►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 6-22-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
All
right
and
we
have
vaccinations
for
local
information
on
getting
your
vaccine
and
to
sign
up
for
notifications.
You
can
go
to
boco.org
forward.
Slash
covet
vaccine
notify
sign
up
second
slide
on
boards
and
commissions.
B
So
the
city
is
accepting.
B
Applications
for
several
boards
and
commissions,
the
boulder
junction
access
district
parking
and
boulder
junction
access,
district
travel,
demand
management
and
beverage
licensing
authority.
So,
if
you're
interested
in
applying,
please
visit
the
boards
and
commissions
webpage
at
boulder
colorado.gov
forward,
slash
boards,
hyphen
commissions
and
be
heard
boulder
third
slide.
B
B
It's
a
great
way
for
individuals
to
provide
input
on
their
own
time
in
a
safe
anonymous
space.
If
you
would
prefer
to
provide
your
feedback
verbally
or
participate
in
a
conversation
with
city
staff.
Other
community
members,
please
sign
up
for
an
upcoming
online
forum.
You
can
access
the
sign
up
sheets
and
available
dates
on
the
same
be
heard.
Folder
page.
B
So
before
we
launch
into
our
official
business
tonight,
we'd
like
to
reflect
on
the
sad
news
that
another
shooting
has
claimed
lives,
including
that
of
a
police
officer,
the
shooting
yesterday
in
our
neighboring
city
of
arvada,
brings
up
grief.
That
remains
all
too
raw
for
many
of
us
as
we
continue
the
process
of
healing
from
the
march
22nd
shooting
in
our
own
community.
B
B
B
B
B
We
have
a
terrific
community
resource
available
called
the
boulder
strong
resource
center.
It
offers
counselors
and
other
free
support
services
for
anyone
who
may
be
struggling,
a
more
complete
list
of
mental
health
services
for
boulder
residents
is
available
at
boulder
colorado.gov
forward
slash
mental
health.
B
B
Thank
you
all.
So
we
can
move
on
to
our
business.
C
Just
coming
off
of
you,
thank
you.
Thank
you
mary
and
thanks
for
those
words.
We
as
staff
have
also
reached
out
and
send
our
prayers
to
our
community
in
arvada,
as
chief
harold
prepares
to
tell
us
about
the
data
innovation
happening
in
the
police
department.
Today,
I
sort
of
wanted
to
take
a
moment
if
you
would
to
remind
people
of
the
broader
context
of
all
this
great
ongoing
work,
which
is
part
of
the
integration
with
reimagining
policing.
C
We've
gotten
several
questions
about
the
strategic
action
plan
versus
the
reimagining
master
plan,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
convey
that
they
are
not
separate
efforts.
They
are
integrated
processes
that
ensure
the
department
can
keep
moving
forward
with
reform,
while
working
with
the
community
to
clarify
a
local
public
safety
vision
for
the
long
term.
C
This
window
has
been
open
for
two
weeks,
but
so
far,
we've
gotten
and
so
far,
we've
gotten
really
good
response
in
be
heard
boulder
with
over
a
hundred
responses,
but
we've
also
have
special
outreach
happenings
through
our
latinx
leadership
team,
black
and
american
leadership
team
and
people
with
lived
experience
and
homelessness.
D
Thank
you
noria
good
evening
council.
My
name
is
maris,
harold,
I'm,
the
police
chief
of
boulder
mary
I'd
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
thank
you
and
counsel
for
those
kind
and
thoughtful
words.
D
D
So
I
committed
to
you
almost
a
year
ago
that
I
would
give
you
full
commitment
on
police
reform
and
part
of
that
police
reform
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
tonight
is
my
passion
in
policing,
and
that
is
understanding
crime
strategies,
how
we
are
using
data
and
problem
solving
to
reduce
community
harm
by
embracing
a
crime,
science
approach,
which
is
the
most
overlooked
aspect
of
any
police
reform
movement,
and
I
would
think
that
many
criminologists
across
the
country
would
agree
that
crime,
science
and
crime
strategy
is
the
most
important
part
of
police
reform.
D
So
later
in
the
presentation,
we
will
have
two
presenters
provide
a
live
demonstration
of
our
community
dashboard
and
the
exciting
part
of
this
community
dashboard
is
we
can
build
upon.
It
is
so
we
start
going
through
our
master
plan
process.
What
is
important
to
the
community
council
other
departments?
We
can
build
upon
this
dashboard
to
add
traffic.
Stop
data
use
of
force
data
citizens,
complaint
data,
really
anything
that
we
have
becomes
transparent
and
we
all
understand
and
all
are
working
from
the
same
data
sets
so
tonight.
D
I'm
excited
I'll
have
three
presenters
with
me
tonight
that
I've
worked
with
extensively
and
very
talented
group
of
people.
The
first
is
julie
wartell.
She
is
an
internationally
recognized
researcher
works
for
the
san
diego
prosecutor's
office
and
is
a
consultant
for
the
national
institute
of
justice
and
the
bureau
of
justice
administration
administration
translating
research
into
practice.
D
He
builds
technology
platforms
for
police
to
assist
with
problem
solving
and
accountability,
and
then
we
have
our
own
katie
bridges,
who
is
a
senior
data
analyst
with
the
city
of
boulder's
innovation
and
technology
team,
and
she
has
led
the
city
with
numerous
capital,
analytic
projects
for
the
city,
so
I'm
very
excited.
I
really
believe
that
by
the
end
of
this
year,
if
we
continue
to
go
at
this
pace,
boulder
police
department
in
the
city
of
boulder
will
be
leading
and
data,
consumption
and
data,
understanding
and
crime
strategy
and
crime
science
principles.
D
So
I'm
very
excited
about
the
work.
So,
as
julie
is
presenting
tonight,
she
will
present
the
crime
trends
right
now
in
boulder.
So
crime
has
somewhat
stabilized
across
the
city
over
our
2020
numbers.
D
However,
property
crime
continues
to
be
very
problematic
and
there's
lots
of
reasons
for
that
boulder
is
experiencing
a
flood
of
methamphetamine
coming
into
boulder.
It's
very
cheap.
This
is
creating
motivated
offenders,
there's
also
economic
factors
at
play
in
boulder
right
now
and
across
the
region.
D
D
D
F
G
Julie,
if
you
press
the
view
options
button
on
the
top
of
your
screen,.
F
F
G
H
F
F
F
So
why
is
it
important
to
apply
crime
science?
Well,
overall,
crime
science
promotes
ethical,
effective
and
equitable
policing.
There
are
some
core
principles
of
crime
science.
These
are
that
prevention
is
more
effective
than
apprehension
and
for
most
effective
prevention.
This
requires
partnerships
with
a
wide
variety
of
stakeholders,
in
addition
to
members
of
the
police
department
at
all
levels
and
all
roles,
we
also
rely
on
community
members,
businesses
and
many
city
departments.
F
F
2021
and
just
sorry
one
more
note
on
that
is
that
it
might
be
hard
to
see
on
the
screen
that
the
mean
call
per
maximum
occupant
is
1.03
and
the
median
call
is
0.67,
so
those
very
large
dots
are
well
above
average.
F
So
these
charts
display
calls
for
each
fraternity
or
sorority
house
in
the
area
the
chart
on
the
left
has
places
ordered
according
to
the
raw
counts,
from
highest
to
lowest,
while
the
chart
on
the
right
orders
the
places
based
on
the
counts
standardized
by
the
maximum
occupancy,
while
some
places
may
switch
in
rank
when
the
counts
are
standardized.
The
important
thing
to
note
is
that
both
charts
depict
the
j
curve
that
we
expect
to
see.
F
F
These
patterns
hold
true
for
other
rental
housing
types.
Excuse
me,
I
yep
we're
good
here
you
see
the
j-curves
associated
with
call
concentrations
around
apartments
and
single-family
dwellings,
although
not
displayed
the
standardized
counts,
hold
the
same
pattern
for
both
apartments
and
single-family
dwellings.
20
percent
of
the
locations
account
for
more
than
fifty
percent
of
calls
across
these
housing
types.
F
The
same
is
true
for
duplexes,
triplexes
and
fourplexes.
This
type
of
analysis
is
important
because
it
shows
that
one
places
are
not
equally
problematic
and
two,
even
when
we
control
for
the
number
of
occupants.
Some
places
have
larger
concentrations
of
problems
than
others,
suggesting
a
need
for
better
property
management
at
these
locations.
F
The
next
crime
science
theory
that
I
wanted
to
talk
about
draws
attention
to
the
importance
of
place
management
and
its
routine
activity.
Theory
crime
occurs
when
three
elements
come
together.
The
motivated
offender,
which
you
heard
the
chief
talk
about
in
terms
of
the
property
and
the
drugs
a
suitable
target
and
a
facilitating
place
controllers,
can
prevent
the
crime
event.
These
controllers
are
the
handlers
or
the
guardians
or
the
managers.
F
F
F
Looking
at
calls
per
year
in
the
san
juan
community
over
the
last
five
full
years
and
through
april
of
2021,
we
see
a
big
jump
from
2017
to
2018
and
a
continued
trend
upward
through
2020.,
based
on
the
first
four
months
of
this
year.
If
we
extrapolate
it
out,
it
is
anticipated
to
go
back
to
the
2018
level.
F
F
F
Did
the
management
practices
change,
or
were
there
new
offenders
or
fewer
handlers,
the
controllers
of
the
offenders
from
the
crime
triangle,
and
was
there
an
increase
in
vulnerable
victims
or
fewer
guardians?
Again,
these
controllers,
however,
to
thoroughly
understand
the
problems
and
develop
effective
solutions.
Crime
science
suggests
that
it
is
very
important
to
be
crime
specific,
so
we
need
to
examine
different
calls
and
crime
types
separately.
F
F
F
F
The
next
theory
that
we
are
looking
into
is
crime
pattern
theory
when
we
look
at
crime
across
an
entire
city,
crime
pattern
theory
helps
to
explain
why
and
how
crime
hot
spots
develop.
Crime
pattern
theory
considers
the
journey
to
crime
and
overlapping
victim
and
offender
activity
spaces,
as
illustrated
here
showing
the
nodes
paths
and
edges.
F
There
are
multiple
ways
that
offenders
find
suitable
targets.
They
know
the
victim
personally,
they
live
or
work
with
or
near
the
victim
or
their
paths
overlap
in
boulder.
One
of
our
most
active
activity
spaces
is
our
downtown
corridor.
During
the
pandemic,
the
foot
traffic
in
downtown
was
significantly
reduced,
leaving
many
businesses
vulnerable
to
break-ins.
F
F
The
police
department
deployed
a
directed
patrol
strategy
to
begin
to
disrupt
the
downtown
burglary
patterns.
We
followed
the
copper
curve
deployment
which
says
that
10
to
16
minute
intermittent
patrols,
increase
the
visibility
and
positive
community
engagement
in
risky
activity,
spaces
officers
engaged
with
repeat
victims
and
helped
identify
and
address
environmental
facilitators.
F
You
can
see
from
the
monthly
averages
from
2018
and
2019
that
it
was
normal
for
the
downtown
corridor
to
experience
between
one
and
three
burglaries
per
month.
This
number
jumped
significantly
in
march
and
april
of
2020
when
the
emergency
health
order
was
issued
and
was
much
higher
than
normal
in
january,
into
february
of
2021.
F
F
Crime
is
more
likely
to
occur
when
crime
opportunities
are
effortless,
meaning
it
takes
little
physical
effort
to
commit
the
crime.
If
they're,
less
risky,
low
risk
of
being
detected
highly
rewarding,
quick
gratification
or
great
compensation
provoked,
people
can
be
incited
in
the
moment
or
excusable
have
justifications
for
the
harmful
behavior.
F
F
Illustrating
several
of
the
situational
crime
prevention
techniques,
the
boulder
police
have
worked
on
reducing
the
opportunity
in
three
distinct
ways:
by
situational
crime
prevention,
the
first
increasing
the
effort
and
the
risk
via
the
distribution
of
theft,
prevention
cards
on
the
high
crime
segments
so
again
focusing
on
the
problem
places
reducing
rewards
through
encouraging
bicycle
registration
and
disrupting
organized
operations
and
lastly,
by
reducing
provocations
through
a
community
awareness
campaign.
As
you
can
see
some
of
the
examples
here,
there
has
been
a
30
reduction
in
incidents
and
number
of
bikes
stolen.
Since
these
efforts
have
started.
F
F
F
F
This
slide
summarizes
what
you
will
see
in
the
next
few
slides
in
more
detail.
Offenses
against
property
have
increased
steadily
since
2019
with
year
to
date,
up
by
29
percent.
Over
the
five
year,
average
offenses
against
persons
are
down
by
13
percent
from
2020
but
stable
when
compared
to
the
five-year
average
and
lastly,
offenses
against
society
have
declined
in
the
most
recent
year,
including
33
percent
from
the
five-year
average.
F
F
F
F
F
J
Hi
thanks
julie,
my
name
is
katie
bridges.
I
am
our
senior
data
analyst.
Oh,
I
think
we
might
have
an
echo.
G
J
You're,
the
echo,
maybe
we're
good
okay,
I'm
a
senior
data
analyst
in
our
iet
department
here
at
the
city
of
boulder.
J
I'm
very
excited
to
be
here
tonight
to
talk
about
the
partnership
between
it
and
police,
on
an
open
data
set
focusing
on
crime
addressed
by
the
boulder
police
department
and
a
dashboard
that's
been
created
with
that
data.
This
data
set
and
dashboard
are
incredibly
important
in
terms
of
transparency.
J
J
I'd
like
to
quickly
note
that
open
data
is
only
one
piece
of
the
partnership
between
it
and
police.
For
example,
another
project
we're
working
to
deliver
is
our
enterprise
data
warehouse,
which
will
allow
for
cross-departmental
city-wide
analytics
and
public
safety
data
is
a
top
priority
for
the
data
warehouse.
J
Here
I
am
going
to
screen
share
a
our
open
data
portal.
J
Go
here
we
go
so
this
is
a
public
website,
the
city
of
boulder,
open
data.
So
anyone
with
internet
access
can
go
to
this
site
at
open
data.bouldercolorado.gov.
J
There
are
several
ways
to
navigate
the
site,
so
folks
can
browse
by
topic
or
a
look
at
recently
updated
data.
If
you
have
a
specific
data
set
you're
looking
for,
you
can
use
the
magnifying
glass
at
the
top
right
of
the
page
before
I
hand
it
off
to
mike
zadar
for
a
live
demo
of
the
dashboard
that
we've
created.
J
I
want
to
talk
about
the
crime
data
that
we
used
to
create
this
dashboard
and
how
folks
can
download
it
in
excel
to
view
or
do
their
own
analysis
on
this
data.
So
to
access
this
data
from
our
open
data
site,
we
can
search
for
bpd
the
boulder
police
department
and
we'll
see
all
of
the
relevant
options
and
data
sets
that
are
available
come
up
as
options
here
we
are
going
to
first
click
on
the
bpd
offenses
data
and
we're
going
to
view
that
data
table
here.
J
So
since
our
open
data
portal
is
through
arcgis,
we
do
have
spatial
data
for
crimes.
The
first
thing
you'll
see
on
this
page
is
a
map
of
where
these
offenses
have
occurred.
In
this
situation.
Here
we
want
to
download
the
underlying
data
so
in
the
top
right
corner,
we're
going
to
click
on
that
view
table
button,
so
here
you
will
be
able
to
see
all
of
the
data
that
we
have.
We
have
over
30
000
records
since
the
beginning
of
2018..
J
As
julie
noted,
there
can
be
multiple
offenses
on
a
single
report,
so
this
data
is
offense
data.
You
can
sort
this
data
by
any
column
by
clicking
on
a
column
header.
So,
for
example,
we
have
sorted
here
by
report
date
and
you
would
just
click
on
that
report
date,
column
header.
It
will
sort
first
ascending
and
then
descending.
J
You
can
also
filter
this
data
before
you
exported
it.
So,
for
example,
if
we
wanted
to
look
at
all
credit
card
or
atm
fraud
crimes
that
have
occurred
in
2021
on
the
left
side
of
the
screen,
you'll
see
this
funnel
icon.
You
can
click
on
that,
and
here
we
want
to
first
select
where
the
report
year
equals
2021..
J
The
second
selection
here
as
julie
mentioned,
is
the
neighbors
sorry
and
that's
not
popping
up
here,
but
we
could
also
filter
by
the
neighbors
definition
of
credit
card
fraud,
and
if
we
did
that
there
we
go
and
we
can
see,
we
can
search
those
neighbors
descriptions
and
search
for
credit
card
fraud
again
once
that
selection
is
made
in
this
filter
panel
on
the
left
side
of
the
page,
the
data
to
the
right
would
automatically
filter
to
show
the
data
that
folks
were
interested
in
looking
at
so
now
that
we
have
this
data
that
we
wanted
to
export
on
that
same
menu.
J
We
do
have
the
options
a
little
cloud
icon
with
an
arrow
underneath
it.
So
we
can
click
on
that
cloud
icon
and
choose
to
export
this
data
by
default.
All
data
is
exported,
so
if
you
only
wanted
to
filter
what
you
were
interested
in
in
this
case,
2021
credit
card
fraud,
information
there's
this
option
at
the
top
to
toggle
filters.
So
you
could
select
that
and
to
open
this
in
excel.
J
I
would
recommend
choosing
a
csv
or
comma
separated
value
format,
so
if
this
is
your
first
time
downloading
data
from
open
data
you'll
just
see
a
notice
here
that
the
file
does
not
exist
and
it
will
take
time
to
create
if
you
click
that
download
button
it
will
automatically
download
to
your
computer
if
you've
downloaded
data
here
before
you
would
see
the
option
to
either
request
a
new
file
with
current
data,
so
this
data
is
updated
daily.
So,
if
folks
wanted
to
continue
getting
updates,
you
could
download
a
different
file
every
day.
J
We
also
do
have
an
api
connection
to
our
open
data
site
if
that's
of
interest
to
folks,
so
those
are
options
available
in
our
download
options
once
that
downloads
to
your
computer
folks
can
have
access
to
look
at
this
crime.
Data
and
julie's
been
speaking
to
these
trends,
so
folks
wanted
to
dive
into
that
further
again.
This
data
goes
back
to
the
beginning
of
2018
and
and
is
publicly
available
on
that
open
data
site.
So
you
could
filter
you
could
sort.
You
could
do
your
own
analysis
there.
J
So
this
is
available
not
only
on
our
boulder
police
crime
data.
This
is
available
on
all
of
our
data
sets
that
are
on
our
city
website
for
open
data.
So
we're
really
excited
that
this
crime,
offenses
data,
is
out
there
to
the
public.
Now
we're
also
excited.
We
have
several
more
in
the
pipeline,
so
you'll
see
here
in
the
search
option.
We
have
stolen
bikes
data
and
also
some
interactive
dashboards.
J
We've
created
here
so
from
here,
I'm
going
to
pass
it
off
to
mike
zadar
who's
going
to
give
a
live
demo
of
the
dashboard
using
the
data
that
I
just
showed,
and
it
will
allow
folks
to
further
analyze
the
data
that's
available
here.
So
you
can
access
this
dashboard
yourself
under
this
bpd
offenses
app
on
the
open
data
webpage
and
from
here
I
will
turn
it
over
to
mikezidar.
K
Thanks
so
much
katie,
I
appreciate
it.
Let's
see
if
we
can
share
here.
K
There
we
go,
I
think
that
worked
cool
all
right,
so
I'm
super
excited
to
be
talking
to
you
guys
about
the
dashboards
and
things
that
we
are
building
at
the
boulder
police
department.
So,
as
katie
mentioned,
this
is
all
based
on
arcgis
and
the
esri
platform.
So
as
we
develop
more
of
these
out,
you'll
start
to
see
more
and
more
data
available
to
the
public,
but
this
is
kind
of
the
first
or
one
of
the
first
things
that
katie
and
I
have
have
pushed
out
to
the
public.
K
So
on
our
dashboard
here,
let
me
see
if
I
can
get
rid
of
that
yeah
on
our
dashboard.
Here
we
have
all
of
that
offense
data
that
katie
was
talking
about
from
the
file
which
is
available
here.
If
we
click
on
this
link,
you
can
go
and
see
sort
of
live.
What
katie
was
talking
about
out
here
so
from
our
dashboard.
You
can
link
to
that
data,
but
here
you
get
the
neighbors
offenses
for
an
extended
period
of
time
and
you're
able
to
sort
and
filter
and
play
around
with
it.
K
So
let
me
just
run
through
here
and
show
you
exactly
what
we're
looking
at.
So
if
you
go
out
and
want
to
play
with
this
or
or
do
some
analysis
before
you
download
the
data
and
do
further
analysis,
it's
available
to
you
here
so
I'll
start
with
this
little
hamburger
menu
at
the
top.
It's
got
a
couple
of
links
in
here,
so
you
can
go
to
the
boulder
police
home
page.
You
can
file
a
report
online
through
this
other
link
and
then
you
can
jump
to
that
open
data
from
here
as
well.
K
The
map
in
the
center
has
a
few
icons
here
at
the
top.
Our
first
one
is
our
base
map.
So
if
you
don't
like
this
sort
of
night
type,
nighttime
style
base
map,
you
can
come
in
here
and
select
a
bunch
of
base
maps
that
are
available
through
the
city's
gis,
as
well
as
some
other
base
maps
here.
So
if
you
would
like
a
navigation
based
map
or
something
like
that,
that's
available
to
you
out
here
for
this
I'll
switch
back
to
the
the
darker
basement.
K
You
also
have
this
little
button
here
that
will
show
you
what's
on
the
map,
so
you
can
see
little
red
dots
are
a
bpd
offense
and
then
the
colored
areas
here
on
the
map
are
the
police
beats.
K
You
also
get
this
little
nap
like
what
do
you
call
that.
K
Glass
icon
there,
if
you
click
on
that,
you
can
search
for
a
location.
So
if
we
look
for
the
boulder
police
department.
K
Click
on
that
and
it'll
zoom
us
right
into
the
public
safety
building
there,
and
so,
if
you
have
an
area
of
the
city
that
you're
interested
in
or
what
not,
you
can
search
for
it
there
and
it'll.
Take
you
right
to
that
location
so,
on
the
map.
You've
also
got
the
little
the
little
red
dots
here.
If
we
click
on
one
of
those
dots,
we're
able
to
see
some
information
about
that
offense
report.
K
So
we
get
you
know
the
report
number
the
when
it
was
reported
the
the
year,
the
neighbors
offense
code,
the
description
we
also
get
an
obscured
address
for
where
this
occurred.
So
one
thing
to
keep
in
mind
when
you're
looking
at
these
data
is
that
we
do
obscure
the
addresses
to
the
block
level
and
we
also
randomly
offset
offset
the
location
of
the
point.
So
it
isn't
a
general
area
of
where
that
offense
occurred,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
exactly
like
on
the
dot
where
that
that
offense
occurred.
K
So
that
is
that
all
right,
so
let's,
let's
explore
a
little
bit
more
here
so
off
off
here
to
the
right.
We
have
this.
These
different
totals
here
of
what
of
what
these
offenses
are
and
as
we
sort
and
filter.
So,
if
we
select
like
year
to
date,
our
data
will
update
and
there's
a
whole
lot
of
points
there.
K
I
don't
know
if
that's
super
useful,
but
it
is
a
you
are
able
to
see
the
counts
here,
which
I
do
think
is
useful,
where
you
can
see
that
you
know,
offense
is
against
people.
We've
had
450
for
year
to
date
here
and
if
we
wanted
it
to
sort,
you
know
and
filter
even
more.
We
can
do
that
as
well.
So,
for
just
let's
say
we're
just
interested
in
property
crime.
We
can
click
on
property,
crime
and,
let's
say
we're
interested
in
burglary.
K
We
can
click
on
burglary
and
there
we
go.
We
have
278
burglaries.
We
can
see
some
of
that
crime
concentration.
That
julie
was
talking
about
in
certain
areas
of
the
city,
and
we
also
get
this
chart
here
that
we'll
update.
So
you
can
kind
of
see
some
of
the
trends
here
and
there's
that
that
peak
that
julie
was
talking
about
and
the
reduction
that
we
have
seen.
You
also
get
this
charts
tab,
so
at
the
bottom
you
can
click
on
this
on
these
tabs
and
there's
various
items
inside
these
tabs.
K
K
The
next
tab
we
have
here
are
some
crime
prevention
tips,
so
just
some
some
safety
tips
in
general
around
you
know,
crime
issues
as
well
as
tips
about
you
know
being
prepared
for
for
emergency
situations.
Our
last
tab
on
the
bottom
here
is
the
neighbors
offense
descriptions
and
and
codes
here.
So
if
you
have
questions
about
what
a
specific
code
means
or
something
like
that,
we
have
links
here
to
tell
you
about
what
that
is.
K
If
you
want
more
information
about
neighbors,
we
also
have
a
link
up
here
at
the
top,
where
you
click
on
this
and
that
will
take
you
to
the
fbi's
webpage
on
nibras,
where
there
is
a
ton
of
information
if
you're
a
data
geek.
Like
me,
this
is
fantastic.
There's,
there's
data
from
all
over
the
country.
The
fbi
has,
you
know
an
api
that
you
can
access
and
pull
in
a
bunch
of
data
and
look
at
look
at
data
from
neighbors
reporting
agencies
across.
K
All
right,
so
let
me
clear
some
of
these
filters
out
here
and
we
can
look
at
that.
Okay,
cool
all
right,
so
that
is
our
crime.
Dashboard,
like
I
said,
we're
going
to
be
building
several
more
of
these.
I
can
tease
another
one
here.
We
do
have
a
bike
theft
dashboard
out
here,
which
is
pretty
interesting.
It
breaks
down
the
number
of
stolen
bikes,
the
the
number
of
crime
reports
we
have
and
also
the
cost
for
those
for
those
bikes.
K
So
this
is
the
last
28
days
here
in
the
city
of
boulder,
and
you
can
also
look
at
like
90
days
and
those
those
figures
will
update.
So
you
can
see
what
what
the
cost
of
some
of
these
crime
categories
is
and
as.
K
J
I
think
that
is
it.
If
there
are
any
questions
or
anything,
we
can
certainly
answer
those.
D
Yeah
thanks
mike
and
katie
and
julie,
we'll
be
glad
to
answer
any
questions.
I
know
that
was
a
lot
of
information
to
throw
in
a
very
short
amount
of
time,
but
I
did
want
to
cover
as
much
ground
as
possible,
so
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
about
any
portion
of
the
presentation.
B
I
don't
see
any
hands
going
up,
there's
one
rachel
and
then
bob.
I
I
I
think
that
you
answered
this
question
and
thank
you
all
for
the
great
presentation
I'm
looking
forward
to
digging
into
the
data
set
myself.
So
when,
when
you
look
at
the
dots
or
any
of
the,
I
think
there
was
a
list
too.
With
the
crimes
listed,
you
can't
identify
any
particular
victim
by
their
house.
Right,
like
you,
have
kind
of
anonymized
it
in
that
way,
just
want
to
confirm.
K
Yeah,
that's
correct,
it's
it's!
We
obscure
the
address
to
just
the
block
address
and,
like
you
said,
we
also
randomly
offset
that
point.
So
if
the
point
were
to
fall
on
an
individual
house
there's
a
random
offset,
so
it's
going
to
be
in
the
again,
like
I
said
I'll
be
in
the
general
area
within
you
know,
maybe
a
five
house
sort
of
area,
but
it
will
certainly
not
be
identifiable
as
an
individual
address.
I
Okay,
perfect,
and
is
that
true,
like
there
was
some
question
about
a
previous
data
set
that
people
could
sort
of
identify
complainants,
I
think
chief
harold,
you
probably
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
It
was
a
I
think,
hill
related,
you
know.
If
you
had
called
in
on
a
certain
address,
you
could
see
sort
of
the
address
of
the
complainant
and
that
was
possibly
problematic.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
was
also
not
identifiable.
D
That
yeah
right
rachel
that
will
not
be
identifiable
as
part
of
the
dashboard
if,
if
a
person
calls
in
and
makes
a
complaint
and
that
becomes
public
record,
somebody
could
request
that
data
point
through
a
public
records
request
request
if
it
went
through
9-1-1
or
a
report
was
made
with
the
commitment.
I
J
I
I
And
then,
on
the
there
was
a
slide
like
with
a
u-lock
your
bike
recommendation
and
have
we
given
pretty
good
recommendations
for
what
kind
of
locks
people
should
buy?
I
saw
there
was
a
20
off
thing
and
if
that's
a
big
thing
that
we're
pushing
are
we
making
it
really
easy
for
people
to
know
what
is
the
best
lock
to
prevent
a
theft
and
getting
that
the
card
in
people's
hands?
If
the
20
I
mean
bike,
locks
are
pretty
expensive
for
the
good
ones,
they're
very.
D
Expensive
they're,
like
50
bucks,
for
the
really
good
ones
we
are
trying
to
make
it
as
available
to
everyone
as
possible.
The
bike
shops
in
boulder
have
been
very
supportive
of
giving
the
discounts,
but
for
preventing
bike
theft,
the
u-lock.
Without
a
doubt,
I've
tested
it
myself.
D
I
D
It
is
and
I'll
tell
you,
our
crime
prevention
officer
has
done
an
outstanding
job,
working
with
all
the
bike
shops
and
they
are
boots
on
the
ground
getting
this
information
out,
especially
on
those
hot
street
segments.
But
if
the
community
is
listening,
please
put
your
bikes
in
a
u-lock,
it
works.
We've
tried
to
defeat
the
u-loc
u-locks
ourselves.
We
can't
do
it
and
it
is
the
only
way
to
prevent
bike
theft.
I
That's
great
and
then
and
thank
you
for
getting
that
information
out
and
then
my
last
question
you
mentioned
that
property
crimes
are
still
up
and
it
looked
like
they
spiked
a
lot
in
january,
and
I
couldn't
tell
from
the
quick
presentation
like:
is
that
still
trending
up
each
month
as
we're
going
forward
or
is
there
more
information
on
specifically
property
crimes,
because
that's
the
one
that
sounds
like
it's
not
coming
back
down?
So
just
it's
not,
I
don't
think
it's
staying
at
the
january
peaks.
This
is,
is
it
still
significantly.
D
Up
yeah
we're
trending
we're
about
29
up,
and
I
expect
in
our
prediction
models:
property
crime
is
going
to
continue
to
be
problematic
throughout
the
fall,
and
there
are
multiple
reasons
for
that:
we're
still
struggling
with
jail
restrictions,
even
though
I
I've
had
great
conversations
with
sheriff
kelly
and
we're
working
on
a
strategy
that
I
think
that
he's
going
to
have
a
public
statement
on
july
1st
about
his
strategy.
D
But
I
can
I,
I
think,
we're
going
to
continue
to
see
property
crime
and
that's
why
this
is
so
important
for
the
community
to
understand
the
crime
trends
patterns
in
their
in
their
particular
areas.
So
we
can
start
to
target
harden.
You
know:
locks
lights,
the
basics,
to
prevent
some
of
this
property
crime.
Right
now,
the
state
of
colorado
has
seen
60
increases
in
motor
vehicle
theft.
D
We
are
no
different
in
boulder,
and
these
motor
vehicle
thefts
are
being
stolen
from
major
roadways,
and
it
is
all
based
on
economics
right
now
and
so
not
only
boulder.
But
the
rest
of
the
state
is
struggling
mightily
in
these
areas.
D
Yeah
and
that's
one
of
our
one
of
our
education,
public
awareness
campaigns
is
most
certainly
instructing
the
community
on
these
crime
patterns.
What
we're
seeing
there's,
certainly
crime
concentration
in
certain
areas,
but
burglaries,
are
all
about
lighting
blocks
watching
out
for
your
neighbors
and
mike's.
Dashboard
has
all
of
these
crime
prevention
techniques
on
the
dashboard,
but
it
really
is
most
of
these
property
crimes
are
crimes
of
opportunity
and
can
be
prevented
if
people
lock
their
car
doors
don't
put
stuff
in
your
vehicles.
D
You
know
lighting
becomes
so
important
and
public
awareness
of
what's
going
on
around
them.
The
catalytic
converter
issue
is
very
hard
to
prevent,
and
this
we
have
partnered
with
the
state
of
colorado,
the
public
safety
department,
so
they're
providing
education
and
training
as
well
as
as
us,
but
these
catalytic
converters
can
be
sold.
D
They
can
be
removed
off
a
car
within
I've,
seen
people
do
it
within
15
seconds
and
they
can
be
sold
for
100
to
300
quick
and
they
usually
hit
15
to
20
cars
in
a
in
a
series
of
crimes
within
minutes,
and
so
the
best
advice
is
really.
You
can
either
paint
or
etch
a
serial
number
in
your
catalytic
converter.
So
at
least
they
can't
be
sold
quickly
to
area
recycling
companies
around
the
region.
D
It's
right
next
to
your
muffler
and
it's
it's
it's
all
about
the
metal.
It's
it's
all
about
palladium,
and
it
is
the
economic
factors
of
really
international
or
driving
this
crime.
And
this
trends,
like
you,
know,
copper
prices.
When
they
go
up,
you
see,
copper
theft,
so
these
are
economic
factors
and
we
try
to
block
as
many
of
these
opportunities
as
possible.
I
N
Thanks
mary
thanks
chief
thanks
team,
that
was
a
great
presentation.
Just
a
quick
question.
I'm
sorry!
If
I
missed
this,
can
you
give
us
some
examples
of
crimes
against
society.
D
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question
crimes
against
society
or
are
liquor
usually
a
lot
of
liquor
law
violations,
animal
cruelty,
prostitution-
which
now
you
know,
I
think
the
best
practice
way
to
say
that
is
human
trafficking
issues.
Drugs
all
of
the
drug
would
fall
into
that
category
as
well.
Those
are
your
major
crimes
against
society.
M
Thanks
mary
and
thanks
chief
and
all
for
the
presentation,
super
helpful
great
to
see
the
open
data
available
this
quickly
to
everyone.
I
look
at
the
five
property
crimes
that
were
highlighted,
so
it
was
slide
35.
It
was
the
red
boxes
around
the
the
largest
increase
in
crimes
and
we've
already
heard
about
one
which
is
theft
of
motor
vehicle
parts
or
accessories,
but
it
also
seems
like
motor
vehicle
theft
itself
is
up
quite
a
bit,
and
so
those
two
are
ones
that
we've
heard
a
lot
about
along
with
bike
thefts.
D
D
Not
to
do
that,
because
people
are
looking
for
those
valet
keys,
leaving
your
cars
open
is
also
very
problematic,
and
so,
when
you
read
these
reports
through
these
reports,
you
find
that
people
are
either
leaving
their
keys
in
the
car,
their
cars,
open
and
they're
easy
targets
and
the
areas
that
we
want
to
get
out
and
we
have
a
public
education
campaign.
These
cars
that
are
being
stolen
are
the
cars
that
are
parked
near
the
major
exits
and
entryways
into
boulder
and
out
of
boulder.
D
So
this
really
is
about
educating
the
public
on.
Please
do
not
leave
your
keys
in
the
car.
Please
don't
leave
property
in
the
car.
Put
it
in
the
trunk,
don't
leave
your
valet
keys
and
please
don't
leave
your
keys
in
your
ignition
or
somewhere
in
the
car,
because
people
are
going
through
these
cars
and
finding
these
keys
and
they
are
being
dumped
in
different
parts
of
the
region.
D
And
so
it
really
comes
down
to
a
public
awareness
campaign
on
on
both
motor
vehicle
theft
and
then
also
theft
from
vehicles,
which
is
also
problematic
as
well.
Mayor.
M
Thanks
for
that,
it
does
seem
that
whatever
habits
people
might
have
had
with
leaving
their
ballet
and
spare
keys
in
their
car
is
something
that
probably
hasn't
changed
a
lot.
But
people
are
taking
advantage
of
it.
It
seems
like
more
frequently
you
did
mention
that
there
are
more
vehicles
being
stolen,
near
entrances
and
exits
to
the
city.
I
think
that's
revealing
in
and
of
itself,
so
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that,
because
that
seems
like
it's
a
pretty
big
increase
in
a
pretty
big
ticket
item
for
a
lot
of
people.
B
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you,
sam
any
mark.
O
O
One
of
the
at
least
perceptions
is
that
when
a
call
for
service
is
made
by
the
time
it
is
responded
to,
it
becomes
impossible
to
actually
identify
who
is
responsible
for
whatever
the
activity
was
that
that
was
causing
the
the
call
in
the
first
place.
Are
there
any
strategies
that
could
be
used
to
either
shorten
the
response
time
or
somehow
make
a
better
correlation
between
the
call
for
service
and
identifying
the
action
and
the
people
involved
that
are
that
are
committing
that
activity.
D
D
The
police
have
good
response
times
to
the
hill,
but
it's
proving
that
the
loud
noise
and
what
occurs
is
the
community
members.
When
they
see
the
police
car
pull
up,
they
turn
the
music
off,
they
shut
the
lights
down
and
they
don't
answer
the
door.
This
makes
it
very
complicated
for
the
police
to
investigate
these
very
low
level.
D
You
know
ordinances,
and
so
I
think
what
the
data
clearly
demonstrates
is
that
we
have
severe
place
management
issues
on
the
hill
and
I
think
it's
clustering
around
certain
landlords
management
teams,
and
I
think
that
we
really
need
to
understand
the
the
amount
of
calls
for
service
being
generated
from
a
very
few
places
on
the
hill,
and
I'm
sure
this
would
remain
consistent
as
we
look
at
the
rest
of
the
city.
D
In
the
same
way,
we
we
have
started
to
look
at
the
hill
but
in
my
opinion,
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
police
our
way
out
of
these
noise
complaints
and
disorder,
complaints,
it's
it
is
just
overwhelming.
When
you
look
at
the
data,
how
many
calls
for
service
we
have
across
the
hill
area?
It's
just
it's
overwhelming
and
I
think
the
data
clearly
demonstrates
the
80
20
principle
there
yeah.
Okay,
thank.
O
B
All
right,
if
not,
I
have
one
thank
you
for
that
very
fascinating
presentation
and
all
the
way
around
really
appreciate
it.
My
question
has
to
do
with
the
call
data
and
specifically
on
the
hill
and
at
the
san
juan
community,
where
you
mentioned
during
the
presentation
that
all
of
this
suggests
that
there's
a
better
that
there's
a
need
for
better
property
management.
D
Great
question
mary-
and
I
think
this
really
comes
down
to
landlord
education
training
that
is
sponsored
by
the
bureau
of
justice
administration
and
I
think,
a
lot
of
landlords.
Don't
know
how
complicated
it
is
to
actually
run
a
property
and
not
have
high
calls
for
service
or
high
crime.
So
I
think
that
there's
an
educational
component
which
we
most
certainly
could
do
in
boulder
and
each
city
department,
could
take
a
lead
on
on
the
training
and
then.
D
Secondly,
I
think
that
the
city
has
put
together
a
team
under
nuria's
direction
to
really
start
exploring
model
policies
across
the
country
on
chronic
nuisance
abatement
and
then.
Thirdly,
we
really
have
to
get
a
clear
understanding
and
of
our
data
across
the
city
and
standardize
it
for
different
apartments
and
different
types
of
properties
across
across
the
city.
But
I
would
bet
my
bottom
dollar
that
the
principles
will
remain
consistent
as
we
start
to
look
at
other
parts
of
the
city
as
well.
B
Thank
you
marissa,
and
I
have
so
just
a
follow-up
if,
if,
like
you
said
we're
gonna,
not
gonna
police,
our
way
out
of
this
problem,
what
could
we
do
on
a
small
scale
to
begin
with,
say
a
pilot
program
that
would
get
us
going
on
some
of
these
strategies
that
you
mentioned.
D
Well,
nuri's
already
put
together
a
really
good
team
in
the
city
to
start
refining
our
data,
which
is
step
number
one,
we're
also
exploring
landlord
education
training
with
the
university.
D
In
short
term,
the
university
myself
and
the
planning
director
are
going
to
pilot
some
code
enforcement
and
intelligence
work
up
on
the
hill
and
then
as
we're
looking
at
the
san
juan
property,
which
is
really
fascinating
to
me,
because
our
team
here
in
the
police
department
is
indicating
you
know
a
few
years
ago.
D
The
community
members
of
san
juan
did
not
have
a
lot
of
trust
in
the
police
department
and
now
that
they
they
see
the
police
on
a
daily
basis
that
trust
is
building,
and
so
maybe
that's
why
we're
seeing
high
calls
for
service.
So
all
of
this
is
exciting
to
me
because
it
look
at
least
we
have
actionable
data
to
start
tearing
apart
these
problems
and
working
together
as
a
team,
but
I
think
the
team
will
continue
to
work
on
these.
D
You
know
these
high
calls
for
service
locations
and
I
think
that
we
really
have
to
start
educating
these
landlords
and
then,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
if,
if,
if
we
need
to
have
a
stronger
chronic
nuisance
abatement
ordinance,
I
I
think
that's
an
order
when
you
look
at
when
you
look
at
the
amount
of
calls
for
service
to
some
of
these
locations.
D
It
must
be
traumatizing
for
the
community
to
see
the
police
in
these
communities
so
much,
and
I
don't
think
that's
the
direction
that
we
want
policing
to
go.
So
I
think
this
again
isn't
a
great
example
of
where
the
city
could
use
holistic
governance
and
work
together
as
a
team
to
start
solving
these
community
problems.
That
really
is
causing
a
great
amount
of
community
harm.
B
Thank
you
marist.
What
I'm
hearing
then,
is
that
y'all
are
on
it
and.
D
And
so
I'm
excited
for
the
work,
because
I
think
that
the
biggest
part
of
police
reform
that
people
miss
is
trying
to
extract
police
from
constantly
going
back
and
forth
back
and
forth
to
some
of
these
problem
areas
but
use
a
whole
city,
holistic
approach
and
I'll
tell
you
that
other
city
departments
have
levers
that
are
much
more
impactful
on
some
of
these
crime
and
disorder
issues
than
the
police.
D
B
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
all
the
work
you
all
are
doing
any
other
questions
from
council.
C
Thanks
mary,
I
know
this
item
has
been
bumped
a
couple
times
and
I'm
excited
that
amp's
implementation
and
action
plan
is
before
you
today,
so
I'll
invite
chris
hagelin
in
public
works
and
chris
jones
and
community
vitality
to
present.
Q
All
right,
wait
till
that
comes
up,
make
sure
it
comes
up
yes,
so
good
evening,
mayor
city,
council,
my
name
is
chris
haglin.
I
am
the
acting
manager
of
the
transportation
planning,
division
of
transportation,
mobility
and,
as
you
know,
I
am
joined
by
chris
jones,
deputy
director
of
community
vitality.
Q
Q
Following
a
refresher
of
the
project
background,
I
will
share
the
process
that
we
have
taken
for
the
development
and
refinement
of
these
strategic
options
which
we'll
present
to
you
tonight
and
then
chris
jones
will
share
with
you
the
specifics
on
our
neighborhood
parking
management,
parking
pricing
strategies
and
then
also
our
parking
fine
strategies,
and
then
it
will
return
to
me
and
I
will
share
some
of
the
feedback
that
we
have
received
from
boards
and
councils
and
the
next
steps
that
we
will
are
prepared
to
take
and
then
the
questions
we
have
for
you
tonight.
Q
As
you
know,
the
work
that
we've
done
in
amps
is
guided
by
three
major
documents:
the
boulder
valley,
comp
plan,
our
transportation
master
plan
and
the
access
management
and
parking
strategy
documents
known
as
amps.
These
have
all
shaped
our
work
and,
as
you
may
recall,
the
amps
guiding
principles
were
adopted
by
council
in
2017
and
and
they
include
that
in
boulder,
our
residents,
employees
and
visitors
use
a
variety
of
transportation
options
and
we
need
to
plan
and
provide
access
for
all
of
those.
Q
Q
We
need
policies
and
programs
that
not
only
provide
transportation
access
benefits,
but
also
meet
our
economic
vitality
and
climate
goals
and,
lastly,
in
our
fast
changing
and
very
unpredictable
world,
as
we
have
certainly
felt
in
the
last
couple
years,
we
need
to
plan
for
the
present,
but
also
adapt
to
the
future,
and
it's
social,
environmental,
technological
and
economic
changes.
Q
There
we
go.
Thank
you
chris.
This
chart,
which
you
I
believe
you've
seen
before,
provides
some
examples
of
the
variety
of
projects
underway
under
the
amps
umbrella.
As
you
know,
camp
is
our
annual
parking
management
and
free
shuttle
service
to
chautauqua,
which
is
currently
operating
right
now
for
our
city
government
offices
and
the
main
civic
library,
we
implemented
a
new
parking
management
strategy
and
also
a
parking
cash
out
program
for
our
city.
Q
Employees
staff
continues
to
work
on
a
possible
tdm
ordinance
for
new
developments
to
mitigate
the
impacts
of
new
development
on
our
transportation
system,
and
that
project
is
directly
linked
to
our
parking
code
changes
project
which,
unfortunately,
has
been
delayed
due
to
staff
reductions
in
the
planning
and
development
services.
However,
we
hope
to
get
that
back
on
track
in
the
near
future.
Q
This
fall
we're
also
kicking
off
a
curbside
management
program.
We
received
a
grant
from
dr
cogg
and
we'll
be
looking
at
developing
a
set
of
curbside
management
policies
and
an
implementation
guideline,
so
we
can
begin
looking
at
how
we
employ
that
in
our
city.
The
final
two
projects
are
really
what
we're
here
today
to
discuss
with
you:
our
neighborhood
parking
management,
our
parking
pricing
and
our
parking
fine
strategy.
Q
This
graphic
illustrates
our
project
timeline.
Currently,
we
are
designing
the
implementation
and
action
plan
which
outlines
our
preferred
strategies,
our
next
steps
and
our
costs
following
months
of
community
outreach,
alternative
analysis
and
input
from
our
boards
and
commissions.
We
are
bringing
preliminary
recommended
strategies
for
this
discussion
tonight.
The
study
section-
and
I
apologize.
If
you
hear
my
dog
barking
outside.
Q
Overall,
the
project
objectives
are
to
rework
both
our
neighborhood
parking
management
and
parking
pricing
approach,
and
we
want
this
to
be
more
aligned
with
our
broader
city
goals,
around
access,
mobility
and
climate
to
meet
these
project
objectives.
We've
analyzed
our
existing
conditions,
we've
conducted
extensive
community
engagement
and
we've
also
looked
at
best
practices
in
other
communities.
Q
In
terms
of
community
engagement,
we
have
shared
information
on
our
project
website.
We've
collected
responses
to
polls
and
surveys
and
conducted
focus
groups
within
our
current
npp.
Neighborhoods
we've
tracked
these
demographics
closely
and
we're
pleased
with
our
results
in
reaching
people
of
color,
both
younger
and
older
residents,
and
also
renters.
Q
We've
met
with
community
organizations
boards
and
commissions,
and
we
also
formed
a
community
working
group
that
which
we
dubbed
the
access
allies.
This
was
made
up
of
representatives
from
boards
and
commissions,
and
also
property
owners
other
and
other
stakeholders,
such
as
the
downtown
boulder
partnership.
We
also
had
an
access
allies,
light
group.
This
was
a
group
that
was
made
up
solely
of
our
boards
and
commissioner
representatives.
So
we
can
really
dive
deeper
into
policies
and
strategies.
Q
We've
also
worked
with
our
community
connectors,
who
are
our
paid
liaisons
to
help
us
reach
some
of
our
harder
to
reach
groups
in
our
community,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
chris
jones
to
go
over
the
the
strategies.
P
Thank
you,
chris
haglin
good
evening,
council
on
the
screen.
You
see
in
front
of
you
the
the
goals
that
we
vetted
with
you
earlier
this
year
for
neighborhood
parking
management,
I'm
not
going
to
read
through
these
one
by
one,
but
these
are
the
goals
that
we
look
to
in
the
development
of
the
strategies
that
we
considered
and
wanted
to
evaluate
through
this
process.
P
This
would
be
a
status
quo
approach
to
our
existing
mpp
creation,
expansion
and
management,
but
would
have
included
some
modifications
to
mitigate
some
of
the
persistent
program,
challenges
that
we've
heard
from
from
residents
who
participate
in
mpp
or
are
adjacent
to
neighborhoods
that
are
in
npps,
with
some
parking
challenges
associated
with
that
another
strategy
we
looked
at
was
data-based
decision
making.
This
would
bene.
P
This
would
have
been
a
staff
driven
approach
to
neighborhood
parking
management
where
we
identify
and
implement
changes
in
neighborhood
parking
management,
but
really
largely
proactively,
led
by
staff
delivering
management
strategies
to
neighborhoods.
The
third
strategy
we
looked
at
was
priority
based
neighborhood
access
management.
P
So
we
acknowledge
that
with
that
approach
it
would
require
additional
staff
time
and
resources
to
implement
if
we
were
to
pursue
this
strategy.
What
that
might
look
like
is
first
in
order
to
achieve
cost
recovery,
we
acknowledge
we
need
to
increase
the
permit
costs
for
residents
and
commuters
in
the
years
ahead
in
order
to
we
project
get
to
cost
recovery
by
2024.
we're
proposing
a
13
increase
in
the
annual
permit
for
residents
a
20
increase
in
commuters
next
year,
with
again
incremental
adjustments
until
2024
when
we
can
achieve
cost
recovery.
P
Beyond
that,
we
can
certainly
continue
a
conversation
to
identify
other
ways
that
we
might
use
surplus
if
we
want
to
continue
cost
increases
for
residents
and
commuters.
P
That
could
translate
into
additional
benefits
to
add
value
to
the
the
products
we're
providing
in
neighborhoods
concurrent
with
this
work
over
the
next
couple
years,
the
city
would
review
our
parking
supply
utilization,
adjacent
land
uses
and
multi-modal
access
scores
within
residential
areas
throughout
the
city
and
existing
mpps
to
determine
which
zones
and
residential
areas
would
be
eligible
for
various
management
tools
and
depending
on
how
they
meet
these
set.
P
Metrics
existing
npp
zones
would
could
be
deemed
no
longer
eligible
for
neighborhood
parking
management
based
on
those
key
performance
indicators,
and
we
would
possibly
seek
to
phase
those
npps
out
again,
though,
a
petition
process
would
be
need
to
be
received
from
neighborhoods
who
want
to
pursue
new
tools
in
their
communities,
and
the
petitions
would
be
evaluated
and
prioritized
based
on
those
key
performance
indicators,
and
this
is
really
similar
to
the
neighborhood
speed
management
program
that
transportation
and
mobility
currently
pursues
on
an
annual
process.
P
So
the
three
strategies
we
looked
at
for
parking
pricing
were
first
static
price
adjustments.
This
would
be
periodic
base
price
increases
based
on
our
budget
needs
and
peer
assessments,
similar
to
how
we've
pursued
price
increases
in
the
past.
Another
strategy
we
looked
at
was
place
based
pricing,
so
looking
at
the
aggregate
parking
utilization
for
specific
geographic
areas
and
pricing
on
street
and
off-street
facilities
appropriately
based
on
the
geographic
utilization,
a
third
strategy
we
looked
at
is
performance-based
pricing,
and
this
would
be
more
fine-tuned.
Pricing
adjustments
based
on
occupancy
data
along
specific
corridors
throughout
the
city.
P
When
we
evaluated
those
three
strategies
against
our
goals,
performance-based
pricing
was
identified
as
the
most
aligned
with
those
goals
in
performing
the
same
or
better
in
all
areas,
except
for
achieving
transparency
and
predictability
where,
if
we
are
having
different
pricing
on
different
corridors,
there
will
be
some
challenges
in
making
sure
that
the
public
is
aware
of
where
those
higher
prices
might
be.
And
again,
feasibility
of
this
more
refined
approach
to
parking
management
will
require
more
staff,
time
and
effort
to
implement
if
we
pursue
the
performance-based
pricing.
P
What
that
might
look
like
is
we
want
to
make
sure
that
our
on-street
parking
is
priced
higher
than
off-street
parking,
so
that
folks,
who
are
aware
of
that
that
those
pricing
structures
can
just
go
straight
to
an
off-street
facility
instead
of
circling
trying
to
find
cheaper
parking
on
street
corridors
would
then
be
evaluated
and
set
at
high
medium
and
low
parking
rates,
depending
on
their
typical
peak
occupancy,
and
then
some
high
demand
corridors
where
we're
not
able
to
we're,
even
at
the
high
rate
where
the
parking
pricing
is
not
able
to
ensure
that
there
is
at
least
about
15
capacity
on
those
corridors.
P
We'd
want
to
identify
some
priority
spaces
for
short-term
pickup
and
drop
off
for
business
freight
loading,
unloading,
uber,
lyft
things
like
that
corridor
rates
would
be
updated
regularly,
based
on
our
typical
peak
demand,
and
fortunately,
the
new
meters
that
we've
just
installed
throughout
the
downtown
and
university
hill
are
able
to
be
programmed
easily
with
these
variable
rate
structures
on
the
right
here
you
see
an
example
of
a
possible
approach.
We
could
use
for
branding
to
make
this
more
transparent
and
predictable
for
customers.
P
P
The
second
would
be
graduated
fines
and
mobility,
safety,
fines
for
repeat
offenders
and
higher
fines
for
violations
that
impede
other
users
travel
choices
such
as
parking
in
a
bike
lane
or
blocking
access
to
a
transit
stop
or
an
ada
ram.
The
third
strategy
includes
that
approach,
but
also
adds
having
different
fines
for
different
parts
of
the
city
based
on
parking
utilization
rates.
P
If
we
were
to
pursue
the
graduated
fines
on
mobility
safety,
fines,
we
would
want
to
first
increase
our
base,
fine
rate
for
a
standard
parking
violation
from
what's
currently
15
to
30
from
there.
Second
and
third
violations
would
be
set
with
a
graduated
premium
capped
out
on
the
third
violation
which
we're
currently
proposing
at
sixty
dollars.
Mobility
safety
violations
would
be
set
automatically
at
that
premium
rate
proposed
at
sixty
dollars.
Q
Thank
you,
chris.
During
our
touches
with
boards
and
commissions,
we
received
a
wide
variety
of
feedback
and
we
incorporate
that
into
the
strategies
that
chris
has
shared
with
you
for
neighborhood
parking
management.
We
shifted
to
a
more
equitable
split
between
residential
and
commuter
pricing
and
accelerated
cost
recovery
to
2024..
Q
We
also
tied
key
performance
indicators
to
trip
generation
for
new
developments
to
make
neighborhood
parking
management
a
proactive
tool.
During
our
planning
process
for
parking
pricing,
we
increased
the
difference
between
off
street
and
on-street
parking
prices
and
included
the
15-minute
free
on-street
parking.
Q
We
have
committed
to
regularly
tracking
vehicle
miles
of
travel
and
greenhouse
gas
reduction
impacts
to
understand
the
impact
of
these
parking
management
changes.
We
are
also
committed
to
expanding
tdm
and
mobility
initiative
programs
following
the
achievement
of
cost
recovery.
Parking
pricing
will
be
responsive
to
changes
in
parking
demand,
distribution
and
intensify
in
transitional
districts
like
boulder
junction
as
they
evolve
and
densify,
and
we've
also
changed
some
of
the
terminology
we've
used
in
our
parking
fines
in
regard
to
overall
board
and
commission
sentiments
sentiments
on
these
strategies.
Q
The
downtown
management
commission
is
generally
supportive
and
interested
in
increasing
off
street
parking
use
and
and
also
very
interested
in
the
up
and
coming
curbside
management
work
getting
started.
This
fall.
The
university
hill
commission
supports
the
strategies
developed
through
this
process.
Q
Bjd
boater
junction
access
districts
is
also
supportive
of
the
strategies
and
the
approach,
but
is
also
open
to
some
higher
off
street
parking
prices
within
their
district
planning
board
views
this
the
approach
that
staff
is
taking
as
conservative
and
incremental
and
that
a
more
aggressive
approach
could
be
taken,
but
they
understand
the
need
to
balance
equity,
economic
vitality
and
environmental
goals.
Q
Tab
desires
that
council
directs
staff
to
take
a
more
aggressive
approach
to
parking
prices
and
to
really
use
it
as
a
tool
to
address
greenhouse
gas
reduction
needs
and
to
decrease
vehicle
use.
Tab
also
believes
that
residents
can
and
should
pay
more
for
their
neighborhood
parking
permits
and
that
the
price
for
residential
permits
should
rise
faster
to
achieve
cost
recovery
sooner.
We
do
have
ryan
shushart
from
tab
at
this
meeting
and
he
is
available
to
elaborate
on
tabs
feedback
if
so
desired.
Q
Essentially,
there
are
six
main
principles
in
donald
trump's
approach
to
parking
management,
and
we
have
taken
the
time
to
incorporate
these.
The
first
is
charging
the
right
prices
for
on-street
parking.
The
right
prices
are
really
those
lower
the
lowest
prices
that
will
achieve
15
parking
availability.
Q
So
there
is
never
a
parking
shortage
prices
will
balance
demand
and
supply
on
these
on-street
spaces
staff
is
going
to
collect
data
and,
over
time,
adjust
pricing
to
balance,
supply
and
demand.
Just
as
this
principle
indicates,
the
second
is
to
charge
demand-based
pricing
for
off-street
parking
to
optimize.
Occupancy
staff
are
proposing
that
the
city
change
pricing
to
make
on-street
parking
more
expensive
to
optimize
this,
our
off-street
parking
use
and
which
I
think
is
currently
underutilized.
Q
The
third
principle
is
to
spend
parking
revenue
to
improve
public
services,
so
staff
is
proposing
this
idea
and
really
the
city
has
been
doing
this
for
decades
through
property
taxes
and
parking
revenue
in
our
districts,
cage
it
has
supplied,
supplied
eco
passes
to
our
downtown
employees
in
boulder
junctions,
tdm
access
district.
We
provide
not
only
eco
passes,
but
also
bike
sharing
car
share
memberships
and
soon
micro,
mobility,
memberships,
the
city
periodically
also
issues
bonds
against
anticipated
parking
revenue
for
projects
within
these
districts
to
improve
safety,
aesthetics
and
walkability.
Q
The
fourth
is
to
remove
off
street
parking
requirements,
planning
and
development
services,
we'll
be
working
to
identify
changes
in
these
parking
code,
and
I
would
say
that
our
preliminary
recommendations
before
we
got
to
the
pause
was
to
transition
away
from
parking
minimums
to
parking
maximums,
the
fifth
being
promoting
parking.
Cash-Out
programs,
the
city
initiated
a
program
for
its
own
employee
employees
in
the
civic
area
to
great
success.
Q
Employers
throughout
boulder
are
already
doing
this
voluntarily
and
border
transportation
connections,
which
is
our
local
transportation
management
organization,
is
focused
on
increasing
parking
cash
out
programs
and
before
covid
had
acquired
a
congestion
mitigation.
Air
quality
grant
or
cmac
grant
to
promote
parking
cash
out,
so
we're
going
to
continue
to
work
on
that
as
we
adjust
to
this
postcode
environment.
Q
The
final
shoe
principle
is
to
use
parking
fines
that
increase
with
each
successive
offense
and
as
you've
just
heard.
This
is
definitely
part
of
our
proposal
tonight,
so
to
go
over
just
kind
of
our
next
steps.
If
we
were
to
implement
these
strategies
for
the
neighborhood
parking
management,
we
would
adjust
the
resident
and
commuter
annual
permits
by
ten
dollars
and
twenty
dollars
respectively
to
achieve
cost
recovery
by
2024
with
additional
increases.
Q
We
would
update
the
ordinance
and
regulations
for
our
new
npp
process.
We'd
maintain
the
pause
on
any
new
npp
zones
requests
throughout
this
just
this
next
year,
and
then
we
can
start
revisiting
those.
We
will
conduct
extensive
data
collection
in
those
residential
zones.
To
look
at
the
impact
of
these
changes,
we
would
establish
eligibility
and
priority
for
the
possible
creation
of
new
neighborhood
management
zones
and
also
look
at
possibly
phasing
some
out
that
no
longer
meet
our
kpis.
Q
We
would
also
develop,
of
course,
the
the
outreach
materials
to
communicate.
These
changes
to
the
public
in
terms
of
parking
pricing,
we
would
update
the
ordinance
and
regulations
with
help
of
our
city
attorney's
office
we'd
increase
the
base
on
street
rate
throughout
the
city
by
25
cents,
but
maintain
the
current
rate
in
our
garages.
Q
We
will
eliminate
the
four
hour
graduated
fee,
but
implement
a
flat
max
pricing
after
six
hours
and
also
extend
the
evening
flat
rate
to
the
weekends
and,
of
course,
we
would
need
to
develop
outreach
materials
to
communicate
this
to
the
public
and
then
we'll
really
begin
that
whole
process
of
collecting
data
to
implement
this
performance-based
pricing
based
on
occupancy,
so
that
we
can
dial
into
that
right
price
to
achieve
that
15
occupancy
and
finally,
for
the
parking
fine
strategy.
Q
You
know
if
we
move
forward
with
these
strategies,
we
will
need
to
update
the
ordinance
and
publish
the
fine
schedule
and
then,
of
course
communicate
those
changes
to
the
public
overall
for
the
for
this
entire
effort.
Additional
next
steps
include
making
any
changes
to
our
action
plan
and
the
strategies
based
on
your
feedback.
Tonight.
We
will
continue
our
community
engagement
based
on
those
refined
strategies
and
then
we
plan
on
returning
to
council,
with
our
finalized
2022
work
plan
on
these
amps
efforts
in
the
fourth
quarter
of
this
year.
Q
That
leaves
us
with
the
the
questions
that
we
have
for
for
council
and
just
to
let
you
know
the
third
question.
We
thought,
after
the
the
feedback
that
we
had
received,
that
we
wanted
to
hone
in
the
third
question
a
bit
more,
so
we
have
revised
that
third
question
just
to
just
to
help
guide
the
discussion
tonight.
So
with
that,
we
look
forward
to
an
interesting
discussion.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
B
Thank
you
chris
and
chris
for
the
presentation
and
information
looks
like
we
have
a
bunch
of
hands
up
and
I
didn't
see.
I
think
I
believe
aaron
was
first
and
then
followed
by
bob
and
then
sam.
P
And
real,
quick
mary,
I'm
glad
to
stop
sharing
my
spring,
because
I
know
people
like
to
see
faces,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
folks
have
an
opportunity
to
review
the
questions.
B
And
council
members,
the
questions
are
on
page
packet,
page
24.
If
you
want
to
go
to
them
on
your
packet.
R
Great
thanks,
mary
and
yeah
thanks
so
much
chris
and
chris
for
the
presentation
and
all
your
work
on
this.
It's
wonderful
to
see
this
coming
forward.
I
feel
like
I
started
working
on
this
when
I
was
just
a
wee
planning
board
lad
many
many
years
ago.
So
it's
it's
great
to
see
some
some
steps
happening
here.
I
have
a
few
questions,
but
first
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
our
tab,
representative,
ryan
shoeshart,
wanted
to
offer
a
few
comments
on
tabs
deliberations
and
and
their
recommendations.
S
Okay,
great
well
good
good
evening,
council
members,
so
I'm
ryan
shewhart
and
I
represent
tab.
I'm
not
our
chair,
but
tila
has
given
me
the
role
tonight
to
represent
us
because
I've
been
somewhat
engaged
on
the
topic.
S
So
I,
if
yeah,
if
I
could
I'll
just
say
a
few
words
so
and
first
I
just
do-
want
to
acknowledge
chris
and
chris
and
erica
and
natalie,
partly
for
all
of
their
great
work
as
I've
gotten
to
know
them,
but
also
because
I'm
pretty
new
to
tab
and
they've
been
at
this
for
years.
As
you
mentioned,
and
also
I
should
just
clarify
we
as
tab.
S
We
have
not
voted
on
a
resolution,
so
I'm
not
here
to
you
know,
represent
a
specific
position,
but
it's
it's
more
that
we've
had
quite
a
bit
of
dialogue
over
the
last
couple
of
months,
so
I'll
just
try
to
represent
what
what
I
think
we've.
I
think
we've
talked
about
and
and
I'll
just
say
that
chris
is
exactly
right.
S
That
tab
would
like
to
move
more
aggressively
and
I'll
just
try
to
summarize
it
with
one
big
idea
and
it's
that
if
there's
one
thing
that's
worth
council's
attention
today
on
this
subject,
it's
that,
if
you
take
the
various
measures
individually
with
parking
it,
it
rapidly
becomes
very
technical
and
it,
and
it
makes
it's
kind
of
hard
to
make
sense
of
unless
you're
really
inclined
to
that
kind
of
technical
analysis
and
you
and
you
have
the
time
to
spend
with
with
the
data.
S
But
if
you
zoom
out
what
you
start
to
see
are
some
things
that
are
more
in
the
domain
of
values
and
priorities.
That
council
has
expressed
a
lot
of
opinion
about
and
things
that,
if
you
really
wanted
to
put
parking
to
work
for,
then
staff
would
require
your
direction,
support
and
cover.
So
what
am
I
talking
about?
Well,
parking
is
a
few
things.
Of
course
it
is
a
place
to
put
cars,
but
beyond
that,
it's
it's
at
least
three
more
things.
S
First,
it's
one
of
the
city's
most
powerful
assets
for
climate
action
in
in
the
council
session,
which
I
study
session,
which
I
attended
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
boulder's
climate
office
staff
were
very
direct
in
saying.
The
progress
on
climate
to
date
has
been
shallow,
and
the
city
needs
to
act
with
climate
on
climate,
with
a
lot
greater
urgency.
I
thought
I
saw
council
members
mostly
agreeing
with
that
and
to
that
end,
parking
policy
is
truly
one
of
one
of
the
city's
big
opportunities
for
climate.
S
It
is
a
significant
source
of
potential
conflict
with
with
climate
and
ghg
reduction
versus
gst
reduction
and
vehicle
mouse
travel
reduction,
envision,
zero
and
so
to
to
really.
If
you
wanted
to
put
parking
really
to
work
for
climate,
you
would
be
looking
at
what
are
the
ways
that
we
can
really
pull
the
lever
on
on
parking
pricing
and
some
other
related
subjects.
So
that's.
S
So,
if
you
just
think
about
the
value
of
the
real
estate
of
the
parking
you'll,
the
numbers
will
start
that
up
very
quickly
and
the
question
one
might
ask
is:
if
you
were
starting
from
scratch,
would
you
use
50
dollar?
You
know
square
foot
real
estate
and
just
give
that
away
for
free
or
for
you
know
mostly
for
free
and
the
third
and
final
thing.
That
parking
is
at
least
for
tonight.
S
If
you
increase
the
prices,
it
means
that
cars
will
begin
to
disappear
as
people
choose
private
locations
to
park,
to
get
rid
of
an
extra
vehicle
and
or
take
the
bike
or
bus
and
more
parking
spaces
will
free
up.
If
you
remove
subsidized
parking
altogether,
people
are
still
free
to
park
their
cars
at
a
market
rate,
and
you
can
imagine
local
businesses
and
even
private
residents
who
have
who
have
garage,
driveway
and
other
space.
They'll
com
they'll
compete
to
supply
it
and
we've
seen
this
everywhere,
so
just
to
tie
it
up.
S
If
you
take
a
hard
look
at
climate
or
equity-
and
you
say
we
really
care
about
making
serious
changes,
you
should
expect
it
to
look
a
lot
like
moving
away
from
status
quo,
not
just
incrementally
but
really
saying
how
we
are
going
to
do,
showing
how
we're
going
to
do
things
fundamentally
differently.
And
so
this
is
a
question
I
would
offer,
maybe
less
for
staff
and
more
for
council
to
consider
it's
a
question
of
relative
priorities
and
has
political
dimensions
and
it's
and
it's
not
the
thing.
S
S
Is
that
I
thought
that
the
council's
study
session
on
climate
a
couple
weeks-
it
was
fantastic,
and
you
know
one
of
the
one
of
the
implications
is
we
need
to
do
more
and
do
more
faster,
but
I'd
just
like
to
offer
that
that
the
one
of
the
the
key
things
that
led
to
was
the
idea
of
doing
modeling
and
study
and
what
a
study
is
going
to
give
you
is
this
exact
type
of
a
decision
on
your
desk?
S
So
if
you,
if
you
really
want
to
move
on
climate
here,
you
have
today
no
need
for
for
deep,
deep
modeling.
You've
got
you've,
got
an
opportunity
so
from
that
I'll
I'll
step
down
and
just
wanted
to
offer
that
from
from
tab,
we
we
think
the
tech,
the
staff
is
great.
But
at
least
I
think
this
app
is
great
I'll
speak
for
myself
and
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
council
knows
what
they
have
here.
Thank
you
so
much.
R
Thanks
very
much
for
that
ryan.
I
apologize
for
pronouncing
your
last
name
before
so.
Unless
anybody
has
questions
for
ryan,
I
I
can
proceed
with
my
questions.
I
have
questions
for
ryan.
Okay!
Go
for
it!
Sorry,
here
I'll
I'll,
go
back
over
to
mary.
B
Yeah,
it's
okay,
aaron
actually
had
the
floor
for
questions,
but
if,
if
aaron
is
seeding,
his
questions
to
to
others,
that's
fine.
R
M
Sure
so
do
I
so
ryan
thanks
for
all
of
that
exhortation
to
do
more
and
as
a
person
who's
studied
this
a
lot.
Could
you
tell
us
like
just
to
put
a
fine
point
on
it?
What
would
you
do
as
far
as
the
three
recommendations
we're
looking
at
tonight,
so
we've
got
neighborhood
parking
management,
we're
looking
at
setting
prices
for
three
different
categories:
we've
got
fines
and
we've
got
kind
of
downtown
paid
parking,
so
you've
exhorted
us.
Could
we
get
a
dollar
figure
for
what
you
would
do
for
those?
M
S
S
Or
a
year,
I'm
sorry,
I
should
specify,
I
think,
I'm
we,
a
lot
of
the
discussion,
has
been
on
the
neighborhood
neighborhood
parking
pricing.
So
right
now,
it's
17
a
year.
So
a
couple
of
couple
of
cups
of
coffee
to
store
your
you're
on.
You
know
your
private
vehicle
for
a
year
and
it
would
move
to
50
something
I
think
a
thousand
seems
like
it.
Like
a
pretty
good
start,
I
mean
that's
a
hundred
dollars
a
month
to
store
your
car
a
lot,
a
lot
of
cities.
S
M
S
Right
so
I
mean
you're
just
using
round
numbers
here,
but
but
sure
I
mean
I
I'm
in
that.
In
a
sense
I
think
you
know
a
hundred
dollars
or
so
ish
a
month
for
both
of
them,
I
think,
is
not
it's
not
unreasonable.
It's
not
taking
away
people's
parking,
they're
still
free
to
park
their
driveways
for
free
and
so
on.
So
if
you
want,
if
you
just
want
a
dollar
figure
I'll
give
you
that
I
think
another
thing
you
consider
is
paris:
who's
been
to
paris
loves
to
go
to
europe.
S
They
just
announced
plans
to
cancel
half
of
their
on-street
parking.
So
that's
another
thing
to
think
about
is
is
just
you
know
just
getting
rid
of
about
half
of
it.
You
could
also
think
about
it
from
a
square
footage
perspective.
You
know,
think
about
50,
a
foot,
it's
about
200
square
feet
per
parking
spot,
just
think
about
what
the
you
know.
What
you'd
expect
for
for
business
to
pay.
You
know
for
for
business
lease.
That's
that's
another
starting
point.
S
Were
so
thank
you,
we
were
actually
been
quite
focused
on
the
at
least
I
have
been
through
this
pretty
focused
on
the
parking
rates
itself.
I
do
think
one
one
point
on
fines
is
is
to
take.
You
know,
I
think,
there's
a
national
kind
of
awakening
to
the
the
challenges
that
that
happen.
S
When
you
have
cars
parked
in
bike
lanes
and
keeping
you
know
forcing
vulnerable
road
users
to
swerve
out
of
the
way
of
trucks
and
cars
and
suvs,
that's
a
good
place
to
to
be
more
aggressive
with
parking
and
taking
it
seriously.
You
know,
if
you
let
you
have
a
motor
vehicle
that
was
left
in
the
middle
of
the
street.
People
had
to
drive
around
it.
That
would
be
taken
pretty
seriously.
I
would
say
to
start
to
consider
that
the
philosophy
for
for
black
bike
lanes.
M
S
R
Sam
okay,
so
a
few
few
questions
for
staff.
One
is
so
what
one
of
the
things
that's
not
on
our
agenda
tonight
is
the
parking
code
update
in
the
planning
department
and
understand
the
staffing
issues
there,
but
since
a
lot
of
our
parking
policy
in
the
city
kind
of
revolves
around
that
a
lot
of
our
aspirations
might
might
be
achieved
through
that,
do
we
have
a
sense?
Is
there
anybody
from
the
planning
department
who
has
a
sense
of
when
we're
going
to
be
able
to
get
to
that.
P
P
And
the
intent
had
been
to
make
sure
that
that
work
was
moving
forward
in
conjunction
with
the
work
that
we
presented
with
you
tonight
and
just
you
know,
unforeseen
circumstances.
We
are
we're
not
able
to
be
in
that
position
today,
but
we
will
very
much
look
forward
to
that
work.
Coming
soon.
Q
Q
Would
just
add
real
quick
that
you
know
we've
already
done
a
lot
of
data
collection
on
the
parking
code,
changes
granted
covid
poscovid,
but
I
think
we
have
a
good
foundation
and
we've
also
already
developed
a
lot
of
preliminary
recommendations
for
consideration.
So
I
think
once
we
start,
we
can
hit
the
ground
running
and
come
very
quickly
with
recommendations
on
parking
code
changes.
I
I
think
the
the
key
factor
is,
you
know
what
has
been
the
impact
of
covid
and
that
may
take
a
little
bit
to
understand.
R
Okay,
thanks
yeah,
not
that
anybody
from
the
planning
department
need
to
be
here
for
this
item,
but
that's
helpful
to
understand,
because
I
think
it
like,
I
say,
a
lot
of
our
aspirations
in
this
area.
I
think,
can
be
achieved
through
that
program
with
that
policy.
Those
policy
changes.
So
next
question
is
on
the
neighborhood
parking
permit.
Can
you
refresh
my
memory
as
to
how
many
permits
do
people
get
both
kind
of
year
round
and
guest
access
with
that
program?.
P
I
think
we
allow
three
permits
outright
with
the
program
for
a
resident
who
can
demonstrate
that
they
live
there
and
they
purchase
one
for
each
vehicle,
and
so
that
will
get
the
the
price
for
those
permits
will
go
up
and
then
each
household
or
demonstrated
resident
gets
two
visitor
permits
included
with
their
household
permit,
to
to
hand
out
to
friends
folks
who
are
staying
temporarily
for
house
cleaning,
a
project
or
or
visitor
for
a
short
period
of
time
and
then
they're
also
eligible
for
guest
permits
up
to
two
weeks
of
permits
are
allowed
for
free
per
year
for
them
to
register
a
guest
to
be
able
to
park
on
the
street
for
an
extended
amount
of
time
on
their
block.
P
R
P
So
they
they
are
so
there's
two
permits
allowed
and
they
are
not
they're,
not
time
restricted
in
the
sense
of
when
our
parking
enforcement
officers
see
a
visitor
permit.
They'll
certainly
pay
attention
and
see
it
if
that
car
stays
there
in
that
same
spot
beyond
the
allowable
number
of
hours,
which
is
largely
72
hours,
then,
even
though
they
have
a
visitor
permit,
they
would
still
be
ticketed
for
leaving
their
vehicle
in
a
residential
zone
or
on
the
in
the
public
right-of-way
for
too
long
without
moving
right.
R
P
R
P
P
P
R
Got
it
okay
and
then
on
the
the
pricing
increase,
the
proposal
is
to
increase
that
gradually
over
the
next.
I
think
three
years
to
get
to
that
cost
recovery
level
of
fifty
dollars,
and
then
you
mentioned
the
possibility
of
increasing
to
the
point
where
there'd
be
some
additional
revenue
that
we
could
use
on.
Other
programs,
like
other
transportation,
demand
management
program
kind
of
things
is
that
would
we
have
to
kind
of
specifically?
R
P
So
our
intent
is
over
the
next
couple
of
years
as
we're
increasing
these
rates
and
doing
the
the
key
performance
indicators
and
measures
is
identifying
the
the
various
parking
management
tools
that
we
want
to
make
available
that
are
customized
to
the
conditions,
and
so
we
would
anticipate
that
we're
going
to
continue
to
have
conversations
with
our
boards
and
commissions
tab
and
you
all
on
what
those
specific
management
tools
could
look
like
and
again,
similar
to
what
transportation
mobility
does
with
the
neighborhoods
feed
management
program
is
on
an
annual
basis.
P
So
what
we
really
want
to
do
is
is
model
our
approach
after
what
was
done
with
camp,
where
we
identify
specific
set
of
strategies
that
might
work
better
for
that
area
of
town,
as
opposed
to
just
identifying
the
current
npp
approach
of
these
residential
permits,
plus
visitor
and
guest
permits
made
available,
because
you
have
a
parking
problem,
because
what
we've
learned
from
a
number
of
of
our
focus
groups
with
mpps
is
folks
have
entered
into
the
the
program.
P
They've
permitted
to
be
a
part
of
it
and
discovered
that
it
did
not
actually
solve
or
or
make
a
significant
change
to
their
their
unique
challenges
and
what
we
really
want
to
move
toward
is
yeah,
more
customized
approach
based
on
those
key
performance
indicators,
and
so
that
is
still
going
to
evolve.
If
that's
the
direction
that
we're
receiving
from
you
all
tonight,
our
intent
is
to
evolve
those
tools.
B
Thank
you,
aaron
next
is
bob.
N
N
You
can
look
it
up.
His
name
is
thomas
mcculloch.
It
cost
a
dollar
a
day
which
was
a
lot
of
money
back
then.
My
question,
I
didn't
quite
follow
the
the
memo
on
what
we're
gonna
do
on
parking
pricing
for
parking
garages.
I
know
we
have
the
three
for
three
for
three
program.
You
know
which
is
great
and
I
know
it's
been
very
successful.
N
P
Currently,
if
you
stay
in
a
downtown
garage
beyond
four
hours,
the
rate
increases
to
two
dollars
and
fifty
cents
per
hour.
So
if
you
leave
your
vehicle
in
there
for
an
extended
amount
of
time,
it
becomes
even
more
expensive
to
a
total
daily
max
of
55,
so
we're
working
to
adjust
those
rates,
because
we
want
to
encourage
people
to
utilize
the
the
off-street
assets
that
we
have.
So
we
can
understand
how
that
dynamic
is
going
to
play
out
with
our
on-street
assets
and
so
we're
keeping
the
dollar
25
in
the
garages.
P
We
are
going
to
implement
a
flat
rate.
If
you
stay
after
six
hours,
then
you're
more
like
a
long-term
permit
holder,
and
we
don't
want
a
long-term
stay
to
be
cheaper
than
our
permits
that
we
sell,
because
then
we
will
lose
a
lot
of
customers
on
our
permit
front.
So
that's
one
change
that
we
detail.
The
other
change,
as
you
mentioned
bob,
was
the
the
three
dollar
evening
rate
will
continue
three
dollars
from
three
pm
to
three
a.m.
P
N
M
Thank
you
guys
great,
comprehensive
presentation,
much
appreciated
chris
and
chris
a
couple
quick
questions.
You
focused
on
the
neighborhood
parking
permit.
First,
you
talked
about
the
price
adjustments
and
then
you
also
talked
about
potentially
eliminating
some
neighborhood
parking
programs
or
having
them
redo
petitions,
and
so
I
wasn't
clear
first
of
all,
if
the
price
increase
is
independent
of
the
concept
of
eliminating
or
adding
to
npps,
that's
just
something
you're
proposing
to
do
straight
away,
right,
correct
and
the
fundamental
purpose
of
that
it
seems
like
is
financial
stability
for
the
program.
P
Well,
to
meet
the
the
pricing
goal,
so
one
of
our
goals
was
to
achieve
cost
recovery
and
looking
to
previous
pricing
strategies,
we're
it's
been
17
for
residents
for
quite
some
time,
and
so,
while
that
might
have
been
the
appropriate
price
in
1994
to
make
sure
we
are
achieving
cost
recovery
for
the
program,
having
not
increased
that
over
time,
we
are
no
longer
in
that
space.
P
So
that's
that
is
the
the
primary
cause
of
of
increasing
the
rate
for
the
existing
npp
as
it
as
it
stands,
the
the
additional
petitions
would
be
if
there
were
other
tools
that
were
identified
based
on
the
data
collection
that
we
will
be
doing
that
might
warrant.
Maybe
the
addition
of
on-street
pay
stations
in
a
residential
zone
similar
to
what
we've
done
near
chautauqua.
We
wouldn't
just
outright
put
those
out
there
on
the
street
without
working
with
the
neighborhood.
P
P
So,
for
instance,
whittier
would
maintain
their
npp
as
it
currently
exists
until
we
might
identify
other
strategies
that
could
be
deployed
in
whittier,
but
it
would
still
based
on
again
direction
that
we've
received
from
council-
and
this
was
a
question
that
we
had
for
you
earlier
in
the
year
of
what
is
the
right
way
to
involve
the
communities
and
neighborhoods
in
these
decisions.
We're
making
in
residential
areas
and
the
direction
that
we
had
received
previously
was
that
a
neighborhood
petition
process
was
still
desired
rather
than
a
staff
driven
delivery
of
change
in
nebraska
parking
management.
M
Right
I'll
come
back
to
that
comments,
but
that's
very
clarifying.
Thank
you
for
that,
then.
The
other
question
I
have
is
you
talked
about
key
performance
indicators
and
the
one
that
was
mentioned
was
15.
Vacant
parking
spots
is
kind
of
a
sweet
spot
that
you
shoot
for.
So
you
adjust
your
pricing
until
you
hit
that
sweet
spot.
M
P
That
I'd
say
that
that's
the
primary
goal
and
I
might
call
on
mallory
our
consultant
at
walker,
who
really
was
instrumental
in
developing
the
nuances
of
these
strategies.
I
would
say
that
that
is
our
number
one
factor.
The
other
element,
of
course,
is
going
to
be
the
overall
utilization
in
the
districts,
for
instance,
what's
happening
in
the
garages.
If
we
are
filling
up
the
garages
and
the
streets
outside
the
garages
are
able
or
maintaining
a
15
vacancy,
then
we're
going
to
have
an
imbalance
there
in
our
assets.
T
Sure,
thanks
chris,
and
and
thank
you
sam
for
that
question,
so
on
the
neighborhood
parking
management
side,
as
chris
mentioned,
the
primary
key
performance
indicators
that
we
would
use
in
terms
of
existing
conditions
are
the
parking
supply
and
the
utilization,
because
that
really
tells
us
if
a
parking
issue
that
needs
to
be
solved
is
present.
T
Another
indicator
that
we
would
use
on
a
more
proactive
level
is
trip
generation,
that's
generated
by
new
development.
So
that's
an
area
where
the
planning
department
and
this
effort
are
really
working
in
tandem
and
working
in
coordination.
So
one
thing
that
we
heard
in
our
project
process
and
through
our
board
and
commission
effort
is
that
the
planning
department
frequently
hears
about
parking
and
the
need
to
solve
parking
problems
that
are
sort
of
preemptive
when
new
development
is
is
on
the
horizon,
but
they
really
don't
have
a
recourse
for
that.
T
So
in
this
case
a
key
performance
indicator
would
be
a
trip
generation
cap
for
new
development
and
the
subsequent
condition
that
that
new
development
is
not
providing
its
own
parking
or
sufficient
parking
per
the
code.
So
that
means
that
it
would
trigger
a
review
and
potential
for
a
neighborhood
parking
permit
program
to
be
looked
at
in
that
neighborhood,
given
that
that
new
development
might
cause
or
is
likely
to
cause
that
condition
where
there
is
a
parking
challenge.
T
Another
sort
of
secondary
indicator
that
we
are
looking
at
is
transit
richness
and
access
in
the
neighborhood.
So
in
an
in
a
residential
area
where
parking
management
is
being
considered
as
an
option,
we
will
also
want
to
look
at
the
access
richness,
so
a
combination
of
walk
score,
bike,
score
and
transit
score
to
see
if
parking
and
single
occupancy
vehicles
are
truly
the
primary
necessary
mode
for
mobility
in
an
area
and
that
kind
of
draws
on
on
the
equity
piece
as
well.
M
So
how
would
how
would
you
use
that
latter,
one
which
sounds
pretty
interesting?
So
if
you've
got
an
area
like
whittier,
which
has
got
lots
of
transit
nearby
bikeable
walkable,
would
you
have
a
higher
price
for
an
npp
in
that
area?
Would
you
have
a
higher
on
street
parking
price
like
how
would
you
use
transit,
walkability
to
interface,
with
your
management
of
your
parking
system.
T
Question
right
now
we're
not
showing
any
we're
not
recommending
specific
price
differentials
based
on
access
score
in
the
implementation
act.
An
action
plan
we're
more
recommending
it
as
a
consideration
tool
because
part
of
this
is
you
know,
staff
is
and,
and
the
city
are
responsible
for
prioritizing
and
areas
and
determining
which
areas
are
eligible
for
the
neighborhood
parking
management
program.
So
right
now,
the
petition
is
really
the
only
tool
used
to
determine
eligibility
for
a
neighborhood
parking
permit
program.
T
This
requires
some
additional
robust
knowledge
in
order
for
staff
and
elected
and
appointed
officials
to
consider
that
prioritization.
T
We
certainly
could
look
at
some
price
differentials
based
on
access
richness,
but
that's
not
included
in
this,
and
these
steps.
P
Correct
right,
and
so
what
I'd
like
to
follow
up
with
that
on
is
it.
We
have
not
yet
identified
what
additional
tools
the
the
myriad
of
additional
tools
we
intend
to
make
available
in
a
neighborhood,
but
one
thing
that
could
be
considered
in
a
neighborhood
that
currently
has
neighborhood
parking
management.
P
So
the
cost
of
the
program
in
whittier
would
certainly
be
different
than
the
cost
to
a
program
in
a
in
a
neighborhood
that
might
have
some
parking
challenges,
but
they
don't
have
the
same
level
of
access
to
tools
that
cost
us
money
to
deliver
more
value
for
their
higher
priced
products.
So
it
wouldn't
be
strictly
because
they're
they're
parked
up
and
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
are
spilling
over
in
their
neighborhood,
that
we
would
want
to
increase
those
prices
and
say:
oh,
we
have
transit,
so
it's
more
expensive.
P
But
what
is
how
do
we
make
sure
that,
if
we're
going
to
charge
more
for
one
neighborhood
versus
another
neighborhood?
What
is
the
added
value
to
the
program
that
they
are
getting
outside
of
the
the
same
product,
just
a
different
price,
because
their
kpis
are
different?.
M
Got
it
that's
super
helpful,
but
it
seems
to
me
like
price
and,
as
you
say,
services
are
the
key
reaction
to
whatever
kpis
that
you're
you're
monitoring.
So
that's
all
great
one
more
question.
So
looking
at
fines
and
looking
at
the
fines
for
what
you
call
mobility
safety,
fines
which
I
appreciate,
I
always
hate
having
to
go
into
traffic
around
the
delivery
vehicles.
However,
those
delivery
vehicles
are
performing
a
service
that
people
greatly
appreciate
when
they're
receiving
their
packages.
M
So
I
was
kind
of
curious
how
you're,
looking
at
the
balance
between
community
vitality-
and
you
know-
curb
management
versus
mobility
safety.
Fines,
because
I
personally
would
love
to
never
come
across
a
delivery
vehicle
in
the
bike
lane.
But
it
happens
all
the
time
and
there
are
people
who
want
those
deliveries.
So
I'm
just
kind
of
curious
what
the
thinking
is
on
how
to
balance
those
two
competing
interests.
P
P
Even
if
we
have
these
higher
priced
gold
parking
rate
zones
where
it
might
be
as
much
as
five
dollars
per
hour
to
park,
they
might
still
not
have
space
available
on
those
blocks
for
deliveries
or
or
curbside
pickup
drop
off
for
whatever
purpose,
and
so
that's
where
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
dialing
in
on
our
curbside
management
effort
to
really
take
a
closer
look
at
the
provision
of
these
priority
spaces.
P
P
I
mean,
I
always
say
a
parking
problem
is
a
good
part
is
a
good
problem
to
have,
but
it
doesn't
make
it
any
less
challenging
and
frustrating
on
these
on
all
this
competition
for
space,
and
so
that
is
something
that
we
are
looking
at
in
curbside
management,
and
so
we
will
certainly
be
talking
more
with
you
that
on
that
in
the
months
ahead,
chris
anything
else
you
want
to
add
on
yeah.
Q
I'd
just
like
to
add,
you
know
what
we
one
of
the
ideas
in
curbside
management
is
to
identify
locations.
You
know
that
could
be
like
throughout
our
downtown
and
caged,
that
are
flexible
loading
zones.
Q
You
know
loading
zones
that
could
be
used
by
commercial
vehicles,
your
cisco
truck
delivering
food
during
the
the
morning
hours,
but
then
later
transition
into
a
lifter,
uber,
pickup
or
drop
off
spot
or
even
a
you
know,
a
quick
stop
place
where
you
can
go
if
you,
if
you've
ordered
food
and
you've
got
curbside
delivery
of
that
food,
so
I
think,
looking
at
how
we
develop
those
flexible
spaces
that
way
you
limit
the
actual
number
of
these
loading
zones
and
you
use
them
most
efficiently.
I
think
that
is
the
key.
Q
I
think
another
key,
especially
in
some
of
our
areas
like
our
downtown,
is
maximizing
use
of
our
alleyways.
You
know,
I
see
you
know
from
our
curbside
management
inventory
that
we've
already
started
on
we've
been
working
on
that
prior
to
get
receiving
the
grant.
You
know
we
could
make
greater
use
of
these
alleyways
for
some
of
those
deliveries
as
well
to
eliminate
some
of
the
problems
that
that
you
mentioned
sam
great
thanks.
V
Thank
you
mary.
I
have
quite
a
few
questions
going
back
to
violations
the
increase
of
by
fines
or
parking
violations,
and
I'm
looking
at
the
memo,
but
I
don't
see
how
do
you
intend
to
issue
these
citations?
Is
it
based
on,
for
instance,
you
mentioned
in
the
memo.
Give
me
a
second
I'm
pulling
it
up.
V
P
No,
they
we
have
a
number,
I'm
not
sure
of
the
total
number.
I
think
there
are
42
different
parking
related
violations
that
are
enforcement
officers,
look
to
as
as
people
are
behaving
badly
in
the
right-of-way,
and
so
those
basic
or
standard
violations
such
as
overtime
at
a
meter
that
would
be
treated
a
lot
differently
than
someone
who's
blocking
a
driveway
or
a
bike
lane
or.
P
V
Okay
from
what
I'm
hearing
from
you,
it
would
be
because
in
the
memo
you
mentioned,
that
cu
charges
between
35
to
60
dollars.
So
you're
saying
we
would
increase
our
fees
and
it
would
probably
be
on
that
medium
of
30
to
60
dollars.
And
if
you
are
at
a
meter,
it
could
be
that
the
lower
30
and
if
you
parked
in
a
bike
lane
it
could
be
that
60.,
correct,
okay,
okay,
thank
you.
V
I
also
have
a
question
about
the
repeat
offender,
because
I've
traveled
and
I've
lived
in
many
places
and-
and
I
have
gotten
a
lot
of
well-
let's
just
say
my
fair
share
of
parking
violations,
and
I
wanted
to
know
from
you.
What
is
the
process
for
repeat
offenders
and
why.
V
What
is
the
thought
behind
either
increasing
the
find
and
do
we
have
any
research?
That's
somehow
increasing
the
fine
as
the
person,
you
know
how
how
that
data
impact
behavior,
basically.
P
Yeah,
so
what
we've
found
from
members
of
our
community
is
that,
with
our
current
standard,
fine
of
15,
there
is
a
high
willingness
to
to
take
chances,
because
15
doesn't
seem
like
all
that
much
and
they're
willing
to
press
their
luck
and
every
now
and
then
they're
going
to
get
caught
and
they're
going
to
pay
their
15
and
they're
going
to
keep
doing
it
over
and
over
again,
and
so
we're
trying
to
implement
a
fine
structure
that
that
discourages
folks,
pressing
their
luck
and
it
improves
their
likelihood
to
be
compliant
and
pay
for
parking
like
everybody
else
that
that
chooses
to
to
participate
in
in
our
management
program.
P
And
so
that's
that's
really
part
of
the
intent
of
the
graduated
fines,
as
is
those
repeat
offenders.
There's
the
we
have
usual
suspects
and
that's
we
hear
from
them
over
and
over
again,
and
then
we
have
folks
that
they
get
that
one
ticket
and
they
change
their
behavior
and
they
and
that
we
don't
have
that.
That
repeat
issue.
That's
also
what
we've
heard
from
our
partners
at
the
university.
Their
approach
is.
Your
first
violation
is
always
a
warning.
P
If
it's
the
first
time
that
their
enforcement
officers
have
approached
you
automatic
warning,
if
they
see
you
do
it
again,
then
you
get
a
ticket
as
opposed
to
the
first
time
you
do
it
you're
automatically
in
trouble
and
you're
automatically
paying
a
fine,
and
so
that's
another
thing
that
we're
intending
to
to
do
is.
Is
we
we
all
make
mistakes,
but
we
we,
if
there
are
folks
that
are,
are
feeling
more
willing
to
just
do
it
over
and
over
again
and
take
their
chances.
We
don't
want.
P
We
don't
want
to
send
the
message
that
that
that's
okay,
it's
going
to
be
the
same
price
over
and
over
again.
V
Yeah
yeah.
No,
I
hear
you
but
I'm
wondering
aside
from
the
university
you
mentioned,
have
you
seen
any
city
around
the
country
where
people
get
one
ticket
because,
as
I
mentioned
to
you,
I'm
speaking
from
experience
here,
you
know
having
gotten
one
or
two
tickets
going
downtown
and
parking
and
not
parking
properly.
V
P
T
Yeah
first
I'll
say
that
this
this
is
a
pretty
standard
parking
management
principle.
Just
because,
for
the
reasons
that
chris
is
saying
and
really
based
on
the
data
in
boulder
about
25
of
your
violators,
are
these
repeat
offenders
and
while
75
percent
are
just
first-time
violators
and
then
they
changed
their
behavior
25
is
a
big
chunk,
so
they're
really
having
a
detriment
on
the
parking
system.
And
what
happens
is
you
know
and
I'll
I'll
I'll
answer?
Your
actual
question
julian
in
a
moment,
I'm
sorry
to
delay
it
further.
T
But
what
what
happens
is
it
erodes
the
ability
of
your
existing
parking
supply
to
meet
demand
so,
instead
of
serving
many
people
in
the
day,
one
space
is
serving
maybe
only
one
person
because
they're
violating
the
meter
they're
not
paying
and,
of
course
the
enforcement
officers
are
incapable
of
towing
vehicles.
You
know
multiple
times
per
day.
Of
course
the
enforcement
officers
don't
want
to
do
that.
So
so
that's
you
know
why
these
graduated
rates
are
helpful.
T
The
equity
concern
is
there,
but,
but
really
what
we
want
to
do
is
get
these
specific
25
percent
of
people
to
change
their
behaviors
while
giving
people
appropriate
parking
options.
So
they
can
follow
the
rules
and
that's
really
what
we
want
people
to
do
to
do.
We
don't
want
to
make
this
a
revenue
grab.
We
want
people
to
follow
the
rules
and
that's
the
goal
here.
Seattle
and
portland
both
have
graduated
parking
violation,
fines.
T
D
Believe
greeley
did
implement
two
years
ago
with
the
graduated
fines
and
then
claremont.
T
So
there
are
a
number
of
communities
that
that
have
them,
and-
and
there
are
others
I'd-
be
happy
to
provide
council
with
with
a
broader
list
as
well.
I
just
am
not
sure
of
any
more
off
the
top
of
my
head.
V
Thank
you
for
this.
My
last
question
is,
and
I
think
it's
probably
a
I'm
having
a
hard
time
understanding
the
commuter.
V
P
Yeah
so
traditionally
we
know
that
we
have
on-street
capacity
in
the
residential
areas
surrounding
our
downtown
university
hill,
cu
managed
districts,
and
so
we
do
sell
commuter
permits.
We
have
for
some
time
for
folks
who
would
rather
pay
the
400
a
year
to
park
on
street
in
a
neighborhood,
while
they're
at
work
versus
the
1800
plus
dollars
a
year
for
a
permit
in
one
of
our
downtown
garages,
because
that's
their
alternative.
P
V
No
thank
you
for
this.
I
think
this
is
great
and
I
know
receiving
comments
for
later.
I
notice
the
part
when
you
talked
about
community
connectors
and
the
memo.
V
I
really
appreciate
that
again
because
it
takes
into
account
community
members
and
diverse
communities
and
people
we
probably
wouldn't
hear
from,
but,
as
you
were
talking
about
the
parking
and
I'm
sure,
that's
probably
something
that
you
are
already
doing
because
again,
you
know
you
are
the
expert
here
and
you're,
probably
sleeping
thinking
about
all
this,
but
just
for
my
understanding
as
part
of
the
work.
P
Thank
you
for
that
question.
We
do
have
representatives
from
the
boulder
chamber
on
our
access
allies
team,
so
they've
been
participating
with
us
throughout
the
process.
We
also
have
a
very
close
relationship
with
the
downtown
boulder
partnership
and
I'll
be
going
to
their
public
policy
meeting
here
in
a
couple
weeks
just
to
to
present
to
them
where
we're
at
with
these
strategies
and
and
with
feedback
from
council,
to
make
sure
that
that
we're
bringing
that
community
the
business
community
along
with
this
work
for
sure.
B
Thank
you,
junie
next
up,
rachel.
I
Okay,
thanks
mary
and
junie's
last
questions
were
a
great
segue
into
mine.
So
first
question
is
looks
if
I
understand
it
we're
looking
at
pricing
for
three
different
types
of
permits:
residential
commuter
and
business.
P
Correct
so
both
of
them
are
permits
that
are
localized
to
specific
block
faces.
The
computer
permit
is
made
available
to,
for
instance,
downtown
employees
who
don't
want
to
pay
for
a
permit
in
a
garage
they
are
eligible
if
we
have
space
and
capacity
to
purchase
a
commuter
permit
in
specific
block
faces,
but
that's
they're,
the
la
that
they're
last
on
the
totem
pole.
As
far
as
permit
availability,
the
business
permit
is,
for
there
are
a
few
small
businesses
that
that
exist
within
our
current
mpp
zones.
P
So
it's
old
like
little
pocket
business,
retail
centers,
where
they
have
employees
that
they
need
to
make
sure
that
they
have
parking
nearby.
So
that's
that
business
permit,
that's
priced
a
little
bit
differently.
I
think
we
have.
Maybe
I
don't
and
mallory
knows
the
exact
number,
but
a
dozen
of
those
types
of
permits.
P
I
And
so
I
maybe
don't
understand,
then
what
what
the
difference
like
75
versus
400
for
the
business
versus
commuter
and
the
business
one's
not
going
up
at
all
and
the
other
two
are.
So
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
how
you
got
to
that
outcome.
I
understand
it
sounds
like
it
doesn't
impact
a
lot
of
permits
wanted
to
understand
that
better
and
then
well,
I
guess
I'll
start
there.
P
They
have
other
options
available
to
them,
and
that
is
not
something
that
we
make
available
to
businesses
that
are
that
are
in
these
neighborhood
zones,
and
so,
given
that
they're
already
paying
more
than
residents
and
that
increasing
the
the
rate
was,
would
be
inconsequential
to
our
ability
to
get
to
cost
recovery.
It's
not
being
proposed
that
we
increase.
We
can
certainly
entertain
it
if
you
feel
like.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
we're
asking
everybody
to
pay
a
little
bit
more,
but
that
was
really
the
the
reasoning
behind.
I
P
Right,
but
these
are
employees
that
are
that
are
in
a
business,
I'm
trying
to
think
of
a
really
good
example
of
a
small
business.
That's
in
a
neighborhood
zone,
maybe
in
near
goss
grove
where
it's
a
you
know.
I
don't
know
if
backcountry
pizza
is
a
good
example,
but
they're
they're,
it's
a
business,
that's
in
a
neighborhood
zone,
and
so
it's
we
treat
them
in
their
employees
and
they
only
get
access
to
three
permits.
We
we
treat
them
a
little
bit
differently
than
we
would
a
business.
P
That's
that's
in
cajun
district
that
has
other
benefits
available
to
them,
and
yet
they
still
choose
to
park
in
neighborhoods
and
contribute
to
the
spillover
challenge
and
where
these
businesses,
their
employees,
aren't
necessarily
part
of
a
spillover
challenge.
They're
part
of
general,
just
use
of
of
of
on-street
spaces
near
their
place
of
business.
I
Okay,
that
helps
thank
you
and
then
so
for
the
people
who
are
using
the
commuter
permits-
and
I
understand
that
they
have
some
of
these
other
kg
options
that
you're
talking
about
I'm
using
the
right
language
there.
Nonetheless,
there
I
I
imagine,
a
lot
of
them
are
coming
into
boulder
to
kind
of
provide
the
services
that
we
all
need
and
they
work
for
employers
in
those
districts
who
don't
have
on-site
parking
available
to
them.
So
question
is
for
the
access
allies
team.
I
P
I
that's
a
really
good
question
and
I
don't
know
that
that
our
access
allies
was
was
where
we
would
have
had
those
conversations,
but
we
did
have
a
number
of
focus
groups
in
our
conversations
with
the
community
connectors
mallory.
I
would
love
to
hear
from
you
a
little
bit
more
on
on
your
thoughts
on
that
question.
T
Absolutely
thanks
rachel
for
that
question,
so
we
did
have
community
connectors
who
worked
on
both
phases
of
the
project,
and
we
had
the
pleasure
of
continuation
with
that
group
of
community
connectors
that
we
had
in
our
work
in
2020
continue
working
with
us
in
2021,
so
at
the
on
that
was,
I
think
we
had
five
community
connectors
and
we
had
six
meetings
with
them
over
the
course
of
the
project
work.
T
That
effort
was
at
the
be
at
the
onset.
Primarily
we
were
talking
about
their
transportation
behaviors
and
how
they
they
make
transportation
choices
and
a
major
issue
that
they
brought
up
was
parking
pricing
availability
of
affordable
parking
in
the
downtown
core.
Many
of
them
make
trips
to
the
downtown
core
for
errands
for
shopping
for
their
work,
and
so
you
know
the
ability
to
drive
and
park
somewhere
at
a
reasonably
affordable
price
was
hugely
important
to
them.
T
Another
issue
that
they
brought
up
was
making
sure
that
if
we,
you
know
char,
that
we
had
some
subsidy
opportunities
for
these
types
of
commuter
permits
and
we
actually
have
specific
subsidy
options
that
are
discussed
in
the
implementation
and
action
plan.
That
would
be
income
qualifications
based
and
tied
to
existing
social
services
programs
that
the
city
of
boulder
has
so
the
second
part
of
our
work
in
2021
with
those
community
connectors
was
really
asking
some
pretty
targeted
questions
around.
T
What
would
those
subsidies
look
like
to
what
extent
should
they
be
subsidized
and
those
specifically
focused
on
those
commuter
options
rachel
that
you're
talking
about
so
people
coming
into
work?
How?
How
can
we,
you
know,
offer
them
something
affordable
so
that
we
don't
impede
their
ability
to
work
in
the
city
of
boulder
and
contribute
to
our
community
so
that
that's
expressed
in
the
implementation
action
plan?
T
So
these
the
prices
that
are
included
in
the
presentation
are
the
straight
unsubsidized
prices,
so
those
would
be
available
to
people
that
are,
you
know
able
to
pay
that
price,
and
then
we
would.
We
have
some
recommendations
for
subsidies
that
would
be
available
on
an
income,
qualification
basis
and
again
tied
to
programs
that,
like
the
food,
the
the
food
tax
rebate
program,
I
think,
is
one
that
we
we
mentioned,
and
other
programs
that
the
city
of
boulder
already
implements
that
are
income
qualified.
I
Okay,
I
appreciate
that
you
know
I
it
may
or
may
not
have
made
sense,
but
it
feels
a
little
bit
siloed
like
if
the
community
commit
connectors,
you
know,
were
sort
of
separately
consulted
and
then
there's
a
group.
That's
that's
access
allies
that
just
maybe
it's
a
little
bit
siloed
from
the
group
dynamic
discussion.
Next,
just
a
question
on
board
feedback.
I
I
very
much
appreciate
tab
cab
looking
hard
at
the
climate
impacts
and
ryan
shoehard.
If
I'm
saying
it
right
advocating
for
that,
but
it
did
make
me
wonder
you
know
the
focus
on
the
climate
impacts.
If
we
consulted
the
environmental
advisory
board,
they
were
asked
to
weigh
in
on
this
or
if
they
should
be
and
kind
of
the
same
question
for
hrc
on
equity
impacts.
I
P
Me
so
we
have
not
consulted
with
them
in
a
formal
manner,
as
we
have
with
with
the
boards
and
commissions
for
our
management,
districts
and
tab
and
planning
board
just
given
their
their
direct
connection
to
parking
policy,
it
doesn't
mean
that
we
can't
I'd,
say
we're
happy
to
get
more
feedback
from
different
perspectives
on
this
work,
as
we
are
finalizing
our
2022
work
plan.
X
Thanks
mary
sorry,
I
have
no
video
tonight.
I
have
a
poor
internet
connection,
so
let
me
know
if
you
can't
hear
me
my
main
question:
is
all
these
policies
they're
only
as
good
as
the
enforcement,
so
are
we
gonna
be
stepping
up
enforcement
in
any
way
along
with
these
policies,
or
is
it
sort
of
the
same
level
of
enforcement
just
with
different
rules?
What's
the
general
take
there.
P
That's
a
really
good
question
and
that's
part
of
why
we've
been
really
careful
about
how
much
we're
we're
proposing
we
want
to
implement
in
2022
we're
not
we're
not
communicating
that
we
want
to
start
installing
new
pay
stations
in
all
commercial
districts
across
the
city,
because
that
would
generate
some
significant
resource
needs
for
an
expanded
enforcement.
So
our
enforcement
team
is,
is
ready
and
prepared
to
to
address
the
changes
in
the
the
types
of
violations
and
fines
and
be
being
looking
out
for
those
things.
P
Mallory
has
done
a
great
job
of
meeting
regularly,
with
with
all
the
different
work
groups
that
have
various
responsibilities
in
implementing
all
these
changes,
and
so
they
are
certainly
prepared.
P
One
of
the
big
changes
that
we've
implemented
in
our
enforcement
team
recently
is
expansion
of
license
plate
recognition
capability,
which
is
going
to
be
leading
to
significant
efficiencies
in
our
ability
to
to
not
require
someone
to
park
a
vehicle
and
walk
and
and
look
at
receipts
in
people's
windshields
or
enter
a
license
plate
into
their
handheld
devices
to
determine
whether
or
not
they
have
a
valid
parking
session.
So
we
have
been
instant.
P
We
have
been
implementing
a
number
of
efficiencies
in
that
operation
and
we'll
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
that
to
not
just
do
better
enforcement
in
our
managed
districts,
but
do
much
better
data
collection
in
support
of
the
development
of
these
kpis.
P
Where
previously,
in
order
to
do
a
great
data
collection
analysis
for
the
implementation
of
neighborhood
parking
management,
we
need
to
have
people
walk
through
that
neighborhood
and
count
cars
in
the
middle
of
the
night,
various
hours
of
the
day
to
get
a
broad
perspective
of
of
what's
going
on
on
street,
and
it
was.
It
were
quite
a
lot
of
time
and
energy
and
now
it'll
be
very
easy
for
us
to
to
utilize
our
license.
P
Plate
recognition
to
it'll
still
require
us
to
collect
data
in
the
middle
of
the
night,
but
we
can
do
it
much
more
effectively
and
efficiently.
So
that's
been
part
of
the
conversation.
The
mallory
is
mallory's
done,
a
great
job
of
making
sure
that
everything
that
we
are
proposing
is
going
to
be
able
to
to
be
implemented
by
our
existing
teams,
with
minimal
expansion
of
resources.
X
That's
great
to
know
along
those
lines,
so
I
know
this
is
going
to
be
a
tough
question
to
answer,
but
I
know
there's
some
point
where
there
are
diminishing
returns
for
the
amount
of
people
that
you
staff
to
you
know
have
fines
and,
along
those
lines,
do
you
think
you've
sort
of
met
that
point.
Do
you
know
where
that
spot
is
or
would
additional
staff
actually
generate
the
additional
revenue
in
some
ways.
P
P
For
instance,
if
we
had
a
parking
district
in
gun
barrel
and
that
included
neighborhoods
surrounding
the
gun
barrel
town
center,
then
that
would
likely
require
additional
staff
and
additional
fleet,
and
that's
where
our
challenge
will
be
is
is
right
now
our
workspace
that
we
house
our
enforcement
officers
out
of
where
they
have
lockers
and
showers
and
those
types
of
things,
the
more
we
expand,
the
coverage
and
and
the
amount
of
of
area
that
they
need
to
be
enforcing
and
the
number
of
staff
we
would
require
to
do
that
effectively.
P
P
I
don't
know
that
we
included
that
level
of
analysis
in
this
specific
work.
I
feel
really
good
about
my
team's
capabilities
and,
where
they're
at
right
now-
and
I
don't
know
that
mallory
and
your
discussions
with
are-
are
proposed-
steps
forward
that
that
there
were
any
concerns
raised
by
our
enforcement
team
on
that
front.
But
in
short,
yes,
I
feel
good
about
where
we're
at
in
our
capacity
to
to
take
on
a
little
bit
more
on
the
enforcement
side.
P
But
it's
certainly
something
that
we
will
continue
to
track
and
in
the
event
that
we
identify
that
we
need
to
expand
our
enforcement
staff,
acknowledging
that
that
they
do
bring
in
more
money
for
the
organization
in
the
german
fund
than
it
costs
to
pay
them.
That's
certainly
something
that
we
would
want
to
follow
very
closely.
T
X
J
T
I
can
add
just
a
little
bit
more
color.
I
suppose
I
think
so
so
chris
mentioned
the
the
meetings
that
we
had
with
staff
teams.
We
had
two
sets
of
pretty
intensive
meetings
with
individual
staff
teams,
noting
that
amps
is
a
hugely
interdepartmental
effort
that
requires
a
lot
of
staff,
liaising
and
and
manpower
or
person
power.
I'm
sorry!
So
we
when
we
first
talked
about
these
recommendations,
we
had
an
individual
meetings
with
the
enforcement
and
muni
court's
team,
both
of
whom
said
this.
T
This
is
doable
and
then,
when
we
were
developing
the
implementation
and
action
plan,
we
again
met
with
enforcement
and
munich,
in
addition
to
many
other
staff
teams,
to
make
sure
that
this
was
implementable,
they're,
confident
about
their
staffing
capabilities
and
also
confident
about
the
software
software
and
technology
capabilities.
That
was
a
huge
consideration,
given
that
we're
adding
a
bit
more
nuance
and
complexity
to
how
we're
issuing
issuing
fines.
So
the
city's
current
software
package
is
capable
of
doing
this
work
without
any
upgrades,
so
that
was
very,
very
important
to
us.
T
We
looked
at
stuffing
in
the
in
the
next
couple
years,
the
the
immediate
term
2022
near
term
and
mid
to
long
term
and
we're
not
projecting
any
big
overhauls
or
staff
ads
to
get
this
work
done.
As
chris
mentioned.
T
This
does
require
some
additional
proactive
study
of
whether
parking
management
needs
to
be
extended
to
other
parts
of
the
city.
So
of
course
that
might
necessitate
some
more
enforcement
officials,
but
for
now
we're
feeling
quite
confident
about
the
staff
levels
that
we
have
to
get
these
implementation
action
steps
done
in
the
next
year
and
then
in
the
next
several
years.
B
Thank
you,
adam
juni
looks,
like
your
hand,
is
up
again.
V
Yeah,
I
just
have
a
few
questions
and
I
think
part
of
it
as
well
is
me
thinking
on
the
type
of
feedback.
I
want
to
give
you
when
we
get
to
that
point,
and
I
see
that
in
the
memo
it
says
that
parking
revenues
generated
are
sufficient
to
pay
for
current
expenses
associated
with
the
parking
program
and
other
transportation
demand
management
access
initiatives
led
by
the
city.
V
So,
and
I
hear
everything
that
you
said
to
adams
earlier
and
I
believe
it
was
mallory
who
mentioned
that
increasing
the
fees
from
20
to
closer
to
the
cu
violation
amount
which
is
between
35
to
60,
is
not
a
way
to
raise
revenue
but
a
way
to
curtail
behaviors,
but
nonetheless
we
will
have
more
money
than
before.
So
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
what
will
this
money
be
used
for,
and
I
looked
in
the
memo
really
quickly.
V
I
did
not
see
your
annual
revenue
coming
from
violations,
so
I'm
sure
that's
going
to
be
a
substantial
amount
from
what
it
used
to
be
to
what
it
will
be,
and
I
just
want
to
know
what
will
that
money
be
used
for.
P
So
we
and
community
vitality
and
transportation
and
mobility
do
not
have
the
benefit
of
receiving
those
resources
into
our
operating
budgets,
and
so
we
certainly
are
making
sure
that,
as
as
the
finance
and
budget
folks
are
working
through
the
2022
budget,
that
that
they
can
take
into
consideration
these
proposed
changes
in
their
overall
budget
outlook
for
2022.
P
I
know
they
are.
They
are
taking
a
more
conservative
approach
just
because
parking
behavior
has
not
returned
back
to
2019
levels,
but
I
would
love
if
there
is
anybody
from
finance
that
that
is.
That
is
on
the
call
right
now
that
wants
to
share
where
they're
at
with
this
right
now.
I
do
know
that
we
are
in
conversations
with
them
to
make
sure
that
it's
included
in
your
overall
2022
budget
conversation.
P
It's
just
it's
not
money
that
we
are
in
a
position
to
propose
how
you
spend
it.
We
do
have
asks
coming
in
the
2022
budget
directly
associated
with
the
implementation
of
these
strategies.
B
Is
that
all
juni
anything
else?
Thank
you.
Thank
you
marion.
Thank
you,
chris
all
right,
any
other
questions
for
staff.
B
Seeing
none,
I
have
a
couple
one.
One
of
the
lines
of
questioning
from
one
of
my
colleagues
had
to
do
with
the
delivery
vehicles
and
and
how
and
the
response
was
that
you'll
have
these
zones
and
where
people
can
park
to
make
their
deliveries.
B
There
are
other
mobile
businesses
and
I
was
curious
to
know
what
you
found
out
in
your
outreach
to
the
mobile
businesses,
people
who
are
doing
yard
work
or
are
doing
housekeeping
things
like
that,
where
they
have
to
pull
down
equipment
or
carry
things
back
and
forth.
B
What
kinds
of
accommodations
were
made
for
those
businesses
in
terms
of
the
the
curbside
management
and
and
and
fines,
and
things
like
that.
P
So,
thank
you
very
much
mary
for
that
question.
We
did
hear
you
loud
and
clear
at
our
previous
study
session
earlier
this
year
on
the
need
to
reach
out
to
those
businesses
specifically
and
the
project
team
did
have
some
focus
group
or
a
survey
that
was
sent
out
specifically
to
those
types
of
businesses
neighborhood-based
mobile
businesses
mallory.
P
I
would
love
to
hear
from
you
if
you
want
to
provide
a
high-level
overview
of
that
conversation,
and
then
we
also
are
proposing
a
new
mobile
based
business
parking
permit
product
in
this
work,
and
so
I'd
love
to
hear
maybe
mallory.
If
you
want
to
share
more
about
that
detail,.
T
Yes,
thank
you.
So
we
did
a
number
of
outreach
specifically
to
mobile
businesses,
as
well
as
npp
holders
who
employ
mobile
business
owners
via
survey
or
questionnaire.
I
guess
is
the
technical
term,
and
then
we
did
a
number.
We
did
three.
I
believe
npp
focus
groups
with
npp
permit
holders
and
that
included
some
questioning
around
how
they
currently
use
or
have
mobile
businesses
park
when
they're
when
they're
conducting
services
at
their
home.
T
But
there
really
needs
to
be
a
more
differentiation
between
these
mobile
businesses
that
are
frequenting
these
zones
and
doing
work
in
these
zones
on
a
regular
basis
so
that
they
can
have
their
own
permit.
Rather
than
always
having
to
ask
the
the
person
that
they're
working
for
for
the
permit
that
extra
layer
of
communication
and
coordination-
and
sometimes
you
know
the
contractor-
is
coming
to
do,
work
and
the
the
resident
isn't
there
to
assist
them
or
help
them,
so
that
person
ends
up
getting
penalized
for
doing
doing
their
work.
T
So
that's
why
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
wanted
to
have
this
separate
product
for
them
that
would
be
priced
identically
to
the
business.
The
existing
business
permit
and
would
have
you
know
similarly
equal
impacts
on
our
cost
recovery
goals,
and
then
the
other
consideration
is.
We
want
to
be
able
to
track
those
permit
types
separately,
because
there's
also
been
some
issues
with
planning
and
permitting
and
building
granting
permits
to
contractors
who
then
have
parking
permits
to
work
in
the
zones
and
and
kind
of
over
permitting
in
those
areas.
T
So
what
happens?
Is
everyone
on
one
street
is
getting
their
kitchen
redone,
let's
say,
and
so
you
have.
You
know
four
or
five
contractors
doing
work
in
that
area
and
the
customer
service
team
doesn't
have
the
ability
to
track
those
separately
because
they're
using
visitor
permits
or
guest
permits
or
permits
that
are
already
in
the
system.
So
that's
you
know.
Those
are
the
issues
that
we
heard
and
we
that
we
wanted
to
work
to
solve
with
this
separate
mobile
business
permit.
B
Thank
you
for
that.
I
appreciate
that
work
and
then
kind
of
and
ryan
shouchard
from
tab
who
was
advocating
for
thousand
dollar
npp
permits
and
and
to
take
a
bolder
move.
I'm
wondering
you
know.
He
also
mentioned
the
climate
study
session
that
we
had
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
as
part
of
that
climate
study
session,
the
other
things
that
came
up
were
that
actions
have
to
be
systems,
changes
and
and
scalable,
as
well
as
the
whole
climate
action,
focuses
on
equity
and
resilience.
B
So
what
my
question
is
for
staff
is:
how
does
the
work
that
you
are
doing
here?
Q
Q
B
Yes,
so,
for
example,
with
our
climate
work,
one
of
the
things
that
we
were
up
against
was
the
120
percent
rule
with
solar,
and
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
we
were
able
to
overcome
through
a
partnership
that
kind
of
went
outside
the
path
that
we
were
previously
on.
B
So
I'm
wondering
in
order
to
achieve
more
of
those
climate
goals
that
are
being
advocated
for
by
by
tab,
then
what
what
do
we
run
up
against
in
terms
of
say,
state
laws
that
are
limiting
what
we
can
do
so
say,
for
example,
also,
we
can't
control
rtd
and
there's
only
so
much
there's
only
so
much
that
we
can
do
in
terms
of
transit.
Q
So
you
know
when
we
look
at
the
the
climate
action
plan
and
we
look
at
the
transportation
sector
and
we
look
at
our
goal
of
an
80
reduction,
primarily
though,
that
reduction
that
we
anticipate
comes
from
two
things:
changes
in
cafe,
standards,
the
the
automobile
efficiency
standards
and
electric
vehicle
adoption.
Q
Those
are
two
major
sectors
that
we
need
to
see
progress
in
to
meet
that
80
reduction
goal,
and
you
know
we
certainly
can
incentivize.
You
know
electric
vehicle
adoption
to
some
extent,
maybe
not
so
much
locally,
but
cafe
standards.
You
know,
so
that's
something
that
is
completely
outside.
We
had
the
obama
standards
and
some
of
those
were
were
pulled
back
during
the
last
administration.
So
I
think
those
are
two
examples
you
know.
Q
Mode
shift
certainly
is
another
factor
to
reach
that
80
percent
goal,
but
it
is
smaller
compared
to
the
progress
we
can
make
in
electrical
electric
vehicle
adoption
and
cafe,
standards
and-
and
one
thing
I
just
say,
is
you
know
parking
management
and
parking
pricing
alone.
While
it
is
a
tool,
it
is
an
effective
tool
for
changing
travel
behavior.
Q
It
is
alone
not
sufficient
to
do
so.
We
have
to
have
a
multimodal
system
that
provides
options
for
people
that
are
competitive
to
the
private
automobile
and
not
just
in
terms
of
cost,
but
also
in
terms
of
reliability
in
terms
of
convenience
frequency,
and
so
that
you
know
what
you
said.
That
reminds
me
of
rtd.
Right,
I
mean
we
work
closely
with
rtd
staff,
but
we've
seen
rtd's
financial
position
and
we've
seen
services
cut.
You
were
on
the
pass
program
working
group
with
me.
Q
We
saw
changes
made
to
the
past
to
the
eco
pass
programs,
our
master
contracts
in
the
districts
that
have
been
detrimental
to
that,
and
you
know
significantly
increasing
the
cost.
You
know,
and
now
we
have
covid
we.
You
know
we
have
seen
as
such
a
significant
decrease
in
transit
use
and
so
far
we
have
not
really
seen
the
recovery.
Q
We're
look
just
now
looking
at
some
preliminary
rtd
service
changes
for
the
fall
and
we
are
seeing
some
increases,
but
we're
not
seeing
the
increases
that
we
need-
and
you
know
it
reminds
me
of
when
boulder
county
was
doing
their
tmp
and
they
received
some
data
from
cell
phones,
and
that
indicated
that
60
of
the
trips
on
the
diagonal
were
coming
from
larimer
and
weld
county.
Those
are
outside
of
our
rtd
service
area.
Q
Those
people
are
coming
and
transit
is,
is
never
going
to
be
a
great
option
for
those
people
in
comparison
to
the
private
automobile.
So
I
think
those
are
the
things
some
of
the
things
that
we're
running
against
that
are
somewhat
outside
of
our
control.
Q
You
know,
hopefully,
we
can
move
forward
with
rtd
and
discussions
about
expanding
our
hop
model,
which
would
provide
more
local
control
of
our
transit
service,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
make
some
progress
with
them
on
on
making
changes
again
to
our
past
program,
so
that
we
can
extend
the
benefits
that
we
provide
say
through
our
neighborhood
ecopass
program.
We
know
it's
not
the
most
socially
equitable
program,
but
we
know
that
there
are
options,
especially
through
technology
with
mobile
ticketing
and
the
myride
card,
that
that
we
can.
Q
We
can
make
changes
and
and
hopefully
change
that,
but
it's
going
to
take
rtd's
willingness
and
their
financial
input
to
to
make
those
changes.
So
those
are
you
know
some
of
the
things
that
immediately
come
to
mind.
P
And
I
want
to
maybe
point
out
just
more
locally
in
consideration
of
of
the
things
that
we
do
have
control
over
in
the
city
and
the
things
that
we
don't.
P
You
know
if
we
wanted
to
charge
a
lot
more
for
parking
in
the
downtown
in
university
hill
in
boulder
junction,
we
don't
have
any
control
over
how
much
mace
rich
charges
for
parking
at
their
shopping
center,
and
so
that's
another
consideration
that
we
want
to
be
really
careful
and
thoughtful
about,
and
until
we
change
our
parking
code
and
redevelopment
happens,
which
translates
into
a
different
way
of
parking
being
being
managed
on
private
property.
B
Seeing
none
we
can
move
on
to
the
comment
phase
with
anybody
like
to
kick
us
off.
B
Seeing
no
hands
aaron
and
then
sam.
R
Since
nobody
else
wanted
to
go
first
I'll,
go
ahead
and
dive
in
well
chris
and
chris
and
mallory,
and
everyone
else
has
been
working
on
this.
Thank
you
for
years
of
effort
and
a
very
thoughtful
approach
to
these
problems.
You
know
you've
come
up
with
some
really
nuanced
responses
to
challenging
situations
and
difficulties.
R
I
appreciate
the
attention
to
donald
shoots,
great
parking
ideas.
We
we
wouldn't
want
to
disappoint
the
pistas
in
our
community
by
not
taking
those
ideas
into
account.
So
I
think
I
think
generally
y'all
are
on
the
right
track.
It
sounds
like
you've
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do
right.
I
saw
that
each
of
these
is
going
to
require,
looks
like
years
of
work
to
measure
everything
appropriately
and
tailor
the
the
next
steps
to
the
program.
R
I
appreciate
how
you're
thinking
about
doing
that
carefully
and
deliberately
so
good
luck
with
all
that
work.
I
do
have
a
couple
specific,
so
the
the
number
of
permits
that
people
are
able
to
get
is
substantial
right,
so
they
can
use
by
your
answers.
R
You
know
can
get
up
to
three
for
their
individual
vehicles,
plus
their
their
visitor
passes
and
their
guest
passes,
and
so
I
think,
increasing
the
price,
for
those
is
a
reasonable
thing
to
do,
but
it
also
seems
like
maybe
we
should
include
pricing
for
those
visitor
passes,
as
well
as
for
their
their
per
vehicle
passes,
particularly
given
that
that
you're
doing
those
new
mobile
business
type
parking
passes,
which,
by
the
way,
I
think,
is
a
great
idea,
and
I
appreciate
your
attention
to
that
issue
so
seems
I
seems
like
part
of
of
right
sizing.
R
The
the
fees
for
this
program
would
be
to
include
those
additional
passes
and-
and
I
would
say
to
make
sure
that
each
individual
pass
has
its
own
separate
cost
so
that
you
know
people
can
have
two
visitor
passes
if
that's
important
to
them,
but
it
seems
like
having
a
cost
for
that
would
be
appropriate
and
then
I'll
say
that
yeah.
R
I
appreciate
you
looking
for
cost
recovery
in
that
program,
but
it
seems
like,
in
terms
of
you
know,
making
a
little
bit
of
a
dent
on
climate
issues
with
our
parking
policies
here
that
if
we
could
go
somewhat
past
cost
recovery
in
terms
of
and
not
not
throwing
all
that
necessarily
straight
into
the
general
fund,
but
look
at
ways
that
we
could.
R
So
I
get
that
you
know.
Chris.
You
had
a
good
answer
about
chris
jones,
you
had
a
good
answer
about
how
you
were
going
to
be.
You
know
going
about
this
very
carefully
in
terms
of
looking
about
what
those
price
numbers
should
be
over
a
few
years,
but
I
would
I
would
go
ahead
and
personally
give
the
direction
that
I
I
would
like
to
see
you
build
into
that
process
of
thought
of.
R
I
feel
like
you
all,
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do,
and-
and
I
look
forward
to
the
next
steps
and
also,
if
there's
any
anybody
from
the
planning
department
here,
I
really
do
look
forward
to
working
on
our
parking
policy
for
our
new
projects,
because
I
think
that'll
have
a
really
big
impact
on
on
again
reducing
single
occupancy
vehicle
used
in
the
community.
B
Thanks
aaron,
we
have
sam
and
then
bob.
M
Thanks
mary,
I
just
want
to
say
again
that
I
think
you've
done
a
really
nice
job
of
breaking
it
down
the
parking
problem
for
us
into
some
bite-sized
chunks
and
you've
got
some
good
proposals.
I
would
support
all
of
them.
Generally
speaking,
starting
with
the
neighborhood
parking
management
price
increases
and
I
think
they're
pretty
substantial.
M
I
mean
they're,
not
the
50x,
that
we
heard
from
tab
that
might
be
good
or
or
so,
but
they
are
a
forty
percent
increase
from
one
year
to
the
next,
the
following
year
to
thirty
percent
increase
year
over
year
following
year
to
twenty
five
percent
increase
year
over
year.
So
I
think
those
are
substantial.
M
I
wouldn't
object
to
what
aaron
talked
about
as
long
as
we
got
enough
feedback
from
the
each
of
the
parking
permit
areas
themselves
that
they
wanted
to
see
that
extra
money
used
for
some
kind
of
tdm
in
their
area.
I
think
that's
kind
of
a
neat
idea
to
do
it
that
way,
but
I
will
say
that,
from
a
climate
perspective,
it
is
an
interesting
concept
to
try
and
keep
residents
from
parking
near
their
home
through
increased
prices
when
those
residents
may
well
not
commute.
Very
far.
M
Generally
speaking,
we
have
110
000
people
live
in
boulder,
40
000
of
those
work
in
boulder,
another
20
000
give
or
take
commute
out
of
boulder
to
work,
but
by
and
large
it
would
appear
to
me
that
a
lot
of
the
folks
who
are
part
of
the
npp
programs
don't
necessarily
commute
with
those
cars
a
lot
or
very
long
distances.
So
one
thing
I'd
ask
if
we're
going
to
have
the
neighborhood
parking
strategy.
M
Be
part
of
our
climate
response
is
that
we
quantify
that
somehow,
like
if
you're
increasing
the
price
of
the
commuter
parking
passes
by
double,
you
probably
would
see
a
response
in
the
number
of
commuters
who
bought
those
passes
right,
but
that
wouldn't
necessarily
reduce
the
their
commute
unless
they
were
in
other
modes.
So
there's
a
question
of
other
modes
and
then
I
think
a
key
point
that
was
brought
up
in
the
idea
of
using
parking
as
a
climate
tool
is
what
about
all
the
private
parking.
M
So
if
we
look
at
where
40
of
our
employment
is
out
in
the
flat
irons
park
area
in
east
boulder,
almost
all
that
parking
is
private,
and
so,
if
you
wanted
to
make
a
dent
in
the
commuting
habits
of
people
who
worked
in
east
boulder
you'd
have
to
address
the
private
parking
much
as
mace
rich
was
mentioned,
which
will
now
be
the
site
of
our
largest
single
office
building
in
boulder
and
all
the
people
who
will
be
working.
There
will
be
parking
in
private
parking
areas
and
may
not
be
paying
anything
for
their
parking.
M
So
it's
nice
that
we
want
to
really.
You
know
hammer
on
the
folks
who
are
parking
in
their
neighborhoods,
but
the
question
really
needs
to
be
asked:
what's
the
bang
for
our
buck,
you
know
for
the
political
capital
that
we're
going
to
spend
on
any
of
this
parking
stuff.
Where
are
we
getting
the
most
climate
response
and
I
would
climb
that
we
need
to
really
seriously
look
at
private
parking
and
in
commuters
is
maybe
the
first
place
for
that
to
mary's
point,
which
I
thought
was
really
good.
M
You
know
we
just
signed
a
new
transportation
bill
in
the
state
which
is
statewide
and
which
really
will
promote
that
eb
adoption
chris
that
you
were
talking
about,
and
I
think
that
is
an
important
step.
To
what
extent
can
we
do
the
same
thing
regionally
with
parking
and
transit
like?
Is
there
a
way
that
we
can
form
a
coalition
regionally
to
do
these
same
kinds
of
things
at
the
same
time,
so
that
we
don't
hear
complaints
from
businesses
that
you're
making
us
less
competitive
than
our
neighboring
communities?
Who
don't
do
this?
M
So
it's
a
super
complex
problem,
because
you
can
address
the
travel
habits
with
parking
pricing
and
maybe
not
really
impact
the
carbon
emissions
piece
very
much
unless
you
think
carefully
about
how
you're
directing
your
price
increases.
So
I
would
just
say
that,
as
a
general
comment,
I
I
also
think
that
your
idea
of
performance
base
pricing
for
parking
pricing.
The
gold,
silver
and
base
looks
like
a
great
way
to
go,
and
so
I
think,
you've
done
a
nice
job
with
that
and
with
fines
as
well.
M
I
mean
I
really
would
like
to
the
one
thing
I
certainly
agreed
with
mr
shachard
about
was
what
we
do
in
response
to
complaints
of
people
parking
in
bike
lanes.
You
know
if
it's
a
delivery
truck
it's
there
and
it's
gone,
but
when
there's
somebody
that
parks
there
for
half
an
hour,
I
kind
of
agree
I'd
like
to
see
that
car
towed.
So
I
don't
know
what
to
do
about
that,
but
I
think
upping
the
fines
is
useful.
M
M
So
let
me
go
to
your
questions
and
see
what
else
so,
there's
the
refined
strategies
next
step
for
implementation.
I
think
you've
done
a
great
job
reaching
out.
I
think
one
of
rachel's
suggestions
of
making
sure
that
you're
talking
to
some
end
commuters
and
maybe
not
the
highest
income
in
commuters,
because
I
think
they
can
take
care
of
themselves,
but
the
middle
and
lower
income
in
commuters
might
be
ones
to
hear
from
about
how
they'd
react
to
strategies
that
are
proposed,
and
I
think
I've
made
my
response
to
the
third
bullet.
M
How
parking
interfaces
with
climate
action
is
complex,
there's
good
reason
to
want
to
reduce
single
occupant
vehicles
across
the
board,
even
in
the
absence
of
climate.
But
if
we're
focused
on
climate,
we
should
make
sure
that
the
actions
we're
taking
on
parking
have
the
maximum
impact
on
emissions.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
sam
next,
up
bob
followed
by
nearby.
N
Thanks
mary,
I'm
going
to
agree
with
with
aaron
and
sam.
I
think
this
is
a
great
first
step
and,
and
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
pushback
on
anything's,
been
recommended.
So
if
I
don't
say
anything
assume
that
I
support
what
staff
is
recommending,
the
one
area
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
about
is
is
is,
is
the
increase
in
the
parking
rate
in
the
garage
is
downtown
for
for
two
reasons.
One
right
now,
our
downtown
parking
garages
are
free
on
saturdays
and
sundays.
N
We
have
a
so
reason
number
one.
We
have
a
perception
and
I
think
it
is
just
a
perception.
N
We
have
a
perception
by
some
members
of
our
community
that
it's
difficult
to
park
downtown,
and
so
some
people
don't
come
downtown
and
some
people
don't
have
access
to
to
transit
or
bikes
and
so
driving
to
downtown
whether
they're
coming
from
a
transit
desert
or
they're
coming
from
another
city
is
their
only
option,
and
the
one
thing
that
I
know
the
downtown
has
been
successful
about
is
touting
the
fact
that
well
on
weekends,
it's
free-
you
can
come
on
saturday
and
come
on
sunday
or
the
farmers
market.
N
N
N
I
want
to
echo
concerns
that
rachel
raised
oftentimes.
The
workers
we
have
working
downtown
on
the
weekends
are
the
lowest
wage
workers
they're,
the
dishwashers,
the
people
waiting
tables,
the
people
at
the
cash
registers
are
not
the
office
workers
or
the
people
that
are
making
minimum
wage
or
thereabouts
and
three
dollars
may
not
seem
like
a
lot.
N
But
if
it's
three
dollars
on
a
friday
night
because
they
they
have
to
go
home
and
three
dollars
again
on
a
saturday
night,
three
dollars
again
on
a
sunday
night
and
suddenly
that's
that's,
that's
upwards
of
an
hour's
worth
of
their
their
wage.
That
weekend,
and
so
I
appreciate
the
fact,
you're
going
to
be
doing
some
more
outreach
to
low-income
folks
and
trying
to
find
some
subsidy
programs.
But
I
for
all
three
reasons.
I
would
really
encourage
us
to
stick
with
our
free
parking
on
the
weekends
in
the
garages.
B
Thank
you
bob
nearby.
L
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
quick
response
and
say
I
appreciate
everything
I
don't
have
much
pushback
on
anything
as
well,
a
little
bit
of
what
bob
was
saying
with
the
parking
garages
making
sure
that
people
can
get
down
to
town,
there's
lots
of
people
who
cannot
take
other
forms
of
transportation,
and
so
I
just
wouldn't
want
shops,
small
businesses
to
get
harmed
by
that
a
little
bit
concerned
about
some
of
the
neighborhoods
for
residents
who
live
there.
L
But
I'm
willing
to
kind
of
watch
and
see
see
how
it
goes
and
hear
from
the
community
as
we
continue
on
with
the
next
steps.
So
pretty
pretty
mild
feedback.
I
think
you
guys
are
doing
a
wonderful
job
and
I'm
excited
to
see
how
this
progresses
so
well
done
from
my
side.
B
Thank
you
nearby
aaron
have
is
that
an
old
hand
or
a
new
hand?
Oh.
I
Rachel
thanks,
I'm
gonna
echo
most
of
what's
already
been
said,
I'm
largely
in
support
of
the
staff
memo.
I,
like
aaron's
suggestion
to
look
into
raising
the
the
rates
and
using
the
additional
funds
for
kind
of
transportation
related
purposes
to
sam's
point
in
getting
data
on
residential
kind
of
travel
patterns
and
whether
they
will
have
an
impact
on
climate.
I
agree
we
need
to
do
that
and
I
would
again
welcome
consulting
with
eab
or
our
staff
experts.
I
It
feels
like
it's
not
yet
like
a
holistic
look
at
this,
because
we
are
all
concerned
with
the
climate
impacts
and
it's
again
while
I
appreciate
transportation
department
really
lifting
them
up
our
tab.
I
do
think
that
it
should
be
from
our
resident
experts
on
on
climate
and
environmental
issues,
so
we'd
love
to
see
that
in
the
next
step,
and
then
I
I
also
like
sam's
idea
of
a
regional
approach
kind
of
like
we
were
looking
at
with
minimum
wage.
I
We
were
going
to
look
at
at
raising
that
regionally
so
that
we
could
stay
regionally,
competitive
and
and
not
kind
of
drive
people
to
neighboring
cities.
So
I
don't
know
how
we
would
get
at
that
with
with
some
of
our
rates,
but
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
and
then
again,
kind
of
like
sam
was
getting
out
with
private
parking
if
our
goals
are
in
part
to
get
people
to
move
away
from
driving
both
for
climate
and
vision,
zero
kind
of
purposes
seems
like.
I
We
should
also
be
looking
more
at
residential
neighborhoods
like
mine,
where
there's
just
lots
of
street
parking,
and
so
we
do
get
the
benefit
of
the
street
parking
just
without
the
the
crowding,
and
so
we
don't
need
in
neighborhood
parking
permits.
So
I
don't
know
what
other
cities
are
doing
if
anything
on
that
front.
But
I
would
be
curious
if,
if
other
places
are
sort
of
converting
more
residential
street
parking
to
something
that
offers
a
better
community
benefit.
I
So
I
guess
I
would
just
be
curious
to
hear
if
that's
happening
and
what
the
options
might
be
and
otherwise
we'll
again
just
lift
up.
I
think
it
is
important,
as
part
of
our
overall
strategies,
that
we
look
very
seriously
at
using
this
opportunity
to
promote
our
climate
crisis
response
goals.
Thanks.
B
Thank
you,
rachel
junie,.
V
Thank
you,
mary.
That
was
really
a
great
memo,
great
presentation,
very
thorough.
I
agree
with
the
residential
parking
program
plan.
V
V
Where
is
the
evidence
and
data
even
though
you
mentioned
there
are
a
few
cities
around
the
country
that
have
implemented
the
graduated
fine,
but
I'm
just
not
sure
if
that
can
really
impact
behavior-
and
you
mentioned
it's
a
small
group
that
is
often
repeat
offenders,
so
I'm
thinking
well,
does
a
small
group
really
should
be,
or
what's
the
word
almost
like
the
anchor
as
to
why
we
change
or
or
or
find
the
amount
of
fine
that
we
charge?
V
V
I
mean,
I
know,
that's
a
lot
of
work
because
we're
talking
in
commuters,
that's
a
lot
of
people
and
people
who
are
not
living
in
the
community,
but
they
also
impact
us,
as
was
mentioned
earlier,
when
we
talk
about
climate
change
and
climate
resiliency,
but
I
think
they
play
a
huge
role
because
I
live
near
downtown
and
I
can
just
walk
just
about
anywhere,
but
these
people
can't-
and
so
they
really,
they
impact
our
behavior
in
a
work
so
finding
a
way
of
reaching
some,
if
not
all,
but
I
I
get
a
sense
that
maybe
the
chamber
and
the
small
businesses,
somehow
you
know,
are
somewhat
a
substitute,
but
nonetheless
knowing
the
impact
it
would
be
would
be
very
informative
and
helpful
because
again
they
are
the
one
communing
in.
V
I
agree
wholeheartedly
with
bob
and
there's
something,
as
you
were,
having
this
discussion
tonight
when
I
heard
all
the
different
processes,
the
different
type
of
engagement
and
programs.
I
was
thinking
to
myself.
I've
walked
around
boulder
for
the
last
three
years.
I
do
believe
this
is
a
very
friendly
community.
It's
inviting
it's
beautiful
and
the
more
I
hear
about
the
different
programming,
I'm
thinking
my
gosh.
This
is
sounding
very
unfriendly
and
the
reason
why
I
said
that
is
because
I
have
visited
new
york
city
and
their
parking
system.
V
It's
a
beautiful
city,
it's
a
very,
very
inspiring
city.
Anyone
who
well,
I
remember
the
first
time
I
went
to
new
york.
It
was
so
overwhelming
that
I
cried
and
I
cried
because
of
how
beautiful
it
was.
But
parking
in
new
york
is
horrible.
It's
almost
like
I
went
to
law
school,
it's
almost
like
you
have
to
read
it
in
a
way
you
park
at
this
time
and
just
hearing
you
tonight.
I
thought
to
myself.
V
You
know
the
in
commuter
pass
to
close
to
a
thousand
or
more
because
of
our
climate
goals,
and
but
I
think
it's
so
important
as
a
community,
as
we
think
about
these
things
that
we
think
about
again.
We
care
about
equity.
What
does
that
really
mean
if
we
increase
it
to
a
thousand
dollars?
V
Who
are
those
people
who
are
in
commuting
into
boulder
every
day,
and
I
think
taking
into
account
of
who
these
people
are
and
what
they
do
well
really
help
inform
how
much
it
should
be,
and
I
think
again,
part
of
that
discussion
having
hrc
might
actually
help
us
in
in
in
figuring
that
out
again.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I
think
it
was
really
really
great
presentation
very
thoughtful.
V
Make
us
think
about
the
hard
questions,
but
I
think
some
some
things.
Definitely
we
need
to
think
along
the
line
of
equity
and
the
impact
of
the
working-class
people
who
are
coming
into
boulder
and
we
need
them.
That's
another
thing,
too,
is
that
these
people
are
needed.
You
know
how
do
we
make
life
easier
for
them,
as
well
as
we're
contemplating
how
to
make
the
environment
better?
So
it's
it's
multi-pronged.
It's
not
one
thing.
It's
not!
V
You
know
it's
not
curbing
people's
behavior
in
that
sense,
where
we
somehow
penalize
them
from
coming
into
boulder.
Thank
you.
O
Now,
first
I'd
like
to
say
she
has
nailed
new
york
parking
in
her
description
of
it.
It's
the
home
of
breathtakingly
high
fines
and
close
combat
if
you
actually
want
to
get
a
parking
spot.
My
my
comments
are
very
very
brief.
I
think
it
was
an
excellent
presentation,
very
comprehensive.
O
I
share
bob's
concern
about
the
impact
on
workers
of
increased
parking.
I'd
ask
you
to
look
at
that
a
little
bit,
and
I
also
liked
aaron's
suggestion
that
maybe
we
go
a
little
bit
past
cost
recovery
in
our
parking
programs
and
and
see
if
there's
a
little
bit
of
revenue
that
can
be
raised,
they
would
do
it.
O
But
I
think
it's
certainly
a
concept
worth
taking
a
harder
look
at,
but
other
than
that,
I'm
I'm
very
supportive
of
what
you've
done.
It
obviously
is
reflective
of
a
lot
of
work
and
you
should
be
very
pleased
with
the
product
that
you
produced.
So
thank
you.
B
Thanks
mark
any
other
comments
I
will
weigh
in
then
I
agree
with
aaron
on
kind
of
tweaking
the
the
neighborhood
parking
permit
program
so
that
each
type
of
permit
has
its
own
pricing,
especially
with
the
visitor
parking.
I
know
of
folks
that
hand
over
those
visitor
parkings
to
people
who
actually
work
downtown,
so
you
might
want
to
you
know
kind
of
reconsider
that
one
a
little
bit.
B
B
So
the
performance-based
pricing
is
good
agree
with
that.
B
The
the
fines
that
are
stepped
up
for
blocking
buses
and
bikes-
I
think
that's
that's
a
good
recommendation
as
well
talking
to
more
in
commuters,
especially
middle
and
lower
income.
B
But
again,
I
don't
believe
that
that
was
part
of
the
scope
of
this
particular
project
and
I
agree
with
bob
with
respect
to
the
parking
garages
on
weekends,
for
all
the
reasons
that
he
stayed
it
as
far
as
the
the
graduated
fines
for
repeat
offenders,
I'm
I'm
going
to
have
to
disagree
with
juni,
because
I
think
that
is
a
strategy
that
people
use
as
as
as
staff
convey
to
us
in
the
presentation
that
people
will
take
their
chances
because
fifteen
dollars
is
so
low
that
hey
they
can
pay
lots
of
fifteen
dollar
tickets
and,
as
we
learned
in
the
in
the
policing
presentation
with
the
pareto
principle,
it's
probably
20
of
the
people
they
get
80
of
the
tickets.
B
So
if
it
does
change
behavior,
maybe
we'll
you
know,
we
may
get
those
repeat
offenders
to
quit.
Repeat
offending.
So
that's
really
all
I
have.
I
really
appreciate
the
outreach
that
you
did
to
the
mobile
businesses
and
I
really
appreciate
it.
The
responses
to
my
question
about
the
systems
and
scaling
of
parking
policies.
Again,
I
don't
think
that
was
part
of
the
scope
of
this
particular
project,
but
thank
you
very
much.
I
think
that
you
are
on
the
right
path.
B
That's
all.
I
have
counsel
any
other
comments.
P
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mary.
Thank
you,
council.
I
would
say
there
I
feel
like
there's
a
little
bit
of
ambiguity,
moving
forward
on
the
garage
pricing
on
weekends
and
the
great
graduated
fines
as
far
as
any
not
of
of
of
counsel
on
whether
or
not
we
should
continue
to
include
those
as
I
was
just
going
through
my
accounts,
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we
want
to
try
to
provide
clarity
now
or
consider
that
later
on.
B
I
I
think
that
we
could
do
that
right
now.
If
we
can
do
just
you
know
a
quick
poll
and
and
see
how
people
are
feeling
about.
Let's
start
with
the
the
graduated
fines
who
would
like
go
ahead.
Who
would
like
to
change
them?
I
guess.
B
Okay
and
the
parking
garages
maintaining
the
free
on
weekends
for
parking
garages
who
is
supportive?
R
Just
said,
I'm
open
to
considering
starting
to
charge
on
the
weekends
at
bob's
point
about
the
sunday
being
free
on
street.
I
thought
was
a
good
one,
so
I
don't
know
that
if
maybe
the
place
to
start
would
be
saturday
if
we
did
start
charging
for
weekend
parking,
but
I
would
want
some.
If
we
did,
it
sounds
like
a
majority
doesn't
want
to
consider.
If
we
did
consider,
I
would
want
additional
downtime
business
outreach
before
we
did.
B
The
the
point
that
bob
made
about
the
free
on
sundays
was
sort
of
defeating
the
the
whole
purpose
behind
having
the
the
parking
garage
price
go
up.
So
a
little
more
analysis,
I
guess,
is
what
I
would
support
on
to
aaron's
point
before
deciding
that
both
days
would
be
free
would
be
my
my
suggestion.
So
to
pull
again
is
there
support
for
doing
a
little
more
analysis
on
the
sunday
piece
of
it
and
holding
on
to
the
saturday.
M
B
M
B
C
Thank
you,
mary,
and
I
apologize
that
my
video
is
off.
I've
been
popping
in
and
out
because
I
have
some
video
malfunction,
but
just
appreciate
a
the
thoughtful
discussion
and
really
the
feedback
of
incorporating
particularly
climate
and
equity
concerns
into
the
previous
conversation
and
personally
appreciated
hearing
more
of
junie's
personal
driving
habits.
So
thank
you
genie,
our
last
and
final
presentation.
C
W
Thanks
nuria
and
thank
you,
taylor
for
for
running
the
presentation
for
us
next
slide.
W
W
W
We
then
asked
voters
and
they
graciously
approved
a
three-year
0.3
percent
sales
tax
for
community
culture
and
safety.
That
was
followed
by
a
renewal
of
that
tax
for
four
additional
years
and
a
portion
of
both
of
those
were
given
to
community
nonprofits
and
then
also
in
2018.
W
The
city
dedicated
some
of
its
operating
revenue
from
the
general
fund
to
develop
a
government
capital
fund.
So
we
put
around
five
to
seven
million
a
year
into
that
fund.
Next
slide.
W
So
direction
we
just
wanted
to
remind
council
regarding
direction
from
the
february
9th
study
session
in
this
direction
was
given
to
both
the
f's
financial
strategy
committee
and
staff,
and
the
first
was
there
was
to
be
no
community
committee
that,
like
we
had
with
ccs
and
really
a
big
reason
behind
that
related
to
covid
back
in
2020
and
early
21
priorities
were
really
shifted
due
to
the
pandemic.
So
time
they're,
it
really
shortened
the
time
frame
for
work
on
this
project.
W
Also,
the
fsc
to
collaborate
with
outside
experts
in
developing
a
statistical,
valid
community
survey
also
recommend
a
tax
structure
so
term
and
designated
uses
based
on
the
community
outreach
results,
which
mainly
is
the
community
survey
and
then
recommend
initial
project
or
categories
for
the
ballot
language
and
as
a
reminder.
At
the
july
20th
study
session,
fsc
will
be
providing
recommendations
to
the
full
council
on
term
community
split
projects
and
debt
amounts
related
to
the
ballot
measure
to
be
considered
for
discussions
in
august.
W
There
were
two
climate
projects
that
we
also
included
in
this
list,
so
we're
looking
at
312
million
through
a
variety
of
projects,
most
of
which
we
are
hoping
to
fund
in
the
next
seven
years,
so
over
220
million
of
that
and
all
of
the
projects
identified
in
this
list
are
either
essential
or
import.
Important
per
our
budgeting
for
resilience.
Definitions
so
again
to
remind
you
essential,
is
for
basic
city
functioning,
critical
to
life
and
safety,
important
valued
by
the
community,
with
clear
legislative
support.
W
Also,
if
we
look
at
our
current
or
pending
master
plans,
93
of
these
projects
fall
into
fiscally
constrained
or
action
plans.
So
these
are
really
to
support
basic
city
services,
not
really
rising
to
the
level
of
the
visionary
plans
in
those
plant
master
plans
next
slide.
W
W
So
the
purpose
of
this
evening,
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
every
single
and
explain
every
single
project.
There
is
summary
information
in
your
packet,
but
we,
if
you
have
questions
about
specific
projects,
please
be
sure
to
ask
them.
We
do
have
staff
here
this
evening
who
will
be
able
to
answer
your
questions.
W
Boulder
has
fallen
behind
in
maintaining
and
replacing
the
capital
infrastructure
that
supports
its
first
responders.
As
and
clearly
as
you
can
see,
we
have
a
lot
of
aging
fire
stations
that
need
to
be
replaced.
In
addition,
if
we
are
looking
at
doing
advanced
life
support,
these
will
will
have
to
be
replaced.
We
don't
have
the
current
infrastructure
for
those
that
program.
W
Also
in
this
list,
you'll
notice,
the
public
safety
building
expansion
for
approximately
30
million,
along
with
some
other
smaller
police
department
projects.
Next
slide,
so
transportation
system
resilience,
maintaining
and
modernizing.
Boulder's
transportation
system
to
allow
for
safer
and
more
efficient
flow
for
all
modes
of
transportation,
pedestrian
bikes
vehicles,
better
traffic
flow
ultimately
leads
to
lower
ghg
emissions,
and
what
we
put
on
the
survey
is
certainly
the
largest
item
here.
Transportation
maintenance
also
included
in
unfunded
projects
are
hot
bus,
electrification,
as
well
as
transfer
transit
partnerships
and
some
other
projects.
W
Next
slide
active
and
healthy,
boulder
the
capital
stock
needed
to
provide
residents
the
amenities
and
opportunities
to
recreate
and
maintain
healthy
and
active
lifestyles.
Physical
health
and
well-being
are
critical
to
the
resilience
of
boulder
residents
here
included.
We
had
the
rec
center
renovations
and
I
will
note
we
do
have
a
special
climate
category,
but
these
certainly
include
retrofitting
to
our
climate
standards
a
boulder
creek
corridor,
various
parks
throughout
the
city,
along
with
athletic
fields
and
cultural
preservation,.
W
Next
slide
customer
service,
modernization,
providing
high
quality
customer
service
in
a
timely
manner
relies
on
information
flow
from
the
city
to
the
customer
and
residents,
and
vice
versa.
Modernizing
and
consolidating
the
city's
data
infrastructure
and
outreach
tool
will
allow
for
better
customer
service
for
all
needs.
We
talked
last
month
about
the
constituent,
relationship,
management
or
crm,
as
well
as
the
enterprise
data
warehouse
also
included
on
these
lists
are
some
large
systems
throughout
the
city
replacements
of
those
systems
as
as
well
as
some
smaller
I.t
projects.
W
Next
slide
progress
toward
climate
goals
of
boulder's,
ambitious
climate
goals
require
a
broad
effort,
as
it
relates
to
city
capital
at
a
minimum.
Boulders
aged
facilities
need
to
be
renovated
and
retrofitted
to
reduce
carbon
footprints,
so
these
are
the
projects
that
were
added
from
the
february
meeting
and
they
include
utilities,
undergrounding,
streetlight,
acquisition
and,
again,
just
to
note
many
other
projects
that
I've
talked
about
include
or
contribute
to
climate
goals.
Certainly,
the
fire
stations,
if
built,
would
also
be
up
to
our
code
as
well
as
many
of
these
other
projects.
W
W
We
have
things
such
as
alpine
balsam,
the
the
largest
one
here,
of
course,
is
our
maintenance
backlog
of
our
buildings.
It's
pretty
sizable,
as
you
can
see,
as
well
as
the
boulder
civic
area
phase
2
development
plan
next
slide.
W
So
those
are
the
projects
that
total
well
over
over
300
million
dollars
and
based
on
the
direction
that
we
were
given
in
february.
9Th
staff
and
the
fsc
financial
strategy
committee
set
out
to
narrow
down
the
list
to
a
small
number
of
projects
in
some
project
categories
that
can
be
included
in
the
community
survey
and
the
full
unfunded
need
list
was
informed
by
master
plans,
facility
assessment
and
other
tools
that
we
have
here
at
the
city.
W
These
were
carefully
selected
to
maximize
imp
impact,
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
it
had
a
broad
benefit
and
solve
pressing
capital
needs.
They
also
could
start
in
the
next
few
years
and
then
the
final
projects
selected
for
the
survey
did
include
criteria
or
were
selected
based
on
the
criteria
that
both
the
financial
strategy
committee
and
staff
worked
on
before
we
even
started
this
entire
exercise.
So
that
criteria
is
in
your
memo.
It's
pretty
extensive
and
I
think
important
to
the
overall
selection
here.
W
Next
slide
here
again
are
just
all
of
those
bolded
projects
that
were
included
in
the
survey
listed
on
one
page
for
you.
So
what
you'll
notice,
when
I
get
to
the
next
slide,
is
our
total
is
88
million,
which
is
less
than
what
we're
looking
at
receiving
for
the
tax
itself.
W
So
we
do
the
community
survey
really
to
gauge
community
support
for
a
tax
extension
ballot
item.
Some
of
the
things
asked
potential
uses
what
I've
talked
about,
this
entire
presentation,
specific
city
projects
and
project
categories
term
and
our
length
of
tax.
So
we
did
ask
questions
about
a
10-year
term
and
a
15-year
term
portion
of
tax
proceeds
that
would
be
dedicated
to
community
non-profits.
W
Through
a
grant
program.
We
asked
questions
on
a
10,
15
and
20
and
then
related
debt
authorization,
questions
for
both
a
10-year
debt
issuance
and
a
15-year
debt
issuance
and
as
a
reminder,
these
revenue
estimates
were
based
on
cu's
may
modeling.
So
certainly
we
do
expect
that
they
will
change
throughout
time,
but
this
is
the
best
information
that
we
have
as
of
right
now
and
then
for
my
final
remarks,
I
did
want
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
exciting
news
regarding
the
survey
itself.
W
W
Okay,
we
have
one
more
slide
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
joel
who
will
talk
about
the
community
nonprofit
outreach.
Y
Thanks
cheryl
good
evening
council,
joe
wagner
tax
and
special
projects
manager.
So,
in
addition
to
the
community
survey,
we're
also
having
some
conversations
with
the
local
nonprofit
community,
because
this
proposed
structure
for
the
community
nonprofit
component
is
a
departure
from
the
prior
two
ccs
ballot
measures.
We
wanted
to
ensure
that
we're
on
the
right
track,
so
we're
starting
this
outreach
to
community
groups,
we're
organizing
focus
groups
in
the
next
three
to
four
weeks
and
we're
targeting
two
groups
of
non-profits
in
two
separate
categories
of
focus
groups.
Y
Yet
that
might
have
capital
projects
that
they're
thinking
about
so
we'll
be
hosting
several
meetings
with
opportunities
to
attend
both
during
the
work
day
and
in
the
evening,
and
really
the
goal
of
these
meetings
is
to
share
the
current
council
vision
for
the
nonprofit
component
and
to
gather
feedback
from
these
organizations
on
how
to
present
this
concept
to
voters
what
feedback
they
might
give
us
for
administration
of
the
program
if
it's,
if
it's
approved
and
we're
also
hoping
to
form
connections
and
understand
what
the
nonprofit
community's
needs
are
as
well
as
gauge
interest
in
and
support
for
the
ballot
item.
N
Yeah,
first
of
all,
thank
you
to
staff
for
for
this
update
this.
This
is
very
helpful
for,
for
catching
several
of
us
up
on
on
the
process
and
and
more
information
about
some
of
these
prospective
projects
that
could
go
in
the
ballot.
I
have
a
a
a
couple
questions
about
specific
projects.
Then
I
have
a
few
questions
that
are
more
general.
I
think
my
first
question
really
is
probably
addressed
to
chief
calderazzo
and
it
relates
to
the
fire
station.
N
I'll
start
asking
my
question
as
that's:
coming
up.
So
among
the
88
million
dollars,
that's
being
po
projects
that
are
being
pulled.
Two
of
them
are
for
fire
station
stations.
One
is
11
million
dollars
for
completion
of
fire
station
number
three
and
another
35
million
is
for
a
new
fire
station,
either
a
new
one
for
number
two
or
number
four.
So
that's
46
million
dollars,
which
is
a
little
bit
more
than
half
of
the
88
million
dollars,
so
that
obviously
kind
of
swamps
things
a
bit
chief.
N
Is
it
possible
that
a
fire
station
replacement
can
be
done
for
less
than
35
million,
and
if
so,
what
would
we
be
giving
up
for
for
that?
If
we
made
it
if
we
did
station
for
25
or
30
million
just
to
pick
numbers
out
of
the
air.
Z
First
of
all,
good
evening,
council,
that's
a
late
evening
again
for
the
record-
I
guess
my
name's
up
there,
but
my
colorado
fire
chief
and
bob.
I
appreciate
the
question.
I
know
these
take
a
huge
chunk
out.
A
lot
of
it
is
the
the
expected
land
cost
and
the
the
construction
costs
that
have
escalated
over
the
last
few
years.
We've
learned
a
pretty
tough
lesson
with
with
fire
station
three.
Z
The
short
answer
to
your
question
is,
I
don't
know
exactly
whether
or
not
we
can
trim
if
we're
asking
whether
we
can
trim
the
size
of
the
stations.
That's
a
different
conversation.
Most
of
the
expense
actually
is
in
the
support
services
areas
of
the
stations,
which
is
what,
which
is
why
all
of
our
stations
are
so
undersized
and
in
need
of
either
rebuilding
or
renewal
of
some
form
or
fashion.
Z
So
I
I
would
I'd
hesitate
to
be
able
to
give
you
a
good
answer
there.
Part
of
this
is
so
that
we
can
be
opportunistic
going
forward
so
to
jump
on.
Potentially,
a
good
deal
so
to
speak
would
be
something
we'd
want
to
be
able
to
do
to
minimize
the
overall
cost.
So
we'd
like
to
be
able
to
do
these
for
lesser
costs.
Z
I
can't
guarantee
it
and
I
can't
even
guarantee
the
time
frame
depending
on
when
either
land
becomes
available
or
we
can
strike
a
deal,
whether
it's
a
public
private
partnership
or
public
public
partnership,
but
in
terms
of
the
size
of
the
stations
we've
sized
them
actually
where
we
think
they
need
to
be
to
support
advanced
life
support
at
the
present
time
and
for
the
life
of
the
master
plan
and
hopefully
for
the
next
50
years.
So
so
that's
what's
in
there
right
now,
and
it's
entirely
based
on
land
and
construction
costs.
N
Thanks
chief
maybe
go
for.
I
have
a
couple
other
specific
questions.
I
think
the
rest
of
these
are
for
ally
rhodes:
go
forward
to
slide
number
nine,
which
is
two
more
on
active
and
healthy
lifestyles
ali.
Could
you
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
on
on
both
those
that
are
bolder,
the
boulder
creek
corridor?
Could
you
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
what
that
is
what
we
would
get
for,
that
seven
million
dollars.
N
U
Well,
we'll
see
if
I
can
do
it
better
thanks
for
the
question
bob
yeah,
the
boulder
creek
corridor,
we're
actually
just
getting
ready
to
do
a
pretty
comprehensive
study
and
management
plan
for
the
creek
corridor,
basically
stretching
from
evangee
fine
at
towards
the
west
end
of
town,
perhaps
all
the
way
out
to
55th
street.
What
this
would
do?
We
anticipate
having
implementation
priorities
from
that
plan
that
would
outline
new
visitor
areas,
recreation
areas
along
the
creek
specific
access
points
to
the
creek.
U
You
know
ecological
restoration
throughout
the
corridor.
So,
if
you
think
about
a
lot
of
the
trees,
we've
had
to
remove
due
to
emerald
ash
borer
along
the
stream
and
some
of
the
other
water
water
quality
issues.
We're
hoping
this
project
will
address
a
lot
of
that
and
if
you
also
think
about
ebon
g,
fine,
the
stream
bank
stabilization.
We
did
several
years
ago
they're
along
the
park
where
there's
designated
ecological
restoration
areas,
then
there's
very
designated
recreation.
N
Thanks
jeff,
that's
real
helpful
and
then
my
final
specific
question
I
have
a
couple
of
general
ones
is
on
slide
12,
which
is
the
miscellaneous
category.
I
think
these
are
for
you
or
for
for
you
ali.
Could
you
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
what
the
community
would
get
on
the
third
and
fourth
ones,
the
pearl
street
mall
refresh?
N
A
Sure
so,
on
the
pearl
street
mall,
it's
it's,
it
would
be.
Generally,
you
know
bob
we've
talked
with
community
vitality
and
downtown
boulder,
and
there
are
not
specific
plans,
but
we
know
there
are
needs
for
updates
and
especially
as
we
approach
the
50th
anniversary
of
the
mall,
and
so
certainly
this
project
would
include
updates
to
the
visitors
information
center
in
the
restrooms,
which
are
dated
and
regularly
encounter
issues.
It
can
include
enhancements
to
other
amenities
that
would
enhance
both
accessibility,
safety
and
just
general
welcominess
in
the
downtown
corridor,
potentially
event
area
in
the
13th
street.
A
But
for
details
of
it
we
would
want
to
work
with
our
downtown
business
partners
and
the
community
to
say
exactly
what
those
refresh
would
be
for
the
civic
area,
I'll
remind
council
that
we
have
an
incredible
civic
area,
master
plan
that
the
first
phase
was
the
park
at
the
core.
That
jeff
just
talked
about
the
enhancements
we
made
between
the
civic
area
and
the
library
and
between
arapaho
and
canyon
still
yet
to
be
completed.
A
U
What
the
plan
showed
for
that
area
was
better
activation,
better
functionality
of
that
central
park
space.
As
you
know,
recently,
transportation
improved
the
underpass
there
to
arapahoe,
and
so
what
this
would
do
is
actually
up
in
the
park
area,
provide
more
flexible
multi-use
areas
to
support
events
like
the
farmers
market.
We've
been
doing
a
ton
of
activation
at
the
band
shell
now
to
really
use
that
space
and
and
provide
opportunities
for
the
community.
It
would
enhance
that
area.
U
There's
a
multi-use
path,
connection
that
would
lead
folks
up
to
the
intersection
of
broadway
and
13,
I'm
sorry,
canyon
and
13th
to
create
a
better
connection
with
the
pearl
street
mall
down
to
the
civic
area.
So
it's
that
general
functionality
access
to
and
through
the
site
and
just
better
using
the
space
for
all
the
great
activation
and
events
that
have
really
kicked
off
more
since
we've
done
that
phase
one
project
west
of
broadway.
U
N
Great
that
was
really
helpful,
both
ali
and
jeff,
and
just
have
some
general
questions
and
probably
more
for
cheryl,
charles
as
we
as
we've
learned
more
about
arpa
and
the
the
money
that
we're
getting
from
the
federal
government.
N
I
assume
that
we're
gonna
apply
that
filter
to
our
final
list
of
projects
here,
as
we
develop
them
in
late
july
early
august,
so
that
if
there
is
a
project
that
we're
really
keen
on,
but
we
can
we
can
we're
allowed
to
use
harpa
funds
for
that
project.
It
probably
wouldn't
make
sense
to
also
put
it
on
the
ballot
and
free
up
that
money
for
for
things
that
would
not
qualify
for
arpa
and
similarly,
I
assume
that
you're,
for
example,
in
the
transportation
projects,
you're
applying
kind
of
a
doctor
cog
filter.
N
So
if
there's
money
that
could
be
obtained
from
dr
cog
or
from
other,
I
know,
there's
lots
of
transportation
money
available.
I
can't
count
on
the
federal
infrastructure
bill
quite
yet,
but
I
know
that
we
get
sometimes
support
on
the
state
level
for
those
things.
So
I
assume
that
those
filters
either
have
been
applied
or
will
be
applied.
As
we
know,
more
about
availability
is
that
right.
D
W
Correct
staff
is
working
working
on
that
and
we
hope
to
present
that,
with
our
july
20th
presentation.
N
That's
great,
that's
great
and
the
the
last
thing
I'll
I'll
just
suggest.
I
guess,
as
you
guys
prepare
for
that
july,
20th
presentation.
I
know
this
is
tough.
I'm
just
gonna
throw
it
out
there
to
the
extent
that
any
of
these
projects
have
a
return
on
investment.
Some
of
them
are
just
things
we
got
to
do
I
mean
we
we
got
to
patch
the
roads.
We
don't
get
any
money
back
for
that.
N
I
get
that,
but
some
of
these
projects,
as
I
go
through
and
look
at
them
some
of
the
recreation
projects,
some
of
the
pearl
street
products,
some
of
the
other
projects,
probably
have
a
bit
of
a
return
on
investment.
That
is,
if
we
improve
the
infrastructure,
more
people
will
participate,
whether
it's
at
the
rec
center
or
on
pearl
street
or
whatever,
to
the
extent
you
guys
can
do
a
little
bit
of
a
back
of
the
envelope
on
some
of
these
projects
in
the
return
on
investment.
N
W
B
Thank
you,
bob
sam.
M
Thank
you
mary.
I
want
to
start
out
with
a
big
thank
you
to
staff
and
to
the
financial
strategy
committee
for
having
done
a
huge
amount
of
work
winnowing
these
projects
down.
So,
as
mary
reminded
us,
it
was
many
hours
of
their
life
hearing
about
the
possible
projects
and
presenting
them
to
us.
So
thank
you
all
for
that.
M
I
really
have
questions
pretty
much
around
where
bob
did
on
the
first
few,
so
chief
calderazzo,
I
wanted
to
speak
about
advanced
life
support
and
I
believe,
if
I
recall
correctly
when
we
had
this
conversation.
Several
months
ago,
there
were
a
few
flavors
of
advanced
life
support.
One
is
where
all
of
our
responding
firefighters
are
trained
as
paramedics
and
another
was
where
we
do
transport,
and
so
I
understood
that
getting
everyone
trained
up
and
equipped
as
paramedics
was
one
level
of
effort,
and
then
certainly
adding
ambulances
and
doing
transport
would
require
a
lot
more.
M
Z
I'm
not
I'm
sorry,
sam,
which,
which
number
are
we
referring
to?
I
might
I
don't
think
I
tracked.
M
I'm
sorry
I'm
on
slide
seven
slide.
Seven
we've
got
advanced
life,
support,
capital
infrastructure,
three
and
a
half
million
dollars
and
then
somewhere
in
the
memo.
M
Z
Z
So
that
would
not
only
require
the
training
and
whatever
the
additional
expense
is
associated
with
that,
as
well
as
retrofitting
vehicles,
if
we
needed
to
to
put
and
the
stations
as
well
to
put
medications-
and
you
know,
temperature
control,
locking
mechanisms
so
on,
so
that
that's
already
built
into
the
progression
over
the
next
10
years.
So
the
idea
is
start
at
the
core
and
it
would
be
the
the
core
areas
of
the
city
where
we
received
most
of
our
calls.
Z
Now,
where
all
the
demand
is
so
twos,
threes
and
fours,
which
are
right
around
the
central
portions
of
town
from
there
we
could
branch
out
and
we
could
take
over
ambulances,
and
that
would
engender
the
additional
three
or
four
million
that
we've
got
built
into
the
capital
infrastructure
or
council
may
decide.
That's
not
what
we
want
to
do.
We
prefer
the
the
contractual
approach
where
you
provide
the
advanced
life
support
or
the
paramedic
capabilities,
but
patient
transport
will
be
handled
by
a
third
party
or
or
so
on.
So
so
it's
built
in
that
way.
Z
Z
Is
built
in
a
system
that
is
a
cost
that
could
be,
we
may
decide,
we
don't
want
to
spend
the
money,
the
four
million
on
the
ambulances
and
all
of
that,
this,
the
these,
the
expenses
associated
with
the
structures,
though
those
need
to
be
done
pretty
much
regardless
of
of
how
als
unfolds
over
time.
We
need
to
make
those
changes.
M
Z
We
can
yes,
we
can
do
that
without
the
capital
piece
of
it.
We
can
trade.
We
can
additionally
train
people,
however,
we'll
never
realize
the
full
build
out,
even
with
everyone
going
als
if
we
don't
build
in
the
support
structures
in
our
stations.
Hence
the
need
to
do
station
two
and
four,
but
but
we
can
begin
the
training
we
can
start
we've
already
begun.
M
M
What
is
here
in
the
community
culture
and
safety
tax
proposal-
and
it
did
not
get
included
that
three
and
a
half
million
is
for
ambulances-
is
for
going
all
the
way
with
als.
M
M
It
certainly
does
seem
like
if
you
could
shave
10
to
15
percent
off
of
the
station
two
or
four
replacement,
you
could
fund
everything
for
going
all
the
way
with
als.
So
I
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
understood
where,
where
you're
planning
right
now,
that's
super
helpful.
Thank
you
and
then
the
other
question
I've
got
back
to
you.
Ali
and
jeff
is
about
the
same
things
that
bob
asked
about,
which
are
the
boulder
creek
corridor
and
the
east
boulder
rec
center
retrofit
and
renovation.
M
Would
it
be
possible
to
do
those
in
phases
like
boulder
creek
corridor,
get
seven
million?
Is
that
something
we
could
decide
that
we
wanted
to
fund
it
four
million
and
and
get
you
know,
half
of
the
benefits
of
similarly
with
east
boulder
rec
center?
Is
it
possible
to
phase
that,
or
is
that
like
need
to
all
be
done
at
once?.
A
I'll
I'll
take
that
and
let
jeff
add
if,
if
I
miss
something
so
with
the
crete
corridor,
absolutely
and
you've
seen
how
we've
done
that
with
the
improvements
at
m
g
fine
park
and
in
the
civic
area,
a
recreation
center
is
much
harder
to
phase
out
it.
It
would
have
a
bigger
impact
on
the
community
because
of
taking
a
facility
out
of
commission.
A
It
also
would
have
cost
escalation
when
you,
when
you
mobilize
for
vertical
construction
and
a
project,
there's
real
efficiencies
in
that,
and
so
the
more
you
can
do
all
at
once,
the
more
effective
it
is
in
costing
and
the
less
impact
there
is
for
the
community.
So
I
do
think
for
a
facility.
If
you're
going
to
do
major
renovations,
the
more
you
can
do
all
at
once,
the
better
it
is
for
everyone.
M
Okay,
great,
I
think
that
that
answers
all
of
my
questions.
I
guess
I
have
a
similar
one
about
the
mall.
If
we
end
up
back
at
that
conversation
would
be
phasing
it
or
doing
partial
work
on
that,
and
I
guess
what
I'll
put
out
there
for
council
to
think
about
is
both
from
a
public
relations
standpoint
and
from
a
kind
of
mission
of
the
city
standpoint.
M
V
Thank
you,
mary,
thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
I
have
several
questions
and
I'm
trying
to
think.
Where
do
I
want
to
start,
but
I
just
wanted
some
clarification
about.
I
think
I
heard
a
comment
about
the
rpa
funding
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
am
I
correct
to
think:
there's
no
correlation
between
the
arca
funding
and
the
community
resilience
in
safety,
tax,
renewal,
programming.
W
You
are
correct
what
we're
doing
as
it
relates
to
both
is
looking
through
our
project
list
that
we
presented
tonight
and
seeing
what
if
any
projects
would
may
be
eligible
for
arpa
funding
and
then
bringing
that
information
back
to
you.
But
there.
V
V
V
Conferences
that
I
have
attended
and
working
groups,
I'm
wondering
if
the
city
is
doing
any
type
of
community
engagement
around
that
money
to
find
out
how
to
bet
to
best
use
it,
because
I
understand
your
your
proposal
or
where
that's
heading,
where
you're
looking
at
programming
and
how
that
money
could
be
used.
V
W
W
So
we
do
have
a
group
of
folks
who
are
working
to
develop
the
plan
for
our
arpa
funding
and
and
really
we're
thinking
initially
trying
to
find
the
the
most
the
most
critical
needs
and
then
for
the
remainder
of
the
money,
making
sure
that
we
have
a
strategic
approach
which
most
certainly
would
involve
outreach
to
different
organizations
and
and
folks
throughout
the
community.
W
W
V
And
I
I
just
remember
as
well
as
part
of
this
conversation,
the
staff
did
send
us
an
email
based
on
from
an
email
on
how
to
spend
the
money
from,
I
believe
from
one
of
awards.
V
V
E
Project
did
not
make
it
onto
the
these.
For
that
exact
reason,
so
the
the.
E
Thinking
was
that
that
it
is
a
current
need,
but
there
is
an
and
all
an
alternative
funding
mechanism
that
that
that
we
could
use
if,
if.
E
Districting
were
to
occur
in
the
next
two
years
or
so.
And
if,
if,
in
fact
that
that
districting
were
were.
E
Mentioned
the
these
herve
does
only
include.
E
E
A
million
which
is
not
the
the
the
total
amount
that
that
the
tax
could
generate
so
perhaps
maybe
two
or
three
years
down
the
road.
This
this
particular
project
could
could
get
get
funding
through
the
capital
tax,
but
we
did
not
think
that
it
was
appropriate
to
to
be
in
rooted
in
this
process.
E
At
this
time,.
B
R
Yeah,
thanks
for
all
this
information
really
appreciate
that,
just
to
clarify
in
terms
of
next
steps
right
so
we've.
R
W
Yeah,
yes,
that's
correct,
aaron,
along
with
some
of
the
other,
like
the
term
and
the
debt.
Those
are
what
we
will
be
coming
to
you
for.
R
B
Thank
you
aaron,
any
other
questions
from
council.
Oh
yes,
bob.
N
Yeah,
just
aaron,
maybe
think
of
something
that
I
want
to
just
throw
out,
there's
a
scheduling
suggestion.
So
I
I
think
we
haven't
had
any
public
hearings
on
this.
We've
had
a
few
study
sessions.
We're
gonna
have
another
study
session
on
july
20th
and
then
we're
scheduled
to
do
first
reading
on
the
ballot
measure
on
august
3rd,
which
of
course
is
not
a
public
hearing.
N
Well,
it's
not
yet
a
public
hearing,
and
then
the
first
and
only
public
hearing
we'll
have
on
this
will
be
a
second
reading
in
august
17,
which
also
happens
to
be
our
last
clear
date
to
put
something
on
the
ballot
and
what
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
about
is.
Is
that
because
we
haven't,
I
know
we're
going
to
do
a
survey,
but
we
haven't
had
public
hearings
on
this.
N
The
very
first
public
hearing
we'd
have
the
first
time
we
would
hear
from
community
members
who
choose
to
come
out
and
speak
to
us
about
what
they
think
should
be
the
you
know,
the
headliners
that
aaron
was
just
referring
to
is
when
we're
already
a
second
reading
and
it'll
be
too
late
for
us
to
make
changes.
I
guess
we
could
pass
that
emergency
that
night
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
cac
might
think
about
flipping
the
order
of
the
public
hearing
and
actually
doing
a
first
reading
public
hearing
on
august
3rd.
N
So
we
have
the
benefit
of
hearing
from
the
community
and
can
make
some
adjustments
at
first
reading,
rather
than
scrambling
at
first
reading,
which
is
our
last
clear
date
to
put
this
on
the
ballot.
I
don't
know
what
the
the
night
looks
like
on
the
third.
I
think
it's
national
night
out,
so
we
may
not
have
a
ton
of
ton
of
time
in
that
night,
but
it
just
might
be
nice
to
have
on
our
public
hearing
not
be
the
last
day
that
we
make
a
decision
on
what
the
headliners
are
for
the
ballot.
H
So
I
can
respond
to
that
bob.
You
know
one
thing
that
we
have
considered
and
I
brought
it
up
at
cac
yesterday-
was
having
first
and
second
reading
or
public
hearing
for
first
reading
on
august
3rd,
so
that
would
be
a
way
to
kind
of
address.
The
issue
of
timing
is
to
have
a
public
hearing
on
both
items
that
are
related
to
the
tax
and
bond
measures
and
then
also
on
any
initiative.
N
M
And
bob
I'll
just
jump
in
here
and
say:
I
think
there
is
room
potentially
to
do
that
on
the
third.
We
would
have
to
shuffle
a
few
things
around,
but
I
think
there's
one
item:
that's
not
time
sensitive
that
we
could
move
and
or
what
sandra
just
said.
I
think
the
other
two
items
that
we
have
now
are
ballot
measures
to
talk
about
as
well.
B
B
Oh
no
worries
all
right,
any
other
questions
from
council.
B
All
right
does
council
want
to
make
any
comments
or
have
has
everybody
made
them
as
we
went
along.
B
All
right,
it
sounds
like
this
item
met
our
needs
and
has-
and
I
guess
I'll
ask
council-
has
this
presentation
address
the
concerns
that
were
brought
up
a
few
weeks
ago,
all
right
great,
so
I
think
that's
it.
B
Yay
happy
recess,
everybody
see
you
on
july,
13th
enjoy
the
break
bye.
Thank.