►
From YouTube: Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Description
July 12, 2023 12:00 PM MDT
A
A
Least
your
presence
I'm
glad
you're
here.
Do
we
do
a
roll
call
just
to
acknowledge.
C
C
A
Go
to
Corn
very
good.
Thank
you
so
means
called
order.
Next
item
in
business
with
the
agenda
is
the
minutes
from
April
12th
and
I
asked
for
a
comments.
If
not
the
motion
to
approve
the
minutes,.
A
Colleen
is
our
second
any
further
discussion
on
the
minutes:
emotion,
hearing,
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
the
opposed
I'm
motion
curious.
Thank
you.
Next
time
in
business
is
North
River
impact
fee
increase,
request
Primrose,
you
see
them
right,
primrose,
okay,
who
gets
to
talk
on
this
one.
A
D
Parks
and
Rex
superintendent
or
excuse
me
parks
resources,
superintendent,
get
my
game
face
on
and
I'll
ask
probably
Travis
to
hop
in
when
we
get
to
details
related
to
them
how
this
will
be
funded.
But
hopefully
this
park
is
familiar
to
you
I,
remember
being
here
maybe
a
year
ago,
and
we
were
talking
about
funding
the
Greenup
and
development
of
a
park
on
Gary
Lane.
At
the
time
we
were
calling
it
The
Gary
Lane
Park
site.
Since
then,
it's
been
named
after
a
native
flower.
The
Primrose
that
grows
in
our
Foothills
could.
D
Acre
Park
has
a
long-sorted
history
that
was
almost
fire
station
and
it
was
almost
a
park.
It
was
almost
a
fire
station,
and
so
here
we
are
hoping
to
develop
this
into
a
public
amenity
and
improve.
You
know:
10-minute,
walk
opportunity
for
folks
in
this
neighborhood
to
access
the
neighborhood
park
in
2020.
D
I
think
the
estimates
were
based
on.
You
know,
work
that
was
being
done
in
2020.
D
It
would
cost
about
700
000
in
2020
and
then
budgeted
that
money
in
2023.,
subsequent
staff
turnover
delayed
the
project.
We
ended
up
going
with
the
consultant
to
help
us
finish
design
because
we
did
not
have
designers
on
staff
to
do
it,
and
so
here
we
are
looking
at
development
of
this
park
and,
having
estimates,
you
know
much
more
up-to-date.
D
Current
estimates
we're
working
with
contractors
to
get
better
pricing
and
that's
why
I'm
here
to
you
in
front
of
you
today,
because
the
current
budget
that
we
have
is
not
sufficient
to
completely
build
out
the
park
with
an
additional
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
funding
would
we
would
be
able
to
complete
all
amenities
in
all
Irrigation
in
the
park?
If
you
wouldn't
mind
moving
forward
with
this
live,
we
can
talk
in.
D
That
additional
400
000
in
funding
will
provide
So.
Currently
I,
don't
know
if
you
are
aware,
but
we
had
fronted
some
of
the
money
in
order
to
purchase
the
the
playground
and
fitness
equipment,
because
we
were
looking
at
long
delays
in
supply
chain
up
to
nine
months
for
those
products.
So
the
leftover
budget
that
we
have
is
around
300
000.
and
that
budget
alone
would
only
allow
for
those
lists
of
items
so
site
demolition.
Obviously,
right-of-way
improvements
utilities
a
pavilion
but
a
much
much
much
smaller
footprint
for
the
plaza.
D
We
have
the
playground.
As
I
mentioned,
we
have
the
fitness
equipment
as
I
mentioned,
but
if
you're,
if
you
go
back
to
the
other
slide
Joey,
if
you'll
forgive
me
that
does
not
include
any
of
the
Landscaping
any
of
the
walking
path
any
of
the
irrigation
that
would
be
needed
and
items
that
really
would
finish
out
the
park.
Okay,
go
forward
again,
thank
you,
so
the
additional
amenities
that
we
would
be
able
to
install
with
that
400
000
that
would
get
our
budget
to
approximately
700
000.
D
D
D
The
berm
and
the
pollinator
plantings
were
items
that
were
specifically
asked
for
from
the
neighborhood.
The
concrete
walking
Loop
is
an
ADA
accessible,
walking
Loop
that
we
feel
is
essential
to
including
ensuring
this
park
is
accessible
for
everyone
and,
of
course,
we
want
to
have
turf.
We
want
to
have
appropriate
hydrated,
site
drainage
and
irrigation
needed
to
to
grow
the
the
plants
that
and
the
trees
on
site.
So
that's
the
the
kind
of
breakdown
of
where
we're
at
and
why
we're
before
you
today
asking
for
an
additional
400
000.
D
F
I
ask
questions
Michael
go
ahead.
Thank
you,
I'm,
trying
to
see
from
the
rendering
where
the
plaza
is
that
was
mentioned
on
on
the
side
on
the
next
slide
over.
Yes,
where
is
that,
underneath
the
shelter
or.
D
D
Of
the
city
is
Right,
absolutely
yeah.
Thank
you
for
asking
that
and
off
the
top
of
my
head
I
think
it's
over
1100
households
will
be
added
to
our
10-minute.
Walk
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
look
specifically
because
I
don't
remember
the.
C
D
C
E
C
C
C
Question
and
so
the
access
point
for
those
that.
D
A
D
So
Toby
Court
there
is
some
ability
for
parking,
but
given
that
Optimus
is
not
too
far,
there's
some
other
parks
around
that
folks
could
access
with
a
vehicle.
This
is
really
meant
to
be
a
neighborhood
park.
Is
it
what
was
the
driving
through?
That's
not
a
road
below
it.
That's
a
parking
lot
for.
C
D
Gary
Lane,
you
wouldn't
really
see
the
site
very
easily
because
it
does
it
butts
up
to
Carrie
Lane,
pretty
narrowly
there's
just
two
bollards
there
you'd
miss
it
in
a
second.
Can.
A
B
C
D
That
may
change
over
time.
As
they
see
you
know
the
park
being
utilized
and
see
the
benefit
to
the
community.
We
have
a
similar
agreement
with
the
church
on
Sunset
and
36th
Street.
So
it's
not
unprecedented
for
us
to
partner
with
churches
to
provide
additional
parking
so.
A
C
A
Questions
Corbin
on
this
design
or
nope.
That's
it.
D
E
Sure
so
you
know
in
general
increasing
budget
for
any
given
project
right.
It's
not
available
for
the
other
projects
in
the
plan,
however,
166
000
is
just
available
because
of
inflationary
adjustments
granted
that
is
taking
into
account
the
9.4
that
will
go
into
effect,
this
October,
but
still
ultimately
be
collections.
E
There's
adequate
funding
for
it,
and
so
the
thought
being
is
then,
when
we
update
our
plan
by
pushing
by
pushing
Pierce
Park
out
of
the
next
out
of
the
current
five-year
window,
we
could
just
pick
it
up
and
adjust
speeds
accordingly,
when
we
get
to
the
next
impact
fee
plan
so
and
I
mean
correctly,
if
I'm
drawing
this
but
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think
we're
pushing
peers
apart
out
because
of
this
I
think
it
was
just
due
to
Staffing
another
considerations
we
weren't
going
to
get
to
it
anyway.
E
So
it's
not
like
we're
doing
this
at
the
expense.
It's
just
that
one
like
thoughts
after
five
years,
readjust
fees
when
we
get
there
so
far
to
understand
what
you
said,
the
pierce,
the
part
was
in
The
Five-Year
Plan.
That's
probably
how
you
generated
these
based
on
that,
but
due
to
Staffing
or
other
reasons,
Pierce
Park
is
now
going
out
in
some
ways
this
Edition
or
brothers
in
completion
of
this
part
from
Rose
it
takes
its
place.
E
Is
that
a
fair
way
to
say
that
the
only
in
the
five
year
when
the
only
new
entity
is
just
the
the
you
know
the
impact,
the
appointments
for
10
years?
So
the
the
collections?
Theoretically
for
all
the
parks
in
North
River
for
over
10
years?
And
since
there's
many?
Almost
all
of
them
were
front-weighted.
A
B
D
I
can
kind
of
you
know
we.
We
are
trying
to
finish
what
we
started
and
prioritize
that,
and
it's
it's
to
know
that,
given
the
timeline
we're
projecting
for
other
Park
developments
within
this
region,
we
won't
be
having
to
utilize
funds
from
another
Park
in
the
future,
with
the
understanding
that
the
fund
will
balance
itself,
that,
if
that's
a
Layman's
way
to
say
it.
A
F
Yeah,
so
just
to
reconfirm
monies
from
Primrose
will
come
from
the
North
River
planning
area,
and
then
those
monies
will
get
replenished
from
pushing
off
Pierce
Park
just
to
confirm.
Pierce
Park
is
also
in
the
vicinity
of
where
this
Primrose
site
will
be
correct.
F
Okay,
so
I
guess
I'm
we're
not
taking
a
park
away
or
enhancements
away
from
one
area,
putting
in
another
same
General
impact
right
we
can't
cross
by
making
or
the
local
Parts.
The
issue
that
you
raise
does
come
up
when
you're.
Looking
at
the
unit
marks
because
effectively,
you
know
like
Walter,
Harris,
Spalding,
Ranch
and
and
then
it
all
compete
for
the
same
dollars,
yeah
and
then
follow-up
question.
You
said
that
there's
a
166
000
and
additional
funding.
F
E
So
we're
just
saying
the
total
budget
is
increasing
by
the
400
and
I
guess
what
I
was
trying
to
do
on
this
slide
would
say.
166
of
that
is
basically
the
inflationary
adjustment
that
we're
taking
and
you
fill
that
gap
between
the
166
and
the
400ths
of
the
call
it
250.
yeah,
that's
like
moving
out
through
this
part,
okay,
so
that
is
what
you're
doing
yeah
it's
just
running
right,
right,
yeah!
So
it's
not
purely
a
foreign.
D
I'd
like
to
thank
you
for
that
comment
chairman.
It
is
very
important
that
we
have
that
level
of
Engagement.
The
staff
obviously
do
their
best
to
try
and
be
responsible
to
these
funds
and
to
the
communities
that
are
relying
on
them
for
future
works.
Exactly
and.
C
D
C
That
this,
because
of
the
back
and
forth
between
the
ability
of
fire
station
or
will
it
be
a
part
of
Olivia
Firestone,.
A
A
B
It's
not
a
comment
why
this
isn't
the
first,
nor
will
it
be
the
last
time
this
has
happened
since
I've
been
on
this
committee.
I'm
sure
we've
had
this
about
six
times
where
a
budget
increase
has
happened,
and
this
time
it's
no
surprise
and
again
this
was
approved
in
fy20.
We
know
the
inflation.
That's
happened,
that's
by
23
since
then,
since
fy20,
so
no
surprise,
I
do
see
it's
a
33
increase.
Doing
the
math.
B
Let
me
make
sure
it's
36
excuse
me:
36
increase
that
seems
to
match
with
the
last
three
years
have
been
so
not
hugely
different
from
any
kind
of
expectations.
I
would
have
every
time
the
budget
has
asked
to
be
increased,
it's
I
don't
like
to
do
it,
but
at
the
same
time
I
understand
the
world
we're
in
it
happens,
and
it
is
good
to
see
that
the
increase
impacting
increase
is
doing
what
it's
supposed
to
do.
Help
increase
the
budget
based
on
inflation.
B
In
this
case,
it
wasn't
quite
enough
at
this
point
we're
going
to
see
it
better
to
do
projects
in
the
future,
but
all
in
all,
I
think
things
are
working
the
way
they
should
be
instead
of
asking
for
400
000
extra
we're
only
asking
for
244
and
then
in
the
aspect
of
all
things,
166
was
included
to
for
this
kind
of
thing
right,
so
that's
all
in
all
I
think
we're
it's
working
and
we
are
being
fiscally
conservative
of
the
ability
that
we
have
to
deal
with
inflation.
So.
A
A
D
Well,
I
think
I
think
if
I,
if
I
miss
any
items,
but
we
really
have
to
look
at
the
feedback
we
got
from
the
community
with
regard
to
the
master
plan
and
the
site
size
itself.
So
the
community
provided
us
with
master
plan
that
we
are
showing
you
today,
the
the
community
prioritize,
the
fitness
center,
the
shelter
and
the
playground
and
the
community
prioritized
on
streets.
So
we
it's
a
it's.
D
A
community
park,
a
larger
footprint,
five
acres,
six
acres-
that
we
would
start
to
look
at.
You
know
parking
that
would
serve
the
function
of
the
park.
Obviously
we
would
love
to
put
a
restroom
in
if
we
could
at
this
site,
but
you
know
between
the
size
and
the
site,
the
budget
and
the
community
feedback.
That's
not
that's,
not
something
I.
D
Through
our
comp
plan,
we're
required
to
do
certain
amenities
on
certain
size
Parks,
but
obviously,
as
you
get
to
a
bigger
park,
that's
hosting
events
or
hosting
Sports
Fields.
Then
it's
a
different
versus
something
like
this.
A
F
Is
there
a
correlation
with
restrooms
and
parking
lots
where
you
know
if
we're
having
a
park
that
needs
a
restrooms?
It
probably
also
needs
a
parking
lot
because
of
the
size
and
it
warrants.
Is
there
any
correlates
from
there.
D
D
We
have
many
many
bathrooms
across
the
city
that
are
only
open
during
the
summer
months
and
people
are
using
our
parks
year
round,
which
is
why
VLC
porta
potties
placed
at
some
of
the
park,
because
the
neighborhood
has
asked
for
it,
for
example.
So
you
know
if
that
that's
always
an
option
moving
forward.
If
it
becomes
an
issue,
then
we
would
really
look
to
the
public
feedback.
For
that
you
know
catalyst,
but
thank
you
sure.
Okay,
any
other
questions
for
the
city.
A
C
A
C
F
Should
we
delineate
the
where
the
monies
are
coming
from
between
the
166
and
the
roughly
250
from
the
North
River
and
back
feet?
Travis.