►
From YouTube: City Of Clearwater Community Development Board 10/18/22
Description
Comments are not monitored on this platform. To make a comment, please visit www.myclearwater.com/government/council-meeting-streaming-videos or one of our social media pages.
Agenda can be found here: http://bit.ly/ClearwaterCityCouncilMeetings
A
B
B
E
F
B
B
Agendas
of
today's
meeting
are
on
the
podium
to
your
left
near
the
entry
door.
Also
on
this
Podium
are
a
roster
of
the
Community
Development
board,
the
list
of
City
staff
experts
and
their
resumes
the
board's
rules
of
procedures
and
the
annual
schedule
of
this
board.
Our
first
order
of
business
is
to
review
and
approve
the
minutes.
From
last
month's
meeting,
May
I
have
a
motion
for
approval
of
the
minutes.
B
All
in
favor
aye
opposed
the
minutes
are
approved.
A
next
order.
Business
is
the
to
allow
people
to
be
heard
on
any
item
that
is
not
on
today's
agenda.
Is
there
anyone
present
who
had
wishes
to
speak
about
something
that
is
not
on
today's
agenda?
It's.
K
Okay,
members
of
the
board,
I
am
Bill
Jones,
j-o-n-s-o-n2694,
Redford,
Court
West
in
Clearwater.
Let
me
first
command
the
city
staff
for
posting
all
documents
for
at
least
the
1524
Highland
case
together
on
the
sellout
website.
It's
a
lot
easier
if
you
just
have
to
look
in
two
folders
instead
of
trying
to
go
through
past
history.
So
thank
you.
K
At
last
month's
cdb
meeting
I
made
public
comments
on
1310
South
Washington
Avenue,
reporting
that
the
staff
report
wasn't
posted
timely
on
the
normal
website
and
submitting
photographic
evidence
showing
setback
in
consistencies
with
the
property
in
question
and
the
property
to
the
South.
Later
in
the
meeting,
the
board
attorney
was
asked
to
provide
guidance
to
the
board
on
the
delayed
posting
on
the
website.
K
K
K
It
is
not
the
intent
of
the
development
code
to
continue
their
intent
to
encourage
their
continuation,
but
instead
to
bring
non-conforming
properties
into
compliance,
so
that
property
was
already
non-conforming
that
continuation
or
expansion
of
non-conformity
should
not
have
been
allowed,
or
at
least
you've
been
brought
to
the
attention
of
the
board.
But
the
big
issue
is
saying
what
you
mean
and
meaning
what
you
say.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
Thank
you,
Miss
Johnson.
Is
there
anyone
else
present?
Who
wishes
to
speak
on
an
item?
That's
not
on
today's
agenda.
All
right.
We
will
move
on
to
our
consent
agenda.
This
board
has
adopted
a
consent,
agenda
format
and
the
consent
items
are
identified
as
such
on
the
agenda
consent.
Agenda
items
are
those
for
which
the
Planning
and
Development
Department
recommends
approval.
The
applicant
is
in
agreement
with
any
proposed
conditions
and
no
written
objections
to
the
case
have
been
received.
B
I
will
read
each
item
on
the
consent
agenda
and
if
any
person
wishes
to
remove
this
item
from
the
consent
agenda,
please
sow
state
or
raise
your
hand,
and
we
will
remove
it.
Items
removed
from
the
consent
agenda
will
be
heard
in
the
regular
order
of
the
meeting
items
that
remain
on
the
consent
agenda
will
be
approved
with
a
single
vote.
B
Fld2022-07020
at
1185,
Court
Street
the
owners
in
your
face
skin
care
LLC.
The
location
is
0.753
Acres,
consisting
of
one
parcel
on
the
south
side
of
Court
Street
approximately
165
feet
west
of
South
Missouri
Avenue.
The
board
is
reviewing
a
proposed:
approximately
6
000
square
foot,
light
assembly
use
in
the
commercial
district
for
the
property
located
at
1185
Court
Street.
The
proposed
project
will
be
approximately
15
feet
in
height
from
grade
and
request
allowable
flexibility.
Regarding
Landscaping,
you
use
setbacks,
provision
of
a
loading
zone,
space
and
parking.
B
B
23-29-15-79254-002-0010,
the
owner
is
Highlands
West,
Coast,
LLC,
Representatives,
sander,
Bradbury
of
Northside
engineering.
The
location
is
1.693
Acres,
consisting
of
three
Parcels
located
on
the
west
side
of
South
Highland
Avenue
approximately
517
feet
north
of
the
intersection
with
Bel
Air
Road.
The
board
is
reviewing
a
23-lot
preliminary
plot
to
construct
a
22-unit
attached
to
dwelling
use
in
the
medium
density,
residential
district
for
the
property.
At
that
location
and
an
abutting
unaddressed
parcel
the
number
I
read
a
moment
ago.
B
The
project
will
be
30
feet
in
height,
provides
two
off
street
parking
spaces
per
unit
and
requests
allowable
flexibility
from
setback
requirements.
Is
there
anyone
present
who
wishes
to
remove
this
item
from
today's
consent
agenda?
All
right,
Mr
Johnson,
we'll
remove
that
and
it
will
be
heard
in
the
regular
order.
L
B
B
Fld2022-02009
on
regular
order,
the
case
that
we're
cases
that
we
will
be
hearing
on
regular
order
today
are
quasi-judicial
Level,
2
applications
all
level
two
cases,
such
as
flexible
development,
are
considered
quasi-judicial
hearings
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing,
the
board
reviews,
the
application,
the
staff
report,
correspondence
and
all
evidence
presented
today
and
makes
a
final
decision
subject
to
appeal.
B
This
board
has
previously
qualified
the
city
staff
who
will
testify
as
experts
in
their
area
of
Professional,
Training
education
and
experience.
The
list
of
City
staff
experts
in
their
resumes
are
in
the
handbook
on
the
podium
near
the
entry
door.
Any
other
professionals
who
wish
to
be
qualified
as
an
expert
witness
shall
so
request
at
the
beginning
of
the
case
and
present
a
resume
to
each
board
member.
The
board
shall
determine
whether
or
not
to
qualify
the
person
as
an
expert
and
in
what
field
of
study
at
the
beginning
of
each
level.
B
B
Then
the
case
will
proceed
as
follows:
after
request
for
party
status,
presentation
by
Planning
and
Development
staff,
10
minutes
maximum
presentation
by
the
applicant
10
minutes
maximum
presentation
by
persons
with
party
status,
five
minutes
per
party,
maximum
cross-examination
of
witnesses
by
Planning
and
Development
staff,
cross-examination
of
witnesses
by
applicant
cross-examination
of
witnesses
by
persons
with
party
status
comments
by
the
public
three
minutes
per
person,
closing
remarks
by
the
planning
and
development
staff
at
the
three
minutes.
Maximum
closing
remarks
by
persons
granted
party
status
three
minutes
maximum
closing
remarks
by
the
applicant
three
minutes.
B
Maximum
closing
the
public
hearing,
discussion
and
vote
by
the
board
is:
is
there
anyone
who
wishes
to
request
party
status
on
case
fld2022-02009.
B
All
right
we'll
proceed
with
the
presentation
of
Planning
and
Development
staff.
B
M
M
2022-01001
and
it's
three
vacant
Parcels
of
land
which
constitute
1.693
acres
and
it's
located
on
the
west
side
of
South
Highland
Avenue
directly
across
the
street,
from
the
LaBelle
Plaza,
which
contains
a
Publix
and
other
various
retail
sales
and
service
uses.
The
property
is
in
the
medium
density,
residential
zoning
district
and
the
density.
That's
permitted
is
through
the
residential
office
General
future
land
use
category
which
allows
for
15
dwelling
units
per
acre.
M
The
property
is
surrounded
by
a
mix
of
single-family
homes
to
the
north
and
to
the
West.
Some
attached
dwelling
units
similar
townhome
type
construction
to
the
Northeast,
and
then
you've
got
the
commercial
Plaza,
which
is
retail
sales
and
service
to
the
East
and
there's
offices
to
the
South
The
Proposal
is
a
23
lot.
Preliminary
plot.
M
The
density
that
they're
proposing
is
not
they're
not
taking
advantage
of
the
full
permitted
number
of
units
So
based
on
the
15
dwelling
units
per
acre.
This
site
by
math
supports
25
blown
units
and
they
are
proposing
22
dwelling
units
and
it
will
be
within
four
buildings
and
I'm.
Sorry,
my
throat,
of
course,
always
does
this.
M
So
it's
going
to
be
a
townhouse
development.
There
will
be
one
building
that
will
be
long
and
it'll
be
parallel
to
South
Highland
Avenue.
There
will
be
an
internal
private
drive
system
that
will
intersect
with
the
entryway
to
The
public's
Plaza,
which
you
can
see
on
the
screen,
I've
sort
of
circling
around
it.
The
main
driveway
entrance
is
at
this
point,
and
it's
proposed
as
predominantly
a
one-way
traffic
circulation
pattern
with
the
vehicles
exiting
at
the
southerly
area
of
the
lot
back
onto
Highland.
M
We
worked
extensively
with
the
applicant
to
develop
a
elevations
along
the
Highland
Avenue,
where
there's
a
three
foot
masonry
wall
that
will
be
located
within
the
required
landscape
buffer
and
then,
as
you,
progress
towards
the
dwelling,
there
will
be
a
walkway
leading
up
to
an
entryway
that
has
columns
and
a
porch
with
some
architectural
definition
to
it
and
as
well
as
the
end
buildings,
which
usually
are
not
as
extensively
articulated
with
fenestration
and
columns
and
details
the
applicant
has
agreed
to
at
the
building.
On
the
end
of
there's
two
of
them.
M
M
The
use
itself
is
required,
as
at
minimum
a
level
one
planning
application.
So
in
this
zoning
District,
you
can't
just
propose
attached
dwelling
units
and
go
right
to
building
permit
either
a
level
one
planning
application,
or
in
this
case,
because
they're
requesting
a
reduced
front
setback
which
is
permitted
and
the
range
that
you
can
ask
for
is
between
25
feet
and
10
feet
and
the
project
proposes
at
minimum
a
15
foot
front
setback
on
the
southernmost
building
along
Highland.
M
Don't
know
that
there
is
a
sidewalk
there's
portions
of
it,
and
some
of
it
is
on
the
east
side
of
Highland.
M
So
usually
when
developments
come
through,
this
is
the
time
to
ask
you
know
you
must
install
the
public
improvements,
so
they
will
be
installing
it
and
then
hopefully,
at
some
point
as
things
progress
most
likely
to
the
South,
because
to
the
north
you
have
predominantly
single-family
homes,
but
at
least
there
will
start
to
be
some
sort
of
pedestrian
Connection
in
the
area.
Yes,.
M
Yes,
so
for
the
attached
dwelling
use,
there
are
two
parking
spaces
per
dwelling,
which
would
be
44
spaces
and
they
are
accommodating
that
through
each
dwelling
unit
having
a
two-car
garage,
so
they
are
complying
with
the
code
required
parking.
G
M
That
would
be
something
that
perhaps
David
could
address
from
the
engineering
perspective.
M
Line
that
would
also
be
probably
even
Beyond
engineering.
You
know
that
would
probably
be
Duke.
M
What's
that
that
would
be
something
I
think
that
I
would
have
David
from
engineering.
Perhaps
address.
O
G
N
N
P
So
Melissa
eloquently
described
a
project.
She
is
absolutely
right.
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
with
staff
we
had
to
design
and
redesign
a
project
several
times
to
be
sure
that
it
met
all
aspects
of
your
code.
Step
was
extremely
helpful,
extremely
knowledgeable.
We
like
to
I'd
like
to
publicly
thank
them.
They
did
a
wonderful
job
and
she
also
stated
that
the
you
know
the
number
of
units
prey
curve
there
are
allowed.
P
She
also
said
that
we
had
gone
above
and
beyond,
be
our
coach,
so
we're
going
to
be
piping
that
ditch
right
now
that
ditch
is
very
unsafe,
so
we're
going
to
pipe
that
ditch
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
issues
with
you
know
safety,
the
only
variance
to
the
maximum,
because
your
code
allows
for
a
minimum
and
maximum
setbacks.
So
the
only
area
that
we're
alluding
to
to
request
a
reduction
which
still
within
the
range
is
because
of
a
jog.
P
P
Set
back
the
rear
setback,
the
dimensional
requirements
of
the
building
and
also
access
in
the
back,
so
it
just
seemed
like
that
request
would
make
a
better
project.
It
will
allow
us
to
do.
You
know
what
the
ownership
would
like
to
do
and
enhance
the
project
with
landscaping
and
fencing
so
I.
You
know
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
with
the
staff
and
we
feel
we
have
brought
a
very
good
project
before
this
board,
and
we
feel
that
you
folks
will
be
extremely.
B
P
So
there's
a
cyclone.
P
I'll
be
glad
to
well
I,
guess
I
can't
so
should
I
put
my
site
plan.
P
Should
we
show
a
site
plan
without
the
landscape
on
it,
whether
it's
a
d
might
okay,
because
this
is
there,
you
go
remember
the
job.
Yes,
yes,
so
that's
fine
I
can
use
this
any
of
these
arrows
there.
Yes,
okay
and
the
maps.
Okay
thanks,
so
that
jug
that
we
were
discussing
is
in
this
very
location
in
here
and
oops.
P
And,
and
also
with
regards
to
the
utilities
and
Engineering,
we
had
to
work
really
really
hard
to
to
come
up
with
this
sort
of
a
design
to
dedicate
land
to
the
city
for
their
utility
easements,
because
the
city
required
you
know
certain
easements
to
be
retained.
P
P
So
the
setbacks
that
I
was
basically
describing
you
know,
there's
a
there's,
a
10-foot
setback
in
the
back
right
in
here,
and
then
we
had
to
give
some
land
to
the
city
for
easement
and
then
the
buildings
there's
a
building.
And
then
this
distance
between
the
two
buildings
would
accommodate
access
to
the
building
and
driveway.
And
then
we
have
the
buildings
so
that
sort
of
pushed
us
towards
requesting
that
15th
part.
P
Thank
you
by
the
way
I
just
wanted
to
also
say
that
Scott
bench
was
one
of
the
ownership
is
here
and
also
one
of
Northside
engineers.
Daniel's
truck
is
here
too
for
any
additional
questions.
B
Cross-Examination
by
the
applicant.
K
K
Bill
johnson2694
Redford
Court
West
in
Clearwater
I
would
like
to
thank
Miss
Hawk
Baker
for
providing
me
with
considerable
information.
As
we
discuss
this,
as
I
mentioned,
there
is
a
sidewalk
in
front
a
Long
Island
on
the
west
side
of
Highland
to
the
South
that
is
humidly.
This
will
connect
up
with
another
issue
with
sidewalks
is
the
sidewalks
within
the
property.
K
If
a
car
is
parked
on
the
driveway
or
the
garage
apron,
but
not
in
the
garage,
it
will
block
the
sidewalk
that
is
going
through
the
the
new
valve.
The
development
I
would
point
out
that
there's
an
error
on
the
staff
report
reference
on
page
six
to
section
2-101.d.1.
There
is
no
such
provision
in
the
code.
That's
that's
an
error
and
it
it
relates
to
mechanical
equipment.
K
I
couldn't
find
the
reference
in
a
different
place,
but
there
is
no
storm
water
retention
provision
in
the
site,
plans
that
were
available
on
the
website,
which
is
usually
there.
The
project
is
being
submitted
as
residential
infill
and
the
application
does
not
contain
competent,
substantial
evidence
for
residential
infill.
Again.
K
B
K
K
They,
and
can
you
just
wrap
it
up
the
so
that
it
seems
like
the
applicant
has
been
confused
with
the
provision
of
information
which
is
not,
which
is
not
what's
required
by
the
burden
of
proof.
The
burden
of
proof
is
that
the
applicant
shall
submits
substantial,
competent
evidence.
It's
not
in
the
record,
that's
on
the
website
and
when
I
ask
for
City
staff
assistants
I
did
not
find
that
as
well.
M
L
M
Melissa
Health
Baker
senior,
planner,
Planning
and
Development
Department
the
case
before
you
is
a
permitted
use
in
this
zoning
district
and
at
minimum.
Someone
who
would
be
proposing
attached
dwelling
units
in
this
type
of
zoning
District
would
require
a
planning
application,
depending
on
the
amount
of
flexibility
that
they
may
need
for.
M
The
actual
development
then
determines
if
it
stays
as
a
level
one
application
or
if
it
progresses
to
a
level
two
application
and
due
to
the
fact
of
the
easement
and
other
land
issues
along
the
western
side
of
this
L-shaped
property
that
resulted
in
having
to
shift
the
buildings
closer
to
Highland,
Avenue
and
thus
creating
the
need
for
the
front
setback
reduction.
The
minimum
that
they're
asking
for
is
15
feet.
The
code
provides
that
they
could
actually
ask
between
10
and
25
feet,
so
they're
not
asking
for
the
maximum
it's
within
a
range.
M
M
The
site
visibility
triangles
are
all
adhered
to
and
applied
at
the
point
where
the
private
drives
will
intersect
with
South
Highland
Avenue
and
the
fact
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
only
a
three
foot
high
masonry
wall,
which
will
not
occur
within
the
site.
Visibility
triangle,
so
I
think
the
combination
of
the
lower
wall
and
the
fact
that
it
will
be
set
back
at
least
20
feet
from
where
the
private
property
line
intersects
with
Highland
Avenue.
M
P
P
P
It's
a
storm
Tech
system
and
we
have
provided
calculation
to
the
city
so
as
far
as
drainage,
although
it's
not
required
at
this
stage
of
the
game,
but
we
have
provided
that
to
the
city
and
I
think
you
made
a
statement
towards
the
sidewalks
so
we're
putting
a
five-foot
sidewalk
in
front
of
the
property
connecting
North
and
South
sidewalks
together,
that
that
will
be
five
feet
and
it'll
be
the
Ada
regulations.
C
P
P
There
is
volume
in
that,
as
you
know,
I'm
a
subplant
for
yourself
you're,
an
engineer
so
so
those
those
drainage,
that's
the
drainage
system
that
will
provide
the
drainage
requirements
for
the
city.
We
also
have
to
meet
Swift
Mud
and
penalty
and
regulations.
So
it's
all
so
where's
that.
C
L
B
I
think
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
burden
of
proving
that
this
meets
the
code
and
I'm
inclined
to
support.
It
is.
J
Anyone
prepared
to
make
a
motion
chair
I'd,
like
to
move
to
approve
case
number
FLD
to
to
2-02009.
J
B
Okay,
all
in
favor
all
right
opposed
assignments
approved
our
final
level.
Two
item
is
case:
fld2022-05016.
F
R
The
site
is
developed
with
a
gas
station
with
an
accessory
but
bordered
Up
Car
Wash
approved
in
2001
as
part
of
a
flex
element,
and
it
was
built
at
a
Publix.
Grocery
store
is
adjacent
to
the
south
south
of
the
site.
Single-Family
homes
exist
to
the
north
and
east
across
old,
Coachman
and
Townhomes
are
located
across
Belcher
to
the
West.
The
subject
site
does
not
include
direct
access
to
either
adjacent
Street.
R
R
Q
R
R
R
All
of
which
contribute
towards
mitigating
the
inclusion
of
one
Bay,
the
building's
vehicular
exit
facing
that
portion
of
old
Coachmen
as
it
intersects
with
North
Belcher
at
the
North
End
of
the
site.
However,
as
noted,
there
is
one
point
of
contention
as
part
of
The
Proposal,
the
applicant
is
showing
10
vacuum
booms
located
along
the
west
side
of
the
site.
R
R
I
L
R
Therefore,
staff
cannot
support
The
Proposal
with
the
inclusion
of
these
vacuum
homes
along
North,
Belcher
Road,
as
this
is
the
only
point
of
contention.
Staff
has
opted
to
include
a
condition
of
approval,
condition:
five,
which
basically
requires
the
removal
of
the
vacuum
booms
along
the
west
side
of
the
site
along
North,
Belcher
Road,
provided
that
condition
five
is
maintained.
So
that's,
of
course,
the
proposal
and
recommends
approval,
as
the
proposal
is
otherwise
consistent
with
the
applicable
noted,
CDC,
section
and
components
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
without
condition.
Five
staff
cannot
support
the
proposal.
C
C
R
Yeah
just
not
provide
them,
they
are
providing
some
vacuum
booms
directly
along
the
building.
You
can
see
here
that
they
will
have
12
directly
along
the
building
which
are
attach
the
building
or
right
on
it.
Our
only
issues
really
is
limited
to
the.
H
R
R
R
R
The
other
ones
yeah
we're
we're
still
going
to
have
landscape
coverage
and
tree
canopy
preservation,
but
these
booms
in
in
staff's
opinion
just
doesn't
mean
to
let
us
test
for
a
comprehensive
infill.
It
doesn't
meet
the
aesthetic
requirements,
a
better
provider
throughout
the
code
we.
G
R
You
know
what
I
mean
I
I
can
provide
pictures
that
I
know.
L
G
C
If
they
don't
have
the
booms,
then
they
have
a
bunch
of
parking
spots
which
they
can
have
without
the
humans
correct.
But
what
do
they
need?
Any
parking
spots
for
I
mean?
Are
they
are
they
can
they
use?
Do
they?
Would
they
then
want
to
come
back
and
re-utilize
that
parking
equivalent
space
for
for
10
cars
or
moving
something
over
and
taking
advantage
of
that
or
something
you
know
they
or
are
they
just
going
to
pave
it
over
and
at
least
out
the
rooms?
I
guess
I,
don't
know
well.
R
H
H
I
I,
don't
even
necessarily
mean
well.
Yeah
I
mean.
R
I
mean
the
BJ's
built
a
auxiliary
building
to
hide
their
gas
pumps
all
over.
So
theoretically,
yes,
but.
R
The
booms
are
11
feet
tall
and
at
least
for
this,
drawing
a
little
bit
over
11
foot
tall
and
with
a
span
of
14
feet
so
to
the
question.
I
was
hearing
on
the
side.
This
fencing,
yes,
the
fence,
maximum
fence
height
is
six
feet,
still
wouldn't
really
do
much
and
ideally
would
probably
prefer
just
to
have
the
Landscaping
rather
than
fencing.
If.
F
Q
And
I'm
sure
I
have
two
gentlemen
here
we'd
like
to
present
to
you:
Eli
Payne
and
Stevens
Masada
Eli
his
nine
year
experience
in
civil
engineering
Works
in
private
I'm,
sorry,
Todd,
Pressman,
202nd,
Avenue,
South
number
451,
St
Petersburg,
as
I
was
indicating.
Eli
has
had
nine
years
experience
with
private
Land
Development
projects.
Excuse
me
you.
Q
Pain
is
p-a-y-n-e,
he's
experienced
as
a
professional
engineer
in
the
discipline
of
civil
engineering
development
site,
Design
Land
Development,
Transportation
Landscaping
plans
and
storm
water,
and
then
I
have
Mr
Stephen
spasado,
who
is
an
aicp
planner
yes,
Stephen
is
s-t-e-p-h-e-n.
Q
Explosado
is
s-p-o-s-a-t-o,
is
an
aicp
planner
he's
worked,
both
private
and
public,
he's
well
experienced
and
credentialed
in
the
discipline
of
planning,
including
site
design,
landscape,
Transportation,
site
development
and
design
storm
water
and
Zoning.
If
I
may
submit
these
resumes
to
you,
yeah
for
the
board
members.
D
Madam,
chair
of
the
board's
rules,
require
the
copies
available,
be
copies
of
resumes,
be
available
development
previously
qualified
before
the
rule
belongs
to
the
board.
You
can
wave
it
if
you'd
like
to
ask
those
resumes
around
for
your
board
members
innovation
in
the
committee
determination
as
to
whether
you
wish
to
qualify
Asado
and
Mr
Payne
as
experts.
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
You
know
where
there's
consequences
of
what
you
can
do
is.
Can
you
just
provide
that
is
that
landscape
has
that
number?
That
goes
with
that,
but
I'm
not
sure
what
your
question
is.
Well,
you
know
as
a
PE,
if
you
have
after
me,
you
messed
up
because
of
xyzer
and
your
license
and
we
can
go
after
you
just
saying.
Is
there
equivalence
for
the
landscape
side?
I
know,
there's
letters
you've
been
admitted
to
a.
C
S
I
am
a
certified
planner,
aicp
I.
Think
similar
to
you
know
some
of
your
opinions.
It's
a
certification.
It's
not
a
professional
license.
We
did
have
sort
of
the
the
and
I'm
with
I'm
with
level
up
Consulting.
A
professional
landscape.
Architect
did
prepare
the
landscape
plan,
that's
included
in
the
information.
That's
been
provided
to
the
city
so,
where
you
see
land,
specific
landscape
information
plants,
the
types
the
locations
that
was
all
done
by
a
question
of
landscape
architect
who
is
licensed
has
a
number
is
required
to
go
through.
S
S
I
I
will
I
will
testify,
I
think
Mr
President
and
if
and.
C
Q
The
vacuums
are
the
sole
point
of
contention
and
let
me
say
to
you
that
we
work
through
a
lot
of
issues.
The
vacuums,
as
indicated,
are
a
critical
part
of
this
development
and
it
is
a
deal
breaker.
So
we
ask
you,
as
I
will
show
you
improvements
that
we've
made
do
not
throw
the
baby
out
with
the
bath
water.
So,
as
you
look
at
the
site,
it's
mechanical
devices
that
you
can
see
from
both
right-of-ways
there's
no
Landscaping,
it's
just
a
pure,
concrete.
L
Q
At
indicating
as
well
is
really
just
one
expensive,
concrete
pad.
There
is
a
car
wash
that's
bordered
up
and
it's
just
repairs.
You
can
see
it
here.
There
was
a
car
wash
the
site's,
looking
very
poorly
the
dumpsters
looking
poorly
unkept.
This
is
what
we're
going
to
bring
this
site
to
2022
architecture
on
all
sides.
Q
This
is
an
area
by
computer
design,
as
you
can
see
the
amount
of
landscaping
and
natural
trees
that
will
remain
at
the
particular
site.
It's
very
green.
It's
very
positive
staff
report
has
been
very
supportive
again.
Looking
at
that
one
particular
point,
so
we
took
care
of
the
AC
unit.
That
was
one
issue.
We
took
care
of
that
late
last
week.
So
again,
as
Mark's
indicated,
only
the
vacuums
and
the
air
conditioning
has
been
moved
to
an
acceptable
location,
so
I
want
to
go
through
the
progression
steps
of
site
plan
Improvement
for
you.
Q
This
is
how
the
site
was
originally
under
the
DRC,
as
you
can
see
on
the
screen,
the
car
wash
in
the
retail.
What
we
did
was
in
yellow
are
the
vacuums
that
were
under
contention
by
the
staff
and
what
we
did
was
we
reoriented
the
site
to
pull
those
into
the
site
along
with
some
other
corrective
actions.
So
the
first
thing
we
did
was
we
removed.
We
moved
the
orientation
as
you
can
see,
to
move
it
away
from
Belcher
Road.
Q
Now
the
separate
green
triangles
were
a
result
of
additionally
saved
buffer
trees,
and
that's
in
your
plan
that's
submitted
to
you.
So
we
were
able
to
reduce
the
building
size
to
a
smaller
size,
move
some
things
around
the
plan
and
save
a
quite
a
large
number
of
buffer
trees,
particularly
in
that
little
window.
Where
that
red
arrow
is
that's
the
window,
visibility.
That's
of
concern.
Q
If
you
look
at
the
building
that
I
have
in
Black,
that
provides
a
lot
of
buffering
and
screening
as
well
in
that
window,
and
these
are
the
existing
save
buffer
trees.
You
can
see
the
existing
Car
Wash
there.
These
have
been
trees
on
the
North
side
that
have
been
kept
on
site
so
because
of
that
movement.
The
vacuums
now
are
at
a
minimum
of
25
feet
to
a
maximum
of
85
feet
off
of
Belcher
Road
15
feet
is
the
minimum
buffer.
So
we
think
we've
done
really
good
with
that
and
the
staff
is
indicated.
Q
Market
indicated
to
you,
there's
very
Lush
Landscaping
exceeds
the
CDC
requirements.
Many
mature
shade
trees
will
be
preserved,
but
we
wanted
to
go
a
step
further,
like
I
see
on
TV,
but
there's
more
so
we
are
submitting
today
additional
buffer
Landscaping,
as
you
can
see
in
the
green
triangle,
which
will
close
that
small
gap
of
visibility
to
the
vacuums
and
zooming
in
what
we're
proposing
today,
we'll
submit
this
plan
to
you
as
well.
Q
So
what
we've
done
is
we've
added
a
second
four
foot,
hedge,
all,
along
that
vacuum
line:
we've
added
five
new
trees
from
six
feet
to
eight
feet,
to
Ten
Feet,
specifically
in
that
one
area
that
is
open,
I'll
pass
this
plan
around
to
you
as
soon
as
I
finish
if
I
may
even
enter
so
that's
improved
landscaping
and
by
computer
generation.
This
is
an
aerial
rendering
of
all
the
green
improvements.
You
can
see
that
they're
substantial
buffering
and
screening
by
Landscaping
on
that
vacuum
line
and
by
computer
generation.
Q
The
third
practice
that
which
we
did
discuss
that
I
made
Mark
aware
of
at
very
late
last
week,
is
that
the
color
of
the
vacuums
will
be
a
neutral
color.
That
was
a
big
change
for
the
operator,
but
we're
trying
to
move
through
and
meet
expectations
as
best
we
can
so
this
is
generated,
is
what
you
would
typically
see
we're
proposing
them
at
unusual
color,
and
this
would
be
how
the
site
would
look
at
at
one
particular
neutral
color
with
the
mature
Landscaping.
So
in
summary,
we
work
closely
and
diligently
with
the
staff.
Q
Q
We
propose
many
actions
which
include
the
reorientation
of
the
of
the
vacuums
which
gives
us
further
from
the
right
way
and
the
building
help
screens
site
plan
revisions
to
save
the
screens
added
a
second
hedge
and
second
tier
Landscaping,
which
are
under
acceptable
species
under
the
Clearwater
code,
agreed
to
neutral
vacuum,
colors
reduce
the
building
size
and
again
repeating
the
neutral
color.
So
with
that
I'd
like
to
ask
Stephen,
if
you
would
come
up
please
and
make
a
few
comments
we
make
mention,
thank.
S
It
really
functions
more
as
a
second
phase
in
the
car
wash
process,
although
we
understand
how
this
sort
of
fits
within
the
definitions
of
the
code,
but
the
code
is
not
envisioned,
it
can't
predict
all
the
different
circumstances,
all
the
different
types
of
Arrangements
that
there
are
in
the
city
of
Clearwater,
it's
not
a
one-size-fits-all
and
it
also
especially
beneficial
when
we're
dealing
with
the
the
Redevelopment
of
an
existing
site.
As
we
talked
about
that
has
multiple
frontages
and
also
the
the
that
there's
an
existing.
S
You
know
convenience
gas
station
on
the
site
and
so
we're
interpreting
the
code
based
on
those
design
and
process,
and
in
fact
this
you
know
why
we're
here
is
because
situations
like
this
require
judgment
and
interpretation
go
back
to
the
main
point
or
the
point
that
code
can't
predict.
Nor
is
it
a
one-size-fits-all,
so
we
definitely
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
present
what
we
believe
that
what
is
being
presented
is
consistent
with
the
code.
S
Generally,
it
Fosters
the
Redevelopment
of
a
lawfully
created
parcel
in
development
or
not
intensifying
the
use,
we're
not
expanding
the
use,
that's
already
there
on
the
site.
It's
already.
That
type
because
has
already
been
experienced
within
the
community.
So
we're
not
going
from
a
parcel.
That's
undeveloped,
to
a
develop
a
parcel,
we're
rehabilitating
redeveloping
an
existing
parcel.
S
The
layout
remains
and
integrated
into
the
the
shopping
center
and
was
brought
up
by
staff
and
Todd
that
we're
not
asking
for
new
access
points
or
anything
different
in
terms
of
the
all
right,
the
the
I
guess
when
I
asked.
My
key
point
is
that
the
accommodation
being
made
related
to
the
angle
of
the
parking,
along
with
the
location
of
the
retail
building
and
Landscaping,
both
preservation
of
the
existing
Landscaping
in
the
new
new
Landscaping
rates
up
and
it
diffuses
the
sight
line.
S
Not
it's
not
parallel,
but
it's
at
an
angle,
and
so
your
sight
lines
do
not
directly
look
into
the
site
and
then
neither
is
there
an
access
point
directly
adjacent
to
where
those
the
where
the
booms
are
so
there's
no
Clear
Sight
line
into
the
site
from
Belcher
and
again.
This
is
an
aesthetic
concern
and
so
I
think
overall,
we're
addressing
those
aesthetic
concerns,
we're
mitigating
for
it,
and
so
we
believe,
what's
being
proposed,
exceeds
the
code.
G
Any
questions
so
the
the
coloring,
the
booms,
you
said
that
you
changed
the
coloring,
are
they
red?
Are
they
not
I
mean?
Because
when
you
go
back
to
the
picture
of
the
the
booms
themselves,
I
was
trying
to
understand
the
mute.
We
said
we
you
changed.
The
coloring
right
is
that
we.
Q
Q
Q
It
was
a
term
that
we
I
believe
we
received
from
the
staff
or
that
it
was
a
range
of
colors
that
are
not
strong
or
eye-catching.
Much
more
quieter
tone.
Colors.
G
So,
and
the
other
thing
is
what
were
the
other
things
that
were
of
compromise,
we
heard
about
the
AC
unit?
What
other
things
did
you
compromise
with
the
staff
that
you
were
in
because
you
said
there
was
a
couple
things
I
didn't
know.
There
was
more
than
the
AC
unit
other
things
that
you
guys
worked
with
the
city
on.
Let.
Q
T
Yeah,
that
was
that
was
the
two
main
things
and
then
adding
adding
buffering
screening
all
the
way
around
and
then
recently,
we've
added
the
second
round,
Edge,
okay,
saving.
One
of
the
points
that
made
was
originally.
We
were
saving
some
trees
on
the
front
end.
We
wanted
to
pull
the
parking
back
even
further
to
make
sure
we
were
confirmed
that
those
trees
will
definitely
be
saved,
providing
extra
extra
distance
there
from
the
roots
and.
G
N
T
Yeah,
so
the
bottom
just
south,
if
we
can
zoom
out
but
just
south
there's
an
exit
there,
it's
actually
not
bulleted
on
our
parcel
with
the
adjacent
commercial.
No,
no
I'm,
sorry
I'm.
Looking
for
the
curve
where.
T
There's
no
additional
assets
once
proposed
the
project.
Everything
you
guys
are
maintaining
this
Greenery
that
you're
all
putting.
C
It
I
appreciate
the
changes
you
you've
made
and
always
get
to
a
concerned.
I
have
to
really
work
it
through
really
heavily,
but
when
the
city
sometimes
I,
don't
agree
with
because
they
make
things
too
easy
and
if
they
disagree
with
something
I
got
to
really
make
sure
I
understand.
You
know
they
probably
have
a
real
point
that
they're
concerned
about,
and
so
I
I
really
want
to.
Listen
to
this,
partly
what
we
have
is
a
you're
saying
you
had
to
go
to
corporate
to
get
the
colors
of
the
polls
changed.
C
It
sort
of
surprise
me,
so
this
is
really.
This
is
a
corporate
body
and
building
here
they
really
actually
have
control
of
what
we're
discussing
here,
because
you
know,
if
you
had
to
go
to
them,
say
we
want
to
pay
them
something
other
than
your
whatever
you
want
all
right,
if
you
pretty
topped
out,
but
let
me
but
on
the
other
hand,
you've
done
a
lot
of
things
and
it's
the
I'm
sort
of
trying
to
figure
out
how
far
back,
if
in
a
perfect
world
with
this
city,
would
not
have
any
problem
at
all.
C
I
think
ones
that
are
overhead
I
mean
if
they're,
the
lower
part
that
are
back
30
foot
from
the
road
are
those
okay
or
is
it
going
to
the
top
five
that
are
close
to
the
the
roadway
that
are
now
the
concern
and
I
don't
know
if
they've
already
reviewed
these,
these
new
changes
or
not
so
I'll
leave
this
for
them.
But
those
are
my
concerns.
Right
now
is
and
I
guess,
I
don't
know
if
I
can
ask
this
because
it
gets
into
business
things
that
are
sort
of
Beyond.
C
You
wanted
to
say,
but
maybe
perhaps,
but
why
is
that
exact
number
of
overhead
things
a
deal
breaker
as
opposed
to
say
taking
out
five
or
something
like
that?
I
just
do
not
understand
what
the
driver
on
that.
How
many
could
you
take
out
and
make
everybody
happy
if
you
took
out
my
parking
spots
without
the
overheads
would
still
be
people
be
happy.
T
So
we
have
a
representative
here
from
loud
wash
developer
and
he
didn't
probably
answer
that
question.
I
Before
you,
let
him
come
on
up
I
just
wanted
to
go
on
with
your
trees.
Do
you
have
identified
the
six
to
eight
trees
that
you're
looking
to
do
to
add
in
The
Proposal
with
this
new
landscape?
Is
it
identified
on
there
for
them
to
consider
and
staff
to
look
at
yeah,
there's
a
so
they're,
not
palm
trees
or
if
they're,
okay,
Live.
O
Yes,
hi
everyone,
Jim
Treadwell
with
Hutton
development,
we're
the
owners
of
The
Mod
wash
facility.
And
can
you
spell
your
name
yeah,
that's
t-r-e-d-w-e-l-l,
Jim
Treadwell.
O
Correct,
what's
that
yeah,
so
just
want
to
make
a
general
statement.
First,
we've
been
working
very
closely
with
our
consultants
and
indirectly
with
staff
in
making
sure
that
we're
responsive
to
all
the
major
issues
and
we're
very
flexible
to
make
this
project
a
reality,
we're
very
proud
of
what
we've
done
in
terms
of
adhering
to
the
buffers,
the
setbacks,
the
visual
sight
lines
and
the
fact
that
we're
not
disrupting
the
circulation
patterns
outside
of
our
site,
we're
not
adding
any
more
access
points.
So,
in
that
regard
we're
very
proud
of
this
project.
O
As
far
as
the
booms
we
are,
we
would
prefer,
of
course,
to
have
the
plan
that
we
show
right
now,
but
if
need
be,
if
we
needed
to
reduce
the
number
of
booms,
we
would
certainly
agree
to
that.
You
know
there
are
other
mitigating
factors
that
we
could
include:
Maybe
keep
some
of
them
on
one
end
and
maybe
reduce
the
ones
on
below
it
or
stagger
them
or
even
consider
putting
up
a
more
of
a
decorative
screen
of
some
sort.
These
booms
are
very
thin,
we're
going
with
a
neutral
color.
It
I.
O
We
don't
think
it's
very
obtrusive
for
people
that
are
driving
along
that
road
and
we
prefer
to
have
the
booms
because
it
signals
it
as
a
car
wash
and
for
vehicles
coming
there.
That's
one
of
the
first
things
that
they
would
see,
but
we
had
to
compromise
in
terms
of
the
landscaping
and
we
looked
at
it
very
closely
as
far
as
the
sidewalk
area
and
the
people
looking
up
and
I
would
think.
O
This
just
looks
almost
like
a
park
when
you're
driving
there
and
when
you
have
a
park,
you
have
little
Fountain
areas
and
things,
so
we
didn't
think
the
booms
were
really
an
issue.
I
was
very
surprised
to
hear
that,
but
but
irregardless
we
are
flexible
to
reduce
the
number
as
far
as
an
exact
number
I.
Don't
have
that
number
in
front
of
me,
but
whatever
would
be
a
good
number
to
compromise
with
the
board
whatever
they
come,
come
up
with.
J
Yeah
I,
don't
know
your
business
and
you
know
a
lot
better
than
I
do.
But
2020
sounds
like
a
lot.
It
looks
like
a
vacuum
farm
that
I
mean
to
me
I
understand
the
stats
concerned,
because
I
would
think
that
would
be
a
lot
to
fill
and
use.
But
but
again
I
don't
know
your
business,
but
right
it's
just
to
attract
people.
It's
seeing
a
number
of
them.
That
draws
people
in
that.
That
concerns
me
that
you
need
that
and
then
what.
O
I
O
G
I
do
want
to
point
out
because
I'm
a
monthly
member
of
like
a
car
wash
and
just
to
let
you
know
that
I've
experienced
vacuums
always
filled
so
I
can
see
the
need
I
understand
that
area.
Well,
I
will
in
gold
today
Mr
they
have
about
eight
or
nine
and
they're
filled.
Sometimes
you
have
to
go
back
so
I
I
actually
get
the
need
on
the
contrary
that,
besides
attraction,
it's
actually
a
need
that
in
that
area,
I'm
sure
they'll
have
them
all
filled.
G
So
I
do
understand
the
business
part
of
that,
because
I've
witnessed
it
I've
seen
it
and
experienced
it
and
also
understand
the
density
in
that
area
and
the
need
of
that
so
I
do
believe.
You
did
a
great
job
in
trying
to
cover
it.
If
there's
a
visual
obtuse
scenario
with
it,
I
I
do
believe
that
the
company
has
done
a
great
job
in
trying
to
meet
all
the
standards.
You
know
to
help.
O
Good
point:
okay,
if
you
don't
have
any
other
questions.
I
I'd
like
to
just
make
the
point
too:
it's
Mike
brought
up
and
as
we're
making
statements
here,
I
mean
my
concerns.
Were
the
color
of
the
booms
mean
there's
one
that's
going
up
on
US
19
in
the
county,
but
it's
US
19
and
they're
orange
and
they're
very
attractive
to
see
what
accents
that
they're
trying
to
do
is
to
gain
attention.
This
property
sits
back.
The
car
wash
sits
back
off
the
road
attention
to
it,
some
where
I
like
it,
some
are
not
going
to
like
it,
but
it's
also
us
19..
I
There's
everything
in
the
world
out
on
us
19.
good
point:
I
can
respects
staffs
in
determine
Belcher
Road
is
classified,
and
that
area
is
a
Scenic
corridor
and
so
I
mean
those
are
the
situations.
This
property
is
situated
there
and
we
have
to
deal
with
it
being
there
I,
like
the
thought
of
the
additional
Landscaping
I,
think
you
guys
have
compromised
a
lot.
I
mean
I,
have
a
development
background.
I
think
you
are
doing.
You
know
there
comes
a
point,
there's
only
so
much
you
can
do
you
know
before
the
bag
breaks.
I
I
L
I
A
hang
up
on
it
I
would
strongly
recommend
I,
see
the
the
booms
on
the
southern
end,
those
five
or
six
space,
the
five
spaces
on
the
south
to
have
them
and
the
five
spaces
to
the
north
Corner
not
having
them.
They
would
be
tucked
back
behind
the
trees
they're
farther
away
from
the
road
they're,
not
25,
feet,
they're
80
feet
at
the
one
spot.
If
I
see
that
correctly
I
mean
that
compromise
might
be
the
last
compromise
with
staff
to
get
it
over
the
edge
I'd
like
to
hear
from
them
before
this
is
over.
B
Thought
and
I
just
to
simplify
because
I,
like
simple
your
difference
of
opinion
with
the
city
staff
on
compliance
with
the
code.
Is
you
believe
that,
particularly
with
the
landscaping
and
the
other
things
you
propose
to
do
it's
a
sufficient
screen
and
sufficient
blocking
of
the
between
the
right-of-way
and
the
building
structure
that
that
you
believe
that
that
complies
with
the
code
requirements?
Q
B
Q
C
C
Compromise
you
have
made
here
it's
just
for
me
to
understand.
It
is
that
you
had
looked
at
having
them
along
the
road.
Essentially
because
they
were
advertisements,
people
would
say
you
had
a
car
wash
there,
so
you
move
them
back.
So
they're
not
no
longer
an
advertisement,
so
you're
going
to
have
to
really
have
a
good
operation
there
to
bring
people
in
and
make
it
a
better
place,
but
without
having
the
advertisement
along
the
road,
and
so
your
cop.
C
C
Yes,
it
is
there
any
excuse
myself
in
the
foot
by
saying
that
I've
seen
an
awful
lot
of
power
poles
up
along
this
area
and
I,
don't
know
if
I
would
because
there's
more
shaded
like
they
are
like
here,
I,
don't
know
if
I'll
notice
them
from
power
poles
then
and
I
go
by
especially
I
noticed
my
friends
25
feet
back
at
that
farthest.
Corner.
Q
U
Q
B
Q
Mr
dagna
Madam
chair,
if
I
may,
with
the
discussion
about
the
number
of
vacuums,
Mr
Treadwell,
will
move
forward
to
ask
your
consideration
for
the
strip
of
vacuums
on
Belcher
would
be
a
vacuum
at
every
other
space
versus
the
Total
Line.
So
we'll
take
that
one
additional
step
so,
rather
than
a
vacuum.
As
you
can
see
on
the
plan
at
every
parking
spot,
we
would
propose,
and
after
consideration
there
would
be
a
vacuum
at
every
other
spot
along
on
the
side
of
Belcher.
Q
A
If
the
board
is
inclined
for
us
to
work
with
the
applicant
on
a
a
little
different
than
what
was
submitted,
I
would
ask
that
perhaps
you
either
continue
it
for
a
month
for
us
to
work
it
out,
so
that
we
can
do
that
or
at
the
very
minimum.
Continue
it
allow
the
director's
item
to
go
forward,
and
then
we
can
try
to
to
work
it
out
and
then
come
back.
Would.
Q
With
great
respect,
Madam
chair
we're
always
again
happy
to
work
with
the
staff
on
the
board.
Really.
What
you're
looking
at
today
would
be
approval
with
consideration
of
the
Landscaping
Improvement
that
you
plan
in
front
of
you
and,
as
we
just
indicated,
a
reduction
in
number
of
vacuums.
Q
B
B
F
B
There
again
is
another
kind
of
open-ended
thing.
It
would
be
much
more
helpful
to
the
board
if
this
could
come
back
to
us
with
specifics
and
a
recommendation
or
note
a
recommendation
against
approval,
but
I
don't
think
it's
helpful
for
us
just
to
be
discussing
well,
we
could
do
this.
We
could
do
that.
A
I
A
B
A
O
O
O
O
Extension,
that's
the
overall
parcel
itself.
There's.
I
Another
Spirit
of
the
parks
and
purchase
exactly.
B
Cost
I'd,
like
some
guidance
from
our
Council.
We
are
at
the
point
in
the
process
for
cross-examination.
We
have
yet
to
hear
comments
from
the
public.
Is
this
an
all
right
time
for
them
to
have
a
meeting?
Do
we
need
to
recess
the
hearing
to
let
that
happen.
D
Yeah,
what
I
would
do
is
because.
D
Of
the
applicant
and
the
city
staff
to
attempt
to
work
out
whatever
issues
remain,
while
the
remain
reward,
I'd
get
a
motion
to
suspend
this
hearing
to
be
resumed
at
the
conclusion
of
the
presentation
of
the
director's
item.
That's
on
today's
agenda
bring
everybody
back
and
we'll
pick
it
up.
D
I
suggest
that,
pending
those
discussions,
we
give
a
couple
extra
minutes
to
party
and
or
to
city
and
applicant,
to
update
the
board
on
the
status
of
those
discussions.
Where
we
are,
then
we
can
move
on
to
cross-examination
the
remainder
of
the
items
required
by
our
processes.
All.
B
Q
D
G
B
E
Good
afternoon,
Jamie
lapcom
a
long-range
planning
manager
for
the
city
and
the
Planning
and
Development
Department,
and
we
are
here
today
to
present
some
updated
information
on
our
comprehensive
plan
rewrite
including
the
Visionary
vision
statement
and
preliminary
framework.
E
As
you
may
recall,
our
consultant
HDR
did
present
to
you
back
in
October
of
2021,
as
well
as
City
Council
in
November
of
2021,
to
get
some
information
from
you
on
where
we're
headed
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
framework
that
we're
building
for
that.
So
I'm
back
to
you
today
to
give
you
kind
of
an
update
on
where
we
are
refresh
your
memory
on
what
we're
doing
and
give
you
some
progress
on
where
we're
at
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
E
E
So
again
the
process
of
our
rewrite
with
extensive
Community
engagements
to
ensure
we
understood
expectations
of
the
residents
and
So.
Based
on
what
we
heard
in
this
engagement
and
building
on
that
vision
statement,
we
came
up
with
the
planning
themes
and
these
are
slightly
different
than
what
you've
seen
before,
but
they're
basically
the
same
premise.
E
So
we
have
a
city
of
opportunity
that
the
City
offers
opportunities
to
raise
a
family
to
start
or
build
a
business
to
visit
for
the
day
or
have
an
extended
vacation.
Our
livable
and
attractive
places
that
we
have
a
unique
natural
setting,
Rich
history
and
culture,
locational
advantages
with
strong
neighborhoods,
a
thriving
downtown
and
quality
Parks
and
Recreation,
sustainable
and
resilient
environments.
E
The
person
inclusive
is
we
celebrate
our
Rich
history
and
Heritage
of
our
neighborhoods,
as
well
as
a
diverse
and
broad
range
of
educational,
entertainment,
cultural,
recreational
and
economic
and
economic
opportunities
available
to
our
community.
And,
lastly,
we
have
our
cooperative
and
responsive
governments,
and
that
is
our
quality
and
accessible
Communications
to
make
sure
that
we're
engaging
the
public
by
ensuring
transparency
and
openness
in
our
communication,
collaboration
and
engagement,
so
we're
moving
into
our
framework.
It
was
a
place-based
approach
to
build
on
the
design
framework
and
our
current
plan
to
develop
this
preliminary
plan
framework.
E
These
are
our
traditional
centers
for
living,
working,
entertainment
and
shopping,
they're,
our
most
dense
and
walkable
areas,
and
so
we
want
to
focus
on
the
continued
success
of
those
areas
but
offer
guidance
in
activating
our
vacant
and
underutilized
spaces,
also
the
character
and
Mobility
for
the
residents,
visitors
and
workers
in
those
areas,
our
mixed-use
centers,
that's
along
U.S,
19
and
Fort
Harrison.
Those
are
our
living
working
and
shopping
areas,
but
they're,
more
Auto
oriented.
E
So
the
focus
of
those
will
be
reinvestment
and
Redevelopment
to
attract
employment,
intensive
uses,
but
also
improve
access,
connectability
and
walkability
of
those
areas.
There
are
corridors
and
our
neighborhood
centers.
Those
are
more
local
focal
points
that
are
going
to
meet
your
daily
needs
of
the
neighborhoods
and
the
focus
there
will
be
to
promote
a
mix
of
uses
that
will
activate
under
utilize
properties,
improve
the
mobility
but
also
mitigate
any
impacts
of
adjacent
neighborhoods.
E
And
lastly,
is
our
Hercules
District,
which
has
traditionally
been
our
industrial
area
for
some
small-scale
manufacturing
assembly,
repair
and
maker
spaces,
and
so
the
focus
there
will
be
protecting
this
employment
area
while
providing
opportunities
for
a
broader
range
of
employment,
supported
uses,
and
so
the
themes
were
used
to
create
chapters
for
the
new
plan.
Our
current
plant
is
built
around
elements
that
were
required
by
an
old
rule
from
the
state
code
9j5.
E
Well,
that
was
repealed,
and
so
now
we
have
the
ability
to
write
the
plan
and
a
more
user-friendly
format
that
might
be
easier
to
find
some
of
the
things
based
on
topics
so
we're
looking
at
five
chapters,
and
so
these
five
chapters
are
Mobility.
That's
going
to
be
our
level
of
surface
our
safety,
our
vision,
zero,
our
complete
streets,
anything
Transportation,
related
Quality
places
is
going
to
be
where
we
find
housing,
land
use,
our
mixed
youth
centers
and
our
corridors.
E
Coastal
and
conservation
is
going
to
cover
our
flood
hazards,
our
Coastal
and
Resource
Management,
our
natural
resource
protection
parks
and
public
places.
Again
we
are
parks,
wrecks,
Recreation
areas,
trails
and
community
centers
and,
lastly,
is
our
Support
Services,
which
is
more
utilities
of
solid
waste.
Water,
Wastewater,
storm
water,
and
so
our
next
steps,
where
we
are
in
the
process
right
now,
is
we're
in
the
process
of
drafting
the
actual
goals
of
deficit
and
policies
of
those
chapters.
E
Right
now,
our
biggest
focus
on
mobility
and
quality
places
we're
working
with
our
consultant
hdr
on
those,
and
the
remaining
three
chapters
will
be
written
by
staff,
and
so
the
intention
is
to
bring
out
workshops
and
instead
of
rolling
out
an
entire
plan
for
somebody
to
try
and
digest
it
once
we're
going
to
try
and
do
it
in
some
pieces,
we'll
try
to
do
it
with
the
steps
of
like
quality
places
and
Mobility
will
be
first,
so
we
will
get
those
prepared
put
them
on
a
Clearwater.
2045
website
put
some
surveys
out
there.
E
We
will
then
go
through
the
same
process
for
the
next
three
chapters,
but
then,
at
the
end,
when
the
full
plan
is
ready,
we'll
then
again
have
several
workshops
out
in
the
community.
For
people
who
are
unable
to
attend
the
other
ones
to
do
a
full
plan
of
the
workshops
for
the
plan
when
it's
prepared
and
then
we
will
actually
start
through
the
approval
process,
which
will
actually
begin
with
this
board
in
the
spring
of
2023,
but
is
a
very
lengthy
process.
E
C
C
C
Sorry,
bad
news:
we
got
to
do
these
things.
We
just
cannot
keep
saying.
Let's
do
the
same
thing
and
hoping
the
next
Administration
is
going
to
take
it
because
I
know
it's
political
concern.
No
no
good
politician
is
going
to
say
you
can't
be
here
in
10
years,
they'll
be
out
of
office
in
two
minutes.
That's
how
these
things,
not
in
the
city
Clearwater
at
any
place,
and
the
second
one
is
the
city
going
to
perhaps
be
looking
at
Alternatives
I've
had
a
concern.
C
I'll
say
it
before
about
natural
gas
in
the
city
and
it's
concerned
from
environmental.
It's
methane.
It's
what's
bubbling
up
in
the
ocean.
We've
seen
that's
the
same
stuff
but
which
85
times
worse
than
too.
But
that's
not
really.
My
point
I'm
saying
that
city
has
an
opportunity
to
take
some
of
those
National
guests.
C
C
And-
and
we
looked
at
say
taking
some
of
these
properties
and
looking
at
batteries
that
will
support
us
for
two
weeks.
Instead
of
for
10
minutes,
we
have
a
hurricane
through
we
can
connect
running
the
whole
city
base
options
that
have
new
place.
For
that
you
can't
do
it
now,
I'm
just
saying:
where
would
we?
Where
would
I
stand
up
someday
and
say
here?
I
am
again.
E
At
sea
level
rise,
we
are
looking
at
that.
We
will
of
course,
touch
on
it
in
coastal,
in
our
conservation
and
Coastal
management
chapter,
but
also
sustainability
and
resiliency
is
a
theme
overarching
theme
that's
going
to
touch
be
touched
on
in
many
of
the
chapters,
so
I
can
say
that
it
may
be
covered
in
multiple
chapters,
and
it
is
something
that
we
are
looking
at.
N
N
V
Oh,
if
I
may,
Lauren,
matsky,
Planning
and
Development
I
stole
Gina's
chair,
while
she's
out
of
the
office,
some
of
the
things
that
that
you're
mentioning
are
more
the
true
implementation
component
of
it.
So
this
is
a
higher
level
document,
of
course,
like
regarding
the
policies
and
the
direction,
but
we
look
at
it
as
kind
of
teeing
up
to
a
certain
degree,
our
work
program
for
the
next
five
to
ten
years.
V
Just
so
you
know
we
have
a
green
Fleet
policy
that's
in
place,
so
there
are
things
that
our
sustainability
group
is
working
on.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
in
the
comp
plan
for
us
to
do
it,
but
this
is
our
opportunity
to
really
modernize,
bring
us
up
and
set
those
aspirational
goals
for
us,
but
but
we
don't
want
them
to
be
aspirational,
that
we
have
no
intentions
of
meeting
them.
So
there's
going
to
be
enough,
Direction
in
there
to
start
working
into
the
implementation.
G
Mr
fire
just
to
give
you
some
information
that
maybe
you're
not
aware
with
as
far
as
solar
as
far
as
storage
energy
I'm,
actually
going
to
Israel
tomorrow
meeting
with
a
company
that
is
revolutionizing
battery
storage
brand
new,
never
seen
technology,
2024
lighter,
cheaper,
faster,
so
batteries
that
when
we
talk
about
solar
batteries-
and
they
don't
last
as
long
and
this
company
is
revolutionizing,
it
I
mean
everyone's
going
to
have
to
come
to
them.
So
I
have
just
be
meeting
the
CEO
there,
which
is
random.
G
He
went
to
high
school
with
me
35
years
ago,
but
it
is
an
amazing
company
and
what
they're
going
to
do
is
sulfur
and
how
they're
restructuring
how
batteries
are
made
from
ground
up.
So
as
soon
as
I
have
that
information
off
city
of
clear
will
be
the
first
person
that
I
would
probably
tell
them
about
a
second.
But.
C
There's
a
number
of
systems
out
there
and
this
may
be
the
best,
but
there's
like
Vanadium,
there's
carbon
there's
LED
out.
There's
a
air
batteries.
There's
iron
batteries
there's
a
number
of
different
approaches
that
could
solve
our
problems
yep,
but
they
take
a
lot
of
space.
You'll
put
them
in
the
back
of
your
trunk
of
your
car.
They
take
a
maybe
a
half
a
block.
There
may
be
all
big
bats
of
chemicals
that
fix
together
and
make
the
electricity
there.
C
But
that's
the
way
this
is
going
to
be
solved,
but
we
need
to
be
looking
at
it
now
and
making
those
plants,
so
the
city
can
be
self-sufficient
when
the
next
hurricane
comes
through
and
we're
not
going
to
be
like
at
low
level.
We
have
the
opportunity.
Clearwater
is
blessed
by
having
high
elevations
that
doesn't
happen
much
on
the
coast
of
Florida.
Not
many
cities
have
that
and
we
can
have.
We
can
be
sustainable
in
the
next
hurricane.
C
G
C
B
Well,
they're,
not
back
I'll.
Maybe
someone
could.
O
P
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
U
Good
afternoon
Ellen
Crandall,
Planning,
Development
I
believe
we
have
made
very
good
progress,
so
I
can
convey
to
you
what
we've
we've
agreed
upon.
So
we're
talking
about
the
plan
here
at
the
northwest
corner.
We
are
in
agreement
to
remove
these
four
parking
spaces.
If
you
remember
the
staff
report,
they
have
extra
parking.
So
this
does
not
cause
an
issue
with
that.
G
L
U
So
these
are
the
parking
spaces
at
the
northwest
corner
of
the
property
which
is
along
Belcher
Road.
They
have
excess
parking,
so
we
are
talking
about
removing
four
parking
spaces
and
five
booms
in
this
area
and
revising
that
to
additional
landscape
area.
U
This
allows
for
better
preservation
of
the
trees
and
you
know
putting
our
prior
slides.
This
was
like
an
85
foot
setback.
This
would
still
be
a
considerable
setback
and
a
neutral
color
of
white
and
I
can
read
the
exact
modifications
of
the
conditions
of
approval.
U
So
if
you're
looking
at
the
stock
report-
and
we
were
originally
talking
about
condition
of
approval
number
five-
so
we
would
propose
to
revise
that,
basically
to
truncate
it
so
that
it
says
that
prior
to
the
issuance
of
any
building
construction
permit,
excluding
Demolition
and
clearing
and
grabbing
accessory
mechanical
equipment,
including
the
AC
unit
on
the
east
side
of
the
building
along
Old
Coachman
Road
is
removed
that
addresses
the
AC
unit
and
then
we'll
do
separately
the
the
parking
spaces.
So
then,
we
would
propose
a
new
additional
condition
of
approval
number
13.
U
that
would
say
prior
to
the
issuance
of
any
building
permit.
Excluding
Demolition
and
clearing
and
grabbing
revised
plans
are
submitted,
removing
the
four
parking
spaces
and
the
five
booms
at
the
northwest
corner
and
providing
improved
landscape
plan
with
additional
area
trees
and
plants
such
as
native
understory,
sensitive
to
the
existing
tree
root
systems
to
the
satisfaction
of
City
staff.
You
know
newborn
again.
They
provided
this.
They
show
some
of
the
species
I'm
not
terribly
concerned
about
nailing
down
the
exact
species,
more
than
kind
of
the
area
and
generally,
what
are
we
talking
about?
U
Trees,
ground
cover
Hedges,
so
that
would
be
an
additional
condition:
number
13,
and
then
we
propose
an
additional
condition:
number
14,
which
would
be
that
the
vacuum
boom
shall
be
painted
white
to
match
the
buildings
to
the
satisfaction
of
City
staff.
So
I
think
that
covers
all
of
the
concerns.
As
far
as
the
number
of
booms
North
Belcher,
the
Landscaping,
the
color
I'm
happy
to.
B
Q
B
B
Right,
then,
is
there
cross-examination
by
Planning
and
Development
staff,
no
Cross
cross-examination
by
the
applicant,
all
right
comments
by
the
public.
Anyone
wish
to
speak
on
this
there
being
none
closing
remarks,
closing
remarks
by
the
applicant
all
right,
we'll
close
the
public
hearing
and
discussions
vote
by
the
board
I
think
we're
all.
We
really
appreciate
you
all
going
through
and
doing
this
making
it
happen.
Yes,
because
this
really
actually,
for
me
at
least,
would
have
been
a
tough
call.
D
Right,
I
would
only
suggest
it
when
a
motion
be
made
on
this.
If
you're
going
to
recommend
approval
based
on
you
always
incorporate
a
staff
report
that
the
staff
board
be
incorporated
as
amended
as
explained
here
in
my
staff
this
afternoon,.
G
H
J
Based
on
the
evidence
and
testimony
presented
in
the
application
staff
report,
as
amended
with
the
amendments
to
the
conditions
of
approval,
as
stated
in
the
record
and
other
evidence
at
today's
hearing,
and
hereby
adopt
the
findings.
In
fact,
in
conclusions
to
the
law
stated
in
the
staff
Report
with
conditions
of
approval
as
amended
a
second
right
all
in
favor.