►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 2-15-22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
B
E
Do
have
channel
8
ready
and
I
will
begin
recording.
B
Good
evening,
everyone
and
welcome
to
the
february
15
2022
meeting
with
the
boulder
city
council,
we're
expecting
congressman
joney
goose
here
shortly,
but
while
we're
waiting
for
him,
I'm
going
to
read
through
a
couple
of
announcements,
so
we
could
get
those
on
the
screen.
Please.
B
B
Covid
testing
and
the
boulder
site,
for
that,
is
it
2445
stasio
drive
in
boulder
it's
open
seven
days
a
week
from
8
am
to
6
pm
and
for
vaccinations
for
vaccine
information
and
provider
locations.
You
can
go
to
boco.org
covid
vaccine,
so
if
you
still
need
to
do
that
or
maybe
a
booster,
that's
your
opportunity.
B
B
If
you're
looking
for
an
opportunity
to
get
involved
in
city
affairs,
a
great
way
to
do
that
is
with
our
boards
and
commissions
and
the
recruitment
period
is
now
open.
It
closes
on
february
21st.
You
still
got
a
few
days
left.
You
can
find
your
board
and
commission's
descriptions
and
vacancies
online
at
boulder
colorado.gov
boards
dash
commissions.
B
B
B
Price
gouging,
so
colorado
law
prohibits
charging
excessive
prices
for
certain
essential
products,
goods
or
services.
During
a
disaster
period.
It
makes
clear
that
such
price
gouging
is
a
deceptive
trade
practice
under
the
colorado
consumer
protection
act,
coloradans
who
witness
price
gouging
or
who
think
they
might
be
a
victim
of
price
gouging,
should
file
a
report
with
the
attorney's
general's
office
at
800-222-4444.
B
That's
it
for
our
announcements
and
we
just
need
another
minute
for
junior
goose,
so
alicia.
How
about
we
call
the
roll.
C
C
C
C
I
J
J
B
Well,
why
don't
we
go
ahead
and
roll
into
our
decla
declaration?
For
the
evening
we
have
a
declaration
honoring
rare
disease
day
to
be
read
by
council
member
mark
wallach.
Thank
you.
K
Mayor
as
a
member
in
good
standing
of
the
rare
disease
club,
I
am
very
happy
to
read
the
following
declaration
in
support
of
rare
disease
day
february
28
2022
there
are
over
seven
thousand
diseases
and
conditions
considered
rare
that
is
each
affecting
fewer
than
two
thousand
twenty
two
hundred
thousand
americans
in
the
united
states.
According
to
the
national
institute
of
health.
K
K
Living
with
a
rare
disease
is
made
harder
by
the
fact
that
there
is
often
low
profit
potential
for
development
of
treatments
for
uncommon
illnesses.
Therefore,
very
little
research
is
done
while
more
than
450
drugs
and
biologics
have
been
approved
for
the
treatment
of
rare
diseases.
According
to
the
food
and
drug
administration,
90
of
the
known
rare
diseases
are
still
without
fda,
approved
treatments.
K
B
Thanks
so
much
for
that
mark
and
do
we
have
lindsay
kane
or
someone
else
to
receive
the
declaration
here
this
evening,
lauren
rosenberg.
G
We
appreciate
it
so
much.
Thank
you,
city,
council,
members
and
mayor
for
recognizing
february
28th,
as
rare
disease
day
in
boulder,
it's
extremely
meaningful
to
my
family
and
countless
others
in
our
shoes.
I'm
actually
stepping
in
tonight
for
lindsay
kane,
who
is
supposed
to
address
you,
but
sadly
had
experienced
a
flare-up
in
her
own
rare
condition
and
could
not
be
here.
G
G
Not
only
were
we
faced
with
great
fear
and
sadness,
we
had
to
lay
off
almost
100
of
our
own
employees
in
a
day
in
our
jobs
and
live.
We
had
hung
in
the
balance
as
we
entered
the
pandemic,
but
at
the
same
time,
after
a
long
and
winding
road
of
seeking
answers
for
our
daughter,
who
was
two
and
a
half
at
the
time.
So
we
we
received
her
diagnosis.
G
She's,
actually,
right
here
waving,
we
were
told
that
she
was
among
30
to
50
people.
That's
it
in
the
whole
world
that
had
what
she
had
a
disease
called
mcto,
it's
rare,
ultra,
rare
and
progressively
crippling
and
okay,
and
we
were
told
her
bones
would
continue
to
disappear
over
time
and
that
she
would
experience
kidney
failure
and
other
problems.
G
Ours
is
made
up
of
the
most
compassionate
and
giving
people
who
have
contributed
to
our
research
efforts
and
also
the
high
caliber
cutting
edge
bioscience
community
that
exists
here
which
we're
lucky
for
companies
like
artisan,
biosomologic,
arpeggio
and,
of
course,
cu
right
here
in
boulder.
Helping
us
understand
the
disease,
as
we
just
heard,
there
are
seven
thousand
rare
diseases
that
affect
between
25
and
30
million
americans.
G
And
so
I
speak
for
all
of
those
who
understand
the
isolation
that
comes
with
this
hardship,
and
I
thank
you
for
giving
us
the
platform
and
recognition
that
is
so
deserved.
So
on
february,
28th
we'll
be
at
the
courthouse
and
we'll
see
you
there.
Thank
you
so
very
much.
B
Thank
you
so
much
ms
rosenberg
for
that
that
moving
speech
and
for
turning
your
your
family's
challenges
in
into
a
way
to
help
people
around
the
world
who
are
experiencing
similar,
similar
difficulties.
I
know
I've.
I've
bought
some
cookies
in
front
of
one
of
your
restaurants
as
part
of
one
of
your
fundraisers
for
that
cause.
Well,.
G
We'll
be
doing
some
zebra,
themed,
donut
or
sorry
brownies
at
our
restaurants
on
february
28th
as
well,
so
all
supporting
rare
disease,
something.
B
To
look
forward
to
and
I'll
note
as
well
that
the
band
shell
will
be
lit
up
in
pink,
green,
blue
and
purple
the
colors
of
rare
disease
day
in
honor
of
vacation
thanks.
So
much.
B
All
right:
well,
we
did
just
get
news
that,
unfortunately,
congressman
goose
had
an
important
other
commitment
come
up
and
will
not
be
able
to
join
us
tonight.
So
we
will
reschedule
and
look
for
another
time
to
hear
about
his
important
work
in
washington.
B
So
with
that
alicia
shall
we
move
to
the
next
part
of
our
agenda
here
with
open
comments.
E
Yes
mayor,
thank
you
I'll,
go
ahead
and
do
that.
Thank
you
emily
for
pulling
up
these
slides
four
community
members
here
for
open
comment
this
evening.
Welcome
and
thank
you
for
being
here
to
share
your
perspective
and
your
experience.
E
E
E
All
remarks
and
testimony
shall
be
limited
to
matters
related
to
city
business.
No
participants
will
make
threats
or
use
other
forms
of
intimidation
against
any
person,
obscenity,
racial
epithets
and
other
speech
and
behavior
that
disrupts
or
otherwise
impedes
the
ability
to
conduct
this
meeting
are
prohibited
and
participants
are
required
to
sign
up
and
speak
using.
The
name
they
are
commonly
known
by
individuals
must
display
their
whole
name
before
being
allowed
to
speak
online,
and
only
audio
testimony
will
be
prevented
this
evening.
B
Which
that
ryan
and
all
speakers
will
get
two
minutes
to
speak
in
open
comments
tonight.
Our
first
three
people
are
patrick
murphy,
michelle
rodriguez
and
lindsay
losberg.
L
My
name
is
patrick
murphy.
I've
lived
in
boulder
52
years.
This
presentation
is
about
using
the
boulder
occupation
tax,
a
carbon
tax
in
an
equitable
way.
My
previous
presentations
proved
that
it
is
a
carbon
tax
and
that,
over
time,
boulders
collected
over
88.2
million
dollars
in
carbon
taxes,
and
more
than
half
of
that
was
never
used
for
real
carbon
reduction
and
the
four
million
dollars
of
carbon
tax
that
is
collected
each
year
and
not
used
for
carbon
reduction
could
enable
all
boulder
residences
and
businesses
to
be
100
percent
renewables.
L
Today
using
wind
source
incentives,
solar
incentives
would
provide
value
that
lasted
over
20
years.
Renewable
energy
certificates,
also
known
as
wrecks,
have
been
denigrated
by
boulder
and
that's
ludicrous
wrecks
stimulate
the
renewables
industry
and
we
should
be
buying
them
directly
now
to
meet
our
climate
goals.
All
of
these
options
can
be
done
equitably
by
providing
larger
incentives
for
low-income
citizens
and
smaller
incentives
for
large
income
residents.
L
This
presentation
is
about
energy
use
reduction,
combined
with
real
community
engagement
that
works
instead
of
imagined
engagement
and
endless
propaganda.
I'm
certain,
if
you
ask
100
random
boulder
residents
what
they
know
about
boulder
climate
actions.
The
vast
majority
would
know
nothing,
but
many
of
them
would
know
about
the
muni
failure.
L
M
Hi
this
is
michelle
rodriguez
and
I
wanted
to
first
of
all
congratulate
all
the
council
members
that
just
made
it
and
I'm
happy
to
see
you
guys
and
have
the
opportunity
to
speak.
I
wanted
to
say
about
the
sammy
lawrence
issue
that
I
felt
that
was
kind
of
a
little
bit
of
a
disgrace,
I'm
horrified
at
the
fact.
M
M
I
know
you
guys
have
brought
some
federal
agents
on
there
there's
a
lot
of
officers
that
still
aren't
safe,
those
that
haven't
left,
I
already
have
dropped
the
role
since
I
filed
my
lawsuit
and
I
just
need
to
be
able
to
be
free
in
society
to
be
able
to
speak,
and
I'm
not
sure
when,
when
I'm
able
to
speak
and
what
I'm
able
to
relate
to,
but
I
I
know
that
will
and
lola
ty
did
not
quit
because
of
social
media.
He
quit
because
of
my
lawsuit.
M
I
apologize
forever
being
off
I'll
kill
troop
because
I
babble
a
lot,
but
I
have
the
utmost
respect
for
you
guys
and
I'm
hopeful
with
the
new
the
new
council
that
has
come
in
and
as
far
as
the
federal
agents
they've
brought
in,
I
need
I
had
questions
about
whether
or
not
they
were
going
to
be
somebody
from
inside
the
department
or
somebody
from
the
outside.
I
kind
of
support
the
somebody
from
the
outside.
M
M
B
Next,
we
have
lindsay
lohberg,
daniel
glaser
and
lynn
siegel.
N
Hello
thanks
thanks
for
having
me
thanks
for
the
time
thanks,
hi
everyone,
hi
council
members,
welcome
those
of
you
who
are
new,
my
name's
lindsay
loberg.
N
They
them
I'm
on
the
human
relations
commission
and
I'm
here,
because
I
wanted
to
make
an
invitation,
because
I
was
really
I'm
I'm
here
to
follow
up
about
the
fbi
mou
that
you
all
voted
on
in
your
last
meeting
and
heard
some
calls
for
input
from
our
commission
and
just
wanted
to
express
that
we're
open
to
that,
and
I
wanted
to
point
out
a
pattern
that
I
noticed
where
there
were
a
couple
calls
for
input
and
then
emotion
went
through
anyway
and
for
those
who
are
new,
I
don't
I
don't
want
to
be
condescending.
N
I
brought
this
up
because
I
also
had
to
learn
this
I'm
serving
on
a
commission,
but
if
emotion
is
moving
forward
and
you're
uncomfortable
with
it
or
you
feel
like
you
need
more
information,
you
can
make
a
motion
to
postpone
until
a
certain
thing
happens
so,
like
you
can
make
a
motion
to
postpone
until
we
at
the
hrc
can
create
a
report
for
you,
for
example,
and
we'll
be
happy
to
provide
that,
for
you,
we're
actually
going
to
talk
about
the
fbi
mou
at
our
next
meeting,
I'm
here
speaking
for
myself,
because
we
haven't
had
a
chance
to
discuss
this.
N
So
thank
you
for
having
from
me
thank
you
for
having
me
and
hope
to
hear
from
you
all
in
the
future.
O
O
O
Also
since
affordable
housing
is
a
city-wide
program
shouldn't
all
city
homeowners.
Instead
of
just
the
disadvantaged
minority
pay,
we
need
the
city's
hope
finding
a
solution
for
giving
us
market
rate
earnings
on
our
mortgage,
which
is
still
just
a
fraction
of
what
our
home
is
worth
here.
Are
some
suggestions
number
one
the
new
homeowner
proportionally
gets
the
same
deal
we
did.
This
will
make
things
fair?
O
Can
the
city
make
this
work
with
grants
of
them
if
needed,
number
two
require
all
homeowners
in
boulder
to
financially
contribute
a
small
percentage
when
selling
three
contributions
from
oversized
companies
in
boulder,
like
google
and
other
sources.
Four.
Lastly,
allow
us
to
bind
to
true
home
ownership
to
emancipate
ourselves
from
the
program.
O
As
long
as
we
are
not
getting
near
market
rate
appreciation
on
a
mortgage,
you
are
sadly
sinking
us
well
beneath
the
fantastically
rising
housing
market.
We
are
now
financial
prisoners
in
a
program
that
the
city
still
promotes,
just
like
warnings
for
guns,
it's
imperative
for
the
city
to
have
explicitly
warned
potential
buyers
of
long-term
negative
financial
health
mobility
and
other
consequences.
O
B
P
Good
evening
my
name
is
ben
bender
and
I
live
in
south
boulder.
I'm
not
going
to
waste
my
time
trying
to
convince
you
to
repeal
the
flawed
cu.
South
annexation
agreement
passed
out
of
desperation
during
a
meeting
which
was
more
of
an
infomercial
to
sell
the
agreement
to
the
public
than
a
serious
deliberation
of
the
pros
and
cons
of
the
agreement.
P
But
I
am
going
to
remind
you
in
the
public
of
the
numerous
shortcomings
of
the
agreement,
which
put
more
importance
on
cu's
desire
to
intensively
develop
its
flood,
flood-prone
depleted
gravel
pit
than
on
providing
adequate
flood
protection
for
the
lives
and
properties
of
thousands
of
boulder
residents
to
meet
cu's
demands.
The
size
of
the
flood
control
utility
was
drastically
reduced
to
only
provide
production
for
a
100-year
flood
which
was
deemed
inadequate
by
a
previous
council.
P
The
agreement
also
provides
for
a
new
intersection
was
colorado
93
at
a
dangerous
location
on
a
curve
on
a
hill
which,
according
to
cu's
traffic
consultant,
will
not
have
a
traffic
light
until
there
are
five
accidents
at
the
site
and
utility
rate
payers
will
have
to
pay
millions
to
import.
A
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
cubic
yards
of
earth
fill
to
replace
sand
and
gravel
mine
from
the
site
to
provide
cu
with
additional
land
above
the
level
of
a
500-year
flood.
P
E
Thank
you.
I
believe
that
this
landline
number
it's
a
shama
I'll,
just
go
ahead
and
mute
to
confirm.
Q
All
right,
thank
you,
sorry
about
that
good
evening,
city,
council
and
city
staff,
I'm
here
to
speak
about
the
need
to
take
action
around
finding
a
solution
for
our
unhoused
population.
We
have
been
talking
about
it
for
months
and
it's
not
a
topic
that
requires
more
study.
It's
time
to
take
action.
Q
We
had
a
very
strong
wonderful
response
to
the
marshall
fire
and
that
same
criteria
ought
to
be
applied
to
people
who
are
unhoused
if
they're
unhealthy
economic,
mental
health
reasons-
and
I
I
would
say
to
you
all
with
all
due
respect
that
maybe
it's
time
for
those
involved
in
this
decision
to
consider
sleeping
outside
during
these
below
freezing
days
to.
Q
I
talked
to
may
martin,
who
is
one
of
the
owners
of
madelife
first,
she
is
actively
looking
for
a
new
place
to
move
to,
but
in
the
interim
she
is
open
for
two
thirds
of
that
building
is
vacant
to
have
a
solution
right
away
for
our
unhoused
population
to
just
physically
be
in
that
building.
That's
one
possibility.
Q
A
second
is
to
look
at
that
inventory
that
our
city
manager
requested
of
available
buildings,
because
madelife
is
ready
to
move
and
wants
to
find
a
building
to
buy,
along
with
some
other
community
art
organizations.
Q
I've
provided
that
criteria,
that's
another
possible
solution
and
would
make
2691
303
available.
The
third
is:
why
are
we
even
considering
demolishing
that
building?
You
know
it
was
designated
for
the
for
helping
people
are
unhoused,
it
worked.
Unhoused
people
are
still
coming
to
the
building
because
it
was
such
a
good
experience.
It
was
safe
and
familiar,
and
the
only
reason
that
I
understand
that
building
is
set
to
be
demolished
is
because
it's
to
provide
a
turnaround
space
for
fire
trucks
that
firehouse
that's
been
retrofitted,
has
the
wrong
size
door.
B
B
R
Okay,
thank
you.
My
name
is
margaret
lecompte
and
I'm
a
32-year
resident
of
south
boulder
last
fall
and
I'm
also
the
co-chair
of
the
organization
safe
south
boulder
last
fall.
The
save
cu
south
coalition
conducted
a
petition
drive
to
put
a
referendum
to
repeal
the
cu
south
annexation
ordinance
on
the
ballot.
R
In
30
days,
last
fall
more
than
600
6
000
people
signed
our
petition
to
repeal
the
annexation
twice.
The
number
required
to
put
the
referendum
to
repeal
on
the
ballot
tonight.
City
council
must
figure
out
how
to
act
on
this.
It
has
three
choices:
number
one.
It
can
pass
the
repeat
the
repeal
referendum
themselves
right
now.
S
S
S
B
T
Quite
a
few
campaigns
in
boulder
was
that
the
previous
city
council
jumped
the
gun
less
than
three
weeks
before
the
ballots
were
mailed
out,
people
felt
like
they
had
been
cut
off
at
the
knees
and
they
were
told
by
the
acting
city
attorney
that
their
vote
really
didn't
matter
when
they
voted
that
fall
because
council
had
already
acted.
T
So
this
council
seems
to
want
climate
action
to
be
a
priority.
Developing
cu
south
is
currently
envisioned
is
far
from
that
applies
in
the
face
of
climate
action.
Please
give
the
citizens
of
boulder
a
real
chance
to
make
their
voices
heard
either
repeal
and
give
citizens
a
full
airing
of
the
complexities
involved
or
put
it
on
the
november
ballot
for
a
good
showing
when
everyone
will
be
voting.
Thank
you.
U
The
91
million
is
made
of
two
numbers:
25
million
for
goose
creek,
66
million
for
south
boulder
creek.
These
are
what's
known
as
roms
rough
orders
of
magnitude,
so
we
can
expect
50
percent
increase
in
those
numbers,
so
the
91
million
is
just
the
initial
guess
now.
Unfortunately,
there
are
10
other
drainages
in
boulder
that
need
serious
attention,
so
the
total
amount
of
money
we
need
to
put
into
that
bond
issue
is
not
the
91
million.
It
needs
to
go
up
significantly
for
the
two
already
mentioned,
plus
the
other
10
million
other
10
drainages.
U
So
I
anticipate
that'll
be
about
250
million.
Now
I
firmly
believe
in
peer
review
of
estimates,
not
something
that
just
comes
out
of
fresh
air
and
I'd
like
to
see
the
city
council
really
demand
analysis
of
these
estimates
because
the
south
boulder
creek
one
is
a
huge
one
and
it
could
be
very
huge
indeed.
U
So
we
really
need
to
take
other
factors
into
account,
such
as
energy.
Inflation
is
currently
predicted
at
25
per
year,
and
the
projects
require
lots
of
energy,
concrete
equipment,
transportation,
all
energy
things,
so
the
cost
is
going
to
go
way
up.
So
once
again,
I'll
send
you
my
thing
that
I
sent
to
the
water
advisory
board
and
you
can
digest
it
at
length.
U
O
F
Okay,
good
evening
city,
council,
members
and
staff,
I'm
diane
corlett,
I
live
in
south
boulder.
I
request
you
repeal
the
cu
annexation
agreement,
ordinance,
number
8483,
climate
change,
unstable
weather
and
a
ridification
of
our
lands
now
pose
new
dangers
that
must
be
faced
in
making
land
use
decisions.
These
dangers
were
less
apparent
decades
ago
when
cu
bought
land
in
flood
prone
south
water
creek
valley.
F
It
is
now
obvious
that
the
south
boulder
creek
valley,
a
lush
riparian
area,
should
be
used
for
500
year
flood
control
basins
and
preserved
as
open
space
for
public
use.
Ordinance
number
8483
pastors
emergency
major
with
scant
public
examination,
allows
the
annexation
of
the
cu
land
the
city
for
dense
development
and
supports
an
annexation
agreement
that
was
developed
in
secret.
The
text
of
the
agreement
is
riddled
with
inconsistencies
and
accurate
assumptions
and
saddles
boulder
taxpayers
with
millions
of
dollars
of
costs
over
the
coming
decades.
F
The
agreement
also
fails
to
realistically
address
and
fund
the
numerous
heavy
negative
impacts.
This
dense
mega
development
will
place
on
south
boulder.
I
request
you
repeal
this
ordinance
this
evening
and
immediately
proceed
to
negotiate
an
agreement
with
cu
to
swap
this
land
for
equivalent
acreage
in
the
city-owned
planning
reserve
planning.
Reserve
land
is
set
aside
for
development
of
projects
of
city-wide
concern
and
offers
large
areas
for
affordable
housing
construction
as
well.
It
is
not.
It
is
not
in
a
flood
plain,
it
does
not
imperil
riparian
wetlands.
F
It
does
not
inhibit
the
proper
flood
control
needed
to
protect
older
residents.
This
ordinance
and
the
agreement
it
supports,
represent
major
mistakes
and
leadership,
ignoring
the
needs
of
the
citizens
for
protection
and
good
planning,
while
committing
the
city
to
pay
for
costs
that
should
be
borne
by
the
university's
construction
budget.
Please
correct
these
mistakes
and
repeal
this
ordinance.
V
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
okay,
good,
because
the
capitals
on
in
the
background-
because
I'm
testifying
there
too
and
it's
impossible
to
get
on
with
them?
Can
you
hear
me
okay,
wow,
because
I've
got
my
volume
way
down,
so
I
don't
have
to
listen
to
them
at
the
same
time
and
I
can
concentrate
yes,
so
I
also
am
opposed
to
see
you
self
and
boy.
It's
that
the
capital,
it's
climate
and
I'm
opposed
to
modular
nuclear
reactors.
V
Let's
see
I've
also
got
a
big
problem
with
private
equity
groups
buying
up
housing
throughout
the
united
states.
We
are
coming
to
a
renter's
market
renter
for
everybody,
no
ownership
for
anyone
anymore.
I'll.
Tell
you
one
way
it's
happening.
Did
you
know
what
the
new
rent
is
property
taxes?
That's
the
new
rent
in
boulder.
V
You
have
no
idea
what
I
go
through
every
year,
fighting
it
at
the
board
of
equalization
and
the
board
of
assessment
appeals
and
pretty
soon
I'm
not
gonna
win
because
guess
what
it
doesn't
matter.
I'm
fighting
against
impossible
odds
as
every
project
at
planning
board
that
gets
added
on
for
for
subsidies,
for
a
third
story
for
higher
and
bigger
and
better
just
drives
up
the
property
value
and
drives
up
the
demand
for
affordable
housing,
which
boulder
will
never
keep
up
with,
especially
with
cu.
V
You're
chasing
your
tail,
if
you
think
you're
going
to
keep
up
with
housing
in
this
community-
and
you
know
I
don't
know
about
you,
but
I
can't
afford
aspen
the
homeless
can't
afford
boulder,
but
I
sure,
as
heck
can't
afford
aspen
at
16
million
dollars
average
home
price
there.
So
you
know
what
are
you
gonna
do?
Thank
you
so
much.
B
Okay,
do
we
have
any
staff
responses
to
anything
in
open
comment.
W
Yep
I'll
just
say
I
just
wanted
to
note
for
the
caller
that
called
in
from
hrc
is
that
actually,
we
have
just
confirmed
wendy
schwartz
who's,
leading
the
reimagining
public
safety
effort
has
confirmed
that
the
chief
has
accepted
an
invitation
to
talk
about
the
very
issue
at
next
week's
hrc
meeting,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
share
that.
That
was
happening
and
really
appreciate
the
chief's
willingness
to
change
your
schedule.
In
order
to
do
so.
B
That's
great
to
hear
glad
that
engagement
will
happen.
Let's
see,
I've
got
some
council
members
lined
up
here.
We've
got
matt
and
bob
and
rachel.
X
Thanks
aaron,
I
I
just
want
to
sort
of
maybe
address
a
bunch
of
the
speakers
that
past
current
and
and
future
that
talking
about
see
you
south
we're
gonna
embark
on
yet
another
season
where
this
is
on
the
ballot.
It'll
be
contentious,
there'll
be
passions
on
both
sides
and
good
arguments
on
both
sides.
X
D
Y
I
was
going
to
do
c
south
as
well.
I
just
wanted
to
invite
any
staff
responses.
C
south
is
not
up
tonight,
but
it's
always
a
little
bit
difficult
when
things
are
presented
as
factual
that
are
not
factual
and
so
wanted
to
see.
If
I
don't
know
if
joe
teddyuchi
would
have
any
reason
to
be
on
this
call
tonight,
maria.
W
Y
I
will
clarify
with
him
then,
but
but
just
want
to
say
to
the
community
who's
watching
who
may
not?
You
know
some
people
are
probably
coming
in
cold
to
this
there's
an
allegation
that
that
cu
is
sort
of
monstrous
in
its
demands
and
that-
and
that
is
what
limited
us
to
100
year-
flood
protection
rather
than
500
years.
But
that's
not
the
case.
Y
We
we're
told
time
and
again
that,
even
if
we
owned
all
the
land-
and
it
was
our
land
to
do
with
whatever
we
could
the
maximum
flood
protection
that
we
could
realistically
build,
there
is
a
hundred
years.
So
just
I
want
us
to
make
sure.
As
matt
said,
you
know
to
be
civil
and
cordial.
I
think
part
of
that's
going
to
be
rooting.
Y
Our
our
discussions
in
common
facts
and
and
facts
have
to
be
facts
so,
but
I
will
look
forward
to
the
the
update
where
joe
will
be
and
dig
in
deeper
thanks.
D
And
then
mark,
I
had
a
different
subject,
thanks
matt
and
rachel.
For
that
a
good
question
for
nuria
murray.
I
I
one
of
the
speakers.
I
think
the
first
speaker
spoke
to
the.
We
actually
have
two
taxes.
I
think
right
now,
a
climate
action
tax
or
cap
tax
that
was
passed.
I
think
back
in
2006,
maybe
has
been
renewed
a
few
times,
and
then
we
have
a
slightly
newer
utilities:
occupation
tax,
both
of
them
are
used
for
climate
action
and
I
think
both
of
them
are
coming
up
for
renewal.
D
The
next
few
years
seems
to
me.
I
recall
that
sometime
in
the
next
week
or
two
I
know
the
utility
occupation
tax
is
a
very
confusing
name,
but
in
the
next
week
or
two
we're
going
to
take
that
up
and
possibly
talk
about
combining
those
in
a
single
tax
for
voter
approval.
Am
I
remembering
that
scheduled
correctly,
maria.
W
You
are
bob
that
actually
is
coming
forward
next
study
session
next
week
is
financial
and
revenue
strategies
for
climate
work
and
we're
going
to
be
having
that
very
conversation.
So
I
invite
those
that
are
interested
in
that
to
tune
in,
because
I
think
it
will
be
a
deep
conversation
and
one
really
about
what
is
the
future
of
funding
for
our
climate
action
work.
B
K
I
I
do
support
what
matt
said
about
elevating
the
dialogue
on
this.
It's
a
very
contentious
issue
and
I
think
it's
very
important
that
we
all
treat
each
other
with
the
respect
that
that
we
are
due.
I
only
have
one
substantive
comment,
which
is:
I
have
often
heard
the
the
comment
that
somehow
all
of
this
was
worked
out
in
private.
K
This
is
it's
just
not
accurate
to
say
that
every
draft,
every
change
in
language
everything
was
made
public
and
the
community
got
a
chance
to
see
it
with
the
comment
on
it
and
having
waded
through
almost
innumerable
emails
on
the
subject,
I
can
say
we
had
a
very
engaged
conversation
about
that.
So
it's
just
not
it's
not
fair
to
say
that
somehow
this
was
all
done
in
the
dark
of
night
and
nobody
knew
what
it
was
going
to
be.
We
were
very,
very
public
about
this.
Thank
you.
B
Hey
and
in
chat
mark
just
one
comment
that
I'll
add
in
here
was:
I
was,
I
believe
ms
quickly
was
asking
what
our
vision
for
the
c
south
side
is,
and
I
just
would
refer
her
and
other
interested
parties
to
the
the
comprehensive
plan
from
2015.
B
We
agreed
city,
council
and
county
commissioners
and
see
you
on
a
set
of
guiding
principles
for
what
what
could
happen
there
at
cu
south
and
the
eventual
annexation
agreement
followed
those
principles.
I
think
that
was
where
we
set
forward
what
we
thought
should
go
there
in
the
broad
outlines,
so
just
want
to
offer
that
one
other
comment
anything
else
on
opencomment.
B
B
D
Yeah,
so
with
that
I'll
recuse
myself,
a
member
of
my
family,
owns
some
a
small
amount
of
stock
and
ball
aerospace.
So
I
thought
it'd
be
appropriate
for
me
to
recuse
myself
from
both
this
item
and
also
later
on
in
the
meeting
the
call-up
potential
for
the
all-air
response
matters.
So
I'm
going
to
leave
the
meeting
right
now
I'll
come
back
after
I'm
signaled
that
you're
done
with
the
presentation
on
this
matter
and
and
vote
at
least
a
through
c
of
the
consent
agenda.
Goodbye
thanks.
Z
Tonight
we're
gonna
just
talk
about
the
ball:
aerospace
proposed
expansion
at
1600,
commerce,
street
and
5001
arapahoe
avenue.
The
two
items
before
the
council
tonight
are
a
vote
on
the
ordinance
884.99
on
first
reading.
A
second
reading
for
that
ordinance
is
scheduled
for
march
1st.
Z
The
second
consideration
is
whether
council
wants
to
call
up
the
planning
board
decision
on
the
site
review
application
that
call-up
period
is
30
days
after
the
planning
board
decision,
and
if
council
does
vote
to
call
that
up,
we
would
just
suggest
that
the
march
first
date
also
be
considered
if,
if
it's
called
up
so
just
really
briefly,
on
the
background
on
this
particular
project,
a
concept
plan
was
submitted
by
ball
aerospace
early
2021.
Z
It
was
heard
by
planning
board
in
april
of
2021
I'll
talk
about
what
some
of
the
comments
were
on
that
that
concept
plan
was
not
called
up
by
the
council
at
that
time.
Since
that
time,
we've
had
two
good
neighbor
meetings
on
this
project.
We've
met
the
public
notice
requirements,
the
reason
that
it
requires
a
site
review
application
is
because
the
properties
are
greater
than
five
acres
in
size
and
the
floor
area
is
greater
than
a
hundred
thousand
feet
of
what's
proposed.
Z
So
the
planning
board
review
is
required
because
of
the
hype,
modifications
on
the
site,
so
there's
proposals
to
build
additions
onto
their
existing
manufacturing
buildings.
What
we
call
the
fisher
building
as
well
as
some
new
administrative
buildings,
b
and
c
in
the
parking
garage
all
proposed
to
be
up
to
55
feet
in
height
setback,
modifications
and
parking
reductions
that
were
proposed
as
part
of
the
project
and,
as
I
noted,
the
planning
board
decision
on
the
site
review
is
subject
to
call
up
within
30
days.
Z
So
this
is
a
a
slide
that
shows
the
properties
it's
roughly
27
acres,
it's
just
east
of
foothills,
parkway,
just
north
of
arapahoe.
You
can
see
the
the
boulder
creek
corridor
to
the
northwest
of
the
site
and
and
the
green
space.
That's
on
that
part
of
the
property
it's
in
between
48th
street
and
range
street
commerce.
Street
is
kind
of
the
central
spine
of
the
boulder
of
the
ball
aerospace
campus.
Z
So
per
the
boulder
valley
converts
of
plan,
the
bvcp,
the
land
use
designation
on
the
site
is
light
industrial.
It
is
in
the
area
that's
being
considered
for
the
east
boulder
sub-community
plan,
but
just
note
obviously
that
has
not
yet
been
adopted.
There
are
no
connections.
Plans
that
apply
to
this
particular
site
generally
matches
the
land
use
its
industrial
general
ig.
Z
This
is
what
they're
proposing
are
permitted
uses.
The
height
limit
in
that
zone
is
40
feet
so
obviously
going
over.
That
requires
the
height
modification.
Z
I
want
to
point
out
some
of
the
more
historic
buildings
that
are
on
the
site:
there's
a
modernist
architect
who
designed
and
and
helped
for
the
construction
of
some
of
these
buildings
albert
wagner
on
the
site,
they're
they're,
all
over
50
years
of
age,
so
they
do
require
administrative
approval
for
demo
and
they
do
require
landmark
alteration
certificates.
Z
So,
if
you
look
at
the
slide,
you
can
see
one
of
the
original
aerials
of
the
site
that
show
the
older
buildings
that
were
built
in
the
50s
and
60s,
including
the
tech
tower
which
fronts
on
arapahoe
ball
is
basically
noting
that
a
lot
of
these
buildings
are
reaching
the
end
of
their
useful
life
and
is
proposed
to
demolish
most
of
the
buildings
through
the
course
of
the
review.
This
is
something
we
talked
about
at
concept
plan.
Z
We
worked
with
them
to
try
to
preserve
the
original
ball
aerospace
building
on
the
site,
which
is
noted
on
that
area.
As
the
ado
building,
what
they'd
be
demoing
is
the
tech
tower
the
t
buildings,
as
well
as
the
addition
to
the
ado
building,
which
is
shown
as
the
ad
building,
so
that
original
diagonally
oriented
1956
structure
is
what
would
be
preserved
on
the
site,
so
the
landmark
alteration
certificate
that
was
required
for
that
building
was
called
up
by
the
landmarks
advisory
board.
Z
They
did
conditionally
approve
the
the
preservation
of
that
building
and
as
they
proposed
it,
they
would
still
need
to
look
at
the
project
again
to
set
the
landmark
boundary
for
the
site
after
site
review.
Z
So
this
is
the
concept
plan
that
was
discussed.
There
were
a
number
of
topics
that
were
that
were
discussed
at
this
time.
You
can
see.
Some
of
the
buildings
are
very
close
to
one
another
in
the
center
of
the
site,
and
this
is
because
of
ball
aerospace.
Unique
needs
on
the
site
for
the
the
manufacturing
that
they're
doing
they
need
to
have
close
proximity
of
the
administrative
buildings
to
the
manufacturing
and
testing
buildings.
There's
also
security
requirements
that
have
to
be
met,
so
this
has
greatly
informed
their
site
plan.
Z
Z
They
were
not
wanting
to
extend
the
riverbend
road
public
right-of-way,
which
you
can
see
on
the
on
the
left
side
of
the
picture
from
the
boulder
community
health
site
onto
the
ball
aerospace
site
for
security
reasons.
So
we
discussed
that
boulder
community
health
also
is
opposed
to
that
extension.
We
support
what
they
have
proposed
on
the
plan
with
the
extension
of
the
multi-use
pass.
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
later.
Z
So
again,
the
concept
plan
at
that
time
was
not
called
up
by
the
city
council,
so
the
applicant
moved
forward
with
their
site
review
application,
as
well
as
the
city
working
on
preparation
of
the
ordinance,
so
just
getting
into
the
components
of
the
ordinance.
Z
The
ordinance
would
allow
up
to
a
0.65
far
on
the
site
which
exceeds
that
0.5
far
maximum
and
in
turn,
with
that
additional
floor
area
and
consistent
with
bvcp
policies
on
community
benefit.
Additional
increased
commercial
linkage
fees
would
apply
to
that
space
as
well
as
any
bonus
floor
area.
That's
in
upper
stories
of
the
building,
so
the
ordinance
allows
for
that
increased
commercial
linkage
fee
for
that
additional
floor
area.
Since
that
portion
of
the
floor
area
is
not
actually
in
the
land
use
code.
The
language
code
really
just
talks
about
bonus
floor
area.
Z
That's
in
an
upper
story.
This
would
include
all
additional
floor
area
that
is
above
the
0.5
far.
The
ordinance
also
allows
for
the
expiration
extension
of
the
landmark
alteration
certificate,
as
well
as
the
demolition
permits.
The
applicant
is
requesting
greater
than
three
years
of
vested
rights
with
a
phasing
plan
up
to
15
years.
So,
given
that
duration,
they
would
have
to
keep
reapplying
for
their
extension
of
their
landmark
alteration,
certificate
and
demo
permit.
So
this
would
allow
that
those
extensions
to
to
spam
the
15
years
of
their
phasing
plan.
Z
Z
One
of
the
statements
talks
about
providing
development
incentives
to
encourage
important
businesses
like
primary
employers
like
ball,
to
stay
and
obviously
considering
the
unique
considerations
for
the
floor
area
at
ball,
where
they
need
the
massive
amount
of
space
within
the
buildings
to
construct
their
satellites
and
test
their
satellites
in
there.
It
needs
additional
floor
area,
so
we
found
that
all
of
these
things
combined
to
meet
the
comprehensive
plan
and
planning
board
agreed
with
that,
and
they
provided
this
motion
on
the
slide.
Z
They
they
passed
or
recommended
approval
of
the
ordinance
on
a
vote
of
six
to
zero.
What
they
did
add.
They
added
a
secondary
motion.
That's
on
the
bottom
of
the
slide,
basically
just
requesting
that
council
consider
using
the
additional
funds
that
are
from
the
commercial
linkage
fee,
focused
more
on
the
middle
income
housing
as
part
of
that
moving
on
to
the
site
review.
One
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out
is
15
years
is
obviously
a
long
phasing
plan
considering
other
projects
in
boulder.
Z
It's
not
unheard
of
when
ball
got
approval
for
an
expansion
back
in
2005.
That
was
also
for
15
years.
They
did
not
act
on
all
of
the
phases,
so
it's
since
expired,
but
in
this
case,
with
their
approval
moving
forward,
they
would
be
moving
towards
completion
by
the
year
2037..
Z
Z
I
understand
there's
been
some
requests
to
maybe
just
round
that
up
to
point
seven
far
to
provide
just
some
flexibility.
This
would
require
ball
to
eventually
come
back
in
if
they
were
to
exceed
that
0.65
as
a
site
review
amendment,
but
we
we
certainly
could
change
the
ordinance
to
allow
0.7
if
the
council
agreed
it
just
would
require
a
third
reading.
Z
These
are
some
renderings
of
some
of
the
additional
buildings
you
can
see
the
original
ado
building
in
the
upper
left
that
would
be
preserved.
It's
basically
returned
to
its
original
appearance.
You
can
see
the
additions
to
the
fisher
building,
the
parking
garage,
the
solar
panels,
there's
a
new
entry
to
the
fisher
building
on
the
lower
left
and
then
the
administrative
buildings
which
are
closer
to
arapahoe
buildings,
b
and
c.
Z
So,
when
planning
board
looked
at
the
the
site
review
project,
they
largely
agreed
that
the
the
project
met
the
site
review
criteria
related
to
community
benefit.
Z
Basically,
the
main
focus
relative
to
building
design
that
was
discussed
was
the
east
elevation
of
the
parking
garage
where
there
was
a
concern
raised
about
the
amount
of
metal
screening
on
that
side
after
discussion,
the
applicant
noted
that
a
lot
of
the
metal
screening
didn't
need
to
be
increased
because
of
the
landscaping
and
trees
would
block
some
of
the
visibility
of
the
structure
and
that
it
wouldn't
be
necessary.
It's
also
not
a
very
prominent
elevation.
Z
That's
visible
from
the
street,
so
plain
port
agreed
that
they
didn't
need
to
make
any
changes
to
that
elevation.
Most
of
the
discussion
really
focused
on
site
design
elements.
Z
Y
Y
Z
Okay,
so
the
blue
dotted
path,
it
was
proposed
by
ball
and
they
were
basically
trying
to
set
up
a
condition
where
we
could
connect
ultimately
to
the
boulder
creek
pathway.
This
did
prove
to
be
challenging
since
that
area
shown
on
the
aerial
is
actually
within
a
conservation
easement
and
would
require
a
disposal
by
the
open
space
board
of
trustees.
So
this
is
something
that
they're
they're,
showing
as
a
dotted
line
on
their
plan.
It's
not
a
requirement
of
the
plan,
but
it's
something
that
you
know.
Z
Perhaps
in
the
future,
the
city
could
work
towards
some
sort
of
solution
that
could
make
that
connection
happen.
In
you
know,
conjunction
with
working
with
open
space,
where
we
focused
getting
a
connection
through
the
site.
Is
that
that
red
line
the
east-west
pathway,
so
they
would
be
extending
the
existing
multi-use
path
from
the
boulder
community
health
site
from
48th
street
to
range
street
through
the
site,
so
that
was
all
a
main
part
of
the
of
the
discussion.
Z
The
second
part
really
focused
on
just
trying
to
encourage
modes
to
driving
to
the
site,
based
on
the
amount
of
parking
that
was
proposed.
So
planning
board
did
act
on
the
application,
adding
a
condition
of
approval
that
the
applicant
look
at
additional
transportation
demand
management
options
for
the
site
as
part
of
the
tech
box
stage.
Z
So
this
is
the
motion
that
was
added
by
planning
board.
They
approved
the
site
review
on
a
vote
of
five
to
zero.
The
first
bullet
is
really
just
a
clerical
change.
It's
it's
just
a
mistake
in
the
in
the
lettering.
The
second
part
you
can
see
the
tdm
plan
requirement
that
was
added,
so
that
is
as
quickly
as
I
could
go
through
all
that
information
tonight,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
question:
if
there's
any
missing
pieces.
B
Thanks
for
that,
carl,
and
what
I
would
propose
is
that
people
ask
any
questions
they
have
about
the
ordinance
or
the
site
review
now,
but
then
we'll
break
up
the
voting
on
the
consent
agenda
and
whether
to
call
up
the
site
review
into
separate
chunks.
After
all,
questions
are
answered.
So
with
that
questions
mark
you
got
one.
K
Z
B
Sorry,
if
you
don't
mind
I'll
respond,
because
this
came
from
me.
So
if
you
don't
mind
this
I'll
explain
here,
I
was
asking
questions
about
this.
The
the
reason
why
I
was
bringing
this
up
was
because
the
allowed
amount
in
the
special
ordinance
is
almost
precisely
the
amount.
That's
in
the
site,
review
approval
and
over
15
years
of
development,
it's
quite
possible
that
they
might
want
to
make
a
minor
modification
somewhere
along.
The
line
to
you
know,
increase
the
floor
area
by
two
percent
or
something
like
that.
B
If
they
asked
for
that,
they'd
have
to
go
through
an
internal
or
an
administrative
review
process
with
the
planning
department
and
planning
board.
But
if
we
bumped
the
far
allowed
in
the
special
ordinance
up,
it
wouldn't
require
coming
back
to
council
to
update
the
special
ordinance
if
they
wanted
to
just
change
it
by
a
percent
or
two.
So
that
was
why
I
was
asking
about
that.
Okay,
thank
you.
B
I
I
just
had
a
question
about
the
phasing
of
the
surface
parking
and
just
because
you
know
I
know
we're
working
on
more
and
better
transit
solutions
along
that
corridor
and
things
like
that
transit
solutions
that
are
not
car
focused,
and
so
I
was
just
wondering
if
the
surface
parking
is
kind
of
phased
in
in
an
area
where
it
could
be
adapted.
As
you
know,
some
of
the
the
transportation
options
to
that
area
change
over,
hopefully
over
the
next
decade
or
so.
Z
I
mean
in
general
the
parking
that
they're
proposing
is
linked
with
their
additions.
So
obviously
the
parking
requirement
is
based
on
how
much
floor
area
is
on
the
site.
So
when
they
do
the
additions
to
the
fisher
building,
that's
going
to
require
a
certain
amount
of
parking.
So
that's
when,
when
they
do
those
additions,
they
would
eventually
demo
the
hobart
wagner
buildings
and
turn
that
into
surface
parking
to
meet
that
requirement.
I
Thank
you,
and
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
speak
a
little
bit
to
why
there
was
such
a
large
reduction
in
bike
parking
requirements,
but
not
in
car
parking
requirements.
Z
Yeah
I
mean
the
the
the
bike
parking
requirement
is
also
based
on
the
amount
of
floor
area.
The
issue
here
is
that,
with
with
the
amount
of
floor
area
that
they're
proposing
and
a
lot
of
the
flurry
is
not
necessarily
linked
to
the
employment
employees
that
would
be
in
that
space.
It's
really
large
spaces
that
are
meant
to
accommodate
the
satellites
that
it's
not
really
indicative
of
what
the
real
parking
need
is.
Z
I
And
then
one
one
just
clarification
point:
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
it
sounds
like
that
north
bikeway
connection
is
still
a
possibility.
It's
not
kind
of
being
written
out
in
this.
Z
Correct,
it's
not
a
requirement
of
the
approval,
but
it's
a
possibility.
So
we
we.
They
have
a
note
on
their
plans.
But
it's
something
that
if,
if
you
know
an
idea
comes
up
on
how
to
best
make
that
connection-
and
it
might
be
something
that
has
to
be
even
added
to
the
capital
improvement
projects
of
the
city
as
well,
because
it
does
cross
over
a
public,
right-of-way
and
there'd
have
to
be
a
bridge.
So
there
there
could
be
future
discussions
that
that
work
towards
making
that
connection.
B
All
right,
seeing
another
I'll
just
mention
to
folks
that
I
will
bring
back
that
possibility
of
the
0.7
far
when
we
have
the
public
hearing,
but
I'll
wait
until
we
have
a
full
discussion
on
in
a
second
reading
and
then
theresa
kind
of
just
asked
procedurally
here
do
we
need
to
vote
on
this
with
bob
absent,
or
can
we
bring
him
back
vote
on
the
entire
consent
agenda
and
have
him
recuse
himself
from
item
d.
AA
So
the
rules
in
the
code
require
that
the
council
member
absent
themselves
through
the
vote,
so
you
would
need
to
vote
with
this
vote
on
this,
rather
with
him
out
of
the
room.
B
Great,
so
can
we
go
ahead
and
do
that
alicia
and
do
a
vote
on
the
first
reading
of
item
d
and
then
once
we
bring
back
bob
will
vote
on
a
through
c.
B
All
right
so
we'll
this
will
be
for
item
d,
the
first
reading
of
this
special
ordinance
on
the
ball
aerospace
campus.
Do
we
have?
Does
anyone
want
to
vote
against
this?
We'll
put
it
that
way?
B
Let's
see
junior
you
were
nodding.
Did
you
does
that
mean
you
want
to
vote
against
it?
No,
no!
Okay,
all
right!
So
it
looks
like
no
objections
so
that
that
passes
unanimously,
and
I
will
ask
bob
to
come
back
in
oh
yeah.
Actually,
rachel
points
out.
We
should
probably
have
an
actual
motion
right,
not
just
a
call
for
a
vote,
so
maybe
I
would
invite
invite
a
motion
on
that.
Y
I
would
like
to
still
moved
do
you
have.
C
B
Right
bob,
we
finished
out
item
d,
so
I
would
now
invite
someone
to
make
a
motion
on
the
consent
agenda
items
a
through
c,
so
move.
B
AB
B
Okay,
can
we
move
to
our
call-up
check-ins,
then.
C
C
To
expand
existing
manufacturing
buildings
at
1600,
commerce,
street
and
5001
arapahoe
avenue
by
approximately
309
000
square
feet
and
construct
two
new
administrative
buildings
and
a
new
parking
garage
structure.
The
pedestrian
bridge,
crossing
commerce,
street
height
modifications
for
up
to
55
feet
and
a
16.5
parking
reduction
are
proposed.
B
Thanks
should
we
have
any
interest
in
calling
this
up
or
comments
on
the
matter.
B
All
right:
well,
I'm
I'm
not
seeing
any
interest
in
calling
it
up.
I'm
not
interested
in
calling
this
up
either.
I
will
just
say,
having
which
I
think
seeing
no
one
interested
in
calling
it
up.
I
think
that
means
it's
approved.
I'll,
give
a
congratulations
to
ball
aerospace!
I
do
this
is
you
know
the
project
meets
the
site
review
criteria,
but
I
also
just
want
to
say
that
ball
has
been
an
important
part
of
our
local
community
for
many
many
years
and
does
extraordinary
work.
B
Congratulations,
for
example,
to
the
recent
success
of
the
james
webb
space
telescope
that
they
were
instrumental
so
to
speak
in
implementing
and
so
very
glad
that
you're
you're
moving
forward
with
additional
projects
in
our
community
glad
to
still
have
you
here
and
matt.
I
see
you've
got
a
hand
up
as
well.
X
Yeah,
I
I
largely
just
want
to
echo
what
you
said.
You
kind
of
beat
me
to
the
punch
a
little
bit
but
yeah
I
mean
right
now,
james
james,
the
mirrors
and
the
optical
assembly
were
built
here
in
boulder
and
they're,
currently
testing
that
on
the
spacecraft,
that's
a
10
billion
dollar
spacecraft,
so
hopefully
all
goes
well,
and
the
engineering
and
great
work
done
by
the
engineers
in
town
we'll
see
that
success
through.
X
I
just
want
to
highlight
that
you
know
this
is
in
such
incredible
work
to
see
the
evolution
of
ball,
because
in
many
ways
the
legacy
of
this
company
is
our
shared
legacy
in
our
community
and
has
built
just
a
world-renowned
space,
science,
aerospace
and
astronomy
community.
Here
in
boulder,
I've,
I've
spent
12
years
being
a
part
of
that
community,
and
so
it's
just
awesome
to
see
that
they're
expanding
because,
ironically,
as
technology
here
terrestrially
seems
to
shrink
as
phones
get
smaller,
it's
the
opposite.
X
With
space
technology
it
just
keeps
getting
bigger
and
bigger,
so
a
new
facility
to
help
accommodate.
That
is
definitely
in
line
with
keeping
a
ball
competitive
and
being
able
to
stay
at
the
cutting
edge.
So
just
congratulations
to
ball
and
all
the
work
they've
done
and
I
look
forward
to
future
work
that
they
do
in
our
community.
B
Anyone
want
to
call
this
one
up
all
right
c,
none,
and
that
brings
us
to
the
end
of
our
call-ups.
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone
for
their
patience.
It
was
a
little
bit
of
a
of
a
dance
to
make
that
all
work,
but
we
got
through
it
so
appreciate
it
all
right,
alicia.
C
W
Sure
just
quickly-
and
I
know
that
we've
got
a
lot
to
talk
about
here,
so
I'm
going
to
keep
my
preamble
short
and
mostly
it's
just
to
thank
a
huge
tremendous
cross-departmental
team
that
assembled
to
really
provide
these
recommendations
and
worked
super
hard
and
mark,
certainly
as
the
lead
and
the
head
of
that
team
to
put
that
together.
So
with
that
bit
of
thanks
ahead
of
time
I'll,
send
it
over
to
mark.
X
X
Mark
real,
quick
before
you
get
started,
could
you
remind
our
listeners
and
and
people
watching
what
arpa
is
because
we've
been
using
that
acronym
just
remind
folks
what
arp
is
please.
AC
Yeah,
absolutely
thanks
matt,
so
so
arpa
is
our
american
rescue
plan
act
that
and
I'll
get
into
a
little
bit
of
the
background.
Just
so,
we
all
have
the
same
base
and
knowledge
in
a
couple
slides
here,
thanks
again
council
good
to
be
talking
to
you
again
about
arpa,
I'm
mark
wolfe,
I'm
our
senior
budget
manager
I'll
be
walking
through
a
few
slides
today.
Tonight
we're
gonna
break
it
up
a
bit.
AC
I
have
a
bunch
of
friends
here
that
will
be
covering
various
different,
slides
and
we'll
be
bouncing
back
and
forth.
We'll
try
to
keep
the
conversation
flowing.
I
know
that
you're
going
to
have
specific
questions
on
specific
topics,
and
so
we
anticipate
that
we
can
handle
that
mayor
as
you'd
like
if
we
want
to
dive
in,
as
we
have
a
slide
up,
we're
comfortable
with
that
as
we
go
through.
So
we
can
play
that
by
ear.
B
Well,
actually,
mark
can.
I
just
propose,
I
think,
because
we've
got
basically
trash
one
two
and
three,
and
maybe
people
can
save
their
questions
until
the
end
of
each
tranche.
If
I'm
saying
that
word
correctly,
you.
AC
Are
that
makes
sense
to
me
great
thanks
all
right,
so
we
thought
it'd
be
helpful
to
review
the
the
purpose
of
of
arpa
the
steps
we've
taken
to
date.
I'll
then
quickly
review
our
methodology
as
background
in
developing
all
of
these
various
recommendations.
AC
We
have
two
questions
for
council
this
evening.
The
first
it
will
be
around
the
trench.
Two
recommendations:
does
council
support
the
recommended
tranche
to
arp
initiatives
and
direct
staff
to
bring
forth
a
special
adjustment
to
base
in
march
to
appropriate
funds
to
set
initiatives,
and
the
second
will
be
around
basically
what's
next.
What's
after
that,
does
council
support
the
approach
in
developing
potential
tranche
3
recommendations.
AC
AC
It
included
significant
response
and
recovery
resources,
including
stimulus
checks,
child
care,
tax
credits,
expanded
rental
assistance
and
many
many
many
different
programs.
Those
are
we've
had
information
and
packets.
Related
to
to
that.
Our
last
packet
study
session
back
in
august,
we
had
a
whole
bunch
of
information
on
the
various
different
programs
associated
with
arpa.
So
it
was
a
major
bill
that
continues
to
support
our
recovery.
AC
A
part
of
arpa
was
a
provision
called
the
state
and
local
recovery
funds.
Arpa
delivered
funds
directly
to
government
state,
local
and
tribal
to
aid
in
organizational
and
community
recovery
efforts
through
this
fund,
the
city
of
boulder
will
receive
a
total
of
20.15
million.
We've
received
half
of
that
in
july
of
21,
and
we
will
we
expect
to
receive
the
second
half
in
july
of
this
year.
AC
There
are
funding
restrictions
as
to
how
we
can
use
those
local
recovery
funds.
There
are
specific
categories
that
we
have
to
fall
with
under
those
are
outlined
in
the
attachment.
A
of
the
memo
provided
this
evening,
a
few
previous
actions
again
just
for
your
information,
we
provided
an
overview
of
of
this
nature.
AC
What
arpa
is
and
what
it's
intended
used
to
the
local
recovery
funds,
or
our
plans
were
for
initial
steps
in
planning
in
june
of
21,
and
then
we
brought
back
our
kind
of
initial
tranche
of
recommendations
which
included
service,
rest
city,
service,
restorations
and
immediate
needs.
That
was
in
study
session
in
august
and
then
appropriation
in
september
of
21.,
with
that
included,
an
approach
for
to
planning
for
additional
spending.
AC
That
was
in
a
number
of
different
trying
to
categorize
our
plan
for
our
areas
of
focus
and
also
how
we
were
going
to
prioritize,
which
we
knew
would
be
many
requests
of
our
our
funds.
So
I
want
to
spend
a
moment
emphasizing
the
prioritization
criteria
that
we've
applied
throughout
this
process.
So
this
is
a
part
of
council's
review
back
in
august
of
21.
AC
The
the
full
criteria
are
included
in
appendix
b
in
your
packets,
as
well
so
just
to
read
through
these
really
quickly,
and
these
are
in
relative
order
of
importance
as
we
applied
them
through
the
through
our
staff
prioritization
process.
Starting
with
that,
the
initiative
would
advance
racial
equity
sustainability
and
resilience
goals
that
it
hit
a
demonstrated
gap
or
need
created
or
exacerbated
by
the
pandemic.
It
was
also
a
key
provision
of
the
arpa
criteria
itself
that
it
might
leverage
engagement
opportunities
to
inform
the
proposal.
AC
AC
I
think
it's
important
to
call
out
how
we
approached
him.
Embedding
racial
equity,
specifically
within
this
process.
In
addition
to
just
calling
it
out
as
an
important
criteria,
we
applied
our
rapid
response,
racial
equity
assessment
to
each
proposal.
This
assessment
is
designed
to
allow
us
to
consider
the
specific
impact
on
different
racial
and
ethnic
groups,
a
vulnerable,
vulnerable
populations
and
help
us
account
for
and
mitigate
any
unintentional
impact.
AC
A
summary
of
this
work
is
included
for
each
tranche
ii
recommendation
within
the
packet,
specifically
only
initiatives
that
were
able
to
demonstrate
an
intended
net
positive
impact
on
equity
were
advanced.
It
led
us
to
focus
on
recommendations
that
better
target
resources
to
underrepresented
communities
instead
of
broader,
more
topical
initiatives
that
spread
resources
too
widely.
AC
We
focused
that
type
of
support
earlier
in
the
recovery.
I
think
that
was
needed
at
the
time,
so
we
really
intended
to
try
and
focus
our
efforts
a
little
bit
more
surgically.
If
you
will
those
come
out
in
some
of
our
recommended
approaches
in
guaranteed
income,
manufacture,
housing,
community
support
and
others
that
you'll
hear
throughout
the
presentation
this
evening.
AC
These
partnerships,
especially
in
the
realms
of
housing,
human
services
and
economic
vitality,
have
helped
guide
our
response
and
recovery
activities
since
the
beginning
of
this
pandemic,
and
we
have
continued
to
lean
on
these
partnerships
to
coordinate
resources
to
help
determine
the
best
use
of
city
dollars.
In
these
recommendations,
one
of
our
most
important
and
innovative
programs
is
our
community
connectors
program.
AC
This
has
been
bolstered
with
emergency
response
connectors
throughout
the
pandemic.
This
has
helped
us
to
ensure
that
resources
are
getting
to
those
in
the
community
who
have
the
most
need
working
with
our
community
and
emergency
response.
Connectors
has
strengthened
these
recommendations
and
highlighted
any
gaps
in
resources,
information
and
other
recovery
activities.
AC
In
addition
to
working
with
our
connectors
and
partners
to
identify
gaps,
we
have
also
used
available
data
and
information
to
confirm
or
inform
need
the
county
commissioned.
A
community
survey
related
to
gauge
community
priorities
in
the
use
of
arpa
spending
for
their
dollars.
AC
Hundreds
of
city
of
boulder
residents
participated
in
that
survey
and
the
results
of
that
survey
aligned
very
nicely
with
some
of
our
areas
of
focus
that
we've
highlighted
and
last
we've
reviewed
best
practices
from
pure
cities
and
other
key
industries.
All
of
this
has
kind
of
led
to
that
funnel.
If
you
will
in
scoping
each
individual
potential
initiative
using
that
prioritization
criteria
that
I
had
on
the
screen
to
to
lead
us
to
two
different
sets
of
recommendations.
AC
So,
as
I
mentioned
for
trench
two,
we're
ready
for
implementation
so
tonight
that
if
council
does
support
those
trunch2
recommendations,
our
intent
is
to
bring
that
forward
to
the
special
adjustment
on
march
first
and
fifteenth
for
appropriation
and
for
potential
tranche
3.
We
need
additional
direction.
You'll
see
that
our
the
list
exceeds
the
the
amount
we
have
available.
AC
All
right,
quick
overview
of
funding
on
the
left
side
of
your
screen,
that's
kind
of
blurred
or
the
trench
one
approved
spending
already,
so
that
was
just
shy
of
four
million
that
we've
already
appropriated.
AC
What
we're
seeking
appropriation
in
tranche
two
tonight
are
those
trench,
two
two
different
ones
at
the
top
in
two
different
categories:
one
we're
calling
continued
recovery
initiatives
which
I'll
touch
on
in
a
moment,
and
the
second
is
our
more
transformative
initiatives
all
together
about
three
and
a
half
million
dollars
a
little
shy
of
that.
And
then
that
leaves
us
if
everything
were
to
be
approved
about
11.8
million
remaining
in
funding.
AC
AC
All
right
so
just
to
be
clear
again,
these
are
trench
ones,
one
initiatives
these
have
already
been
approved,
but
I'm
going
to
give
you
a
quick
update
on
where
we
stand
with
some
of
these,
so
I'll
just
say
it
at
the
outset.
We've
done
a
pretty
good
job
in
committing
following
through
in
our
commitments
from
september.
AC
We
have
spent,
or
are
imminently
about
to
spend
about
2.9
out
of
this
3.97
million
dollars
and
I'll
get
into
the
reason
why
we
haven't
spent
100
percent
city
service
restoration.
So
those
are
pretty
straightforward.
We
did
agree
to
provide
a
grant
to
boulder
housing
partners
to
help
bridge
the
digital
divide
at
their
sites.
AC
As
you
might
imagine,
with
two
organizations,
there's
been
a
lot
of
paperwork
and
going
back
and
forth
that
is
in
process
to
be
signed
at
grant
agreements.
That
is
good
news.
They'll
be
well
underway.
In
q1,
we
had
a
number
of
different
economic
recovery
programs
associated
with
trench.
One
in
here
included
extending
our
delivery
fee
subsidy,
which
was
the
program
started
all
the
way
back
under
cares.
AC
150
000
was
provided
the
cvb
to
encourage
safe
visitation.
A
hundred
thousand
dollars
has
been
held
back,
we'll
touch
on
this
as
a
part
of
the
outdoor
dining
pilot,
so
that
has
not
been
spent
yet
for
utility
bill
assistance.
Council
that
was
here
at
the
time
may
recall
that
we
were
first
focused
on
water
customers.
AC
AC
AC
AC
We
did
extend
some
critical
human
service
needs
that
were
either
started
under
cares
or
tranche
one,
including
emergency
rental
assistance
before
before
our
e-pers
program
was
up
and
running
our
workplace
transformation
continues,
I
think,
is
almost
complete,
which
is
great
news
to
allow
us
to
transition
fully
to
hybrid
work
and
continue
to
deliver
services,
and
then
we
established
a
million
dollar
public
health
reserve.
We
have
not
tapped
100
of
this
money,
so
that's
another
big
chunk
of
why
we
haven't
spent
the
full
4
million.
AC
Okay,
deep
breath,
that's
trench,
one
mayor
brockett
did
you
want
to
see
if
there
were
questions
about
anything
so
far,.
X
Mark
you've
mentioned,
and
I
just
want
to
be
clear
there
was
you
mentioned
that
that
100k
was
being
held
out
for
outdoor
dining.
Were
you
going
to
answer
that
in
the
tranche,
2
discussion,
or
was
that
sort
of
for
the
end,
as
just
a
caveat
to
touch
on?
I
just
didn't
know
where
you
were
gonna
come
back
to
that?
Maybe
I
didn't
quite
understand
why
that
was
held
out.
AC
AC
Okay,
fun
stuff:
let's
talk
about
spen
spending,
the
money
now
new
money,
so
trent's,
two
recommendations.
What
I'm
going
to
do
is
highlight
some
of
them
that
we
don't
have
a
full
slide
on
again.
We
can
we,
we
have
information,
we
have
staff
available
to
get
in
the
details
of
all
of
these,
but
we
try
to
be
a
little
bit
respectful
of
time
tonight.
AC
AC
What
you
see
in
the
slight
highlighted
areas
are
two
continued
recovery
programs,
one
in
the
housing
and
human
services
and
one
in
economic
recovery,
the
others
that
I'll
just
touch
on
emergency
response
connectors.
I
talked
about
how
important
that
program
is.
So
there
is
a
recommendation
to
extend
and
expand
that
program
over
the
next
three
years
to
continue
to
help
to
inform
our
where
our
resources
are
going.
AC
We
will
touch
at
length
on
guaranteed
income
and
the
building
home
project.
Fiber,
smart
city
phase,
2
design,
so
our
scoping
work
for
fiber
phase
2
is
underway.
Council
will
have
a
discussion
in
q2,
I
believe
about
the
scope
of
that
work
and
looking
for
some
policy
direction,
we're
anticipating
that
there
will
be
some
design
work
to
get
shovel
ready
for
potential
other
federal
resources,
so
50k
is
being
suggested
out
of
our
to
make
sure
we
have
the
money
available
to
do
that,
design
work
quickly
for
economic
recovery
planning.
AC
One
is
the
economic
environments,
a
lot
different
than
2013,
and
so
it
seems
like
a
good
use
of
funds
to
to
inform
how
we
might
look
at
our
existing
programs,
recovery
efforts
and
potential
additional
arpa
spending
in
the
future,
and
it
is
a
requirement
to
have
an
updated
strategy,
a
regional
strategy
for
the
economic
development
agency
for
some
potential
grant
opportunities.
AC
So
suggestion
is
a
hundred
thousand
there.
We
will
talk
in
depth
about
the
rest.
AC
So
for
continued
recovery
programming
just
to
touch
on
these
briefly
continued
housing
and
human
services,
recovery
program,
extensions
up
to
500
000
over
22
and
23
in
several
areas,
including
direct
financial
assistance
through
the
left
behind
workers
fund
and
through
our
partners,
food
assistance,
transportation,
assistance,
digital
divide
assistance
again,
just
acknowledging
that
we're
still
in
this
thing
and
there's
still
that
need
to
be
responsive
through
some
existing
programs
continued
economic
recovery
programs.
AC
Some
of
these
are
extensions,
are
of
existing
some
address
and
gaps,
newer
gaps
that
we
have
identified,
including
looking
at
impacted
industry
and
underserved
business
grants
and
programming,
year-round,
visitor
promotion
so
again
trying
to
support
our
tourism
industry,
100,
000
cbb
for
that
and
holding
50
000
for
potential
participation
with
boulder
county
for
workforce
training.
Again
a
big
need
in
the
community.
AC
AC
But
I
did
want
to
at
least
tee
this
up
for
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
We
do
have
staff
available
from
community
vitality
and
transportation
and
many
others
this
evening,
so
the
use
of
arpa
dollars
would
essentially
offset
some
of
the
costs
of
purchasing
parklet
infrastructure
and
so
the
structure
of
the
program
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
I'm
not
the
expert
on,
but
I
can
tell
you
that's.
The
intent
of
the
arpa
dollars
is
to
offset
some
of
that
that
cost
the
rest
of
those
funds
where
it
comes
from
again.
AC
Others
can
speak
to.
But
the
proposal
this
evening
is
to
use
the
150
from
tranche
2,
so
that
would
be
a
new
appropriation
and
then
the
hundred
thousand
that
matt
that
was
mentioned
earlier
would
be
funds
that
we
have
not
yet
spent
out
of
tranche
one
that
have
already
been
appropriated.
But
we
would
just
need
council
support
on
in
order
to
to
access,
be
250
total
out
of
arpa
to
support
the
outdoor
dining
pilot
and
that's
the
end
of
that
kind
of
continued
recovery.
AC
AC
All
right,
so
I'm
going
to
take
a
break
from
talking
now.
The
first
tranche
ii
transformative
initiative
that
we'll
discuss
is
the
exploration,
potential
exploration
of
a
guaranteed
income
pilot.
AD
AD
This
proposal
definitely
meets
the
criteria,
the
arpa
criteria
of
being
innovative
and
transformative.
However,
the
city
would
not
be
first
in
this
space
there
are
roughly
15
cities
right
now
with
guaranteed
income
programs
in
place
and
the
mayors
for
guaranteed
income
network
estimates
around
60
or
more
will
launch
this
year.
In
fact,
louisville
kentucky
just
announced
launch
of
its
guaranteed
income
pilot
program
this
past
weekend.
AD
First
I'd
like
to
just
briefly
note
that
there
are
a
lot
of
terms
used
to
describe
this
kind
of
program,
for
example,
guaranteed
income
basic
income,
and
there
are
a
lot
of
different
perceptions
about
what's
involved.
Guaranteed
income
generally
describes
programs
that
provide
a
cash
transfer
on
a
regular
basis.
AD
What
exactly
that
eligibility
would
be,
as
I
was
just
saying,
any
other
detailed
details
of
a
pilot
project
would
be
determined
collaboratively
by
city
staff
and
partners
based
on
the
needs
in
our
community,
and
so
this
with
this
request,
we're
not
saying
that
we
have
figured
out
every
detail
in
fact,
intentionally
quite
the
opposite.
AD
So
if
you
want
to
go
to
the
next
slide,
fortunately,
there
are
some
robust
networks
in
place
that
connect
city
and
state
governments,
research
institutions,
economic
advisory
agencies
and
others
to
share
these
resources
and
best
practices,
and
one
of
those
primary
networks
is
called
mayors
for
guaranteed
income.
I
mentioned
it
just
a
moment
ago.
AD
So,
in
terms
of
the
the
next
steps
potential
next
steps
listed
on
this
slide
with
this
upper
request,
one
of
the
first
next
steps
would
be,
or
could
be,
for
the
city
to
formally
join
the
mayors
for
guaranteed
income
network
that
just
gets
us
greater
access
to
resources,
lots
of
best
practices
from
these
60
plus
cities
that
are
already
in
this
space.
AD
One
of
those
consistent
best
practices
to
ensure
quality
management
is
to
hire
a
project
coordinator
who
would
help
recruit
those
other
project
partners,
including
of
those
who
may
want
to
contribute
funding
and
another
best
practice,
is
early
formation
of
a
task
force
that
really
represents
varied
community
interests
and
diverse
populations,
and
that's
what
again
like
really
puts
the
details
to
this
to
this
type
of
proposal.
The
last
block
there
really
kind
of
talks
about
what
some
of
those
details
would
be,
who
might
be
eligible,
what
kind
of
target
populations?
AD
What
might
that
cash
transfer
amount
be
500
per
month
is
a
very
common
amount
for
a
duration
of
a
year
18
months,
two
years
we
would
have
to
figure
out
with
our
partners
what
that
would
look
like
for
us
in
the
city
and
then.
Lastly,
you
know
that
this
consultant,
putting
together
a
task
force,
would
definitely
be
able
to
address
sustainability
issues.
One
of
the
other
key
questions
about
a
project
like
this
is
what
happens
after
the
arba
dollars
are
gone.
AD
It
seems
realistic
that
the
city,
if
we
pursue
this
option,
would
be
able
to
quite
potentially
have
a
project
launched
by
the
end
of
the
year.
Some
are
really
taking
about
eight
to
nine
months
from
from
a
council
or
mayor
decision
to
actually
starting
to
release
payments
to
community
members.
AD
So
have
a
lot
more.
We
could
say
about
this,
but
I
think
I'll
just
stop
there
and
I
think
we're
taking
questions
at
the
end.
AE
So
I
have
mentioned
this
project
a
couple
of
times
previously
once
was
at
the
retreat,
so
this
initiative
is
really
meant
to
focus
on
the
the
hundreds
of
people
that
have
been
housed
who
were
previously
homeless
over
the
last
four
years,
as
well
as
those
who
are
in
the
process
of
being
housed
and
addressing
issues
particularly
of
isolation
in
the
past
programs.
AE
Housing
first
programs
have
typically
measured
how
successful
people
stay
are
are
in
housing,
but
we
really
want
to
bring
that
that
bar
up
to
address
a
number
of
different
things.
So
there's
a
couple
of
main
components
to
this.
The
one
is
the
peer
support
program,
so
it
would
be
an
organization
in
our
community
that
would
work
with
and
recruit
peers
who
would
be
paid
some
sort
of
stipend
to
assist,
others
that
have
been
housed
and
also
to
assist
them
in
getting
into
services.
AE
The
other
is
day
programming,
which
would
include
support
groups
and
different
programming
activities
and
learning
that
could
assist
them,
assist
them
with
things.
Like
substance
use,
mental
health,
you
know
emotional
and
physical
health
and
things
like
job
job
preparedness,
and
it's
really
both
of
these
programs
would
be
linked
together
to
provide
connections
to
services.
AE
AE
Gone
beyond
the
capacity
of
our
ability
to
simply
support
them
through
case
management,
many
of
our
affordable
housing
developments
where
these
individuals
call
home
now
have
community
spaces,
and
so
the
approach
that
we've
taken
to
to
reduce
the
cost
of
of
the
program
but
to
be
to
run
these
types
of
programs
in
these
community
spaces
throughout
the
community.
So
they're
not
coming
to
one
central
location,
it's
actually
making
the
the
programs
closer
to
where
they
live,
and
this
would
increase
our
our
sort
of
our
case
management
success
as
well.
AE
AE
For
organizations
to
do
this
type
of
work
at
the
end
of
last
year,
we
actually
put
out
an
rfi
to
get
information
from
organizations
working
with
this
population
for
them
to
provide
us
input
into
forming
this
program
and
so
developing
or
understanding
what
how
we
would
measure
the
program
working
with
coordinated
entry
and
homeless
solutions
for
boulder
county
and
ensuring
that
this
work
would
be
integrated
with
the
programs
and
systems
we
have
in
place
and
then
contracting
for
this
work.
AE
This
would
this
work
would
be
done
by
organizations
in
the
community,
and
I
think
that's
it
for
this
slide.
AC
AF
All
right
thanks
a
lot
mark
and
greetings
council.
We
have
two
sets
of
proposals
for
you
addressing
the
arts
industry.
The
first,
as
you
see
on
this
slide,
is
a
specific
response
to
the
economic
conditions.
The
second
I'll
talk
about
in
a
second
reestablishes,
some
targeted
programs
that
can
have
specific
outcomes
that
enhance
our
recovery.
AF
AF
AF
The
fact
is
that
the
recovery,
the
arts
recovery,
is
behind
the
rest
of
the
economy
and
we're
still
tracking
at
only
about
15
we're
below
15
of
2019
numbers
in
workforce,
and
so
these
two
are
designed
to
specifically
target
this
part
of
the
economy.
This
gap
in
recovery
for
the
arts
sector,
built
on
top
of
that
is
the
additional
challenge
that
for
the
artists
in
our
community,
with
about
5000
artists
in
our
community
third
highest
concentration
in
the
country.
AF
So,
given
the
uneven
recovery,
this
first
part
of
this
proposal
to
reestablish
programs
is
around
bringing
back
a
professional
to
work
on
programs
for
artists
and
all
of
the
work
in
the
community
cultural
plan
around
the
work,
the
workforce
of
individual
artists
in
our
community-
and
that
includes
not
only
hiring
a
professional
but
also
taking
back
up
convening
professional
development,
addressing
issues
for
our
venues
that
are
having
a
particularly
challenging
time
as
the
restrictions,
kind
of
ebb
away
and
then
looking
at
the
venue
ladder
and
how
young
artists
can
segue
into
an
arts
job
in
this
community.
AF
AF
The
idea
of
those
being
that
not
only
is
this
funding
going
to
artists
and
in
the
case
of
public
art,
the
teams
of
contractors
from
the
community
that
they
deploy
to
build
these
projects,
but
all
of
the
social
infrastructure
outcomes
that
we
can
expect
by
profound
arts
activity
at
a
neighborhood
scale.
So
we're
looking
at
measuring
how
these
type
of
projects
can
lead
to
things
like
improved,
improved
measures
of
equity,
of
social
cohesion,
of
community
efficacy
and
of
social
resiliency
yeah
so
I'll
hand
it
back
to
you
mark
that
summarizes
it.
AC
Great
thank
you
matt,
and
that
is
the
last
tranche
two
item
this
evening.
So
I
think
I
will
pause
and
maybe
stop
sharing
so
that
you
all
can
ask
some
questions.
B
D
Thanks
mark
thanks
everyone
that
was
a
great
presentation
that
was
very
understandable
mark.
We
have
a
little
bit
of
awkwardness
as
far
as
timing.
This
is
no
one's
fault.
This
is
just
the
way
that
calendar
lined
up
around
outdoor
dining,
where
we're
being
asked
to
approve
some
funding
for
outdoor
dining,
but
we
haven't
yet
approved
the
program,
and
I
think
that
that
that
discussion,
outdoor
dining,
is,
is
march
8th
and
then
the
adjustment
to
base
to
approve
formally
approve
this
crunch
funding
will
be
the
following
week.
D
If
it
turns
out
that
when
we
have
that
discussion
in
a
few
weeks
in
outdoor
dining,
there
is
less
of
a
need
for
the
subsidy
than
what
you're
showing
here
today.
Could
we
reallocate
that
money
kind
of
on
the
fly
in
early
march
and
towards
other
economic
recovery
things?
I
think
there
are
some
other
categories
in
that
that
are
similar
to
that.
D
You
know
around
economic
recovery,
small
business
development
convention,
visitors,
bureau,
those
types
of
things:
could
we
kind
of
juggle
that
money
around
if
it
turns
out
that
we
don't
need
as
much
for
outdoor
dining.
AC
Yes,
from
a
budget
standpoint,
once
you
appropriate
that
money
we're
just
appropriating
the
dollars
to
spend
if
we're
going
to
change
the
the
use,
that
would
be
that
council's
discretion
and
I
would
yield
to
chris
jones,
who
I
see
as
to
you,
know
what
process
he'd
like
to
follow
if
they
want
to
have
alternatives
in
case
it
goes
that
way
or,
however,
they'd
like
to
handle
it
from
the
actual
programmatic
perspective.
AG
Yeah,
thank
you
mark
chris
jones
interim
director
of
community
vitality.
Thank
you
bob
for
that
question
and
yeah.
I
would
say
that
we're
exploring
all
opportunities
to
bring
the
proposed
pilot
costs
down
for
participating
businesses
and
arpa
is
one
of
those
strategies
in
the
event
that
we're
able
to
identify
a
different
approach
to
standing
that
pilot
program
up
similarly
to
the
100
000,
that's
currently
allocated
in
trench
one.
D
X
Yeah
thanks
aaron
and
I
appreciate
the
yeah
I
mean
this
is
a
deep
dive
into
into
how
we
sort
of
help
our
community
and
I
just
want
to
piggyback
a
little
bit
on
bob
because
I'm
sure
going
the
other
direction.
I
know
we'll
talk
on
the
eighth,
which
is
right
now
it's
budgeted
seems
to
be
light
in
my
book
in
order
to
bring
that
cost
barrier
down
for
restaurants.
X
I'd
like
to
see
that
number
at
15
a
square
foot,
not
the
26,
which
would
have
required
full
arpa
subsidy
of
roughly
around
550
000,
and
so
I'm
looking
to
see.
If
we
go
the
other
direction
and
commit
a
lot,
can
we
throttle
back
the
other
direction,
and
so
my
worry
is
if
we
over
allocate
and
then
there's
not
arpa
there
I'd
much
rather
err
on
the
side
of
caution,
but
it's
one
time
use
and
allocate
more
money.
X
And
then,
if
subsequent
conversations
say
we
don't
need
it
throttle
back,
then
then
not
have
enough
to
get
to
where
we
need
to
be
to
get
that
price
point
for
businesses
to
say
hell.
Yes,
I
want
to
be
a
part
of
outdoor
dining
because
I
think
that's
the
reaction
we
want.
The
other
generally
speaking
about
tranche
2
is
about
just
overall
economic
recovery
and
my
only
real
concern
is
it
kind
of
touches
on
what
bob
was
saying.
X
How
are
we
front
loading
our
expenditures
to
prime
the
pump,
because
their
success
in
turn
is
our
success
budgetarily
with
our
general
funds,
from
which
we
can
then
take
care
of
some
of
these
other
things.
So
I
want
to
know
why
maybe
there's
some
held,
and
maybe
it's
a
conversation
for
trons3,
but
it
would
be
trying
to
bring
some
of
that
into
tronch
two
in
order
to
really
prime
the
pump
to
support
our
local
businesses.
X
I
see
1.2
million
in
other
stuff
for
transformative
business
support
in
tranche
iii,
but
I
am
curious
about
you
know
what
is
looking
like
only
about
520
000
between
tranche
one
and
two
supporting
local
business
recovery
and
supporting
the
cvb
like
marketing
to
get
to
get
the
word
out
for
tourists
and
people
to
come.
Here
I
mean
this
is
the
year
that
we
we
make
our
comeback.
Assuming
another
variant
doesn't
come
in.
AC
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question,
matt
and
I'll
just
note
that
our
proposal
for
tranche
2
is
an
additional
620
000
total
to
support
economic
recovery.
So
that's
kind
of
what
we're
calling
continued
economic
recovery
within
that
is
the
150
of
the
of
the
250
for
the
outdoor
dining
pilot
and
in
terms
of
kind
of
what
that
goes
towards.
I
saw
that
pop
up
briefly
between
her
and
chris.
I'm
sure
they
could,
if
they'd
like
to
add
any
any
thoughts
on
that,
but
that
is
new
new
funding,
new
spending,
in
addition
to
the
trench,
one.
AG
I
don't
have
anything
else
to
add,
but
I
I
imagine
a
vet
might.
AH
Happy
to
tag
team
with
you,
chris
yeah
you're,
raising
great
points,
and
the
last
thing
we
want
to
do
is
put
the
brakes
on
a
recovering
economy,
but
our
economy
is
complex
and
there
are
a
lot
of
needs.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
being
thoughtful
about
that
matt.
Yes,
there
are
things
that
we
could
move
forward
a
little
faster,
but
we
we
want
to
benefit
from
your
conversation
tonight
to
help
us
appreciate
the
best
way
to
move
forward
with
our
alliance
partners.
B
Good
madison
cover
your
question.
X
I
I
Yep,
thank
you,
then.
My
my
questions
were
again
around
the
outdoor
dining.
I
I
think
you
know
mark
we.
We
talked
about
this
a
little
bit
briefly
over
email,
but
you
know.
I
For
me
this
is
the
one
where
I'm
just
not
understanding
how
it
kind
of
taps
into
that
racial
equity
priority
and
the
sustainability
that
sort
of
first
or
highest
priority
item-
and
I
was
just
wondering,
if
could
maybe
clarify
that
a
little
bit
more
and
then
the
other
question
that
I
was
wondering
about
is
kind
of
how
how
this
facilitates
recovery
and
the
questions
that
I'm
sort
of
thinking
about
are
that
you
know
right
now.
We
are
in
a
place
where
just
last
night
that
the
county
board
of
health
decided.
I
You
know
that
some
of
these
coveted
restrictions
are
going
away.
You
know
so.
Presumably
this
kind
of
opens
up
some
more
space
inside
restaurants.
I'm
just
given
some
of
the
staffing
struggles
that
some
of
these
businesses
are
having.
I
guess
my
question
is
around
you
know:
is
it
useful
right?
What
is
the
kind
of
problem
that's
trying
to
be
solved
in
some
of
this
outdoor
dining
space?
AG
Thank
you
nicole
for
the
question.
This
is
something
that
we
could
certainly
and
we
would
intend
to
dive
in
deeper
on
march,
8th
of
the
reason
why
we
are
looking
to
stand
up
a
pilot.
We
have
restaurants
who
have
spent
a
significant
amount
of
resources
and
time
putting
out
temporary
structures
that
probably
would
not
have
otherwise
been
allowed
outside
of
emergency
conditions,
not
necessarily
to
our
safety
design
standards.
AG
Again,
I
don't
know
that
we
want
to
dive
into
that
now,
but
we're
trying
to
do
is
stand
up
a
pilot
program
that
leverages
resources
where
we're
able
to
find
them
to
allow
participating
restaurants
to
get
to
a
pathway
to
compliance.
So
they
can
continue
to
take
advantage
of
maybe
some
of
the
silver
linings
from
the
covid
experience
and
take
advantage
of
outdoor
dining
without
a
significant
additional
expense.
AG
I
A
I
Just
just
speaking
a
little
bit
more
to
some
of
the
racial
equity,
how
it
kind
of
hits
on
that
that
player.
AG
So
I
know
that
all
of
the
proposals
went
through
the
the
racial
equity
tool
on
a
high
level.
I
don't
know
that
we're
suggesting
that
this
pilot
specifically
balances
something
other
than
making
sure
that
that
we're
trying
to
level
the
playing
field
for
any
business,
regardless
of
who
they
are
and
then
also
one
key
element
of
the
current
conditions,
is
ada
accessibility.
AG
B
For
that,
nicole
and
I'll
just
say,
amy
kane,
if
you
had
any
thoughts
on
that
feel
free
to
pop
in
but
don't
feel
required
to.
K
Yeah
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
regarding
the
250
000
request
for
guaranteed
income.
We've
been
given
very
little
background
as
to
these
programs
and
how
we
ought
to
analyze
this
issue.
You
know
at
500
a
month
we're
talking
about
a
program
that
will
serve
152
people,
and
I
would
have
appreciated
the
reason
why
we
haven't
been
given
an
analysis
of
why
that
is
a
preferable
outcome
to
distributing
that
money
to
the
many
other
groups
that
we
have
in
this
town.
K
That
actually
target
people
in
in
need
for
various
services,
and
my
other
concern
is
that
the
request
itself
seems
to
assume
the
conclusion
that
this
is
a
program
we
want
to
enter
into,
and
I
would
have
you
know,
appreciated
phrase
it
as
a
question.
If
you
want
why
weren't,
we
given
more
background
so
that
we
can
do
that
analysis.
K
AC
Yeah
thanks
for
that
mark
and
I'll
let
elizabeth
get
into
the
details.
I
just
want
to
say
that
it
was
not
our
intention
for
council
to
feel
like
you're,
supporting
the
creation
of
a
guaranteed
income
program
tonight
that
it
was
very
much
our
intention
that
to
bring
you
back
the
parameters
of
such
a
program
and
analysis
of
what
oh,
such
a
program
based
on
certain
variables,
would
cost
and
allow
you
to
look
at
that
before
appropriating
any
additional
dollars
towards
a
pilot.
So
is
that.
K
AC
Yeah
I'll,
let
elizabeth
speak
a
little
bit
to
what
the
plan
would
be
for
the
use
of
those
dollars.
AD
Thanks
mark
and
thank
you
councilmember
for
the
question,
just
as
mark
said-
definitely
didn't
want
to
put
the
cart
before
the
horse.
So
much
and
I'll
also
allow
that.
I
think
we
struggled.
I
don't
think.
I
know
we
struggled
with
how
much
detail
to
provide
at
this
point
when
there's
so
much
information
from
other
cities
that
are
already
have
pilots
engaged
and
some
that
are
actually
complete.
Like
the
stockton,
california
example,
where
they
put
their
pilot
in
place
in
2019,
there's.
AD
That
have
made
allocations
from
arpa
or
total
allocations
that
are
around
that
3
million
total
for
a
pilot,
so
we're
kind
of
provided
a
dollar
amount
as
a
total
and
an
amount
that
we
think
is
a
is
reasonable
to
get
approved.
If
council
chooses
so
that
we
can
go
ahead
and
do
that
planning,
we
don't
know
that
setup
and
kind
of
the
front.
End
administrative
costs.
AD
You
know
getting
on
a
coordinator
determining
a
task
force
bringing
on
a
research
partner
if
we
need
to
if
we
need
to
allocate
funding,
for
that,
would
actually
equal
250
000,
and
it
may
well
be
that
it
comes
in
far
less
than
that.
And
then,
if
we
choose
to
move
ahead,
then
again
that
would
that
would
be
those
dollars
could
roll
over.
AD
There
are
a
number
of
different
scenarios
there,
but
essentially
there
there
are
some
quite
detailed
evaluations
and
on
outcomes
from
projects
so
far
and
lots
of
details
about
how
cities
other
cities
have
already
made
decisions
about
what
populations,
what
eligibility
etc.
AD
I'll
also
just
say
really
very
quickly
that,
with
this
pilot
program,
we
wouldn't
be
replacing
the
financial
assistance
that
we
already
provide
to
a
number
of
different
nonprofits,
we're
still
planning
on
funding
effa
for
keep
families,
housed,
shelter
and
basic
needs.
We
support
a
wide
range
of
other
nonprofits
that
provide
financial
assistance
and
economic
assistance
to
our
community
members
and
all
that
stays.
K
Well,
I
I
acknowledge
that
the
only
issue
is,
should
they
get
more
and
and
it's
a
question
of
an
analysis
that
shows
why
this
is
a
better
path
than
giving
effort
more
money,
giving
community
foundation
more
money,
giving
boulder
housing
partners
more
money.
I
mean
I
I'll
get
into
this
more
with
the
comments,
but
those
those
are.
J
AB
Yeah,
I
really
appreciate
you
guys
bringing
forward
a
bunch
of
innovative
things.
I
think,
like
mark,
I'm
struggling
a
little
bit
with
understanding.
AB
AC
Yeah
and
warren,
we
can
certainly
provide
that
in
detail.
We
do
have
that
information,
I
mean.
Obviously,
we,
our
staff
made
every
attempt
to
try
to
limit
the
quote
administrative
part
of
any
program
to
make
sure
that
the
dollars
were
freed
up
for
direct
support,
I'm
just
kind
of
glancing
through.
I
know
that
the
vast
majority
of
the
homeless
solutions
building
home
dollars
are
those
will
go
direct
out
to
the
services
that
kurt
described
the
infrastructures
in
place
for
the
art
industry
support.
AC
There
is
a
part-time
position
that
will
help
support
the
commissions
that
you
know
that's
a
part
of
it,
but
that
certainly
is
a
and
add
value
to
the
the
programs
themselves.
So
there
are
some
examples
there
where
couldn't
do
it
without
it
and
it
helps
get
the
resources
out,
but
we
can
provide
you
a
little
bit
more
detailed
breakdown
on
that.
AB
X
I
I'm
I'm
still
I'm
kind
of
stuck
on
a
philosophical
aspect
of
of
arpa
and-
and
maybe
you
know
it's
not
a
question
for
staff,
but
maybe
my
council
colleagues
as
well.
X
The
philosophical
question
I'm
struggling
with
is
is
the
expeditious
nature
that
in
which
these
funds
were
received
by
the
city
or
given
out
by
the
federal
government,
and
I
see
a
pacing
of
this
and
I
know
some
of
it
is
it
takes
a
while
to
initiate
a
plan
and
or
there's
some
staffing
limitations
to
implement,
and
so
I'm
aware
of
some
of
those
tensions.
But
what
I
also
see
is
I
see
that
we
we've
we've
really
pushed
on.
X
Now
and-
and
I
come
I
just
I
come
back
to
business-
and
my
question
is
like
how
many
more
businesses
are,
we
gonna
lose
and
then
in
hindsight
go
yeah,
but
we
held
on
to
money
too
long,
and-
and
I
worry
that
the
same-
maybe
mistake
we
made
about
not
spending
our
reserves
to
hold
on
to
our
staff
and
now
paying
the
consequences
of
planning
and
other
things
costing
businesses
money
slowing
other
things
down.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
learning
the
lesson
a
little
bit.
So
I'm
kind
of
wondering
why.
X
Why
is
it
that
the
process
we're
in
and
not
the
spend
money
get
it
now
get
it
to
the
help
it
needs
as
fast
as
possible,
and
so
I'm
just
I'm
struggling
with
the
philosophy
of
it,
and
that
and
understanding
that
might
help
me
understand
why
the
plan
is
the
plan.
AC
Yeah
I
appreciate
that
question
matt.
I
I
would
say
that
we,
we
tried
to
strike
that
balance,
so
I
think
take
that,
as
as
you
will,
we
did
have
a
number
of
expenditures
in
trench,
one
that
were
about
immediate
need,
and
so
I
think
that
was
a
little
over
2
million
that
we
identified
as
immediate
need
and
those
dollars.
AC
You
know
we
tried
to
get
out
the
door
as
quickly
as
possible
and
we're
successful
in
that
in
a
lot
of
ways,
we
have
identified
a
little
over
a
million
one.
I
think
it's
about
1.1
million
in
this
tranche
and
trench
two
that
again
support
that
kind
of
continued
recovery.
Those
are
more
immediate
merging
needs,
as
we've
seen
them
over
the
last
several
months.
So
those
are,
they
wouldn't
really
fall
into
that
kind
of
new
or
transformational
or
whatever.
AC
You
want
to
call
it,
and
then
I'd
say
that
we
were
challenged
with
the
last
council
to
try
to
come
up
with
those
innovative
approaches
to
some
of
our
most
challenging
issues.
And
so
that's,
where
you
see
kind
of
a
different
or
a
new
approach
reflected,
is
that
we
took
some
care
in
trying
to
plan
and
scope
what
it
would
take
to
actually
do
some
of
these
things.
And
so
that's
where
you
get
some
of
these
others
that
you
know,
may
require
some
additional
planning
even
to
get
to
that
type
of
initiative.
AC
But
hopefully
it
supports
that
sustained
longer-term
recovery,
but
both
community
and
economic
recovery,
and
so
again
it's
a
balance.
I
mean
the
longer
we
take
to
plan
and
make
sure
we're
doing
that
we're
you
know
potentially
missing
something
in
the
shorter
term,
but
we've
tried
to
really
make
sure
that
we're
listening
to
those
gaps
that
exist
today
and
make
sure
that
we,
we
are
funding
initiatives
that
that
address
those
gaps.
AC
And
then
the
last
thing-
and
I
was
going
to
touch
on
this
for
tranche
3-
is
that
we
don't
have
10
million
yet
until
july.
So
that's
one
caveat
and
we
are
excited
about
the
prospect
of
partnering
and
planning
with
the
county
as
they
make
decisions.
As
you
know,
that
process
has
not
completed
itself
yet.
X
I
I
appreciate
that
mark,
and
I
I
know
how
hard
and
all
this
is
in
in
the
moment
of
all
the
chaos
and
the
complexity
and
and
the
struggle
for
so
many
in
all
this.
How
hard
it
is
sometimes
to
to
it's
easy
to
sort
of
in
hindsight
have
different
view
and
so
and
not
that
we're
totally
in
hindsight.
But
I
do
think
that,
and
I
can
appreciate
that.
I
know
that
that
might
be
a
position
I'm
coming,
but
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
all
the
great
ideas
that
have
come
out
of
this.
X
B
AC
It's
up
to
you.
I
have
the
questions
again.
At
the
end,
I
think
it
for
feedback
on
two.
I
know
that
they're
we
had
some
conversation
with
a
couple
council
members
about
potentially
looking
at
some
that
were
in
tranche
three
and
asking
about.
Could
we
move
them
up
and
and
stuff
like
that?
So
it
might
be
good
to
hear
the
trench
three
yeah.
B
J
B
Nobody's
complaining
at
all,
okay,
thanks,
we'll
wait
to
hear
from
you
for
until
we
get
to
comments.
AC
AC
You
know
you
do
hear
a
lot
about
staff
capacity
continues
to
be
a
thing,
so
we
are
asking
for
your
help
and
prioritization
that
will
help
us
focus
efforts
as
we
continue
to
plan
towards
the
spending
the
rest
of
the
dollars
that
we
have
available.
There's
some
here
that
we've
said
it's
really
important.
We
know
it's
a
top
priority.
We
should
hold
funds,
but
there's
some
coordination,
that's
necessary.
I
mentioned
especially
with
the
county.
I
mean
it's
not
just
to
call
them
out.
I
mean
they.
AC
They
have
over
60
million
in
our
dollars
on
themselves,
they're
they're,
going
through
a
process
to
determine
their
funding
efforts
and
so
again,
we've
we've
enjoyed
a
very
close
relationship
that
with
them,
and
especially
in
the
human
services
realm
closely
aligned
on
funding,
and
so
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
our
dollars
are
not
duplicative,
and
so
I
think
it'll
be
great
to
hold
funds
but
kind
of
wait
for
those
final
decisions
to
play
out
in
their
process
and
yes,
feedback.
If
there's
any
gaps.
AC
AC
Digital
divide
improvements.
I
don't
think
we
touch
on
specifically
it's
an
area
that
we
know
we
need
to
continue
to
address
outside
of
the
phase
two
work.
We've
had
several
conversations
in
in
this
area.
It's
a
difficult
one.
I
can
get
into
the
details
of
that,
but
we
would
still
like
to
hold
funding
and
address
digital
divide
issues
as
they
arise.
This
is
more
on
the
infrastructure
side
than
I
think,
providing
direct
assistance
which
we
are
doing
through
housing.
AC
Human
services
in
some
ways,
child
care
capacity
and
industry
support
continues
to
be
an
issue
within
the
community.
We
are
doing
some
smaller
initiatives.
This
would
be
to
coordinate
some
larger
work.
We
have
talked
about
a
guaranteed
income.
So
again,
this
would
be
in
our
tranche
3
bucket.
We
wouldn't
be
seeking
appropriation
in
march
for
for
the
bulk
of
the
dollars
for
that
potential
pilot.
AC
I'll
speak
very
briefly
on
san
lazaro
and
we
will
talk
about
manufacture,
housing,
community
support
and
again
with
trans
transformative
economic
recovery
that
1.2
million
would
be
held
subject
to
the
completion
of
the
the
strategy.
The
economic
sustainability
strategy
update
that
we
talked
about
earlier
in
total.
This
would
be
a
little
shy
of
15
and
a
half
million
we'll
just
flag
here
that
if
everything
was
funded
then
it
would
exceed
our
current
remaining
of
about
11.8
million.
So
just
keep
that
in
mind.
AC
There's
a
caveat
with
what
we're
actually
talking
about
with
the
san
lazaro
annexation.
So
that'll
become
a
little
bit
more
apparent
with
numbers
and
we'll
talk
about
that
specifically,
so
I
believe
for
this
one,
I'm
handing
back
over
to
elizabeth
to
talk
about
how
we're
looking
at
this
particular
issue.
AD
Yeah
thanks
mark
I'm
sure
council
is
well
aware
that
our
community
members
are
really
experiencing
quite
a
wide
range
of
mental
behavioral
health
needs,
and
these
have
been
exacerbated
by
covid
and
then
compounded
by
other
disasters,
our
communities
faced,
including
shootings
and
fires,
etc.
AD
We
know
the
needs
are
very
urgent
and
we
also
need
some
clarification,
as
mark
mentioned
from
our
government
partners
like
boulder
county
and
more
info
input
from
a
range
of
non-profits
to
really
land
on
exact
kind
of
supports.
We
want
to
be
able
to
provide
and
make
sure
we're
leveraging
these
opera
dollars
to
the
greatest
extent
possible.
AD
You
go
there
you're
right
and
actually
these
a
lot
of
these
situations
are
very
similar
for
child
care,
as
they
are
for
mental
behavioral
health,
and
that
this
industry
is
really
quite
critical
to
making
sure
that
families
in
our
community
have
what
they
need
to
re-enter
the
workforce
and
do
so
sustainably
address
these
issues
with
affordability
and
also
just
address
the
very
kind
of
business
industry
of
child
care
providers,
which
our
colleagues,
yvette
and
others
in
community
vitality
can
address
as
well
and
hhs
and
community
vitality
have
been
working
really
collaboratively
to
identify
this
initial
set
of
outcomes
and
possible
investment
areas
again
that
add
value
to
the
ongoing
services
that
we
already
provide,
either
directly
through
hhs
or
community
vitality
and
through
investments
and
other
child
care
and
nonprofit
partners,
and
we
also
made
a
sizable
investment
using
cares,
act
or
coronavirus
relief
funding
in
2020
for
this
industry.
AD
AD
Another
area
where
collaboration
with
the
county
being
able
to
continue
to
work
with
our
colleagues
in
the
city
of
longmont,
for
example,
to
with
all
of
our
nonprofit
partners
to
be
able
to
land
on
you
know
what
we
really
believe
is
the
right
allocations
in
detail.
So
we
can
leverage
this
opportunity
well.
AE
Thank
you
mark,
so
the
the
previous
council
approved
the
the
ponderosa
community
project
and
it's
a
it's.
A
multi-year
project
which
initially
created
a
lot
of
planning
with
the
community,
turned
into
an
annexation,
a
new
site
plan
whoops
there
we
go
and
as
well
as
a
commitment
and
one
of
the
one
of
the
outcomes
that
the
community
desired
and
city
council
desired
at
that
time,
was
to
ensure
that
residents
of
the
ponderosa
community
at
the
time
that
it
was
purchased
by
the
city.
AE
So
it's
really
addressing
a
sort
of
a
long-term
city
project.
That's
that's
gone
over
several
councils,
but
also
it's
worth
noting
that
these
households
have
certainly
been
significantly
impacted
from
an
economic
standpoint
through
this
covered
the
last
couple
years
as
well,
and
I
will
stop
there.
Thank
you.
AC
Okay,
I
think
I'm
covering
briefly
this
slide,
so
a
long-standing
conversation
has
surrounded
the
san
lazaro
community
and
the
potential
annexation
into
the
city.
I
want
to
be
clear
with
this
that
we're
not
suggesting
the
use
of
city
arpa
dollars
yet
at
this
time,
but
we
believe
that
arpa
could
be
used
to
support
the
potential
annexation
in
some
way
through
the
coordination
of
resources
and
other
partners.
AC
There's
a
a
few
reasons
we're
putting
this
on
there.
I
think
it
comes
at
a
good
moment.
We
we
do
have
staff
available
from
both
utilities
and
hhs
to
help
answer
questions
here
comes
at
a
good
moment.
Where
there's
been
some
progress
with
negotiations,
I
think
it's
important
for
us
as
a
as
a
city
to
secure
adequate
community
benefit
apart
as
a
part
of
any
annexation
into
the
city,
there's
also
other
entities
that
have
an
interest
here,
including
boulder
county.
AC
This
is
not
currently
within
city
limit
limits
inherent
with
an
annexation
so
again,
and
really
trying
to
see
the
road
map
to
the
future
and
the
use
of
any
potential
arpa
dollars
would
include
other
entities
at
the
table.
AC
Those
are
some
elements
that
are
potentially
a
part
of
this
again
would
be
informed
by
the
update
of
the
economic
sustainability
strategy
and
then
just
quickly
to
touch
on
potential
ongoing
funding
impact
just
so
that
we
can
get
into
the
heart
of
the
questions
here.
AC
We're
just
pointing
out
here,
and
this
information
is
in
your
packets-
that
some
of
these
are
not
necessarily
one-time
expenditures.
Inherently,
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
information
on
this
slide,
we're
just
pointing
out
that
any
consideration
of
arpa
funding
may
implicate
future
funding,
and
so,
especially
from
you
know,
the
budget
hat
perspective
here
is
that
we'll
just
want
to
be
thinking
ahead,
so
that
if
we
are
intentionally
funding,
something
because
it's
important
now
to
aid
in
recovery?
AC
That
has
ongoing
implications
that
we
need
to
consider
that
as
we
go
into
future
budget
cycles
and
just
lastly,
that,
as
you
think
about
moving
things
up
and
back,
it
would
really
help
us
to
prioritize.
So,
if
there's
something
that's
less
of
a
priority
in
the
current
trench
two
recommendations
and
like
to
move
something
up
and
out
of
tree,
I
think
generally
you'll
hear
support
for
that
from
staff
as
we've
gone
through
that
process
over
the
last
couple
months
is
try
to
figure
out
what
is
council's
priority.
AC
Obviously
we
will
be
responsive,
but
we
do
have
only
so
much
capacity
to
make
that
happen.
So
that's
just
the
reality
and
if
you
can
give
us
an
indication
of
what
those
priorities
are
over
others
that
that
is
helpful.
I
mentioned
the
ongoing
funding
implications
and
prof
process
for
trans
three.
I
think
it
depends
on
the
progress
of
the
various
different
initiatives,
some
of
these,
like
the
guaranteed
income
pilot.
If
that
does
move
forward,
that
would
have
maybe
a
different
track
than
others.
A
couple
might
be
in
that
boat.
AC
Coordination
with
others,
including
boulder
county,
will
be
a
part
of
these
potential
trench
three
initiatives
and
then
some
may
be
requested
through
our
our
budget
process,
utilizing
arp
as
a
source
of
money.
Again
it
depends
if
it's
council's
will.
We
could
certainly
just
do
something
similar
like
this
and
just
have
a
trans3
conversation
separately.
So
a
number
of
different
ways
to
structure
that
as
well.
B
Well,
thanks
for
that
mark
and
just
just
a
big
overall
thank
you.
It's
clear,
an
enormous
amount
of
work
and
thought
went
into
preparing
these
recommendations.
They're
very
detailed,
they're,
very
well
thought
through.
So
thanks
to
and
everyone
on,
staff
who
collaborated
and
put
in
that
together
all
right
questions,
terry,
you
still
have
a
hand
up.
Do
you
do
you
have
questions
now
or
do
you
want
to
wait
until
comments.
B
Okay
mark
and
then
nicole,
yeah,
just.
K
One
question:
wouldn't
the
san
luis
arrow
annexation
cost
be
something
that
would
be
appropriate
for
upcoming
infrastructure
funds.
AC
It
definitely
could,
I
think
it
depends
on
the
the
type
of
infrastructure
we're
looking
at.
I
believe
there
is
at
least
one
program,
and
this
is
off
the
top
of
my
head.
Based
on
a
webinar.
I
attended
a
little
while
back,
but
yeah.
I
think
there
there
definitely
are
opportunities
there.
I
think
we'd
want
to
define
what
our
what
our
interest
is
in
investment.
AC
K
And
obviously
a
discussion
of
san
jose
was
out
of
the
out
of
our
purview
tonight,
but
I
will
have
many
comments
and
questions
when
that
comes
to
us
so
be
forewarned.
B
I
Thanks
yeah,
I
just
had
a
couple
of
questions
about
the
child
care
funding,
as
well
as
the
behavioral
health
funding,
and
I
was
just
wondering
if
there
what
was
or
is
a
conversation
around
using
some
of
that
funding
for
workforce,
because
that's
a
major
issue
in
both
of
those
areas.
Right
now
and
anyway,
just
curious
about
the
workforce
component
of
that.
AD
Sure
the
short
answer
is
yes.
That
is
exactly
what
we
want
to
be
able
to
do
with
those
funds,
maybe
not
exclusively.
AD
There
may
be
some
system,
other
types
of
system,
support
or
both
for
mental
behavioral
health
professionals
and
and
child
care,
but
it's
really
about
addressing
this
huge
gap
between
people
who
need
the
services,
many
quite
desperately
and
the
amount
of
people,
and,
as
I
said-
and
I
think
you
know,
this
is
a
nationwide
issue
and
the
that
extends
beyond
just
the
dollars,
but
hopefully
in
our
our
desire
is
that
with
some
really
strategic
investments
we
can
truly
make
some,
which
may
or
may
not
be
innovative
right
in
kind
of
the
true
sense
of
the
word,
but
certainly
transformative,
and
that
we
want
them
to
be
long
lasting
and
that
just
takes
a
lot
of
care
as
they
you
know.
AD
Thank
you.
You
are
acknowledging
to
get
right
because
if
we
just
say
hey
we're
going
to
address
salary
shortfalls,
you
know
that
that
could
actually
set
organizations
up
for
a
negative
consequence
in
a
short
period
of
time.
So
but
but
again
the
short
answer
is
even
though
I'm
talking
longer
is
that
yes,
a
lot
of
it
is
about
really
trying
to
make
those
investments
in
in
workforce.
I
Thank
you
and
then
the
other
question
that
I
had
was
related
to
the
second
mortgage
idea
around
funding,
some
of
the
upgrades
and
things
on
the
manufactured
homes
and
my
question.
There
was
whether
there
are
any
other
thoughts
on
kind
of
how
to
sustain
that
program
in
the
future
and
just
thinking
back
to,
for
example,
the
public
commenter.
You
know
tonight
who
is
noting
how
much
those
kind
of
solutions
can
strain
the
amount
of
money
that
folks
are
able
to
get
when
they
sell
their
home
and,
I
think,
sometimes
with
manufactured
homes.
I
That's
an
especially
hard
thing
to
do
so,
I'm
just
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
could
provide
just
a
little
more
background
on
alternative
ideas
there
or
if
that's
a
discussion,
that's
kind
of
still
in
progress.
Then
we
would
hear
more
about
as
we
learn
more
about
this.
AC
AE
Yeah,
thank
you,
nicole,
so
I
think
to
address
the
comments
of
the
the
speak.
There
was
two
speakers
at
open
comment
that
would
probably
take
its
own
study
session
and
I
would
actually
be
glad
to
address
a
lot
of
those
things.
In
fact,
we
received
an
email
in
that
regard
today,
as
well,
that
I'll
be
responding
to,
but
the
if
you
look
at
it
currently,
those
a
lot
of
the
residents
at
ponderosa
have
lived
in
those
manufactured
mobile
homes.
AE
For
many
years
we
had
those
sort
of
appraised
about
three
years
ago
for
market
appraisal.
They
ranged
in
they
ranged
in
value
according
to
market
appraisals
between,
I
think
the
lowest
was
about
fourteen
thousand
dollars
and
the
highest
was,
I
think,
forty
five
or
fifty
thousand,
and
what
we
don't
really
see
appreciation
of
of
those
types
of
of
homes,
and
through
this
program
they
would
actually
be
getting
into
a
fix
foundation
home
where
they
would
have
a
home.
That
would
be
worth.
AE
AE
However,
depending
on
their
financial
capacity,
it
would
be
a
shared
appreciation,
so
you
know,
depending
on
on
which
household
they
would
have
sort
of
a
different
amount
of
value
from
that
home
is.
However,
it's
it's
a
significant.
It's
a
significant
step
upwards
in
something
that's
actually
going
to
appreciate
year
after
year,
whereas
in
many
cases
these
homes
have
actually
depreciated
and
and
the
quality
of
the
homes
is
substantially
different.
I
AB
Thank
you
so
first,
I
just
have
a
basic
one,
which
is
the
deadline
for
spending
this
money.
Is
there
one
of
those,
and
when
is
that?
Yes,.
AC
There
is,
we
must
commit
the
funds,
so
I
we
could
read
that
a
couple
of
different
ways,
but
I
take
that
as
be
under
contract
to
spend
funds
by
the
end
of
2024
and
actually
expend
funds
by
the
end
of
26..
AB
Okay,
and
just
because
you
know
hearing
some
of
these
things
about
child
care-
and
I
also
think
about
it
with
some
of
the
arts
funding
things
that
have
a
built
component
to
them
and
might
require
some
time
for
our
planning
and
development
services,
people
and
making
sure
that
we're
also
sort
of
allocating
time
so
that
we
have
can
meet
these
goals
within
the
timelines
that
we
have.
AB
I
was
also
wondering
about
something
that
feels
sort
of
like
it's,
not
there
that
I
was
anticipating,
more
of
which
is
sort
of
the
day
sheltering
and
expanded
night
sheltering
that
the
community's
been
you
know,
bringing
up.
I
heard
a
lot
about
that
both
campaigning
and
then
also
you
know
we're
always
getting
emails
about
those
kinds
of
things,
and
I
I
don't
know
why
I
was
expecting
that.
AB
But
I
was
kind
of
expecting
something
along
those
lines
to
be
part
of
what
might
be
proposed
here,
and
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
speak
to
maybe
why
that
isn't
something
that
we're
looking
at
more.
AC
AE
AE
AB
AE
Yeah
that's
helpful.
Thank
you,
so
the
the
day
services
we
don't
quite
understand
what
the
scope
of
that
will
be,
and
I
I
think
council
will
be
discussing
that
a
little
bit
later
this
evening
as
well.
AE
AE
When
we
look,
we
were
looking
at
what
the
resources
we
had
to
work
with
and
not
with
not
understanding
what
a
day
shelter
might
look
like
if
you're.
If
we're
talking
about
a
building,
a
building
that
could
do
day,
services
is
probably
anywhere
from
five
to
six
million
dollars
for
a
used
building.
AE
If
we
wanted
to
purchase
it,
and
so
in
order
to
to
get
the
the
most
out
of
this
approach,
we
wanted
to
use
resources
and
and
venues
that
we
knew
already
existed,
that
we
didn't
have
to
pay
for
that
could
be
better
utilized
and
those
are
community
spaces
that
already
exist
throughout
our
community
and
we're
also
wanting
to
make
the
approach
is
to
actually
create
connections
between
people,
so
individuals
going
to
a
class
or
a
group
or
connecting
with
their
peers
that
often
works
best
in
the
neighborhood
that
they
live
in,
and
so
that's
the
approach
that
we
we
took.
AE
We
thought
it
would
be
the
the
most
outcome
for
the
amount
of
resource
being
put
into
it
and
have
a
significant
impact
on
the
individuals
we're
trying
to
serve.
B
J
J
I
agree
with
you
and
what
I
want
to
bring
up,
and
I
appreciate
all
staff
did
tonight
and
the
comment
that
was
made,
maybe
by
mark
was
really
true
that
in
2021
things
were
one
way
and
now
in
2022
things
are
another
way
and
there
was
no
way
when
council
was
working
on
this
package
in
2021
that
you
would
have
known
about
2022,
which
is
to
me
what's
a
trifecta,
but
with
two
extra
factors
like
a
quintifecta.
J
So
we
have
the
pandemic.
This
labor
shortage,
the
supply
chain
shortages,
pushing
up
the
prices,
causing
inflation
and
pushing
up
the
prices
some
more
so
I've
never
and
I'm
old.
You
know
seeing
so
much
instability,
so
much
changing
in
not
just
business,
but
our
entire
society.
With
these
all
things,
these
things
all
happening
at
once.
J
So
I
agree
with
matt
that
what
is
going
on
now,
with
the
small
business
community,
with
the
restaurants
with
the
whole
small,
with
the
hotels,
the
hospitality,
is
an
emergency
because
we
don't
know
what's
going
to
happen
at
the
next
tranche.
I
mean
we
don't
we
don't
know,
what's
going
to
be
in
2023
we'd
like
to
save
the
businesses
so
that
they're
still
here.
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
that,
and
I
wanted
to
also
say
one
thing
about
the
outdoor
dining.
J
J
Yes,
I
understand
the
point
and
it's
a
good
point
about
those
that
are
disabled
being
able
to
get
to
these
places,
but
we
really,
I
think
we
should
reconsider
how
much
money
we're
going
to
spend
this
year
on
all
these
new
things
and
somebody
brought
up
so
many
great
things
are
brought
up
by
my
council
members
and
some-
and
I
think
maybe
it
was
lauren
or
maybe
not
that
brought
up.
Is
this
a
time
for
innovation
when
we
just
need
to
get
through
till
the
end
of
2022.?
J
It's
good
to
have
innovative
thought,
but
I
think
there's
like
an
emergency
and
I'm
not
a
big
one
from
using
the
word
emergency.
You
know
I'm
not
so,
but
I
think
that
there
is
somewhat
of
an
emergency
and
really
just
doubling
down
on
making
sure
that
our
businesses
who
are
made
up
of
people
who
who
hire
late
people
who
are
in
the
labor
force,
need
to
get
to
the
end
of
2022
and
we
need
to
help
them
do
it,
and
so
that's
what
I
was
thinking
for
the
past
45
minutes.
B
Julie
noted
and
thanks
for
this,
and
that
was
that
was
succinct.
Thanks,
tara,
great
great
points
mark
then
bob
and
matt.
K
Okay,
my
first
comment
is
also
a
question.
I
am,
I'm
actually
quite
shocked
that
in
all
of
these
proposals
I
do
not
detect
any
that
are
really
intended
to
enhance
community
resilience
against
climate
change.
I
know
it's
it's.
You
know
it's
been
a
few
weeks.
K
Maybe
our
memory
is
short,
but
the
marshall
fire
should
teach
us
that
it
is
important
to
enhance
our
community
in
terms
of
its
ability
to
deal
with
that
kind
of
occasion,
and
I
I'm
really
quite
surprised
that
no
portion
of
these
funds
seems
to
be
directed
in
that
direction.
K
My
other
comment
is,
I
guess,
directed
more
towards
the
guaranteed
income
proposal,
which
my
suggestion
on
that
would
be
to
put
both
of
the
both
the
consultant
phase
and
the
disbursement
phase
in
the
third
tranche
to
give
staff
time
to
get
us
a
little
bit
more
up
to
speed.
Give
us
some
education.
K
Let
us
understand
why
this
is
a
good
proposal,
in
contrast
to
other
possible
uses
for
the
money,
because,
if
it
were
simply
up
to
me,
I'd
be
happy
to
reallocate
those
funds
to
effort
community
foundation.
Bridge
house,
you
know
bhp
could
take
2.75
million
dollars
and
leverage
it
into
more
than
20
million.
That's
how
they
operate
and
leverage
I
thought,
was
one
of
the
objectives
of
the
use
of
arpa
funds,
and
I
I
don't
see
as
much
leverage
in
the
guaranteed
income
portion
of
this
as
I
would
like.
K
K
You
know
I'd
be
more
than
happy
to
strengthen
the
safety
net,
the
behavioral
safety
net
above
2.5
million.
I
think
it's
potentially
great-
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
this,
but
does
every
child
in
boulder
have
a
home
computer?
K
Does
every
family
have
a
home
computer?
If
not
I'd
be
happy
to
spend
funds
to
rectify
that?
That
addresses
a
very
particular
need,
and
I
think,
will
benefit
underserved
communities
on
a
grander
scale
than
taking
150
or
125,
or
even
200
people
and
giving
them
guaranteed
income,
and
we
have
so
many
larger
issues
to
address.
K
So
I'm
not
saying
I
can't
ever
support
guaranteed
income,
but
I
don't
have
anywhere
near
the
data
to
be
able
to
do
that
now
and
to
suggest
that
we
ought
to
spend
a
quarter
of
a
million
dollars
to
hire
consultants
for
a
program
that
might
not
be
an
appropriate
program
for
us.
I'd
certainly
like
to
know
what
other
cities
between
100,
000
and
125
000
population
are
doing.
We
don't
have
that
data.
I
don't
want
to
belabor
it
too
much.
K
I
I
have
a
lot
of
questions
and
I
do
suggest
that
we
take
a
different
look
at
it,
especially
in
in
terms
of
the
quarter
of
a
million
dollars
for
consultants.
Thank
you.
D
Thanks
erin,
I
want
to
agree
with
some
of
the
things
that
have
already
been
said.
I
have
three
three
points
to
make.
First
of
all,
on
outdoor
dining,
as
I
mentioned
before,
it's
a
little
awkward
for
us
to
comment
on
this.
My
sense
is:
the
allocation
is
either
too
much
or
too
little.
I'm
not
really
too
sure
which
one
things
I
don't
like
about
the
program,
at
least,
is.
I
understand
it
right
now
the
outdoor
dining
program
right
now.
D
Is
there
a
lot
of
built-in
city
fees,
and
it
feels
to
me
a
little
like
we're
using
our
positi,
our
subsidy
for
outdoor
dining,
which
I'm
generally
in
favor
of,
but
some
of
that
money
is
going
to
go
back
to
the
city.
So
it's
really
just
an
economic
transfer
of
the
money
to
the
city's
general
fund,
and
I
would
not
be
happy
about
that,
but
I
I
really
can't
ascertain
that
now,
because
we
haven't
really
drilled
into
the
outdoor
running
program
and
it
is
still
very
much
in
flux.
So
I
guess
I'll.
D
Just
put
a
placeholder
there
to
say
I'd
like
to
use
arpa
fun
funding
to
truly
subsidize
outdoor
dining,
but
I
don't
know
exactly
what
that
means
yet.
So
I
think
we'll
just
have
to
wait
till
march
8th
to
figure
it
out,
and
then
I
have
to
dial
the
number
up
or
down
second
related
to
that
echo.
The
points
that
tara
and
matt
and
others
have
made
about
business
recovery.
D
I
think
that
we
are
under
funding
our
business
recovery
segment
and
I
don't
know
if
that
means
goosing
up
the
numbers
in
tronch
2
or
bringing
numbers
forward
from
tranche
3.
But
I
think
timing
is
super
critical
here,
because,
as
tara
said,
we
have
a
lot
of
businesses
that
are
on
the
cusp
of
either
recovering
or
failing,
and
time
is
of
the
essence.
D
And
if
we
don't
fully
recov
fund
that
business
recovery
now
we're
going
to
lose
businesses,
and
some
of
these
are
businesses
that
actually
support
our
lowest
paid
workers
in
our
community.
I'm
thinking
particularly
about
hospitality,
some
of
our
lowest
earning
workers,
work
in
hotels
and
they
work
in
the
restaurant
service.
Business
and
those
industries
are
really
really
struggling
right
now
and
if
we
don't
help
them
get
back
visitors
and
diners,
they
will,
they
will
simply
close
and
those
employees
will
be
the
beneficiaries,
unfortunately,
of
our
guaranteed
income
program.
D
If
we
have
one
and
that's
not
what
we
want,
we
want
them
to
earn
wages
and
be
successful.
So
I
would
really
strongly
recommend
staff
take
a
harder
look
at
our
business
recovery
funding,
particularly
for
the
convention
visitors
bureau,
which
in
turn
supports
our
hospitality
industry,
which
is
so
critical
and
so
fragile.
D
Right
now,
I
think
the
cvb
asks
for
420
000
to
support
those
industries
and
they're
they're
being
the
proposals
to
give
them
one
hundred
thousand
so
less
than
a
quarter
of
what
they
ask
for
and
then
finally,
I'm
still
struggling
with
the
guaranteed
income
program.
First
of
all,
I
I'm
fully
supportive
of
disbursing
some
of
this
money
to
our
lowest
income
and
struggling
families
in
the
community.
I
have
no
problem
with
a
grant
program
along
those
lines.
D
This
is
this
is
effectively
money
that
we've
received,
that
the
us
government
printed
off
its
printing
press
and
if
we
can
get
that
into
the
hands
of
of
poor
families
in
our
community
as
quickly
as
possible.
That
would
be
just
great.
So
I'm
fully
supportive
of
that,
but
I
sure
mark's
concern
about
spending
250
000
in
the
next.
D
I
think
I
heard
eight
to
nine
months
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
do
that
and
it
seems
to
me
it
could
be
done
cheaper
and
faster,
because
the
the
the
r
in
in
arpa
stands
for
rescue
and
it
doesn't
feel
like
much
of
a
rescue
if
we
don't
start
distributing
money
until
2023,
which
sounds
like
what
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
doing
so.
I
would.
I
would
disburse
that
money
as
quickly
as
possible
to
the
neediest
families
and
then,
of
course,
I
am
worried
about
sustainability.
D
I
was
a
little
troubled
by
the
was
the
second
last
or
third
last
slide.
That
mark
showed-
and
I
think
it
was
candid-
but
I
I'm
concerned
that
we're
gonna
slip
into
a
long-term
and
permanent
welfare
program,
and
I
guess,
while
it
is
our
job
to
disperse
funds,
that
we
got
from
the
federal
government
to
help
families
and
businesses
be
rescued.
D
I'm
not
sure
it's
the
role
of
municipal
government
to
provide
long-term
social
welfare
that
is
historically
and
traditionally
the
realm
of
counties
and
states
and,
to
some
extent
the
federal
government
and
not
cities.
And
so
I
wouldn't
want
us
to
to
set
up
expectations
in
our
community
that,
because
we're
disbursing
called
two
or
three
million
dollars
of
arpa
money
to
low-income
families
to
help
them
rescue
that
suddenly
becomes
a
line
item
a
permanent
lie
down
in
the
city
budget,
because
that
would
be
a
little
bit
troublesome.
D
X
Thanks
erin-
and
I
think
I
sort
of
hinted
at
where
I
I
was
sort
of
leaning
here
and
and
now
I
think
I'll-
try
to
be
a
little
more
specific.
X
X
I
I
think
that
would
be
that
I
would
not
want
to
be
in
that
position,
so
I
I'd
like
to
see
us
allocate
at
least
600
000
to
cover
a
full
outdoor
dining
set
and
if
we
can
find
ways
to
get
out
those
fees
down
in
other
ways
and
not
need
the
arpa
I'd
much
rather,
you
know
focus
on
one
in
the
hand
rather
than
two
in
the
bush,
so
that
we
can
then
move
it
somewhere
else
if
we
need
to,
but
I'd
hate
to
need
it
and
not
have
it
in
that
capacity.
X
With
regards
to
outdoor
dining
and
I'll
echo
bob's
point
with
the
cdb
there's
such
a
lead
time
that
is
required
for
our
tourism
industry
to
plant
the
seed
to
get
people
here
to
book
their
hotels
and
really
go,
and
now
that
mask
mandates
are
starting
to
wane.
X
This
is
the
time
that
people
are
gonna
go,
oh
there's
some
freedom
and
when
they
come
to
colorado,
the
first
place
they
should
see
is
come
to
boulder
and-
and
we
need
our
cvb
to
put
a
leading
edge
on
that,
so
that
our
businesses
can
get
back
in
the
game
and
then
support
our
general
fund.
So
I'd
love
to
see
the
cbb
get
the
money
they
need
in
order
to
do
the
best
campaign
they
can
for
the
spring
summer
and
fall.
X
And,
lastly,
I
want
to
touch
on
mark's
comment
about
climate
in
this
as
a
whole,
but
also
with
regards
to
an
equity
component,
and
that
is
with
regards
to
some
some
mobility
efforts.
I
I'd
like
to
see
how
we
could
always
think
of
maybe
working
with
community
cycles
a
little
bit
on
a
voucher
program
they
reached
out
to
us
on
this.
X
This
is
a
way
to
help
get
lower
income
individuals
that
work
at
some
of
our
larger
employers,
a
voucher
to
get
e-bikes,
and
so
it's
a
way
to
sort
of
meet
them
where
they
are,
but
also
find
a
way
to
address
some
of
our
climate
action
to
get
people
out
of
cars
and
increase
some
of
that
mobility.
It
also
directly
aligns
with
our
you
know
boulder
can,
yes,
we
can
proposal,
which
is
to
try
to
build
more
protected
bike
lanes.
X
So
these
are,
I
think,
very
synergistic
things
we
can
think
of
that
address
climate
address
mobility
and
address
some
more
lower
income
individuals
that
work
in
our
community.
So
those
are
the
three
things
I'd
really
like
to
see
us,
maybe
pivot,
to
and
and
move
on
and
really.
Lastly,
the
real
concern.
X
Sorry,
I
said
three
but
there's
fourth,
I'm
a
little
still
unsure
about
what
to
do
with
the
annexation
at
we're
talking
about
annexation,
holding
up
to
four
million
dollars
on
something
that
might
happen
that
could
also
be
applicable
with
infrastructure
money.
X
I
I'm
worried
about
holding
that
money
up
when
there's
such
an
immediate
need
other
places.
I
think
we
should
still
support
that
annexation.
I
think
it's
a
great
thing
for
us
to
do.
I'm
just
not
sure
holding
arpa
until
we
know
that
annexation
comes
through
is
necessarily
the
right
way
to
do
it
with
regards
to
arpa,
but
I
would
like
to
say
you
still
make
sure
that
that
annexation
of
the
san
larso
or
san
lazaro
area
gets
taken
care
of
just
maybe
not
totally
through
or
not
completely
through
our
money.
Thanks.
B
Thanks
matt
I'll
call
myself,
the
nicole
and
rachel
so
again
huge.
Thank
you
for
all
the
great
work
that
you've
done
on
these
proposals.
I
appreciate
how
it's
been
responsive
to
requests
from
a
number
of
groups
in
the
community,
the
restaurant
tours
the
hotel,
motel
folks,
the
creative
groups,
the
arts
groups,
child
care
providers.
B
You
know
business
groups
looking
for
the
updated
economic
strategy,
etc.
So
appreciate
you
listening
to
some
of
those
voices
and
coming
up
with
some
great
ideas
for
them.
I'll
agree
with
my
colleagues,
who've
said
that
I
think
it
would
be
beneficial
to
have
some
additional
business
support
in
the
shorter
term
in
the
trench.
Two
section,
including
support
for
the
convention
visitor
bureau,
know
I
think
those
are
industries
where,
if
they
have
to
lay
folks
off
that
often
hits
you
know
some.
B
Some
of
the
you
know
folks,
who
are
least
able
to
sustain
being
laid
off
right.
So
it's
in
addition
to
assisting
you
know
the
businesses
themselves.
I
think
the
the
employees
need
need
that
help
as
well.
So
I'd
love
to
see
us
do
a
little
bit
more
in
the
shorter
term
and
another
another
thing
that
struck
me
about
a
shorter
term
possibility.
B
I
know
your
capacity
is
limited,
but
I
was
really
glad
to
see
the
child
care
support
in
this
in
this
list,
because
there
are
so
many
people
in
in
our
society
in
our
community
who
can't
take
on
employment
unless
they
have
good
child
care
where
they
know
their
their
kids
are
safe,
and
if
that
child
care
isn't
available,
then
there
you
lose
a
whole
section
of
the
workforce
and
then
and
then
our
the
staffing
shortages
continue
and
and
folks
don't
have
the
income
they
need
for
their
family.
B
So
really
glad
to
see
that
and
then
my
question
is,
is:
can
we
can
we
accelerate
some
of
that
support
into
tranche2
so
because
I
think
it
was
currently
in
trench
three,
but
I
believe
that
a
lot
of
those
providers
are
struggling
now.
So,
if
that's,
if
that's
something
we
could
move
some
of
the
funding
in
earlier.
I
think
that
would
be
fantastic,
just
I'll
add
in
on
the
guaranteed
income
pilot.
B
I
think
it
is
a
it's
a
very
promising
idea
so,
and
I
know
a
lot
of
other
cities
are
working
on
it,
so
I
support
continuing
to
investigate
it,
but
clearly,
I
think
we'll
need
to
to
learn
more
about
how
that
will
work,
who's
eligible
who
we'll
go
to
and
then
some
real
information
about
how
this
then
helps
some
of
the
most
vulnerable
members
of
our
community
in
in
both
the
short,
medium
and
long
term
and
and
the
there's
that
question.
B
I
know
you
mentioned
it-
that
part
of
that
analysis
would
be
about
the
sustainability
or
the
long-term
future.
But
those
were
some
pretty
big
numbers
that
we're
talking
about
in
that
in
that
later
phase-
and
you
know,
do
we
have
the
does
that
just
end
when
the
arpa
funds
expended
or
and
does
that
leak
people
out
on
you
know
without
those
additional
funds,
or
are
we
expected
to
include
those
in
the
city
budget?
So
you
know
all
these
are
questions.
I
think
we'd
need
to
get
answered,
so
I
I
look
forward
to
exploring
it
further.
B
I
think
it's
a
very
promising
idea
just
need
to
to
get
some
more
information
about
that
on
the
the
building
home
proposal.
I
think
that
is
very
promising.
I
understand
that
we've
housed
a
lot
of
people
who
now
need
additional
support
in
order
to
stay
in
housing
and
be
successful,
but
to
lauren's
question.
I
think
it's
important
to
to
balance
those
investments
with
support
for
people
who
do
not
yet
have
housing,
and
so
the
the
day
shelter.
I
idea
and
the
other
services
that
we'll
be
talking
about
later
this
evening.
B
A
couple
more
points
of
behavioral
health
really
glad
to
see
that
in
there
that's
such
a
critical
gap
in
our
society
overall
of
support
for
mental
health
and
substance
abuse
issues.
I
do
very
much
hope
we
can
partner
with
the
county
on
this.
I
know
we're
working
on
that.
B
I
I'm
very
supportive
of
having
some
funds
available
to
support
that
annexation,
but
with
and
now
to
say
on
that
that
this
is
one
of
those
transformative
things
that
we
talked
about
last
year.
Is
it?
What
are
what
are
some
long-term
needs
in
our
community
that
we
may
be
able
to
make
progress
on
with
these?
These
once-in-a-lifetime
funds,
and
so
san
lazaro
has
some
deep
infrastructure
needs
that
may
be
hard
to
fund.
B
Otherwise,
that
being
said,
there
are
all
the
infrastructure
funds
coming
available,
and
so
I
know
you
all
are
looking
at
that,
but
we
should
absolutely
see
if
we
can
get
those
infrastructure
needs
met
with
with
other
grant
sources
so
that
potentially
the
the
arpa
funding
can
be
used
for
some
of
the
many
other
needs
in
our
community.
But
I
very
much
want
us
to
continue
to
work
on
this
project
with
the
hope
of
of
bringing
those
folks
into
the
city
and
and
improving
and
upgrading
their
infrastructure
infrastructure.
B
With
the
caveat
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
funds
are
going
to
primarily
to
support
the
current
and
the
future
residents.
You
know
it
shouldn't
shouldn't,
just
be
a
check
written
to
the
owner
to
offset
costs
that
they
would
otherwise
have
to
to
bear
themselves.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
keep
a
focus
on
on
the.
B
How
is
this
benefiting
primarily
the
residents
as
we
work
on
that
annexation
in
those
infrastructure
improvements
and
that's
what
I
got
so
thanks
again
for
some
great
work,
and
now
we
got
nicole
rachel
and
lauren.
I
And
I
just
first
wanted
to
give
kudos
to
staff
for
all
this
hard
work.
As
my
comment
as
my
first
comment,
and
also
just
to
really
call
out
the
the
value
of
this
racial
equity
tool,
it
really
did
kind
of
infuse
that
idea
of
equity
into
all
of
these
ideas
in
a
way
that
I've
not
seen
before,
and
so
I
just
I
greatly
appreciate
that
you
all
you
know,
spent
the
time
getting
trained,
how
to
use
it
and
implemented
it
here.
I
This
is
a
really
big
decision
on
how
to
spend
all
this
money,
and
it
seems
really
critical
that
this
tool
is
used
here.
So
thank
you
for
that.
I
also
just
wanted
to
know
my
appreciation
with
collaboration
with
community
connectors.
I
think
that's
super
important,
as
well
as
with
some
of
the
really
impacted
groups
like
the
arts,
commission
and
some
of
the
arts
community,
and
I
also
this
was
another
new
thing
for
me.
Seeing
this
in
here.
I
I
really
appreciate
your
noting
that
the
arts
contribute
to
social
cohesion
and
community
resilience
and
the
critical
role
that
they
play
in
our
ongoing
response
to
covid
and
the
trauma
that
all
of
us
are
experiencing
from
this.
I
you
know
this.
This
was
another
area
where
it
was
very
clear
that
this
idea
of
resilience
was
really
throughout.
I
All
of
these
of
how
can
we
make
our
community
stronger
and
better
able
to
weather
these
kinds
of
challenges
right
now,
as
well
as
as
we
move
forward
so
to
answer
your
original
questions
mark
there
are
two
of
them.
If
I
remember
correctly,
yes,
I
agree
with
the
general
direction
for
true
funding
would
love
to
see
you
bring
this
before
us
to
implement
these
funding
plans?
I
had
a
couple
of
just
comments
about
some
of
the
specific
things
that
were
brought
up
as
far
as
that
the
guaranteed
income
pilot
program.
I
I
really
really
really
love
this
idea,
and
I
also
wanted
to
ask
ask
slash
put
for
consideration
some
of
what
mark
and
lauren
and
others
have
talked
about
about
whether
there
are
groups
in
the
community
that
are
kind
of
further
along.
In
being
ready
to
launch
something
like
this,
whether
you
know
we
need
to
kind
of
reinvent
this,
I
think
a
few
years
ago,
for
example,
effa
did
a
pilot
program
of
this.
I
think
they
had
great
success.
I
You
know
really
helping
their
families.
I
think
there
was
a
community
foundation
report
about
it
that
talked
about
how
you
know
for
five
million
dollars
a
year.
We
could
basically
end
child
poverty
in
our
city,
which,
which
seems
really
huge
so
anyway,
I
was
just
wanting
to
put
that
out
there.
If
there
are
other
groups
that
are
are
able
would
be
able
to
take
the
money
and
run
with
it
and
get
it
out
to
people
faster.
I
Like
we've
been
talking
about
with
businesses
and
other
folks,
I
think
that
would
be
wonderful
and
be
so
supportive
of
something
like
that.
If
that
doesn't
exist
by
all
means,
please
start.
Please
continue
investigating
and
look
at
this
because
I
think
it
really
is
critically
important
for
us
to
think
about
how
we
can
fill
some
of
these
gaps
while
we
or
while
the
county
and
others
are
working
on
filling
some
of
them
like
with
a
living
wage
and
some
of
those
kinds
of
things
that
could
also
address
these
issues.
I
I
wanted
to
come
back
to
the
timing
of
the
behavioral
health
and
child
care.
For
me,
this
feels
like,
if
we
have
capacity
trying
to
do
this
sooner
in
charge.
Two
rather
than
turns
three
would
be
great,
especially
around
the
workforce
development
because
training
people
takes
time-
and
you
know
the
earlier-
we
can
get
started
on
that
the
better.
But
to
your
question
about
the
tranche
iii
and
knowing
that
there
are
trade-offs,
I
don't
really
know
what
I
would
prioritize
from.
I
You
know:
moving
from
trance
2
to
tranche
3
in
order
to
get
some
of
that
trench
three-step
to
happen
earlier.
So
just
sort
of
a
general
comment:
I'm
I'm
with
you
all,
I'm
just
being
stuck
a
little
bit
and
thinking
about
how
to
order
these
between
tree
and
trench
because
they're
all
they
are
all
really
important
other
than
perhaps
the
outdoor
dining
pilot
funds
that
that
may
be
something
that
to
me
just
feels
like
something
that
could
wait
a
little
bit.
The
let's
see
other
things.
I
Sorry,
I
took
notes
all
over
the
place,
I'm
trying
to
find
them.
Oh
yeah,
the
other
thing
that
I
just
wanted
to
note,
because
I
know
that
the
total
spending
was
higher
than
the
money
that
we
have.
I
I
believe
that
we
haven't
really
touched
our
reserve
funds
throughout
this
entire
pandemic
and
the
kind
of
catastrophic
impacts
that
it's
had
on
our
community,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
know
that
I
personally
would
be
open
to
the
idea
of
dipping
into
that
not
for
everything
that's
wrong,
but
for
kind
of
filling
some
of
those
gaps
between
some
of
the
work
that
you
all
have
identified
as
critically
important,
some
of
the
things
that
folks
are
needing
right
now
and
and
the
money
that
we
have
from
these
arpa
funds,
and
the
final
comment
was
just
sort
of
a
meta,
a
meta
comment
about
the
process.
I
I
would
be
really
interested
in
hearing
at
some
point:
people's
feedback
about
using
the
racial
equity
tool,
in
particular
some
of
the
community
connectors.
I
would
just
be
really
curious
to
hear
what
they
thought
of
the
process
and
its
outcomes,
and
things
like
that.
So
it's
not
for
right
now,
but
just
to
flag
for
later.
B
Thanks
rachel,
lauren
and
tara.
Y
Thanks
aaron
thanks
everyone,
I
I
don't
remember
which
all
questions
we
were
supposed
to
answer,
so
I
wonder
if
others
might
be
in
that
same
boat
and
if
it
would
be
worth
a
slide,
going
up
to
make
sure
that
we've,
given
you
the
feedback
that
you
requested.
Y
And
while
that's
happening
just
a
couple,
quick
comments
on
the
guaranteed
income,
I'm
pretty
supportive
of
that
pilot
and
getting
information
on
it
and
it's
nice
to
see
elizabeth
crowe
you're,
not
here
often
enough
so
hi
and
thanks
for
being
here,
especially
and
I
and
I
appreciated
your
enthusiasm
and
in
the
in
coming
up
with
that
creative
concept
and
all
the
the
background
work
that's
gone
into
it.
Oh
good
questions.
Are
these
all
the
questions
or
is
this
like.
Y
Y
This
has
been,
I
think,
a
little
bit
of
a
funky
situation
for
staff
crossing
over
two
councils
with
these
three
different
phases
of
the
money
allocation-
and
I
think
you
all
have
done
a
good
job
of
cobbling
together
a
reasonable
proposal
that
that
you
know
meets
what
what
you
were
told
under
a
previous
council's
guidelines
as
well
as
trying
to,
I
think,
be
responsive
to
some
some
newer
directions
and
and-
and
I
I'm
trying
to
be
cautious-
to
not
relitigate
sort
of
the
the
sort
of
the
feedback
that
we
gave
you
back
in
september
and
previously
as
an
example.
Y
Looking
at
you
know
the
amount
of
money
that
we're
going
to
put
into
some
homelessness
help.
You
know
when
we
were
looking
at
that
day.
Shelter
was
not
on
the
table
and
not
approved
by
council.
Y
So
I
don't
consider
this
to
be
sort
of
the
end-all
repository
for
where
our
values
are
going
to
be
reflected
in
how
we
spend
money
and
so
appreciate
that
this
is
is
one
chunk
of
money
and
it's
a
goodly
chunk
of
money,
but
it's
not
all
and-
and
we
don't
have
to
sort
of
try
and
accomplish
all
of
our
goals
through
this
through
this
series
of
expenditures.
Y
So
now
I'm
going
to
look
at
the
questions
and
see
if,
if
we've
or
if
I've
given
feedback,
yes
generally
support,
the
initiatives
would
like
to
see
a
special
adjustment
to
base
in
march
to
appropriate
funds.
To
said
initiatives,
great
and
number
two
is:
does
council
support
the
approach
in
developing
french
three
yeah
and
I'm
with
nicole,
like
I,
I
don't
know
that
I
can
that
I
really
have
the
the
expertise
or
information
yet
to
really
say
which
we
should
emphasize
so
it
seems
like
we
were.
Y
What
are
you
asking
like
of
the
15
million
that
needs
to
be
shrunk
down
to
11
million?
Do
you
want
us
to
give
you
some
direction
on
on
where
to
cut
and
shave?
Is
that
the.
AC
Yeah-
and
I
think
generally
is
fine-
I
mean
there
has
been
comments
already
about
child
care.
Mental
health
is
being
you
know,
certain
areas
that
if
we
can
do
that
even
sooner
than
trans3,
that's
great.
I
mean
that
it's
just
helpful
to
to
know
with
this
council
understanding
those
priorities
will
help
us
prioritize
our
time.
Y
All
right
so,
and-
and
do
you
need
that
tonight
or
will
there
be
another
check
in
where
we
can
give
you
some
more
feedback
on
on
that
specific
bucket
and
where
we.
AC
Yeah
well
we'll
be
right
back
with
with
an
adjustment
for
the
tranche
too
that's
another
opportunity,
and-
and
we
will
have
to
schedule
additional
time
with
this
council.
Y
So
maybe
when,
when
you
come
back
to
us
with
the
adjustment
to
base,
it
would
be
helpful
to
to
see
that
list
again
and
have
had
some
more
time
in
light
of
this
conversation
to
reflect
on
on
those
areas
and
receive
feedback
from
the
community
on
on
where
we
might
look
at
prioritizing.
So
if
you
could,
if
it's
possible,
I
don't
know,
may
or
brockett
if
that's
acceptable,
request
or
not,
but
just
to
have
that
tweet
up
again.
As
part
of
that
discussion,
I
think
might
be
helpful
thanks.
AB
Thank
you.
So
I'm
gonna
echo
what
a
lot
of
people
have
said.
I
really
appreciate
the
balance
between
sort
of
well.
I
don't
know
that
people
have
said
this
exactly.
AB
I
want
to
agree
with
nicole
and
matt
about
sort
of
how
urgent
this
is
and
the
more
we
can
partner
with
groups
in
our
community
that
are
already
doing
this
work
and
already
have
sort
of
the
network
set
up
to
kind
of
help
get
these
funds
out
to
people.
I
think
we
should
do
that,
but
in
general
I
really
support
this.
I
think
you
know
the
arts
funding
the
guaranteed
income
day
care.
AB
I
really
appreciate
how
all
of
those
things
while
they
might
not
directly
support
businesses.
One
of
the
things
I've
seen
in
our
community
downtown
is
that
you
know
during
the
work
week,
town
kind
of
empties
out
but
on
the
weekends
downtown
is
pretty
packed
and
so
to
me
that
says,
like
our
tourism
is
actually
doing
fairly
well,
but
we're
not.
We
need
more
than
that
to
support
our
local
businesses.
AB
We
need
the
people
who
work
here
who
are
here
every
day
to
also
have
sort
of
the
income
and
the
means
to
go
out
to
our
restaurants,
and
to
do
all
of
that.
So
I
think
that
and
and
the
draw
of
the
of
innovative
arts,
and
all
of
that,
I
think,
will
help
support
our
community
in
a
really
holistic
way,
and
I
appreciate
that
you
guys
have
you
know,
done
some
research
to
try
and
figure
out
some
innovative
solutions.
There.
AB
I
also
really
appreciated
what
rachel
just
said,
I
think,
prior
to
being
able
to
really
pick.
You
know
what
I
think
is
the
most
important
from
these
things.
I
would
need
a
little
bit
more
information,
but
generally
both
the
tranche2
and
the
trench.
Three
recommendations
seem
like
really
good
directions
for
our
community.
B
Thanks
tara
and
then
rachel
and
also
jenny.
If
you
want
to
jump
in
here,
please
feel
free.
J
T
J
J
Where
has
it
worked,
and
then
I
google
search
where
has
it
not
worked?
And
one
thing
I
don't
want
to
do
is
to
be
the
one
to
find
my
own
information,
because
it's
really
not
my
strong
point.
So
I
am
looking
forward
to
hearing
more
about
what
you
have
to
say
about
that.
I
just
don't
feel
that
I
know
enough
about
the
pros
the
cons
and,
like
others
said,
can
we
do
it
faster?
J
That
would
be
more
helpful
and
then
also
is
it
worth
the
money
for
the
250
000
when
we
have
so
many
other
needs
and
whether
or
not
this
is
the
time
to
look
into
that,
although
I
so
appreciate
all
you've
done
and
how
excited
you
are
about
it,
your
excitement
is,
in
fact
infectious.
So
I
thank
you
for
that,
and
I
also
wanted
to
say
that
I
thank
every
single
person
on
staff.
I
really
do
I
didn't.
J
H
Thank
you,
aaron
you're,
so
kind.
Well,
I've
seen
a
lot
of
this
presentation
before
as
part
of
the
financial
strategy
committee,
and
I
just
think
staff
really
put
a
lot
of
thoughts
to
this
and
they've
done.
An
amazing
work
work
to
really
actually
bring
forward
issues
that
this
council
would
support
the
progressive
ideas
and
I
fully
support
them.
So
my
answer
to
question:
one
is
yes.
H
H
It
is
still
a
lot
of
money,
but
it
seems
it's
a
it's
a
good
idea
so
because
of
that,
I
I
support
it,
but
I
understand
that
250
000
could
have
been
put
into
other
things,
but
this
is
one
thing
staff
has
identified
and
they
want
to
do
it.
I
think
it's
really
good
to
think
about
people
who
are
struggling
right
now
and
to
help
them
with
giving
them
some
extra
funding
to
help
them.
I
think
that's
a
good
idea.
H
I
support
the
annexation
of
san
lazaro,
but,
with
the
caveat
I
would
want
to
know
from
some
kind
of
guarantee
that
once
we
annex
this
property
into
the
city
that
the
owner
is
not
gonna
turn
around
and
hike
rent
on
the
people
and
in
colorado
we
don't
have
rent
control.
So
what
does
that
really
mean
once
we
annexed
and
we
give
we
give
them
all
the
utility
services?
H
You
know
what
guarantee
do
we
have
as
a
council
to
still
protect
people
and
ensure
that
now
the
ranking
the
rent
is
so
high?
They
cannot
pay
it
thanks
to
council
members
because
hey
we,
we
somehow
contribute
to
that.
I
I
think
again,
that's
something
that
we
really
have
to
think
through.
H
This
council
support
the
approach
in
the
developing
potential
trends.
Three
recommendations
I
support
them.
I
just
think
staff
is
doing
a
great
job
at
bringing
again
ideas
that
will
really
help
the
community.
So
I'm
I'm
grateful
and
thankful
for
all
the
discussion
tonight
and
I've
been
quiet.
Yes,
but
I
just
think
my
fellow
council
members
did
a
great
job
at
really
teeing
up
the
questions
and
asking
all
the
right
questions.
So
thank
you.
B
Thanks
for
that,
jenny,
so,
okay,
so
what
what?
What
I've
heard
mark
and
staff
is
that
I
think
generally
people
are
supportive
of
the
direction
you're
going
in,
but
with
all
kinds
of
detailed
comments
added
on
top
of
it.
So
I
know
that
was
a
lot.
I
wanted
to
see
if
you
needed
any
clarification
from
us
or
if
you
feel
like
you're
kind
of
able
to
get
a
sense
of
where
counselors
were
feeling
in
different
areas.
W
So
I'll
jump
in
and
start,
and
certainly
if
they're
staff
who
really
want
something
more
appointed,
certainly
invite
them
to
to
ask.
But
I'll
say
this,
that
the
conversation
has
been
really
illuminating
and
helpful.
So
I
appreciate
the
thoughtfulness
that
council
has
given
us
conversation
now.
I
think
others
have
noted
when
we
started
this
initial
work.
W
Perhaps
there
was
more
of
a
direction
to
focus
on
people
specifically
and
use
our
racial
equity
lens
in
that
way,
and
I'll
also
say
that
this
does
this
conversation
does
not
necessarily
divert
from
that,
but
we
do
have
announced
that
a
new
council
body,
so
it
is
really
great
to
get
the
feedback
from
you
as
we
move
forward.
I'll
just
say,
staff
really
did
in
situations
like
this.
When
there
is
money
to
be
had
transformational
money,
but
not
unlimited
money,
right
staff
really
tried
to
balance
the
things
on.
W
How
do
we
support
people
in
our
industries
right,
particularly
our
small
business
interest
industry,
and
we
have
some
monies
go
to
that
in
trench
one,
but
really
try
to
support
existing
efforts,
while
also
trying
to
figure
out?
How
are
we
coming
out
of
this
post
pandemic
right
because
the
economy
is
shifting
and
people
are
shifting
and
the
needs
of
individuals
have
shifted,
as
we
have
heard
back
from
our
community
connectors
and
some
of
our
community
organizations?
W
W
It
will
take
us
more
than
march
15th
to
come
back
to
you
in
a
thoughtful
way,
and
so
we're
going
to
go
back
and
look
at
calendaring
and
make
sure
that
we
can
bring
back
additional
recommendations
as
we
move
forward
on
the
variety
of
things
that
we
have
heard.
As
as
we
move
in
that
direction
mark
I
I
want
to
make
sure
you
get
a
chance
to
make
sure
that
you
know
what's
happening
and
kurt.
I
just
saw
your
hand,
go
up.
AE
Thank
you,
and
I
I
also
want
to
echo
maria.
This
was
great
feedback.
I
I
certainly
appreciated
it
in
in
listening
to
council.
I
I
had
five
points
that
I
wanted
to
make.
I
think
the
the
first
point
is
is
last
fall.
There
was
a
lot
of
listening,
we
did
to
the
from
the
community
and
we
really
reached
out
to
community
members,
particularly
those
who
were
most
impacted
by
by
covet
and
that's
where
these
things
came
from.
AE
I
think,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
it
feels
like
we're
moving
really
fast
and
we're
trying
to
implement
things
that
can
be
impactful
as
as
soon
as
as
soon
as
possible.
AE
As
far
as
the
the
guaranteed
income
proposal
that's
been
put
forward,
I
was
chatting
with
elizabeth
over
the
last
few
minutes
and
I
I
think
we
we
could
potentially
put
a
a
study
session
together
in
the
next.
You
know
three
or
four
months,
depending
on,
of
course,
I
always
say
this
staff
capacity
and
and
then
as
well
as
how
we
could
schedule
it
in.
AE
But
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
done
on
this
and
I
think
what
elizabeth
was
the
direction
she
was
going
is
we
need
to
really
engage
further
with
the
community
to
look
at
how
this
would
work
specifically
for
the
for
the
city
of
boulder,
but
the
organizations
that
I
think
mark
listed.
He
he
listed
effa
the
the
community
foundation.
AE
I
think
the
community
connectors
in
other
organizations.
Those
are
all
the
organizations
that
actually
motivated
us
and
pushed
us
for
this
guaranteed
income
initiative
and
also
responding
to
mark's
comment
about
climate
change,
and
I
don't
disagree
with
that
at
all.
The
one
small
component
I
could
raise
the
flag
on
is
the
second
mortgages.
AE
Those
are
individuals
that
are
living
in
homes
with
that
have
insulation,
values
of
like
r4
and
5,
and
their
walls
they're
gonna
be
moving
into
like
net
zero
homes.
I
think
that's
significant
and
I'm
quite
proud
of
that.
The
the
child
care
services,
some
of
those
things,
are
already
being
supported
in
the
in
the
trench.
AE
One
funding
and
those
funds
are
already
going
out
and
I
really
appreciated
how
council
talked
about
the
the
interface
with
the
with
the
economy
related
to
that
as
well,
and
how
that
impacts,
workers
and,
as
far
as
san
lazaro,
really
appreciated
junie's
comments.
AE
I
totally
agree
with
that,
as
as
we
go
through
the
process
around
their
annexation,
we're
really
going
to
want
to
figure
out
how
we
get
community
benefit
out
of
that
and
and
more
so
than
just
you
know,
clean
water.
It
needs
to
really
have
a
financial
impact
on
on
the
residents
that
are
there.
AE
We
did
a
similar
project
to
this
with
the
mapleton
mobile
home
community
several
years
ago,
and
the
outcome
of
that
was
a
lot
of
permanently
affordable
lots,
which
has
had
a
huge
impact
for
many
years
now,
and
I'd
want
to
go
in
a
similar
direction
to
that,
and
then
the
last
thing
I'll
say
about
elizabeth.
AE
She
works
with
60
different
organizations
in
the
city
of
boulder,
so,
while
you
may
not
know
or
a
lot
of
other
folks
do
and
those
are
the
people
that
we've
been
listening
to
in
a
big
way
for
these
proposals-
and
I
I
think
very
highly
ever
as
well,
so
thank
you.
AC
AC
Just
because
the
way
the
calendar
has
worked
with
some
adjustments
that
that
special
adjustment
we're
putting
together
that
package
now
that
would
be
due
for
us
on
thursday.
So
what
we're
talking
about
is
potentially
just
moving
that
back
two
weeks:
keeping
the
public
hearing
on
march
15th
moving
the
second
reading
two
weeks
after
that.
AC
If
that
we
can
bring
that
up
at
cic
on
tuesday
if
that
works
and
just
buy
us
a
little
bit
of
time
to
make
sure
that
the
tranche
to
spending
amount
matches
this
conversation,
but
really
appreciative
of
council's
comments
this
evening
and
we'll
do
our
best
to
refine
these
proposals
going
forward.
B
I'm
sure
a
slight
delay
is
worth
it
to
to
get
it
right.
So
no,
no
problem
there
at
all
and
we'll
talk
about
the
details
at
cac
and
then
nicole.
You've
got
your
hand
up.
I
Yes,
I
just
had
one
really
quick
thing
which
is
to
ask
if,
if
it's
possible,
because
there
there
may
be
things
that
don't
need
as
much
discussion
as
others
and
just
you
know,
given
the
urgency
that
I
think
many
of
us
are
feeling
if
there
are
things
that
could
be
kind
of
pulled
out
and
approved
sooner
rather
than
later.
I
elise
would
be
open
to
that.
I
I
don't
know
you
know
can't
speak
for
others,
of
course,
but
just
given
the
urgency
we
talked
about,
I
wanted
to
pose
that
as
something
if
it
doesn't
make
your
jobs
staff
harder.
AC
We
certainly
can
look
at
that.
We
do
have
the
public
health
reserve
appropriated
so
I'll
check
with
staff
and
see
if
there's
anywhere,
that
we
essentially
have
funding
ready
to
go
out
the
door
or
an
initiative
ready
to
be
funded
before
that
appropriation
happens
and
we
might
be
able
to
tap
into
existing
appropriation
to
do
so.
I
B
Good
all
right
any
last
words
on
this,
or
should
we
move
on
all
right,
very
good,
so
I
would
say
the
way
that
we
move
on
is
to
have
a
break.
I
could
use
a
leg
stretch,
so
how
about
we
go
for?
Should
we
go
for
six
minutes,
9,
45
and
nicole?
You
get
an
extra
long
break
because
you're
recused
from
the
next
one.
So
I'll
text
you
once
we
finish
the
next
item.
A
A
A
A
J
J
Let's
see
any
idea
we're
taking
votes
when
we
think
this
is
gonna
end
by
or
should
I
not
say
that
what
was
our
over
under
on
this
one.
K
B
The
problem
with
betting
on
what
time
the
meeting
ends
is
that
we
all
have
an
influence
on
it
right,
so
you
can
go
late.
You
can
just
grandstand
and
talk
for
half
an
hour.
J
X
AA
AE
B
B
All
right,
let's
see,
I
think,
we're
just
missing
juni
juni.
Let
us
know
if
you're,
if
you're
back.
B
There
she
is
okay,
because
nicole
is
recused
from
this
next
item,
so
at
least
maybe
you
can
take
it
away.
I'm
going
to
turn
my
camera
up
for
a
minute
because
I'm
just
eating
something
get
us
started.
Please.
C
AA
Great
so
good
evening,
council
members,
I
do
have
just
a
brief,
a
small
power
point
to
help
guide
us
through
this
conversation
and
looking
for
direction
from
you
this
evening.
We
can't
take
a
final
action
in
under
matters,
but
what
I
can
do
is
get
some
direction
from
you
for
something
to
put
on
the
consent
agenda
in
the
future,
so
we're
talking
about
the
referendum
of
ordinance
8483,
which
involves
the
cu
south
annexation
next
slide.
AA
Please
you'll
recall
that
on
september,
21st
2021
council
adopted
ordinance,
8430
or
8483
by
emergency
and
that
effectuated
the
cu
self
annexation.
AA
Shortly
thereafter,
a
referendum
petition
was
submitted
by
the
people
and
that
was
received
by
the
city.
In
october,
council
accepted
the
city
clerk's
certification
of
sufficiency
on
november
16th
of
2021,
and
so
I
did
go
back
and
watch
that
meeting.
What
wasn't
clear
to
me
was
direction
given
as
to
next
steps.
So
I
thought,
let's,
let's
get
some
clarity
on
that
next
slide,
please,
and
so
what
what
I'm
asking
for
you
from
you
tonight
is
to
give
direction
with
respect
to
one
of
three
mutually
exclusive
options.
AA
You
can
either
repeal
ordinance
8483
or
you
can
submit
the
referendum
to
a
special
election,
and
then
there
are
some
time
frames
around
that
if
you're
interested
in
exploring
that
or
the
third
alternative
would
be
to
place
a
referendum
on
the
ballot
in
november
of
2022.
So
that
would
be
our
regular
election
ballot.
B
Great
thanks
can
I
do
you
all
mind
if
I
frame
the
discussion
here,
I'd
just
like
to
see
if
we
can
eliminate
options
so,
first
of
all,
I'm
going
to
ask:
would
anyone
like
to
speak
up
in
favor
of
repealing
the
annexation
arguments
and
mark?
I
see
you've
got
your
hand
up,
but
I
think
you
had
it
on
before.
Okay,
so
I'm
not
seeing
anybody
interested
in
speaking
up
for
that
option.
B
AA
So
we
have
done
historical
research
on
that,
but
not
any
current
research.
It's
a
pretty
significant
amount
of
staff
time
to
figure
that
out.
So
it's
a
pretty
big
window,
but
we
estimate
somewhere
between
75
and
150
000.
B
Great
question
mark,
given
that
would
anyone
like
to
advocate
for
a
special
election.
B
I'm
seeing
no
hands
so
then
that
seems
to
leave
us
with
a
november
2022
election.
Is
that
generally,
the
will
of
council
that
we
would
want
to
put
it
on
the
ballot
for
november
of
2022,
I'm
seeing
lots
of
heads
up
and
thumb
nodding
and
whatever
you
call
it
so
trace?
Is
that
good
enough
direction
that
we
could
then
put
something
together
for
formal
approval
at
a
future
meeting.
AA
Y
One
question
about
when
it
comes
back
to
us
in
august
is
that
okay,
please?
So
there
was
some
commentary
tonight
at
open
comment
about
the
the
presentation,
the
language
of
the
ballot
title
and-
and
I
think
some
some
blame
was
placed
on
a
previous
city
attorney,
and
so
I'm
just
wondering.
Y
I
thought
that,
like
people
who
put
together
ballot
measures
put
together,
the
title
is
that
how
it
comes
sorry
about
the
cat.
She's
very
angry,
so
just
wanted
to
get
clarification
on
on
how
that
title
will
be
chosen
and
maybe
clarification
on
how
the
last
title
was
chosen
as
well.
AA
I'm
afraid
I
don't
know
specifically
what
what
the
color
was,
which
which
item
they
were
referring
to
or
any
of
the
history
of
that.
What
I
can
tell
you
is
with
the
citizen
initiated
referendum.
We
are,
we
are
pretty
well
bound
by
the
language
that
they
put
in
that
petition.
AA
We
could
make
slight
corrections
for
clarity,
but
really
the
language
that
they
put
forward
is
is
what
goes
on
the
ballot.
C
Of
course,
thank
you,
sir.
We
have.
Our
next
item
is
item
eight
for
tonight's
agenda
matters
from
the
mayor
and
members
of
council
8a
is
the
discussion
to
clarify
the
homelessness
topic
work
plan
from
the
retreat.
Y
So
at
the
retreat
we
had
agreed
to
a
homelessness,
related
work
plan
item
and
it
was,
I
can't
remember,
the
exact
language
that
we
voted
on,
but
there
was
a
some
conversation
on
friday
night
and
then
it
was
sort
of
language
was,
was
condensed
and
clarified
for
us
to
vote
on
saturday
and
in
conversations
subsequent
to
the
retreat.
Y
It
became
clear
to
me
that
amongst
council
members,
we
had
different
understandings
of
what
we
had
sort
of
greenlit
for
the
work
plan.
So
I
thought
it
would
be
helpful
to
clarify
what
what
staff
heard
and
what
we
all
understood
so
that
we
are
teeing
up
staff
and
the
community
for
success.
Y
W
Sure
I'll
attempt
to
do
that
and
then
ask
kurt
if
I've
gotten
anything
wrong
in
his
understanding.
We
actually
have
a
slide
from
what
was
the
language
that
was
approved,
and
I
wonder
if
staff
could
bring
that
up
as
I'm
talking
about
it,
and
my
recollection
of
that
to
your
point,
rachel
is
that
the
question
was
really
about
the
hiring
of
a
facilitator
and
what
that
convening
would
entail.
W
W
I
think,
as
we
came
out
of
it,
there
was
some
understanding
that
the
data
that
it
was
just
about
convening
and
having
a
facilitator
and
convening
stakeholders
to
provide
recommendations
on
what
a
day
shelter
could
look
like
and
what
services
and
programs
could
be
there
versus.
Maybe
that
is
the
first
part
of
it,
but
that
we
would
also
be
employing
that
facilitator
and
those
stakeholder
conversations
to
think
of
what
other,
perhaps
services
or
programs
or
gaps
for
our
unsheltered,
specifically
unsheltered
community,
could
exist.
So
I
think
that's
where
we
left
off
kurt.
W
AE
The
the
only
thing
that
I
would
add
is
there
was
there
was
some
conversation
in
the
retreat
about
a
facilitator
that
could
also
have
more
broader
communications,
with
the
with
the
community
around
homelessness
as
far
as
sort
of
the
direction
that
they
would
like
to
go,
or
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
you
know
disagreement
within
the
community
and
I
think
there
would
they
would
benefit
from
constructive
conversations,
and
I
think
I
heard
some
of
that
at
the
retreat
and
a
facilitator
may
be
able
to
assist
with
that.
AE
If
we're
going
to
do
something
like
this,
I
would
hope
that
it
would
move
much
quicker
than
that,
and
I
think
that
we
would
be
able
to
work
pretty
effectively
and
getting
feedback
from
communities
and
particularly
service
providers
on
the
type
of
services.
That
would
be
helpful,
but
I
think
hearing
from
council
tonight
about
their
ideas
would
be
would
be
very
helpful.
W
And
if
I
may,
just
before,
we
do
that,
I
posit
that
for
staff,
if
we're
moving,
which
we
are
to
hire
a
facilitator
and
think
about
that
it.
We
would
benefit
greatly
from
that
alignment
and
the
hearing
in
the
broader
spectrum,
while
wanting
to
prioritize
the
day,
shelter
but
hear
from
us
at
least-
and
I
think
I'm
echoing
a
little
bit
of
conversations
with
kurt
is-
is
that
it
really
would
be
useful
for
us
to
have
that
facilitator.
AH
A
Y
Yeah
that
I
support
that,
I
guess
I
would
just
say
so.
I
don't
know
what
what
all
we
need
to
say.
I
also
want
to
appreciate
kurt's
point
that
it
would
be
hopefully
less
and
significantly
less
than
two
years
of
a
timeline,
so
I
didn't
want
the
impression
to
be
that
that
it
was
a
two-year.
Y
You
know
just
investigation
and
I
guess
the
other
it.
It
said
in
the
the
language
that
you
put
on
the
slide
that
part
of
the
goal
was
to
purchase,
or
you
know,
to
have
a
building
a
separate
building.
Y
So
I
think
there
was
some
confusion
from
what
I
was
hearing
among
us
about
whether
an
an
existing
you
know,
service
provider
might
be
called
upon
to
host
day
shelter,
but
it
sounds
like
part
of
what
we
teed
up
is
specific
to
a
building
and-
and
I
guess
the
other
piece
of
it
that
there
was
maybe
some
confusion
on
is-
is
that
building
some
would
part
of
the
discussions,
be
whether
the
building
itself
could
be
used
for
things
beyond
a
shelter.
B
Great
I've
got
matt
and
nicole
and
I'll
chime
in
here
afterwards.
X
I
appreciate
what
you're
saying
in
terms
of
being
open,
that
the
facilitator
would
sort
of
be
able
to
handle
a
broader
swath
of
conversations,
because
I
think
some
of
the
larger
aspects
outside
of
that
perhaps
specificity
around
the
day,
shelter
impact
day,
shelter,
overflow
and
thus
supported
services,
and
so
I
think,
there's
obvious
synergy
there,
and
I
appreciate
you
seeing
that
so
so
I
support
those
efforts.
It
sort
of
makes
me
feel
better
about
some
of
that.
X
That
was
left
hanging
at
the
retreat
that
this
could
be
wrapped
into
this
conversation
with
this
group
and
and
hopefully
that
the
timing
of
this
being
done
in
a
year
is
helpful.
So
you
know
I,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
adjustments,
kurt
as
we
all
are
working
through
this.
It's
always
hitting
a
moving
target
here
and
so
having
more
people
that
can
stay,
attuned
and
help
us
adjust
is
all
the
merrier.
So
I
appreciate
the
common
openness
for
that.
I
think
we're
gonna
be
better
off
because
of
it.
B
I
Yeah,
I
think
the
one
thing
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we're
all
really
aligned
on
is
kind
of
those
two-year
timeline
and
what
exactly?
That
means
for
me
kind
of
the
key
word
and
there
was
not
just
planning
but
implementation.
I
So
you
know
that
when
we
get
to
two
years
right,
we
have
a
building.
We
have
programs
ready
to
go
into
it
right.
It's
not
like
we're
kind
of
talking
kind
of
like
rachel
said
for
two
years,
and
then
you
know
we.
I
We
start
at
that
point
right
which,
which
is
why,
for
me,
this
two-year
process
seemed
very
ambitious
but
hopefully
potentially
doable,
and
then
you
know,
I
absolutely
support
the
idea
of
kind
of
this
group,
the
facilitator
being
open
to
helping
the
community
come
together
and
get
aligned
on
on
some
of
these
other
steps,
and
I
think
that
we're
clear
on
this,
but
just
sort
of
with
the
focus
being
this
day,
shelter
just
because
it
seems
like
a
really
timely
time
to
have
that
that
we're
working
toward
for
a
number
of
reasons
that
we
talked
about
at
the
retreat.
I
But
you
know
certainly
not
to
say
that
we
can
only
talk
about
navigation
services
and
this
facility
during
the
course
of
these
conversations,
because
I
think
there
are
other
things
that
are
likely
to
come
up
like
we
talked
about
the
retreat.
You
know
the
idea
of
using
we
could
find
a
building
that
had
a
parking
lot
could
be
used
for
safe
parking,
for
example,
or
you
know
a
building
that
we
could
renovate
to
meet
the
standards
for
overnight
sheltering
should
that
be
necessary,
like
some
of
those
other
things.
I
So
for
me
it
was
it
it's
not
sort
of
limiting
the
conversation,
but
more
focusing
the
conversation
on
navigation
on
having
a
navigation
center
up
and
operational
in
two
years.
B
Instant
call
call
myself
and
bob,
and
just
all
agree
with
with
what's
been
said
and
like
what
nicole
just
said
that
I
think
you
know
there's
a
clear
desire
to
create
a
navigation
center.
You
know
day
shelter
and
focus
on
that,
but
not
to
the
exclusion
of
saying
well.
If
we
have
a
great
facility,
you
know
whether
some
other
potential
services
we
could
offer
to
the
community.
So
just
I
look
forward
to
that
facilitated
conversation,
so
we
we
can
talk
those
things
through
and
and
then
move
forward
into
planning
and
implementation.
B
D
Yeah,
I
think
I'm
I'm
going
to
agree
with
nicole
and
aaron
just
now.
I
think
that
I
think
the
the
the
prize
here
really
is
a
day
center
a
day
a
day
center
and
navigation
services
that
would
be
provided.
D
D
It
undoubtedly
will
will
spill
into
other
service
discussions.
I
don't
doubt
that,
but
I,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
we
don't
throw
that
away.
There's.
I
think,
there's
an
opportunity
here
to
really
focus
on
on
a
day
center
and
a
day,
shelter
and-
and
other
discussions
may
happen
and
that's
perfectly
fine.
They
will
invariably
happen,
but
let's
not,
let's
not
start,
throwing
a
whole
lot
of
things
on
the
discussion
and
lose
sight
of
of
the
day
shelter.
D
The
second
thing
is:
it's
just
a
small
pedantic
point.
There
was
a
parenthetical.
I
appreciate
neri
calling
up
the
exact
language
we
underdone.
There
was
a
parenthetical
that
kind
of
listed
some
of
the
things
that
might
happen
when
I
voted
in
favor
this,
and
this
was
a
unanimous
vote
at
the
retreat.
All
nine
of
us
supported
this.
I
saw
those
as
more
exemplary
than
than
prescriptive.
So,
for
example,
one
of
them
says
buy
a
building.
Well,
we
may
not
buy
a
building.
We
may
rent
a
building.
D
There
may
be
a
facility
out
there,
that's
appropriate
for
us,
and
so
I
wouldn't
want
to
wouldn't
want
staff
to
take
that
away
as
a
you
must
buy
a
building.
I
think
that's
an
example
of
of
the
type
of
thing
that
we
might
do,
but
we
might
find
other
facilities
that
don't
involve
city
purchasing
real
estate.
So
I
just
want
to
be
clear
on
on
that
point
that
those
were
examples
of
things
that
would
happen
in
this
effort
to
setting
up
a
a
day,
shelter.
J
I
think
focusing
the
most
on
a
day,
shelter.
I
agree
with
you
that
other
things
might
come
up,
but
to
me
the
most
important
thing
is
the
success
of
the
day,
shelter,
and
it's
not
that
easy
to
have
success
in
a
new
thing.
Right
I
mean
me
and
lauren
are
trying
to
do
that
with
the
boards
and
commissions
you
know
so
to
ensure
success.
J
I
feel
like
if
we
focus
on
it
and
give
it
the
time
that
it
needs
in
two
years
is
really
not
a
lot
of
time
to
work
on
a
new
business
or
a
day,
shelter
or
anything.
I
that's
why
I
kind
of
want
to
focus
on
that,
because
I
feel
like
the
success
of
that,
will
help
the
community
stay
with
us.
B
Thanks
for
that
tara,
well,
I'm
hearing
general
agreement
from
council.
As
far
as
I
can
tell
so
kurt
does.
Does
it
sound
like
you're,
getting
some
clarity
on
how
to
move
forward.
AE
I
think
we
want
it'd
be
nice
to
get
sort
of
alignment
on
the
goals
of
of
such
a
center
as
well,
and
so
we
know
that
we're
we're
we're
working
towards
a
common
goal
in
in
developing
this
approach,
and-
and
so
we
know
it-
we
can
also
measure
what
success
looks
like
with
that.
B
Okay,
well,
I
think
that
takes
care
of
that
alicia
do
we
have
and
well.
Let
me
just
thank
rachel
for
asking
for
that
clarification,
because
I
think
this
was
really
helpful.
I
think
there
was
not
clarity
right
afterwards
and
I
think
we're
in
a
better
place
now.
So
thanks
for
the
suggestion
alicia,
what
else
we
got.
B
I
have
10
or
15.
all
right.
It's
very
close
all
right!
Well,
thanks
everybody
for
a
good
meeting.
The
arpa
discussion
was
a
full
one
that
that's
it's
a
big
deal.
It
deserves
some
time
and
I
appreciate
all
of
your
thoughtful
comments
tonight
and
have
a
good
night
and
I'll
gavel.
This
meeting
close
at
10
07
pm.