►
From YouTube: Joint Meeting ACHD & City of Boise
Description
March 1, 2023
A
A
C
C
E
Okay,
great
so,
like
President
Pickering,
said
I'm
here
to
share
the
work
that
our
vision,
zero
task
force
did
in
2021
and
2022
to
hopefully
prepare
you
all
for
a
discussion
on
how
the
commission
and
Council
partner
to
address
the
traffic
safety.
E
D
A
A
E
Can
I
can
hear
you
the
first
time
we
saw
Vision
zero
mentioned
as
an
Initiative
for
the
city?
Wasn't
our
transportation
action
plan
in
2016
safety
for
all
was
identified
as
one
of
the
top
six
initiatives
that
the
city's
action
plan
could
take
on
and
adopting
a
vision.
Zero
framework
was
one
of
the
program-based
steps
we
hope
to
take
on
to
create
safer
roads
and
adopting
such
a
policy
was
also
a
recommendation
on
our
bicycle,
friendly
City
status
with
the
league
of
American
cyclists.
E
So
that's
something
we've
heard
over
the
years
and
then
in
2021
it
really
became
a
priority
to
help
the
city
develop
an
action
plan
to
reduce
Serious
injury
and
Death
on
our
streets
and
really
identify
what
things
we
could
realistically
do
and
where
we
might
need
to
partner
with
others.
So
here
you'll
see
the
group
that
we
had
tasked.
E
Probably
a
lot
of
familiar
faces,
a
lot
of
advocates
in
the
community
representing
different
sectors
and,
of
course,
the
neighborhood
representation
as
well,
and
as
the
group
met
one
of
the
first
things
that
emerged
was
the
term
Vision.
Zero
has
really
evolved
to
now
reflect
approach
rather
than
the
goal.
So
the
reason
why
it's
on
your
agenda
list
says
Vision
Zero,
Safe
Systems
is
because
this
is
sort
of
the
new
framework.
We're
thinking
about
this
as
Vision
zero
is
the
goal
creating
Safe
Systems
is
how
we'll
be
able
to
get
there.
E
One
of
the
key
principles
of
Safe
Systems
people
make
mistakes,
people
will
make
mistakes
and
human
error
is
inevitable,
but
our
system
can
be
designed
to
accommodate
those
inevitable
mistakes
and
those
mistakes
don't
have
to
end
up
being
fatal
or
cause
serious
and
capacitating
injuries
and
I
think
the
example
I
gave
to
council
when
they
first
started
discussing
this
as
an
initiative
was
something
everybody
knows
as
standard
practice
on
interstate
highways,
a
rumble
strip
rumble
strips,
came
about
in
the
early
1950s,
with
no
other
purpose
than
to
alert
drivers
who
are
drowsy
drifting
off
the
road
them
back
in
very
normal
design
principle.
E
Today
that
was
used
to
do
just
this
accommodate
human
error,
and
then
one
of
the
second
principles
here
you'll
see
is
people
are
vulnerable.
The
human
body
only
has
so
many
limits
for
tolerating
crashes
and
I
think
this
is
something
we
can
think
about.
Very
simply,
the
faster
a
crash
occurs
at
the
higher
likelihood.
It
is
to
be
fatal
or
serious,
and
then
safety
is
proactive.
E
The
Safe,
Systems
approach
is
relying
on
a
systemic
view
of
the
system,
so
not
just
what
intersection
is
problematic,
but
what
are
components
of
that
intersection
that
exist
across
the
entire
system?
Where
do
we
see
those
same
conditions
across
multiple
intersections
and
we're
not
just
that
one
spot
that
looks
like
trouble?
E
But
these
are
a
few
of
the
things
that
really
stood
out
to
the
group.
Some
things
you
might
expect,
like
crashes
occurring
in
typical
peak
hours,
the
age
of
drivers
tending
to
be
young
18
to
28
and
the
27
range,
and
then
one
I
found
the
most
interesting
here
was
38
of
pedestrian
crashes
are
occurring
while
The
Pedestrian
was
walking
on
a
crosswalk,
so
fatal
crashes
is
that
including
car
on
car
pedestrating?
Yes,
this
is
this.
125
number
is
car
car
pedestrian,
any
crash
that
occurred
on
the
roadway
that
police
responded
to
council
member.
E
Sorry,
it's
a
member
wedding.
Yes,
it
is
Boise.
E
A
part
of
that
dashboard
is
a
map
and
there's
a
link
to
this
on
our
website,
but
I
can
send
it
out
afterwards
as
well.
Actually,
but
it's
it's
low
to
upload
all
the
data,
so
I
just
stuff
this
out
here.
This
is
2016
to
2020
and
a
map
of
all
of
the
Fatal
and
incapacitating
crashes.
You
can
go
through
the
dashboard
and
see
what
road
classification
it
was.
E
B
E
Mean
sure,
yes,
absolutely,
president
Pickering,
this
is
some
of
the
language.
That's
cited
on
police
reports,
because
that's
how
that's
how
they
record
it
and
that's
how
it's
reported
back
so
when
you
say
most
harmful
event,
we're
taking
what
they
have
cited
as
the
primary
cause
of
the
crash
and
not
maybe
other
contributing
factors.
So,
let's
say
rear
end
is
the
most
harmful
event.
Contributing
cause
could
be
following
too
closely,
so
there's
two
different
things
there
and
most
harmful
event,
and
what
you're
seeing
here
is
for
pedestrians.
D
E
Most
of
the
time
you're
seeing
fatal
crashes
happen
with
pedestrians,
so
you
have
a
smaller
red
bar
for
rents.
That's
not
going
to
result
in
a
fatality,
as
often
as
it
will,
when
a
pedestrian
is
involved
in
a
harmful
event.
E
G
E
Yeah
president
Pickering
on
other
parts
of
this
dashboard,
you
can
layer,
in
other
things
like
the
contributing
circumstance,
and
that
makes
the
column
on
the
right
make
a
little
bit
more
sense.
So
I'm
definitely
going
to
get
you
the
link,
and
then
you
can
kind
of
play
around
with
it
yourself
and
see
how
the
most
harmful
event
changes.
Depending
on
what
other
factors
you're
layering
in
to
look
at.
E
With
this
is
something
we
looked
at
as
well,
when
we
were
looking
at
really
the
difference
between
Ustick
and
Fairview,
the
difference
in
types
of
crashes.
If
you
think
about
the
conditions
on
Fairview,
you
have
a
lot
of
front
on
businesses
with
Drive
access
directly
onto
the
arterial.
You
also
allow
left
turns
from
exiting
those,
so
you
have
people
making
left
turns,
maybe
across
three
lanes
of
traffic.
So
it's
not
terribly
surprising.
G
E
And
commissioner
Hanson,
when
you,
when
you
get
the
link
to
the
portal,
you
can
click
on
each
one
and
see
what
time
of
day
it
was,
and
one
of
the
other
tabs
is
intersection
lighting,
and
we
saw
that
crashes
that
happen
after
dark
tend
to
be
more
DUIs
crashes
that
happen
during
the
daytime
are
less
likely
to
have
that
element.
But
there
wasn't
really
any
correlation
between
we're
seeing
more
crashes
when
there's
no
lights
in
the
intersection.
E
Misitating,
so
maybe
a
less
serious
injury,
possible
injuries
and
then
property
damage
pretty
similar.
You
can
see
Fair
views
sticking
out
as
one
that
has
a
lot
of
nonic
dating,
but
this
this
just
shows
you
that
rear
ends
still
tend
to
be
one
of
the
biggest
car
car
crashes.
We
see.
B
E
E
Okay
and
then,
finally,
getting
into
the
group's
recommended
strategies
and
timeline,
we
have
made
our
way
through
some
of
those
immediate
ones.
E
City
council
endorsed
division,
zero
via
resolution,
probably
about
a
year
ago
almost
to
the
day,
and
the
goal
was
to
explore
strategies
that
the
city
could
Implement
to
reduce
crashes
by
50
by
2030
was
their
stated
goal,
and
then
we
didn't
end
up
working
on
some
of
these
with
you
all,
because
you
worked
on
it
already
without
without
any
partnership
example,
the
bike
lane
delineators
really
waiting
for
the
results
from
you
all
on
the
Maple
Grove
project
when
this
was
drafted
that
was
going
on.
E
Creating
neighborhood
traffic
safety
toolkits
targeting
what
is
traditionally
the
education
component
of
vision,
zero
one
of
the
five
E's
to
tackle
traffic
safety
and
then
working
through
these
other
ones
will
be
really
interesting
because,
as
you
all
many
of
you
heard
at
Compass
yesterday,
they
were
awarded
a
four
hundred
thousand
dollar
save
streets
for
all
planning,
Grant
and
I
borrowed
a
slide
from
their
presentation,
with
their
permission,
to
show
a
little
bit
of
process
that
we'll
go
through.
E
This
plan
may
not
be
underway
for
another
seven
months,
so
I'm
showing
this
to
hopefully
get
you
thinking
about
what
we'll
see
in
this
plan,
but
also
what
things
we
might
want
to
do
before
getting
at
the
regional
vision
and
goals
for
Transportation
safety,
engaging
stakeholders
doing
this
data-driven
analysis
that
we've
started
some
of
the
work
for
and
identifying
proven
countermeasures
things
that
you
all
are
already
starting
to
identify,
leading
pedestrian
intervals,
testing
out
the
different
types
of
delineator
materials.
Things
like
that.
E
So
this
will
be
really
good,
because,
once
this
plan
is
established,
anybody
in
the
community,
anybody
in
the
region
any
entity
can
go
apply
for
the
money.
The
one
of
the
caveats
of
applying
for
this
funding
pool
was
you
had
to
have
a
plan
first
before
you
started
going
for
the
implementation
grants
where
you
could
actually
do
some
of
the
work.
E
Make
the
action
plan
you
all
were
very
engaged
in
that
process
when
they
submitted
the
Grant
and
got
the
scope
ready.
So
now
that
scope
is
ready
to
go
they're
going
to
get
it
out
the
door
and
start
doing
the
agreements
necessary
to
get
the
planning
underway
by
the
end
of
the
year.
We'll
continue
to
work
through
the
strategies
we
identified
through
the
task
force
and
then
seek
your
direction
and
partnership
on
approaches
that
can
balance
those
quick
wins
with
long-term
systemic
changes.
B
Three
one:
one
of
the
things
that
I've
been
thinking
is
you
guys
have
moved
forward
on
a
couple
of
the
by
lady
Delaney.
B
E
I
lost
my
clicker
access,
but
if
I
could
go
back
to
one
of
the
slides
that
talks
about
a
long-term
goal,
which
I
think
is
really
doable
with,
your
partnership
is
before
and
after
studies
of
corridors
that
you're
doing
these
things
on
callster
Kootenay,
all
the
things
you're
implementing
on
those
streets
being
intentional
about
the
data
you're
collecting
through
design
and
then
a
few
years
after
implementation,
a
process
for
what
are
we
looking
at
on
the
corridor
after
we
did
this
design
so
really
I
think
a
really
easy
thing
to
do.
E
Sure
Council
or
investing
that
up
today,
president
Pickering,
the
data
that
we
saw
through
this
process
doesn't
change
too
much
of
the
things
we're
asking
for
it
does
show
where
we
might
prioritize
things
differently.
We
are
hoping
for
the
same
thing:
people
friendly
streets,
better
safety
for
pedestrians
and
cyclists,
protected
bike
Lanes.
These
are
all
things
that
we've
always
been
really
excited
about,
but
I
think
it's
helped
us
change
the
order
of
things
and
see
that
maybe
improvements,
Town
streets
should
have
a
little
bit
higher
priority.
E
E
That
would
be
something
we
would
love
to
work
on
and
a
toolkit
of
things
that
we
could
use
in
Boise
projects
that
reflect
this,
but
it
really
just
changes
the
priority
importance
of
projects.
H
G
G
G
G
Right
in
the
middle
of
a
block
to
a
church
that
a
child
was
crossing
to,
we
were
giving
them
the
signal
it's
safe
to
cross
here,
any
time
of
day
they
were,
they
pushed
the
button
across
the
street,
but
those
two
signals
one
to
the
driver
that
you
can.
You
can
go
as
fast
as
you
want
on
this
stretch
and
one
to
pedestrian
to
safely
cross
here.
G
G
C
D
E
Yes,
Madam
mayor
council
president,
that
was
actually
a
better
intro
than
I
could
have
given
our
modern
zoning
code
will
change
the
way
people
interact
with
the
streets.
It'll
change
the
way
people
relate
to
the
streets,
these
new
developments,
the
changes
in
where
we're
focusing
on
the
growth.
Those
are
all
things
that
change
the
way
people
interact
with
your
facilities
and
we
try
to
take
into
account
where
existing
facilities
exist.
But,
like
the
council
president,
said
what
changes?
C
Sony
and
so
I
would
just
say
we
are
on
the
same
page.
We
want
to
be
able
to
coordinate
and
under.
D
H
Level
of
stress
and
the
things
that
you've
already
been
working
on
with
a
really
great
example,
upcoming
policies
that
you're
already
planning
on
like
the
leading
pedestrian
interval
on
the
new
shared
policies
that
we're
sort
of
exploring
together
Compass,
builds
out
a
little
bit
of
this
plan
and
only
working
on.
But.
H
C
E
Sure
Madame
mayor
president
Pickering
I
think
a
good
example
is
what
you're
about
to
see
this
afternoon
on
the
commission
agenda
from
Ryan's
team,
the
leading
pedestrian
interval
plan.
E
That's
an
example
of
something
staff
and
is
now
presenting
to
policy
makers,
so
I'm
thinking
about
that,
while
I'm
thinking
about
this,
because
we
don't
want
to
duplicate
any
of
the
work
our
respective
teams
are
doing.
But
whatever
is
learned
through
this
LPI
implementation
process,
maybe
there's
some
things
that
you
learn
as
you're,
implementing
that
we
can
use
to
implement
things
like
or
develop
a
high
Injury
Network
and
to
review
the
speed
limit,
setting
process
to
create
alignment,
and
some
of
these
things
will
can
be
done
together.
E
C
E
But
we'll
start
it
and
then
work
with
your
staff
on
iterations
of
what
they
hear
from
neighborhoods.
This
is
the
neighborhood
traffic
safety
toolkits
there's
a
tool
we
hope
to
push
out
to
the
neighbors
associations
like
in
your
neighborhood.
Your
speed
limits
are
this:
you
have
this
kind
of
bicycle
infrastructure.
You
have
this
kind
of
intersection
treatments,
things
like
that
just
Educational
Tools.
So
it
is
something
we
feel
like.
We
can
take
all
the
plans
you
have
and
wrap
them
up
in
a
way
that
neighborhood
associations
can
use
to
inform
residents.
E
That's
why
it's
not
as
iterative
of
a
process
where
we
need
a
ton
of
input,
because
it's
all
already
available
to,
but
something
we
would
need
to
work
really
closely
with
your
staff
on
is,
and
you
in
this
at
the
policy
level
review
speed
limit,
setting
process
this.
B
E
Up
in
the
last
joint
meeting
where
we
talked
about
speed
limits
being
enforced
by
Design,
that's
clearly
a
policy
maker
role
and
something
we
can
work
with
as
staff,
but
it's
really
set
out
in
your
policy
manual
and,
of
course,
part
of
our
zoning
code
efforts
how
our
built
environment
reinforces,
what's
happening
on
the
streets
criteria
for
installation
of
right
on
red,
looking
out
to
these
three
to
five
year
goals.
This
is
something
we
would
have
to
work
together
on
because
we
have
this
land
use
perspective.
E
That
says:
here's
where
schools
are
here's
where
really
high
pedestrian
environments
are
like.
We
know
that
information,
and
then
you
all
know
how
the
intersection
functions
for
traffic
and
how
it
needs
to
function
and
how
those
two
can
work
together
to
create
maybe
some
criteria
for
installation
or
right
on
red
and
then
long
term.
E
I,
don't
think
this
has
to
be
that
long
term,
but
it
is
in
the
five
to
ten
year
range
because
of
the
before
and
after
component,
but
creating
the
standard
evaluation
template,
that's
something
we
do
together.
We
decide
like
what
factors
are
important
to
each
of
us
and
how
can
we
create
a
template
now
that
we
know
projects
will
be
measured
for
in
the
future?
E
I
don't
know
if
I
as
clearly
delineated
who's
on
first
10,
where
we're
starting,
but
no
we're
starting
here,
working
on
some
messaging
to
our
residents
about
traffic
safety
within
their
own
neighborhoods
and
then
working
with
you
all.
Maybe
we
can
get
into
some
of
the
high
Injury
Network
map,
analysis
and
speed
limit
setting,
but
I.
B
Would
deal
to
you
remember.
Excuse
me
remember
that
we
did
this
internally
in
the
city
and
it
wasn't.
You
know,
in
collaboration
with
you
as
I.
Look
at
it.
B
D
C
To
me,
the
foreign.
C
C
G
E
President
Pickering
commissioner
Hanson,
as
we
start
putting
these
together,
we
know
who
those
neighborhoods
are.
We
don't
hear
from
very
much
and
we
know
who
the
ones
we
are
we
hear
from
the
most,
but
we
also
enjoy
really
open
communication
with
your
staff.
We
have
a
monthly
regularly
scheduled
meeting
where
we
can
bring
little
things
like
this
or
bigger
things
and
talk
through
things
like
that.
So
we
we
have
the
Forum
to
discuss
them
and
can
bring
them
along
the
way.
C
D
D
C
G
G
I
G
C
D
F
G
G
G
H
H
H
D
Yeah
I've
got
to
step
out.
I,
actually
think
that
what
you
said
was
just
better
stated
than
what
I
was
trying
to
say,
because
we
have
a
vision
for
this
area.
There
is
going
to
be
future
development.
We
ought
to
be
talking,
but.