►
From YouTube: Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Description
February 9, 2022
B
C
B
E
The
one
thing
I
did
do
that
changed
up
a
little
bit
from
our
normal
presentation
here
is,
since
we
spent
so
much
of
this
year,
focusing
on
what's
to
come,
I've
kind
of
not
glossed
over
you'll,
see
like
when
we
get
to
each
section.
It's
basically
just
a
rehash
of
you
know
for
each
park,
planning
area
or
fire
police.
What
we
have
in
the
plan,
that's
primarily
the
focus
and
then
I'm
combining
the
annual
report
with
also
highlighting
any
changes
that
were
made
after
that
november
10th
meeting.
E
Where
you
all
voted
to
recommend.
I
can
tell
you
that,
as
I
mentioned
in
the
memo,
the
primary
changes
were.
A
few
dates
were
changed
in
the
southeast.
We
made
some
changes.
There
scaling
back
the
scope
for
alba
harris
and
adding
a
micro
park
in
another
location,
and
then
all
the
impact
fee
fund
balances
were.
E
On
actual
ending
balances,
so
in
in
all
cases,
those
adjustments
resulted
in
fewer
in
a
higher
balance,
so
lower
future
need
for
impact
fees,
not
huge
dollars,
but
I'll
discuss
each
of
those
as
we
grow
through
it.
So
it
also
since
this
is
admittedly
very
dry,
I'm
going
to
do
my
best
just
to
gloss
over
most
of
these
items.
A
E
We
basically
cut
everything
to
very,
very
low
levels
and
obviously
the
reality
is
fortunately
not
worn
that
out.
So
we
we
did
very
well
relative
to
budget
and
because
of
that,
because
budget
was
set
so
low.
That's
why
you
saw
you're
going
to
see
many
of
the
impact
fee
fund
balances
that
are,
you
know
in
some
cases
not
insignificantly
higher
than
what
we
anticipated.
E
E
So
when
you
have
lumpy
activity
like
that,
you'll
see
a
little
bit
move
and
I
also
don't
know
how
much
of
this
is
for
larger
developers
trying
to
front
load
their
permit
applications
just
to
get
around
the
fee
increase
that
is
coming
and
then
the
last
thing
worth
noting.
Is
that-
and
I
mentioned
this
last
year,
so
internal
audit
has
told
us
that
we
can't
have
negative
impact
fee
fund
balances.
E
But
what
we
do
is
we
just
basically
carry
them
at
zero
and
then
the
remaining
funds
are
advanced
by
the
capital
fund.
So
although
these
aren't
technically
negative
positions,
these
are
funds
that
are
owing
to
the
capital
fund
and
so
obviously,
with
the
police,
who
is
based
on
the
micro
district
and
the
southeast.
That's
for
bowler.
E
Correct
the
the
only
nuance
on
the
interest
free
is
because
there's
I
mean
yes,
we're
not
charging
interest,
however,
because
there's
effectively,
no
balance
you're,
also
not
getting
interest,
not
that
it
matters
a
lot
in
this
environment,
but
yeah
fair
enough
yeah,
as
one
would
expect.
So
it's
yes,
it's
effectively
an
interest-free
loan.
Okay,
thank
you,
as
the
last
page
alluded
to
collections
were,
were
very,
very
strong
over
budget
by
50
percent.
E
This
looks
just
at
and
there's
a
type
on
the
screen.
This
is
fiscal
2021
annual
report,
but
this
is
parks
by
planning
area
and
across
the
board.
21
was
a
good
year.
The
benches
were
especially
strong
and
some
of
that
lumpiness
actually
came
in
in
the
west
bench.
Where
you
know
it
was.
It
was
down
62
percent
last
year,
but
now
it's
up
122
and
that
usually
relates
to
just
a
couple
larger
developments
going
in
in
the
area.
E
Central
bench
is
small,
so
it
tends
to
be
volatile.
It
was
the
second
worst
last
year
down
33
percent,
and
now
it's
up
51
overall
collections
were
just
barely
in
line
just
slightly
below
sorry.
The
2016
levels,
which
was
our
banner
year
in
regional
parks,
overall
we're
up
29
and,
as
I
mentioned,
year-to-date
collections
are
looking
good,
although
the
benches
are,
you
know,
probably
reflecting
their
strong
year
and
21
are
a
little
weak
this
year.
E
This
just
goes
through
that.
I
believe
it's
the
second
attachment
in
the
in
the
memo
kind
of
running
through,
where
we've
been
using
the
impact
fees
specifically
for
parks
so
downtown,
we
completed
what
we've
historically
called
the
downtown
west
side
park.
That's
the
sherry
buckner
web
park
with
the
kind
of
interesting
pink
tree
in
it.
Golda's
harris
reserve
was
completed,
hillside
to
hollow
and
the
harrison
hollow
was
was
completed.
E
The
trail
heads
with
restrooms
that
was
completed
in
last
year.
However,
we
had
some
remaining
funds
that
were
using
to
build
a
trailhead
restroom
at
hawkins
range,
so
I
think
it
was
71
000
from
that
moved
over
to
hawkins
range
and
is
being
used
in
terms
of
the
local
areas.
We're
underway
at
franklin
park
we've
got
memorial
park
is
basically
complete.
There's
a
few
minor
things
that
need
to
be
done.
Stuart
gulch
has
it's
currently
delayed.
E
Final
punch,
punch
list
items
were
done.
I
believe
it
was
at
the
end
of
the
calendar
year
of
21..
Mullin
are
still
in
process.
They
still
have
the
the
splash
pad
to
go,
and
there
were
no
west
bench
parks
last
year
going
forward
in
this
year
again.
I
won't
dwell
on
these
because
we've
been
dwelling
on
them
for
the
past
year,
but
we
have
hawkins
range.
We
have
the
julie,
davis,
restroom,
the
parks,
maintenance
facilities
and
that's
you
know
consolidating
what
we
spent.
Also
a
lot
of
time.
E
Talking
about
was
consolidating
those
support.
Facilities
parks
in
particular,
is
the
one
that's
going
to
be
moving
sooner
rather
than
later.
So
that's
why
it's
focused
on
here,
but
also
fire
logistics,
some
police
evidence,
storage.
Things
like
that
going
out
at
this
consolidated
site
and
then
veterans
park
is
starting.
E
G
A
B
A
E
E
A
E
F
G
E
E
E
E
F
E
Exactly
exactly
and
that
sorry,
I
could
have
elaborated
on
that
a
little
bit
more
and
the
reason
why
council
wanted
to
accelerate
that
one
is
exactly
for
that
reason.
It's
everyone's
been
expecting
something
there
for
a
while,
and
the
argument
was
always
we'll
wait
till
we
know
what
we're
doing
with
the
fire
station,
and
so
now
that
we
know
what
we're
doing
with
the
fire
station
we're
moving
ahead
with
that.
E
E
The
regional
amenities
are
still
1.2,
but
here
we
cut
from-
and
I
should
say,
council
recommended
that
we
rather
than
spending
such
a
large
amount,
especially
since
we
don't
we're
currently
in
a
deficit
position
here,
to
bring
the
cost
down,
so
we
can
get
to
it
sooner,
but
then
also
on
the
back
end,
add
a
micro
product
just
to
increase
the
level
of
service
in
terms
of
the
10-minute
walk
for
more
residents.
So
that
way,
north.
E
Is
is
going
to
get
something
in
the
form
of
ulta,
harris
and
south
of
the
river
we'll
get
something
as
well,
because
that's
most
likely
where
this
micro
park
would
go
probably
somewhere
near
boise
state,
but
that
is
still
tbd
and
this
balance
came
up.
We
were
thinking
it
was
going
to
be
about
negative
457.
E
E
Yeah,
so
I
don't
have
much
more
in
the
way
of
prepared
comments
on
it.
Outside
of
you
know
the
context,
for
you
know
the
rationale
on
why
we
tried
to
cut
costs
and
we're
also
still
working.
I
should
note
with
the
developer
and
the
cid
to
see
if
there's
options,
for
you
know
somebody
else
providing
funding
to
grow
the
and
I'm
sorry
I'm
moving
my
mouse
on
the
projection.
But
you
can't
see
that
that
move
from
limited
amenities
to
you
know
not
full
amenities.
E
E
E
E
G
E
E
Significant
fun
balance:
this
is
the
last
year,
so
we
finally
finished
the
station
15
repayments,
which
predates
my
arrival
here
and
we're
also
this
year,
starting
planning
and
next
year.
We'll
begin
construction
for
that
northwest
fire
station,
and
I
believe
that
this
year
we
will
also
be
ordering
the
engine
for
that,
and
much
of
that
is
impact
fee
funded
as
we'll
get
to
here.
E
As,
as
we
all
know
well
know,
you
know
we
put
in
10.4
million
for
the
2021
cost
of
the
station,
so
you
know
just
growing
that
two
years
by
the
time
we
actually
get
to
construction
got
us
to
about,
I
believe
it
was
eleven
or
eleven.
Five
current
estimates
are
sorting
out
kind
of
in
the
mid
to
high
12
range.
I
don't
know
what
the
thinking
is.
E
E
E
Here
again,
we
benefited
from
better
than
expected
collections,
so
we
thought
it
was
going
to
be
about
a
million
dollars
give
or
take
in
the
hall,
and
you
know
we're
in
better
shape
than
that
so
less
to
repay
on
the
micro
district
and
then
move
before
I
move
on
to
just
the
construction
market
in
general.
Any
questions
on
place
or
fire.
E
A
E
But
I
just
thought
it
was
illustrative
to
show
how
lumpy
the
multi-family
can
be,
and
it
was
a
very
positive
lumpy
year
this
year.
You
know
a
record
is
as
near
as
I
can
tell
at
just
over
1100
permits
and
that's
1100
units,
not
buildings.
Obviously
you
know
and
single
family
tends
to
fluctuate
in
the
six
to
seven
hundred
count
range
again.
E
F
E
So
those
are
pretty
significant
moves
and
the
total
number
of
permits
this
year
again,
looking
at
everything
not
just
new
occupancy
buildings
was
up
11
and
you
can
see
that's
the
blue
line
up
above,
but
because
I've
shrunk,
the
scale
it
looks
like
there
was
a
pretty
big
jump
and
it
was
and
not
a
significant
jump.
But
again
this
one
typically
ranges.
E
F
B
E
E
E
F
E
Of
based
on
some
preliminary
scope
work,
they
thought
that
the
cost
could
be
the
one
and
a
quarter,
so
it
just
happens
to
be
the
next
year's
expense,
but
the
reality
is,
is
it
is
it
it
should
be
pulling
from
the
different
column?
That
is
the
actual
we've
budgeted,
so
that
one
in
particular
is
an
error,
and
I
can
circulate
a
corrected
file.
E
B
E
E
E
E
B
E
B
F
D
B
F
B
E
A
B
So,
as
you
said
mentioning
already,
we
know
it's
too
early
in
22,
but
are
we
projecting
what's
the
thoughts
on
growth
for
22?
Overall,
you
know
it's
hard
to
say
on
each
area,
but
obviously
I
probably
don't
assume
we're
going
to
have
the
same
kind
of
growth
as
adding
21..
It's
probably
not
safe
to
assume
that,
since
it
was
very
large.
E
E
So
there's
the
budget
and
the
budget
is
the
budget
yeah,
but
in
terms
of
what
the
actual
collections
will
be,
I
mean
the
thing
that
gets
confusing
is
when
exactly
we
start
collecting
new
feeds,
because
that
dramatically
changes.
So,
even
if
you,
since
fees
are
going
out
by
not
small
amounts,
you
know
you
could
have
the
same
number
of
permits.
E
F
E
X
percent
of
that
three
million
dollar
number
and
just
full
full
disclosure.
When
we're
looking
at
projections,
we're
not
I
mean
we
take
into
the
into
account
the
overall
growth
projected
by
compass,
but
since
these
are
just
for
setting
revenue
targets
and
it
doesn't
really
impact
collections,
you
know
we
just
kind
of
try
to
weight
them
year
over
year,
so
we're
getting
to
the
right
place
over
time,
but
any
given
year
could
be
very
wrong,
as
was
proven
out
in
this
year's
budget.
E
On
revenue,
yes,
yes
exactly,
I
mean
that's.
The
thing
is
for
revenues.
We
could
project
zero
and
I
mean
collections
are
what
they
are.
It's
you
know
it's
really
on
the
expense
side
that
we
do.
We
want
to
be
accurate
and
obviously,
when
it
comes
to
like
balancing
the
fun-
and
you
know,
one
of
the
questions
that
was
you
know
raised
was
about
those
future
fund
balances.
E
I
don't
know
if
that
was
a
specific
question,
but
you
know
that's
where
you
know
we
adjust
timing
as
we
get
into
the
plan
based
on
how
collections
are
actually
going
like,
isn't
going
to
be
as
front
weighted,
as
I
think
it
was
maybe
chair.
Jorgensen
had
mentioned
in
one
of
the
meetings
that
you
know
it
was
anticipated.
There
could
be
some
over
the
next
year
or
two
or
three.
E
A
large
number
of
permits
coming
in
that
could
generate
some
upfront
revenue,
but
you
know
that's,
but
you
know
again,
our
projections
are
looking
at
more
even
over
a
10-year
horizon,
but
a
lot
of
our
projects
is
a
good
example.
The
west
benson
we've
got
up
here
very
front-end
weighted,
so
some
of
these
might
might
have
to
move
just
based
on
fund
balance,
because
obviously
a
fire
station
will
spend
you
know
negative,
because
we
need
a
fire
station.
B
A
E
B
E
B
B
H
H
Oh
yeah,
so
sarah
arkle
nice
to
meet
you
all
colleen
nice
to
see
you
again.
I
just
recently
last
week
started
in
this
position
as
the
park
superintendent.
I
came
from
the
department.
I
was
the
open
space
and
foothills
superintendent,
so
some
of
you
will
remember
remember
me
from
previous
meetings
where
we
discussed
the
trailhead
at
hillside
to
hollow.
H
I
am
excited
to
work
with
you
guys
more
closely
and
to
work
with
travis
more
closely.
My
background
is
in
ecology.
My
professional
background
is
in
sort
of
environmental
policy
and
land
use,
so
the
park's
work
is
is
already
sort
of
familiar,
but
I
have
a
steep
learning
curve
for
sure.
So
this
is
my
first
impact
fee
meeting.
I
hope
to
be
better
versed
in
what
it
is
that
my
job
entails
by
the
next
time
we
meet,
but
there
will
probably
be
meetings
when
I
don't
know
the
answers
to
the
questions.