►
From YouTube: 9-11-23 Cannabis Licensing Advisory Board Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
B
B
B
B
Cob,
kristen
teague:,
obscenity,,
racial
epithets,
and
other
speech
and
behaviour
that
disrupts
or
otherwise
impedes
the
ability
to
conduct
the
meeting
are
prohibited..
Participants
are
required
to
sign
up
to
speak,
using
the
name.
They
are
commonly
known.
By,
and
individuals
must
display
their
whole
name
before
being
allowed
to
speak
online.
B
B
A
A
A
A
F
F
F
G
A
B
H
H
H
H
A
A
A
I
Clab,
kate,
thomson
(she/her):
from
a
schedule.
one
substance
on
the
control
substance,
act.
our
controlled
substances
to
a
schedule.
3,
and
so
you
know,
it.
ease
up
some
of
the
2280
tax
restrictions
for
canvas
businesses..
I
don't
know
the
implications
that
it
would
have,
for
you,
know,
nonprofit
donations.,
but
obviously,.
If
you
are
able
to
make
exceptions
and
using,
you
know,
2,
80
exemptions.,
then.
I
Clab,
kate,
thomson,
(she/her):
obviously,,
there
will
be
more
benefits
to
those
businesses
to
be
able
to
provide
to
nonprofits..
So
the
assumption
is
probably
yes.
but
again,.
That
is
just
a
recommendation
from
the
first
kind
of
organization.
That's
come
out
and
said:
something.
we,,
you
know,
hope
to
hear
something
in
the,
in
the,
in
the
coming
months,
from
the
federal
government
about
how
they
may.
wanna
proceed
doesn't
mean
that
we'll
have
an
actual
answer.
I
A
I
I
Clab,
kate
thomson,
(she/her):
ii,
mean,
ii,
would
be
speculating
with
the
hundreds
and
thousands
of
other
people
that
are
writing
articles
about
which
way
it
would
go,
and
and
what
it
would
mean,
and
what
it
could
mean.
and
what
will
the
fda
fda
do?
and
what
will
the
da
do?
and
what
will
this?
not??
I
mean,
it's.
I
Clab,,
kate,
thomson,
(she/her):
yeah.,
my
opinion
would
just
be
that
his
opinion?,
so
I
mean,,
I
think
it's
definitely
interesting.
and
worth
kind
of
checking
out
some
articles.
there's
some
good
ones
out
there.
That
kind
of
show
that
the
pros
and
cons
of,
you
know,
rescheduling
versus
descheduling.
I
A
A
I
A
F
A
B
J
J
D
J
J
F
F
F
F
A
Clab,
evan,
anderson:,
yeah.,
think
think
of
the
the
underage
kid
asks,
the
guy
to
go
into
the
liquor
store
and
buy
him
a
beer,,
and
then
he
hangs
out
off
camera
in
the
back
of
the
parking
lot
and
walks
out
outside
that.
That's
been
an
issue.
Forever.
we've
had
many,
many
incidents
of
catching
people
doing
that.,
but
it's
it's
really,
really
difficult
to
completely
eliminate.
so,.
Knowing
that
the
city
police
is
aware
of
that
and.
F
Clab,
evan
anderson:
keeping
eyes
outside.,
I
mean,
we
can't
afford
to
staff
people
to
hang
out
outside
and
standing
staring
at
cameras
outside
is
practically
impossible.,
so
we
identify
we
ban
people
for
life.,
but
the
truth
is,,
it's
impossible
to
truly
eliminate
that..
So
if
you
guys
are
doing
it,
and
you're
being
successful
with
it.,
that's
great
to
hear.
thank
you.
A
A
J
J
J
J
D
Clab,
robin
noble:-
I
guess
this
is
kind
of
a
question
for
both
pam
and
you,
evan,,
because
we've
seen
these
really
drastic
reductions
in
medical
cards
for
people
between
the
ages
of
18
and
21,,
because
those
requirements
were
increased
so
much
by
that
2021
legislation..
And
what
I'm
wondering
is,.
Are
you
seeing
more?.
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
Clab,
evan
anderson:
and
identify
the
micro
print
that's
wrong
on
this.,
but
that
is
something
that's
a
couple
of
minute.
Process,
and,
what's
generally
giving
it
away,
is
used
to
be
you?.
Somebody
handed
you
a
fake
illinois
id..
You
could
feel
it
and
know
in
2
s
that
it
wasn't
real.,
but
that's
not
the
case
anymore..
They
are
much,
much
more
difficult
to
identify
now..
So
it's.
F
Clab,
evan
anderson:.
We
had
a
big
stretch
of
time
where
it
was
readily
accessible,
and
there
was
a
lot
of
programs
being
advertised,,
since
businesses
were
able
to
capture
them
a
little
bit
more
easily.,
but
that's
reduced
a
little
bit,.
But
I
think
it's
still
it's
something
we
need
to
be
promoting
to
all
of
our
dispensaries,,
because
if
we're
seeing
reductions
in
total
confiscations.
F
A
A
J
J
J
B
B
G
G
G
A
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
Cob,
andy
frohardt:,
following
the
city's
receipt
of
complete
application
and
all
required
application,
materials,
the
applicant
receiving
all
permits
and
initial
city
approvals
and
all
inspections
perform..
So
we
struck
that
because
I
think
the
staff
wanted
the
ability
to
perform
inspections
to
verify
certain
information
is
correct.
G
K
K
K
Cob,
kristen
changaris:
staff
resources
going
out
and
doing
these
inspections
if
license
is
going
to
be
denied
at
hearing..
So
that's
why
we
recommended
removing
that
section,
perform
the
inspections
after
the
hearing,,
which
is
also
consistent
with
the
way
we
do,
inspections
for
the
beverage,
licensing
authority
for
new
with
the
licenses
as
well.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
Cob,
andy
frohardt:
good
point
was
essentially
just
asking,.
How
often
does
the
pla
chair
determine
that
someone's
testimony
is
not
material,
relevant,
or
competent?
besides,,
the
majority
overruling
the
chair,?
Is
there
any
remedy
for
a
board
member
if
they
believe
the
chair
was
wrong
and
keeping
someone
from
testifying.
G
G
G
G
Cob,
andy
frohardt:,
just
allowing
it
to
come
in
considering
it,
and
if
it's
something
that
you
think
is
well,,
it's
hearsay,,
you
know.
she's,
saying
what
this
person
told
them,
and
we
haven't
had
an
opportunity
to
this
person..
That's
all
fine!
That
all
goes
to
the
weight
of
the
evidence..
You
know,.
If
it's
some
document
that
you're
questioning.
G
Cob,
andy
frohardt:.
I
don't
want
to
completely
foreclose
that..
We
would,
you
know.,
restrict
evidence
in
some
fashion,,
but
but
I
would
just
encourage
the
cloud
to
just
let
it
let
let
it
come
in
as
evidence,
and
have
a
discussion
as
to
how
probative
and
how
much
weight
you
give
that
specific
evidence,,
whether
it's
somebody
testifying.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
A
G
G
G
K
Cob,
kristen
changaris:,
so
members
will
have
the
opportunity
to
review
those
prior
to
hearing,
and
then
for
vla.
in
the
hearing
itself,,
the
applicant
has
an
opportunity
to
present
present
their
application,
share
any
details.
they
that
they
that
they
think
the
board
should
take
into
consideration
and
staff
is
typically
just
available
to
answer
any
questions
and
just
kind
of
support
through
their
process.
but
typically
doesn't
present
any.
A
K
K
K
Cob,
kristen
changaris:
there
will
be
a
public
notice,
poster
posted
on
the
license
premises
prior
to
the
hearing,
and
then,
as
part
of
the
neighborhood
responsibility.
Plan,,
the
applicant
will
be
doing
outreach
and
alerting
neighbors
to
the
fact
that
there's
public
hearing
as
well.
so
there's
there's
a
very
good
chance
that
you'll
hear
from
neighbors
during
the
public
hearing,
and
that's
all
part
of
the
process.
G
D
D
G
G
G
K
I
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
D
D
K
Cob,
kristen
changaris:
sure,,
so
cob,
kristen
changaris:
any
license
violations
or
compliance
issues.
Any
kind
of
enforcement
actions
would
be
continued
to
be
handled
administratively
by
staff.,
so
right,
now,
we
handle
those
administratively..
We
issue
notices
the
violation..
We
issue
fines
and
penalties
when
needed,
and.
K
D
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
I
Clab,
kate
thomson,
(she/her):
yeah,,
I
guess.
the
question
was,.
I
watched
the
you
know,
like,,
listen
to
the
audio
from
the
october
vla
meeting
and
you
know
they
went
through
like
a
motion
right,
emotion
to
approve
or
deny..
Does
this
mean
that
this
comes
that
we
don't
do
that
in
in
our
hearing.
and
this
decision
comes
after.
or
this
is
just,.
This
is
this.
Is
the.
G
G
G
G
G
K
K
K
K
G
G
G
G
G
K
A
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
A
G
Cob,
andy
frohardt:
ii,
don't
know
that
you
need
to
cob,
andy
frohardt:
to
go
there,,
but
I
think
it's
ii
would
suggest
you
all
do
the
reverse,
where,.
If
there
are
3
consecutive,
regularly
scheduled
meetings
where
somebody
does
not
attend.
that
the
board
have
that
discussion,
whether
their
absence
was
approved,
and
maybe.
G
G
I
I
I
I
I
A
Clab,
robin
noble:
thanks.,
I
mean,,
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
you
say.
Andy
is
is,
if
you're,
if
you're
on
this
board,
you're
taking
on
a
stepped
up,
responsibility.,
there's
people
who
are
running
businesses,,
who
are
spending
money,,
time,
staff,
resources,,
hopes,
etc.,,
and
there
needs
to
be
some
reasonable
assurance
that
there'll
be
a
quorum.
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
B
B
A
K
K
K
K
Cob,
kristen
changaris:
number
2,.
We
we
would
give
us
some
time
to
do
some
training
before
we
transition
to
quasi-judicial
in
january.
and
then
number
3..
We've
spoken
to
the
cannabis
inspection,
team,
and
they've
confirmed
that
they
are
available
to
attend
that
meeting
and
provide
a
presentation
on
inspections
and
answer
any
questions
about
that
process..
So
it
just
seems
like,
at
least
from
a
staff
perspective.,
that's
a
really
good
opportunity
to
schedule
the
retreat..
So
I
just
wanted
to
put
out
that
proposal
and
then
open
it
up
to
the
board
for
discussion.
K
I
A
I
I
A
K
K
G
L
L
L
I
Clab,
kate
thomson,
(she/her):
thanks,
tom.,
appreciate
that.
well,.
I
guess
there
was.
I've
looked
through.
You
know,,
obviously
haven't
been
at
the
last
couple
of
meetings..
I
apologize
for,
and
there
was
a
conversation
about
hybrid
meetings
like
this
is
this
is
a
retreat..
This
feels
very
different
to
me,.
I
I
A
K
K
D
E
A
A
K
K
B
B
B
B
B
A
G
B
B
D
B
B
Cob,
kristen
teague:
do
those
types
of
things,,
but
also
with
us
accessing
items
that
aren't
you
know.
with
that
we
really,
technically
don't
have
access
to,
and
a
paywall
format,.
You
know
that
kind
of
stretches
it
a
little
bit.
andy
might
be
able
to
speak
to
that
a
little
bit
more
than
than
more
articulately
than
I
can.
G
G
G
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clab,
allison
bayley
she/her:
way
that
some
people
might
be
able
to
access.
It,,
though
I
do
think
a
written
summary,
regardless
is
a
really
good
idea,,
because
I
think
it
is
a
lot
that
will
mean
the
bar
of
what
we
send
to
you
is
something
that's
really
important
versus
something
that
we
just
think
is
interesting.
I
D
D
Clab,
robin
noble:
you're
talking
about
a
very
limited
distribution.
yes,.
It
goes
into
the
packet
that
goes
to
the
public.
but,
generally
speaking,
articles
are
shared.,
there's
no
commercial
interest.,
it's
kind
of
a
fair
use,
sort
of
idea
in
my
in
my
mind,
and
if
we
could
do,,
I
like
an
idea
of
a
paragraph
summary
with
an
attachment
of
a
pdf.,
and
I
just
wondered
how
kristen.
G
G
G
G
G
G
E
E
E
E
E
E
B
B
F
F
F
Clab,
evan
anderson:
in
the
case
that
we
do
that.
yes,.
We
have
access
and
copyright
questions,,
but
it
doesn't
impact
the
accessibility
modifications..
The
city
has
to
do
the,
whether
it's
behind
a
pay
wall
or
not,.
It's
still
a
pdf.
that
needs
to
be
made.
Accessible.,
so
ii
recognize
everybody's
argument.
Here..
I
think
the.
F
F
F
F
F
A
A
A
A
G
G
G
G
G
G
F
Clab,
evan
anderson:
oh,,
I'm
sure
I'm
sure
it's
far
more
nuanced
than
I'm
aware,
of.,
I'm
simply
getting
at
the
fact
that
if
it's
from
a
free
source
and
you
print
a
pdf.
and
share
it
versus
being
behind
a
paywall,
and
you
print
a
pdf.
and
share
it.
they're,
both
going
to
implicate
the
same
complexities
that
we
need
to
address
for
accessibility,
issues..
So.
F
E
E
G
Cob,
andy
frohardt:
yeah,
ii,
would.,
just
if
it's,
if
it's
a
communication
between
you.
all
that's
between
3
or
more
bar
board
members.,
it
needs
to
be
public..
So
that's
the
restriction.
We
need
to
be
mindful
of.
and
I
think
what
you
were
giving
up
brian
as
well,.
You
know
we
would
still
announce
it,
or
announce
that
it
was
shared.
or
this
is
the
document
that
was
shared.
G
G
A
B
A
A
I
I
I
Clab,
kate,
thomson,
(she/her):
and
curious
whether
staff
can
plan
on,
or
would
plan
on
doing
any
kind
of
presentation
of
what
those
things
are
either
in,
you
know,
when,
when
they're
done.,
december,
january,
february,
or
a
way
that
we
can
more
formally
discuss
rulemaking
at
the
state
level..
I
know
it's
been
here.
Already,,
it
says,
legislated
rulemaking
and
updates.,
but
just
thinking
about,
you
know,,
either
december
or
january,
is
usually
when
they
come
out
with
new
rules,
and
if
there's
a
process
that
we
can.
I
B
I
Clab,,
kate,
thomson,
(she/her):,
yeah?
or
or
have
you
know
the
med
do?
you
know,,
we've
had
them
come
before?
just
to
give
a
summary
of
what
the
changes
were.
just
wanna
put
it
on
the
radar
right
that
this
is
the
time
year
that
happens.
it'd
be
better
if
they
could
do
it.,
obviously,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say,
like,.
This
is
the
time
that
that
happens,
and
and
when
we
could
put
it
on
an
agenda,
would
be
great.
E
E
G
G
E
G
B
K
cob,
kristen
changaris:,
that
we've
been
kind
of
following
at
the
staff
level,
is
the
state
rule
making
the
state
will
begin
their
role,
making
session
and
the
beginning
of
next
year,
and
their
plan
is
to
have
the
state
rules
finalized
by
may..
So
I'm
not
expecting
any
new
information,,
probably
at
least
for
the
licensing
team
until
the
state
finalizes
those
rules.
and
we
get
a
better,
a
better
sense
of
what
the
state
licensing
program
is
going
to
look
like.
E
G
G
G
G
E
E
E
E
E
A
E
C
A
A
D
A
Clab,
tom
kunstman:
okay.
clab,
robin
noble:,
the
one,
the
impairment
experts
bullet
at
the
top,,
and
I
wondered
if
allison
had
anything
from
the
the
report
that
you
attached
was
was
really
long
and
detailed..
Was
there
an
idea,
or
a
a
speaker,
or
a
conversation
that
you
thought
might
come
out
of?
That?
allison?.
I
I
I
Clab,
kate,
thomson
(she/her):.
I
know
that
in
the
ble
and
and
kristen
you
kinda
mentioned
this,
too,,
but
there's
like
a
an
andy,.
Do
you
do?
well,
the
hearing
procedures
outline,
and
the
preliminary
findings,
report
and
report
those
things.?
I
mean,
obviously,
we're
we're
getting
the
the
rules
of
procedure
kind
of
finalized
in
the
next
month
or
so.,
but
obviously
those
things
would
be
things
that
we.