►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 10-13-22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
Thursday
October
13th
and
welcome
to
the
special
meeting
of
the
Boulder
City
Council
I'm,
Rachel
friend,
I'm
filling
in
for
mayor
Brockett
tonight
and
next
week,
so
buckle
up
and
have
a
little
fun
with
this
and
we're
going
to
start
with
a
few
announcements
and
I
believe
we
have
slides
great
thanks.
So
first
is
covid-19
testing
and
vaccinations
for
information
on
covid-19,
either
getting
tested
or
getting
free
vaccines.
B
You
can
go
to
boco.org
covet
testing
and
we
are
still
doing
drive-through
at
stazio
Drive
in
Boulder
seven
days
a
week,
eight
to
six,
so
please
get
tested.
If
you
need
it
and
then
next
slide
Juni.
We
all
heard
that
yawn.
This
is
gonna,
be
a
long
night.
Lady
I
feel
your
pain.
Okay.
The
next
slide
is,
we
are
returning
to
council
chambers.
We
welcomed
community
members
back
last
week
for
the
first
time,
so
we
will
be
in
Chambers
on
the
first
and
third
Thursdays
for
our
business
meetings.
B
So,
for
example,
next
week
we
will
be
in
Chambers
and
with
the
public
being
back
in
Chambers.
We
wanted
to
remind
you
that
we
are
now
offering
the
public
to
participate
both
virtually
and
in
person
as
options
and
either
way
you
need
to
sign
up
in
advance
and
there
will
be
no
in-person
sign
ups
available
during
the
meeting.
So
that's
a
little
bit
changed
from
or
that
has
changed
from
from
prior
to
the
coveted
protocol.
B
B
All
speakers
will
be
listed
in
the
order
in
which
they
signed
up
and
you
can
change
your
location
preference
if
you
need
to
by
emailing
Elisha
our
city
clerk
at
city,
clerk's
office
at
Boulder,
colorado.gov
anytime,
before
the
start
of
the
meeting
and
I.
Think
that's
it
for
announcements.
So
with
that
Elisha
call
the
order
and
roll
call.
C
B
Thanks
Delicia
next
I
was
going
to
ask
for
an
a
motion
to
agend
and
amend
the
agenda
to
add
item
5A,
but
I
would
like
to
withdraw
that
request.
To
avoid
some
kind
of
process
drama
so
can
I
just
strike.
The
request
no
motion
to
move
on
might
be
a
question
to
the
city
attorney's
office.
F
Yes,
Aaron
Poe
Deputy,
City
attorney.
Yes,
if
you'd
like
to
strike
that
we
could
move
on
okay,
striking.
C
E
Yeah
I,
just
not
so
much
of
a
question
just
have
a
maybe
a
comment
or
a
statement
or
a
suggestion.
I
know
we
took
a
straw
poll
on
this
a
week
or
two
ago
and
and
I
respect
that
straw
poll
and
I
don't
want
to
relitigate
or
revisit
that.
E
E
The
kind
of
Commissioners
I
think
met
on
Tuesday
if
I
remember
correctly
and
decided,
with
with
one
exception,
not
to
endorse
City
ballot
measures.
They
did
endorse
our
climate
tax,
which
I
was
happy
about,
but
they
did
not
endorse
other
City
ballot
measures
and
then
I
understand
that
the
school
board
met
I,
think
last
night
and
they
decided
not
to
endorse
the
library
tax,
Library
District,
so
there's
kind
of
some
cross
jurisdictional
endorsements
that
are
happening
or
in
this
case
not
happening.
E
Actually,
as
I
said
before,
we
took
our
struggle
last
week.
I,
don't
think
that
cross
jurisdictional
endorsements
are
particularly
helpful
or
good.
I
think
we
should
kind
of
stay
in
our
own
lanes
and
put
forward
what
we're
going
to
put
forward
and
support
those
things
and
let
the
other
governmental
entities
support
their
things
and
so
I
just
wanted
to.
In
light
of
those
things
that
happened
this
week,
I
just
wanted
to
maybe
revisit
with
my
colleagues
on
Council
whether
we
still
want
to
do
this.
E
If
people
want
someone
to
do
it,
that's
fine
I
think
there's
going
to
be
some
abstentions.
Tonight
I
will
certainly
hope
stain
from
taking
a
position
one
or
the
other
on
these
County
and
School
Board
measures,
but
in
light
of
the
developments
for
the
last
two
days,
I
want
to
just
kind
of
check
in
with
people
to
see
if
they
still
want
to
do
these
things.
E
I
think
I
predict
that
that
endorsements,
if
they
happen,
are
going
to
be
somewhat
less
than
unanimous
and
and
maybe
less
helpful
than
than
unanimous
endorsements,
and
so
I
just
want
to
focus
to
reflect
on
that.
Thanks
thanks.
B
Bob
is
it
okay
if
I
ask
Chris,
if
we
have
a
staff
presentation
on
this
and
and
then
we'll
get
to
maybe
a
a
straw
poll
for
interest
in
in
voting
on
this
still,
will
that
work
for
you
for
your
request,
Bob
yeah.
B
Right
thanks
so
and
it's
on
consent
agenda.
So
ordinarily,
there
would
not
be
discussion
unless
someone
asked
for
it.
It
would
be
my
understanding,
so
maybe
let's
just
go
right
then
to
to
Bob's
kind
of
straw
poll
show
of
hands.
B
Or
would
anyone
like
to
have
more
comment
before
we
do?
That
looks
like
markwood.
H
Yeah
as
a
individual
member
of
the
city
council,
I
I,
do
support
these,
but
I'm
troubled
by
taking
official
positions
on
it,
I
would
prefer
if
we
could
express
our
views
as
individual
members,
as
opposed
to
as
a
body,
so
I
think
I'm,
probably
going
to
abstain
as
well.
Although
making
note
of
the
fact
that
I
do
support
these
on
an
individual
basis.
I
B
I
appreciate
that
I
think
what
Bob's
suggesting
this
maybe
been
a
change
in
circumstance
by
actions
taken
by
County
and
school
board
that
that
elevates
this
to
wanting
another
check-in.
Is
that
about
it
Bob?
Let's
summarize,
it.
E
Yeah,
it's
a
bill
of
counsel.
If,
if
folks
want
to
just
go
to
a
vote,
that's
fine
that
the
chips
will
fall
where
they
may
I
just
wanted
folks
to
have
a
sense
of
of
how
the
ultimate
vote
might
go.
There
was
about.
If,
if
it
doesn't
matter
to
people,
you
know
how
many
affirmative
votes
or
negative
votes
or
obsessions
there
are,
then
that's
perfectly
fine.
I
just
wanted
to
I
didn't
want
anybody
to
be
blindsided.
B
Yeah,
that's
fair
Tara.
J
I
just
wanted
to
agree
with
Mark
I
I
when
I
abstain,
I
don't
want
people
to
think
it's
not
because
I.
Don't
think
that
these
are
great
ballot
measures,
but
more
because
I,
don't
feel
like
I
feel
like
people
can
ask
me
personally,
but
I
don't
I'm,
not
that
excited
about
having
accounts
and
majority
about
these
things
that
are
out
of
our
purview.
B
Okay,
Junior
and
then
I
have
a
question
for
city
attorney's
office.
Thank.
B
K
B
L
Well,
I
I
think
this
is.
This
is
leadership.
This
is
where
we,
as
elected
leaders,
lead.
We
should
be
advocating,
has
a
body
let
with
it
let
the
crumbs
fall
where
they
may
in
terms
of
who
votes
for
what,
but
this
is
where
we
lead.
This
is
where
we
show
our
leadership
to
the
community,
about
where
we
find
these
synergies
and
connection
points
between
issues
that
are
between
us
or
the
county
or
or
bvsd.
We
are
one
large,
you
know
symbiotic
ecosystem.
L
We
have
to
be
able
to
do
that
and
and
and
and
play
in
the
abstain
and
not
not
weighing
in
I
I.
Think
is
an
abdication
of
our
responsibility
to
to
to
actually
weigh
in
I
mean
otherwise
doing
the
one-off
thing
to
me
that
just
it
it's
not.
Why
we're
here
we're
here
to
advocate
for
what's
better
for
our
community
and
and
if
there's
things
like
at
bdsd
in
the
county
that
are
better
for
our
community,
then
we
should
be
advocating
as
such
and
do
so
as
a
body.
B
Thanks
Matt
Aaron,
when,
if
I've
heard
several
people
mention
abstention,
can
you
tell
how
that
will
work
in
this
context
of
a
consent
agenda?
What
will
that
vote
convert
to.
F
Under
the
charter
section
16
should
any
council
member
being
present
refuse
to
vote
on
any
measure
said
members
vote
should
be
recorded
in
the
affirmative,
so
I
believe
that's
the
section
that
would
apply.
Okay,.
B
So
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
for
I
think
for
people
who
abstain,
that's
going
to
convert
to
a
yes
vote
so
for
what
that's
worth
and
then
are
we
still?
Okay
with
will
you
let
me
know
Aaron
if,
if
this,
if
we're
doing
something
out
of
bounds
for
consent
by
through
discussion,
continuing
yes,.
B
Okay,
so
Juni
had
asked
if
someone
could
explain
what
happened
at
the
school
board.
I
cannot
I,
don't
know
if
a
staff
member
knows
or
if
that,
if
that's
Bob's,
to
answer.
E
I
did
not
watch
the
school
board
proceedings.
I
was
just
reported
that
it
was
a
four
to
three
vote
and
they
decided
not.
So
somebody
made
a
motion
to
endorse
the
library
district
ballot
measure,
which
I
think
is
6C
and
on
a
four
three
vote.
The
school
district
School
Board
rather
voted
not
to
sustain
it
and
but
I
don't
have
all
the
details
about
what
each
of
the
school
board
members
said.
E
You
know
in
response
to
Matt,
you
know,
I
get
I
get
what
you're
saying
about
as
far
as
leadership,
but
we
are.
We
are
drawing
smart
official
lines,
I
guess
we're
going
by
the
county
lines
because
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
State
ballot
measures
that
we're
not
weighing
in
on
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
races
at
the
state
level
of
governor
and
state
legislatures
in
some
sorts
we
I
just
don't
know
where
we
draw
the
line.
E
It
seems
to
me
that,
because
we're
Boulder
City
Council,
we
draw
the
line
of
the
boulder
State
limits
and
we
start
going
out
to
school
board,
and
then
we
go
out
to
to
the
county
and
then
maybe
we
should
do
this
date
or
maybe
we
shouldn't
do
this
date
and
it
it
seems
to
me
it's
a
little
bit
arbitrary
there
and
so
I'd
rather
I'd
rather
focus
on
the
issues
that
are
City
issues
and
let
the
school
board
advocate
for
their
issues
and
the
County
advocate
for
their
issues
and
the
state
advocate
for
their
issues.
E
B
Including
state
state
ballot
measures,
not
individual
races,
but
ballot
measures,
so
I'm
I'm
comfortable
doing
so,
because
I
think
that
often
the
community
does
look
to
elected
leadership
to
to
sort
of
signal
where
they
are
and
help
to
interpret
the
different
ballot
measures.
So
with
that,
if
there's
no,
although
Bob
I
appreciate
your
dead
consistent
on
this
at
all
times.
B
B
I've
got
Nicole
Lauren
me
Matt
juny's
at
a
hand,
up
I,
think
yes
and
I,
and
so
it's
that's
five.
That's
a
majority
and
I
will
say
that
mayor
Brockett
had
emailed
ahead
of
time
his
support
as
well,
so
it's
kind
of
five
plus
so
with
that
I
think
we
would
need
a
motion
for
the
consent
agenda,
foreign.
L
L
C
We'll
start
this
roll
call
tonight
for
the
consent
agenda
with
council
member
fogerts.
M
C
C
N
B
Thanks
Alicia
thanks
everyone
for
giving
me
a
rocky
start
to
my
first
two
weeks.
Dent
here
is
sub
mayor
really
appreciate
that.
B
Problem,
Bob:
okay,
so
with
that
I
believe
we're
on
to
our
public
hearings,
but
back
over
to
Elisha.
C
Thank
you,
ma'am
tonight's
item
number
three
on
the
agenda
is
our
public
hearings
item
three:
a
is
the
input
on
proposed
2023
policy
statement
on
regional
state
and
federal
issues.
G
And
I'm
happy
to
introduce
our
chief
policy
advisor
Carl,
Castillo
and
Laura
Witt
assistant
City
attorney,
and
they
are
going
to
kick
off
this
annual
conversation
that
we
have
on
our
policy
statement.
So
Carl
take
it
away.
O
O
Okay,
great
well
good
evening,
mayor
Pro,
tem
friend
and
City
Council
Members,
as
Chris
said,
I'm
Carl,
Castillo
Chief
policy
advisor
for
the
city
of
voter
and
I
enjoying
this
evening
by
this
assistant,
City
attorney,
Laurel
Witt,.
O
This
evening,
we're
going
to
give
you
a
presentation
and
the
goals
of
it
will
be
to
propose
the
revisions
to
the
2022
policy
statement
and
or
the
changes
from
2022
to
2023,
specifically
there'll,
be
principles,
positions
and
priorities
that
we're
proposing
and
I'll
be
talking
about
those
here
shortly,
we'll
be
looking
for
direction
to
finalize
a
2023
policy
statement
and,
ultimately,
we're
preparing
Council
to
participate
in
regional
state
and
federal
advocacy
in
2023.
O
So
in
terms
of
the
purpose
of
the
policy
statement,
you
all
know,
but
I'll
go
over
it
anyway.
It's
to
inform
the
city's
actions
on
specific
policy
proposals
as
they
go
forward.
It
allows
the
city
to
have
a
quick
response,
the
shape
policy
before
the
government's,
where
decisions
are
being
made
and
to
be
nimble
in
doing
so
and
then
in
terms
of
the
governments
that
we
will
actually
be
advocating
before
its
Regional
governments,
such
as
Dr
cogg
RTD
and
the
Rocky
Point
Stewardship
Council.
O
It's
the
state,
both
the
executive
branch
and
the
general
assembly,
and
it's
the
federal
government,
both
executive,
legislative
and
judicial.
In
terms
of
amicus
briefs,
which
we
we
are
grouping,
amicus
briefs
more
under
the
advocacy
side
advocacy
side
rather
than
a
purely
legal
matter,
so
I
want
to
introduce
the
advocacy
team,
so
it
is
Laurel
and
myself.
O
P
O
Also
Adam
mikeberg
and
will
Coyne
from
Headwater
strategies
are
not
able
to
be
here
tonight.
I
think
most
of
you've
seen
them
and
heard
of
their
presentation
before.
It
also
includes
our
federal
lobbyist,
Brett,
Carson
and
Christian
Chen,
and
ultimately
it's
it's
our
Council.
So
it's
all
of
you,
so
this
is
kind
of
the
core
advocacy
team
that
is
going
to
be
advocating
for
what
is
included
in
the
policy
statement.
O
It
also
includes
many
departments
and
I
was
almost
tempted
to
put
in
the
individual
names
of
the
people
who
are
very
actively
involved,
but
I
did
include
the
Departments
who
are
mostly
involved
in
advocacy
and
this.
This
really
is
a
substantial
amount
of
work
in
terms
of
using
their
expertise
to
conduct
analysis,
drafting
Coalition
work
testifying.
O
O
So
that's
just
something
I
wanted
to
mention.
Likewise,
we
are
not
just
advocating
on
our
own.
We
are
members
of
many
intergovernmental
organizations
such
as
the
ones
that
are
listed
here
on
your
screen,
and
each
one
of
them
is
a
force
on
their
own,
in
fact,
they're
more
forceful
because
they
are
made
up
of
a
variety
of
local
governments,
and
so,
as
members
and
active
members
of
these
organizations,
we
often
have
the
opportunity
to
help
shape
the
agenda
of
these
organizations
and
most
of
them
have
their
advocacy
team
and
lobbyists.
O
So
it
allows
us
to
really
leverage,
basically
our
positions
and
to
to
use
these
coalitions
to
work
with
these
coalitions
to
really
Advance
our
agenda
in
as
effective
of
a
way
as
we
can
so
in
terms
of
the
recommended
changes
there
are,
as
I
mentioned,
there's
principles,
which
is
a
new
category.
I'll
describe
that
there's,
there's
15
position,
changes
that
I'll
be
recommending,
I
won't
cover
them
all.
O
I'll
just
cover
the
highlights,
and
then
there
is
the
state
policy
priorities
and
the
federal
policy
priorities,
which
are
the
perhaps
most
important
ones
that
you
should
focus
on
in
terms
of
what
you
all
should
expect
to
see
accomplished
by
the
end
of
the
year.
So
let
me
start
off
with
policy
principles,
and
these
are.
These
are
new
to
the
policy
statement.
I
I
would
see
these
as
overarching
tenants
or
values
that
inform
all
the
cities
in
our
governmental
advocacy
efforts
and
our
first
one
is
equity
in
racial
Justice.
O
This
was
previously
worded
as
a
policy
position,
but
frankly
it
applies
to
everything
we
do
so
we
thought
it
was
important
to
move
it
to
a
principle.
I
wanted
to
make
number
one,
because
we
we
know
that
this
is
incredibly
important
for
the
sitting
for
the
city
council.
So
the
wording
that
you
have
here
was
proposed
and
was
run
by
the
intergovernmental
Affairs
committee
and
supported.
We
also
at
the
at
the
direction
of
the
intergovernmental
Affairs
committee,
ran
it
by
our
community
connectors.
O
O
The
second
one
is
a
recognition
that,
when
we
engage
in
advocacy,
we
are
doing
so
with
recognition
that
we
are
part
of
a
a
team
of
local
governments
that
we
will
work
with
for
a
long
time,
and
we
would
like
to
support
them
when
we
can.
This
is
something
that's
come
up
in
the
past,
where
at
times,
there's
been
a
bill
where
the
city
had
limited
interests,
but
our
Council
said
it
was
very
important
that
they
be
seen
as
being
a
regional
player.
O
So
collaboration
is
something
that
I
know
that
I
always
try
to
make
parent
Paramount
in
the
advocacy
efforts
is,
is
to
make
sure
that
we're
we're
playing
the
long
game
and
maintaining
the
relationships
and
enhancing
them.
As
we
need
to
local
control
is
an
important
one
again,
this
was
the
position,
and
this
is
one
that
many
of
you
have
asked
about.
Generally
speaking
as
a
as
a
matter
of
default,
we
seek
to
protect
local
control
and
home
of
authority.
O
O
Perhaps
one
of
the
best
examples
is
in
the
area
of
climate
change,
where
we
we
of
course
recognize
that
climate
change
does
not
recognize
local
borders
and
that
it's
essential
that
there
be
perhaps
a
floor
if
not
a
ceiling
at
the
state
and
federal
level.
So
that's
what
this
position
is
about.
What's
important
to
note
here
is
while
we're
indicating
support
for
local
control.
O
It
also
indicates
that,
if
there's
any
other
place
in
the
policy
statement
or
any
other
position,
that
Council
has
made
known,
that
is
Inc,
that
is
in
inconsistent
with
protecting
local
control
staff
and
the
advocacy
team
will
always
yield
to
that,
and
so,
in
other
words,
we're
not
going
to
be
dogmatic
about
protecting
local
control,
we'll
always
recognize
there
are
times
that
we
need
to
yield.
O
And
finally,
this
just
should
go
without
saying,
but
the
city
will
support
seeking
resources
for
local
programs,
and
so
when
we
apply
for
federal
funding
or
state
funding
or
help
advocate
for
a
bill
that
creates
new
sources
of
funding.
O
O
The
first
policy
position
change
that
I
want
to
highlight,
has
to
do
with
urban
forestry
we've
spoken
about
this
before
it's
part
of
an
existing
position.
The
main
change
that
you
see
is
to
indicate
that
we
were
successful
in
getting
funding
for
the
U.S
forest
Service.
O
In
fact,
we
have
gotten
1.5
billion
dollars
that
have
been
included
in
the
inflation
reduction
act
specifically
for
urban
forestry,
which
is
a
huge
success,
and
we
all
know
that
Urban
forests
are
probably
the
most
impactful
things
that
cities
can
do
to
build
resilience
in
the
face
of
climate
change
and
extreme
temperatures.
Trees
can
lower
Urban
temperatures
by
10
degrees.
So
what
we
propose
to
change
this
position
is
to
indicate
that
now
the
goal
is
to
secure
this
funding
and
to
make
sure
that
we
do
so
in
a
way
that
is.
O
O
Brett
can
Karen
from
the
climate
admissions
Department
very
much
as
leading
an
effort
here
to
make
sure
that
we
coordinate
among
our
local
government
Partners
to
do
so
to
find
out
what
the
best
trees
are
to
plant
so
that
we
can
do
that
in
a
coordinated
and
informed
way
and
make
sure
there's
applied
research
that
informs
that
effort
and
to
make
sure
that
there
is
a
an
equity-centered
Workforce
program
where
we
can
have
people
that
essentially
and
the
economies
of
scale
of
having
a
program
that
is
not
just
unique
to
the
city,
but
one
that
perhaps
is
throughout
the
Front
Range.
O
That
provides
jobs.
And
that
recognizes
that
Equity
needs
to
be
at
the
Forefront
of
both
who
gets
a
job
as
well
as
where
we
plant
these
trees.
So
we
know
that
people
who
are
who
do
not
have
the
advantage
of
going
into
an
air-conditioned
office
or
an
air-conditioned
home
or
have
to
be
outside
for
extended
periods
of
times.
These
are
the
folks
that
need
to
make
sure
that
we
have
Urban
canopies
in
their
neighborhoods
where
they
reside
where
they
spend
time.
O
So
that
is
when
I
think
about
Equity
centered
part
of
the
how
we
would
hope
to
get
there.
This
is
one
of
our
prior
proposed
priorities.
I
thought
it
was
important
to
policy
art
and
explain
that
with
a
little
bit
of
detail,
the
next
policy
position
change
is
just
to
recognize
that
there
have
been
numerous
attempts
to
prevent
local
governments
from
prohibiting
or
otherwise
trying
to
strengthen
our
communities
or
our
ability
of
our
community
to
shift
away
from
the
use
of
natural
gas.
O
We
all
know
that
natural
gas
is
a
potent
greenhouse
gas
and
ultimately,
we
will
need
to
make
this
shift
there's
a
lot
of
issues.
We
will
have
to
wrestle
with
there,
but
we
think
that
they
are
ones
that
local
government
should
be
able
to
wrestle
with
and
not
have
any
prohibition
from
the
state
government
so
for
this
next
one
I'd
like
to
turn
it
over
to
Laurel,
Witt
and
Laurel.
If
you've
had
a
chance
to
unmute
your
microphone,
if
you
could
explain
these
changes
great.
Q
Thank
you
so
much
Carl.
Hopefully
you
guys
can
hear
me
just
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
policy
position,
number
22,
which
is
on
page
36
of
your
packet.
Q
This
particular
policy
statement
was
not
very
Broad
and
didn't
have
a
lot
of
helpful
stuff
for
things
like
funding,
so
we
thought
this
position
statement
could
be
expanded
a
little
bit
to
include
some
things
that
you
see
here
on
this
screen,
including
increased
funding
for
Supportive
Services
and
permanent
housing
options.
These
are
things
that
the
city
has
tried
to
do
in
the
past,
and
so
it
seems
like
something
that
we
should
memorialize
in
this
policy
statement.
Q
Additionally,
you'll
see
some
proposals
to
address
those
who
often
use
our
services
frequently
if
those
proposals
provide
Broad
and
systematically
beneficial
changes,
and
that
brought
in
systematic
medical
changes
is
something
that
we
talked
about
about
a
little
bit
in
our
in
our
committee
meeting.
Just
to
talk
about
making
sure
that
this
covers
all
of
those
who
need
services
and
I
will
hand
it
back
to
you,
Carl
for.
O
The
next
all
right,
thank
you,
Laurel,
so
moving
on
to
the
next
one,
let's
see,
if
my
there
we
go
so
I
know,
Council
and
the
city
are
engaged
in
a
exploration,
it's
more
than
an
exploration.
It's
we're
beginning
the
a
pilot
program,
a
guaranteed
income
and
I,
had
an
opportunity
to
speak
with
Elizabeth
Crowe,
and
she
mentioned
that.
One
of
the
challenges
with
doing
so
is
that
by
providing
this
guaranteed
income
to
individuals,
there
are
times
when
we
could
actually
cause
them
to
lose
current
benefits.
O
So
the
position
that
is
being
proposed
here
above
all
else,
is
that
we
make
sure,
by
seeking
waivers
on
the
income
ceiling,
eligibility
for
any
basic
needs,
Assistance
programs-
and
it's
important
to
note
that
I
believe
Denver
and
it's
not
just
Denver
I'm
sure
other
cities
as
well
are
pursuing
this.
So
we're
hoping
to
find
a
coalition
of
local
governments
that
can
work
at
the
state
level.
I
think
this
might
be
something
that
could
be
done
administratively.
O
If
not,
it
will
be
legislatively
and
if
it
needs
a
federal
action,
we
would
seek
that
as
well,
but
we
think
ultimately,
that
there
should
be
a
way
for
the
city
to
work
with
helping
people
with
this
guaranteed
income
without
causing
them
to
lose
benefits.
It
also
indicates
a
support
for
the
federal
expanded
child
of
tax
credit
which
existed
in
2021.
It
was
lifted
as
I
gotta
apologize.
My
little
my
little
windows
are
overlapping.
What
I'm
trying
to
read
on
the
screen
here
it
was
lifted,
and
before
doing
so,
it
was.
O
Q
So
earlier
this
year,
as
you
all
know,
Council
adopted
several
measures
related
to
the
Friendship
of
gun
violence
and
this
particular
policy
statement
needed
to
be
or
position
needed
to
be
updated
to
reflect
some
of
those
changes.
This
position
statement
is
divided
into
two
like
subsections.
The
first
one
is
things
that
we
would
support
the
state
doing
and
then
things
that
we
would
oppose
to
stay
doing
so.
Q
The
changes
we
made
were
in
the
supporting
category
here,
as
you
can
see,
one
of
the
things
that
Council
adopted
in
the
list
of
ordinances
related
to
open
carry
prohibition.
So
we
went
ahead
and
mirrored
that
in
positions
that
we
or
at
the
city,
May
support
related
to
gun
violence
prevention,
which
is
open,
carry
prohibitions.
O
Thanks
Laurel,
so
the
next
one
here
is
coin
air:
restoring
queen
air
to
Colorado
a
huge
priority
for
Council
I
would
say
for
everybody
in
Colorado,
and
this
was
something
that
we
had
before,
but
we
wanted
to
expand
on
it
and
decided
that
this
is
long
enough.
That
I
would
take
the
time
to
create
some
animated
arrows
here
to
focus
one
by
one.
O
Cd
PhD,
the
Colorado
Department
of
Public,
Health
and
environments,
did
receive
money
to
do
justice
in
in
the
session
that
earlier
this
this
year.
So
now
it's
a
question
of
making
sure
that
they
Implement
and
use
that
money
to
actually
engage
and
that
kind
of
enforcement.
So
that's
the
first
priority
or
maybe
I
shouldn't
say
priority,
but
it's
the
first
example
of
how
we
would
like
to
get
the
queen
error.
O
Secondly,
we'd
like
to
eliminate
air
pollution
from
combustion
appliances
in
billions,
which
I
did
not
know,
I
knew
that
it
was
an
indoor
air
quality
show
on,
but
apparently
it
is
also
a
significant
contributor
to
poor
outdoor
air
quality.
Here,
we're
talking
about
ozone
and
apparently
the
natural
gas,
not
surprisingly,
eventually
leaks
from
your
house,
and
it
contributes
to
outdoor
air
quality
and
the
terrible
ozone
that
we're
facing
here
in
the
Front
Range.
The
next
one
is
we'd
like
to
strengthen
the
regulations
over
motor
vehicle
exhaust.
O
So
what
I'm
understanding
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
vehicles
that
are
poorly
maintained,
they
might
pass
the
emission
test,
but
between
the
emission
tests,
whether
it's
one
or
two
years
or
whatever
period
of
time
that
they're
given
to
not
have
to
go
there.
They
may
be
out
of
compliance
and
that
it's
it
can
cause
quite
a
bit
of
a
problem
for
especially
neighbors
that
live
along
major
corridors,
which
again,
that
tends
to
avoid,
tends
to
be
our
marginalized
communities,
which
is
most
vulnerable.
O
We
think
that
something
like
that
that
could
basically
detect
whether
your
vehicle
is,
is
polluting
and
maybe
not
actually
send
you
a
penalty,
but
at
the
very
least
send
you
a
requirement
to
get
your
vehicle
tested
is
one
way
to
make
sure
that
kind
of
a
year-round
way
of
making
sure
that
vehicles
are
meeting
basic
standards
and
I
want
to
pause
on
this
one,
because
there
was
a
a
piece
of
legislation
that
was
discussed
at
the
Colorado
Municipal
league
on
Friday.
That
was
closely
related
to
this,
which
had
to
do
with
them.
O
Vehicles
that
don't
have
mufflers
and
increasing
the
penalties
and
increasing
the
ability
to
require
them
during
inspections
and
I
was
surprised
to
learn
that
Mufflers
are
not
required
in
the
state
of
Colorado.
So
I
think
that
this
all
falls
under
the
general
category
of
tampering
with
your
emissions
and
so
the
same
things
that
may
cause
nuisance
issues.
Some
Noise
will
often
lead
to
air
pollution
concerns.
So
we
would
like
to
support
legislative
changes
or
regulatory
changes
that
lead
to
that
address.
O
These
concerns
and
then
finally,
again
recognizing
that
a
lot
of
people
have
to
be
outdoors
and
when
we're
getting
to
these
hundred
plus
degree
days,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
there
are
some
safe
indoor,
Sheltering
and
some
health
services
and
sure
we
can
do
some
of
this
at
the
local
level.
But
this
ultimately
is
going
to
require
quite
the
coordinated
effort.
O
O
The
next
category
again
I'm
going
to
cover
this
with
a
little
bit
of
a
detail
only
because
this
this
too
is
a
priority
and
I
should
have
mentioned
it
and
I'll
I'll
Circle
back
at
this
at
the
end,
but
but
air
quality
is
definitely
a
priority
Focus
for
us
at
least
what
we'd
like
to
propose
is
a
priority.
Wildfire
prevention
is,
is
a
proposed
priority,
and
what
we
know
is
that
control
of
burns
is
perhaps
one
of
the
most
effective
things
that
land
managers
can
do.
O
Of
course,
the
city
owns
quite
a
bit
of
open
space.
I've
been
told
and
I
am
understanding
that
we
have
very
limited
days
that
we
can
actually
engage
in
these
controlled
bronze
either
because
it's
too
dry
it's
too
windy.
It's
a
poor
air
quality
day.
A
variety
of
hurdles
are
there
that
really
prevent
us
from
doing
what
could
most
prevent
out
of
control
wildlifiers
from
occurring?
We
have
begun
conversations
with
the
CD
CD
phe,
the
C,
what
regulatory
barriers
might
be
lifted.
O
We've
also
begun
to
speak
with
our
legislative
delegation
to
to
explore
the
possibility
of
legislation
like
was
introduced
in
Oregon.
That
would
recognize
that
sure
poor
air
quality
days
have
to
be
respected
by
not
having
you
know
more
or
error
added
because
the
control
burns,
but,
of
course,
if
we
don't
have
control
burns,
it's
going
to
be.
You
know,
10
100
times
worse
and
worse
in
terms
of
air
quality.
O
So,
given
the
new
realities,
we
need
to
find
a
new
way
to
balance
these
somewhat
competing
interests
and
to
provide
the
flexibility
that
we
need.
We
also
need
to
make
sure
that
a
very
complicated
ownership
structure
that
exists
along
ditches
where
a
lot
of
brush
will
tend
to
gather.
We
have
private,
ditch
owners,
ditch
owner
interests.
We
have
public
and
private
properties
that
are
joining.
O
O
There
I
understand
that
during
the
Marshall
fire
that
the
ditches
were
a
major
conduit
for
the
fire,
that
was
that
that
was
roaring
to
the
east,
so
we'd
like
to
engage
the
state
in
helping
us
find
out
how
we
can
help
coordinate
with
this
complicated
ownership
structure
and
to
make
sure
that
these
ditches
are
being
mitigated,
as
I
mentioned
before
we
want
to
mention.
When
we
engage
in
both
Wildfire
mitigation,
you
know
thinning
of
trees
or
whether
it's
Urban
canopy.
O
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
do
so
in
a
coordinated
fashion
and
that
we
create-
and
we
take
leadership
as
a
city,
to
work
on
a
regional,
if
not
a
Statewide
effort
to
create
a
equity-centered
Workforce
where
people
can
be
working
on
this
and
the
model
that
is
being
proposed
out
of
climate
initiatives
is
a
climate
Conservation,
Corps,
so
kind
of
a
take
on
the
conservation.
Civilian
Conservation
Corps
from
that
was
a
post
post-depression
era,
and
also
one
that
there's
Congressman
de
goose
is
very
supportive
of.
O
But
at
this
point,
I
understand
that
there's
not
really
been
any
advancement
of
it
in
Colorado
we'd
like
to
see.
If
boner
can
be
a
champion
of
making
sure
that
one
is
create
dated
as
council
member
Matt
Benjamin
had
brought
up
to
my
attention
a
few
months
ago,
when
there
was
a
potential
I
think
it
was
called
a
oh
I
think
it
was
called
a
fire
honk,
and
the
question
was
you
know:
where?
O
First
of
all,
we
think
that
the
Front
Range
is
very
much
in
ground
zero
for
a
lot
of
wildfire
concerns
and
we'd
like
to
make
sure
that
we
have
firefighting
resources
at
our
disposal
as
necessary.
O
Also
recognizing
that
overhead
power
lines
and
unsanctioned
campfires
are
a
problem
in
terms
of
an
ignition
source
for
wildfires
and
again.
We
think
that
we,
we
will
probably
need
the
state
and
the
region
to
help
us
combat
these
concerns,
we'd
like
to
make
sure
that
we
have
resources
to
conduct
fuel
mitigation
on
residential
lands,
resources
to
address
Forest
help
and
strategic
location
of
Water
Resource
infrastructure.
O
For
firefighting
purposes,
I
understand
that
there's
been
conversation
by
certain
elected
officials
to
make
sure
that
the
water
is
available
to
our
firefighters
when
they
arrive
at
the
site.
That's
not
always
been
the
case
and
there's
been
some
limitations
there.
So
all
these
things
we
think
are
essential
for
the
city
to
be
advocating
for
to
be
at
the
table.
We
are
certainly
affected
by
the
lack
of
these
resources.
O
O
One
change
that
we
have
not
proposed
yet
and
we
were
going
to
bring
up
to
the
intergovernmental
Affairs
committee,
but
we
weren't
able
to
convene
them
because
of
the
change
of
the
council.
Meeting
discussion
on
this
prevented
us
from
doing
it,
but
councilmember
spear
had
brought
up
that
position.
47,
which
has
to
do
with
Health
Care,
was
somewhat
Limited
in
its
use.
You,
you
can
see
it
right
here.
O
O
It
doesn't
identify
whether
we
want
a
Single,
Payer
or
a
multi-payer,
or
what
have
you
and
and
the
reason
we
did
identify
that
when
we
first
put
this
in
here
a
couple
years
ago
is
because
we
knew
that
we
had
a
lot
of
our
own
elected
officials
that
had
different
views
in
it,
and
we
also
recognized
that
as
a
since,
we
were
not
a
public
health
agency
like
the
county
that
we
didn't
have
the
expertise
to
recommend
any
changes.
O
Nonetheless,
Council
may
very
well
want
to
revisit
this,
so
I
wanted
to
just
bring
this
to
your
attention,
since
councilmember
spirited
asked
us
to
make
make
room
for
this
to
be
Revisited.
So
now,
I
want
to
talk
about
our
state
and
federal
policy.
Priorities
and
I
want
to
mention
again
that
these
were
developed
in
coordination
with
the
councils
in
our
governmental
Affairs
committee
and
I'm,
going
to
start
talking
about
different
priorities,
and
they
are
a
packaging
of
one
or
more
of
the
policy
positions
that
already
exist.
O
They
might
even
call
to
attention
to
certain
aspect
of
of
what
a
more
position
and
they
are
ones
that
we
think
we
can
make
a
difference,
that
we
want
to
use
our
political
capital
and
our
limited
resources
recognizing
that
we
can't
go
after
everything
in
the
policy
statement,
and
there
is
the
reason
these
are
being
proposed
is
because
there
is
political
interests
that
would
indicate
that
we
can
make
progress
on
these.
O
What
I'm,
not
going
to
be
able
to
do
is
is
actually
share
details
or
sponsors,
because
it's
premature
to
do
so,
and
frankly,
it's
not
in
the
interest
of
The
Advocates
to
share
information
before
they're.
They
have
their
their
package
ready
their
their
bill
ready,
but
I
did
want
you
to
know
that
this
isn't
just
a
wish
list.
This
is
based
on
Research
that
we've
done,
and
people
we've
spoken
about
that
these
priorities
are
ones
that
we
can
actually
move
on,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
influence
them.
O
If
not
lead
on
them.
It's
not
just
legislation,
it
can
also
be
regulatory
and
it
could
be
just
a
question
of
securing
resources.
So
it's
not
really
even
a
policy
matter.
It
could
be
just
making
sure
that
we're
sick
that
we're
pursuing
a
grant
or
or
seeking
the
funding
through
other
means
through
authorization,
so
for
2023
staff
is
proposing
four
state
policy
priorities
and
three
federal
policy
priorities.
O
First,
one
here
I'd
like
to
turn
it
over
to
Laurel.
Actually
what
honorable
I'm
going
to
save
you
time
here,
because
really
this
is
kind
of
reiterating
what
Laura
has
already
explained.
So
this
is
basically
what
she
described
it
for
as
our
position
on
homelessness,
making
sure
that
this
is
identified
as
a
priority.
In
fact,
our
number
one
priority
number
two
is
division
zero,
and
this
is
one
that
we
didn't
talk
about
yet.
O
But,
of
course,
protecting
the
safety
of
the
users
of
our
streets
of
our
sidewalks
is
Paramount
and
we've
seen
too
many
injuries
and
too
many
deaths
over
over
the
years,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
convey
to
our
state
legislators
that
a
priority
is
to
address
this
and
the
the
way
that
we
believe
can
be
that
something
could
be
accomplished
in
2023
is
through
expanding
the
use
of
local
of
of
photo
radar,
which
is
basically
those
cameras
on
the
side
of
the
road.
O
In
a
van
where
you
have
a
sign
in
advance
and
if
you
go
over
the
speed
limit,
you
get
a
ticket,
there's
actually
significant
limitations
in
where
these
cameras
can
be
placed
has
to
be
in
a
residential
Zone,
close
to
a
school
next
to
a
school
or
close
to
a
park
or
a
construction
area.
There's
quite
a
bit
of
areas,
including
our
arterials,
where
most
of
the
accidents
occur.
Where
these
cannot
be
used,
it
requires
Vans
to
actually
have
a
person
inside
them,
which
is
somewhat
defeating.
O
The
the
purpose
of
the
efficiency
that
this
technology
creates
part
of
the
goal
is
to
make
sure
we
free
the
ability
of
our
police
officers
to
engage
in
in
other
work
that
maybe
equally,
if
not
more
important,
it
limits
the
amount
of
penalties
that
we
can
assess
and,
ultimately,
the
the
currents
value
that
we
can
and
that
we
can
impose.
O
So,
for
those
reasons,
we'd
like
to
make
that
a
priority
to
expand
local
control
to
use
photo
radar,
we
also,
although
not
mentioned
here
but
I
I-
do
think
there
may
be
some
some
progress
or
I
should
I
should
say.
I
do
think
the
distracted
driving
bill
that
prevents
adults
from
using
cell
phones
that
are
not
hands-free,
while
driving
I
think
that
may
be
reintroduced,
and
if
so,
we
would
like
to
again
be
part
of
the
campaign
to
advocate
for
that
and
that
would
fit
under
this
priority
as
well.
O
O
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
securing
the
substantial
funding
that
has
been
made
available
by
the
federal
government
under
the
inflation
reduction
act
that
we're
doing
it
in
a
coordinated
and
informed
way
with
the
best
science
and
that
we're
using
a
an
equity,
centered,
Workforce
program
and
a
campaign
that
allows
us
to
really
do
so
in
a
way
that
benefits
as
many
people
as
possible
and
then.
Lastly,
in
the
state
priorities,
we
are
wanted
to
make
clean
air
priority.
O
Once
again,
this
was
already
discussed,
so
I
don't
need
to
discuss
it
again,
but
we
think
that
these
four
state
policy
priorities
reflect
councils
priorities.
You
can
let
us
know
otherwise.
I
will
say
that
there
is
no
limitation
of
how
many
priorities
we
can
add,
because
it
really
comes
down
to
resources
and
again
these
priorities
were
tied
to
doing
some
homework,
to
make
sure
that
they
had
the
ability
to
to
pass
this
year.
O
So,
moving
on
to
Federal
priorities,
the
exact
same
thing
that
we
want
to
do
at
the
federal
at
the
state
level.
We
want
to
do
at
the
federal
level,
so
securing
money
from
the
from
the
U.S
forest
Service
is
going
to
require
working
with
U.S
forest
Service.
O
Pursuing
a
a
climate,
Conservation
Corps
is
going
to
require
us
to
work
with
Congress
and
the
goose.
He
has
been
the
champion
of
this
idea,
so
it's
both
a
state
and
federal
priority
and
it's
been
identified
as
such.
For
that
reason,
secondly,
we'd
like
to
again,
as
we
always
do,
make
a
priority
to
pursue
congressionally
directed
spending
requests
otherwise
known
as
earmarks.
We
were
successful
in
fiscal
year
2022
and
getting
just
under
a
quarter
million
for
an
expansion
of
the
existing
Crisis
Intervention
response
team
for
fiscal
year.
O
2023
we
are
in
the
running.
We
are
it's
not
finalized
and
it
won't
be
till
the
end
of
the
year,
but
it
looks
like
we
are
going
to
be
likely
to
get
half
a
million
for
the
city's,
affordable,
housing,
modular
Factory
and
20
million
in
an
authorization
Under
the
Water
Resources
development
act.
O
That
would
allow
us
to
address
a
lot
of
Water
Resource
needs
so
for
fiscal
year
2024
we
haven't
identified
what
we'd
like
to
submit,
but
we'd
like
to
get
council's
blessing
that
you,
your
directing
us
to
go,
pursue
that
funding
and
we'll
find
what
could
be
most
viable
and
we
always
try
to
pursue
projects
that
are
consistent
with
council's
priorities.
O
And,
lastly,
under
Federal
priorities
is
the
Northwest
area,
Mobility
study
project.
So,
as
many
of
you
know,
this
was
a
study
that
identified
how,
in
addition
to
building
the
rail,
which
is
going
to
take
a
long
time,
how
we
can
make
sure
Mobility
is
improved.
As
we
wait
for
the
rail
it
includes
supporting
the
Braille
and
so
as
described
here.
O
As
you
know
that
we
we
want
to
get
some
multimodal
improvements,
there's
been
substantial
work
and
and
the
design
and
funding
that's
been
secured,
but
we're
still
looking
for
some
federal
Direct
Federal
support,
which
we
have
not
gotten.
So
we
want
to
make
that
the
final
of
the
three
Federal
priorities,
so
I
also
want
to
mention
that
one
of
the
things
that
we
discuss
in
the
memo
is
that
we
want
to
introduce
Equity
considerations
well,
I.
What
I
should
say
is
we
want
to
be
enhancing?
O
We
want
to
make
sure
that
when
we
propose
changes
to
the
policy
statement,
that
we
evaluate
the
changes
to
make
sure
that
we're
consistent
with
this
principle
and
in
your
packet
under
each
proposed
change,
we
attempted
to
have
a
some
comments
about
how
we
thought
that
it
was
in
compliance,
and
this
is
not
to
say
that
we're
going
to
always
say
that
every
chain,
every
proposed
policy
position
is
in
compliance,
would
furthering
racial
Equity.
O
This
is
perhaps
what
I
think
is.
One
of
the
most
important
parts
is
that
those
of
us
who
are
engaged
in
advocating
for
policy
changes
at
the
regional
state
and
federal
level.
We
need
to
do
a
better
job
of
reaching
out
to
the
groups
that
represent
of
a
lot
of
the
the
people
that
are
not
being
heard
from
the
conventional
mainstream
policy,
Advocates
that
are
at
the
Capitol,
and
there
are
some
groups
that
we
have
been
working
with,
like
nine
to
five
and
Circ.
O
We've
worked
with
them
on
some
mobile
home
legislation.
Cclp
we
work
with
them
on
some
fiscal
matters,
Colorado
fiscal
Institute,
but
there's
many
that
we
have
not
reached
out
to
like
the
NAACP
and
green
Latinos
and
ACLU
and
Center
for
people
with
disabilities.
We
want
to
create
a
a
more
consistent
relationship
where
we're
not
going
to
them
on
any
specific
bill,
but
we're
developing
relationships
where
we're
checking
with
the
end
with
them,
occasionally,
basically
a
relationship
where
we're
asking
them.
What's
on
your
radar,
what
are
the
Bills?
What
are
the
policies?
O
What
are
the
regulations
that
you
have
some
interest
in
and
where?
What
concerns
that
you
have?
This
is
not
to
suggest
that
they
would
then
tell
us
something
that
we're
going
to
automatically
do
it,
but
it
raises
an
awareness
that
is
all
too
often
not
existed
in
the
policy
advocacy
work.
So
this
would
allow
us
to
then,
when
we
recommend
something
to
you
or
when
we
actually
take
a
position
and
ask
you
to
like.
O
Let
us
know:
do
you
want
to
revisit
it
that
we're
able
to
say
here's
what
we're
hearing
from
a
variety
of
organizations
that
might
have
different
perspectives,
and
let
you
make
a
decision
on
whether
or
not
it's
worth
the
trade-off.
Hopefully,
everything
we're
doing
is
in
furtherance
of
racial
equity
and
I
should
say
Equity
more
General
more
generally
speaking,
but
if
not
these
these
relationships
would
allow
us
to
raise
our
or
or
IQ
on
these
issues
or
EQ.
O
Perhaps,
finally,
when
we
one
of
the
benefits
of
our
policy
statement,
is
that
it
allows
us
to
move
really
quickly
when
a
Bill
gets
introduced.
O
When
an
amendment
is
being
proposed,
a
representative
that
can
call
me
and
ask
me
right
away
and
I
could
say
yes,
Council
has
given
us
Direction
I
know
for
sure
they
would
support
us,
go
for
it,
so
we'd
like
being
able
to
be
quick,
but
at
the
same
time
we
always
should
have
the
time
to
conduct
an
equity
analysis
of
the
position
that
we're
advocating,
and
so
what
we're
committing
to
do
is
to
do
just
that
it
would
be
documented.
It
won't
necessarily
be
shared.
O
You
know,
bill
by
Bill
would
counsel,
but
it's
something
that
we'll
have
there.
So
if
anybody
asks
did
you
answer,
did
you
ask
the
question?
Did
you
even
consider
equity
and
before
you
took
a
position
on
this
policy
matter?
That
way
you
can
say?
Yes,
in
fact,
we're
required
to
and
we've
had
we
haven't
documented
and
we
can.
We
can
dig
it
out
and,
and
we
can,
we
can
share
it
with.
O
However,
we
need
to
or
we
can
frankly,
it
really
should
be
at
the
top
top
of
our
mind
tip
of
our
tongues.
So
hopefully
it's
not
just
something.
That's
lost
in
the
file.
O
I
want
to
just
conclude
this
last
slide
about
what
to
expect
in
2023
and
overall
I.
Guess
I'll
start
by
saying
forecasting
is
dangerous
business.
O
It's
really
difficult,
especially
given
the
high
turnover
I
heard
that
there
may
be
as
much
as
60
percent
turnover
and
the
legislators
at
the
Capitol.
So
we
just
don't
know
who's
going
to
be
there.
O
We
don't
know
whether
the
Democrats
are
going
to
retain
the
senate
or
whether
they're
going
to
retain
the
significant
majority
they've
had
in
the
house,
but
what
we
have
heard-
and
these
are
some
rumors
and
I'm-
not
going
to
go
into
detail
either
because
I
don't
have
that
detail
or
because
it's
not
appropriate
for
me
to
share
what
I
what
I
was
given
in
confidence.
Q
Yeah,
absolutely
thanks
Carl,
so
this
first
one
is
something
that
we're
hearing
from
the
governor's
office
just
generally
that
the
governor
has
expressed
interest
in
land
use
manners
to
address,
affordable
housing
and
he's
not
his
best
interested
in
exactly
what
that
will
look
like
we've
heard
some
rumors,
but
we
don't
know
the
the
full
extent
of
what
that
looks
like,
but
if
this
does
turn
into
a
bill,
I
think
this
is
something
that
we
want
to
discuss
further
when
we
see
a
bill
because
there's
a
balancing
act
here
between
local
control,
which
we've
talked
about
and
wanting
to
have
authority
over
our
land
use
codes
and
the
importance
of
affordable
housing,
and
so
this
could
potentially
go
into
things
like
our
comprehensive
plan
or
other
matters
that
we
deal
with
on
a
daily
basis.
Q
So
it's
something
that
we're
just
not
sure
what
this
will
look
like
it's
something
that
we
want
to
bring
forward
at
some
point
again
again:
affordable
housing
is
a
really
important
thing
to
the
city,
of
course,
but
this
is
something
that
we're
just,
not
sure
what
it'll
look
like.
But
it's
something
that
we're
starting
to
hear
about
and
then
rent
control,
that's
the
next
one
that
girl
hold
up
thanks.
Q
Carl,
rent
control
is
something
that's
been
discussed
in
the
past
It's
Something,
That
We're
hearing
again
that
maybe
there's
a
new
discussion
from
rent
control
and
what
that
will
look
like
most
recently,
we've
seen
some
incentives
with
rent
control
being
able
to
use
rent
controls
in
a
positive
way
or
in
in
trying
to
help
get
more
affordable
housing.
Q
But
the
governor
has
expressed
disinterest
in
rent
control
in
the
past
for
local
governments
to
be
able
to
do
this
so
I,
don't
know
how
far
this
discussion
will
get,
but
it
is
something
that
we're
starting
to
see
a
little
bit.
Is
this
idea
of
right
control
again
going
back
to
affordable
housing
and
some
of
those
important
topics
that
we
talk
about.
O
Thank
you,
Laurel
we're
also
hearing
about
a
bill
that
would
create
a
State
Building
Code
board
to
create
minimum
standards
for
the
Willy,
the
Wildland
Urban
interface.
It
would
actually
Define
what
the
Wildland
Urban
interface
is.
Of
course,
that
has
changed
quite
a
bit
over
the
last
year.
O
We
are
expecting
legislation
that
addresses
the
bray,
problematic
concerns,
but
under
insurance
and
the
fact
that
people
didn't
know
they
were
uninsured
and
that
a
lot
of
insurance
companies
have
have
gone
out
of
their
way
to
not
make
it
Easy
by
not
providing
transparency
and
using
different
databases
on
what
it
would
cost
to
rebuild
and
just
bottom
line.
O
It's
not
the
guarantee
that
somebody
who
secures
insurance
is
fully
covered,
but
that
they
have
the
ability
to
know
perhaps
on
an
annual
basis
what
it
takes
to
be
fully
insured
and
they
can
make
an
informed
decision
so
that
we
can
expect
some
legislation
in
that
regard.
O
So,
of
course,
Colorado
allows
abortion
abortions,
but
there's
many
other
aspects
of
policy
that
may
still
need
to
be
addressed,
especially
with
cross
jurisdictional
needs
and
travel
and
liability
for
doctors.
So
we're
expecting
some
more
policies
to
come
forward
in
that
regard,
and
we
do,
by
the
way,
have
a
policy
statement
position
that
would
allow
us
to
support
bills
that
would
further
abortion
rights.
O
The
right
to
rest
I
think
all
of
you
have
heard
of
this,
but
in
case
you
haven't
it's
essentially
a
bill
that
in
some
variation
would
prevent
cities.
I
actually
should
have.
Let
Laurels
think
about
this,
because
this
is
under
your
topic,
but
I'll
go
ahead
and
finish
just
because
it
it
would
prevent
cities
from
Banning
camping.
Some
variations
of
it
have
basically
said
unless
the
city
had
provides
a
certain
minimum
standards
for
homeless
services.
O
So
this
is
something
that
we
recognize.
Council
would
like
to
look
into
further.
So
so,
if
this
was
to
come
up,
we'll
bring
it
to
your
attention,
we're
not
going
to
go
advocating
on
it
without
bringing
it
to
your
attention
and,
looking
at
the
specifics.
Generally
speaking,
we
have
a
position
to
oppose
taking
away
the
right,
the
ban
camping,
but
if,
if
it
gets
more
complex
than
that
and
it
it
creates
some
sort
of
balancing
act
about
you
know
minimum
standards
that
cities
may
need
to
meet.
O
That
would
be
a
situation
that
we
would
certainly
bring
it
back.
The
intergovernmental
Affairs
committee,
if
not
the
full
Council,
expect
something
on
geothermal
electricity
production
creation
of
a
clean
hydrogen
Hub
in
Colorado,
especially
for
hard
to
decarbonize
sectors.
O
A
bill
was
introduced
last
year
that
would
require
EB
charging
requirements
and
pre-wiring
for
multi-family
and
commercial
buildings.
We
expect
that
to
come
back
and
we
think
that
this
time
it
may
be
brought
back
in
a
way
that
is
likely
to
get
the
support
from
the
governor.
This
was
the
bill
that
I
believe
passed
and
was
ultimately
vetoed.
O
I
think
the
the
thinking
was
that
it
was.
It
was
to
the
the
cost
that
they
would
impose
on
both
the
the
homeowner,
the
owner
of
the
building
and
the
construction
industry
was
too
high.
So
the
question
is
how
to
do
this
in
a
way
that
wouldn't
create
that
cost.
So
with
that
I'd
like
to
conclude
my
presentation,
but
I
am
really
excited
to
shift
it
now
and
Jacob
and
Anita.
If
you
haven't
already,
you
might
want
to
turn
on
your
cameras.
O
I
want
to
shift
it
over
to
two
very
good
friends:
Jacob
Smith
and
Anita
sites,
both
of
them
as
it
turns
out,
were
Mayors
Anita
was
the
mayor
in
Westminster.
Jacob
was
a
mayor
in
Golden.
They
both
have
a
quite
impressive
resume
in
policy
advocacy
and
right
now
they
are
leaders
for
the
Colorado
communities
for
climate
action,
which
is
an
organization
that
Jacob
will
tell
you
about
and
I'll
leave
it
with
that
and
I'll
turn
it
over
and
start
the
PowerPoint
so
Jacob
when
you're
ready.
M
Hi
everyone
I'm
actually
going
to
kick
it
off.
First
Carl,
my
name
is
Anita
site
and
I
am
the
advocacy
director
for
cc4ca
I
actually
joined
the
team
mid
legislative
session,
but
I
have
had
a
long
relationship
with
cc4ca,
as
Carl
mentioned.
I
did
serve
on
the
Westminster
city
council
for
eight
years
and
during
that
time,
I
worked
very
closely
with
cc4ca.
I
was
actually
the
very
first
president
of
the
organization.
M
During
that
time,
I
had
the
privilege
of
working
and
learning
and
collaborating
closely
with
older
team
members
and
I.
Just
really
feel
I
owe
I
have
a
debt
of
gratitude.
Carl,
Castillo
and
Jonathan
Cohen.
Both
really
helped
me
quite
a
bit
as
a
new
local,
elected
or
wonderful
Regional
partners
and
helped
Propel.
My
communities
ability
to
meaningfully
participate
in
climate
action
and
in
addition
to
that,
I
am
a
boulder
High,
School
grad,
so
go
Panthers
I'm,
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Jacob
Smith
our
executive
director
to
introduce
himself
in
our
organization.
R
Great
thank
you
Anita
and
good
evening,
mayor
Pro,
tem
and
Council
and
staff,
and
really
thrilled
to
be
here.
We
we,
as
Anita,
said
we
work
closely
with
your
staff
a
lot
and
it's
a
great
relationship,
we're
very
grateful
to
the
support
and
the
working
relationships
and
have
also
had
the
chance
to
work
with
some
of
you
individually,
the
mayor
and
some
of
you
on
Council,
and
really
appreciate
those
opportunities
as
well
Carl.
You
can
go
to
the
next
slide
if
you're
still,
there.
R
You
all
right
well,
so
we
thought
we
would
give
you
an
overview
of
cc4ca.
It's
a
good.
It's
a
good
follow-up
to
the
conversation
you
just
had
with
Carl
his
presentation
we
are,
we
are
fundamentally
an
advocacy
organization
and
Boulder
played
Boulder
was
one
of
the
founding
jurisdictions
Boulder
and
a
small
group
of
other
jurisdictions
about
2016
got
together
and
had
had
grappled
with
the
realization
that
as
an
individual
jurisdiction,
it's
very
difficult
to
accomplish
much
at
the
state
level.
R
When
you
all
are
at
the
state
legislature,
testifying
the
only
legislators
that
care
what
you
think,
hopefully
are
your
own
State
reps
and
state
senators.
Hopefully
at
least
they
do,
and
the
rest
of
the
legislation
is
true
for
every
jurisdiction
doesn't
much
care
if
you've
got
some
of
the
jurisdiction
and-
and
the
realization
was
on
some
issues
where
you
really
need
a
bigger
voice
than
a
single
jurisdiction
can
bring.
A
coalition
of
jurisdictions.
Speaking
with
one
voice
can
be
a
really
powerful
tool,
and
it
has
turned
out
to
be
exactly
that.
R
I
joined
about
two
years
later,
2018
I
think
so.
I've
been
with
the
organization
for
five
or
so
four
or
five
years
now
and
and
we've
grown
every
year.
The
foundation
that
that
Boulder
was
part
of
creating
has
I
stepped
into
an
organization
that,
unlike
certainly
unlike
some
executive
director
new
executive
director
roles,
there
was
no
crisis
to
fix.
There
were
no
no
big
problems
to
unwind
you
all
you
and
the
other
jurisdictions
that
have
begun.
R
The
organization
have
done
a
fantastic
job
of
the
foundation
building,
and
so
we've
just
been
able
to
continue
on
that
same
trajectory
since
then,
cz4ca,
fundamentally
an
advocacy
group.
So
we
our
job,
is
amplify
the
voices
of
local
governments
and
local
elected
officials
in
these
State
and,
to
some
extent
federal
policy
making
venues,
and
that
is
our
almost
exclusive
Focus.
There
are
lots
of
other
needs
and
opportunities
and
groups
that
provide
some
services
and
benefits
to
local
governments,
but
our
job
really
is
this
advocacy
role.
R
We
do
a
little
bit,
and
so
that's
really
the
important
thing
to
emphasize
here
and
we
work
in
all
the
same
venues
that
Carl
referred
to.
Certainly,
at
the
legislature,
with
the
governor's
office
and
his
agencies
in
the
regulatory
Arenas
like
the
puc
and
the
air
quality
control
commission,
we
also
do
a
little
bit
of
work
at
the
federal
level.
R
That's
really
been
around
where
they're,
where
we
think
we
can
have
a
real
impact
on
outcomes,
so
the
the
investment,
or
rather
the
inflation
production
Act,
is
a
good
example
of
where
Senator
Hickenlooper
hearing
constantly
from
local
elected
officials
and
local
governments
about
how
important
that
was
was
as
far
as
we
can
tell
part
of
why
he
was
motivated
to
work
as
hard
as
he
did
to
win
over
Senator
manchin's
support
and
get
something
passed.
So
that's
an
example
of
where
federally
will
engage
where
we
think
we
can
actually
make
a
difference
on
the
outcome.
R
We
also
do
some
other
resource
providing
to
local
governments
and
capacity
building
work.
We
do
trainings
and
workshops
and
briefings
and
provide
lots
of
information
to
you
to
all
of
our
members
about
what's
happening
on
the
policy
Arena,
what's
happening
on
the
science
side
and
so
on,
and
so
those
are
things
we
do
when
we
can
to
to
provide
value
to
you
all
to
enable
you
all
to
be
more
effective
as
advocates
on
climate,
but
our
core
at
heart,
we
are
about
the
advocacy
work
Carl
next
slide.
R
Thank
you.
This
is
a
list
of
the
members
39
members
across
the
state.
Half
of
those
are
West
slope.
Two-Thirds
are
rural.
We
represent
about
a
quarter
of
the
state's
population,
so
it's.
This
is
a
far
cry
from
the
half
dozen
jurisdictions
that
six
years
ago
got
together
and
started
the
thing
one
of
the
most
interesting
shifts
over
time
last
couple
of
years,
especially
is
the
number
of
of
communities
are
really
purple
or
have
historically
been
purple
that
have
become
members
and
I.
R
O
I'm
sorry
about
that
I
was
trying
to
move.
I
was
trying
to
move
this
bar
and
somehow
it
is
that
working
out,
Jacob
nope.
R
O
That
yeah,
you
keep
speaking
I'll,
go.
R
So
yeah,
that's
the
important
point.
I
wanted
to
flag
there
is
the
membership
has
grown
from
the
communities
you
would
expect
to
be
and
have
historically
been
Leading
Edge
on
climate,
like
Boulder
and
Boulder
County
Pitkin
County,
to
include
a
bunch
of
communities
that
that's
just
not
been
the
case
historically
well,
even
like
Anita
and
Anita's
case
Westminster,
but
also
communities
like
North,
Glenn
and
Avon
Edgewater
joined
recently.
Wheat
Ridge
is
a
is
I.
R
Think
the
newest
member
and
those
are
all
communities
that
historically
have
been
much
more
purple,
and
so
the
fact
that
they
are
joining
is
a
reflection
of
the
political
shift
overall,
but
also
just
the
growing
awareness
of
the
very
real
impacts
that
local
communities
are
experiencing
because
of
climate
change.
Tech
slide
come
on.
R
The
only
thing
I
want
to
mention
here
is
just
to
flag
that
the
the
Coalition
the
organization
is
governed
by
a
board
of
directors
like
a
ordinary
non-profit
and
every
jurisdiction
has
a
seat
on
the
board.
So
one
of
the
organizing
principles
here
is
no.
Every
member
has
an
equal
voice.
Nobody,
it
doesn't
matter
your
size
or
your
political
theft.
Every
jurisdiction
is
at
the
table
equally
and
that's
a
big
part
of
I
think
why
we've
been
able
to
grow
the
way
we
have
a
lot
of
jurisdictions.
R
Really
small
ones
in
particular,
tend
to
be
leery
of
coalitions
like
this,
where
they
are
concerned,
their
voice
make
each
round
out,
and
the
fact
that
we
treat
everybody
equally
around
the
table
is
a
I
think
a
big
part
of
why
we
continue
to
grow
the
way
we
do.
There
are
also
lots
of
opportunities
to
engage
for
you
all
as
members
of
the
council
and
for
your
staff
and
Anita
will
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
later,
but
the
the
Committees
represent
on
the
on
the
on
the
screen
here,
just
some
examples
of
those
opportunities.
R
Carl
the
next
slide,
please.
But
the
the
board
is
really
the
point.
I
wanted
to
flag
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
legislative
session
and
I'll
talk
about
some
of
the
other
Regulatory
and
policy
successes
of
the
past
year,
or
so.
This
is
just
a
high
level
summary
of
the
session
from
our
perspective
focused
on
climate
specifically,
and
you
get
a
sense
of
just
the
scale
of
the
work
that
we're
doing.
R
R
A
couple
of
years
ago,
we
ran
a
bill
to
create
I,
mean
last
year
to
create
a
grant
fund
for
local
governments
to
do
natural,
Hazard
Medicaid
Nation,
like
a
lot
of
the
work
that
Carl
was
talking
about
around
fire
and
fuels,
but
to
leave
it
wider.
So
it's
not
just
about
fire
and
fuels,
but
natural
hazards
that
are
Amplified
by
climate.
R
That
was
a
gap
in
the
network
of
programs
out
there
and
and
that's
a
good
example
where
we
stepped
up
and
actually
ran
a
bill
to
to
add
some
capacity
and
resources
to
local
governments.
Next
slide,
Carl
I
wanted
to
highlight
just
a
few
of
the.
What,
for
us,
were
the
biggest
wins
legislatively
on
climate
I.
Won't
there's
six
here
three
on
this
and
three
in
the
next
slide.
I
won't
talk
about
all
of
them,
but
off
like
a
couple
of
them
one
at
the
bottom.
R
There's
the
air
quality
Investments
Carl
did
make
some
reference
to
that.
The
47
million
dollars
listed
there
for
air
pollution
control
division.
A
lot
of
that
is
for
enforcement
enforcement
has
been
underfunded
for
a
very
long
time.
We
continue
to
improve
the
regulations
on
air
quality,
air
pollution
and
what
the
rules
are
and
the
thresholds
what's
permissible,
but
the
enforcement
pieces
lag
far
behind
and
the
result
is
even
though
the
regs
are
better.
R
We
still
have
many
cases,
pollution
levels
that
are
far
in
excess
of
what
the
regs
themselves
ought
to
allow,
so
that
funding
is
a
big
part
of
how
we
should
make
progress
there,
and
that
was
one
of
the
bigger
wins
last
session
and
then
that
very
top
bullet
the
producer
responsibility
bill,
I,
don't
know
how
much
you
all
followed
that
but
I
want
to
mention
it,
because
it's
it's
transformative
and
immensely
powerful.
R
It
essentially
says
it
creates
a
system
where
producers
have
to
pay
a
fee
based
on
the
packaging,
the
environmental
footprint
of
the
packaging
they
use
for
their
products,
and
so
basically,
products
that
are
not
recyclable
or
use.
Lower
content
of
recycled
content
of
the
materials
themselves
are
a
lower
amount
of
recycled
content.
Those
packaging
choices
are
going
to
result
in
higher
fees
for
the
producers,
so
it's
basically
created
a
market
mechanism
that
builds
those
choices
into
the
builds.
R
Those
those
cost
considerations
into
the
choices
from
the
very
almost
the
very
top
of
of
the
supply
chain,
and
that's
been
so
important
because
those
costs,
as
you
all
certainly
know,
have
been
externalized
to
all
of
us
in
our
local
governments
and
our
community
members
for
forever.
This
is
basically
taking
those
costs
and
internalizing
them
into
the
cost
of
the
product.
R
That
money
will
go
to
offset
the
cost
of
the
residence.
The
the
vision
is
that
every
every
Coloradan
should
have
recycling
access
that
is
as
good
or
better
than
their
their
current
waste
hauling
service-
and
this
is
you
know,
these
kinds
of
programs
are
great
they're,
very
new
in
the
US,
but
they
have
been
well
established
in
other
parts
of
the
world
and
we
have
a
lot
of
confidence
that
that
is
going
to
both
transform
how
we
think
about
waste.
Q
R
R
These
are
just
three
other
of
what
for
us,
where
the
some
of
the
biggest
highlights
of
the
session
I
won't
go
into
them
now,
but
I'm
happy
to
talk
about
any
of
these
later.
At
the
end,
if
you
have
any
questions
or
thoughts
about
any
of
them,
the
next
slide
Carl
and
then
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
Regulatory
and
policy
side.
R
If
the
sun
isn't
shining
in
Colorado,
it
is
probably
shining
somewhere
else
across
that
much
larger
geographic
area
and
that
because
the
RTO
gets
built
out
laterally
across
the
U.S,
it
means
we're
covering
multiple
time
zones.
So
Peak
use
on
in
the
Mountain
Time
Zone
is
an
hour
off
from
Peak
use
in
the
next
time
zone
over
in
either
direction,
and
all
of
that
means
we're
a
whole
lot
better
able
to
maintain
grid
reliability
and
stability,
the
even
being
heavily
dependent
on
intermittent
sources
like
wind
and
solar.
R
So
this
is
a
good
example
of
this
is
going
to
fundamentally
transform
Colorado's
Grid,
it's
going
to
take
some
time,
but
the
wheels
are
now
in
motion
and
that's
a
that's
a
legislative
outcome,
a
lot
of
the
regulatory
proceedings.
Now,
that's
the
the
PC
is
now
doing
the
RTO
work,
the
analysis
to
figure
out
what
does
that
look
like
in
what
are
the
pros
and
cons?
R
Certainly,
the
making
the
coal
plant
retirement's
enforceable,
federally
enforceable
now
is
a
huge
deal
that
was
late
last
year
as
part
of
the
ozone
step,
the
state
of
limitation
plan
and
the
regional
Haze
Sip,
and
that
means
these
plants
really
are
going
to
be
retired
and
on
this
time
frame,
which
is
of
enormous
consequence
again,
you
all
Boulder,
City
Council
knows
more
about
these
things
than
than
most,
and
you
certainly
get
the
implications
of
that
and
then
Tri-State,
which
is
not
as
relevant
to
Boulders
directly
but
is
hugely
relevant
from
a
greenhouse
gas
footprint.
R
Standpoint
I
would
say
inconceivable
even
two
or
three
years
ago.
Tri-State
is
now
committed
to
80
reduction
by
2030,
which
is
just
it's
hard
to
imagine,
Tri-State,
which
has
really
been
the
laggard
across
the
utility
sector,
stepping
up
the
way
they
have.
So
these
are
some
of
the
examples
of
on
the
regulatory
side
proceedings
with
huge
implications
for
greenhouse
gas
submissions
and
and
for
the
work
that
you
all
do
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
Anita.
The
next
slide.
Please
Carl,
but
I
just
want
to
emphasize
that
part
of.
R
You
want
to
accomplish
a
certain
kind
of
pollution
reduction
at
greenhouse
gas
emission
reduction
or
an
increase
in
transit
services,
or
something
like
that
and
and
local
governments
often
are
running
into
barriers
at
the
state
level
that
just
prohibit
them
from
doing
more
than
they
want
to
do
some
of
those.
Those
issues
that
Carl
was
talking
about
are
good
examples
of
that,
and
we
that's
a
huge
part
of
what
we
focus
on.
R
What
are
the
barriers
that
are
preventing
or
impeding
your
ability
to
get
things
done
around
your
climate
plan,
your
greenhouse
gas
plan,
and
we
go
after
those
and
figure
out.
How
do
we
change
them
or
remove
them,
or
at
least
tweak
them
in
ways
that
make
it
easier
for
you
to
do
the
work
you
want
to
do
and
that's
married
to
so
much
again.
R
So
reducing
ozone
has
huge
health
benefits,
but
also
huge
rain
has
gas
benefits
and
ozone
is
just
not
a
that's,
not
a
challenge
that
local
governments
can
take
on
at
the
local
level.
You
can
you
can
nip
away
at
bits
and
pieces
and
that's
hugely
important,
but
if
the
real
levers
are
at
this
at
the
state
level-
and
that's
that's
the
work
that
we
do,
how
do
we
make
sure
you
get
accomplish
your
goals
and
locally
and
make
sure
we're
moving
the
levers
in
the
right
way
at
the
state
level?
M
M
We
are
an
example
of
just
the
sum
being
greater
than
our
parts:
CC
forces.
Our
advocacy
team
works
really
hard
to
make
engagement
easy
for
our
members,
so
we
will
hold
your
hand
through
the
process.
We
work
directly
with
Carl.
M
We
have
a
very
deep
bench
of
talent
and
knowledge
and
lived
experience
within
our
member
communities,
and
we
leverage
this
Collective
knowledge
to
impactfully,
engage
with
our
state
legislature
and
and
the
agencies.
So
definitely
let
us
know
if
you're
interested
in
being
part
of
these
numbers
in
the
future,
and
we
have
really
benefited
from
your
involvement
throughout
the
years
that
we've
existed
as
an
organization
next
slide.
Please.
M
So
there's
a
lot
of
different
ways
to
engage.
We
don't
just
work,
you
know
during
the
legislative
session,
as
Jacob
went
through,
we've
been
very
busy
with
every
single
agency,
and
this
has
been
a
particularly
busy
year.
So
providing
public
comments
or
written
comments
in
both
of
those
venues
is
something
that
we
can
support.
You
with.
M
Also,
though,
some
people
like
op-eds
and
letters
to
the
editors
and
we
can
help
you
get
those
placed
and
walk
you
through
those
processes,
and
then
we've
had
multiple
meetings
with
our
both
Federal
and
our
state
delegation
walking
through
and
really
trying
to
make
people
understand
the
impact
that
climate
change
has
on
local
governments.
M
Our
current
president
Matt
sure
he
he
says
when
they
joined
cc4ca.
They
saw
climate
change
as
an
imminent
threat
that
it
was
something
they
knew
was
on
the
horizon
and
was
going
to
change
the
livability
of
his
campti
he's
an
Eagle
County
Commissioner.
He
says
now
the
house
is
on
fire.
M
The
the
impact
of
our
work
could
not
be
more
critical
and
we
have
a
great
track
record,
but
really
our
our
power
is
our
members
and
leveraging
them
is.
Is
how
we
get
stuff
done,
Jacob.
R
Great,
thank
you.
Anita
next
slide
girl
just
we're
at
the
very
end.
Just
a
couple
of
thoughts
about
what's
coming
up.
Carl
did
a
great
job
of
of
a
rundown
on
the
legislative
session
coming
up,
so
I
won't
repeat
any
of
that
ex
I'll,
just
I'll
just
mention
that
a
lot
of
your
priorities
are
overlapping
with
ours.
That's
not
surprising
because
you
all
are
at
the
table
when
we
craft
our
priorities.
So
a
lot
of
the
work
we'll
be
doing
is
going
to
tap
into
things
that
Carl
talked
about
like
around
air
quality.
R
Certainly
around
wildfire
and
Wildfire
mitigation.
Natural
gas
is
another
one.
We're
fighting
a
fight
now
at
the
puc
to
eliminate
a
subsidy
there
currently
is
a
subsidy
for
developers
who
want
to
build
new
gas
lines
to
new
developments
and
we're
maybe
on
the
cusp
of
eliminating
that
subsidy,
where
every
other
ratepayer
pays
to
build
new
gas
lines,
new
development,
which
is
crazy,
so
the
legislative
side,
a
lot
of
our
work
is
going
to
line
up
to
the
work
you
do.
R
So
I
will
talk
more
about
that
on
the
on
the
regulatory
side
in
the
programmatic
side,
there's
a
certainly
a
ton
of
funding
that
is
either
flowing
now
through
what
people
now
call
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
law
from
the
fall
of
last
year,
and
now
the
the
IRA,
the
inflation
reduction
act,
tons
of
dollars
are
flowing
or
are
close
to
flowing
and
we're
putting
a
lot
of
effort
into
making
sure
we
can
curate,
which
programs
are
most
likely
to
be
beneficial
to
our
members
and
putting
a
lot
of
incur
a
lot
of
encouragement
to
the
Congressional
Delegation
to
help
identify
those
programs,
because
it's
a
huge
mass
of
programs
and
and
agencies
and
different
requirements,
so
making
sure
as
much
of
that
money
flows
into
Colorado
is
possible
to
fund
good
climate
forward
projects.
R
That's
one
piece:
I
mentioned
the
producer
responsibility
Bill.
The
next
step
in
that
process
is
the
creation
of
a
producer
responsibility,
organization
and
I
should
mention.
I
know
equal
cycle.
Eco
cycle
is
a
big
part
of
your
community
and
they
were
a
huge
part
of
the
legislative
effort
to
get
that
bill
passed
and
now
the
subsequent
implementation
side.
So
there
they
are
now
standing
up
the
organization.
That's
going
to
govern
that
whole
process.
That's
going
to
be
a
major
priority
for
us,
certainly
over
the
next
year,
a
lot
of
work
on
clean
trucks.
R
Some
of
that
will
be
regulatory,
some
of
that'll,
be
the
state's
plans
to
fund
and
deploy
Technologies
there's
a
Carl
I
think
Carl
mentioned
the
hydrogen
Hub.
That
is
another
piece
of
this.
It's
hydrogen!
What
role
does
hydrogen
player
should
it
play
in
the
in,
particularly
with
with
the
heavy
duty
truck
truck
uses
where,
like
electricity,
maybe
batteries
may
be
still
more
difficult
to
figure
out?
So
there's
a
lot
of
work
there
figuring
out.
What
are
the
conditions
where
those
like
on
hydrogen?
What
is
what
should
count
as
green
hydrogen?
R
R
That
was
a
huge
effort
and,
and
the
result
is
for
the
first
time
in
the
country,
this
is
become
becoming
a
model
for
lots
of
other
states,
and
even
the
federal
department
of
transportation
is
looking
at
what
we
did
here
in
Colorado
as
a
model
where
ghd
considerations
are
now
integrated
into
the
Metropolitan
planning
organization
planning
process
on
Transportation,
so
Dr
Cog
now
has
to
consider
ght
emissions
in
a
way
it's
never
had
to
before.
There's
a
lot
of
implementation
work.
R
R
That
was
where
we
saw
some
huge
wins
around,
with
Excel
and
retirement
at
coal
plants
and
some
of
the
other
Provisions
about
the
decarbonization
of
the
grid,
but
now,
as
the
next
phase,
where
all
those
things
get
translated
into
the
actual
bids
and
actual
decisions
about
what
resources
Excel
is
going
to
spend
rate
payer
money
on.
So
that
is
also
going
to
take
up
a
huge
amount
of
time.
We
will
work.
Certainly
work
closely
with
you
and
your
staff
Jonathan
is,
is
a
considerable
experts.
R
I'm
sure
you
know
on
on
Excel
related
and
puc
related
activities,
and
we
do
a
lot
there.
So
we
work
closely
with
him.
Carl
is
great
to
work
with
on
a
whole
Suite
of
policy
activities,
so
we'll
continue
to
work
closely
with
your
staff
and
happy
to
work
with
you
all
individually
at
we
typically
organize
that
through
Carl,
as
Anita
mentioned,
whenever
you're
interested
on
a
particular
issue,
or
if
you
let
us
know
in
advance,
we'll
keep
an
eye
out
for
opportunities
to
plug
you
in,
but
just
know
it
we
boulders
okay.
R
So
all
of
our
members
are
our
favorite
members,
but
Boulder
is
our
favorite
favorite
member
and
we
we
really
do
love
working
with
you
and
happy
to
have
a
chance
to
to
update
you
tonight
and
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
and
Carl
yeah.
You
can
jump
to
that
last
slide
thanks
so
much
Carl
for
the
slides.
O
O
Frankly,
previous
councils
knew
a
lot
more
about
cc4ca
and
what
they
did
and,
as
Anita
said,
they
make
advocacy
easy
for
their
members,
and
that
could
be
a
better
way
of
succinctly
saying
what
they
do.
So
we
are
part
of
many
membership
organizations,
but
this
is
our
favorite
favorite.
So
I
thought
it
was
important
to
bring
it
to
your
attention.
Last
thing,
I
will
say
in
terms
of
again
the
influence
that
we're
having
currently
Jonathan
Cohen
is
the
chair
of
the
policy
committee.
O
So
definitely
we
have
opportunities
to
have
our
voices
heard
so
with
that
I
want
to
I
want
to
turn
it
back
to
council
and
I
know
that
it's
time
for
questions
and
I'd
like
to
encourage
Council
of
Interest
questions
for
cc4ca,
so
that
we
don't
have
to
keep
them
here
or,
if
there's
questions
that
are
frankly
ones
that
they're
more
likely
to
be
able
to
answer.
Perhaps
you
can
prioritize
those
again.
Thank
you.
So
much.
B
Thanks
Carl,
and
that
is
a
great
suggestion-
thank
you
also
Laurel
for
the
presentation
and
Anita
and
I'm
looking
for
Jacob
for
being
here
and
for
that
awesome
presentation.
B
I
You're
up
thanks
for
that
presentation,
Jacob
really
appreciate
that
and
I
apologize.
If
my
attention
blipped
during
the
presentation
but
I
just
wanted
to
ask,
is
a
kind
of
a
housing
density
and
land
use,
something
that
is
sort
of
in
the
realm
of
things
being
considered
so
I'm,
our
Dr
Cog
representative,
and
you
know
there.
Of
course,
you
know:
we've
been
talking
into
having
a
lot
of
discussions
about
that.
So
I
was
just
curious.
How
that
is
is
fitting
in.
R
Yeah,
thank
you
counselor.
That
is
a
great
question
and
Carl
alluded
to
it
a
little
bit.
There
is
there's
a
real
energy
around
some
legislation
that
might
try
to
weave
together,
affordable
housing,
Transportation
climate,
all
into
some
kind
of
a
package.
The
governor,
as
Carl
mentioned,
has
expressed
some
or
Carl
and
I
think
Laurel
mentioned
also,
maybe
has
expressed
some
real
interest
in
doing
something
on
this.
We
have
some
sense
of
his
inch
of
what
that
looks
like,
but
it's
still
pretty
early
lots
of
of
those
interest
groups.
R
The
stakeholders
are
at
the
table,
including
us
we're
in
this
local
government
hat
and
try
to
figure
out
where,
where
we
think
we
can
get
something
done
that
doesn't
cross
the
line.
That
would
not
be
tolerable
to
our
members
that
local
control,
where
that
line
is
exactly
but
does
actually
do
some
meaningful
integration.
That
one
thing
I,
don't
think
I
mean
I
I
did
mention
I,
don't
think
Carl
did
one
thing.
That's
particularly
unusual
about
cc4ca,
and
it's
worth
mentioning
here
on
this
issue
in
particular.
R
Is
that
to
make
changes
to
our
policy
statement
requires
every
member
to
sign
off
on
that,
so
to
become
a
member
you
have
to
the
elected
body
has
to
pass
a
resolution
that
says
they.
They
support
the
policy
statement
and
that
way
coming
in
we
know
everybody's
aligned
and
once
you're
a
member.
You
have
essentially
veto
power
over
changes
and
on
paper
it
sounds
crazy.
I
have
a
40
member
39
member
board,
and
every
member
has
to
sign
off
on
changes
in
practice.
R
It
has
worked
really
well
surprisingly
well
and
some
of
that's
because
we
put
just
a
ton
of
time
into
those
conversations
to
figure
out
like
on
this.
Where
is
the
local
control
line
that
everybody
can
live
with
and
will
work
really
hard
to
see
something
move
through
the
legislative
process?
That
does
something
meaningful,
bringing
those
pieces
together,
but
stays
on
the
right
side
of
that
local
control
line?
That
is
the
the
hard
line
that
our
members
are
not
going
to
be
comfortable
with,
including
certainly
you
all.
K
Thank
you,
I
just
have
a
quick
question.
I
was
looking
at
some
of
the
issues
that
you
mentioned
that
are
coming
forward
and
one
that
I
was
particularly
interested
in
was
to
read
peer
regulation
of
excel
through
the
puc
and
I
was
wondering.
Is
there
a
place
where
all
this
information
is
located?
We
can
have
access
to
them,
or
is
it
a
matter
of
I
suppose
reaching
out
to
you
and
after
this
meeting.
R
Yeah,
that
is
a
more
complicated
question
than
it
should
be
than
it
might
sound.
The
puc
itself
is
terrible
at
at
making
information
available
in
comprehensible
ways
to
the
barrier
to
entry
is
pretty
steep.
You
have
to
speak
puc
and
you
have
to
understand
a
website.
That's
not
designed
to
be
used
by
people
who
are
not
puc
for
deeply
puc
literate.
They're
I
think
the
puc
is
taking
seriously.
How
do
they
make
that
better?
So
I
don't
want
to
sound
like
a
criticism,
but
that
has
historically
been
the
case,
and
it's
still
very
true.
R
So,
if
you're
trying
to
figure
out
what's
going
on
the
puc
by
going
to
the
puc
website,
the
stuff
is
all
there,
but
it
could
be
very
difficult
to
find
and
interpret
the
pieces
of
the
puc's
docket
that
we're
involved
in.
We
try
to
make
that
a
whole
lot
more
accessible.
We
do
a
roughly
bi-weekly,
we
call
it
the
Roundup,
basically
a
newsletter
to
all
of
our
members.
R
It's
pretty
lengthy
and
detailed,
so
it
tends
to
go
to
the
board
members
and
our
committee
members,
not
necessarily
all
of
the
elected
officials
that
are
on
the
bodies
of
every
one
of
our
members.
But
anybody
who
wants
it
we
are
happy
to
add
you
to
it.
So
one
option
is
we
add
you
to
that
and
every
couple
of
weeks
or
so
you'll
get
a
pretty
detailed
update
on
what's
happening
at
the
puc
that
we're
involved
in
and
I'd
also
say
anytime.
R
You
have
questions
that
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
us
or
ask
Carl
to
reach
out
whatever
the
right
protocol
is.
We
are
more
than
happy
to
speak
to
you
directly,
provide
any
information
you
might
want.
We
often
prepare
little
background
memos
internally,
so
that
like,
if
you
were
going
to
testify
at
the
puc,
we
can
give
you
a
background
or
on
that
proceeding.
So
even
if
you're
not
going
to
testify
happy
to
share
any
of
those
that
might
be
helpful
to
you.
R
B
B
Let's
move
on
to
other
questions
just
on
the
on
the
whole
policy
statement,
Nicole's
up.
I
Thank
you
and
apologies
to
the
four
of
you
who
are
on
the
legislative
committee,
because
I've
got
I've
got
some
questions,
but
hopefully
I
can
get
there
and
quickly
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
wondering
about
Carl
and
maybe
other
folks
on
the
committee
too.
How
are
the
principles
prioritized
so,
for
example,
if
something
can
increase
equity
and
racial
Justice
Statewide?
I
O
But
what
comes
to
mind
is
that
if
any
of
these
principles
are
being
violated
by
pursuing
by
by
advocating
for
a
bill,
that's
something
that
we
would
want
to
bring
to
your
attention.
Essentially,
that's
a
political
issue
right
away.
O
It
might
even
mean
that
we
don't
even
take
a
position
until
we
check
in
with
you.
So
so
that's
probably
the
value
of
the
principles.
It's
not
a
question
of
one
being
more
important
than
the
other.
O
It's
a
question
of
all
of
them
being
important,
and
yes,
there
may
be
times
that
we
need
to
yield
local
control
or
perhaps
racial
Equity,
not
everybody's,
going
to
be
happy
in
that
perspective,
but
we're
gonna
like
I,
said
before
we're
gonna,
do
it
intentionally.
We
want
to
make
sure
this
is
basically
a
red
flag
for
us
for
principals
being
violated.
We
need
to
bring
to
you.
I
Thank
you,
that's
helpful
and
I
was
wondering:
did
we
consider
climate
resilience
and
social
vulnerability
as
principals
was
that
anything
discussed
I'm.
I
Again,
if
I
was
just
wondering
if
we
had
considered
climate
resilience
and
social
vulnerability
as
principles
right
things
that
multiple
different
ones,
that's.
O
No,
it's
actually
a
position
right
now
and
yeah
I'm
actually
I
mean
I,
it's
definitely
a
position.
I
guess
the
reason
I
don't
immediately
think
of
it
as
a
as
a
priority,
but
you
can
convince
me
otherwise
our
principle
is
because
does
it
apply
to
everything
I
mean
if
we're
working
on
a
sales
tax
matter,
for
example?
Is
there
applicability
I
mean
I,
don't
know
it
certainly
would
be
more
than
happy
to
add
it
as
a
principal.
If
the
council
thinks
that
that's
appropriate.
I
Yeah
now
it's
just
something
that
kind
of
came
to
mind
for
me,
because
that
social
vulnerability,
I
think
ties
into
a
lot
of
different
areas,
and
you
know,
and
and
I,
do
think
about
taxes
right.
As
relating
to
social
vulnerability,
some
of
us
are
more
vulnerable
to
increased
taxes
than
others,
for
example.
I
So
for
me,
it
just
seemed
just
in
line
with
a
lot
of
the
discussions
that
we've
had
this
last
year
and
I
think
with
the
storm
and
flood
water
master
plan
fresh,
on
my
mind
that
I.
That
idea
was
just
out
there
as
a
principal.
So
then
another
question
I
had
was
around
the
rapid
response.
Racial
Equity
tool,
I
was
just
wondering
at
what
level
we're
focusing
on
assessments
and
impacts.
Is
that
at
the
local
level?
O
Good
question
that
honestly
I
hadn't
thought
of,
but
what
comes
to
mind,
is
that
it
would,
generally
speaking
I
think
it
would
be
a
state
I
mean
if
it's
a
state
policy
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
state
impact
and
that's
how
it
should
be
reviewed.
O
One
way
of
looking
at
it
is:
let's
say
we
close
a
coal
plant
and
it
leads
well.
Maybe
this
is
not
a
good
example,
because
not
sure
if
that
really
fits
into
the
equity
column,
but
there
may
be
an
impact
to
one
Community
or
maybe
even
a
series
of
communities,
that's
negative
and
we
can
benefit
and
that
may
violate
our
Equity
principles
and
I.
Think
that
is
included.
O
I
think
that's.
That
is
a
consideration
that
that
we
would
want
to
take
into
account.
So
if
I
had
to
rank
it,
I
guess
I
would
say
an
equity
issue
that
addresses
our
community
is
first
and
foremost
important.
One
that
is
impacts
outside
the
community
is
nonetheless
one
that's
worth
noting
and
bringing
the
people's
attention
and
considering.
I
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
I
was
wondering
if
we
had
considered
affordable
housing
as
Prairie
I
know,
you
talked
about
it
a
bit.
It
sounds
like
it's
kind
of
going
to
be
on
the
radar
in
general.
It
was
just
one
that
that
I
was
a
little
I,
was
expecting
to
see
and
didn't
see
it
so
much
the
rent
control
one,
but.
O
Right
and
and
I
mean
again,
you
know
what
makes
a
priority
list
has
up
until
now
been
checked
a
variety
of
boxes.
It's
not
just
what's
important.
O
Clearly,
affordable
housing
is
important
and
that
would
be
under
everybody's
top
three
top
four
lists,
and
we
have
worked
for
the
last
five
years
on
successfully
on
mobile
home
legislation,
which
is
one
of
the
best
ways
to
address
the
market
rate
affordability,
and
we
also
supported
legislation
last
year
that
provided
a
great
amount
of
Recovery
Act
funding
for
for
affordable
affordability
from
what
I
know
in
terms
of
what
we
can
actually
realistically
get
in
2023.
O
It's
a
question
of
pursuing
the
grants
and
that's
something
that
representative
Mobley,
for
example,
is
really
Keen
to
make
sure
that
Boulder
is
prepared,
that
we
have
some
shuttle
ready
projects
for
the
substantial
money
that
is
now
being
made
available
for
mental
health,
for
homelessness
and
for
affordable
housing.
So
it's
a
little
bit
more
I
mean
so
the
answer
is,
we
will
be
pursuing
that
absolutely
and
I
told
that
to
representative
every
time,
I
speak
with
her
and
I.
O
Also
thank
her
for
reminding
us
it's
great
to
have
a
local
Champion
but
I,
also
I
I,
guess
pursuing
grants.
O
I
Yeah,
okay,
thank
you.
That's
helpful
and
then
I
think
this
is
a
similar
question
to
my
first
one
about
principles
being
prioritized,
and
so
let
me
just
say
what
I
think
your
answer
is:
that's
not
right.
So
my
question
was
about
how
policies
are
prioritized
when
they're
in
Conflict,
so,
for
example,
22
be
about
preventing
camping
man
seems
a
little
bit
in
conflict
with
32
about
Criminal,
Justice
Reform
to
me
right
so
I
was
just
in
that
case.
I
Then
it
sounds
like
if
a
policy,
if
an
issue
came
up,
you
would
then
bring
it
to
the
legislative
commit
committee
and
then
to
possibly
to
counsel
for
discussion.
Is
that.
O
It's
almost
like
legal
principles
but
I
I,
think
and
I
am
a
former
attorney,
so
I
guess
what
what
I
do
my
process
is
to
look
at
this?
What's
what
most?
What's
most
specific,
so
there
is
actually
language
and
the
policy
statement
that
says:
oppose
limitations
on
City's
ability
to
ban
the
band
camping
so
that
one
would
Trump
another
one
that
could
otherwise
be
read
as
allowing
it
now,
of
course
you
can
change
it.
O
You
can
strike
that
language
right
now,
but
yes,
that
is
the
way
that
that
I
interpret
it
and
I.
Also,
frankly,
I
mean
my
job
is
to
make
sure
I
have
a
good
sense
of
the
pulse
and
Council.
O
It's
not
just
the
words
in
the
policy
statement.
If
I
know
that
there's
one
or
two
members
that
are
really
concerned
about
it,
I
will
probably
check
in
with
you
individually,
because
frankly,
if
you
don't
have
a
unanimous
voice
and
worse
yet,
if
we
have
a
council
member
going
to
a
legislator
and
saying
don't
listen
to
what
Carl
says,
we
don't
really
believe
it.
That's
not
going
to
really
help
so
seeking
unanimity
and
that's
one
of
the
benefits
for
working
people.
Voters
that
our
Council
has
so
often
been
unanimous,
so
yeah.
B
I
guess
22
B
opposed
preventing
local
governments
from
Banning
camping
in
public
spaces
is
one
of
the
things
I
had
highlighted
as
well
and
I.
Don't
I
guess,
given
that
you
brought
up
in
your
short
list
Carl
that
right
to
rest
is
likely
to
be
up
this
year
at
the
state
level.
Might
it
be
more
helpful
for
you
to
solicit
feedback
from
us
now,
rather
than
like?
If
we
know
it's
there
and
if
that
does
need
some
amending
is
this?
Is
this
the
time
to
look
at
that.
O
You
know
so,
thanks
to
you,
mayor
mayor
Pro,
tem
friend,
we
actually
have
two
pieces
of
language
in
that
bill
and
that
position
one
is
protect,
protect
our
abilities,
but
also
to
look
for
the
ability
to
kind
of
like
raise
the
floor
Statewide.
O
So
to
me,
if
it's
just
a
straight
out
cities,
you
can't
band
camping
I,
have
the
direction
I
need
if
it's,
if
it
goes
into,
raise
the
standards
and
maybe
some
sort
of
trade-off,
you
know,
while
camping,
unless
you
don't
have
enough
homeless.
Services
that
to
me
is
one
that
I
would
automatically
take
to
you
because
that's
that's
such
a
tricky
political
trade-off
and
it
could
very
well
be
after
all,
that
we
just
decide
we're
not
going
to
be
involved
in
this.
O
O
We
want
to
stand
out
as
a
city
that
wants
to
support
it,
but
in
that
other
case,
that's
that's
my
political
intuition
that
when,
if
it
gets
any
more
complex
in
the
straight
out
band,
any
conditional
issues
that
I'll
bring
it
to
you
and
I
will
not
be
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
city
without
getting
your
further
Direction
and
and
the
reason
I
won't
I'm
not
looking
to
resolve
it
now
is
because
I
just
don't
know
how
that
balance
might
be
thought
to
be
struck
and
and
what
what
you
know,
what
Shades
they
might.
B
Yeah
I
mean
I
would
think
that
and
I
I
can
just
come
back
to
this
in
comments.
Thanks
for
letting
me
call
away
Nicole,
but
you
know
there
could
be
a
clause
at
the
end
that
that
says
something
like
unless
population
proportional,
adequate
alternative
housing
options
exist
or
something
like
that.
So
when
the
the
right
time
is
to
look
at
that,
but
I
don't
I,
don't
know
that.
That's
exact
that
that
22b
is
is
precisely
the
majority
of
this
council's
probably
preferred
statement
anyhow.
I
Back
to
Nicole
cool
yeah,
that
was
for
my
comments
later,
but
so
anyway.
Thank
you.
Carl
just
wanted
to
thank
you
and
I
apologize
for
springing.
These
questions
on
you
tonight
versus
sending
them
in
advance,
as
I
normally
would
have
it's
been
a
little
a
little
bit
of
a
week,
but
I
really
appreciate
your
Fielding
them
at
the
last
minute,
and
I
also
wanted
to
thank
you
for
remembering
my
earlier
comment
about
Healthcare
I'm
super
impressed
that
you
remembered
that.
Thank
you.
H
Couple
well,
I
only
have
two
questions.
The
first
call
and
thank
you
for
the
presentation
regards
policy
position.
Number
53
in
which
we
advocate
for
the
reduced
threat
of
ignition
sources
such
as
overhead
power
lines.
H
You
know
we're
talking
about
undergrounding
with
Excel
and
it
seems
to
me
there's
not
very
much
there
there
and
is
it
possible
to
do
that.
Yeah.
O
I
think
it
should
be
qualified
with
something
like
such
as
an
unnecessary
risks
or
risks
that
could
be
avoided
with
overhead
power
lines,
because
we're
clearly
not
saying
that
we're
well,
it
does
start
off
with
reduced
threat,
I
think
in
any
case,
I
could
certainly
bring
some
more
some
more
specificity.
Okay,.
H
But
I
I-
it
just
struck
me
as
as
you
know,
for
for
a
policy,
that's
significant
to
this
city
and
which
we're
going
to
work
with
Excel.
To
do
undergrounding
we
ought
to
be
advocates
for,
for
you,
know,
state
and
federal
funding
for
that
purpose,
so
that
we
can
accelerate
the
process
because
at
the
moment,
I
think
we're
looking
at
a
very
extended
amount
of
time
before
we
could
actually
underground
all
of
our
city.
O
H
You
my
second
question
regards
rent
control
as
as
I
think
it-
and
you
can
correct
me
on
this-
that
it's
it's
sort
of
unlikely
that
the
governor
is
going
to
be
receptive
to
a
rent
control
regime.
Could
we
at
least
make
a
distinction
between
General,
rent
control
and
manufactured
home
Community
pad
rent
stabilization,
which
is
you
know,
we've
discussed
that
a
little
bit.
H
It's
really
a
a
little
bit
of
a
different
animal
and
trying
to
get
people
to
understand
that
it's
a
different
animal
and
for
those
people
who
reflexively
throw
up
their
hands
and
say
you
know
we
we
cannot
have
rent
control,
but
I
think
we
could
make
a
good
case
that
we
ought
to
have
pad
rent
stabilization
for
those
communities,
because
it's
different-
and
you
know,
we've
discussed
that
we
discussed
it
when
when
I
was
testifying
down
in
in
Denver
on
the
bill
and
I
think
there's
a
case
to
be
made
that
that
might
pass
muster.
H
Even
if
the
larger
rent
control
Bill
does
not
move
forward.
O
So
the
way
I
took
that,
for
example,
when
we
were
working
on
mobile
home
legislation
last
year,
is
some
Advocates
said
no,
let's
not
include
that
from
mobile
home,
because
that'll
take
away
our
ability
to
like
get
a
more
broader
bill,
because
that's
one
of
the
best
examples
and
yet
I
knew
that
you
know
there
was
no
appetite
for
a
full
rent,
control
limitation.
O
So
I,
you
know,
I
pushed
to
make
sure
that
we
went
for
what
was
a
very
good
example
of
where
it's
uniquely
needed,
unique
vulnerabilities
of
the
owners
of
mobile
homes,
and
so
that
was
included
and,
as
you
know,
the
governor
threatened
The
veto
it.
That
was
to
be
that
continued
to
be
included
in
the
bill
so
bottom
line.
Even
though
I
bring
this
to
your
attention
because
I
know
it's
a
great
interest
to
our
community
I
think
we
know
where
the
governor
stands
and
I.
Don't
you.
H
H
B
Nicely
done,
council,
member
Wallach
double
time.
Okay,
I
think
I
have
four
questions.
Carl
and
I
will
try
and
move
through
them
quickly,
still
on
on
paragraph
22
under
CD
and
E.
B
This
is
also
new
in
the
homelessness
HHS
space
D
makes
a
ton
of
sense
to
me:
increased
funding
for
Supportive
Services,
but
I'm
wondering
overall,
where
this
new,
like.
How
did
we
arrive
at
this
language?
Because,
if
I
look
at
like
c
and
e
together,
I
have
some
concerns
that
that
high
systems
utilizers
may
need
more
transitional
housing
as
an
example.
So
so
why
did
we
say
flexible
funding
for
permanent?
B
Maybe
I
don't
understand
the
terminology
here
for
targeted
populations,
but
it
seems
a
little
bit
more
narrow
and
specific
than
I
might
want
it
to
be
just
wondering
where
we
got
that
language
and
are
we
sure
that
that's
as
a
council,
what
we
want
to
be
saying,
because
I
I
have
I
have
some
concerns
like
that
people
are
being
given.
B
You
know
Keys
rather
than
the
real
Supportive
Services
and
and
maybe,
as
I
said
last
week,
one
group
home
options
and
and
transitional
housing
before
getting
into
the
permanent
housing
that
that
is
not
helping
people
to
succeed.
O
Many
of
you,
of
course,
are
aware
of
the
the
concept
of
high
utilizers.
Those
who,
who
use
a
high
amount
of
the
city
services
invests,
are
having
a
great
impact
on
themselves:
the
fiscal
budget
of
the
city
and
on
the
community
in
public
safety
as
a
whole.
O
We
often
attempt
to
find
ways
to
address
strategically
those
higher
utilizers,
and
one
possibility
is
that
we
might
bring
a
policy
recommendation
to
on
how
to
address
that,
recognizing
that
it
might
cost
less
for
us
to
advocate
for
a
state
bill
that
you
know,
spends
x
amount
of
money
when
it's
going
to
be
2x.
If
we
don't
do
anything,
the
intergovernmental
Affairs
committee
heard
this
recommendation
and
they
suggested,
let's,
let's
hold
up
on
saying
that
we
would
support
those
kinds
of
recommendations.
O
What
we
can
say
this
is
what
the
committee
said,
and
certainly
you
can
revisit
is
if
recommendations
are
ones
that
would
be
broad
enough
to
apply
or
potentially
apply
to
other
members
that
were
on
sheltered
Community
and
you
know,
have
the
ability
of
being
replicated
and
systematic.
O
That
would
be
a
win-win,
so
in
other
words
they
would
they
would
address
the
needs
of
high
utilizers
help,
get
them
out
of
the
unhoused
situation,
but
also
provide
the
potential
to
have
a
broader
impact
and
councilmember
warlock,
I,
I,
I,
hope,
I,
captured
your
sentiments
in
in
how
I
worded
it
there
and
I.
Don't
know
if
there's
anything
you'd
like
to
add
to
that.
O
B
O
Course,
in
fact,
one
thing
you
may
do
is
is
say:
this
is
good
for
now,
but
next
time
the
committee
reconvenes,
just
like
councilmember
Spirits,
bring
your
have
the
committed
luck
of
this
to
see.
If
there's
any
need
for
reconciling
potentially
competing
language
is
that
would
that
work
for
you
yeah?
That's
great.
B
B
You
know
a
lot
of
what
we're
asking
for
now,
I
think
has
been
sort
of
potentially
bungled
by
the
recent
Supreme
Court
decision
and
and
I.
Don't
know
that
that
anything
gets
done.
If,
if
Federal
elections
aren't
aren't
swung
so
do
we
have
any
room
to
Advocate
to
to
get
selected
on
things,
or
is
that
outside
the
scope
of
what
we
do,
because
I
I
don't
think
our
advocacy
on
gun
violence
is
going
to
make
any
any
bit
of
difference
because
it
needs
to
happen
at
the
federal
level?
B
And
if
there
are
people
who
are,
you
know
appointing
Supreme,
Court,
Justices
and
whatnot
that
are
ruling
the
ways
that
they're
ruling
we're
not
going
to
gain
the
ground
that
we
need
is
that
just
is
that
is
that
illegal
I?
Don't
I,
don't
know,
then
maybe
for
a
good
answer.
I'm,
not
sure
I.
O
Mean
I'm
not
entirely
sure
what
you're
asking
to
but
of
course,
I
think
we
should
advocate
for
whatever
policies
we
want
and
then
let's
in
court
decide
whether
it's
unconstitutional
and
until
they
decide
that
what
we're
asking
for
is
not
constitutional.
We
should
preserve
the
option
to
advocate,
for
it.
B
Yeah,
yes,
and
as
a
city
I
think
it's
it's.
The
advocacy
is
almost
on
on
who's
who's.
Appointing
justices
for
a
lot
of
these
things,
so
right
right.
F
B
O
Yeah
great
point,
because
we
have
carried
it
over
for
like
three
or
four
years,
I
think
it
was
then
council,
member
Lisa
Marzell,
who
was
very
actively
involved
in
Rocky
spots,
and
so
I
did
look
through
it
and
I
I
believe
it
still
is
relevant.
O
I
mean
somewhat
Evergreen
principles
that
are
there,
but
if
there's
anything
that
you
see
there,
that
you'd
like
me
to
to
research
to
confirm
you
know,
I
did
look
at
it.
I
do
think
it
carries
over
well,
okay,.
B
S
Good
evening
everybody,
this
is
Sarah
Huntley,
director
of
communication
and
engagement
before
we
go
into
public
participation
for
this
hearing,
as
we
typically
do,
I've
been
asked
to
go
over
our
vision
for
productive,
meaningful
and
inclusive
Civic
conversations,
and
thank
you
Emily
for
bringing
up
the
slide.
So
this
is
a
vision.
S
That's
been
created
with
community
members
and
City
staff
to
support
the
physical
and
emotional
safety
of
everybody
participating
in
a
meeting,
so
that
includes
community
members,
staff
and
Council,
and
also
trying
to
make
sure
that
we
are
making
space
for
people
of
all
ages,
identities,
lived
experiences
and
political
perspectives.
There's
more
information
about
the
productive,
atmosphere's
Vision
on
our
website.
S
Next
slide.
Please,
specifically,
what
it
means
is
that
we
have
some
guidelines
and
rules
that
we're
asking
people
to
withhold
part
to
uphold
during
this
meeting.
One
is
that
all
remarks
and
testimony
be
limited
to
the
matters
related
to
City
business.
No
participant
shall
make
threats
or
use
other
forms
of
intimidation
against
any
person,
obscenity,
racial
epithets
and
other
speech
and
behavior
that
disrupts
or
otherwise
impedes
the
ability
to
conduct
the
meaning
are
prohibited.
S
And
lastly,
we
ask
people
to
sign
up
to
speak
using
the
name
they're
commonly
known
by
and
to
display
that
name
before
being
allowed
to
speak.
We
are
allowing
audio
testimony
at
this
time.
I
believe
you
have
one
person
signed
up
to
speak
this
evening.
You
can
take
the
slides
down
Emily
and
that
is
Lynn
Siegel
and
I
can
go
ahead
and
allow
her
to
unmute.
B
Thanks
Sarah
hi,
Lynn,
you've
got
three
minutes
and
I
will
give
you
a
thumbs
up
that
we
can
hear
you
when
you
start.
S
You
should
be
able
to
unmute
I'll,
send
you
a
note
toggling
you
to
unmute.
S
B
B
B
Even
there's
no
one
else
in
line
for
Linda
Q
up
behind
I'll,
just
give
it
another
30
seconds
or
so.
S
And
the
one
thing
I
could
try:
Rachel
I
think
the
issue
is
the
microphone's,
not
speaking,
but
I
could
temporarily
promote
her
to
a
panelist.
If
you
would
like
us
to
try
to
see
if
that
helps,
get
her
access
and
I
can
burn
her
back
down
from
a
panelist
to
an
attendee
after
the
public
hearing
that
sounds
great
okay,
I,
don't
know
if
it'll
make
a
difference
because,
as
I
said,
looks
like
her
microphone
is
unmuted,
but
let's
give
it
a
try.
T
And
with
my
prompt
and
I
suggest
that
you
get
rid
of
web
zooming
I
mean
Zoom
webinar
web
zoominar.
That's
what
it
seems
like
at
kind
of
Carnival
webinar
does
not
allow
too
many
things
and
it's
being
used
throughout
the
city
now,
and
it's
really
really
not
good
and
I.
Appreciate
you
getting
rid
of
Zoom
webinar
and
just
using
Zoom
there's
nothing
scary
about
it.
There's
nothing
security
about
it.
It
just
needs
to
be
used.
T
It's
a
lot
better
of
a
format
than
Zoom
webinar
I
just
had
to
go,
take
some
stuff
outside
and
so
I
didn't
hear
what
you
were
just
talking
about,
but
I
appreciate,
Carl's
his
presentation
and
what
went
before
with
the
people
about
all
of
our
federal
opportunities
and
such
and
I'm
glad
that
y'all
are
doing
such
a
great
job
on
getting
these
opportunities
open
to
the
city.
So
thanks
a
lot
and
that's
all.
B
Thanks
for
being
here,
Lynn
and
that
wraps
up
our
public
hearing,
so
with
that,
we
will
go
back
to
council
members
to
see
who's,
got
thoughts
to
share
and
have
discussion.
L
Well,
so,
first
I
I,
really
it's
more
just
expression
of
gratitude
towards
Carl
and
the
team
I
I
have
to
say
he
has
an
uncanny
ability
to
seemingly
always
be
taking
mental
notes
because
it
seems
like
any
passing
little
conversation
or
or
anything
he's
he
logs
it
away,
and
then
it
ends
up
in
the
policy
position,
so
just
credit
to
Carl
and
the
team
for
just
always
being
listening
really,
even
if
we're
not
on
the
subject
of
policy
to
take
those
little
little
nuggets
and
fold
them
in
so
just
just
credit,
because
some
of
those
pieces
that
were
mentioned
I'm,
like
I,
don't
even
remember
having
those
conversations
as
a
group,
but
yet
they
folded
in
and
they
definitely
you
know,
represent
the
will
of
this
Council.
L
So
so
just
great
work
and
I
like
where
this
is
at
and
certainly
respect
where
my
colleagues
are,
and
certainly
some
of
those
modifications
and
changes
and
I'm
glad
they
caught
them.
But
but
by
and
large,
this
is
a
really
nice
policy
statement
and
again
credit
to
Carl
and
the
whole
team.
For
for
doing
that,
work
and
making
it
easy
on
us
by
always
hearing
all
those
conversations
throughout
the
year
to
get
it
done.
So
thank
you.
I
Thanks
Rachel,
oh
yeah,
thanks
thanks
again,
Carl
I
had
a
few
comments.
I'm
gonna
try
to
get
through
them
quickly,
Rachel
if
it
gets
to
a
point
where
he's
just
like
no
Nicole,
please
go
and
have
a
conversation
with
Carl.
Please
let
me
know
at
that
point:
no,
no,
that
I'm
open
to
that
as
well.
I
I,
think
you
know
one
of
the
one
of
the
points
that
I
just
had
just
around
the
state
policy
priorities
is
that
the
way
that
some
of
them
are
kind
of
phrased,
I
worry
a
little
bit
that
they're
impractical
goals
and
I
wonder
if
we
could
just
change
the
phrasing
a
little
bit
to
make
them
more
achievable.
I
So,
as
an
example,
we
talk
about
ending
homelessness,
supporting
the
city's
ability
to
end
homelessness
and
I,
wonder
if,
instead,
we
could
shape
that
to
be
reducing
the
harmful
effects
of
homelessness
for
all
residents
or
reducing
chronic
homelessness.
Something
like
that
feels
a
little
bit
more
achievable
to
me
kind
of
like
with
vision,
zero,
we're
not
saying
we're
going
to
stop
moving
people
through
the
city,
just
that
we're
going
to
work
on
doing
that
more
safely.
Where
nobody's
getting
killed
or
seriously
in
injured,
so
I'm
just
I'm
wondering
about
that.
I
Similarly,
with
the
Clean
Air
in
Colorado
I'm
kind
of
priority
that
I'm
not
sure
that
we're
going
to
kind
of
restore
clean
air
to
Colorado,
but
promoting
access
to
clean
air
across
Colorado,
something
like
that
feels
like
it
fits
in
a
little
more
with
some
of
the
new
additions
around
making
sure
that
people
have
safe
spaces
to
be
on
bad
air
quality
days
and
things
like
that,
so
just
kind
of
I.
Don't
it's
not
changing
them?
It's
really
just
describing
them
I!
I
Think
in
a
way
that,
at
least
to
me
feels
a
little
more
actionable
and
I
wanted
to
say
there
was
a
point
where
we
were
talking
about.
Sorry.
Let
me
find
it
really
fast,
though,
committing
to
regularly
convening
with
organizations
and
communities
that
have
awareness
of
potential
inequities
and
policies,
I
really
love
that
idea
and
just
want
to
again.
You
know,
encourage
us
as
we're
talking
to
these
groups
that
have
this
information
that
we're
making
sure
we're
doing
so
with
an
eye
toward
acting
on
that
information.
I
If
we're
kind
of
frequently
asking
for
this
feedback
and
then
overlooking
it
or
ignoring
it,
I
think
that
that
causes
a
lot
of
harm,
so
just
just
want
to
kind
of
name
that
out
loud,
the
I
I
think
I
mentioned
this,
got
to
it
a
little
bit
and
my
questions
beforehand,
but
seeing
not
seeing
land
use
under
greenhouse
gas
reductions
number
two
of
the
policy
priorities.
I
That
was
a
little
just
surprising
for
me,
I,
just
wonder
if
it's
something
we
want
to
think
about,
adding
in
and
at
some
point
I'd
be
happy
to
give
an
update
on
what
Dr
cogg
has
been
kind
of
getting
to
around
some
of
those
things.
If
that
would
be
helpful
for
all
of
us
to
move
forward
with.
With
that
knowledge,
I
think
Mark's,
comment
about
pad,
rent
or
question
about
pad
rent
is
a
really
really
good.
I
One
and
I
would
love
to
to
sort
of
see
us
even
formalize
that
as
something
we're
paying
attention
to,
even
if
we
don't
feel
like,
we
can
make
a
lot
of
progress.
Progress
with
it.
I
do
disagree
with
22b
just
wanted
to
to
name
that.
That's
not
it's!
Not
one
I'm
really
comfortable
having
in
in
this
policy
statement,
and
oh
yes,
okay,
so
another
kind
of
bigger
topic
area.
I
This
was
around
number
policy
and
number
24
where
we're
talking
about
immigration
and
then
also
number
40
and
and
some
of
the
ones
that
followed
there.
We
talk
about
protecting
immigration
data,
but
I.
Think
in
this
climate
that
we're
in
where
our
rights,
basic
human
rights
are
being
Stripped.
Away,
specifically
are
Reproductive,
Rights,
I.
I
And
yes,
I
would
love
to
have
a
conversation
about
adding
single-payer
healthcare
or
finding
some
some
way
of
putting
some
teeth
into
the
the
priority
around
health
care.
I
think
that
would
be
wonderful
and,
let's
see,
I
really
appreciate
the
addition
of
air
quality
and
clean
air
under
the
air
quality
and
clean
air
thinking
about
safe
Sheltering
as
well.
So
just
thank
you
to
everybody
on
the
committee
and
Carl
for
for
including
that
and
for
number
60.
I
I
would
really
love
to
get
some
feedback
from
some
from
the
people
at
the
center
for
people
with
disabilities
at
some
point
just
around
transportation
and
modalities,
and
almost
there
got
two
more
comments
on
number
61,
where
we're
talking
about
Transportation
modalities,
thinking
about
a
future
that
has
fewer
cars
and
how
is
that
impacting
our
transportation
priorities
and
what
kind
of
policies
we're
advocating
for
at
the
regional
state
and
federal
level,
because
in
the
future,
if
we're
doing
things
right,
we
will
have
fewer
cars.
So
how
can
we
start
thinking
about
that
now?
I
So
the
policies
we
have
in
you
know
10
or
20
years-
are
really
reflecting
the
future
that
we'll
hopefully
have
at
this
point
or
at
that
point,
if
we're
doing
things
right
now
and
finally,
around
67
and
thinking
about
where
we're
advocating
for
higher
education
and
CU
in
particular,
I
would
love
to
see
some
things
there
advocating
for
housing
and
Mental
Health
Services
as
well,
because
those
are
things
that
I
think
are
are
campus-wide
issues
that
also
have
impact
on
our
older
community.
I
B
Thanks
Nicole
I
will
ask
if
you,
if
anybody
wants
to
queue
up
behind
me
or
just
sorry,
make
a
few
comments.
B
So,
first
back
to
the
the
22,
BC
and
E
I
would
love
for
us
to
look
at
some
different
language
there
and
coming
back
to
council
with
some
amendments,
so
I
I'm
not
suggesting
that
we
completely
strike
B,
but
I
think
that
we
should
look
at
different
language
for
that
and
then
c
and
e
I'm,
just
not
sure
that
we
get
to
where
I
would
want
to
go
for
ensuring
that
we
are
advocating
for
what
would
be
the
most
effective
uses
of
of
state
law
change
in
particular.
B
So
if
we
could
do
that
Carl
at
subcommittee
and
come
back
with
that,
that
I
think
that
would
be
great
and
then
just
again
with
my
not
well
articulated
concern
around
the
gun.
Violence
prevention,
which
is,
is
far-reaching
just
to
consider
whether
we
are
empowered
at
all
to
do
anything
that
might
help
get
people
elected.
Who
can
actually
make
the
things
that
we're
advocating
for
happen.
B
So
we
we
just
nothing's
going
to
happen
if,
if
the
people
aren't
in
office
who
are
going
to
enact
any
of
these
things,
so
it
feels
like
an
exercise
in
futility.
Sometimes
so,
if
there's
a
way
to
to
do
that
more
formally
through
through
this
arm
of
the
city,
I
would
like
to
know
about
it
and-
and
you
just
use
it
I
guess,
that's
all
I
got
any
other
feedback,
yeah
right,
Junie
and
Lauren
on
Deck.
K
K
Thank
you
and
actually
I
I
thought
it
was
it's
well
written
and
I
did
notice.
The
comment
made
by
my
council
members
fear
about
the
homelessness
I
mean
most
of
you
know
that
I
care
deeply
about
the
homeless,
but
I
think
ending
homelessness
itself
is
very
hard,
so
I
think
reducing
or
some
of
the
language
that
was
mentioning
earlier
seems
to
be
something
that
get
us
to
something
concrete,
because
it's
so
easy
to
have
just
lofty
ideas
about
change.
K
B
Thanks
Judy
Lauren
bring
us
home.
D
I
don't
know
if
I'll
do
that,
but
I
will
give
my
best
shot.
So
I
agree
with
some
of
the
issues
that
were
brought
up
around
22
BC
and
E
I'm
and
I'm
not
I'm
a
little
bit
skeptical.
If
we
will
be
able
to
come
up
with
a
language
change
for
B.
That
would
get
unanimous
support
on
Council.
I
am
open
to
the
effort,
but
that
seems
challenging
in
terms
of
rent
control.
D
Getting
rid
of
the
prohibition
on
rent
control,
you
know
that
doesn't
mean
that
us
as
a
community
would
have
to
implement
it.
It
would
just
give
us
the
opportunity
to
look
at
that
and
other
communities
around
the
state
to
do
it
if
they
desired
and
again
I
understand
that
the
governor
is
not
very
supportive
but
I
think
it's
an
important
policy
statement.
D
Regarding
homelessness,
I
appreciate
a
lot
of
the
comments.
Other
council
members
have
brought
up
I
I
understand
why
there's
a
emphasis
on
High
system
utilizers,
but
I
also
would
like
to
see
you
know,
emphasizing
anything
involving
family
homelessness,
I
think
that
that's
something
that
we're
not
bringing
to
light
enough
and
can
often
be
hidden
so
just
trying
to
bring
that
forward.
D
And
I
agree
with
Rachel's
comment
about
in
the
for
the
funding
for
permanent
housing
options.
I
mean
it
might
be
as
simple
as
just
striking
permanent
from
that.
I
think
that
you
know
we
I
personally,
would
really
like
to
see
us
look
at
supporting
all
housing
options,
and
that
might
mean
looking
at
options
that
are
not
permanent
as
well
and
yeah,
and
protecting
our
Health
Data
reproductive
data
and
access
to
gender.
Appropriate
Healthcare
all
seem
like
really
great
additions
as
well.
B
Thanks
so
much
Lauren
Junior
your
hands
up.
Is
that
a
new
hand
I'm
guilty
of
that
all
the
time
too?
Okay,
so
with
that,
I
think
that
the
public
hearing,
I
should
probably
should
have
formerly
formally
brought
to
a
close
a
bit
ago,
if
I
didn't
do
that,
so
that
was
brought
to
a
close.
It
is
now
and
so
I
I,
this
being
a
public
hearing.
I
assume
we
need
a
roll
call
vote.
Is
that
true,
an
emotion
or
no
or
just
feedback?
I.
O
O
I'd
just
like
to
clarify
what
I
intend
to
do
as
far
as
next
steps
and
see
if
that
works
for
Council,
so
no
I
wasn't
able
to
take
notes
on
everything.
I'm,
actually
delighted
that
you
guys
had.
You
were
so
engaged
that
you've
made
as
many
comments
as
you
did.
So
my
intent
is
to
review
this
video
capture
as
many
of
the
thoughts
where
I
believe
that
they
are
likely
to
bring
about
Anonymous
view.
O
So
a
lot
of
these
things,
I
think,
are
just
plain
improvements
and
and
I
think
those
are
easy
enough
to
make
and
some
of
them
either
because
I'm
not
sure
Council
has
unanimity
on
or
or
even
close
to
it
I
might
delay
those
to
the
intergovernmental
Affairs
committee
or
on
ones
that,
frankly,
I
just
don't
understand
how
to
best
address.
So
if
that
works
for
all
of
you,
I
will
bring
that
document
back
in
the
memo.
O
I
will
highlight
the
changes
that
have
been
made
and
if
I
did
my
job
right,
you'll
be
able
to
approve
it
on
consent
and
I
hope
to
do
that
the
next
next
month.
The
goal
would
be
to
have
this
policy
statement
finalized
and
printed
and
ready
for
our
legislative
breakfast
on
the
13th
and
I
think
we
have
December
13th,
so
I
think
we
have
ample
time
to
do
that.
So
if
that
process
works
for
you,
that's
that's
my
intent
intended
next
steps.
B
That
sounds
great
Carl.
Anyone
else
need
to
give
any
feedback.
Bob
Yates
you
look
like
you're,
just
chomping
at
the
bit
I'm
kidding
all
right.
Thank
you.
Thank
you!
So
much
Carl
and
Laurel
and
everyone
else
who
was
involved
in
that
presentation
and
with
that,
let's
Elisha,
can
you
take
us
to
our
next
agenda
item.
C
N
Thanks
so
much
Council
and
because
you
haven't
heard
enough
of
Mark
Wolfe
lately
with
the
budget
I'm
going
to
send
it
over
to
him
and
Charlotte
Husky
and
budget
as
well,
they
make
a
great
team
and
they
will
turn
over
the
Reigns.
P
Sorry,
let
me
start
that
again.
P
We'll
get
it
feel
like
I've
done
this
enough.
That
I
should
be
an
expert
by
now,
okay,
good
evening,
Council
Mark
Wells
Senior
budget
manager
happy
to
be
with
you
again
a
long
time
no
see,
but
we're
talking
about
a
little
bit
different
subject
this
evening,
we'll
be
discussing
the
community
culture
resilience
and
safety
tax
non-profit,
grant
program
structure.
P
Of
of
how
this
might
look
once
the
criteria
is
full
developed
and
were
actually
you
know,
implementing
the
program.
So
the
goal
this
evening
is
to
receive
your
feedback
and
essentially,
hopefully
get
a
green
light
on
moving
forward
to
implementation,
to
develop
more
specific
program
criteria.
So
again,
we're
looking
at
the
the
broad
structure
of
the
program
and
making
sure
we're
hitting
your
intent
of
the
creation
of
that
program
and
happy
to
receive
that
feedback
as
a
part
of
the
discussion
later
this
evening.
U
Good
evening,
Council
I'm
Charlotte
Huskey
a
principal
budget
analyst
with
a
budget
office
and,
as
Mark
mentioned,
we're
going
to
go
through
a
brief
history
of
the
community
culture
and
safety
tax.
The
tax
was
first
approved
by
voters
in
2014,
which
extended
it
was
a
three-year
cycle
for
the
first
CCR
CCS
tax
through
2017,
generating
approximately
27
million
over
three
years
and
funding
13
projects,
a
mixture
of
both
City
and
Community
nonprofit
projects.
U
This
past
November
2021
voters
again
extended
the
the
ccrs
community
cultural
resilience
and
safety
tax
through
2036
for
15
years,
the
longest
extension,
the
non-profit
program
structure
was
developed
with
staff
and
Community
input,
as
well
as
councils
input
developed
last
year
from
between
January
and
June
of
this
year,
and
we
provided
a
touch
point
with
Council
in
July
22..
U
In
addition,
we
also
have
appropriation
for
City
projects,
Council
appropriated
1.7
million
so
far
this
year
and
a
special
ATP
earlier
this
March
and
have
planned
appropriation
of
28.1
million
in
the
2023
recommended
budget.
U
Just
a
brief
reminder
of
the
the
21
renewal
of
the
ccrs
tax,
this
renewed
the
0.3
percent
dedicated
sales
and
use
tax
in
November
of
last
year
authorizing
us
to
issue
debt
debt
up
to
110
million,
specifically
for
the
ballot
language
for
the
non-profit
portion.
It's
stated
using
up
to
10
percent
of
tax
revenue
to
fund
a
grant
pool
for
non-profit
organization
projects
that
serve
the
people
of
Boulder.
U
After
the
renewal
was
passed
in
November,
we
formed
an
internal
steering
committee
made
up
of
Grant
managers:
internal
Grant
managers
within
the
city,
including
staff
from
the
equity
office,
the
Arts
office,
housing
and
Human
Services,
Community,
Vitality
Communications,
and
engagement
and
finance,
which
we
formed
in
January
to
explore
Grant
structures.
U
We
also
held
several
focus
groups,
discussions
that
help
to
inform
the
framework
that
we
put
together
for
Council
consideration
in
July
and
as
as
well
as
the
revised
structure
for
consideration
this
evening,
the
focus
group
discussions
were
held
last
summer
as
well
as
earlier
this
year,
where
we
spoke
with
non-profit
stakeholders
and
they
helped
Identify
some
challenges
and
benefits
of
the
potential
Grant
structures.
U
Providing
a
summary
of
the
2021
engagement
that
we
held,
leading
up
to
the
tax
renewal.
Last
November,
we
held
several
station
several
focus
group
sessions
last
summer
and
received
input
from
19
non-profit
organizations,
including
a
mixture
of
large
medium
and
small
organizations,
also
including
existing
ccs
grantees,
and
they
provided
us
some
great
feedback,
including
summarized
list
here,
which
includes
supporting
Capital
planning,
grants
and
planning
studies
and
not
just
Capital
construction
projects,
making
both
transformational
Investments
as
well
as
investments
in
smaller
capital
projects,
supporting
projects
that
have
broad
reach
and
support
the
entire
community
in
Boulder.
U
We
also
conducted
two
additional
sessions,
this
this
this
spring
and
March
and
April
of
22,
where
we
had
over
15
representatives
from
12,
non-profit
organizations,
primarily
smaller
non-profit
organizations
participating
and
they
provided
us
feedback
which
helped
confirm
the
program,
goals
and
refine
potential
structures
of
the
grant
framework.
And
these
this
feedback
from
the
stakeholders
really
fell
into
three
General
categories
or
themes,
and
those
themes
are
Grant:
accessibility
and
technical
assistance,
coordination
opportunities
and
flexibility
and
value
under
Grant
accessibility
and
technical
assistance.
U
They
noted
that
a
key
factor
for
Success
was
Acts
access
to
planning
opportunities
and
Technical
technical
assistance,
and
they
also
identified
both
in
in
the
22
engagement
session
and
the
21
challenges
to
finding
affordable
commercial
space
with
in
Boulder.
U
The
second
thing
theme
of
collaboration
opportunities,
the
non-profit
organizations,
had
an
interest
in
the
ability
to
collaborate
with
other
non-profit
organizations
and
establishing
Partnerships
for
a
shared
non-profit
space
to
help
address
gaps
in
community
services.
U
They
also
noted
the
Partnerships
with
City
staff
and
want
to
continue
those
Partnerships
with
city
city
staff
and
working
on
these
grants
and
the
third
theme
of
flexibility
and
value.
We
heard
that
the
size
of
Grants
should
be
scaled
to
the
organization
side
and
that
their
size
and
that
there
should
be
many
different
types
of
Grants
to
support
the
diversity
of
non-profit
organizations
that
exist
in
the
community.
U
So
these
engagement
sessions,
as
well
as
our
internal
steering
committee
and
input
that
we
received
from
Council
leading
up
to
the
21
tax
extension,
helped
us
develop
these
funding
goals
and
intended
outcomes
for
the
ccrs
nonprofit
program
listed
here,
including
advancing
our
racial
Equity
goals
and
outcomes,
addressing
critical
deficiencies,
improving
infrastructure
and
advancing
our
vision
of
being
an
inclusive
and
welcoming
Community.
Maintaining
a
healthy,
stable
and
financially
sustainable
non-profit
base
within
Boulder
leveraging.
Investment
of
public
dollars
to
provide
Community
impact.
P
Thanks
Charlotte,
so,
as
I
mentioned,
we
were
chatting
with
you
about
this
proposed
program
structure
back
in
July
I.
Think
it's
fair
to
say
that
we,
we
did
have
some
challenges,
trying
to
capture
Council
feedback
in
certain
areas
in
in
July,
there
were
a
range
of
opinions
on
aspects
of
the
program
and
areas
of
limited
consensus.
P
So
some
of
those
areas
included
clarifying
the
focus
on
capital
projects,
so
making
sure
the
intent
of
the
program
was
in
line
with
with
voter
intent
that
we
were
clarifying
the
use
and
limits
on
technical
assistance
that
robust
evaluation
was
built
into
the
the
program
structure
that
we
provided
both
the
capability
for
larger
transformative
projects
and
also
access
for
smaller
organizations.
P
And
lastly,
we
heard
some
range
of
opinions
on
the
Staffing
structure
of
the
program
itself,
So
based
on
that
feedback.
What
we
did
is,
as
a
staff
team,
went
back
to
revisit
and
emphasize
the
original
goals
of
the
program
as
Charlotte
has
outlined.
P
Revisit
our
previous
engagement
results
again
to
make
sure
that
we're
in
alignment
with
our
nonprofit
organizations
that
will
be
receiving
this
assistance,
re-emphasizing
the
importance
of
the
program
evaluation
and
with
that
and
I'll
touch
on
this
a
bit
later
in
the
flexibility
associated
with
evaluating
the
program.
Knowing
that
we
were
trying
something
a
bit
different
and
reevaluating
the
types
of
grants
for
clarity.
So
again,
there
I
think,
because
we
were
looking
at
a
variety
of
different
types.
P
There
was
some
confusion
in
how
we
were
presenting
it
so
again
we're
trying
to
clear
that
up
this
evening
and
then
in
the
specific
revisions
we
looked
at
looking
at
the
limitation
maximums
that
we
had
proposed
across
the
types
of
Grants
and
instead
look
at
honing
in
on
the
limitations
related
to
the
administrative
and
technical
assistance
spending
and
then,
lastly,
to
readjust
the
timeline
and
look
at
the
specific
process
for
criteria.
Development
and
our
next
Council
touch.
Point.
P
All
right,
so
I
will
do
a
combination
of
things,
and
hopefully
this
won't
take
too
long,
but
I'll
remind
Council
community
on
the
structure
of
the
grants
that
we
had
proposed
and
we'll
walk
through
some
of
those
changes.
P
So
to
start,
this
is
the
table
that
we
displayed
in
July.
What
is
important
to
note
here
is
that
we're
not
proposing
to
change
the
different
types
so
we're
proposing
to
maintain
those
three
different
types
of
Grants
and
I'll
remind
everybody
what
the
three
different
types
of
Grants
were
in
a
moment.
I
think
what's
important
here,
is
to
point
out
that
on
the
far
right
we
had
proposed
these
recommended
maximums
by
the
type
of
Grant
and
we're
essentially
suggesting
to
remove
that
and
I'll
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
that.
P
P
So,
instead
of
looking
at
it
by
type
one,
two
or
three
we'll
look
at
it
by
the
type
of
spending
in
capital
planning
or
technical
assistance
and
administration,
so
this
ensures
that
the
vast
majority
of
funding
is
going
towards
either
planning
for
Capital,
Investments
or
Capital
Investments
themselves
and
then
what's
what
we
thought
would
be
of
use.
P
Given
that
we're
trying
to
reach
as
many
organizations
as
possible
is
let
the
demand
of
the
program,
the
demand
by
type
essentially
Drive,
how
much
spending
occurs
in
each
Grant
type
right
and
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
But
essentially,
if
there's
huge
demand
in
type
1
great,
then
we'll
let
our
evaluation
committee
determine
that
and
make
those
recommendations
and
awards.
P
P
We
have
most
of
that
75
percent
going
to
that
direct
capital,
and
then
a
portion
of
that
would
be
reserved
for
that
technical
assistance
and
planning
to
receive
Capital
dollars
so
again,
just
making
sure
we're
in
a
the
capital
infrastructure
tax.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
the
vast
majority
of
these
dollars
are
going
towards
capital
projects.
P
All
right,
so
this
section
will
cover
what
what
types
of
Grants
are
we
talking
about
just
as
a
reminder
and
then
provide
some
scenarios
of
example.
Organizations
that
may
go
through
the
grant
process
for
each
type
I
want
to
put
a
disclaimer
here
now
these
are
fake
organizations.
P
These
do
not
exist
in
at
least
we
were
not
intending
for
them
to
mimic
any
individual
organization,
they're
just
to
be
instructive
of
how
this
grant
process
may
look
so
starting
with
type
1.
This
is
the
area
where
we
felt
based
on
feedback
that
we
had
heard
in
the
in
the
number
of
different
engagement
sessions
that
we
needed
to
provide
a
type
of
grant
that
was
more
accessible
to
a
greater
number
of
organizations.
P
So
what
type
1
grants
are
intending
to
do
is
invite
organizations
in
where
they're
at,
and
so
some
may
be
in
a
position
where
they're
closer
to
receiving
Capital
dollars.
They
have
a
project
that
is
more
identified
for
their
facility.
Others
may
be
at
a
stage
where
they
simply
need
a
help
need
help
to
get
into
in
the
door
right,
so
they
might
need
some
technical
assistance
in
organizational
development
to
do
some
Capital
planning
to
imagine
what
their
commercial
space
needs
might
be
or
what
their
Solutions
may
be.
P
So
this
is
something
that
we
felt
important
and
in
alignment
with
some
of
those
program
goals
was
to
have
a
place
to
go
for
organizations
where
they
could
receive
technical
assistance
in
anticipation
of
a
capital
investment
so
who
might
be
eligible
or
interested
in
this
type
of
Grant.
So
we
have
a
couple
of
different
again
fake
organizations.
P
Example,
a
human
services
organization
that
is
currently
renting
commercial
space.
They
have
a
short
period
of
time
remaining
on
their
lease,
but
they've
seen
an
increase
in
demand
for
services,
they're,
hiring
additional
staff
and
they're
seeking
a
permanent
space
solution.
Knowing
that
that
lease
is
coming
up
in
a
couple
of
years,
so
they
don't
really
know
where
to
go
from
here,
but
they
they
know
they're
they're
in
need
of
some
assistance
and
they're
interested
in
determining
that
that
long-term
solution
organization,
B
is
or
arts
and
culture
organization
that
currently
owns
a
small
commercial
space.
P
P
So
these
two
organizations
may
be
good
candidates
to
pursue
type
1
grants,
meaning
that
we
would
open
up
applications
to
organizations
they
would
Define
exactly
what
their
need
is
in
the
similar
summary
based
on
criteria
that
we
would
develop
over
the
next
few
months
and
then
be
connected
to
services
in
the
case
of
organization,
a
that
might
be
a
bit
more
intensive
in
terms
of
the
technical
assistance
to
figure
out.
What's
the
options
within
their
existing
with
their
existing
space,
is
there
an
option
to
renew
the
lease
for
the
long
term?
P
Are
there
other
issues
on
the
horizon
that
they
need
to
be
aware
of
that
they
need
some
assistance
in
negotiating
with
their
property
owner,
for
instance,
organization
B
might
be
a
bit
closer
to
a
capital
investment
where
they
simply
need
some
Capital
planning
dollars
to
bring
in
somebody
that
can
cost
out
what
that
project
might
be.
So
we've
called
this
a
cohort
before,
but
essentially
these
organizations
will
be
at
different
places
and
connected
to
third-party
technical
assistance
in
order
to
identify
exactly
what
their
long-term
space
solution
may
be.
P
Some
may
be
going
for
Grant
dollars
through
ccrs,
so
direct
capital
assistance
for
their
their
project
within
their
space,
Others
May
benefit,
but
only
from
the
technical
assistance
in
identifying
long-term
commercial
lease
that
meets
their
needs
and
and
would
not
pursue
Grant
dollars
beyond
beyond
that.
At
this
point,.
P
All
right
type
two,
so
this
is
the
more
traditional
direct
capital
investment
more
similar
to
previous
CCS
Grant
cycles,
and
we
would
do
this
every
couple
of
years
and
a
couple
fake
organization,
scenarios,
organization,
C,
Arts
performance
organization
and
venue
that
currently
owns
their
facility.
This
existing
facility
is
inadequate
and
needs
significant
upgrades
or
even
relocating
to
a
new
facility.
This
organization
has
cash
on
hand
and
is
interested
in
a
capital
campaign,
but
needs
some
type
of
jump
start
to
do
so.
P
Organization
D
is
a
larger
Child
Care
Organization
that
currently
owns
their
facility
as
well.
They
have
existing
event
space
within
their
building,
but
it
needs
to
be
expanded.
They've
determined
the
exact
scope
of
that
project
have
determined
cost
and
are
seeking
Grant
dollars
specifically
for
that
project.
P
So,
in
both
of
these
instances,
we
think
these
would
be
organizations
attractive
for
type
2
grants
in
the
case
of
organization
C
they
would
be
seeking
to
receive
City
dollars.
Criteria
could
like
other
Grant
Cycles
in
the
past,
require
some
type
of
matching
dollars
and
there
may
be
some
guidance
available
on
timeline
and
setting
up
their
Capital
campaign,
but
this
would
be
more
direct
capital
investment
for
their
space
for
organization
D
again
they
have
scoped
and
costed
out
their
project.
They're
asking
for
a
specific
dollar
amount
for
a
specific
thing.
P
And
lastly,
type
three,
so
this
is
kind
of
leaving
the
door
open
for
other
types
of
community-based
facilities
where
we
need
some
feasibility
and
partnership
with
organizations
to
determine
the
the
need,
but
it's
not
as
straightforward
as
technical
assistance
to
Capital
Grant
or
Capital
dollars
directly.
So
what
do
we
mean
by
by
this
again?
This
is
something
that
we
heard
consistently
through
our
our
focus
groups
in
these
fake
organization
profiles.
P
One
might
be
a
health
and
education
organization
that
currently
rents
existing
commercial
space
and
that
space
happens
to
be
adequate,
but
they
are
exploring
and
looking
at
common
community
space
to
reach
teens
and
youth,
they
have
connected
with
a
couple
of
organizations
to
brainstorm
ideas,
but
need
guidance
on
how
to
scope
a
project
or
even
look
at
what
the
true
need
is
in
community
organization.
F
is
a
multi-purpose
cultural
organization
that
owns
commercial
space
and
has
previously
received
Grant
funds
through
the
city.
P
The
organization
is
interested
in
simply
exploring
opportunities
to
directly
engage
with
teens
and
youth
and
other
organizations,
and
so
this
is
a
little
bit
more
nebulous
right.
There
might
be
some
City
assistance
and
support
there,
but
whether
it's
a
direct
capital
Grant
is
questionable
at
this
stage.
So
we
would
invite
these
types
of
organizations
in
to
go
through
a
feasibility
study
if
there's
areas
of
commonality.
P
So
in
this
example,
if
it's
a
teen
a
new
center
or
facility,
we
would
invite
organizations
in
to
connect
conduct
some
type
of
joint
feasibility
study
to
look
at
existing
facilities
and
services
and
see,
if
there's
a
gap,
and
then
there
might
be
the
ability
to
connect
to
capital
investment
depending
on
the
project
that
could
be
ccrs.
It
could
be
another
source
again,
it
just
leaves
the
door
open
for
for
ideas
and
innovation.
Without
you
know,
saying
it
must
be
type
A
or
B
can
I,
say,
there's
a
third
door
here.
P
So
first
thing:
first,
we
would
need
to
identify
project
manager.
That
would
happen
immediately
after
this
meeting,
where
we
would
be
going
through
that
process
in
a
parallel
track.
We
would
identify
third-party
technical
assistance
partners
for
those
planning
and
technical
assistance
pieces
of
the
program.
P
We
would
be
working
quickly
on
evaluation
design,
so
we
know
that
creating
indicators
will
be
really
important
so
that
we
can
actually
measure
the
impact
of
our
investments
and
then
set
up
a
process
where
we
have
clear
checkpoints
to
return
to
council
to
tweak
the
program
as
we
need
the
criteria.
Development
and
approval
would
be
the
next
touch
point
with
Council.
So
again,
this
is
the
broad
framework
there's
agreement
on
the
framework.
P
So
again,
we
had
to
spend
two
meetings
with
Council
to
make
sure
that
it
was
clear
what
this
program
might
look
like.
We'll
need
to
do
even
more
of
that
Outreach
and
communication
out
in
community
to
make
sure
that
organizations
are
not
only
aware
of
the
different
types
of
Grants,
but
we're
providing
clear
explanation
of
what
the
opportunity
is
and
which
type
might
be
appropriate
for
which
type
of
need
so
timeline.
What
this
looks
like
again,
this
is
adjusted
slightly.
P
We
tried
to
expedite
as
best
we
could
here
coming
back
to
you
in
October,
so
what
we
would
hope
to
do
is
be
able
to
work
on
the
specific
criteria
through
the
winter
and
come
back
in
February
for
the
final
approval
of
that
criteria.
That
would
allow
us
to
do
outreached
organizations
through
the
early
spring,
where
we'd
be
targeting
a
program
launch
sometime,
April
or
May
of
next
year.
The
Review
Committee
would
be
formed
in
that
may
July
window
as
we
launched
the
program.
That
would
be
a
combination
of
City
staff
and
external
Partners.
P
I
think
that's
it
yep.
So
questions
for
Council
this
evening
generally.
Do
you
support
the
revised
structure
with
the
proposed
limitations
as
funding
as
we
outlined
some
feedback
on
program,
implementation
and
evaluation
design
and
on
the
process
and
timeline
for
Council
approval
of
Grant
criteria?
Since
that
will
be
your
next
touch
point
all
right,
happy
to
hand
it
back
over
to
you,
Rachel.
B
Thanks
so
much
thanks
to
both
Mark
and
Charlotte
for
those
presentations,
so
let's
just
take
the
questions
one
at
a
time.
So
first
question
is:
does
council
support
the
revised
structure
with
the
funding?
Well,
let
me
back
it
up.
Let's
see
if
we
have
any
questions
before
we
answer
questions
uh-huh
questions,
I
got
confused,
it's
wrong
kind.
All
right
and
my
screen's
not
working
I,
see
Nicole's
hand
up.
I
Thank
you
Rachel
you
caught
it.
I
was
just
about
to
ask
for
questions
before
we
get
to
questions.
I
just
have
two
quick
questions.
One
Mark
and
I
I
think
you
know
we
already
went
over
this
a
little
bit
in
financial
strategies.
I
just
want
to
make
crystal
clear
that
I've
got
it
for
the
technical
assistance
amount.
I
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
all
think
based
on
your
feedback
talking
to
people
that
the
kind
of
pocket
of
funds
that
set
aside
for
that
is
enough
to
meet
the
needs,
because
this,
for
me
at
least
the
technical
assistance
component,
is
a
major
Equity
component
of
this
process.
It's
really
a
way
that
we
can
ensure
that
folks,
who
are
often
left
out
of
Grant
processes,
have
a
path
in
and
have
the
support
they
need
to
figure
out
how
to
navigate
the
system
and
and
be
successful
with
these
grant
opportunities.
P
Yeah
thanks
Nicole
appreciate
that
question,
I
I
think
so,
and
it's
something
we'll
evaluate.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
in
line
with
voter
intent,
so
that
technical
assistance
provided
is
to
is
to
pursue
a
permanent
commercial
space
solution,
and
if
it's
not
Capital,
then
it's
probably
not
ccrs
is
the
solution
which
is
okay
and
there's
some
benefit
of
that
technical
assistance.
P
So,
given
that
it's
not
operating
support
grants,
it's
not
well
we'll
fund,
no
matter
what
the
solution
might
be,
I
think
it's
reasonable,
especially
for
now
at
this
early
stage.
If
the
demand
is
incredible
on
that
level,
I
think
it's
something
that
we'd
revisit
with
Council
just
like.
If
the
demand
was
great
and
another
type
of
Grant
as
well,
but
I
think
we
feel
pretty
comfortable
with
with
that
amount
for
technical
assistance
for,
for
the
time
being,.
I
Awesome,
thank
you
and
then
my
other
question
was
just
around
the
timeline
for
rollout.
Do
you
have
some
initial
thoughts
on
plans
for
outreach
like
if
somebody's
hearing
about
this-
and
they
you
know,
are
thinking
wow
I'd
be
interested
in
applying
for
this?
When
it
comes
out
next
spring,
how
do
they
find
out
where,
where
the
applications
are
going
to
be
how
they
get
to
them
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
P
Yeah
good
question
so
I
think
we
can
use
some
of
our
normal
communication
channels
that
that
will
help
I
believe
what
is
unique
to
where
we
are
today
versus
where
we
were
in
previous
CCS
processes,
is
that
we
have
access
to
our
wonderful
Community
connectors,
and
so
that
is
another
resource
that
we
would
work
with
our
community
connectors
to
get
information
out,
and
then
we
also
have
incredible
networks
internally
as
well.
So
we
issue
a
number
of
Grants
internally.
P
B
You
see
Nicole
any
other
questions
before
we
do
the
other
kind
of
questions.
Okay,
so
let's
answer
the
staff
questions
then
to
number
one
and
just
raise
your
hands.
If
you
have,
if
you'd
like
to
pontificate
on
your
answer
and
if
no
one
raises
their
hands,
I'd,
probably
just
ask
for
a
show
of
hand.
So,
does
council
support
the
revised
structure
with
the
funding
proportions
on
Administration
and
planning
technical
assistance?
B
D
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
and
appreciate
that
we
did
give
a
really
broad
variety
of
feedback
and
I
think
this
is
a
really
creative
way
of
solving
that
issue,
and
I
am
really
excited
that
you
guys
were
able
to
rethink
this
and
bring
it
back
to
us
in
this
way.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
B
I
Yes,
just
that
I
I'm
hopeful
that
the
metric
that
we
use
will
include
equity
in
some
way,
that's
kind
of
giving
us
an
indication
of
you
know
whether
we're
getting
more
grants
led
by
folks
who
typically
haven't
applied
for
Grants
or
from
marginalized
groups
that
I
haven't
often
been
recipients
of
Grants.
B
Thanks
all
right,
no
other
virtual
hands
up.
So
let's
do
a
just
show
of
our
real
hands.
Do
you
support
the
proposed
framework
for
implementation
and
evaluation?
Yeah
me
Lauren
Mark
Tara,
Nicole
Bob
Juni
met
everyone
on
to
number
three.
Does
councils
support
the
proposed
process
and
timeline
for
Council
approval
of
Grant
criteria,
virtual
hand,
comments.
B
Nicole
you're
letting
me
down
here,
I'm
counting
on
you,
but
nothing
I
got
it
all
out
all
right.
Okay
and
let's
just
do
a
show
of
hands.
Please
raise
your
hand
if
you
support
the
proposed
process
and
timeline
for
Council
approval
me
Lauren,
Tara,
Mark,
Nicole,
Bob,
Juni
Matt.
Everyone
well
done
awesome
any
other
from
Council
Members
comments
that
you'd
like
to
make
on
this
before
I
check
in
with
staff
to
see
if
they
have
what
they
need.
B
We
gotta
we
got
claps
and
jazz
hands
yeah.
That
was
very
well
done
and
it
was
sort
of
herding
cats
with
our
feedback.
So
thank
you
for,
for
taking
that
slap
and
bringing
us
back.
You
know
a
nice
casserole
or
whatever.
The
right
metaphor
is
so
thanks
for
that.
Mark
and
Charlotte.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for
us
before
we
tune
out?
No.
P
We
got
what
we
need,
we'll
we'll
get
our
next
touch,
Point
scheduled
but
appreciate
feedback
and
glad
that
we
were
able
to
capture
the
wasn't
a
wasn't
slop,
but
maybe
sloppy.
It
was
good.
Thank
you.
Casserole.
B
Thanks
for
it
again
all
right
with
that
Elisha
I
believe
that's
done,
the
other
agenda
items
or
not
ones
we
usually
tackle,
but
do
you
still
read
them.