►
From YouTube: 7-10-23 Transportation Advisory Board Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
Veronica
son,
cob:
yes,
cool.
well,,
we're
pleased
to
have
you
join
us
today..
This
meeting
has
been
called
to
conduct
the
business
of
the
city
of
boulder
activities
that
disrupt
delay
or
otherwise
interfere
with
the
meetings
are
prohibited..
The
time
for
speaking,
is
limited
to
3
min.
no
person
shall
speak
except
one
recognized
by
myself,
and
no
personal
speak
for
longer
than
the
time
allotted.
A
A
A
A
Veronica
son,
cob:,
the
q.
a
function
is
enabled,:
it'll,
be
used
for
individuals
to
communicate
with
the
host..
It
can
be
used
for
technical
or
online
platform
related
questions
only
if
in
a
t.,
if
an
attendee
attempts
to
chat
for
any
other
reasons
that
are
the
other
than
seeking
assistance
from
the
host.,
the
city
reserves
the
right
to
disable
the
individuals.
access
to
the
chat.
A
A
D
B
B
B
B
A
G
G
B
G
B
A
A
H
H
H
B
B
B
B
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
good
evening.
good
to
be
with
you
for
the
third
of
3
monthly
presentations
on
the
capital
improvement
program..
I
am
joined
with
you
this
evening
by
lindsey
merr
and
james
smith,,
who
are
both
principal
project
managers
and
the
capital
projects,
division
of
the
transportation
and
mobility
department.
I
Gerrit
slatter:
and
myself.,
I
am
a
civil
engineering
senior
manager,
with
the
transportation
and
about
mobility
department.,
so
we're
here
to
revisit
the
items
that
were
presented
to
you
last
month..
So
not
a
lot
has
changed
from
what
we
presented
to
you..
So
we
will
not
go
into
the
same
level
of
detail
as
we
did
last
month.,
but
provide
a
reminder
of
the
programs
and
projects
that
are
included
in
the
24
to
29
c.
I,
p.
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
the
next
slide
here
talks
about
our
consistency
with
the
sustainability,
equity,
and
resiliency
framework,,
and
I
will
say
that
you
will
continue
to
see
more
about
the
way
our
investment
programs,,
as
well
as
our
capital
improvement
program.
Projects
are
tied
to
the
sustainability
and
equity
framework
through
the
use
of
a
tool
that
the
city
is
adopted.
Recently,
starting
last
year,
called
open,
gov.
and.
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
so
our
24
to
29
c.
I.
p.
represents
an
approximately
100
million
dollar
investment
with
17
million
dollars
in
grants,
and
hopefully,.
That
number
will
grow
over
the
next
year
or
so,
as
we
wait.
Announcements
of
pending
grant
applications
and
24
to
25..
We
are
looking
at
an
average
of
20
million
dollars
per
year.
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:
to
turn
our
pennies
in
our
quarters
into
full
dollars
by
allowing
us
to
be
competitive
with
pursuing
and
receiving
grant
funds
through
the
doctor,,
cog,
tip
program,
the
highway
safety
improvement,
or
each
set
program,
transportation
all
to
alternative
programs
or
tap
and
see
for
us
to
school,,
all
of
which
we've
been
successful
in
obtaining
funding
over
the
last
calendar.
Year.
I
I
I
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
additional
funding
for
nineteenth
street,
additional
funding
for
the
easter
rap,
a
whole
47,
sidewalk
and
downtown
boulder
station
and
an
increase
to
the
t.,
t.
and
p.
line,
item
and
removal
of
deficient
street
light
replacement
because
of
that
now
being
an
effort
of
the
the
city
to
take
over
the
purchase
of
all
the
excel
street
light..
So
that
will
be
an
item.
That's
covered
elsewhere
in
the
the
city
budget
for
the
future.
I
Gerrit
slatter:
so
you've
seen
this
slide
previously
as
well.
that
talks
about
each
of
the
capital
programs.
james,
is
going
to
touch
on
those
again
here
in
a
moment..
These
are
the
annual
ways
that
we
preserve
the
integrity
and
the
assets
that
we've
made
significant
investments
in
over
the
years
and
are
focused
on
taking
care
of
these
vital
assets
that
are
used
by
all
modes
of
trouble.
Travel
throughout
the
community.
I
J
J
J
J
James
smith:,
the
pedestrian
facilities,
repair
and
replacement
program
and
the
sidewalk
maintenance.
program.
These
programs
are
100%
dedicated
to
pedestrian
movement.,
the
sidewalk
maintenance
budget
funds..
The
miscellaneous
side
of
our
repair
program
cycle
compares
under
this
program
identified
through
citizen
reports
throughout
the
entire
city.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
so
moving
on
to
the
next
item,
and
the
cip
is
the
tip
local
match
and
t
up
implementation,,
which
is
reflected
on
the
project
side
of
the
the
table,,
and
we
are
proposing
to
increase
that
historically,.
We
have
been
around
the
3
million
dollar
level.
and
we're
proposing
to
increase
that
to
the
4
million
dollar
level.
I
Gerrit
slatter:
being
strategically
positions
to
pursue,
grant
opportunities,
as
they
come
forward
to
us.
and
so
examples
of
that
would
be,
say,
streets
for
all
the
smart
grants,,
and
we
are
also
a
minor
partner
in
the
protect
grant,
for
which,
right
now,
we
are
not
being
asked
to
provide
any
funding,.
But.
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
such
as
making
better
bike
and
pedestrian
improvements
as
part
of
that
project.,
and
so
we
would
want
to
have
that
funding
available
to
us.,
and
so
the
a
a
other
aspect
of
this
is
being
able
to
keep
up
with
the
level
of
matching
we've
provided
in
the
past,
with
inflation
being
where
it's
at..
This
will
continue
to
provide
a
competitive
advantage
to
the
city
and
being
successful
in
pursuing
grant.
I
I
K
K
K
K
Lindsay
merz:
and
the
phase
2.
portion
of
the
project
includes
constructing
additional
bike,,
lane,,
protection,,
intersection,
and
pedestrian
crossing
improvements,
transit
efficiency
and
safety.
Improvements,
such
as
40
bus
islands,
and
converting
some
of
the
phase,
one
improvements
into
more
permanent
features
and
construction
of
phase
2
is
estimated
to
begin
in
2,025.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
I
Gerrit
slatter:
all
right.,
so
our
next
steps
are
to
take
this
information
to
planning
board,
along
with
all
of
the
other
departments
in
the
city
for
their
review
and
input.,
and
then
this
will
also
go
to
city
council
in
september
and
october
for
their
review
and
consideration
and
approval,
and,
as
alex
noted,.
This
is
a.
B
B
C
C
C
I
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:
that
are
boosting
it
to
a
a
higher
ratio
to
where
it
might
be
approximately
40%
of
the
overall.,
but
I
know..
So
I
I
think
we've
got
gastonia
here.,
but
as
our
budget
analyst
to
to
be
able
to
speak
to
the
the
ratio
of
the
overall
budget
that
I
made
a
reference.
Earlier,
ryan,
to
open
gov.
which,
as
a
a
finance
and
government,
the
trans.
or,
excuse
me.
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
we
have
transparency
and
government
finance
tool
that
the
city
is
using,
and
there
are
a
number
of
charts
and
graphs
and
tables
that
you'll
be
able
to
explore,
to
get
a
sense
of
our
overall
budget
here,
fairly
soon,
when
that
is
shared
with
the
public..
So
not
only
feel
free
to
jump
in
here.
L
L
L
Natalie
stiffler:,
the
cip,
probably
be
on
a
bigger
percentage.,
it
might
be
40%..
I
haven't
really
looked
at
it
closely.,
but
and
that's
because
of
as
we've
talked
about
a
lot
of
grant
funding
that's
coming
in
over
the
next
couple
of
years..
We
have
a.
We
have
a
big
vip.
The
next
couple
of
years,,
which
is
exciting.
L
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:
to
be
doing.,
so.
okay,
got
it
and
and
that's
great
news.
and
understand..
That's
also
a
lot
yeah,
like,,
but
the
dawn
thing,.
Maybe
some
respects.
can
you
just
say
then,,
so
that
a
quarter
to
a
third
is,
or
something
of
the
overall
budget.?
That's
what
this
is.,
the
council
sees..
Are
there
other
main
budget
items
or
proposals
that
will
go
to
council.-
besides,
cip,,
just
in
so
far
as
that
providing
perspective.
To,
you
know,
for
the
proposal
of
the
council.-.
C
L
L
L
Natalie
stiffler:
increase
over
2023,
and
garrett
can
correct
my
math
on
that,
but
that's
really
just
to
continue
to
provide
the
level
of
service
from
an
operation
to
maintenance
standpoint
of
our
system
that
we're
providing
today
and
edit,
you
know,
at
a
big
increasing
cost
to
do
that..
We
did
have
some
other
enhancement
adjustments
that
we
needed
to
make
a
couple
of
personnel
requests
to
support.
Just
ongoing
needs.
you
know,,
you
saw.
L
L
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:
that
that's
our
request.
nothing's
been
approved
yet,,
but
we
can
certainly
come
back
to
tab
at
a
future
night
to
give
a
more
detailed
kind
of
summary
of
what
our
request
was.
okay..
So
the
picture
I'm
getting
just
to
understand
the
the
context
of
the
of
how
this
budget
fits
the
over
budget.
That
council
you'll
ask
for
council
feedback,
on.
there's
the
overall
budget:
that's
not
today.!
That's
that's
the
overall
budget
for
another
day,
and
there's
a
cip
budget
council
will
see
both
of
those.
C
C
Gerrit
slatter:
great.
okay.
to
to
clarify
ryan.
the
reason
that
we
come
to
tab
for
input
and
recommendation
on
the
capital
improvement
program
specifically,
and
not
the
overall
operating
budget
is..
It's
in
your
charter.
and
the
the
boulder
revised
code
that
it's
in
your
purview
to
review
and
recommend
the
capital
improvement.
Program.
I
Gerrit
slatter:
and
that's
not
unique
to
transportation.
every
other
department
in
the
city
that
has
a
board
is
asked
to
do
the
same.,
so
the
parks
and
recreation
recreation,
advisory
board,,
the
the
rep
for
utilities,
osbt
for
open
space.,
they
are
all
conducting
similar
reviews
of
the
cip,
which
are
recommended
to
to
planning
board.
planning
board,
also
does
not
get
to
direct
approval
on
the
operating
budget..
That
is
only
through
city.
Council.-.
C
B
B
A
M
B
A
N
N
N
B
I
O
O
A
P
David
light:,
I've
yeah,,
I
believe
I
am.
just
a
quick,,
a
quick
clarification,,
and
this
might
just
a
quick
clarification..
It
might
be
too
far
off
for
for
that.,
but
I
would
love
to
hear
more
of..
In
regard
to
the
supplemental
funds
for
the
thirtieth
street
multi
multi-modal
improvements.,
I
was
kind
of
wondering,
what
what
improvements
for
being
planned
in
in
specific.
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
and
so
the
outcome
of
that
will
be
based
on
our
pretty
robust
community
engagement
effort
and
consulting
with
stakeholders
affected
along
the
corridor.,
and
so
it's
too
early
to
know
what
will
come
of
that
effort..
But
the
desire
is
to
bring
forward
recommendations
for
the
quarter
that
make
it
easy
for
people
to
travel
along
and
across
the
30
street.
Quarter
on
that
segment.
B
I
B
H
B
H
H
H
Lynn,
segal:
they're
they're
at
the
same
time
that
they're
offered
to
the
city.,
then
they're,
also
promoting
a
lot
more
growth.
and,
from
my
perspective
of
riding
my
by
family
drive
my
car
once
every
6
months
or
so..
I
just
don't
like
to
go
east,
and
I
live
at
6
than
doing..
I
don't
like
to
go
east
and
boulder
at
all,
because
it
just
adds
so
much
time
to.
H
Q
Q
Q
Q
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:
the
incredible
work
that
staff
has
done
and
is
doing
to
both.
flip
this
kind
of
a
bunch
together
and
prepare
for
and
staff
up
to
to
do
the
work
ahead..
I
really
appreciate
the
diligence
of
this
study
here,
itself,
and
what's
gone
into
it?
and
I
have
feedback.,
but
it's
the
feedback
is
really
just
about
how
you
label
the
package
that
is
going
to
city.
Council.-.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:,
but
I
think
that
some
way
to
to
label
this,
to
counsel
with
the
strategic
significance
that
the
council
really
has
a
choice:
here,
not
just
to
not
just
to
say,.
Will
you
please
approve
it?,
but
the
council
has
a
choice
to
say
you
really
want
to
crank
on
a
multimodal,,
completely
walkable,
bikeable,
transit
ridge,
center
or
city
city..
C
B
Alex
weinheimer:
thanks,
ryan.
alex
weinheimer:
yeah,.
I
do
this.
having
seen
how
this
has
evolved
over
the
past
5
years
to
me,
I
mean,.
This
is
exciting..
It
doesn't
feel
like
business,
as
usual.
feel
like..
When
I
got
onto
the
board..
A
lot
of
the
projects
were
small
and
reached
and
extravagant,
and
price,,
and
we
were
missing
some
of
the
low
cost.
B
B
B
B
B
B
Alex
weinheimer:
okay,
yeah,.
I
think
this
is
scalable.
and
what
should
inspire
confidence?
and
and
council
to
provide
additional
funding..
Did
you
hear
me
when
I
was
talking
about
a
map.,
okay,
cool.
yes,,
I'm
ready
to
support
this
this
evening,
and
it
is
exciting
to
see
a
lot
of
things
that
this
board
has
been
involved
with
in
the
past,
from
the
pavement
management
program
to
the
core
material
network,
to
some
of
the
tip
projects
that
we've
brought
forward.
C
F
B
C
C
C
B
L
B
Alex
weinheimer:,
so
we
have
a
couple
of
things:
here.,
sorry
about
that.
Issue..
The
residential
access
management
programs
will
be
a
briefing
for
tab
and
for
us
right
feedback
as
well
as
a
public
hearing
on
the
east,
aurora
neighborhood
parking
permit
expansion
that
being
a
public
hearing..
It
means
there'll,
be
an
opportunity
for
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
address
the
board
to
do
so.
After
we've.
S
Cris
jones,
cob:
good
evening,
tab.
chris
jones,
here,
director
of
the
community
vitality,
department.,
we're
joined
by
sam
bromberg
in
community
vitality
and
bill
cowan
this
evening
from
fox
total,
who's
been
helping
us
with
some
analysis
of
the
east
aurora
neighborhood,
as
well
as
other
elements
of
the
residential
access
management
program..
So
without
further
ado,,
I
think
I'm
just
going
to
hand
it
over
to
them
to
begin
their
presentation.
T
T
T
T
T
T
Samantha
bromberg:
council,
directed
staff
to
move
forward
with
the
program
and
prepare
a
proposal
for
the
east.
aurora
and
pp.
expansion
petition..
It
was
at
this
time
that
staff
identified
an
opportunity
to
further
refine
the
proposal
approach
and
use
the
petition
to
show
how
the
approach
could
work.
T
T
T
T
T
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
T
T
T
T
T
T
Samantha
bromberg:
finally,,
those
who
disapproved
of
the
structure
of
the
program
mentioned
that
the
proposal
would
create
parking
impacts
on
nearby
streets,
and
that
there
are
not
enough
permits
being
offered
per
per
per
household..
This
was
clarified
in
the
fa
cues,,
but
many
people
mentioned
in
the
comments
that
only
2
permits
could
be
purchased
per
household
when
it
is,
in
fact,
2
permits
per
resident.
T
T
T
T
T
T
Samantha
bromberg:
option
3
is
to
expand
the
npp.
to
the
proposed
blocks,,
which
include
both
the
petitioned
and
the
non-petitioned
blocks.
option.
4
will
entail
additional
engagement
activities
and
program
development
activities..
This
could
include
other
options
such
as
bringing
to
you
to
the
table
in
a
more
meaningful
way.
T
T
Samantha
bromberg:,
although
the
data
suggests
that
the
area
would
benefit
from
parking
management,
and
that
parking
congestion
is
severe,,
especially
on
the
blocks
closest
to
williams
village.
There
is
not
sufficient
support
from
residents
to
expand
the
existing
npp.
or
management
of
surrounding
ramp
blocks.
At
this
time.
T
T
D
T
D
T
T
D
C
B
C
C
C
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),,
tab:
elementary
school,
and
I.
p.
some
medical
school
joining
it
right,
is
that
right?
okay,
thank
you.,
so
I,
as
I
thought
I
didn't.,
I
don't
think
I
heard
much
about
those
elementary
schools,
2
of
them.,
so
joining.
you're
a
lot
of
us
to
you..
So
I
guess
I
have
a
few
questions
just
as
far
as
like
how.
C
C
C
C
T
T
U
Bill
cowern:
that
the
predominant
bill,
cowern:
parking
impacts
in
and
around
that
school
mostly
had
to
do
with
pick
up
and
drop
off
activity,,
not
with
long-term
parking..
They
provide
for
long
term
parking
on
their
site..
There
certainly
are
pick
up
and
drop
off
issues
that
impact
that
neighborhood,,
but
that
would
not
be.
C
C
C
C
T
T
T
T
U
U
S
S
Cris
jones,
cob:
and
when
you
have
that
amount
of
activity,
there's
a
lot
more
blind
spots
and
issues
with
side
triangles
that
lead
to
crashes..
So
maybe
what
I
would
summarize
that
I've
heard
is,.
The
team
is
aware
that
there's
there's
a
couple
of
schools
there
considered
what
you
know,,
that
the
whether
or
not
there
are
key
impacts,
you
know,
with
perspective,,
which
direction
we
go
with
it
here.
C
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:
did
so..
I
sound
like
there
wasn't
like
a
real
signal
from
in
the
petition,
like
the
real
signal
of
representing
stakeholders
from
the
school,
like,
you
know,
parents
or
resid,.
I
guess
residents
talking
about
school
traffic
or
teachers,,
or
they
just
there
wasn't..
This
was
not,
despite
the
being
just
wasn't,
reflected.
T
C
Q
B
A
V
V
Mike
chaffin:,
over
the
last
6
years
since
I
bought
my
house.,
they
haven't
noticed
any
change
in
parking
utilization
on
my
street
due
to
the
construction
of
the
large
dormitories.
it
willville.
I
saw
no
change.
and
partially.
As
a
consequence
of
that,
I
want
to
speak
in
strong
opposition
to
the
creation
of
this
zone..
For
me,
the
zone
does
not
solve
a
problem.
V
V
V
V
Mike
chaffin:,
with
regard
to
the
60%
threshold,,
I
do
want
to
raise
a
question,
because
this
expansion
increases
the
size
of
the
area
by
a
factor
of
more
than
4..
I
have
to
wonder
whether
the
85%
threshold
is
more
valid,
particularly
in
light
of
the
fact
that
the
reason
for
the
expansion
is
different.
V
mike
chaffin:
in
fact,.
It
creates
a
problem,,
because
now
I
need
to
manage
parking
for
me
and
my
household,
for
my
guests
and
for
service
workers..
I
understand
that
process
for
purchasing
permits
and
for
purchasing
temporary
permits.,
but
this
just
creates
additional
cognitive
load
for
me
in
terms
of
deciding
whether
to
use
a
visitor
permit
for
service
workers
who
might
be
performing
plumbing
repairs
or
roof
repairs
for
my
house
versus.
V
V
A
M
M
M
M
Thomas
david
kehoe:,
if
you
don't
want
to
do
pay
parking,,
could
we
at
least
get
painted
parking
spaces
on
the
street.,
there's
3
room
to
park,
3
cars
in
front
of
each
of
our
houses,?
And
what
I
see
is
that
the
first
car
parks
kind
of
in
the
middle,,
the
second
car
parts
behind
the
first
car,
leaving
a
3
quarter
space
on
one
side
in
a
one
quarter,
space
on
the
other
side,
and
then
a
third
car
tries
to
park
in
the
3
quarters.
M
F
W
W
W
Thomas
david
kehoe:,
that's
fine.,
but
there's
not
going
to
be
a
space
once
they
arrive
in
the
neighborhood..
Kids
are
going
to
park
for
whatever
the
2,
2,
3
h,
limit
zoom
to
another
space
immediately.
They
leave
the
first
space.
a
second
student
or
not
a
student
is
going
to
pull
in
there..
I
think
it's
not
a
actually
a
good
solution.
W
W
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A
A
Y
Y
Drew
morrill:
a
lot
of
stress
among
residents.,
I
mean
frankly,,
nobody
likes
having
parking
vultures
hovering
around
their
neighborhood..
You
know
I
I
I
actually
did
bring
up
the
school
in
my
survey
response.
and
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
ryan,
when
he
spoke,
earlier,
was
correct..
That's
most
of
the
parking
on
my
street
is
associated
with
that
school.
and
also,.
You
know,
things
like
a
park.
Activity,
little
league
baseball
stuff.,
but
you
know.
Y
Y
Y
Drew
morrill:-
and
it's
just
kind
of
hard
for
me
to
imagine
how
she
would
navigate
the
system.
and
I
I
just
think
it'd
be
confusing
and
stressful
for
her.
and
it's
it's
just
frankly,
unnecessary.
the
photos
that
you
guys
showed
earlier
of
thirty-first
and
30
s
street..
They
just
frankly,
don't
represent
my
my
neighborhood
at
all
and
I.
I
am
sympathetic
to
people
who
are
maybe
closer,
farther,
farther
west.,
but.
Y
Drew
morrill:
frankly,
you
know,
in
in
terms
of
my
neighborhood,.
I
don't
think
this
would
be
a
a
an
improvement..
I
wanted
to
also
mention
that
before
the
pandemic,
we
had
an
rtd
bus
line
that
went
along
aurora
avenue.,
that
was
the
209
line
and
at
the
start
of
covid
that
was
shut
down..
So
you
know,.
I
think
if,
if
the
intention
is
to
reduce
motor
vehicle
traffic
in
the
area.
trying
to
revamp
the
209
would
be
a
a
great
thing,,
because
it
really
connected
my
neighborhood
with.
Y
Drew
morrill:
the
university
and
other
parts
of
of
of
town.,
so
you
know,,
just
to
summarize
I
I
do
strongly
oppose
this
measure..
I
don't
think
it's
necessary..
I
think
it
would
add
a
lot
of
stress
to
our
lives..
I
think
one
of
the
stated
goals
earlier
of
the
program
was
to
generate
revenue
and
achieve
cost
recovery.
and
that's
kind
of
what
it
feels
like,.
You
know.
start
a
program
and
then
have
it
pay
for
itself
by
by
our
parking
citations.,
and
I
I
don't
like
to
feel
that.
but
anyway,.
G
G
Brandi
mccarty:
increasing
the
number
of
unrelated
people
that
can
live
in
houses
in
our
neighborhood,
that
if
we
increase
the
number
of
people
who
unrelated
people
who
can
live
in
our
neighborhood.,
there
will
be
more
cars..
That
means
more
need
for
permits,,
which
means
that
a
landlord
would
have
to.
G
G
G
G
Brandi
mccarty:
people
blocking
our
fire
hydrants,
people
parking
in
the
wrong
direction,
facing
in
the
wrong
direction,
people
parking
too
far
from
the
curb.
and
really,.
It's
just
the
rules
that
we
currently
have
are
not
enforced..
So
if
we
can't
enforce
the
rules
that
we
have.
now,,
I'm
not
sure
how
$40
a
house
here
is
going
to
get
that.
G
A
Z
Lee
payne:
great!
great!
lee
payne:,
my
name
is
lee
pain..
I
live
in
the
northwest
area.
This
under
consideration.
Here.
I've
lived
in
the
same
house
for
21
years..
I
am
going
to
my
twelfth
year
of
viking
to
be
csis
with
my
3
children.
what?.
This
neighborhood,
in
a
great
extent
is
my
children
grew
up.
Z
Z
Z
Z
Lee
payne:
to
aurora,
and
then
the
neighborhoods
north
of
aurora
itself.
many
students
park
in
that
area
to
go
to
the
research
part..
So
this
is
not
simply
overflow
from
williams
village..
It's
an
issue
that
permeates
itself
towards
north,
and
I
feel
like
that..
That
issue
would
then
be
exacerbated.
as
this
is,
it
just
premiates.
Other
parts
of
the
neighborhood.
Z
Z
Lee
payne:
idiot!
there
is
safety
concerns
on
that
street.
we
back
to
school,
every
day.,
the
traffic
control
measures
that
have
been
installed
on
that
street
of
reduced
parking,
and
they've
decreased
bike
or
safety
by
pushing
bicyclist
into
the
flow
of
traffic.
Instead
of
being
able
to
hurt,
hug
the
curb
when
cars
are
not
parked
there.
as
I
mentioned,,
I
feel
like
that..
That
issue
will
be
exacerbated,
as
well
as.
Z
Lee
payne:,
probably
early
school
events,,
not
only
for
drop
off,,
but
also
for
classes
and
the
circulation
in
those
areas.
There,
there
is
a
big
drop
off
issue
and
pick
up
issue..
It's
not
that
far
to
walk.
If
you
end
up
having
to
park
in
the
neighborhood,,
should
it
be
allowed.
but
bicycling
is,
is
pretty
unsafe.
Z
Lee
payne:,
the
geometry
of
the
intersection
of
aurora,
and
35,
is
not
well
suited
for
the
round.
Temporary.
it
seems,
round
about
that's
been
installed.
There.
I've
seen
several
crashes
there
because
of
that
and
those
those
measures
which
have
been
removed
as
you
as
you
continue,
east
on,
or
roy
and
get
towards
mo
mohawk,
have
been
removed
and
the
bicycling
there
is
much
safer.
thank
you.
H
B
Alex
weinheimer:
okay,,
we'll
close
the
alex
weinheimer:
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
tab
discussion
with
the
opportunity
to
provide
a
recommendation.
if
we
would
like..
One
thing
that
came
up
through
this
question
for
staff
is
the
prospect
of
marking
spaces
on
a
residential
street??
Is
that
something
that
the
city.
T
O
O
D
D
Becky
davies,
tab:
effectively,,
I
guess
I'm
assuming
the
whole
city.
you
know,.
Everyone
pays
for
a
program
that
only
serves
a
portion
of
neighborhoods
based
on
the
characteristics
of
housing
in
those
neighborhoods,
and
whether
it's
the
family
or
single
family,
homes,
and
creating
that
economy
with
no
real
rationale
to
me
is
like,
really,,
that's
really
concerning,
because
it
seems
like
a
really
big
inequity
in.
D
D
D
Becky
davies,
tab:
like
what
would
be
gained
either
by
the
community
or
by
city
at
large
by
spending
more
time
on
this
decision.
there's
been
a
lot
of
analysis.
Done,
and
I
understand
it
was
part
of
developing
broader
kind
of
policy
recommendations.,
and
so
that's
why?
Maybe
it
was
more
expensive.
and
it
wouldn't
be
like
in
the
future
when
it
was
repeated.,
but.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Becky
davies,
tab:,
built
on
this
criteria,
gotten
all
this
information
done.
all
this
input,.
We
still
don't
know..
I
then
maybe
is,
you
know,
is,.
Does
that
mean
it's
not
working?
What
we've
done,?
You
know
I'm
just.
I'm
kind
of
confused
about
why,.
None
of
that
is
enough
to
to
move
forward
one
way
or
another,
and
I
think
you
know,.
We
need
to
move
on
to
other
places
that
might
merit
if
we
decide.
no,.
This
doesn't
merit
management.
then,.
D
Becky
davies,
tab:
and
I
think
also,
ultimately,
you're,
never
gonna,
know
what
the
whole
neighborhood
thinks,,
because
we
never
get
full
participation
in
polling..
So
we
don't
really
have
a
representative
view
of
what
the
neighborhood
thinks,
and
that's,
you
know,
pretty
much
impossible
to
get
without
a
representative
poll,,
which
is
hard
to
do.
so.
you
know,,
we
can
keep
pulling
people.,
we
can
keep
asking
people,
and
we'll
keep
getting
different
viewpoints.
D
Becky
davies,
tab:,
but
ultimately
we
need
to
have
some
path
for
for
making
a
decision,
and
then
moving
on
and
being
able
to
replicate
it
in
a
kind
of
an
efficient
way.
That
recognizes
that
we
can't
spend
an
undo
amount
of
resources
on
a
limited
part
of
the
city,,
especially
since
the
program
is
already
focusing
on
a
limited
part
of
the
city
by
excluding
people
who
live.
D
D
B
ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:
oh,
well,,
I'm
sorry..
I
don't
know
if
I
can
do
this,
but
you
but,
becky,,
you've
germinated
a
question
which
is,
I
I
now
realizing.
I
don't.
I'm
not
sure
it
fully
grasp
to
what
extent
city
code
just
gives
us
the
definitions
for
what
staff
needs
to
do
versus
that
pass.
More
discretion.
C
C
C
C
S
Cris
jones,
cob:
yes,,
that's
correct,
ryan..
The
the
code
that
pertains
to
neighborhood
parking
permit
zones
clearly
describes
what
the
processes
for
establishing
or
expanding
zones
and
tab
has
the
option
to
accept.
Whatever
plan
staff
has
put
forward.
we're
not
recommending
that
you
do
that,
based
on
community
engagement.
S
S
C
C
C
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:,
indigestion,
here.,
ryan,
schuchard,
(he/him),,
tab:,
so,
anyway,,
that's
just
my
obsession..
I
guess
I
would
just
say,
yeah,,
I'm
I'm
just
sort
of
torn.
I
between
agreeing,
becky,,
I
I
agree
with
you..
You
said
I.
also
maybe
just
stepping
back,,
though
I
I
think
I
mean?
that's
I.
I
appreciate
what's
that,
has
done
and
is
doing
within
the
bounds
of
the
law
and
resources,
available.
and.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:,
especially
with
something
that
council
is
going
to
see
and
pointing
out
what?.
What
are
the
options
on
the
table
for
boulder
strategically,
to
get
this
right
and
go
beyond
a
scarcity
mindset
to
thinking
about
abundance.
and
what
a
what
a
real
multi
role
system
looks:
like.,
so
I'll
step
down.
and
I
again,
I'm
happy
to
support
number
4
and
appreciate
staff
work
on
this.
B
B
Q
Q
Q
Q
C
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:.
I
don't
know
if
this
goes
into
the
motion,,
but
to
me
the
the
what
council
should
here
is
city
code
needs
to
get
fixed..
That's
the
that
we're
going
to
keep
doing,
this.
we're
going
to
keep
doing
this.
and,
and
you
know,,
having
this
sort
of
well,
staff,.
Are
you
doing
it
right
unless
we
speak
city
code.,
so
we
we
know
it.?
Why
don't
we
say
it
and
use
this
as
an
opportunity
to
focus
on
that?.
B
C
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:
to
go
with
what
staff
is
recommending,,
which
is
option,
for
with,,
while
saying
also
city
council,.
We
have
a
you
know,,
40
year
old
code,,
that
this
is
all
based.
On,
and
everybody
is
frustrated
and
disappointed
in
the
community.
well,.
You
know
all
kinds
of
problems
with
it.
C
D
D
D
D
B
B
B
Q
S
S
Cris
jones,
cob:
problem
areas
throughout
the
city.,
so
the
the
tagli,
or
the
the
additional
information
option.
Was,
one
is
no
action
this
time
until
conditions
change
and
those
changing
conditions
could
be
a
revision
to
neighborhood
parking
ordinances
that
provide
us
other
tools
to
mitigate
these.
The
challenges
experience
in
this
neighborhood.
C
C
B
C
C
B
C
B
C
S
Cris
jones,
cob:
yes,,
thank
you
so
much,
tab.
and
thank
you.
sam
and
bill
and
the
rest
of
the
folks.
Who've
been
working
on
this
item
for
some
time,
and
we're
looking
forward
to
continuing
the
conversation
on
that
that
bigger
level
of
working
with
planning
and
transportation
and
mobility
on
some
retooling.
S
B
B
B
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
Chandler
van
schaack:,
the
project
owner,
is
looking
into
options
for
commutify,,
which
is
a
local
transportation
consultant
company
to
manage
the
alternative
transportation
fund..
The
lease
is,
proposed
to
include
language
that
residents
will
not
be
allowed
to
have
a
vehicle
to
receive
the
alternate
transportation
fund
unless
they
can
prove
they
have
a
suitable
offsite
location
to
store.
their
vehicle.
AA
AA
Chandler
van
schaack:,
so
redgers
pay
for
an
onsite
parking
space
separately
from
the
unit
itself..
The
monthly
fee
for
on
site
parking
would
be
125
to
150
a
month..
I
don't
think
they've
determined
that
yet.
renters,
who
are
car
free
would
therefore
save
1,500
to
1,800
a
year..
In
addition
to
the
alternative
transportation
on
allowance.
AA
AA
AA
Chandler
van
schaack:
there's
also
an
onsite
car
share
space
with
colorado
car
share
that
will
be
funded
by
the
developer.,
so
residents
will
have
the
ability
to
use
a
car
share,
vehicle.
and
then
there's
shared
onsite
loading,
tnc
base,,
which
provides
additional
options
for
uber,
lifts,
deliveries,
other
red,
shares,,
etc.
AA
AA
AA
C
C
C
AA
AA
AB
Chris
hagelin,
cob:
yeah,,
so
I
would
say,
you
know,.
We
have
a
a
of
research
from
our
both
our
residential
travel
diary
and
from
our
border
valley,
employee
surveys..
We
started
doing
those
in
1990
in
1,991
respectively.
and
we
know
for
sure
that
a
combination,
for
example,
of
paid
parking
combined
with
eco-passes,
is
one
of
the
best
ways
to
change
travel,
behavior.
AB
AB
AB
Chris
hagelin,
cob:
combination
of
the
unbundled
parking,
the
neighborhood
e
go
pass,
and
then,
people
who
don't
have
a
vehicle..
Not
only
do
they
save
by
not
having
to
pay
for
that
parking,
because
it's
unbundled.
they're
also
getting
a
fund
that
could
be
used
for
something
like
buying
a
an
annual
b
cycle
membership,
for
example..
So
so
I
think
you
know,
we,
we
haven't
done
studies
of
that,
because
we've
used
it
so
rarely..
But
this
is
to
me
just
an
an
added
bonus
on
top
of
a
very
robust.
AB
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:,
okay,,
thanks,
chris,.
Thank
you,
both.
and
yeah,
that
that
$150
fund
was
sort
of
what
I
was
thinking
about
is
like,.
Do
we
have
an
idea
about
the
stringency
of
that.
and
you
know,
sensitivity
at
different
levels.,
but
but
great,
thank
you..
This
is
this
is
really
really
nice,
work.,
no
more
question.
AA
B
AB
AB
AB
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
D
D
D
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
D
B
B
R
Jean
sanson:
okay,
great.,
so
good
evening,
tab
members..
My
name
is
jean
samson.,
I'm
a
principal
transportation
planner
with
the
city,,
and
I'm
pleased
to
be
here
this
evening.
on
the
regional
transportation
front..
We
have
a
lot
to
celebrate,
and
a
lot
of
work
still
ahead
of
us..
So
this
evening,
I'm
just
going
to
briefly
share
progress
on
3
important
initiatives
that
are
helping
us
to
meet
our
local
and
regional
goals,
of
enhancing.
R
Jean
sanson:
equity,
increasing
access
and
reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions.,
and
these
will
be
the
0
fare
for
better
air
transit.
Program.
news
on
the
colorado,
119
safety
and
mobility
improvement
project
connecting
boulder
to
longmont.
and
then,
lastly,.
The
next
steps
we're
taking
to
advance
the
colorado,
7
east
arabaho
transportation
plan
connecting
boulder
to
our
eastern
neighbors.
R
R
Jean
sanson:,
all
rtd,
transit
services
will
be
free
for
riders
to
board,,
including
local
and
regional
bus
routes
and
accessoride
pair
of
transit.
Service.,
the
city
of
boulder,,
in
partnership
with
rtd.
and
via
mobility
services,
will
also
provide
0,
fair
services
or
is
providing
the
0
fare
services
on
the
local
boulder.
hop
bus
route
that
you
see
here..
This
is
pretty
neat..
This
is
the
second
year
of
a
statewide
initiative
to
help
produce
harmful.
R
Jean
sanson:
air
pollutants
by
increasing
the
use
of
transit,
and
provides
the
opportunity
to
welcome
back
those
whose
travel
habits
have
changed
because
of
the
pandemic.
Last
year,
boulder
county
boulder
city
council
passed
a
resolution
in
support
of
0
fare
for
better
air
and
the
initiative
clearly
alliance,
with
the
goals
laid
out
in
our
city's
transportation
master
plan.
R
Jean
sanson:
and
then,,
I
think,
a
fun
factoid.
that
we're
sharing
is
that
in
2,021,
on
road
emissions
accounted
for
26%
of
boulder's
greenhouse
gas
emissions..
So
by
leaving
their
car
at
home
just
2
days,
a
week,
community
members
can
reduce
their
ghg
emissions
by
over
3,000
pounds
per
year..
So
that's
the
kind
of
like
fun
fact.
You
can
share
with
your
neighbor,,
your
friends
when
they're,
considering
using
transit
and
particularly
trying
it
this
month
or
next.,
given
that
the
fare
is
essentially
free.
R
Jean
sanson:
for
a
period
of
up
to
18
months,,
which
would
make
transit
free
for
all
riders
19
years
of
age
and
under
and
based
on
the
results
of
the
pilot
and
rtd's
ability
to
secure
stable
funding
for
the
program..
It
may
be
made
permanent.
so
stay
tuned
and
we'll
keep
you
posted
when
a
decision
is
made
by
the
rtd.
Board.
R
Jean
sanson:
so,
moving
on
to
the
next
item,
I
wanted
to
share
information
on
the
colorado,,
119
or
diagonal
project..
So
2
weeks
ago
we
received
the
thrilling
news
from
congressman
jonah
goose.,
that
boulder
county
is
the
recipient
of
a
pretty
monumental
25
million
dollar
grant
from
the
department
of
transportation..
This
funding
is
made
possible
through
the
d
os
basically
raise
grant
which
stands
for
rebuilding
american
infrastructure,
with
sustainability
and
equity,
discretionary
grant
program.,
that's
a
mouthful..
We
call
it
the
raise
grant.
and
I
think.
R
R
Jean
sanson:
together,,
these
improvements
will
provide
greater
transportation,
options
and
safety
for
people
using
all
modes
of
travel
while
supporting
our
mobility
and
transportation.
Goals.
you
know,.
This
successful
funding
package
includes
local,,
regional,,
state
and
federal
funding..
That's
a
result
of
over
10
years
of
collaboration
and
teamwork
by
all
of
our
organizations,
and
with
much
support
from
tab,,
including
the
city
of
boulder,,
boulder
county,,
longmont,
c.
dot,
n.
rtd.,
and
this
will
allow
us,
or
allow
c.to
begin
construction
next
year,,
providing
a
critical
link
to
the
city's
20.
R
Jean
sanson:,
so
some
exciting
news
on
that
front.,
jean
sanson:
and
last,,
but
not
least,,
is
the
colorado
7
on
easter
rap
hope
project..
So
we
wanted
to
make
you
aware
of
some
exciting
progress
on
this
project.
see.as
lindsey
mentioned
earlier.
This
evening,
see,,
that
is
initiating
preliminary
engineering
on
this
segment
of
easter.
rap
a
host,.
So
that
would
be
what
they
are
calling
segment
a.
there
are
several
segments
within
this
regional
corridor..
We
are
the
western.
R
R
Jean
sanson:,
the
preliminary
engineering
project,
will
help
to
advance
and
refine
the
east
arapaho
vision
to
a
15%
level
of
design,,
including
cost
estimates,,
whereby
the
city,,
as
also
mentioned
earlier.
This
evening,,
will
then
take
the
lead
in
advancing
the
western
segment
of
the
project
between
20
eighth
street
and
foothills
parkway
to
final
design.
next
year,
having
secure
tip
funding
for
this
past
year.
For
that
project.
R
Jean
sanson:
so,,
getting
back
to
where
we
are
today
with
the
preliminary
engineering,
project,
see,
dot,
launched
a
project
website
that
you
see
here
in
an
online
presentation
which
offers
an
introductory
overview
of
the
project
and
encourages
community
members
to
participate
and
provide
input
and
feedback
various
via
various
public
engagement
opportunities.
That
will
be
made
available
later
this
summer
and
through
the
fall.
R
Jean
sanson:,
this
presentation
is
available
through
august
eleventh.
and
again,.
Just
asking
that
you
please
help
us
to
spread
the
word
on
this
important
next
step
in
designing
improvements
to
a
regional
can
corridor.,
and
you
can
see
that
project
website
below.
and
I
can
also
perhaps
put
it
in
the
chat
or
send
it
via
email
as
well..
So
you
have
a
direct
link
to
that.
Website.
R
C
Q
AC
Melanie
sloan:
okay?,
melanie
sloan:,
so
tonight,,
I'm
probably
providing
an
update
on
the
core
arterial
network..
It's
initiative,
work
plan,
funding
and
specific
updates
on
the
priority
corridors
being
baseline,
road,
irs
avenue
and
folsom
street..
You've
heard
from
several
of
my
colleagues
tonight,
from
lindsey
to
garrett,
and
then
gene,
just
now
about
projects..
So
some
of
this
might
sound
familiar.,
but
I
think
so
much
for
your
attention..
So
I
think
we
have
some
really
good
information
to
share.
AC
AC
Melanie
sloan:,
so
when
we?
look
at
that
list.,
we
know
many
of
those
projects
benefit
from
grant
funds
and
22..
The
cities
was
successful
in
gaining
10.7
million
dollars
for
can
projects
through
various
grant,
pursuits,
and
23,.
We
continue
to
pursue
grant
funding
for
can
infrastructure
through
2
grants.
AC
Melanie
sloan:
and
I'm
pleased
to
announce
that
3
additional
can
quarter
projects
received,
funding
from
the
tip
and
the
tap
in
23
that
initiates
work
on
each
of
those
in
the
first
quarter
of
25..
Those
are
called
out
on
this
map
and
from
north
the
south..
It's
design
and
construction
of
the
20
street
multi
use
path
from
4
mile
canyon,
creek
to
jay
road,,
a
project
that
you're
familiar
with
from
briar
tip
funding,
discussions.
AC
Melanie
sloan:
preliminary
design
and
community
engagement
for
folsom
avenue
from
pine
street
to
colorado,
avenue.,
that's
a
can.
priority,
corridor
and
engagement
and
design
of
multimodal
transportation
improvements
on
thirtieth
street
from
colorado
to
baseline
road,
and
funds
for
construction
of
those
from
colorado
avenue
to
aurora.
Avenue,
and
garrett
spoke
to
that
one
a
bit
earlier
since
the
same
project.
AC
AC
Melanie
sloan:,
starting
with
the
first
priority,
corridor,
baseline
road
from
thirtieth
street,
to
hills,
parkway.,
that's
being
implemented
in
2
phases
and
phase,.
One
leverages
planned
pavement
resurfacing
to
gain
those
safety
benefits
now
between
20,
eighth
street
and
foothills
parkway..
As
you
see
in
this
diagram.
AC
AC
AC
AC
Melanie
sloan:
related,
but
separate
work
to
improve
the
crossing
at
fifteenth,
street,
and
iris
is
anticipated
to
begin
in
the
fall
of
this
year,
and,
as
jean
was
talking
about..
We
have
this
really
wonderful
project
on
the
future,
diagonal
bike
way:
east
of
20,
eighth,
street,
and
so
planned
connections
to
iris
from
there
also
being
contemplated
and
related
efforts.
AC
AC
Melanie
sloan:
those
tip
funds.,
they
are
available.
The
first
quarter
of
2525.
excuse,
me,
and
we'll
initiate
community
engagement
and
advance
conceptual
design..
That
planned
project
on
colorado
avenue
was
not
awarded
tip
funds,,
but
is
ranked
in
the
top
5
on
the
tip
wait
list
for
a
potential
award.
If
additional
funds
are
identified
by
dr.
cog
for
waitlisted
projects.
AC
Melanie
sloan:,
so
after
tonight,
staff
will
submit
an
information
item
to
count
at
their
july
twentieth
meeting..
It
will
provide
a
bit
more
of
a
comprehensive
overview
of
what
I've
shared
with
you
tonight,
like
initiative,
work,
plan
and
funding
strategy,
as
well
as
those
updates
on
those
corridors.
B
C
C
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:
within
being
e
en
enshrined
in
a
2
year,
work,,
plan,
or
versus
one
that
is
not
doesn't
make
a
difference
to
staff..
I
realize
this
might
be
like
a
bigger
question..
Then
you
can
easily
answer.,
but
you
know,
council,
as
council,
thinks
about
what's
going
forward.,
we
can,,
I
think
it,
you
know,,
might
be
of
interest.
L
Natalie
stiffler:
I'm
sure.
yeah,
no,.
I
think
so.
It's
a
good
question,
ryan.
and
I
think,
hopefully,,
what's
obvious,
is
in
the
work
that
we're
doing,
that
there's
longevity
to
it,
right.
The
the
funding
that
we've
pursued
is
obviously
well
into
the
future..
It
commits
us
to
work
being
done
into
the
future.
L
Natalie,
stiffler:
and-
and
I
think
you
know
what
I
continue
to
talk
about
with
the
team-
is
that
you
know
the
work
that
we're
doing
with
the
can.
we've
we've
kind
of
organized
it
and
structured
it
in
a
bit
of
a
different
way.,
but
it's
always
been
work.
That's
in
the
transportation
master
plan
and
in
past
transportation,
master
plans.,
we've
just
focused
the
work
to
be
structured.
L
Natalie
stiffler:
in
a
kind
of
a
work
plan
that
is
easy
to
communicate,,
easy
to
kind
of
tell
a
story.
and
we've
been
able
to
to
focus
the
work
and
and
our
resources
to
align
to
that..
So
you
know
whether
a
future
council
wants
to
call
it
can
or
not..
You
know
the.
I
think
the
work
is
going
to
live
on,.
So
I
guess
that's
my
kind
of.
L
L
Natalie
stiffler:,
I
don't
know,
melanie,
if
you
have
anything
to
add
natalie,
stiffler:,
no
or
or
others,
alex..
I
think
the
the
maps
are
a
really
powerful
communication
tool,
and,
to
my
I
mentioned
earlier,
and
talking
about
the
cip.,
I
think
a
map
showing
the
cip
projects,
which
show
how
much
is
has
been
done,
and
then
we
might
get
to
it
a
little
bit
more
later,
when
tony
and
I
provide
an
update
on
our
work
to
support
council
and.
B
L
L
L
D
L
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
Mark
shisler:
so
background.
earlier
this
year,
we
finalized
our
5
year
vision,
0
action,
plan..
This
project
originates
directly
from
that
action
item
or
from
an
action
item,
within
that
plan,
which
is
to
update
and
implement
folders,
policies
and
practices
regarding
speed,
limit,
setting
to
better
align
and
target.
AD
Mark
shisler:
and
actual
operating
speeds.,
so
we
understand
that
speed,
limit
setting
and
signing
is
just
one
piece
of
the
overall
puzzle
and
aligning
target
and
operating
space..
Other
puzzle
pieces
that
complement
this
work
are
designing
construction
standards
and
practices
and
speed
management.,
so
physical
speed,
mitigation
devices
and
enforcement,
traditional
and
automated.,
so
each
contributing
and
overlapping
with
each
other
as
they
work
to
help
eliminate
serious
injury
and
fail.
Crashes.
AD
Mark
shisler:
so
before
diving
into
the
projects,
purpose,
and
goals,,
I
like
to
provide
a
historical
context
with
how
the
city
has
set
speed
limits
and
install
speed
limit
signs
over
the
last
several
decades..
So
changes
in
speed
limits
have
been
on
a
typically
shorter
roadway
segments
typically
completed
by
consultants
who
do
use
a
context,,
sensitive
approach.
AD
AD
Mark
shisler:,
so
what's
the
purpose
of
this
project?,
the
speed
limit,
setting,
assigning
practices,
projects
will
incorporate
industry
best
practices
to
develop
a
framework
and
improve
the
consistency
for
establishing
and
communicating
speed
limits.
Citywide
continuing
the
effort
to
reduce
speed.
related
crashes
on
city,
owned
collectors
and
arterials.
AD
AD
Mark
shisler:,
since
boulder
has
several
state
highways
traversing
through
the
city,
staff,
is
participating,
partnering
with
the
colorado
department
of
transportation,
as
they
are
also
working
on
developing
a
new
methodology
for
a
speed
limit
setting..
So
we
do
have
a
seat
at
the
table.
and
we
are
currently
working
on
a
pilot
study
with
them
on
south
broadway.
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
Mark
shisler:
as
part
of
the
community
stakeholder
working
group.-
we
anticipate
to
work
with
the
transportation
advisory
board
community
cycles,
the
center
for
people
with
disabilities
and
bolder
transportation
connections..
So
so
these
groups
will
essentially
be
able
to
provide
feedback
on
purity
and
best
practices
to
be
considered
as
staff
develops,
our
methodology.
AD
AD
AD
AD
Mark
shisler:
staff
will
use
this
document
to
review
collectors
and
arterial
city-wide
and
develop
recommendations
for
any
speed
limit
changes,
including
signing.,
and
then
note,
this,
methodology
isn't
just
for
existing
roadways,
but
also
for
capital
projects..
So
we
can
actually,
where
we
can
directly
influence
the
projects.
infrastructure,
design
to
align
with
the
recommended
speed,
limit.
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
B
B
AD
L
I
I
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
the
application
I'll
just
want
to
say
and
and
give
some
kudos
to
the
work
that
is
gone
before
this
application..
It
could
not
have
happened
without
all
the
tremendous
effort
that
went
into
the
vision,
0
action
plan
and
the
say,
streets.
We
would
have.,
there's
this,,
there's
no
way
it
would
have
happened
at
all..
So
it's
it's
great
that
we
were
in
a
place
that
we
were
ready
to
pursue,
that,
because
of
that
body
at
work.
I
I
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:
they.,
they
were
curious
to
know
about
our
asset
management
systems
that
if
they're
gonna
give
us
a
big
chunk
of
funding..
What
are
we
going
to
do
to
take
care
of
that??
So
we
were
able
to
speak
to
our
advanced
and
mature
systems
for
being
able
to
take
care
of
the
assets
that
we
are
experienced
with
asset
management.
and
then
also,
of
course,.
The
low
stress,
walk
and
byte
network.
we're
integral
to
the
application..
So.
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
that
was
no,,
and
there
was
no
exception
to
that..
With
this
process.
For
the
c
streets.
for
all
application,,
we
had
our
clunky
federal
forms..
We
had
to
fill
out
that,
where
we
really
were
able
to
tell
our
story
is
in
the
12
page
narrative,,
where
we
were
able
to
weave
together
the
the
crash.
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:
and
gerrit
slatter:,
a
key
component
of
that
was
computing,
a
benefit
cost
ratio
for
those
that
aren't
familiar
with
bc.
Ratios..
That's
simply
a
a
computation
of
the
numerical
benefit
divided
by
the
numerical
cost.
and
our
ratio
came
out
at
10
to
one
based
off
the
specific
guidance
that
was
included
in
the
notice
of
funding
opportunity
from
the
us.
department
of
transportation..
So
we
believe
that
also
is
very
compelling.
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
the
total
request
that
we
put
forward
for
the
implementation
grant
is
for
about
almost
25
million
dollars
for
in
total
project
funding.,
and
we
requested
20%
local
match
that
we
would
need
to
bring
about
5
million
dollars,
and
that
would
yield
20
million
dollars
and
grant
funds..
That
would
be
implemented
between
2025
and
29..
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:,
as
some
of
you
are
aware,
at
the
nectar
conference
that
was
held
in
denver,,
there
was
a
breakout
session
on
the
ss.
for
a
application.,
so
we
grab
some
of
those
folks
time.
While
we
were
there..
We
also
met
with
representatives
from
the
us.to
to
get
some
clarification,,
and
what
we
learned
is
that
they
have
a
a
whole
lot
of
money
to
award
for
planning
and
demonstration.
Grants.
I
I
Gerrit
slatter:-
and
I
think
that
is
the
high
point
in
terms
of
when
we
expect
to
hear.
we've-
been
told
that
the
planning
and
demonstration
grant
awards
notifications
will
go
out
in
october
and
the
implementation
grant
awards
will
go
out
in
december,.
So
we're
got
a
little
bit
of
waiting
ahead
of
us
before
we
get
any
word
as
to
the
results.
Here.
I
Devin
joslin,
cob:
yeah,
thanks
so
much,
eric.
just
really
excited
to
present
this
project.
and
I'll
touch
just
a
little
bit
more
on
the
relationship
and
correlation
to
our
vision.
0
action
plan
work,
and
how
we
leverage
that
plan
to
inform
this
application
and
make
a
strong
case..
I
want
to
highlight
that
our.
O
O
Devin
joslin,
cob:
addressing
those
higher
cost
solutions
on
the
hr.
n
to
address
top
crash
patterns,,
and
we
did
that
in
our
application.
Through,,
including
all
of
the
higher
cost
projects
that
were
identified
within
the
vision.
0
action
plan.
Action
3
had
to
do
with
implementing
capital
projects
to
improve
safety
and
comfort,,
including
protected
bike.
Lance
protected
intersections.
O
Devin
joslin,
cob:
and
set
back
multi-use
path,
crossings
on
high
priority,
hr.
and
and
can
corridors.,
and
we
did
that
through,
including
the
arapaho
avenue
corridor
and
the
thirtieth
street
corridor..
And
then
we
action
6
had
to
do
with
updating
the
pedestrian
crossing
treatment,
installation
guidelines
and
documenting
relevant
h,
sip
information
or
existing
marked
crosswalk
locations
that
no
longer
meet
the
guidelines.
O
Devin
joslin,
cob:
and
through
a
preliminary
evaluation,
using
f,
hwa
and
denver
guidance.,
we
identified
9
locations
for
enhancement
to
crossing
treatment,
types.
3
locations
that
are
proposed
to
be
changed
from
static
signs
to
our
rfps.
and
6
that
are
planned
to
be
upgraded
from
our
rfb.
to
a
pedestrian
signal.
O
Devin
joslin,
cob:
action.
they
had
to
do
with
devin
joslin,
cob:
pursuing
this
type
of
funding
and
action
9
had
to
do
with
the
demonstration.
grant
that,
garrick,.
This
discussed
so
just
really
fortunate
that
the
timing
and
sequencing
of
our
work
aligned
in
such
a
great
way.
to
transition
so
smoothly
from
the
action
plan.
completion
into
this
grant.
Request.
B
B
Alex
weinheimer:
and
I've
heard
a
lot
of
exciting
things
from
training.,
so
triny
willerton,
tab:,
yeah,,
no,
no..
I
am
so
incredibly
happy
for
you
guys.
and
I'm
so
excited.
and
I'm
sure
you
guys
are
going
to
get
it.
and
I'm
like
crossing
my
fingers.,
but
it
really
on
a
personal
note..
I
mean,
it's
just
so.
so
inspiring
to
see
that
you
guys
really
put
so
much
work
into
this?
and
and
yeah,.
I'm
sure
I'm
sure
we're
gonna
get
it.
I
L
L
L
Natalie
stiffler:
and
then
just
the
second
point..
I
I
just
wanted
to
again.
just
think
the
team!.
There
was
a
huge
effort.
by
valerie
garrett
and
devin
to
really,.
You
know
all
the
lake
work,
and
and
of
course,
staff
that
supported
them
too.,
but
this
was,,
I
mean,
it's
a
one
of
a
kind,,
great
opportunity,,
and
it
took
a
one
of
the
kind
of
lift
by
our
team
to
make
it
happen.
L
B
Alex
weinheimer:
now,
matters
from
the
board..
The
only
thing
that
made
on
the
agenda
was
about
racial
equity
trainings.
I
was.
I've
signed
up
twice,
and
unfortunately,
both
have
been
canceled,
due
to
lack
of
attendees..
I
was
wanting
to
hear
how
many
people
were
able
to
attend.,
but
I
think
I
since
learned
that.
C
B
L
L
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Q
Q
Q
B
B
D
D
C
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:
to
do
that.,
but
ryan
schuchard
(he/him),,
tab:
frankly,,
we
ryan
schuchard,
(he/him),
tab:.
We
talked
about
parking
ordinance
which
we,
which
we
have,.
I
mean,
dealt
with
to
some
extent
today
in
a
previous
agenda
item
and
and
a
little
bit
regarding
how
city
code
with
between,
you
know,
treating
land
use
in
some
cases
over
here
and
transportation
over
there.
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
Becky
davies,
tab:,
without
updating
the
north.
or
that..
I
forget
what
the
name
is
it
the
subcommittee
plan
for
that
area??
We
need
to
be
updated
in
this
particular
section
of
it..
We
need
to
be
updated,
and
then
that
would
have
to
be
a
council
work.
item,.
I
have
to
go
on
any
engagement
process.,
so
to
clarify
that
I
just
asked.
D
D
D
Becky
davies,
tab:,
you
don't
have
to
have
a
work
plan
item
and
go
through
a
a
long
engagement.
Process.
technically,,
what's
required
is
a
vote
by
planning
for
a
public
hearing
with
a
vote,
by
planning,
board,
and
then
a
public
hearing
of
the
both
by
council
to
change
the
section
of
the
subcommittee
plan..
So
that's
what
I
was
told
by
legal
and
planning.
D
Becky
davies,
tab:
and
then
I
talked
to
planning
board
and
learn
that
typically
we
don't
put
forward
items..
So
so
a
planning
board
wouldn't
come
forward
and
say,.
We
have
this
idea..
We
want
to
have
a
public
hearing
about,
they
react
to
things
that
are
brought
to
them
and,
and
they
have
such
a
full
plate
that
they,
it
wouldn't
make
sense
for
them
to
be
bringing
for
additional
things
on
top
of
that..
They
already
have
so
much
to
do.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Natalie
stiffler:,
so
I
think
you
know,
even
though,,
even
if
you,
I'm
I'm
just
trying
to
be
helpful,
because,
like,.
Even
if
you
structure
this
request,
an
area,,
it's
gonna
come
back
to
the
departments.
and
it's
gonna
come
back
to..
Is
this
a
priority
for
council
to,?
You
know,
prioritize
our
work
plans
in
this
way,
and
then
the
final
thing
I'll
say:
is,
you
know,
in
my
experience.
L
L
Natalie
stiffler:,
even
if
we
tried
to
kind
of
shortcut
the
process
and
go
to
just
planning
board
and
then
council,,
I
don't
think
they
would
let
us,,
I
think
they
would
say,.
Have
you
done
community
engagement??
What
have
you
heard
from
the
business
community
on
this??
What
have
you
heard?
From,
you
know,
stakeholders
along
the
corridor
for
this..
So
I
I
think.
L
D
D
Becky
davies,
tab:,
I
guess.
my,
well,.
What
I
mean,
my
biggest
concern
is
just
somebody's
gonna
get
very
hurt
or
killed,
because
the
way
it's
designed.-
and
I
feel
like
frequently
this
sort
of
like
through
this
process,
a
lot
of
times,
the
response
has
been,
well,.
We
don't
know
what
the
business
numbers
think,
and
I
think.
D
D
D
Becky
davies,
tab:
a
community
engagement
process
that
might
result
in
continuance
of
unsafe
conditions.
because
then
we're
sort
of
it
feels
like
it's
kind
of
setting
ourselves
up
for
failure
and
future
can
projects
where
we're
going
to
get
the
same
exact
feedback,
you
know.
somebody's,
going
to
say
no,.
You
can't
do
that
because
I
don't
like
it,
and
then
we
won't
build
it.
and
then
we're
going
to
end
up
with
the
same
outcome..
So
that's
part
of
my
fear
is
that
this
is
like
it's
not
gonna.
D
D
D
Becky
davies,
tab:,
but
it's
sort
of
this
sort
of
reference
to
what
we
have
so
community
plan
and
dictate
what
can
be
done,,
and
I
think
it's
it's
not
like
letting
this
sort
of
piece
of
paper
be
the
thing
that
we
use
to
defend.
why,.
We
can't
do
something
is
a
bit
of
a
like
application
of
responsibility
for.
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
B
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),,
tab:,
yeah.
and
just
it
just
reminded
me,
that.
I
mean,.
This
goes
back
to
what
I
said
earlier.
That,
like
the
this,.
This
seems
like
the
strong
force
here
is,
is
is
available
resources,
and
that
there
should
be
a
political,
slash,
values,
decision
about,.
Are
we
going
to
pursue
choices
that
they
do
things
to
improve?.
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:
to
make
life
better?.
I
mean,.
If
you
look
at
what
I
pcc
in
their
their
middle
climate
change,
says
about
the
way
city
carbonization,
give
you
cost
curves,
and
they
show
you
that
the
public
transit
and
walking
and
biking
or
cost
negative
pay
money
back.
it's
not..
It
should
not
be
complicated
that
these
are
that
that
making
completely
safe
and
transfer
rich
environment,,
something
we
can
do
and
we
can
afford
to
do
it
and
make
life
better..
But
it's
staff
can't
just
do
it
on
its
own..
C
Ryan
schuchard
(he/him),
tab:
city
council
to
consider
what
what
the
strategic
options
are,-
and
this
seems
to
me
like
one
of
those..
This
question,,
that
of
where
we
don't
have
the
resources
is,
we
don't,
and
that's
not
staff's
fault,,
you
know,,
and
if
it
that,
that's
something,
that's
a
political
decision
that
we
need
to
put
on
the
table
where?
and
I
think
some
of
the
other
answers
will
become
easier.
If
we
can.
that
unfortunately,,
it's
not
super
super
fast.
C
B
D
B
B
L
L
L
L
B
E
B
B
B
I
B
Q
Q
Q
B
Triny
willerton
tab:,
sorry!
well,.
You
don't
want
to
share
with
us
verbally
looking
forward
to
so
for
years.
I've
been
trying
to
do
this,
and
somehow
it
just
all
came
together
and
in.
well,
in
collaboration
with
c.
dot,.
We're
going
to
launch
this
messaging
campaign
to
kind
of
raise
awareness
about
the
safe
systems
approach,,
which
was
a
challenge
within
itself,,
but.