►
From YouTube: Columbus GA PAC Meeting 11 03 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
Thank
you
very
much,
and
I
would
first
like
to
ask
you
if
you
would
to
either
silence
or
turn
off
your
cell
phones.
We
are
operating
under
much
different
circumstances,
as
in
the
past,
most
meetings
are
being
held
differently.
A
A
We
also
have
citizens
who
will
be
calling
in
via
phone
with
any
questions
or
comments
and
you'll
see
the
phone
number
across
the
screen.
At
this
time,
phone
number
is
706-225-3930.
A
A
We'll
first
hear
a
reading
of
the
staff
report
from
planning
and
ask
then
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
request.
We
will
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak,
for
or
against
that
request,
or
to
inquire
about
that
request.
Commissioners
will
have
time
for
any
needed
discussion
on
the
case.
Once
a
motion
is
made
and
seconded
by
the
commission,
a
vote
will
take
place
and
a
recommendation
will
be
rendered.
A
A
The
city
council
of
columbus
will
hold
a
public
meeting
and
that's
called
the
first
reading
said
council
shall
consider
the
case,
review
our
results
and
also
planning
department,
recommendations
and
we'll
hear
discussion
on
the
matter.
Council
will
make
a
final
decision
at
a
second
meeting
called
the
second
reading.
A
Okay
for
the
commissioners,
first
item
on
the
agenda
today
is
to
approve
the
minutes
of
two
previous
meetings.
We
have
the
minutes
from
october
6th.
Does
anyone
have
any
changes
that
need
to
be
made
to
that
or
any
comments
about
the
minutes
from
october
the
6th?
A
A
This
is
a
request
to
resume
1.92
acres
of
land
located
at
6301
and
6313
macon
road
current
zoning
is
nc
neighborhood
commercial
proposed
zoning
is
gc
general
commercial.
The
proposed
use
is
convenience
store
with
gas
sales,
retail
bloomers,
lawn
and
garden
and
more
llc
is
the
applicant.
This
property
is
located
in
council
district
5,
councilman
council
persons
crab
for
this
district,
we'll
hear
from
the
planning
staff
on
this
one.
First.
B
Yes,
sir
general
land
use
is
consistent
for
planning
area
b.
The
current
land
use
designation
is
general
commercial
future
land
use
is
general
commercial,
it
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
Property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
or
flood
plain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
decrease
to
690
trips.
If
used
for
commercial
use,
the
level
of
service
will
remain
at
a
level
b.
B
The
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
ccg
for
commercial
usage,
there'll
be
no
school
impact.
The
site
shall
include
a
category
c
buffer
along
all
property
lines,
bordered
by
the
sfr2
zoning
district.
The
three
options
on
a
category
c
are
20
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees,
understory
trees,
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet,
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
and
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall
30
feet
undisturbed,
natural
buffer,
there's
no
fort
bend
recommendation
of
dri
recommendation.
B
The
surrounding
zoning
to
the
north
as
sfr2
to
the
south
is
nc
to
the
east,
is
nc
to
the
west,
is
nc
50
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
Property
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
The
planning
department
received
eleven
emails
or
calls
regarding
the
rezoning
and
those
11
were
in
opposition.
There's
no
additional
information.
A
C
C
Are
here
we're
going
to
use
the
existing
building
where
the
retail
store
is
would
be
converted
to
a
convenience
store?
Then
the
accessory
building
to
the
left
of
the
existing
building?
Would
it's
it's
already
a
canopy
that
will
be
replaced
with
a
gas
canopy.
We
modified
the
plan.
We
had
a
little
more
aggressive
plan,
originally
with
8
100
feet,
and
we
we
backed
it
back
down
to
4
700
feet,
which
is
what's
already
on
site.
C
A
C
A
So
everyone
the
audience
like
to
come
forward
and
speak
for
this
resonating
request.
Please
come
forward
at
this
time
and
nobody's
moving.
So
is
there
anyone
that
would
like
to
speak
against
this
case?
Please
come
forward
at
this
time.
How
many,
how
many
in
the
room
are
here
for
this
case?
Would
you
please
raise
your
hand
just
just
for
my
knowledge?
Okay,
all
right!
If
you
want
to
come
up
and
speak,
please
come
up
to
the
podium
and
give
us
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
G
The
nursery
presents
no
problem,
but
I'm
afraid,
with
a
gas
station
convenience
store,
there
will
be
a
confusion
and
noise
and
insecurity
during
the
night
and
during
the
day
we
already
have
a
convenience
store
three
doors
down
from
me
on
macon
road
and
one
at
miller
and
milgen
miller
and
macon
road.
The
marathon
and
I
really
feel
like
the
neighborhood-
does
not
need
another
convenience
store
and
I
feel
you
know.
I
live
alone
and
it's
I'm
concerned
about
my
safety
also
and
the
traffic.
A
A
H
I'm
brenda
west,
I
live
at
6422
b,
makin
road,
just
three
doors
down
from
betty
moody,
I'm
a
little
bit
further
down,
but
bloomers
is
almost
across
from
me
and
our
concern
is
additional
traffic
with
convenience
stores
we're
on
the
east
end.
You
never
know
after
they
close
who's
going
to
be
hanging
around
those
places.
H
I
I
A
J
Good
morning
I'm
renee
roth,
and
I
am
the
current
owner
and
rezoning
applicant
for
the
property
at
6301
macon
road.
In
addition
to
the
information
that
mr
smallman
provided,
I
would
just
like
to
speak
to
the
the
three
residents
that
we
heard
from
just
a
few
minutes
ago.
The
one
thing
that
is
different
about
this
property
from
the
other
convenience
store
locations
in
near
proximity
is
this
location
is
completely
within
fencing.
J
A
Rode
out
and
looked
at
it
and
I
think
most
everybody
on
the
panel
rode
by
and
looked
at
it,
and
so
those
gates
will
be
used
as
a
security.
A
A
Crystal
valley
church
is
right.
My
question
was
all
right
all
right.
Thank
you
any
other
questions.
Mr
baldwin
did
you
want
to
say
anything?
I
was
okay,
all
right.
Thank
you
very
much.
All
right
is
there.
Anyone
else
in
the
audience
would
like
to
speak
on
this
case.
Please
come
forward
at
this
time.
A
All
right,
commissioners,
the
floor
is
open
for.
Oh
I'm,
sorry.
L
A
Okay,
thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you
for
that
all
right,
commissioners.
The
floor
is
open
for
a
motion.
I'm
looking
here.
We
do
have
one
commissioner,
that's
virtual
today
and
it's
james
dudley.
That's
generally
here
to
my
left
and
your
right,
so
he
hasn't
asked
any
questions,
but
anyway,
that's
why
I
keep
looking
at
my
phone
all
right
commissioners.
D
Okay,
reference
to
rezn0921842
a
request
to
be
zoned:
1.92
acres
of
land
located
at
6301,
6313
macon
road
current
zoning
is
neighborhood
commercial
proposed
zoning
is
general
commercial.
The
proposed
use
is
convenience
store
with
gas
sales
in
retail,
bloomers,
lawn
and
garden.
Llc
is
the
applicant.
This
property
is
located
in
council
district
five.
I
recommend
we
approve
this
okay.
A
A
A
R-E-Z-N-1021-1929,
this
is
a
request
of
rezone
4.10
acres
of
land
located
at
6877.
Far
road
current
zoning
is
rmf
ii.
Residential
multifamily
ii
proposed
zoning
is
gc,
general
commercial
proposed
uses
grocery
store.
Timothy
h,
diese
is
the
applicant.
This
property
is
located
in
council
district.
Three,
mr
huff
and
we'll
hear
from
planning
staff
first
place.
B
Yes,
sir
general
land
use
is
inconsistent
from
platinum
area
e.
The
current
land
use
designation
is
vacant
undeveloped.
The
future
land
use
designation
is
multi-family.
It
is
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
us
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
is
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
the
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
to
1150
trips.
B
If
used
for
commercial
usage,
the
level
of
service
will
decline
to
a
level
of
d.
The
site
shall
meet
the
the
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
ccg
for
commercial
usage.
There'll
be
no
school
impact.
The
site
shall
include
a
category
c
buffer
along
all
property
lines,
bordered
by
the
rmf
ii
zoning
district.
B
The
three
options
under
category
c
are
20
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees,
understory
trees,
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet,
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
and
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall
30
feet
under
disturbed
natural
buffer.
There's
no
fort.
Bending
record
main
recommendation:
no
deer,
I
recommendation
the
surrounding
zoning
to
the
north
is
rmf2
to
the
south.
As
rmf
ii
to
the
east
is
sfr2
to
the
west
is
lmi
30
property
owners
within
300
300
feet
of
the
subject.
B
A
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
redford
commissioners.
Y'all
have
any
questions
of
planning
staff
on
this
case
now
I
didn't.
I
did
note.
The
sign
got
back
put
back
up
correct.
Yes,
sir,
when
I
roll
by
it
was
gone.
Apparently
somebody
had
taken
it
down
all
right,
all
right,
no
questions
who
is
here
to
represent
this
case,
mr
deese,
if
you
would
please
come
to,
are
you,
mr
diese
yeah?
Yes,
sir
all
right,
so
if
you
would
just
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
for
us,
please.
A
All
right,
sir,
and
what
are
your
plans?
Where
are
you
going
all
right,
sir?
Tell
us
what
your
plans
are
there.
A
E
Watched
that
area
grow
and
recently
was
approached
that
there
are
no
true
services
really
available
for
that
area.
That's
growing
in
the
right
direction
and
after
looking
at
a
proposal
with
grocery
dental
and
medical
office
facilities,
I
thought
this
would
be
the
perfect
time
to
rezone
it
and
go
in
that
direction.
A
Okay,
so
I
know
you're,
I
know
your
case
says
that
you're
planning
a
grocery
business
there,
maybe,
but
it
would
be
what
you're,
just
what
you
described
is
what
you're
saying.
E
N
I
do
yes,
mr
diese.
E
E
A
A
All
right
is
there
anyone
the
audience
like
to
come
forward
and
speak
for
this
case
at
this
time.
Please
do
so
and
if
nobody's
stirring,
so
I'll
say,
if
anybody's
out
in
the
audience,
who'd
like
to
speak
against
this
case,
please
come
forward
at
this
time
and
nobody's
moving
all
right
all
right.
Commissioners.
Floor
is
open
for
a
motion
on
case.
In
this
case,
if
you
68
77
far
road.
O
When
it
comes
to
ruzn
10-21
dash
a
request
to
rezone
4.10
acres
of
land
located
at
6877
fall
road
current
zone
is
rm.
F2
residential
multifamily
proposed
zone
is
gc
general
commercial.
The
proposed
use
is
a
grocery
store.
Timothy
hd
is
the
applicant.
This
prophecy
is
located
in
council
three
rusev.
I
recommend
that
we
approve
it.
A
A
All
right,
I
noticed
we
got
quite
a
crowd
here
and
I
got
a
got
a
feeling.
It
has
something
to
do
with
edgewood
road.
I'm
going
to
tell
you
the
first
case.
We're
going
to
we're
going
to
propose
is
going
to
be
the
rezoning
of
the
property.
This
will
have
nothing
to
do
with
the
cell
tower,
so
this
is
to
bring
the
club
into
compliance
with
what
it's
doing
now.
So
we're
going
to
hear
this
case
first
and
then
we'll
hear
the
special
exception
case
after
that.
A
So
if
you
would
just
keep
that
in
mind
when
your
comments
are
are
brought
forward-
okay,
we'll
listen
to
this
case.
First
r
e
z
in
10,
21
1930,
a
request
to
rezone
3.16
acres
of
land
located
at
3202
edgewood
road.
Current
zoning
is
rmf
one
residential
multifamily
one
proposed
zoning.
His
ro
residential
office
proposed
use
is
a
club
or
lodge
not
for
profit.
A
B
Yes,
sir,
the
general
land
use
is
inconsistent
for
planning
area
e.
The
current
land
use
designation
is
public
institutional.
The
future
is
single-family
residential.
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
the
property
is
serviced
by
all
city
services,
there'll
be
no
traffic
impact.
Since
it's
going,
it's
basically
going
to
go
from
a
club
to
a
club
and
lodge
it's
the
same
use.
B
The
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
ccg
for
ccg
for
commercial
usage,
there'll
be
no
school
impact.
The
site
shall
meet
the
shall
include
a
category
c
buffer
along
all
property
lines,
bordered
by
the
sfr-2
zoning
district.
The
three
options
under
category
c
are
20
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
cannon.
B
Excuse
me
20
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees,
understory
trees,
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet,
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
and
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall
30
feet
undisturbed.
Natural
buffer,
there's
no
fort
bending
recommendation,
no
dri
recommendation.
The
surrounding
zoning
to
the
north
as
sfr2
to
the
south
as
sfr2
to
the
east
is
sfr2
and
to
the
west
is
sfr3.
B
60
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
Properties
were
notified
of
the
resulting
request.
The
planning
department
received
10
calls
or
emails
regarding
the
rezoning,
those
10
those
10
were
in
opposition
of
the
rezoning.
As
far
as
additional
infinite
information,
the
applicant
attempted
to
rezone.
This
parcel
in
2018
was
declined
by
council
and
all
of
that
information
was
provided
to
you
before
the
meeting.
A
P
Right,
my
name
is
rob
porter
chef
from
936
second
avenue
with
porter
chef
and
sours,
and
I
we
represent
municipal
communications
and
we're
going
to
kind
of
lump.
Both
zoning
requests
into
one
presentation
and
I'll
introduce
john
throckmorton
he's
spearheading
the
project.
On
behalf
of
municipal
communications
and
he'll
present
more
of
the
detail
on
the
tower.
P
We
are
requesting
approval
by
the
planning
committee
to
erect
a
communications
tower.
It's
on
3202
edgewood
road
in
columbus.
Most
of
you
do
recognize
and
know
that
this
is
the
shriners
club
as
you're
going
towards
university
avenue
and
to
accommodate
the
tower
we're
asking
for
the
approval
of
a
zoning
change
from
rmf-1
to
r0,
which
is
residential
office
and
we're
also
requesting
a
special
exception
of
use
for
the
tower.
P
So
before
I
bring
john
on,
I
would
like
to
address
the
council
and
tell
you
why
I'm
in
favor
of
it
as
a
resident
and
why
we
hope
you
would
be
in
favor
of
it.
I
live
in
that
area.
I
live
on
the
corner
of
averitt
drive
and
in
hilton,
and
I
would
be
served
by
that
tower
and
I'm
not
sure
if
anybody
lives
in
that
area.
But
if
you
do
you'll
know
that
if
your
wi-fi
is
out,
the
cell
coverage
drops
down
to
one
bar
and
you
can't
really
do
anything.
P
P
So
something
happens
in
my
house:
it's
transmitted
to
my
provider
with
a
cellular
service,
and
then
you
know
when
everybody
comes
home
from
the
holidays
at
our
house,
everybody's
on
their
cell
phones.
If
you
have
children,
you
know
that's
all
they
do
is
look
at
their
cell
phones,
but
my
wife's,
the
same
way
and
everybody's
reading
texting
and
all
that
stuff.
P
During
the
pandemic.
There
was
a
period
of
time
that
I
work
from
home.
I
think
all
of
us
and
all
the
surrounding
community
experiences
a
new
way
of
doing
business
and
that's
working
from
home.
All
these
things
serve
to
put
pressure
on
existing
services,
and
I
would
say
to
my
experiences,
maybe
like
yours,
maybe
like
other
people.
P
You've
got
the
quicker
they're
able
to
respond
and
the
more
accurate,
the
neighborhood
in
the
house
that
they
can
go
to,
and
this
is
critical
to
have
access
to
information
in
this
day
and
age.
When
there's
no
power
in
your
house,
if
your
power
goes
out
that
zaps,
your
wi-fi
and
all
of
a
sudden
you're,
now
just
relying
on
your
cell
network
at
my
house,
we're
in
trouble,
it
barely
registers
a
bar
and
my
neighborhood
everybody's
the
same
way.
It's
not
because
I
have
poor
service.
P
Everybody
is
the
same
way
and
if
you're
familiar
with
the
area,
you'll
also
know
there's
an
elementary
school
about
a
block
or
so
away,
and
their
need
and
reliance
on
emergency
services
is
even
more
acute
than
mine.
Just
because
they've
got
the
duty
to
protect
a
bunch
of
children
that
come
in
and
out
of
their
school
elementary
and
middle
school
children
and
unfortunately,
the
fact
of
the
matter
is:
there's
no
safe
place
in
this
world
and
every
place
needs
to
be
protected.
P
That's
more
important
to
have
this
communications
tower
the
way
it
is
you
know,
people
are
more
mobile
and
workplaces
have
morphed
so
that
people
are
not
working
out
of
their
homes,
as
I
previously
mentioned,
as
much
as
they're
working
on
their
office.
In
addition,
we
have
you
know,
we've
heard
about
this
and
it's
starting
to
come
in
with
the
5g
network
and
that's
going
to
increase
the
need
for
cell
tower
and
communication
tower
utilization.
P
P
There's
going
to
be
people
that
are
going
to
object
to
this
saying
that
my
property
value's
going
to
go
down,
and
I
would
submit
to
you
and
to
them
that
in
this
day
and
age,
and
I
know
that
area
I
used
to
live
in
that
area.
In
fact,
I
used
to
live
in
mojina
woods,
but
in
this
day
and
age,
people
are
as
part
of
their
factors
of
considering
homes
are
looking
at.
What
is
the
cell
tower
coverage
they're
looking
at?
P
If
there
was
no
coverage
in
their
area,
they
would
probably
be
less
likely
to
buy
than
if
there
was
a
strong
cell
coverage
in
their
area.
For
all
the
reasons
that
I
outlined
before
so
to
say
that
property
values
would
go
down
and
go
up
in
my
mind,
a
cell
tower
can
only
help
the
property
values,
and
then
you
know
I'm
going
to
be
quite
honest,
that
cell
tower,
when
it's
located
at
the
shriner
club
with
you,
know
a
multiple
acre
parking
lot.
P
That
has
an
insignificant
impact
on
property
values
because
there's
already
the
shriners
club
with
their
huge
parking
lot.
It's
also
a
quality
of
life
issue,
and
that
is
connectiveness.
So
I.
A
P
Anyway,
so
what
we're
proposing
and
I'll
kind
of
wrap
it
up?
It's
not
incompatible,
as
the
city
said,
with
the
current
use
of
the
facility,
there's
no
real
consequential
environmental
impact
by
direction
of
the
tower
it's
going
to
be
made
to
look
as
much
as
possible.
You
know
to
kind
of
blend
in
with
that
environment,
and
I
will
lastly,
before
I
introduce
mr
throckmorton
I'll,
actually
note
that
their
known
commun
municipal
communication
is
known
for
taking
care
of
the
properties
and
making
them
aesthetically
pleasing.
P
So
this
property's
not
going
to
fall
into
disrepair,
it's
going
to
it's
going
to
be
maintained
and
it's
going
to
be.
You
know
an
attractive
piece
of
property
as
much
as
you
know,
one
can
be
so
without
further
ado.
I'll
have
john
come
and
talk
to
you
a
little
bit
more
about
the
specific
plans.
Well,.
A
Let
me,
let
me
ask
you
a
question:
if,
if
the
zoning
is
is
approved
to
change
and
the
property
backs
up
to
one
of
the
residences
and
the
buffers
not
in
place
are,
are
they
going
to
be
required
to
buffer
the
area?
Put
up
fences
do
whatever
they
need
to
do.
Q
A
I
mean
not
just
around
the
tower
I'm
talking
about
the
full
property
that
you
know.
It's
a
pretty
large
piece
of
property
that
backs
up
to
a
lot
of
homes,
so
I
mean
what
it
would
this
would
you
would
have
to
take
care
of
that
throughout
the
property.
If
the
zoning
were
to
change
correct,
it
wouldn't
be
grandfathered
in
necessarily
the
buffering.
B
The
the
buffering
would
because
the
use
is
not
changing,
so
they
technically
would
not
have
to
re-landscape
the
property.
Okay,
all
right!
That's
what
I.
P
P
So
it's
not
they're,
not
cutting
a
new.
You
know
partial
out
or
impacting
like
further
back
right.
Okay,.
Q
Good
morning
my
name
is
john
throckhorn,
I'm
the
vice
president
for
municipal
communications,
we're
an
atlanta-based
tower
developer
at
3495
piedmont,
road
in
atlanta
georgia.
So
we
have
built
hundreds
of
towers
in
15,
different
states,
but
we're
focused
in
georgia
and
alabama
and
in
fact,
in
columbus,
we
at
the
columbus
fort
benning
area,
we've
built
eight
towers
to
date,
so
very
familiar
with
this
community.
Q
I've
lived
here
four
times
once
as
a
child
three
times
as
an
army
officer,
so
we've
got
a
lot
of
again
familiarity
with
the
requirements
of
the
jurisdiction
and
the
community
and
the
community
needs.
So
this
is
the
ninth
project
that
we
brought
to
this
area.
I
do
have
a
few
diagrams
that
can
kind
of
define
the
scope
of
the
problem
and
and
why
this
is
needed,
and
I
could
show
those
on
the
projector
of
that.
R
Q
Q
This
was
prepared
by
t-mobile,
so
so
you
know
separate
technical
analysis
that
they've
done
and
and
when
you've
got
an
issue
like
this.
Obviously
the
the
that's
185
running
through
the
center
of
that
highly
trafficked
tens
of
thousands
of
people
using
that
we
did
a
an
analysis
of
the
residents
in
the
area
and
out
to
one
mile
from
that
dot.
When
it
comes
back
on.
According
to
post
office
statistics
usps,
there
are
between
six
thousand
and
8
000
people
in
that
area
that
are
using
that
service.
Q
So
this
doesn't
just
enhance
service
within
the
the
one
mile
area
it
actually
contributes
to
making
the
overall
network
in
on
the
eastern
side
of
columbus
more
effective,
so
people
are
going
to
experience
improved
wireless
service,
even
if
they're
already
in
that
in
one
of
those
green
areas.
Typically,
the
highest
demand
are
happening
during
your
rush
hour
period,
so
8
to
10
a.m
or
4
to
6
p.m.
So
again
those
the
residents
or
employees
and
those
green
areas
are
also
going
to
experience
a
little
bit
of
an
improved
service.
Thank
you,
but
really
the.
Q
Q
This
is
what
we
have
done.
There
are
no
existing
structures
within
3000
feet
of
this
location,
so
I
think
the
closest
cell
tower
is
about
0.9
miles
away.
If
the
carriers
could
go
on
that
tower
and
improve
service
in
that
yellow
area
that
I
showed
they
would
do
that
right
away,
rather
than
go
through
the
time
and
expense
of
a
year
of
designing
and
developing
this
location.
Q
So
again,
this
is
what
the
improved
coverage
will
look
like.
If
this
structure
was
to
be
approved-
and
you
can
see
you
know
so-
your
185
gap-
there
is
completely
covered
for
the
most
part,
except
for
that,
just
that
slight
yellow
area
and
that's
probably
a
trick
of
topography,
but
significantly
out
to
either
side,
east
or
west.
You
get
a
lot
of
improvement
and
again,
if
we
could
do
this
with
an
existing
structure,
we
would
do
it.
Q
It
would
save
a
tremendous
amount
of
time
and
money
we're
just
unable
to
do
it
with
the
technology
that
we
have
right
now.
There
is
never
a
perfect
location
for
a
cell
tower.
We
acknowledge
that
this
is.
You
know
compared
to
to
many
that
I've
seen
this
is
a
a
very
suitable
location.
Q
We
tried
to
to
cite
these
as
far
away
from
residences
as
we
possibly
can
that's
why
this
this
property
was
approached
originally,
rather
than
doing
it
at
a
church
or
school,
or
something
like
that.
We're
trying
to
keep
it
as
as
far
away
from
from
neighbors
as
possible,
and
we
look
for
properties
that
have
the
best
screening,
so
the
building
itself
for
the
most
part
screens
the
tower
to
the
to
the
east,
to
anybody
to
the
east.
Q
There's
a
little
bit
of
existing
screening
from
vegetation
and
the
building
itself
to
the
south
and
then
that
median
there
along
lindsay
drive,
really
helps
with
some
of
the
screening.
But
but,
as
we
all
know,
cell
towers
are
not
invisible.
We're
just
not
there
yet
to
be
able
to
make
to
to
construct
these.
In
a
way.
That's
going
to
make
everybody
happy,
we
do
do
the
best
that
we
can
with
how
we
cite
it
and
and
then
how
we
design
the
tower.
Q
Q
We
push
the
carriers
to
get
the
lowest
height
while
at
the
same
time
providing
the
optimal
amount
of
service.
If,
if,
if
they
could
go
higher,
they
they
would
but
just
keeping
the
community
and
the
neighborhood
concerns
in
mind.
150
feet
is
the
best
balance
between
covering
as
many
people
as
we
can,
and
keeping
the
aesthetic
impact
or
the
visual
impact
to
a
to
a
minimum.
Q
I
mentioned
the
existing
screening
along
lindsay
drive
earlier.
This
is
a
pretty
good
picture
of
of
what
that
looks
like
again.
These
are
these.
Trees
are
probably
you
know,
50
to
60
feet
tall,
so
the
cell
tower
obviously
is
going
to
go
over
them,
but
because
of
how
close
the
trees
are
to
the
houses
on
the
other
side,
just
the
the
angle
of
that
is
going
to
reduce
the
aesthetic
impact.
It's
not
it's
not
perfect.
There's
never
or
very
rarely.
Q
So
those
those
are
sort
of
the
the
technical
details
that
I've
got
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
any
of
the
members
may
have.
Q
Yes,
it's
going
to
be
designed
for
six
total
tenants
at
t
has
expressed
interest
previously.
It
will
also
have
space
available
for
verizon.
Should
they
express
interest
in
the
future.
Their
closest
tower,
I
think,
is
also
about
a
mile
away.
Q
So
so
we
expect
that
there
will
be
interest
from
them
in
the
future
and
then
there's
now
a
fourth
carrier
in
the
industry
and
that's
dish.
Dish
has
entered
the
wireless
space,
they
have
kind
of
replaced
sprint
who
merged
with
t-mobile,
and
you
know
it's
a
pretty
dynamic
industry,
so
if
apple
or
google
or
some
other
major
tech
company
or
one
that
doesn't
even
exist
yet
should
want
to
locate
on
the
tower
within
you
know
the
next
10
to
20
years
they'll
have
space
available
to
to
go
on
there.
F
All
like
it,
I
I
assume
that
this
turns
out
to
be
like
a
long-term
lease
of
this
section
of
this
property.
Is
that
correct,
that's
correct
what
what
is
is
that
typically
a
ten
year
or
is
that
negotiable?
I
guess
in
every
every
case.
Q
Q
It's
fairly
short
compared
to
a
lot
of
construction
projects,
so
we'll
we
will
spend
about
in
this
case
the
the
property's
already
cleared,
or
that
section
of
the
property
is
already
cleared
so
about
two
weeks
or
so
to
get
the
foundation
in
a
week
or
ten
days
to
let
the
foundation
cure
and
then
to
actually
stack
the
tower
takes
about
three
to
four
days,
so
fairly
minimal
site
work
there's
a
gap
in
there
again,
while
everything
cures,
and
then
we,
you
know,
dress
up
the
site
with
the
fencing
and
any
landscaping.
Q
In
this
case,
the
there
will
be
either
cabinets
or
shelters.
It's
a
very
small
compound,
as
you've
seen
so
and
just
with
the
weather
in
south
georgia.
You
know
they'll
likely,
install
cabinets
so
fairly
small
footprint
for
that
in
some
cases-
and
I
don't
think
t-mobile-
has
plans
for
this,
but
a
future
tenant
might
I'll
just
be
honest.
They
may
need
a
backup
generator
if
power
was
to
go
out
to
ensure
that
continuous
emergency
cell
tower
service.
Q
F
Mr
becker,
what
was
the
I
think
we
all
have
sort
of
grown
up,
knowing
that
property
and
I
have
lived
in
mohini
woods
and
on
glenbrook
behind
it
and
all
around
there.
What
was
the
rationale
behind
not
using
the
area
where
the
the
pool
used
to
be,
which
was
a
larger
section
off
to
the
to
the
east
of
that
on
that
property.
Q
I
think
at
the
time
that
the
lease
went
into
effect
in
2014,
I
wasn't
part
of
that
initial
leasing
process
usually
we'll
defer
to
the
landlord
wherever
the
landlord
wants,
and
they
may
have
some
future
plans
for
that.
Maybe
the
pool's
going
to
go
back
in
at
some
point
where
some
other
development
may
happen,
but
that
was
the
initial
discussion
between
our
leasing
agent
and
whoever
walked
the
site
with
with
him
originally.
A
M
Thank
you,
taylor
club
view.
Elementary
was
at
that
time
in
1960
had
the
seventh
and
eighth
grade
there.
So
the
school
was
crowded,
so
we
had
kindergarten
in
that
building
and
at
that
time
it
was
a
25-yard,
long
pool
and
then
later
on,
they
made
the
l-shaped
pool
50
yards
so
that
that
that
building's
been
there.
M
I
know,
probably
70
years.
Okay.
A
N
P
I
don't
think
anybody
can
predict
what
the
shriners
will
or
won't
do.
I
mean.
Certainly
anybody
is
free
to
sell
or
purchase
anything
that
they
want.
You
know
so
long
as
it's
willing
parties,
so
I
don't
think
that
we're
confident
to
tell
you
it'll
never
be
sold.
There'll
always
be
a
shrine
club.
I
just
don't
know
the
answer
to
that,
but.
Q
Within
the
lease
there's
a
provision
that
the
the
net
new
owner
or
subsequent
owner
you
know
the
lease
is
valid
throughout
the
life
of
the
lease.
So.
Q
N
N
A
Okay,
does
that
answer
your
question
all
right,
all
right,
any
other
questions,
all
right,
you
very
much
all
right.
Let's
keep
in
mind,
we
are
addressing
the
zoning
first
and
then
we
will
address
the
special
exception
which
they've
already
crawled
over
into
sir.
If
you
want
to
come
up
to
the
podium
and
give
us
your
information,
we'd,
certainly
love
to
hear
from
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
S
S
My
objection
to
the
rezoning
is
the
loss
of
value
of
the
property,
because
right
now
it's
multi-family
which
could
be
apartments
going
back
to
an
ro
the
second.
We
are
a
501
c
3
nonprofit
since
19
since
2015..
S
There's
a
lot
of
other
issues
with
this,
as
you
see
that
this
contract
was
signed
seven
years
ago,
we
have
council
hired
this
stuff,
and
I
know
that's
not
here.
This
stuff
was
not
approved
by
our
higher
stuff.
Our
council
has
all
this
stuff
in
writing,
which
is
out
of
macon.
Georgia
is
the
shrine
temple,
and
so,
if
you've
got
questions
about
the
shrine
property
or
the
club
or
any
of
the
dates,
I
can
answer
those.
S
A
I
think
we're
a
little
confused,
because
it
would
seem
that
the
shrine
club
would
have
would
have
positively
said
it
was
okay
for
this
to
happen
back
in
18
or
whenever
it
was
addressed.
So
tell
us
why?
Well.
S
S
A
S
Hopefully,
not
because
we'll
take
other
action,
I
mean
we,
don't
we
don't
want
it
rezoned.
That's
that's.
A
S
A
Okay,
thank
you
all
right,
no
other
questions.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you
all
right.
Is
there
anyone
else
in
the
audience
like
to
come
up
and
speak
for
this
case?
Please
do
so
at
this
time
and
if
there's
someone
that
would
like
to
speak
against
this
case,
please
come
up
at
this
time
and
we
are
talking
about
rezoning
at
this
point.
P
T
I
think
these
are
the
same
concerns
that
we
brought
up
in
2018
and
this
zoning
request
was
denied.
Then
I
and
a
couple
of
council
members
were
shocked
that
it's
coming
back
up
again
and
I
understand
that
trying
to
persuade
us
not
to
do
something
is
good,
but
it
is
going
to
be
an
unsightly
thing
and,
as
mentioned
before,
we
might
need
more
cell
tower
business.
There's
a
country
club
down
the
road.
T
T
A
U
Are
you
this
morning
I'll
address
both
of
the
zoning
issues.
U
So
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
this
morning.
My
name
is
justin
d
felicia
antonio.
I
am
a
tennis,
coach
and
yoga
instructor
here
in
columbus.
I
reside
at
3013
sumac
drive,
which
is
across
the
street
from
richards
middle
school
and
less
than
half
a
mile
from
the
location
of
the
zoning
issue
at
hand.
U
I
strongly
oppose
the
proposed
rezoning
and
special
exception,
because
the
shrine
club
is
in
fact
smack
in
the
middle
of
our
neighborhood
a
large
residential
area.
That
is
why
it
is
currently
zoned
not
as
ro
but
as
rmf1
residential
multi-family,
hundreds
of
houses
in
hilton
and
club
view
heights,
as
well
as
mojino
woods
and
circle
3202
edgewood
road.
U
The
impact
of
cell
phone
towers
on
house
prices
in
residential
neighborhoods
published
in
the
appraisal
journal,
which
is
edited
by
the
appraisal
institute,
one
of
the
largest
professional
organizations
for
appraisers
in
the
world.
The
authors
wrote
even
buyers
who
believe
that
there
are
no
adverse
health
effects
from
cell
phone
based
base
stations,
knowing
that
other
potential
buyers
might
think
the
reverse
will
probably
seek
a
price
discount
for
a
property
located
near
a
cell
phone
base
station.
U
U
U
The
ntp
scientists
were
able
to
show
clear
evidence
of
tumor
growth
due
to
the
constant
exposure
as
dr
ronald
melnick,
a
retired
senior
toxicologist
at
the
national
institutes
of
health,
explained
the
mtp
study.
The
assumption
that
non-ionizing
radiation
cannot
cause
cancer
or
other
adverse
health
effects
other
than
other
than
by
tissue
heating
is
wrong.
U
I
am
not
a
professional
scientist
and
I'm
not
here
to
make
an
argument
about
whether
or
not
cell
phones
or
towers
pose
health
risks.
I'm
simply
pointing
out
that
the
scientific
debate
over
risks
of
cell
phone
based
towers
is
still
unfolding
and
that
there
are
potent
reasons
available
today
for
potential
home
buyers
to
perceive.
U
U
Of
course
it
depends
on
the
buyer,
but
the
appraisal
institute
cites
cases
of
up
to
a
20
percent
reduction
in
value
of
properties
that
happen
to
be
where
cell
towers
were
erected
regardless.
A
scenario
involving
any
property
devaluation
would
be
a
violation
of
our
neighborhood
and,
speaking
personally,
unfair
and
distressing
to
my
middle
class
parents,
stephen
and
christy
defelicio
antonio,
who
have
worked
very
hard
for
decades
to
pay
for
our
house
on
sumac
drive.
U
I
am
not
against
cell
phones.
I
use
an
iphone
most
days.
What
I
am
against
is
cell
phone
towers
placed
in
people's
backyards,
particularly
like
by
companies
like
municipal
communications,
who
seek
to
profit
while
not
having
to
suffer
their
towers,
deleterious
effects
on
the
property
values
of
local,
hard-working
people.
U
Furthermore,
I
find
it
disrespectful
that
a
cell
tower
can
even
be
considered
for
placement
in
the
middle
of
a
residential
zoning
with
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
houses.
The
law
should
be
such
that
my
neighbors
and
I
do
not
have
to
spend
precious
time
and
energy
opposing
cell
towers
in
densely
residential
areas.
U
U
My
family
and
all
my
neighbors
on
sumac
drive
did
not
receive
a
rezoning
letter
and
some
still
may
not
be
aware
of
what
is
happening,
considering
that
a
rezoning
would
certainly
affect
the
value
of
homes
outside
the
350
foot
radius.
The
rules
and
regulations
in
place
regarding
notification
are
inappropriate
to
the
situation,
and
I
would
ask
the
city
to
take
a
closer
look
at
this
issue.
U
In
closing,
I
ask
you
to
protect
me
and
in
the
hundreds
of
my
neighbors,
by
recommending
against
the
ro
rezoning
and
special
exception.
If
you
would
like
to
read
more
about
the
aforementioned
points
and
sources
you
can
find
them
by
searching
our
neighborhood
facebook
group
organized
around
this
issue
preserve
our
heights.
U
U
N
I
do
mr
santonio:
were
you
living
in
the
area
when
this
originally
came
up.
U
U
U
N
A
That's
not
part
of
our
issue,
ms
brown,
it's
been
done.
The
lease
was
signed
apparently
a
long
time
ago,
and
the
fight
is
internal
with
schreiner.
Obviously,
so
we're
not
going
to
get
into
that
issue.
A
The
shriners,
obviously
at
one
time,
approved
it
and
it's
still
obviously
a
case
to
be
made,
but
according
to
this
gentleman,
there's
some
internal
conflict
with
the
shriners,
but
we're
not
going
to
address
that
we
are.
We
are
addressing
land
issues
today.
Okay
and
land
use
on
this
first
case.
N
A
No
sir,
mr
did
you
want
to
thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right
is
there.
Anyone
else
would
like
to
come
forward.
Thank
you
very
much,
sir.
Anyone
else
like
to
come
forward
and
speak,
and
please
understand
we
do
not
like
repeat
cases,
we
hear
what
you're
saying
and
we're
listening.
I
hope
you
all
are
too.
I.
S
A
S
A
V
My
name
is
meredith
taylor.
I
live
at
2878,
cromwell
drive
and
I
grew
up
in
the
neighborhood.
It's
the
same
house
where
my
father
grew
up
and
I
intend
to
maintain
the
house
and
my
family
god
willing.
I
just
wanted
to
speak
to
you
all.
As
a
remote
worker,
I
was
working
in
new
york
for
an
academic
publisher
and
when
covid
hit,
I
had
to
come
back
home.
My
my
friend
in
chicago
had
to
do
the
same
thing.
V
V
W
W
I
want
to
respectfully
take
umbrage
to
mr
poitichev,
who
is
speaking
that
he
lives
in
the
neighborhood
everett
woods.
I
don't
count
as
our
immediate
neighborhood
and
when
it
is
spoken
about
property
values
going
up,
I
could
only
say
that
perhaps
those
studies
or
that
argument
is
made
by
those
folks
who
will
profit
from
profit
in
their
portfolio
of
the
cell
phone
tower.
W
W
These
changes
have
been
tried
to
force,
be
forced
down
our
throat,
but
I
would
also
appeal
to
you
that
outside
of
that
dotted
circle,
the
proximity
that
we
saw
all
the
great
technical
arguments
made
by
the
applicants
just
south
of
there
on
macon
road.
There
are
already
ro
residential
commercial
opportunities
to
erect
this
monopole.
W
So
I
I
would
just
appeal
to
using
the
zones,
as
you
intend
to
get
to
that
compatible
use,
and
so
I
just
want
to
say
that
I've
we've
collaborated
met
some
great
neighbors,
mr
kraft.
I've
collected
some
of
the
signatures
from
east
lindsay
court
and
they
are
in
the
back
door.
We
did
not
receive
that
letter,
but
even
though
we
are
outside
of
that
proximity
didn't
get
the
letter,
I
just
want
to
voice
wholeheartedly
my
opposition
and
say
sell.
No.
Thank
you.
A
L
All
the
roads
right
around
me,
I
have
been
everywhere,
I've
gotten,
you
know
nothing,
but
opposition
for
this
rezoning,
and
one
thing
that
I
did
pull
from
the
columbus
consolidated
government
page
was
that
the
planning
board
is
to
require
development
in
harmony
with
the
natural
environment,
to
protect
the
rights
of
the
property
owners
and
to
conserve
conserve
the
value
of
the
buildings
and
to
encourage
the
most
appropriate
use
of
the
land
which
I
and
my
neighbors
do
not
feel
like
is
the
most
appropriate
use
of
this
land.
L
We
feel
like
it
needs
to
stay
residential,
and
it
would
definitely
hurt
the
property
values
on
that
side.
It
also
said
that
decisions
should
not
be
made
solely
for
financial
gain,
which
I
feel
like
is
what
this
is
all
about,
because
unfortunately,
mr
protochef,
is
you
know
trying
this.
You
know,
because
I'm
sure
he's
going
to
be
able
to
financially
gain
from
this,
and
I
don't
think
that
this
will
help
our
neighborhood
at
all
in
any
way.
I
have
also
looked
through
the
websites,
millions
of
websites
that
say
that
these
rf
waves
can
harm
you.
L
I
would
be
right
there
and
I'm
not
in
my
family.
I
do
not
want
to
do
that
and
I
don't
think
you
would
want
that
for
your
family
to
be
harmed
by
these
rf
waves,
so
the
the
lodge
itself
has
been
there.
I
have
lived
there
since
63.,
it
was
a
it
was
a
moose
lodge,
and
before
that
my
neighbor
said
it
was
the
edgewood
country
club,
and
so
I
know
it's
been
there.
At
least
you
know
like
70
years
or
whatever,
and
it's
it's
been
fine
with
the
rmf,
whatever
the
the
one.
L
It
has
multi-family
residential
and
it
has
all-
and
it's
been
tax-free-
it's
been
fun.
I
don't
see
that
it
needs
to
be
rezoned
at
all,
because
it
can
stay
that
way
as
this
ryan
club
or
in
any
other
club
and
not
have
to
have
the
the
cell
tower.
That's
the
only
reason
that
they're
wanting
to
do
it,
so
I
I'm
definitely
against
it
and
I
have
no
dead
zones.
That
was
the
other
point
I
wanted
to
make.
I
have
t-mobile
and
I
have
no
dead
zones.
I
have
finest
coverage.
I
have.
L
I
live
across
the
street
from
the
the
worst
place
on
I-85
185
for
rex
right
there
in
that
curve,
where
you
always
have
wrecks.
I'm
calling
constantly.
I
just
heard
a
bang.
I
think
there
you
know,
there's
been
a
wreck
up
there.
Sure
enough.
You
hear
sirens
coming
and
there's
been
another
wreck.
Well,
I
have
had
no
trouble
getting
out,
you
know
and
having
any
coverage.
I
can
ride
along
that
road
on
I-85,
and
I
also
you
know.
L
If
I
see
something
and
I
have
to
dial
9-1-1,
I
have
had
no
trouble,
so
I
just
you
know
I
do
not,
and
also
I
was
going
to
say
that
I
pulled
this
from
the
t-mobile
site
and
they
say
that
they
don't
have
any
trouble.
They
have
no
lack
of
coverage
and
neither
do
any
of
the
four
other
major
phone
companies.
L
They
had
pulled
up
some
things
from
verizon
and
that
was
verizon
over
there
and
that
was
t-mobile
anyway
and
so
they're
they're
all
good
according
to
the
website,
but
according
to
other
people
it
doesn't
sound
like
it
and
then,
like
I
say,
I've
been
watching
podcast,
listen
to
podcasts
and
and
reading
things
on
the
internet.
You
can
do
all
that
so
yourselves
and
you
can
find
out
more
about
the
rf
waves.
You
can
find
out
more
about
property
values
and
anyway
I
don't.
I
just
don't
see
any
reason
for
it.
L
I
think
there
are
other
places
there,
maybe
over
there,
where
the
old
putt-putt
was
behind
roses
or
over
there.
On
that
side
close,
I
mean
something:
that's
already
zoned,
for
you
know
business,
commercial
or
whatever
they
need.
So.
Thank
you
very
much
for
listening.
Thank.
R
N
Yes,
I
have
another
question
for
the
gentleman:
I'm
sorry
that
represents
the
shrine
club.
Is
it
mr
moody.
A
A
N
I'm
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
the
condition
of
the
property
that
you
just
want
to
that.
You
want
to
put
this
tower
on,
because
it
appears
that
this
property
has
been
some
sort
of
a
club
for
70
years,
and
if
the
shrine
club
is
unhappy
now
that
you
want
to
put
the
cell
tower
there
and
they
decide
to
sell
the
property,
are
you
not
concerned?
N
P
Well,
I
think
I
think
that
to
put
in
perspective,
if
this
lease
has
been
in
place
since
2014,
it's
a
little
bit
suspect
to
come
down
and
object
to
it.
I
don't
know.
What's
going
on
in
the
shrine
club,
that's
that's
their
business.
I
agree
with
mr
king.
This
is
a
valid
lease.
It
was
an
it
was
entered
into
by
two
willing
parties,
two
informed
parties.
There
was
council
on
both
sides.
In
fact
the
council
he
rep
talked
about
in
macon
was
involved,
so
this
was
very
well
negotiated.
P
What
I
like
to
add
is
this
look.
I
I
appreciate
everybody
coming
up
and
having
a
concern
about
their
property,
values
and
aesthetics,
and
I
get
it,
but
the
fact
would
matter-
and
I'm
gonna
be
quite
blunt
about
it.
The
same
people
be
objecting
to
the
shriners
club
going
up
because
it's
unsightly
I
mean
it.
Is
it's
a
huge
parking
lot,
there's
a
pool,
that's
not
even
used
it's
empty
and,
as
you
pointed.
T
P
They
have
bingo
two
or
three
times
a
week.
There's
traffic
coming
in
and
out.
There's
noise,
that's
not
as
much
of
an
impact
I
mean
the
cell
tower
is
not
even
close
to
impacting
property
values.
That's
what
already
has
impacted
it
and
that's
that
shrine
club,
if
you
remember
the
the
chart
or
the
the
picture
that
was
thrown
up,
we're
talking
about
a
very
small
portion,
a
very,
very
small
footprint,
of
an
overall
huge
footprint
in
that
residential
area.
P
So
you
know
I,
I
don't
really
understand
the
the
issue
of
the
property
values,
because
I
don't
think
the
cell
tower,
as
opposed
to
the
already
constructed
and
existing
shrine
club
is
going
to
impact
property
values
that
much-
and
I
want
to
also
touch
on
about
the
health
aspect
of
it,
and
I
understand
that
too,
and
I
I
would
understand
the
concern
as
well,
but
the
the
fact
of
the
matter
is:
is
that
there's
there's
not
a
health
issue,
that's
posed
by
a
cell
tower,
the
cell
tower
energy
is
projected
up.
P
P
So
I'm
not
sure
if
I
answered
your
question,
but
I
would
agree
with
mr
king
from
the
standpoint
that
I'm
not
sure
what's
going
on
with
the
shrine
club,
but
I
don't
think
that
it's
really
I'm
not
trying
to
be
disrespectful.
P
But
it's
not
really
relevant
today
in
front
of
you
on
the
zoning,
the
the
only
issue
or
zoning
issues,
and
I
respect
the
writer
of
the
trying
club
to
be
able
to
bring
an
injunction
or
do
whatever
they
want
to
do
after
you
know
the
zoning
is
approved
and
we'll
handle
that
and
I'm
sure
the
shrine
club
has
a
lot
of
soul-searching
to
do
and
arguments
to
be
made.
But
that's
that's
their
issue
and
I
can
appreciate
that.
But
that's
what
they've
got
to
grapple
with
and
we'll
just
deal
with
it.
A
All
right
does
that
answer
your
questions.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
porter
chef.
All
right
is
there
anyone
else
that
would
like
to
come
up.
Add
anything
else
to
what's
already
been
said
here.
I
I've.
My
observation
is
the
only
one
that
lives
next
to
the
shrine
club
is
the
only
one
that
came
up
and
spoke
from
that
region,
so,
yes,
ma'am
you're
on
cromwell,
I.
V
I
am
old
enough
to
have
used
the
community
pool
at
the
shriners
club.
I
went
to
bingo
with
my
grandmother.
I
never
noticed
any
kind
and
I
still
live
there
and
pass
there
every
day.
I've
never
encountered
any
bingo
traffic.
I've
never
seen
it
as
a
blight
on
our
neighborhood.
It's
where
I
learned
to
drive
and
it's
a
community
center
and
so
and
it's
been
there
forever
and
it's
not
unsightly,
and
I
can't
see
it
from
my
house.
W
W
X
X
My
husband
and
I
have
lived
there
for
40
years.
When
we
moved
in
that
house,
it
was
directly
across
the
street
from
hardaway
high
school
people
said
you're
crazy.
We
learned
you
just
didn't
get
out
of
the
driveway
at
eight
o'clock
in
the
morning.
You
know
you
did
it,
but
we
knew
that
when
we
moved
there,
we
chose
that
area
for
the
schools
for
the
the
atmosphere,
the
traffic,
everything
that
was
involved
in
that
area
that
we
were
going
to
pass
every
single
day.
The
shrine
club
was
a
big
part
of
that.
X
X
X
All
of
those
things
we
haven't
had
any
problem.
Even
through
the
pandemic,
with
wi-fi
and
all
of
that,
we
have
what
we
need
and
we
would
like
to
see
the
neighborhood
stay.
This
is
seen
as
a
very
disruptive
force.
We
were
not
informed
of
anything,
don't
get
out
as
much
as
I
used
to.
I
just
happened
to
notice
the
sign
in
front
of
the
shrine
club.
X
X
A
Thank
you
all
right,
all
right,
commissioners,
we
are
at
a
point
where
we
need
to
come
up
with
a
motion
and
and
a
vote,
and
we
are
talking
about
rezoning
of
rezn
1021,
1930,
3202,
edgewood
road,
we're
going
to
talk,
we're
going
to
do
that
first
and
we
are
not
going
to
hear
anything
else
on
this
exception
other
than
the
staff
report
and
then
we'll
be
voting
on
that.
D
Mr
derby,
in
reference
to
rezn
10
21
1930
request
to
resell
3.16
acres
of
land
located
at
3202
edgewood
road
kerning
zoning
is
rem,
f1
residential
multi-family,
one
proposed
zoning
is
ro
residential
office.
The
proposed
use
is
clubber
lodge
not
for
profit.
Municipal
communications,
2
is
the
applicant.
The
property
is
located
in
council
district
5..
I
recommend
we
approve
it.
A
A
B
Yes,
sir
special
exception
use
request
to
allow
for
a
150
foot
telecommution
telecommunications
facility
located
at
3202
edgewood
road,
columbus,
georgia,
31907
edgewood
road
is
an
arterial
road.
It
will
provide
adequate
free
flow
movement.
This
use
will
be
an
accessory
used
to
the
property.
Access
in
and
out
of,
the
property
in
question
will
provide
for
adequate
traffic
and
pedestrian
safety
and
emergency
access.
Services
such
as
water,
sewer
utilities,
police
and
fire
protection
are
all
adequate.
B
All
mechanical
equipment
will
behind
a
six
foot
high
fence,
the
property
is
surrounded
by
sfr2
uses,
noise,
light
flare
and
odor
should
be
limited
due
to
the
nature
of
the
equipment.
The
hours
of
operation
for
this
use
will
not
have
an
adverse
impact
on
the
neighboring
properties
in
the
area.
The
tower
should
not
have
any
14
hours
of
operation
and
the
operation
should
be
seamless,
except
for
outages
and
required.
Maintenances
the
structures,
height,
size
and
location
shall
match
the
uses
found
in
other
ro
properties.
B
A
A
F
10-21-1931
a
request
for
special
exception
use
at
3202
edgewood
road
current
zoning
is
rmf
one
residential
multi-family
one
proposal
uses
wireless
communication
facilities.
Multiple
excuse
me
municipal
communications.
Two
is
the
applicant
property
is
located
in
council
district
five
crab.
I
recommend
that
we
deny
this
application
based
on
significant
opposition.
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
to
deny
the
special
exception
use.
Do
we
have
a
second
from
anyone,
mr
dr
mccaskey,
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
to
deny
please
raise
your
right
hand
all
right.
We
have
two
to
deny
and
all
right.
We
need
a
new
motion
to
approve
because
we
did
not
have
adequate
to
approve
it.
So
would
someone
like
to
make
that
motion
to
approve
this.
D
In
reference
to
excp
1021
1931,
a
request
for
special
exemption
use
at
3202
edgewood
road
current
zoning
is
remf
1
residential
family,
residential
multi-family
one.
The
proposed
uses
wireless
communication
facilities,
municipal
communications,
two
is
the
applicant.
The
property
is
located
council
district
five.
I
recommend
we
approve
it.
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
to
approve.
Do
we
have
a
second
all
right?
We
have
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
to
approve,
raise
your
right
hand
and
that's
three
and
two
to
deny,
and
I
have
a
third
to
deny.
So
I
am
tasked
with
making
the
choice
to
break
the
tie
and
I'm
going
to
approve
it.
So
it'll
be
four
to
three.
A
Yes,
sir
rezoning
and
the
special
exception,
all
right
next
case
is
rezn
1021
1932.
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
8.61
acres
of
land
located
at
6672
billings
road.
Current
zoning
is
nc
neighborhood
commercial
proposed
zoning
is
gc
general
commercial.
The
proposed
use
is
self-service,
storage,
all
good
storage
solutions,
llc
is
the
applicant,
and
this
property
is
located
in
council
district
six
commit
councilman
allen
and
we'll
hear
from
planning
staff
on
the
report.
First,
please.
Yes,.
B
Sir,
the
general
land
use
is
inconsistent
for
planning
area
b.
The
current
land
use
designation
is
vacant
undeveloped,
future
land
uses
single-family
residential.
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
Developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
decrease
by
104
trips.
If
used
used
for
commercial
use,
the
level
of
service
will
remain
at
a
level
b.
B
The
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
ccg
for
commercial
usage,
there'll
be
no
school
impact.
The
site
shall
include
a
category
c
buffer
along
all
property
lines,
bordered
by
the
sfr-3
zoning
district.
The
three
options
under
category
c
are
20
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees.
Understory
tree
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet,
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
and
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall
30
feet
undisturbed,
natural
buffer,
there's
no
fort
bender
recommendation
no
dri
recommendation.
B
Their
surrounding
zoning
to
the
north
is
nc
to
the
south
as
sfr-3
to
the
east
as
sfr-3
to
the
west
is
ggc.
75
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
Properties
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
The
planning
department
received
two
calls
and
or
emails
regarding
the
request.
Those
were
both
in
opposition
as
far
as
additional
information
and
2015
big
billings
fought
rezoning
to
build
38,
single-family
lots,
sfr4
size,
lots,
the
pac
and
the
planning
commission.
The
excuse
me
pac
and
the
planning
department
recommended
approval.
However,
council
denied
the
application-
okay,
that's
it
and.
A
Y
You,
commissioner,
chandler
riley
11-11
bay,
avenue
third
floor,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
and
thank
you,
commissioners
for
all
this
time
this
morning,
planning
department
for
being
here.
I
know
it's
been
a
fairly
long
meeting,
so
I'll
try
to
be
brief
with
you
this
morning.
What
we're
proposing
here
on
billings
road
is
a
self
storage
facility.
Y
Y
It
also,
of
course,
will
bring
in
jobs
and
revenue
as
the
development
is
is,
is
brought
into
the
property
there
and,
as
the
staff
reports
stated-
and
I
think
mr
renfrow
said
this,
new
zoning
will
actually
decrease
the
traffic
count
coming
to
the
area.
You're,
not
talking
about
some
big
shopping
center,
going
in
there
you're
talking
about
just
some
self
storage
which,
as
far
as
commercial
developments
go
self
storage,
is
about
as
quiet
of
a
development
as
you
can
get
so
it'll
be
well
done
as
a
site
plan
concept.
A
Y
Correct
we
start
closer
to
billings
road,
of
course,
where
the
entrance
is
get
that
first
section
built
the
developer
owner
anticipates
once
that
gets
leased
up
fairly
good,
then
they
would
start
on
the
back
side
of
the
the
development
there.
A
Y
K
Y
A
R
Y
Lanes
that
go
down
the
middle
with
the
storage
units
facing
inwards
towards
those
towards
those
roads.
A
Y
In
place
and
it
provides
a
nice
buffer
towards
that
neighborhood
back
there
on
that
side,.
A
Z
Good
morning
my
name
is
lebrette
jackson
and
I
live
at
65
47
georgian
way
in
heritage
place
we're
not
in
opposition
to
it.
I
think
the
land
is
vacant
and
we
would
like
to
see
something
done
with
the
property,
but
our
concern
is
whether
you're
going
to
bring
something
in
there.
I'm
sorry,
I
didn't
get
all
the
information
that
you
gave
about
how
it
was
going
to
be
the
better,
but
anyway
real
concern
about
how
the
property
will
be
brought
into
the
area.
Z
We
have
a
natural
buffer
there
already
and
we
would
like
to
see
that
natural
buffer
maintain
that
state
and
whether
you
would
have
this
development
surrounded
with
a
wall,
so
it
is
not
just
out
in
the
over.
We
have
concerns
about
how
this
development
will
be
put
into
in
this
area.
That's
the
only
thing
we
have
concerned
about
we're
not
opposed
to
it.
We
just
want
it
to
be
in
the
area.
That's
going
to
complement
our
value,
that's
all!
B
Speak
to
that
as
far
as
the
buffer,
they
have
three
options
that
I
read
over
and
I
can
read
them
again:
20
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees,
understory
trees,
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet,
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100,
leaning
your
feet
in
a
wood
fence
or
mastering
wall
or
a
30
foot
undisturbed
buffer,
and
I
know
typically-
and
he
can
speak
to
this-
these
types
of
units
do
have.
They
are
typically
fenced
in.
Y
As
the
site
plan
shows,
it's
in
the
staff
report
there
there's
more
than
ample
buffer
for
the
three
different
types
of
options
that
mr
venpro
spoke
to
the
place
where
it
gets
maybe
closest
to
the
neighborhood
that
backs
up
to
it
is
in
that
phase
two.
So
that's
a
ways
down
the
road,
but
even
there
you
have
more
than
enough
buffer
on
that
back
side
to
put
in
the
type
of
buffer,
that's
required
by
this
zone
environment.
Y
We
do
anticipate
having
it
fully
secured
and
doing
whatever
you
know
more
than
what's
required
by
the
zoning
requirements.
Y
Yes
to
the
to
the
back
side,
where
that
tension
pond
is
kind
of
as
it
goes
to
the
corner
of
the
back
of
the
property
there'll
be
a
a
large.
We.
Y
Z
R
Y
As
I
was
talking
about
back
in
this
part
right
this
corner
here,
you'll
see
as
you
get
closer
to
the
neighborhood
here,
you
can
have
a
lot
of
space,
that's
going
to
be
between
the
development
and
the
neighborhood,
and
then
this
is
the
phase
2,
which
we
anticipate.
You
know
much
further
down
the
road,
but
we'll
have
a
nice
buffer
on
the
back
side
of
that
as
well.
Z
Y
You
talking
about
this
property
here,
sir.
Well,
let's
see
here,
yeah.
Y
And
we
we
totally
want
to
work
with
you
all.
In
fact,
the
the
current
owner
who
is
selling
this
property
to
the
applicant
lives
in
the
neighborhood,
where
you.
P
Y
A
A
N
N
This
property
is
located
in
council
district,
six
councilman
allen,
and
I
think
we
should
approve
this,
and
I
make
a
request
for
that.
Okay,.
A
A
Thank
you,
sir.
All
right,
we
have
one
more
presentation.
This
text,
amendment
change.
This
is
rec
in
10,
21
2031.
This
is
a
request
for
a
text
amendment
to
amend
the
text
of
the
udo,
unified
development
ordinance
in
regards
to
sections
6.4.4,
point
c
pertaining
to
the
minimum
lot
requirements,
and
I
think
mr
johnson
is
going
to
present
this
case.
Is
that
correct?
AA
Well,
I
don't
need
to
read
a
staff
report
in
2005
we
adopted
edo
and
our
consultants
put
in
a
chapter
on
resource
conservation
subdivisions
which
is
a
lot
like
a
pud.
It
allows
you
to
reduce
lot
sizes
and
maximize
density
away
from
areas
that
are
environmentally
sensitive.
AA
AA
AA
AA
Well,
I'm
gonna
do
this
because
that
thing
won't
zoom
out
enough,
as
you
all
can
see
all
this
green
space
to
that
is
standing
boy
creek,
that
is
flood
plain
and
floodway,
and
what
they're
doing
is
they're,
protecting
that
environmentally
sensitive
area
to
to
protect
rock
outcroppings
and
the
floodway
and
floodplain.
AA
It's
got
see,
I
mean
lots
is
going
to
be
in
here.
It's
got
the
yield
of.
AA
It's
316
acres,
291
lots,
so
it's
the
yield
of
what
re-1
would
allow
under
normal
circumstances,
but
to
protect
these
sensitive
environmental
areas.
This
part
of
the
ordinance
allows
them
to
reduce
the
locks
down
to
stay
out
of
those
environmentally
sensitive
areas.
To
give
you
an
example
of
the
problem,
we're
having
with
the
setbacks.
AA
All
right
what
you
see
here
is
this
is
off
of
one
of
their
actual
permits.
This
is
the
front
setback
line
at
25
feet.
AA
AA
What
we're
proposing
to
do
in
the
ordinance
is
take
out
that
minimum
setback
requirement
of
the
underlying
zoning
and
having
language
in
there
that
establishes
the
setbacks
on
the
preliminary
plat,
because
none
of
these
are
going
to
be
the
same,
that
one
might
be
re1.
AA
AA
AA
And-
and
you
know,
as
I
said,
we've
had
this
ordinance
for
16
years
and
this
is
the
first
time
we've
actually
had
to
look
at
it,
and
so
essentially
we
missed
this
part
of
it,
which
is
really
like.
I
said
it's
not
practical
from
a
development
standpoint:
okay,.
R
A
AA
AA
Well,
they
have
to
meet
all
the
requirements
of
that
chapter
six
and
it
takes
an
engineer
to
and
you
got
to
go
out
there
on
the
property
and
you
got
to
find
these
sensitive
areas
and
there's
a
lot
of
math
involved
and
it's
it's
a
process
like
I
said,
they're
they've
submitted
their
first
15
permits
here
september
of
2021,
and
we
started
this
in
february
march
of
2020.
N
A
A
All
right
the
floor
is
open.
Is
anyone
the
audience
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this?
I
keep
looking
at
you
over
there
in
the
corner.
Okay,
obviously
you're,
not
all
right.
The
floor
is
open
for
a
motion
regarding
this
text
text.
Amendment
change.
F
A
To
approve
do
we
have
a
second
second,
mr
derby
and
mr
dr
murkowski
any
discussion
all
those
in
favor
to
approve,
raise
your
right
hand
and
all
to
deny.
I
got
one
to
deny
and
five
to
approve
mr
dudley
approved
this
one
as
well
all
right.
That
concludes
our
cases.
For
today
we
have
a
cases
on
the
next
meeting
date
of
november,
the
17th
we
have
one
case.
One
case
all
right
should
be
quick.
It
should
be
quick
all
right.
A
Is
there
any
other
discussion,
any
other
business
we
need
to
attend
to
today,
not
at
this
time,
all
right.
We
are
adjourned.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
your
and
your
patience
this
morning.