►
Description
City of Charleston Army Corps 3x3 Advisory Committee 3/30/22
A
A
Good,
so
I
don't
have
a
long
list.
Thank
you.
So
that's
good,
just
a
couple
things
of
import,
so
the
chief,
the
the
feasibility
study,
is
formally
being
reviewed
at
division
and
headquarters,
they're
doing
it
concurrently,
which
is
good
because
they're
trying
to
move
forward,
as
I
have
been
told
that
there
is
a
draft
chief
report
being
circulated.
A
So
not
only
are
they
looking
at
reviewing
the
feasibility
report,
they
people
have
started
to
turn
this
over
into
a
draft
piece
report
again.
That
is
what
the
chief
of
engineers
will
eventually
sign.
If
he's
happy
with
it
and
all
the
the
technical
and
policy
reviews
are
are
conducted
and
everyone
agrees,
so
that's
good.
Their
target
is
still
the
chiefs,
a
signature
from
the
chief
on
the
draft
chiefs
report
by
the
end
of
may
until
we
hear
otherwise
that
is
what
there
is
they're
they're
intending.
A
It
would
go
to
the
white
house
and
to
the
congressional
authorizers,
so
the
committee's
in
congress,
with
authority
over
water
resources
policy
to
create
the
authorization
for
the
pet
phase
and
then
the
crate,
and
then
that
would
be
approved
and
then
in
the
appropriations
process
in
the
fall
for
fiscal
year
23.
A
But
that's
where
we
are
right
now
on
the
three
by
three
for
the
army
corps
feasibility
study,
perhaps
more
exciting.
For
me,
maybe
for
you,
but
certainly
for
me,
is
the
water
plan.
Procurement
is,
as
they
say,
on
the
streets
worked
hard
on
it
over
the
last
four
five
six
weeks
kicked
it
around
with
some
with
some
experts.
Looking
at
it,
I'm
happy
with
it.
A
It's
a
35-day
procurement,
so
the
interested
teams
or
interested
firms
will
have
until
may
5th
to
respond,
and
after
that
we
will
go
through
a
selection
process,
a
review
and
a
selection
process
that
could
take
a
little
bit
of
time.
If
you
want
to
know
more
about
how
that
works,
I'll
tell
you.
There
are
two
components
to
the
water
plan.
A
One
component
is
the
water
plan
right,
so
an
integrated,
comprehensive
water
plan
for
the
entire
city
and
the
second
component
of
the
procurement
is
an
owner's
owner's
agent
possibility
for
the
same
team,
doing
the
water
plan
to
also
serve
or
to
be
tasked
by
the
city.
Of
course,
funding
would
be
needed,
but
tasked
by
the
city
to
do
prepaid,
head
resilience,
plan
or
other
water
management
work.
A
So
we've
created
a
vehicle
that
if
we
are
happy
with
this
team,
we
eventually
procure
they
could
do
components
of
work
for
us
if
we
choose
so
without
having
to
cure
separately.
That
just
allows
you
to
get
to
work
a
lot
faster
so
and
then
it
also
allows
in
the
consulting
world,
as
you
you
may
or
may
not
know,
is
when
you
have
a
procurement
and
and
the
best
team
that
you
have
comes
from
somewhere
else,
their
mobilization
time
like
they
have
to
learn
again
as
I
joke,
they
have
to
learn
where
the
bathrooms
are.
A
A
E
A
A
possible
vehicle-
it's
named
in
the
in
the
water,
in
the
scope
of
work
that
that
is
possible.
What
we
have
to
see.
We
will
get
a
number
of
responses
from
interested
firms
or
teams
we're
going
to
select
the
best
one
for
the
water
plan
right
and
then
we
will
see
if
we
want
them
to
do
the
resilience
plan.
That's
if
that's
an
if
right
and
then,
as
you
may
know,
within
this
tight
labor
market
right
now,
firms
sometimes
don't
have
the
capacity
in-house
to
do
everything.
We
may
ask
them
to
do
so.
E
Got
it
a
second
question,
we
had
discussed
that
the
last
meeting
in
a
draft
was
circulated
on
an
acceleration
of
the
water
plan
via
additional
supplemental
funding.
E
What,
and
maybe
this
is
a
question
to
hey
good,
if
he's
on
what
happened
to
that.
A
Well
I'll
speak
from
from
my
perspective,
you
can't
accelerate
the
work
too
much
because
there's
again
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
you
need
to
gather
in
before.
You
can
start
to
do
your
assessment.
A
So
what
we
have
the
schedule
of
work
that
we,
even
that
is
that
is
in
the
scope,
is
nine
months
so
from
the
start
of
their
work.
So
after
they're
contracted
in
nine
months,
we
would
have
a
draft
interim
a
water
plan
and
then
no
later
than
15
months,
we
would
have
a
water
plan.
A
A
The
issue
that
I
saw
was
the
amount
of
money
that
council,
thankfully,
had
allocated
last
year
to
this
project
was
insufficient
to
the
broader
task
of
a
comprehensive
integrated
water
plan,
and
there
was
a
first
certainly
by
myself,
to
get
a
good
water
plant
and
others
to
top
up
the
500
000
that
the
city
council
had
provided
for
the
water
plant
with
additional
funds.
A
We
have
had
discussions
within
the
within
the
mayor's
office
and
with
the
cfo
about
how
we
do
that,
we
think
that's
doable.
We
think
that's
going
to
happen
and
the
scope
will
work
for
the
water
plane
if
our
budget
would
be
between
500
000
and
a
million
dollars.
A
E
So
this
group
does
not
want
to
provide
encouragement
for
that
process
of
finding
additional
funds,
which
is
fine.
I
just
I'm
just
you
know
wondering
I
thought
there
was
a
fair
amount
of
support,
enthusiasm
for
throwing
our
whatever
our
weight
is,
but
throwing
our
weight
behind.
E
You
know,
let's
get
this
done,
resourcefully
creatively,
however,
you
want
to
characterize
yeah.
F
Process-Wise
bob,
I
think,
from
the
action
items
left
from
the
last
meeting.
There
was
a
call
for
the
finance
working
group
and
the
communications
working
group
to
get
together
on
the
respective
leftover
items
from
the
emails.
I
think
that
we
were
copied
on.
I
believe
that
the
finance
working
group
probably
couldn't
find
schedules
to
get
together.
F
So
I
I
think
that
might
have
been
what
happened
between
the
last
meeting,
but
that's
just
from
a
process
by
step.
I
think
the
finance
folks
were
going
to
try
to
get
together
to
talk
about
that
and
then
I
think
maybe
schedules
didn't
align
but
I'll
I'll.
Let
anybody
else
I
think
cassian
was
as
the
leader
of
that
one.
Maybe
she
has
some
input.
C
Yes,
I
was
I'm
the
dutiful
leader
of
the
finance
group.
We
have
not
met
and
I'm
happy
bob
is
a
member
of
that
group.
So
I'm
happy
to
circle
up
with
bob
and
jordy,
and
I
think
doug
was
a
member
of
our
group
as
well
afterward
if
we
want
to
pull
a
group
together,
but
I
would
be
supportive
of
us
moving
forward
with
a
recommendation
to
council
to
use
that
second
tranche
of
funding
to
support
having
a
better
water
plan,
more
comprehensive
water
plan.
F
So
perhaps
it
would
make
sense
cash
and
if
you're
able
to
get
a
majority
of
folks
from
your
working
group
to
review
that
and
then
send
that
around
and
then
if
we
need
to
we'll
be
scheduled
for
another
meeting
in
a
month.
But
if
we
need
to
call
folks
together
to
vote
on
that
prior
to
that,
then
we
can
do
that
and
we'll
work
with
the
chair
to
make
that
happen.
If
that
works.
D
Dale
I've
got
a
question
if,
if
this
is
a
good
time,
sure
how
just
maybe
we're
back
to
our
group
well,
how
is
the
grass
down
hey
good
being
for
when
high
water
be
before
ped?
Are
they
is
the
city
working
on
hay
good
as
far
as
a
hot
water,
you
know
elevated
where
the
traffic
can
get
through
if
there's
flooding
or
is
that
something
that
has
to
go
through
pit
and
is
is
years
away.
A
So
I
mean
hey
good
and
fish
burn
that
that
funny
intersection
you
have
over
there,
the
one
that
looks
like
a
war
zone
yeah.
No,
so
again,
we
know
why
that
why
that
area
is
bumpy.
There
are
a
lot
of
reasons
for
that,
but
they're
they're
we
can.
We
can
dig
into
those
that
would
not
be
part
of
head.
That's
the
pet
is
related
to
the
army
corps
project.
A
This
would
be
a
a
separate
drainage
project
or
you
know,
and
again
the
the
connection,
the
possible
connection
from
west
edge
with
a
drainage
pipe
into
the
spring
fishburn
tunnel
would
help
manage
some
of
that,
but
you're
still
going
to
have.
There
are
still
some
other
issues
over
there
that
need
to
be
assessed.
A
That
is
what
a
water
plant
the
water
plant
would
look
at
that
basin
and
say:
okay
in
relation
to
as
a
separate
project.
This
deserves
this
kind
of
attention
and
why,
whether
that's
elevation
or
something
else-
that's
a
tbd
right.
That's
what
the
water
plant
team
would
do.
The
interface
of
that
with
the
army
corps
project
would
only
occur
if
there
were,
if
they
were
saying,
to
dump
more
water
from
that
area
through
the
karmi
core
wall.
D
A
So
what
I
would
suggest-
and
I
will
carry
it
for
you,
but
if
the
medical.
A
Eu
dentist
wanna,
so
the
city
is
in
in
work,
is
working
with
the
county
right
now
on
the
development
of
its
own
hazard
mitigation
plan.
Of
course
you
know
evacuation.
A
Those
are
parts
of
this,
so
that
could
be
a
very
clear
recommendation
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
our
evacuation
routes
are
resilient.
Also
or
you
know
that
there's
redundancy
in
our
evacuation
processes-
and
this
is
one
way
so
I
mean-
I
think
that
would
be
good
for
you
to
share
that,
and
then
you
can
share
that
with
me
once
you
have
a
an
idea
about
that,
and
then
I
will
share
it
with
with
the
emergency
management
team
here
and
with
the
with
the
emergency
management
folks
in
the
county,
because.
A
A
A
So
we're
not
going
to
change
it,
but
you
can
look
and
see
what
we're
doing.
If
that's,
if
you
would
like
that.
A
Got
it
then,
two
more
two
more
quick
items:
the
committee
made
a
recommendation
that
we
should
pursue
a
resilience
plan
with
the
community
of
rosemont.
A
Over
the
last
month,
we've
had
two
meetings
with
the
community
in
person
in
the
community
with
them
constituted
in
different
fashions,
but
that
is
that
is
proceeding.
We
are
working
with
lansi
the
lower
area
alliance
for
the
low
country
alliance
for
model
communities,
which
is
a
non-profit
that
has
worked
up
worked
with
them,
but
with
other
environmental
justice
communities.
So.
A
We
are
trying
to
find
ways
to
fund
that
with
a
combination
of
both
city,
money
and
non-profit
money.
We
have
very
various
ideas.
You
can
see
the
nickels
and
dimes
coming
together
as
I
joke.
So
it's
going
to
happen
when
we
would
procure
it
is
still
a
tbd.
It
depends
on
when
we
would
get
some
of
this
grant.
Funding
and
again
grant
funding
has
its
own
cycle,
but
we
would
our
goal
is
to
start
this.
A
You
know
in
the
summer
or
afterwards,
and
it's
not
going
to
be
next
month,
but
it'll
be
sometime
in
2022.
We
would
hope
to
start
this,
so
that
is
moving
nicely
and
all
that
I
would
say,
is
it.
It
feels
pretty
good.
There's,
there's
good
collaboration
and
we're
building
trust
with
the
community,
and
I
think,
they're
being
very
active
and
building
their
own
capacity
to
engage
and
think
through.
A
A
And
then
my
final
with
two
things
in
their
short,
the
city,
the
nature,
conservancy
and
clemson
design
center
have
been
planning
a
nature-based
feature
series.
This
will
kick
off
in
middle
of
may
this
year,
almost
next
month,
middle
may
it'll
be
four
or
five
sort
of
workshops
over
time.
The
first
one
is
just
to
set
the
stage,
but
we're
doing
that.
We're
hoping
just
to
tease
out
and
show
people
what
nature-based
speakers
are,
what
they're
not
how
they
work.
A
D
A
It's
pretty
exciting,
I
think,
and
then
one
final.
My
final
item
is
so
you
are
going
to
discuss
an
update
to
the
document.
The
communications
document
that
you
have
you
developed
last
fall
and
an
update
to
it.
A
If
you
would
like,
we
are
happy
to
have
that
asked
the
neighborhood
services
folks
to
distribute
that
across
the
city
with
their
weekly
email
blast,
we're
happy
to
ask
the
information
officer
to
do
a
you.
A
One
or
two
things
like
that,
so
if
you
want
that
we're
happy
to
do
it
happy
to
help
you
with
that,
okay.
A
Okay
and
then
then
one
final
thing
you
all
recommended
that
you
know
we
need
to
talk
more
about
what
we're
doing
that
the
city
doesn't
communicate.
Well,
I've.
You
know
I've
heard
that
a
lot
so
we've
had
a
discussion
with
neighborhood
services,
we're
planning
for
them
to
push
out
an
email
or
some
sort
of
communication
to
all
the
neighborhood
associations
and
councils
citywide
to
say:
hey
if
you
want
caitlin
or
I
or
whatever
to
come
talk
about
water
plan,
the
comp
plan,
the
three.
A
E
Hey
dale
so
as
a
qualification
to
what
you
just
offered.
Does
that
at
what
point
do
we
start
more
active
advocacy
as
opposed
to
communication?
If
there's
a
distinction
there,
I
think
there
may
be.
When
do
we
what's
the
marketing
program,
the
pr
program
in
terms
of
roles,
responsibilities,
content,
just
you
know,
communication.
E
You
know
points
of
order
from
various
meetings
and
process
developments
and
that's
all
pretty
sterile.
If
we've
identified
that
we've
got
an
issue,
we're
concerned
with
the
amount
of.
E
A
I
want
to
respect
the
committee's
authority
and
jurisdiction
here.
I
think
what
we,
what
I
would
like
to
do
and
what
I've
heard
from
you
is
to
communicate
where
we
are
what
this
is
and
what
it
is
not
and
to
shorthand
it
we're
not
buying
a
great
wall.
So
you
know
what
I
mean.
I
want
to
communicate
that
to
the
rest
of
the
to
the
other
parts
of
the
city
like
we
did
with
various
neighborhood
associations
in
january
and
february
right,
you,
you
were
part
of
one
you
suggested
one.
A
I
want
to
do
more
of
that
as
an
information
service
and
again
what
it
becomes
is
some
people
there's
there's
a
sense
that
I
have
picked
up,
that
some
people
think
this
is
a
done
deal
and
you
know
we're
just
gonna
roll
over
right
to
the
core.
That's
how
some
people
feel
about
this
and
other
people
are
like
this
is
stupid.
You
know,
why
would
we
want
to
do
this
and
I
think
you
know
it's
something
in
between
right.
A
So
that's
what
I
want
to
do
is
explain
what
this
is
and
where
we
are
and
where
we
are
not
and
then
engage
the
community
that
way
as
an
information
for
advocacy.
A
A
F
I
think
this
is
actually
a
good
segue
into
our
next
agenda
item,
which
is
the
update
from
the
communications
working
group
and
susan.
Would
you
would
you
mind,
since
you're
heading
that
communications
up
to
kind
of
give
the
overview
to
the
rest
of
the
committee
about
the
conversations
had
over
the
past
month
and
then
the
hard
work
that
you've
been
working
on
to
update
that
and
then
I
think
that
can
segue
and
address
issues
bob
brought
up
if
that
works.
B
Sure
so
we
all
talked
about
updating
the
big
white
paper
as
it's
called,
and
then
we
talked
about
doing
a
quick
one
pager,
so
I
have
updated
both
and
sent
them
to
the
small
communications
group
to
see
and
dale
has
vetted
them
for
accuracy,
and
I
think
we
should
send
it
out
at
this
point
to
the
full
group
for
approval
and
distribution
both
of
them,
I'm
not
sure
where
the
short
form
will
go
and
if
that's
different,
a
different
distribution
than
the
whole
long
form,
but
we
should
have
both
and
we
should
distribute
both.
B
I
believe
it
basically
brings
the
project
from
a
strictly
educational
informational
standpoint
up
to
date
pretty
much
from
where
it
was
some
months
ago.
So
if
everybody
agrees
with
that,
we
could
just
move
ahead
with
the
process
of
doing
it.
Doug
is
not
on,
I
guess,
but
he
was
very
helpful
in
producing
producing
the
documents.
So
I'll
call
him
after
this
meeting.
If
we
agree
that
that
that's
a
good
idea.
H
And
I'll
just
jump
in
here
since
I
served
on
the
committee
with
susan
and
first
just
y'all,
she's
done
the
lion's
share
of
this
piece,
and
I
think
it's
really
really
well
done.
It's
very
well
balanced.
It's
very
informative.
The
the
faqs
are
spot
on,
so
I
just
encourage
you
to
review
it.
H
We've
had
many
eyes
on
it,
but
it
always
helps
to
have
some
more
and
I
think
it's
a
good
thing
to
use
and
roll
out
as
dale
was
talking
about
the
meetings
with
the
neighborhoods
and
the
workshops
starting
in
may.
I
think
that
that's
good
timing,
if
we
can
get
this
approved
and
produced
and
doug,
was
fantastic
in
offering
and
producing
a
printed
version
of
it
earlier
that
was
really
marketable
and
nice
and
neat
and
pretty
and
all
that.
So
I
think
it's
a
great
piece.
H
I
think
it's
going
to
go
a
long
way
to
you
know
really
educating
the
community
about
what's
going
on
and
maybe
dispelling
some
of
that
misinformation
that's
out
there.
So
I
mean
if
we
could
do
this
in
a
timely
fashion
to
where
we
could
meet
that
may
schedule.
That
would
be
great
and
again
thanks
to
susan
for
taking
it
on.
She
did
a
great
job
and
showed
her.
Many
many
years
of
of
skills
are
not
rusty,
they're
great
so.
F
As
susan
as
dale
mentioned,
you
know
you,
you
questioned
how
it
could
be
distributed.
If
the
committee
would
like
it
distributed
in
two
different
fashions,
that's
something
we
can.
We
can
do
too
and
as
well
as
like
how
we
post
it
on
the
website.
As
we
talked
about
the
working
group,
that's
something
where
we
can
have
two
different
links
for
the
different
updates
and
label
them,
as
as
the
committee
and
the
working
group
sees
fit.
So
so
that's
not
an
issue.
I
mean
if
you
have
two
things.
F
B
Good,
maybe
we
should
get
the
short
form
out
real
fast,
since
it
won't
have
graphics
and
stuff,
it's
basically
just
copy
and
then
ask
doug
if
he
can
work
on
the
graphics
for
the
for
the
four
or
three
or
four
pager
as
it
comes
along.
If
and
if
there
are
any
changes
in
it,
does
that
work
sort
of
use
the
short
form?
Is
it
like
a
teaser
or
just
a
for
people
who
don't
want
to
read
very
much.
B
F
If
you
can
resend
the
final
versions
and
then
in
my
follow-up
notes,
I
will
send
that
out
to
the
whole
committee,
okay,
great
and
then
just
have
folks,
I
would
say
as
a
reminder:
we
can't
respond
all
to
our
email.
So
if
any
additions
or
changes
just
share
them
directly
to
susan
and
then
susan
once
you
have
a
final
version,
then
then
share
it
with
me
and
I'll
get
that
out
to
folks.
A
So
in
the
interim,
kailyn
has
posted
the
link
to
the
water
procurement
in
the
chat
so
for
sure
purposes,
look
at
page
22,
which
is
what
is
the
so
when
you
look
at
when
you
open
this
link,
this
document
page
22,
has
the
submission
requirements
for
the
for
the
offer,
so
to
speak.
So
what
we're
let
what
we're
seeking
from
them
page
24
has
the
about
evaluation
criteria
that
we
will
review
them
and
select
a
team
from
that
I
mentioned
before.
A
A
The
challenge
is
with
any
team
effort
is
the
more
team
members
you
have
the
harder
it
is
to
coordinate
schedules,
and
there
is
a
very
detailed
legal
process
required
for
the
evaluation
of
proposals
for
procurement,
and
so
you
know
you
have
to
the
rest
of
everyone
has
to
be
there
and
everyone
has
to
open
it.
At
the
same
time.
There's
all
kinds
of
things
that
have
to
occur
so
the
more
people
you
put
on
an
evaluation
committee,
the
harder
it
is
to
organize
it
expeditiously.
A
So
there's
a
balancing
there,
but
you
know
I
do
think
it
would
be
wise
or
it'd
be
good.
If
someone
from
the
committee
would
be
part
of
that
process
and
it
requires
a
whole
bunch
of
reading,
but
just
let
you
know
it
is,
it
is
not
a
labor
of
love,
it
is.
It
is
it's
off,
it's
a
lie
so
and
then
the
scope
of
work
is
on
page
20,
25
to
29
on
this
document.
F
Okay,
I
mean
we
just
had
the
communications
was
the
one
discussion
item?
F
I
don't
know
if
any
of
the
other
committee
members
have
any
other
discussion
items
they'd
like
to
bring
up
before
we
have
perhaps
one
of
our
quickest
meetings
on
record
but
I'll,
throw
it
out
to
any
other
folks
that
want
to
bring
any
other
discussion
items
up.
B
I
had
one
other
thing
we
had
vaguely
talked
about
having
an
a
public
meeting
where
dale
and
others
potentially
could
address
the
community
at
large
about
what's
going
on
with
the
with
the
three
by
three
and
the
water
plan.
Is
that
still
something
that
groundswell
was
going
to
share
that
with
you
with
the
city?
If,
if
that
looked
like
something
we
wanted
to
do?
Is
that
still
on
the
table.
A
I
I'm
happy
to
do
things
like
that.
Let's
you
know,
let's
find
the
timing
of
that,
because
you
know
we
will
have
this
offer
out
to
the
neighbor
associations,
and
maybe
none
of
them
want
us
to
do
that.
That's
possible
right!
No!
Thank
you,
but
no
thank
you.
Let's
see,
but
if
you
all,
if
you
want
to
do
that,
I'm
we
need
to
share
information
about
this.
You
know
what
it
is
and
what
it
isn't
and
where
we
are
what's
possible
and
what's
not
so
I'm
happy
to
do
that.
A
D
Hey
I
am
on,
I
was
feeling
mute.
I
tried
to
chat
chat.
Sorry,
my
voice
is
shot,
but
point
is
that
I've
reached
out
to
clemson
to
see
if
we
can
hold
it
there,
I'm
sort
of
on
a
board
there,
but
it's
a
different
board,
so
they're
putting
me
in
touch
with
the
right
people.
This
is
a
short
version,
so
whenever
we
kind
of
give
it
and
finalize
you
know,
that's
that
is
something
I'll
see.
B
D
B
C
Can't
cash
in
if
the
clemson
space
doesn't
work
out
where
we
can
use
our
community
room
here
at
hcs
great
I
mean.
A
The
one
consideration:
it's
just
a
refinement
process,
thought
process.
So
again
the
army
court
process
is
moving
forward.
You
know
if
we
get
a
cheats
report.
That
would
be
a
moment
because
that
that's
a
that's
a
threshold.
So
maybe
after
that,
because
if
we
don't
get
a
cheese
report,
it
smokes
we've
all
enjoyed
each
other's
company
and
you
know
whatever.
B
Okay,
maybe
the
last
last
week
some
people
still
leave
here
in
june
right,
but
a
lot
of
people
don't
so
whatever
works.
B
Right,
do
they
let
you
know
sort
of
ahead
of
time
or
do
they
just
tell
you
on
that
date?.
B
A
Once
you
know,
the
district
here
will
tell
us
hey
well,
it
looks
like
it's
got
this
approval
that
approval
that
approved
we
and
now
it's
with
the
chief
will
we
get
those
kind
of
updates
or
hey
it's
going
to
fall
apart.
I
mean
we'll
get
those
kind
of
updates,
but
we
don't
know
what's
on
a
day-to-day
basis.
Okay,.
E
D
Yes,
that
sounds
good.
I'm
yes,
yeah!
Let's
do
that.
Let's
talk
probably
does
friday
might
be
a
good
day
to
do
it
or
monday.
Early
next
week.
F
Okay
and
just
looking
at
the
calendar
and
the
action
items
we
have
regarding
the
finance
language
and
the
updates
with
the
working
group,
the
communications
working
groups,
potentially
our
next
meeting
would
be
april
the
20th,
but
we
will.
If
we
need
to
meet
before
then
then
the
chair
will,
let
me
know,
and-
and
we
can
figure
that
out
city
council
isn't
meeting
until
the
12th.
F
So
obviously
we
we
don't
like
to
have
them
our
meetings
after
the
city
council
meetings,
that's
an
early
morning
for
our
members,
so
just
tentatively
hold
the
wednesday
the
20th
same
time,
and
I
know
dale.
If
you
want
to
talk
about
quickly,
we
were.
We
were
strategizing
about
in
this
kind
of
blow,
with
the
army
corps
of
what
kind
of
productive
discussions
we
can
have
with
the
committee,
and
we
thought
it
may
be
beneficial
for
you
all
to
hear
from
some
of
the
other
cities
that
are
going
through
this
process
as
well.
F
So
norfolk
perhaps
has
a
lot
of
interesting
updates,
so
either
next
meeting
or
maybe
in
may,
depending
on
when
they're
ready
to
go
public
with
some
of
their
updates.
We
thought
it
may
be
beneficial
to
have
basically
the
dale
of
norfolk
come
and
speak
to
you
all
and
present
what
they're
going
through
and
and
some
of
the
flexibility
provided
by
the
core.
If
that
would
be
of
interest
for
the
committee
to
hear
as
well.
A
From
those
places
to
join
us
for
20
or
30
minutes
and
tell
us
where
they
are
it'd
be
great
and
the
dale
norfolk
is
an
old
friend
of
mine,
so
his
name's
kyle
and
he's
great
so
and
then
the
one
other
thing
cashing
me
to
your
you're.
You
and
I
have
been
kicking
around
this
idea
for
a
speaker's
series
and
do
we
have
one
lined
up
already,
and
I
that's
your
that's
your
goal.
That's
your
project,
but
do
you
want
to
say
anything
to
this
committee
about
it.
C
We
wanted
to
host
a
water
dialogue,
hcf
wanted
to
host
a
water
dialogue
series,
because
we
we
had
a
lot
of
important
conversations
about
the
3x3
project,
but
we
also
wanted
to
talk
about
some
other
aspects
of
water
and
water
risk
and
planning
for
water,
and
so
we
have
proposed
doing
sort
of
one
a
quarter,
a
virtual
webinar
with
a
q,
a
component
we
missed
q1,
but
we
have
our
first
one
set
actually
for
april
20th
at
4,
pm
and
dale
has
very
kindly
availed
his
wonderful
network
of
very
smart
people
to
participate
in
these
webinars.
C
So
our
first
speaker
will
be
carolyn
kiewski
she's
at
wharton,
and
I
would
encourage
you
to
google
her
and
and
look
at
some
of
her
work,
because
she's
really
fascinating
in
the
way
that
she
looks
at
community
risk
and
vulnerable
communities,
underserved
communities.
C
And
so
we're
really
excited
about
this
water
dialogue
and
we'll
we'll
be
pushing
out
an
email
probably
later
this
week,
maybe
early
next
week
to
our
sort
of
global
community
and
it's
it's
free
and
even
to
the
public
and
then
we're
looking
at
waiting
to
confirm
a
date.
But
we'll
probably
have
the
next
one
in
june
and
it
will
look
at
resiliency
planning,
possibly
from
a
statewide
perspective,
and
so
we're
we're
looking
forward
to
that
as
well.
C
We
want
to
do
one
potentially
that
could
pair
with
the
city's
proposed
or
planned
zoning
code
overhaul.
That
would
look
at
elevation
based
zoning,
which
is
something
that
was
recommended
in
the
dutch
dialogue
spinal
report
and
then
then
further
recommended
in
the
city
plan,
which
you
know
was
just
adopted
last
october.
C
And
then
this
zoning
overhaul
was
funded
in
the
city's
budget
this
year
and
will
likely
be
a
two
to
three
year
process,
but
I
think
it
will
be
good
to
sort
of
inform
that
conversation
and
then,
lastly,
we
want
to
do
something
on
engineering
with
nature,
nature-based
solutions.
C
C
He
is
when
we
had
our
initial
call.
I
said
you
know
we
might
need,
like
you
know,
a
less
sophisticated
presentation
so
that
we
can
you
know
not.
Everybody
is
familiar
with
all
these
wonderful
terms
that
you're
using
including
me,
and
so
we
may
need
sort
of
like
the
usa
today,
version.
C
You
to
dale,
for
availing
his
network
to
us,
he's
super
connected
if
y'all,
just
not
there.
F
C
I
Yeah,
thank
you
thanks.
Caitlyn
I
just
wanted
to
share
each
member
of
the
advisory
committee
should
have
received
an
invitation
to
an
event
that
happens
this
saturday
evening.
I
know
some
of
you
have
already
rsvp'd
to
attend.
It's
the
launch
of
a
consortium
called
the
center
of
resilience,
excellence.
South
carolina
core
sees
the
acronym,
the
founding
partners
of
the
college
of
charleston
charleston
county
municipal
government
and
the
aquarium,
and
one
of
the
underlying
intents
of
this
exercise
or
this
consortium
is
to
attract
nasa
as
an
invested
partner.
I
They
have
centers
of
excellence
around
the
country
a
dozen
or
so,
but
none
of
them
focus
specifically
on
issues
related
to
resilience.
So
this
would
be
a
tremendous
opportunity,
both
environmentally
and
economically
for
the
state,
and
we
will
have
nasa
members
in
attendance
that
evening.
I
I
I
share
all
this
in
part
just
to
acknowledge
that
we
will
have
a
panel
discussion
that
will
examine
local,
regional
and
state
resilience,
issues
that
includes
the
man
who
never
rests.
I
Dale
morris,
as
well
as
our
board,
chair,
jonathan
zucker
ben
duncan
who's,
the
state's
chief
resilience
officer,
kevin
limehouse
from
the
county
and
then
dr
jose
nunez
from
nasa.
So
it
is
a
saturday
evening
there
are
cocktails
before
and
after
it's
not
all
hardship.
So
if
you're
able
to
attend
it's
not
too
late
to
rsvp
and
thank
you
for
those
that
are
joining.
E
Yeah
thanks
caitlin,
hey
building
on
this
notion
of
what
can
we
accomplish
as
a
group
during
this
relative
lull
in
the
process?
E
A
So
I
was
waiting
to
see
if
mike
wanted
to
jump
in.
We
are
still
working
from
the
from
the
outline
that
we
had
before
again.
A
My
I
want
to
be
careful
because
I
have
strong
opinions
about
this,
but
I
want
to
get
into
I
want
to.
I
personally
think
we
need
to
start
ped
to
see
if
we
can
get
to
a
point
where
we
can
design
the
wall
that
we
want,
because
if
we
can't,
then
the
construction
point
is
moved
right.
So
again,
that's
how
I'm
looking
at
this.
A
I
do
think
we
ought
to
I'm
happy
to
ponder
with
you
bob
or
with
with
councilman
seeking
and
others
to
figure
out.
Okay,
who
would
we
bring
in
to
help
us
understand
this
again?
There's
municipal
finance
issues,
there's
state
funds
again,
and
you
know
we
again.
The
state
is
developing
a
resilience
plan
and
ben
duncan
will
speak
at
this
at
this
event
that
kevin
just
mentioned
on
saturday.
A
There
is
an
allocation
of
resources
to
be
required
from
that
state
resilience
plan
for
state
issues
and
also
to
support
local
issues.
So
that's
important,
and
then
you
know
the
the
federal
government
push.
That's
out
there
that
it's
there
it's
going
to
take
five
to
seven
years
for
that
money
to
be
absorbed
in
the
economy.
A
E
Okay,
yeah,
I
I
would
tend
to
disagree
that
this
is
not
something
that
we
can
kick
kick
down
the
road
one.
You
know
in
the
venn
diagram
of
talking
about
communication
and
advocacy.
One
of
the
concerns
of
the
public
likely
will
be.
How
do
we
pay
for
this,
and
if
our
answer
to
that
question
is
we'll
figure
that
out
later,
I
think
that's
gonna
feel
inadequate,
but
yeah,
let's
maybe
take
it
offline.
I
appreciate
that
conversation.
G
I'm
happy
to
jump
in
just
really
quickly
on
this,
and-
and
that
is,
I
think,
the
question
bob
from
internally
looking
out
at
the
city
is
going
to
be.
How
do
we
pay
for
all
of
this?
You've
got
to
add
that
all
in
there
and
as
we
go
through
the
water
plan
and
other
priorities
that
will
be
put
forward,
that's
going
to
be
the
question
it's
going
to
have
to
be
much
like.
I
believe
we
need
an
integrated
water
plan.
I
do-
and
I
think
you
all
agree
with
that.
G
G
I
was
in
a
very
interesting
meeting
this
week
with
the
chairman
of
county
council
and
it
reminded
me
it
had
nothing
to
do
with
with
this,
but
it
had
something
to
do
with
a
very
important
project
that
we
need
to
partner
with
the
county
on
and
that's
the
ashley
river
bike
ped
bridge,
and
we
also
need
to
account
partner
with
the
state
and
in
that
room
was
the
secretary
of
transportation,
the
chairman
of
the
county
council
and
the
mayor
of
the
city
of
charleston.
G
G
For
what's
a
I
mean,
that's
a
40
million
dollar
project
and
it
was
complicated
think
about
what
happens
when
you're
looking
at
a
billion
to
two
billion
dollars
for
this,
and
there
are
other
needs,
wants
and
desires
out
there.
So
the
other
thing
I
will
tell
you
is:
it's
been
instructive.
If
you've
been
following
this,
it's
so
small,
it
might
not
have
hit
your
radar,
but
we've
had
some
interesting
discussions.
G
The
last
two
city
council
meetings
about
financing,
a
portion
of
a
road
improvement
project,
west
ashley
on
the
glenn
mcconnell
and
along
the
glen
mcconnell
corridor
to
the
north,
is
lake
dotterer,
which
is
an
artificial,
man-made
lake,
but
it
creates
lots
of
problems
with
flooding
in
that
part
of
west
ashley
and,
along
with
the
glenn
mcconnell
widening
and
improvement
project.
There
is
some
things
that
we
can
do
short
and
long
term
to
give
some
flooding
relief,
and
none
of
that
was
built
into
the
project.
G
So
I
tell
you
those
couple
of
anecdotal
stories
to
tell
you
that
I
think
bob
and
everybody
else
in
this
committee
and
I
think,
they'll
see
him
nodding
his
head
and
we're
going
to
talk
later
today
when
it
comes
to
finance,
we
are
going
to
have
to
start
having
serious
conversations
right
now
with
other
funding
partners,
governmental
funding
partners.
So
that's
my
two
cents
worth
for
whatever
it's
worth.
F
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
councilman
any
other
last
thoughts
for
the
meeting
to
bring
up
before
the
group
before
we
adjourn
for
the
morning.
F
Okay,
well,
please
stay
tuned
for
my
email,
follow
up
that
besides,
the
normal
notes
will
also
include
the
document
from
susan
for
everyone
to
review
and
those
of
you
on
the
finance
working
group.
Please
stay
tuned
for
an
email
from
kashin
to
get
together
for
bob's
suggestion
of
that
recommended
additional
funding
language
and
please
hold
a
april
20th
for
your
calendar,
but
I
will
send
that
out
in
an
email
too
all
right.
Well,
thank
you
all
and
have
a
great
day.