►
From YouTube: City of Charleston James Island Creek Task Force 2/17/22
Description
City of Charleston James Island Creek Task Force 2/17/22
A
B
Actually,
the
school's
in
north
charleston
at
military
magnet,
they're
going
to
give
like
50
computers
away
up
there-
that's
very
nice
of
them,
but
I'll
invite
mayor
summe
down
here
and
we'll
we'll
accept
them
together.
All
right.
So
thank
you
all
for
getting
together
for
our
james
island,
crete,
water
quality
task
force
meeting.
I
see
a
lot
of
folks
here
on
the
hollywood
squares
thanks
for
joining
us.
Do
we
have
any
everybody,
I
think
can
see
everyone
else,
but
it's
is
anyone
here
new
or
visiting
us?
A
My
name
is
ashley
girillo
and
I
work
for
charleston
county
stormwater
and
I
recently
joined
forces
with
chris
wanamaker
and
brett
champion
to
look
into
this
tmdl
a
little
bit
more.
A
B
I
did
want
to
formally
nominate-
and
I
think
I
already
have
a
second
to
nominate
our
former
council
member
and
task
force,
member
carol
jackson
who,
as
you
know,
really
helped
get
us
started
with
this
effort.
Everyone
thanks
and
kudos
to
her
again
and
again
for
that,
but
since
she's
no
longer
representing
the
city
as
a
officially
as
a
council
member,
I'd
like
to
nominate
her
to
be
a
citizen's
representative
on
our
task
force,
and
I
I
believe
I
have
a
second
mayor
I'll.
B
Second
it
there,
you
go
the
two
mayors
co-chairs
nominate
and
second,
your
membership
on
the
task
force.
All
in
favor,
please
say:
aye.
G
B
By
acclimation
carol,
you
are
once
again
duly
a
member
of
the
task
force
and
we're
glad
to
have
you
on
here
and
I'm
glad
to
have
your
help
appreciate.
Thank.
B
All
right,
so,
I
think
we're
going
to
have
a
watershed
management
plan
presentation
is
that
true
is
will
here
with
us
from
terracon
or
someone
from
terracott.
B
C
Mayor,
I
think
I
heard
through
the
the
second
hand,
that
andrew
wunderli
had
not
been
able
to
reach,
will
vesey
again,
and
I
think
the
wisdom
among
the
technical
group
in
particular
is
that
we've
sort
of
gone
past.
The
introduction
of
the
watershed
management
plan
so.
H
C
All
we've
all
had
it
in
our
inboxes,
and
you
know
if
we
need
to
refer
to
it
as
time
goes
on,
then
I'm
sure
people
who
are
using
it
as
as
our
guidance
will
be
able
to
educate
us,
but
I
I
think
that's
what
I
understand,
that
we
decided
not
to
bother
tara
khan
with
making
a
an
official
presentation.
B
B
I
can't
say
I
was
an
executive.
Summary
thereof-
would
be
a
nice
thing,
but
that's
okay,
all
right!
So
we
got
our
three
little
working
groups
and
it
looks
like
we
need
a
new
coordinator
on
the
technical
side.
Does
anybody
want
to
talk
about
the
technical
group
and,
what's
going
on
there,.
I
Mark
well,
we've
been
monitoring
the
sampling,
obviously,
which
I
believe
there's
a
report
that
was
passed
out
to
everybody
of
the
november
sampling
and
what
we
got
so
we've
been
taking
a
look
at
that
and
trying
to
come
up
with
maybe
some
other
places
where
we
could
do
some
sampling
upstream.
So
that's
what
we've
been
working
on.
B
Right
and-
and
I
I
looked
at
the
report
myself
but-
and
maybe
I
just
didn't-
spend
enough
time
on
it,
but
did
did
you
see,
did
it
indicate
trend
up
down
compared
to
sampling?
That's
been
done
prior
to
this.
I
really
didn't
see
that
and
my
glance
through
it.
I
Right
and
and
really
this
is
still
early
days,
we
need
to
get
more
data,
so
we
can,
you
know,
definitively
say
one
way
or
another
where
it's
going.
So
I
would
say
that
we,
just
you
know,
stick
with
what
we're
doing
gather
the
data
and
take
a
look
at
it.
You
know
several
months
down
the
road.
H
And
mayor
knows
her:
this
is
chris
wannamaker.
The
human
was
still
low.
Bird
was
actually
moderate.
Dog
was
in
there
too
a
little
bit,
but
there
were
some
high
overall
intercoccus
counts.
Some
bacteria
counts,
which
were
very
general,
pretty
general
test.
It
is
more
common.
H
You
know,
intercock
is
just
to
remind
everybody,
is
more
indicative
of
warm
blooded
mammals
than
fecal
coliform
or
sampling
them
both,
but
even
certain
plant
matter
can
increase
your
test
results
for
fecal
coliform.
So
that's
why
we're
also
sampling
for
it
just
to
try
and
get
a
better
idea
of
it.
Like
mark
said,
it's
still
early,
hopefully
over
time
over
the
next
few
months,
we
can
get
a
nice
trend
line
going
and
show
everybody
that
one
way
or
the
other.
Yes,
sir,.
B
J
Yes,
you'll
recall:
last
year
I
predicted
the
bird
would
be
up
because
winter
migrating
birds
are
in
this
area
and
I'm
very
familiar
with
riley
road.
I
go
there
bird
watching
all
the
time,
and
my
question
is:
why
are
we
testing
riley
road
in
the
first
place?
J
My
psd
is
getting
ready
to
look
at
trying
to
put
in
sewer
around
clark,
sound
area
and
we're
not
testing
that
area
at
all,
and
I
object
to
this
riley
road
anyway,
because
there
is
sewer
on
riley
road
and
I
just
feel
like
we're
wasting
our
time
at
riley
road.
H
So
that
was
for
the
the
sampling
location
for
the
have
to
look
up
which
monitoring
station
it
was
to
satisfy.
So
we
told
deheck
that
we
would
sample
in
two
different
locations:
we're
sampling
in
three
and
the
riley
road
location
was
for
one
of
the
monitoring
station
buoys
where
the
samples
had
been
taken
at
and
it
was
accessed
from
a
boat
landing.
H
G
H
G
H
K
G
The
fourth
place
is
at
the
end
of
jim
mile
drive.
However,
later
on
the
agenda,
you
know
we
have
report
from
walport
right.
B
All
right,
kathy,
dooley
noted
and
sounds
like
we've
added
a
spot
and
maybe
need
to
talk
some
more
about
that
all
right,
any
other
thoughts
on
the
technical
side.
Anyone.
G
Well,
I
can
report
that
mark
is
willing
to
volunteer
mark
johnson
is
willing
to
volunteer
to
coordinate,
set
up
the
meetings
and
things
for
the
technical
group.
Oh
great.
B
B
C
B
Mark
nominate
somebody
if
there
wasn't
a
volunteer
so
mark.
Thank
you
for
doing
that.
You're
wrong.
All
right
did
did
andrew
show
up,
or
anybody
from
citizen
education,
engagement
with
us.
B
Hearing
none,
we
will
move
on
to
ross
appel
any
policy
report
at
all.
E
You
know
mayor
I,
I
have
to
admit
that
the
policy
subcommittee
is
not
met
of
of
late.
I
think
that
you
know.
Last
year
we
came
up
with
a
series
of
ordinance
based
approaches
and
we
had
talked
about
that
at
these
sessions
and
I
think
that
my
understanding
was
the
sentiment
had
been
moving
more
towards
an
infrastructure-based
solution.
E
You
know
we
got
the
great
information
from
charleston
water
systems
and
we've
got
our
state
delegation
working
on
you
know,
funding
up
in
colombia,
mayor
woolsey
has
been
taking
the
lead
over
on
town,
james
island,
and
it's
almost.
I
don't
want
to
say
that
that
those
efforts
have
kind
of
mooted
the
policy
approach,
but
it
certainly,
I
think,
has
taken
a
lot
of
the
focus
off
of
that,
and
you
know
I
can
just
speak
for
myself.
E
Where
I
mean
I
think
at
the
end
of
the
day,
this
is
an
infrastructure
problem
at
its
heart
and
if
we
can
make
some
progress
on
that
front,
I
think
we'll
all
be
doing
very
well,
and
perhaps
we
can
avoid
having
to
pass
an
ordinance.
You
know
mandating
hookups
and
mandating
septic
clean
outs,
and
I
mean
we've
got
all
that
stuff
compiled
it's
on
the
shelf.
It's
just.
Perhaps
that
may
not
be
the
way
we
need
to
go.
If,
if
this
infrastructure
solution
is
you
know
a
better
course.
C
Has
the
town
is
there
legislation
still
pending
mayor
wilson.
G
No,
so
we
we've
passed
a
ordinance
that
requires
septic
inspections,
at
least
every
three
years,
and
so
that
applies
throughout
the
town
of
james
island
and
then
in
the
james
island,
creek
tmdl
area
in
the
drainage
basin.
I
get
the
watershed,
the
chamberlain
watershed
that
ordinance
applies,
but
the
town
is
going
to
do
what
we
call
a
baseline
inspection
of
all
the
septic
tanks
in
the
town
jurisdiction
in
that
watershed
over
the
next
year.
I
think
we're
actually
are
supposed
to
finish
before
the
end
of
this
fiscal
year.
G
I
believe
that
we're
in
the
process
of
qualifying
our
first
contractor
that's
going
to
do
some
of
the
do
work
for
us
in
this
area,
and
so
I
anticipate
we'll
start
doing
these
inspections,
and
so
this
would
involve
pumping
out
of
the
septic
tanks
and
checking
the
septic
fields
and
drawing
pictures
of
the
second
fields
and
where
it
is
compared
to
the
critical
line
and
so
on
throughout
the
area-
and
you
know,
I
believe,
most
of
the
septic
tanks
in
the
james
island
creek
watershed
are
in
the
town,
but
not
all.
G
B
Thank
you
appreciate
that
and
ross,
if
you
don't
mind
following
up
and
seeing
what
few
we
have
in
the
city,
if,
if
we
can
do
a
similar
inspection
protocol
as
the
town,
I
think
that
would
that
would
be
a
good
thing
for
us.
B
There's
so
few
of
them,
I
don't
know
that
we
need
to
pass
an
ordinance.
We
probably
just
need
to
try
to
go
out
and
do
it,
but
but
please
remind
me
to
let's
check
on
that.
B
Thank
you
all
right,
so
I
see
our
waterkeeper
has
arrived
andrew.
You
got
any
report
for
us
on
citizen
education,
engagement.
L
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
Sorry,
for
being
late,
I've
been
up
to
my
eyeballs
and
nerdles
lately,
but
I
am
here
and
ready
to
go
so
kim
morganello
and
I
and
kim
thanks
for
tracking
down
the
link
wherever
she
is
met
prior
to
the
break
for
the
holidays
and
started
work
and
sort
of
a
draft
communication
strategy.
L
Some
of
the
conversations
that
kim
and
I
have
been
having
about
how
to
best
get
this
information
out
to
the
public
and
then
some
of
the
work
that
the
james
island
pst
is
going
to
be
doing.
So
I
think,
maybe
after
this
meeting
a
good
time
to
link
up
and
see
if
we
can
see
if
we
can
maybe
kind
of
coordinate
some
efforts
in
those
two
areas
kim
were
able
to
join
in.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I've
covered
everything
that
we've
discussed.
B
M
While
dave
is
figuring
that
out,
this
is
kyle
and
michelle
I'll
chime
in
and
say
that,
yes,
we
are
working
with
dhec,
we
have
met
with
them
and
we
actually
had
another
conference
with
them
last
week
to
sort
of
a
conference
in
anticipation
of
the
pre-application,
which
we
expect
will
come
out
well
either
this
week
or
this
coming
week.
And
yes,
the
public
service
district
will
be
taking
the
lead
on
that.
C
C
Kyle
a
follow-up
then,
please
sure,
sir,
I
know
I
know
you've
been
doing
a
lot
to
warm
up
d
hack
to
all
the
needs
here,
and
so,
when
you,
when
you
say
of
the
pre-app,
is
that
just
for
the
319
grant
process,
because
I
read
in
the
paper
today
that
you
know
the
house
has
now
voted
well.
Both
both
I
think
bodies
have
voted
on
their
versions
of
the
arpa
funding
and
they're
going
to
have
to
have
a
conference,
obviously
before
it
goes
to
the
governor.
C
D
Well,
but
if
you
want,
I
think
the
pre-application
meetings
that
kyle
is
talking
about
are
just
for
the
319
and
so
and
sorry
to
be
driving
while
we're
having
this
just
still
on
the
road
back
from
columbia.
But
whenever
the
appropriate
time
is,
I
can
give
a
quick
update
on
the
house.
Arbor
funding.
M
Right,
let
me
just
say
this
very
fast
carol
that,
yes,
the
the
the
319
program
is
dx
man,
administration
of
a
federal
program.
M
So
that's
epa
federal
money
that
comes
down,
and
so
what
we
will
be
applying
for
is
that
amount
that's
nowhere
near
the
total
cost
of
of
what
we're
going
to
do
for
those
items
that
the
319
program
can
pay
for
that
are
part
of
the
project
and
we're
doing
that
because
we're
turning
over
every
possible
rock
to
get
all
possible
funds
in
and
then,
after
that,
we
will
then
look
at
or
at
the
same
time,
we'll
look
at
other
avenues
of
state
funding
and
that's
what
I
was
going
to
let
the
representative
have
the
floor
on.
A
B
While
we're
talking
about
money
spencer,
why
don't
you
go
ahead
and
let
us
know
what
what's
going
on
up
there
with
the
with
the
house
and
senate.
D
Perfect
so,
yes,
we
came
out
with
the
recommendations.
A
lot
of
it
was
top
line
today,
and
so
I
still
don't
have
all
of
the
details
and
all
the
finalized.
I
don't
want
to
get
anybody's
hopes
up,
but
I'm
I'm
optimistic
about
it
as
as
potentially
even
an
allocation,
but
even
if
we
have
to
go
to
the
riaa
for
funding,
we
have
really
really
and
this.
This
is
a
good
note
for
everyone
to
to
take
in
even
not
outside
the
james
island
project.
D
We've
really
been
talking
with
them
about
the
importance
that
we
cannot
do
another.
You
know
this
can't
be
the
normal
riaa
after
you
know
incredibly
difficult
application
process,
so
it
is
a
greatly
streamlined
process,
even
if
we
do
have
to
go
to
riaa,
but
I
am
I'm
still
optimistic
that
we
may
have
some
good
news,
hopefully
before
even
the
next
meeting,
but
again,
even
if
we
do
have
to
go
to
the
raa,
which
we
just
allocated
800
million
to
today.
That
is
a
greatly
streamlined
process
with
application
engineering
support.
D
The
municipal
association
is
actually
going
to
do
procurement
for
statewide
engineering.
If
we
wanted
to
tag
in
on
any
of
that,
I
know
I
think
we're
already
doing
some
engineering.
But
yes,
I'm
optimistic.
I
just
don't
have
anything
finalized
yet,
but
the
good
news
is
there
is
going
to
be
a
lot
of
money
out
there.
D
I
think
the
average
projects
from
the
raa
if
we
do
go
there
are
going
to
be
smaller,
but
hopefully
I'll
have
a
good
news
update
for
for
you
all
before
the
next
meeting
and
I'll
send
out
an
email
or
ask
ask
liz
too.
If
we
get
any
news
on
that
front
for
sure.
B
So,
spencer,
when
I
was
up
in
columbia
last
week
I
went
to
the
senate
finance
meeting
and
in
their
version
they
said
they
were
going
to
set
a
maximum
of
10
million
dollars
per
project,
which
of
course,
is
much
better
than
the
normal,
ria,
500
000.
So
exactly
did
you
all
put
a
number
on
it
on
the
house
side.
D
You
know,
I
don't
think
I
don't
think
our
number
is
that
big,
but
I
I
think
what
they
were.
What
we
even
talked
about
on
the
house
side
is
more
a
division
between
big
systems
getting
60
and
smaller
systems
getting
40
percent
of
the
money
and
then
the
per
project
average.
I
think
we
were
talking
about
even
smaller,
but
either
way.
D
800
million
is
a
substantial
amount
of
money
and
to
have,
I
know,
we're
not
exactly
shovel
ready,
but
to
be
but
to
be
able
to
do
this
on
the
front
end,
we
will
be
in
a
very
good
position
if,
if
we
do
have
to
apply
to
the
raa.
D
I
will
and
sorry
it's
just
all
you
know
today
was
sort
of
the
first
day
of
the
recommendation,
so
the
timing's
a
little
tough
on
the
meeting
today,
but
hopefully
I
can
get
some
some
better
news
out
to
everybody,
at
least
on
the
house
side
and
samuel,
and
I
will
talk
about
it.
So
we
have
an
idea
of
what
we're
going
to
be
walking
into
on
the
conference
committee.
M
Let
me
say
this
in
case:
dave
can't
speak
up.
Two
two
points
number
one
spencer
wetmore
has
been
a
star
on
this
at
the
state
house
in
colombia,
so
everybody
should
know
that
has
taken
this
issue
on
and
has
written
herd
on
it
like
what
you
would
hope
times
two.
M
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
number
two
dave
and
I
had
a
meeting
with
senator
bright
matthews
yesterday
in
her
office,
and
we
have
met
on
the
senate
side.
As
you
know,
with
sandy
sin,
we've
spoken
and
met
with
chip,
campson
and
senator
bright
matthews
was
so
interested
in
meeting
with
us
and
really
wanted
to
know
about
this
project,
because
her
new
district
is
going
to
have
more
than
a
little
bit
of
james
island
in
it.
M
So
she
is
very
interested
in
finding
a
way
to
quote
unquote,
introduce
herself
to
her
new
constituents
through
supporting
something
like
what
we're
doing
she's
going
to
make
this
a
priority
for
her
request
to
the
senate
finance
committee
and
we'll
see.
Well,
I
shouldn't
say:
make
it
a
problem:
she's
going
she's
going
to
promote
our
project
as
best
she
can
from
the
position
that
she's
in
maybe
I
should
put
it
that
way.
So
we
are
indebted
to
senator
bright
matthews
for
her
work
on
this
as
well.
B
That's
great
and
thank
you,
spencer.
Thank
you
for
your
help
on
this.
Well
well
deserved,
and
that's
good
news
about
senator
matthews
as
well
great,
all
right
so
wolpert
sampling.
Most
recent
results
is
someone
here
to
can.
N
I've
been
finagling
with
microphone.
N
Did
fixed
it?
What
what
I
wanted
to
reiterate?
You
know
kyle
mentioned
that
we
had
an
update
with
dhec.
It
was
the
31st
of
january,
and
what
we
were
trying
to
establish
is
how
the
319
money
can
apply
to
this
project
specifically
and
because
this
is
a
pass
through
from
federal
dollars.
N
Obviously,
there
are
specific
items
that
are
allowable
and
not
allowable
as
far
as
what
the
319
money
can
encompass,
and
so
for
this
specific
project
you
know
kyle
and
I
we
will
get
with
andrew
and
the
rest
of
the
citizen
in
education,
engagement,
319,
there's
a
funding
component
for
citizen
education,
engagement
within
319.,
the
other
larger
piece
of
the
319
funding
would
be
associated
with
hooking
up
the
homes
to
the
sewer.
N
So
the
319
money
is
not
going
to
be
used
for
engineering,
soft
costs
or
even
putting
the
sewer
mains
on
the
streets
within
the
neighborhoods.
The
319
money
is
going
to
be
used
to
connect
the
homes
off
of
the
septic,
abandon
the
septic
and
then
hook
the
homes
onto
the
actual
sewer
mains.
That's
that's
what
the
319
funding
can
be
used
for.
There's
specific
time
frames
within
the
319.
N
So
if
we're
awarded
the
money
it
has
to
be
spent
in
two
years
and
that's
what
we're
trying
to
understand
the
timing,
how
how
is
that
going
to
be
in
relation
to
award
to
actually
being
able
to
hook
up
the
homes-
and
you
know
I
am
I
am
I
got
my
fingers
crossed
spencer-
is
gonna,
come
back
with
fantastic
news
by
next
meeting
and
we
are
rocking
and
rolling
on
this
and
that's
going
to
make
a
lot
more
money
or
a
lot
more
sense
to
get
the
money
now
for
the
319
versus
versus
later,
but
at
a
minimum
you
know
the
319.
L
Andrew,
I
just
want
to
add
the
319
rfp
came
out
this
morning
and
I've
just
sent
it
to
to
kyle
and
dave,
so
should
be
in
your
email,
inboxes.
B
Perfect,
thank
you,
terrific.
Thank
you
andrew
all,
right.
Let's
move
on
to
jacob
berkey
with
wolpert
to
tell
us
what's
going
on
with
the
same
play.
K
K
It
was
okay,
excellent,
so
at
a
high
level
you
know
we
have
another
season
of
data
under
our
belt.
We've
got
summer
and
fall
that
have
been
collected
and
analyzed
more
work
to
be
done.
K
In
general,
we've
seen
higher
numbers
during
wet
conditions
compared
to
dry
and
higher
in
the
watershed
compared
to
lower,
and
we
have
individual
storm
plots
to
get
more
into
the
details,
but
to
keep
it
high
level
at
this
call,
that's
that's
what
we've
seen
and
I'd
love
to
answer
any
any
questions,
be
they
further
discussion
of
sites
or
otherwise.
B
All
right:
well,
I
know
we
have
a
lot
of
experts
on
the
call,
but
how
about
for
layman
explain
why
you
see
that
differential
in
wet
and
dry
sampling.
K
Sure
sure
so
you
know,
we've
got
aquatic
sources
of
pollution
when
it
rains
you
get
runoff
and
and
getting
into
the
source
tracking
of
what?
What
is
that
from?
That's.
That's
the
more
expensive
sampling
which
we
have
done.
One
of
we
get
four
total
under
this
scope
of
work,
so
we
have
not
done
any
additional
source
tracking.
We
can.
K
We
can
pick
our
samples
and
do
that
later,
so
we're
being
very
selective
with
the
source
tracking,
but
generally
it
varies
because
you've
got
a
tidal
system
where
you've
got
runoff
moving
into
it
and
then
moving
back
and
forth,
eventually
making
its
way
out
so
grabbing
one
sample
at
a
given
title
condition
it
it
tends
to
vary
quite
a
bit
at
others.
So
that's
why
you
know
the
dynamics
of
the
system
are,
why
you
see
the
variability
and
you
can
have
sort
of
a
baseline
dry
weather
source.
K
B
K
K
During
wet
weather
and
higher
higher
in
the
watershed,
which
makes
sense
to
sort
of
you
get
dilution
as
you
move
through
that's
how
sort
of
the
natural
growing
water
body
as
it
gets
larger
works.
L
Thank
you
jacob
real
quick.
Do
you
know,
do
you
intend
to
save
the
source
tracking
samples
for
the
wet
weather
events,
or
are
you
going
to
do
some
dry
weather
ones
for
the
source
tracking,
so.
L
And
then
I'll,
just
add
too
that
I
think
after
reading,
through
the
report
I
mean
the
the
you
know,
the
general
relationship
between
rainfall
tide
stages
is
what
we
see
in
our
data
set.
It
all
looks
very
familiar
yeah.
K
L
A
O
Yes,
good
good
afternoon,
everybody
jacob
one
question
I
had
on
the
sampling
was:
are
y'all,
also
gathering
salinity
levels
when
you're
taking
the
samples
to
see
how
much
of
a
tidal
influence
is
being
impacted
at
the
time
the
sample
is
being
collected.
K
O
Yeah
I
mean
I
was
thinking
about
like
almost
installing
samplers
composite
sampling
that
can
be
done
to
try
to
collect
that,
because
I'm
still
curious
about
the
flushing
effects
that
the
creek
experiences
and
so
and
salinity
would
be
a
good
correlation
factor
for
that.
But
I
was
just
curious
if
it's
being
sampled.
K
Yeah
not
currently
is
relevant
data,
but
that's
just
that's
that's
another
level
and
something
you
know
this.
This
doesn't
doesn't
happen
in
one
month.
It's
an
ongoing
effort,
definitely
something
we
could
potentially
add
in.
G
So
I
have
a
question
the
the
source
sample
was
taken
in
november.
I
mean
excuse
me
in
september.
G
And
is
that
what
I'm
looking
at
the
november
of
september
21st
and
we
just
tested
riley
road
at
harborview
road
bridge
and
we
had
high
numbers
for
riley
road,
I
mean
do
they
seem
like
unusual
they've,
seen
problem
worse
than
most
of
the
numbers
like
we've
seen?
Is
that
correct.
K
Yeah,
that
was
one
of
the
higher
observations,
and
so
that's
why
we
went
ahead
and
and
ran
that
one
source
tracking
now
doing
a
source
tracking
downstream,
which
is
still
in
play.
That's
where
some
of
the
power
of
of
exploring
the
sources
throughout
the
watershed
you
know
can
be
done.
So
if,
if
then
that's
why
an
upstream
site
is
useful,
you
know
compare
if
you're
up
here
and
you
see
this
and
you're
down
here
and
you
see
something
different.
Well,
then
you
know
it
got
introduced
in
between.
G
Well,
I
mean
riley
road
is
about
a
half
mile
up
from
the
folly
road
bridge,
and
the
traditional
source
site
is
maybe
100
feet.
I
think
from
the
folly
road
bridge
right
well,
have
you
started
taking
samples
at
the
end
of
10
mile
drive.
I
Yes,
as
far
as
as
I
know,
chris,
do
you
know
anything
from
brett.
G
I
G
That's
it
maybe
the
documentations
haven't
been
sent
in
let's.
Why
don't
we
check
on
that
see
if
it's
been
sent
in
and-
and
you
know
I
think,
mark
it
might
be
a
good
idea
to
go
visit
them
again
and
let
them
sign
things
in
front
of
you.
I
you
know,
hey
everyone.
This
is
patrick
moore.
Those
are
my
friends.
G
B
B
G
Have
a
comment,
so
we
have
basically
had
three
source
test
tests
now:
walpert
who's
now
working
for
the
town
and
the
county
and
the
city
has
done
just
one
and
but
we
had
two
you
know
in
the
last
year
and
both
of
those
two
showed
human
waste
and
then
we
had
one
that
did
show
a
good
bit
of
bacteria,
but
it
was
bird
which
you
know
I
don't
you
know,
I
don't
think,
there's
I
don't
think
it's
chickens.
You
know,
I
think
it's
waterfowl.
G
I
still
think
that
we
should
be
going
forward
and
thinking
about
what
we're
doing,
for
example,
I
don't
think
it's
a
mistake
for
the
town
to
have
this.
It's
not
you
know
when
I
hear
well,
we
just
don't
have
enough
data.
So
really
so
we,
it
was
a
mistake
for
the
town
to
you
know,
begin
to
check
septic
tanks.
G
Is
it
a
mistake
to
pursue
sewer
improvements?
I
mean
you
know,
maybe
there's
you
know
so
I
just
think
we
you
know.
The
information
we
have
is
still
the
majority
of
information.
Is
that
it's
human
and
I
think
that
unless
we
continue
getting
different
information,
we
should
continue
to
move
forward
with
our
current
plans,
which
reflect
the
the
this
study,
not
the
pmdl
study
to
some
degree,
but
also
our
watershed
study.
L
Yeah
thanks
for
that
mayor
woolsey,
I
you
know
a
couple
of
things.
You
know
in
our
work
on
this
bacteria
issue.
The
you
know
my
my
senses
is
that
you
know
we
know
what
the
universe
of
sources
is
right.
We
we
know,
you
know
it's,
you
know
it's
it's
going
to
be
wildlife,
it's
going
to
be
dogs,
it's
going
to
be
it's
going
to
be
human
source,
and
you
know
that
all
you
know
maybe
the
odd
vessel
discharge
right.
We,
you
know
we
and
we've.
L
L
You
know
the
other
thing
to
keep
in
mind
too,
and
and
would
certainly
you
know
to
defer
to
the
you
know,
experts
that
do
the
source
tracking
work,
but
they
are
snapshots
in
time
of
one
event,
and
so
I
would
caution
us
about
reading
too
much
into
those
one
way
or
the
other.
I
think
they're
important
information
about
the
types
of
sources
that
are
out
there
and
their
contributions,
but
they
are
snapshots
in
time
and
you
know
we
could
spend
millions
and
millions
of
dollars
and
never
have
a
definitive
answer.
L
B
So
am
I
hearing
that
we
should
be
doing
something
different
technically
or
sampling,
wise
or
location,
and
if
so,
I
don't
know
that
this
is
the
forum
to
make
those
decisions,
but
I
I
guess
I
would
kick
it
back
one
more
time
to
mark
johnson
and
his
team
to
to
come
back
to
his
next
time.
If
y'all
really
think
we
need
to
be
doing
something
different,
you
know.
Let's,
let's
talk,
let's
y'all
make
a
recommendation
to
us
and,
and
let's
see
what
we
need
to
do
to
make
that
happen
would
be
my
suggestion.
B
You
mayor
does
that
give
us
a
path
forward
to
your
concern.
Mayor,
woolsey.
G
B
We
will
yes,
sir
all
right.
So
next
up
is
a
little
report
from
charleston
water
system
about
plum
island.
I
see
ken
and
mark,
and
who
else
is
there?
Is
that
russ?
I
can't
see
yes.
F
Mr
mayor,
how
are
you
this?
Is
ken
hill
great
welcome
having
us
on
the
agenda
today?
Yes,
sir,
we
are,
four
of
us
are
gathered
here
in
mark
klein's
office
since
he's
got
the
nicest
monitor,
but
mark's
here
he's
our
assistant,
ceo.
Everyone
knows
me
ken
hill
don
benjamin
is
our
director
of
engineering
and
construction,
and
over
here
to
my
right,
which
you
may
not
be
able
to
see
on
the
screen
is
mike
saya
who's.
F
F
Well,
we'll
be
glad
to
give
you
any
information,
we
can
talk
for
two
hours.
I'm
sure
you
don't
want
that,
mr
mayor
or
anyone
else
on
the
committee
on
the
task
force.
But
what
we
thought
we'd
do
is
maybe
turn
it
over
to
don
benjamin
to
give
you
all
kind
of
a
quick
update
of
where
we,
where
we've
been
and
some
of
the
improvements
we've
made
at
plum
island
in
the
last
few
years,
what
we
call
phase
three
and
we're
about
to
go
into
phase
four
of
improvements.
F
It's
been
quite
a
lot
of
work
done.
We've
also
done
some
work
for
our
sewer
tunnels
as
well,
especially
west
ashley
replacement
tunnel.
But
before
I
steal
any
more
of
his
thunder
I'll
turn
it
over
to
don
just
let
him
give
y'all
a
thumbnail
sketch
of
what's
been
going
on.
A
P
P
We
added
new
primary
clarifiers
and
anoxic
selector
in
the
secondary
clarifier,
so
kind
of
a
big
heavy
process.
Tankage
project
that
was
completed
a
couple
years
ago,
two
or
three
years
ago,
we've
most
recently
finished
our
influence
pump
station
project.
That's
part
of
the
phase
5
west
ashley
sewer
tunnel
replacement.
P
P
P
P
The
brunt
of
that
project
is
forced
a
new
solids
handling.
Building,
that's
going
to
replace
our
existing
solids
handling,
we're
also
going
to
replace
our
existing
effluent
pump
station
that
that
hasn't
been
working
for
a
number
of
years,
but
we're
going
to
replace
that
we're
going
to
add
another
primary
clarifier,
we're
going
to
add
new
two
new
secondary
clarifiers,
so
again
a
lot
of
process
tankage.
P
None
of
this
is
really
plant
expansion.
As
far
as
capacity
goes,
it's
really
replacement
of
existing
infrastructure
setting
us
up
for
plant
expansion
in
the
future.
The
this
seymour
project,
the
phase
four-
is
kind
of
unique.
As
I
mentioned
it's
a
seymour
project
where,
typically,
you
would
take
a
a
gmp
guaranteed
maximum
price.
We've
split
this
project
up
into
three
different
gmps,
essentially
three
different
phases.
P
The
first
phase
is
really
about
a
our
existing
solids
handling,
has
some
structural
issues
with
it
and
we're
really
addressing
those
just
to
shore
up
the
building.
It's
kind
of
a
when
I
say
permanent:
it's
not
permanent,
forever,
it's
more
temporary
for
about
a
10-year
period,
but
we'll
be
shoring
that
up
with
some
structural
steel
and
doing
some
miscellaneous
improvements
to
the
system.
P
All
of
that
is
contained
within
that
one
building.
So
there
is
no
excavation,
there's
no
construction,
so
heavy
civil
construction,
as
we
typically
had
with
the
previous
projects
that
contractor
garni
construction
is
currently
on
site.
They
just
mobilized
around
february,
first
and
so
they'll
be
working
on
that
and
meanwhile
we'll
be
working
on
the
phase
4b,
which
is
a
little
bit
more
construction.
Oriented
that'll
include
a
new
disinfection
facility
towards
the
north
side
of
the
island
kind
of
the
the
peninsula
side.
P
P
We
expect
to
really
get
started
somewhere
around
the
middle
of
the
year
june
or
july,
so
that
will
increase
the
kind
of
the
construction
activity
on
the
island
and
then
the
third
and
kind
of
final
phase,
what
we
call
4c
as
a
as
a
the
brunt
of
the
new
structures,
so
the
new
solids
handling,
building
our
effluent
pump
station
and
our
primary
clarifier.
That's
the
round
circular
ones
that
you
can
see
on
the
island.
P
We
add
one
more
and
then
two
final
clarifiers,
so
a
lot
of
tankage
there
in
heavy
construction,
pipe
work
and
whatnot.
We
expect
that
to
start
up
somewhere
around
the
end
of
this
year,
first
of
next
year,
the
brunt
of
that
is
about
66
or
so
million
dollars,
and
then
overall,
this
is
about
a
four-year
construction
project,
so
kind
of
ramping
up
through
2022
and
then
continuing.
I
think
the
completion
date
is
at
near
the
end
of
2025.
F
B
That's
that's
terrific
and
a
big
investment,
but
if
I
may
just
ask
a
simple
question
for
all
that
money
invested
and
and
additional
clarifiers-
and
I
know
even
currently
you're
meeting-
you
know
dhec
requirements
and
all
like
that
and
of
course
your
affluent
is
more
going
into
charleston
harbor
than
in
the
creek.
But
at
the
end
of
the
day,
does
all
this
investment
give
us
a
better
water
quality
of
affluent
of
what
you
all
are
pushing
out?
A
The
plant
the
plant
meets
all
the
epa
standards
for
effluent
quality
already,
so
it
maintains
our
ability
to
do
that
as
well
as
plan
for
future
growth
and
expansion
of
the
plan.
It
sets
it
up
well
for
that
it
it
addresses
some
aging
infrastructure
needs,
especially
on
the
biosolid.
A
G
A
Of
things
for
addressing
sustainability
and
reliability
of
the
operation.
F
And,
as
most
of
you
probably
know
that
you
mentioned
that,
mr
mayor,
the
the
treated
effluent
actually
goes
out,
3
900
feet
something
like
that
fairly
long
way
out
into
charleston
park.
F
Very
high
quality
ethanol,
we
we
not
only
meet
our
regulatory
response
for
dhec
and
epa.
We
far
exceed
what's
required
in
those
areas
and
very
proud
of
that
fact,
because
we
feel,
like
we've,
done
a
lot
to
help
clean
up
charleston
harbor
over
the
years.
But
it's
not
just
a
matter
of
meeting
it's
far
exceeding.
I
can
promise
you.
F
C
I'd
like
to
see
the
logo
for
that
award,
I
think
that
would
be
very
interesting.
Can
I
ask
just
one
follow-up
question
that
maybe
we
should
put
it
on
the
agenda
for
our
next
meeting
mayor.
It
occurs
to
me
that
back
a
year
and
a
half
ago
or
however
long
it
was
excuse
me,
we
were
listening
to
cws
and
the
psd
talk
about
getting
serious
about
better
redundancy
in
the
pipes
that
carry
to
plum
island.
C
B
All
right,
commissioner,
woolsey
kathy.
J
Yes,
I
would
like
to
know
what
specifically
charleston
water
systems
are
doing
to
repair
leaking
pipes
and
to
prevent
storm
water
into
getting
to
their
sewer
pipes.
J
When
storm
water
overflows
into
sewer
pipes,
it
causes
sewage
overflows
and
I
just
want
to
know
what
they're
doing
smoke
testing
realigning
pipes
redoing
their
tops
to
their
manhole
covers
to
prevent
storm
water
from
getting
into
those
pipes
because
their
pipes
go
into
our
pipes
and
when
we
get
a
rain
event,
there's
a
lot
of
storm
water
coming
from
their
pipes,
and
we
would
like
that
storm
water
to
not
come
into
our
pipes
and
cause
overflows.
J
F
F
F
One
of
the
primary
sources
of
infiltrate
or
inflow
is
that
that
darn
clean
dive
cap
in
the
front
yard
that
gets
hit
by
the
lawnmower
during
the
summer
and
gets
cracked
and
then,
when
it
rains
water
flows
in
there
and
goes
right
into
the
system,
and
so
we
have
programs
in
place
where
we
have
carrots
and
sticks.
You
might
say
to
incentivize
homeowners
to
replace
those
caps
and
if
they
don't,
we
can
even
do
it
ourselves,
but
I'll
turn
it
over
to
baker.
F
Q
Well,
I
would
just
start
with
the
results.
You
know.
We
have
a
very
active
systematic
process
for
prioritizing
our
areas
and
targeting
them
for
ii
reduction,
and
our
flows
today
are
just
a
little
bit
higher
than
what
they
were
15
20
years
ago,
and
so
we
do
have
aging
pipe
in
our
system
and
we're
continuously
looking
at
that
pipe
and
repairing
it.
We
do
a
tremendous
amount
of
lining
work.
Just
in
west
ashley
alone,
we've
lined
over
26
miles
of
pipe,
and
so
we
continue
to
do
that.
Q
We
do
have
some
high
infiltration
inflow
from
two
of
our
pump
stations
that
discharge
directly
into
the
james
island,
pst
we're
in
the
process
of
investigating
those
two
and
are
providing
the
results
to
james
island
psd
kind
of
in
direct
cooperation
with
with
with
james
island
and
helping
them
reduce
their
issues
in
james
island,
we're
very
fortunate
our
system
and
we
have
about
25
pump
stations
and
they
were
actually
designed
to
handle
a
lot
more
flow
than
we
receive,
and
so
stormwater
events
have
not
been
a
capacity
problem
at
all.
F
Let's
not
say
that
that's
the
case
elsewhere
in
our
system,
but
that
is
certainly
the
case
on
james
island
and,
if
I
may,
mr
mayor,
I
want
to
take
this
opportunity
because
mrs
woolsey's
question
is
a
very
good
one
to
tell
you
another
initiative
that
we
actually
embarked
on
just
recently.
F
We
actually
finished-
I
guess
today,
and
it
has
to
do
with
an
idea
that
we
thought
would
be
appropriate
just
from
a
due
diligence
point
of
view
for
the
operation
of
our
sewer
system
in
conjunction
with
james
island
psd,
and
so
we
coordinated
with
with
dave
and
david
and
decided
that
it
made
sense
in
the
grand
scheme
of
things
and
especially
with
regards
to
the
water
quality
task
force,
to
look
at
our
pipelines,
our
specific
pipelines
that
either
parallel
or
cross
james
island
creek.
F
Specifically
we're
talking
about
force
mains,
which
you
don't
know
that
terminology
are
pressurized
sewer
lines.
F
These
are
lines
that
are
on
the
downstream
side
of
a
pump,
and
we
have
quite
a
few
of
those
charleston
water
has
at
least
two
or
three
that
are
that
cross
the
creek,
either
at
harvey
road
bridge
or
trolley
road
bridge
or
further
up
towards
central
park
road,
and
so
you
know
we
thought
you
know
what
is
the
possibility
that
maybe
there's
a
small
leak
somewhere
that
we
aren't
aware
of
you
know:
we've
had
those
kinds
of
things
elsewhere
in
the
past.
F
Let's
get
together,
you
know
and
evaluate
those
normally
when
you
have
a
leak
like
that
on
the
system,
you
would
know
it
just
from
an
increase
in
flow
from
the
water
that
would
go
into
an
open
pipe
the
other
way,
but
we
decided
to
do
that.
We
got
on
the
phone
with
dave,
schaefer
and
dave
hoffman
and
they
agreed
to
jointly
do
that
as
well,
and
so
we
decided
to
take
the
lead
on
that
and
we
finished
for
the
most
part
the
die
testing,
I
believe,
and
baker.
Craig
has
gone
wrong.
F
I
think
we
put
dying
about
18
pump
stations
over
on
james
island
and
actually
flew
a
drone
look
for
dye
to
see
if
there
any
dye
coming
out
and
the
second
flying
of
the
drones
today
and
we're
delighted
to
report.
I'm
not
sure
dave
and
david
didn't
wear
this
july
report.
We
did
not
find
any
dye
anyway
anywhere
so
in
the
test
area,
and
this,
of
course,
would
have
been
the
most
critical
portion
of
our
system
on
james
island
as
it
relates
to
the
watershed
in
james
island,
crete.
F
So
we're
going
to
be
writing
up
a
short
report.
We
can
make
that
available
through
the
task
force.
I
had
actually
called
andrew
and
made
him
aware
that
we
were
doing
this
and
left
a
message
on
that
and,
as
I
said,
the
final
flight
of
the
drone
was
actually
today
and
we've
not
seen
any
doubts
that
we're
happy.
F
We
want
to
make
absolutely
sure,
at
least
on
this
day,
that
we
state
unequivocally
that
the
force
mains
that
cross
that
creek
that
carry
you
know
untreated
sewage,
are
intact
and
are
working
as
designed
so
happy
to
report
today
that
at
least
based
on
our
test.
That
is
indeed
the
case.
So
we're
glad
to
answer
any
questions
on
that
as
well.
C
F
C
G
C
G
Chime
in
and
say
you
know
great
job
as
I
you
know,
look
at
the
material
on.
You
know
what
the
utilities
that
what
the
psd
and
the
charleston
water
system
are
doing
to
control
leaks.
You
know
ex
exfiltration
and
sanitary
sewer
overflows.
I
see
a
lot
of
good
information
in
general
from
charleston
water
system.
G
You
know,
looks
nice
and,
and-
and
I
have
heard
of-
and
you
know
seen
lots
of
action
by
the
psd
and
I'm
sure
there's
lots
of
action
by
charleston
water
system
and
this
one
example
of
doing
the
dye
test.
You
know
that's
just
great,
but
I
think
it's
very
important
that
this
all
this
information
gets
shared
consistently,
that
you
know
that
the
psd
and
the
charleston
water
system
are
working.
G
You
know
they
work
hard
to
make
sure
we
don't
have
exfiltration
and
that
also,
of
course,
the
information
about
plum
island
and
that
it
just
seems
like
when
you
go
surrounding
palm
island.
G
You
know
the
water
is
pretty
clean
around
there
and
and
it's
pretty
clean
at
the
outlet
which
isn't
even
very,
very
close
to
james
island
creek
and
the
reason
is,
I
guess,
sort
of
political.
It's
you
know.
The
people
in
my
town
that
have
been
had
got
a
letter
in
the
last
week
saying
that
you
know
from
here
on
out.
They
have
to
have
their
septic
tank
inspected
at
least
every
three
years.
G
G
You
know,
pipes
are
leaking,
you
know
every
excuse
and
as
if
we
move
to
expand
sewer,
you
know
what
good
does
that?
Do
you
know
this?
If
you
expand
sewer
the
sewer
utilities
just
leak
like
sieves
right?
Well,
you
know.
I
don't
believe
that
we
have
good.
You
know.
We
just
heard
some
good
evidence
that
it's
not
true.
G
B
And
and
y'all
are
very
thoughtful
to
eliminate
you
know
the
possibilities.
Well,
this
is
where
bacteria
or
contamination
is
coming
from
just
every
every
point,
along
the
way
that
we
can
figure
out
to
exclude
that
possibility.
It
helps
us
drive
toward
the
solution.
Andrew.
L
Can
thanks
for
sharing
that,
when
you
all
have
that
report
done,
and
would
you
want
to
echo
what
everybody
said
so
far
about
cooperation?
I
think
it's
it's
great
and
you
know
to
pick
up
where
mayor
woolsey
was.
When
you
all
have
the
report
done,
will
you
all
publish
that
online
somewhere?
Can
you
will
that
be
in
a
shareable
format.
B
That'd
be
great
back
to
kathy.
J
Yes,
very
good
report
also.
I
would
like
to
point
out
that
charleston
water
system
has
an
excellent
youtube
channel
and
last
time
I
visited
which,
a
couple
of
months
ago,
most
of
the
youtube
videos
about
what
they
do
are
very
old
and
you
need
to
update
them
and
advertise
them
more
in
this
drone
footage.
I'm
sure
there
was
footage
of
that
drone,
and
this
is
very
interesting,
high-tech
stuff,
and
I
would
like
to
see
a
video
on
youtube
about
what
you
did
and
other
works.
Your
smoke
testing
video
is
very
good.
J
I've
shared
it
with
people
and
to
explain
that
to
people,
but
you
have
very
few
views
on
your
youtube
channel
advertising.
What
you're
doing
is
very
important
on
your
newsletter
on
your
bills.
You
send
out
hey
check
out
our
youtube
channel,
see
see
what
we're
doing,
and
I
would
really
like
to
see
that
die
and
drone
thing
put
into
some
kind
of
social
media
thing,
so
it
can
get
out
there
and
let
people
know
about
it,
and
I
think
it's
very
exciting
and
very
good
work
and
bill
is
right.
J
I
don't
agree
with
my
husband
very
often,
but
when
we
talk
to
people
we're
on
james
island,
they
they
blame,
plum
allen.
Every
time
you've
got
a
bad
reputation,
people
think
you're
polluting
it
and
it's
not
them,
and
I
have
to
explain
to
them.
The
tests
don't
show
that
and
you've
got
to
toot
your
home
own
horn
and
get
the
advertising
out
there.
A
trouble
with
government
people
is,
you
don't
understand
advertising
government
people
aren't
used
to
advertising
and
you
have
to
advertise
it
and
spend
some
money
on
advertising.
B
B
Anything
else
from
anyone-
okay,
our
next
meeting-
will
be
thursday
april
28th.
We'll
keep
the
momentum
going
hope
to
get
some
great
news
out
of
columbia
for
some
of
that
additional
funding.
So
maybe
the
arpa
can
tie
together
with
the
319,
and
we
can
really
get
some
of
those
septic
tanks
out
of
the
way
and
mark,
please
let
us
know
what
y'all,
if
y'all
come
up
with
any
additional
recommendations.