►
From YouTube: Columbus Ga Planning Advisory Comm Meeting 12 05 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Thank
you
and
I
would
like
to
please
just
remind
everyone
in
the
audience,
since
this
is
being
taped,
live
to.
Please
turn
your
cell
phones
off
or
make
sure
that
they
are
on
silent.
So
we
don't
have
any
ringing
of
the
phones
during
this
I
would
like
to
remind
those
in
the
audience
and
those
watching
on
television
that
this
is
the
first
hearing
of
any
rezoning,
Tech's
change
or
special
exception
request
brought
before
us
today.
A
We
will
first
hear
a
reading
of
the
staff
report
for
the
case
of
the
planning
by
the
planning
staff
and
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
request.
We
will
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak,
for
or
against
that
request
and
inquire
and
to
have
any
inquiries
about
the
request.
The
commissioners
will
have
any
needed
discussion
on
the
case.
Once
a
motion
is
made
and
seconded
by
the
Commission,
a
vote
will
take
place
and
a
recommendation
will
be
rendered.
A
The
case
will
then
go
back
to
the
Planning
Department
for
their
independent
recommendation.
If
a
favorable
recommendation
is
given,
then
the
case
is
forwarded
to
City
Council
with
two
independent
recommendations.
If
the
Planning
Department
makes
a
recommendation
for
denial,
the
applicant
will
have
ten
days
from
the
receipt
of
a
letter
stating
the
denial
to
notify
the
clerk
of
the
council
that
they
are
requesting
to
be
placed
on
this
City
Council's
agenda.
A
The
City
Council
of
Columbus
will
hold
a
public
meeting
called
the
first
reading.
The
said
council
shall
sue,
shall
consider
the
case,
review
pack
and
Planning
Department
recommendations
and
hear
discussion
on
the
matter.
Council
will
make
a
final
decision
at
a
second
public
meeting
called
the
second
reading.
We
do
have
minutes
have
been
sent
out
to
the
commissioners
ahead
of
time.
I
hope
all
of
you
had
an
opportunity
to
review
your
minutes.
A
Do
we
have
any
questions
amongst
the
commissioners
or
any
changes
to
those
minutes,
because
if
we
don't,
we
can
submit
them
as
accepted
and
just
looking
to
see
if
there's
anything
it
does
not
appear
to
be
so,
we
will
submit
those
as
accepted.
Thank
you
so
that
will
go
ahead
and
bring
us
to
our
first
case,
and
this
is
case
number
r
e
ZN,
1
1
1
8
2
0,
1
8,
and
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
8
point
8,
0,
acres
of
land
located
at
zero
Salman
Road
and
79
30
beaver
Run
Road.
A
C
Ma'am
general
land
use
is
consistent
for
planning
area
B.
Currently
in
use
designation
as
role
residential
future
is
neighborhood
commercial.
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
a
developer,
or
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
The
traffic
impact
will
increase
by
eleven
hundred
and
seventy
trips,
if
used
for
retail,
restaurant
and
the
level
of
service,
will
decrease
from
a
from
B
to
C.
C
C
The
three
options
are
as
follows:
20
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees
under
storage,
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet,
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
with
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall
30
feet
undisturbed,
natural
buffer,
no
response
from
fort
benning
or
dri
recommendation;
18
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject,
property
or
notified,
or
the
request
rezoning
request.
The
Planning
Department
received
13
phone
calls
for
opposing
addition.
No
additional
information
all.
D
C
D
D
E
E
E
C
A
F
Good
morning
my
name
is
Craig:
greenhorn
I
live
at
295
Cecily
court
in
Fortson,
Georgia
I'm,
a
partner
in
this
Highland
beaver,
run
LLC,
and
we're
also
here
on
behalf
of
second
Avenue
Baptist
Church
I've,
been
in
the
real
estate
business
for
20
years,
both
residentially
and
commercially,
and
also
my
license
building
contractor.
This
is
partner.
Edward,
French,
yeah.
F
Eda
and
our
both
were
raised
and
lifelong
people
in
the
Columbus
area,
so
we
really
have
a
best
interest
to
make
sure
this
is
really
a
nice
place
and
for
the
midland
community.
Like
again,
we
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
make
our
presentation
this
morning
concerning
the
rezoning
to
the
subject
property
and
we
propose
to
have
a
high
quality
development
that
conforms
with
the
overlay
district
and
that's
a
junior
Allen
sr22
us
80,
and
it
will
be
a
great
asset
for
the
Midland
community.
F
We
have
made
every
effort
to
comply
with
the
city,
state
and
federal
regulations.
In
addition,
we
set
up
a
meeting
with
the
state,
G
dot
officials,
city
planning,
engineering
staff,
elected
officials,
the
church
property
owners
and
other
landowners
ahead
of
time.
We
work
to
convince
gie
to
try
to
install
a
traffic
light
at
the
intersection
of
Solomon
and
jr.
Allen
Parkway.
F
There
was
a
discussion
held
among
the
members
and
all
the
parties.
This
happened
about
a
week
ago.
We've
got
18
people
in
a
room
to
try
to
to
try
to
lobby
and
fight
to
try
to
traffic
light
of
that
intersection.
Try
to
be
something.
You
know
that
we
could
try
to
add
to
that.
The
conclusion
after
the
meeting
was
that
there
was
not
enough
traffic
to
warrant
a
light
and
that's
according
to
the
G
dot
and
national
standards.
F
So
I'm
not
to
be
repetitive
here:
I'm,
sorry
and
so
anyway.
G
dot
will
construct
additional
u-turn
site
to
support
the
use
of
our
cuts
to
prevent
the
crossing
a
full
range
of
traffic
to
turn
left
and
despite
our
strong
support
for
a
traffic
signal,
G
dot
has
already
made
a
decision
and
is
in
the
process
of
building
our
cuts
and
u-turns.
F
Additionally,
we
hired
a
third-party
traffic
analysis
performed
by
Wilbur
in
engineering
and
that's
one,
that's
very
reputable
the
city,
the
state,
other
private
developers
used
them
for
an
impact
study
on
what
our
development
would
have
and
the
summary
of
finding
is
that
the
proposed
development
that
we
have
will
not
have
any
material
significant
impact
on
the
traffic
in
the
area.
So,
basically,
there's
not
enough
additional
trips
on
Solomon
Road
to
warrant
having
a
traffic
light.
G
Thank
y'all
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
development
in
the
overlay
requirements
real
quickly.
As
you
can
see
on
the
site
plan,
the
development
will
provide
for
in
a
partial
connectivity
through,
inter
connecting
driveways,
to
create
a
safe
arterial
traffic
flow.
We
have
shown
on
the
site
plan
to
write
in
right
out
driveways
at
intervals
of
325
feet
and
a
285
feet
along
u.s.
highway
80
with
the
internal
roadways
coming
in
off
the
right
and
right
out
at
120
and
105.
G
G
A
unit
per
acre
as
you'll
see
we'll
have
parking
in
the
front
which
will
require
must
a
landscape
of
earthen
berm
evergreen
hedge,
with
a
minimum
height
of
18
inches
that
we'll
use
and
then
a
little
bit
about
architectural
will
will
comply
with
the
overlay
for
the
facade,
Monument
style,
signage,
with
architectural
character,
using
glass,
brick,
stone,
wood
or
stucco,
and
that
I'm
sure
everybody.
You
know
you
know
we'd
like
to
know
who
who
were
you
know
talking
with
and
considering
for
this
the
site
we're
we've
got
to
make
up
of
you
know.
G
F
A
F
F
Those
are
already
zoned
commercial,
also
less
than
seven
tenths
of
a
mile.
All
the
way
down
at
the
intersection
is
all
DC
commercial,
that
if
you
go
six
hundred
feet
to
the
east
of
our
subject,
property's
already
zoned
general
commercial
and
that's
according
to
the
current
land
use
mouth
next,
if
you'll
take
a
look,
the
comprehensive
plan
is
a
document
that
any
developer
anybody
else
utilizes
to
see
what
they
could
potentially
do
on
the
site.
F
This
is
our
subject:
property
to
the
left
again
to
the
west
and
to
the
north
is
illustrated
plus
to
the
right
there's
a
mixed
juice
on
the
joining
property
and
over
there,
which
includes
GC
and
other
commercial
form.
So
it
conforms
additionally
with
what
the
future
land
use
map
also.
So
we
believe
that
general
commercial
is
the
highest
and
best
use
for
this
property,
and
our
request
is
consistent
with
current
established
zoning
nearby.
It
meets
your
future
land
use
and
it
is
not
spot
zoning.
F
Finally,
if
you
could
would
consider
these
following
benefits,
we
would
appreciate
it.
Development
provides
easier
access
in
to
inconvenience
to
surrounding
property
owners
instead
of
other
difficult
areas
and
commercial
developments
nearby,
so
it
will
provide
additional
for
all
the
eastbound
traffic.
It
gives
them
another
opportunity,
instead
of
having
to
go
back
down
into
the
other
congested
area.
F
Secondly,
the
City
of
Columbus,
the
School
Board
and
Public
Safety
will
have
a
much
greater
revenue
than
the
present
use.
The
current
tax
revenue
on
the
subject-
property
yields
773
dollars
and
our
estimated
tax
new
benefit
from
the
development,
and
this
is
going
to
take
two
to
four
years,
there's
going
to
be
natural
market
forces,
but
in
the
end
we
project
that
we
could
generate
somewhere
around
seventy
one
thousand
dollars
an
ad
valorem
tax
per
annum
going
forward
and
that's
money
that
can
be
used
for
city
schools
and
public
safety.
F
So
we
would
respectfully
ask
for
the
same
treatment
to
be
given
as
the
other
adjacent
property
owners
have
had.
Particularly
the
church
property
owner
should
be
able
to
sell
their
property
if
fair
market
value
and
receive
equal
treatment
from
the
point
of
commission
in
the
City
of
Columbus
consolidated
government,
and,
to
conclude,
we
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
before
you
this
morning
to
present
our
case,
and
we
would
appreciate
your
positive
recommendation
to
the
council
members.
The
subject
property
should
be
rezone
commercially
because
it
clearly
meets
all
the
requirements.
F
F
C
H
F
H
G
G
H
H
H
I
Yes,
sir,
as
you're
saying,
DoD
has
done
a
study
on
the
corridor
and,
as
you
have
observed,
they
have
already
installed
few
of
those
are
cuts
and
those
are
just
because
of
conflict
intersection,
so
they're
putting
it
for
safety.
So
that
means
as
mr.
French
and
I
explained
you
know,
if
you're
going
westbound,
then
you
can
just
make
a
u-turn,
but
that
the
intersection
like,
for
example,
here
at
Salomon
growth
at
the
present
time,
didn't
have
anything
planned.
I
But
after
looking
into
more
data
and
recent
accidents
and
everything
for
the
safety,
they
have
determined
that
for
the
are
cutting
now,
that's
not
the
only
one
already
had
that
Mallard,
the
other
intersection
yeah
beaver
on,
so
they
have
already
or
is
under
construction.
We
already
had
some
further
east
now
any
of
those
intersections.
If
you're
coming
going
eastbound
at
those
intersections,
you
can
make
it
turn,
but
people
they
cannot
make
a
90-degree
turn
coming
straight
through
and
that's
for
the
protection
so
and
this
Solomon
wrote
the
same
thing.
I
H
Only
concern
is
that
I
drive
through
there
quite
often
and
and
I
see
the
traffic
backed
up
on
Salman
Road,
trying
to
cross
80.
So
now,
if
you're
gonna
put
them
in
the
road
to
make
a
left
turn
at
some
point
that
traffic
potentially
back
out
into
the
highway
in
that
turn
lane
and
cause
more
congestion
than
solving
a
traffic
intersection
problem.
That's
what
I'm!
That's
what
I'm
getting
to
here!
That's.
I
G
H
Have
to
make
a
right
right
and
hit
the
the
u-turn.
What
I'm
saying
is
the
volume
of
traffic
that
I've
seen
at
that
intersection?
There
will
be
points
during
the
day.
There's
no
we're
from
telling
you
there
will.
There
will
be
points
during
the
day
which
traffic
will
be
backed
up
at
the
u-turn,
waiting
on
all
the
traffic
on
82,
clear,
which
is
gonna
cause
a
cost,
a
truth
cause
a
traffic
congestion
right
here
in
front
of
your
establishment
right,
that's
what
I'm
getting
there.
H
I
I
H
Cars
are
waiting
they're
going
to
be
backing
up
in
the
u-turn,
which
means
that
you're
going
to
have
people
coming
off
Salomon,
pretty
much,
not
not
having
to
stop
because
there's
a
right
turn
there,
just
yielding
which
mean
that's
gonna,
be
a
lot
quicker
than
the
people
that's
waiting
to
make
a
complete
u-turn
and
to
oncoming
traffic.
Yes,
sir
I
understand.
I
I
K
M
Me
let
me
give
you
the
whole
deal
when
the
parties
that
did
Midland
Commons
came
in
and
began
the
process
which
took
a
year
before
it
ever
got
here.
G
dot
was
involved.
The
whole
way
we
got
to
the
end
of
when
y'all
were
ready
to
see
that
case
and
that's
when
we
found
out
that
G
dot
had
been
doing
an
additional
study
to
the
east.
M
That
includes
the
roundabout
at
technology
way
in
eighty,
the
roundabout
at
Macon
Road
in
eighty,
the
are
cuts
from
Salomon
all
the
way
through
beaver
run
and
they
had
considered
because
they
were
involved
in
the
beginning.
They
had
considered
Midland
Commons
impact,
and
so
this
came
after
the
fact-
and
it
was
all
part
of
the
same
deal,
but
we
were
not
aware
that
they
were
doing
this
until
we
were
ready
to
come
to
you
guys.
K
K
M
Transportation
consultants
and
everyone
else,
and
they
ensured
us
that
everything
was
adequate.
It
does
not
warrant
a
signal
because
South
sallman
Road
has
virtually
no
traffic
on
it,
except
for
local
traffic.
However,
northern
little-league
does
show
us
that
it
could
be
warranted
there,
but
the
south
side
does
not
warrant
it.
We're
interested
in
doing
a
right
away.
K
I
mean
also
a
roundabout,
but
when
you
take
into
account
that
they
assure
you,
they
assured
you
also
that
the
intersection
right
there,
AJR
Island,
Parkway
and
beaver
run,
and
all
that
was
going
to
be-
and,
to
be
quite
honest
with
you,
that
is
a
fiasco.
I
mean
it
still
is
so
I'm
still
gonna
go
back
to
my
original
question.
I
want
to
know
how
many
cars
can
be
stacked
in
that
way.
Yes,.
I
Sir,
it
all
depends
on
the
speed
limit
and
again
I'm
talking
about
as
far
as
the
design
and
G
dot
has
studied
this
and
based
on
that
I
suspect,
I,
don't
know,
as
I
mentioned,
I
have
not
seen
the
complete
plans,
so
the
do
you
turn
or
the
D
sell
lane
they
created
is
stacking
lane
normally
about
200
feet.
So
what
you're
saying
the
length
of
carving
about.
H
H
It's
traffic,
that's
that's
desiring
to
go
straight
across
Salomon
road
is
gonna
back
up
that
lane
and
they're
closer
to
the
fast
lane
on
highway
80,
which
makes
it
more
serious
situation,
I'm,
not
against
the
development
I'm
more
concerned
about
the
traffic
buildup
in
that
area,
which
is
a
major
thoroughfare
for
Columbus,
highway,
80
going
east
to
west
in
the
middle
of
Georgia
and
Alabama.
That's
a
heavily
traveled
highway.
Yes,
sir,
and
it
would
be
a
mistake
for
us
to
implement
a
design.
That's
gonna
make
it
more
dangerous
than
I
understand.
H
You
know
safety
concepts,
things
that
nature,
but
you
got
to
look
at
the
numbers.
I
mean
and
I
don't
sit
on
that
corner
I
mean
just
driving
through
you
can
see
the
traffic
early
in
the
morning.
It's
backed
up
up
through
there
and
you're.
Potentially,
putting
these
people
in
the
road
waiting
to
make
a
left
turn
to
do
a
u-turn
to
come
back.
Yes,.
I
A
C
C
E
M
E
M
E
E
E
In
your
description,
you
talked
about
property
properties
and
the
adjacent
area
being
commercial,
there's,
general
commercial
and
there's
neighborhood
commercial.
The
future
land
use
for
per
the
city's
planning
documents
says
that
this
should
be.
This
would
be
neighborhood
commercial,
not
general
commercial.
Why
are
you
going
with
general
commercial
versus
the
proposed
by
the
city?
Neighborhood
commercial.
G
Well,
they're
our
tenant
mix
on
a
general
commercial
for
the
c-store
that
we're
gonna
put
in
there.
It
has
to
be
under
G
C
and
then
it's
also
dictated
by
the
size
of
the
building,
an
auto
parts
store
or
Bridgestone
they're
over
the
five
thousand,
which
is
the
minimum
for
a
neighborhood,
commercial
and
then
I
believe
a
fast-food
is
loud
and
neighborhood
commercial.
Isn't
it.
D
G
E
Well,
why
can't
you
I
mean
I
guess
my
basic
question
is:
if
this
the
future
land
use
is
supposed
to
be,
is
recommended
by
the
city
to
be
neighborhood
commercial,
and
that
has
a
5,000
square
foot,
footprint
and
so
forth.
Why
can't
you
proceed
on
that
basis,
design,
something
that
why
didn't
you
choose
to
design
something
that
met
the
neighborhood
commercial
criteria.
F
Well,
the
natural
mix
and
what
the
the
market
that
we
determine
out
there
is
what
we've
applied
to
try
to
do
in
600
feet
from
where
we
are
is
already
general
commercial,
such
as
me.
This
is
not
a
big
stretch
and
we
ought
to
have
the
same
opportunity
in
the
church.
All
I
have
the
same
opportunity
to
get
the
true
market.
F
A
N
A
Any
questions
from
the
commissioners
anyone
else
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
in
favour
of
this
rezoning
request?
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
against
it
and
if
you'll,
please
raise
your
hand
okay
before
we
call
each
of
you
up
here.
Let
me
say
this
to
you:
our
practice
for
the
planning
and
Advisory
Commission
is.
You
are
welcome
to
come
forward.
Please
make
sure
if
you
come
forward
that
you
have
something
to
tell
us
that
we
haven't
already
heard.
A
So
if
the
person
in
front
of
you
has
a
concern
about
one
intersection
and
your
your
concern
is
the
same.
Please
do
us
a
favor
and
just
acknowledge
the
fact
that
we've
already
heard
that,
because
we
don't
want
to,
we
don't
want
to
hear
the
same
thing
ten
times
just
out
of
respect
for
time
for
the
other
people
in
the
applique
on
the
agenda
as
well.
Oftentimes
in
situations
like
this
there's
a
group
spokesman,
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
one
in
this
case,
has
there
been
a
group
spokesman
selected?
A
Okay,
so
if
I
don't
have
anybody
that
wants
to
come
forward
and
just
speak
on
behalf
of
the
entire
group,
then
we're
gonna
raise
your
hands
again.
So
I
can
figure
out
who's.
Who
wants
to
come
forward
and
speak
okay,
so
I'm
just
gonna
kind
of
go
in
the
front
row.
I
mean
you
know,
start
going.
So
if
the
first
woman
right
here
I'm
sorry
if
you'll
come
forward
and
please
state
your
name
and
address-
and
let
us
hear
from
yes
ma'am
we're
just
going
to
kind
of
go
row.
O
Well,
start
number:
one
I,
don't
want
to
guess
a
20
pump
gas
station
on
the
corner,
I
think
that's
dangerous
and
the
traffic
is
a
huge
problem.
Number
one.
It's
based.
This
traffic
study
is
based
on
2016
data.
There
was
not
a
traffic
count
done
and
it
is
the
school
buses
have
to
come
across
saman
Road
with
us
from
the
Sandlot
over
two
hours,
and
that.
O
Bow
to
the
back
entrance
to
this
development
then
are
coming
in
the
front
two
entrances
we're
going
to
have
peak
traffic
with
us
trying
to
get
out
and
those
cars
coming
in
and
coming
out
the
back
way
in
the
morning.
It's
it's
a
real
problem
just
to
get
out
of
there
in
the
morning
and
the
school
buses
are
not
going
to
be
able
to
get
across
that
road.
I
I
have
lots
of
other
things
to
say,
but
I'll.
Let
somebody
else
big.
Thank
you.
O
A
O
O
A
A
P
Heard
of
go
ahead,
a
couple
of
things:
I
heard
that
I
want
to
talk
about,
but
one
first
of
all,
I
want
to
just
say
that
I
think
that
mr.
French's
development
is
fabulous,
but
here's
the
problem
and
I
was
musing
over
this
as
I
was
driving
here
today
that
what
what's
the?
What
is
this
board
for
it's
for
the
safety?
P
It's
not
only
to
pick
quality
businesses
and
developments
and
such
and
and
mix
them
in
the
right
way,
but
it's
also
for
the
safety
of
the
community
I,
wouldn't
suspect
that
none
of
you
on
this
board
would
allow
a
fireworks
factory
connected
to
it
next
to
a
an
elementary
school.
You
would
just
mix
that.
Well.
This
is
what
we
have
situation.
That
is
extremely
dangerous
and
I
heard
the
engineer.
Talking
and
everybody
said
they
don't
live.
There.
P
I
lived
there
I'm
on
that
corner
every
day,
six
to
seven
days
a
week
and
I
watch
and
I
turn
those
intersections
every
day,
but
I
watch
it
every
day.
I
watch
it
and
in
the
big
issue
here,
is
the
traffic
and
I'm,
hoping
that
this
board
will
temporarily
put
this
on.
Hold
and
reject
this
until
the
city
can
force
a
traffic
light
to
be
installed.
P
That's
what
I
hope
we'll
have
it,
because
if
you
are
going
east
on
highway,
80
and
you're
gonna
make
a
left
turn
on
the
Solomon
Road,
which
hundreds
of
people
do
every
day,
hundreds
of
people
school
buses,
daycare
buses,
all
of
them
all.
The
people
going
to
the
ball
fields
are
making
a
left,
and
then
you
have
one
car
going
west
on
80
and
making
a
left
into
this
new
gas
station
or
whatever
it
is
you
car.
P
The
cars
that
are
turning
on
us
on
the
road
cannot
see
the
incoming
traffic,
so
one
so
they're
sitting
here
and
I've
been
set
there
for
five
minutes
with
another
car.
Turning
left
onto
Sahlman
Road
and
meat
hurting
left
on
the
Solomon
roster
five
minutes.
He
won't
move
I
can't
see
over
him.
He
can't
see
over
me.
Cars
are
speeding
through
they're,
never
going
less
than
55.
We
need
to
slow
the
traffic
down.
How?
How
do
you
slow
the
traffic
down
on
that
highway?
There's
only
one
way:
a
traffic
light.
P
So,
let's
this
Columbus,
you
are
thousand
dollars
every
year
or
do
you
want
to
spend
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
and
put
a
traffic
light
it
it's
all
about
money.
This
is
not
about
safety.
Nobody
really
cares
it's
about
money.
If
the
city
wants
the
money,
then
they
need
to
force
the
d-o-t
to
put
a
traffic
light
in
and
in
the
in
that's
the
issue.
These
are
cuts.
Do
you
see
that
this
is
making
it
worse?
P
P
P
D
P
Nobody
this
issue
of
there's
no
traffic
over
there
or
this.
This
statement
is
completely
wrong.
I
watch
it
every
day.
I
count
the
traffic
this
this
this
development,
which
is
fabulous,
I
love
it
I,
want
it
to
be
there.
It's
going
to.
There
are
going
to
be
more
than
100
cars
turning
in
there
or
there
will
not
be
a
gas
station
that
would
dare
build
on
that
site.
We're
looking
at
a
thousand
cars.
Turning
in
there,
that's
what
they
want
fast
food.
They
don't
want
a
hundred
people
at
all.
P
My
little
business
across
the
street
I
have
maybe
average
per
year
five
cars
a
day
come
in
there
very
little
impact
if
they
want
a
good
development.
They're
gonna
have
thousands
of
cars
taking
left,
and
it's
just
it's
all
gonna
jam
up
so
I
plead
that
you
will
not
I
just
want
to
put
it
on
temporary
hold
until
we
first
the
city,
the
city
engineers,
which
one
of
them
is
here
to
demand.
P
You
know
bring
it
before
that.
You
know
present
it
to
and
I'm
telling
you,
the
the
the
DLT
will
do
what
the
city
ask,
because
I'm
I'm
absolutely
sure
positively
sure
that
the
d-o-t
does
not
go
around
one
to
put
traffic
circles
in
the
city,
wants
a
traffic
circle
down
down
at
make
and
Road,
and
that's
all
good
and
fine.
The
city
wants
our
cuts
everywhere
and
d-o-t
is
just
complying
to
what
the
City
of
Columbus,
because
this
is
in
the
City
of
Columbus
and.
L
P
Q
P
In
the
people
coming
out
of
the
gas
station
can
wait
their
turn
until
the
traffic
light
changes
and
they
can
take
a
right
or
left
or
cross
in
safety.
Without
fear.
Do
you
know
my
wife
will
not
turn
left
to
come
in
our
business?
She
goes
through.
The
entrance
of
beaver
run
comes
at
the
back
entrance
to
get
to
you
know
to
go
a
few,
a
quarter
of
a
mile.
She
drives
a
mile.
She
won't
take
a
left
there
because
it's
too
dangerous.
You
cannot
see
the
traffic
coming
over
there.
A
R
R
The
numbers
I
just
have
to
say
that
I'm
asking
this
commission,
so
numbers
are
great
unless
it's
your
child
and
we've
been
there
to
pick
up
children
guys
we're
on
this
corner
a
lot.
This
is
an
incredibly
dangerous
intersection.
Don't
make
it
worse?
I
don't
want
it
to
be
your
child.
Okay,
so
I
want
G
dot
to
come,
spend
a
day
with
us.
R
A
And
who
is
who's
my
next
person
and
if
all
of
you,
if
all
of
your
concerns,
are
about
the
traffic
I,
think
we've
got
that
message
loud
and
clear,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
if,
if
that's
what
you're
coming
forward
to
discuss,
let's
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
hear
any
more
on
the
traffic.
If
there's,
if
there's
another
topic
along
this,
then
that
would
be
great.
But
yes,
if
you'll
give
us
your
name
and
address,
we
don't
have
a
mic.
Hang
on
sorry.
S
S
Good
morning,
I
already
told
you,
my
name
I'm
here
today
to
express
my
concerns,
relate
to
the
proposed
rezoning
of
the
property
located
at
the
southwest
corner
of
Summit
Road
and
beaver
Run
Road,
my
family
and
I
have
lived
at
our
residential
property,
which
is
located
adjacent
to
the
property
in
question
for
approximately
three
years.
Therefore,
if
I
have
interpreted
the
information
received
by
mr.
Renfro
correctly,
the
right
corner
of
my
property
is
across
the
street
from
a
portion
of
the
proposed
area.
S
My
concerns
are
that
the
rezoning
will
negatively
impact
the
value
and
character
of
my
home.
I
am
also
concerned
about
an
increase
in
the
volume
of
traffic,
as
my
home
will
be
across
the
street
from
any
city
roadway
that
will
be
put
in
place
for
an
alternate
interest,
entrance
and
exit
for
the
proposed
area,
and
one
thing
I
didn't
hear
anybody
anybody
say:
is
there
going
to
be
a
city
road
made
off
of
sámi
road
as
well
for
entry
and
exit
Wade
like
a
back
way?
I
think
I
talked
to
you
about
that
too.
G
G
S
And
I
was
going
to
say
if
there
was
going
to
be
a
city
road.
If
so,
what
is
the
current
city
traffic
count
on
Solomon
road
and
what
would
be
the
additional
traffic
due
to
the
proposal
and
I
say
that,
because
even
though
they're
going
to
have
these
turns
up
closer
to
the
development,
I
still
feel
like
people
are
going
to
be.
Turning
on
Solomon
Road,
because
you're
going
to
have
that
entry
and
exit
there?
S
G
S
G
S
Was
going
to
say
that
and-
and
this
is
based
on
something
that
the
developer
said-
none
of
the
other
general
commercial
developments
encroach
upon
any
of
the
surrounding
areas
like
this
one
would
and
that's,
because
those
subdivisions
are
situated
differently
than
ours
and
also
there
would
be
just
as
much
taxes
collected
for
the
city
if
it
stayed
and
I'm
confused
their
zoning.
For
that
right
now
is
not
residential
anymore.
L
T
T
Wife
stated
early
20
years
of
military
US,
army,
military
and
retired
and
I've
been
living
in
Columbus
for
in
an
area
for
a
while,
now
and
I
see
what
we're
doing
here
in
Columbus
I'm,
not
seeing
any
business.
I've
talked
to
my
wife
and
talking
about
a
Circle
K
and
a
restaurant,
and
things
like
that.
The
nature
that
we're
bringing
here
are
not
bringing
any
surplus
or
revenue
in
the
city.
Why
can't
we
get
something
else?
T
If
we're
going
to
build
something
in
that
area,
something
that's
going
to
build,
really
bring
some
revenue
as
far
as
a
business
or
that
nature
bigger
business,
not
just
a
circle.
Cade,
not
just
another
restaurant
right
down
the
street,
not
even
half
a
mile.
We
already
have
a
gas
station,
the
shale
you
go
you're
going
west,
you
go
east,
then
of
course
we
already
have
another
Chevron.
T
So
now
we're
putting
in
another
gas
station
and
some
restaurants
right
there
I'm
totally
against
it,
I'm
totally
against
I
understand
everybody
wants
to
make
the
revenue
wants
to
make
their
money
I
understand
that.
But
if
we're
going
to
bring
a
business
there
bring
a
business
here.
That's
going
to
bring
Columbus
actually
some
money,
a
restaurant,
some
gas
station,
it's
not
bringing
the
revenues
in
the
Columbus
not
going
to
help
Columbus
Andy.
If
we
really
want
to
make
a
difference,
let's
bring
some
business
and
put
a
nice
business
on
that
area.
A
A
A
U
Did
you
always
said,
but
I'll
try
to
address
just
the
impact
on
our
neighborhood
other
than
the
traffic
I
was,
of
course,
gonna
speak
about
the
traffic
t.
My
name
is
Ray
Williams
I
live
next
door
to
this
development.
I
live
at
60
to
70
for
Solomon
Road
I've
got
a
4,000
square
foot
house
that
sits
off
the
road
that
will
be
adjacent
I'm
on
the
same
side
of
the
road
as
this
development
I've
been
that
30
years
on.
U
This
is
a
residential
area.
It's
not
a
commercial
area.
I
know
we
have
commercial
to
our
left
and
to
our
right.
I
can
stand
on
that
corner
and
see
a
shell
service
station,
a
half
a
mile
away
a
Chevron
station,
a
half
a
mile,
the
other
way
the
residents
on
the
street
are
not
transit.
Most
of
them
have
lived
there.
For
40
years
we
were
expecting
a
beautiful
new
Baptist
Church
to
go
on
that
corn.
Sadly,
obviously
it's
not
going
to
be
built
and
I
think
you'll
agree.
If
you
live
there.
U
T
U
And
I
took
a
minute
last
night
and
went
out,
visited
the
Shell
station
and
Chevron
station
and
talked
with
their
night
managers
and
asked
them
if
they
lived
in
this
area
of
what
their
fears
would
be
with
if
this
development
is
built-
and
they
said
the
same
thing-
that
first
fears
robbery.
Of
course
we're
not
worried
about
that,
but
their
number
one
concern
of
these
service
stations
is
at
night
is
lowering.
They
have
a
tremendous
problem
that
constantly
calling
the
police
with
people
in
their
parking
lots,
drinking,
loud,
music
and
won't
leave.
U
This
happens
every
night,
especially
on
the
weekends
they
say.
So
this
is
gonna
bring
that
element
to
our
neighborhood,
which
of
course
we
don't
want,
will
have
contend
with
these
contend
with
these
problems.
This
zoning
has
changed.
I,
don't
talk
about
just
the
impact
on
the
neighborhood
I
have
about
two
hundred
and
fifty
feet
of
road
frontage
I
go
out
there
once
a
week
with
a
kitchen
bag
of
a
13
gallon
bag
and
fill
it
up
with
trash
right
now:
lottery:
tickets,
beer
cans,
McDonald's,
Hardee's
Saks.
U
U
This
place,
beaver
run,
would
briar
on
Winfield
and
Hickory
Grove,
plus
the
people
that
live
on
Solomon,
Road
I,
don't
want
to
talk
about
trophy,
but
we
have
total
traffic
gridlock
out
there
right
in
there
show
the
average
speed
on
this
road.
If
they
tested,
is
fifty
five
to
sixty
miles
an
hour
on
the
beaver
run,
quarter
they're,
both
east
and
west.
U
U
The
city
needs
a
tax
revenue,
I
understand
that
part
of
it
I'm
not
against
progress,
but
hopefully
something
can
be
built
on
this
corner
that
will
not
impact
this
with
traffic
and
the
way
of
life
that
we
have
on
sallman
Road
again,
I've
stressed
most
of
theirs
never
for
sale,
sign
on
the
street
if
there's
a
sale
sign
says
Warren
up
there
and
somebody
died,
but
I.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak
and
I'll
close
lady
and
gentleman
with
this.
U
If
you
own
this
side
of
this
podium,
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
vote
as
if
you
were
standing
on
this
side
of
this
thing,
if
you
lived
where
we
do
and
think
about
the
impact
this
is
gonna
have
on
the
people
that
have
been
there
all
these
years
or
I.
Thank
you
very
much
for
listening
to
me
and
I
appreciate
you.
Thank.
U
A
V
We
oppose
this
rezoning
property
at
7300,
beetle,
Run
Road,
the
southeast
corner
of
Beaver
Run
Road
in
Solomon,
Solomon
Road,
is
divided
into
two
sections
by
Beaver,
Run
Road,
the
north
part,
is
mostly
residential
in
the
southern
part,
is
all
residential
and
should
remain
so.
The
community
was
willing
to
accept
second
Baptist
Church
as
a
neighbor,
because
the
church
would
have
been
an
asset,
unlike
a
church
that
proposed
rezoning
and
proposed
project
will
degrade
the
quality
of
life
for
our
community.
V
The
south
part
of
Solomon
road
is
posted,
prohibiting
tractor-trailer
trucks
and
other
large
trucks.
The
very
nature
of
this
project
would,
and
its
entrance
point
will
place
large
trucks
on
Solomon
Road.
There
is
no
reason
to
believe
those
drivers
will
confine
the
confine
themselves
to
just
a
few
hundred
feet.
In
fact,
when
the
new
orchid
is
in
place
on
big
LaRon,
truckers
will
be
encouraged
to
turn
south
down
solomon.
V
We
believe
home
property
values
will
be
negatively
impacted
by
the
proposed
project
and
there
is
no
doubt
the
quality
of
life
of
those
living
on
solomon
and
the
residences
near
solomon,
who
will
suffer?
We
respectfully
request
this
board
recommend
council
deny
this
rezoning
petition
and
it
matters
not
whether
there's
a
traffic
light
or
an
orkut
or
not.
We
are
opposed
to
this
rezoning.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
very
much
anyone
else
with
any
other
information
for
us
in
the
opposed
category.
I
do
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
coming
today
and
taking
time
out
that's
what
we
need
as
citizens,
who
will
take
the
time
to
to
come
forward.
Commissioners,
do
I
have
any
questions
or
comments
for
further
discussion
before
I
ask
for
a
motion
all
right?
Yes,
sir
mr.
Johnson,
we.
M
Ali
probably
cannot
count
on
both
his
hands.
How
many
times
we've
gone
to
G
dot
about
getting
a
signal
at
Solomon
Road
in
highway
80.
We
still
want
a
signal
at
that
location.
We
were
flat-out,
told
that
it
does
not
warrant
it
and
they
did
the
are
cuts
they
did.
Our
cuts
at
Jenkins
and
80
are
cuts
to
the
west
of
this
location,
it's
their
Road
and
we
have
not
a
whole
lot.
We
can
do
about
it.
Thank.
F
A
W
F
Wanted
to
reiterate
that
we
did
initiate
getting
18
people
together,
including
G
Dodd
I've,
reached
out
to
the
former
chairman
of
it
to
get
mr.
Floyd,
which
is
the
district
G
dot
official
to
get
a
meeting
together.
We
got
the
city,
we
got
the
plant
in
Division,
we
got
counselors,
we
had
everybody
mr.
Alton
Duncan.
We
had
two
other
people,
the
stakeholders
in
the
area,
to
try
to
get
a
traffic
signal
at
that
intersection.
We've
done
everything
we
actually
got
a
different
study.
She
mentioned
about
the
old
data
we
had
our
guy
analyze.
F
F
Was
our
intention
to
do?
We
did
everything
we
could
do
to
try
to
improve
that
intersection,
but
it's
strictly
based
on
G
dot,
ansan
national
standards,
so
we've
done
everything
we
could
in
that
respect
and
what
they're
doing
now,
according
to
Donna
and
G
dot
we
were
in
the
meeting
is
to
try
to
improve
the
safety
situation
there.
That's.
Is
that
not
correct
Holly,
so
what
is
being
done
in
the
future
is
being
done
to
improve
it,
but
we
just
wanted
to
reiterate
the
the
study
that
we
have
performed.
F
C
Just
like
the
state
that
the
the
trip
generation
that
we
generated
that
had
eleven
hundred
and
seventy
trips
when
which
took
it
down
to
a
high
C
there,
there's
that
they
generated
was
twenty
four
twenty
seven,
which
would
still
leave
it
in
a
category
C
and
that's
from
data
that
was
just
generated
from
for
from
their
study.
Okay,.
K
K
A
A
And
all
of
those
who
are
opposed
to
denying
the
request,
please
raise
your
right
hand.
Ok,
this
will
be
given
to
the
Planning
Department
as
a
recommendation
for
denial
that
moves
that
will.
Mr.
King,
will
you
get
mr.
Bollinger
back
for
us.
Thank
you
all
right
that
moves
us
to
our
next
case
on
the
agenda,
which
is
re
Z.
A
Okay
are
easy
n
1,
1,
1,
8,
2,
0,
1
9.
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
0,
hey
guys
if
you
get
to
hold
it
down
in
the
audience
horse.
We're
still
on
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
0.93
acres
of
land
located
at
54
0
for
moon
road.
Current
zoning
is
sfr
2,
which
is
single-family
residential
to
the
proposed
zoning
is
sfr
4,
which
is
single-family
residential
for
the
proposed
use
is
single-family
residential
Remax
executive
group
is
the
applicant,
and
this
property
is
located
in
council
district
5
Baker
mr.
C
Ma'am
general
land
use
is
consistent
in
planning
area.
A
current
land
uses
single-family
residential
future
single-family
residential.
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
improved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
The
traffic
impact
will
increase
65
trips
a
day.
The
level
of
service
room
will
remain
at
be
the
site.
C
C
A
You,
the
commissioners,
any
questions
regarding
the
staff
report,
all
right
and
I
think
a
mic
has
already
been
handed
to
mr.
Buckman,
because
we
just
so
you
in
the
audience
know
the
microphone
at
the
podium
is
not
working,
even
though
the
light
is
on.
So
if
you'll,
please
come
forward
and
state
your
name
and
address
and
give
us
a
brief
overview.
My.
M
X
A
X
X
Adjacent
Lots,
next
to
thirty
eight
seventy
six
going
down
Hampton
Court.
We
want
to
make
them
actually
fifty
five
foot
wide
and
have
two
Lots
there.
As
you
can
see,
the
current
zoning
is
sfr
two
for
that
that
lot,
but
we're
actually
gonna
be
facing
off
Hampton
Court
we're
gonna
be
really
and
conformed
with
existing
Lots
or
housing.
That's
there
now
they're.
Actually,
forty
foot
wide
org
actually
gonna
be
a
little
bit
wider.
We're
gonna
go
55,
so
we
can
actually
create
a
home
that
has
two
car
garages
most
of
those
homes.
X
X
X
Gonna
be
consistent
with
the
other
homes.
Most
of
those
for
two-story
homes
were
either
going
to
be
one
in
half
or
two-story
homes,
okay,
trying
to
get
the
master
on
main
as
what
people
want
in
that
area.
The
other
thing
we're
trying
to
do
again
is
the
main
thing
is:
get
the
pricing
that
we
don't
have
in
Columbus.
X
As
you
see
everybody,
because
of
the
cost
of
lots
and
everything
that
how
the
housing
is
actually
priced
closer
to
300
or
250,
to
300
on
the
new
home
being
built,
we're
trying
to
target
homeowners
that
are
closer
to
200,000
180
to
210,
which
is
not
out
there
and
really
out
there
in
the
market
unless
you're
in
South
Columbus.
So
we're
trying
to
give
another
option
for
home
buyers.
A
E
Kenner,
sir
good
morning,
yes,
are
you
gonna,
keep
that
up
that
existing
house
that's
over
on
the
far
corner.
X
It's
it's
not
an
addition
where
it
needs
to
stay.
We're
gonna
have
to
remove
it.
It's
in
bad
condition.
It's
the
old!
That's!
Actually,
this
property
is
owned
by
Muscogee,
County
School
District,
it's
been
not
in
use
for
a
long
time.
It
needs
a
lot
of
work.
It's
going
to
you
know
all
the
Plumbing's
gonna
have
to
be
redone
all
electrical
to
get
it
where
it
really
needs
to
be
it
just
would
be
efficient.
We
would
just
take
it
down.
Well,.
A
Have
you
read
this
I
did?
Have
you
read
this
out
I'm,
like
already
sorry
he's
been
a
little
bit
of
a
morning
this
morning,
all
right
I'm,
looking
at
your
mic
on
and
I'm
thinking,
oh
did
I.
Have
you
read
the
staff
report,
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
request?
I,
don't
see
anyone
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
against
the
request
if
you'll
please
come
forward
and
state
your
name
and
address
for
me
for
us.
Q
My
name
is
Teresa
Sneden
I
live
at
39:11,
Austin
Drive,
my
property
backs
up
to
the
back
of
this
proposed
building
I'm,
not
actually
in
opposition.
I
just
have
a
couple
of
questions
that
I
need
answered.
First,
first
of
all,
I
was
I'm.
I've
lived
there
for
almost
25
years
and
I'm
under
the
impression
that
this
piece
of
property
has
the
same
type
of
stipulations
that
Claflin
lands,
so
I've
been
told.
I
was
told
that
when
I
first
bought,
my
property
I
think
that
needs
to
do
be
addressed
or
verified
or
clarified.
M
Z
Q
M
Q
There
were
no
deed
restrictions
on
it
whatsoever,
but
I
was
told
that
by
when
I
purchased
my
property
in
95,
so
you
might
want
to
double
check
that
you
might
want
to
take
a
look
at
that
also
when
they
put
the
for
sale,
sign
up
and
I
know.
This
is
some:
let's
go
to
county
school
district
issue
and
it's
beyond
that
point
and
I'll
make
it
quick.
I
made
an
offer
to
purchase
the
property
for
a
few
fifty
thousand
dollars.
Q
I
was
corresponding
with
the
mr.
Goldberg.
He
said
he
spoke
with
dr.
Lewis
and
dr.
Lewis
said
we
won't
take
less
than
75
thousand
and
I
said.
Okay,
I
understand.
If
someone
offers
you
75
or
more,
that's
great.
Please
please
reconsider.
Let
me
know,
then
I
learned
the
paper
where
it
sold
for
60.
So
I'm,
not
sure
you
know
exactly
how
that
happened
or
if
there
was
intent.
Q
You
know
when
I
made
my
offer
but
I
just
that
needed
to
be
known,
that
the
offer
was
made
and
I
wasn't
going
to
try
and
rezone
it
or
anything.
Actually,
this
may
sound
silly,
but
I
wanted
to
do
the
bird
sanctuary,
make
it
a
bird
sanctuary
and
possibly
work
with
Muscogee
County
School
District.
They
you.
I
L
L
Q
Not
in
opposition
yeah
to
to
building
the
extra
homes
there,
but
I
need
clarification
on
the
difference
between
the
residential
SFR
SFR
to
in
the
SF
r4.
Is
that
the
standard
size
of
the
lot
are
they
breaking
it
down
so
that
they
can
later
add
more
I
just
need
clarification.
Mr.
Brennan
friend,
do
you
wanna.
A
M
Let
me
give
a
little
history
since
o5
we
no
longer
have
the
our
3b
patio
home
designation.
That
is
what
this
proper
subdivision
is
owned,
the
old
our
3b.
We
got
away.
We
got
rid
of
it
in
O
5,
that's
why
it
shows
SF
4
3
on
your
maps,
the
old
our
3b
had
a
minimum
35
foot
wide
lot
with
and
it
had
a
minimum
3500
square
foot
lot
size.
These
gentlemen
are
going
to
an
SF
r4,
which
is
a
50
foot
lot
with
50
and
a
6,000
square
foot
lot
minimum.
M
So
these
are
bigger,
wider
Lots
and,
as
far
as
a
deed
restriction
that
part
of
their
due
diligence
again,
we
had
to
go
through
the
General
Accounting
Office
on
Claflin
to
get
it
released.
If
there
is
some
lead
restriction
here,
they
will
have
to
do
the
title,
searches
and
whatnot
and
that's
on
them.
Q
Q
X
Pull
that
put
it
up,
actually
we're
just
gonna.
Have
it's
only
gonna
go
back,
I,
think
it's
a
hundred
125
feet
or
something
like
that.
We're
gonna
go
deep,
so
there's
actually
gonna
be
where
they
have
the
clubhouse
or
the
gentian
Club.
That's
what
you
call.
It
will
still
be
there.
Well,
the
land
will
be
there.
We're
gonna,
remove
it
just
for
the
fact
that
it's
gonna
cost
us
money
over
time.
X
X
Q
X
X
Of
Bruton
the
backyard.
Okay,
all
right
see
the
lots.
A
lot
won
a
lot
or
the
two
that
we're
adding
mm-hmm
we're
not
even,
and
that's
the
structures
lot
three.
So
the
two
Lots
that
we're
really
gonna
be
building
on
are
not
going
to
be
back
in
that
to
you.
We're
actually
just
we're
trying
to
conform
to
the
existing
Lots
that
are
being
built.
We're
just
going
to
be
wider.
We're
gonna,
50
to
55
wide
minimum
50
will
probably
go
55
just
so
we
won't
be
so
close
to
the.
Q
L
X
You
know
we
somebody
else,
we
sell
it
or
with
three
years
down
the
road.
I
can't
promise
you
that
build
something
differently,
but
our
goal
right
now
is
just
to
we're
going
to
rezone
these
three
lot,
this
to
SF
r
2
s,
fr4
we're
actually
conforming
to
what's
adjacent
to
us,
even
though
it's
I
think
it's
currently
zoned
SFR
I
believe,
but
it's
really
because
it
was
owned
prior
to
2006.
The
Whitlock
is
very
consistent
with
what
we're
going
to
be
doing.
X
It
will
probably
may
increase
the
value
of
the
property
and
it's
gonna
allow
these
homes
that
we're
building
to
improve
the
value
of
those
homes.
So
there's
the
price
per
square
foot
when
you
sell
it
would
be
better
for
the
future.
That's
our
goal.
I
put
Newcombe.
Normally,
when
you
add
new
construction
to
an
area,
it
helps
the
area
because
it
gives
you
a
higher.
X
It
we're
gonna
build
something
similar
that
other
there
only
one
car
garages
and
you
have
a
little
bit
of
road
disturbance
because
you
only
have
one
garage.
You
have
people
parking
out
on
the
street.
We're
going
to
do
two
chlorides
trying
to
prevent
people
from
you
know:
I
can't
promise
you
they're
not,
but
we're
trying
to
get
the
traffic
off
of
Hampton
Court
and.
Q
Q
X
A
A
A
M
You
made
him
share
are
easy
in
1118
2125.
This
is
request
to
amend
that
takes
to
the
you
do
in
section
four
point:
six
point:
four
City
arborist
to
them
in
existing
paragraph,
a
section
four
point:
six
point:
twelve
tree
protection
and
planting
plan
requirements
to
amend
the
existing
paragraph
F
in
Section.
Thirteen
point:
thirteen
point,
one
point:
one:
new
definitions:
four
sections
to
amend
the
existing
definitions
to
read
as
follows:
I
am
NOT
going
to
read
this.
Thank.
A
M
This
is,
if
you
all,
will
read
in
the
paper:
I
guess
late
spring
early
summer
at
Columbus,
Park
cross
and
some
of
our
right
away
was
cut
by
private
entities,
and
this
is
an
effort
to
clean
up
some
of
the
ordinance
to
give
us
further
protections.
If
that
ever
happens
again,
I'm
going
to
turn
this
over
to
Bill
consul
Eddy,
he
is
the
chair
of
the
city
tree
board
and
he
will
go
into
more
detail
about
this
text.
Amendment
change.
Thank
you.
J
Georgia
t
OT
granted
a
permit
to
cut
both
on
the
side
of
the
fence
towards
the
North
Columbus
crossing
development,
and
also
you
SAT,
and
it
was
done.
Private
citizen
saw
it
going
on
contacted
authorities
and
got
it
to
stop.
So
we
at
the
tree
board,
along
with
trees,
Columbus
fostered
this
change
in
the
you
do
to
prevent
such
a
happening
again
and
without
reading
these.
The
first
F
talks
about
that.
You
can't
cut
a
tree
unless
it
matches
up
it
conforms
with
thirteen
one
one.
You
have
that
in
front
of
you.
A
J
So
we're
defining
a
beautification
tree,
a
public
protected,
protected
tree,
exceptional
tree
and
private
protected
tree
under
beautification
plan
would
be
the
trees
that
were
on
jr.
Ellen
and
the
code
they're
under
B.
Where
it
says,
don't
you
can't
cut
the
tree
in
the
state
right
away
pursuant
to
a
G
ot
special
encroachment
without
permission,
so
we
feel
that
that.
J
J
Public,
protected
trees
and
exceptional
trees
were
added
so
that
we
would
have
a
means
of
protecting
trees
that
are
on
city
property
and
also
if,
if
trees
are
designated
as
exceptional
or
Georgia
champion
trees
on
land,
then,
if
it's
on
private
land,
of
course,
a
private
landowner
can
cut
a
tree
if
it's
on
public
land
or
other
public,
there
would
be
more
difficulty
so
we're
trying
to
protect
trees.
We're
trying
to
make
some
code
here
for
exceptional
trees
and
private
protected
trees.
J
I
got
some
definition
of
myself
that
I
needed
to
know
the
TD
use
provide
for
trees
to
be
on
a
lot
at
the
time
of
sale,
but
once
it
is
passed
into
private
ownership,
the
tdu
tree
could
be
cut.
That
came
up
in
the
discussion
and
I
wanted
to
point
that
out
to
y'all
too
and
I'll
take
any
questions,
but
that's
about
it
are.
B
B
It
talks
about,
and
in
paragraph
B
removal
of
private
protected
trees,
a
private
property
owner
may
pay
an
application
fee
of
$35
and
apply
for
a
permit
from
the
city,
our
brush,
for
the
remove
of
any
private
protected
tree
located
on
his
property.
So
this
is
actually
requiring
that
a
private
property
owner
come
to
the
city
and
pay
a
fee
for
an
application.
Is
it
I
mean
it's
the
way
I'm
reading
it?
That's.
M
T
M
That's
not
on
the
right
away.
Is
your
tree
as
a
single
family
property
owner
this?
If
you
cut
down
a
tdu
tree,
we
can't
catch
them
all,
obviously,
on
multifamily
and
commercial,
that's
why
we
have
the
ordinance.
We
can
go
back
in
and
site.
You
have
you
replant
these
kind
of
things.
This
just
tightens
it
up
even
further
for
commercial
and
multi-family
industrial
activities.
Anything
beyond
single-family
is
what
this
applies
to
so.
B
A
B
AA
AA
I
understand
the
need
to
say
person,
because
you
don't
want
random
person
out
there
with
the
chainsaw
cut
it
down,
but
I'm
still
struggling
with
the
$35
fee
that
something
has
to
go,
find
I'm.
Also
struggling
with
you
know.
This
is
yet
another
thing.
Is
the
city
going
to
keep
a
competent
database
easily
accessible
database
of
these
protected
trees,
because
that
you
know
you
go
back
out
for
that?
Oh
gosh?
AA
M
J
I
can
look
at
the
exceptional
tree,
which
is
something
you
didn't
mention,
but
I'll
mention
that
there
is
a
city.
Arbor
should
keep
a
record
of
all
specimen
trees
so
designated.
So
if,
if
a
tree
was
a
specimen
a
champion
tree,
that
is
something
we
would
want
to
keep
track
of.
So
right,
City
arborist
is
going
to
require
that,
as
mr.
Johnson
said,
private
landowner
could
cut
a
tree.
That
was
a
tdu
tree
and
there's
no
way.
AA
Then
I
guess
that's
my
point
then,
if
there's
no
record
defined
by
the
city
of
these
trees,
how
can
we
expect
a
we're?
Gonna
have
to
have
a
property
owner
that
wants
to
make
a
change
in
his
property.
Every
time
have
the
City
arborist
come
out
and,
and
hopefully
the
city
Arbor
snows,
those
are
are
not
tdu
trees.
Well,.
M
J
Discussions
that
came
up
in
the
meetings
we
had,
both
in
August
and
then
just
about
a
week
and
a
half
ago,
Rick
Jones
brought
questions
up
Eric
from
the
CEO
burrs
office.
How
are
we
going
to
know
where
all
of
these
trees
off
it's
a
tdu
tree
tree
out
in
front
of
a
lot
that
was
developed
and
the
man
wants
to
cut
a
person
wants
to
cut
it
down
and
it
was
just
decided
we
can't
keep
track
of
all
of
them,
so
there
won't
be
a
database
of
all
of
those.
J
AA
AA
It
but
if
you're
gonna
say
well,
you
can
get
fine
later
on
for
cutting
down
a
you
know,
someone
just
figures
out
later
on
after
the
process
you
know.
Is
there
someone
that's
going
to
sign
off
and
say:
I
approve
that
there's
no
tdu
trees
on
here,
because
you
go
through
it
and
now
we're
we
got
to
replace
a
whole
property
full
of
trees,
because
oops
someone
figured
out
it's
a
tea
to
you,
we're
talking
about
a
sweeping
change.
AA
That's
gonna
be
really
burdensome
on
businesses
in
property
developers
with
no
guarantee
that
they're
about,
even
if
they
took
their
best
efforts.
Somebody
couldn't
come
back
and
say:
well,
gosh
you
cut
down
that
strip
of
tdu
trees
and
now
they're
they've
got
to
bear
that
expense
I'm
for
protecting
trees.
We
have
a
beautiful
one
in
overlook.
AA
J
You
keep
mentioning
developers
the
developer
plans.
The
law
puts
the
tdu
trees
in
then
passes
ownership
over
to
the
buyer.
It's
no
longer
the
developers
problem.
A
buyer.
A
landowner
can
cut
a
tree
on
their
property.
If
it's
a
tree,
that
is
a
tvu
tree,
they
might
have
to
pay
$35.
If
it's
not,
if
it's
not
on
the
right-of-way,
they
can
just
cut
it.
AA
T
AA
AA
You
gotta
put
these
trees
back
and
all
this
source
stuff,
there's
no
I
am
all
for
putting
in
a
penalty
if
somebody
breaks
the
rules,
but
we
have
no
mechanism
in
this
to
protect
the
person
who's,
trying
to
do
right
and
says
the
city
art
unless
the
city
art,
which
is
gonna
sign,
a
thing
says
these
tree
you're
good
to
go.
It's
just
it's
a
broad
brush
for
fixing
one
problem
or
we
want
to
fix
the
problem.
That's
fine,
but
let's
give
them
a
mechanism
to
be
protected
on
the
back
end.
J
Okay,
I'll
see
if
I
can
explain
this
the
way
it
wasn't
a
meeting
sure
the
QI
do
tree
is
put
there
as
part
of
a
plan
to
sell
the
lot
and
TV
use
will
put
in
2002
to
accomplish
the
idea
of
having
trees
and
have
keeping
our
canopy
once
it
passes
over
in
the
private
ownership.
The
tdu
tree
is
just
a
tree
on
a
lot.
Unless
it's
in
a
right
of
way,
it
can
be
cut.
It
was
put
there
to
sell
the
lot
once
it
becomes
private.
It's
another
tree
on
the
laws.
They're.
H
Reese
just
two
quick
things:
one
I
mean
considering
over
he
said
earlier
that
she
was
told
about
the
school.
You
know
when
these
means
we
hear
a
lot
in
and
I'm,
not
comfortable,
supporting
something
where
I'm
not
absolutely
clear
that
a
private
resident
on
their
property
would
not
be
punished
if
they
cut
a
tree
and
right
now
with
what
we
have
before
us.
That's
what
would
happen.
I
understand
you
saying
other
coals.
H
It
says
this
and
that
I
would
have
liked
to
see
that
to
make
sure
to
your
point,
sir,
that
they're
actually
excluded,
and
the
other
thing
is
what
is
the
$35
for?
Well,
you
know
with
this
fee
for
them
to
come
out
the
application
fee.
Are
they
gonna
remove
the
tree
have
$35
it
will
what's
the
purpose
of
it,
I
think.
J
H
Y
H
A
H
Be
a
Scott,
it
sounds
sounds
a
little
pointless
to
me.
I,
don't
know
it
just
sounds
like
more
money
coming
out
of
people's
pockets,
but
I
don't
see
the
point
of
this
application
at
this
point
you
know
if,
if
they're
not
gonna
be
instrumental
in
the
actual
removal
of
the
tree,
why
would
someone
need
to
pay
$35
for
someone
to
tell
them
that
they
can
cut
a
tree
and
I'm
missing
something?
No.
E
E
A
E
J
Be
fine
with
that
tree
board
will
be
fine
with
that.
I
can
understand
your
concern
in
the
confusion
there
and
the
rights
of
a
private
landowner
being
infringed
upon
are
having
to
pay
$35
to
cut
a
tree
on
his
own
property.
I
can
see
that
that
that's
a
genuine
issue
so
for
this
to
go
through
for
you
to
be
happy
with
this
I
take
out
being.
A
H
E
A
A
D
K
M
K
M
A
So
we
have
got
a
recommendation
to
which
I
don't
need
a
second
on
we're
gonna
recommend
that
we
table
this
until
we
have
all
the
pertinent
parties
before
us
so
that
we
can
put
forward
our
concern,
so
will
will
will
move
on
with
this
one.
Thank
you
for
that
conversation
all
right.
So
then
that
leaves
that
takes
us
to
only
figure
out
where
I'm
at
we
have
two
special
exceptions.
A
The
first
one
is
exc
P
10
1
8
1
8
9
3,
and
this
is
request
to
rezone
two
acres
of
land
located
at
4929
15th
Avenue
current
zoning
is
GC
general
commercial.
The
proposed
use
is
used,
auto
sales
under
2
acres
and
above
0.5
acres,
Jimmy
McClellan
is
the
applicant,
and
this
property
is
located
in
council
district
8,
Garrett,
I
fuel
state,
your
name
and
address
forest.
Please
Jimmy.
Y
C
Is,
or
will
the
type
of
street
providing
access
to
that
use
be
adequate
to
serve
the
proposed
special
exception
use
15th
Avenue
is
a
local
Road.
It
will
provide
adequate
free
flow
movement.
This
will
be
primarily
used
for
49:29
15th,
Avenue
traffic
and
pedestrian
safety
is
or
will
act,
access
into
and
out
of
the
property
be
adequate
to
provide
for
traffic
and
pedestrian
safety.
The
anticipated
volume
of
the
traffic
flow
and
access
by
emergency
vehicles,
access
into
and
out
of
the
property
in
question
will
be
provided
for
adequate
traffic
and
pedestrian
safety
and
emergency.
C
Adequate
adequacy
of
public
facilities
are
or
will
public
facilities
such
as
school,
water
or
sewer
utilities
and
police
and
fire
protection
be
adequate
to
serve
the
special
exception,
exception
use
services
such
as
water,
sewer
utilities,
police
and
fire
protection,
or
adequate
protection
from
adverse
effects,
or
will
refuse
service
parking
and
loading
areas
of
the
property
be
located
or
screened
to
protect
other
properties
in
the
area.
I'm
such
a
verse
effects
as
noise
like
glare
odor,
the
properties
are
surrounded
by
other
GC
uses.
C
Parkings,
our
service
and
refuge
should
be
adequate
and
provide
as
provide
us
that
stated
within
the
you.
Do
noise
like
glare
and
odor,
should
be
limited
to
the
nature
of
the
location
hours
of
operation
will
that
hours
and
manner
of
operation
of
special
exceptions
use
have
no
adverse
effect
on
other
properties
in
the
area.
Hours
of
operation
for
this
use
will
not
have
an
adverse
impact
on
the
neighboring
properties
in
this
area.
C
Compatibility
with
a
height
size,
location
of
the
Bill
of
the
buildings
or
other
structures
on
the
property
be
compatible
with
the
height
size,
character,
other
locations
or
other
structures
on
neighboring
properties.
This
structure,
the
structures,
height,
size
and
location,
should
match
the
uses
found
in
other
GC
properties.
Council,
district,
841
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
property
I've
been
notified
by
mill
of
the
proposed
special
exception,
used
the
planning
apartment
and
received
one
one
phone
call
phone
call
inquiry
and
there's
no
additional
information.
All.
E
W
A
A
Y
A
A
Exc
P,
eleven
one,
eight
two
zero
one,
seven,
and
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
0.93
acres
of
land
located
at
thirty
nine.
Seventy
eight
D
Essex
Heights
Court.
The
current
zoning
is
re,
one
which
is
residential
estate.
One
the
proposed
use
is
a
Wi-Fi
tower
right,
wait
is
the
applicant
and
this
property
is
located
in
Council
District,
two
Davis
staff
report.
Yes,.
C
Ma'am
access
is,
or
will
the
type
of
street
providing
access
to
they
used
to
be
adequate
to
serve
the
proposed
special
exception
use
hot
Essex,
Heights
courts
is
a
local
Road
will
provide
adequate
free
flow
movement.
This
will
be
an
accessory
used
to
the
property
traffic
and
pedestrian
safety
is
or
will
access
into
and
out
of
the
property
be
adequate
to
provide
for
traffic
and
pedestrian
safety.
The
anticipated
volume
of
traffic
flow
and
access
by
emergency
vehicles,
access
in
and
out
of
the
property
in
question
will
be
brighter
for
adequate
traffic
and
pedestrian
safety.
C
The
property
is
surrounded
by
re
noise,
light
flare
and
odor
should
be
limited
due
to
the
nature
of
the
equipment.
Hours
of
operation,
where
the
hours
in
manner
of
the
operation
of
the
special
exception
use,
have
no
adverse
effects
on
the
property
properties
in
the
area.
The
hours
of
operation
for
this
use
will
not
have
an
adverse
impact
on
the
neighboring
properties
in
this
area.
C
The
tower
should
have
not
have
any
first
seen
hours
of
operation
and
the
operation
should
be
seamless,
except
for
outages
and
require
maintenance,
compatibility
with
a
height
size
or
location
of
the
buildings
or
other
structures
on
the
property
be
compatible,
the
height
size,
character
occasion,
buildings
or
other
structures
on
neighboring
properties.
The
structure,
height,
size
and
location
should
match
these
found.
E
A
AB
AB
Our
neighborhood
has
zero
high-speed
Internet
at
all.
We
have
DSL
service
right
now
which,
to
our
knowledge
from
AT&T,
is
going
to
be
discontinued
in
2020,
current
home
sales
have
declined
in
our
neighborhood
due
to
the
fact
that
people
don't
want
to
spend
three
to
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
on
a
home
that
they
can't
have
internet
service
with.
AB
It
will
reduce
our
cost.
That
gives
us
an
option.
Currently,
when
new
homeowners
buy
in
our
neighborhood,
they
can't
even
sign
up
for
the
DSL
service,
so
they
have
zero
options
for
Internet.
We
have
talked
with
the
big
providers
while
stuff
Wow
else,
al
charter
AT&T,
and
it's
upwards
of
two
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars
to
get
in
the
pool
the
service
in
our
neighborhood.
This
is
a
$12,000
option
for
our
neighborhood
that
we
as
homeowners
have
come
together
to
fund
and
it
cuts
our
monthly
usage.
AB
A
Z
Wade
I'm
the
developer
of
the
subdivision
and,
as
you
can
see,
that
the
location
is
in
the
end
of
a
cul-de-sac,
the
last
cul-de-sac
in
the
neighborhood
only
cars
will
be
going
down
there.
Hopefully
it's
just
the
people
who
live
there
and
the
subdivision
is
just
full
of
trees,
and
this
is
the
cul-de-sac
where
you
will
be
looking
at
the
tower
the
trees
that
will
be
blocking
a
majority
of
it.
It's
about
80
to
90
feet
high.
So
you
you
will
see
very
little
of
the
tower.
Z
It
is
located
on
a
I
call
it
a
pawn
lot,
it's
not
a
residential
lot
and
the
whole
neighborhood
is
in
favorite
of
it
and
I'm
in
favor
of
it
might
help
sell
a
couple
more
lots
and
a
lot
of
my
real
estate
agent
Mike
is
here,
and
he
says
our
problem
is
that
clients
come
in,
cannot
get
any
Wi-Fi
and
a
lot
of
them
work
from
home.
So
we
we've
lost
a
lot
of
customers.
K
K
Z
R
Z
M
Greenblatt,
if
they
had
to
come
back
in
the
future,
to
hide
in
the
tower
they
can't
go
as
high
as
200
in
the
rt1
district.
Until
mr.
white
came
to
us,
we
were
not
aware
that
Internet
access
and
North
Columbus
was
a
problem
since
he's
turning
his
application.
We've
had
another
one
turned
in
for
a
building
permit
on
industrial
property,
which
does
not
need
to
come
here
for
a
200-foot
wireless
internet
tower
on
Old,
River
Road,
so
evidently
up
there
and
that
hilly
land.
A
M
M
L
AA
H
AB
Company,
that's
installments,
call
eConnect
Wi-Fi,
it
could
potentially
service
other
areas,
but
but
we
have
volcán
Hill
out
there
in
Fortson
box.
Every
signal
we
get
even
your
normal
satellite
signals
a
problem
out
there.
Sometimes
so
the
tower
is
being
erected
to
receive
a
signal
from
his
main
tower,
which
is
just
across
the
river.
AB
But
it's
not
broad
enough
to.
Let
us
have
nay
the
closest
one
that
probably
could
get
service
from
our
tower
would
be
country
place
a
place
in
the
country.
It's
just
a
little
north
of
us
on
Fortson
Road
right.
Otherwise
it
would
just
service
our
neighborhood.
It
would
be
a
giant
Wi-Fi
network
just
for
our
neighborhood.
Z
A
There
isn't,
if
there's,
no,
no,
no
other
questions
right.
There
is
nobody
else
in
the
audience,
so
I'm
not
and
mr.
Weems
has
come
forward
to
speak
in
favor
representing
the
homeowners
association,
and
he
is
the
only
other
person
in
the
audience.
So
I'm
not
going
to
ask
for
in
favor
or
against
do
I
hear
a
motion.
I
have.
A
A
M
A
So
let
me
a
couple
things:
commissioners,
you
all
were
emailed
the
agenda
for
2019
I'll,
say
the
proposed
agenda
because
technically
we
have
to
approve
it,
and
I
would
like
to
do
that
now,
since
we
have
everybody
here,
it
was
there's
nothing
special
on
the
agenda.
It's
a
tip
are
typical
calendar.
So
if
I
hear
can
I
get
a
motion
so
move
mr.
Reese.
Second,
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
of
approving
the
2019
meeting
scheduled
it
is
unanimous
and
one
other
thing
just
that
we
need
to
address.
A
M
L
A
A
M
A
Okay,
so
let's
I
want
to
be
respectful
of
your
time.
I
know
we
have
not
met
for
a
couple
of
months
and
we
certainly
made
up
for
that
today.
But
this
is
a
point
in
time
where
just
as
a
reminder
currently
I'm
chair
at
Kenner
is
your
vice
chair.
But
we
do
need.
I
do
need
to
hear
from
you
all
in
terms
of
election
of
new
officers,
a
new
chair
and
a
new
vice
chair
and
then
and
I.
A
H
E
Y
K
A
All
right
so
then
the
nomination
is
chair
for
EDD
Ken
or
vice
chair
for
Ralph
King,
don't
hear
a
second
all
right.
All
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hand
yeah.
He
owes
them
a
choice,
all
right,
so
it's
unanimous
so
so
our
going
forward
after
my
tenure
expires,
March,
31st,
Eadie
Kenner
will
be
the
new
chairperson
and
Ralph
King
will
be
the
vice
chair
and
then
the
City
Council
will
appoint
a
replacement
once
I
roll
off
and
we
have
a
meet
our
next
meeting.
We
have
a
meeting
in
January.