►
From YouTube: PRBH 01 27 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
I
want
to
just
give
you
a
few
notes
before
I
turn
it
over
to
our
chair
for
today,
torrance
goodwin
and
he'll
he'll
be
chairing
the
the
hearing
today,
so
just
as
an
overview,
the
prb,
the
personnel
review
boards.
Their
mission
today
is
to
assure
that
merit
system
employees
have
received
due
process
and
proper
treatment
when
they
have
received
significant
disciplinary
actions.
A
The
members
of
the
board
are
subject
to
the
code
of
ethics
contained
in
the
city's
charter.
As
such,
they
must
recuse
themselves
if
they
have
conflict
of
interest
in
this
case,
meaning
that
they
know
the
individual
that's
appealing
today,
they've
either
been
employed
with
or
an
employer
of
the
individual,
or
they
have
some
other
type
of
business
relationship
with
the
person
that's
appealing
today
in
terms
of
the
standard
of
review,
the
board's
review
shall
be
made
in
accordance
to
the
following
standards.
A
A
This
is
an
administrative
hearing.
It
is
not
a
court
of
law.
Therefore,
rules
of
evidence
do
not
apply
and
turn
it
over
to
the
chair.
For
today,
I
will
just
remind
them
that
once
they've
completed
their
deliberation,
that
you
must
vote
in
public
and
again
today's
hearing
is
going
to
be
chaired
by
board
member
torrance
goodwin.
So
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you.
B
B
B
F
H
B
As
far
as
the
rules,
each
side
will
be
allowed
30
minutes
to
do
their
presentation.
That
would
include
any
opening
and
closing
remarks
and,
after
your
witness
is
a
call,
both
witnesses
you'll
get
a
chance
to
actually
question
any
follow-up
witnesses
and
we'll
limit
that
to
five
minutes,
a
piece
at
this
time
we're
swearing
any
witnesses,
any
witnesses
who
are
going
to
testify
in
this
case.
Please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand.
B
B
This
time
we'll
begin
the
session.
Mr
whitaker,
we'll
start
with
you.
We
ask
that
you
use
to
michael
if
you
want
to
bring
your
witnesses
up
to
the
witness
stand,
but
we
do
have
to
use
one
of
the
microphones
at
the
witness
stand,
or
I
think
you
should
have
a
mic
at
your.
I
Desk,
we
appreciate
this
opportunity
to
appear
before
the
board
for
this
fairness
hearing
and
that's
all
we're
asking
that
the
board
be
fair
and
do
what
in
good
conscience,
they
should
officer.
Brown
is
appealing
this
decision
to
suspend
him
for
three
days
because
he
feel
it
wasn't
fair
in
this
situation.
I
It
may
seem
like
three
days
is
insignificant,
however,
when
it
affects
future
employment
advancement,
and
things
of
that
nature
is
very
important
that
he
have
due
process
now.
Officer
brown
was
called
to
a
domestic
dispute
and
we
all
know
that
a
domestic
violence
case
is
one
of
the
most
precarious
and
dangerous
situation
an
officer
can
be
called
to
when
he
arrived.
I
Was
there
the
perpetrator
came
to
the
door
in
his
underwear
and
he
was
immediately
arrested.
He
was
put
in
custody.
Rather
mr
brown
received
three
days
suspension,
allegedly
because
he
allowed
the
victim
to
go
into
the
house
where
the
perpetrator
lived.
However,
the
evidence
showed
that
she
lived
there.
Also
she
had
clothes
there,
her
children
stayed
there.
All
the
witnesses
and
neighbors
said
that
she
didn't
go
into
the
house
for
illicit
purpose,
but
to
retrieve
clothing
for
the
perpetrator
and
the
keys
to
the
vehicle.
That's
also
subject
of
his
suspension.
I
Now
mr
brown
talked
with
the
witnesses
and
people
on
hand
who
also
corroborated
the
fact
that
this
lady
lived
in
this
house,
but
he
was
wrote
up
for
allowing
her
to
go
in
there.
He
was
also
written
up
because
he
gave
the
keys
to
the
victim
to
the
durango.
To
the
victim,
however,
is
uncontroverted
that
the
perpetrator
told
mr
brown
to
give
the
victim
the
keys.
I
I
I
I
All
you
have
to
have
for
probable
cause
is
a
crime
occurred
and
you
may
have
had
something
to
do
with
it.
That's
enough
to
be
for
the
rest
to
go
in
the
case
to
be
bound
over
to
a
higher
k
court,
where
the
facts
would
have
to
be
proven
beyond
a
reasonable
doubt.
There
was
probable
cause.
It's
alleged
that
there
was
no
proper
cause.
However,
this
victim
had
bruises
all
on
them,
but
according
to
the
perpetrator,
these
bruises
were
called
by
two-year-old
twins.
I
I
At
some
point,
mr
brown
did
not
make
a
inventory
arrest
or
arrest
of
this
guy
in
his
vehicle.
The
vehicle
was
not
impounded,
so
there
was
no
need
to
make
an
inventory
of
this,
but,
most
importantly,
this
victim
received
a
temporary
restraining
order
based
on
these
same
facts,
temporary
restraining
order
issued
by
judge
mullen
subsequently
extended
for
12
months
by
judge
art
smith,
so
I
submit
if
mr
brown
was
wrong.
These
two
judges
were
wrong
as
well.
I
I
I
G
G
G
Mrs
claimed
that
mr
watson
had
kicked
her
in
the
leg
and
there
was
no
previous
reports
to
document
family
violence,
there's
no
particular
in
place
and
no
injury
sustained
during
this
incident.
Although
mrs
banks
did
advise
me
that
she
had
old
bruising
from
her
physical
altercation
with
mr
watson.
At
that
time
I
explained
to
ms
watson-
I
could
do
as
much
as
you
want
me
to
do.
I
know
the
state
minimum
requires
to
do
a
report.
G
I
went
also
to
retrieve
my
family
violence
camera
for
my
vehicle.
Also,
I
contacted
the
supervisor
with
ms
brittney
hayes.
Miss
hayes
is
not
here,
or
certainly
it's
not
here.
The
present
time
she's
moved
on
at
that
point
in
time
explaining
to
her.
According
to
what
I
had
I
went
back
inside.
Excuse
me.
I
went
back
inside
and
I
asked
mrs
banks
to
show
me
what
the
alleged
incident
of
injury
was.
So
when
she
lifted
her
left
pants
legs.
G
I
observed
multiple
bruising
that
was
on
her
left
leg.
Her
right
leg,
her
chest
her
back
and
neck.
They
were
all
documented
on
my
cameras
at
that
point
in
time.
According
to
the
cpd
policy,
I
received
197
pages
from
the
city
and
referenced
my
case.
It's
page
number
138,
section,
6,
city
policy,
reference,
the
criminal
procedures
process,
5-2
alpha
and
1-7-6
nora.
G
G
If
an
officer
has
probable
cause
to
believe
and
act,
the
family
violence
had
occurred
at
that
point
in
time
from
her
having
the
bruising
and
what
I
saw
based
on
what
she
told
her
co-workers,
I
had
probable
cause
now
again,
if
I
arrested
mr
watson
for
a
simple
battery
family
violence
charge.
Based
on
what
I
had,
I
truly
felt
I
did
my
job.
It
was
not
overly
done,
but
my
job
he
was
interviewed
at
the
point
I
was
stated
upon.
Speaking
to
mr
watson,
I
reflected
my
report,
my
report
states
upon
speaking
to
mr
watson.
G
He
stated
if
I
speak
to
him
that
mean
he
said
something
and
I
wrote
it
down.
I
again,
I
was
alleged
to
not
to
interview
him.
I
was
alleged.
Why
arrested
him
in
his
underwear?
He
came
to
join
his
underwear.
His
wife
already
outlined
the
facts.
It
was
in
my
arrest
report
that
he
has
a
gun
problem.
He
is
a
convicted
felon.
So
again,
am
I
going
to
allow
the
felon
to
go
in
the
house
and
get
the
guns.
No,
I
would
not.
Yes,
there
were
two
other
officers
there
decided
to
incident.
G
G
G
I
I
would
like
to
ask
a
few
direct
questions
to
you
to
you,
mr
a
few
direct
questions.
Mr
brown.
Yes,.
J
G
G
G
Also
being
stated
that
ils
gave
this
lady,
the
car,
it's
not
the
legs,
I
did
give
the
car.
I
give
the
keys
to
the
car
based
upon
what
mr
watson
stated
what
I
did
in
front
of
starting
hoover
when
he
was
down
to
headquarters.
I
called
mrs
banks
on
the
telephone
in
front
of
sergeant
hoover.
I
placed
it
on
speaker.
She
stayed
at
it
because
I
want
to
get
some
clarification
of
what
her
relationship
was
with
mr
watson,
mr
watts,
living
husband
boyfriend
at
two
set
of
twins
two
and
a
half
years
old.
G
That
time-
and
I
asked
mrs
banks
a
question
and
find
a
certain
who
owned
speaker
for
clarification.
I
also
explained
who
is
mrs
jones.
She
said
she
didn't
know
exactly
start.
There
was
a
friend
then
later
on,
going
through
more
of
my
questions,
the
steps
that
mrs
banks
boyfriend,
mr
watson,
had
a
girlfriend
named
mrs
jones
alleged
the
car
was
hers.
I
did
not
know
that
because
mr
watson
never
stated.
However,
miss
washington
did
try
to
see
me
at
the
scene
by
telling
me
that
she
does
not
live
there.
G
G
It
was
placed
on
speaker
in
front
of
sergeant
hoover
as
she
standing
the
corner
as
I'm
sitting
there,
and
I
asked
her
ma'am
explain
your
relationship
and
she
established
what
was
going
on.
I
asked
her
also
as
well.
Did
mr
watson
not
state
to
give
you
the
keys
at
some
point
and
she
replied?
Yes,
he
did.
I
wrote
it
down
in
my
report
again
a
three-day
suspension
based
upon
somebody
gave
me
some
testimony
cars
not
stolen.
What
am
I
gonna
say
about
something
that
I
was
given
to
give
to
her.
G
G
G
This
is
page
number
72,
the
interview
performed
by
at
that
time
there
was
officer,
dobbins
and
sergeant
hoover.
Okay,
the
interview
was
on
8
23
2017,
with
mr
david
warwick
alpine
pawn
shop,
who
stated
he
was
familiar
with
miss
banks.
She
drove
a
gray
dodge
charger.
Oh
sorry,
of
course,
a
great
dodge
durango
and
on
many
occasions
a
white
male
stayed
inside
the
vehicle
when
she
pawned
her
items.
Miss
warriors
stated
that
he
was
guessing
that
the
mail
party
who
had
a
past
felony
arrest
and
could
not
own
a
firearm.
G
G
I
G
G
Well
from
the
investigation,
what
I've
done
from
what
I
wrote
down
from
what
I
had,
I
never
been
in
trouble
from
then.
Up
until
now,
I
can
tell
you
my
history.
I
serve
my
country
to
bring
to
the
military,
which
probably
has
nothing
to
do
with
this.
I
also
work
for
the
dod.
I
did
that
too.
I
don't
get
in
trouble,
my
job
and
my
passion
to
get
back
into
help
three
days
suspension,
because
somebody
alleged,
I
did
something,
and
I
now
one
time
did
I
get
the
support
and
I
see
support
from
sergeant
hoover.
G
Yes,
you
questioned
me
used
my
body.
Camera
pushed
against
me
because
you
stated
he
told
you
eight
times,
but
the
one
part
you
didn't
put
in
is
that
I
was
giving
the
keys
to
the
leg,
because
I
was
told
I
didn't
see
that
part
written
up.
Maybe
I
overlooked
it
because
it's
only
197
pages,
maybe
I
overlooked
it.
I
don't
know,
but
three
days
suspension
for
never
getting
in
trouble
puts
my
jail,
who
allegedly
beat
on
somebody
at
the
board,
say
well
I'll.
G
G
If
that's
what
you're
choosing
me
to
do
you,
let
me
know
now,
because
I
should
not
be
disciplined
from
doing
what
you
asked
me
to
do.
You
say:
write
the
report
minimum
require
and
don't
make
the
arrest
based
upon
the
excerpt
that
we
have
from
the
cpd
policy
alleged.
I
have
probable
cause
based
on
what
she
said.
Probable
calls.
B
So
we'll
now
turn
it
over
to
this
representation.
H
H
You
officer
brown
is
actually
very
lucky
because
these
mistakes
he
made
on
this
day
on
the
in
2017
were
actually
very
costly
mistakes.
They
were
costly
because
they
cost
cpd
resources.
Time
addition,
as
you
will
see,
through
the
testimony
additional
resources
that
would
not
have
had
to
been
used
had
he
not
made
these
mistakes
had
were
used.
H
Cpd
officers
were
led
on
a
wild
goose
chase
to
recover
this
vehicle
at
issue.
There
were
also
two
additional
reports
that
had
to
be
filed
and
investigated
because
of
issues
with
the
chain
of
custody
and
claims
that
property
was
stolen
from
the
vehicle,
as
well
as
from
mr
watson
through
this
incident.
So
these
these
mistakes
that
happened
and
these
policy
violations
were
happened,
were
costly.
They
were
costly
in
cbd
resources,
but
he's
lucky
in
the
fact
that
it
could
have
been
a
lot
worse.
H
These
policy
violations
are
very
serious,
an
arrest
without
probable
cause
that
can
be
a
very
serious
liability
issue
for
cpd
and
so
we're
lucky
that
it
didn't
become
that,
but
it
was
a
very
serious
issue,
so
we're
looking
at
a
three-day
suspension
the
progressive
discipline
policy,
while
it
does,
while
it
does
encourage
progressive
discipline,
it
also
takes
into
account
incidents
where
there
are
multiple
policy
violations,
as
there
were
here,
as
well
as
incidents
where
there
are
more
severe
policy
violations.
H
Where
there
are
here
as
well,
we
have
a
one-day
suspension
for
making
an
arrest
without
probable
cause.
He
made
an
arrest
based
purely
on
the
statements
of
miss
banks.
He
had
no
other
evidence
at
the
time
of
the
arrest.
There
were
no
witnesses.
There
were
no
visible
injuries
at
the
admission
of
miss
banks.
She
had
no
injuries
that
resulted
from
her
claims.
H
She
had
some
old
bruising
there's,
no
actual
evidence.
Besides
her
testimony
where
that
old
bruising
came
from,
there
was
no
previous
family
violence
reports,
no
documented
history,
and
there
were
no
protective
orders
in
place
at
the
time
to
go
on.
So
he
was
purely
stating
going
on
what
miss
banks
told
him
not
to
mention
that
miss
banks
told
him
this
at
a
different
site.
So
when
he
went
to
arrest
mr
watson,
he
didn't
give
mr
watson
the
chance
to
speak.
He
didn't
interview,
mr
watson,
he
didn't
see
what
mr
watson
had
to
say.
H
He
immediately
placed
him
under
arrest
without
collecting
any
further
evidence
without
talking
to
neighbors
without
doing
any
of
that
stuff.
First
now,
probable
cause
is,
as
many
of
these
law
enforcement
officers
has
described
it
to
me.
It's
police
101.
H
It
is
the
most
basic
concept
in
policing.
Without
it,
police
officers
can't
do
their
jobs.
They
can't
make
arrests,
arrests,
don't
stick!
This
claim
that
the
arrest
was
without
probable,
cause
the
assistant
chief
solicitor,
who
had
the
case
against
mr
watson.
He
was
contacted
and
asked
about
this
case
by
sergeant.
J
H
Sergeant
hoover
asked
him
whether
he
believed
that
there
was
probable
cause.
He
agreed
that
there
wasn't
probable
cause
and
he
dismissed
the
charges
against
mr
watson.
There
were
two
days
in
addition
to
the
one
day
for
probable
cause.
The
two
days
were
for
a
general
neglect
and
dereliction
of
duty,
specifically
relating
to
incidents
of
insufficient
and
incompetent
investigation,
and
that
involves
several
events,
the
one
being
him
giving
the
keys
to
this
vehicle
without
first
verifying
ownership
of
the
vehicle.
H
He
was
told
multiple
times
by
officer
watson
that
the
vehicle
did
not
belong
to.
Mrs
mrs
banks,
that
he
did
not
want
mrs
banks
to
drive
the
vehicle,
and
even
mrs
bates
said
she
didn't
own
the
vehicle
and
on
scene,
one
of
mrs
banks.
Co
co-workers
asked
well
what
happens
if
the
owner
of
the
vehicle
reports
it
stolen
to
which
officer
brown
replied?
Well,
it's
essentially
not
my
problem.
H
She'd
have
to
prove
that
it
was
stolen
and
I'm
not
going
to
say
anything
is
what
he
said.
There
were
additional
incidents
him
allowing
mrs
banks
on
the
property
to
retrieve
mr
watson's
wallet
and
private
property.
When
there
was
dispute
about
whether
or
not
mrs
banks
lived
there
and
belonged
on
the
property,
mr
watson
repeatedly
said
she
does
not
live
on
the
property.
She
is
not
on
the
lease.
She
is
not
to
go
in
the
property,
and
yet
he
allowed
mrs
banks
to
go
on
the
property
unsupervised
and
retrieve
the
wallet
that
was
later
alleged.
H
That
money
was
taken
out
of
it
that
had
to
be
followed
up
on
and
finally,
he
allowed
the
victim.
Who
again,
I
said
he
initially
met
at
a
different
location
to
follow
him,
along
with
four
co-workers
to
view
this
arrest
like
it
was
a
watching.
A
battle
in
the
civil
war
allowed
them
to
follow
him
on
scene
to
watch
this
man
get
arrested,
which
is
not
only
a
danger
to
those
citizens
itself.
H
H
H
K
H
Okay,
did
you
consult
with
your
chain
of
command
before
issuing
the
discipline?
Yes,
ma'am.
K
J
H
Signed
off
on
it,
yes,
ma'am!
Okay,
can
you
describe
for
us
the
events
that
led
to
this?
What
did
that
led
to
this
discipline?
What
did
you
issue
the
discipline
for?
Can
you
describe
for
us
what
happened.
K
Yes,
ma'am
on
august
12,
2017
officer
brown
was
dispatched
to
liberty,
national
in
reference
to
meeting
with
miss
banks
about
an
altercation
that
occurred
at
another
another
residence.
The
altercation
supposedly
occurred
around
nine
or
ten
o'clock
this.
He
was
dispatched
around
three
o'clock
when
he
arrived
at
liberty,
national.
He
spoke
to
miss
banks
who
was
crying
who
stated
that
her
boyfriend
her
child's
father.
K
K
There
were
no
previous
reports
of
family
violence,
no
protective
orders
in
place.
Mr
watson
was
not
there
to
speak
for
himself
and
his
side
of
the
story
at
that
time.
After
speaking
with
mrs
banks,
officer
brown
got
some
backup
officer,
dobbins
and
officer
marty.
They
went
to
crystal
valley
trailer
park
113.,
the
two
other
officers
went
to
the
back
officer.
Brown
went
to
the
front,
mr
watson,
the
suspect
came
to
the
door
and
his
boxer
shorts,
holding
a
cell
phone
officer
brown
drew
down
on
him
and
told
him.
H
K
Yes,
ma'am
to
start
with,
there
was
no
probable
cause
for
the
arrest
family
violence.
You
are
required
to
write
a
report.
A
report
was
required,
and
that
was
all
that
was
required
for
this
incident
number
one.
He
allowed
miss
banks
and
four
of
her
co-workers
to
go
to
the
scene
to
watch
the
arrest.
Any
arrest
is
all
can
be
a
dangerous
situation.
K
There
was
no
need
for
them
to
be
there.
If
he
planned
on
making
an
arrest,
they
didn't
have
to
be
there
to
witness
it
number
two
he
drew
down
on
mr
watson
he's
in
his
boxer
shorts
holding
the
cell
phone
was
that
necessary
and
if
he's
claiming
it
was
a
dangerous
situation
because
he
needed
to
be
arrested,
then
why
did
he
let
the
co-workers
come
to
the
scene?
It
doesn't
make
sense.
K
Number
three:
there
was
some
question
on
whether
miss
banks
lived
there
to
my
knowledge
officer,
brown
never
went
inside
the
residence
to
even
see
if
her
clothing
was
there.
If
that's
what
he's
claiming,
but
even
if
she
did
leave
live
there,
there
was
no
need
for
her
to
go
inside
the
residence
to
obtain
the
wallet
and
the
keys
to
this
car
without
any
kind
of
supervision.
K
H
Was
there
an
issue
that
you
found
with
the
fact
that
mr
watson
was
not
allowed
to
get
dressed
as
well.
K
I
believe
that
is
an
issue.
It's
a
courtesy
issue.
There
were
two
officers
on
scene
that
could
have
easily
assisted
him
in
getting
dressed.
He
said
to
officer
brown
on
body
camera.
He
I
have
law
enforcement
tattoos.
Please
allow
me
to
get
dressed.
I
don't
want
to
go
into
the
jail
with
these
tattoos,
showing
he
said
he
told
officer,
brown
I'll,
be
happy
to
get
dressed
in
the
back
seat
of
this
car.
D
K
K
F
K
First
thing:
miss
jinx
stated
that
the
vehicle
was
no
longer
at
crystal
valley
trailer
park.
So
I
got
on
the
radio
and
asked
an
officer
to
go
out
to
crystal
valley
to
verify
that
the
dodge
durango
was
not
there
officer.
Braden
dobbins
had
got
over
the
radio
and
said
I
was
there
for
the
arrest.
I
will
go
back
up
there
and
see
if
the
vehicle
is
there,
he
went
back
up
there.
The
vehicle
was
no
longer
at
crystal
valley
trailer
park.
K
I
asked
officer
dobbins
to
come
to
mcdonald's,
to
assist
me
in
retrieving
the
vehicle
when
he
arrived.
He
had
told
me
about
the
arrest.
While
I
was
waiting
for
dobbins
to
arrive.
I
ran
the
tag
given
to
me
by
the
complaining
party.
Miss
jinx.
The
vehicle
did
in
fact
belong
to
miss
jenks,
not
mr
watson,
nor
miss
banks.
K
Originally
we
were
going
to
meet
at
the
fire
station
on
old
river
road
to
exchange
the
vehicle.
Shortly
after
that,
when
I
was
in
route
officer,
dominance
was
in
route
and
miss
jinx
was
in
route.
I
got
another
call
back
from
one
of
miss
bank's
co-workers
that
she
was
with.
They
wanted
to
know
my
badge
number,
because
they
wanted
to
verify
that
I
was
a
police
officer.
Well,
I
tried
to
explain
to
them
as
a
sergeant
with
the
columbus
police
department.
We
do
not
have
badge
numbers,
but
they
were.
K
They
could
call
and
verify
that
I
was
a
sergeant.
I
even
gave
them
my
car
number,
which
was
7
15
and
it
just
went
downhill
from
there.
They
hung
up
on
me
several
times
didn't
believe
I
was
an
officer
we
were
going
to
meet.
They
finally
said
they'd
meet
me
at
new
mountain
hills,
school
in
harris
county
to
exchange
the
vehicle,
but
they
did
not
want
to
stay.
They
wanted
to
leave
the
vehicle
keys
in
the
car.
K
I
said:
look
between
the
time
I
get
there
and
the
time
you
leave
it
the
car
could
be
could
be
stolen.
I
can't
I
can't
sign
off
on
that,
so
at
that
time
I
had
to
get
two
harris
county
deputies,
the
sergeant
and
the
deputy.
They
were
going
to
meet
me
up
there.
Hopefully
they
were
going
to
leave
the
vehicle.
When
I
arrived,
the
vehicle
was
not
there.
K
I
called
my
lieutenant
lieutenant
askew
at
the
time.
Captain
ask
you
now
she
assisted
me
in
calling
miss
banks
and
her
co-workers
back
and
they
agreed
to
leave
the
vehicle
at
harris
county
courthouse.
So
at
that
time,
myself
officer,
dobbins,
miss
jenks
sergeant
from
harris
county
and
a
deputy
from
harris
county
went
to
the
harris
county
courthouse
and
recovered
the
vehicle.
H
Okay
and
after
that
incident
did
miss
jenks
want
to
file
a
formal
complaint
against
officer
brown.
K
K
H
Much
time
I
have
left,
I'm
sorry
15
minutes.
Okay,
I'm
sorry.
Can
you
briefly
describe
for
us
the
the
very
steps
you
took
in
that
investigation.
K
Yes,
so
that
the
next
day,
which
was
the
13th
first
thing
I
did-
was,
I
called
miss,
jenks
and
verified
she
wanted
to
make
a
personnel
complaint.
K
Second
thing
I
did
that
day
was
pull
the
rms
report,
which
is
the
report
officer
brown
had
completed
in
reference
to
the
incident,
so
I
could
be
know
exactly
what
he
had
documented
and
what
had
occurred.
There
were
several
grammatical
mistakes.
There
was
no
probable
cause
mentioned
so
at
that
time
I
spoke
with
officer
brown
for
the
first
time
and
I
was
the
one
that
advised
him
to
go
talk
to
neighbors.
I
was
the
one
that
advised
him
to
go,
try
to
find
some
witnesses
which
he
did
after
the
arrest
of
mr
watson.
K
I
spoke
with
officer,
dobbins
officer,
marta
and
officer
brown
in
reference
to
writing
statements
in
reference
to
the
incident,
I
pulled
all
three's
body
camera
footage
later
on
in
the
investigation.
I
spoke
to
david
ranieri
with
the
state
solicitor's
office
where
he
agreed.
There
was
no
probable
cause
to
make
the
arrest
we
had
officer,
dobbins,
assisted
in
the
investigation
of
the
supposed
lost
firearms.
The
money
missing
from
the
wallet
we
pulled,
the
jail
property
sheet
for
mr
watson
went
to
alpine
pawn
shop.
It
just
goes
on
and
on
and
on.
J
H
Want
to
talk
briefly
about
you
reviewed
all
the
body
cams,
yes
ma'am
in
those
body
cams
at
any
time,
did
you
hear
mr
watson
say
that
miss
banks
could
have
the
keys
to
the
car.
K
No,
I
reviewed
the
mr
officer
brown's
body.
Camera
footage
multiple
times
documented
it
in
my
complaint
by
minute
by
minute.
Second,
by
second,
he
never
one
time
told
him
to
give
miss
banks
the
keys
to
that
car,
not
one
time
over
eight
times.
He
told
him
do
not
specifically
do
not
give
her
the
keys
to
that
car.
She
does
not
own
that
car.
H
K
K
K
K
H
K
I'd
like
to
add,
he
was
also
required
to
go
to
domestic
violence
training
as
part
of
this
discipline,
because
he
made
some
statements
at
the
scene
that
it
was
a
civil
matter
in
reference
to
the
vehicle.
It
was
not
a
civil
matter,
so
it
was
my
opinion
that
officer
brown
needed
to
go
back
to
domestic
violence,
training.
H
H
H
W
chief
hastings
did
sergeant
hoover,
consult
with
you
regarding
this
disciplinary
action.
L
H
And
did
you
agree
with
the
three-day
disciplinary
I
did?
Okay,
did
you
think
that
the
three
days
was
appropriate
even
given
the
progressive
disciplinary
policy.
L
H
And,
in
your
view,
is
that
disciplinary,
in
accordance
with
cpd
and
ccg
policy,
it
is
okay,
briefly
officer
brown
alleged
that
he
had
consulted
with
the
sergeant
brittany
hayes
before
making
the
arrest
and
that
hayes
had
authorized
him
to
go
ahead
and
do
it?
Are
you
familiar
with
that
claim.
H
Sure
officer
brown
had
spoken
about
consulting
with
the
sergeant
hayes
prior
to
making
the.
J
H
H
H
L
I
can
basically
what
sergeant
hayes
reported
well.
What
she
documented
in
this
statement
was
that
officer.
Jerry
brown
had
contacted
her
on
the
radio.
They
went
to
a
side
channel.
L
He
explained
to
her
briefly
that
he
had
spoken
with
a
victim
who
had
been
assaulted
and
that
he
was
going
to
make
contact
with
the
suspect
across
the
valley.
Trailer
park
wanted
to
know
if
he
should
obtain
a
warrant.
First,
with
that
limited
information,
she
believed
that
he
was
describing
an
incident
that
had
occurred
recently
and
that
he
had
sufficient
probable
cause
to
make
the
arrest.
L
L
So
she
she
gave
the
officer
credit
to
assume
that
he
knew
what
he
was
talking
about,
that
he
had
established
a
probable
cause
in
his
mind,
and
she
told
him
that
if
the
incident
occurred
within
the
past
within
the
res
a
recent
time
frame,
then
yes,
he
could
proceed
and
make
an
arrest
without
probable
cause.
That
is
a
true
statement,
but
it's
his
job
to
determine
that
sufficient
probable
cause
had
been
established
and
he
clearly
had
not.
H
E
J
H
L
Yes,
this
is
a
document
that
I
sought
out
from
the
office
of
professional
standards
and
it
is
a
log.
That's
printed
that
was
printed
out
that
documents
there's.
We
have
a
system
called
the
power
document
management
system,
it's
a
system
which
evidences
that
or
or
demonstrates
that.
Anyone
who,
logs
on
to
that
system,
access
this
database
their
account
and
and
then
looks
at
a
particular
policy
it
documents
when
in
terms
of
time
and
date
that
they
looked
at
that
policy,
you
can't
specifically
say
what
they
read,
but
you
know
they
access
the
policy.
L
H
H
Okay,
so
he
was
familiar
with
that
policy
on
his.
H
Okay,
thank
you.
I'm
gonna
call
the
former
chief
boren
briefly.
H
J
E
L
L
L
E
H
E
H
B
B
G
Based
upon
excuse
me,
based
upon
the
statements
made
by
the
witness,
also
the
victim
at
the
time
of
the
incident,
that
was,
the
probable
cause
dealing
with
family
violence
according
to
the
excerpt,
and
also
stating
that,
upon
speaking
to
mr
watson,
he
established
that
mrs
watson
did
stay
there.
Also
by
speaking
with
him,
I
did
allow
her
to
get
the
property
because
she
lived
there.
Everything
is
based
upon
family
violence
according
to
family
violence.
G
I
know
the
minimum
of
a
record,
but
without
having
all
the
bruises
and
injuries
that
she
had
despite
they
said
it
could
have
what
it
should
have
at
the
end
of
the
day.
If
I
did
not
do
something
to
probably
take
control
of
the
situation,
could
she
have
been
possibly
murdered?
Yes,
so
again,
the
probable
cause
for
the
exercise
dealing
with
family
violence.
I
had
the
probable
cause
based
on
her
statement.
G
G
The
victim
had
told
her
co-workers
that
mr
watson
beats
honor.
I
annotated
that
in
my
report,
her
statement
to
them
when
they
called
they
encouraged
her
to
tell
and
let
them
know,
let
me
know
was
anyone
there
to
for
children,
no
sir,
they
were
not
anyone
there
at
the
time
of
the
incident.
However,
by
her
going
to
work
they're
observing
that
she's
bruised
up
there's
ever
her
actions
at
work,
it
was
annotated
and
noted.
B
So
this
did
she
tell
you
that
it
happened
that
the
incident,
the
the
bruises
were
old,
bruises.
G
That
day,
when
I
spoke
to
her
sir,
I
asked
because
I
had
to
get
my
camera
have
to
document
items
things
when
I
asked
her
cause.
She
showed
me
what
happened.
She
said
mr
brown
she's
also
brown.
Today
I
don't
have
any
yet
I
don't
have
any
yet
I
said
well,
let
me
see
so
I
can
document
when
she
put
up
her
left
leg,
her
pants
leg,
I
saw
bruising.
G
G
Probably
making
an
arrest,
I
contacted
my
supervisor,
brittany
hayes
and
I
relayed
the
facts
to
her.
I
relayed
the
facts
to
her
on
the
radio
because
I
was
not
sure
if
I
needed
to
obtain
a
warrant,
so
I
asked
sergeant
hayes
if
I
need
to
obtain
a
warrant
for
the
rest
of
mr
watson,
since
the
incident
took
place
between
0,
900
and
100
on
earlier
that
day,
sergeant
hayes
stated
to
me
I
would
not
need
to.
I
would
not
need
a
warrant
to
make
the
arrest
since
the
incident
took
place
early.
B
Okay,
so
the
the
memo
from
sergeant
hayes
is
saying
that
at
the
time-
and
I
quote,
I
was
under
impression
that
the
assault
happened
within
the
past
hour
to
end
quote:
did
you
let
sergeant
hayes
know
that
the
assault
did
not
happen
recently
within
the
past
couple
of
hours.
G
G
B
Okay
concerning
the
the
dodge
durango,
it
was
stated
that
he
told
you,
mr
watson,
told
you
eight
times
not
to
give
her
the
key,
miss
banks,
the
keys.
Why
don't
you
give
her
the
keys?
Because
mr.
G
Washington
stated
it,
it
says
it
wasn't
documented.
I'm
sorry,
it
said
that
I
gave
her
the
keys
without
permission
at
some
point
in
time
again,
if
I
called
the
lady
my
victim
and
sergeant
founder
sergeant
hoover
in
front
of
her
in
her
office,
the
woman
did
not
know
that
sergeant
who
was
even
listening.
The
woman
had
no
reason
to
lie
for
me
or
to
support
me.
I
asked
that
question
in
front
of
sergeant
hoover.
G
B
Sergeant
hoover
is
your
testimony
is
that
from
the
body
cam
video,
you
heard
mr
watson
stating
not
to
give
miss
banks.
The
keys
is
that
correct.
D
K
Phone,
no
ma'am,
that
is
incorrect.
It
also
at
the
scene
on
on
body
camera
footage
you
can
see
later.
Miss
banks
questions
him
about
this
car.
She
says.
Obviously
I
don't
own
the
car,
mr
watson
doesn't
own
the
car.
Somebody
else
owns
the
car.
Am
I
going
to
get
in
trouble
for
having
the
keys
and
having
this
car
and
officer
brown
says
it's
a
civil
matter.
Don't
worry
about
it!
I'm
giving
you
permission
to
have
this
car.
D
Okay,
so
I
just
want
to
make
it
make
sure
so.
You're
saying
that
in
the
presence
of
officer
brown,
that
when
miss
banks
was
on
the
speaker
phone
correct
that
she
did
not
say
that
suspect
watson
said
to
turn
the
keys
over
to
her.
K
D
Okay,
thank
you
officer,
brown.
Let
me
ask
you
this
question
at
the
time
of
the
arrest
of
mr
watson,
did
you
explain
to
him
why
he
was
being
arrested
or
offer
any
type
of
information
at
that
time?.
G
G
So
I
I
can't
reiterate
what
was
done.
My
interview
was
sergeant
hoover.
It's
not
an
interview,
it's
a
badgering
again
she's
badgering.
She
wants
to
know
she's
interrogating
me
out
of
respect
for
her
rank.
I
have
to
work
with
regardless.
I
said
I'm
like
what
happened
again:
you're,
not
defending
me.
You're
badgering
me
now,
once
you
say
I'll,
tell
you
what,
let's?
G
So
again,
if
I
did
what
I
did,
did
I
not
call
miss
banks
in
the
presence
of
sergeant
hoover.
She
said
she
didn't
hear,
but
did
I
call?
Maybe
this
question
should
be
asked?
Why
would
I
call?
Why
would
I
call
I
put
in
my
statement
that
for
clarification
I
need
to
know
she
told
me
that
mrs
jenks
was
under
the
vehicle
and
that
was
his
girlfriend.
I
did
not
know
their
their
their
arrangements.
G
G
D
And
one
other
question:
you
have
mentioned
a
temporary
restraining
order
for
miss
banks
against
watson.
I
needed
more
information
about
that.
What
was
the
date
of
that
restraining
order?
If
you
have
that
information.
G
H
G
Brown,
it's
dated
again.
This
is
dated
on
the
it
was
stamped
and
filed
on
the
14th.
They
say
the
owner
about
august
12
2017
in
response
committed
to
the
following
acts
of
family
violence
against
the
petitioner
or
the
minor
children.
As
far
as
I
know
that
he
has
not
heard
any,
has
I
hurt?
Our
children
he's
been
it's
kind
of
hard
to
read
what
she
says,
but
it
allies
verbal
abuse
as
well
as
physical
abuse.
By
kicking
her
in
that
leg
telling
her
that
he
would
he
could
hit
him.
G
B
So
I
have
another:
you
said
that
the
temporary
protective
order
was
issued
on
8
14
2017
correct
this.
G
B
C
G
The
victim
also,
I'm
sorry
the
suspect,
was
staying
back.
Dude,
miss
watson,
we're
getting
when
I
say
mixed
message
when
I
say
this
question,
while
doing
the
scene,
he
was
deceiving
me.
He
was
trying
to
assume
that
hey
she
didn't
live
here
x,
y
z.
You
deceive
me
about
that.
Don't
give
her
the
car,
I
want
her
in
my
house.
She
don't
live
there,
but
I
got
people
placed
her
there.
Her
co-workers
placed
there
prior
to
living
there
or
prior
to
me,
making
the
rest
they
placed
her
there
her
living
there.
G
C
So
if,
if
there
was
some
conflict
of,
I
guess
ownership
of
the
vehicle
did
that
give
you
pause,
I
mean
did
so
should
that
I
mean,
what's
the
I
guess,
what's
the
policy
on
the
chain
of
custody,
foreign.
G
Issues
we
don't
dispute,
probably
if
you're
looking
at
did
he
have
a
possession
of
a
car.
He
didn't
the
property
was
inside
the
car.
So
at
that
point
in
time,
when
I
asked
mrs
mr
watson
won
this
property
out
the
house,
I
think
he
had
not
one
time
like
he
said
he
was
in
his
underwear
when
he
came
to
the
door.
The
thing
about
the
tattoos-
I'm
sorry,
I
don't
know
things
about
gangs
and
tattoos.
I
do
not,
sir,
I'm
sorry,
you
telling
me
something,
but
his
criminal
history
showed
he
fights
for
police.
C
I'm
sorry
another
question:
how
did
she
establish
residency?
Did
she
was
about
simply,
did
you
ever
ask
her?
Do
you
have
another
residence
because
it
appears
that
once
he
said
that
it
seemed
like
that
should
have
been
a
reasonable
question
to
ask
her?
Well,
do
you
stay
over
here
sometime
or
do
you
have
another
residency?
Was
her
name
ever
ran
through
us?
I
mean
because
you
all
can
do
that.
You
can
do
a
residency
check
right
well,.
G
When
we
check
the
resident,
if
I
run
this
building,
sir,
the
building's
gonna
show
right
owner
of
the
building,
it's
gonna
show
the
tenants
of
the
building.
So
yes,
her
co-workers
placed
it
there
at
the
beginning.
I
did
not
allow
the
co-workers
to
come
there
to
witness
anything.
That's
not
my
job.
There's
no
difference.
Somebody's
outside
watch
me
arrest
people
just
without
responding
here.
It's
been
observed.
I
can't
tell
everybody
get
out
and
then
I
make
the
arrest.
It
doesn't
seem
to
work
that
way.
G
I
don't
arrest
people
walk
across
with
a
beer
in
their
hand
or
driving
a
bike
because
they
got
no
reflectors
on
it.
There
are
a
lot
of
things
that
I
just
don't
do
that
others
do
do,
sir.
I
do
believe
in
doing
my
job
fair.
When
I
say
fair,
I
use
the
guidelines
that
I
have.
If
I
don't
know
something,
I
would
ask
that
question
sir.
I
got
you.
G
C
F
G
I
can't
say
I
can't
state,
I
don't
want
to
speculate
ma'am.
I
do
not
know.
I
can't
give
you
the
clarification.
Do
you
like
the
ledge?
If
someone's
taken
out
the
house,
do
we
take
and
just
monitor?
I
myself,
I
can't
say
I
have
seen
which
people
get
certain
items.
If
I'm
there?
Yes,
whether
other
officers
they're
there
outside
they
did
not
waste
a
lot
of
things.
They
were
out
there
for
backup
and
they
indicated
that
they
were
out
for
backup.
F
G
F
G
G
No,
so
they
didn't
come
with
me.
I
cannot
transport
her.
Her
co-workers
transferred
her
back
to
the
location
which
I
had
no
control
over,
that
vital
there's
volatile
people
being
outside
there
were
people
outside
looking
also
while
we
were
there.
I
had
no
control
over
that.
So
when
I
say
she
was
there,
she
was
not
interfering
with
me,
she's
over
across
the
street
or
next
door
to
her
coworkers.
I
can't
stop
that
forbidden
public.
I.
G
I
Excuse
me,
mr
chairman.
Yes,
sir,
I
didn't
know
whether
I
would
have
an
opportunity
to
to
ask
any
questions.
I
think
it's
already
been
adequately
addressed,
but
I
I
would
like
to
make
a
couple
of
closing
points,
particularly
regarding
the
absence
of
the
alleged
body
cam
and
the
fact
that
this
document
exhibit
a
dated.
I
1012
2017
is
not
in
the
198
pages
that
were
submitted,
and
I
think
the
that
both
of
those
matters
is
convenient
for
the
city
very
convenient
that
they
were
not
in
there
and
they
their
body
disappeared,
and
we
could
just
sum
this
up.
As
my
five-minute
closing.
I
If
we,
mr
it
was
a
alleged
that
mr
brown
planned
on
making
the
arrest
and
allowed
people
to
come,
as
he
indicated,
he
couldn't
control
those
individuals
and,
as
I
indicated
earlier,
consider
the
source
we
have
a
man
living
with
one
woman
and
driving
some
other
car
he's
a
very
credible,
noble
person
not
to
imperium
his
character,
but
you
really
have
to
consider
the
source
and
was
alleged.
I
I
Once
again,
I
I
submit
that
if
there's
a
failure
on
mr
brown
part,
it's
failure
officer,
hastings
failure
on
the
court
who
issued
a
restraining
order
within
two
days
of
this
incident,
and
this
frustrating
roger
alleged
that
that's
why
she's
seeking
it?
What
happened
august
12th
two
days
before
so
we
just
asked
the
court
to
consider
the
totality
of
the
circumstances.
I
M
Just
as
a
point
of
reference,
we
do
typically
allow
for
some
closing
statements
from
both
representatives.
B
H
Since
mr
whitaker
just
was
able
to
make
us
okay.
H
Just
a
brief
statement,
so
all
I
would
like
to
say
is
is
with
regard
to
the
first
one
day,
the
without
probable
cause,
regardless
of
the
a
question
about
warrant
procedure.
H
Probable
cause
is
something
that
officer
brown
should
have
known.
He
did
know
he
reviewed
the
policy
27
times.
He
was
aware
of
probable
cause.
What
probable
cause
is
required.
Every
officer
knows
that
and
it's
police
police
101.,
so
that
policy
violation.
I
think
it
is
very
clear
from
the
the
evidence
that
just
going
on
miss
banks,
statements
is
insufficient
for
that
probable
cause
the
additional
two
two-day
suspension,
the
neglect
and
dereliction
of
duty
sergeant,
hoover
and
officer
dobbins.
They
were
led
on
a
wild
goose
chase.
H
They
were
led
from
one
place
to
another
to
find
this
vehicle
that
they
had
to
end
up
going
to
harris
county,
contacting
harris
county
officers
for
an
assistance
in
collecting
this
vehicle
that
never
should
have
the
keys
never
should
have
left
anyways
it.
It
was
a
complete
waste
of
officer,
responsibility,
a
complete
waste
of
officer,
time
and
and
embarrassing
that
we
had
to
get
officers
from
muskogee
county
county
in
there.
H
It
was
a
waste
of
resources,
and
these
were
incidents
that
were
very
easily
avoided,
just
by
a
little
bit
more
investigation,
a
little
bit
more
efficiency
and
duty,
getting
a
few
more
witness
statements
before
making
the
arrest
verifying
the
vin
number
of
the
vehicle,
leaving
the
keys
on
the
property
or
giving
them
with
mr
watson,
since
they
were
in
his
possession
having
supervision
with
miss
banks
on
the
property.
While
she
was
there
to
make
sure
she
didn't
steal
anything.
So
we
didn't
have
to
investigate
that
issue,
letting
him
get
dressed.
H
Allowing
the
coworkers
to
this
go
to
the
scene.
In
mr
officer,
brown's
statements
within
the
the
policy
packet
you'll
find
that
officer
brown
actually
had
the
victim
and
her
co-workers
lead
him
to
the
address
because
he
he
didn't
know
where
it
was
so
that
was
by
his
choice.
H
It
wasn't
a
situation
where
he
couldn't
stop
them
from
going
there
and
you'll
see
that
by
reviewing
that,
there's
contradiction
in
whether
or
not
the
there's
clear
contradiction
in
who
owns
the
vehicle
and
who
has
a
right
to
the
vehicle,
and
just
imagine
this
and
whether
or
not
that
statement
was
made.
Okay,
just
go
ahead
and
give
her
the
keys
by
mr
watson.
H
Why
would
mr
watson
say
that
if
he
knew
the
vehicle
would
belong
to
his
other
girlfriend,
that
doesn't
even
make
sense
for
him
to
say
you
have
testimony
that
it
wasn't
in
the
body
cam,
he
admitted
that
and-
and
we
believe,
progressive
discipline
was
followed
that
cpd
ccg
policies
were
followed
and
this
discipline
was
in
line
with
that.
You've
heard
testimony
to
that
effect,
and
we
appreciate
your
time
in
this
in
this
matter
today.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
Thank
you
very
much
at
this
time,
we'll
deliberate
and
just
a
reminder
that,
during
our
deliberation
we
will
not
take
any
votes.
Once
the
deliberation
is
complete,
we
will
come
out
and
vote
in
the
public
forum.
Thank
you
good
afternoon.
Everyone.
The
deliberation
has
been
completed
at
this
time.
I
would
like
to
open
the
floor
for
a
motion
on
the
decision.
B
A
call
for
a
vote
on
this
appeal,
all
in
favor
of
affirming
the
decision
please
indicate
by
saying
aye,
aye
aye
all
opposed
have
the
same
rights
at
this
time.
We
find
that
the
disciplinary
determination
of
the
police
department
was
not
an
abuse
of
discretion
and
should
therefore
be
upheld.
The
disciplinary
determination
is
hereby
affirmed.
Violations
of
the
following
policies
are
upheld
in
part
on
the
following
parts
of
record
of
the
testimony
at
this
time.
The
hearing
is
adjourned.
Thank
you.