►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 12 05 17
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Columbus
Georgia:
this
is
your
city
council,
mayor
Teresa,
Tomlinson
city
manager,
Isaiah
Hinckley,
nuts,
Barnes
district
Leon,
Glen
Davis
district
to
loose
district
3,
Evelyn
1015,
where
pro
Tim
and
district
4
Mike
Baker
district
5,
Jerry,
Yellin
district
6,
many
Woodson
district,
7,
Walter,
Garrett
district
8,
Judy
Thomas
coastline
at
large
councillor
skip
Henderson
boost
in
at-large,
council,
10,
Washington
cloak
of
council
and
city
attorney,
Clifton
Columbus
Georgia.
This
is
your
City
Council
good
evening.
A
B
C
C
C
C
We
pray
o
Heavenly
Father
that
you
will
guide
them
with
integrity.
You
will
guide
them
with
the
due
diligence
to
look
at
decisions
that
will
be
in
the
best
interest
of
all
citizens
of
this
great
city,
pray,
o
Heavenly,
Father
that
you
will
continue
to
bring
unity
in
this
city,
pray
that
we
will
all
have
the
same
desire
have
the
same
love
for
this
city,
protect
us
from
the
evil.
C
B
D
E
F
G
H
H
B
I
It's
an
honor
to
read
this
resolution
into
the
record,
whereas
mr.
Terry,
a
fuller
former
waste
equipment
operator
employed
with
the
Public
Works
Department,
passed
away
on
November
20th
2017,
whereas
mr.
fuller
was
employed
with
the
city
from
November,
19
2012
to
November,
19
2017.
Now,
therefore,
the
counsel
of
Columbus
Georgia
hereby
resolves.
I
B
Thank
you.
I
would
also
like
to
express
condolences
to
the
family
of
Frank
Etheridge.
His
memorial
service
is
hell
yesterday
and,
as
you
know,
Frank
was
a
longtime
citizens
of
Columbus
Georgia
and
he
was
retired
president
for
SunTrust
Fame
and
he
actually
hired
some
trusting.
He
would
be
truly
missed
in
this
community.
B
K
K
But
we
will
riad
ver
ties
that
planning
divisional
certain
they
notice
in
the
paper
of
the
public
hearing,
but
it
should
be
set
for
January,
23rd
and
I
believe
that
it's
a
5:30
meeting
appreciate
that's
right,
and
one
of
the
applicants
is
here
tonight,
but
we're
not
going
to
have
a
hearing
tonight,
it'll
be
delayed
until
January
23rd
all
right.
Thank
you,
sir.
K
B
L
As
of
this
morning,
at
9
o'clock
we
had
40
790
active
appeals
in
our
system.
At
six
point,
nine
percent
of
the
total
taxable
parcels
in
the
county
represents
one
point:
four
percent
of
the
value
in
dispute
and
we've
gone
over
that
a
number
of
times
of
the
forty
seven
ninety
act
of
Appeals.
That,
of
course,
have
all
been
reviewed.
L
1995
of
those
have
been
recommended
for
a
reduction.
That's
42
percent
of
those
active
appeals.
Last
time
last
several
times
we
talked
about
these
30
day
letters
or
changed
notices.
We've
issued
eighty
seven
hundred
and
eighty-nine
changed
notices,
which
is
a
letter
of
reduction
from
the
notice
value
they
got
on.
Their
first
notice
of
a
settlement
represents
it
basically
a
negotiated
reduction
in
their
value,
so
87
cents,
Evan
thousand
one
hundred
twenty-three
of
those
or
eighty-one
percent
of
those
have
been
expired,
meaning
that
30-day
time
period
has
elapsed.
L
L
Certified
to
the
BOE,
we
have
certified
nine
hundred
and
seventy
one
of
the
hearings
or
the
cases
to
the
BOE
for
their
hearing
and
as
I
said
before,
the
appeal
of
innis
traitor
is
the
one
who
schedules
those
hearings,
so
that
appeal
administrator
actually
reaches
out
to
the
taxpayer
by
letter
after
we
certify.
This
is
our
second
week
of
BOE
hearings.
We,
if
you
recall
last
Monday
of
last
week
and
we
had
to
still
anticipate
those
BOE
hearings
lasting
through
the
beginning
of
April
2018.
L
For
the
week
last
week
and
this
week,
we've
had
or
have
225
commercial
hearings,
so
that's
a
combined.
We
still
have
some
to
go
Wednesday,
Thursday
and
Friday
of
this
week,
but
currently
of
the
ones
that
we've
seen.
25%
of
those
have
been
no-shows.
The
tax
payer
or
their
agent
has
decided
not
to
come
to
the
hearing.
Ten
of
those
have
been
rescheduled.
Four
of
those
have
been
withdrawn.
Six
of
those
have
actually
been
reduced,
which
means
the
taxpayer
brought
information
to
the
BOE,
the
Board
of
Equalization.
L
L
15
of
those
have
been
upheld,
our
value
has
been
upheld
and
then
47
of
those
have
been.
We've
negotiated
a
settlement
prior
to
the
BOE,
so
they
were
scheduled
for
a
BOE,
though,
as
I've
briefed
you
in
the
past,
we
continue
to
try
to
negotiate.
If
there's
room
for
negotiation,
we
try
to
negotiate
a
reduced
value
and
that's
what
that
47
number
represents.
We
have
as
of
9
o'clock.
This
morning
there
were
87,
more
BOE
hearings
to
be
held
this
week
and
then
the
next
two
weeks,
beginning
the
11th
and
the
18th
of
December.
L
L
L
Even
last
week,
if
you
recall
I
briefed
you,
there
were
approximately
90
percent
no-shows
last
week.
We're
set
numbers
changed
dramatically,
but
still
one
of
it
of
every
four
don't
show
up
that.
That's
a
bigger
no-show
percentage
than
we're
used
to
see
I,
don't
know
what
that
says.
I
can
draw
some
assumptions,
but
I
don't
typically
do
that,
but
it
is
higher.
The
number
of
no-shows
is
higher
and.
I
L
M
L
I
B
B
G
At
the
last
business
meeting,
we
had
an
income
inconclusive
vote
on
the
additional
services,
a
dental
for
Tyler
technologies,
and
so
that
is
back
on
the
porches
agenda
today
and
we
have
mr.
John
Williams
here
from
the
tax
assessor's
office
and
I,
see
that
he
has
the
chair
of
the
board
of
tax
assessor's
president
and
the
attorney
for
the
board
of
tax
assessor's.
Our
present.
N
L
N
And
as
far
as
what
y'all
would
be,
having
tower
do,
how
many
understand
kind
of
data
collection,
type,
stuff,
I'm,
sorry,
I,
understand
it's
kind
of
a
data
collection
type
task
yeah?
Is
it
just
those
the
eleven
employees
that
would
be
qualified
for
that
or
would
all
twenty-three
be
potentially
qualified?
Oh.
L
G
B
G
And
so
basically,
what
I'm
requesting
approval
on
tonight
and
mr.
John
Williams
will
will
share
with
you
why
this
is
critical,
why
it's
necessary,
but
we're
asking
for
an
addendum
to
the
tiler
technology
agreement
for
a
hundred
and
four
thousand
four
hundred
dollars
for
at
twenty
nine
dollars,
of
course,
over
three
thousand
six
hundred
parcels
to
provide
residential
field
inspection
services
and
appeal
reviews,
and
so
with
that,
mr.
Williams,
would
you
share
with
us
why
you
here?
Yes,.
L
Sir
and
I
apologize
for
not
being
present
the
last
time
this
was
discussed
and
brought
up
for
a
vote.
I
think
I
really
could
have
helped
with
some
of
the
confusion
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
take
a
personal
hit.
You
know,
communication
is
two-way
and
if
there's
a
failure
to
communicate
and
and
I'm
part
of
that
communication,
I'll
go
ahead
and
take
the
hit
on
that.
Because
I
haven't
done.
L
The
the
way
that
that
addendum
is
written-
this
is
they're
trying
to
do
two
things
with
the
one
addendum
and
it's
just
a
legality
thing
that
they
had
date.
Tyler
had
to
do
two
different
things:
I
want
to
clarify
the
additional
BOE
support
was:
is
that
20
additional
person
days
that
you
had
some
questions
about?
Mr.
L
Allen,
counselor,
Allen
and
I
I
think
that
that
really
got
blended
in
with
the
3600
parcels
in
the
100
$4,400
request:
they're
separate
they're
in
the
same
addendum
to
the
contract,
because
Tyler
needs
to
put
the
fact
that
they're
giving
us
20
additional
workdays.
It's
got
to
be
in
somewhere.
It's
got
to
be
in
a
contract
somewhere,
so
we
can
hold
them
to
so
they
put
that
in
the
in
this
addendum
as
well,
but
the
hundred
and
four
thousand
four
hundred
dollars
does
not
buy
20
additional
workdays,
that's
a
separate
gift.
L
L
That's
a
$16,000,
gimme
and
I
say
that,
because
his
per
diem
rate
is
eight
hundred
dollars
a
day
and
that's
in
the
Tyler
contract.
If
we
were
to
buy
twenty
days,
that's
sixteen
thousand
dollars.
That's
at
no
cost
to
the
city.
That's
not
part
of
the
hundred
four
thousand
four
hundred
dollars,
it's
just
in
the
dinner.
So
let's
try
to
separate
that
if
you
will
and
I
can
answer
any
questions
to
that,
but
it
basically
those
first
four
points
under
additional
BOE
support
is
what
I
just
talked
about
now.
L
The
addendum,
the
104
four
hundred,
that
is
to
purchase
manpower
to
come
in
here
and
collect
data
in
the
field
for
our
sales
and
our
permits,
I
throw
in
transfers.
So
this
is
work
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
do
because
of
the
15
percent
of
Appeals
that
we've
encountered
through
this
process.
We're
not
asking
Tyler
to
come
in
here
and
help
us
with
the
appeals
by
paying
them
more
money.
We're
not
saying
you
know
what
you
had
this
contract.
Some
bleep
you've
satisfied
that
others
are
questionable
about
that.
L
L
So
we
have
to
do
that
every
year
and
instead
of
doing
it
with
would
normally
do
the
last
three
months
of
the
year.
We've
had
to
postpone
that
so
since
August
we've
not
accounted
for
or
done
the
paperwork
for
any
sales
in
our
office
or
any
permits
in
our
office,
so
we
anticipate
that
number
being
about
3,600
3,600.
So
when
you
multiply
that
rate
of
29
times
that
it
gets
104
400,
that's
where
the
numbers
come
from.
There
was
some
question
about
them,
not
giving
enough
on
the
negotiation
and
again
I'll.
L
Take
the
hit
on
that
I
failed
to
communicate
where
we
started
from
I
came
and
briefed
to
you
several
weeks
ago
that
they
were
at
30
and
they
went
to
29
and
that's
I
know
that
from
some
of
councillor
Garrett's
questions
that
that's
really
what
everybody
thought.
That's
where
they
started
and
that's
where
the
end.
That's
not
the
complete
story
and
I'll
get
that
to
the
next
slide.
They
went
from
$40
to
29
again
I'll
cover
that
in
a
second.
That
$11
swing
is
a
thirty
nine
thousand
six
hundred
dollar
savings.
L
L
They
went
from
30
to
29
what
I
failed
to
communicate
to
you
was
that
$30
was
a
ten
dollar
reduction
off
their
standard
$40
for
parcel
fee.
So
we
had
already
through
our
relationship
with
Tyler,
got
to
a
25%
discount
on
their
typical
data
collection
fee
per
parcel.
Then
you
asked
us
to
go
back
and
ask
for
more
and
we
did.
L
Tyler
has
been
involved
with
this
county
for
20
years.
I
know
a
lot
of
you
are
all
in
business.
If
you've
been
dealing
with
a
client
for
20
years,
would
you
give
them
a
standard
rate,
or
would
you
give
them
a
pretty
good
rate
I
think
they
give
them
a
pretty
good
rate.
So
this
represents
their
rate.
You'll
hear
me,
say
a
blended
rate,
so
I
blend
81,
38
and
$35
to
make
40.
That
is
their
standard
rate
that
they
started
from
and
reduced
it
to
29.
For
us.
The
reason.
L
Know
they're
they're
charging
that
county
81
dollars
for
new
construction
is
they've,
been
in
that
County
for
20
years.
They
can
press
a
button
and
tell
themselves
how
many
new
construction
do
we
have
right
now.
So,
when
they're
quoting
this
at
this
addendum
for
them,
they
press
a
button
and
say
alright:
we've
got
three
thousand
or
2500
new
construction.
We
have
five
hundred
permits.
L
L
How
many
new
construction,
how
much
new
construction
we
have,
what
number
that
would
be
or
what
number
the
permits
will
be
or
what
number
the
sales
review
would
be
as
we
get
closer
to
in
December
we'll
know
so
we
didn't
know
when
we
asked
them
to
negotiate
this
rate,
so
they
gave
us
a
blended
rate
and
that's
why
you
see
the
difference.
But
if
you
look
at
what
it
costs
us
at
a
hundred
and
forty
four
and
you
use
their
standard
rate
of
$40
a
parcel
times,
36,
that's
a
hundred
forty
four
thousand,
we're
saving!
L
That's
where
my
last
slide
said:
we're
saving
39
thousand
six
hundred,
it's
a
twenty
seven
and
a
half
percent
savings
off
their
standard
rate.
That
is
why
I
wanted
to
come
back
and
talk
to
you
all
and
let
you
know
it's
not
just
a
dollar
movement
off
the
river
they
negotiated
this
fee
because
they
they
do
want
to
maintain
their
they've
thrown
in
an
additional
month
for
Steve
the
project
manager
to
be
here
to
support
our
beliefs
because
they
do
want
to
maintain
their
relationship.
L
They
understand
that
we've
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do
and
there
is
no
way
that
my
staff
can
do
that
work
and
get
the
information
to
the
tax
commissioner
in
the
digest
on
time,
so
that
she
can
then
push
out
her
bills
later
in
the
year.
The
same
kind
of
mess
that
we
got
into
now
will
happen
again
if
we
don't
have
augmentation
of
our
staff
to
deal
with
the
permits
and
the
sales
and
the
reviews,
and
that's
why
I'm
asking
for
this
to
be
approved
tonight.
L
The
other
thing
that
we're
concerned
with
is
they're
gonna
have
anywhere
from
two
four
I'm,
not
sure
it
just
depends
on
the
flow
personnel
here
first
week
in
January,
well
they're
trained
and
ready
to
go
but
they're
in
different
parts
of
the
country,
so
they
have
to
arrange
for
their
TTY.
Their
per
diem
get
reservations,
get
them
a
place
to
sleep.
Get
them
set
up.
We're
very
concerned
that
if
we
continue
to
delay
that
that's
all
just
gonna
get
pushed
back,
we
won't
have
be
able
to
have
them
here
at
the
beginning
of
January
it'll.
L
Just
as
long
as
we
delay
or
not
approve
it.
If
we
don't
approve
it,
we
don't
approve.
We
just
won't
get
the
work
done,
but
I'm
very
concerned
that
if
we
don't
vote
on
this
tonight,
it
may
jeopardize
being
able
to
get
them
in
here
in
a
timely
fashion
and
getting
that
project
completed
by
the
end
of
March,
which
is
what
we
need
to
do
and
that's
what
the
contract
calls
for.
L
Came
from
looking
John,
Hutchison
and
I've
worked
together
with
permits,
basically
first
looked
at
in
August,
and
we
anticipated
several
slides
several
presentations
ago.
I
give
you
the
numbers
on
what
we
were
last
year
at
this
time
and
where
our
totals
were
last
year
and
then
where
we
were
as
of
August
and
then
what
we
anticipated
it
being
at
the
end
of
the
year.
So
that
was
an
educated
guess
based
on
John's
department
at
my
department.
N
L
We
do
that
there
was
a
question
last
week
about
why
didn't
Tyler
do
that.
Tyler's
field
gathering
ended
with
the
date
of
assessment,
1
117,
so
they
did
all
their
preliminary
work
for
the
for
the
one
117
assessments
in
60,
so
their
field
gathering
requirement
and
the
contract
ended
as
of
1
117.
So
we're
talking
about
2017
permits
and
transfers
for
texture
2018.
L
N
And
what
do
you
I
know?
This
would
be
a
guess:
cuz
every
home
is
different,
but
what
would
you
guess
it
takes
because
I
understand
it's
40
houses
a
day.
Basically,
if
you
break
it
out
over
3
months
to
get
to
3,600,
what
do
you
think
it
takes
the
time?
What
kind
of
time
does
it
take
per
house
typically
to
do
the
measurement
so.
L
It
really
depends,
and
one
of
the
reasons
why
that
new
construction
is
so
high.
You
know
it
depends
on
the
size
of
the
house
if
I'm,
what
we
call
strapping
a
house
measuring
a
house
and
taking
notes
on
everything
about
it,
you
know
I
can
do
that
in
30
minutes
or
it
may
take
me
an
hour
and
a
half
depends
on
how
many
floors
there
are
in
the
house.
L
These
are
experienced
field
data
people,
so
I
know
from
talking
to
Steve
he's
run
projects
like
this
before
not
to
use
the
two
because
he's
doing
Beuys
support
we're
not
talking
about
him
managing
this,
but
he
said
that
that
that's
very
doable
for
an
experienced
staff.
We
rarely
see
those
numbers
because
we've
got
so
much
going
on.
We
can't
put
appraisers
in
the
field
for
weeks
at
a
time.
Okay,
thank.
N
B
O
L
O
We're
in
a
situation
where
the
city
has
been
behind
the
eight-ball
down
several
million
dollars
that
this
whole
situations
cost
us
a
lot
of
money,
and
so
what
we
asked
last
week
was
Tyler
needs
to
have
more
skin
in
the
game,
because
part
of
this
is
their
fault.
I
think
you
share
some
of
the
bird
and
the
bird
share,
some
of
the
burden
that
the
thing
we
talked
about
earlier
communication
problem.
O
M
O
O
Understand
I
understand
that,
but
this
is
their
donation.
Yes,
so
that's
their
donation.
That
goes
in
the
equation
of
what
we're
all
trying
to
do
here
to
resolve
the
issues
we
have
right
now
to
go
back
to
the
3,600
number.
All
of
those
are
not
new
construction.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
okay,
what?
What
are
the
percentages
of
those?
What.
L
O
L
O
L
L
L
We
don't
always
know
the
condition
of
house,
you
know
if
we
went
out
looked
at
it
in
July
and
it
transferred
and
August.
We
really
don't
have
to
go
back
out
there
and
look
at
it
again.
If
we
haven't
looked
at
it
since
a
year
or
two,
then
we
do
need
to
go
back
out
and
look
at
it,
so
that
buries
the
work
required
varies
on.
O
L
I
can
do
my
best,
you
know
I,
think
one
thing
lost
in
all
this
is
we're
working
with
a
brand-new
software
application.
So
it's
for
people
that
have
been
through
a
conversion.
You
know
it
can
be
complex,
so
it's
like
working
with
all
these
Appeals
that
we've
had
we're
working
them
in
a
brand
new
software
application.
I'm
not
complaining
it's
the
best
software
you
can
buy,
but
it's
complex
and
so
to
query
a
system
to
get
that
information.
I
know
it
can
be
done
and
I
know
standing
here
before
you
right
now.
O
L
Please
I
think
that
blending
a
couple
things
yes
were
required
by
the
state
of
Georgia
to
review
that
all
the
property
in
the
county
over
three
years.
There
is
no
requirement
that
says
you
do
a
third.
Every
year.
It
only
says
you
are
to
review
the
physical
characteristics
of
the
property
every
three
years,
all
problems.
L
We
we
process
sales
and
permits
every
year,
so
they
may
fall
into
part
of
that
one.
Third,
that
we
would
like
to
review
for
that
year,
but
we,
regardless
of
the
review,
all
properties
every
three
years
we
have
sales
and
permits
that
we
review
every
year.
So
it's
not
the
same
and
I
felt
like
you
were
kind
of
lumping
it
together
and
the
way
you
were
describing
that
so
I
just
want
to
interject
that.
O
O
L
It's
the
best
estimate
that
we
can
produce
is
the
thirty
six
hundred
looking
at
to
date
this
year
and
last
year.
If
that
comes
up
low
I
assure
you,
I've
got
commercial
work
that
we
will
get
thirty
six
hundred
parcels
reviewed
in
this
contract
by
Tyler
staff,
because
there's
a
whole
another
set
of
commercial
properties
that
I
have
to
work
with
and
could
easily
use
the
help.
O
L
Let
me
put
it
this
I
was
trying
to
ease
your
concern
that
we
weren't
going
to
get
our
money's
worth,
but
if
there
is
a
way
to
say
you
know
what
we
didn't
do
600
parcels,
we
want
that
money
back
if
that's
doable
and
I'm,
not
an
attorney
I,
don't
know
if
that
is
doable.
Certainly
I
won't
spend
money.
We
don't
have
to
spend
well.
O
O
L
O
Well,
it's
kind
of
a
chicken
and
egg
on
it,
you're
asking
us
for
for
a
hundred
four
thousand
dollars
more,
but
we
don't
know
what
it's
going
to
be
applied
to
and
it's
it's
a
speculation
number.
Your
best
guess
is
3,600
well
and
I.
Think
we
resolve
it.
I
thank
the
city
manager
is
on
the
right
track,
breaking
it
down
and
tying
it
to
an
identifiable.
Yes,.
G
O
B
M
O
P
P
P
You
know
and
I
kind
of
look
at
this,
as
you
know,
Tyler
having
everything
to
gain
and
nothing
to
lose,
and
you
said
earlier,
this
is
somewhat
a
gift:
I,
don't
look
at
it
as
being
a
gift
because
we're
paying
for
their
services
I
understand
where
you're
at
I
think
it's
been
very
clear
in
what
you
stated.
We
we
just
went
through
a
countywide
reassessment.
P
It's
in
your
presentation
just
stated
that
you're
about
to
get
all
the
matters
with
the
board
equalization,
taking
care
of
all
that,
so
the
2017
digest
is
taking
care
of
its
in
I.
Think
you're
you've
referred
to
the
2018
digest,
but
that's
not
even
here
last
time
when
we
asked
you
to
look
at
the
2016
digest
and
to
carry
over.
So
we
could
give
you
more
time
to
work
through
this.
P
You
basically
said
you
didn't
have
time,
and
that
was
just
a
few
months
ago,
we're
in
December
now
and
2018
is
not
even
even
close,
so
I
don't
look
at
2018
being
in
jeopardy.
By
what's
been
stated,
and
what's
been
stated
to
this
council
I'm
looking
clearly
at
the
staff
reports,
I
even
have
the
minutes
from
the
board
of
Tax
Assessors
meeting,
and
it's
clearly
that
you
want
to
go
out,
and
you
want
to
do
some
reviews,
3,600
properties
or
less,
that
you're
gonna
go
and
knock
on
the
doors
and
you're
gonna
ask
people.
P
Let
me
come
in
and
check
out
your
interiors
and
then
you're
going
to
ask
to
look
at
additional
structures
and
things
like
that
with
the
intent
of
going
back
to
the
office
and
redoing
the
values.
So
potentially
these
3,600
people
that
were
residents
that
we're
talking
about
their
assessments
or
values
will
most
likely
go
up.
That's
the
intent
of
going
back
out
there
just
to
clarify
all
this.
That's
the
way
I
understand
it
and
you've
also
been
clear
about
what
the
state
is
said.
P
We
just
turned
into
2017
tax
digest
and
what
the
state
says
about
you've
got
three
years
to
you
know
to
work
it
out
and
clean
it
up,
and
what
I
am
understanding
is
within
the
three
years.
You
can
still
make
this
happen,
I
think
what
I'm
more
concerned
about
what
I'm
more
concerned
about
is
what
is
happening
systematically
between
codes
and
inspections
when
we
got
new
houses
or
cells
and
things
of
that
nature,
that's
happening.
P
What
is
happening
in
the
line
of
the
communication
between
those
guys
over
there
in
that
department
and
the
Board
of
Tax
Assessors.
There
should
be
some
way
to
trigger
all
this
to
where
it
can
be
done
on
the
front
end
and
I'm,
not
understanding
why
that
didn't
happen,
or
just
everybody
just
said.
We
can't
do
it
because
we're
out
of
time
on
currently
on
this
countywide
reassessment,
I,
don't
understand
that,
but
it
does
concern
me.
It
does
concern
me.
P
L
L
So
we're
not
going
up
there
out
to
visit
3,600
people
and
say
you
know
what
we're
here
to
raise
your
taxes
number
one.
We
don't
do
taxes,
we
do
assessments,
but
my
point
is
we're
required
to
do
that
and
the
idea
is
to
be
accurate.
We
want
our
records
to
be
that's
why
we
go
out
not
to
raise
somebody's
taxes.
We
want
our
assessment
to
be
accurate.
So
that's
just
the
first
thing
that
I
want
to
clarify
part
of
this
project.
L
The
Tyler
project
was
to
actually
automate
the
function
of
the
permits
from
inspection
and
code
directly
into
is
world,
so
that
has
been
done
as
a
component
of
the
project
we
no
longer
have
to
down,
lay
the
download
a
file
and
then
shuffle
through
one
permit
after
another
and
go
okay.
This
belongs
to
you.
This
belongs
to
you.
It's
done
automatically
and
and
populates
the
parcel
NIS
world
automatically
so
that
in
future
years
that
time
that
it
takes
to
process
permits
will
be
much
less
we're
doing
that
now.
L
But
we
still
have
to
do
the
inspection.
We
still
have
to
go
out
and
look
at
what's
been
done.
Does
that
add
value?
Let's
make
sure
our
record
is
accurate,
so
I
think
we're
on
the
right
path
as
far
as
getting
to
and
improved
interacts
of
a
tweaked
code
and
inspection
in
our
office
I'm
actually
quite
pleased
with
the
way
that
turned
out
no.
P
Really
don't
know,
but
anyway
you
know
I
we've
spent
time
on
it
and
I
think
I've
stated
my
position
on
it.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
what
I'm
starting
to
see
here
is
that
you
know
we
can
become
more
efficient
and
effective.
If
we
have
the
assurance
that
the
triggers
are
in
place
for
your
people
to
go
and
get
this
work
that
you're
requesting
to
catch
up
on
you,
you
can
get
that
done
beforehand,
and
you
won't
have
to
come
back
and
do
this
again.
Absolutely.
L
P
Inspections
field
inspections,
those
happen
periodically
when
new
homes
are
built
right.
Whenever
somebody
takes
out
an
application,
they
go
to
codes
inspections
or
building
they
take
out
a
building.
Permit
I'm
aware
it's
supposed
to
trigger
everything
right
right
and
then
over
time
there
supposed
to
be
some
aspect
of
residential
inspections
along
the
way.
One.
P
If
there's
before
that
in
finality,
when
they
start
asking
more
CEO,
they
want
to
move
in
our
house.
What
I'm
saying
is:
it
makes
sense
that
the
tax
assessor's
office
or
the
evaluation
should
already
be
in
place,
the
interior
inspections,
inspections
of
building
structures
or
anything
all
those
additions
that
should
be
done
entered
into
the
system
before
that
CEO
and
before
people
are
allowed
to
get
in
the
house
right.
L
That
should
happen
as
you
know,
and
then
you
don't
get
behind.
As
you
know,
what
codes
and
inspections
does
on
what
they
inspect
it's
different
than
what
we
do.
You
know
that
so
they're
going
to
have
a
multitude
of
inspections
along
a
typical
construction
that
we
don't
we're
looking
at.
Is
it
finished
right?
So
we
get
the
permit
and
something
that
we've
done
in
the
past,
that
we've
not
corrected,
because
it
didn't
make
sense
to
me
either
we'd
get
that
permit,
and
then
we
go.
Oh,
we
have
a
permit.
L
We
need
to
put
it
over
here
and
at
certain
time
of
year
we're
gonna
go
review
these
permits,
so
we
go
out
before
the
co
was
issued,
but
before
we
knew
it
was
complete.
So
you
know
it's
some
stage.
Everybody
that's
been
involved
will
say,
there's
a
certain
stage
of
construction
that
you
can
actually
get
the
physical
measurements
of
the
outside
of
the
house,
which
is
what
square
footage
is
a
term
of
mine,
even
though
it's
not
complete.
You
can
still
do
that.
Well,.
L
P
L
Possibly
but
I
mean
it
could
be
flipped,
it
could
be
anything
so
we
want
accurate
information
yeah,
so
we're
gonna
go
out
there.
But
what
we're
doing
now
is
we're
not
gonna
waste.
Our
time
going
back
out
to
see
if
it's
complete,
we're
gonna
wait
for
somebody
to
tell
us
it's
complete,
then
we're
gonna
go.
What.
P
I
hear
you
saying:
is
you
prefer
it
done
that
way
and
that
you
know
my
concern
is
the
triggers
that
alert
you
guys
to
go?
Do
the
work
before
the
final
CEO
is
given
or
the
permanence
of
given,
so
you
don't
have
to
go
out
after
the
fact
and
do
these
inspections
or
whatever
it
needs
to
be
done.
I'm
just
thinking
about
we've
always
talked
about
how?
Where
do
we
get
from
here
today
or
yes?
Well,
we
just
call.
Q
P
P
Maybe
there
can
be
some
conversations
they're
there
to
make
sure
that
maybe
there's
a
way
to
do
a
better
system.
I,
don't
know
well,
it
does
concern
me
and
I
just
raised
the
just
raise
to
be
at
the
point
there
yeah.
Maybe
it's
already
being
done.
I
don't
know,
but
it
just
strikes
me
in
this
conversation
is
that
could
be
part
of
the
systemic
problem
here
that
we're
experiencing
well.
G
G
You
got
the
permit,
maybe
prematurely
it
could
be,
that
the
permit
is
entered
into
the
system
and
I'm
just
talking
because
they're
going
to
tell
me
no,
you
can't
do
it
that
way,
possibly,
but
if,
if
a
person
is
issued
a
permit-
and
we
know
that
the
inspectors
are
going
to
go
out
there
at
various
intervals
to
inspect
it
could
be
I,
don't
know
they.
They
will
probably
tell
me
can't
be
done,
but
it
could
be
that
the
permit
is
not
entered
into
the
system
until
it's
3/4
of
the
way
complete.
G
P
Another
one
more
part
of
this
I'll
tell
you
I'm
really.
You
know
we
just
went
through
a
quite
stressful
and
painful
aspect
to
all
this.
You
know
to
what
we've
got
through
and
I
think
we're
finally
getting
through
it
and
seeing
the
light,
but
I
do
have
a
concern
that,
once
these
inspectors
from
tyler's
start
knocking
on
doors
that
it's
just
going
to
stir
up
a
hornet's
nest.
L
There's
nothing
I
can
do
about
the
perception
of
people
when
somebody
comes
knocking
at
their
door,
they're
going
to
have
their
identification,
it's
going
to
be
posted
on
our
website
on
the
city
website.
What's
going
on
that,
there
will
be
inspectors
coming
out.
We
don't
always
get
on
the
inside
of
the
house.
That's
actually
pretty
rare,
strappin
houses
measuring
houses,
doing
everything
they're
going
to
do
we're
going
to
try
to
make
that
known
and
every
way
we
can
so
that
we
can
at
least
get
the
information
out
in
advance.
L
How
someone's
going
to
react
to
whether
it's
a
Tyler,
appraiser
or
one
of
our
appraisers.
They
get
a
very
wide
range
of
responses.
We're
not
liked
by
everyone.
I
know
that
may
come
as
a
surprise
to
you.
Appraisers
have
been
one
for
26
years.
You've
got
a
bullet
a
target
on
your
back.
It's
somebody
somebody
may
like
you.
They
have
a
party
wall.
You
know.
L
But
we're
gonna
do
everything
we
can
to
communicate
that
we
talked
about
not
being
done
or
those
permits
and
sales
is
just
sitting
there.
The
reason
why
I
couldn't
answer
your
question,
sir,
about
how
many
they're
there
waiting
on
us
to
process
them
it's
in
the
system,
so
the
permits
are
in
the
system,
the
sales
are
there
the
deeds
which
we
look
at
and
make
sure
all
that's
correct,
work
we're
doing
that
now
we're
processing
those
deeds
and
that's
part
of
processing
those
sales.
R
Thank
You
Mayor,
Pro,
Tim,
yeah
I,
know:
we've
been
talking
a
lot
about
this,
so
I
just
felt
kind
of
compelled
to
make
a
statement
as
to
why
I've
supported
this
the
first
time
around
and
will
support
it
again
and
well.
It's
not
really
in
the
form
of
questions.
You
can
just
correct
my
mistakes,
because
this
is
a
complicated
issue.
Very
to
me.
R
Think
what
we
decided
was
probably
the
least
painful
way
at
the
time
when
we
discussed
it
was
allow
Tyler
to
do
it
for
the
$30
or
whatever
was
then
per
parcel,
but
we
were
going
to
put
out
an
RFP
so
that
we
could
kind
of
double-check
ourselves
and
see
if
what
the
fee
appraisers
would
say
they
would
do
this
work
for
so
that
we
could
kind
of
have
them
on
standby.
In
the
event,
your
shortage
of
appraisers
ever
created
a
situation
where
we
weren't
able
to
get
through
the
digest.
R
At
a
time
we
meant
to
me,
the
risk
was
too
great,
which
is
why
I
supported
last
last
week's
I
get
it
I
know.
People
are
disappointed
in
the
way
this
process
went
and
I.
Think
if
you
were,
if
I
were
to
ask
you,
you
would
probably
tell
me
you're
disappointed
in
the
way
that
this
impacted,
so
many
people,
that's,
certainly
not
the
way.
Y'all
want
the
efforts
of
the
tax
assessor's
office
to
be
perceived.
R
R
We
would
just
get
the
one
payment
in
December
now
we're
very
fortunate.
We
had
to
issue
the
tainted
initiative,
tens,
but
we
closed
on
the
ability
to
to
access
a
line
of
credit,
basically,
but
I
don't
think
we
had
had
to
do
because
we
have
I
think
by
and
large
done
as
good
a
job
as
we
can
under
economic
circumstances
at
managing
the
general
fund,
but
to
me
that
risk
that
particularly
the
school
district
and
us
if
we
were
to
be
short
again.
R
If
we
were
in
the
same
position
next
year,
it
did
just
to
me
it
was
a
risk.
I
wasn't
willing
to
take
last
week.
So
I
checked
with
I
talked
with
some
of
the
Tax
Assessors
and
I
also
talked
with
some
of
the
appraisers,
because
I
wanted
an
idea
of
whether
or
not
I
was
barking
up
the
wrong
tree
so
to
speak
and
I
think
it's
important
for
folks
to
understand
what
each
one
of
these
is.
R
When
we
talk
about
new
construction,
I
hope,
councillor,
Davis
is
right,
because
we've
got
to
look
for
ways
to
streamline
the
way
government
does
things
we've
got
to
find
more
efficiencies
in
the
way
we
conduct
business
on
a
regular
basis,
I
love
the
idea
of
communicating
with
codes
and
inspection
with
the
invent
and
the
inspectors
and
leveraging
the
time
of
the
appraisers
to
try
to
make
it
work.
The
way
it's
supposed
to
I
think
one
challenge
you're
going
to
have
is
with
new
construction.
R
An
appraiser
typically
does
an
estimate
of
value
based
on
the
plan
so
that
they
can
initiate
the
loan
process.
That
lender
is
going
to
probably
demand
a
revisit
of
the
property
to
deter
was
built
in
in
in
accordance
with
the
plans
that
they
spent.
So
unless
we
can
get
some
give
on
on
the
mortgage,
companies
in
I
think
it
still
may
be
a
little
bit
of
a
challenge.
The
permits
are
different
because
the
way
I
understand
it,
that's
if
somebody
is
going
to
add
a
kitchen,
are
they
gonna
put
a
mother-in-law.
R
Suite
and
they're
gonna
build
another
bedroom
and
in
that
instance,
to
me
the
reason
that
seems
so
important
that
we
get
out
there
and
put
eyes
on
it
is
we
have
to
make
sure
that's
accurate,
because
even
if
their
property
is
frozen
through
homestead,
the
additional
value
created
by
that
kitchen
or
that
mother-in-law
suite
of
that
bedroom
will
be
added
to
their
frozen
value.
That's
frozen
and
it's
a
common
thing
misunderstanding.
It
doesn't
unfreeze
your
property,
but
it
does
add
the
value
that
you
created
when
you
when
you
made
the
addition
correct.
L
R
It's
imperative
that
we
get
that
right,
because
it's
gonna,
it's
gonna,
affect
what
they're
paying
and
it's
going
to
be
different
than
what
they've
been
paying
for
a
lot
of
years,
and
the
other
side
of
that
is,
if
we
don't
have
an
accurate
value
for
the
properties
that
have
been
newly
constructed,
have
changed
hands
or
we
have
improved
the
property
in
some
way.
Then
it
could
impact
somebody
else
in
that
neighborhood,
when
you're
using
sales
to
try
to
determine
what
should
happen
to
their
particular
properties,
could
have
impact
it
up
for
days.
R
So
to
me,
I
recognize
that
it
had
to
be
done.
The
work
had
to
be
done.
The
fee,
appraisers
I,
checked
with
I,
asked
him.
I
said:
what
would
you?
What
would
you
offer
your
services
for
it?
What
rate
to
do
field
work
to
go
out
there
and
just
run
a
tape?
Take
some
pictures
and
get
it
to
the
guys,
so
they
could
enter
it
in
the
system.
I
didn't
find
a
single
one
to
do
it
for
under
100
bucks.
R
Now
I
can't
say:
I'm
the
biggest
Tyler
fan
in
the
room
either,
but
I
recognize
that
it
29
dollars
of
property.
That's
probably
the
cheapest.
We're
going
to
be
able
to
get
that
done.
I
do
want
to
continue.
I
do
want
to
go
and
put
an
RFP
out
so
that
we
can
check
ourselves
and
make
sure,
but
but
but
I
wanted
folks
understand
why
we
were
voting
for
this.
This
wasn't
just
blindly
casting
a
vote
to
hire
Tyler
to
come
in
there
and
do
some
additional
work.
R
This
was
because
sometimes
we
have
to
do
what
we
think
is
right
and
sometimes
what
we
think
is
right.
There
are
a
few
folks
that
are
going
to
disagree
and
to
put
the
taxpayers
at
risk
by
possibly
having
to
deal
with
another
tan,
certainly
dealing
with
an
opportunity
to
not
have
access
to
revenue
that
we
use
to
pay
our
bills.
It
just
wasn't
worth
it
to
me,
so
anything
I
messed
up
in
my
definitions,
please
please
correct.
B
G
B
T
K
J
Q
K
U
K
K
U
M
U
Has
900
foot
of
road
frontage
there
on
Veterans
Parkway
I
was
reading
through
the
paperwork?
Hey
I
apologize
for
us
not
being
here
last
week,
but
I
didn't
receive
the
notification
I've
been
on
my
partner
from
email,
I
was
out
of
town
I've,
gotten
a
call
just
last
night,
I've
gotten
back
in
regard
to
meeting
today,
so
apologize
we
weren't
here
last
week,
their
original
denial
had
talked
about
not
in
the
resemblance
of
the
area
surrounding
it
everything
Veterans
Parkway.
U
This
is
all
the
way
at
the
end
of
the
four
lanes
and
it
would
be,
on
the
west
hand,
side
if
you
were
heading
north
and
it's
like
say
it's
900
foot
of
property.
What
we
were
looking
at
doing
is
a
retail
type
center,
similar
to
the
several
of
them
that
up
Veterans,
Park
late,
already,
I
guess
the
most
recent
would
be
right
there
next
to
Walgreens
the
Eco
clean
shopping
center.
U
U
The
cost
that
it
would
take
for
the
development
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons
that
I
think
that
it
would
really
only
be
feasible
for
the
commercial
development,
because
cost
would
be
to
be
cost
prohibitive
to
do
anything
in
a
residential
aspect
at
3.5
acres.
There
is
no
sewer
to
this
property
again.
It
has
900
foot
of
road
there
on
Veterans
Parkway
and
everything
going
up
and
down.
U
Veterans
Parkway
of
the
four-lane
I
had
also
constructed
the
fire
station,
quite
a
while
back
there
by
the
north
side,
school
and
I
even
saw
back
then,
where
that
development
of
four-lane
is
going
to
continue
going
north
of
past,
where
the
schools
at
the
cost
of
the
development
and
the
cost
of
the
of
the
land
site
work
to
be
residential
again
without
any
sewer
inside
there
three
point
four
or
five
acres.
If
you
use
a
concept
of
two
acres,
so
you
have
your
septic
system.
If
it
ever
failed,
you
would
have
to
relocate
it.
U
It
talks
about
a
retainer
wall
that
I
could
be
constructed
inside
there
to
get
the
lot
level
for
a
construction
basis
and
all
those
is
part
of
the
reasons.
Half
a
million
dollars
of
site
work.
It's
not
feasible
for
a
residential
lot
at
that
location,
so
open
hadn't,
said
too
much
and
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
tried
to
cover
it.
In
just
one
scenario.
I
M
W
Evening,
I'm
Adam,
Pro,
Tem
and
members
of
council.
This
just
come
to
you
with
a
double
denial,
which
is
order.
Rare
it
issuance
from
both
of
us
on
this
concern
was
about
in
in
dealing
with
this
project.
Is
that
the
property
itself
and
how
it
was
situated
in
terms
of
how
you're
gonna
get
the
building
on
site?
If
you've
ever
been
out
about
veterans
this,
we
did
right
there
at
Galena.
W
You
know
there
that
Galena
goes
straight
up
for
the
most
part
and
everything
they're
looking
at
in
terms
of
dealing
with
this
law,
they're
going
to
actually
cut
back
into
that
debt
embankment
there
to
make
this
whole
site
work.
It's
not
like.
There's
simple
things
go
out
there
and
just
put
it
in
there
that
standpoint,
it
doesn't
marry
up
with
the
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
turns
we're
calling
more
lawful,
mixed-use
more
than
just
to
assemble
commercial
uses.
Here
at
this
time
it
is
single-family
right
now
from
that
aspect
of
it.
W
We're
also
concerned
about
additional
curb
cuts
at
this
time.
Right
now
on
Veterans,
we
are
getting
going
to
that
process
of
widening
that
road
and
trying
to
mitigate
as
much
as
we
possibly
can
additional
curb
cuts
that
we
go
along
and
that
so
I
hope,
counsel
Thomas.
That
gives
you
some
idea.
What
we're
trying
to
trying
to
achieve
here
and.
I
W
Yes
found
that
there's
another
another
phase
coming
behind
the
actual
actual
Capisce
right
now
is
not
under
the
t,
Spock
funding
source
there's
another
another
faith
so
coming
it
is
part
the
Chiefs
block
it
is
under
design
right
now
it
will
run
basically
right
there
at
Hancock,
all
we
into
up
to
khattala
and
what
I've
seen
about
that
conversation
right
now
they
are
looking
at
trying
to
maintain
as
much
they
possibly
can.
The
existing
footprint
of
the
roadway
itself
now
I
mean
they're
wide
it
out,
but
they're,
not
we.
W
You
all,
have
seen
different
different
variations
that
thing
going
off
in
different
directions.
That's
the
idea
now
anyway,
and
in
some
cases
when
they
get
to
Harris
right
now,
it
may
actually
take
her
down
to
a
three
length
of
time
B,
but
they
are
getting
ready
to
come
back
and
widen
that
project
out.
I
was
hopeful.
They
were
going
to
have
a
public
hearing
on
that
before
the
end
of
the
year.
That's
not
going
to
happen
so
I
would
hope.
I
And
I
guess
one
of
my
concerns,
too
is
is
traffic
already
in
that
area
and
with
a
convenient
store
there.
It
will
just
add
to
that
or
the
congestion
I
guess
with
the
high
school
and
the
other
two
schools
there
and
so
forth.
I'm
just
a
little
concerned
about
that,
but
both
the
planning
department
in
pack
denied
that
denied
the
request
right
right
can
the
can
they
come
back
to
you
with
a
different
configuration
that
you
guys
may
may
be
more
willing
to
accept
the.
W
W
To
restate
that,
to
you,
excuse
me
if
Council
recommends
and
Rickon
deny
the
application,
they
can
come
back
within
six
months
with
a
will
another
another
concept.
Another
idea
for
the
project,
if
they're
coming
back
the
same
popularly,
have
still
activated
1/8.
We
have
to
wait
another
year
to
make
that
happen.
R
W
R
Work
and
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
just
make
sure
that
it
wasn't.
It
wasn't
completely
out
of
character
for
what
we
see
that
could
go
out.
If
you
have
a
question,
I
have
and
frankly
I.
Just
this
is
kind.
This
is
for
I
think
both
you
and
city
attorney
when
I
see
something
with
a
severe
elevation
change,
I
immediately.
R
As
a
result,
I
know
we've
never
done
it,
but
when
we
are
when
we're
going
to
make
contiguous
properties
that
wide
of
a
gap
in
in
the
intensive
intensity
of
the
use
from
a
GC
to
residential
I
think
we
I'm
just
really
lay
of
allowing
any
kind
of
development
that
would
pull
that
kind
of
water
down
into
a
residential
area.
We've
lived
it
before,
and
council.
W
R
K
R
U
A
lot
a
lot
of
the
trouble
that
you
have
is
for
surface
water,
on
the
on
the
commercial
development
residential
also,
but
I,
know
more
of
what
they've
done
for
the
commercial
side
of
it
and
what
they've
done
for
the
commercial
side
of
it
is
now
they're
more
going
to
the
underground
detention.
A
lot
more
expensive,
you
know,
could
be
fifty.
Seventy
five
thousand
dollars
a
piping
that
goes
underground.
U
It
holds
this
retention,
water
and
slowly
lets
it
out
instead
of
the
detention
pond
and
the
surface
water
on
top
of
the
ground
as
they
used
to
do
it.
Where
you
have
your
erosion
and
your
problems,
there
now
they're
piping,
it
they're
putting
it
in
the
concrete
they're,
putting
it
underneath
the
parking
lot
and
they're
retaining
it
there.
So
you
don't
have
the
problems
that
you're
talking
about
and
that's
the
same
way
that
this
project
would
be
developed
would
have
the
full
engineer
inside
there.
That
would
put
and
put
this
in
a
detention
basis.
U
That
would
be
underneath
the
parking
lot
in
the
pipe
system,
and
that
is
that
that's
the
way
that
they're
doing
now,
as
we
submit
our
plans
to
be
approved,
they're
allowing
less
surface
water
on
commercial
properties
and
more
underground
detention
and
that
way
everything's
in
a
pipe
and
it
doesn't
have
the
erosion
problems.
We
also
have
900
foot
of
frontage
on
this
property,
we're
talking
about
the
egress
in
and
the
egress
out.
It's
not
a
tight
lock.
U
We
do
several
of
them
that
are
very
tight
and
it
does
get
a
little
bit
tight
or
tight
to
a
to
a
stop
stoplight
that
that
they
don't
want
it
to
back
up
into
that
stop.
We
have
no
stoplight
on
either
side.
We
have
900
foot
of
frontage
to
be
able
to
allow
the
engineers
to
do
the
proper
design
to
access
and
exit
the
property,
and
then
the
water
retention
would
be
in
an
underground
pipe
system
as
we're
doing
now
in
the
new
modern
times.
Instead
of
surface
water
flowing
on
top
for
erosion
problems,.
R
W
Thank
you,
I
appreciate
councillor
Henson
to
your
to
your
question.
I
do
recall
a
situation
when
we
dealt
with
Walmart
up
there
gateway
where
we
required
the
independence
of
certain
improvements,
particularly
a
signal
in
front
out
there
in
front
of
winter
field
when
it
became
necessary
and
we
required
the
equip
a
bond
at
that
time.
So
there
is
some
precedence
for
that,
but
I
can't
we
have
to
do
a
little
more
research,
be
absolutely
sure.
R
B
B
R
Yeah
and
I
know
it
was
I
mean
it
was.
It
was
one
of
those
days
where
there
was
a
very,
very
steep
elevation
change
and
the
residents
were
very
concerned,
and
you
know
I
mean
waters,
gonna
go
where
water's
gonna
go
and
and
as
it
turned
out,
it
was
not
captured
in
quite
the
way
we
we
warned
it
to
done
to
do.
You
won't
have
any
comments
on
the
retention
system.
They're
talking.
X
Sure,
just
for
clarification,
we're
talking
two
different
situations
in
that
particular
case
that
you're,
referring
to
that,
was
actually
a
creek,
then
went
through
there
went
through
their
property
and
so
with
their
detention
system
because
they
had
so
much
flow
they
had
to
bypass.
If
you
will,
they
didn't
have
enough
area
to
retain
the
the
amount
of
flow,
because
it
was
a
large
acreage
that
was
draining
through
there.
That
was
the
difference
in
the
system.
X
We
see
it
on
a
large
part
of
those
depending
on
the
site
and
how
much
strain
Egeria
we're
talking
about
it's
commonly
used
and
there
and
there
different
methods
of
doing
that.
But
it
is
common
because,
typically
on
commercial
sites,
you're
using
a
lot
more
of
the
area,
so
you're
forced
to
put
it
on
the
ground,
then
on
a
detention
pond
type
situation,
but.
P
Mr.
Hawley
and
mr.
Patel
I
understand
that
you're
looking
to
do
a
project
and
and
that's
okay,
but
you
know-
there's
the
staff
has
mentioned
a
few
things
here
about
the
compatibility
and
the
residential
aspect
of
this
and
as
well.
You
know
it
looks
like
there's
going
to
be
a
res
restaurant
or
a
potential
bar
which
could
be
you
know,
kind
of
like
another
maple
Mart
or
something
like
that,
and
you
know
it
does
bring
up
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
concerns.
P
You've
got
some
serious
investment
right
across
the
street
from
it
over
in
a
section
of
maple
ridge,
and
then
you
have
these
residents
on
Galena
Road
I'm
more
concerned
about
the
values
that,
if
a
project
like
this,
like
you're
stating
that
you
want
to
do
goes
into
this
area,
it's
going
to
seriously
have
an
effect
on
the
values
of
these
homes.
So
I
can
understand
the
had
ability
of
it.
P
In
that
aspect,
it
does
have
a
double
denial
on
it.
Director
Jones,
it's
a
very
it's
a
rarity
that
they
would
bring
something
like
that
to
us,
and
you
know
in
in
understanding
this
the
shape
of
the
lot
where
it's
at
all
factors
involved.
I
I,
have
to
tend
to
agree
with
them,
so
I
cannot
be
in
support
of
this
request.
For
for
this
project,.
U
Q
U
Actually,
we
would
do
that
and
we
would
do
that,
but
once
we
get
to
approval,
then
it
would
go
to
full
engineering
and
then
the
engineer
would
actually
do
it
for
Eric
as
the
arborist
for
the
amount
of
landscape
and
then
again
it
is
the
overlay
area.
So
it
would
have
to
have
a
lot
more
decor
than
the
normal
commercial
areas
that
are
not
in
that
overlay
zone.
But
all
that
would
be
in
the
development
and
design
from
engineering
still
to
be
approved
by
the
city
and
again
we
don't
have
any
sewer
there.
U
R
P
K
B
K
P
K
P
K
B
B
G
G
And
I
will
say
that
her
email
that
came
to
me
very
late
this
evening,
just
before
I
came
over,
did
indicate
that
the
tree
remains
that
was
left
that
you
found
were
fresh-cut.
Maybe
once
you
tell
us
what
you
what
you
know
and
then,
of
course,
if,
if
you
want
to
hear
from
mistake
course,
she's
on
public
agenda
I
think
you
should
hear
from
her
Elsa.
Z
Z
Z
First
of
all,
I
thought
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
a
map
to
show
28:13
is
located
in
the
curb
curve
there
and
backed
up
to
this
Natural
Preserve
area.
I
did
find
that
there
were
deed
restrictions
on
the
Natural
Area.
It
is
a
preservation
area
and
under
the
terms
of
the
deed
restrictions,
it
must
stay
vegetated
unless
used
for
recreational
purposes.
It's
a
protected
area.
Z
I
went
back
to
2010
to
see
how
many
calls
had
come
in
to
public
works
and
there
in
fact
have
been
six.
If
you
count
last
week's
council
meeting
in
the
requests
that
were
made
at
that
meeting
back
in
2011,
we
had
two
calls
in
May
25th.
There
was
a
limb
over
the
and
we
remove
that
June
1st
October
11th.
There
was
another
limb
on
the
fence
and
that
was
removed,
October
12th
in
2015.
We
did
not
have
any
calls
in
12,
13
or
14
2015.
Z
There
was
a
call
about
a
falling
limb
in
front
of
the
address
when
we
got
there.
We
found
that
it
was
in
the
back
and
we
went
out
found
some
a
tree
bent
over
the
fence
and
also
a
large
hanging
limb
in
an
adjacent
tree
and
we
removed
those.
Also,
there
is
a
very
large
oak
tree
there
that
we
checked
out
because
they
had
expressed
concern
and
found
that
it
was
healthy
on
march
19th.
A
few
days
later,
they
called
back.
Z
There
was
still
concerned
about
the
large
oak
tree,
so
we
placed
it
on
our
pruning
list
not
top
priority
because
it
wasn't
deemed
to
be
unsafe,
but
certainly
we
felt
that
the
pruning
would
would
not
hurt.
The
tree
in
would
benefit
their
peace
of
mind.
So
we
proved
that
large
oak
and
cut
several
small
trees
on
August
25th
in
2015.
Z
Then
we
did
not
receive
another
call
from
them
until
July
3rd
of
this
year
we
got
a
call
about
a
tree
on
the
fence
we
investigated
and
actually
found.
It
was
just
a
limb,
a
leader,
but
it
was
a
limb
and
we
removed
that
limb
on
July
5th,
on
July
11th
11th.
We
also
assigned
our
contractor
to
do
some
additional
pruning
in
the
area
and
anything
that
looked
questionable
on
August
23rd
wood
came
up
on
the
pruning
list.
Z
The
contractor
pruned
and
cut
small
trees
and
then
asked
the
citizen
if
they
would
like
them
to
remove
the
debris.
The
citizen
response
was
no.
It's
ok,
where
it's
at
the
contractor
reports
that
he
also
asked
at
that
time.
If
they
wanted
him
to
repair
the
fence
and
the
citizen
responded
in
the
negative
that
they
would
get
the
city
to
make
the
repairs
as
requested
at
Council.
There
was
debris
there,
and
so
we
were
asked
to
him,
and
that
has
been
done.
Z
This
is
the
before
shot
and
you
can
see
all
the
debris.
That's
lined
up
there
in
a
dish
and
some
tree
stubs
that
are
there,
and
this
is
the
after
shot.
You
can
see
that
the
debris
has
been
removed
and
don't
know
who
did
it,
but
the
fences
at
least
put
back
together
again,
and
that
is
the
history
with
Public
Works.
B
G
So
they
are
protune
with
that.
Certainly
we
can
hear
from
misstate,
but
we'll
be
happy.
Answering
questions
in
and
I
would
just
remind
you
that
this
area
is
a
heavily
I,
don't
know
what
the
acreage
is
out
there,
but
it's
the
Soccer,
Complex
and
and
it's
heavily
heavily
wooded
a
large
acreage
and
it
would
there's
a
deed
restriction
and
we
just
can't
go
out
there
and
just
cut
down
trees,
especially
live
trees,
and
so-
and
so
it's.
G
It's
a
situation
where
I
think
you
can
see
from
the
dates
and
the
chronology
provided.
I
think
we've
tried
to
be
considerate,
considering
it
is
a
heavily
for
a
forestry
area
with
lots
of
trees,
and
you
know,
and
I
want
to
say
that
I
believe
our
risk,
manager
and
and
public
works
have
tried
to
be
considerate
and
they've.
G
G
O
Just
wanted
to
ask
an
administrative
question:
I
won't
take
about
a
minute
I'm.
Sorry,
the
report
that
was
sent
out
talks
about
a
chronology
of
events
where
the
challenge
fell.
The
tree
that
was
assessed
and
some
pruning
occurred
fence
was
repaired
at
least
a
couple
times
by
the
city.
Okay,
when
the
assessment
occurred
was
the
arborist
involved
in
that
I
mean
how
does
that?
Who
makes
the
assessment
well
I'd.
G
Z
Do
use
a
certified
arborist
for
any
evaluation
of
that
type.
We
actually
have
three
or
four
on
our
staff
who
are
nationally
certified,
so
we
have
were
blessed
with
some
talent
there
and,
yes,
they
will
decide
if
the
tree
is
not
healthy.
Obviously,
and
did
they
there's
a
national
scoring
system?
That's
used
the
oak
tree
that
we
were
talking
about.
The
very
large
oak
scored
around
a
75
and
that's
on
a
scale
of
one
to
a
hundred,
so
that
tree
is
very,
very
healthy.
Z
O
Z
But
if
the
limbs
that
are
falling
are
green,
that's
usually
something
that
takes
place
during
a
storm
and
the
weather
and
the
wind
has
brought
them
down,
which
is
a
good
indicator
for
us,
usually
of
whether
there's
a
problem
there.
And
if
we
were
seeing
dead
limbs.
Who
would
be
looking
for
the
source
of
those
dead
limbs.
O
AA
M
O
G
G
And
that's,
and
and
I
do
concur
that
we,
if
we
had
known
if
I
had
know
I
at
the
last
meeting,
right
and
and
as
I
said,
staff
did
not
know
they
were
going
to
appear
because
we
would
have
been
here
with
what
we
have
tonight.
And
so
we
did
spend
a
considerable
amount
of
time
and
now
we're
some
mystery
person.
Of
course,
ins
who
pretty
much
repaired.
It
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
hundred
percent
to
their
satisfaction.
O
H
T
G
There's
a
healthy
tree
and
the
neighbor
and
a
limb
falls
on
the
neighbor's
fence.
The
neighbors
insurance
is
responsible
and
I
said
what,
if
that
neighbor
says
I
know
your
trees
are
healthy,
but
your
limb
has
fallen
on
that
tree
and
I'm
telling
you
I'm
warning
you
that
you
need
to
get
that
tree
down
and
I
don't
get
it
done,
and
another
limb
falls
on
the
tree.
Who's
responsible
and
the
adjuster
says
your
neighbors
homeowners
insurance
is
responsible.
It's
a
healthy
tree
I!
G
Just
encourage
you
talk
to
your
insurance
folks
and
see
what
they
tell
you
don't
take.
My
word
I
see
councillor
Henderson
I
mean
Davis
you're
doing
this,
because
you
probably
know
that
what
I'm
telling
you
is,
what
the
way
it
works
and
so
I
don't
want
to
focus
on
that.
Offense
has
been
repaired
to
some
extent,
I'll
be
happy
to
look
at
it.
I'm
just
telling
you
what
the
insurance
rules
are.
G
R
AB
AB
Is
key
and
if
you
come
out
in
in
2011
for
the
same
set
of
circumstances
in
my
parents,
they
said
these
trees
are
rotten,
they
asked
and
she
conic
and
she
implied
that
they
said
that
they
were
healthy,
and
so
they
couldn't
just
cut
them
down.
They
could
only
turn
them
they're,
not
arborist.
They
just
lived
there,
it's
about
their
property
right
and
she
said
to
them.
Please,
sir,
cut
these
trees
now
I'm,
not
just
one
there
now,
claiming
that
it's
not
the
same
tree
ironically,
once
we
asked
for
them
to
pay
for
the
damage.
AB
Now
when
they
came
to
the
house,
they
didn't
say
to
my
parents:
hey
I,
know
you're
asking
for
us
to
pay
for
the
damage,
but
this
is
a
different
tree.
They
didn't
indicate
that
it
was
only
after
we
sent
the
letter
that
they'll
come
up
with.
This
is
a
different
tree
and
therefore
now
an
act
of
God
because
they
didn't
have
prior
knowledge,
not
took
the
time
myself
to
research,
the
law,
and
nowhere
does
it
say
that
we
have
to
continuously
call
you
to
give
you
knowledge.
Knowledge
is
knowledge.
AB
If
you
know
it
today
or
if
you
know
it's
six
years
from
now,
knowledge
is
knowledge,
they
had
knowledge
in
2011,
but
there
was
an
issue
with
these
streets
and
we're
not
talking
about
the
heavily
wooded
area
two
miles
down
the
road
at
the
soccer
field.
We're
talking
about
ten
feet
away
from
the
property
line
that
butts
up
to
our
to
our
property
line.
I,
get
that
we
can't
go
out
there
and
point
out
all
the
trees,
but
these
are
elderly
people
and
they
did
the
best
that
they
could
do
to
say
to
them.
AB
AB
It
was
your
tree
and
now
you
can
see
that
there's
an
issue
and
you
you
expect
a
liability,
then
in
our
eyes
and
then
the
second
time
when
we
call
same
set
of
circumstances,
same
group
of
trees,
same
ideal
thing
in
the
same
spot
on
the
same
fence.
They
came
out
just
like
her
chronological
order
said,
and
they
fix
the
fence.
Here
we
are
2070.
AB
AB
Cutting
down
with
them
since
last
week
was
in
that
picture.
In
fact,
you
identified
it
as
being
rotten.
It
was
in
the
picture
that
we
sent
back
in
August.
So
to
me,
are
they
waiting
for
another
act
of
God?
So
they
can
say
it's
a
different
tree
and
we're
not
going
to
fix
it
when
it
was
in
the
picture.
We
even
said
it
I
circled
it.
Here's
some
more
rotten
lens.
Here's
other
tree's
right
here.
AB
Nothing
was
done,
but
now
something
is
being
done
between
a
week
a
week
from
last
week
to
this
week
they
come
to
cut
the
very
tree
down,
one
of
them
that
we
said
months
ago
was
in
the
same
picture.
So
it's
like
you're
picking
and
choosing
what
you
want
to
remember
or
what
you
want
to
fix.
We
first
nominal
damage
I've,
you
I've
lost
more
time
off
of
work
and
energy,
just
because
of
the
principle
now
to
her
point.
AB
Someone
did
come
back
in
the
summer
when
they
came
to
after
July
and
they
offered
to
fix
the
fence.
Well,
she
had
been
in
conversation
with
the
city
and
they
had
said
no,
so
she
rightfully
declined
their
offer
because
one
it
wasn't
authorized
by
the
city,
and
we
know
that
if
we
allow
some
outside
source
to
fix
it
till
now
we
own
the
property.
So
that
is
why
I
told
her
to
say
no,
because
we
hadn't
received
any
authorization
from
the
city.
AB
In
fact,
the
gentleman
said
that
he
hadn't
been
authorized
to
fix
it,
but
he
would
fix
it.
So
we
said
no,
because
it
didn't
make
sense
that
we
should
do
that
now.
Since
then,
several
times
in
the
past
week,
they've
come,
they
cut
down,
trees,
they've
been
pruning
away,
and
we
think,
however,
when
they
take
someone
put
the
fence
back
up
because
they
had
to
go
out
there.
We
don't
know.
AC
AC
He
and
I
stood
in
the
backyard
and
we
talked
about
that
eagle
tree
and
he
said
that's
where
they
will
come.
I
said
you
know
that's
right,
but
the
tree
you
saw
mr.
Vieau
write
it
next
to
it.
I
thought!
Well,
it
could
be
that
tree
both
I'm
sorry,
but
he
it
says,
that's
where
the
name
comes
from
so
I
said:
okay,
that's
what
I
am
come
on.
AC
AC
We
would
come
back
and
fix
that
for
you,
but
I
told
him
I
said:
listen
that
drive
wasn't
as
important
as
it
was
for
you
to
fix
my
fence,
so
I
didn't
call,
because
that
was
a
little
thing,
but
even
though
these
trees
was
a
little
thing,
but
no
one
took
it
as
a
little
because
they
don't
blow
it
up
and
it's
a
big
thing.
Man,
mr
Turner
Evan,
said
Billy
Martin.
All
right
do
the
lead
to
ask
me
to
let
him
fix
my
fence
free
of
charge.
To
please
me
I
in
turn
told
him.
AC
Q
Y
AC
Was
no
rejection
on
him
and
when
he'd
moved
when
he
asked
about
the
debris,
I
need
to
tell
you
that
to
the
Babri
he
asked
me:
could
he
put
it
back
there?
I
said
you
know.
This
is
I
said
it
properly.
I
can't
tell
you
what
to
do,
but
there's
more
Creek
right
there
and
if
you're
gonna
put
it
in
that
Creek
you're
gonna
create
another
problem,
so
he
said
I'll
put
it
back
as
far
as
I
can
I
said.
AC
AC
G
M
G
Y
Cuz
I
know
yeah
I
would
just
like
to
explain
the
reason
that
mr.
Tate
is
upset
is
because
of
a
husband
has
really
good
ill.
Nona
and
I
appreciate
you,
mister,
but
I
want
to
explain
why
she
was
upset.
Her
husband
has
been
very,
very
ill
and
still
his
and-
and
he
called
me
today-
upset
because
he
didn't
know
who
was
in
his
backyard
and
I
said.
Don't
you
worry
about
I
said
everything
he
said.
No,
no
one
told
me
anything,
my
wife
is
not
here
and
he
is
so
sick.
Y
He
can't
even
get
out
of
the
bed
yeah,
and
so
that's
why
she
is
upset
I,
said
and
she's
also
upset,
because
when
he
was
well
mr.
Tate
used
to
walking
at
the
area
here
they
don't,
they
can't
do
it
because
the
lives
are
falling
and,
as
you
can
see
their
laborious
Lee
of
contacted
the
city
about
this
here
and
I'm
grateful
to
the
City
Council
for
listening,
Alan
I
appreciate
you
and
everyone
here,
because
right
is
right
and
I'm
not
working
you
over
the
coals.
Y
It's
just
a
fact
that
I
this
is
a
senior
citizen
procedure.
Citizens
and
I
can't
see
how
not
only
the
citizens
but
I
can't
see
how
individuals,
who
are
not
trained
to
be
able
to
look
at
trees
or
limbs
and
be
able
to
predict
what
limbs
are
going
to
fall
off
of
a
tree,
whether
it's
in
their
back
and
you
see
how
close
the
trees
were.
So
you
know
the
lids
were
hanging
over
or
on
the
front
of
her
individuals.
Y
How
anyone
can
predict
that,
particularly
when
a
city
tells
us
do
not
do
anything
to
a
tree.
The
average
citizen
is
not
trained
as
our
braces
to
be
able
to
do
that.
So
when
something
like
that
happens
and
I'm
just
trying
to
wrap
and
I
appreciate
that
this
issue
settled
I
would
just
like
to
wrap
my
head
around
this
issue
and
also
have
the
really
audience
who
have
called
me
about
this
issue
so
that
they
would
understand
correct
me
if
my
understanding
is
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
Y
Y
Y
Not
what
I'm
saying
if
the
citizen
has
no
knowledge
that
that
is,
is
going
to
happen,
how
why
should
they
three
be
responsible?
If
we're
talking
about
people
who
are
able
to
look
at
something
and
see
about
my,
my
problem
concerning
this
is
I
think
we
need
to
do
a
relook
on
this
year,
because
how
can
we
put
two
onus
of
responsibility
on
the
citizens
to
be
human
or
something
I
would
not
be
able
to
look
and
see?
If
it's
not,
this
sooner
happened
with
me.
Y
I
would
be
upset,
because
the
first
thing,
I
would
say
with
I,
didn't
know
it
either.
Just
like
you
didn't
know
it
I
could
notify
you,
because
I
don't
have
the
expertise
to
be
able
to
look
and
see
that
you
either
have
to
pay
for
my
vehicle.
That's
damaged.
So
that's
my
problem
with
this,
and
this
is
this:
an
ordinance
of
ours.
No.
G
B
G
K
Y
Y
Y
What
I'm
saying
is
that
the
average
person
is
not
an
arborist
and
that's
the
catch
word
right
there.
If
the
land
order
owner
knew
a
lot
of
people,
don't
know
I,
wouldn't
know
and
I
think
that
that
is
just
not
if
we
need
to
go
through
dues,
it's
legislative
agenda
we'll
do
it
because
I
don't
think
this
is
in
fact
I.
Don't
I
know
it's
not
fair
to
the
citizens
to
be
held
responsible
when
they
don't
know
anything
well.
AB
B
Y
Y
AC
AC
G
M
AC
B
B
B
AB
G
G
AB
G
AB
G
If
it
select
a
lot,
you
all
have
been
to
Savannah
and
you
rat
down
the
streets
and
the
trees
are
all
over
the
streets
in
Savannah
and
in
Oakland,
for
where
trees
are
all
over
hanging
over
the
street
in
Oakland
Park.
There's
no
way
when
we
say
if
they
live
tree
and
limbs
hanging
over
a
street
go
through
Oakland
Park,
it's
all
over
the
place,
so
we
can't
go
out
and
take
down
every
tree
or
lake
bottom.
G
AB
G
AC
AC
Y
Point
is
this
here:
not
that
Stan
will
recommend
and
I
will
say
this
to
our
viewing
audience.
If
you
think
that
this,
what
the
city
manager
just
verbalized,
it's
unfair,
these
elected
officials
here
let
them
know
because
it
is
to
me
it's
unfair-
to
punish
the
citizens
for
a
city
tree
than
their
Falls
and
damages
property
on
their
property.
Y
But
you
know
this:
the
Texas
citizens
are
the
taxpayers
that
pay
for
everything,
so
it
seems
like
they're
being
punished
for
something
that's
not
even
did
their
ability
to
control
and
I'll
just
let
this
matter
rest
for
now,
because
it's
not
right
the
whole
act
of
God
issue.
To
me,
it's
not
right.
Okay,.
B
M
Y
Y
M
B
AC
Good
evening,
on
their
pro
tip,
toe
and
counsel
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
Sarah
daughters,
a
non-profit
women's
ministry
and
we're
having
a
4th
annual
Fashion,
Show
and
tastes
of
Christmas
on
Sep,
been
here
so
long
call
me:
September
December
16th
at
Christ,
Community
Church
at
5
o'clock
p.m.
I
have
with
me
some
of
the
participants.
They
would
like
to
introduce
themselves
quickly
because
it's
a
school
night
come
on
you're.
First
you're
gonna
go
up
there.
Okay,.
F
S
Q
V
T
T
AC
AD
Hi,
my
name
is
Tara,
rot
off
I
am
the
area
ten
fundraising
chair
for
Special
Olympics
area,
ten
stretches
from
Clay
County
to
just
north
of
Harris
County,
my
job
and
my
responsibility
is
to
raise
funds
through
our
community
to
support
training,
education,
sportsmanship
and
other
things
for
the
Special
Olympic
program,
Special
Olympic
programs
in
those
counties.
My
final
fundraiser
for
2017
is
going
to
be
a
girls
night
out.
We
are
here
tonight
to
invite
the
community.
It
is
a
free
event.
There
are
Flyers
posted.
You
guys
got
the
flyer
last
week.
AD
It
is
going
to
be
at
the
Clarion
in
between
six
and
eight.
The
Clarion
in
is
the
old
Holiday
Inn
Express
on
Manchester
expressway.
They
have
generously
donated
us.
There
come.
There
is
Elia
room.
It's
next
to
the
new
big
chick-fil-a.
We've
contracted
with
some
local
vendors
to
sell
their
items
here
in
the
community,
they're
gonna
come
and
they're
gonna
set
up
tables.
We've
purchased
food
from
Walmart
as
well
as
we
have
some
donated
goods,
and
we
have
some
items
to
raffle
off
and
again
it
is
free.
AD
We
will
be
there
between
6:00
and
8:00.
This
Thursday
December
7th
and
again,
as
I
said
it
is
my
final
fundraiser
for
2017
and
I,
would
like
to
thank
the
Columbus
community
for
the
support
that
I've
gotten
from
the
City
Council
from
various
organizations
throughout
the
community.
All
of
those
funds,
a
hundred
percent
go
to
our
special
needs
programming.
All
of
us
are
volunteers,
and
we
just
really
would
like
the
community
to
come
out.
B
X
AD
The
Clarion
in
at
2,800
Manchester
expressway,
it
will
be
between
six
and
eight
and
it
is
free
on
December
7th,
Thursday
December
7th
this
coming
Thursday
thank.
B
I
G
W
H
Hey
yes,
my
name
is
Dan
Harkness
I'm,
a
president
and
CEO
of
quantum
Wireless.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
say
thank
you,
mayor,
pro-tem
and
Steve
council
of
Columbus
for
letting
me
talk
here
today.
So
basically,
the
model
of
the
business
model
that
we're
proposing
is
to
book
our
typical
to
a
tower
model.
I,
don't
know
you
know
how
often
you
guys
I'm,
assuming
you
guys
have
probably
been
said-
you
know,
ordinances
or
things
in
relation
to
towers.
H
If
they
were
building
a
tower
would
require
that
term.
In
order
to
commit
their
capital
and
their
commitment
apartment
partnership
to
the
investment,
but
it's,
but
instead
of
a
tower
they're
doing
this
in
a
inside
of
a
building
or
a
facility,
and
we've
done
similar
contracts
with
these
at
the
Macon
Coliseum,
as
well
as
the
James
Brown
Arena
in
Augusta
Georgia.
H
R
V
G
AE
Ten
years
with,
the
two
five-year
renewals
is
very
common
for
municipal
tower
leases,
as
they
have
said,
and
we
actually
have
one
like
that
on
our
South
Commons
today.
Given
the
investment,
it
seems
reasonable.
The
10-year
term
begins,
but
then
there
are
automatic
renewals
for
the
next
two
five-year
terms
as
long
as
all
the
conditions
are
being
met
and
the
rent
is
being
paid
and
this
facility
is
getting
the
benefit
of
having
service.
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
On
this
particular
project,
that's
great
okay,
no
cost
to
the
taxpayers.
The
developer
was
was
informed
that
in
order
to
obtain
state
historic
tax
credits
through
the
Department
of
Revenue
that
the
entity
will
develop
and
own,
the
project
must
be
named
holder,
on-site
control
and
that's
why
we're
asking
for
this?
T
G
P
So
in
light
of
that,
though,
I've
made
some
calls
because,
when
I
first
looked
at
it,
the
the
contract
that's
being
presented
is
somewhat,
in
my
opinion,
complicated
because
you
have
a
lessee
and
a
sublease
see
I
tried
I
want
to
thank
the
city
attorney
in
their
department
before
walking
me
through
some
things.
I
had
some
question.
I
think
the
main
thing
that
my
concern
is
is
this
is
that
we
have
a
above
board.
P
This
is
City
land
I
mean
a
city,
land
city,
property,
taxpayers,
land
taxpayers,
property
and
that
we
have
an
aboveboard,
transparent
and
a
development
of
integrity
and
a
solid
integral
relationship
with
the
developers
that
are
there,
and
certainly
by
no
means
there
should
be
outside
of
the
sub
lacy
in
this
case,
which
is
a
developer
that
the
assurance
of
any
type
of
profiteering
on
for
taxpayers
land.
So
I've
been
assured
by
that.
P
P
P
B
G
T
S
T
Does
this
city
because
he's
gonna
make
money
from
the
property,
the
development,
the
housing
and
all
that
I
understand
that
a
small
portion
of
it
will
come
back
to
our
budget
will
they'll,
be
then
the
leasing
of
that
land
with
them
we're
all
we're
gonna
get
is
just
a
portion
of
that
rental
money.
That's
the
part,
I,
don't
understand
I'm
trying
to
understand
how
are
we
gonna
make
any
money
off
of
this
deal
to
go
into
our
budget
or
which
is
gonna,
be
a
partner
in
a
project
public
library.
G
Are
you
taking
the
blighted
property
that
was
handed
to
us
that
we
did
not
want
and
we
tried,
we
were
prepared
to
give
it
back
to
the
federal
government.
We
gave
it
to
Claflin
and
they
struggled
with
it
for
a
couple
of
years.
And
then
this
developer
came
along
and
with
an
idea
and
that
idea
took
getting
the
deed
restriction
or,
and
the
developer
is
ones
who
construct
44,
plus
or
minus
affordable
housing
units
where
there
will
be
property
tax
paid
to
the
city,
and
it
will
remove
the
blight
from
that
area
and
and.
I
G
G
G
AF
Pro
Tem
council.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
come
clarify
a
few
things.
My
name
is
Thompson
shooting
I
work
for
the
developer,
horrible,
consulting
services.
When
we
approached
you
earlier
this
year,
March
April,
another
colleague
of
mine,
from
our
same
company
same
developer,
was
here
representing
us.
I
was
working
on
the
project
at
that
time
as
well,
but
he
has
since
left
the
company.
So
you're
stuck
with
me
today
to
answer
your
question.
This
new
entity
is
a
sole
purpose.
AF
V
AF
AF
K
I
B
R
Just
finally-
and
I
just
wanted
to
add
an
answer-
a
piece
of
an
answer
to
councilor
Woodsen's
about
what
the
community
gets
out
of
it-
certainly
it
it
allows
us
to
eliminate
a
blighted
area,
but
it
also
preserves
a
major
historic
structure
and
it
does
so
while
creating
quality
housing
at
lower
the
market
rate,
because
the
nature,
the
tax
credits,
still
have
instant
equity
when
they
sell
those
tax
credits
which
then
they
are
required
to
lease
those
properties
and
a
70%
75%
of
market
rate.
Sometimes.
AF
R
G
While
we
get
the
quality
housing,
you
know,
I,
don't
want
the
the
fact
that
the
preservation
is
you
say
of
the
school,
and
there
will
be
an
area
set
aside
for
educational
programs
and
to
display
the
school's
history.
We
can't
let
that
get
lost
in
all
of
this,
but
and
we
won't
and
I
know
Richard
Jesse
and
the
Friends
of
cert
Claflin
will
not,
but
but
all
those
other
things
we
talked
about.
That
comes
out
of
this.
R
B
P
B
P
AF
AF
We
may
end
up
with
some
relatively
small
long-term
debt
we'll
have
to
see.
We
have
the
pleasure
of
the
uncertainty
of
tax
reform
in
Washington
right
now.
That's
going
to
have
a
material
impact
on
a
lot
of
this,
so
some
of
those
things
aren't
totally
defined
yet,
but
if
possible,
we'd
like
to
structure
it
without
debt,
simply
because
it
you
know
these
deals
of
your
Housing
Authority
does
similar
deals
that
are
hundreds
of
units
or
more
and
only
forty
four
units
with
the
additional
cost
of
historic
renovation.
Everything
just
gets
really
tight.
Thank
you.
Thank.
G
B
G
T
B
G
G
B
P
Mr.
city
manager,
you're
finished
with
your
agenda:
I
am
okay,
I
just
went
to
one
thing:
councillor
Garrett
and
I
had
the
opportunity
to
participate
yesterday
in
an
event
that
our
d-o-t
representative,
Sam
will
burn
hat
out
at
national
infantry
museum
is
really
great
to
have
the
d-o-t
Commissioner
here
and
his
whole
staff
for
the
region
and
just
the
the
representation
and
taught
that
was
there
on
the
way
out
to
the
infantry
Museum
as
went
down
south
Lumpkin,
and
just
noticed
that
evidently,
all
the
trees
that
were
planted
there
are
gone
now.
P
P
Well,
that
makes
sense
the
the
one
of
the
Commerce
I
know
our
DoD
representative,
mr.
Wellborn
is
very
very
concerned
about
the
conditions
of
our
roads
and
Columbus
and
almost
any
time
you
meet
him,
see
him
or
you
know
any
time
he
talks
to
any
of
us
he's
going
to
talk
to
you
about
repaving,
I
promise,
you
and
you
know,
and
and
and
likewise
I'm
concerned
the
same
in
the
same
manner
as
he
makes
a
very
valid
point.
P
You
know,
I,
don't
know
if
the
citizens,
maybe
we
can
do
another
update,
so
the
citizens
can
actually
see
how
this
works,
but
you
know
it
does
bring
the
question:
are
we
or
are
we
Pavin
enough
streets
in
a
timely
manner
based
on
the
resources
that
are
available,
I,
get
when
I
say
resources
available,
I?
Guess
the
people
who
actually
do
the
paving,
which
you
know
I've
always
heard
there-
may
be
some
concerns.
There
may
be
a
weather
issue.
P
Maybe
some
matter
like
that
that
might
be
hampering
I
haven't
seen
any
paving
going
on
lately
in
a
while.
I
do
have
some
streets
that
I
need
checked
out
and
my
council
member
actually
lives
in
a
subdivision
where
it's
probably
what
four
or
five
streets
that
are
I
guarantee
in
the
last
two
years.
They
moved
is
down
the
list
right,
but
the
lower.
The
number
is
party
right
right
and
certainly
there's
a
couple
others
that
I
don't
mind
to
call
in,
but
they
do
need
to
be
looked
at.
P
But
my
concern
is
that,
if
we're
not
routinely
paving
I
think
everybody
understands
is
we're
not
routinely
paving
the
streets
up
here
continue
to
get
worse
and
then
you
just
have
a
logjam.
That's
gonna
get
re-evaluated
and
put
down
at
the
at
the
priority
list,
and
then
you
just
kind
of
have
masses
and
it's
gonna
be
log
jam.
Basically,
that's
what
it's
going
to
be
so
I
am
concerned
about
that.
I
hope
the
mayor
will
attempt
to
address
that
and
her
upcoming
budget
I
think
we
have
maybe
resources
to
do
that.
P
G
B
G
Have
definite
city
manager
Hodge
come
back
with
an
update
and
without
but
I'll
just
tell
you
so
that
there's
no
confusion
out
there
for
those
watching.
You
know
back
when
we
had
money
when
we
had
special-purpose
local
option
sales
tax
and
at
some
point
at
peak
we
were
able
to
do.
We
did
for
a
year
250
miles
of
resurfacing
in
a
year,
and
our
target
had
been
25
miles
in
a
year
but
based
on
funding,
I
think
we're
down
to
about
15
miles
a
year
and
it's
based
on
funding.
P
R
P
B
T
City
manager
I
wanted
to
go
back
on
on
the
south
flunking
wrong
now
that
they
removed
the
trees
so
that
they
can
make
areas
and
they're
going
to
replace
it.
Have
we
come
up
with
some
type
of
beautification?
You
know
I've
been
asking
you
for
about
three
years
now.
What
are
we
gonna
do
to
beautify
that
road?
Well,.
G
T
Q
B
AA
Mayor
pro-tem
and
Council
on
the
clerk's
agenda,
we
have
three
items
of
information.
We
received
correspondence
from
the
city
of
Stockbridge.
They
are
asking
for
a
resolution
in
support
of
Georgia
municipal
associations,
legislation
policy
regarding
D
annexation,
legislation
to
create
new
missive
municipalities.
We've
got
a
biographical
sketch
of
mr.
James
Lewis.
This
is
beside
for
recommendation
for
the
unexpired
term
of
miss
JC
Jenkins,
who
has
resigned.
We've
received
correspondence
from
the
Medical
Center
Hospital
Authority,
submitting
recommendations
for
the
position
held
by
dr.
Michael.
T
AA
AA
Poses
on
our
animal
control
that
visor
eboard,
we
had
a
conversation
with
animal
control
division
on
last
week.
They
are
trying
to
make
contact
with
the
Association
president
to
get
that
recommendation
for
animal
control.
Advisory
Board,
miss
Libby
Smith,
has
then
be
nominated
for
the
board
of
historic
and.
I
AA
AA
I
AA
AA
T
T
AA
B
I
AA
I
AA
P
P
AA
P
AA
B
AA
AA
Okay,
we'll
bring
this
back
up
next
meeting
for
confirmation.
The
mayor
is
working
on
a
replacement
for
miss
Jenice
Granville
for
the
Public
Safety
Advisory.
We
are
working
with
the
school
district
for
their
replacement
for
mr.
Jeff
battles.
Counselor
Davis
is
working
on
a
replacement
for
mr.
Oh
Bruce
and
councillor
Henderson
is
working
for
replacement
for
miss
pate
on
the
Medical
Center
Hospital
Authority
for
dr.
Michael
warm
seat
tonight,
counselor
Thomas
is
making
the
recommendations
of
mr.
Murray
Solomon
mr.
Tracy
sayers
and
dr.
Michael.