►
From YouTube: City Council Sub-Committee Meeting of 2-8-21
Description
City of Chelsea, via WebEx, Chelsea Community Cable TV
A
A
Definition,
former
homeowner
means
any
natural
person
or
group
of
natural
persons
who,
prior
to
foreclosure
of
a
housing
combination.
Residential
unit,
has
been
the
title
owner
of
owners
of
such
a
residential
combination,
residential
unit,
foreclosing
owner
means
of
any
natural
person
or
entity
that
holds
title
in
any
capacity
directly
or
indirectly,
without
limitation,
whether
it's
an
own
name,
a
trustee
or
beneficiary,
to
a
housing
accommodation.
A
Within
a
dwelling
used
for
the
intended
use
by
one
family
or
household
for
living,
tenant
any
means
any
person
who
inhabits
or
entitled
to
inhabit
a
dwelling
unit
under
a
rental
agreement,
66
c
applicability.
The
provisions
of
this
ordinance
shall
apply
to
all
rental
use
units
and
housing,
accommodations
in
the
city
of
chelsea
in
whole
or
park,
where
notice
to
quit
or
other
notice
of
lease
of
non-rule,
renewal
or
expiration
has
been
served
or
should
have
been
served
on
a
tenant
or
former
homeowner
of
any
such
rental
or
housing.
A
Such
landlord
or
foreclosing
owner
shall,
at
the
time
also
do
the
following
one
provide
the
tenant
or
former
homeowner
with
a
notice
of
basic
housing
rights
and
resources,
including
a
list
of
organizations
available
to
assist
tenants
and
or
former
homeowners
with
not
with
their
contact
information
on
a
form
or
forms
prepared
by
the
city
of
chelsea's
housing.
Community
development
department
two
provide
a
copy
of
the
notice
of
the
lease
non-renewal
or
expiration
or
notice
to
quit
to
the
city
of
chelsea's
housing,
community
development
department,
at
least
30
days
prior
to
commencing
any
summary
process.
A
A
A
Each
failure
to
comply
with
the
requirements
set
forth
in
this
act
with
respect
to
an
individual,
tenant
or
occupant
entitled
to
notice.
Herein
shall
be
deemed
a
separate
offense,
triggering
a
separate
warning
or
fine
unless
otherwise
provided
a
person
or
entity
violating
any
provisions
of
the
ordinance
shall
be
punishable
by
warning
or
fine.
In
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
chelsea's
code
of
ordinances,
section
1-8,
effective
date,
this
ordinance
shall
become
effective
immediately
after
passage
by
the
city
council.
A
C
C
A
D
Section
d,
the
required
notice,
and
basically
what
we're
doing
is
saying
that
if
you
are
a
landlord
and
you
are
proposing
to
evict
someone
with
this
ordinance,
we
are
asking
you
to
do
two
things
that
previously,
you
weren't
required
to
do.
One
give
us
a
copy
of
the
notice
in
advance
of
the
eviction
so
that
it
gives
our
housing
community
development
department
an
opportunity
to
try
to
assist
people.
We
have
lots
of
programs
to
assist
tenants,
but
it's
hard
for
us
to
always
know
when
someone
is
being
evicted.
D
This
gives
us
that
important
notice-
and
the
second
thing
we're
asking
is
that
when
you
give
that
notice
to
quit,
it
is
accompanied
by
a
resource
page
that
tells
the
tenant
all
the
resources
that
are
available
to
them.
We
would
prepare
that
resource.
It
would
likely
be
a
couple
of
page
pamphlet
that
you
could.
D
At
the
and
you
would
just
include
that
with
your
notice
to
quit
so
that
the
tenant
knows
what
resources
exist
out
there
to
help
them
places
like
where
they
can
call
for
raft
assistance
or
what
legal
organizations
exist
out
there.
Now
I
will
tell
you
this
is
hardly
a
novel
idea.
In
fact,
all
of
this
is
in
essence,
currently
required
by
state
law
passed
at
the
end
of
last
year.
So
at
the
end
of
december,
the
state
legislature
passed
an
emergency
ordinance
that
pretty
much
required
landlords
to
do
something
very
similar
to
this
one.
D
Every
time
they
send
out
a
notice
to
quit.
Now
every
landlord
has
to
send
a
copy
of
that
to
the
executive
office
of
housing
and
community
development.
They
don't
have
to
send
it
to
us,
but
they
do
have
to
send
it
to
the
state
and
let
the
state
know
they're
about
to
evict
someone
and
they
have
to
attest
to
the
state
that
they've,
given
all
these
resources
to
the
tenant,
so
that
the
tenant
knows
about
raft,
assistance
and
other
assistance
that
exists
out
there.
D
D
So
when
the
state
of
emergency
ends,
that
law
will
also
end,
unless,
of
course,
the
legislature
decides
to
extend
it,
and
certainly
there
are
advocacy
advocacy
groups
seeking
for
them
to
do
that,
but
for
now
it
is
scheduled
to
end
at
the
end
of
the
governor's
state
of
emergency,
this
pretty
much
mirrors.
What
that
is.
It
basically
says
going
forward.
You
have
to
give
notice
to
our
office,
and
you
have
to
provide
this
similar
list
of
resources
to
people
you're
evicting
so
very
comparable
to
what
the
state
is
currently
requiring
when
was
to
do.
D
This
is
not
all
that
onerous.
In
my
opinion,
landlords
will
be
used
to
doing
this
because
they
have
to
do
it
right
now
likely
have
to
do
it
for
at
least
another
six
months.
So
what
we're
proposing,
in
my
opinion,
is
really
not
that
onerous
and
I'd.
Ask
the
council
to
seriously
consider
it
and
pass
it.
E
Thank
you,
mr
president,
so
I
don't
have
much
to
add.
The
city
manager
succinctly
provided
an
overview
of
the
proposed
ordinance.
I
do
want
to
weigh
in
on
just
the
benefit
that
this
would
provide
for
the
city
for
residents,
both
tenants,
small
landlords
and
homeowners
who
are
facing
foreclosure.
So
right
now.
As
you
know,
there
are
a
plethora
of
housing
resources
available
to
help
with
rental
assistance,
to
help
with
utility
payments
and
to
provide
you
with
services.
E
F
F
D
So
I
would
say
that
it
is
true.
This
is
aimed
at
protecting
tenants
and
helping
tenants,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
tenants
know
their
the
rights
and
resources
that
exist
for
them,
and
it
is
my
opinion
that
putting
this
burden
on
a
lan
on
on
a
landlord
is
not
all
that
onerous.
It
really
is
downloading
a
phone
and
handing
it
to
them
and
sending
us
an
email.
This
is
not
something
that's
going
to
require
a
lot
of
resources.
D
F
But
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
that
why
is
it?
Why
is
it
that
the
city
has
to
insert
itself
in
the
business
between
two
private
people
in
order
to
in
order
to
you
know
why?
Why
should
you
have
the
power
to
do
that?
I
mean
to
compel
people
to
do
something.
I
understand
that
that
you
know
it's
not
that
it's
not
that
heavy
of
a
lift
necessarily
but
you're
still
compelling
people
to
to
insert
the
city
in
every
single
type
of
transaction.
D
There
is
no
question:
the
city
is
in
this
case,
inserting
itself
in
a
private
transaction,
but
no
more
so
than
we
insert
ourselves.
When
someone
changes
a
tenancy,
we
insert
ourselves
there
with
an
audience
that
says
you
have
to
come
to
us
and
have
a
certified
that
that
apartment
is
habitable
before
you
change
your
tenancy,
so
we
insert
ourselves
in
these
private
transactions
in
lots
of
cases
when
we
reach
a
point
that
we
think
the
benefits
of
the
city
and
cern
itself
are
necessary
to
protect
the
health
and
safety
of
our
residents.
F
F
F
D
F
F
D
I
guess
I
understand
your
philosophical
point
and
I
I
conceded
that
we
seek
to
intervene
as
big
brother
in
a
lot
of
circumstances
that
at
some
point
for
some
may
cross
a
line.
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
you
to
do
as
you
look
at
this
specific
proposal
is
to
weigh
for
this
proposal
the
benefits
to
the
tenant
versus
the
cost
added
to
the
landlord
and
in
that
balancing
of
interest.
D
I
think
it
weighs
heavily
in
favor
of
doing
this,
because
the
the
benefits
so
least
in
this
case
outweigh
the
minimal
minimal
cost.
I
concede
you
at
some
point.
We
may
propose
something
where
that
balance
is
struck
in
a
much
different
way,
but
on
this
one
I
would
say
this
is
one.
I
think
that
reasonable
people
could
say
the
cost
is
really
low
and
the
benefits
are
really
high.
One.
F
D
I'm
not
sure
exactly
how
alex
wants
to
do
this.
I
would
envision
something
as
simple
as
we
have
a
we're
asking
you
to
give
them
something.
We
have
a
farm
online
that
you
can
download
and
that
we
say
is
acceptable
when
you
hand
it
to
them,
you
print
it
out,
or
you
come
to
the
city
and
grab
a
packet
of
50
of
them
and
you
hand
them
out.
You
could
download
it,
and
the
notice
to
us
can
be
as
simple
as
an
email
or
filling
out
some
pre-determined
form
that
we
have
on
our
website.
D
G
E
Great,
so
this
is
going
off
of
the
december
report
so
for
the
chelsea
legal
services
contractor,
we
seek
monthly
reports
so
for
each
monthly
report.
They
submit
them
15
days
after
the
close
of
the
month.
So
in
the
coming
days,
we'll
be
receiving
our
january
report
and
I
could
forward
that
to
the
city
council
as
well.
So
in
the
month
of
december,
there
were
19
eviction
filings
in
the
housing
court
and
there
were
15
eviction
filings
in
the
chelsea
district
court.
Those
are
filings
that
are
involving
chelsea
residents.
E
Out
of
those
filings,
there
were
11
of
households
represented
by
chelsea
legal
services
in
the
court
process.
That
includes
prior
months
as
well,
but
those
were
cases
that
were
being
represented
in
december.
Additionally,
there
were
four
housing
cases
that
were
being
represented
in
the
housing
courts
throughout
the
month
of
december.
E
Moreover,
there
are
over
15
cases
that
are
being
dealt
with.
What
we
call
mediation,
which
is
negotiations
that
occur
with
the
property
owners
before
the
cases
reach
the
the
formal
court
process.
In
total,
the
chelsea
legal
services
group
was
able
to
resolve
eight
cases
that
they
fully
closed
out
in
the
month
of
december.
E
H
H
Else
in
here
that
I
don't
understand
it's,
I
don't
know
if
this
is
beneficial
to
the
people
that
rent
houses
I
might
be
beneficial
to.
But
I
don't
know
about
there's
something
else
here:
rental
units
or
residential
unit
means
non-owned
occupied
room,
so
you
given,
if
a
person
rents
a
room
he
has
all
so
so
now
one
room
can
mean
everything
like.
According
to
this,
it
says
man
not
owned,
occupied
room
or
groups
or
related
rooms
right.
So
that's
like
a
boarding
house.
D
D
H
Is
that
good?
Is
that
going
to
cost
the
landlord
something
to
send
it
to
you
so
now
you're
requiring
every
homeowner
that
some
tenant
doesn't
want
to
pay
you're
telling
them?
Okay,
you
can't
get
rid
of
him
unless
you
tell
us
and
then,
if
you
decide
to
say
oh
well,
there's
reason
not
to
evict
this
person
how
the
poor
guy
that
owns
a
house
now
that
has
to
pay
his
mortgage
can't
pay
his
mortgage.
H
So
it
must
be
voluntary
for
the
landlord.
No,
it
shouldn't
be
that
you
have
to
should
be
voluntary.
If
he
chooses
to
do
so,
so
it
shouldn't
be
that
it
has
to
be
because
anybody
can
say
enya
rents,
his
house,
I
rent
my
house
roy
rents,
his
house,
he
wants
to
evict
someone,
then
he's
got
to
notify
you
first,
you
shouldn't
have
to
do
that.
That's
his
choice
and
then
the
second
thing.
If
he
decides
he
wants
help
from
you,
then
he
can
tell
you
say:
okay,
what
can
you
do?
H
H
D
H
That's
the
that's
the
law,
I'm
sorry
for
interrupting
you.
I
can
tell
you
how
the
eviction
works.
Okay,
first
thing
you
have
to
go,
you
got
to
go
to
constable
and
he
has
to
get
a
paper
constable
sergey
the
paper.
Then
after
he
serves
you
the
paper.
You
have
a
certain
amount
of
time
that
person
the
tenant
can
go
to
court
and
the
court
can
determine
that
and
if
you
have
children,
if
you're
disabled,
he
can't
just
evict
you.
So
all
these
things
are
in
place
right,
whatever
you're
proposing
is
in
place.
H
H
D
H
H
H
C
H
D
H
You
could,
oh
somebody
can
say:
well,
I'm
not
in
a
room
there.
Okay,
the
landlord
says
I
don't
want
you
anymore.
Well,
you
can't
get
rid
of
him,
but
even
though
that
guy
was
renting
an
illegal
room
to
start
with,
because
you're
not
supposed
to
rent
the
room,
because
for
one
you
have
an
ordinance
that
says
this
city
has
an
ordinance
which
is
boarding
houses.
So,
when
you're
condoning
what
you're
saying
here,
you're
allowing
every
house
to
be
a
boarding
house.
H
D
H
A
We
have
one
of
the
the
the
problems
that
I
see
in
our
in
our
city
is
that
there's
an
illegal
black
market
of
people
who
go
out
who
rent
apartments
in
their
names?
Okay,
who
who
goes
out
and
rents
rooms,
sorry
rents,
apartments
I
go
out
and
I
rent
five
six
apartments
in
my
name,
this
is
going
on
and
then
I
go
to
all
the
laundromats
put
up
my
name
and
a
number-
and
I
say,
rent
a
room
for
me.
A
D
D
No
they're
already
protected
regardless
of
this
once
you
rent
that
room
to
that
person,
even
if
it's
illegal
for
you
to
have
done
that
under
the
city's
ordinances,
you
cannot
by
law,
you
cannot
simply
throw
them
out.
The
court
wouldn't
allow
you
to
do
that.
They
would
say:
you've
created
a
tenancy
with
that
person,
even
though
it's
illegal
under
the
city's
rules
we'll
go
after
you
we'll
we'll
bring
a
criminal
complaint
against
you
for
illegally
renting,
but
that
person
can't
be
just
thrown
out
on
the
street.
But
here's
my
question:
that's
independent
of
this.
D
A
A
First
of
all,
I
probably
you
know
the
landlord
who
has
no
idea
that
this
is
going
on.
Okay,
they're
not
going
to
get
punished.
You
can't
go
after
him
if
judith
was
the
one
who
rented
me
one
of
her
three
one
of
the
apartments
in
her
family
street
family
and
I
decided
to
sublease
it.
You
can't
go
after
judith
because
she
didn't
do
anything
her
contract.
D
Because
it
no
well,
it
simply
says
if
the
court's
going
to
force,
if
you're
going
to
give
a
notice,
we're
basically
saying
that's
a
situation
that
you
described
the
city
would
take
the
position
that
as
illegal
as
what
you
have
done
is
you
have
created
a
tendency
with
that
person
and
you
simply
can't
throw
them
out
on
the
street.
Even
if
the
city
comes
after
you
and
says,
you've
done
something
illegal,
we're
coming
after
you,
you
can't
remedy
the
problem
by
just
throwing
the
person
out
and
said
I
fixed
it.
D
A
And
the
only
hook
that
you
have
is
that
the
punishment
that
somehow
I
would
me
as
this
the
person
was
renting-
is
that
the
only
clause
is
some
way
somewhere
you're
going
to
have
a
claim
against
the
property,
because
21ds,
if
you
don't
collect
that
money
for
me,
you
collect
it,
you
just
put
it
against
the
property.
That's.
D
Right
well,
but
we
always
have
the
option
of
a
criminal
complaint
against
the
person
who
violated
our
zoning
ordinance,
in
that
case,
in
the,
in
the
circumstance
that
you
just
described,
the
city
would
have
the
ability,
whether
we
would
do
it
or
whether
it
would
be
a
waste
of
our
time
is
another
matter.
But
the
city
would
certainly
have
the
legal
right
to
pursue
a
criminal
complaint
against
you.
Take
you
to
criminal
court
for
violation
of
our
zoning
law.
D
A
Well
again,
so
again,
so
I'm
bringing
up
an
issue
that
is
occurring
and
I'm
trying
to
settle
that
issue.
Of
course,
this
going
back
to
this,
I
just
you
know.
Let
me
focus
on
this
hold
on.
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
hands
up
and
we're
bringing
up,
but
I
just
want
to
describe
to
me
exactly
the
process
of
how
alex's
department
is
going
to
handle
this.
A
Now
I've
done
this,
I
have
an
apartment,
I'm
serving
a
notice.
I
have
a
non-paying
tenant.
I
want
to
get
them
out.
Okay,
I
have
they
didn't
pay
me
the
last
two
months
and
I
need
okay,
it's
already
march,
whatever
february
I
want
them
out
by
end
of
march
okay.
Now,
first
of
all,
what
is
my
timeline
and,
according
to
you,
timeline?
How
much
time
do
I
have
to
give
you.
D
D
D
A
A
D
A
D
D
D
Know
my
process,
I
am
adding
six
as
proposed
in
a
situation
where
you're
evicting
me
on
a
pure
notice
for
non-payment
of
rent
as
proposed.
This
is
adding
16
days
to
the
process.
I
would
say
to
you
if
that
is
a
hang-up
of
the
city
council,
then
simply
reduce
it
to
14
days
notice,
because
it
still
accomplishes
our
goal.
We
want
to
get.
We
want
to
get
advanced
notice
that
would
be
shorter
than
we
want,
but
I
think
we
could
live
with
it
and
it
would
still
get
the
resource
page
into
people's
hands.
D
Then
it's
a
matter
of
alex's
shop.
Deciding
can
we
intervene
in
this
situation?
Is
there
some
way
to
help
but
I'll?
Let
him
describe
that,
but
before
I
do,
let
me
just
say
that
this
is
what
you
absolutely
have
to
do
all
of
this
right
now
today
you
must
do
all
of
this.
The
only
difference
is
you
send
your
notice
not
to
us,
but
to
the
executive
office
of
housing
and
economic
development,
okay,
but
I'll,
let
alexander
so
what's
he
going
to
do
once?
He
gets
that
note.
E
All
right
so,
starting
at
the
time
the
notice
is
actually
supplied
to
the
tenant,
so
that's
uploaded
on
to
our
website.
It
comes
into
our
department.
We
will
maintain
a
database,
it's
a
monthly
database,
it's
all
of
notices
that
have
been
issued
in
the
city.
Once
we
have
the
property
owner
name
the
address
the
address
of
the
rental
units.
We
will
take
it
up
on
a
weekly
basis,
if
not
sooner
than
that
at
our
eviction
task
force
meetings.
E
Those
are
meetings
that
involve
housing
agencies
in
chelsea,
that
provide
rental
assistance,
mortgage
assistance,
different
kinds
of
social
services
and
we'll
determine
the
best
course
of
action.
If
it
involves
a
a
smaller
property
owner
or
a
homeowner
with
20
units
or
less
that
homeowner
can
actually
or
small
landlord
can
apply
directly
to
raft,
they
don't
need
the
tenants
to
apply.
They
can
go
directly
to
the
state
and
petition
the
state
for
funds
for
up
to
20
units
of
rent.
That's
been
owed
up
to
ten
thousand
dollars
per
unit.
E
In
other
cases
we
may
intervene
directly
with
the
tenant.
Instead,
if
it's
a
smaller
building,
there's
only
one
tenant,
that's
being
evicted,
we'll
confer
with
the
tenant,
we'll
advise
them
on
rental
assistance,
different
options
and
then
do
our
best
to
connect
them
with
those
options
as
quickly
as
possible.
E
I
think
the
big
issue
right
now
that
we're
facing
is
that
when
evictions
are
filed
in
the
court
system,
it's
already
too
late,
both
for
tenants
but
also
for
property
owners.
You
know
for
tenants
it's
too
late
because
they
already
have
that
on
their
record,
the
minute
it
gets
to
the
courts.
They're
already
so
far
gone
down
the
process
that
even
if
we
can
intervene,
it's
often
too
late
to
intervene
for
property
owners.
It's
a
terrible
place
to
be
because
evictions
are
expensive.
It's
like
really
really
expensive
to
evict
a
tenant
in
this
state.
E
So,
on
a
weekly
basis,
we'll
be
taking
up
these
cases
to
see
what
resources
can
we
pair
with
the
different
filings
and
then
about
once
a
month
we
will
be
receiving
data
from
the
chelsea
district
court
and
the
housing
court
to
see
which
evictions
have
occurred
that
haven't
complied
with
this
ordinance
so
we'll
be
able
to
see
you
know
any
issues
of
non-compliance
and
then
take
the
appropriate
enforcement
actions
from
there.
So
that's
pretty
much
it
in
a
nutshell,
but
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
Well,
I
I'm
just
going
to
lay
out
one
concern
in
all
this
tom,
and
I
just
I
I
I
want
to
be
on
the
side
of
helping
residents
and
tenants,
but
there
are
some.
You
know
you
again
when
what
my
colleague
taylors
talks
about
interfering
on
a
contract
in
a
private
deal,
and
you
know
I
hate
to
say
it
as
a
realtor.
I
am
in
many
positions
where
I've
seen
an
owner
occupied,
say
two
family
and
they've
already
notified
the
tenant.
A
Now,
all
of
a
sudden,
you
know,
I
give
my
notice
to
quit
to
my
tenant
upstairs
and
I've
signed
a
purchase
sale
that
has
timelines
timeline
says
when,
when
the
buyer
has
to
go
out
and
apply
for
a
loan
and
when
they
have
to
get
a
commitment
letter,
because
I
got
to
plan
my
life
and
they
got
to
plan
theirs
a
lot
of
moving
parts
here
and
yet
what
happens?
I
don't
want
to
muck
up
this
situation.
A
A
Oh
guess
what,
in
order
to
extend
the
date,
I
gotta
buy
an
extra
interest
point
to
keep
my
rate
down,
because
I
had
it
locked
in
and
that's
to
cost
money,
and
so
I'm
going
to
ask
the
seller
to
have
to
pay
for
that
locked-in
rate.
There's
a
lot
of
things
that
are
in
business,
that
you're
not
being
aware
of,
and
I
wouldn't
want
to
mess
that
all
up.
D
Okay,
so
let
me
let's
walk
through
that
scenario.
You
just
described
what
I'm
going
to
say
to
you
is
what
we
are
proposing
here:
doesn't
change
what
you
have
to
do
in
that
scenario
by
one
day
or
one
iota
in
that
scenario,
just
described
that
homeowner
must
by
existing
law
that
has
existed
in
this
commonwealth
for
50
years,
give
a
30-day
notice
to
quit
to
that
tenant.
D
All
we
are
saying
is
that
when
you
hand
that
notice
to
quit
to
that
tenant,
we're
now
imposing
in
your
two
very
minor
things,
one
the
same
day,
you
hand
that
notice
to
quit
the
tenants
send
us
an
email
two
when
you
hand
that
notice
to
quit
to
the
tenant
attached
to
it.
This
other
two-page
document
that
you've
downloaded
from
the
city.
That's
it
we're
not
interfering
with
your
relationship,
we're
not
deferring
with
your
eviction,
we're
not
interfering
with
anything.
D
D
That's
all
we
would
do
we're,
not
interfering
with
the
tenancy
we're,
not
interfering
with
the
eviction.
We're
not
there's
no
moratorium
on
what
we
can
do,
we're
not
adding
any
substantive
legal
requirements
to
you.
We're
adding
two
tiny
processes
send
us
an
email
and
when
you
hand
them
that
notice
to
quit,
add
this
two-page
document
to
it,
because
this
will
tell
them
what
housing
resources
exist
for.
F
On
this,
I
understand
that
it's
kind
of
a
light.
You
know
it's
a
light,
lift
for
for
landlords,
but
but
it
really
is
a
kind
of
a
fairness
issue
too,
because
what
you're
doing
is
really
compelling
the
landlords
to
give
the
information
to
tenants
to
turn
around
and
go
after
them
to
try
to
get
relief
so,
and
that
is
that
is
correct.
Isn't
it
that
the
part
of
the
resources
that
you're
talking
about
include
in
fact
attorneys,
for
you
know
people
to
sue
their
landlord,
so
they
can't
get
evicted.
F
So
so,
at
what
point
I
guess,
as
I'm
saying
is,
is
that
at
what
point
do
you
expect
any
kind
of
responsibility
to
come
from
tenants
any
kind
of,
or
is
it
just
that
I
know
we
want
to
help
people?
I
do
too,
and
I
don't
want
people
to
be
evicted
unjustly.
I
think
that
this
is
really
about
being
fair,
but
is
it
like?
F
Is
it
fair
to
make
a
landlord
do
something
that
is
really
against
their
interest?
And
so
and
so
the
this
is
this?
Is
the
government
encouraging
the
residents
or
or
wanting
to
be
a
nanny
state
to
take
care
of
all
their
problems
and
all
their
instead
of
actually
requiring
people
to
be
adults
and
to
try
if
you
have
a
problem
reach
out
and
I'm
not
saying
like
some
people
are
unaware,
I
get
it
right.
I
understand
that,
and-
and
I
want
to
help
them
too-
it's
not
that
it's
not
that
I'm
indifferent
to
that.
F
D
F
It's
it's.
I
guess
I
guess
I
might
make
a
distinction
between
a
business
like
that
and
somebody
who
has
a
duplex
and
they're
renting
out
the
other
space.
Those
are
the
people
that
I'm
not
concerned
about
the
people
that
the
landlords
that
have
resources
to
to
you
know
fight
these
things.
They
know
what
they're
getting
into
that's
their
business
right,
that's
in
their
business
model.
D
D
F
I
understand
I
think
that
that's
helpful
too,
but
that
doesn't
address
the
fact
that
this
is
compelling
people
to
do
something
rather
than
having
it
be
a
program
to
actually
educate
people
and
have
them
be
responsible.
Adults,
that's
to
have
a
more
educated,
responsible
citizenry
should
be
the
focus
of
government,
not
just
for
government
to
try
to
solve
every
individual
problems
like
like
you
know.
Well,
if
we
could
only
intervene,
I
I
get
it,
but
we've
got
to
find
some
other
way
to
do
it
rather
than
the
government
compelling
people
to
do
things,
but.