►
From YouTube: Historic Preservation Commission
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
I'll
be
going
through
the
work
session
today
and
go
through.
You
know
the
consent
agenda
number
one
Dr
h2300121
at
2123,
West
Eastman
Street,
will
be
heard.
Is
the
appeal
of
the
administrative
denial
of
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
allow
vinyl
windows
number
two
located
at
616
East
cross
street
will
be
deferred
until
the
September
25th
HPC
meeting.
You
should
have
had
a
memo
provided
indicating
that
in
late
correspondence
or
actually
before
number
three
brh
2300226
is
to
be
heard.
C
It
is
for
the
construction
of
an
addition
to
an
existing
single-family
residence
and
adding
a
detached
garage
with
Adu
number
four
Dr
h2300242
at
1607
North
6th
Street
is
going
to
be
or
has
been
dropped
down
to
a
administrative
review
due
to
the
removal
of
the
Adu
above
a
garage
as
was
originally
presented
to
us.
C
Now
there
will.
Instead,
there
will
be
an
unfinished
bonus
room,
and
that
brings
it
down
to
administrative
review.
D
C
B
C
For
audio
and
recording
that
was
a
wave
yeah
goodbye
number
five
brh
230245,
18
West
rombach
is
to
be
heard,
and
that
is
to
alter
the
character,
defining
facade
and
rebuild
front
porch
and
last
is
number
six
Dr
h230266
is
to
be
heard
for
the
construction
of
a
detached
garage
with
an
Adu.
Above
so
that's
going
to
be
for
heard
one
deferred
and
one
dropped,
and
we
feel
that
all
all
items
that
are
to
be
heard
are
definitely
to
be
heard.
C
But
if
you
feel
any
of
those
does
are
eligible
for
consent
agenda.
That
is
something
okay.
C
D
C
D
C
F
Madam
chair,
yes,
if
I
may,
potentially
you
might
want
to
just
give
a
heads
up
at
the
beginning
of
the
hearing
that
item
four
will
not
be
heard
tonight
because
of
that
just
for
a
clearer
record,
perfect.
C
All
right,
I
think
that
concludes
it.
Just
you
know,
as
and
the
passage
of
the
the
minutes
and
all
that
jazz
that
you
do
great.
D
All
right
welcome.
We
are
a
citizen
volunteer
appointed
by
the
mayor
and
we're
approved
by
the
city
council.
We
make
the
final
decisions
on
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
applications.
Any
decisions
made
tonight
may
be
appealed
to
the
city
council,
provided
that
the
PLS
file
within
10
days
of
this
hearing
in
order
to
file
npl,
you
must
have
given
written
or
oral
testimony
tonight's
meeting.
So
that's
why
it's
important
to
give
your
name
and
address
when
you
testify
tonight,
we
utilize
a
consent
agenda.
This
means
to
have
an
advocate.
D
If
an
applicant
agrees
to
the
staff
report
and
if
there
are
no
public
opposition,
then
the
item
will
be
placed
on
the
cassette
agenda.
All
items
that
are
placed
on
the
consent
agenda
are
approved
with
one
motion.
Without
further
public
comment
for
items
not
on
the
consent
agenda,
we
will
hold
a
full
public
Hearing
in
order
detailed
I,
guess
the
agenda's,
probably
out
in
the
hall
right
now
just
a
few
minutes
ago,
with
testimony
from
staff,
applicant
neighborhood
association
and
then
public
testimony.
Thank
you
all
for
attending
tonight.
Well,
the
clerk.
D
You
I'm
all
we're
approving
the
minutes.
Can
somebody
grab
the
sign
up
sheet
from
the
hall
for
me?
Thank
you.
H
Oh,
my
commotion
I
moved
to
approve
the
historic
preservation
committed
commission
meeting
minutes
from
July
31st
2023.
D
D
D
Drh23-00226,
and
that
is
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
construct
an
addition
to
an
existing
single-family
residence
and
add
a
detached
garage
with
an
Adu
above
the
property.
This
is
at
1515,
North,
17th,
Street,
I'm.
Sorry
I
have
this
wrong
number
two
I'm
sorry
drh23-00122!
This
is
at
616
East
cross
street
a
certificate
of
appropeness
to
construct
three
single-family
homes
on
consecutive
substandard
lots
of
record
on
a
property
in
the
medium
density,
residential,
historic
overlay.
Zone.
D
And
did
we
have
anybody
signed
up?
No
signs
perfect,
that's
CC,
okay,
perfect!
So
let's
go
ahead
and
we
will
defer
that
to
September
25th
and
then
we'll
hear
all
of
the
remaining
items,
with
the
exception
of
number
four,
which
is.
D
Drh23-00242
there's
been
an
adjustment
to
that
project
which
has
made
it
so
it
can
be
reviewed
administratively,
all
right.
So
with
that
we
will
start
with
number
one.
Do.
D
C
Yes,
this
property
is
located
in
the
expanded
North
End.
It
is
classified
as
a
non-contributing
structure.
Here's
an
indication
of
its
location
site
plan
join
a
general
outline
of
the
property.
C
C
With
some
notation
on
them
that,
like
I
said
all
of
this
is
also
in
your
packet
and
the
applicant
used
vinyl
replacement
windows
and
a
door
which
are
not
allowed
in
the
residential
historic
districts.
Therefore,
the
application
was
administratively
denied
and
has
appealed,
been
appealed
to
this
Commission.
D
Right
are
there
any
questions
for
staff?
No
is
the
I'm
sorry,
madam.
I
C
I
D
Okay,
any
other
questions
for
Stuff,
okay
hearing
none
is
the
applicant
here
excellent.
If
you
can
step
forward
and
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
F
A
J
J
I
do
object
to
some
of
the
due
process
and
procedures
undertaken
by
the
city
of
Boise
regarding
this
specific
matter
and
Reserve
any
rights
to
object
to
these
in
subsequent
hearings,
but
to
the
matter
at
hand,
I
think
the
facts
and
the
relevant
code
sections
require
a
ruling
in
my
favor
for
the
following
reasons:
number
one
the
city
has
included
photos
to
present
to
you.
That
should
not
be
included.
In
my
opinion,
these
photos
were
erroneously
submitted
by
the
window
contractor
who
filed
for
the
original
permit
in
April.
J
Those
photos
just
depict
another
residence
building
on
a
different
lot,
which
is
which
is
not
the
lot
property
or
the
residence
building
at
issue
in
this
appeal.
The
photos
of
that
other
residence
which
are
arguably
do
have
architectural
historical
Design
Elements,
should
not
be
considered
in
by
this
body.
These
photos
are
irrelevant
and
misleading
and
I
have
asked
the
city
to
remove
them
for
those
reasons,
and
they
have
refused
so
I'm
asking
them
not
to
be
considered.
J
A
J
J
And,
more
importantly,
the
city
does
not
claim
that
there
are
such
elements
to
be
preserved
in
this
on
this
residence
building.
Nor
has
it
provided
any
evidence
that
any
architecturally
historical
design
elements
is
described
in
the
guidelines.
Therefore,
there
aren't
any.
It
is
literally
a
square
box
720
feet
in
an
alleyway.
J
The
resident
building
does
not
have
any
direct
access
to
any
public
Street.
It
is
situated
on
an
irregularly
shaped
lot
due
to
a
long-standing
irrigation
canal.
Its
only
access
is
to
an
Alleyway
running
between
the
properties
on
21st
and
22nd
Street.
The
resident
building
entry
door
is
less
than
10
feet
from
the
alley
right-of-way
and
that
nondescript
entry
door
and
three
non-descript
residents
Windows
face
the
alley
and
look
directly
into
the
garage
and
out
building
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
alley.
J
If
this
residence
building
had
any
architectural
Design
Elements,
which
it
doesn't,
they
cannot
impact
the
walking
or
driving
view
on
public,
sidewalks
and
streets,
because
the
resident
building
cannot
be
seen
from
the
two
intersection
intersection
public
roads
or
the
sidewalk
on
21st
Street.
Views
of
this
resident
building
are
blocked
by
fences
that
are
situated
on
another
residential
parcel,
not
the
property
at
issue.
In
fact,
the
city
noted
that
the
proper
location
of
the
sign
to
post
this
appeal
cannot
be
seen
from
the
public,
Street
or
sidewalk.
J
D
All
right
sharing,
none,
none
can
sit
back
down.
You'll
have
an
opportunity
to
wrap
that
in
a
minute
is
there
a
registered
neighborhood
association
present
permission
to
testify.
F
But
I'm
sure
there
is
Sandra
Herman.
D
All
right,
great
Miss
Herman,
if
you
can
state
your
name
and
address
please.
K
Hi,
can
you
hear
me
yes,
Sandra
Hermann,
1404,
North,
7th,
Street,
Madam,
chair
and
commission
Nina
feels
that
preserving
the
look
and
of
the
smaller
homes
in
the
neighborhood
is
as
important
as
the
large
homes
on
Harrison
small
homes
make
up
the
Greater
portion
of
properties
in
the
North
End,
and
we
are
disappointed
that
this
home
was
not
considered
contributing.
K
We
feel
it
is
an
example
of
what
could
be
preserved
with
a
new
survey,
though
this
house
is
not
visible
from
21st,
it
is
obvious,
while
traveling
eastbound
on
Eastman
the
loss
of
the
three
over
one
windows
and
the
use
of
the
inappropriate
modern,
full
glass
door
removes
any
historic
charm
from
this
structure.
As
you
can
see
from
our
submitted
photos,
the
new
windows
have
been
framed
with
wood
grain,
Hardy
style
material,
and
we
expect
that
the
historic
guidelines
are
upheld
consistently.
K
D
No
okay
hearing
none
will
go
ahead
and
move
to
the
public
portion.
The
public
comment
portion
of
the
evening.
There
was
nobody
on
the
sign
up.
She
deserve
online.
That's
wishing
to
testify.
D
D
No
okay,
great
excellent,
okay:
we
will
close
the
hearing
then
and
render
a
decision.
Do
we
have
a
motion
or
some
discussion.
F
I
F
I
I
J
But
if
you
show
the
the
pictures
again,
you
can't
see
the
the
one
from
the
backyard
over
the
six
foot
fence
of
the
property
in
front
of
us.
You
can
see
it
there.
You
can
actually
see
the.
What
you
can
see
is
from
right
there
and
that's
that's
the
twin,
the
Eastman
view
from
the
street.
That's
the
alley
View!
J
D
Okay,
perfect,
thank
you
that
that
helps.
Are
there
any
other
questions
before.
D
I
guess
my
thoughts
are
in
the
past.
We've
we've
been
more
concerned
about
the
the
front.
This
is
a
unique
case,
obviously
because
it
faces
the
alley
and
not
the
street,
but
where
it
is
being
used,
I
mean
that's,
obviously
the
functioning
front
door
of
it
and
that
door
hasn't
been
replaced.
H
C
I
believe
you
could
approve
or
did
not
policy.
If
you
approve
the
recommendation,
you
may
be
able
to
add
conditions.
I
I
think
that
is
a
possibility
and
I
would
just
State
for
the
record.
The
only
place
we
have
been
seeing
vinyl
windows
pretty
much
ever
is
for
egress
windows
and
basements.
That's
part
of
our
guidance
and
our
regulation.
H
I
mean
I
still
support
the
staff's
decision.
We
have
they've
done
lots
of
Outreach
in
the
past
couple
of
years
about
what's
appropriate,
what's
not
appropriate
within
our
historic
district.
They
put
videos
on
the
city's
website,
so
I.
Don't
think
there's
any
excuse,
but
there's
no
excuse
for
us
too.
H
B
H
B
D
All
right,
so
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
Steph,
please
or
clerk.
Please
call
roll.
G
D
C
Yes,
this
property
is
located
in
the
North
End,
and
the
classification
of
the
property
is
as
a
contributing
structure.
C
C
The
garage
with
an
Adu
above
here
are
the
four
plans
to
give
you
an
idea
of
how
they'll
look
some
elevation,
showing
that
one
story
addition
to
the
rear
and
the
one
and
a
half
story,
garage
Adu
at
the
very
rear
of
the
property,
there's
some
photographs
to
give
you
the
context
of
the
historic
property
itself.
It's
aerial,
close-ups
and
more
photos
of
the
primary
residents
and
adjacent
properties
and,
finally,
a
historic,
Sanborn
Insurance
map.
C
To
give
you
a
context
of
the
history
of
the
property,
we
feel
that
this
Edition
is
set
back
from
the
existing
house,
as
is
recommended
by
our
guidelines
as
a
one-story
addition
to
us,
two-story
house,
which
is
desirable.
There
may
be,
as
you
were,
able
to
see
in
the
packet
and
on
these
slides,
limited
visibility
from
the
street
as
it
set
closer
to
the
northern
property
line
than
the
existing
house,
but
there
are
multiple
coniferous
and
deciduous
trees
present
that
do
now
at
least
and
will
continue
to
obscure
The
View.
C
The
garage
Adu
structure
will
be
two
stories
that
should
have
read
one
and
a
half,
as
it
has
grown
that
way
more
accurately,
with
a
height
to
the
Peak
at
27
feet.
Six
and
the
resonance
is
two
stories:
that's
a
almost
a
couple
feet
taller
our
guidelines
just
encourage
attached
structures
not
to
exceed
the
height
of
the
primary,
and
this
proposal
is
one
feet:
nine
inches
shorter.
C
As
with
the
addition,
the
garage
Adu
may
have
limited
visibility
from
the
street
as
it
is
set
closer
to
the
northern
property
line
than
the
existing
house
and
proposed
Edition.
But
once
again
there
are
the
multiple
coniferous,
trees
and
deciduous
trees
present
that
obscure
The
View
and
regardless
it
does
meet.
You
know,
setback
requirements,
so
the
visibility
is
acceptable.
C
The
design
uses
Gable
gross
and
the
exterior
stairway
to
the
second
floor,
and
it's
featuring
materials
and
elements
that
are
congruous
with
the
district
and
the
material
in
the
existing
home
and
all
materials
that
are
called
out
seem
are
appropriate
and
are
conditioned
regardless
and
it's
below
a
thousand
square
feet
and
under
22
feet
in
height
to
the
midpoint
of
the
roof
and
therefore
complies
with
the
full
skit
setback.
Requirements
of
the
zone,
as
alluded
to
before
and
with
that
Steph
recommends.
Approval
and
I
will
stand
for
any
questions.
H
Sure,
just
a
quick
question:
did
they
come
in
with
this
application,
or
did
you
work
with
them
closely
on
the
application.
C
They
came
in
with
this
application,
and
I
did
some
follow-up
feedback
some
questions
about
why
it's
all
set
the
way
it
is,
and
they
responded
that
there
are.
C
You
know
certain
they
wanted
to
have
the
least
impact
as
far
as
it
being
shifted
to
the
right
and
not
being
directly
behind
and
totally
obscured
for
the
one-story
Edition.
There
were
some
site.
You
know
they
wanted
to
keep
as
much
of
the
historic
property
still
kind
of
visible,
so
to
speak.
So
it's
sort
of
a
corner
edition
versus
a
rear,
pushback,
Edition
and
yeah.
C
That
was
it
basically
I
I
asked
for
some
follow-up
questions,
but
they
they
gave
reasonable
explanations
and,
as
I
said,
it's
a
one-story
addition
to
a
two-story
building
and
once
you
get
to
the
Viewpoint
I
guess
so
to
speak
of
seeing
that
garage
you
it's
way
back
and
it
like
I
said
it
meets
the
it
meets
the
setback,
so
it
can
be
where
it
is.
As
far
as
you
know,
for
a
pure
planning
location
perspective,
it's
okay,
where
it
is,
it's
just
I've
felt
the
need
to
address
the
visibility
issue.
Yeah.
D
L
D
Right,
if
there's
no
questions,
do
we
have
a
representative
from
the
neighborhood
association?
That's
wishing
to
testify
on
this
project?
K
Hi
Sandra
Herman,
1404,
North,
7th,
Street,
Madam,
chair
and
commission
Nina
supports
this
project.
The
lock
coverage
is
only
30
percent
and
the
thoughtful
addition
in
Adu
construction
are
appropriate
for
the
property.
We
especially
like
the
care
and
consideration
for
the
mature
trees.
We
enjoyed
the
very
buttoned
up
and
easy
to
read
proposal.
We
recommend
down
shielded
lighting
and
permeable
Paving,
especially
after
the
summer
we've
seen
you
know
quite
quite
the
rainstorms
and
seeing
how
the
storm
drains
are
have
already
been
overwhelmed
with,
with
flooded
intersections
and
with
climate
change.
K
We'd
really
like
to
see
some
of
these
projects
start
using
permeable,
Paving
Nina
would
would
like
to
remind
homeowners
and
contractors
that
materials
listed
within
the
accepted
plans
are
part
of
an
agreed
upon
contract
with
the
city.
It
is
important
to
adhere
to
the
materials
as
listed
as
they
are
part
of
this
of
standards
in
a
historic
neighborhood.
Changing
materials
without
consulting
the
city
could
result
in
fines,
delays
and
mitigation
at
the
contractor,
homeowner's
expense.
D
D
No
all
right
hearing
none!
You
have
an
opportunity
to
rebutt.
If
you
would
like.
Yes,
please
step
forward
state
your
name
and
address.
E
Hi
Jennifer
Stevens,
I,
guess
I'm
1515,
North,
17th
Street,
but
actually
you're,
probably
better
off
reaching
me
at
318,
East,
Highland,
View,
Drive,
Boise,
83702
I
just
want
to
respond
to
Nina
and
thank
you
all
for
hearing
the
application
tonight.
I
really
appreciate
what
sounds
like
boilerplate
language
that
you've
put
into
your
testimony.
E
I've
served
on
both
the
Nina
board
as
well,
and
the
historic
preservation
Commission
in
the
past
and
I
think
the
kind
of
community
and
Resident
involvement
in
actually
reading
these
applications
and
actually
saying
the
kind
of
thing
you
just
said
is
super
important
and
I
just
really
applaud
Nina
for
continuing
that
tradition.
E
I
also
want
to
say
thank
you
for
the
recommendation
on
the
pavers,
just
not
that
it
matters
to
this
application,
but
we
do
intend
to
use
permeable
pavers
for
the
patio
that
we're
going
to
be
putting
in
the
back
and
great
idea
about
the
apron
for
the
garage
that
we'll
keep
in
mind
when
we're
doing
that
level
of
design.
So
thank
you
and
thank
you
all
for
your
time.
Thank.
D
D
You
are
there.
Is
there
a
second,
oh
second,
thanks,
commissioner
otter
clerk,
please
call
roll.
H
D
Thank
you.
We'll
move
on
to
item
number
five,
which
is
drh23-00245.
It's
at
8,
18,
West,
Brumback,
Street,
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
alter
the
character,
defining
facade
and
rebuild
the
front
porch
on
a
property
in
a
single-family
residential
and
historic
overlay.
Zone
Steph.
Can
we
please
get
the
report.
C
Yes,
this
property
is
located
in
the
North
End
and
it
is
a
contributing
structure.
There's
a
site
plan
Ariel
to
give
you
an
indication
of
its
location
and
here's,
the
drawing
of
the
existing
house
and
the
outline
of
where
the
new
covered
porch
would
be
hand,
sketch
elevation
and
then
a
a
further
drawing
showing
the
theme
of
what
it's
going
to
look
like
in
general
and
they've
provided
a
lot
of
detailed
drawings.
C
To
give
you
an
idea
of
the
materials
which
all
seemed
appropriate
and
here's
the
Sanborn
fire
Insurance
map.
That
shows
clear
evidence
that
there
was
a
porch
as
all
the
adjacent
properties
had
and
almost
every
historic
home
built
in
the
North
End
and
all
other
historic
districts
would
have
had,
especially
in
these
time
periods,
and
they
have
an
inspiration
photo
for
a
nearby
property
that
is
has.
C
Treatment
and
as
you'll
see
in
this
photo
that
I've
outlined
with
an
arrow,
there
is
a
witness
Mark
for
where
the
ports
used
to
be-
it's
probably
faint
on
this
projection,
but
it
is
there
and-
and
you
can
kind
of
see
it
through
there
too,
so
there's
clear
physical
evidence
on
the
property
that
there
used
to
be
a
Portage
there
and,
as
I've
said
it's
based
on
historical
evidence,
and
there
was
some
there
was,
of
course
it
wasn't
at
some
point
removed
and
the
outlines.
C
As
we
have
seen,
we
feel
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
design
that
matches
the
materials
we
know
they
are
doing
something
that
matches
the
materials
that
stand
on
the
house,
and
we
see
that
there's
no
conjectural
Design
Elements,
trying
to
like
make
it
a
Craftsman,
porch
or
whatever,
to
confuse
us
and
give
us
a
false
sense
of
History,
and
we
feel
that
it's
is
an
important
in
accordance
with
page
30
of
the
design
guidelines
for
residential
historic
districts,
and
we
recommend
approval
for
this
application.
I
will
stand
for
any
questions.
Thank.
C
C
D
Excellent,
so
I
guess
the
applicant
isn't
here
to
testify
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
skip
over
them
and
is
the
neighborhood
association
wanting
to
testify
on
this
project?
Yes,
all
right
state,
your
name
and
address
please.
K
Sandra
Herman
1404,
North,
7th,
Street,
Madam,
chair
and
commission.
We
appreciate
the
homeowners
willingness
to
reproduce
this
historic
front
porch.
We
support
this
project.
We
recommend
the
use
of
down
shielded
lighting.
Nina
would
also
like
to
remind
homeowners
and
contractors
that
materials
listed
within
the
within
the
accepted
plans
are
part
of
an
agreed
upon
contract
with
the
city.
It
is
important
to
adhere
to
the
materials
as
listed
as
they
are
part
of
the
standards
in
the
historic
neighborhood.
K
D
D
D
G
H
D
C
There's
the
side,
aerial,
here's,
the
site
plan
showing
the
primary
residence
and
the
location
of
the
proposed
work,
some
floor
plans
and
the
elevations-
and
here
are
photographs
of
the
alley
area
to
get
a
sense
of
its
location
and,
most
importantly,
pay
attention
to
the
photo
to
the
bottom
right.
That's
kind
of
an
indication
of
a
side
elevation,
especially
of
the
primary
residence
front,
elevation
there
and
then
other
nearby
properties,
more
showing
the
the
side
and
the
architectural
character,
the
property
and
more
adjacent
and
nearby
properties.
C
This
story
starts
will
be
one
and
a
half
stories
in
height
with
a
height
to
Peak
at
22
feet.
The
existing
residence
is
a
one
and
a
half
story
that
happens
to
have
the
same
Peak
height.
As
you
know,
the
guidelines
encourage
detached
structures
not
to
exceed
the
height,
and
this
one
is
the
same.
The
design
uses
gabled,
Rose
and
Dormers,
and
an
exterior
Stairway
To
The
Second
Story
the
proposed
structure,
feed
slap,
siding
and
Cedar
shape,
which
is
congruous
to
the
district
and
the
material
on
the
existing
house.
C
I
spoke
with
the
staff
on
SRI
I
spoke
with
the
applicant
and
asked
them
to
kind
of
Pare
down
the
design
a
little
bit
to
not
look
just
like
the
house
exactly
to
where
they
removed
the
the
brackets
or
whatever
you
want
to
get
a
term.
You
want
to
use
the
O-ring
brackets.
The
siding
window,
materials
are
called
out
and
are
appropriate
with
that
staff
recommends
approval
of
this
application
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
Thank.
I
All
right,
Madam
chair,
sorry,
what
about
the
tree
what's
happening
with
the
tree
in
the
existing
plan.
C
D
N
I'm
at
6812,
Fairfield
Avenue
in
Boise.
Thank
you
so
I
didn't
hear
too
many
concerns.
I
I
talked
already
with
staff
and
made
a
couple.
Modifications
I
think
the
only
concern
I
got
an
email
from
the
North
End
Neighborhood
Association
about
some
privacy
and
I
did
send
one
additional
photo.
That
shows
there's
one
tree
present
in
the
owner's
yard
that
will
remain
and
there's
two
additional
trees.
That
kind
of
shade
their
backyard.
N
D
D
You
is
the
neighborhood
association
present
wishing
to
testify
on
this
project
accident.
You
can
state
your
name
and
address.
Please.
K
K
As
the
applicant
said,
we
expressed
some
concern
to
the
contractor
about
neighborhood
neighbor
privacy
and
ask
whether
the
neighbors
had
been
contacted.
We
did
not
hear
back
from
them
whether
whether
they
had
been
communicative
with
the
neighbors
or
not.
We
recommend
down
Shield
lid
lighting
and
permeable
Paving.
Nina
would
like
to
remind
homeowners
and
contractors
that
materials
listed
within
the
accepted
plans
are
part
of
an
agreed-upon
contract
with
the
city.
It
is
important
to
adhere
to
the
materials
as
listed
as
they
are
a
part
of
Stan
of
standards
in
a
historic
neighborhood.
K
D
All
thank
you.
Miss
Herman,
any
questions
for
Nina
all
right
hearing.
None!
Is
there
any
one
from
the
public
wishing
to
testify
on
this
project
either
present
or
online.
M
Hi,
my
name
is
Kiva
slack
I
live
at
706
North
20th
Street
here
in
Boise,
in
talking
to
Danny,
about
Nina's
concerns.
I
actually
have
since
spoken
to
all
of
my
neighbors,
all
of
which
who
approve
the
project
and
understand
what
we're
looking
to
accomplish.
They
don't
have
any
concerns
about
privacy
right
now.
Our
block
is
fantastic,
so
I
don't
think
there
should
be
any
issue
there.
D
D
I
And
move
to
approve
drh,
23-20
or
zero
zero;
two
six,
six
with
staffs
recommendations.
D
You,
commissioner,
Fox
quick:
please
call
roll.