►
From YouTube: 8-8-23 Board of Zoning Adjustment Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Amanda
cusworth,
cob:
oh,
okay.,
amanda,
cusworth,,
cob:,
alright.
so.,
thanks
for
joining
us.
This
evening.
this
or
this
afternoon..
The
city
has
engaged
with
a
community
members
to
co-create
a
vision
for
productive,,
meaningful,
and
inclusive
civic
conversations..
This
vision
supports
physical
and
emotional
safety
for
community
members,
staff
and
board,
and
commission
members,,
as
well
as
democracy.
for
people
of
all
ages,
identities,
lived
experiences
and
political.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
Katie
crane,
boza,
chair:
okay,,
so
tonight,
we
just
have
one
item,
and
for
for
that
item,
staff,
robbie
is
gonna,
present
first,
and
then
the
applicant
will
present
second,
and
then,.
If
there
is
anybody
from
the
public
that
wants
to
comment,
that'll
happen,
then,
and
then
the
board
will
discuss
it
and
just
to
review
the
voting
rules,
since
there's
only
3
of
us,.
I
guess
all
3
of
us
have
to
approve.
A
A
F
F
F
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
the
resulting
side.
South
setback
will
be
approximately
12.2
feet.
taken
from
the
upper
story,
addition,
where
25
feet
is
required.
and
we're
approximately
12.2
feet
exists
today,
taken
from
the
existing
south
face
of
the
house
section
of
the
land
use
code
to
be
modified.,
section
9,,
7,,
one.,
boulder,
revised
code,
1981.
F
F
F
F
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:,
and
this
just
shows
you
some
existing
site
conditions.
on
the
left.
You
see
the
aerial
view
of
the
property,
and
to
the
right.
You
have
the
existing
split
level
house
located
partially
within
the
12
or
the
25
south
yard,,
and
I
highlighted
in
blue,
just
to
show
the
approximate
location
compared
to
the
overall
size
and
layout
of
the
site.
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
and
the
applicant
kindly
provided
the
existing
footprint
of
the
house,
and
then
also
the
buy
right
or
required
setbacks,,
and
then
also
the
existing
portion
of
the
house
that
is
considered
nonconforming,
due
to
setback
meaning..
It
is
located
within
that
south
25
setback,
and
the
portion
of
the
house
located
within
that
setback
is
highlighted
and
gray
on
the
image
you
see
up
on
the
screen.
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
and
then
we
have
the
proposal.
so
tonight
the
board
is
considering
a
setback,
variance
for
the
new
addition
to
the
house,
and
it
is
a
site
adjacent
to
street
or
south
setback
variants,,
and
it's
for
approximately
12.2
feet
from
the
addition,,
where
25
feet
is
required
and
approximately
12.2
feet
from
the
existing
house
exists.
Today.
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:,
I
added
a
few
lines
to
the
to
the
exhibit..
The
blue
line.
You
see,
at
the
bottom
of
the
site,
is
the
proposed,
and
that's
that
12.2
foot
location
that
marker
and
then
the
buy
right
or
required
minimum
setbacks..
I
have
highlighted
in
the
red
dashes
up
on
the
screen.,
so
you
see
the
3,
25
foot
setbacks.
F
F
F
F
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
and
you
can
see
how
it
creates
somewhat
of
a
different
design.,
so
again,
I'll.
Let
the
applicant
speak
more
to
the
specific
designs
and
what
was
looked
at.
when
it's
their
time
to
speak..
But
this
image
might
come
up,
and
I
thought
it
was
pertinent
to
showing
it
within
the
presentation.
F
F
F
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
and
the
existing
and
proposed
building
coverage
is
existing
a
little
over
a
thousand
square
feet,,
and
the
proposed
is
a
little
over
1,700
square
feet..
The
maximum
coverage
for
the
lot
is
2450,,
so
proposed.
Building
coverage
is
below
the
maximum
allowed
for
the
site
and
existing
and
proposed
floor
area,,
including
the
addition.
F
F
F
Robbie
wyler,,
cofb:
and
then
side,
yard,
wall
articulation
and
side.
Yard,
bulk,
plane
are
not
impacted
due
to
the
design
and
scope
of
the
work..
All
of
this
would
be
there,
or
will
be
verified
at
time
of
building
permit.
and
that
said,
there
actually
is
an
active
building.
permit
in
the
hopper
right
now..
It
has
gone
through
one
round
of
review,,
which
I
believe,
is
where
this
issue
was
presented
and
the
home
was
built.
Circa,
1963.
F
F
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:,
rather
than
which
is
typical
for
the
board.,
so
with
that
staff
to
look
into,
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
read
through
the
3
a,
b
and
c.
since
this
is
new
for
the
board.
3,
a.
states.
The
volume
of
that
part
of
the
lot
in
which
the
buildings
may
be
built
consistent
with
this
code
has
been
reduced
substantially
as
a
result
of
the
provisions
of
solar
access,
9,
17,
3
b
is
the
proposed
building
or
object
would
not
interfere
with
the
basic.
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:,
solar
access
protection,
provided,
and
section
9,,
9,
17,
solar
access.,
and
then
we
have
3
c,,
which
is
the
volume
of
the
proposed
building
to
be
built
outside
of
the
building.
setback.
Lines
for
the
lot
will
not
exceed
the
amount
by
which
the
buildable
volume
has
been
reduced..
As
a
result
of
the
provisions
of
9,,
9,
17,.
F
F
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:,
5
c
is,
would
be
the
minimum
variance
to
afford
a
relief,,
and
it
would
be
the
least
modification
of
the
provisions
of
this
title
with
that.
The
specific
design
in
front
of
you
tonight
was
designed
to
meet
the
solar
access
regulations
and
respect
the
properties
to
the
north
and
the
east.
F
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:,
so
I
will
leave
it
at
that..
I
can
go
over
any
other
things
in
terms
of
which
criteria
the
board
is
considering,
or
any
of
the
details
within
the
application.
If
needed,
and
I
believe
we
also
have
representatives
of
the
application
here
as
well,,
so
I
will
leave
it
at
that
and
hand
it
back
over
to
you,.
Madam
chair.
F
F
G
G
A
B
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
H
D
H
H
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
E
F
E
D
D
A
A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lynn,
segal:
efficiencies
that
are
being
approved.
a
and
given
parking,
restriction,,
lifting,,
parking,
restrictions,,
giving
building
height..
These
are
subsidies,,
I
don't
think
should
be
done
because
people
are
still
moving
around
and
people,,
especially
when
they
have
that
smaller
place..
When
you
have
a
bigger
place,,
you
can
potentially
have
more
communal,
household,,
more
people
using
less,
you
know,,
faucets
and
infrastructure.
drywall..
All
of
that.
I
B
A
A
E
C
C
C
A
A
G
G
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
F
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
no,
the
application
deadline
for
the
september
twelfth
meeting
isn't
until
next
week..
This
is
one
of
those
cases
where
the
meeting
comes
before
the
next
deadline..
So
next
week
I
will
provide
an
update.
as
to
that
september.
Twelfth
meeting,
and
I
do
know
we
are
anticipating
at
least
one
the
item
that
was
postponed.