►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 6-8-23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
Good
evening
and
welcome
to
tonight's
study
session
of
the
Boulder
City
Council
I
am
council
member
Nicole
Speer.
Thank
you
for
joining
us.
We
have
on
tonight's
agenda
two
items.
Our
first
item
will
be
the
Boulder
Junction
Phase
2
update,
and
our
second
item
is
the
community
culture
resilience
and
safety
tax,
ccrs
non-profit
support
program,
a
review
of
the
grant
criteria.
B
There
was
a
third
item
inadvertently
listed
on
the
agenda
for
tonight
titled
discussion
on
proposed
rules
regarding
Council
participation
at
boarding,
commission
meetings.
This
item
was
removed
prior
to
Monday's
Council
agenda
committee
meeting
and
should
not
have
been
listed
on
tonight's
agenda.
This
item
will
be
rescheduled
for
a
future
meeting
after
Council
summer
recess.
We
apologize
for
any
confusion.
This
may
have
caused
we'll
start
the
meeting
this
evening
with
an
announcement.
B
The
2023
boards
and
commissions
mid-year
recruitment
period
is
now
open
from
May
29th
to
July,
2nd
2023.
We
are
accepting
applications
for
the
following
board
or
commission
beverage,
licensing,
Authority
Boulder,
Junction
access,
District
parking,
Boulder,
Junction
access,
District
travel,
demand,
management,
downtown
management,
commission
landmarks
board
and
University
Hill
commercial
area
management.
Commission.
You
may
find
board
and
commission
descriptions
and
vacancies
online
at.
B
Before
we
go
into
our
work
items,
I
will
take
a
moment
to
outline
how
the
meeting
will
be
conducted.
We
will
review
staff's
presentations
for
each
of
the
items
or
subsections
of
each
item
and
then
we
will
have
a
time
for
questions
at
the
end
of
each
presentation
and
questions
period.
We
will
conduct
our
Council
discussion
with
staff.
If
you
have
any
questions,
please
wait
for
staff
to
complete
their
presentation
and
please
save
any
comments
for
after
our
question
periods.
C
Thank
you
so
much
councilmember
and
I'm
excited
to
hear
and
have
staff
present
a
little
bit
more
on
this
really
cross-departmental
work.
That's
been
happening
on
Boulder
Junction
and
with
that
I'll
ask
KJ,
I,
think
you're
gonna
kick
us
off
and
if
you
can
introduce
yourself
and
the
team
as
you
go
forward,
that'd
be
great.
D
I
will
do
that
hello
city
council,
thank
you
for
having
us
here
this
evening.
I'm
Christopher
Johnson
I'm,
the
comprehensive
planning
manager
with
planning
and
development
services
joined
here
by
my
colleagues
in
pnds,
Chris,
wranglos
and
Vivian
Castro
Wooldridge.
We
also
have
Rachel
shinman
and
Daniel
rebond
from
EPS.
There
are
economic
and
market
study,
consultants
and
they'll
be
available
for
questions
and
also
Rachel
will
be
doing
part
of
our
presentation
to
give
city
council
an
update
on
some
of
the
preliminary
market
trends
that
we
have
uncovered
as
part
of
this
project.
D
And
hopefully,
you
are
now
seeing
the
presentation
great,
seeing
a
thumbs
up
excellent.
So,
as
Nuria
mentioned,
we
are
here
to
provide
you
an
update
on
the
Boulder
Junction
phase
two
project.
This
is
one
of
City
council's
priorities
and
we
have
been
really.
D
The
year
and
have
offered
a
couple
of
more
text
updates
and
through
an
information
packet
earlier
in
the
year,
so
we
are
excited
to
be
here
to
speak
to
you
directly
and
get
some
feedback
on
some
Alternatives
and
really
direction
for
a
preferred
alternative.
D
So
really
quickly
and
just
in
terms
of
overview.
We
are
going
to
provide
a
brief
project
overview.
We
do
have
a
lot
to
cover
tonight,
so
we're
going
to
move
fairly
quickly
through
the
slides.
We
can
always
pull
those
back
up
and
go
back
to
them,
but
hopefully
you've
had
a
chance
to
review
the
memo
that
includes
much
of
this
information,
but
we'll
start
with
a
quick
project
overview
we'll
go
into
what
we've
heard
through
our
community
engagement
process
and
and
then
also
have
an
opportunity
for
Rachel
to
share
some
insights
into
the
preliminary
market.
D
So
what
we
are
here
to
speak
about
this
evening
is
the
transit,
Village
area
plan
and
really
an
amendment
to
the
transit
Village
area
plan.
So
the
area
is
now
relatively
known
as
Boulder
Junction
and
that's
how
we've
been
referring
to
it.
The
transit
Village
area
plan
was
completed
back
in
2007.
D
It
guides
future
development
within
this
particular
area
and
back
at
the
end
of
last
year,
in
late
2022,
there
was
Council
direction
to
move
forward
with
amending
the
plan
really
to
update
it
to
where
we
are
here
15
years
later,
and
do
that
prior.
A
D
Moving
forward
with
a
significant
implementation
step
so
before
we
would
change
in
land
uses
or
rezonings
or
look
at
any
infrastructure
phasing,
we
wanted
to
basically
revisit
the
area
plan
and
one
clarification
I
just
want
to
make
and
something
we've
been
keeping
in
mind
as
staff
team
moving
forward
through
this
process.
Is
that
really
this
is?
This
is
an
opportunity
for
us
to
just
make
some
very
strategic
updates
to
the
plan
we
are.
We
are
not
Reinventing
the
wheel
or
really
starting
from
scratch.
D
There's
a
lot
of
really
great
information
and
policy
guidance,
that's
in
the
original
plan,
and
so
we're
you
know
really
holding
on
to
a
lot
of
that
probably
85
and
just
making
some
very
key
and
strategic
updates
as
we
move
forward.
We're
focusing
in
on
three
particular
areas
of
the
topic
topic
matters
for
the
for
the
Amendments
going
forward.
D
So
we
are
evaluating
and
looking
at
potential
amendments
to
the
transportation
connections
plan
the
land
use
that
is
described
within
the
plan
and
then
finally,
the
Urban
Design
and
character
for
the
phase
two
area,
and
so
we
will
cover
those
three
items
tonight
and
have
a
key
question
for
you
to
discuss
as
we
move
forward
a
couple
of
thoughts
to
just
really
set
the
table
in
terms
of
some
considerations
and
opportunities
in
phase
two.
That
staff
has
certainly
been
thinking
about
and
has
come
up
as
part
of
our
community
engagement
feedback.
D
We've
been
hearing
and
also
I
think
it's
important
for
Council
to
keep
this
in
mind
as
well,
that
this
is
a
bit
of
a
different
animal
than
the
phase
one
area
which
was
on
the
west
side
of
the
railroad
tracks.
A
lot
of
that
area
was
open
parking,
lots
and
vacant
lands
from
the
original,
colored
motor
site
and
other
other
kind
of
large-scale,
open
and
vacant
areas.
This
is
totally
different
here.
D
We
have
multiple
properties,
multiple
owners,
a
lot
of
existing
structures,
there's
very
few
vacant
areas
within
the
phase
two
Zone
there's
a
very
vibrant
local
business.
Community.
That's
on
site,
there's
there's
also
not
any
developable
city-owned
property.
If
you
remember
back
on
the
phase
one
side,
the
city
owned
a
large
amount
of
acreage
that
ultimately
then
partnered
with
them,
affordable
housing
developers
and
others
to
bring
those
projects
forward.
But
here
really
the
only
city-owned
property
is
the
area
along
Goose
Creek
that
serves
as
storm
and
flood
water
management
and
also
some
Park
and
open
space.
D
Paths
and
that
type
of
thing
we
anticipate
and
really
expect
that
this
is
going
to
be
a
fairly
incremental
change
over
time.
So
we
are
trying
to
think
about
the
really
the
character
of
this
area
and
how
it
can
react
to
the
market
in
the
future
and
and
respond
to
a
lot
of
intermediate
conditions.
So
it's
not
all
going
to
change
overnight.
It's
going
to
be
I
think
a
very
more
sort
of
progressive
and
incremental
change
over
time.
That's
going
to
happen
piece
by
piece
as
opposed
to
large-scale
Redevelopment.
D
The
other
benefit
that
we
have
as
staff
is
that
we
recognize
that
there
was
a
three-year
process
to
work
through
the
East
Boulder
subcommunity
plan,
which
was
recently
adopted
last
year
and
offers
a
lot
of
very
relevant
policies
and
a
planning
framework
that
we
can
apply
here.
The
character
of
this
area
in
terms
of
its
existing
uses
and
what
the
future
may
hold
is
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
similarities
there
with
these
Builders
of
community
plan,
so
again
we're
drawing
upon
that
force
and
inspiration
as
we
move
forward.
D
So
the
key
questions
for
you
this
evening
are
going
to
be
around
those
three
topic
areas.
So
does
council
agree
with
the
possible
changes
to
the
transportation
connections?
Does
council
agree
with
potential
land
use
changes
that
are
being
considered
and
then
finally,
do
you
agree
with
the
proposed
approach
to
using
Place
types
and
publics
and
and
the
approach
to
public
spaces
to
better
Define
the
Urban
Design
character
of
the
outcomes?
G
Thank
you
KJ
and
good
evening.
Council
members,
I'm
Vivian
I'm.
The
engagement
lead
for
this
project
and
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
sharing
with
you
how
and
what
we
heard
through
the
process
about
phase
one
and
hopes
for
phase
two
and
you'll
see
later
in
the
presentation
how
this
feedback
is
reflected
in
The
Guiding
principles
that
underlie
that
teams
work
next
slide,
so
we've
made
numerous
channels
available
to
make
sure
we're
hearing
from
Broad
and
diverse
voices
in
the
community
and
at
the
same
time
ensuring
we
hear
from
those
will
be
highly
impacted.
G
We
have
four
focus
groups
with
a
total
of
67
members
and
we're
very
appreciative
of
their
time
and
thoughtfulness
in
providing
feedback.
We've
met
twice
virtually
and
had
two
site
tours
with
focus
group
members
and
members
include
people
who
live
or
work
in
or
near
Boulder
Junction.
They
include
phase
one
and
phase
two
property
and
business
owners.
They
include
representatives
of
various
advocacy
topics
and
they
also
include
the
development
community
and
the
project
team
is
also
being
supported
by
two
Community
connectors.
G
We've
had
two
open
houses
and
online
questionnaires
as
well
to
provide
options
for
the
broader
public
to
participate
and
to
ensure
that
property
owners
and
businesses
in
the
phase
2
area
were
aware
of
the
project
and
could
provide
input.
We've
sent
mailings
and
emails
explaining
all
the
various
engagement
opportunities
and
communication
channels
and
organized
a
site
tour
specifically
targeting
property
and
business
owners,
and
we've
also
been
collaborating
with
representatives
of
other
departments
in
the
city.
G
Next
slide,
as
noria
mentioned,
the
project
covers,
subject
matter
that
spans
several
of
our
boards
and
commissions
and
I
wanted
to
highlight
that
this
project
is
piloting.
A
multi-board
working
group
and
the
overarching
purpose
is
to
ensure
that
we
have
an
efficient
mechanism
to
share
information
with
and
seek
input
from
all
interested
boards.
But
to
do
this
without
having
to
meet
individually
with
each
one.
We
had
our
first
meeting
at
the
end
of
May
and
the
next
meeting
is
scheduled
for
July
and
we've
already
received
some
initial
feedback.
G
There
was
also
some
discussion
and
a
hope
expressed
in
the
first
meeting
that
perhaps
with
greater
densities
and
activity
here,
it
would
make
a
commuter
rail
option
more
viable
in
terms
of
land
use.
There
were
comments
about
how
great
our
flexibility
of
land
uses
will
help
the
area
evolve
over
time
in
response
to
demands
and
opportunities
and
could
lead
to
more
interesting
character
and
in
terms
of
public
space,
the
as
a
city
doesn't
own
any
developable
land.
In
the
phase
two
area,
there
was
some
concern
about
how
to
make
privately
owned
public
spaces.
G
A
success
next
slide,
please.
So
these
are
some
pictures
of
our
two
open
houses.
We
had
over
40
people
attend
the
first
one
and
over
60
people
attend
the
second
one.
Next
slide.
Please
and
now
I'll
share
an
overview
of
what
we
heard
so
I'll
start
with
the
feedback
on
how
the
phase
one
area
has
developed.
G
We
heard
from
many
people
that,
despite
the
challenges
that
we
all
know
about,
with
the
halted,
RTD
Services
people
did
appreciate
the
longer
term
vision
of
the
transit
oriented
design,
with
its
mix
of
residential
types
offered
at
a
range
of
prices
and
the
mixed
land
uses
and
the
well-connected
mobility
Network
and
improved
walkability.
In
terms
of
dislikes.
We
heard
that
the
architecture
felt
flat
and
across
the
board,
we
heard
the
desire
for
more
green
public
space
and
tree
canopy
throughout
phase
one,
so
more
places
to
gather
and
connect
and
for
kids
to
play.
G
G
We
heard
quite
a
bit
about
the
fear
or
disappointment
at
the
prospect
of
losing
a
beloved
business
that
currently
serves
as
a
community
Gathering
space
and
the
desire
to
keep
these
types
of
businesses.
Here
is
the
area
Transitions
and
generally
ensuring
that
smaller
businesses
would
be
able
to
thrive
here,
because
it
makes
for
more
interesting
or
social
neighborhood
community.
G
We
also
heard
the
desire
for
an
attraction
that
would
contribute
to
Boulder
Junction's
identity
and
a
sense
of
community
and
be
a
draw,
and
the
idea
of
a
Gateway
also
came
up
quite
a
bit.
The
community
felt
that,
with
its
location
next
to
Foothills
and
adjacent
to
East
Boulder,
we
should
have
some
Urban
design
elements
that
make
it
feel
special
like
this
is
Boulder
Junction,
and
that
would
help
with
the
transition
from
a
more
industrial,
East
Boulder
into
other
parts
of
Boulder.
G
G
We
heard
feedback
from
phase
one
that
the
retail
and
Commercial
spaces
are
spread
out
and
that
it
would
be
better
for
for
both
Place
making
and
business
liability
to
Cluster
retail
in
a
few
strategic
locations,
and
the
team
will
explore
this.
We
heard
over
and
over
again
that
residents
in
Boulder
Junction
would
like
more
spaces
to
gather
including
kid-friendly
spaces,
and
even
the
idea
of
a
dog
park
was
and
how
important
these
amenities
are,
especially
in
a
denser
neighborhood
in
denser
neighborhoods,
with
multi-family
housing.
G
H
Perfect,
thank
you.
So
I'm
gonna
do
a
very,
very
quick
Market
overview
and
we'll
have
lots
of
time
for
questions.
But,
as
Christopher
said
in
the
introduction,
I
am
Rachel.
Shinman
I'm
a
vice
president
with
economic
complaining
systems
and
Dan
Dimond
senior
principal
in
our
office
is
on
the
call
as
well.
For
the
conversation
we're
based
in
Denver,
we're
a
land
economics,
consulting
firm.
H
You
can
see
what
we
do
there,
but
we
have
done
a
lot
of
work
in
the
region
in
Boulder,
specifically
and
actually
on
the
tbat
plan
back
in
2007.
So
it's
been
exciting
for
us.
I
wasn't
here
back
then,
but
Dan
worked
on
it
to
see
how
it
has
built
out
and
now
to
get
to
take
another
look
at
it.
So
on
the
next
slide,
you'll
see
the
framework
of
the
analysis
that
we're
doing
so.
H
This
is
one
component
of
the
broader
study
right
now,
but
what
we're
really
looking
at
is
those
initial
land
uses
that
were
proposed
in
the
original
plan
and
do
those
still
align
with
the
market
and
if
not,
what
changes
might
be
needed.
So
today
we're
doing
a
very
high
level.
Look
and
as
we
move
through
the
process,
we're
doing
more
detailed
analysis,
specifically
within
this
area,
to
really
understand
how
the
market
has
changed
since
2007
and
what
changes
that
might
mean
for
this
area
and
so
you'll
see
throughout
this
study.
H
We're
looking
at
industrial
Flex
office,
retail
and
multi-family
as
a
core
land
uses
and
the
the
market
characteristics
of
those
and
the
outcome
is
understanding.
What
changes
to
the
land
uses
might
be
needed
and
then
also
as
we
look
at
implementation,
what
some
gaps
might
be
in
terms
of
implementing
the
types
of
development
that
the
community
wants
to
see
and
what
tools
and
strategies
and
policies
might
be
able
to
address
those
so
on.
H
The
next
slide,
there's
a
whole
lot
of
words,
but
this
is
a
high
level
overview
of
market
trends
in
these
four
areas.
City-Wide,
and
so
in
general.
H
H
Where
we're
seeing
larger
industrial
users
migrate
out
of
the
city
to
where
there's
cheaper,
larger
pieces
of
land
to
get
the
types
of
development
that
they're
looking
for
and
so
an
adaptation
of
industrial
space
within
the
city,
and
then
retail
has
sort
of
followed
the
larger,
broader
retail
Trends
over
the
last.
You
know
10
15
years,
and
that
and
so
less
new
development
and
slowing,
rent
growth
and
then
office
is
really
interesting
to
us
right
now,
because
we're
still
working
out
with
the
impacts
of
covid
are
so.
H
Rents
are
still
high,
particularly
in
downtown
as
as
we'll
see
in
Phase
One
area,
but
vacancies
are
also
very
high
and,
and
so
we're
still
looking
at
what
that
means
for
the
future.
So
in
the
next
couple
of
slides
I'm
going
to
walk
through
these
specific
areas
for
the
Boulder
Junction
area
as
it
relates
to
the
city
and
so
with
industrial,
the
key
takeaways
are
that
vacancy
is
very
low.
H
Rents
are
high
and
the
share
of
the
city's
inventory
is
high,
but
also
we've
been
seeing
this
net
decrease
in
space,
and
so
what
we
might
be
looking
at
is
sort
of
an
adaptation
or
repurposing
of
these
industrial
spaces,
as
the
current
users
move
out
and
the
space
is
no
longer
suitable
for
a
new
user
because
it's
outdated,
but
with
land
costs
and
development
costs,
it's
very
difficult
to
build
new
industrial
on
that
space
and
that's
potentially
a
really
big
opportunity
for
this
area.
H
So
on
the
next
slide,
we
see
Flex
space,
which
are
often
combined
in
Market
analyzes.
Sorry,
there's
a
siren
going
fast
if
you
can
hear
it,
but
we've
split
it
out
here
because,
especially
as
we
think
about
industrial,
mixed
use,
types,
development,
type,
development,
that's
often
more
related
to
this
Flex
space
And.
H
One
area,
which
is
you
know
as
a
result
of
the
build
out
of
the
plan
and
the
office
in
that
area,
is
really
comparable
to
office
space
downtown,
and
so
it's
a
very
strong
office
Market
there,
but
we're
also
seeing
those
higher
vacancy
rates
across
the
board
not
unique
to
this
area,
and
so
looking
at
what
that
means,
and
also
this
has
been
a
growth
node
for
office.
So
you
can
see
at
the
bottom
that
almost
a
quarter
of
the
growth
in
Citywide
office
space
since
2010
has
been
in
the
phase.
H
That's
the
probably
the
the
weakest
sector
in
this
area,
just
in
terms
of
the
metrics.
Obviously
there
is
retail
in
this
area
and
it's
functioning,
but
it's
not
a
large
portion
of
the
market
and
often
that's
more
tied
to
residential
and
so
that
comes
later
on
after
residential
is
there
and
then
in
this
area
it's
also
a
question
of
what
retail
is
available
in
surrounding
areas
and
how
to
access
that.
H
So
that's
potentially
an
opportunity,
if
and
as
more
new
residents
are
added
to
have
additional
retail
in
this
area,
but
it's
not
currently
really
competitive
with
other
retail
spaces
in
the
city
and
that's
something
that
we've
seen
sort
of
across
the
East
Boulder
area
as
well
and
then
on
the
last
slide
or
the
second
last
Slide
the
multi-family.
H
H
They're
also
expensive
units
for
the
most
part
because
of
the
nature
of
new
development,
but
it
is
a
really
strong
opportunity
as
we
look
to
phase
two
and
how
much
multi-family
was
envisioned
versus
what
might
be
demanded
by
the
market
now
and
how
to
incorporate
that.
So,
on
the
last
slide,
that
I
have
just
these
initial
findings
and
again
this
is
the
beginning
of
our
work
and
I
went
through
it
faster
than
I.
H
Probably
ever
have
so
we'll
have
time
for
questions,
but
again
just
emphasizing
that
the
market
support
for
residential
really
is
strong,
retail
will
likely
be
tied
to
the
residential
and
Industrial
and
office
are
changing,
and
so,
as
we
look
at
what
we
might
do
within
this
plan,
that's
where
you've
already
heard
the
word
flexibility.
A
lot,
that's
likely
to
come
up
more
just
making
sure
that
we
have
the
tools
to
adapt
to
some
of
these
Market
changes
while
still
delivering
what
the
market
wants
and
the
community
wants.
H
And
so,
as
we
move
through
the
rest
of
this
process,
you
can
see
on
the
right
all
the
fun
stuff
that
we'll
be
doing
on
our
end.
But
that's
the
the
super
quick
Market
overview.
D
Thank
you
Rachel.
That
was
great
Nicole
I
wanted
to
offer
an
opportunity
to
pause
here
at
this
moment
before
we
get
into
the
the
really
the
key
questions
and
and
the
meat
of
what
we're
interested
in
hearing
from
Council
about.
So,
if
that
makes
sense,
I
can
pull
down
the
presentation
and
just
see
if
anybody
has
questions.
B
Great.
Thank
you
so
much
thanks.
Thanks
for
the
presentation,
Tara,
it
looks
like
oh
nope,
you
went
away,
okay,
Lauren
or
Tara.
Did
you
want
Lauren
to
go?
First,
okay,
Lauren
you're
up.
I
Thank
you,
Nicole
and
thank
you
Tara,
and
thank
you
for
that
great
presentation.
I've
heard
a
lot
of
territory
really
quickly
and
I
appreciate
that.
So
one
of
my
questions
is
about.
I
You
talked
a
little
bit
about
sort
of
regional
industrial
and
how
some
of
that's
you
know
as
businesses
look
for
more
industrial
property,
they
might
be
moving
away,
but
what
about
Service
Industrial
I
was
wondering
if
there
were
any
trait
any
thing
from
your
market
analysis
that
you
could
share
with
us
on.
F
Well,
yeah
yeah,
you
know,
I
think.
The
data
that
Rachel
shared
so
far
is
is
mainly
more
the
the
macro
industrial
influx
related
information.
Our
our
next
task
is
to
drill
down
a
little
closer
looking
at
the
existing
business
mix,
that
is
in
the
area
and,
as
you
alluded
to
there's
a
lot
more
in
the
way
of
service,
commercial
or
Service
Industrial
uses
in
that
area.
F
So
I
think
we
still
have
some
work
to
do
in
terms
of
understanding
the
Dynamics
and
viability
of
those
businesses
and
you
know
kind
of
balancing
what
may
be
possible
in
the
way
of
preserving
those
uses
versus.
F
Maybe
the
underlying
land
demand
Dynamics,
which
you
know,
land
values
and
and
such
that
are
made
made
the
result
may
result
or
maybe
resulting
in
some
of
those
businesses
being
turned
over
as
a
result
of
Redevelopment.
J
Thank
you
Tara,
yes,
and
one
of
the
last
few
slides
when
you're
going
through
all
the
vacancies.
There
was
a
slide
that
said
that
residential
was
the
strongest,
and
so
we
should
do
Residential.
But
then
it
said
something
about
multi-family
vacancy
being
higher.
Did
I
read
that
wrong?
It
was
going
pretty
fast,
so
I'm
worried
that
I,
misunderstood
and
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
explain
what
you
mean
by
that
or
did
I
incorrectly
read
that.
H
No
that's
a
great
question:
it
is
higher
in
this
area
and
that's
a
result
of
new
development
still
being
built,
and
so
that's
that
rate
captures
the
lease
up
process
and
so
when
a
building
is
built,
it's
empty
to
start,
and
so
over
time
at
least
is
up,
and
so
because
the
multi-family
in
phase
one
is
still
new
and
still
leasing
up.
That's
a
lot
of
what's
baked
into
that
number.
That's
great
observation.
J
Is
it
for
the
multi-family
that's
already
been
is
already
up?
How
is
the
vacancy
vacancy
rates
on
that,
or
do
you
not
know
detailed
and
not
macro
enough.
H
Yeah,
so
right
now
the
data
we
have
is
at
a
macro
level.
We
can
dig
into
that
to
look
at
how
you
know
the
the
developments
that
were
built
in
2014
2015
and
look
at
you
know
at
least
up
times,
and
things
like
that
at
this
point
in
the
process,
we
just
don't
have
that
granularity
of
the
data,
but
that's
something
that
we
can
get.
K
Thanks
for
that
great
presentation,
my
first
question
was
actually
asked
in
its
entirety
by
Lauren,
so
thank
you,
Laura
I'm,
very
concerned
about
how
the
Service
Industrial
properties
are
going
to
be
fairing
in
this.
You
know
new
world,
but
you
also
noted
in
the
multi-family
that
the
rents
are
11
higher
than
elsewhere
and
I
asked.
My
question
is:
how
is
that
fitting
into
our
overall
goals
to
provide
attainable
and
affordable
housing.
F
F
Is
primarily
or
that
we
presented
anyway,
is
primarily
market
market
rate
projects.
It
doesn't
it,
it
probably
doesn't
reflect
the
affordable
units
that
were
that
are
built
in
the
area.
F
I
I
think
I
I
again
we
can.
When
we,
when
we
drill
down
into
the
individual
projects,
we
could
provide
a
better
rent
profile
of
of
the
units
by
type
within
the
phase,
one
within
at
least
phase
one
of
the
plan
area.
H
And
just
you
know
at
the
beginning,
when
we
talked
about
looking
at
the
market
dynamics,
but
also
the
implementation
considerations,
that's
one
that
we
definitely
anticipate
coming
up
is
when
we
talk
about
including
residential
in
this
area,
we
sort
of
know
what
it
will
look
like
if
we
just
let
the
market
go
and
build
multi-family,
residential
and
so
depending
on
what
we
really
want
to
see
in
the
area.
What
you
know,
tools
or
other
strategies
or
policies
might
be
needed
to
ensure
that
that
happens.
H
D
All
right,
thank
you
and
thanks
for
those
questions,
we
are
now
going
to
turn
to
three
key
questions
and
the
three
topic
areas
that
we
identified:
the
transportation
connections,
the
land,
use
choices
and
then
design
a
character
and
we're
going
to
start
out
with
Chris
to
take
us
through
the
transportation
component.
L
Please
so
initial
feedback
through
our
community
engagement
has
confirmed
that
the
community
feels
that
there
could
be
improved,
Transportation
Connections
in
the
area
and
given
the
feedback
that
you
see
on
the
screen,
staff
has
evaluated
the
transportation
connections
plan
and
identified
additional
connections
next
slide
before
we
jump
into
what
we
are
going
to
propose.
Let's
just
start
with
some
existing
conditions
essentially,
and
so
what
you
see
here
is
the
existing
Road,
Network
and
and
multi-use
path
Network
in
the
area
and
so
the
dark.
L
If
you
look
at
the
map,
the
dark
gray
lines
here
is
the
existing
Road
Network
Wilderness,
Place,
sort
of
a
teardrop
Road
north
of
Goose
Creek,
and
then
we
have
old
Pearl
connecting
to
Frontier
across
Pearl
Parkway.
L
We
see
as
I
mentioned
minimal
connections
throughout
the
area
and
in
many
instances
we
see
evidence
of
a
lot
of
social
child.
In
the
area
and
the
image
that
you
see
to
the
top
is
up
Goose
Creek
looking
East,
and
this
is
a
highly
used
multi-use
path
in
the
city
connecting
many
key
locations
and
the
bottom
image
is
of
old
Pearl.
Looking
East
next
slide,
actually
more
existing
conditions,
this
time
from
Wilderness
place,
looking
North
on
the
top
image
and
then
Frontier
also
looking
north
towards
Pearl
Parkway
on
the
bottom
image
next
slide.
L
The
first
is
going
to
be
a
proposal
to
extend
the
month.
The
proposed
multi-use
path
along
the
rail
tracks,
all
the
way
up
to
Valmont,
and
this
connection
is
originally
proposed
to
begin
at
Pearl,
Parkway
and
end
at
the
store
where
the
future
rail
station
is
considered
and
feedback
that
we've
been
receiving
naturally
indicates
extending
this
connection.
All
the
way
up
to
Valmont
should
be
considered,
and
you
also
see
an
additional
connection,
pedestrian
connection
off
of
this
multi-use
path,
connecting
it
to
Wilderness
place
next
slide.
L
We
also
propose
additional
local
Road
connections
with
back
alley,
access
in
particular
along
Foothills.
This
helps
form
smaller
blocks
in
the
area
more
conducive
to
enhancing
The
Pedestrian
experience
and
allows
for
better
building
access
next
slide,
and
the
final
Edition
that
we're
exploring
is
to
extend
the
already
proposed
pedestrian
path
across
Goose
Creek
on
the
east
side
of
phase
two
up
to
proposed
multi-use
path.
This
is
really
a
minor
addition
and
it's
more
about
filling
a
gap
between
the
two
already
proposed
Connections
in
the
area
plan
next
slide.
B
Wonderful,
thank
you
so
much
so,
let's
start
with
questions
and
then
we
can
move
into
just
kind
of
getting
a
pulse
on
where
we're
at
and
any
comments
that
folks
have
who
has
questions.
Tara.
J
Little
questions
tonight
so
I
have
a
question:
did
I
must
have
missed
an
email
if
possible,
we
had
so
many
about
the
rail.
The
future
Rail
and
I
did
my
own
studying
in
the
past
few
days,
but
I
just
want
to
confirm
with
you.
What
exactly
you
mean
by
that
did.
I
miss
something
big
in
the
news.
L
I,
don't
know
that
you
missed
anything
big
in
the
news.
Kj
I
might
let
you
or
we
do
have
transportation
staff
available
on
the
call
as
well
provide
maybe
an
update
to
City
Council
on
the
the
status
of
the
future
rail
station,
as
well
as
maybe
the
bus
station,
because
I
know
that
there's
probably
questions
around
that
too.
M
Chris
haglin
principal
planner,
Transportation
Mobility
good
evening
Council,
yes,
I,
can
provide
some
updates
on
future
rail
service.
So
basically
there
are
two
different
types
of
service
being
studied
right
now
there
is
the
Northwest
rail
peak
hour
service.
M
That's
an
RTD
study
right
now,
they're
in
the
midst
of
a
two-year
or
24-month
study,
to
look
at
providing
Peak
rail
service
in
the
Northwest
Corridor,
which
would
include
train
going
up
to
Boulder
and
then
all
the
way
to
Longmont
right
now
in
terms
of
a
possible
start
date
for
that
survey
according
to
RTD,
we're
looking
at
perhaps
2030.,
and
that
would
really
just
be
peak
hour
service.
So
a
a
few
runs
in
the
morning
and
a
few
runs
in
the
evening.
However,
there
there's
also
the
Front
Range
passenger
rail
study.
M
That
is
also
happening
at
this
time.
This
is
more
of
a
a
Statewide
effort
led
by
CDOT.
They
received
I
think
two
and
a
half
million
dollars
to
study
the
possibility
of
creating
a
Front
Range
rail
that
would
essentially
connect
you
know
Pueblo
to
Fort
Collins
up
to
Cheyenne,
so
that
is
a
different
type
of
service.
At
this
point,
there's
not
a
future
date
of
proposed
start
of
that
service,
since
they
are
doing
the
feasibility
study
and
if
you
would
like,
I
could
also
provide
an
update
on
on
bus
service
at
this
time.
B
You
could
maybe
just
just
give
us
in
a
couple
of
sentences:
Chris
and
yes,
I
just
want
to
clarify-
you
said
I,
think
I
heard.
The
24-month
study
is
happening
now
for
the
Northwest
rail
peak
hour
service,
and
you
mentioned
that
the
Serv,
the
survey
would
start
at
20,
30
and
I.
B
M
Sure
so,
as
you
all
know,
Transit
service
out
of
the
Boulder
Junction
Station
ended
in
April
2020
as
part
of
their
covet
service
plan.
M
Rtd's
2022
system,
optimization
plan
or
sop
calls
for
the
restoration
of
two
of
the
five
routes
that
had
previous
previously
served
photo
Junction
that
includes
the
Flatiron
flyer
4
or
the
ff4,
which
goes
to
the
Civic
Center
and
also
the
ab2,
which
would
be
the
airport
ride
right
now,
we're
looking
at
restoring
that
service
by
2027.,
of
course,
that
is
all
dependent
on
RTD
resources,
most
mostly
they
refer
referred
to
as
an
operator
shortage.
M
There
is
also
an
upcoming
Boulder
County
Transit
plan,
and
this
will
really
be
an
opportunity
to
assess
additional
Transit
service
options
in
the
Boulder
County
region
through
Partnerships
with
the
city
and
Boulder
County,
so
that
that's
also
a
possibility
for
getting
service
a
little
quicker
there.
We
know
we've
been
trying
very
hard
to
get
RTD
to
restore
that
service.
F
N
Thanks
for
going
Chris
thanks
for
that
update
on
the
RTD
and
the
and
the
rail
stuff
and
communities,
long
overdue
want
to
see
something
happen
in
that
regard
and
we're
not
the
only
ones
on
the
Front
Range.
So
thanks
for
that,
my
question
centers
around
the
very
sort
of
South
End
of
sort
of
TV
app
to
I,
think
it
was
sort
of
area
three
referenced
in
the
map
and
sort
of
thinking
about
connectivity
out
of
the
South
End.
N
You
know
towards
the
Google
property
and
then
ultimately
down
towards,
like
the
grocery
store
and
and
and
that
stuff
down
under
30th
and
I'm,
just
sort
of
thinking
that
if
we
are
to
do
housing
there,
it
would
certainly
pose
an
awkward
job
for
people
to
have
to
move
strictly
West
or
strictly
East
to
then
come
down
to
what
maybe
another
grocery
store
other
than
the
Whole
Foods
or
just
other
services.
So
I'm
just
wondering
was
there
any
consideration?
I
know
it
deals
with
the
BNSF
rail
and
any
sort
of
crossing
over
that.
N
D
Matt,
are
you?
Are
you
referring
to
the
the
crossing
that
is
to
the
very
southern
end
and
crosses
the
rail
on
towards
Walnut
or
towards
that
direction?
To
the
far
south
correct.
N
D
Yeah,
as
far
as
my
recollection
and
as
part
of
a
site
review
process
that
occurred,
I
believe
last
year,
that
came
to
city
council
that
that
underpass
connection
there
was
essentially
removed
from
part
of
the
plan,
or
that
say,
plan
was
or
that
say,
review
was
approved
without
that
connection.
I'd
have
to
double
check,
with
Charles
in
the
development
review
team
to
get
an
update
on
that.
O
Thanks
this
is
kind
of
a
follow-on
to
math
question
in
that
same
area.
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
under
transportation
or
under
land
use,
so
I'll
just
ask
it
now
and
if
you
want
to
defer
to
land
use,
that's
fine.
What
is
the
what's
the
flood
situation
here?
I
know,
you
know
we
we
we're
trying
to
be
careful
now,
as
we
as
new
developments
come
along
not
to
put
housing
or
actually
anything
in
the
100
Year
floodplain.
O
D
Yes,
great
great
question
and
I
can
offer
an
update
there,
so
the
most
of
that
area-
that's
south
of
pearl
Parkway,
is
within
that
hundred
year.
Floodplain.
D
D
So
if
you
can
imagine
on
the
map,
it's
basically
the
Far
Western
side
of
that
area,
just
south
of
pearl
Parkway
and
there
and
I
just
haven't,
had
an
opportunity
to
connect
with
our
utilities
department
just
today,
actually
and
learned
that
there
is
a
essentially
a
letter
of
agreement
for
City,
Department
utilities,
the
property
owner
in
that
particular
area
and
the
ditch
company
to
work
together
to
come
to
some
solutions
about
improving
that
that
area
and
essentially
getting
getting
that
property
out
of
the
flood
plain
and
improving
the
the
drainage
there
also.
D
They
will,
of
course,
be
looping
in
with
the
BNSF
Rail
Road,
just
because
all
of
that
is
interconnected
and
it's
it's
a
it's
a
very
complicated
situation,
as
you
can
imagine
within
the
the
original
Transit
Village
area
plan,
there
is
also
a
proposed
underpass
for
multi-use
and
pedestrian
connection
there
as
well.
So
it's
I
from
what
I
understand
from
talking
with
utilities
and
transportation
and
mobility
and
staff
it
it's
not
going
to
be
easy.
D
O
Well,
that's
great
Christopher
that
really
kind
of
ties
back
to
Matt's
point
about
about
connectivity
to
the
to
the
Southwest
there.
It
would
seem
we
could
kill
two
birds
with
one
stone.
Many
many
many
years
ago,
Aaron
and
I
put
on
The
greenway's,
Advisory,
Board
and
I
know
that
we
always
try
to
put
flood
mitigation
efforts
and-
and
you
know,
a
bike
and
pet
Transit
together,
because
they
they
they're
often
go
hand
in
hand.
So
it
seems
to
me
it
would
be
a
very
elegant
solution.
O
I
I
know
that
we've
got
a
lot
of
parties
involved.
Something
like
that.
There's
the
you
mentioned.
The
ditch
company,
Burlington
Northern,
which
I
know
sometimes
is,
will
challenge
you
to
work
with
and
property
owners
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
O
But
I
would
think
that
if
we
could
get
all
the
all
the
relevant
players
together
and
and
both
mitigate
that
flood
risk
before
we
start
putting
a
bunch
of
houses,
Downstream
and
and
at
the
same
time
put
some
connectivity
in
there
to
Matt's
point,
it
seems
to
me
that's
a
win-win
situation,
so
I
from
my
perspective,
it
seems
to
me
that's
something
we
should
really
bake
into
this
whole
project.
B
Thanks
thanks
and
Lauren
and
Tara
I
saw
your
hands
go
up
and
I'm
just
going
to
ask:
is
this
more
related
to
the
transportation
connections
or
more
to
land
use
kind
of
stuff?
Okay,
cool
Lauren.
I
Thank
you
so
I
know
with
both
of
these
connections
on
the
south
of
the
site.
They've
been
laid
out
in
the
plan
is
under
past
connections.
I
guess
I
was
wondering
if
there's
a
if
we
don't
do
overpass
connections
anymore
or
if
that's
a
space
constraint
issue
to
me,
it
feels
like
the
most
important
thing
is
to
be
able
to
connect
both
sides
and
so
I
guess
I'm,
just
wondering.
D
Sure
yeah
I
think
at
this
point.
All
options
are
on
the
table
to
explore
and
the
the
area
plan
as
currently
written
includes
some
flexibility.
I
think
the
preference
is
for
an
underpass,
but
certainly
it
would
allow
for
an
overpass
and.
A
D
Particular
if
it
was
more
of
a
pedestrian
overpass
that
the
much
easier
connection
to
make
than
any
kind
of
vehicular
connection,
I
will
say.
The
one
challenge,
of
course,
that
presents
itself
is
that
overpasses,
particularly
over
commercial
Rail
lines,
need
to
be
extraordinarily
high
and
I
think
they
need
25
to
28
foot
clearance
below
them.
So
it's
it's,
not
an
insignificant
structure
to
you
know
to
get
something
across,
but
but
that
certainly
is
an
option.
K
Thank
you,
I'd
like
to
go
back
to
the
the
transit
center.
The
the
two-year
feasibility
study
that's
being
conducted
with
respect
to
Peak
our
rail
Service
would
I
be
correct
in
saying
that
that's
simply
a
study
to
determine
whether
we
should
actually
be
studying
providing
the
service
and
that
it's
entirely
possible
that
in
a
couple
years
we
will
come
back
and
be
told
sorry
there
will
be
no
rail
service.
M
I
I
think
the
you
know,
the
vision
of
of
the
study
itself
is
to
determine
when
service
can
be
provided
along,
the
rail
court
or
starting
with
peak
hour
so
I
think
that's
what
the
key
thing
is.
It's
an
incremental
bringing
on
of
service
of
of
really
looking
at
just
at
the
peak
hour
at
the
beginning,
and
then
that
laying
the
foundation
for
for
for
regular,
you
know
all
day
type
rail
service,
but
that
that's
my
understanding,
that's
that
the
assumption
is
moving
forward
with
it.
M
I
I
can't
say
anything
for
certain
on
that.
You
know.
P
Because
we
talk
about
this
at
a
lot
at
the
Northwest
American
commissioner
Coalition,
and
also
in
regular
Communications
with
RTD
on
this,
so
I
I
would
say
nothing
is
certain
about
the
peak
service
right
so
that
that
could
work
out
or
that
could
not
work
out.
I.
Think
the
best
chance
for
the
rail
service
here
is
in
conjunction
with
the
Front
Range
passenger
rail,
where
you
have
some
local
service
and
you
have
some
long
distance
service
and
there
are
all
kinds
of
activities
going
on
to
make.
P
Front
Range
past
URL
happen
right
now
grants
from
Amtrak
and
from
state
level
things,
and
so
there's
there
are
people
who
are
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
that
right
now
and
there's
some
it's
it's
looking
promising
and
that's
probably
our
best
bet.
Thanks.
B
Okay,
so
heading
into
this
next
part,
I
think
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
just
ask
a
general
question
about
agreement
with
the
possible
changes
to
Transportation
connections
and
see
where
folks
are
at
and
if
people
have
anything
that
they
would
like
to
change
or
a
specific
thing
that
they're
interested
in
adding
I
will
then
ask
for
people
to
weigh
in
on
that,
and
then
we
can
have
a
discussion
about
any
of
those
changes
is
that
General
thumbs
up
seem
okay,
Okay
cool,
so
raise
your
hand
if
you
are
in
general
agreement
with
possible
with
the
proposed
possible
changes
to
Transportation
connections.
B
Okay
looks
like
we
got
almost
everybody
there.
So
does
anyone
have
any
specific
things?
They
would
like
to
propose
changes,
modifications
additions,
anything
like
that.
B
N
I
mean
I
think
it
was
I
just
just
to
be
for
clarity,
I,
think
kind
of
just
coming
back
to
what
Bob
really
poked
on
and
I
was
kind
of
too
about
just
making
sure
we
have
good
pedestrian
or
bike
egress
out
of
whatever
we
do
in
that
southern
section
of
tbap2
out
into
the
South
Southwest
Direction.
So
if
that's
through
the
slew
or
revamp
there
or
through
some
other
underpass
it
just,
we
need
some
conduit
to
get
people
out
of
the
south
end
of
there.
B
Great
and
then
before
we
go
on
there,
does
anybody
have
any
comments
specific
to
Matt's
comments?
B
Okay,
who,
who
is
of
similar
mind
to
Matt.
B
J
I
didn't
want
to
double
down
on
what
Matt
and
Bob
did
say,
I
believe
it
was
Bob
who
said
it
about
the
the
flood
mitigation
situation,
not
just
for
transportation,
but
also
for
being
able
to.
You
know,
build
residential
and
KJ.
Is
that
your
nickname?
Do
you
want
us
to
call
you
kids.
J
Okay,
Jake,
you
said
the
words
not
easy,
but
feasible,
but
wouldn't
it
be
difficult
to
make
retail
excuse
me,
residential
with
the
flood
plain
as
the
500
year
floodplained.
If
the
flooded
plane
is
100,
Year
floodplain.
D
Impossible,
you
can,
you
can
raise
it
up.
You
know
essentially
have
parking
on
the
ground
level,
but
it
makes
residential
extraordinarily
challenging
just
again
because
of
our
height
limits
as
well.
It
reduces
the
number
of
housing
units
that
can
be
created,
so
the
financial
feasibility
of
a
residential
Redevelopment
and
that
area.
A
B
You
all
right,
do
you
have
any
questions
or
points
about
the
transportation
connections,
though
Tara?
Okay,
thank
you.
Lauren.
I
I
think
I
just
wanted
to
emphasize
something
that
Christopher
said
earlier
in
the
presentation
which
was
sort
of
about
a
more
fine-grained
approach
to
the
transportation
connections.
That
generally
I
think
we're
seeking
to
sort
of
break
down
some
of
these
blocks
and
have
sort
of
the
weave
of
the
fabric
of
this
area
be
like
a
smaller,
tighter
weave
and
so
I
guess.
My
just
encouragement
to
continue.
B
Thank
you
can
I
get
hand
raised
if
you
are
all
a
favor
of
this
idea
of
adding
in
some
more
smaller
connections,
as
that
seems
appropriate,
as
it
comes
up.
P
B
K
You
and
Mark
just
a
quick
question,
are
the
expensive
but
feasible
infrastructure
projects
that
we're
discussing
tonight
already
within
the
300
million
dollars
of
unfunded
infrastructure
needs
that
we
have,
or
would
this
be
in
addition
to
what
we
already
have.
D
Well,
that
is
a
great
question
and
my
I
I
would
have
to
double
check
with
utilities,
but
to
my
awareness,
the
any
sort
of
improvements
on
the
boulder
Slough
are.
We
do
not
have
a
mitigation
plan.
It's
not
currently
in
our
CIP
six
year
plan
the
as
I
mentioned.
D
There
is
a
signed
letter
of
agreement
between
the
parties
to
coordinate
on,
understand
really
in
more
detail
what
this
would
entail,
and
certainly
what
cost
estimates
would
come
out
of
that,
and
my
my
assessment
at
least
at
this
moment,
is
that
this
would
not
all
fall
to
the
city
to
to
actually
perform
that
there
would
need
to
be
some
some
kind
of
a
public-private
partnership
in
order
to
do
this,
because
certainly
the
the
landowner
would
benefit
tremendously
from
from
improvements
in
this
location.
N
E
The
utilities
director
for
the
city
understand
that
you're
talking
about
the
the
boulder
Slough
and
the
potential
to
reduce
the
flood
plain
and
maximize
Housing
Development
and
our
utilities
team
is,
is
aware
of
that
desire,
and
just
recently
here,
I
signed
an
agreement
to
advance
some
work
with
the
railroad
and
some
of
the
ditch
companies
that
are
involved
out
there
to
support
some
of
the
analysis
that
is
needed.
So
I
I,
don't
know
that.
E
There's
any
Council
action
needed
at
this
moment
to
accelerate
things
and
and
may
have
to
follow
up
with
you
after
the
meeting
on
the
status
and
and
the
details.
But
we
we
are
aware
of
the
needs
and
and
are
working
forward
to
support
reduction
of
the
flood
plain
and
then
I
heard
Mark.
Ask
a
question
about
whether
the
the
funding
for
project
development
is
within
the
300
million
dollars
and
I.
E
Think
it's
350
million
dollars
that
and
what
he's
talking
about
is
what
we've
identified
in
our
Flood
Master
Plan,
as
the
backlog
of
projects
needed
across
all
16
drainages
I
I
can
confirm,
but
I
believe
all
of
the
projects
across
all
drainages
are
are
part
of
that
350
million
and
I
can
go
back
and
look
at
details
as
the
discussion
continues
and
may
be
able
to
confirm
tonight
so
again,
without
the
benefit
of
of
the
prior
discussion.
That's
what
I
can
share
at
this
time.
N
B
Thanks
yeah,
it
seems
like
we're
getting
very
eager
to
move
on
to
leonie's
discussion
but
Bob
any
any
final
Transportation
connection,
thoughts,
yeah.
O
I
know
it
just
this:
this
flood
litigation
is
kind
of
the
convergence
between
transportation
and
land
use.
So
thank
you
for
indulging
us
Nicole,
as
we
kind
of
drill
into
this
just
a
couple
questions
for
Joe
Joe
thanks
for
that
one
is:
do
you
have
a
back
of
the
envelope
estimate
on
what
this
would
cost?
I
know
the
move
from
clustering
between
various
parties
and
then
second
related
question
is:
is
this
the
type
of
project
that
we
might
get
some
funding
from
the
wildlife
flood
rustic
core
thanks
foreign.
E
Sorry
about
that
I
don't
have
the
cost
details.
I
can
look.
I
can
look
into
that,
while
the
discussion
continues
and
follow-up
and
for
sure
any
of
our
any
of
our
16
drainages
are
subject
to
us
requesting
assistance
from
the
mile
high
flood
District.
So
we
can
look
into
that
as
well.
B
Great,
thank
you.
Okay
I
think
we
can
officially
move
on
to
The
Next
Step
but
stuff.
Let
us
know
if
you
are
missing
anything
but
I
think
we
have
General
agreement.
Yes
to
this
question
you
posed
to
us,
and
we
are
especially
interested
in
an
exit
point
in
that
southwest
corner,
as
well
as
a
more
fine-grained
approach
as
it
as
it
comes
up
and
seems
relevant.
L
L
The
first
option
that
you
see
on
the
screen
here
proposes
no
change
to
the
TV
apps
original
proposed
land
uses.
This
is
our
no
Change
option
essentially,
and
the
goal
with
this
is
to
proceed
with
the
existing
plan
and
introduce
a
mix
of
uses
to
the
area
while
retaining
some
light
industrial
and
office
uses,
especially
in
north
of
Goose
Creek.
This
option
also
identifies
high
density
residential
development
along
Goose
Creek,
taking
advantage
of
that
as
an
amenity.
L
L
So
option
two
taking
lessons
from
the
East
Boulder
sub
community
plan.
This
option
introduces
a
broad
application
of
mixed
use,
Transit
oriented
development
or
mutod
to
the
area,
and
this
is
a
new
bvcp
land
use
designation
that
was
recently
adopted
during
the
East
Boulder
subcommunity
plan
and
is
intended
to
be
located
at
Regional
or
local
Mobility
hubs
and
along
key
Transit
corridors.
L
L
There
was
also
appreciation
for
how
this
land
use
designation
could
allow
the
area
to
adapt
to
the
availability
of
Transit
and
Market
needs
over
time
next
slide
and
our
final
option
option
three.
We
see
m-u-t-o-d
once
again
applied
north
of
Goose
Creek
near
the
future
rail
stop,
and
this
would
replace
the
office
industrial,
as
was
suggested
in
the
original
Transit
Village
area
plan.
L
Again,
this
mixed-use
designation
places
emphasis
on
Housing
Opportunity,
while
also
still
allowing
for
a
wide
variety
of
supporting
uses.
Here
we
also
see
Nui
or
mixed
use.
Industrial
applied
to
the
south
of
Goose
Creek
and
similar,
but
differing
from
m-u-t-o-d
mui
places
emphasis
on
light
industrial
uses
on
ground
floors,
while
still
allowing
for
supporting
uses
such
as
attached
residential
retail
service
office
in
commercial.
L
The
goal
with
option
three
is
to
introduce
a
mix
of
usage
to
the
area
while
maintaining
a
focus
on
preserving
some
light
industrial
uses.
We
place
emphasis
on
housing
opportunities,
north
of
Goose
Creek
and
near
the
future,
rail
stop
in
the
nutod
and
high
density
residential
designations,
while
focusing
more
on
a
potential
mixed-use
light
industrial
area
south
of
Goose
Creek
in
the
mixed
use,
industrial
designations.
L
This
option
would
yield
somewhere
between
800
and
1000
new
dwelling
units
in
between
1300
and
1500
new
jobs
and
finally,
varying
feedback
was
received
from
the
community
members
on
this
option.
A
slightly
more
respondents
disagreed
with
the
idea
of
splitting
the
land
use
designations
up,
rather
than
having
a
more
consistent
land
use
approach
across
the
entire
area.
L
So
we'll
sort
of
summarize
the
three
options
that
we
have
for
us
and
they
all
offer
varying
opportunities
to
increase
residential
units
and
jobs
from
what
exists
today
so
option,
one
would
maintain
the
existing
tbat
plan
and
would
perpetuate
office
and
Industrial
uses
to
the
north,
with
housing,
light,
industrial
and
mixed
uses
to
the
South.
This
option
would
yield
the
least
amount
of
new
housing
units
in
the
most
amount
of
new
jobs
option.
Two
again
would
maximize
flexibility
and
opportunities
for
residential
units
and
density
near
Transit
facilities
in
the
entire
area.
L
This
option
would
deal
the
most
amount
of
Housing
and
the
least
amount
of
new
jobs
option.
Three
would
focus
residential
units
and
mixed
uses
north
of
Goose
Creek,
and
still
allow
for
an
increase
in
residential
units
and
density
South
at
Goose
Creek,
as
well
as
potentially
a
greater
range
of
light
industrial
uses,
and
this
option
will
yield
slightly
more
jobs
than
it
would
housing
units
next
slide.
B
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
presentation.
Let's
open
this
up
for
questions
first
and
then
we
can
get
to
comments
and
talk.
You
through
the
different
options
and
Bob
I
saw
your
hand
go
up.
Tara
I
know
you
had
a
question
that
I
made
you
carry
over
here,
so
I
just
want
to
see.
If
you
would
like
to
address
that
question.
First
you're.
O
Thanks
just
just
a
technical
question
for
KJ,
you
talked
about
jobs.
Are
those
incremental
jobs
under
each
of
those
options
incremental
to
what
jobs
are
there
now
or?
Is
that
just
total
jobs,
including,
what's
already
there
yeah.
D
That's
a
great
question:
it
is,
it
is
total
jobs
based
on
some.
You
know
assumptions
that
we
would
make
into
our
model
based
on
the
different
Lane
juice
categories.
So
it's.
F
O
F
O
And
then
just
back
the
envelope,
how
many
jobs
are
there
right
now
is
just
if
we
wanted
to
back
out
and
figure
out
if
we
can
do
apples
to
apples
on
increments,
both
housing
and
jobs,
how
many
jobs
are
there
now?
So
when
you
say
a
thousand
to
thirteen
hundred
or
whatever
those
ranges
were
that's
compared
to
like
what
do
we
have
500
jobs
there
now
a
thousand
jobs
there,
not
just
yeah.
D
Yeah,
it's
a
great
question
based
on
the
data
that
we
have
for
the
entire
phase
two
area,
it's
in
the
neighborhood
I'm
16
to.
D
J
J
J
Is
that
because
we
have
the
possible
but
not
definite,
train
coming
or
is
it
other
Transit
not
that
I
I
mean,
let's
be
honest,
that
we
put
this
whole?
We,
you
know
TV
app.
One
was
all
about
the
train
that
you
know
stopped
coming
and
not
only
did
the
train
not
come,
but
the
buses
even
stopped
coming
so
I
guess.
My
second
question
is:
if
it
is
all
about
the
train,
then,
is
there
an?
J
D
It's
a
great
it's
a
great
question,
so
the
the
short
answer
is
no:
it's
not
directly
linked
to
the
train.
It
is.
It
is
linked
to
sufficient
and
ideally
Rapid
Transit.
That
is
you
know
that
is
offered.
So,
for
example,
the
mutod
land
use
category
you
know
was
was
created
through
these
folder
subcommunity
plan
and
was
applied
for
the
first
time
at
55th
and
Arapahoe,
where
there
is
a
Rapid
Transit
facility,
that's
being
studied
and
hopefully
will
be
built
soon
along
that
Arapahoe
Corridor.
So
it's
not
specific
to
train.
D
But
certainly
would
benefit
from
and
is,
is
you
know
essentially
linked
to
the
anticipation
or
or
existence
of
significant
Transit
facilities
being
there
and
being
available.
I
Thanks
so
when
I
think
of
land
use
versus
zoning,
I
usually
think
you
know,
the
land
use
is
kind
of
the
bigger,
broader
brush
stroke
tool,
and
then
you
kind
of
dial
in
and
get
more
specific,
with
the
Zoning
for
what's
allowed
and
not
allowed
I
appreciate
the
m-u-t-o-d
is
more
flexible.
Are
there
any
things
that
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
do
in
that
zoning,
that
the
other
or
sorry
in
that
land
use
that
the
other
land
use
types
would
allow
like?
D
It
raises
it's
something
we,
as
staff,
have
been
thinking
about
and
kind
of
wrestling
with
in
that
in
them
by
applying
mutod
across
a
very
large
area
it
it
does
open
the
door
too,
essentially
the
most
flexibility
that
we
would
have
and
that
that
flexibility
comes
in
the
uses
that
we
would
be
appropriate
in
those
areas,
the
the
intensity
of
development,
so
the
the
scale
and
height
of
development
that
could
that
could
occur
there
again,
you're
not
required
to
build
before
or
even
five
stories,
but
certainly
the
possibility
would
be
there.
D
It
also
can
be
refined,
somewhat
and
I.
Think
to
your.
D
Your
description
of
the
land
use
category
is,
is,
is
spot
on
and
that
it's
the
broad
brush
stroke
mutod,
is
the
most
flexible
of
our
land
use
categories
that
we
have
available
to
us
where
we
start
to
refine
that
is
through
and
we'll
touch
on
this
actually
a
little
bit
later
this
evening
is
there's
the
notion
of
place
types
that
can
be
applied
essentially
to
Overlay
the
land,
use
that
start
to
refine
a
little
bit
more
about
the
types
of
uses
that
would
that
would
occur
there.
D
The
performance
expectations,
the
feel
of
those
places
and
then,
ultimately,
through
zoning
or
even
application
of
the
form-based
code,
we
can
further
refine.
You
know
the
character
of
those
physical
built
outcomes,
but,
to
you
know
to
your
question
about:
are
there
things
that
would
not
be
appropriate
or
not
be
allowed
within
the
mutod
that
might
be
allowed
in
some
of
the
others?
D
D
I
Thank
you
that
great
I'm
so
excited
to
hear
that
also
just
one
more
clarifying
question
in
along
with
that,
there
was
a
three
to
five
story.
Type
sort
of
I
think
suggested
with
that
is
that
tied
to
that
land
use
I,
usually
think
of
Heights
is
being
tied
to
zoning.
I
D
Yeah
I
think
it's
absolutely
part
of
the
later
discussion.
The
you
know
what
we're
intending
to
do
by
including
some
of
that
information
and
the
presentation
and
in
our
descriptions
with
the
community
is
just
to
try
to
give
everybody
a
kind
of
a
sense
of
what
could
happen
there.
Certainly
we
can
get
into
a
lot
more
detail
as
we
move
through
a
zoning
process
or
a
re-zoning
process
to
identify.
Are
there
areas
that
might
be
more
appropriate
for
that
four
or
even
five-story?
Q
I
think
my
question
is
maybe
the
inverse
of
Lauren's
first
question,
but
if
I
followed
everything
correctly
our
office
space
use,
our
inventory
has
increased
71
percent
over
about
the
last
decade.
At
the
same
time,
we've
lost
a
lot
of
industrial
and
flex
or
we've
lost
some
of
it,
especially
compared
to
outlying
towns
surrounding
towns.
So
under
m-u-t-o-d
we'll
might
we
get
more
office
or
predominantly
office
with
this
Flex
zoning
I
would
think
at
some
point
the
market
would
say,
especially
with
bacon.
Q
We
don't
want
it,
but
there
must
be
some
reason
that
we
keep
building
offices.
I
I,
assume
it's
lucrative
or
beneficial
in
some
ways.
So
if
we
use
this,
can
we
say
you
know
some
amount
really
should
not
be
more
offices
that
we
don't
need
more
of,
or
is
that
coming
zoning
or
are
we
safe?
There.
D
Yeah
a
couple
of
thoughts
there
so
as
we'll
touch
base
on
there
are
some
place
types
that
again.
This
is
a
planning
framework
that
was
used
within
East
Boulder
and
there
are
some
place
types
that
don't
allow
for
office,
but
they
do
allow
for
this
integration
of
light,
industrial
retail,
that
type
of
thing
and
residential,
the
other
I
would
say
also
certainly
within
the
if
there
are
to
be
rezonings
in
the
future.
That
is
something
that
we
can
look
at
and
and
really.
A
D
You
have
anything
to
add
to
that,
but
certainly
I
think
that
there
are
tools
and
mechanisms
we
can
put
in
place
to
guide
I
won't
say,
guide
the
market,
but
certainly
guide
some
of
the
outcomes
and
the
direction
of
the
uses
that
we're
interested
in
and
perhaps
away
from.
You
know,
pure
office
uses.
Q
Q
H
I
was
just
going
to
add
that
there's,
and
this
is
related
to
sort
of
both
of
the
last
two
questions.
There's
there's
trade-offs
with
flexibility
and
Dan
could
probably
speak
this
a
little
bit
too
is
that
if
there
is
so
much
flexibility
in
that
you
can
build
any
of
these
uses
go
do
what
you
want
we're
going
to
see
what
the
market
is
strongest
in,
and
only
that
typically,
and
so,
if
there's
a
desire
for
more
than
just
say-
and
you
know,
I
can't
tell
the
future.
Unfortunately,
I
keep
trying.
H
H
What
comes
in
and
so
different
mixes,
ensuring
that
there's
some
sort
of
flexibility
to
allow
for
the
market
dynamics
to
play
out,
but
even
some
form
of
you
know
non-residential
use
that
allows
for
whether
it's
Market
or
sorry
office
or
light
industrial
or
Flex
or
retail,
but
ensures
that
there's
there's
some
level
of
shaping
there.
D
Yes,
I
would
say:
that's
not
tonight,
so
just
as
far
as
quick
overview
and
we'll
cover
this
in
next
steps
at
the
very
end.
But
you
know
really
what
we're
talking
about
tonight
and
where
we
will
ultimately
be
coming
back
to
you.
Ideally
in
September,
is
for
an
amendment
to
the
transit
Village
area
plan
that
will
establish
these
high-level
policies.
D
The
next
phase
of
the
project
is
to
move
into
that
those
implementation
steps
where
we
will
hone
in
you
know
much
more
in
much
more
detail
on
rezoning
strategies,
again
possible,
form-based
code
updates
and
how
how
we
can
shape
the
things
that
are
actually
built
in
and
what
those
outcomes
look
like.
O
K
D
Yeah,
it's
it's
that
it
kind
of
gets
to
the
the
Crux
of
of
what
the
evolution
is
going
to
look
like
I,
think
in
the
phase
two
area
and
how
that
might
be
different
than
what
occurred
in
Phase,
One.
D
I
mentioned:
there's
a
there's,
a
very
vibrant
existing.
You
know,
business
community
that
that
works
here
and
some
of
those
some
of
those
businesses,
some
of
those
individuals
own
their
buildings
and
own
their
properties
and
may
not
have
a
whole
lot
of
reason
to
redevelop
in
the
future
or
at
least
for
a
period
of
time
because
their
their
business
May
operate.
You
know
profitably
and
they're
comfortable
where
they
are
and
they
want
to
continue
to
be
in
in
the
community.
D
There's
also,
you
know
scenarios
where
those
properties
are
owned
by
others
at
least
that
space
too
profitable
businesses
and
again
there's
there.
There
needs
to
be
enough
of
a
financial
incentive
to
go
through
the
long
and
complicated
process
that
we
have
here.
You
know
in
Boulder
to
redevelop
a
property
into
something
else,
so
I
think
there
are
many
cases
of
existing
businesses
that
are
there
today.
That
will
continue
for
a
considerable
amount
of
time.
Before
you
know,
Redevelopment
pressures
may
may
change
that.
K
D
You
know
I,
don't
take,
maybe
quite
as
dire
of
a
of
a
look
at
it,
because
I
do
think
that
there
is
an
interest
in
the
community
and
if
there
is
residential
here,
the
residents
that
are
going
to
be
living
in
that
area
to
have
access
to
those
types
of
services
and
businesses
and
there,
even
if
you
know
a
business,
may
change
or
move
the
really.
D
What
we're
hoping
to
be
able
to
offer
and
provide
is
the
flexibility
for
a
future
mixed-use
building
to
come
forward
and
offer
some
of
those
same
types
of
uses
on
the
ground
floor
with
perhaps
residential
above
so
there
may
be.
You
know
the
structure
may
change
the
building
may
change,
but
the
goal
is
for
a
lot
of
those
types
of
uses
to
be
maintained
and
I
know.
D
Our
community
vitalities
Department
department
is
working
on
a
number
of
ways
to
be
able
to
support
existing
businesses
and
actually,
in
particular,
support
businesses
that
are
going
through
these
periods
of
transition
and
change
where
they
maybe
moved
to
a
different
location
within
the
city,
but
also
looking
for
ways
to
help
support
the
new
spaces
that
are
created
to
make
those
affordable
to
future
businesses.
Going
forward.
K
D
Well,
as
I
understand,
Chris
is
on
the
call
tonight
or
not.
Oh
I
do
see
his
name
there,
and
he
certainly
could
speak
to
this
Navy
a
little
bit
more.
But
as
I
understand,
there's
a
you
know,
fairly
informal
process
right
now,
where
Community
Vitality
help
helps
to
you
know,
find
and
essentially
connect
businesses
with
property
owners
that
have
space
available,
and
that's
certainly
one
thing
that
we
are
trying
to
formalize
and
become
more
intentional
about
and
Chris.
If
you
want
to.
If
you
want
to
add
to
that,
thank
you
KJ
good
evening.
D
Everyone
Chris
Jones
director
of
community
Vitality,
so
just
to
speak
to
what
KJ
was
mentioning
around
the
work
that
we
are
looking
at
when
it
comes
to
Affordable
commercial
and
making
sure
that
spaces
remain
available
for
the
types
of
businesses
that
we
want
to
see
able
to
stay
within
the
Boulder
Junction
area.
We're
going
to
be
having
a
conversation
with
Council
on
August
10th
regarding
our
affordable
commercial
pilot
program.
D
But
having
said
that,
councilman
Wallach
I
think
you
were
asking
where
light
industrial
land
uses
may
be
preserved
in
the
city
and
I.
Don't
know
that
that
is
related
to
the
work
that
we're
pursuing
as
far
as
making
sure
that
spaces
are
still
available
for
the
types
of
businesses
that
we
want
to
see
in
these
areas
that
are
redeveloping.
K
I'm
I'm
merely
suggesting
that
what
we're
presenting
as
a
series
of
choices
will
not
really
be
a
series
of
choices
that
these
industrial
will
be
eliminated
one
way
or
another,
and
those
properties
will
be
turned
to
a
a
higher
and
more
profitable
use.
That's
simply
the
the
nature
of
the
development
business.
I
D
There
are
form
based
code
or
zoning
districts
that
would
actually
require
line
industrial,
but
certainly
we
can
use
those
tools
and
use
those
regulations
to.
A
D
You
know
potentially
guide
or
limit
it.
You
know
the
the
types
of
uses
that
would
that
would
be
available,
or
that
would
be
permissible
within
certain
areas.
J
Hey
Jay
was
there
Outreach
to
the
businesses,
the
landlord's
tenants
in
that
area,
and
how
did
they
feel
about
the
three
options.
D
Yes,
absolutely
and
Vivian
and
Chris-
please
chime
in
on
this,
but
I
know
that
we
so
we.
A
D
We've
also
hosted
a
site
tour
with
those
groups
and
had
a
lot
of
response
to
these
to
these
Alternatives
as
part
of
our
second
round
of
focus
group
meetings
a
couple
of
weeks
ago-
and
you
know
the
the
general
perspective
that
that
staff
has
has
received
from
the
business
community
and
the
property
owners-
is
that
they
they
are
very
interested
in
the
flexibility
they
certainly
do
have
I
would
say
similar.
You
know
concerns
to
what
councilman
Wallach
raised
in
and
are
interested
in,
staying
there,
but
also
we've.
D
You
know:
we've
heard
that,
under
the
current
current
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan,
land
use
category
that
applies
in
this
area
in
the
zoning
that
applies
in
this
area.
There's
there's
actually
some
property
owners
that
would
like
to
have
certain
types
of
tenants
and
they
and
have
had
offers
to
bring
those
tenants
in,
but
they're
not
able
to
do
it
under
the
current
regime.
So
there
certainly
is
an
interest
overall
to
look
for
some
additional
flexibility
and
Vivian.
Please
please
join
them
if
there's
anything
else
there
no.
O
Thanks
KJ,
just
kind
of
following
up
on
the
discussion
that
that
you
had
with
Mark
and
with
Lauren
about
jobs
and
Lead,
industrial
and
whatnot.
If
I
understood
your
chart
right
even
under
option
two,
which
is
the
least
number
of
jobs,
you're
still
talking
a
thousand
to
thirteen
hundred
Eleven
Hundred
to
thirteen
hundred
jobs.
I
know
that's
not
incremental.
That's
roughly
what
we
have
there
now,
maybe
slightly
less
than
what
we
have
there
now
I
I
get
the
fact
that
not
every
job
is
is
equal.
In
other
words,
a
light.
O
Industrial
job
may
be
different
than
a
retail
job
or
a
restaurant
job,
but
I
think
I
always
want
to
make
sure
that
I
understood
your
point
and
answer
to
Lauren's
question.
There
is
still
potential
for
when
we
get
eventually
get
to
zoning
here,
we're
just
talking
about
land
use.
Now
that
you
we
could
Zone
it
for
things
that
are
job,
creating
whether
that's
origami,
preserving
whether
that's
light
industrial
or
retail
or
office
or
any
other
types
of
jobs.
Is
that
right
that.
D
That
is
correct,
yeah,
the
again
the
mutod
land
use
category
allows
for
the
greatest
range
of
zoning
assumptions
that
we
could
that
we
could
make
under
100.
B
All
right
thanks
everyone.
This
has
been
a
really
substantive
discussion.
I
appreciate
everybody.
Staying
really
focused
on
on
the
topic
and
we're
also
exhausted
from
our
90
minutes
that
was
allocated
so,
but
thank
you,
I
think.
The
comments
have
been
helpful.
Okay,
so
now,
I
just
want
to
go
through
kind
of
a
similar
thing
to
what
we
did
with
the
transportation
connections.
B
I'm
just
going
to
ask
generally
for
each
option
who
was
in
support
of
that
option,
and
then
we
can
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
any
finer
grained
distinctions
that
we
would
like
to
make
tonight
recognizing
that
we
future
Council
will
have
a
chance
to
come
back
to
some
specific
zoning
types
of
conversations
too.
So,
let's
start
with
option
one.
Is
there
anybody
who
is
in
favor
of
option?
One.
B
B
I
So
I'm
cheating
a
little
bit.
It's
not
something
that
I
want
to
tweak
at
this
stage.
But
as
you
move
forward
with
this,
and
we
start
looking
at
zoning
I,
you
know
I
share
a
lot
of
Mark's
concerns
and
if
there
are
areas
where
we
can
do
something
to
preserve
our
service
industrial
or
make
that
you
know,
depending
on
what
our
market
analysis
shows
more
feasible
for
people,
I
would
be
interested
in
that.
B
Thank
you
can
I
just
ask
for
a
show
of
hands
of
who
who
is
also
interested
in
Lauren's
suggestion
we
got
a
mostly
yes,
so
one
one
in
the
middle
we'll
say
mostly.
Yes,
thanks,
Lauren
Aaron.
P
Yeah
I
think
you
all
are
on
the
the
right
track
here
and
I
just
want
to
offer
a
couple
of
comments
just
kind
of
following
up
on
some
of
the
questions
that
people
are
asking
and
just
in
terms
of
like
the
transit
oriented
nature
well
in
in
general,
like
when
this
plane
is
implemented,
it's
going
to
take
a
long
time
to
go
into
effect,
like
properties
will
redevelop
incrementally
slowly
over
a
pretty
long
period
of
time.
So
I
don't
think
we're
going
to
see
like
a
large-scale
Vanishing
of
existing
uses.
P
Some
of
them
are
buildings
are
really
new.
You
know
they're
not
going
to
go
away
anytime
soon,
so
I
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
keep
in
mind
the
the
benefit
of
additional
housing.
You
know
in
the
long
term
as
we're
moving
to
zoning,
because
I
think,
even
if
our
zoning
is
focused
primarily
on
housing,
it's
not
like
that
entire
area
is
just
going
to.
You
know
redevelop
in
in
three
or
four
years.
P
I
think
it'll
take
decades,
I'm,
sure
and
and
while
it
does
I'll
just
mention,
I
think
the
transit
will
be
coming
back
and
we're
getting
more
service
to
Boulder
Junction.
Before
too
long,
and
while
we've
been
focusing
on
what
exactly
has
been
going
into
that
transit
station,
there
are
other
bus
lines
that
stop
very
nearby
like
the
Hop
is
nearby.
The
flex
route
to
to
Fort
Collins
is
nearby
and
we
are
working
on
the
bus,
rapid
transit
to
Longmont
along
119.
P
B
Thanks
for
those
additional
comments,
Erin
and
I
just
wanted
to
offer
just
the
additional
comment.
I
mentioned
to
everybody,
about
the
mitigation
action
plan
that
is
probably
going
to
kick
in
in
a
few
years
to
try
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
along
the
Front
Range.
B
One
of
the
things
that
I
really
like
about
this
is
that
it
does
kind
of
get
us
staying
ahead
on
being
on
having
our
land
already
doing
some
of
the
mitigation
action
plan,
steps
which
will
help
us
out
in
a
few
years
if
those
restrictions
on
transportation
funding
start
to
come
in,
so
I
really
appreciate
it
for
that
as
well.
D
D
Everybody's
time
and
patience.
B
Okay,
great
then
I'm
just
going
to
ask
the
general
question
again.
It
does
council
agree
with
the
proposed
approach
to
place
types
and
public
spaces
to
better
Define,
Urban,
Design
and
character,
just
a
yes
or
no
to
that
very
general
question
that
we
can
move
on.
Raise
your
hand
if
you
agree.
D
I
do
I
I
would
offer
just
a
very
quick
slide
on
next
steps,
if
that
would
be
useful,
so
give
me
Justin.
Thank
you
get
to
that.
D
Yes,
so
as
as
we've
been
talking,
we,
this
is
really
really
great
and
useful
information
for
us.
So
we
will
be
heading
back
and
and
pencils
down
here
for
a
while,
through
the
month
of
June,
to
develop
our
preferred
approach
through
the
month
of
July
we're
going
to
be
gathering
feedback,
then,
on
that
preferred
approach,
we've
got
a
number
of
Engagement
activities.
Another
round
of
Focus
meetings
with
our
focus
groups
we're
going
to
provide
an
update
to
planning
board
towards
the
end
of
July.
D
After
all
of
you
are
back
book
planning
board
and
city
council
are
back
from
your
break
over
the
summer.
We
are
hoping
to
be
able
to
provide
you
with
an
IP
around
that
same
time
towards
the
end
of
July,
just
to
provide
you
with
an
update
of
where
we've
landed
for
a
preferred
approach.
D
Going
to
have
another
meeting
of
the
multi-board
working
group,
so
we're
going
to
gather
all
those
liaison
from
our
different
boards
and
review
that
with
them,
and
then
we're
also
going
to
make
the
draft
Amendment
to
the
plan
available
to
the
public
for
public
review
for
about
two
weeks
towards
the
end
of
July,
before
we
put
any
final
refinements
to
that
at
the
planning
board
in
August,
ideally
and
then
back
to
you
in
the
third
week
of
September,
for
a
public
hearing
on
amendments
to
the
plan
and
also
our
hope
is
to
go
ahead
and
bring
forward
the
updates
to
the
BBC
land
use
map
as
well
and
run
and
run
currently.
B
All
right,
thank
you
so
much
KJ
and
thank
you
to
everyone
else
who
came
in
to
give
us
all
this
great
information.
It
was
really
a
robust
discussion.
Thank
you.
C
Would
be
great,
and
thank
you
thank
you
so
much
council
members,
fear
and
I
just
want
to
say
really
thank
all
of
you.
That
was
a
really
great
conversation,
super
productive
feedback
and
excited
to
hear
some
of
your
thoughts,
since
the
team
continues
to
move
forward
so
appreciate
that
our
next
item
is
one
that
many
of
you
have
heard.
In
the
past,
we've
had
presentations
I'm
going
to
go
directly
to
Mark
wolf,
to
talk
about
some
updates
on
Grant
fundings
and
we
have
a
new
grants.
B
Thank
you
and
I
just
want
to
remind
folks
I.
Think
I
may
have
forgotten
to
do
this
reminder
earlier.
Can
you
please
introduce
yourself,
as
you
start
talking,
thank
you.
R
All
right
so
good
evening,
I'm
Mark,
Wolfe
I'm
budget
officer
for
the
city
happy
to
be
with
you
again
to
discuss
the
Community
culture
resilience
and
safety
tax
specifically
are
non-profit
grant
program.
We
will
be
reviewing
Grant
criteria.
R
This
is
in
a
follow-up
to
our
last
touch
point
with
Council
on
the
ccrs
grant
program
back
in
October
of
last
year,
where
we
discussed
the
overall
program
framework.
So
we've
been
hard
at
work,
developing
a
program
filling
out
that
program
structure,
developing
specific
criteria
which
will
review
this
evening
so
I'll
take
you
through
a
very
brief
history.
R
Many
of
you
are
very
familiar
with
the
history
of
ccrs,
formally
CCS,
we'll
just
touch
on
some
of
that.
Just
for
context
briefly,
touch
on
our
an
overview
of
the
program
structure
itself
and
then
I'll
turn
over
to
Tony.
Who
will
describe
the
Criterion
a
bit
more
detail.
R
We'll
then
shift
over
to
some
additional
program,
information
and
pause
for
questions
and
discussion.
So
normally
we
don't
get
into
them
the
management
structure
per
se,
but
we
thought
it
would
be
helpful
context.
Given
that
the
grants
function
is
a
is
a
new
function
in
the
city
certainly
related
to
our
efforts
to
to
continue
to
to
strive
for
efficiency
and
how
we
deliver
internal
Services,
we
created
a
new
division
within
the
finance
department
to
help
support
Citywide
Grant
activities.
R
We
are
really
excited
to
have
both
Tony
Townsend,
who
you'll
hear
from
in
a
moment
as
our
grant
senior
program
manager,
Annie
Scott,
who
has
been
with
us
about
10
days
now,
so
we're
not
going
to
make
her
present
this
evening,
but
really
excited
they
both
come
with
a
whole
bunch
of
great
experience
and
will
be
valuable
members
to
to
the
team
how
we
hope
to
support
Citywide
grants
activities.
R
A
focus
will
be
on
supporting
organize
strategy
and
capacity
in
obtaining
a
federal
state
and
other
Grant
resources,
and
also
administering
the
ccrs
program.
So
I
thought
it
would
be
helpful
just
to
set
that
context
a
bit
and
how
we'll
be
performing
the
tasks
in
looking
at
the
the
history.
So
again,
voters
approved
the
renewal
of
ccrs
back
in
November
of
2021.
This
is
a
0.3
dedicated
sales
and
use
tax
primarily
for
infrastructure
investment.
The
ballot
language
did
a
few
things,
most
importantly
for
our
discussion.
This
evening.
R
It
created
10
percent
of
the
tax
revenues
up
to
10
percent
of
the
tax
revenues
to
fund
a
grant
pool
for
non-profit
organization
projects
that
that
serve
the
people
of
Boulder.
So
what
that
means
in
terms
of
projected
revenue
is
about
21.75
million
over
the
life
of
the
the
tax
that
it's
10
and
then
about
a
million
and
a
half
annually.
So
we
can
either
look
at
that
annually
or
over
the
life
of
the
tax.
R
Depending
on
the
flexibility
we
need
within
the
program,
we
formed
an
internal
steering
committee
in
January
of
last
year
to
help
explore
Grant
structures
that
were
based
off
of
focus
group
input
from
both
the
lead
up
to
the
tax
renewal
and
and
also
subsequent
engagements,
that
we
did
in
2022
within
that
the
lead
up
to
the
the
renewal
of
the
tax
and
developing
the
ballot
language
in
2021,
and
also
the
engagement
that
we
conducted
in
2022
helped
create
a
series
of
goals
and
intended
outcomes
for
this
nonprofit
Support
Program,
specifically
looking
at
advancing
our
our
racial
Equity
goals
and
outcomes.
R
We
conducted
two
focus
group
sessions.
First,
in
the
lead
up
to
the
ccrs
tax
extension
in
2021,
we
received
input
from
19
non-profit
organizations,
including
a
couple
of
previous
CCS
grantees.
A
number
of
items
were
pointed
out,
specifically
the
need
to
support
planning
grants
and
not
just
construction
costs
that
a
combination
of
transformational,
investments
in
smaller
capital
projects
should
be
considered
that
they
should
have
broad
reach
in
support
of
the
entire
community,
that
we
enhance
the
flexibility
and
Grant
Administration
and
ensure
a
transparent
decision-making
process.
R
R
The
feedback
helped
confirm
the
program
goals
that
we
went
over
and
lead
us
to.
The
structures
that
were
shared
out
last
fall.
The
feedback
we
put
in
three
different
categories
related
a
lot
to
the
accessibility
of
the
grant
program
itself
and
some
of
the
barriers
that
were
present
in
accessing
CCS
dollars
of
the
past
and
what
might
be
needed
in
order
to
to
make
sure
that
any
resources
were
accessible
to
a
variety
of
organizations.
R
We
also
heard
about
the
desire
to
have
collaboration
opportunities
with
City
staff,
but
also
with
other
organizations
and
looking
at
opportunities
to
to
partnership,
either
in
space
or
providing
service,
and
that
there
should
be
value
in
participating
in
the
grant
process
itself
going
through
an
extensive
application
can
be,
and
it
can
be
prohibitive
for
a
lot
of
small
organizations,
and
so
we
heard
the
need
to
provide
flexible
cash,
but
also
overall
capacity
to
make
sure
that
there
there
was
value
in
participating
in
general.
R
So
all
that
background
led
us
to
propose
a
grant
structure.
We
received
from
some
feedback
from
Council
in
August
of
22
and
came
back
in
October
of
22
to
confirm
the
three
different
Grant
types
that
we
would
be
offering
Under
the
ccrs
Umbrella
the
first
being
focused
on
capacity
building
and
planning
leading
to
capital
investment,
so
that
idea
of
making
more
grants
accessible
to
a
greater
number
of
organizations.
So
the
type
one
is
really
about
the
capacity
building
and
planning
through
technical
assistance.
Type
2
is
our
direct
capital
investment.
R
It's
not
necessarily
the
focus
of
the
criteria
tonight
which
we'll
talk
about
but
again
reflects
the
the
desire
we
heard
in
a
number
of
different
venues
to
be
open
to
community-based
projects
that
were
really
related
to
more
of
a
partnership
with
City
and
community-based
Facilities,
and
with
that
confirmation
of
the
structure
in
October,
we
also
confirmed
some
thresholds
for
the
overall
costs
of
the
program
and
where
the
dollars
were
going
90
or
almost
20
million
19
and
a
half
million
is
focused
on
Capital
Investments,
the
vast
majority
of
which
is
going
directly
to
capital
investment.
R
So
again,
these
are
our
funding
thresholds
or
targets
for
the
program,
so
16.3
million
will
be
direct
capital
and
then
that
3.2
million
15
of
the
overall
Capital
Investments
that's
geared
towards
direct
investment
in
organizations
through
technical
assistance.
So
again
that
idea
of
capacity
building
where
all
that
red
circle
there
is
value
for
organization,
so
vast
majority
of
program
dollars
are
going
to
Capital
and
investing
directly
into
organizations.
S
Pleased
to
be
here
so,
as
we
shift
into
the
new
information
I
I
want
to
point
out
that
this
will
be
our
last
Council
checkpoint
on
this
program.
Before
we
release
the
information
for
applications,
program
launch
will
be
focused
on
that
type,
1
and
type
2
project.
That
Mark
was
just
discussing
That,
Type,
1
being
that
capacity
building,
planning
and
investment
program.
With
that
technical
assistance,
we
are
anticipating
an
August
launch
date
for
that
type,
one
and
type
2.
For
that
direct
capital.
S
Investment
will
be
more
similar
to
what
we've
done
in
the
past
to
be
launched
in
July
and
then,
as
Mark
said,
he'll
touch
on
that
type
3
a
little
later
on
tonight,.
S
So,
for
a
type
one,
this
is
really
going
to
be
focused
on
making
these
dollars
more
accessible
to
organizations,
prioritizing
organizations
that
deliver
programs
and
services
that
align
with
our
Equity
goals,
strengthening
and
providing
value
to
each
organization.
That
participates
so,
regardless
of
whether
or
not
we're
able
to
identify
a
capital
investment,
we
really
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
value
in
participating
in
the
program
in
and
of
itself
and,
finally,
that
we're
investing
in
these
organizations
for
Capital
funding
as
needed
and
identified
in
the
process
so.
S
Focusing
on
small
to
medium
organizations
that
need
that
wraparound
technical
assistance
to
access,
Capital
funds,
our
goal
is
to
accept
eight
to
twelve
organizations.
But,
ultimately,
demand
will
lead
us
to
what
that
final
number
is.
Maybe
it's
five,
maybe
14.
I
think
we're
just
going
to
let
the
process
dictate
well,
keeping
it
reasonable
so
that
everyone
is
provided
with
that
adequate
level
of
support
once
accepted
into
the
program.
These
organizations
will
receive
that
initial
capacity
Grant,
so
some
initial
flexible
cash
paired
with
technical
assistance
and
that
will
eventually
lead
into
capital
investment.
S
S
So
we'll
have
Outreach
help
spread
word
to
organizations
that
we
would
like
to
apply
for
the
program,
but
we
want
the
barrier
to
apply
to
be
low.
So
we're
looking
for
a
simple
summary
of
the
organization
size,
Community
served
and
a
description
of
their
physical
space
needs
so
again
that
technical
assistance
will
be
an
important
component
of
type
1
grants.
But
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
long-term
goal
is
that
commercial
space
Solution
that's
sustainable
in
Boulder.
S
The
evaluation
for
these
will
be
based
on
criteria
aligned
within
the
city's
sustainability,
equity
and
resilience
goals,
demonstrated
long-term
commitment
to
the
community
programs
and
services
that
are
inclusive
and
demonstrate
a
commitment
to
serving
historically
marginalized
communities
within
the
city.
S
So
a
bit
of
an
aside
here
will
be
on
that
third
party
technical
assistance
that
we've
been
talking
about.
We
issued
an
RFP
on
May
26th.
It
will
be
open
for
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
So
if
there's
any
organizations
that
are
out
there
and
interested
in
this,
we
would
love
for
you
to
apply.
S
This
will
be
to
identify
a
third-party
partner
to
provide
technical
assistance
for
type
1
organizations,
we're
likely
seeking
one
firm
to
be
the
point
of
contact
on
that
program,
and
then
they
will
conduct
an
initial
assessment
in
partnership
with
City
staff
of
those
organizations
that
are
accepted
into
the
program.
S
This
third
party
will
identify
the
top
needs
that
the
organization
selected
have
and
connect
them
to
services,
so
whether
they
directly
provide
that
or
they
subcontract
it
out,
it
kind
of
remains
to
be
determined,
but
essentially
this
will
be
in
the
realm
of
things
like
financial
planning,
legal,
real
estate
board
element
and
other
types
of
assistance
that
will
help
Advance
toward
a
capital
investment
or
a
long-term
commercial
stay
solution
in
Boulder.
S
Findings
of
those
assessments
will
help
us
inform
the
top
technical
assistance
needs
that
are
catered
individually
to
each
organization
and
then.
Lastly,
we
hope
that
this
technical
assistance
will
help
just
lay
a
foundation
for
determining
the
most
successful
potential
solution
for
that
long-term
space
challenge
that
may
or
may
not
be
a
capital
investment
with
City
dollars
and
that's
okay.
We
still
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
value
in
this
program
for
all
of
the
organizations
to
go
through
the
process.
S
Our
targeted
timeline
for
this
type,
one
we
have
a
little
bit
more
lead
up
time.
While
we
get
the
third
party
technical
assistance
partner
on
board,
we
still
have
some
Outreach
to
do,
which
will
be
really
important
ahead
of
releasing
the
opportunity
for
applications,
we're
targeting
an
August
release
date
for
application
and
then
we'll
leave
a
good
period
of
time
open.
So
that
way
we
can
do
more
Outreach.
S
So
these
are
for
that
specific
Capital
project
for
long-term
investment
within
the
city.
The
goal
for
this
is
that
they
support
Community,
focused
programs
and
services
that
are
aligned
with
the
city's
Equity
goals
and
that
they're
designed
to
deliver
City
resources
in
a
timely
manner.
So
this
is
really
getting
at
that.
What
we
don't
want
to
see
happen
is
having
grants
that
are
awarded
and
then
sitting
out
there
that
have
like
a
match
requirement
for
another
four
or
five
years.
We
really
want
to
be
able
to
invest
those
dollars
in
real
projects.
S
S
We
don't
exactly
know
when
that
cycle
or
like
what
that
cycle
will
be,
but
we're
thinking
it'll
be
about
every
two
years
that
we
would
release
another
RFP
announcement
for
it
and
again
this
will
just
depend
on
demand,
so
the
grant
sizes
of
this
will
vary
also,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
enough
resources
to
support
both
type
1
and
type
2
grants
and
to
be
able
to
do
this
on
a
cyclical
basis.
S
We
don't
believe
that
these
Awards
will
exceed
two
million
dollars,
but
for
anything
larger
than
a
million
we
will
require
just
a
generally
greater
requirements
that
we
will
discuss
in
a
little
bit
here.
S
So
general
information
on
these
type
2
again,
we
don't
want
that
bar
to
be
too
high
for
organizations
to
apply,
but
since
these
are
focused
on
more
of
an
eminent
investment,
there
will
be
more
information
requested
on
these
applications.
So,
in
addition
to
some
of
those
Basics
we'll
also
want
some
simple
financial
statements
so
that
we
can
understand
the
financial
position
of
the
organization
and
their
ability
to
execute
on
the
proposed
investment.
Our
evaluation
criteria
will
look
similar.
S
And
then
this
is
just
important
to
reinforce
what
we
talked
about
with
those
type
1
organizations
is
that
they
will
be
prioritized
for
type
2
Capital
funding
in
the
future
and
that
some
of
these
criteria
might
be
waived
after
going
through
the
process
and
being
recommended
for
capital
investment.
S
So
talking
about
those
larger
Awards
will
come
a
greater
amount
of
scrutiny,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
their
on
hand,
resources
are
adequate
to
support
an
initial
project.
Planning
and
Development.
The
city
funding
should
generally
be
one
of
the
last
Investments
within
that
Capital
stack,
especially
for
larger
projects
that
the
city
is.
S
Essentially,
we
want
to
be
the
last
piece
that's
able
to
come
in
and
and
make
that
project
move
forward,
as
opposed
to
being
the
base
funding
where
you
know,
there's
years
of
planning
in
order
to
raise
funds
before
that
project
can
be
executed,
we
want
to
make
sure
there's
a
coherent
funding
strategy.
So
if
one
of
the
last
pieces
is
the
city
dollars
and
you
need
to
raise
like-
let's
say
a
million
dollars-
we
want
to
see
that
funding
strategy
within
their
application.
S
For
a
type
2
timeline
we're
looking
at
a
shorter
period
of
time,
so
we're
optimistic
that
we
can
release
a
funding
Opportunity
by
the
end
of
July.
Applications
will
be
due
by
mid-september
and
then,
ideally
we're
making
Awards
in
October.
Again
these
are
targets,
and
we
will
definitely
be
making
sure
to
advertise
these
dates
once
we
have
them
finalized
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
pass
it
back
to
Mark
and
he's
going
to
talk
about
additional
program
information.
Thank
you.
R
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
Tony
all
right,
a
few
last
pieces
and
then
we'll
open
it
up
for
questions.
So
Tony
alluded
to
how
we
will
evaluate
Grant
applications.
Our
plan
is
to
establish
a
grant
Review
Committee
that
will
be
comprised
of
City
staff,
our
third
party
technical
assistance
partner
and
then
we'll
be
seeking
some
outside
assistance
to
fill
out
that
group
to
make
sure
that
it's
balanced,
including
an
external
participant
with
direct
nonprofit
management
experience.
R
Obviously
somebody
that's
not
applying
for
Grant
funds,
but
could
help
us
from
that
side
of
things,
and
then
we
do
plan
to
engage
with
Community,
connectors
and
residents
or
Outreach
to
our
broader
Community
Connector
Network,
to
see
if
there
is
at
least
one
participant
that
could
help
us
evaluate
Grant
applications.
This
Review
Committee
is
responsible
for
making
final
funding
award
determinations
again.
R
This
is
something
we
discussed
back
in
October
to
help
address
some
of
the
things
that
we
have
heard
in
feedback
from
last,
a
few
CCS
processes
in
in
helping
with
a
smoother
final
award
process
and
just
to
say
out
loud
that
we
will
be
certainly
over
communicating
those
Awards
to
community
and
to
council
at
the
proper
time,
probably
staggered
a
little
bit
depending
on
if
it's
a
type,
1
or
type
two
program
evaluation
is
really
important.
R
Again,
we
touched
on
this
back
in
October,
but
since
we're
doing
something
different,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
evaluating
this
continuously
and
making
changes
whenever
it
looks
like
we're
not
meeting
our
goals.
So
first
piece
of
that
is
establishing
what
our
goals
are
and
how
we
intend
to
measure
that
measurement
piece
being
in
alignment
with
our
racial
Equity
instrument
is
really
important,
meaning
that
we
will
be
looking
at
to
the
extent
possible
where
we
are
seeing
benefit
and
burden
across
all
of
the
Investments
we've
made
in
type
1
and
type
2
grants.
R
And
if
there's
any
opportunity
to
make
tweaks
to
the
program,
we
will
do
so
that'll
be
a
part
of
the
report
and
recommendations
that
we
will
bring
back
to
council
at
the
right
time
to
evaluate
how
type
1
and
type
2
grants
went
the
first
time
around
and,
lastly,
we'd
love
to
be
able
to
do
this
in-house.
What
we
think
some
third-party
assistance
will
be
necessary.
We
have
included
that
in
the
RFP
for
technical
assistance,
that
partner
could
help
us
potentially
there's
also
potential
for
an
academic
partner
to
help
us
with
the
evaluation.
R
And
then
the
last
piece
are
type
3
grants
so
again,
we're
not
focused
on
criteria
for
Grant
three
we're
not
officially
opening
applications
for
type
three
but
type
3
grants
were
specifically
aimed
at
feasibility
studies
related
to
Concepts
that
might
be
in
partnership
with
the
city
related
to
a
specific
type
of
use.
So
the
feasibility
is
really
about.
Does
this
Gap
exist
in
the
community
and
if
so,
how
might
we
go
about
addressing
that
Gap
in
in
service,
specifically
related
to
more
of
a
community
Gathering
space?
R
So
essentially,
what
we're
highlighting
here
is
that
we're
leaving
the
door
open,
and
so
if
there
is
some
type
of
interesting
or
emerging
opportunity
that
comes
out
of
applications
or
comes
out
of
other
conversations
that
we
have
the
ability
to
tap
into
this
type
three,
it
could
lead
us
down
to
a
path
on
interesting
financing
models.
Maybe
it's
not
just
City
dollars,
maybe
there's
there's
other
City
resources,
maybe
there's
partnership,
maybe
there's
establishing
some
type
of
other
trust
or
other
Financial
Arrangement
that
leverages
City
dollars.
R
So
we
think
by
by
leaving
the
store
cracked,
if
you
will,
we
can
respond
a
little
bit
more
nimbly
for
emerging
opportunities
that
come
into
this
space.
So
stay
tuned
on
that
I.
Think
the
application
process
for
type
1
and
2
will
help
inform
what
might
be
possible
within
this
realm
and
we'll
make
sure
to
hold
back
an
adequate
amount
of
research
resources
to
help
support
type
threes
that
may
emerge
through
our
process.
O
Of
all
Tony
welcome
to
the
city,
you,
you
found
a
great
place
to
work
and
I
hope,
you're
happy
with
us.
O
It's
always
great.
Having
that
handyman
money,
the
question
for
for
Tony
Amar
Mark.
What
I
know
that
we
structured
this
with
with
an
ability
for
the
city
to
borrow
against
future
tax
collections
so
that
we
wouldn't
have
to
pay
as
we
go,
that
we
could.
O
We
could
borrow
money
and
then
repay
with
tax
collection,
so
we
wouldn't
have
to
wait
for
all
the
collections
to
happen
and
I
know
that
you
said
that
for
the
up
to
10
portion,
that
would
would
result
in
about
a
million
and
a
half
dollars
a
year
or
about
twenty
one,
22
million
dollars
over
the
course
of
the
life
of
the
tax.
O
Do
you
guys
have
a
kind
of
a
preliminary
estimate
of
how
how
much
you
might
disperse
in
maybe
this
year
or
next
year
for
type
1
and
type
two
I
recognize
the
fact,
also
that
we've
collected
this
tax
now
for
a
year
and
a
half.
So
we've
got
a
little
bit
of
money
in
the
kitty,
but
are
you
in
a
front
end?
Load
this
or
is
this
gonna
be
kind
of
limited
to
roughly
a
million
and
a
half
dollars
a
year
over
the
next
15
years.
O
R
Thanks
for
the
question
Bob,
but
it's
a
good
one.
What
we
plan
to
do
is
let
demand
Drive,
how
we
end
up,
structuring
the
financing.
You
know,
obviously,
if
we're
up
against
our
full
10
allotment.
That
would
be
a
conversation
we
would
have
with
Council,
but
let's
say
we're
above
that
million
and
a
half
threshold
annually,
especially
within
this
first
cycle.
Given
that
there's
there's
probably
some
pent-up
demand
for
the
support
we
do
intend
to
tap
into
our
ccrs
fund
as
a
whole.
R
Knowing
that
our
our
limit
is
that
10
over
the
life
of
the
tax,
not
just
the
10
annually,
so
you're
right,
we
do
have
some
saved
up.
We
have
about
2.6
2.7
million
dollars
appropriated
for
2023
for
the
program
if
we
do
need
additional
dollars,
we'll
plan
to
look
at
the
adjustment
to
base
in
November
December
to
help
supplement,
but
we
have
adequate
appropriation
within
ccrs
fund
to
support
that
for
this
year
and
early
in
the
next
year
will
be
budgeting
appropriately
for
the
2024
budget
as
well.
N
Yeah
my
question
kind
of
I
guess
naturally
Falls
Bob's
and
I
know
that
type
2
has
that
sort
of
limit
and
not
wanting
to
exceed
the
2
million
and
three
and
type
three.
Is
there
to
kind
of
be
the
catch-all
for
everything
else?
But
but
my
question
really
centers
around
those
irresistibly
large
projects
that
that
I,
you
know,
think
that
actually
I'm
pretty
sure
are
out
there
to
be
frank
and
I
would
just
hate
for
us
to
be
capping
off
opportunity.
Where
someone
says
look:
five
million
dollars
from
the
city
and
we've
got.
N
You
know
a
state
leading
Performing,
Arts
Complex
right
I
mean
something
like
that.
Where
you
go,
oh,
we
really
can't
say
no,
but
then
have
we
maybe
capped
ourselves
off
based
on
this.
So
that's
where
I
just
I
want
to
know
that.
There's
flexibility
that,
if
just
something
that
is
irresistible
that
just
really
strikes
the
community
as
a
must-have,
that
we
have
the
ability
that
this
can
meet
that
at
any
sort
of
magnitude
within
reason,
and
not
really
just
sort
of
capped.
N
It
too
so
I
I
just
want
to
know
that
there's
an
ability
for
those
people
to
feel
that
they
could
submit
a
proposal
and
could
look
for
us
to
creatively,
invest
in
those
things
and
not
be
sort
of
capped
off.
So
that's
really
kind
of
where
my
question
centers
is
how
big
can
we
go
and
let
the
community
know
that
that's
available,
whether
we
say
yes
or
no
is
kind
of
irrelevant.
R
Yeah
thanks
Matt
also
a
good
question.
I.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
in
October,
which
is
why
we
didn't
come
forward
with
a
hard
cap.
So
to
your
point,
we
do
want
to
invite
all
proposals.
We
do
want
to
understand
what
the
demand
is
for
grant
funding.
R
So
our
threshold
of
2
million
was
just
to
to
estimate
that
if
we
wanted
to
preserve
a
few
cycles
of
of
these
grants
over
the
15
years,
at
some
point
we
we
do
have
to
think
about
what
our
maximum
award
is.
Is
it
two?
Is
it
three?
R
Is
it
fours
I,
you
know,
I,
don't
know
until
we
see
the
full
Grant
applications
come
in
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
if
we
issued
a
significant
Grant,
let's
say
five
to
ten
million
dollars
at
some
point,
there
are
trade-offs
to
that
and
how
far
we
can
extend
the
tax
dollars.
So
that's
why
we're
trying
to
put
some
language
in
there
around
some
parameters
but
leave
the
door
open
that,
certainly,
if
demand
is
saying
you
know,
we
only
have
five
organizations
that
are
in
type
one.
B
Foreign,
thank
you.
Does
anybody
else
have
questions
I've
got
a
few
but
want
to
make
sure
everyone
else
can
get
them
in
okay.
I'll
ask
my
questions.
So
you
talked
a
little
bit
Mark
about
the
collaborative
aspect
of
the
type
1
grants,
and
you
know
hoping
to
kind
of
cultivate
some
collaborations
and
things
is
there
an
opportunity
for
groups
that
might
need
to
or
maybe
open
to
cooling
their
type
1
resources
to
collaborate
at
that
stage
of
the
technical
assistance?
R
Yes,
good
question:
I
think
it
will
be
interesting
to
see
who
ultimately
applies,
that'll,
be
a
driver
and
where
we
might
have
partnership
opportunities.
R
I
think
our
hope
is
to
create
a
space
where
those
synergies,
those
Partnerships,
could
develop
an
example
that
we
talked
about
during
our
focus
groups
with
some
of
the
nonprofit
organizations
were
what,
if
three
or
four
of
us
want
to
partner
on
a
particular
space,
maybe
we're
all
renting
a
space
now
and
we
we
want
to
own
a
building.
R
I,
think
that
is
a
really
exciting
opportunity
that
could
come
out
of
the
type
one
and
then
the
focus
of
the
technical
assistance
is
with
that
group
of
organizations
that
are
interested
in
that
in
getting
them
ready
for
that
type
of
investment,
and
you
can
imagine
all
the
lead
up
to
that
between
organizational
development
and
financial
planning
and
eventually
a
real
estate
transaction,
which
again,
the
city
would
be
there
to
support
as
well.
But
I
I
think
that
we
hope
would
be
a
nice
space.
For
that
to
happen.
R
B
I
completely
agree,
so
people
wouldn't
necessarily
join
on
a
touch
collaborative
relationships,
those
who
are
successful
with
their
type
1
applications.
That
might
then
lead
to
collaborations
later.
R
Yes
and
I
I
think
it's
also
important
to
note
here
that
we'll
need
to
do
Outreach
directly
to
organizations
before
the
application
closes,
because
I
think
it's
easier
to
explain
than
it
is
to
write
on
a
sheet
of
paper,
as
we've
learned
so
we'll
be
doing
that
Outreach
working
with
our
communication
engagement
folks
and
our
community
connectors
the
organizations
that
we've
already
worked
with
to
help
support
that
Outreach
prior
to
to
the
closing
of
that
type.
One
opportunity.
B
Thank
you
and
then
my
next
question.
R
It's
a
good
question:
we
we
struggled
with
that
a
bit
and
coming
up
with
a
final
answer
so
similar
to
the
way
I
answered.
Matt's
question
was
that
we've
left
the
door
open,
certainly
to
consider
organizations
that
don't
have
a
physical,
a
current
physical
address
in
Boulder
I.
Think
that's
with
several
caveats.
One
is
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
supporting
organizations
that
serve
Boulder
residents.
R
That's
in
the
ballot
language
and
two
I
think
it
is
important,
given
it's
an
infrastructure
tax
that
it's
supporting
Boulder
infrastructure,
and
so
we
have
talked
about
non-profit
the
non-profit,
Network
being
infrastructure
in
and
of
itself.
I
think
that's
an
important,
Point
I
think
we
would
look
at
organizations
that
want
to
establish
a
physical
presence
in
Boulder
as
kind
of
that
first
priority.
R
That
would
be
underneath
those
organizations
that
already
do
have
a
physical
presence
that
want
to
stay
and
serve
older
residents
and
so
again
we'll
let
that
demand
help
with
that
calculate
us
and
see
what
types
of
organizations
ultimately
end
up
applying.
But
I
do
think.
If
we
get
in
the
realm,
where
we
have
too
many
that
don't
already
have
a
presence,
a
physical
presence
and
servable
to
Residence-
and
we
might
get
kind
of
in
the
crosshairs
of
what
voter
intent
was.
B
Thank
you
just
a
couple
more.
These
are
all
sort
of
related
to
some
of
the
equity
considerations
that
that
we'll
be
looking
at
using
the
racial
Equity
instrument,
and
things
like
that.
Are
we
going
to
be
looking
at
things
like
diversity
and
employees,
as
well
as
in
program,
participants
and
programming.
R
That's
a
good
question:
we
hadn't
contemplated
that
specifically
again,
we
were
trying
to
make
the
application
process
a
low
bar.
However,
some
of
the
the
back
and
forth
with
organizations
through
the
through
the
application
process
could
invite
some
of
those
questions.
I
think
our
initial
Focus
was
on
Who
Who
Are
You
serving
in
the
community,
but
that
that
doesn't
prevent
us
necessarily
for
for
asking
for
some
more
specifics
from
the
organizations
themselves.
Thank.
B
R
We
can
certainly
do
that
with
the
applications
in
terms
of
having
multiple
languages
available.
We
haven't
picked
our
medium
yet,
but
that
is
a
consideration
and
making
sure
that
this
is
accessible
as
one
of
our
top
goals
and,
as
we
hope,
to
close
out
the
RFP
process
for
technical
assistance
in
the
next
few
weeks.
That
is
certainly
a
question
we
will
ask:
is
the
ability
to
help
some
of
that.
B
Great
thank
you.
Does
anybody
have
any
other
questions
before
we
move
to
feedback
all
right?
Let's
offer
staff
some
feedback.
I,
don't
think
there
was
a
general
consensus
question
you're
asking
for
just
some
feedback,
so
anybody
would
want
to
jump
off
with
feedback.
P
Else's
Champion
I
think
you're
on
the
right
track.
You
know
you've
come
to
us
several
times
on
this
matter
and
in
previous
iterations
we've,
given
some
feedback
about
maybe
shifting
in
some
different
directions.
A
little
bit
and
I
think
you've
been
very
responsive
to
that
and
I
think
you've
got
a
great
set
of
types
and
criteria
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
seeing
this
program
get
out
in
the
community
and
benefits
some
of
our
non-profits.
O
O
I
really
really
like
the
fact
that
you
guys
have
built
in
a
lot
of
flexibility
here,
flexibility
between
types,
one,
two
and
three
flexibility
on
the
geography
question
was
just
asked:
even
flexibility
on
how
much
we're
going
to
allocate
per
year
we're
not
limiting
ourselves
to
the
amount
we
collect
in
good
years.
We
may
front
end
load
some
stuff
and
there
may
be
some
years
where
we
just
don't
see
a
lot
of
good
applications.
O
B
Thanks
Bob
and
Bob,
you
basically
captured
everything
that
I
wanted
to
say
just
a
giant.
Thank
you
for
the
flexibility,
I
I
love
the
creativity
and
the
enthusiasm
that
is
sort
of
coming
forward
with
those
process
and
just
trying
some
new
things
and
being
open
to
seeing
what
happens
and
making
adjustments
as
we
go,
I
think
it's
a
really
wonderful
approach,
I
think
it's
the
more
Equitable
approach
and
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
seeing
what
happens
with
all
this.
B
B
Thanks
everyone
does
anybody
else
have
anything
they
want
to
add
on.
Otherwise
we
can
have
an
extra
16
minutes
in
our
evening.