►
From YouTube: Columbus GA PAC Meeting 01 05 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Yes,
good
morning,
I'd
like
to
bring
the
january
5th
2022
planning
advisory
commission
meeting
to
order.
The
official
start
of
this
meeting
is
9
a.m.
If
you
would,
please
stand
for
the
pledge
of
allegiance.
A
A
A
A
I
see
we
don't
have
any
minutes
to
approve
all
right.
Well.
That
brings
us
to
our
first
case
of
the
day,
which
is
rezn
12-21-2347.
A
A
request
to
re-zone
.08
acres
of
land
located
at
2807
bradley
circle.
Current
zoning
is
rmf
ii
proposed
zoning
is
sfr4,
the
proposed
use
is
single-family
house
historic
columbus
foundation
is
the
applicant.
The
property
is
located
in
council
district
7
woodson
we'd
like
to
hear
from
the
planning
department.
C
Yes,
sir,
the
general
land
use
for
this
area
is
consistent
with
planning
area
f.
The
current
land
use
designation
is
vacant
undeveloped,
future
land
use
designation
is
mixed
use.
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
lane
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
to
10
trips.
If
used
for
residential
use,
the
level
of
service
will
remain
at
a
level.
C
A
the
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
ccg
for
residential
usage.
There'll
be
no
school
impact,
no
buffer
requirements,
no
fort
benning
recommendation,
no
dri
recommendation.
They're
surrounding
zoning
is
rmf2
to
this
north,
south
east
and
west
35
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
Properties
were
notified
of
the
resulting
request.
The
planning
department
received
one
call.
A
D
C
E
We
we
have
a
historic
shotgun
house
that
was
removed
from
another
property
and
we're
aware
of
this
vacant
lot
and
mr
dudley,
as
you
mentioned,
there
are
a
lot
of
single-family
small
houses
around
the
area
and
there's
been
quite
a
bit
of
renovation.
Work
that's
taken
place
in
that
neighborhood
and
we
found
an
opportunity
to
move
this
house
onto
that
vacant.
Lot
to
do
some,
infill
and,
and
so
the
intention
is
to
you
know,
put
it
back
together,
stabilize
it
as
a
single
family
home
and
then
sell
the
property.
E
Use
it
for
one
single
house,
and
so
the
interesting
thing
about.
I
don't
know
if
you're
familiar
with
that
area,
but
these
lots
are
kind
of
pie
shaped
that
are
internal
to
bradley
circle,
and
so
a
shotgun
house
is
a
little
bit
long
and
skinny
instead
of
short
and
wide
and
so
on.
The
site
plan
that
should
be
included
in
the
application.
E
You'll
see
that
we're
taking
off
the
back
15
20
feet
of
the
shotgun
house
and
using
it
almost
as
an
addition
onto
the
side
to
make
it
more
of
a
cottage
instead
of
a
shotgun
that'll,
better
fit
the
lot
size,
as
well
as
the
it'll
match
up
better
with
the
existing
houses
that
are
in
that
neighborhood.
I
got
you.
B
A
A
B
Mr
king,
all
right
I'll
make
a
motion
case
of
rec
in
12,
21
2347
request
results,
0.08
acres
of
land
located
at
2807,
bradley
circle.
Current
zoning
is
rmf
ii,
residential
multi-family
two
proposed
zoning,
sfro4
single-family
residential
four
proposed
use
of
single-family
house.
I
make
a
motion
that
is
that
we
approve
it
because
it's
consistent
with
the
general
land
use
in
the
area.
All
right,
I
need
a
second
all
right.
Miss.
A
A
A
12-21-2348
a
request
to
rezone
0.35
acres
of
land
located
at
5339
thomason
avenue.
Current
zoning
is
fr.
Sfr2
proposed
zoning
is
neighborhood
commercial.
The
proposed
use
is
commercial
parking,
lr
partners,
llc
is
the
applicant.
This
property
is
located
in
council
district
8.
we'd
like
to
hear
from
the
planning
department.
C
Yes,
sir
general
land
use
is
inconsistent
for
planning
area
f.
The
current
land
use
designation
is
single
family
future
single-family
residential.
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
There'll
be
no
traffic
impact
traffic.
Excuse
me,
the
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
ccg
for
commercial
usage.
There'll
be
no
school
impact.
C
The
site
shall
include
a
category
c
buffer
along
all
property
lines,
bordered
by
the
sfr-3
zoning
district.
The
three
options
under
category
c
are
20
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees.
Understory
tree
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet.
No
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall
30
feet
undisturbed,
natural
buffer,
there's
no
fort
be
fort.
C
Bending
recommendation,
no
deer
eye
recommendation
to
the
surrounding
zoning
to
the
north
is
gc
to
the
south
as
sfr2
to
the
east
as
sfr2
to
the
west
is
nc.
30
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
Property
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
The
planning
department
received
one
one
call
in
opposition
regarding
the
rezoning
and
there's
no
additional
information.
C
B
C
The
previous
owner,
the
the
person
that
was
in
opposition,
was
the
previous
owner.
They
brought
that
up,
stating
that
a
fit
multiple
officials
here
in
with
the
the
government
have
told
told
him
that
no
commercial
usage
would
be
rezoned
past
the
railroad
tracks.
This.
This
was
new
information
to
me.
It
came
to
me
yesterday
afternoon
late,
so
I
was.
I
wasn't
able
to
dig
any
further
into
that.
C
A
Any
other
questions:
okay,
we'll
start
our
second
case
reference
to
rez
and
no
applicant,
oh
yeah,
I'm
sorry
would
the
applicant
please
come
forward
and
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
please
give
us
an
overview
of
your
plan.
H
H
It's
the
taxidermy
here
and
there's
a
barbecue
place
here
and
it's
right
behind
it
then
there's
a
vacant
lot
that
we
own,
I
believe
it's
80
or
90
foot
wide
and
then
there's
a
house
zone
nc
on
this
side
and
we
own
that
as
well
and
then
there's
apartment
complex
next
to
that
house.
H
D
I
Yes,
ms
brown,
are
you
planning
on
paving
that
lot
when
you
turn
it
into
parking,
gravel.
I
J
H
A
A
K
K
A
G
A
A
A
request
to
rezone
49.27
acres
of
land
located
at
zero
old
guard
road
current
zoning
is
re1
proposed,
zoning
is
sfr4
and
the
proposed
use
is
a
single
family
subdivision
banana
bay.
Llc
is
the
applicant.
This
property
is
located
in
council
district
2..
We
could
hear
from
the
planning
department.
Yes,.
C
Sir,
the
general
land
use
is
consistent
for
planning
area.
A
the
current
land
use
designation
is
vacant
undeveloped.
The
future
is
mixed
use.
It
is
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
flood
plain
era.
Develop
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
C
C
I
believe
it
was
two
weeks
ago.
Maybe
a
month
of
the
muskogee
county
schools
were
here
and
said
there
would
be
some
sort
of
impact
buffer
required.
There
would
be
no
buffer
requirements.
No
fort
bending
recommendation.
No
dear
eye
recommendation.
The
surrounding
zoning
north
south
east
and
west
is
re1.
C
A
F
It
says
it's
served
by
all
city
services
already,
but
this
is
yet
to
be
built.
I
guess
because
it's
undeveloped,
the
land
am,
I
correct,
say
that
one
more
time
it
says
the
on
the
application
that
a
property
is
served
by
all
city
services,
but
because
it's
a
vacant
on
develop,
I'm
guessing
they
still
have
to
connect
to
to
the
services.
L
L
So,
as
I
mentioned
we,
this
came
before
you
all
on
december
15th
and
at
that
time
the
school
district
was
here
and
mentioned
that
there
were
some
traffic
concerns
and
things
of
that
nature
regarding
school
impact
and
traffic,
and
they
requested
that
a
traffic
study
and
school
impact
study
be
done
with
respect
to
the
property
to
determine
you
know
what
effect
that
would
have
on
the
property,
and
then
you
all,
of
course
accepted
that
request
and
stated
that
we
should
go
and
obtain
that.
L
But
you
know,
unfortunately,
we
appreciate
you
know
the
feedback
and
the
concerns
to
raise.
And,
of
course
we
fully
understand
those.
But
for
a
couple
reasons
that
I'll
outline.
If
you'll
indulge
me
for
a
few
minutes,
we
don't
think
we
can
do
the
traffic
study
as
requested
and
so
we're
here
today
to
just
request
that
you
all
consider
our
rezoning
without
without
the
traffic
study
being
done.
You
know
understanding
the
consequences
of
that
so
first
to
be
to
be
fully
transparent.
L
We,
you
know,
we
spoke
with
our
engineering,
firm
moon
meeks
and
they
recommended
a
traffic
engineering
firm
out
of
noon,
and
so
we
contacted
them
as
well
as
a
couple
of
other
folks
to
get
an
estimate
and
to
discuss
the
traffic
impact
with
them,
and
so
the
cost
of
the
study
was
twenty
thousand
dollars.
That
was
the
estimate
of
the
cost
of
the
traffic
study,
and
so
while
cost
is
not
is
not
the
factor
or
the
reason
that
we
that
we
weren't
able
to
do
the
study.
L
I
did
think
it
was
important
to
be
transparent
with
you
all
and
let
you
know
exactly
what
the
cost
of
the
traffic
study
was
going
to
be
and
that
what
would
have
to
the
developer
would
have
to
pay
to
get
that
done,
and
I
I
especially
want
to
point
out
that
the
you
know
the
planning
department
indicated
that
the
current
traffic
designation
is
is
class
b
or
level
b
and
that
that
level
would
not
change
based
on
this
development.
L
Despite
the
increase
in
trips
on
old
guard
road
excuse
me,
and
so
I
I
think
part
of
the
issue
is
we,
you
know
without
having
the
traffic
study
done.
You
know,
just
from
speaking
with
our
engineering
firm,
making
some
trips
out
to
the
site,
and
just
you
know,
general
knowledge
that
anybody
who
goes
out
on
old
guard
road
would
have
you
know
we.
We
know
what
the
what
the
traffic
concern
is
during
during
school
drop
off
and
pick
up.
L
You
know
you
may
drive
down
old
guard
road
and
not
pass
another
vehicle,
but
at
that
time
of
the
day,
specifically
in
the
morning
when
during
school
drop
off
and
then
in
the
afternoon,
school
pickup,
of
course,
there's
significant
traffic
from
the
from
the
cars
queuing
to
turn
left
into
old
guard
road,
and
you
know,
unfortunately,
last
time
when
we
spoke
there
was
some
you
know,
commentary
about.
You
know
whether
we
could
put
an
additional
traffic
light,
a
roundabout
things
like
that
to
maybe
alleviate
some
of
those
concerns
on
old
guard.
L
But
you
know,
I
think
the
planning
department
indicated
that
that
wasn't
an
option
because
of
the
proximity
of
veterans
parkway,
we
couldn't
do
any
another
traffic
light.
So
close,
I
believe,
was
the
was
the
recommendation,
so
so
you're
really
left
with
the
only
the
only
option
that
that
I
can
think
of-
and
there
may
be
others
is
that
old
guard
road.
L
The
problem
is
that
it
has
one
access
point
one
one
way
in
one
way
out
and
it
dead
ends
at
the
back
and
the
only
the
only
way
to
fix
that
would
be
to
move
to
extend
the
road
and
connect
it
to
an
additional
existing
road,
and
that's
just
not
something
that
the
developer
can
do
they.
You
know
based
on
this
site
that
would
require
you
know,
condemnation
from
the
city
of
some
private
property
as
well.
L
L
So
the
second,
the
second
point
I'd
like
to
make
is
that
you
know
if
we're
talking
about
olgar
road.
Unfortunately
I
don't
have
the
map
up
on
the
screen,
but
you
may
have
it
in
front
of
you.
You
know
old
guard
row
comes
off
veterans
and
it
moves
up
in
a
north
direction.
Then
it
takes
a
90
degree
left
hand
turn
almost
to
make
an
upside
down
l
and
so
the
initial
spur
of
old
guard
road
that
just
went
straight
up.
L
That's
been
there
for
you,
know
more
than
a
decade,
but
approximately
three
years
ago,
the
road
that
that
additional
left-hand
turn
was
extended
over
to
to
that
property,
so
that
that's
only
a
three
year
old
road
and
at
that
time,
when
that
road
was
built,
it
was
built
in
connection
with
the
graystone
development
that
that
you
know
approximately
300
units.
That's
going
caddy
corner
across
the
street
to
this
development
and
at
that
time
that
develo
the
road
was
built.
L
L
You
know,
as
you
know,
of
course,
the
georgia
constitution
requires
that
zoning
ordinances
and
rezonings
be
applied
in
a
reasonable
and
non-discriminatory
manner,
and
I'm
not
suggesting
in
any
way
that
that's
not
the
case
here,
but
I
think
it's
something
that
we
all
need
to
keep
in
mind,
because
you
know
approximately
three
years
ago,
this
body
understanding
that
membership
has
probably
changed
in
the
last
three
years.
L
There
was
no
requirement
for
any
traffic
impact
study,
no
school
impact
issues,
no
conditions
at
all
were
placed
on
that
property
to
my
knowledge
and
additionally,
the
schools
cooperated
with
that
rezoning
in
that
they
allowed
graystone
to
use
part
of
their
property
as
an
additional
emergency
access
route,
and
so
at
that
time
there
were
no.
There
was
no
concerns
raised
about
traffic
or
any
of
those
issues,
despite
the
300
units
being
put
in
there,
and
so,
of
course,
our
development
is
approximately
115
single-family
units.
L
And
so
like,
I
said,
I'm
not
suggesting
that
there
that
there's
any
ill
intent
behind
these
deviations,
because
you
know
I
know
that
three
years
ago
the
concerns
were
different.
They
were
you
know.
Now
we
have
to
consider
the
traffic
from
graystone,
as
as
at
that
time
you
know
we
we
didn't
because
graystone
of
course
wasn't
there
three
years
ago,
and
so
I'm
not
suggesting
that
there's
any
you
know
ill
intent
or
anything
of
that
regard.
L
But
I
just
think
it's
important
to
remember
that
we
have
to
apply
that
we
have
to
apply
the
zoning
ordinances.
You
know
uniformly
to
all
the
different
to
all
the
different
parties
who
come
up
for
a
rezoning
and
then
I.
Finally,
I
wanted
to
make
a
point
with
respect
to
state
law,
which
is
pretty
clear
that
you
can't
rezoning
can't
be
conditioned
absent,
absent
going
through
the
impact
fee,
ordinance
requirements
on
system
improvements.
L
It
can
only
be
conditioned
on
project
improvements,
and
so
the
distinction
there
is
a
project
improvement
is
an
improvement
that
that
would
improve
the
project
itself
and
is
reasonably
related
to
the
project
itself.
So
so,
as
an
example,
you
know
xl
d
cell
lanes
into
a
development
that
would
be
a
project
improvement
because
it,
you
know,
relates
directly
to
the
project
and
this
as
opposed
to
a
system
improvement
which
you
know,
as
an
example
may
be.
You
know
manchester?
L
L
That's
inherent
to
the
entire
system
of
that
area,
rather
than
just
the
project
itself,
and
so
on
on
a
project
that
that
the
planning
department
has
said,
there's
there's
no
there's
no
change
in
the
level
of
traffic
based
on
classification,
of
course,
there's
an
additional
you
know
increase
in
number
of
vehicles,
then
I
think
I
don't.
I
don't
think
that
we
can.
L
We
can
require
because
the
traffic
study
is
one
thing.
That's
that's!
Twenty
thousand
dollars!
That's
you
know,
that's
that's
one
portion,
but
I
would
assume
that
you
know
based
on
what
the
traffic
study
says.
If
the
traffic
study
comes
back
and
says
you
know
x,
the
x
y
and
z
improvements
need
to
be
made.
Then
you
know
the
developer
may
ask
be
made
to
make
those
improvements
as
well,
and
I
just
don't
know
that
that
fits
the
constitutional
framework
that
we
have.
L
L
All
that
being
said,
though,
I
know
I've
I've
rambled
a
little
bit
up
here,
but
all
that
being
said,
our
hell,
bowers
who's
who's.
The
principal
of
the
applicant
he'd
like
to
give
a
very
brief.
You
know
overview
of
the
project
specifically
hitting
on
the
you
know,
the
age
group
that's
being
targeted
and
the
type
of
development
this
is
going
to
be
and
how
that
may
address
some
of
the
school
impact
and
traffic
concerns
just
inherent
to
the
development
itself.
So
he'll
very
briefly
address
that,
if
you
all
don't
mind.
M
Hey
good
morning,
my
name
is
kell
bowers.
My
address
is
6053
veterans
parkway.
I
wanted
to
get
that
up
there
if
possible.
M
All
right
good
morning,
commission
members,
I
hope
everybody
had
a
good
holiday
season
when
we
last
met
some
additional
information.
Some
additional
information
was
needed
in
regard
to
our
proposed
age-focused
community.
M
M
All
right
in
this
presentation,
I'll
summarize
the
expectations
that
we
have
in
place
for
the
proposed
development
market
statistics
and
an
overview
of
the
property.
Additionally,
my
contact
information
was
listed
to
the
left
of
the
last
slide,
but
that
one's
unimportant
we
can
go
ahead
and
move
forward.
M
We're
striving
to
provide
the
active
adult
demographic
with
a
viable
option
in
the
columbus
area,
something
which
is
desperately
needed
in
the
city.
In
the
senior
housing
market.
We
tend
to
break
the
different
needs
categories
into
three
groups:
gogo
slogo
and
nogo
gogo
encompasses
the
active
adult
sector.
These
are
individuals
who
are
over
the
age
of
55
who
are
not
in
need
of
health
care,
based
housing,
environment
or
meal
services.
Slogo
and
no
go
seniors
will
both
require
the
availability
of
medical
services
or
meal
services
in
their
housing
environment.
M
Our
group
is
aspiring
to
serve
the
go,
go
senior
group
in
columbus
in
the
columbus
active
adult
housing
sector.
It's
important
to
note
that
virtually
all
housing
in
the
senior
space
is
either
traditional
for
sale,
housing
in
non-age,
focused
communities,
nursing
homes,
apartment
buildings
or
income,
restricted
housing.
M
We
seek
to
provide
an
option
to
those
in
the
55
up
age
group
who,
for
any
number
of
reasons
prefer
to
stay
in
a
home
environment,
would
prefer
to
conserve.
Their
capital,
are
not
looking
to
invest
in
a
forever
home
and
would
like
something
new
and
modern
to
avoid
maintenance,
retain
lifestyle,
flexibility
and
live
in
a
quality
single
family
community,
not
in
an
apartment
building.
M
We
believe,
especially
since
covet
19,
that
there
are
a
large
number
of
people
who
would
prefer
not
to
live
in
an
apartment
building,
take
the
elevator
when
they
come
and
go
and
essentially
live
in
a
forced
communal
environment,
not
with
standing
covet.
It's
important
to
remember
that
most
people,
age,
55
and
up
have
not
lived
in
an
apartment
since
they
were
young
and
the
option
to
be
able
to
continue
to
live
in
a
home-style
community
and
not
have
neighbors
on
all
sides
and
above
and
below,
has
not
been
available
to
this
market.
M
M
Also,
an
interesting
fact
you
may
know
is
that,
each
day
in
the
us,
roughly
ten
thousand
people
turned
sixty-five.
This
age
group
also
has
a
minimal
impact
on
its
surrounding
community
in
regard
to
traffic
load
and
school
burden.
According
to
the
u.s
census,
approximately
six
percent
of
seniors
have
school-aged
children
living
in
their
home.
M
Additionally,
our
marketing
and
floor
plan
selection
will
be
targeted
towards
individuals
who
do
not
have
children.
A
large
number
of
units
in
this
neighborhood
will
contain
only
two
bedrooms,
which
typically
are
not
an
attractive
option
to
families
with
children.
Also,
our
amenities
selection,
which
I
will
go
over
later,
as
well
as
our
hoi
hoa
compliance
rules,
will
be
strictly
targeted
towards
go,
go
seniors
and
would
not
be
attractive
to
a
family
with
school-age
children.
M
Based
on
conversations
I've
had
with
traffic
engineers,
a
neighborhood
of
the
size
would
generate
an
expected
100
car
trips
per
day.
M
These
numbers,
as
I
stated,
are
based
on
conversations
with
traffic
engineers,
as
well
as
independent
research
with
the
daily
number
of
trips
and
the
existing
three-lane
road.
It
can
be
concluded
that
this
neighborhood
would
create
zero
impact
on
the
existing
traffic
patterns
in
the
immediate
area.
The
aaa
or
foundation
for
traffic
safety
survey
has
shown
that
senior
drivers
drive
35
percent
less
than
other
age
groups,
which
further
decreases
the
amount
of
traffic
that
can
be
expected
to
come
from
this
community.
M
Lastly,
as
far
as
traffic
is
concerned,
the
issues
present
on
old
guard
road
are
primarily
confined
to
the
center
turn
lane
during
school
pickup
and
drop
off
times
only
while
the
travel
lanes
remain
almost
unrestricted
for
travel.
It's
anticipated
that
most
residents
in
this
neighborhood
will
not
have
school
age.
Children
and
therefore
will
be
trying
will
not
be
trying
to
access
the
school
pickup
drop-off
line
and
adding
to
the
traffic
backup
that's
present
during
these
times.
M
Just
to
touch
a
little
bit
on
the
floor
plans
that
we're
planning
to
have
in
this
subdivision
to
show
you
how
they
wouldn't
really
be
conducive
to
a
family
with
children,
a
neighborhood
as
all
right,
so
the
homes
in
this
proposed
development
will
range
from
approximately
1200
square
feet
to
over
1800
square
feet
and
will
be
built
to
class.
A
high-end
design
and
quality
specifications
throughout
most
homes
will
have
a
two-car
garage.
M
Some
smaller
units
will
have
a
one,
and
homes
will
include
such
features
as
nine
foot
ceilings,
open
floor
plans,
private
patios
or
screened
in
porches,
granite
or
similar
countertops
deluxe
appliances
and
fixtures.
A
combination
of
wood
style
and
carpeted
floor
areas
and
a
limited
number
of
homes
may
have
a
second
floor
with
a
caregiver
suite
for
individuals
who
would
like
to
age
in
place.
M
This
is
not
a
possibility
or
acceptable
acceptable
for
many
newly
retired
service
members,
so
they
choose
instead
to
leave
columbus
and
move
elsewhere
so
that
their
needs
can
be
met.
I
would
like
to
help
columbus,
retain
these
great
americans
and
to
serve
our
veterans
in
a
manner
consistent
with
what
they
deserve.
M
This
development
will
create
a
large
number
of
jobs
throughout
its
construction
and
will
continue
to
offer
employment
opportunities
to
the
city
through
its
ongoing
operations.
Lastly,
this
development
will
provide
much
needed
tax
revenue
to
the
schools
while
placing
almost
no
burden
upon
them
and
if
you
can
just
go
to
the
last
page,.
M
A
All
right
any
questions,
yeah
mr
dudley.
D
One
for
you
and
then
one
for
your
for
the
applicant.
You
talked
about
having
seniors
in
the
55
to
64
age
group.
Being
your
main
target
target
purchasers,
are
they
likely
to
be
working
and
then
leaving
the
area
and
using
old
guard
road
in
the
morning
when
the
school
backup
is
at
worst.
M
M
I
Okay,
I
have
several
questions:
okay,
who
owns
the
property
on
both
sides
of
the
property
that
you
own.
M
I
Okay,
I'm
not
a
cartographer.
So
if
your
lot
is,
if
your
land
is
here,
yes,
I'm
yeah,
can
you
put
it
on
the
overhead
there.
I
L
K
L
I
And
the
property
in
front
of
his
like
going
down.
Okay
to
the
right
there.
N
L
L
M
Yes,
so
the
owner
of
that
property.
I
M
It
would
be
sarah
elizabeth
sabra
elizabeth
leatherwood.
I
That
house
is
yes
and
there's
300
units
that
are
going
into
that
when
those
apartments
are
completed.
So
that's
at
least
300
cars,
maybe
600
if
they
have
two
cars
apiece,
but
let's
give
them
the
benefit
that
300
cars,
so
the
traffic
is
definitely
going
to
increase
on
old
guard
all
times
during
the
day,
just
because
of
people
coming
and
going
from
those
apartments.
Yes,
now
is
there
and
you
know
the
amer
emergency
road
from
the
apartments
has
been
blocked
off.
I
That
is
not
even
a
consideration
for
in
in
or
out
pattern
because
it's
it's
not
usable,
it
runs
into
school
property,
and
so
there's
one
way
in
those
apartments
and
one
way
out.
M
M
M
M
They
they
could.
However,
the
likelihood
I'm
going
to
say
is
slim
to
none,
seeing
as
we're
not
anticipating
that
most
these
people
will
be
working,
nor
will
they
have
children,
and
also
I
mean
I
have
driven
down
old
guard
road
during
the
time
when
that
traffic
is
terrible
and,
as
you
know,
I
did
say
a
lot
of
that
traffic
really
is
constricted
to
that
center
turn
lane
and
those
travel
lanes
where
people
that
are
just
trying
to
simply
get
in
and
out
of
old
guard
road
remain
pretty
much
unrestricted.
I
Okay,
the
other
question
there
is
absolutely
I
guess
this
might
be
for
john
there's-
no
way
that
the
schools
would
have
any
kind
of
a
in
and
out
off
of
veterans
to
the
schools
to
alleviate
that
traffic.
Is
there.
I
Mr
gibbs,
no,
not
mr
gibson,
mr
bowers.
I
know
you're
going
to
target
this
to
55
and
older,
but
that
doesn't
mean
if
I'm
a
young
couple
with
one
kid
that
I
can't
buy
a
house
in
here.
M
That
does
not.
That
would
be
an
age
restricted,
which
would
let
which
would
say
that
we
have
20.
That
would
not
have
to
be
within
that
55
and
up.
However,
80
of
the
people
would
have
to
be
right.
The
reason
why
we're
trying
to
stay
away
from
totally
restricting
it
to
55
and
up
is,
like
I
stated
earlier,
the
retirees
from
fort
benning.
A
lot
of
them
will
not
have
reached
that
age
of
55.
I
I
M
N
M
Is
always
a
possibility,
however,
like
I
said
we're
going
to
be
making
this
neighborhood
so
that
it
is
attractive
to
the
55
and
up
demographic,
not
necessarily
the
demographic
that
would
have
kids?
I
have
two
kids
of
my
own.
I
can
tell
you
I
would
not
want
to
live
in
a
two-bedroom
house,
nor
would
I
want
to
live
in
a
neighborhood
that
has
hoa
restrictions.
That
would
be
like.
I
can't
have
toys
out
in
the
front
yard.
I
can't
have
you
know
all.
M
Here's
ever
been
to,
like
the
villages
in
florida,
we'd
be
essentially
trying
to
stick
to
something
similar
to
that
where
you
have
the
hoa
restrictions
in
place
that
make
it
so
that
it's
comfortable
for
your
55
and
up
community
right,
but
it
just
it,
wouldn't
be
a
great
place
to
bring
you
know
your
children.
If
you
wanted
to
live
there,
I.
L
Think
one
one
other
reason
that
it's
we
haven't
gone,
the
full
deed
restriction
is:
we've
we've
done
a
little
bit
of
preliminary
research
into
the
law
on
that,
and
I'm
not
totally
sure
that
georgia
law
would
allow
you
to
do
to
do
an
age
restriction
of
that
nature.
On
on
a
single
family,
residential
subdivision
of
these
lots,
I
know
you
can
do
it
on
condos
and
things
like
that,
but
I'm
not
totally
sure
that
it's
legal
to
do
to
do
it
specifically
on
a
subdivision
like
this.
I
Well-
and
that
was
my
concern,
because
I'm
telling
you
it's
very
desirable
to
live
close
to
a
school
if
you
have
small
children
and
some
people
like
having
covenants
and
restrictions
because
they
know
that's
the
way
to
keep
the
neighborhood
looking
nice
and
and
if
you're
buying
a
new
house.
That's
the
kind
of
thing
that
you're
attracted
to.
L
I
L
B
M
D
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
for
the
applicant
or
for
for
the
city,
but
the
applicant
mentioned
the
city's
traffic
analysis
as
indicating
it
wouldn't
change
the
level
of
service
for
the
road.
But
at
least
the
analysis.
We
have
only
looks
at
veterans
because
they
don't
have
any
traffic
studies
for
old
guard
road
right
and
also
certainly
wouldn't
have
any
studies
taking
into
account
the
impact
of
the
graystone
development.
That's
still
being
built.