►
From YouTube: City of Charleston Committee on Ways and Means 3/9/2021
Description
City of Charleston Committee on Ways and Means 3/9/2021
A
A
C
D
E
F
It's
a
different
look.
I'm
trying
I'm
trying.
I
discovered
that
I
have
a
tendency
to
spill
coffee
in
the
mornings
and
so
it's
ruined
enough
ties
and
I'm
like
I
can
at
least
oxiclean
a
shirt
you
know
as
opposed
to
so
that's.
Hence
the
bow
tie.
It's
a
little
higher.
H
H
D
I
J
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
I've
used
up
my
moments
of
silence,
so
I'm
going
to
sing
a
a
a
hebrew
prayer
for
healing.
It's
called
the
mishabera
may
the
source
of
strength
who
bless
the
ones
before
us
help
us
find
the
courage
to
make
our
lives
a
blessing
and,
let
us
say,
amen,
amen,
bless.
J
H
H
K
I
I
did
want
to
share
that.
I
believe
I
recall
what
amy
wharton
shared
with
me
that
the
rate
for
this
agreement
is
0.6
less
than
one
percent,
so
it's
a
incredibly
good
interest
rate.
It's
it's
almost
just
like
using
somebody
else's
money.
Thank
you.
H
Second,
moved
and
properly
seconded
any
discussion
regarding
item
four.
If
not
I'll
say
I
I
I
the
eyes.
Have
it
item
number
five
budget
finance
revenue.
E
K
K
It's
it's
like
a
bonus
of
getting
these
young,
energetic
citizens
ready
to
go
to
work
and,
of
course,
the
vista
program
is
mostly
picking
up
the
tab.
So
it's
it's
just
a
terrific
bonus
of
benefit
for
our
community
and
our
different
organizations
that
receive
one
of
these
vista
employees.
We
can
go
down
the
list
sometime
if
you
like,
but
it's
it's
just
a
a
terrific
program.
Thank
you.
H
H
J
H
G
E
A
Yes,
sir,
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
touch
on
number
11
just
quickly.
I
spoke
with
our
public
services
division
and
we
talked
about
just
not
only
are.
Is
this
grant
going
to
do
great
things
for
getting
more
trucks
into
our
fleet?
But
it's
also
going
to
save
us
a
considerable
amount
of
money
over
the
coming
years
by
this
diesel
emission
reduction
is
going
to
save
us
a
lot
of
money
and
diesel,
and
it's
also
better
for
the
environment.
So
not
only
are
we
do.
A
We
have
a
cost
savings
here
and
we
we're
getting
help
from
this
grant.
Those
are
all
great
things,
but
we're
also
doing
a
good
job
of
protecting
the
environment.
A
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
put
that
out
there
that
there's
a
lot
of
really
positive
things
that
are
coming
out
of
this
grant
and
we
all
know
that
we
need
to
continue
to
build
up
our
fleet,
especially
in
garbage
collection,
because
you
know,
we've
got
a
large
portion
of
the
city
that
doesn't
get
picked
up
by
by
the
city,
so
it's
always
good
when
we
can
add
more
trucks
and
improve
our
fleet,
because
our
our
garbage
collection
is
second
to
none
in
this
area
and
they
do
a
fantastic
job.
A
They
run
circles
around
everybody
else
and
they
constantly
are
meeting
every
single
one
of
our
needs.
Whenever
we
need
something
we
call
matt
I'll
top,
he
jumps.
I
just
I'm,
really
really
proud
that
we're
getting.
We
got
this
grant
and
I
think
this
is
a
really
good,
valuable
spending
of
our
money.
Thank
you.
H
A
Yes,
sir,
no
problem,
thank
you,
mr
chairman
yeah.
We
we
took
this
up
at
public
works
and
it'll
be
in
our
committee
report
as
well,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
everybody
on
council
got
an
opportunity
to
check
out
this
letter,
and
you
know
we
I'm
sure
we
have
mr
wilbert
on
the
call.
A
Maybe
he
can
explain
this
letter,
because
there
is
some
language
in
there
that
hints
at
us
potentially
spending
up
to
three
million
dollars.
Is
it
three?
It's
three
million,
I
think
total
for
a
study
1.5
coming
from
the
federal
government,
the
army
corps
and
then
another
one
and
a
half
match
from
the
city.
A
So
I
just
want
everybody
to
be
aware
that
they're
down
the
road
it
might
not
be
today,
but
there
will
be
some
cost
to
this
down
the
road
and
we
need
to
look
at
how
we're
going
to
how
we're
going
to
afford
that,
and
I
also
would
love
to
find
out
exactly
how
this
money's
going
to
be
spent.
Whether
or
not
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
all
of
these
areas
that
we've
already
spent
a
lot
of
money.
A
Studying
I
I
I
get
worried
that
we're
spending
so
much
money
studying
having
the
same
having
all
these
different
companies
come
out
and
study
the
same
areas.
It
ends
up.
We
have
a
lot
of
conflicting
approaches,
and
you
know
I
just
don't
know
how
effective
this
is
going
to
be.
So
I
was
hoping
we
could
get
some
more
clarification
on
that.
H
Is
mr
woolbert
on
the
phone.
L
L
Okay,
can
you
hear
me
now,
mr
chairman
yeah,
okay
yep,
so
I
think
I
can
address
all
those
questions
that
council
member
griffin
had.
So
this
is
a
feasibility
study,
and
the
purpose
of
a
feasibility
study
is
for
the
federal
government
to
determine
if
there
is
federal
interest
in
them
spending
money
to
do
construction
projects.
In
this
case
it
would
be
projects
to
alleviate
flooding
throughout
the
city
of
charleston
to
council
member
griffin's
specific
point
about
all
of
the
existing
studies.
L
Those
studies
would
actually
help
this
study
in
that
they
would
not
have
to
restudy
those
areas.
They
would
simply
look
at
them
as
a
potential
area
that
they
could
then
perhaps
do
construction
projects
in
so
yes,
there
will
be
some
studying
that
will
be
done
in
those
areas
that
have
not
been
studied,
but
the
studies
that
are
there
would
certainly
be
used
just
like
in
the
study
that
we're
doing
now
for
the
storm
surge
risk
study.
L
None
of
those
studies
are
thrown
away
or
discarded,
they
are
certainly
used
and
it
helps
make
the
project
go
a
little
further.
But
one
thing
I
just
want
to
be
clear
is
that
the
scope
and
scale
of
this
study
is
still
to
be
determined.
We
intentionally
left
it
very
broad.
The
authorization
in
the
federal
authorization
bill
was
very
broad.
We
wrote
the
letter
very
broad.
L
The
army
corps
of
engineers
understands
that
they've
asked
it
to
be
broad
they're,
going
to
work
it
up
through
their
chain
of
command,
and
they
will
come
back
with
us
and
together,
we'll
have
a
little
more
scoping
to
do.
But
the
the
intent
of
this
is
to
look
for
ways
that
the
federal
government
can
determine
federal
interest
and
therefore
perhaps
come
to
the
city
and
be
able
to
cost
share
future
construction
projects
to
help
with
our
flooding
at
a
cost
share
amount
of
65
to
35
percent.
E
H
I
know
the
army
corps
of
engineers
has
a
division
which
specifically
looks
at
natural
solutions
to
flooding
issues.
I
do
know
that,
as
a
part
of
the
first
three
by
three,
we
are
sort
of
looking
at
natural
solutions
for
certain
parts
of
the
peninsula,
more
specifically
wagner
terrace.
H
L
Right,
the
one
that's
ongoing
and
and
we'll
get
into
this
more
and
more
as
the
committee
gets
going,
and
we
brief
out
on
that.
It's
it's
difficult
for
natural
solutions
to
by
themselves
stop
storm
surge
of
any
considerable
size
just
by
their
nature,
but
they
can
maybe
used
as
an
adjunct
to
some
type
of
a
other
measure.
L
In
this
particular
study,
though,
I
think
there's
a
lot
more
opportunity
for
natural
solutions
to
be
the
solution,
because
we're
looking
not
only
at
storm
surge,
we're
looking
at
all
types
of
flooding
throughout
the
city
of
charleston
and
then
in
those
types
of
flooding.
There
is
more
opportunity
for
natural
type
solutions
to
to
be
effective.
H
Did
we
consider
such
solutions
as
opposed
to
a
wall,
particularly
along
lockwood,
where,
if
we
were
to
raise
lockwood,
we
can
make
brittle
bank
park
sort
of
a
catch
basin
during
storm
surges
or
flooding
and
as
they
do
in
in
the
netherlands,
once
the
water
is
gone,
it
returns
back
to
a
park?
Did
we
ever
consider
anything
like
that,
along
lockwood
and
in
brittlebank
parks
out
of
being
a
retaining
area.
B
G
Yes,
thank
you
yeah.
I
I
really
appreciate
I
I'm
not
on
the
public
works
committee,
but
I
did
watch
your
discussion
of
this
this
topic
yesterday
and
I
I
I
appreciate
mr
wilbert's
responses
to
council
member
griffin.
G
Yes,
it's
worth
going
forward
on
the
study
side
of
things,
but,
but
I
think
my
takeaway
about
this
is
based
on
all
of
the
comments
that
we
were
contributing
to
the
to
the
work
work
session
discussion
a
few
weeks
ago
after
we
listened
to
the
army
corps
and
we
listened
to
wagner
and
ball
and
my
that
session,
as
a
you
know,
consensus
among
council
was
that
we
can't
really
make
decisions
about
the
wall
until
we
have
a
more
holistic
plan
for
managing
water
all
over
our
city,
and
so
I
I
think
the
fact
that
we
can
get
you
know
part
of
that
paid
for
from
a
group
of
engineers
that
we
trust
and
have
a
good
working
relationship.
G
D
Thank
you
miss.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Mark
specifically,
I
mean
it's
great
if
this
is
a
precursor
to
getting
federal
money
to
do
some
projects,
but
as
a
practical
matter
in
terms
of
studying
the
areas
of
the
two
city,
we've
pretty
much
done
it.
I'm
sitting
here
sort
of
looking
at
a
map
trying
to
think
about
where
we
actually
haven't
done
a
study
of
some
sort
or
another
johns
island,
james
island
church,
creek,
the
entire
peninsula.
We
know,
what's
going
on
out
there
absent
our
groundwater
studies,
I
mean
you
know.
D
L
I
think
that's
that
a
lot
of
that
is
true.
I
think
this
process
that
the
army
corps
uses
before
they
commit
federal
money
is
to
go
through
this
process.
Again,
I
don't
think
they
would
restudy
the
areas,
but
they
would
propose
solutions
to
the
challenges
that
those
areas
have
and
recommend
construction
projects
to
fix
those
areas.
So
that
would
be
more
of
the
intent
to
come
up
with
construction
projects
and
see
if
those
construction
projects
have
a
significant
cost-benefit
ratio
to
determine
federal
interest
where
we
could
then
spend
federal
dollars.
D
Well,
why
I
just
humbly
suggest
that
when
we
send
along
if
this
passes
our
assent
to
them,
thinking
about
it
bundle
up
every
single
study
that
we've
already
done
and
send
that,
along
with
it,
so
that
they
have
it
in
front
of
them
as
they
think
about
all
the
challenges
that
we've
got
here.
Don't
duplicate
a
bunch
of
efforts,
because
in
the
end,
really
what
we
need
is
action,
not
studies.
We
got
to
get
going.
So
if
this
slows
things
down
that
speeds
things
up,
that's
not
the
greatest
result
in
the
world.
H
E
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
mark
just
to
follow
back
up
on
what
councilman
was
seeking
left
off
on.
As
he
mentioned,
this
is
a
precursor
to
getting
the
ball
rolling
and
we're
not
committing
our
sales
without
committing
the
city
to
spending
any
money
at
this
point,
and
we
can
pull
the
plug
on
this
if
we
so
desire,
it
isn't
that
correct.
L
Yeah,
so
the
way
I
read
it
is
this
is
a
letter
of
interest
that
we're
sending
to
them.
It's
very,
very
broad.
I
would
be
shocked
honestly
if
they
came
back
and
said
we're
going
to
study
the
entire
city
of
charleston
and
propose
construction
projects
for
the
entire
city.
That's,
but
because
of
the
way
the
authorization
was
written,
that's
the
way
we
had
to
follow
up
the
letter
of
interest.
L
What
we
want
to
be
able
to
determine-
or
we
want
to
give
them
the
opportunity
to
work
with
us
and
determine
areas
that
they're
interested
in
studying
and
that
they
believe
there
could
be
a
cost-benefit
ratio
that
would
be
significant
enough
for
them
to
invest
federal
money.
Once
we
get
that
back
that
answer
back
through
working
back
and
forth
with
them,
then
I
think
we
would
have
the
opportunity
again
to
say
yeah
we're
going
to
move
forward
to
commit
or
not
we're
not
committing
any
money.
With
this,
the
letter
is
very
clear
on
that.
E
This
is
just
one
of
the
legs
we
have
to
move
on
with
a
rung
in
the
water,
so
to
speak
to
in
order
for
this
to
proceed.
That's
all
right
now,
if
we
don't
send.
H
E
H
You,
mr
chairman,
and
mark
just
in
response
to
compliment
seekings.
I
would
assume
that
anyone
conducting
a
study
would
take
existing
studies
into
account
before
they
even
start
their
process.
L
Mr
chairman,
I
can
assure
you
from
working
with
them
on
the
last
study.
That's
the
first
step,
and
the
first
thing
that
they
ask
for
is
all
the
existing
studies
in
the
area.
Any
blueprints
we
have
any
gis
layers
that
pertain
to
the
area
is
it's
information
gathering
phase
lasts
on
the
last
study.
It
lasted
almost
a
full
year.
D
K
So
so
I
just
wanted
to
share.
I
I
viewed
this
show
as
a
real
opportunity
for
us
to,
as
councilmember
jackson
mentioned,
fulfill,
that
vision
of
a
holistic
approach
to
flooding
for
our
whole
city,
and
it
doesn't
mean
we're
waiting
for
this
to
occur.
I
mean
you
all
know:
we
got
the
strategy,
five
strategies,
we're
we're
pursuing
those
things.
We've
got
so
many
projects
that
we're
proud
of
that
mr
fountain
and
our
stormwater
department
are
pursuing.
K
Yesterday,
we
reviewed
a
bunch
of
small
projects,
I
mean
none
of
that
is
going
to
stop,
but
but
this
allows
us
the,
I
think,
incredible
opportunity.
We
know
we
got
to
fix,
still
have
future
projects
to
further
address
flooding
in
various
parts
of
our
city,
and
even
if
this
puts
us
on
the
path
where
the
federal
government
even
helps
us
on
a
portion
of
those
that's
money,
we
don't
have
now
it's
it's.
It
just
makes
good
sense
to
try
to
continue
to
partner
with
them
and
bring
them
into
the
full
of
our
ongoing
efforts.
K
Over
time
it
could
mean
some
more
federal
assistance
that
I
would.
I
think
we
would
all
welcome
if
it
falls
right
into
other
future
projects
that
we
need
for
our
city,
and
this
is
just
a
stepping
stone
to
get
us
in
that
direction.
So
I
hope
you'll
support
this.
It's
it's
really
a
great
opportunity,
in
my
view.
Thanks.
A
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
sir
okay,
so
basically,
I
just
want
to
piggyback
quickly
on
what
the
mayor
has
said
and
also
council
member
seeking.
I
don't
think
any
of
us
are
hesitant
about
the
fact
that
we
could
get
some
federal
money
from
this
project.
I
think
the
the
bigger
question
is:
how
much
is
it
going
to
cost
on
our
end,
just
like
we're
looking
at
a
potential
500
million
dollar
buy-in
on
the
current
study
that
we're
doing-
and
we
haven't
really
got
into
in-depth
discussion
about
how
we're
going
to
raise
that
money?
A
How
we're
going
to
get
to
that
number,
and
so
I
think
more
than
anything.
What
scares
me
is
that
we're
going
to
waste
a
lot
of
time
going
through
this
process,
maybe
a
half-heartedly
looking
at
raising
the
money.
But
you
know
just
like
this
study
that
we're
going
through
right
now,
the
3x3
500
million
dollars.
I
mean
we're
talking
about
a
project,
that's
bigger
than
and
we
haven't
even
talked
about
putting
it
on
a
referendum
or
anything.
A
Yet
I
feel
like
something
like
that
needs
to
be
headed
down
that
path,
and
so
what
scares
me
is
that
we're
just
appeasing
the
army
corps
of
engineers
saying
we're
interested,
but
we're
not
actually
taking
the
the
steps
necessary
to
we're
going
to
come
up
with
this
exuberant
price
tag
on
the
first
project
and
now
we're
going
to
tell
them
that
we're
going
to
start
looking
at
a
second
project,
and
we
have
no
idea
how
we're
going
to
fund
the
first.
A
So
I
mean
if
this
is
like
a
smaller
scale
mark,
it
seems
to
me,
like
you,
might
have
some
more
information
about
what,
where
they're,
potentially
looking
at
you
said
that,
maybe
that
it's
it's
the
letter's
got
to
be
broad.
But
you
would
be
surprised
if
it
was
if
it
was
a
broad
thing.
Does
that
mean
that
you
have
maybe
some
information
that
they
may
be
looking
at
a
specific
area.
L
Yeah,
I
think-
and
I
don't
I
don't
do
to
you-
what
I
we
have
not
had
those
discussions
at
all
to
any
particular
areas.
Okay,
again,
it
goes
to
the
the
federal
cost
benefit,
one
of
the
things
that
we
did
in
fact
put
in
the
letter
and
certainly
in
the
first
paragraph,
there
speaks
exactly
to
your
concern
and
that
is
that
the
city
is
comprised
of
distinct
areas,
areas
of
special
concern
that
could
be
treated
individually
and
could
be
severed
from
one
another
as
a
project
develops.
L
So
the
goal
there
in
that
particular
language
was:
can
we
break
these
up
and
do
some?
Now
I
mean
I
say
now,
probably
six
or
seven
years
from
now,
and
then
you
know
one's
maybe
nine
ten
years
after
that,
so
it's
intentionally
written
that
way
that
this
is
not
a
broad
grandiose
solution,
and
even
if
it
is,
we
know
the
city
is
severable.
A
And
then
I'll
plan
I'll
support
yesterday,
I've
had
to
know.
Mr
chairman.
I
just
want
to
explain
that.
I
voted
no
yesterday
because
I
wanted
some
more
information,
but
I'm
going
to
vote
yes
today,
because
I
would
like
to
find
out
where
the
army
corps
is
headed
and
what
they're
looking
at
and
what
sort
of
scale
this
project
is.
A
I
have
a
lot
of
of
questions,
and
hopefully,
with
this
letter
of
just
interest,
we'll
get
some
more
specifics
as
to
where
they're
looking
and
what
kind
of
ideas
they
have
and
what
sort
of
price
tag
it's
going
to
be.
These
people
are
going
to
want
to
know
how
much
it's
going
to
cost.
L
These
are
three
million
dollar
studies,
that's
what
they're
unless
it
goes
over
and
then
that
would
if
the
study
were
to
go
over
just
like
the
one
that
we're
currently
on,
of
course,
that's
being
funded
100
by
the
federal
government
if
it
were
to
go
over,
that
would
have
to
be
negotiated
between
us
and
them
at
the
three-year
mark.
E
H
M
M
M
You
know
to
lead
the
army
corps
of
engineers,
anybody
else
along
and
we
hadn't
put
the
we
had
to
roll
up
our
sleeves
to
say,
city
of
charleston.
Where
is
our
money
coming
from?
We
have
not
put
any
effort
on
that.
We
talk
about
it,
doing
a
meeting
every
now
and
then
and
then
in
between
the
meetings
it's
over
with.
M
So
I'm
gonna
vote
for
this,
but
I
believe
before
we
get
to
the
jumping
off
point
kind
of
like
what
council,
lady
jackson
said,
yeah
a
couple
of
I'm
just
paraphrasing,
but
to
a
couple
of
points.
If
we
want
to
hit
the
off
ramp,
we
could,
but
it
would
be
disingenuous-
and
you
know
earnestly
get
to
the
point
of
saying
where's
our
money
going
to
come
from.
Hopefully
the
fed
does
come
through.
M
Where
does
our
money
come
from
and
that's
not
going
to
be
something
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
make
a
decision
on?
I
don't
think
between
the
13
of
us
we're
going
to
need
a
collective
to
come
up
with
those
kind
of
monies
I
mean.
Councilman
griffith
says
500
million.
I
thought
I
was
six
north
of
600
million.
That's
approximately
three
times
our
annual
budget,
so
we've
got
to
think
collectively
in
a
broad
way.
M
We
have
this
conversation,
but
then
I
don't
see
the
action
steps
on
the
how
to's
of
getting
dollars
to
do
it.
So
I
would
hope,
on
the
other
side
of
this
vote
in
the
days
and
weeks
ahead,
we
begin
to
put
together
honest
financial
plan,
how
we're
going
to
come
up
with
the
money
to
do
this.
Can
this
community.
H
M
Doubt
but
it
has
to
be
concise,
something
understandable
for
the
people
at
large
to
understand
and
comprehend
right
now
we
know
we're
close
to
having
that
message
much
too
much
more
the
methodology
about
getting
the
finances
of
this
done.
So
I
think
that's
about
the
third
or
fourth
time
between
committee
meetings
and
on
now,
council
meeting
ways
and
means
many.
I've
talked
about
a
broad
approach
to
try
to
generate
the
money
to
do
this.
If
we
don't
take
the
action
steps,
then
shame
on
us.
E
H
E
Yes,
sir,
the
committee
on
real
estate
met
yesterday
afternoon
several
items
on
our
agenda.
The
first
item
is
may
sound.
Familiar
to
all
of
you,
which
we
just
checked
us
out
about
a
month
ago,
disregards
the
surface
lot
on
hagert
and
fishburne
street
over
100
surface
parking
lots.
E
The
state
came
back
to
us
because
there
were
some
teas
that
we
did
not
cross
and
eyes
that
needed
to
be
dotted,
but
there
was
no
other
major
changes
to
this
lease
within
usc
that
we
had
already
not
approved.
E
I
don't
see
peter
roscoe
on
on
our
call,
but
there
were
just
three
minor
issues
that
we
needed
to
address
to
get
this
done.
So
we
moved
item
a
b,
approved
item
b,
regarded
a
agreement
with
palmetto
railways,
in
which
the
city
was
going
to
get
11.5
million
dollars
for
the
sale
of
some.
This
is
part
of
that
railroad
model
area.
This
was
also
discussed
at
the
traffic
and
transportation
committee
meeting
preceded
us
yesterday.
E
Ship
mcqueen
is
is
on
the
phone
of
the
11.5
million.
If
we
accept
this
deal
about,
5
million
of
it
will
have
to
go
to
mediation
of
this
area
and
and
then
the
other
money
would
be
used
for
helping
us,
probably
relocate
milford
street
property,
so
chip
with
that
sort
of
being
teed
up
for
you.
Would
you
mind,
picking
out
from
from
that
point
and
giving
us
more
explanation
on
this
proposal
for
this
mou.
I
Yes,
sir,
I'm
happy
to
and
as
casper
shade
mentioned,
there
are
still
a
lot
of
moving
parts,
the
so
the
let
me
sure
jennifer
can.
I
share
my
screen.
I
All
right
here
we
go.
This
is
probably
the
best
map
to
use,
but
this
is
so.
The
red
area
is,
is
the
new
quote:
southern
access
route,
rail
access
to
the
navy
base
intermodal
facility,
the
city
owns
the
w,
what's
known
as
the
wr
grace
site,
which
is
shown
highlighted
here,
the
we've
known
for
a
long
time
that
palmetto
railways
needs
to
acquire
a
portion
of
our
property.
I
I
think
the
the
latest.
Basically,
what
I've
got
is
up
to
2.53
acres
at
this
point
they
also
anyway,
going
back
to
the
beginning.
We've
also
been
negotiating
sort
of
a
list
of
mitigation
improvements
for
either
the
city
to
make
with
palmetto
railways
dollars
or
palmetto
railways
to
make
an
association
with
department
of
transportation
and
the
department
of
commerce.
I
We
were
stuck
for
really
a
couple
of
years
at
somewhere
around
five
million
dollars
with
a
list
of
mitigation
improvements
and
the
idea
that
we'd
work
out
the
sale
of
the
wr
grace
site
or
a
portion
of
it.
Excuse
me
at
a
later
date.
More
recently,
the
ports
authority
has
gotten
involved.
They
are.
The
general
assembly
is
actually
considering
a
economic
development
bond
for
like
550
million
dollars
for
the
intermodal
project.
I
That's
pending
and
subject
to
the
passage
of
that.
What's
currently
a
joint
resolution,
that's
been
referred
to
their
committee
on
ways
of
means.
I
They've
offered
us
11.5
million
dollars
for
I'm,
describing
it
I'm
describing
it
as
up
to
2.53
acres
of
the
wr
grace
site
because
they
don't
know
exactly
what
the
outline
is
going
to
be
and
that's
going
to
be.
The
maximum
and
4.9
million
roughly
would
have
to
go
to
mitigation
impacts,
meaning
transportation
mitigation
impacts.
I
I
I
The
palmetto
railways
had
come
back
with
their
own
mitigation
study
and
wanted
to
that's
where
they're,
I
think
they
had
4.2
million
dollars
worth
of
projects
listed.
We
would
get
the
11.5
million
dollars.
We
could.
We
have
to
use
five
for
transportation
or
related
mitigation
in
this
area
from
the
southern
access
route.
The
other
6.5
million
would
have
to
use
for
one
of
two
purposes
that
being
mitigation,
improvements
or
replacement
facilities
for
what
was
to
be
built
on
the
wr
grace
site,
which
was
public
works
facility,
a
public
service
facility.
I
I
think
department
of
transpo,
tnt,
new
facilities,
fleet
storage
for
the
police
and
fire
training
facilities,
potentially
so
that
that
has
been
their
offer
and
again
it's
subject
to
the
to
the
bond.
As
far
as
what
mitigation
projects
we
would
implement.
I
E
Alright,
mr
mcqueeny,
the
I
think,
one
of
the
comments
you
made
yesterday
that.
E
Us,
and
as
far
as
negotiating
and
trying
to
get
more
money
they
may
we
may
lose
that
on
the
table.
I
Either
going
to
get
this
or
we
can
say
no
and
we'll
deal
with
those
consequences
which
you
know,
that's
that's
y'all's
policy
call
to
make.
We
we
have
older
appraisals
of
the
property.
I
don't
think
we
have
a
relatively
recent
appraisal
and
that
did
come
up
at
real
estate
and
I
can
order
that.
I
think
they
said
it's
been
a
six
to
eight
week
turnaround,
so
it
will
hold
it
up.
I
My
the
reason,
I'm
kind
of
trying
to
get
this
done
is,
I
would
prefer
to
have
this
in
place
signed
by
both
parties
before
that
bond
is,
is
passed
by
the
general
assembly
so
that
both
parties
are
sort
of
guaranteed.
This
is
going
to
how
it's
this
is
how
it's
going
to
work
once
that
bond
goes.
So
that's
that's
really
the
hurry.
I
feel
like
on
my
end,
but
you
know
it
anyway.
That's
that's
pretty
much
everything.
I've
been
very
blunt,
but
that's
that's
pretty
much.
You
know
everything.
E
I
know
that
councilman
seeking
our
director
of
traffic
and
transportation
is
available,
as
I
said,
with
their
attention
as
well,
but
that's
sort
of
where
we
are
with
with
this
item
on
real
estate.
I
can
move
on
to
the
item.
Other
items
as
well
item
c
is
an
ordinance
to
authorize
the
mayo
mayor
to
execute
a
third
amendment
to
the
memorandum
regarding
some
property
on
hanover
street
for
affordable
housing
is
giona
available.
H
N
Sorry
trying
to
unmute
and
put
the
camera
on
as
well.
Yes,
sir.
Thank
you
councilmember
shaheed
and
councilmember
gregory.
So
what
is
before
what
we
presented
to
real
estate
yesterday
and
what
is
before
council
today
is
the
authorization
for
a
third
amendment
to
an
mou
between
the
city
and
the
episcopal
diocese,
chodo
or
community
housing
development
organization.
N
Many
of
you
who've
been
on
council
for
a
while
recall
this
organization.
Basically,
this
is
finalizing
our
efforts
with
the
episcopal
diocese
chodo,
and
this
literally
would
do
two
things.
It
would
return
83
hanover
street
to
the
city
which
we've
already
begun,
development
on
and
have
a
design
for,
and
then
it
would
allow
the
edie
choto
to
utilize
approximately
one
hundred
and
sixty
one
thousand
one
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
dollars
toward
the
construction
of
two
additional
homes
on
humphreys
court.
N
This
organization's
efforts
have
been
undertaken
in
the
cannonbarro
elliott
borough
community,
and
so
we
want
them
to
continue
that
and
in
fact,
once
they're
done
there.
That
would
finalize
the
efforts
that
they've
undertaken
to
date
with
the
city
of
charleston.
So
I
asked
for
your
continued
approval
of
this
item.
E
The
mr
chairman
dealt
with
these
the
ongoing
litigation
with
crown
castles.
E
E
E
We
were
able
they
were
able
to
identify
three
different
polls
that
the
city
owns
and
we
could
use
those
utility
poles
to
accommodate
crown
council's
need
for
the
erection
of
the
for
these
towers
instead,
so
we
discussed
giving
them
authorization
to
proceed
with
this.
I
don't
think
steve
is
on
the
on
the
line.
Just
maybe
susan
hodena
can
add
anything
that
I'm
missing
on
that.
That
was
a
very
quick
reader's
digest
description
of
what
we
talked
about
at
length
yesterday
about
these
black
hideous.
Looking
poles.
E
One
of
them
was
positioned
to
be
right
at
the
corner
of
the
four
corners
of
wall
right
across
the
street
from
city
hall.
The
other
was
going
to
be
positioned
further
down
broad
street
near
logan
street,
so
they
these
were
things
that
we
were
trying
to
avoid.
Having
installed
and
literally
sticking
out
like
a
like
a
big
old
sore
thumb
at
various
locations
throughout
the
peninsula
and
through
their
efforts,
we've
been
able
to
provide
for
an
alternative
to
these
polls,
using
what
we
have
in
our
inventory,
with
our
our
stockpile.
E
So
to
speak
on
that
so
susan.
If
I
missed
anything,
I
kind
of
glossed
over
that,
but
I
think
that's
the
the
gist
of
what
we're
looking
forward
to
permission
to
proceed
with
that
offer.
C
That's
that's
correct.
We
would
like
the
authorization
to
for
the
mayor
to
execute
the
non-exclusive
poll
agreement.
That's
in
your
agenda
package,
which
would
authorize
crown
castle
to
place
their
equipment
on
city-owned
polls
and
the
benefit
of
this
is
they
would
not
be
installing
their
own
new
polls
which
are
very
unattractive
near
these
polls.
So
we
strongly
encourage
and
hope
that
council
will
authorize
us
to
go
forward
with
this
poll
agreement.
Thank
you.
E
Item
e,
mr
chairman,
was
a
request
for
a
memorandum
of
understanding
between
federal
health
and
the
city
to
have
a
temporary
cover
location
at
265,
fishburne
street
and
finally,
for
consideration
were
the
annexations
of
two
pieces
of
property
council
member
mapel
has
been
on
his
bicycle
pedaling
very
fast,
and
hardly
to
get
more
people
in
this
district
on
gulf
view,
which
is
right
off
the
tenth
hole
of
the
muni
and
in
council
member
sacramento's
district,
which
is
sort
of
borders.
E
With
my
district
and
council
member
wearing
institute
114
magnolia
items,
a
through
f
are
all
recommended
for
approval
and
submission
to
this
committee
recommendation
that
we
approve
all
those
items.
Mr
chairman,.
H
I
If
I
can
just
real
quick,
I
apologize,
we
do
have
an
appraisal
of
the
property
from
march
of
2019,
and
I
I
did
not
realize
that
I
don't
think
I
was
involved
that
point
that
I
just
got
from
matt
froelich
I'll.
I
can
provide
that
to
the
real
estate
committee
meeting
before
this
is
the
first
reading
of
the
ordinance,
but
it's
it.
I
It
does
not
concern
me
that
appraisal
based
on
what
we'd
be
getting
under
this
agreement.
I'll
just
put
it
that
way,
but
I
don't
want
to
announce
it
to
the
general
public
because
it's
privileged
so
thank
you,
but
I
will.
I
will
provide
it
I'll,
go
back
to
real
estate
next
month
and
provide
everybody
a
copy
between
now
and
then.
H
H
H
Yes,
yes,
is
there
anything
else
to
be
brought
before
this
committee?
If
not,
his
meetings
adjourn.