►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 8-24-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
D
F
D
Thank
you
very
much
alicia.
We
have
one
item
to
add
to
the
agenda
tonight
that
is,
item
2b,
which
is
consideration
of
a
motion
to
authorize
nuria
the
city
manager,
to
execute
documents
on
behalf
of
the
city,
to
accept
financial
assistance
for
the
boulder
airport
through
the
federal
airport
coronavirus
response
grant
program.
H
J
K
Thank
you
very
much,
so
the
item
before
you
tonight
is
for
a
thirteen
thousand
dollar
grant
from
the
faa
through
the
covid
program,
and
you
know
you
have
all
that
there
in
front
of
you
from
a
series
of
unfortunate
events,
so
the
first
of
which
that
we
had
some
changes
in
the
airport
manager
position
and
then
with
whenever
the
faa
sent
it
on
to
nuria.
K
Having
a
long
name
myself.
I
understand
when
people
don't
get
it
to
you
the
right
way.
So
it's
they
didn't
get
the
request
to
us
in
enough
time
for
us
to
put
on
an
earlier
agenda,
and
so
that's
why
there's
the
expedited
needs.
So
it's
13
or
13
000
that
can
be
spent
toward
various
operational
improvements
or
debt
service,
and
you
know
a
couple
of
other
things,
but
not
capital
to
support
code
response
for
the
airport,
and
so
we
would
very
much
appreciate
council
supporting
that
request.
K
There's
a
deadline
for
that
and
the
deadline
is
this
thursday
and
since
we're
at
tuesday
we're
trying
to
seize
this
opportunity.
I
K
D
Thank
you,
aaron,
and
with
that
I
think
we
are
on
to
the
consent
agenda.
We
have
two
items
on
the
consent
agenda,
setting
the
order
of
the
ballot
measures
for
the
2021
election
and
the
item
that
we
just
spoke
about.
So
I
would
entertain
motion
on
the
consent
agenda.
L
D
D
Great,
seeing
no
objections,
the
consent
agenda
passes
unanimously
and
with
that
we're
at
the
end
of
the
meeting,
and
I
will
adjourn
the
meeting
and
then
I
will
turn
the
study
session
over
to
rachel.
L
Thanks
sam,
that
feels
like
a
record
speed
record
for
a
meeting,
so
that
was
delightful,
I'll,
try
and
match
it.
With
the
study
session
here-
and
I
am
chairing
part
two
of
tonight's
meeting,
which
is
the
tuesday
august
24
2021
study
session
of
the
boulder
city
council,
which
we
are
officially
calling
to
order
now,
alicia,
can
you
confirm?
Do
we
need
a
new
roll
call
or
confirming
quorum.
L
Awesome
thank
you.
Tonight
we
will
be
discussing
two
items.
First
will
be
arpa
funds
and
second
will
be
an
update
on
an
opioid
settlement.
But
first
we
have
two
announcements.
Do
we
have
slides
ready
for
those?
Yes,
we
do
awesome
so
announcement,
one
number
one
for
covid,
19
vaccinations.
We
encourage
you
all
to
get
them
for
more
local
information
on
getting
your
vaccine
and
to
sign
up
for
notifications.
You
can
go
to
the
website
that
is
listed
on
the
screen
in
such
fine
print
that
I'm
not
sure
I
can
read
it.
L
Let's
see
boulder
www.bouldercounty.org,
slash
families,
slash
disease,
slash
covet,
hyphen,
hyphen,
19
vaccines.
Slash
again,
please
get
your
coveted
vaccinations.
Second
announcement.
We
are
still
recruiting
for
our
2021
mid-year
boards
and
commissions.
We
are
looking
for
volunteers
to
serve
on
the
following
boards.
Thank
you
for
the
new
slide
and
commissions
with
current
vacancies.
L
Please
visit
boulder
colorado.gov
government,
slash
boards
dash
and
dash
commissions
all
right
and
with
that
we
are
going
to
move
on
to
our
discussion
items
we'll
turn
the
meeting
over
to
our
city
manager,
nuria
rivera
vandermaid
to
kick
off
the
staff
presentations
for
arpa
thanks
maria
thank.
J
You
rachel-
and
it
is
that
very
last
name
that
I
think
tripped
up
the
faa
when
they
sent
me
an
email
and
got
it
wrong.
So
today
we're
going
to
be
discussing
arpa,
funding,
use
and
I'll
say
that
we've
got
tremendous
staff
who
often
step
in
when
we
have
complex
cross-departmental
projects
and
the
use
of
such
funding.
J
And
what
we're
going
to
do
it
either
now
or
in
the
future,
is
something
that
we
wanted
to
engage
a
variety
of
staff
members
on
so
you'll
be
hearing
from
mark
wolfe
from
community
vitality,
who
graciously
accepted
this
assignment
to
sort
of
lead.
That
team,
as
we
move
forward
and
cara
skinner
in
finance
who's
been
assisting
as
we
look
at
that
as
well.
A
variety
of
folks
from
the
department
have
been
really
involved,
but
with
that
I
will
shift
it
on
over
to
mark
and
cara.
B
Great
I'm
going
to
share
my
presentation
here
car
and
get
you
going
just
one
second,.
M
Okay,
well,
thank
you,
comfortable
cara,
skinner
assistant,
director
of
finance,
and
while
he
gets
this
in
presentation
mode,
I
will
just
get
kicking
us
off.
This
is,
I
guess
I
thought
for
the
next
slide.
But
can
you
go
to
the
next
slide?
Mark
thanks?
M
This
is
our
agenda
for
this
evening.
I'm
going
to
do
a
quick
high-level
review
of
how
services
have
been
impacted
by
public
health
orders
and
our
budget
reductions
and
then
I'll,
provide
a
revenue,
update
and
an
overview
of
service
restorations
and
the
special
adjustment
to
base,
and
then,
as
nuria
noted
mark,
will
lead
the
discussion
on
the
arpa
funding
next
slide.
M
So
the
set
context
for
service
restorations
and
the
special
atv,
and
particularly
our
arpa
discussion.
We
wanted
to
do
a
high
level
review
of
how
services
have
been
impacted
since
march
of
2020
and
as
you
know,
we
eliminated
many
positions
and
held
many
others
vacant
and
as
a
result
that
did
impact
our
service
levels
across
the
organization.
M
M
We
also
at
the
same
time,
did
enhance
our
online
services
and
in
some
instances
we
did
provide
home
delivery
services
and
and
below
are
some
examples.
M
We
also
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
as
a
result
of
budget
reductions,
we
did
reduce
maintenance
across
the
organization,
facilities
parks
and
then,
of
course,
also
our
open
space
in
mountain
parks,
which
are
not
mentioned
there.
So
that's
just
sort
of
big
picture
of
the
impacts
and
then
next
slide.
M
M
This
chart
actually
has
a
couple
editions.
However,
you'll
notice,
the
first
numbers
column,
we
did
add
2019
figures
for
all
the
sales
and
use
tax
categories
and
then
the
very
last
column
we
calculated
what
the
compound
annual
growth
rate
would
be
from
from
2019
to
2021,
and
we
thought
that
was
important.
M
We
heard
that
from
a
number
of
council
members
and
we've
been
sort
of
speaking
to
the
difference
between
2019
and
2021
in
the
report,
but
we
thought
it
was
important
to
actually
share
the
numbers
here
and
the
reason
it
is
important,
as
you
all
can
see
is
2020
was
very
anomalous.
M
You
know
revenue
did
sort
of
sharply
decline,
particularly
after
march
through
april
may
june
july,
and
then
it
started
bouncing
back
a
bit
toward
this
latter
half
of
the
year,
but
it
really
was
anomalous,
and
so
we
want
to
start
actually
comparing
or
seeing
how
our
revenue
looks
when
compared
to
2019..
M
M
Overall
revenue
is
up
almost
20
when
compared
to
20,
again
not
surprising
since
it
was,
it
had
had
that
sharp
decline
in
2020,
but
3.5
compound
annual
growth
when
compared
to
2019.
and
next
slide.
M
N
M
This
again
is
just
sort
of
a
visual,
so
you
can
see
how
we
were
moving
up
from
2018
to
2019,
and
then
we
had
that
sharp
drop
in
2020
and
then
in
2021.
We
have
come
back
to
a
level
above
the
2019..
M
We
did
add
this
yellow
line
and
I'll
explain
what
that
is.
The
55.9
million
or
the
the
the
figure
that
is
attributed
to
the
blue
line
in
2021
includes
revenue
that
we
received
in
2021,
really
because
council
approved
to
the
marketplace:
facilitator
ordinance
last
fall,
which
required
marketplace
facilitators
to
begin
collecting
and
remitting
sales
tax
revenue
to
us
marketplace
facilitators.
M
The
best
explanation
is
it
am
if
you
buy
on
amazon,
if
you
buy
from
an
amazon
company,
they
were
already
remitting,
but
when
they
were
when
you
were
making
purchases
from
amazon
from
one
of
their
marketplaces,
so
it
was
not
an
amazon
owned
company.
They
were
not
collecting
and
remitting
until
last
fall,
and
so
that
was
a
significant
change.
So
the
yellow
line
shows
what
our
revenue
would
have
been
had.
We
not
had
that
marketplace,
facilitator
ordinance
in
place,
so
sort
of
that's.
M
This
slide
is
just
sort
of
to
convey
that
use.
Tax
is
very
volatile.
This
is
total
use
tax
and
each
line
represents
a
year
and
then
it's
the
different
months.
So
what
this
is
trying
to
show-
and
it's
pretty
wonky,
but
is
that
it
really
bounces
around
month
to
month,
and
so
you
can
have
very
strong
month
one
month
and
then
it
can
fall
off
the
next
month.
M
We've
had
three
very
strong
use
tax
months
so
far
this
year,
but
you
know
we
don't
know
what
is
going
to
happen
in
the
last
six
months
of
the
year.
A
for
example,
is
construction.
Use.
Tax
has
had
four
very
strong
months
already
one
as
high
as
1.9
million
dollars,
but
june
was
only
500
000,
so
it
can.
It
can
vary
significantly
next
slide.
M
This
table
is
now
moving
from
sales
and
use
tax
to
the
general
fund
revenue.
M
So
this
is
is
talking
about
our
general
fund
revenue
forecast
for
2021.,
we
again
added
2019,
actual
revenue
in
that
first
column,
and
we'll
also
just
note
that
the
previous
slides
were
sales
and
use
tax
across
all
funds,
and
there
are
other
funds
that
our
sales
and
use
tax
supported
besides
the
general
fund.
So
this
is
now
the
shift
to
the
general
fund.
M
So
that
is
good
news
and
you'll
see
from
the
first
line
that
a
lot
of
that
relates
to
retail
sales
tax
and
then
the
second
line.
It
also
relates
to
use
tax.
We
did
add
property
tax
line
here,
even
though
there
is
no
change
from
the
revised
revenue
projection
from
the
approved
revenue
budget.
But
we
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
you
know
the
housing
market
has
been
in
the
news,
a
lot
and
the
increase
in
property
values,
and
we
just
wanted
to
reiterate
that
that
does
not
impact
this
budget
year.
M
and
then
all
other
revenue
is
also
forecast
to
increase
over
budget.
Some
of
the
revenue
sources
that
are
in
are
trending
higher
our
accommodations
tax
and
some
parking
revenue,
so
total
is
up
about
10.1
million
or
6.9
percent,
and
then
we
just
also
wanted
to
capture
that
we
have
already
appropriated
some
additional
revenue
earlier
in
the
year,
the
advance
to
the
eviction,
prevention
and
rental
assistance
services
program
and
then
in
atb-1
we
did
appropriate
3.5
million
from
new
revenue
for
a
variety
of
needs.
M
M
It
does
include
some
funding
to
start
restoring
services
and,
importantly,
to
restore
positions
and
hiring
staff
so
that
we
have
the
capacity
to
restore
those
services,
and
here
are
some
examples:
library,
services,
support
for
arts
programs
and
cultural
grants,
recreation
services,
forestry
park,
maintenance
and
then
staffing
to
support
the
reopening
of
the
pennsylvania.
The
third
municipal
building,
as
well
as
age,
weld
programs.
M
This
slide
is
really
just
intended
to
give
a
very
high
level
preview
of
further
service
restorations
that
you'll
see
when
we
release
the
budget
next
week
and
present
that
budget
to
you
later
in
september.
M
A
main
focus
of
the
2022
budget
is
restoring
services
and
again
that
is
the
staff
to
support
those
services,
restoring
some
specific
program
funding,
and
we
also
wanted
to
highlight
restoring
maintenance
activities
again
across
the
city,
particularly
open
space
and
mountain
parks,
transportation
parks
and
the
urban
forest.
M
M
M
Next
slide
next,
this
was
also
described
in
your
memo.
Staff
is
recommending
that
we
make
a
one-time
restorative
payment
to
current
employees
who
took
the
2020
extended
holiday
furlough
days
and
that
restorative
payment
could
be
equivalent
to
up
to
six
days
if
they
in
fact
took
the
six
furlough
days.
M
The
total
cost
of
this
payment
would
be
1.5
million
dollars,
and
that
would
be
attributed
to
the
co
to
the
funds
where
the
employee
is
budgeted
or
funded,
and
of
that
the
general
fund
would
have
a
cost
of
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
the
other
funds
together.
The
cost
would
be
eight
hundred
thousand.
M
It
is
across
22
funds,
and
the
payments
would
range
quite
widely
for
those
other
funds,
depending
on
how
many
employees
are
impacted.
M
M
M
P
Thanks
car,
that
was
real
helpful.
I
know
that
was
a
bit
of
a
preview
for
the
adjustment
to
base
and
the
budget
which
we're
going
to
see
next
week
and
talk
about
next
month.
Just
as
part
of
that
preview,
could
you
remind
us
all?
I
know
that
before
coven
we
were
kind
of
moving
our
reserves.
Our
general
fund
reserves
up
about
a
point
a
year.
I
think
jane
had
a
goal
of
trying
to
get
them
up
to
about
20
percent.
I
think
we
were
on
the
cusp
of
getting
to
20.
P
M
Sure
so
we
did
in
2020
have
to
draw
from
fund
balance,
and
that
draw
was
nearly
10
million
dollars.
So
our
expenditures
did
exceed
our
revenue
by
10
million
dollars
in
2020.,
but
we
did
have
some
fund
balance
in
excess
of
reserves
in
in
20
before
that.
So
we
we
mostly
drew
down
that
that
fund
balance
in
excess
of
reserves,
and
so
the
emergency
reserves
balance
was
able
to
be
maintained
at
close
to
the
19.5
percent
level,
and
that
is
also
the
intention
for
2022.
G
It
is
just
a
couple
of
short
questions.
The
year-to-date
statistics
is
is
that
through
may
june
or
july.
G
And
I
guess
my
second
question
is
the
year-to-date
numbers
look
very
good
as
we
project
out
for
the
year,
do
we
see
any
impact
on
economic
activity
from
the
delta
variant.
M
So
you
will
notice
that
the
slide
that
showed
the
end-of-year
revenue
forecasts
that
we
we
are
being
more
cautious
in
our
end-of-year
revenue
forecasts.
Then
the
year-to-date
through
june
numbers
would
show-
and
I
think
that
that
does
give
us
some
sort
of
room
for
this
potential
adverse
impact
from
the
delta
variant.
M
M
Lastly,
just
well.
G
Not
lastly,
but
an
odder
question
did
I
correctly
see
on
the
use
tax
slide
that
revenues
were
higher
in
2020
than
2021?
Is
that.
M
That's
it
that
is
correct,
and
that
is,
I
think,
as
we
discussed
back
at
the
in
april,
the
financial
update
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
did
not
have
to
draw
down
fund
balance
and
reserves
as
much
as
we
thought
we
would
is
because
those
youth
taxes
came
in
quite
strong
unexpectedly
in
2020,
and
we
budget
very
conservatively
for
use
tax
because
they're
so
volatile,
and
so
we
budget
a
base
amount
and
whenever
that
use
tax
comes
in
above
that
base,
then
that's
sort
of
one-time
revenue
that
could
be
used
for
other
things,
but
so
in
essence,
the
use
tax
revenue
coming
in
so
strong
last
year,
sort
of
replenished
our
reserves
sort
of
real
time
in
the
sense
that
we
did
not
have
to
draw
as
much
as
we
thought.
G
I'll
have
to
look
at
it
again.
Thank
you.
I
Cara
does
a
great
presentation
with
a
lot
of
good
news
in
it,
so
it's
really
wonderful
to
see
our
finances
coming
back
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
you
know
making
all
those
employee
payments
and
their
salaries
as
as
well
as
restoring
a
lot
of
service
cuts
for
city
services.
There's
one
I
wanted
to
ask
about.
I
In
particular,
you
know:
we've
been
hearing
a
fair
amount
from
the
community
about
delays
and
permitting
for
the
planning
development
services,
and
I
believe
I
saw
an
intention
to
hire
some
additional
folks
back
into
that
department
as
part
of
the
the
adjustment
to
base
that's
coming
up.
I
just
want
to
hear:
will
that
get
us
more
or
less
back
to
our
previous
baseline
and
and
allow
us
to
really
substantially
reduce
those
those
delays
in
the
permanent
department.
M
I
would
love
to
have
someone
there's
jacob.
I
figure
we.
O
Well,
thank
you
aaron,
and
the
answer
is
that
it
will
not
fully
restore
the
staffing
levels
or
the
service
levels
to
the
pre-pandemic
numbers,
but
it
will
get
us
about
75
of
the
way
there
we
put
in
a
slate
of
requests
for
13,
individual
staff
members,
and
it
will
significantly
help
us
to
restore
our
service
levels.
O
It
does
not
get
us
back
to
pre-pandemic
levels,
but
it's
pretty
significant,
and
I
will
also
add
that
in
making
this
request,
we
examined
every
single
position
that
we
requested
in
light
of
restoring
our
service
levels
to
the
pre-pandemic
state.
That
was
the
specific
purpose
behind
every
request
that
we
made.
So
we
think
that
we're
going
to
get
the
most
bang
for
the
buck
that
we
possibly
can
from
from
the
individual
positions
that
we've
asked
for.
I
Appreciate
that
jacob-
and
so
it's
great
to
hear
that
we'll
be
making
significant
progress
on
that
and
hopefully,
if
our
revenue
numbers
hold
up
in
the
way
that
they're
trending,
we
can
get
all
the
way
back
to
that
pre-pandemic
service
level
before
too
much
longer.
I
F
Yeah,
I'm
just
gonna,
follow
up
to
aaron's
question
real
quick.
I
recall
before
the
pandemic,
we
were
trying
to
get
planning
and
development
services
to
be
more
streamlined
and
efficient
and
do
more
work
with
less
people.
I
seem
to
remember
that
being
a
big
push,
so
are
we
just
talking
strictly
service
level?
Are
we
actually
trying
to
eventually
get
back
to
the
same
amount
of
people,
even
though
one
of
the
goals
was
to
have
fewer
people
overall.
J
Jacob
before
you
answer,
can
I
just
say
that
preface
the
answer
to
that
is
for
the
exercise
that
we
did
with
budget
this
year
was
precisely
that
adam
to
to
ask
folks
really
to
think
about
what
did
you
do
and
what
are
those
efficiencies
that
happened
because
of
covet?
J
A
lot
of
things
went
digital
so
that
when
we
come
back,
we're
not
just
really
trying
to
get
to
that
number
of
free
pandemic,
but
really
to
the
efficiencies
that
we
want,
and
I
want
to
just
say
all
department
heads
were
thoughtful
and
really
thinking
about
that
exercise
as
we
move
forward.
So
some
adjustments
were
made
in
that
direction,
but
it
was
really
about.
Let's
take
what
we
learned
and
how
we
have
adjusted
services
already
and
with
that
jacob
I'll.
Let
you
continue.
O
Thank
you,
that's
exactly
correct,
and
I
would
just
in
addition
to
that
would
add.
If
you
recall
there
was
an
outside
consultant
retained,
tipton,
who
issued
a
report
and
among
the
report
among
the
items
that
were
highlighted
in
that
in
that
report,
were
the
complexity
of
our
regulatory
landscape
and
the
the
challenge
that
applicants
have
when
applying
to
pnds
for
predictability,
for
clarity
among
our
regulations,
in
addition
to
challenges
that
the
staff
had
among
psychological
safety
internally
and
externally,
and
also
understanding
their
own
roles.
O
So
that
report,
the
tifton
report,
since
it
when
it
was
issued,
has
been
turned
into
a
whole
series
of
projects
that
we
have
been
working
on
internally,
that
have
rolled
out
the
solutions
to
many
of
the
challenges
that
were
articulated
in
that
report
and
to
be
very
clear
about
it.
Doing
more
with
fewer
staff
was
never
a
an
aspect
of
that
report.
Nor
was
it
part
of
what
we
were
working
toward
internally.
O
Doing
more
with
fewer
staff
was
was
never
a
recommendation,
so
the
fewer
staff
that
were
handed
to
us
during
the
coveted
budget
cuts
did
impact
our
services
significantly
and
that's
why
we've
asked
for
more
staff,
so
we
want
to
do
is
create
predictability
and
clarity,
but
doing
more
with
fewer
staff
was
never
a
recommendation.
F
My
apologies
for
that
mistake
yeah.
I
I
just
seem
to
remember.
There
was
a
lot
of
efficiency
inefficiencies
that
were
earmarked
in
that
report
and
I
didn't
know
if
that
was
going
to
lead
to
fewer
staff
or
just
better
processes.
So
it
sounds
much
more
like
the
better
processes
is
the
answer
to
that
got
it.
Thank
you.
Jacob.
L
N
Thanks
rachel,
so
how
did
the
one-time
restart
of
payment
address
any
inequities
that
may
have
been
experienced
by
city
employees.
Q
So
when
we
were
looking
at
the
restoration
of
of
pay,
there
were
a
couple
factors:
one
were
what
is
the
average
salary
of
our
various
groups
of
employees
and
our
lowest
wage
earners
tend
to
be
hourly
in
the
bmea
union,
as
well
as
some
non-union
hourly
employees
and
that's
what
we
were
looking
to
address
first
and
foremost,
is
employees
that
took
a
pay
cut
in
2020
as
a
result
of
those
extended
holiday,
furlough
dates,
and
so
those
were
factors
that
went
into
our
decision
decision-making
process
to
ensure
that
we
were
addressing
the
folks
who
had
those
types
of
impacts.
L
Thanks
mary,
I
don't
see
any
more
hands
up
right
now,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
steph.
The
two
questions
we
are
answering
right
now
are:
does
council
have
questions
about
the
revenue
forecast
and
any
questions
about
the
approach
to
service
restorations
that
right,
maybe
cara
with
that
question
and
if
so
I'll
put
out
a
final
request
for
questions.
L
Once
twice,
okay,
any
comments
then,
before
we
move
on.
Thank
you
for
restoring
the
questions
before
we
move
on
to
kind
of
part.
Two
of
this
part
one
of
tonight's
study
session,
any
other
comments
for
the
revenue
forecast
or
service
restorations.
L
I'm
not
seeing
any
hands
okay,
so
I
think
it
will
turn
it
back
to
cara
or
nuria
or
mark.
I
think
we're
turning
it
to
mark
thanks.
B
All
right
thanks
rachel
good
evening
members
of
council,
I'm
excited
to
finally
talk
to
you
about
arpa,
thanks
for
giving
us
some
time
to
bring
back
some
more
specifics
to
give
you
a
sense
of
proposal
on
process
to
address
some
of
our
biggest
community
challenges.
Again.
B
I've
included
a
detailed
summary
of
all
resources
with
within
arpa
in
appendix
a
I
believe
that
begins
on
page
16
of
your
packet
in
the
memo
with
links
to
relevant
programs
if
they
exist,
but
tonight
we're
a
little
bit
more
focused
on
the
state
and
local
fiscal
recovery
funds
I'll
just
refer
to
those
as
our
local
recovery
funds.
Instead
of
trying
with
that
acronym
a
few
notes
here,
local
governments
were
received
over
130
billion
dollars
in
direct
allocation
states
also
received
direct
assistance
within
that
130
billion
for
local
fiscal
recovery.
B
B
We
will
receive
the
funds
in
two
tranches.
One
has
occurred,
so
we
have
half
of
the
funds
already
and
we
will
receive
the
remaining
50
12
months
from
now
so
around
july
august.
2022
is
what
we're
expecting.
B
B
The
important
thing
to
remember
for
eligibility
is
the
tie
back
to
the
recovery
from
covin,
so
individuals,
businesses
that
were
negatively
impacted
by
the
pandemic,
the
allowable
uses
of
funds
are
organized
in
five
specific
categories.
The
first
eligible
category
is
in
support
of
public
health
expenditures.
B
B
I
will
point
out
that
the
categories
generally
do
not
provide
exclusive
examples,
so
we
think
there
is
some
flexibility
there.
As
long
as
we
have
that
tie
back
to
to
covid
related
impact,
we
will
continue
to
monitor
the
guidance
as
it
as
it
changes
and
if
it
impacts
any
of
our
guidance
from
this
evening,
we
certainly
will
pass
that
information
along
and
there
are
a
few
specific
ineligible
uses
I'll
go
into
a
whole
bunch
of
detail.
B
B
Okay
shift
in
gears
a
little
bit
when
we
last
spoke
with
you
all
in
in
june,
we
discussed
some
very
general
funding
categories
and
guiding
principles
to
provide
some
structure
to
the
work.
Since
then,
we
have
formed
a
cross-departmental
staff
team
to
flesh
out
desired
funding
outcomes
and
a
mechanism
to
prioritize
funding,
needs
and
requests.
B
Appendix
c
in
your
memo,
provides
more
information
and
specific
definitions
on
the
desired
funding
outcomes,
or
the
proposed
desired
funding
outcomes
to
quickly
summarize
city,
organizational
and
financial
recovery
refers
to
the
ability
of
the
organization
to
provide
services
to
the
community,
especially
those
most
impacted
by
the
pandemic.
B
As
you
are
aware,
we
have
received
many
requests
or
suggestions
already
as
to
the
use
of
local
recovery
funds.
We
know
that
will
exceed
the
requests
that
come
in
over
the
coming
months
will
exceed
what
we
have
available
so
to
help
with
decision
making.
B
B
Before
we
get
caught
in
the
details
here,
I
want
to
let
council
know
I'll,
be
walking
through
each
of
these
categories
separately,
just
to
provide
a
little
bit
more
information.
But
hopefully
this
bases
you
in
in
our
overall
approach.
Here
we
have
worked
on
several
different
front
fronts
over
the
past
couple
of
months,
including
a
peer
city
review
to
benchmark
our
activities.
B
That
information
is
also
contained
within
the
memo
and
appendix
b
many
cities
are
setting
a
threshold
of
spending
on
immediate
needs
of
anywhere
between
10
and
20
of
the
total
allocation.
We'll
talk
a
bit
about
why
that's
the
case
in
a
moment
for
boulder
we've
identified
approximately
2.1
million.
That's
that
yellow
section
of
immediate
needs
based
on
input
across
the
organization
leveraging
our
existing
relationships
and
engagements,
approximately
868
000
that
small
little
blueish
bar
on
the
top.
B
B
Most
of
our
discussion
this
evening
is
reserved
for
that
big
old,
green
chunk
on
the
left
there
about
15
million
dollars
for
longer
term
investment
needs
and
we'll
talk
about
a
process.
For
that
again,
as
a
reminder,
we
only
have
half
of
our
allocation
now
expect
the
second
half
in
2022
for
a
total
of
the
20.15
million.
B
The
first
category
that's
recommended
for
for
funding
is
gaap
funding
for
service
restorations,
despite
the
longer
period
of
time
and
cara,
spoke
to
this.
It
is
a
one-time
source
of
funds,
and
so
we
really
looked
at
those
areas
that
if
we
did
need
to
restore
service,
it
ideally
is
in
one
time
in
nature.
B
To
that
end,
we've
made
very
limited
recommendations
to
us
to
use
arpa
funds
to
restore
services.
The
largest
need
is
within
the
recreation
activity
fund.
It
is
kind
of
a
catch-22
and
our
friends
for
parks
and
rec
could
certainly
expand
on
this.
B
But
in
order
to
have
revenues
come
in
and
return,
the
service
needs
to
be
there,
so
you
have
to
have
something
to
pay
for,
and
so
we're
kind
of
in
that
period
of
time
where
we
need
to
ramp
up
hire
staff
in
order
to
provide
expanded
hours
and
services
to
help
jump
start
fund,
it
probably
isn't
the
entire
scope
of
the
need,
I
can
say
it
isn't
as
of
the
current
projections,
but
the
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
now
will
certainly
help
us
restore
service,
beginning
in
september
of
this
year
to
make
sure
that
those
services
begin
to
be
available
as
we
get
into
the
the
fall
and
winter
months.
B
Another
recommend
recommended
service.
Restoration
is
for
the
severe
weather,
shelter.
Two
hundred
thousand
dollars
would
maintain
shelter,
bed
space
during
high
demand,
time
periods
and
allow
for
hotel
room
availability
to
replace
bed
space
loss
due
to
social
distance
requirements.
B
Now
I'll
turn
to
talking
a
bit
more
broadly,
about
immediate
needs
in
may
departments
provided
recommended
recommendations
for
the
use
of
arpa
funds
based
on
known
gaps
and
needs
at
that
time.
Additionally,
as
budget
requests
were
made
to
our
internal
executive
budget,
team
departments
indicated
whether
advanced
funding
in
2021,
perhaps
through
arpa,
was
was
needed
or
recommended.
B
And,
lastly,
the
arpa
staff
team
utilizing
our
existing
partnerships
relationships
information
that
we
had
on
hand.
We
reviewed
additional
short-term
needs.
All
of
these
were
put
through
that
prioritization
lens.
If
you
will
and
several
funding
recommendations
were
made
for
the
for
the
short
term
here
for
a
total
of
2.1
million
dollars,
beginning
with
the
top
one,
the
work
to
continue
to
to
bridge
our
digital
divide
in
our
community.
B
As
council's
is
aware,
we
have
made
a
good
progress
on
the
fiber
phase,
one
build-out
across
the
city
as
a
part
of
that
plan,
city
fiber
will
be
brought
adjacent
to
22
bhp
sites.
B
This
funding
would
provide
a
grant
to
bhp
to
make
investment
in
endpoint
infrastructure,
so
essentially
the
the
stuff
within
the
buildings
that
allows
that
internet
the
high-speed
internet
service
to
exist
for
sites
that
are
not
part
of
city
fiber
phase
one.
There
are
ongoing
costs
to
bhp
associated
with
connecting
to
the
private
fiber.
B
The
next
section
is
in
our
small
business,
continued
small
business
and
local
economic
recovery
assistance.
One
proposal
is
to
expand
our
microloan
program.
This
would
be
to
target
those
businesses
that
have
not
had
access
to
traditional
means
of
capital,
expand
and
pilot,
affordable
commercial
programming
for
small
businesses
looking
at
ways
to
reduce
overall
costs
for
businesses.
B
B
The
last
couple
here
are
our
continuation
of
certain
programs
that
we
funded
through
the
cares
act
in
hhs
in
food,
child
care,
health
care
access
and
gap
funding
for
emergency
rental
assistance.
If
that
is
necessary
over
the
next
several
months
and
the
last
one
here
is
in
providing
support
to
accommodate
our
hybrid
work,
so
that
we,
as
as
a
city
organization,
can
continue
to
provide
service
delivery
excellence
in
a
different
model.
B
And
last
for
immediate
needs,
everything
seems
to
change
daily,
as
you
all
know
very
well,
so
we're
recommending
a
an
additional
supplemental
authorization
in
a
couple
areas.
One
is
for
emerging
needs.
So
again,
if
we're
looking
at
capacity
restrictions
or
different
types
of
you
know,
if
our
the
needle
is
is
moving
over
the
next
several
months,
there
may
be
things
that
come
up
that
we
need
to
be
nimble
as
an
organization.
B
If
we
were
to
tap
into
this
amount
of
money.
That
would
be
communicated
very
well
with
council
in
the
community
as
to
why
that
is
and
what
the
need
is
and
then
just
as
we
did
in
the
cares
act,
we
set
aside
some
dollars
for
public
health
needs
if
they
arise.
B
So,
to
go
back
to
the
pie,
chart
that
you
saw
we
have
the
868
for
our
gaap
funding
2.1
for
the
immediate
needs,
as
I've
walked
through
and
the
the
two
reserves
for
the
about
three
million
dollar
expenditure
that
we're
seeking
for
identified
needs
that
reflects
about
seventy
percent
for
community
recovery
activities.
B
B
All
right
now
we're
going
to
talk
about
that
big,
green
bar.
Sorry,
I'm
gonna
turn
on
a
light,
so
I
stopped
looking
orange
in
the
screen.
Thank
you.
So
we
talked
about
about
20
25
of
our
funding.
Now
we'll
talk
about
the
15.1
dollars
that
we're
setting
aside
for
transformative
funding
opportunities,
we
are
seeking
feedback
on
this
process
and
potential
areas
of
focus
for
that
investment.
B
B
So
we
want
to
take
time
to
leverage
those
dollars.
We
want
to
be
ready
for
the
infrastructure
package
at
the
federal
level
took
another
step
forward
today.
So
that's
another
potential
opportunity,
and-
and
given
the
time
period
that
we
have
for
arpa
funds,
which
is
a
different
scale
in
time
than
we
were
dealing
with
under
cares.
B
We're
hoping
that
council
will
devote
some
time
to
providing
us
feedback
on
those
emphasizing
particular
initiatives
that
are
listed
or
pointing
out
those
that
may
be
missing.
This
will
help
guide
our
staff
time
over
the
coming
months
and
in
what
to
prioritize
the
three
areas
of
focus,
public
health
and
safety,
affordability
and
service
access
and
community
and
economic
resiliency
or
sometime
in
that
time
frame
to
discuss
specifics
and
hopefully
approve
some
more
specific
plans.
B
That
is
the
end
this
evening.
We
have
a
whole
bunch
of
staff
here
as
well
to
help
with
some
of
the
specifics,
we'll
do
my
best
to
provide
answers
to
maybe
the
easier
ones
or
more
directly
related
arpa.
The
two
questions
we
have
this
evening
are
related
to
the
process
and
prioritization,
and
I'm
happy
to
pop
up
any
slides
as
necessary,
and
the
second
is
really
about
that
longer
term
planning
and
making
sure
we're
capturing
any
of
those
initiatives
that
are
most
important
to
council.
L
Thanks
so
much
mark,
let's
start
with
just
what
questions
we
might
have.
So
we
have
two
questions
to
answer:
whether
we
support
the
process
and
what
are
the
areas
of
recovery
that
should
be
emphasized
in
medium
and
long
term,
but
before
we
share
the
feedback
there
to
answer
those
questions.
Does
anyone
have
questions
about
mark's
presentation.
G
Up:
okay,
a
couple
of
questions
with
respect
to
the
digital
divide-
I
think
that's
great,
but
aren't
there
parts
of
this
community
that
are
on
the
wrong
side
of
that
digital
divide
other
than
those
that
are
operated
by
bhp.
B
Yes,
you're
absolutely
correct
that
there
are
areas
of
the
city
that
don't
have
that
access.
B
Some
of
those
bhp
sites,
the
19
that
I
mentioned
are
not
a
part
of
fiber
phase,
one
as
well,
and
don't
currently
have
an
option
for
free
high-speed
internet,
so
we're
making
some
progress
in
the
short
term
there,
and
I
think
that
is
one
of
those
areas
mark
that
we'd,
like
council
feedback
on
to
you
know.
If
it
is
one
of
those
top
priorities,
then
absolutely
would
like
to
bring
back
some
strategies
to
address
that
that
divide
in
other
areas
of
the
city
as
well.
G
My
second
question
is
the
gap
funding
for
emergency
rental
assistance.
Are
we
not
receiving
the
the
funds
that
were
to
be
generated
by
the
the
newer
initiative
from
last
year?
I
mean
that
was
supposed
to
generate
about
a
million
and
a
half
million
seven
per
year.
Are
those
funds
not
coming
in.
B
Yeah,
it's
a
good
question
and
I'm
I'm
happy
to
defer
to
any
of
our
colleagues
on
that.
I
believe
it's
a
timing
issue
with
the
rental
assistance
is
that
it's
just
the
lag
of
when
those
dollars
are
available.
We
don't
want
to
be
caught
in
a
situation
where
we
we
do
not
have
funds
available
to
help
folks
if
they
need
it
and.
G
To
follow
up
on
that,
if,
if
this
is
gap,
funding
are
we
intending
to
pay
back
those
funds
from
newer
revenues
so
that
the
money
can
be
recycled
for
other
purposes?.
R
I'm
kristen
heiser
deputy
director
of
housing
and
human
services
and
if
I
could
just
take
a
moment
to
talk
about
the
rental
assistance
that
we're
looking
for
so
you
are
correct,
city
council
is
great
this
year
and
through
a
special
process
of
awarding
us
the
one
million
dollars
plus
to
set
up
the
eviction
prevention
rental
assistance
program.
R
We
have
not
started
to
collect
those
revenues
yet
so
because
the
tax
has
not
been
implemented
yet
so
there
might
be
others
on
the
call
that
maybe
cara
can
cara
can
kind
of
inform
that
piece
of
a
little
bit,
but
we
do
have
those
dollars.
R
It's
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
philosophical
question
for
us,
because
those
are
local
funds
that
we
would
love
to
preserve
into
the
future,
and
so
our
request
is:
if
there
is
a
rush
for
rental
assistance,
come
the
lifting
of
the
eviction
moratorium
come
on
october
3rd.
Is
there
a
possibility?
We
would
prefer
to
preserve
our
local
dollars
and
use
federal
dollars.
Kind
of
our
general
approach
is
to
use
federal
funds
if
those
are
available
to
us
preserve
our
local
dollars,
for
when
federal
funds
aren't
flowing
into
our
community.
R
The
other
aspect
to
this
is
there
are
quite
there's
quite
a
bit
of
money
coming
into
the
county
through
the
eviction.
Excuse
me,
the
emergency
rental
assistance
program,
we're
also
trying
to
get
ahead
of
that
because
they're
in
the
process
of
standing
up
that
program
and
their
capacity,
we
are
trying
to
get
ahead
in
case.
Our
capacity
is
not
in
place
when
the
october
3rd
eviction
moratorium
is
lifted,
so
it
really
is
just
kind
of
a
a
preventative
hope
that
we
wouldn't
have
to
tap
into
these
dollars,
but
just
really
kind
of
preparing.
G
G
To
implementing
the
the
newer
system.
S
Good
evening,
council
kristen
I'll
jump
in
on
this
one
joel
wagner
tax
and
special
projects
manager.
So
council
may
recall
earlier
in
the
year
when
we're
providing
updates,
we
discussed
that
we
actually
found
a.
I
think,
elegant
solution
to
the
the
administrative
burden
of
collecting
75
tax
on
on
thousands
of
rental
license
holders,
and
that
solution
was
that
we
will
certify
those
taxes
with
the
boulder
county
assessor
every
year,
and
so
those
taxes
will
show
up
on
property
owners,
tax
property
tax
bills.
S
G
My
last
question
is:
do
we
have
any
ballpark
estimates
of
what
we
might
receive
in
infrastructure
funds
under
the
biden
administration's
bill?
Should
it
become
a
reality.
B
So
the
work
to
scope,
our
second
phase
of
fiber
is
really
important
effort
and
will
be
important
in
in
other
areas
and
transportation
and
others
to
be
ready
for
that
that
infrastructure,
the
better
ready.
We
are
the
more
dollars
we
hope
to
receive
through
that
package.
G
And
my
my
question
with
respect
to
that
is:
should
the
infrastructure
tax
passes,
I
hope
it
will
and
we
receive
considerable
amounts
of
money
under
the
the
biden
bill.
My
understanding
is
that
we
have
in
our
budget
what
is
it
five,
six
million
dollars
for
capital
expenditure
projects
on
a
yearly
basis?
G
B
Yeah,
I
don't
have
a
firm
answer
on
that
other
than
to
say
if
we
had
an
influx
of
federal
dollars,
we
certainly
could
look
at
our
approach
to
capital
spending.
It
just
depends
on
whether
or
not
it's
a
one-time
use
of
funds
or
or
not
if
it's
within
the
general
fund
is
ongoing.
Certainly
those
could
be
diverted
elsewhere
cara.
Do
you
want
to
expand
on
that.
M
Sure
thank
you
and
I
thought
I'd
just
also
note
that
most
of
our
infrastructure
type
funding
is
funded
out
of
the
transportation
fund
and
not
the
general
fund,
and
so
it
just
might
free
up
capacity
within
the
transportation
fund
for
other
types
of
transportation
related
uses.
M
D
It
is,
it
is
awesome
when
I'm
running
the
meetings.
I
never
hit
that
button,
so
there
you
go.
The
first
question
is
about
the
equity
instrument
and
how
we
use
that
new
instrument
in
looking
at
the
areas
of
focus,
I'm
looking
at
slide
31,
which
is
looking
at
that
15
million
dollars.
How
did
we
consider
our
new
equity
instrument
in
making
these
focus
areas.
B
Yeah,
it's
a
really
good
question,
so
I
would
say
that,
for
the
for
the
immediate
needs,
what
we
did
as
a
part
of
our
budget
process,
which
continues
to
improve
every
year,
is
explicitly
ask
departments
what
is
the
racial
impact
or
burden
in
the
proposals
for
the
2022
budget.
B
So
we
were
able
to
get
some
of
that
information
as
we
were,
considering
who
would
be
impacted
by
the
service
restorations
and
in
the
longer
term,
with
the
the
15
million
it's
really
about
our
process
and
how
we're
going
about
researching
each
of
these
areas
and
making
sure
that
the
that
the
proposals
are
informed
by
those
that
will
be
impacted
and
that
we're
considering
kind
of
that
broad.
B
C
D
Okay
super
well,
it
sounds
like
you
were
thoughtful
about
that,
so
I'll
follow
up
with
one
specific
area
that
I
was
curious
about,
which
is
we've
got
down
at
the
bottom
of
community
and
economic
resiliency.
A
couple
bullets
are
supportive
hardest
hit
industries
by
covet,
and
then
the
next
one
is
initiative
to
support
lowering
operating
costs
for
small
businesses
and
along
those
lines,
it
seems
to
me,
like
both
of
those
areas
could
have
an
additional
equity
focus
component
to
them.
D
Amy
and
I
and
yvette
and
mary
met
with
some
folks
who
wanted
to
talk
about
black
owned
small
business
support,
as
well
as
expanding
that
concept
to
latino
owned
small
businesses,
lgbtq
owned
small
businesses
and
so
on.
So
I
just
wanted
to
to
hear
from
you
guys
how
you
might
have
thought
about
how
to
incorporate
those
kind
of
the
support
for
those
small
businesses
and
the
best
way
to
get
those
dollars
and
communicate
the
program
opportunities
to
those
types
of
small
businesses.
R
B
And
just
to
add
sam
to
that
question,
the
micro
loan
program
that
I
mentioned
before
that
that
is
one
good
short
term
intervention
it.
It
is
still
loan
dollars,
but
our
work
through
the
community
through
the
colorado
enterprise
fund.
So
we
have
an
existing
program.
That's
fifty
thousand
dollars,
that's
leveraged
at
a
hundred
percent,
so
we
have
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
typically
on
an
annual
basis
to
to
lend
out
and
the
the
program
itself
targets
those
businesses
that
do
not
have
traditional
access
to
capital
a
lot
of
times.
B
That's
women
and
minority
owned
businesses,
though
not
solely
what
we're
planning
to
do
with
the
additional
50
is
again
to
go
back
to
cef
and
leverage
those
funds
and
we're
in
conversations
with
them.
One
thing
that
they've
pointed
out
is:
they
will
be
able
to
access
the
funds
through
wells
fargo
that
they
manage
a
specific
program
called
the
black
owned
business
fund,
which
will
help
provide
additional
dollars
into
that.
We
we
won't
have
that
be
exclusive.
B
We
want
to
make
sure
we're
not
leaving
any
business
behind
that
hasn't,
had
access
to
some
of
the
federal
grant
programs
federal
loan
programs.
That's
a
good
short-term
help,
but
to
your
point
on
the
longer
term,
need
we'll
absolutely
have
to
work
with
our
stakeholders
in
in
all
of
our
respective
areas,
boulder
chamber,
latino,
chamber
of
commerce
and
naacp
and
others
to
help
inform
our
approach
in
in
the
longer
term,
economic
recovery.
D
That's
excellent,
I
think
those
community
organizations
that
you
just
named
are
really
important
to
have
at
the
table
and
the
discussion
about
how
to
get
the
word
out.
So
all
these
programs
are
great,
but
how
we
make
sure
that
the
folks
who
need
the
dollars
know
that
they
can
apply
for
them
and
to
give
them
help
to
apply,
for
them
is
important.
D
Two
more
quick
questions.
Those
are
good
answers.
Thank
you.
One
thing
I
notice-
and
I
I
like
is
that
we
have
mental
and
behavior
health
service
expansions.
All
behind
that.
I
think
our
next
subject
for
the
study
session,
we'll
talk
about
that
as
well,
but
given
that
these
are
one-time
dollars
and
that
the
service
expansions
generally
require
ongoing
support,
how
are
you
thinking
about
the
one-time
dollars
used
to
support
mental
behavior
health
services
and
homeless
services
expansion?
How
do
we
think
about
the
one-time
dollars
versus
what
will
become
ongoing
operational
needs.
B
So
that
buys
us
some
time
to
figure
out
the
long-term
funding.
I'm
not
to
say
money
will
just
fall
out
of
trees,
but
that
is
part
of
the
the
planning
that
we'd
like
to
do
and
bring
back
a
more
coherent
strategy
to
say
instead
of
just
hey,
apply
x
amount
of
our
dollars
and
we'll
be
done
here
that
we're
thoughtful
about
that
sustainable
funding
approach.
D
Okay,
super
thank
you
and
then
I
I
think
my
last
question
is
you
know
this
15
million
bucket
of
money
is,
I
think,
an
opportunity
to
use
on
some
of
our
most
intractable
problems.
One
of
those
additionally
is
climate
and
climate
action,
so
I
was
just
curious.
What
kind
of
thinking
might
have
gone
into
how
to
use
one-time
dollars
for
climate
action
and
I've
got
some
thoughts,
but
I'm
curious.
What
kind
of
conversation
has
already
occurred
around
that.
B
Yeah
another
good
question:
I
think
so.
The
restriction
there
that
we're
mindful
of
is
with
the
the
infrastructure
investments
being
limited
in
in
water
sewer
broadband
under
arpa.
Now,
though,
in
the
water
and
sewer
area,
there
is
a
specific
emphasis
on
on
those
that
provide
for
some
type
of
climate
action,
and
I
do
think,
there's
an
opportunity
to
look
there.
The
issue
and
we've
had
some
conversations
with
our
utilities
about
this-
is
that
the
scale
of
some
of
those
projects
pale
our
arpa
dollars
pale
in
comparison
to
some
of
the
scale
of
those
projects.
B
That
being
said,
I
think
there's
an
opportunity
in
looking
at
some
of
our
longer
term
plans
and
planning
efforts
to
make
sure
that
we're
we're
really
focused
on
our
key
community
goals,
including
climate
action,
with
with
our
dollars,
that
that
could
be
one
that
we
could
explore
further
and
then
I
think,
there's
there's
other
opportunities
as
we're
talking
about
serving
those
disproportionately
impacted
by
covet
in
areas
disproportionately
impacted
by
covid
that
we're
thinking
about
the
the
disproportionate
impact
of
of
climate
change
as
well.
So
I
think,
there's
a
path
there.
D
Super,
well
that's
a
very
thoughtful
answer.
I
appreciate
that.
I
I
would
say
that
I
certainly
appreciate
that
the
project
dollars
would
be
daunting
compared
to
the
amount
of
funding
that's
available
so
yeah.
I
don't
think
this
is
appropriate
money
to
put
necessarily
towards
much
in
the
way
of
climate
projects.
I
was
thinking
more
about
programs
and
so
like
exactly
as
you
described
for
the
mental
health
service
expansion,
we
have
three
or
four
years
of
available
funding.
D
L
Thanks
sam,
I
have
juni
and
mary
and
then
I'll
call
myself
for
questions.
E
Thank
you
rachel
and
thank
you
for
this
great
presentation,
although
I've
seen
part
of
it
before
at
subcommittee
meeting,
but
this
is
a
great
presentation.
Thank
you.
I
have
a
question
about
the
well.
I
have
several
questions.
My
first
question.
I
wanted
to
hear
a
little
bit
more
about
the
fiber
phase.
One
build
out
that
you
mentioned
when
it
comes
to
bridging
the
digital
divide,
and
I
wanted
to
know
was
this
a
pre-harper
project
and
then
somehow
nearly
a
million
dollars
being
allocated
for
that
project.
B
Yeah
good
question-
and
I
I'm
not
sure
if
we
have
somebody
from
innovation
and
technology,
but
I'll
I'll
start.
The
answer
here
so
yes,
fiber
phase
one
build
out
was
a
previous
arpa
project
that
has
been
underway
for
quite
some
time.
We
expect
the
fiber
phase
one
build
out
to
be
completed
sometime
in
2022
with
service
provided
to
bhp
sites,
which
is
just
a
portion
of
the
fiber
phase,
1
project
by
the
beginning
of
2023.
B
The
additional
funds
provide
dollars
to
the
other
bhp
sites
that
don't
currently
have
access
a
free
high-speed
internet
access,
but
are
not
a
part
of
that
that
phase
one.
So
it
does
a
little
bit
of
both
there.
It
makes
sure
that
we're
able
to
hit
our
goals
in
phase
one,
but
it
also
provides
or
helps
provide
that
service
to
residents
and
at
other
sites
as
well.
J
U
Sir
mark
to
your
your
earlier
point,
I
can
add
just
a
little
bit
more
context,
juni
to
your
question,
which
is
when,
when
we
started
to
move
forward
on
the
first
phase
of
building
the
the
fiber
backbone,
when
we
got
the
bids
back
in
for
that
project,
they
actually
came
in
under
what
our
cost
estimate
was.
And
so
we
we
had
a
little
bit
of
extra
funding.
U
So
we
came
to
council
then,
and
I'm
forgetting
the
exact
exact
timing
of
what
year
it
was
with
what
were
some
areas
where
we
could
expand
that
network
a
little
bit
further
and
one
of
those
areas
was
to
those
22
bhp
sites.
U
So
the
project
that's
underway
now
gets
the
the
fiber
optic
cables,
basically
up
to
the
property,
but
then,
as
mark
was
describing
then
they're
still
getting
the
the
electronics
in
the
building
to
then
actually
provide
the
internet
service
inside
the
building,
and
so
this
additional
these
additional
funds
would
help
go
towards
continuing
to
make
sure
that
that
it's
not
just
fiber
laid
to
the
property
line,
but
indeed
it's
actually
making
that
internet
access
happen.
E
Okay,
thank
you
and
also
I
have
a
question.
I'm
looking
at
the
slides
and
I
just
went
somewhere
else.
I
have
a
question
about
the
400
000
that
are
being
set
aside
to
help
community
members
with
utilities,
and
I
am
just
so
happy
and
grateful
to
see
that
as
well
as
part
of
the
process,
and
it
shows
that
staff
is
really
thinking
about
community
and
how
to
best
serve
them.
And
my
question
is
how
many
households
do
you
consider
to
support
with
that
funding?.
B
That's
a
good
question:
we're
still
doing
the
analysis
on
on
which
households
that
have
delinquency
are
are
perhaps
due
to
coven,
so
that
kind
of
post
march
2020.
We,
we
still
have
some
work
to
do
in
figuring
out
the
program
administration
itself,
so
there's
some
arpa
related
restrictions
that
make
that
more
difficult
than
we'd
like
we
can't
provide
that
those
dollars
directly
to
utilities
that
that's
not
allowed
and
just
waive
those
those
outstanding
bills.
B
So
we
need
some
direct
support
of
individuals
at
the
same
time,
we're
trying
to
not
make
this
burdensome
for
those
that
that
need
the
help
so
we're
working
on
it
we're
optimistic.
We
can
find
a
solution
and
drill
down
to
those
those
households
and
make
sure
we're
extending
the
400
000
as
far
as
possible.
The
need
is
is
greater
than
that,
and
certainly
if
delinquency
continues
to
tick
up,
that's
one
of
the
areas
that
we
may
have
to
loop
back
around
in
the
emerging
need
reserve
that
we
talked
about
in
case.
B
That
is
true.
I
hope
the
400
000
represents
about
what
we
think
is
the
need
in
in
water
bills.
If
we're
talking
about
broader
utility
bills
across
the
city,
the
need
is
probably
greater
and
and
again
once
we
have
some
more
details
on
program
administration
and
this
the
scale.
J
L
Junie,
do
you
mind
if
I
colloquy
on
that
one,
please
rachel,
I'm
just
I'm
just
wanting
to
clarify,
so
I
I
understand
that
we
can't
gift
water
due
to
our
charter,
correct,
which
is
why
we
can't,
but
we
can
gift
money
that
pays
water
bills.
Is
that
how
we
get
around
the
charter?
Prohibition.
Is
that
what
we're
talking
about
here.
L
And
so
just
want
to
verify
with
the
city
attorney's
office,
that
that
is
legal.
T
Yeah,
so
thank
you
for
the
question
and
I
think
it's
a
creative
solution
to
a
problem
that
we
would
like
to
solve
for
folks,
and,
to
be
honest,
I
haven't
been
asked
this
question
before
so
it's
the
first
time.
I've
heard
it,
but
it
doesn't
seem
unreasonable
to
me
to
to
have
that
interpretation
of
our
charter,
and
so
with
that
I
would
say
I
would
I
would
agree
with
with
moving
forward
in
that
way.
L
Okay,
maybe
before
it
comes
back
for
a
vote
it
might,
it
would
be
helpful
to
just
have
a
firm,
firmer
answer.
T
E
E
My
question
is
with
200.
000
is
very
little
money.
It's
it
well,
it
will
certainly
help,
but
it's
very
little
considering
the
needs
that
we
have
and
I'm
wondering
if
this
money
will
somehow
be
an
addition
to
is.
Is
there
maybe
some
type
of
how
do
I
put
it?
I
know
the
city
is
also
coordinating
with
the
county
in
the
county.
It's
getting
its
own
money,
so
I'm
wondering
if
this
200
000
will
be.
E
You
know,
just
in
addition
to
other
money
that
we
will
put
together
toward
you
know
the
severe
weather
shelter
as
opposed
to
just
two
hundred
thousand
dollars.
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you
juni.
So
the
the
200
000
represents
the
a
similar
approach
to
hotels
which
we
had
in
the
previous
winter
season
and
if
you
recall,
we've
we've
actually
never
had
that
in
our
our
city
budget
and
last
year
it
was
paid
for
through
the
cares
act
and
it
is
a
well
while
the
numbers
may
seem
small
to
you.
H
It's
it's
big
for
our
departments
and
that
type
of
support,
so
we
we
haven't
had
that
budgeted
previously
and
covet
really
helped
push
for
that
that
type
of
solution.
H
That
hotels
have
picked
up
in
their
usage
and
finding
hotels
that
work
well,
for
this
type
of
service
isn't
represented
by
every
hotel.
So
we've
been
out
there
in
the
community
figuring
out
how
this
program
could
best
work
with
with
those
types
of
constraints
if
the
county
were
to
get
additional
funding.
For
that
we
could.
We
could
also
look
at
that
and
if,
if
you're-
and
this
is
really
an
initial
conversation
around
all
these
things-
and
this
is
what
we've
allocated
at
this
time-.
N
Thanks
rachel,
so
I
I
my
first
question
is
really
a
clarification
in
an
earlier
question.
I
believe
that
mark
asked
the
response
came
back,
that
infrastructure
dollars
would
go
into
the
transportation
fund,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
that
assumes
that
the
infrastructure
is
only
roads
and
bridges
and
that
other
infrastructure
is
water
and
sewer,
and
so
wouldn't
money
go
into
those
funds
as
well
for
any
needs
and
infrastructure.
B
Yeah,
it
might
clarify.
I
think
the
question
was
related
to
what
would
happen
if
we
were
receiving
federal
infrastructure
dollars,
and
could
we
basically
then
use
what
we
had
programmed
in
city
dollars
for
infrastructure
elsewhere?
I
think
what
car
was
saying
is.
It
depends
on
the
fund
that
predominantly
it
is
not.
Our
capital
funds
are
not
in
our
general
fund,
so
it
depends
on
the
restricted
nature
of
wherever
those
dollars
are.
B
N
I'm
still
not
entirely
clear,
but
I
can
I
can
kind
of
take
that
offline
with
cara.
Perhaps
I
don't
want
to
take
up
a
lot
of
time
on
this.
M
N
Okay,
great
so
so
it
really
depends
on
the
project.
General
fund
project
goes
to
the
general
fund.
If
it's
a
transportation
project
would
go
to
the
transportation
fund,
sewer
to
sewer
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
yeah.
Exactly
okay,
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
one
and
then
kind
of
following
up
on
some
of
the
questions
that
sam
asked
there
are.
N
There
could
be
pilot
projects
that
are
proposed
by
organizations
and
if
they
are,
if
they
are,
that
that
pilot
project
itself
would
be
a
one-time
funding
and
would
the
time
frame
in
which
the
expenditure
needs
to
happen
for
the
arpa
funds.
N
Would
that
be
that
pilot
project
be
looked
at
the
same
way
as
the
expansions
that
were
mentioned
earlier?
So,
in
other
words,
if
the
pilot
project
were
successful,
we'd
have
some
time
to
figure
out
how
to
fund
it
on
an
ongoing
basis.
B
B
We
are
looking
at
expanded
pilots,
essentially
for
that.
So
if
we,
for
instance,
figure
out
a
way
to
participate
in
shared
commercial
kitchen,
space
for
food
trucks
and
restaurants
and
that's
successful
and
something
we
think
is
appropriate
for
the
city
to
participate
in
the
longer
term,
we
we
could
absolutely
consider
that,
and
that
would
be
a
part
of
any
plan
is
to
say
this
is
this
is
how
we're
proposing
us
arpa
dollars.
B
N
Another
clarification
question
on
the
broadband
when
chris
mentioned
chris,
you
mentioned
that
when
the
bids
came
in
for
broadband
phase,
one
they
were
lower
than
anticipated,
and
so
the
money
that
was
the
the
delta
between
the
end,
the
budgeted
and
and
the
lower
bid
that
went
towards
the
bhp
sites
in
the
phase
two
portion
of
it
did.
I
understand
that
correctly.
U
That
went
towards,
as
we
were,
building
this
65
miles
of
of
backbone.
It
went
towards
extending
essentially
some
connections
out
to
those
bhp
sites.
It
also
included
some
other
funding
for
things
like
connecting
some
of
our
traffic
signals.
That
sort
of
thing.
So
that's
all
the
fiber
phase,
one
okay
yeah,
which
is
separate
from
any
other
future
work.
N
Okay,
great,
that's
all
I
have
thank
you
very
much.
Thanks.
F
Thanks
rachel,
two
quick
questions,
first,
one
being
as
far
as
the
feedback
goes
from
the
community.
I
know
you
probably
have
a
general
list
of
organizations
you
go
to
and
things
along
those
lines
I
was
wondering,
are
the
relevant
boards
and
commissions
that
may
have
you
know
some
sort
of
stake
in
what
kind
of
projects
happen
be
consulted
as
well?
Is
that
a
plan
for
the
process.
B
Yeah,
it's
a
good
question
and
we
have.
We
have
received
some
specific
feedback
already
for
from
certain
boards
or
commissions.
I
wouldn't
say
we
have
an
explicit
process
to
go.
B
Ask
every
border
commission,
but
there
are
absolutely
going
to
be
touch
points
based
on
the
project
or
initiative
and
we'll
rely
on
our
departments
as
we're
planning
and
bringing
back
a
strategy
to
say
you
know
this
is
appropriate
for
us
to
get
some
feedback
from
our
boards
and
commissions
on
on
this
project
at
this
level
or
at
this
touch
point
it'll
depend,
but
certainly
that
is
a
part
of
the
outreach.
F
Thanks
for
that,
second
question
being
in
this
funding
allocation,
it's
going
to
bridge
over
two
different
councils,
and
so
some
decision
making
will
happen
in
one
council
and
some
will
happen
in
another.
What
are
staff's
contingencies?
Should
the
new
council
decide
that
the
original
plans
aren't
what
they
are
looking
for
in
the
final
approval.
B
If
that
is
under
another
council
to
consider
those
various
different
strategies,
they
can
tell
us
whether
those
continue
to
be
the
priorities
or
we
need
to
do
some
more
work
in
going
down
the
list.
But
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
reflect
existing
community
goals,
plans
engagements
that
we've
already
done
this
council's
feedback
that
hopefully
are
in
close
alignment
to
where
we're
trying
to
go
together
and
that'll,
hopefully
help
it
won't
prevent.
You
know
future
discussion
by
any
means,
but
hopefully
we
will
stay
on
the
same
track.
F
B
Yeah,
I
think
that'll
depend
on
the
amount
of
work
once
we
find
getting
into
these
initiatives
and
developing
those
the
strategies
that
I
mentioned.
If
we
need
a
bit
more
time
to
make
sure
that
it's
realistic
and
it
reflects
community
expectations,
then
we'll
certainly
let
council
know
at
that
time.
Our
goal
is
to
try
to
move
as
fast
as
we
can
within
a
reasonable
time
frame
and
we
anticipate
at
least
making
significant
process
in
some
of
the
areas
that
we've
outlined
by
the
end
of
the
year.
L
Thanks
adam
I'm
going
to
call
on
myself
for
two
questions.
First,
one
of
the
the
questions
you're
asking
is:
are
there
areas
of
recovery
that
are
missing
or
should
be
emphasized
during
the
long
and
medium
term
planning
efforts
so
for
like
for
the
longer
term
considerations,
you've
listed
public
health
and
safety,
affordability
of
service
access
and
community
and
economic
resiliency?
I
think
and
then
we're
supposed
to
identify
any
that
are
missing.
L
But
for
me
I
would
probably
want
to
hear
from
as
adam
suggested,
boards
and
commissions
and
community
and
community
connectors
sort
of
before
I,
I
really
could
say
whether
any
are
missing
or
whether
we've
prioritized
the
right
three.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
what
are
you
asking
for
in
terms
of
feedback
tonight
before
we
hear
from
the
community.
B
What
we
were
specifically
asking
was
looking
at
the
list
of
example,
initiatives
to
say
are
there
anything
within
those
initiatives
that,
based
on
your
work
and
knowledge
of
the
community,
that
you
would
place
particular
emphasis
on
or
see
any
glaring
items
that
are
that
are
missing
as
we
go
through
our
process?
I
I
agree.
L
Okay,
that
helps
thanks
and
then
my
second
question
is
around
there's:
a
million
dollars
targeted
on
emerging
needs
and
it
says
that
any
need
that
arises.
Hang
on
there's
a
dog:
that's
going
to
go
for
my
food
here,
any
any
need
that
arises
will
be
communicated
to
council
and
the
community
prior
to
expenditure.
So
I
just
want
to
understand:
could
that
1
million
be
sort
of
flexed
across
all
the
departments
or
are
used
anywhere?
L
B
Yes,
it
would
still
be
subject
to
the
arpa
restrictions.
Our
intention
would
be
to
not
access
that
million
dollars.
B
Ideally,
there
wouldn't
be
needs
that
arise
over
the
coming
months
until
we're
back
in
front
of
council
with
a
longer
term
strategy,
but
an
example
could
be
if
we're
looking
at
capacity
restrictions
again
in
indoor
venues
and
all
of
a
sudden
there's
a
need
to
try
to
patch
through
the
late
fall
winter
months
for
arts
venues
and
restaurants,
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
that
might
be
an
example
where
we
come
back
and
say
council
could
we
spend
a
little
bit
of
those
dollars
for
that
purpose?
B
Another
might
be
rental
assistance
if
it
takes
even
longer
to
to
have
some
of
the
county
resources
become
available
and
that
need
is
is
greater
if
the
eviction
moratorium
expires
so
on
and
so
forth.
There's
just
things
that,
based
on
the
reality
of
the
public
health
situation
that
may
come
up
and
we
want
to
be
able
to
at
least
have
the
spending
authority
that
we
could
you
know,
notify
instead
of
go
through
a
formal
expenditure
process
which,
as
you
know,
could
take
us.
You
know
four
or
five
weeks.
L
Okay,
but
it
it
it
sounds
like
though
it
could
be
used
for
in
any
department,
and
so
I
guess
I
would
just
this
is
probably
getting
into
the
comment
section
a
little
bit,
but
also
going
along
with
adam's
point
about
this
is
going
to
cross
over
two
councils
and-
and
it
may
seem
a
little
bit
micromanaging,
but
it
is
a
million
dollars
and
I
could
see
you
know
some
council
members
really
supporting
and
others
bristling
at
an
expenditure.
L
L
So
I
guess
I
will
be
kicking
off
comments
with
it,
but
I
would
prefer
that
we
keep
that
million
in
a
bucket
that
we
vote
on
and
especially
because
it
could
be
used
by
by
a
new
council
during
a
new
council's
tenure,
and
with
that
I
will
open
it
for
other
discussions
on
or
anyone
who
wants
to
weigh
in.
On
the
two
questions
which
are,
do
we
support
the
process
for
arpa
funding
prioritization
and
are
there
areas
of
recovery
that
are
missing
or
should
be
emphasized
during
medium
and
long-term
planning?
E
Thank
you
rachel.
I
had
a
question
and
I
think
I've
answered
it
myself.
I
fully
support
staff's
direction
here
when
it
comes
to
the
funding.
My
only.
E
My
only
I
guess
issue,
although
I
am
the
representative
representative
on
council
for
bhp,
seeing
that
we're
setting
aside
nearly
a
million
dollars,
which
is
great,
we're
serving
community
needs
we're
serving
people
who
are
residents
of
bhp,
but
nonetheless,
I
I
get
a
sense,
or
at
least
based
on
my
own
perception
that
it's
a
little
bit
lopsided
when
we're
thinking
about
equity
and
the
question
that
is
not
answered
for
me
tonight
is
we
have
a
few
mobile
home
sites
as
well
around
boulder
and
I'm
wondering
as
part
of
the
fiber
phase,
one
build
out.
E
Are
there
any
of
these?
You
know
these
mobile
home
housing
have
access,
will
have
similar
access
as
well,
because
we're
setting
aside
one
million
dollars
for
one
group,
but
other
parts
of
the
community
could
be
neglected.
So
I
believe
that
you
know
these
parts
of
the
community
should
actually
be
part
of
this
process
as
well.
So
if
we're
gonna
set
aside
a
million
dollars
for
bhp,
we
should
also
set
maybe
500
000
or
400
000
for
these
other
parts
of
of
the
community.
E
It's
just
to
me
feel
very
lopsided,
although
I
am
fully
in
support
of
bhp
and
the
work
that
they
do,
they
do
amazing
work
supporting
our
community,
but
they're,
not
the
only
community
that
has
needs.
So
I
would
like
to
see
something
like
that
as
part
of
the
process.
What
I
you
know
to
me,
it's
still
very
much
gray
as
well.
When
it
comes
to
how
many
household
we
intend
to
serve
with
the
400
000.
E
Is
it
enough
when
it
comes
to
the
utility
bill
assistance?
I
think
having
that
number
would
have
been
good,
but
I
understand
limitations,
staff
time
and
all
that,
but
that's
still
a
little
bit
gray.
It's
almost
like
we're
setting
aside
money,
but
we
don't
know
the
needs
that
we're
really
serving
yeah
and
that's
actually
my
my
comments
to
staff.
I
think
it's
a
great
presentation
again.
I've
been
part
of
the
subcommittee
with
mark
and
mary
and
they
do
great
work
and
staff
really
doing
amazing
work
to
see
it.
E
You
know
to
see
the
presentation
on
the
back
end
tonight.
It's
really
great,
but
some
of
these
challenges
I
see
with
the
bridging
the
digital
divide
and
also
the
utility
bills
assistance.
Thank
you.
I
Yes,
well,
I
do
absolutely
think
that
you
all
are
on
the
right
track.
I
think
you've
done
a
phenomenal
job
of
analyzing,
all
the
different
needs
and
the
different
stages
and
keeping
amounts
in
reserve
for
transformative
projects
and
also
for
future
needs.
I
think
fundamentally,
you're
definitely
on
the
right
track.
I
I
do
just
have
a
few
comments.
In
addition,
you
know
building
on
what
sam
and
mary
were
asking
about
in
terms
of
pilot
programs
with
one-time
funding.
I
just
would
like
to
encourage
you
to
keep
that
in
mind
that
you
know
they're.
I
It's.
I
think
it's
perfectly
fine
to
stand
up
some
some
new
programs,
some
new
pilot
programs
with
some
of
this
funding,
because
I
think
in
particular
in
the
area
of
substance,
abuse
and
mental
health
treatment
like
these
are
areas
of
deep
under
investment
in
our
society
and
our
community.
I
And
there
are
whole
categories
of
services
that
we
don't
offer
in
this
area.
And
so,
if
we
could
put
together
something
a
pilot
program
that
offers
some
of
those
services
that
then
hopefully
would
work
out
well
and
then
we
could
find
the
grant
funding.
Or
you
know,
maybe
a
county
tax
support
or
some
other
source
of
funding.
Allow
that
to
continue.
I
So
we
might
be
able
to
put
something
together
in
partnership
with
them,
or
maybe
some
other
local
municipalities
and
jurisdictions
as
well
to
get
some
things
off
the
ground
that
could
really
plug
a
major
gap
in
our
social
safety
net
and
yeah,
and
to
just
look
for
partnerships
in
in
general.
You
know:
we've
had
some
great
proposals
and
ideas
like
from
the
naacp
about
supporting
black
businesses.
I
We
got
a
great
kind
of
position
paper
from
the
east
county
housing
coalition
about
ways
that
our
funds
could
support,
affordable
housing
in
town.
I
know
the
the
boulder
chamber
is
working
closely
with
local
businesses
about
the
kinds
of
support
they
need
to
be
successful.
So
I
know
you
all
are
thinking
about
that,
but
just
really
encourage
you
to
continue,
because
to
the
extent
that
we
can
work
with
other
organizations
and
then
also
leverage
other
forms
of
funding,
that
was
one
of
your
key
tenants.
I
think
that's
really
important.
I
D
I
I
Small
business
support
is
a
is
a
deep
need
in
the
community,
and
you
know
we
got
some
letters
from
restaurant
tours
today
about
the
needs
of
that
industry,
so
I
know
hopefully
they'll
be
able
to
access
some
of
that
funding
if
necessary
and
appropriate,
and
also
you
know,
we
do
have
these
unknowns
with
delta
getting
worse
possibly,
and
the
economic
situation
could
get
worse
for
dining
and
maybe
other
industries
as
we
head
into
the
fall
and
winter.
I
So
I'm
glad
to
see
you
have
some
funding
positioned
in
case
we
have
those
needs
come
up,
so
I
appreciate
that
on
your
side
appreciated,
seeing
the
amount
for
some
additional
severe
weather
capacity-
and
I
hope
that's
another
one-
that
we
keep
an
eye
on
again
if
things
get
worse,
that
might
be
an
area
where
we
need
to
devote
some
additional
funding
to
make
sure
we're
successful
this
winter
with
our
sheltering
program,
maybe
whether
that's
hotel
rooms
or
some
some
other
kind
of
short-term
source.
I
So
I
appreciate
you
working
on
that
and
then
one
thing
in
terms
of
transformation
that
I
wanted
to
mention.
You
know
one
of
the
things
that
we've
identified
as
a
probable
goal
for
the
city
is
the
annexation
of
the
san
lazaro
mobile
home
park.
We
talked
about
in
the
context
of
the
east
boulder
subcommittee
plan.
I
I
that
may
be
an
area
where
we
could
start
to
use
some
of
this
funding
to
help
realize
that
I
don't
know
exactly
what
their
infrastructure
needs
are,
but
water
may
well
be
one
of
them,
which
I
know
is
one
of
the
categories
we're
allowed
to
use
infrastructure
structure.
Funding
for
and
those
folks
may
need
other
other
forms
of
support
that
could
be
eligible
for
this.
I
So
maybe
there's
an
opportunity
for
an
investment,
maybe
a
public
private
partnership
with
a
mobile
home
park
owner
where
we
could
upgrade
the
infrastructure,
the
water
infrastructure
and
one
or
more
of
those
parks.
So
that's
another
idea.
I
just
want
to
get
out
there
to
consider
as
you're
looking
through
this.
I
D
Thank
you
rachel.
I
want
to
second
most
of
what
aaron
said.
I
think
you
are
totally
on
the
right
track
here.
I
think
that
having
a
quarter
of
this
money
being
used
to
backfill
city
needs
is
important
and
I
think
the
way
you
teed
that
up
is
excellent,
so
I'm
I'm
pretty
happy
with
where
that
is
looking
to
the
transformative
pieces.
I
also
think
that
that's
teed
up
pretty
well.
I
want
to
second
a
couple
things
aaron
said,
one
of
which
is
the
mental
health
and
substance
abuse
services.
D
I
think
we
all
recognize
that
as
a
gap
in
our
services
for
the
homeless-
and
I
I
think
I
would
like
to
see
it
focus
there
to
the
extent
that
we
are
crafting
that
pilot
program.
I
think
that's
that
gap
is
one
area
where
I
I
think
that
if
we
can
use
this
money
to
get
started
there
and
if
we
can
do
it
in
tandem,
especially
with
the
county,
where
a
lot
of
that
responsibility
lies
and
where
some
of
the
funding
lies.
D
I
think
that
would
be
great,
but
I
also
want
to
second
what
aaron
had
to
say
about
mobile
home
parks
and
water
infrastructure.
I
think
that
is
a
great
way
to
go.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
matched
by
the
private
dollars
to
the
extent
that
the
mobile
home
parks
are
owned
by
private
owners.
I
think
they
need
to
have
some
skin
in
the
game
for
the
upgrades,
but
I
especially
want
to
agree
with
aaron
on
san
lazaro.
D
So
I
think
that
if
we
had
to
pick
that
would
be
one,
we
would
bring
our
first
housing
into
the
east
boulder
sub
community
officially,
and
that
would
be
kind
of
the
leading
edge
for
we
hope
to
see
more
of
there.
Then
I
guess
the
only
other
area.
I
thought
much
of
what
you
have
outlined
for
how
to
look
at
small
business
assistance
is
good,
but
on
the
climate
I
just
wanted
to
say.
D
Of
course,
our
climate
initiatives
group
is
going
to
be
most
expert
on
where
the
dollars
could
be
used,
but
I
focus
mostly
on
electrification
at
this
point
because
we
know
where
excel
is
going.
We
know
where
our
power
supply
emissions
are
going
where
they're
headed
and
they're
on
the
track
that
we're
monitoring
but
much
more
complicated,
our
buildings
and
transportation
and
electrification
is
a
focus
of
our
efforts
and
we
have
a
lot
of
funding
coming
for
vehicle
electrification
through
the
state
transportation
bill
that
just
passed
this
year.
D
But
I
think
that
building
electrification
is
a
hard
nut
to
crack
and
so
any
any
interest
that
climate
initiatives
gives
you
in
how
to
work
on
programs.
For
that,
I
think
this
funding
could
help
get
those
programs
off
the
ground
and
help
us
learn
what
works
and
what
doesn't.
So.
That
was
basically
the
only
thing
I
wanted
to
add
to
what
we've
touched
on
before,
but
I
think
this
is
great
work.
It's
a
really
good
start
and
I
look
forward
to
finally
making
the
appropriations
on
it.
Thank
you.
G
Okay,
I'm
going
to
be
exceedingly
agreeable
tonight.
I
first
I
agree
with
judy
at
the
need
to
serve
all
of
our
economically
challenged
communities,
not
just
bhp
related
facilities.
I'm
going
to
agree
with
rachel
that
there
should
be
a
check-in
with
council
before
you're
spending.
You
know
an
undoes,
an
undifferentiated
1
million
dollars.
I
think
that's
an
important
thing
to
do
and
I'm
going
to
agree
with
aaron,
particularly
with
respect
to
standing
up
some
new
programs
to
for
to
fill
the
social
services
gap
as
well
as
yeah.
G
Park
water
infrastructure
is
very
important
and
I
would
like
to
see
that
happen,
particularly
with
respect
to
those
manufacturing
home
parks
that
are
within
our
city
limits,
the
only
I
thought
it
was
a
great
presentation,
I'm
I'm
generally
very,
very
supportive.
G
I
am
always
reluctant
to
adopt
the
philosophy
that
god
will
provide
with
respect
to
the
funding
of
programs,
and
so
I
would
I
would
want
to
be
very
careful
about
that,
but
other
than
that,
I
I
think
you
guys
are
on
the
right
track.
I
think
you've
done
good
work
and
with
the
comments
I've
made
tonight,
I
think
you,
you
know
your
priorities
and
your
concepts
are
good.
So
thank
you.
N
Yeah,
it's
nice
to
see
an
agreeable
mark
thanks
rachel,
so
I
was
particularly
impressed
by
the
appendix
c
and
how
thoughtful
that
was,
and
it
really
covered
a
lot
of
the
the
sam
made
a
reference
to
the
meeting
that
we
had
on
friday
with
the
naacp
and
and
I
think
what
they
would
like
to
see
in
their
letter
that
they
had
sent
to
us
a
lot
of
what
they're
asking
for
could
be
covered
in
that
through
specific
asks
on
pilot
projects.
N
So
so
thank
you
for
that.
I
think
it
was
very,
very
thoughtfully.
Put
together
I'm
going
to
agree
with
pretty
much
everything
that's
been
said.
I
want
to
talk
about
broadband
phase
two
and.
N
And,
and
with
reference
to
the
mobile
home
park,
water
infrastructure,
there's
also
that
broadband
infrastructure
and
again
in
that
in
the
situation
of
mobile
home
parks,
there
would
have
to
be
some
agreeableness
from
the
mobile
home
park
owners
in
order
to
be
able
to
take
it
from
the
connection
to
the
mobile
home
park
onto
the
individual
unit.
So
whatever
can
be
done
there.
Similarly,
to
how
my
colleagues
have
spoken
about
the
the
public-private
water
infrastructure
to
work
with
them
in
a
similar
fashion
for
the
broadband
infrastructure,
I
think
that
would
be
really
helpful.
N
I
particularly
was
interested
in
the
comments
that
were
made
by
aaron
and
mark.
I
believe
that
about
some
vasaro
mobile
home
park
and
how
can
we
start
to
mobilize?
Some
infrastructure
needs
to
be
able
to
eventually
annex
that
mobile
home
park,
because
they
have
some
serious
water
issues
and
then.
N
One
of
the
there
was
a
an
email
that
I
saw
come
around
today,
that
was
from
effa
emergency
family
assistance
association,
which
I
they
were
looking
into.
N
The
gap
that
was
created,
or,
should
I
say,
the
the
the
kids
that
were
left
behind
through
the
pandemic
because
of
lack
of
access
or
great
access
to
the
internet.
So
there
was
an
educational
gap
that
was
created
and
how
to
be
able
to
have
kids
that
were
left
behind
because
of
their
inadequate
access
to
broadband,
how
to
help
them
catch
up.
N
So
I
realize
that
a
lot
of
that
falls
on
the
school
district,
but
whatever
the
city
can
do
to
provide
access
to
funds
that
would
help
with
that
effort
that
effa
is
putting
forward
so,
but
I
think
that
it's
all
covered
through
your
your
appendix
c.
All
of
these
projects
that
we've
mentioned
could
possibly
be
covered
so
but
other
than
that,
I
I
think
you
all
did
a
great
job
and,
like
I
said
especially
impressed
with
the
thoughtfulness
of
appendix
c.
So
thank
you
very
much.
L
Thanks
mary
adam,
I
think
it's
up
to
you
to
bring
us
home.
F
Cool,
I'm
also
going
to
be
quite
agreeable,
mark's
set
in
a
good
tone,
especially
along
the
lines
of
concepts
and
piloting
some
things
that
we
haven't
done.
This
feels
like
one
of
those
opportunities
that
we
have
to
do
so
as
mary
referenced.
There
was
a
lot
of
good
ideas
out
there
in
letters
like
the
naacp,
the
only
place
where
I'll
antagonize
mark
a
little
bit,
because
it's
one
of
my
favorite
things
to
do
as
well
is
if
we
don't
pilot
anything,
the
whole
concept
of
a
pilot.
F
Is
you
got
to
try
something
to
see
if
it
works?
If
it's
working
to
solve
the
problem
you're
trying
to
solve,
then
the
funding
tends
to
follow.
If
it
doesn't,
you
get
to
end
it
and
move
on,
so
I
I
would
like
to
be
a
little
bit
more
bold
with
some
of
this
funding
and
really
try
to
address
those
areas
of
the
people
who
are
on
edge
and
either
were
pushed
off
the
edge
by
the
pandemic,
or
are
very
much
more
on
edge
now
that
it
occurred.
F
So
those
are
definitely
the
areas
of
focus
I
think
are
most
important
and
I
think
staff
has
reflected
that
really
well
in
those
areas
that
they
presented.
So
thank
you
for
everyone
who
put
in
the
work.
It's
really
appreciated.
T
I
do
thanks.
I
just
wanted
to
circle
back
on
the
question
that
came
up
earlier
regarding
free
water,
and
I
was
able
to
obtain
some
information.
Our
office
did
some
research
back
in
march
of
2020,
somewhat
unrelated,
but
regarding
low-income
rate
programs
and
the
possibility
of
developing
a
city
fund
for
water,
and
so
the
research
that
we
did
related
to
that
was
that,
yes,
there
would
be
a
way
to
do
that
using
outside
organizations
and
partnering
with
them.
T
There
is
a
a
charter
section
that
talks
about
how
revenues
that
are
derived
from
the
operation
of
the
water
and
sewer
system
have
to
be
used
exclusively
for
maintenance
operation
and
that
and
so
forth,
and
so
I
think
that's
where
that
free
water
comes
from.
So
there
is
a
way,
I
believe,
to
comply
with
the
charter
and
and
also
use
the
funds
for
the
purpose
that
was
stated
earlier.
L
Great
thank
you
for
looking
into
that.
For
us,
you
bet,
okay,
so
I
think
that
wraps
up
discussion,
so
let
me
ask
mark
and
kara
and
nuria.
Maybe
do
you
think
that
you've
gotten
all
the
answers
and
information
you
need
from
this
discussion.
B
J
I'll
echo
that
and
just
say
thank
you
so
much
for
your
feedback.
I
mean
eight,
thank
you
mark
and
cara
for
setting
that
up
and
moving
that
behind
the
two
of
them
are
a
lot
of
staff
that
have
put
in
a
lot
of
hard
work
to
move
this
forward.
But,
frankly,
this
is
precisely
the
information
that
we
need.
We
had
been
talking
about
things
like
san
lazaro.
We
have
been
talking
about.
How
do
we
sort
of
create
a
more
robust
boards
and
commission
feedback?
J
So
please
know
that
we
are
taking
note
and
that
we
will
be
following
up
as
we
move
forward
if
there
are
additional
things
as
you've
been
thinking
about
it
that
you
want
to
share
with
us.
Please
let
us
know,
but
this
is
really
the
depth
and
the
level
of
feedback
we
were
looking
for.
Thank
you.
L
Thanks
nuria
and
thanks
cara
and
mark
again
and
then
nuri,
I
think
I'm
going
to
hand
it
right
back
to
you
for
an
update
on
the
opioid
settlement.
J
Yep
and
we
actually
have
someone
from
the
county
who's
going
to
be
joining
us,
but
maybe
kristin
wants
to
tee
that
on.
R
R
So
good
evening,
kristen
heiser,
deputy
director
of
housing
and
human
services,
so
in
line
with
the
city
council's
interest,
9
showing
up
how
how
we
shore
up
and
really
build
up
our
mental
and
behavioral
services
and
infrastructure
across
the
region.
The
city
is
working
very
closely
with
the
county
and
our
regional
partners
to
assess
the
mental
behavioral
health
resources
as
they
exist
now
the
needs
the
gaps
and
what
opportunities
there
are,
and
we
are
joined
here
tonight
by
the
county,
who's
going
to
give
us
a
presentation
on
another
opportunity.
R
We
have
to
resource
and
meeting
those
needs.
So
brief,
introduction
to
invite
kelly,
veidt,
the
strategic
implementation
manager
of
boulder
county
community
services,
she's
here
to
present
boulder
county's
participation
in
the
opioid
litigation
and
related
settlements,
and
then
following
kelly's
presentation,
we
would
love
to
answer
any
questions
that
council
might
have
and
engage
in
a
discussion
or
dialogue
relating
to
this
item.
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
kelly.
W
Thank
you
so
much
kristen
and
thank
you
to
the
council
for
inviting
me
here
tonight
before
I
move
forward.
I
just
want
to
confirm.
Can
folks
hear
me
okay
and
see
my
screen
all
right
anyway,
thanks,
okay,
perfect.
So,
as
kristen
mentioned,
my
name
is
kelly
bite,
I'm
the
strategic
implementation
manager
for
boulder
county
community
services.
W
I
work
specifically
within
the
community
justice
services
division,
and
I
am
here
as
a
representative
of
a
smaller
cohort
of
individuals
that
have
come
acros
come
together
across
the
county
to
really
dive
into
some
initial
planning
around
some
forthcoming
dollars.
That
we
know
will
be
landing
both
in
the
county
as
well
as
local,
local
jurisdictions,
local
municipalities
within
the
county
in
the
coming
years.
W
Really,
today's
update
is
you
know
about
some
of
the
initial
framework
that
we've
pulled
together
within
that
smaller
cohort
and
some
of
the
sort
of
key
takeaways
for
where
there
needs
to
be
additional
focus
from
key
leadership
across
both
the
county,
as
well
as
the
the
municipalities
within
the
county.
Moving
forward.
W
So,
just
to
start
with
a
little
bit
of
background
when
we
talk
about
the
opioid
litigation
or
lawsuits,
essentially
we're
talking
about
a
number
of
lawsuits
multiple
year,
litigation
that
has
was
brought
for
forward
by
a
coalition
of
local
colorado
governments,
including
boulder
county
and
really
the
the
litigation,
was
brought
against
a
number
of
pharmaceutical
companies
that
you
know,
knowingly
misled
providers
and
the
public
about
the
dangers
of
opioids
and
really
the
the
intention
of
these
lawsuits
was
to
recoup
losses
for
damages
done
to
our
local
communities
and
to
our
our
local
treatment
structures
and
overwhelming
our
our
treatment.
W
Our
harm
reduction,
our
prevention
space
around
sud
and
opioid
use
disorder
in
the
process,
and
so
there's
a
number
of
settlements
that
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
here
today.
I'll
go
through
sort
of
the
four
main
large
pharmaceutical
companies
and
where
those
settlements
currently
sit.
W
W
W
That's
really
going
to
outline
the
stipulations
that
both
the
region,
boulder
county,
as
well
as
sort
of
the
local
municipalities
within
the
region,
need
to
participate
in
in
order
to
trigger
a
distribution
of
those
funds.
W
So
just
a
little
bit
more
about
where
we're
at
right.
Now
again
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
memorandum
of
understanding,
but
this
is
really
sort
of
the
the
the
crux
of
what
needs
to
be
finalized
and
that
work
is
sitting
currently
with
the
attorney
general's
office.
This
mou
outlines
exactly
what
the
attorney
general
expects
to
see
from
our
region
and
from
any
participating
municipalities
in
terms
of
a
two-year
plan,
in
order
for
the
attorney
general
to
approve
distributions
of
funds
to
our
region.
W
So
some
key
components
of
the
mou-
and
you
know
we
had
a
lot
of
discussion
early
on
with
community
stakeholders
about
you-
know
what.
How
can
we
ensure
that
the
majority
of
these
dollars
are
hitting
at
a
local
or
regional
level?
You
know
we
nothing
against
the
state
infrastructure
and
the
state's
ability
to
sort
of
distribute
these
dollars,
but
we
know
that
the
impacts
of
the
opioid
epidemic
have
been
very
localized
and
there's
no
agencies,
organizations
there's
no
nobody.
W
That
knows
our
communities
and
the
disproportionate
impact
that
has
happened
to
some
of
our
communities
around
sud
and
opioid
use
disorder
better
than
our
local
governments,
and
so
after
you
know,
a
few
iterations
of
what
the
distribution
structure
could
potentially
look
like
the
attorney
general
landed
on
having
80
of
the
funds
really
distributed
at
the
local
level.
So
what
that
means
is
20
going
to
local
governments
and
60
going
to
those
regions
and
I'll
put
up
a
map
in
a
second.
W
But
when
we
talk
about
regions,
the
I
believe
the
largest
region
is
six
counties.
W
Boulder
county
is
in
of
itself
one
complete
region
of
the
19
across
colorado,
then
there's
10
percent,
that's
put
in
a
set-aside
account
statewide
abatement
fund,
specifically
for
infrastructure
build-out,
and
so
when
we
talk
about
infrastructure
in
this
particular
context,
we're
really
talking
about
you-
know
roi's
or
releases
of
information
data
sharing
agreement
across
multiple
systems.
W
You
know
software
that
really
facilitates
community
or
excuse
me.
Connectivity
to
substance
use
disorder
treatment,
and
these
are
typically
the
things
that
we've
identified
as
getting
in
the
way
in
terms
of
connecting
folks
with
substance
use
disorder,
treatment,
services
in
their
communities.
So
a
lot
of
infrastructure
build
out
and
talk
of
infrastructure
build
out,
really
led
the
aeg
to
create
a
carve
out
specifically
for
projects
that
have
to
do
with
infrastructure.
W
W
Those
are
all
triggered
by
this
participation
in
the
memorandum
of
understanding
and
once
that
memorandum
of
understanding
is
signed
onto
by
a
region
and
a
locality,
the
there
is
a
regional
structure,
a
regional
body
that
needs
to
come
together
and
develop
a
two-year
action
plan
for
how
we
plan
to
distribute
our
funds.
W
You
know
super
intensely
in
the
weeds,
but
some
highlight
of
our
intended
mechanism
and
strategy,
and
you
know
how
we
identified,
which
programming
or
interventions
we
really
wanted
to
support
through
this,
and
you
know
how
we
were
thoughtful
in
looking
at
community
needs
assessments
that
have
already
taken
place
so
that
we
can,
you
know
not
reinvent
the
wheel,
but
rather
just
start
from
a
place
of
already
knowing
where
our
community
gaps
are
supplement,
that,
with
a
you,
know
a
thoughtful
structure
for
gleaning
community
input
and
then
really
sort
of
outlining
how
we
plan
to
to
spend
those
funds
for
the
next
two
years
moving
forward.
W
W
Yet
on
that
rfp
process-
and
you
know,
when
we'll
see
a
little
bit
more
about
grants
that
are
going
to
be
funded
through
that,
but
suffice
to
say
that
that'll
be
sort
of
a
more
traditional
rfp
and
grant
process
in
terms
of
use
for
funds.
You
know
we
had
a
lot
of
discussion
early
on
about.
You
know
how
how
creative
can
we
be
in
expanding
out?
W
You
know
the
focus
or
the
scope
of
these
these
dollars
and
applying
these
dollars,
and
you
know,
I
think,
we're
all
well
aware
that
there's
you
know
heavy
intersectionality
between
our
increase
in
addiction,
our
decrease
in
availability
for
substance,
use,
disorder,
treatment
and
services
and
a
number
of
other
you
know
social
sort
of
concerns
like
housing,
homelessness,
access
to
other
health
care.
W
So
I
think
that
you
know
our
intention
was:
how
can
we
figure
out
what's
been
impacted
by
opioid
use
disorder
and
the
increase
in
substance
use
disorder
as
a
whole
in
our
region?
And
can
we
do
we
have
the
liberty
with
these
dollars
to
sort
of
extend
our
focus
to
some
of
that
program,
programming
and
intervention,
and
so
the
guidance
that
we've
gotten
so
far
from
the
ag
is
that
the
the
the
funds
really
do
need
to
be
used
very
specifically
for
programming
that
it
has
to
do
with
treatment
prevention.
W
Harm
reduction.
Co-Responder
is
a
huge
strategy
that
a
lot
of
our
our
communities
are
looking
into.
That
is
something
that
is
definitely
approved,
as
well
as
some
other
emphasis
on
criminal
justice,
and
you
know
broader
attempts
to
divert
folks
from
criminal
justice
if
their
main
sort
of
charges
or
needs
actually
are
more
aligned
with
substance
use,
disorder
and
treatment.
Connectivity,
community
leadership,
staffing
again,
I've
already
mentioned,
there's
some
infrastructure
emphasis
and
then
administrative
costs
can
also
be
supported
through
these
funds.
W
So
this
is
a
draft
of
our
current
region,
regional
distribution.
This
draft
was
updated
there
on
the
26th
of
april.
So
I
think
you
know
one
change
to
point
out.
We
do
now
have
19
regions,
broomfield
and
boulder,
just
recently
decided
to
go,
do
become
separate
regions.
My
understanding
is
that
they
were
originally
lumped
together
but
for
various
reasons,
thought
it
would
be
more
appropriate
to
to
sort
of
tackle
their
distribution
channels
separately
and
their
allocation
strategies
separately.
W
So
these
are
our
19
regions,
and
I
just
put
this
up
to
you-
know
kind
of
illustrate
for
you
all.
As
we
talk
about
some
of
these
dollar
amounts
coming
forward,
and
you
know
we
have
regional
shares
that
you
can
imagine.
You
know
who's
all
getting
how
that
is
basically
being
split
up
across
the
state
of
colorado.
W
So
the
four
major
litigation
settlements
that
I
wanted
to
kind
of
talk
about
today
are
the
purdue
sackler
bankruptcy,
the
johnson
and
johnson
settlement.
The
mckinsey
settlement,
which
is
actually
the
first
one
that
has
truly
quote
unquote,
landed
here
in
colorado,
state
and
the
mall
and
crop
bankruptcy
settlement.
W
And
so
you
know
some
of
these
numbers.
I
will
point
out
some
of
the
larger
ones
where
we
see
you
know
billions.
Those
are.
Those
are
total
amounts
for
all
of
the
states
that
were
involved
in
the
litigation
so
where
we
do
know
more
appropriately,
the
correct
colorado
amount-
and
you
know
even
more
so
where
we
know
the
the
more
regional
amount
that
we
will
be
allocated.
That's
indicated
here
as
well,
so
purdue
sackler
bankruptcy.
W
We
are
looking
at
3.5
to
5
billion
over
the
next
nine
years
for
the
governments
that
were
involved
in
that
particular
coalition
and
settlement
johnson
and
johnson
you're,
looking
at
an
18-year
distribution
scale
of
12
of
about
22.8
billion
dollars
and
with
the
first
nine
years,
seeing
five
billion
of
those
dollars
the
mckinsey
settlement.
Again,
this
is
the
one
that
has
actively
landed
here
in
colorado,
and
so
we
do
know
a
little
bit
more
about
the
colorado
cut
for
that
settlement.
W
W
W
Finally,
the
male
and
crop
bankruptcy
settlement
is
one
thing:
1.6
billion
total
and
governments
and
tribes
will
be
receiving
up
to
1.3
of
the
1.3
billion
of
those
dollars
starting
in
2022..
W
So
reason
to
kind
of
put
this
up
as
well
is
to
just
kind
of
highlight
that
a
lot
of
these
settlements
they're
coming
in
in
sort
of
waves
of
funding-
and
so
you
know
it's
it's
not
as
though
we're
looking
at
gigantic
pots
happening
all
at
once,
and
really
what
we
need
to
do
in
terms
of
developing
an
appropriate
structure
and
appropriate
allocation
strategy
is
be
super,
mindful
that
it
needs
to
be
something
that
both
responds
to
our
needs
now,
but
also
has
the
flex
and
give
to
adapt
for
a
20-year
period
of
distribution.
W
So
you
know,
as
I
said,
these
are
we're
looking
at
a
minimum
of
18
years
for
distribution
for
some
of
these
settlements.
W
Oh-
and
there
are
a
number
of
smaller
cases,
still
tied
up
in
litigation,
so
we
don't
have
a
super
accurate
account
of
what
we
could
expect
in
terms
of
the
settlement
dollars
for
those
for
those
suits.
W
So
a
little
bit
about
some
near-term
action.
You
know
I've
kind
of
already
alluded
to
this,
and
you
know
this
really
came
forward
with
from
the
ag.
As
you
know,
a
lot
of
our
local
community
members
said:
okay.
Well,
as
the
mou
is
continuing
to
be
finalized,
and
as
some
of
these
excuse
me,
litigation
details
are
continuing
to
come
forward.
What
can
we
do?
Well?
How
can
we
begin
to
organize
around?
W
You
know
what
we
might
hope
to
expect
and
the
strategies
we
know
we
are
going
to
need
to
develop
in
terms
of
funding
allocation,
so
the
ag
put
put
forward
some
guidance
that
we
do
want
to
have.
Well,
no,
we
do
need
to
have
a
regional
committee
that
is
sort
of
the
fund
allocation
strategic
committee.
W
This
committee
would
be
in
charge
of
submitting
that
memorandum
of
understanding
and
the
two-year
action
plan
to
the
attorney
general
for
approval,
and
so
you
know
some
of
the
questions
that
the
eg
fielded
were
really.
You
know
who
do
you?
Who
do
you
suggest
in
terms
of
populating
the
roster
of
these
of
these
committees?
And
this
is
the
guidance
we
received,
which
is
really?
You
should
have
one
or
two
members
that
are
appointed
by
the
county
government.
W
One
individual
appointed
from
some
of
the
larger
human
service
departments
like
public
health
and
housing
and
human
services,
some
additional
representatives
from
law
enforcement
and
criminal
justice,
the
sheriff's
office,
being
a
big
one
to
be
represented
in
that
space,
as
well
as
the
district
attorney's
office
and
bringing
forward
folks
from
that
represent
municipal
or
county
court
systems
within
the
region
and
then
holding
space
for
one
to
three
representatives.
W
That
will
represent
rotating
cities
from
around
the
region,
and
they
can
also
be
council,
council
members
or
mayors
of
those
respective
localities,
representatives
holding
space
as
well
for
counties
or
cities
who
to
sort
of
come
together
before
deciding
if
there's
anybody
who's
already
missing
from
the
table
and
who
they
they
do
need
to
supplement
and
sort
of
bring
into
that
fold.
As
a
voting
member
and
then
additional
suggestions
on
non-voting
membership.
W
One
of
the
suggestions
within
this
group
that
you
know
are
our
particular
code.
Excuse
me
cohort
within
the
county
recommended
actually
elevating
up
to
the
voting
members,
our
folks
with
lived
experience,
making
sure
that
we
are
are
being
equitable
and
reflecting
within
any
of
the
long-term
planning
and
fund
allocation,
the
voice
of
those
who
have
actually
been
impacted
in
our
communities
by
the
increase
in
opioid
use
disorder.
W
So
some
additional
near
steps-
these
are
items
that
would
be
tackled
by
that
regional
committee.
The
first
is
really
that
the
committee
needs
to
establish
a
fiscal
agent
for
the
region
to
to
receive
the
funds
and
then
to
sort
of
own
the
distribution,
as
as
reflected
in
our
distribution
strategy
and
our
two-year
action
plan.
W
We
also
need
to
identify
any
of
the
cities
that
wish
to
allocate
some
of
their
funding
into
the
larger
pot
with
the
region
of
boulder.
You
know
there
have
been
talks
about
some
localities,
getting
a
pretty
small
dollar
amount,
and
you
know
I'm
totally
making
up
this
example,
but
could
the
town
of
lafayette
do
more
with
say
a
fifteen
thousand
dollar
allocation
if
they
put
that
allocation
towards
a
broader
strategy?
W
That's
in
effect
at
the
regional
level
that
includes
representation
from
lafayette,
but
the
strategy
is
joining
the
pot
with
all
of
the
other
localities
that
are
represented
within
boulder
as
a
region.
W
So
there's
been
a
lot
of
talk
about
what
those
structures
of
collaboration
could
potentially
look
like
and
the
funding
streams
that
could
potentially
be
developed
between
local
jurisdictions
and
the
region
as
a
whole.
I
will
say:
no
concrete
decisions
have
yet
been
made
about
how
to
actualize
that
that
distribution
channel
between
local
governments
in
the
in
the
region
of
boulder
county
and
then
the
this
is
the
the
part
you've
already
heard
me
sort
of
mention.
W
The
main
goal
of
this
regional
body
is
to
create
a
two-year
plan
that
really
identifies
their
the
approved
purposes
within
boulder
county
that
we
want
to
request
funds,
for
that
is
the
plan
that
will
be
forwarded
to
the
attorney
general.
With
the
signed
mou
from
this
regional
body
and
release
those
dollars.
W
Oops,
oh
sorry,
that
little
bottom
part
kind
of
hid.
Under
my
my
closed
captioning
and
then
the
last
item
for
this
group
to
to
really
settle
on
is
an
evaluation
approach
so
making
sure
that
there's
some
sort
of
tracking
modality
or
mechanism
in
place
so
that
we're
holding
ourselves
accountable
to
the
two-year
plan
that
anything
we
said
we
were
going
to
fund
and
the
manner
in
which
we
said
we
were
going
to
fund
it.
That
were
that.
We're
tracking
that-
and
you
know
evaluating
it
over
the
course
of
the
two
years.
W
So,
switching
gears
just
a
little
bit.
I
did
want
to
talk
about
this.
This
small
cohort
that
I
mentioned
that
I
sit
on
as
well
as
a
few
others
within
the
county.
W
We
do
have
representation
from
all
of
our
human
service
departments,
public
health,
housing
and
human
services,
community
services
and
community
justice
services
through
myself,
the
sheriff's
office-
and
we,
as
I
mentioned,
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
talk
around
some
of
the
interventions
that
are
housed
sort
of
within
the
criminal
justice
space
and
so
having
sheriff's
office
and
da's
office
representation
on
this
committee
has
been
critical
and
then
sort
of
our
local
expert
in
all
the
little
all
the
litigation
nuances
is
david
hughes
from
the
county
attorney's
office,
who
really
serves
as
a
liaison
between
you
know.
W
What's
going
on
in
the
litigation
space,
which
is
a
a
daily
change
honestly
and
then
sort
of
translating
that
back
to
this
committee,
whose
global
goal
is
to
sort
of
take
that
information
and
translate
it
down
to
you
know
what
do
our
stakeholders
need
to
know?
What
do
we
need
to
communicate
out
to
our
community
and
to
our
county
as
a
whole?.
W
Looking
at
this
sort
of
in
three
particular
phases
and
trying
to
figure
out,
what's
our
global
goal
per
each
phase
and
then
therefore,
what's
our
subsequent
activities
to
actually
achieve
those
goals
and,
most
importantly,
who
really
needs
to
come
together
and
around
what
body
of
work
in
order
to
achieve
that
that
phased
goal,
so
in
phase
one.
This
is
really
where
we're
at
right
now
and
you've
already
heard
me
talk
at
length
about
how
our
main
goal
right
now
is
getting
that
governance
structure
in
place.
W
So
they
can
complete
the
mou
and
create
a
two-year
action
plan.
Really
we're
focusing
on
the
dollar
amounts
that
we
know
for
certain
right
now,
which
is
that
270
000
plus
the
43
000.
That's
landing
specifically
for
the
county,
applying
pressure
to
the
ag
to
really
get
finished
with
that
mou,
so
that
our
local
regions
and
governments
can
come
together
and
you
know,
do
any
final
sort
of
tweaking
or
negotiations
and
and
sort
of
bringing
back
questions
to
the
ag
that
they
might
have
about
the
ou.
W
Excuse
me
the
mou
and
then
really
diving
into
that
two-year
plan
development,
and
then
some
subsequent
activities
that
our
group
has
been
involved
with
is
really
just
cataloging,
where
our
current
urgent
needs
are
so
again
being
really
intentional
about.
Looking
at
past
community
needs
assessments,
public
health
has
done
one.
Our
county
substance
use
advisory
group,
which
is
a
coalition
of
stakeholders
really
dedicated
to
examining
substance,
use
disorder
and
its
effects
across
the
region
from
the
space
of
harm
reduction
and
prevention
up
to
treatment.
W
They
do
an
annual
or
bi-annual
community
needs
assessment,
as
well.
So,
looking
at
what
we
already
know
about
our
communities
and
pulling
forward
some
of
these
shovel
ready
programs
that
we
know
you
know,
we
can
put
smaller
dollar
amounts
towards
and
have
them
go
a
long
way,
because
these
programs
are
already
stood
up,
they're
already
able
to
be
easily
invested
in
in
terms
of
phase
two
of
work.
We're
really
looking
at
you
know
what
is
the
body?
W
What
does
that
regional
committee
do
to
develop
a
broader
allocation
strategy
and
how
do
they
get?
How
do
they
accept
regional
proposals
for
for
funding
so
really
that
that
phase
of
work
is
about
building
consensus
across
the
county
departments
across
the
county
as
a
region
and
the
local
municipalities
that
are
participating
within
the
region?
W
Looking
at
some
of
those
needs
assessments
not
just
from
the
county
but
from
some
of
our
local
jurisdictions
that
have
put
in
similar
work
to
to
really
figure
out
where
the
impact
of
things
like
opioid
use
disorder
are
happening
within
their
respective
communities
and
then
to
start
planning
out.
You
know
what
our
goals
in
terms
of
these
longer
infrastructure
project
projects
that
we
do
know
the
state
is
putting
us.
W
This
set
aside
fund
in
place
for
us
to
apply
for
some
of
those
funds,
and
so
our
goal
in
that
year
is
really
just
to
implement
the
two-year
action
plan
that
we've
set
forward
in
phase
one
to
monitor
it
and
to
make
sure
that
we're
we're
putting
in
place
a
broader
allocation
strategy
that
has
a
lot
more
inclusive
lanes
for
community
input
and
stakeholder
input.
W
As
we
start
to
plan
out
the
full
18
to
20-year
trajectory
of
this
fund
funding
and
then
phase
three
of
the
work
is
really
about
sustainability
planning.
So
this
is,
you
know,
immediately
after
we
get
through
that
two-year
plan.
We've
we've
got
another.
You
know
16
years
that
we
we
have
funding
coming
towards
us
that
we
have.
You
know
a
really
long
runway.
W
I
should
say
that
we
are
able
to
do
some,
some
really
concise
sustainability
planning,
so
the
the
sort
of
phase
of
work
for
the
committee
and
that
period
of
time
will
really
be
to
kind
of
reflect
on,
what's
already
been
accomplished
and
also
reflect
on
the
makeup
of
the
group
and
the
charge
of
the
group
at
that
time
to
say:
are
we
still
the
correct
folks
that
need
to
come
together
around
this
work?
Has
anything
shifted?
W
Has
anything
changed
so
sort
of
a
pdsa
cycle
internally
or
sort
of
a
quality
improvement
mechanism?
W
Aspect
to
you
know
framing
out
our
own
sustainability
of
our
work
and
then
also
looking
at,
what's
already
been
evaluated,
what
we've
already
done
in
that
two-year
plan,
what's
been
working
and
what
potentially
hasn't
been
working
so
well.
W
So
finally,
you
know
before
diving
into
questions.
I
did
just
want
to
point
out
some
initial
work
that
was
put
forward
by
the
colorado
consortium
for
prescription
drug
abuse.
This
is
you
know,
back
in
march
of
2020,
when
the
opioid
litigation
first
started
to
become
you
know,
a
buzzword
or
a
topic
of
interest
for
folks,
the
consortium
decided
to
pull
together
a
number
of
stakeholders
that
really
spanned
across
the
space
of
excuse
me:
treatment
and
recovery
prevention,
harm
reduction,
criminal
justice
and
other.
W
You
know
local
community
based
organizations
dedicated
to
in
some
way
tackling
addiction
and
opioid
use
disorder,
and
they
put
them
through.
You
know
a
multiple
day
exercise,
but
that
started
with
the
question
of,
if
you
had
100
million
dollars,
hypothetically,
that
you
need
to
figure
out
an
allocation
strategy
for
where
would
you
put
those
dollars
to
effectively
rebuild
the
damage?
That's
sort
of
occurred
through
our
increase
in
addiction
and
opioid
use
disorder
within
our
communities?
W
And
this
image
that
you
see
here
is
an
aggregate
of
those
results
from
that
group.
There
is
in
the
in
the
full
report
a
further
breakdown
of
responses
and
the
allocations
by
particular
sectors.
W
So
it's
probably
no
surprise
that
if
you
looked
at
folks
that
were
representing
the
treatment
and
recovery
space,
there
was
a
little
bit
more
emphasis
and
desire
to
allocate
funds
towards
the
treatment
and
recovery
space
and
same
for
the
other
respective
sectors,
but
suffice
to
say
that
by
and
large
the
overwhelming
majority
in
the
aggregate
was
that
treatment
and
recovery
is
is
really
where
we
need
to
focus
our
energy
and
our
funds
specifically
bringing
forward
treatment
and
recovery
options
in
rural
communities
and
underserved
communities
that
are
not
in
our
urban
cores.
W
So,
additionally,
in
the
report-
and
this
is
a
framework
that
we
have
followed
in
our
initial
discussions-
they
did
do
a
breakdown
of
those
four
categories-
those
four
sort
of
sectors.
That
really
are,
you
know
the
qualifying
sectors
for
some
of
this
funding,
and
they
did
put
forward
a
number
of
example,
programs
or
interventions
that
would
really
qualify
for
these
funds.
Now.
W
This
is
not
at
all
to
imply
that
there
is
programming
or
interventions
outside
of
these
types
that
wouldn't
also
qualify
for
funding
of
the
litigation
dollars,
but
this
is
really
just
a
sort
of
provided
framework
for
communities
as
they
start
to
figure
out.
You
know
what
do
we
already
have
that's
working
in
our
community?
What's
working
in
our
neighboring
communities
that
we
don't
have
that
we'd
like
to
start,
and
you
know
how
do
we
build
up
and
support
some
of
the
interventions
that
are
are
overwhelmed
by
by
this
opioid
epidemic?
W
Currently,
so
I
won't
go
through
all
of
these.
These
are
also
listed
in
that
consortium
report.
There's
a
link
to
the
full
report
on
the
last
slide
and
I
can
also
send
that
out
to
the
group
afterwards,
if
folks
are
interested
in
taking
a
bigger
look
at
the
work,
the
consortium
did
to
really.
You
know,
develop
a
fairly
robust
mechanism
for
community
input,
so
questions.
W
I
know
we
have
time
for
questions
and
before
we
dive
in,
I
will
just
sort
of
give
the
disclaimer
that
I'm
without
my
team
tonight,
unfortunately-
and
so
you
know
if
there
are
questions
that
I
can't
answer-
and
I'm
happy
to
forward
them
to
david
hughes,
our
county
attorney
representative
who's
a
lot
more
versed
in
the
fund
allocation
strategies
and
the
details
of
the
mou,
but
unfortunately
he
could
not
be
here
tonight
but
again,
happy
to
take
all
of
your
questions
and
I'll
do
my
best
to
get
you
the
information
you
need.
L
Thanks
so
much
kelly,
that
was
an
awesome
presentation
and
informative,
and
if
you
I
will
call
on
aaron
in
a
second
and
then
sam
for
questions,
but
also,
if
you
have
specific
feedback
that
you're
looking
for
from
us
tonight.
Let
us
know
what
what
that
might
be
and
then
go
ahead.
Please.
W
In
terms
of
specific
feedback,
I
think
that
we're
just
sort
of
interested
in
hearing
what
the
city
of
boulder
you
know
how
what
the
timeline
would
be
and
who
the
individuals
that
need
to
be
engaged
in
this
work
are
so
that
we
can
move
forward.
That
really
near-term
goal
of
developing.
Excuse
me
developing
the
regional
body
for
governance.
W
W
I
don't
not
that
I
know
of
at
this
time.
I
think
all
of
the
larger
settlements
have
not
been
broken
down
to
the
county
level.
It's
sort
of
the
last
step
in
the
process.
W
W
So,
unfortunately,
it's
it's
there's
been
a
lot
of
misinformation
kind
of
floating
around
and
about
some
of
these
settlements
and
some
of
the
dollars
that
are
attached
to
them,
and
you
know,
I
think
the
added
challenge
comes
in
that
a
lot
of
the
initial
conversations
around
these
settlements
are
really
confidential
and
protected.
So
we're
not
necessarily
getting
just
in
time
updates
on
some
of
these
litigations
and
these
suits
as
they
move
along.
I
Yeah
no
worries
but-
and
I'm
just
talking
about
order
of
magnitude,
so
if
somebody
has
a
sense
that
it's
going
to
be
similar
kinds
of
numbers
to
the
240
or
if
it
more
or
less
it,
hopefully
won't
be
like
those
class
action
lawsuits
that
you're
a
member
of,
and
then
you
get
a
check
for
a
dollar
22
at
the
end
right.
So,
okay,
thanks
for
that
and
then
the
other
one
is
so.
This
is
obviously
about
an
opioid
settlement,
which
is
an
enormous
area
of
addiction
problems
in
our
community.
I
W
Yeah,
so
we
do
have
clarity
that
other
substance
use
disorder.
Treatment
is
appropriate
for
use
of
the
funds.
I
think
the
only
real
parameters
around
you
know
where
we
get
into
the
space
of
scope
creep
is
when
we
started
to
talk
about.
You
know
housing
services,
and
you
know
some
of
the
intersectionality
between
increase
in
addiction
and
the
inability
to
get
folks
housed
and
those
sort
of
things
are
a
little
bit
more
on
the
periphery.
W
We
all
know,
of
course,
that
they
touch
on
addiction
very
strongly,
but
we
do
need
to
sort
of
stay
within
the
space
of
substance,
use
disorder
and
opioid
use
disorder
in
terms
of
allocation
for
the
funds,
but
substance
use
disorder
more
broadly
than
oud
is
inclusive
within
that.
I
That's
good
to
know,
and
then
you
were
asking
like
how
do
we
get
this
started?
I
see
kristen
heiser
here
on
the
screen.
I'm
sure
she
would
be
the
one
to
tell
you
how
who
you
should
talk
to
at
the
city
to
get
this
moving
thanks.
So
much
for
being
here
tonight.
L
Thanks
erin
and
I
did
notice
kristen
that
you
you
popped
up
on
screen.
So
do
you
want
to
chime
in
before
I
give
sam
the
floor?
Yeah.
R
If
you
didn't,
if
you
don't
mind,
I
just
wanted
to
add
kind
of
a
project
that
we're
pretty
excited
about
that's
happening
imminently,
so
we
are
working
really
closely
with
the
county.
It
includes
public
health,
community
services
hhs
over
there,
as
well
as
log
bond
and
our
reach
in
our
regional,
mental
health
and
behavioral
health
partners
to
do
a
thorough
assessment
of
kind
of
the
existing
services
I
mentioned
at
the
top
of
the
presentation.
I
just
wanted
you
to
know.
R
I
think
it
was
at
her
side
of
saying
that
this
is
going
to
be
a
broad
assessment
of
what
is
available.
Currently,
what
are
the
gaps,
and
that
will
the
planning,
as
we
move
forward
with
this
opportunity,
so
just
wanted
the
group
to
know
that
that
is
something
that
we
are
actively
pursuing
and
scoping
out
now
with
the
county.
Taking
the
lead
on
this
and
there'll
be
opportunities
for
us
to
help
inform
that
process.
W
W
Those
are
the
types
of
tools
and
resources
that
you
know
as
communities
build
those
out
for
themselves,
so
start
thinking
of
those
now
and
start
bringing
thinking
about
the
ways
to
kind
of
pull
those
forward,
because
I
think
that
gives
us
leverage
and
the
ability
to
kind
of
hit
the
ground
running.
You
know
we
do
have
tools
at
our
disposal
like
the
framework
that
the
consortium
put
forward,
to
continue
doing
some
broad
community
analysis
and
to
an
extent
that
will
be
done
either
way.
W
Just
because
this
is
a
unique
situation
and
we
need
to
get
that
voice
of
the
community
really
at
the
table
here.
But
we
do
want
to
be
able
to
kind
of
move
these
things
forward
quickly
and
knowing
what
we
already
know
about
our
communities
is
the
biggest
standing
ground
or
piece
of
foundation
that
we
can
really
stand
on
in
doing
that.
So
thank
you
for
offering
that.
D
W
That
one
is
not
over
18
years.
I'd
have
to
double
check
that
the
last
I
heard
I
believe
it
was
over
six
years.
I
will
have
to
get
you
an
exact
number
on
that
distribution
scale,
but
it
was
a
much
shorter
one.
So
we
are
looking
at
getting
the
majority
of
those
funds
right
up
front,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
that
cohort
that
county
cohort
was
really
charged
with
bringing
forward
shovel
ready
programming
that
could
benefit
greatly
from
you
know,
a
quick
infuse
of
dollars
for
sustainability
purposes,
really.
W
The
criteria
that
we
were
looking
at
for
our
acute
programming
or
excuse
me
for
our
shovel
ready
programming
was
that
it
was
serving
an
acute
population
with
an
acute
need.
So
some
of
the
things
that
came
up
were
mat
services
within
the
boulder
county
jail
and
those
were
really
in
the
co-responder
expansion
of
co-responder,
because
we
have
a
few
regional
co-responder
programs
that
already
have
footing
and
could
just
sort
of
benefit
from
having
maybe
one
or
two
additional
staff.
D
Great
and
so
that
270
000
will
be
administered
by
this
larger
regional
group,
which
is
still
within
the
boundaries
of
boulder
county
and
then
the
43
000
that
you
reference
that
goes
to
the
county.
That's
your
direct
allocation
as
a
local
government.
Is
that
correct
so
will?
Will
the
city
of
boulder
expect
about
the
same
43
000
to
the
city
out
of
this
or
something
on
that
order.
W
That
one
I
would
have
to
check
on
for
you,
I'm
not
sure
how
the
allocation
structures
are
created
at
the
eg
level.
So
I'm
not
entirely
certain
how
the
the
43
000
carve
out
was
decided
upon
for
the
boulder
county
government.
But
I'm
I'm
happy
to
look
into
that
one
for
you
to
get
a
more
accurate
number
for
the
city.
D
I
I
guess
I
would
then
ask
you
know-
is
the
county
portion
based
on
just
people
in
the
unincorporated
county
if
the
cities
are
getting
all
their
own
direct
allocations,
but
I'll
just
ask
directly?
Is
it
your
understanding
that
cities
as
local
governments
will
be
getting
direct
allocations
just
like
the
county
got
a
direct
allocation
that.
W
Is
my
understanding?
Yes,
so
I
think
what,
in
terms
of
your
question
around
the
framework
for
how
those
allocation
amounts
are
decided,
that's
something
I'm
happy
to
look
into.
You
know
I
think,
in
terms
of
knowing
whether
or
not
it's
population
based
or
based
on
some
other
determining
mechanism.
I
think
that's
you
know,
obviously
something
we
want
to
get
to
the
city
council
as
soon
as
possible.
So
you
have
an
understanding.
D
Great
well
that'd
be
helpful
and
kristin
may
even
know
already,
but
I
guess
the
reason
I'm
going
through
these
generations
is
just
thinking
about.
You
know
that
was
top
line
of
500
million
dollar
settlement
and
there's
you
know
top
line,
25
billion
dollars
in
settlements,
so
there's
like
40
or
50
times
as
much
money
coming
in
as
what
we're
talking
about
there.
But
some
of
that
money
comes
in
over
18
years
so
to
to
get
a
handle
on.
This
is
difficult.
D
It
seems
to
me
like
we're
talking
ballpark
50
000
to
75
000
a
year
for
the
city,
something
like
that.
You
know
it's
hard
to
figure
out
until
we
know
the
formulas,
but
just
trying
to
wrap
our
heads
around
how
much
money-
and
I
think
I
guess
I've
been
in
a
few
meetings
about
this-
invited
as
a
mayor
and
I've
sat
through
some
of
the
conversation.
But
one
of
the
things
that
was
never
clear
to
me
is
like
how
many
dollars
we're
talking
about.
D
So
if
it's
in
the
order,
fifty
thousand
hundred
thousand,
then
the
question
for
the
next
council
as
these
dollars
get
bigger
and
the
picture
becomes
more
clear-
I
think
is
gonna
be.
Do
we
just
wanna
turn
our
allocation
directly
over
to
the
region,
or
do
we
want
to
do
some
of
our
own
allocation
of
that
money,
probably
in
collaboration
with
the
region
and
the
county?
D
So
it
doesn't
surprise
me
that
you
can't
answer
completely
right
now,
because
I
think
things
are
still
evolving,
but
I
think
it's
worth
the
council
thinking
about
you
know
when
the
numbers
become
clear.
How
do
we
want
to
interface
with
quote
the
region?
Which
really
is
the
county,
but
with
this
other
government
structure-
and
I
see
kristin,
you
have
your
hand
up
too.
R
R
There's
been
so
much
collaboration
and
we've
had
such
a
great
year
and
a
half
working
with
the
cbrf
funds
and
the
arpa
funds
and
how
we
are
working
with
our
community
partners
and
our
regional
partners
that
I
think,
there's
a
great
foundation
as
we're
moving
forward
within
the
structure
that
kelly
just
defined,
that
we
can
inform
that
as
to
our
participation
in
it,
but
feel
very
confident
that
there's
going
to
be
an
opportunity,
whether
we
accept
the
dollars
ourselves
and
can
implement
it.
R
Programs
that
serve
our
needs
or
working
very
closely
with
our
partners
to
make
sure
we're
doing
this
regionally
and
have
a
having
a
bigger
impact.
So
those
conversations
are
ongoing
and
continue
to
be
very
fruitful.
And
so
I
just,
I
feel
very
confident
that
either
way
that
this
city
council
advises
or
the
future
city
councils
do
that
this
will
have
a
great
outcome
for
our
region.
In
this
particular
area.
D
Cooper
thanks
for
that-
and
I
guess
I'll
just
make
the
comment-
this
isn't
really
a
question.
This
could
be
a
fairly
small
amount
of
dollars.
You
know
in
the
city
but
more
for
the
county
in
the
region,
but
it
certainly
seems
like
it
would
plug
into
helping
us
fill
that
gap
in
services
for
the
unsheltered,
then
house.
So,
however,
this
works
out
as
far
as
dollar
amounts
go
it.
Everything
is
appreciated
in
being
able
to
address
this
problem.
So
that's
all
I've
got
thanks.
Rachel.
W
One
thing
I
would
just
add
is
that
the
opportunity
that
boulder
county
has
as
being
a
bit
of
a
smaller
region,
in
that
it's
a
single
region,
is
that
we,
you
know
a
lot
of
the
interventions
that
we're
talking
about,
are
going
to
span
the
entire
region
as
a
whole.
So
some
of
those
larger
means
regions.
If
you
can
recall
that
map
I
put
up
that,
are
six
seven
counties.
You
know
I
think
they're
having
to
be
really
strategic
about.
How
do
we?
W
How
do
we
pool
our
dollars,
but
also
sort
of
protect
some
of
the
local
allocations
that
are
reserved
for
local
interventions
and
for
us
it's
almost
an
opposite
conversation
is
how
do
we
pool
our
dollars
most
effectively
out
of
consideration
for
the
fact
that
many
of
the
interventions
that
we're
going
to
be
funding
through
this
are
spanning
the
entire
region
of
boulder
county,
and
so
I
think
it's
a
unique
opportunity,
just
in
the
way
that
we
are
shaped
as
one
particular
a
singular
county
in
a
singular
region.
L
Thanks
kelly
thanks
again
sam
and
just
to
follow
up
on
those
points,
you
know
if
it
is
something
like
50
000
a
year
that
would
come
into
the
city.
That
would
be
a
paltry
sum
to
do
any
large
outreach
or
effective
resources
I
feel
like
with
so.
Hopefully
the
the
next
council
will
have
a
chance
to
to
win
with
more
information,
and
it
sounds
like
tonight
we're
not.
L
We
don't
need
to
do
that
yet,
because
what
you,
if
I
understood
you
correctly,
are
looking
for
is
for
us
to
weigh
in
on
the
on
the
governance
formation
aspect.
So
on
that
point
I
guess
I'm
wondering
it
did
that
come
fully
baked
to
us.
So
you
know
you
listed
the
the
people
who
can
or
the
positions
who
can
participate
and
one
thing
that
that
jumped
out
was
the
person
with
you
know.
The
representation
of
whoever
has
lived
experience
would
be
a
non-voting
member.
L
W
So
we
do
have
wiggle
room
in
in
terms
of
the
representation,
and
I
think
that
was
an
important
note
that
came
out
in
our
early
discussions
with
the
county
as
well.
Is
that
we
we
would
love
to
elevate
the
voice
of
someone
from
with
lived
experience
to
be
a
member
of
that
voting
cohort
instead
of
just
sort
of
the
the
set-aside
advisory
committee.
W
So
in
terms
of
the
rotation-
and
you
know
moving
folks
in
and
out
of
some
of
those
seats,
I'd
have
to
confirm,
but
I
believe
that
we
do
have
a
fair
amount
of
liberty.
This
was
really
a
framework
that
was
put
forward
by
the
ag
for
guidance
just
to
make
sure
that
you
know
local
governments
or
regions
had
an
understanding
of
who
to
begin
reaching
out
to
and
start
of,
as
and
starting
to
sort
of
pull
together
and
convene
around
these
discussions.
But
it's
my
understanding.
L
Great
thanks
and,
and
so
I
will
invite
other
council
members
to
weigh
in
on
that,
if
anyone
else
wants
to
make
suggestions,
but
mine
would
be
that
people
like
kristen
heiser
and
people
with
lived
experience
are
going
to
be
more
useful
at
that
table
than
I
would
be.
So
that's.
My
vote
is
to
make
sure
that
you
have
those
voices
there
thanks.
I
N
Just
a
real
quick
comment,
first
of
all,
thank
you
kelly
and
just
wanted
to
agree
with
sam
on
the
point
that
he
brought
up
regarding
the
amounts
of
dollars
that
it
may
end
up
being
and
that
it
might
make
the
most
sense
to
just
hand
off
the
city's
portion
over
to
the
county
and
and
work
in
partnership.
That
way.
L
W
Yes-
and
I
know
this
is
very
much
in
the
preliminary
stages,
and
so
you
know
really
wanted
to
present
what
we
were
thinking
in
terms
of
framework
and
bringing
together
the
right
folks
to
start
to
develop
a
broader
allocation
strategy.
So
this
is
just
the
first
of
many
more
formed
updates,
and
I
appreciate
your
your
feedback
as
it
is.
W
I
also
am
going
to
take
away
a
few
of
these
questions
about
sort
of
the
the
allocation
strategy
or
excuse
me,
the
allocation
amounts
and
how
those
are
decided
and
see
if
I
can
get
more
guidance
on
that
from
from
david
and
get
back
to
you
all
with
it.
L
That's
great
thanks
again,
this
was
very
helpful
and
it's
exciting
work
that
that,
hopefully,
can
be
a
bit
transformative.
Mary,
you
have
a
hand
up.
Is
that
an
old
hand
appreciate
an.
L
All
right,
okay,
I
think
that
that
is
all
for
this
topic
then
noria,
unless
there
was
anything
else
from
staff's
point
of
view
on
it.
That
is
all
we've
got
all
right
thanks
and
is
there?
Was
there
a
late
ad
to
another
item
for
tonight,
or
is
that
we
good
that's
maybe
to
alicia
at
the
end
of
our
agenda?
D
Ad
was
just
to
the
special
meeting.
L
All
right,
thank
you,
so
we
did
not
break
any
records
on
having
a
short
meeting
tonight.
I'm
sorry
about
that,
but
thank
you
all
and
have
a
good
night
we're.