have
been
some
upgrades
since
then.
H
Obviously
it
still
has
a
lot
of
those
same
characteristics.
It's
very
auto
oriented
a
lot
of
strip,
centers,
etc.
There's
some
older
housing
and
it
is
showing
its
age
and
not
realizing
its
full
potential.
Although
that
said,
there
is
still
a
fair
amount
of
viable
business
on
on
the
corridor,
so
it,
but
it
could
do
there
could
be
more.
H
It
really
could
be
a
much
more
vibrant
area
than
it
is
it's
a
corridor
that
really
is
kind
of
the
heart
of
the
city
in
a
lot
of
ways
or
historically
traditionally
it
had
been
the
heart
of
the
city,
really
the
the
major
commercial
corridor
in
bloomington.
H
So
it
serves
the
entire
city,
but
it
also
kind
of
functions
as
the
neighborhood
main
street.
So
the
corridor,
particularly
on
the
west
side,
is
surrounded
by
an
established
single
family.
Neighborhood,
there's
also
a
fair
amount
of
multi-family
existing
in
in
the
corridor
and
a
lot
of
those
folks.
This
is
their.
This
is
where
they
shop
for
their
day-to-day
goods
at
the
walgreens
or
going
to
the
auto
shop
or
whatever.
H
It
also
serves
as
a
gateway
to
the
city.
There's
access
to
the
freeway
at
the
north
end
at
494,
and
there's
also
access
to
in
two
places
to
35w
so
access
to
the
regional
roadway
system.
So
it's
got
convenient
regional
access,
the
transit
improvements,
there's
a
lot
of
trans
improvements
happening
here,
in
particular
the
brt.
The
orange
line
brt
is
scheduled
to
open
at
the
end
of
this
year,
down
at
the
98th
street
transit
station.
H
That
transit
station
has
is
already
serving
as
a
major
transfer
point
for
lots
of
different
bus
routes
through
the
city
and
having
the
orange
line
come
through
here
will
only
make
that
even
more
so
met
council
has
also
done
some
studies
to
look
at
how
to
improve
transit
surface
service
in
the
corridor,
given
the
enhanced
transit
service,
with
the
orange
line
coming
on
later
this
year,
so
they're
looking
at
having
some
service
that
runs
on
glendale,
more
frequently
and
also
in
evenings
and
weekends,
and
also
we
wanted
to
you
know
the
city
is
starting
to
see
redevelopment
interest
just
all
over,
but
but
also
in
in
lindell,
along
lindell.
H
Obviously,
lindell
flats
was
recently
approved
and
is
well
under
construction,
and
there's
been
some
other
things
going
on.
So
this
strategy
was
intended
to
kind
of
capture
some
of
that
that
interest.
That's
that's
out
there.
H
So
our
approach.
It
was
really
important
when
we
started
this,
that
that
we
have
a
an
approach
that
included
a
lot
of
community
engagement
and
our
team
included
an
artist,
and
they
just
did
a
really
great
job
of
coming
up
with
some
really
fun
creative
ways
to
get
people
engaged.
We
were
going
to
high
schools,
we
went
to
the
senior
center,
we
had
a
couple
different
activities
out
in
locations
on
the
corridor.
We
met
with
several
business
owners,
had
some
focus
groups,
etc.
H
So
it
was
really
a
very
robust
community
engagement
process,
and
I
don't
know
if
any
of
you
were
able
to
make.
I
I
know
some
of
you
were
able
to
make
some
of
those,
but
they
were
really
actually
quite
a
lot
of
fun
as
well,
and
it
generated
a
lot
of
excitement
from
the
community.
H
So
some
of
the
things
we
heard
is
that
people
are
interested
in
seeing
more
options
for
getting
around,
particularly
along
lindell,
very
strong
support
for
maintaining
of
local
small
businesses,
also
expanding
housing
options
and
creating
more
green
areas
or
park
areas
and
providing
spaces
and
activities
for
families.
H
Another
key
part
of
our
approach
was
that
it
be
grounded
in
some
kind
of
market
reality,
so
the
consultant
team
did
include
some
market
analysts,
a
housing,
analyst
retail
analyst
and
just
a
general
market
study
that
looked
at
general
trends,
so
some
of
the
conclusions
that
they
came
up
with-
and
these
are
you
know
it's
always-
forecasts
are
always
well
they're,
forecast
and
and
there's
lots
of
things
that
can
make
those
forecasts
not
come
true,
but
they
give
kind
of
a
snapshot
of
of
our
based
on
what
we
know
now
what
we
might
be
able
to
exp
expect-
and
this
is
really
a
picture
of
the
potential
of
the
corridor.
H
New
housing
in
the
area
is
what's
really
going
to
drive
any
kind
of
new
retail
retail,
as
I'm
sure
you're
well
aware,
is
going
through
a
lot
of
changes
right
now
and
nobody's
really
certain
as
to
what
exactly
is
going
to
happen
with
it.
But
there
seems
to
be
a
shrinkage
of
bricks
and
mortar
retail
unless
it's
specialty
kind
of
retail
or
experiential
retail
people
want
to
be
able
to
go
to
places
and
and
interact.
So
restaurants,
for
instance,
there's
still
a
fair
amount
of
demand
for
those
kinds
of
things.
H
The
office
market
as
well
is
is
fairly
soft
and
lindell
has
never
been
our
key
office
area.
Our
districts,
our
development
districts
along
the
freeway,
are
really
where
office
tends
to
concentrate.
However,
as
I
said
before,
lindell
has
a
great
location
with
a
good
access
to
the
region
and
and
you've
heard
the
term
location
location
location.
So
there
is
some
potential
here
to
capture
some
office
demand,
as
that
starts
to
build
the
market.
Studies
for
this
were
done
prior
to
the
pandemic.
H
Setting
in
so,
we
did
ask
the
consultant
to
just
reflect
on
what,
if
any
changes
would
come
out
of
that
from
the
the
predictions
that
they
had
and
they
concluded
that
many
of
the
trends
that
they
saw
would
largely
remain,
and
some
of
those
included
like
the
demand
for
open
space
and
the
desire
for
open
space.
In
fact,
they
said,
the
pandemic
has
probably
underscored
that,
and
I
think
we've
all
maybe
experienced
some
of
that.
H
Just
the
idea
to
be
able
to
even
at
a
restaurant,
to
be
able
to
have
an
outside
option
was
was
kind
of
a
lifeline
for
for
some
restaurants
over
the
last
year
and
likewise
the
desire
for
walkable
environments
and
that
healthy
lifestyle
and
providing
mobility
options
and
just
also
continuing
our
the
desire
for
housing
and
neighborhood
affordability.
H
So
some
high
level
highlights
of
the
strategy.
It
was
really
as
a
strategy.
H
It
was
really
trying
to
focus
attention
in
key
areas,
so
prioritizing
two
node
areas
and
I'll
dig
into
all
of
these
a
little
bit
more
in
a
second
expanding
our
multimodal
options
in
the
area,
but
particularly
along
lindale,
improving
the
appearance
and
the
environmental
sustainability
of
the
corridor,
creating
places
for
people
to
gather
strengthening
connections,
especially
between
lindell
and
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
and
employers,
and
preserving
the
unique
history
and
character,
while
also
fostering
new
opportunities,
so
digging
down
a
little
bit
into
the
keynotes.
H
So
the
idea
here
is,
I
mean
lindell
is
the
entire
corridor.
Is,
is
like
three
three
miles
long?
It's
not
going
to
redevelop
all
at
once.
Nothing
ever
does,
but
that's
a
long
corridor
and,
as
I
said
before,
there's
you
know
a
fair
number
of
viable
businesses,
so
they're
not
just
going
to
go
away,
so
the
transition
is
going
to
take
some
time
and
it's
always
good
to
try
to
concentrate
your
efforts
in
some
areas
that
show
the
most
potential,
and
so
the
consultant
identified
these
two
areas.
H
98Th
and
lindell
is
an
obvious
one.
We
were
looking
at
that
a
few
years
ago
when
we
did
a
a
plan
related
to
the
transit,
this
transit
station
area
and
and
so
that's
a
an
area
where
we
definitely
think
that
there's
opportunity
to
do
real
transit
oriented
development.
That
means
a
mix
of
of
residential
and
other
kinds
of
uses
that
can
take
advantage
of
of
that
transit
service.
H
The
other
node
was
up
around
86th
and
and
lindale,
and
partly
because
there's
some
fairly
large
parcels-
and
that
are
you
know,
could
be
densified
like
around
cub.
For
instance,
there's
also
lots
of
smaller
parcels
that
that
could
be
redeveloped
just
right
along
the
corridor.
H
But
the
idea
here
is
that
to
be
strategic
about
where
we
put
public
investments
to
foster
redevelopment
so
digging
down
a
little
bit
further.
This
is
the
86th
street
node
and
some
of
the
strategies
there
so
looking
at
potentially
rezoning
to
from
our
b2
district
to
our
b4
district
in
large
part,
because
b4
allows
residential
and
b2
does
not
because
again
kind
of
the
key
here
is
to
integrate
more
residential
development
throughout
this
corridor,
because
that's
really
going
to
kind
of
drive
it
and
really
start
to
change
the
character.
H
One
of
the
challenges
here
on
the
east
side
of
lindale
is
there's
a
lot
of
old
industrial,
many
viable
uses
and
they're
not
going
to
be
going
away
anytime
soon,
so
we
wanna
we're
gonna
have
to
be
very
careful
about
how
any
kinds
of
transitions
happen
between
those
uses.
H
Another
area
challenge
in
this
area
at
around
90th
or
between
90th
and
86,
is
the
is
the
physical
low
point
of
of
lindell,
and
you
see
on
this
graphic
this
thing
that
looks
a
little
bit.
It's
marked
with
a
four.
It
looks
a
little
bit
like
a
stream,
that's
just
to
denote
where
there
currently
is
a
recurring
flooding
problem.
It's
where
the
bus
company
is
right
now,
so
there's
recurring
flooding
there.
H
It's
basically
an
old
wetland
that
was
filled
in,
and
so
there
might
be
opportunity
to
create
a
regional
stormwater
facility
that
could
serve
a
larger
area.
One
of
the
real
challenges
with
redeveloping
any
of
these
old
properties
is
they
have
to
meet
current
storm
water
standards
and
a
lot
of
these
sites,
particularly
the
smaller
ones.
They
just
don't
have
space
that
they're,
you
know
already
they're
paved
the
whole
site's
practically
paved
and
then
there's
there's
a
building,
and
they
just
can't
do
anything
with
storm
water.
H
H
So
one
idea
here
is
to
look
at
the
potential
to
do
a
regional
stormwater
facility
and
to
do
it
to
design
it
in
a
way
where
it
could
double
as
a
an
amenity
of
some
sort.
So
that's
the
concept
here
by
showing
it
looking
a
little
bit
like
a
stream.
That,
of
course,
is
not
nearly
big
enough
to
accommodate
the
stormwater
needs
of
the
area.
H
The
other
challenge
here,
particularly
in
this
part
of
central
lindale,
is
because
of
all
the
auto
uses
and
industrial
uses.
H
This
area
is
designated
brownfield,
so
there
are
some
pollution
issues
here,
so
one
of
the
strategies
is
to
start
to
go
after
some
brownfield
cleanup
grants
which
are
out
there
and
available,
and
are
the
consultants
really
felt
that
these
sites
would
be
really
great
candidates
for
getting
that
kind
of
funding
down
at
98th
street
again
similarly,
rezoning
b2
to
b4
to
allow
again
a
greater
mix
of
uses,
but
particularly
residential?
Some
of
the
big
ideas
here
is
particularly
in
the
northwest
quadrant.
H
Was
that
a
yes,
so
one
of
the
big
ideas
here?
So
this
is
a
pretty
big
block.
This
is
clover,
and
then
this
is
four
two
very
very
big
blocks,
and
one
of
the
ideas
here
is
to
break
up
the
block
and
provide
more
access
internally
to
new
development,
so
extending
aldrich
all
the
way
through
to
connect
all
the
way
up
here.
H
It
also
creates
an
opportunity
to
create
a
more
walkable
kind
of
a
street,
but
really
the
big
thing
is
that
it
breaks
up
these
blocks
and
it
provides
much
better
access
internally
for
when
these
these
sites
redevelop
so
as
we're
talking
to,
for
instance,
the
owners
of
clover
center.
You
know
we're
talking
about.
You
know,
develop
your
site
so
that
you
can
retain
this
central
area
for
a
future
road.
H
Another
big
idea
is
to
the
creation
of
a
fairly
sizable
park.
I
mean
it's
not
a
huge
park,
but
it's
a
park
that
would
be
large
enough
to,
for
instance,
have
some
small
music
concerts
or
a
farmer's
market,
a
smaller
farmer's
market,
but
some
kind
of
community
gathering,
because
this
quarter
really
could
use
a
community
gathering
space
and
down
at
98.
H
You've
got
some
of
these
bigger
sites
that
could
accommodate
that
when
they
redevelop-
and
it's
shown
here
on
the
ford
site,
because
that's
the
most
likely
place
because
there's
there's
really
no
buildings
there,
so
the
redevelopment
would
be
easy
to
do
that
when
they
redevelop
so
so
those
are
some
of
the
big
ideas
that
would
really
change
the
character
of
of
this
area
and
the
rest
of
this
is
kind
of
infill.
Here's
another
one
where
you
know
right
now.
H
You've
got
these
they're
called
chicones
oops,
I'm
sorry
chicane,
I'm
sorry
where
they
blocked.
This
was
blocked
off
so
right
now
you
cannot
take
garfield
and
go
through
at
dead
ends
because
you
have
to
go
on.
I
believe
this
is
grand
and
it
curves
around
so
reconnecting
those
to
reconnect
the
grid
because
it
just
helps
people
get
around
and
the
more
you
can
disperse
the
traffic,
the
less
everybody
has
forced
to
go
to
the
main
street
and
cause
a
lot
of
cr
congestion.
H
The
transits
stations
site
right
here
on
the
city
owns
part
of
it
and
metro
transit
owns
part
of
it.
Metro
transit
is
very
interested
that
their
tod
office
is
very
interested
in
redeveloping
this
site
and
no,
we
just
put
in
an
application
for
a
livable
communities
grant,
and
I
know
we
did
not
get
that
grant.
But
you
know
you
don't
always
get
those
on
the
first
time.
H
H
That
would,
if
we
get,
it
would
provide
fifty
thousand
dollars
towards
a
corridor
study
of
98th
street
and
the
interchange
here
at
with
35,
because
these
parcels,
or
at
least
the
city-owned
parcels
where
the
current
park
and
ride
and
the
transit
station
are,
were
purchased
with
right-of-way
acquisition
funds,
and
so
they
can't
be
redeveloped
unless
it's
determined
that
those
properties
are
no
longer
needed
for
an
inter
for
the
interchange
and
the
interchange.
H
That's
been
agreed
was
agreed
with
mndot
and
the
city
and
others
back
20
plus
years
ago
includes
these
parcels
as
part
of
the
new
interchange.
Mndot
is
interested
in
exploring
new
interchange
designs.
A
lot
has
changed
in
terms
of
traffic
system
design,
since
that
last
design
was
done.
So
one
of
the
things
that
that
corridor
study
would
do
would
be
looking
at
new
alternatives
for
this,
with
the
hope
that
a
new
alternative
for
the
interchange
could
be
agreed
upon.
H
That
would
essentially
release
these
parcels
from
being
needed
to
for
space
for
the
new
interchange
at
the
point
when
it
gets
rebuilt
which,
but
we
don't
have
a
timeline
on
when
that'll
happen,
but
this
is
preserving
the
land.
So
that
you
don't
build
on
it
if
it's
needed
for
a
future
interchange.
H
So
again,
the
idea
would
be
that
one
of
the
outcomes
of
this
study
would
be
to
come
up
with
an
interchange
design
that
that
would
show
that
these
parcels
are
no
longer
needed
for
a
future
interchange
and
thus
would
be
free
to
be
redeveloped,
because
this
is
a
could
be
a
really
fantastic
redevelopment
site
right
in
conjunction
with
the
transit
station,
and,
as
I
said,
the
metro,
transit
tod
office
is
very
interested
in
partnering
with
the
city
and
whoever
and
they've
actually
had
some
conversations
with
developers
looking
at
at
that.
H
But
until
those
properties
are
released
for
potential
redevelopment,
nothing
can
really
move
forward.
So
so
that's
the
whole
intent
of
that
that
study.
So
that's
the
application
is
going
in.
I
believe,
actually
I
think
it
went
in
today
and
we
should
know
in
a
couple
weeks.
If
we
get
that
and
then
we
would
get
going
on
hiring
a
consultant
to
do
that.
That
study.
H
That
study
would
also
look
at
this
corridor
from
basically
about
here
at
garfield
or
grand
all
the
way
over
to
city
hall,
because
that
too
city
hall
is
really
not
that
far
as
the
crow
flies.
It's
just
not
a
very
comfortable
walk
as
it
stands
today,
so
looking
at
some
ways
where
that
corridor
could
be
designed
to
make
it
much
more
comfortable
for
somebody
to
walk
between
this
area
which
could
develop.
H
As
you
know,
there's
always
the
joke
that
oh,
this
is
the
third
downtown
or
whatever,
but
but
certainly
there's
potential
at
90th
and
lindell
for
this
area
to
really
densify
and
and
become
much
more
mixed
use,
so
it
could
take
a
while,
but
the
potential
is
definitely
there
oops.
I
went
backwards.
H
So
they,
the
consultant,
looked
at
mobility
throughout
the
corridor
and
some
of
the
strategies
here
again
really
focusing
on
how
to
make
the
area
more
multi-modal,
and-
and
by
that
you
know,
it's
always
been
an
auto
oriented
corridor,
and
it
certainly
will
remain
certainly
for
for
automobiles.
But
the
idea
is
to
make
it
more
comfortable
for
bikers
and
walkers
as
well.
So
it's
not
just
autos
and
and
vehicles.
H
So
some
of
the
things
that
were
explored
here
or
suggested
recommended
were
are
that
the
city
maybe
test
out
some
things
using
some
pilot
projects,
so
testing
out,
for
instance,
a
bike
path
either
on
lindale
or
on
a
parallel
street
like
aldrich,
for
instance,
also,
perhaps
looking
at
removing
some
of
what's
called
those
slip
lanes
or
pork
chops.
H
You
know
those
free
rights,
those
the
little
islands
that
are
created,
perhaps
getting
rid
of
some
of
those
because
from
a
pedestrian
standpoint,
those
because
people
kind
of
come
up
to
those
and
they
don't,
they
barely
look
and
they
just
keep
driving
and
they
turn
right.
Those
become
have
the
potential
to
become
hazardous
for
somebody,
who's,
walking
or
biking,
and
and
also
just
by
removing
those
you
remove
the
amount
of
traffic
lanes
a
pedestrian
has
to
cross
in
order
to
get
across
and
also
looking
at
opportunities
to
widen
sidewalks.
H
So
mostly
that
would
happen
as
properties
redevelop.
They
would
need
to
meet
our
current
sidewalk
requirements
and
because
there's
a
lot
of
old
properties
here,
they
don't
so
as
they
redevelop.
That's
when
that
kicks
in
and
then
also
looking
at
opportunities
to
improve
some
of
those
connecting
streets
that
go
into
the
neighborhoods
and
by
improve
I'm
meaning
like
make
them
more
pedestrian
friendly,
wider
sidewalks,
add
some
trees
etc.
H
And
another
characteristic
of
lindell
because
of
how
old
it
is
and
how
it
developed
is:
there's
lots
of
curb
cuts,
and
here
again
so
if
you
were
walking
or
biking
along
lindale
and
there's
all
these
driveway
openings,
there's
just
all
these
different
potential
areas
where
you
can
interact
in
in
a
bad
way
with
somebody
in
a
car
or
in
a
truck
or
something,
and
so
by
minimizing
the
amount
of
those
curb
cuts
that
makes
it
more
safer
and
more
friendly
for
pedestrians
and
bikers
so
consolidating
or
narrowing
up.
H
Public
space
was
another
kind
of
framework
throughout
the
quarter
that
they
looked
at
and
so
again
one
of
the
things
that
would
really
go
a
long
way
to
change.
The
character
is
just
simply
planting
trees
and
again
that'll,
probably
happen
in
conjunction
with
redevelopment
or
when
there's
any
major
segment
of
the
road
that
gets
reconstructed.
H
If
you
think
about
you
know,
when
you
drive
up
and
down
lindale
the
north
end
of
lindell,
because
it's
more
residential
and
there's
a
lot
of
big
old
trees
there,
it
the
character,
changes
a
lot.
So
you
can
almost
imagine
if
there
were
more
trees
on
the
south
end.
How
that
character
might
change
or
even
a
planted
median
in
certain
areas
that
the
scale
of
the
road?
Because
it's
going
to
be
a
big
road,
because
it
carries
a
fair
amount
of
traffic.
H
But
you
can
bring
that
scale
down
by
having
trees
on
the
edge
of
the
road
or
in
a
median
in
the
middle,
and
it
just
really
changes
the
character
and
then
creating
a
safe
and
convenient
neighborhood
park
connection.
So
there's
a
couple
parks
nearby
in
the
just
to
the
west
and
as
well
as
a
little
bit
further
to
the
east.
H
There
are
parks
and
then
there's
the
river
valley,
of
course,
really
not
very
far
away
and
we're
working
actually
right
now
on
a
bike
path,
connection
up
from
the
river
valley,
that's
actually
in
the
works
right
now
and
then
fostering
year-round
activity
so
making
sure
that
as
we
create
these
open
these
spaces
that
they
are
designed
with
winter
in
mind
with
regard
to
retail
and
business
strategies,
the
recommendation
for
things
like
start
conversations
get
to
know
your
your
business
community
out
there
and
and
and
establish
relationships
with
them
and
identify.
H
You
know
what
are
their
needs
and
and
help
connect
them
to.
You
know
some
of
the
services,
because
sometimes
it's
really
about
who
you
know
we
do
have
some
programs
already
and,
as
you
may
know,
the
city
is
just
embarking
on
a
business.
H
A
city-wide
business
survey,
the
morris
leatherman
company,
is
doing
that
and
it's
looking
at
all
city-wide,
but
but
that'll
work
for
lindell
as
well,
and
so
they're
they're
doing
a
business
survey,
and
I
believe
that
the
results
are
going
to
be
coming
out
and
towards
the
end
of
july
or
into
august.
So
that'll
help
give
us
some
ideas
on
what
our
business
community
needs
and
wants.
H
Some
of
the
more
longer
term.
Ideas
were
to
work
with
a
group
of
business
folks
organize
some
some
of
the
business
owners
and
and
maybe
consider
doing
a
strategic
business
plan
for
the
corridor
and
potentially
even
establishing
a
special
service
district.
There
was.
H
Service
district
at
98th
and
lindale,
a
few
I
don't
know
a
decade
or
so
ago,
and
and
those
are
like
special
taxing
districts,
where
the
business
owners
pay
into
a
fund
that
can
be
used
for
maintenance
and
and
joint
events,
and
that
kind
of
thing.
H
The
strategy,
the
consultant,
also
identified
a
a
number
of
funding
strategies
that
the
city
can
use
many.
We
already
do
tiff
abatement
grants
public-private
partnerships.
They
suggested
a
couple
that
we
should
probably
start
get
on
our
radar
and
start
actually
going
after,
as
I
I
mentioned
previously,
the
brownfield
grant
program.
H
H
So
I'm
just
going
to
mention
that
so
with
regard
to
next
steps,
so
there's
a
team
of
us,
a
small
team
of
us
at
staff
who
were
part
of
the
core
team
working
on
this
who
are
starting
to
meet
periodically
just
to
make
sure
that
we
are
keeping
the
list
of
ideas
here
on
our
radar
as
we
go
about
our
business
and
we
do
other
things
like
our
work
plans,
doing
the
update
to
the
cip
every
year.
H
Those
kinds
of
things
also
looking
at
some
of
the
things
that
are
not
capital
actions
like
I
mentioned
the
business
survey
and
doing
some
outreach
to
the
business
owners
in
the
community.
Those
are
those
are
some
things
that
we
can
do
that
don't
cost
money,
they
do
take
staff
resources
which
has
a
dollar
attached
to
it
as
well,
but
but
they
are
soft
costs.
H
I
guess
you
could
call
it
and,
as
I
mentioned
before,
there's
this
grant
that
we
just
submitted
to
hennepin
county
and,
if
that,
first,
if
we
get
that
we'll
proceed
with
that
corridor
study,
which
could
hopefully
then
result
in
the
release
of
those
parcels
around
the
transit
station
for
redevelopment
with
regard
to
those
pilot
projects,
that's
some
sort
of
low-hanging
fruit,
if
you
will,
our
public
works
department
would
is,
is
supportive
of
doing
that,
but
would
like
to
maybe
hold
off
a
little
bit
until
we
get
back
into
kind
of
post
pandemic
life
and
traffic
levels
so
that
we
can
do
an
accurate
test
because
one
of
the
things
you
would
do
like
doing
a
bike
lane
is
you
would
you
would
test
how
putting
a
bike
lane
along
lindale
would
impact
traffic
flow,
for
instance,
and
then
there's
the
opportunity
base,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
are
opportunity
based
and
so
when
developers
come
to
us-
and
some
of
that,
though,
is
opportunity
plus
public
partnership,
because
with
our
housing
trust
fund
and
with
oho
and
some
other
things
we
are-
and
I
know
the
hra
is
is
this:
is
one
of
your
I
mean
this.
H
What
you
do
is,
is
you
you
help
prioritize,
where
we
should
be
spending
money
to
foster
redevelopment,
so
so
plans
like
this
can
help
help
you
make
those
decisions,
that's
the
idea
anyway,
so
that
will
wrap
up
my
my
presentation,
and
I
can
I
hope,
to
be
able
to
answer
whatever
questions
you
might
have.
A
Thank
you
very
much
julie
that
was
really
interesting
and
very
informative.
Commissioners,
do
you
have
any
questions
for
miss
barnum.
B
Do
you
have
any
kind
of
a
rough
idea
of
what
impact
implementing
this
plan,
which
is
very
much
in
the
rough
stages
and
dependent
on
a
lot
of
things
and
will
take
time
and
so
forth,
but
impact
on
the
tax
base
for
the
city
that
would
be
generated
by
doing
what
we
are
seeing
roughed
in
if
the
extent
to
which
we
do
it,
let's
say
that
we
did
most
of
what
we're
talking
about
right
now,.
H
Commissioner
olson
well,
the
this
plan
doesn't
really
get
specific
about
what
development
I
mean.
There
was
that
market
study
that
said
950
housing
units,
but
other
than
that
it
doesn't
get
specific
to
say.
You
know
this
site's,
going
to
accommodate
20,
000
square
feet
of
office
and
50
units
or
whatever.
So
it's
it's
really
hard
to
translate
into
an
economic,
a
tax
number,
because
the
amount
of
tax
it's
generated
is
going
to
depend
on
the
amount
of
development
and
the
type
of
development.
B
I
understood-
and
I
guess
maybe
I
should
make
it
broader
in
in
the
sense
that,
when
we
when
we
as
individuals,
go
to
other
communities-
and
we
see
something
that
has
been
rejuvenated
I'll,
just
use
that
really
generic
term
it.
It
creates
an
interest.
I
remember
going
to
austin
texas,
quite
a
few
years
ago
after
they
had
done
the
riverwalk
and
all
that
kind
of
thing
or
san
antonio.
B
I
guess
it
is,
and
and
so
it
creates
excitement-
and
you
see
a
lot
of
people
so
I'll
I'll-
just
leave
it
at
that.
I
think
that
something
like
this
can
have
that
potential
and
maybe
likelihood
not
guaranteed
if
you
want
to
comment
otherwise,
I
have
another
question.
H
D
H
Those
kinds
of
changes
that
that
you're
talking
about,
we
could
certainly
take
a
look
at
doing
that.
B
Okay
and
then
in
terms
of
people
listening
to
watching
this
presentation
tonight,
some
of
whom
have
been
involved
in
the
opportunities
to
to
offer
ideas
and
ask
questions
of
developers
and
consultants
stantec
that
we've,
the
city,
has
hired
sports
page
bar
being
one
of
them
that
that
that
was
what
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
some
of
it.
And
so,
when
you
have
a
huge
plan
like
this,
what's
realistic
to
start
seeing
something
significant.
B
Are
we
talking
three
years
out
from
right
now
or
five
or
or
one
or
or
what
I
mean
you're
talking
about
some
things
like
pilots
and
and
we
would
see
the
little
things,
but
the
big
picture
that
pulls
it
all
together
doesn't
really
take
shape
for
a
while.
Can
you
give
just
a
rough
idea
of
when
we
we
see
that
kind
of
level
of
activity.
H
Sure,
commissioner,
olsen
yeah,
that's
always
the
struggle
and
as
a
long-range
planner.
This
is
one
of
the
things
that's
very
frustrating,
because
in
preparation
of
a
plan,
it's
you
get
all
excited
about
the
potential
and
and
then
things
happen
like
you
have
a
recession
or
you
know
something
happens
and
and
nothing
like
in
the
south
loop.
We,
we
finished
up
the
south
loop
district
plan
and
then
there
was
a
recession
and
nothing
happened
for
five
or
six
years.
H
H
We
did
that
after
the
98
street
station
area
plan
was
done
and
the
decision
was
made
to
proactively
rezone
the
clover
center
site,
as
well
as
the
festival
site,
but
not
the
other,
the
third
quadrant,
which
is
where
oxtail
I'm
not
it's,
where
the
health
partners
is
and
in
part
because
we
had
during
the
planning
process,
had
a
lot
of
conversations
with
the
the
property
owner.
H
So
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
could
start
to
do
is
have
those
conversations
with
property
owners
and
take
the
temperature
and
see
who
would
be
supportive
of
moving
in
in
that
direction
and
then
see
if
the
city
council
wants
to
direct
staff
to
actually
proceed
now.
Rezoning
property
does
not
make
a
development
materialize.
H
So
there's
still
that-
and
you
know
in
terms
of
so
we
don't
have
a
heck
of
a
lot
of
control
over
that,
except
for
you
know,
to
the
extent
that
I
think
bloomington
is
starting
to
do
this.
Where
we're
starting
to.
H
Maybe
I
don't
know
market
is
the
maybe
the
wrong
word
but
sort
of
market
ourselves
a
little
bit
more,
and
but
you
know
we
don't
necessarily
have
a
heck
of
a
lot
of
control
over
over
when
that
happens
now
the
one
site
that
we
do
have
some
control
over
is
this
one
that
I
mentioned
by
the
transit
station.
H
So
if,
if
we
do
get
that
study
going,
if
we
do
get
that
grant
and
we
do
get
that
study
off
the
ground
and
that
study
does
conclude
that
we
are
able
to
release
those
properties
that
are
on
the
transit
station
site
for
redevelopment,
we
know
that
metro,
transit,
pod
office,
a
transit
oriented
development
office
is
interested
in
partnering
with
us,
and
so
we
could
go
after
some
fun
funding
with
them
and
partner.
Perhaps
on
getting
a
developer
on
board
to
see
that
happen,
we
also
have
had
various
conversations
with
different
property
owners.
H
You
know
clover
center,
but
but
we
don't
have
any
control
over
when
they
come
forward.
We
tend
to
use
plans
like
this
to
point
to
and
say
this
is
what
this
is.
What
we
hope
to
see
here
and-
and
you
know,
use
it
as
a
negotiating
tool
in
terms
of
some
of
those
pilot
projects,
as
I,
as
I
mentioned,
we'll
have
to
just
continue
these
conversations
with
staff,
and
I
I
mentioned
that,
there's
a
team
of
us,
a
small
team
of
us
at
our
meeting,
periodically
to
keep
things
moving
forward.
H
So,
whether
or
not
next
year,
for
instance,
we
could
get
a
pilot
project
going
is
going
to
kind
of
depend
on
how
comfortable
public
works
feels
with
the
traffic
levels,
because
they
don't
want
to
do
a
pilot
project
until
the
traffic
levels
have
resumed,
something
that's
more
normal.
So
that
could
be
two
years
out.
For
instance,
I
know
that's
not
very
specific,
but.
B
Ms
farnham,
thank
you
very
much
that
that's
a
a
real
good
stab
at
a
very
broad
question,
and-
and
I
think
I
asked
it
because
I
think
it's
on
the
minds
of
many
residents
as
to
what
are
we,
what
are
we
looking
for
down
the
road?
So
thank
you
to
you
and
the
many
that
have
been
working
for
years
on
this
and
chair
lewis.
Thank
you
for
the
time
to
ask
questions.
You're.
A
Welcome
welcome.
Are
there
any
other
commissioners
who
have
questions
for
miss
farnham
hearing
none,
as
this
was
just
an
exactly.
E
Regarding
the
the
concept
of
rezoning-
and
I
guess
you
could
call
it
rezoning
proactively-
I'm
wondering
if
doing
some
of
that,
and
I
understand
we
have
property
owners
involved,
it's
a
touchy.
You
know
situation,
and
these
are
you
know
long-term.
This
is
long-term
planning,
but
you
know
I
personally
was
disappointed
when
I
saw
the
storage
facility
going
up
at
the
near
the
corner
of
90th
and
lindale,
and
I'm
wondering
if
proactively
rezoning
or
some
other
tool
would
allow
us
to
maintain
the
vision
in
the
interim.
E
H
H
The
the
plan
provides
some
of
that.
It's
like
a
negotiating
tool
but
you're
right
when
the
rubber
hits
the
road.
If
the
zoning
is
allowing
something
we
have
very
little
latitude.
So
so,
but
that
is
an
argument
for
being
proactive
with
rezoning
and,
as
you
mentioned,
being
proactive
with
rezoning
doesn't
always
make
everybody
happy,
because
some
people
and
some
uses
will
become
non-conforming
and
and
so
that's
a
challenge
so
but
there's
there's
little
ways
to
to
be
able
to
stop
something.
H
A
Not
not
hearing
any,
as
this
was
an
informational
item
only
we
don't
have
any
further
action
needed,
but
thank
you
very
much
julie
for
that
really
really
good
presentation
for
myself.
I
was
really
glad
to
hear
that
update.
So
thank
you
you're
welcome.
I
am
now
going
to
move
on
to.
A
Let's
see
we
are
at
item
4.2.
This
is.
G
Thank
you,
myra.
Thank
you.
Chair
lewis,
brian
hartman
was
going
to
give
a
brief
update
about
the
payment
standards
really
quick
and
then
we'll
go
right
into
item
4.2
from
there,
and
then
we
will
go
from
there
into
our
new
business.
We
have
a
guest
developer.
A
I
So
hopefully
you
can
see
my
screen,
I'm
sharing
madam
chair
some
information
regarding
the
section
8
voucher
program.
This
question
came
up
when
we
approved
the
new
new
payment
standards
for
the
one
and
two
bedroom
sizes
at
a
previous
meeting
recently,
and
the
question
was
asked
kind
of
the
breakdown
of
what
our
section
8
households
look
like
by
bedroom
size,
and
we
have
this
for
you
today,
showing
that
the
largest
number
is
in
the
one
bedroom
category.
So
this
could
be
a
single
or
a
couple.
I
Then
there's
the
two
bedrooms,
three
bedrooms.
Well,
one
bedrooms
are
at
178..
Two
bedrooms
are
the
second
largest
at
125.,
and
three
bedrooms
are
creeping
up
there.
This
is
probably
the
largest
number
we've
seen
in
quite
some
time
at
94.
households
in
four
and
five
bedrooms
at
33
and
14.
for
a
total
of
444..
So
these
are
just
our
bloomington
local
vouchers
that
we
have
issued.
This
doesn't
include
port
in
vouchers
that
we
also
assist
in
bloomington.
I
J
Just
a
really
quick
question:
I've
been
hearing
in
my
talks
with
some
people
that
are
on
the
program
is,
I
don't
know,
do
you
guys
hear
anything
about
a
struggle
to
find
like
three
to
five
bedroom
apartments,
because
that
seems
to
be
a
big
issue
that
I'm
hearing
we
have
really
big
families
and
they're
they're
being
put
in
like
rental
houses,
there's
rental
houses
here
in
bloomington.
J
One
of
them
is
my
neighbor,
but
they're
not
meeting
really
great
standards
either.
So
I'm
just
kind
of
curious
on
if
you're
hearing
the
struggle
because
of
finding
those
bigger
bedrooms.
I
Commissioner,
who
came
chair
lewis?
Yes,
that
has
always
been
a
struggle
when
bloomington
was
developed
in
the
60s
and
70s,
when
the
vast
majority
of
our
rental
units
were
built,
they
were
building
only
ones
and
twos
at
that
time.
So
the
biggest
part
of
our
inventory
is
that
older
noaa
inventory
of
one
and
two
bedroom
units.
It
wasn't
until
more
recently,
where
we're
seeing
new
developments
build
three-bedroom,
multi-family
units.
I
So
that's
what
drives
people
into
single-family
homes,
because
they
can
accommodate
larger
families
with
three
four
and
five
bedrooms
and
they
are
more
expensive
as
well
yeah,
and
we
have
a
variety
of
owners,
usually
it's
small
mom
and
pop
owners
that
own
those
homes
they
may
own
one
or
two
or
maybe
half
dozen
as
kind
of
a
sideline
to
their
their
normal
careers.
So,
yes,
we
are
seeing
that,
but
the
three
bedrooms
are
creeping
up
there
as
we're
seeing
new
multi-family
units
come
online
with
three-bedroom
multi-family
units.
J
Thank
you
very
much.
I
just
wanna
I
kind
of
wanted
to
address
that
just
because,
especially
as
we
work
forward
with
new
development
and
something
something
that
we
want
to,
maybe
push
developers
to
inc.
You
know
include
these
big,
these
larger
bedroom
apartments
and
housing,
so
just
kind
of
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
wasn't
just
me
hearing
this
that
it
is
really
is
an
issue.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
response.
Yeah
thank.
C
Oh,
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
brian
for
assembling
this
information.
You
know
it
it.
You
know
displays
what
he
had
said.
C
I
think
it
was
last
meeting
that
about
70
percent
of
the
vultures
are
in
one
and
two
bedroom,
which
is
just
about
mathematically
spot
on
here.
So
thanks
for
doing
that,
brian.
A
Okay,
any
other
comments
I
can
see
some
faces,
not
all
the
faces,
so
you
have
to
like
speak
up,
but
are
there
any
other
questions
for
brian
carrying
none
and
seeing
no
hands?
A
I'm
going
to
move
on
then
to
item
number
six
and
that
would
be
item
6.1
agreements
with
old
cedar,
limited
partnership
for
affordable
housing
project
at
8012
old
cedar
avenue.
May
we
have
the
staff
report
please.
G
Absolutely
thank
you,
chair
lewis,
erica
coleman,
hra
administrator,
so
speaking
of
three
bedrooms
in
new
developments,
8012
old
cedar
is
a
68
68-unit,
four-story
multi-family
development
at
8012,
old,
cedar
avenue,
and
so
tonight
we
are
asking
for
approval
of
the
development
agreement
and
all
documents
necessary
to
carry
out
the
development
agreement
between
the
housing
and
redevelopment
authority
and
old
cedar,
limited
partnership
for
the
project
located
at
8012
old
cedar,
as
well
as
approving
a
loan
and
the
execution
and
delivery
of
certain
documents
related
to
affordable
housing
project
located
at
8012
old
cedar.
G
And
so
this
project
has
come
before
you
multiple
times
in
just
updates,
but
also
in
approval
of
the
redevelopment
plan,
the
tif
plan
and
establishing
the
project
area.
And
so
with
that
we
did
have
approval
from
this
board
for
tax
increment
financing
to
help
with
the
gap
of
the
development.
G
What
I
want
to
highlight
is
that
this
unit,
this
development
includes
29
one
bedroom
units,
27
two-bedroom
units
and
12
three-bedroom
units.
What
is
really
really
key
about
this
is
that
out
of
all
of
those
units,
six
units
will
be
affordable
at
or
below
30
percent
area
median
income.
So
that's
really
huge
and
out
of
the
out
of
those
units.
G
Also,
three
units
will
be
affordable
at
or
below
50
area
median
income,
and
both
of
those
include
at
least
one
three
bedroom
unit,
so
we're
getting
into
that
larger
family
size
and
that
deeper
affordability
component
and
how
that
happens
is
being
able
to
provide
gap
financing,
that's
really
just
key
when
it
comes
to
the
affordable
projects.
G
What
I
do
want
to
highlight
is
that
when
this
project
was
initially
proposed,
it
did
include
eight
excuse
me,
eight
fifty
percent
area,
meeting
income,
affordable
units
and
as
we
have
gone
through
the
project,
we
have
had
to
lower
that
to
three
fifty
percent
area
median
income
units
and
the
remaining
five
are
now
sixty
percent
area
media
income
units,
and
so
this
is
still
100.
G
Affordable
project
and
staff
is
very
supportive
of
the
new
unit
mix
and
staff
is
supportive
of
it,
because
we
are
still
looking
at
deeper
affordability
with
the
30
units.
I
want
to
highlight
that
the
reason
there
was
a
change
to
the
unit
mix
was
that
when
this
project
was
first
proposed
and
first
brought
forward,
it
included
income
averaging
so
that
there
were
some
80
units
all
the
way
down
to
30
units
and
as
the
developer
went
through
the
process
and
was
approved
for
low
income
housing
tax
credits.
G
There
has
been
some
questions
by
the
irs
about
whether
income
averaging
should
be
allowed,
and
so
that
question
is
out
there.
There
hasn't
been
a
decision
made,
but
that
does
cause
some
unknowns
for
equity
investors,
and
so
the
equity
investors
did
feel
more
comfortable,
taking
a
more
conservative
approach
to
protect
their
investment
and
say
no
income
averaging
take
out
the
eighty
percent
units
we'll
do
sixty
percent
fifty
percent
and
thirty
percent.
G
Well,
when
that
happened,
we
did
not
notice
that
there
were
still
parking
charges
which
would
help
the
revenue
to
be
able
to
pay
gap
financing
back
through
the
oho.
G
A
different
situation
than
what
we
expected
with
the
oho
and
with
this
project,
and
so
where
we
worked
with
the
developer,
was
that
we
needed
to
increase
the
rents
on
five
of
those
units
to
put
them
at
sixty
percent,
so
that
when
we
are
providing
the
gap
financing,
we
have
the
surety
in
their
development
in
their
performa
that
we
will
be
able
to
recoup
the
payments
on
time.
G
And
so
that
is
where
the
change
came
from
and
why
staff
is
completely
supportive
and
appreciative
that
the
developer
was
willing
to
work
with
us
to
move
this
project
forward.
And
so
I
will
stand
for
any
questions.
There's
probably
a
lot
of
information,
but
I'll
stand
for
any
questions
that
anybody
has.
G
But
I
am
looking
for
two
motions
here:
one
approving
the
development
agreement
and
to
be
able
to
execute
the
development
agreement
and
carry
out
any
necessary
documents
and
then
two
approving
the
loan
and
the
execution
and
delivery
of
certain
documents
related
to
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
A
A
Mr
keenan,
are
there
any
questions
for
administrator
coleman
or
mr
keenan.
A
The
first
motion:
do
I
hear
a
promotion
to
approve
the
development
agreement
and
all
documents
necessary
to
carry
out
development
agreement
between
housing
and
redevelopment
authority
in
and
for
the
city
of
bloomington
and
old
cedar,
limited
partnership
for
a
project
located
at
8012
old
cedar
avenue.
B
A
Thank
you.
So
the
motion
was
by
commissioner
olson
seconded
seconded
by
commissioner
who
came.
I
will
now
call
for
a
vote
on
the
motion
to
approve
the
development
agreement
and
all
documents
necessary
to
carry
out
the
development
agreement
I'll
stop
there.
A
My
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
say
aye
those
opposed
say
no
myra.
Can
you
take
the
roll
call
vote.
D
A
J
Who
came
moves
approves
or
moves
your
motion
to
approve
the
loan
and
additional
documents.
A
Thank
you
so
motion
by
commissioner,
who
came
second
by
commissioner
olson.
I
will
now
call
for
a
vote
on
the
motion
to
approve
a
loan
in
the
execution
and
delivery
of
certain
documents
related
to
affordable
housing
project
at
8012,
old,
cedar
avenue,
those
in
favor
say
aye,
those
opposed
no
myra.
Can
you
take
the
vote
or
the
roll
call
vote?
Please
loga.
E
A
G
Thank
you,
chair
lewis,
erica
coleman,
hr
administrator,
so
this
is
formerly
known
as
village
club.
This
is
the
project
that
came
forward
in
2019
to
purchase
and
and
preserve
306
units
at
village,
club
or
19.
The
address
at
1930
east
86th
street
in
that
agreement
with
aeon,
who
is
the
developer,
a
three
million
dollar
payment
on
the
7.1,
actually,
seven
million
on
the
seven
million
dollar
loan
is
due
july.
G
15
2021,
due
to
impacts
of
covet,
which
have
been
delayed
in
doing
some
work,
but
also
revenues
are
down
because
all
rent
has
not
been
able
to
be
received,
as
well
as
some
costs
have
increased.
Due
to
other
issues
that
have
arose.
G
G
What
I
do
want
to
say
is,
in
speaking
with
this,
has
involved
aeon
the
city
of
bloomington
cfo,
legal,
the
community
development
director
myself,
hra's
general
counsel,
because,
as
we
do
have
a
loan
agreement
that
I
previously
mentioned
in
our
last
report
with
the
city
of
bloomington,
we
have
committed
500
000
of
our
annual
levy
to
this
loan
to
cover
interest
and
payments
if
their
payments
cannot
be
collected,
and
so
I'm
asking
for
the
authorization
to
to
start
to
negotiate
and
modify
the
repayment
structure,
one
that
does
not
put
us
in
a
position
to
have
to
use
our
levy
to
make
those
payments
to
that.
G
We
can
be
made
whole
as
quick
as
possible.
Three
that
any
cost
incurred
will
be
covered.
So
with
that
thought
process,
like
I
said,
three
million
dollars
was
due
by
or
is
due
by
july
15th.
G
What
we
have
looked
at
internally
is
a
payment,
a
portion
of
that
payment
paid
by
july
15th,
another
portion
paid
by
january
15th
of
2022,
another
portion
paid
by
july,
15th
of
2022
and
the
final
portion
paid
by
this
by
january.
15
2023.
G
That
will
that
schedule
is
specific
because
it
aligns
with
when
payments
of
interest
payments
are
due
and
or
principle
and
interest
for
the
loan
that
the
city
took
out
for
the
the
bank
for
us
to
take
out
for
development
gap
funding
right
now.
We
just
we
want
to
be
able
to
negotiate
it
and
want
to
get
approval
to
do
that
without
having
to
make
all
of
the
loan
documents
public
at
this
point
is
really
what
I'm
asking.
G
So
if
we
were
to
right
now
this
evening,
provide
that
information
in
writing.
It
goes
public.
G
I
don't
know
where
aeon
is
at
and
we
want
to
be
able
to
enter
into
the
negotiations
and
the
agreement
and,
if
need
be,
I
can
bring
it
back
to
the
board
to
show
what
was
done,
but
I
would
like
to
get
authorization
to
negotiate
and
execute
using
our
general
counsel,
as
well
as
the
city's
cfo
and
legal
counsel,
where
we
are
all
making
sure
that
not
only
is
the
hra's
interest
number
one
protected,
but
the
city's
interest
is
protected
and
the
housing,
the
purpose
of
the
funds
used,
is
maintained
which
was
preserving
and
bringing
up
to
code.
G
E
E
F
E
F
A
Okay,
thank
you,
commissioner
thorson,
so
I
will
reach
out
to
the
other
commissioners.
What
are
your
thoughts.
C
Thank
you
a
question
for
administrator
coleman.
I
recall
that
the
three
million
dollars
was
an
amount
that
aeon
would
receive
on
housing
credits
and
that's
how
that
amount
was
determined.
C
And
I
I
heard
your
explanation
about
you
know,
rents
and
additional
costs,
so
would
they
be
using
that
tax
credit
money
for
those
items
in
lieu
of
the
current
agreement?
Payment
is.
Is
that
what
I'm
understanding.
G
No,
what
I
didn't
say
is
they
were
not
able
to
get
an
investor
to
buy
due
to
covet
due
to
covet.
All
of
that
has
been
delayed,
so
basically
the
three
million
dollars
that
we
were
sure
we
would
be
able
to
get
by
july,
15th
of
2022,
because
that's
two
years
from
when
it
was
approved,
they
were
supposed
to
be
able
to
close
on
the
financing
with
an
equity
investor,
so
basically
sell
the
bonds.
G
They
were
not
able
to
do
that
because
of
the
impacts
of
covid
and
the
the
loss
in
revenue,
so
they
because
they
weren't
collecting
the
rent,
so
the
rents
weren't
being
paid.
So
it
impacted
the
financing.
G
So
the
in
negotiations,
we
would
still
want
to
see
the
payments
being
made
and
it
would
most
likely
come
from
the
low-income
housing
tax
credits
that
they
would
be
getting,
but
now
it
would
have
to
come
from
wherever,
because
now
it
would
be.
We
want
to
negotiate
specifically
a
schedule
that
we
can
abide
by
as
it
aligns
with
our
obligations
that
we
have.
C
G
C
Thank
you
for
the
refresher,
because
I
do
recall
that
that
I
I
think
I've
got
part
of
it
correct,
but
part
of
it
incorrect
so
appreciate
the
refresher
on
that,
as
I've
said,
as
commissioner
thorson
has
stated
previously.
C
I
have
a
couple
concerns
and
one
is
about
transparency
of
what
we
do
as
an
hra
and
the
city
and
doing
this
in
a
manner
that
cloaks
it
from
this.
You
know,
visibility
from
the
community
doesn't
feel
good
to
me.
C
I
really
end
up
needing
to
have
a
very
explicit
reason
that
I
could
understand
and
comprehend
you
know
that
would
override
that
concern
before
I
could
support
that
or
at
least
understand
it
better.
So
I'll
yield
the
floor
to
other
commissioners.
A
All
right
are
there
any
other
commissioners
that
want
to
speak
to
this
or
ask
administrator
coleman
questions.
It
sounds
like
we
have
a
couple
of
couple.
Things
have
been
brought
forward,
commissioner,
who
came
or
commissioner
olson
chair
lewis.
Yes,
commissioner,
who
came
thank
you
chair.
J
F
J
Is
transparency
that
is
one
of
our
the
pillars
in
the
city,
especially
with
I
know
the
city
council,
and
I
know
it's
something
we
have
talked
about
as
well
in
our
planning
and
strategic
planning,
so
I
think
that
that
really
does
raise
an
issue.
I
just
I
agree
I
would
like
to
know
like.
I
would
have
to
have
a
good
reason
as
well
to
do
that,
just
because
I
feel
that
that
is
something
that
everybody
should
be
able
to
to
be
aware
of.
So
that's
my
opinion.
Thank
you,
commissioner.
B
Thank
you,
chair
lewis.
I
I
go
along
in
the
vein
of
what
others
have
said
and
at
this
point
being
the
fifth
one
here,
I
guess
need
to
have
some
idea
about
how
we
are
transparent.
Given
these
circumstances-
and
I'm
not
sure
I
followed
it
fully,
but
director
coleman,
if,
if
you
could-
I
think
you
said
something
about
you
could
come
back
to
us
at
some
point.
B
It
seems
to
me
that
having
some
statements
from
our
finance
people
and
from
legal
or
whoever
staff
determines
to
be
the
ones
that
have
the
are
in
a
position
to
to
explain
this,
to
give
a
brief
explanation
of
of
what
has
been
said
in
some
way
that
can
be
made
available
to
the
general
public
and
I'm
not
sure
how
that
can
happen.
B
But
I
I
think
that
that
we
need
to
do
that
because,
as
commissioner
rahim
mentioned,
we
have
set
a
standard
of
of
transparency,
and
I
think
this
can
be
explained.
But
at
this
point
with
this
amount
of
discussion
at
this
meeting,
I
don't
think
that
the
public
would
pick
it
up.
That
way.
G
So
so
thank
you,
chair
lewis
and
commissioners.
Few
things,
one
I'm
looking
to
get
approval,
one,
I'm
looking
to
notify
you
that
this
is
an
issue
that
it
has
arose.
Two
I'm
looking
to
get
approval
to,
negotiate
and
modify
the
repayment
structure.
If
there
is
a
need
to
come
back
to
have
approval
to
execute
the
amendment,
that's
perfectly
fine.
It
would
be
public
information
anyway,
as
it
gets
recorded.
G
What
I
was
speaking
to
right
now
is
there's
a
few
layers
here.
Bear
with
me.
I
had
to
learn
all
this
coming
on
fairly
new,
so
the
city
of
bloomington
took
out
the
loan
from
a
bank
or
bonds
for
15.2
million
dollars,
and
this
was
done
very
quickly,
and
this
was
the
pilot
project
that
really
spurred
everything
that
we
were
able
to
fund
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
that
15.2
million
dollars
has
a
drawdown
date
as
of
december
31st
2021.
G
G
If
we
do
not
draw
down
any
other
funds
before
december
31st,
we
run
the
risk
of
losing
the
remaining
amount
of
the
15.2
million
and
we
will
not
have
a
funded,
affordable,
housing
trust
fund.
That's
number
one
with
that.
We
have
not
talked
to
old
national
bank,
so
the
city
has
not
approached
the
bank
to
say,
hey.
We
need
to
look
at
what
we
can
do.
G
This
is
coming
forward
before
any
of
those
discussions
are
happening.
So
it's
a
little
bit
hesitation
to
put
the
documents
out
right
now,
but
those
discussions
will
be
happening
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
That
is
through
our
municipal
advisors
that
are
helping
leave
that,
as
they
were
working
to
do
that
with
the
city
number
two
we
don't
know
where
aeon
stands
and
the
reason
I
keep
bringing
that
up
is
be.
G
We
are
a
junior
lien
holder,
we
are
a
subordinate,
lien
or
mortgage.
They
have
a
senior
mortgage
that
we
don't
talk
to
them
or
what
has
happened
there,
which
triggers
all
kinds
of
other
things
and
for
us
to
do
a
repayment
structure
we
have
to.
They
have
to
get
approval
from
the
senior
lien
holder,
so
it's
not
just
hey,
you
can
negotiate
it
and
bring
it
forward,
and
this
board
approves
it
and
it
happens.
G
It
has
to
be
approved
by
the
senior
mortgage
because
they
lended
more
money
than
what
we
lend
it,
and
so,
when
we
look
at
restructuring,
that's
another
thing.
So
basically,
what
I'm
saying
is
I'm
asking
I
want
to
make
you
aware
and
make
the
public
aware
without
putting
all
the
documentation
out
there
before
it
needs
to
be
put
out
there.
G
So
I
am
asking
for
authorization
to
negotiate
and
modify
repayment
structure,
and
I
would
go
ahead
and
say
to
modify
my
request
where
it's
not
an
execution
of
the
amendment,
but
to
come
back
to
get
approval
of
the
execution
of
the
amendment
after
we
have
been
able
to
discuss
with
aeon,
negotiate
and
come
back
to
the
board
and
be
clear
about
what
has
been
negotiated.
What
that
looks
like
and
what
the
impacts
are
to
the
hra.
A
Watch
I
should
watch
my
microphone
picture
and
I'd
know
that
I
would
say
for
myself
the
change
that
administrator
coleman
has
suggested,
that
this
would
be
only
drying
up,
basically
doing
the
negotiations
and
modifying
the
agreement,
but
bringing
it
forward
for
us
to
approve.
A
I
think
that
would
satisfy
some
of
my
concerns
and
also,
I
think
it
does
address
that
transparency
issue,
so
I
would
be
comfortable
with
that.
What
is
the
feeling
of
other
commissioners,
commissioner,
who
came?
Oh
thank
you
chair.
J
I
just
have
a
question
and
obviously
it
can't
be
answered,
but
I
guess
one
of
my
concerns
is
that
there's
issues
right
now
with
payment.
What's
to
say,
I
don't
see
things
changing
dramatically
anytime
soon.
The
workforce
market
is
just
kind
of
starting
to
get
back,
but
I
do
think
rent
is
still
going
to
be
an
issue
for
a
time
to
come
and
catching
up
on
rent
is
going
to
be
an
issue.
J
G
Thank
you,
chair
lewis,
rouhani.
So
that's
the
hard
part
in
allowing
the
extension
and
looking
at
what
that
would
look
like.
G
One,
let
me
back
up
one.
I
am
also
organizing
with
rent
help
minnesota,
which
is
through
minnesota
housing
and
our
public
health
department
to
have
navigators
specifically
at
this
property
to
help
residents
fill
out
the
application,
but
it's
not
restricted
to
this
property,
but
it
did
come
about
because
this
property
in
particular,
so
I
have
reached
out
to
minnesota
housing.
G
I
have
reached
out
to
a
couple
other
entities
and
I
have
navigators
ready
to
go
that
can
be
on
site
and
also
looking
at
a
place
that
they
can
set
up
in
bloomington,
one
to
two
days
a
week
where
residents
can
come
to
complete
the
application
to
get
rent
help.
So
that's
one
thing:
the
other
thing
is:
we
have
provided
funding
to
through
our
cdbg
coronavirus
money
that
we
manage
for
the
city
of
bloomington
to
veep
for
rental
assistance.
So
that's
another
piece
that
has
happened.
G
Thirdly,
we
have
applied
for
additional
cdbg
dollars
for
rental
and
mortgage
assistance
and
have
identified
clues,
which
is
a
culturally
specific,
focused
organization
for
spanish-speaking
and
latinx
community,
which
there's
a
higher
population
that,
if
awarded,
they
would
also
be
administering
rent
assistance.
So
aside,
from
just
directly
with
this
agreement,
putting
things
in
place
to
allow
for
rent
to
be
paid
back,
rent
to
be
paid
and
future
rent,
then
I'll
come
back
to
this
agreement.
G
Really
it
comes
down
to
the
tools
in
our
toolbox
and
the
loan
agreement
that
we
have,
which
would
be
the
option
that
we
have
as
a
junior
mortgage
would
be
to
sue
so,
basically
for
closing,
which
is
not
something
we
necessarily
want
to
do,
but
that's
because
we
are
not
a
senior
lean
holder.
That
is
one
of
the
positions
that
we're
really
placed
in
through
our
loan
agreement,
and
so
that's
the
other
part,
but
otherwise
we
have
a
really
good
partnership
with
aeon.
G
Open
communication
have
been
speaking
with
them.
We
did
all
meet
in
person
to
initially
discuss
like
hey.
What's
going
on
here,
we
have
to
have
our
payment
and
then
working
through
from
there,
so
I
don't
have
a
better
guarantee
for
you,
but
that
is
where
we're
at.
E
E
E
Some
of
you
may
recall
that
a
couple
at
least
a
couple
of
us,
if
not
all
of
us,
had
some
concerns
about
aeon
and
their
acquisitions
and
doing
an
awful
lot
around
the
metro
area
and
had
some
concerns
that
maybe
they
are
biting
off
a
little
bit
more
than
they
could
chew.
So
to
speak,
and
I'm
hoping
that
this
isn't
a
sign
of
just
that
with
the
whole
coronavirus
complicating
things.
E
But
it
sounds
like
I'm
concerned
it
could
be
a
little
of
each
and
and
perhaps
they've
acted
a
little
bit
too
aggressively
and
over
promised-
maybe
not
just
in
this
area,
but
perhaps
in
others.
E
So
I
think
we
need
to
you
know,
negotiate
in
the
interests
of
you,
know
the
city
of
bloomington
and
as
residents
and
taxpayers,
and
I
also
think
along
the
lines
I
believe,
of
what
commissioner
who
was
getting
at
is
you
know,
what's
to
stop
this
from
rolling
forward,
and
I
think
that
you
know
perhaps
in
the
negotiation
a
missed
payment
would
allow
us,
you
know
a
missed
payment.
Let's
say
they
missed
the
first
agreed-upon
payment,
whatever
that
is.
E
That
should
allow
us
to
take
a
fresh
look
at
the
whole
on
the
whole
agreement,
I
believe,
or
some
such
protection.
Well,
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point.
I.
C
So
my
my
focus
of
question
is
the
the
entity
that
controls
this
project.
Are
they
current
on
their
mortgage
payments
to
the
primary
lenders.
G
Not
explicitly,
I
have
spoken
with
the
bank
that
they
formed,
they
formed
a
consortium
when
they
went
to
purchase
this
property
as
well
as
others,
in
reference
to
what
commissioner
thorson
had
said,
because
they
have
purchased
other
properties
around
the
metro.
I
think
they
did
about
three
of
them
at
one
time,
and
these
are.
G
Projects-
and
so
I
had
spoken
to
the
bank
and
there's
there
when
I
spoke
with
the
bank
not
specific
to
where
their
financial
situation
was,
but
just
about
you
know
what's
going
on
and
what
the
ability
is.
They
were
still
in
a
good
relationship
with
the
individuals
that
I
spoke
with
that
were
higher
up
in
the
bank.
So.
C
So
my
my
comments,
then,
are
you
know
I?
I
understand
the
situation
better
and
thank
you
for
that
information
and
could
support
that.
But
some
of
the
information
that
I
would
request
is
is
that
we
have
very
specific
information
on
not
only
the
entity
that
holds
title
to
this
project,
but
all
cross-indemnification
agreements
that
you,
if
I'm
interpreting
what
you
said
correctly
and
the
overall
status
financial
condition
of
a
on
itself.
C
You
know
this.
This
entity
still
could
be
in
a
viable
condition
with
aeon
itself
being
problematic.
So
we
need
to
look
at
both
parties,
I
believe,
and-
and
you
know
they
also
just
lost
their
long-term
leader
within
the
past
30
days
or
so
so
you
know
they're
they're,
seemingly
in
a
state
of
flux,
which
you
know
as
as
a
lender
always
creates
some
concern
and
I'm
sure
you
share
that
experientially
so
yep.
So
yes,.
G
So
I
want
to
clarify
so
I
because
I'm
taking
notes,
I
want
to
make
sure
I'm
clarifying
what
I
heard
in
bringing
in
entering
into
negotiations
and
possibly
modification
of
the
repayment
structure,
to
bring
back
that.
What
is
negotiated
upon
for
approval
with
specific
information
about
who
the
senior
lien,
holder
or
senior
mortgage
is
what
the
financial
status
is
of
that
loan,
as
well
as
the
financial
status
overall
of
aeon,
to
provide
better
clearer
picture
about
what
can
be
done
in
terms
of.
Can
you
actually?
G
Okay?
If
we
restructure,
can
you
repay
on
time
and
then
within
that
making
sure
to
include
I've
learned
this
new
term
with
our
cfo
belts
and
suspenders?
That
basically
say:
if
you
miss
a
payment
or
you
don't
do
something.
We
have
belts
and
suspenders
to
kind
of
snatch.
This
back
and
say:
nope,
that's
not
what
we
agreed
to
and
we
need
to
have
more
reassurances.
C
A
C
B
Thank
you.
I
I
just
want
to
make
two.
I
think
pretty
brief
comments.
One
is
that,
through
all
of
this
discussion,
one
of
the
things
I
felt
it
need
to
do
is
to
get
back
to
why
this
development
is
something
that
we
have
supported
and
wanted
to
happen,
and-
and
that's
that
means
it's
important
to
to
look
for
ways
to
make
it
happen.
B
I'm
I
feel
good
about
I'm
comfortable
with
the
discussions
that
have
happened.
The
the
questions,
the
comments,
the
responses
from
director
coleman
and
I
just
want
to
add
dr
coleman,
you
mentioned
a
number
of
sources
for
like
getting
the
rent
application
forms
filled
out
to
reduce
the
delay
or
whatever
of
payments
of
rent.
We
had
the
bloomington
housing
action
team
meeting
this
afternoon
and
if
mr
hartman
is
still
on,
he
can
maybe
clarify
this,
but
marty
mcdonough.
B
I
think
his
name
is
from
the
the
the
the
owners
of
of
rentable
facilities
indicated
that
the
legislature,
I
think,
have
been
talking
about
a
zero
balance
program
that
apparently
would
involve
the
owners
of
the
prop
the
housing
properties
and
the
the
renters
and,
and
that
sounded
like
it's
another
program
that
might
be
helping
out.
The
context
for
me
is
that
covet
has
thrown
us.
B
A
A
E
And
this
certainly
wouldn't
have
to
be
a
part
of
any
motion,
but
I
I
would
just
request
that
the
this
be
brought
back
to
us
in
a
manner
that
it
is
not
something
that
should
the
commission
have
concerns
and
want
to
address
some
things
at
a
future
meeting
that
it's
not
something.
That's
either
take
or
leave
it
for
the
board,
but
that
if
or
or
there
be
some
kind
of
communication
along
the
way,
because
sometimes
we
find
ourselves
in
a
situation
where
we,
you
know
we're
90
there.
E
But
there
are
concerns
and
it's
kind
of
left
on
the
table
as
well.
You
either
got
to
vote
for
it
or
they're
going
to
go
and
fault
or
you
know
whatever.
It
is.
That's
come
up
in
the
past,
so
if
it
could
be
something
that
that
is
brought
far
enough
ahead,
that
or
we're
informed
of
it.
So
we
can
get
some
of
those,
sometimes
maybe
not
major
issues,
but
tweaking
done
and
then
brought
back
to
us.
If
need
be.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Yes,
administrative.
G
Department,
so
I
want
to
say
that
this
will
be
coming
back
to
you
in
that
manager,
commissioner
thorson,
where
we
will
be
looking
to
review
and
discuss
what
the
components
are
and
at
that
meeting,
which
I
am
pretty
sure
this
will
be
the
june
sorry.
I
was
looking
at
my
calendar.
The
june
29th
meeting
will
include
our
general
counsel,
carla
peterson,
who
is
also
very
involved,
and
very
much
so
experienced
with
this,
to
also
answer
any
questions
and
to
get
direction.
A
Thank
you
administrator
coleman
and
I
would
say
yeah.
I
echo
commissioner
thorson's
comments,
particularly
since
that
payment
date
is
july.
15Th.
It
doesn't
give
us
a
lot
of
time,
but
yeah.
I
don't
want
to
be
like
okay
got
three
days.
You
know
it's
next
week
approve
this.
So
that's
great.
Thank
you
for
addressing
that
all
right.
A
I
would
be
looking
for
a
motion
to
a
pr
to,
and
I
would
prefer
not
to
restate
it
since
commissioner
or
administrator
coleman
has
already
done
it
and
I'm
sure
I'm
gonna
mess
it
up,
but
I
would
be
looking
for
a
motion
to
approve
her
amended
or
adjusted
motion.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
formalizing
that
it
sounded
much
better.
Commissioner
beloga
is
there
a
second.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner
olson.
It
has
been
moved
by
commissioner
beloga
seconded
seconded.
That's
a
hard
word
by
commissioner
olson.
I
will
now
call
for
a
vote
on
the
motion.
As
stated
by
administrator
coleman,
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
say
I
those
opposed
no
myra.
Could
you
take
the
roll
call
vote?
Please.
A
Thank
you
myra.
We
will
now
go
back
to
our
organizational
business
item
5.1
and
update.
Let's
see
5.1
return
to
in-person
commission
meetings.
Can
we
have
the
staff
report
please.
G
Yes,
thank
you,
chair
lewis,
erica
coleman,
hr
administrator,
and
so
this
has
been
discussion
and
we
did
discuss
it
at
our
last
meeting
of
to
get
direction
on
what
that
would
look
like
and
when,
if
returning
to
in-person
meetings
one,
when
can
we
return
but
two,
if
we
return,
is
there
going
to
be
a
hybrid
option
available,
so
the
question
actually
came
up
in
multiple
places,
and
so
the
city,
legal
and
hra
legal
work
to
look
at
the
statute
and
the
current
situation
and
what
it
would
be
going
forward.
G
G
At
that
point,
the
executive
order
could
be
ended
or
it
could
be
extended
if
the
executive
order
is
in
it
ends
on
the
14th,
and
our
next
meeting
would
need
to
be
in
person.
I'm
sorry,
I
said
the
date's
wrong.
Our
next
meeting
is
not
the
29th.
It
is
the
22nd
from
the
previous
from
the
previous
action.
So
let
me
clear
that
up.
G
Our
next
meeting
is
the
22nd,
and
so
if
the
executive
order
ends
on
the
14th,
which
is
monday,
then
on
the
22nd,
we
will
be
required
to
meet
in
person
and
the
carve
out
or
the
ability
with.
That
is
that,
if
there
is
a
concern
or
an
issue,
there's
ability
for
someone
who
has
a
medical
need
continue
to
attend
the
meetings
remotely
from
a
private
location.
G
A
doctor's
note,
so
there
has
to
be
some
type
of
formal
documentation.
That
says
this
is
there's
a
medical
necessity
here
on
top
of
that,
it's
only
good
for
60
days
after
the
executive
order
ends.
So
if
the
executive
order
ends
on
the
14th
of
june,
it
would
only
be
good
for
60
days
from
that
date
of
june
14th.
G
Also,
it's
only
allowed
for
up
to
three
meetings
within
the
60-day
time
frame.
That
is
what
is
currently
in
statute,
and
we
have
been
advised
that
by
our
lobbyist,
as
well
as
shane
redling,
who
does
the
legislative
agenda
for
the
city?
That's
probably
not
going
to
be
changing.
Just
it's
not
going
to
be
it's
not
even
being
brought
forward
in
special
session,
which
is
where
it
would
have
to
change.
Is
that
legislature?
G
G
So
if
the
executive
order
is
extended,
then
on
the
22nd
we
can
meet
in
person,
but
we
would
not
be
required
to,
and
so
we're
kind
of
in
this,
this
limbo
place,
and
I
wanted
to
bring
it
forward
and
have
discussion
with
with
you
all
with
commissioners,
because
I
know
this
was
something
that
was
brought
up
and
we
didn't
have
much
information
then,
but
we
could
move
to
a
hybrid
model
right
now
pending
the
outcome
of
the
executive
order
is
really
where
we're
at.
G
I
know
I
left
the
complete
letter
that
was
actually
typed
up
by
our
general
counsel
is
what
I
attached
to
the
agenda
item,
and
so
I
won't
read
through
it,
but
we
can
I'll
have
a
discussion
or
I'll
answer
any
questions
that
anyone
may
have.
A
Unmute,
thank
you
for
that
and
I
d
I
do
have
a
question
administrator
coleman.
If
we
were
to
go
to
hybrid
and
I'm
I'm
looking
at
that
60
days
so
for
60
days,
a
person
who
wanted
to
meet
virtually
could
still
do
so
for
three
meetings
and
do
it
in
a
private
place.
I
mean
like
at
their
home.
A
G
No,
that's
no
sorry,
chair
lewis,
if
the
executive
order
is
ended
or
whenever
it's
ended,.
A
A
G
We
can
still
take
the
option
to
go
to
a
hybrid,
all
right,
hybrid
meeting
atmosphere
and
then
that
60
days
time
frame
does
not
start
until
the
executive
order
actually
is
ended.
G
Yes,
yes,
and
if
you,
if
you
do,
choose
that
and
mind
you,
I'm
bringing
that
up,
because
I
I
heard
the
interest
of
the
commissioners
wanting
to
be
able
to
be
in
person
safely,
but
also
have
the
ability
that,
if
it,
if
it's
not
safe
for
individuals
to
have
a
option
to
be
virtual,
so
I'm
bringing
up
the
hybrid
option
now.
G
I
still
need
to
talk
with
it,
because
we
all
as
different
boards
and
commissions
are
looking
at.
What
does
that?
Look
like
right
and
the
opportunity
to
record
our
meetings
or
be
live
with
them
has
been
something
that's
nice.
But
how
do
we
continue?
It.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
clarifying
that
a
little
bit
I
mean
it's
still
confusing.
If,
if
the
order
isn't
rescinded
and
we
determined
to
go
hybrid,
will
anybody
who
is
not
coming
to
the
meetings
or
requesting
virtual
meetings
will
they
need
a
doctor's
excuse?
A
I
mean
I
know
if
the
order
is
rescinded,
they
would
need
a
doctor's
letter.
Essentially,
if
it's
not
rescinded,
would
we
need
to
be
that
formal,
okay.
A
Great
okay,
thank
you
just
I
want
to
clarify
all
of
our
options.
Commissioners,
are
there
any
questions
for
administrator
coleman
or
any
things
that
you
want
to
discuss
comments
that
you'd
like
to
make.
A
I'm
not
commissioner
beloga.
I
saw
your
microphone
come
on.
C
Thank
you
there.
Well,
one
of
the
things
is,
is
you
know
the
doctor's
note
that
becomes
matter
of
public
record,
and
I
just
want
to
share
that
information
with
all
of
the
other
commissioners
so
that
you
know
we
can
take
that
into
account
as
we're.
C
Looking
at
what
each
individual's
preferences
are,
so
it's
it's
unfortunate
because
that's
very
personal
and
private
information,
but
it
does
become
at
least
my
understanding
of
the
way
the
current
statute
is
written.
It
does
become
part
of
discover
or
information
that's
available
by
request
of
the
public.
So
you
know
no
comments
beyond
that.
Just
wanted
to
share
that
information.
A
Right
yeah,
and
that
is
that
is
a
little
a
little
disturbing.
I
mean
you
know.
No
one
wants
that
kind
of
information
public.
You
know
my
medical
records.
I
would
feel
uncomfortable
about
it
but,
like
he
said,
we're
dealing
with
the
state
statute.
Are
there
any
other
comments
or
questions
for
administrator
coleman.
A
Hearing
none
thank
you
for
that
update.
I
guess
we
just
have
to
wait
to
see
what
happened
dear.
J
Oh,
thank
you
chair,
just
a
quick
question.
If
the
executive
order
is
ended,
then
will
you
guys
notify
us?
I
mean,
obviously
we
will
probably
all
know,
but
what
would
be
the
notification
just
because
we'd
have
to
then
make
that
I
guess
public
as
well.
What
would
be
the
notification
to?
Let
us
know
that
we
all
need
to
be
back
into
the
building
in
which
room
we
need
to
be
in.
I
guess
yep.
G
So
the
first
step
would
be
an
email,
so
like
this
letter
here,
this
was
the
city
attorney,
melissa,
manderscheid
and
our
attorney
carla
peterson
that
worked
on
this.
They
would
work
on
that
notification
and
it
would
be
an
email
first
off
and
then
basically
myra
and
myself
would
be
in
a
flurry
to
book
rooms.
Actually
we
wouldn't
myra
is
on
top
of
it
and
actually
already
booked
a
room.
G
I
would
need
to
understand
very
quickly
how
to
work
the
it
and
because
that
was
the
other
piece.
Was
that
there's
not
necessarily
enough
equipment
and
we're
all
learning
this.
This
hybrid
model
we've
done.
I've
done
a
couple
of
hybrid
meetings,
they're
really
neat
to
do,
but
there's
something
else
to
try
and
set
up
and
understand
how
to
work
so.
G
First
off
it
would
be
an
email
notification
that
would
have
been
put
together
by
legal
so
that
it's
the
same
for
city
council
and
for
our
boards
and
commissions.
It's
just
working
with
all
the
different
attorneys
for
the
separate
entities
for
the
port
and
or
the
hra,
and
then
it
would
be
additional
notification
regarding
what
the
room
is
and
how
we
would
move
forward.
J
Thank
you,
administrator
coleman.
I
just
have
one
quick
follow-up.
If
that's?
Okay,
yes,
go
ahead!
Since
we
haven't
really
discussed
this,
I'm
I
don't
like
to
assume
anything,
but
I'm
kind
of
assuming
that
since
we
didn't
discuss
going
hybrid,
we're
just
all
going
to
go
with
the
fact
of
if
the
executive
order
is
extended,
we're
going
to
stay
virtual.
H
J
A
I'm
going
to
throw
that
out
to
the
commissioners.
I
know
for
myself.
A
If
a
hybrid
model
could
be
put
into
place
that
would
work
effectively
and
comfortably,
I
would
probably
lean
toward
the
hybrid,
but
safety
is
the.
You
know
first
issue
for
me
and
if
it
turned
out
to
be
just
too
much,
you
know
technically
just
too
difficult
to
do.
I'm
comfortable
staying
virtual,
but
that
would
be
sort
of
right
now.
I
lean
hybrid,
but
I
become
comfortable
if
we
had
to
stay
virtual.
G
A
G
So
it
will,
city
plaza,
will
be
open
and
there
will
be
people.
Staff
is
working
on
a
model.
Basically,
so
basically
it'll
be
open.
June
14th
staff
still
have
the
ability
to
work
remotely
or
come
in
if
they
choose
starting
june
14th.
Some
staff
are
required
to
come
in
starting
june
14th,
just
because
it's
customer
service
and
whatnot
and
then
staff,
and
when
I
say
staff,
city
staff,
the
whole
city.
G
G
One
two
three
four
five
days
a
week,
I'm
not
quite
sure
it
varies,
based
on
the
job
which
will
need
to
go
through
a
two
to
three
step:
approval
process
between
the
supervisors
and
city
leadership,
and
that
form
is
due
by
july
30th
and
so
staff
is
in
a
little
bit
of
a
hybrid
place,
but
we
also
are
not
restricted
by
statute
such
as
the
city
council
and
the
boards
and
commissions
may
be.
A
Yeah.
Thank
you
for
that
clarification.
What
are
the
feelings
of
the
rest
of
the
commissioners?
I
mean
here
again
like
I
said
I
lean
hybrid,
but
I
want
to
do
what's
safest
for
our
members
and
you
know,
depending
on
what
happens,
you
know
whether
that
order
is
rescinded
or
not
will
make
a
lot
of
you
know
we're
not
really
going
to
know
for
sure
what
we
can
do
until
then,
so
anybody
else's
comments.
E
As
excited
as
I
am
about
getting
together
for
in-person
meetings,
I
happen
to
enjoy
them
more
and
think
I
believe
they're
more
productive
as
well.
I
don't
see
an
advantage
of
you
know.
Let's
say
half
of
us
being
remote
and
half
of
us
being
in
a
meeting.
I
think
you
need
to
at
least
have
a
majority
in
person
in
a
meeting
for
it
to
be,
for
it
have
the
same
level
of
effectiveness
of
being
in
a
real
in-person
meeting,
as
I
believe
it
has
in
the
past.
E
So
I
would
also
be
happy
to
continue
with
virtual
meetings
if
there
are
people
who
are
not
yet
comfortable
with
in-person,
rather
than
you
know,
sort
of
the
hybrid,
I
would
probably
choose
if
there's
only
two
or
three
of
us
to
just
continue
virtually
or
hybrid
whatever
you
want
to
call
it.
If,
if
it's,
you
know,
if
it's
a
small
number
of
us,
that
would
be
there
in
person
anyway,
just
my
two
cents.
A
A
valid
valid
comment,
commissioner,
beloga
or
commissioner
olson.
C
Chair
lewis,
I
would
prefer
the
hybrid
because
it
allows
people
to
have
the
option
to
fit
their
own
needs
and,
of
course,
that's
not
to
be
contrary
to
commissioner
thorson's
comments,
because
I
understand
those
and
agree,
and
then
people
who
could
make
the
choice
and
if
we
could
then
let
with
sufficient
notice.
Everybody
know
what
you
know
the
the
numbers
are
for
in-person
virtual.
C
Then
those
individuals
who
have
planned
in
person
can
re-evaluate
their
their
options.
So
and
and
again
it's
ground
in,
as
you
said
earlier,
the
safety
of
all
so
right.
E
Commission,
chair
lewis,
one
more
question.
I
guess
I
have
I
mean
define
hybrid,
is
it
I
mean
obviously
the
way
I
look
at
it
is
some
people
are
there
in
person
and
some
people
technology-wise
are
joining
remotely,
but
it
sounds
like
they're
not
going
to
be
joining
remotely
in
a
webex
type
environment.
So
you
know
define
what
a
hybrid
meeting
is
in
the
city
of
bloomington.
C
I
could
help
on
that,
since
you
know
the
the
city
council
is
coming
back
into
chambers
on
june
14th,
although
at
that
same
token
there
will
be
potentially
some
city
council
members
who
may
opt
to
participate
in
that
meeting
via
webex,
and
there
will
be
some
city
staff
members
who
may
also
be
presenting
information
either
in
person
or
by
webex.
C
So
it
will
truly
be
a
hybrid
environment
and
and
that
the
the
city
manager
asked
for
indication
of
preference
by
mid
friday
from
city
council
members.
Okay,
so
that
helps
give
context
to
it.
C
There
will
be
the
ability
to
call
in
for
public
comment
both
for
the
public
comment
period
and
on
open
agenda
items
that
require
public
comment
via
webex
or
in
person.
So
I
I
think
it's
you
know
a
true
hybrid
at
this
point.
So
thank.
A
A
That's
true,
that's
true.
Thank
you,
commissioner,
for
that
additional
information
that
was
helpful.
Commissioner,
commissioner,
olsen.
B
Thank
you,
chair
lewis.
I
I,
my
preference
is,
is
in
in
person,
but
only
to
the
extent
that
it
is
safe
for
members
of
the
commission,
but
also
for
the
public,
and
I
I
I
see
a
parallel
with
what
I
was
talking
about
with
lindell
retrofit
is
that
we
are
in
a
period
of
flux.
Just
like
we
are
with
you
know.
B
We
don't
know
the
future
for
sure,
with
lindale
and
and
that's
just
something
that
we've
we've
known
in
any
kind
of
major
development
within
a
city
district
whatever,
and-
and
so
I
I
think
what
will
happen
is
that
as
as
covet,
hopefully
gets
even
more
manageable
and
and
what
not
in
terms
of
safety
and
people's
willingness
to
to
be
interacting
with
people
closer
than
succeed
and
outdoors
and
whatever
this.
This
will
be
a
shakedown
time
and
in
terms
of
the
technology
question,
I
think
the
same
thing
will
be
happening.
B
There,
too,
is
that
we
have
an
excellent
I.t
staff
and
they'll
figure
it
out.
The
the
market
side
will
come
up
with
more
tools
beyond
webex
and
zoom
and
that
kind
of
stuff.
So
I
I
I'm
content
to
to
say
that
I
would
like
to
go
in
person
as
long
as
it's
safe,
but
I'll
go
with
whatever
the
flow
is
thanks.
A
Well,
and-
and
here
again
until
we
find
out
what
happens
with
that
emergency
order
and
then
we
can
start
making
some
decisions
once
we
know
what
the
legislature
and
the
governor
have
decided.
A
So
thank
you,
commissioner,
for
administrator
coleman
for
that
update,
and
I
think
everyone
sort
of
indicated
what
they're
willing
to
do-
and
I
think
what's
really
great-
is
that
as
a
as
a
board
as
a
commission,
we
are
just
concerned
at
making
our
members
comfortable
and
what's
safe
for
everybody,
and
I
think
that
says
a
lot
for
our
board.
A
So
moving
on
to
our
last
item
of
business
or
organizational
business
item
5.2,
it's
the
update
of
the
hra
logo.
G
So,
thank
you,
chair
lewis,
really
just
wanted
to
bring
forward.
The
idea
of
an
updated
logo
for
the
hra
reason
being
is
our
current
logo
is,
is
really
just
the
work,
the
letters
hra
and
the
look
of
a
house
behind
it.
So
we
don't
know
why
shouldn't
say
we.
The
average
person
may
not
know
what
the
hra
stands
for,
nor
do
they
know
where
it's
located.
G
So
all
of
our
letterhead.
We
do
have
hra
logo
and
then
we
have
the
address,
but
it
it
can
be
confusing,
and
so
also
we
were
just
kind
of
like
a
one-off
from
the
city
of
bloomington.
We
are
the
housing
and
redevelopment
authority
in
and
for
the
city
of
bloomington
and
so
did
talk
with
staff
and
then
asked
communications
to
provide
a
mock-up
and
this
staff.
G
Hra
staff
really
had
positive
feedback
about
this
logo
design
and
so
just
wanted
to
bring
it
forward
to
one
show
you
all
discuss
and
two
it
would
be
a
time
commitment
and
a
phased
approach
to
update
to
a
different
logo.
We
still
have
stationary
and
different
things
that
we
would
like
to
use
up.
We
have
state,
we
have
materials
that
have
the
hra
current
logo
on
them.
G
A
B
First
impression
for
what
it's
worth
is
that
it
it
shows.
My
first
impression
was,
I
really
liked
it,
and
then
I
thought
it
shows
a
traditional
house
and
a
lot
of
people
are
in
different,
looking
kinds
of
housing
nowadays,
I
don't
know
if
that
can
be
somehow
blended
in
the
simplicity
of
what
I
see
here
is
is
great
and
trying
to
mix
up
the
kinds
of
housing
would
be
difficult
so
anyway,
that
first
impression.
E
Again,
it's
a
gut
reaction,
that's
a
first
reaction,
but
I
but
I
do
like
it.
It's
a
nice
change
from
the
the
block
letters
of
the
hra
and
I
would
hope
that
we
would
continue
to
use
those
old
materials
as
appropriate,
so
they're
not
going
into
a
landfill,
but
you
know
phase
into
a
new
logo,
whatever
the
final
result
turns
out
to.
A
Yes,
for
myself,
I
would
say
my
first,
my
first
look
at
it.
I
like
it
and
I
agree
just
having
hra
a
lot
of
people,
don't
know
what
that
stands.
For
you
know
we
do,
but
not
everybody
else
does
so.
I
like
the
fact
that
it
clearly
states
what
it
stands
for
and
that
we're
in
bloomington,
so
that
works
a
lot
for
me.
Other
comments,
commissioner
beloga,
commissioner,
who
keem.
C
Thank
you,
chair
lewis.
You
know,
I
think
all
of
us
have
a
first
impression,
and
I
also
liked
it
and
I
I
liked
it
for
many
reasons,
but
it
also
mirrors
and
has
a
strong
resemblance,
so
there's
continuity
with
the
city's
local.
C
So
I'm
not
that
I'm
artistically
gifted
which
I'm
certainly
not,
but
you
know
my
you
know
two
cents
worth
is.
Is
you
know
I
could
live
with
this.
J
Chair,
I
also
got
reaction.
I
really
do
like
it.
It
stands
out
yeah.
I
just
second
when
everybody
else
said
so.
G
Yes,
it
is,
I
appreciate
it
and
just
as
you've
noticed
it,
the
direction
was
to
be
similar
to
the
current
city
of
blue.
G
I
believe
there's
some
things
with
how
the
city
of
bloomington
got
that
logo
that
we
may
not
fully
be
able
to
just
take
that
logo
and
change
the
wording
so,
which
is
why
this
one
comes
a
little
bit
differently,
but
this
actually
is
probably
a
little
bit
more
robust
than
the
current
logo
so
of
the
city
of
bloomington.
G
So
it's
that's
nice
too,
and
then
you
know,
I
understand
the
different
types
of
housing
which
I
did
notice
but
I'll
also
say,
as
we
work
towards
our
priorities
of
homeownership
opportunities
and
section
8
being
our
biggest
program.
G
Even
though
we
do
have
people
in
multi-family
complexes,
we
do
have
a
lot
of
people
in
homes
and
the
hra
owns
single-family
homes
itself
that
this
kind
of
draws
that,
in
a
little
bit
more
in
terms
of
it,
can
be
affordable,
but
it
can
be,
it
could
be
a
single
family
home
instead
of
just
thinking.
Affordability
might
only
include.