►
From YouTube: Columbus Ga Planning Advisory Comm Meeting 03 20 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Thank
you
just
a
couple
of
housekeeping
notes.
If
you
have
not
signed
in
it,
is
really
important
that
you
make
sure
you
have
signed
in
at
the
front
and
also
I'm
going
to
ask
that
you
have
your
cell
phones
turned
off
and/or
silenced,
because
this
is
filmed
and
we
would
appreciate
not
hearing
phones
ring
all
right.
Look
this
we're
going
to
start.
We
have
two
cases,
so
we're
gonna
start
with
our
first
case,
which
is
well.
You
know
what
I'm
jumping
right
into
this
thing
hang
on.
A
So
this
is
just
to
remind
the
audience
and
those
watching
television
that
this
is
the
first
hearing
of
any
rezoning
tax
change
or
special
exception
request
bought
before
us
today
now
I
say
that,
however,
we
do
have
a
case
that
that
is
coming
before
us.
For
a
second
time,
we
will
first
hear
the
reading
of
the
staff
report
for
the
case
by
the
planning
staff,
and
then
we
will
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
request.
We
will
first
hear
a
reading.
A
We
will
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak,
for
or
against
the
request
or
to
inquire
about
the
said
request.
The
commissioners
will
have
any
needed
discussion
in
the
case
and
once
a
motion
is
made
and
seconded
by,
the
Commission
vote
will
take
place
and
a
recommendation
will
be
rendered.
The
case
will
go
back
to
the
planning
department
for
their
independent
recommendation
and
if
a
favorable
recommendation
is
given,
then
the
case
is
forwarded
to
the
City
Council
with
two
independent
recommendations.
A
If
the
plant
Planning
Department
makes
a
recommendation
for
denial,
the
applicant
will
have
ten
days
from
the
receipt
of
a
letter
stating
the
denial
in
order
to
notify
the
Clerk
of
Council
that
they
requesting
to
be
placed
on
the
City
Council's
agenda.
The
City
Council
of
Columbus
will
hold
a
public
meeting
the
first
reading
and
then
the
said
council
shall
consider
the
case,
review
pack
and
Planning
Department
recommendations
and
hear
discussion
on
the
matter.
The
council
will
make
a
final
decision
at
a
second
meeting,
which
is
called
the
second
reading.
A
A
So
now
we're
going
to
get
to
our
first
case,
which
is
our
e
ZN
0
2
1
9
0
7
4,
and
this
is
request
to
rezone
0.36
acres
of
land
located
at
53
81
Veterans
Parkway.
The
current
zoning
is
NC,
which
is
neighborhood
commercial
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
G
C,
which
is
general
commercial.
The
proposed
use
is
a
tattoo
parlor,
Michael
Wright
is
the
applicant,
and
this
property
is
located
in
council
district
8
Garrett.
B
Ma'am,
the
general
land
use
is
inconsistent
for
planning
area
F
current
land
use
designation
is
general
commercial
futures
light
manufacturing
industrial.
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
That
developer
will
need
an
improved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
The
ite
trip
generator
manual
does
not
have
a
trip
rate
for
a
tattoo
parlor,
nor
a
similar
rate
that
can
be
used
for
this
particular
use.
B
A
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
columbus
consolidate,
consolidate
government
for
commercial
usage,
there'd
be
no
no
school
impact,
no
buffer
requirements
and
a
response
from
Fort
Benning
and
no
DRI
recommendation.
19
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subjects
property
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
The
Planning
Department
received
no
phone
calls
or
emails
regarding
rezoning,
there's
no
additional
information.
All.
C
D
Thank
You
mr.
Kenner,
when
the
county
in
the
city
consolidated
in
guess
by
the
time
all
the
work
was
done.
72
c2
was
the
general
commercial
for
the
county.
C3
was
general
commercial
for
the
city.
Well,
when
they
consolidated,
they
just
left
them,
as
is
even
though
the
c2
of
the
county
became
what
the
city
considered.
Neighborhood
commercial
stayed
that
way.
There
wasn't
really
a
dimes
worth
the
difference
between
the
two
until
the
unified
development
ordinance
was
adopted
in
2005.
At
that
point,
c2
converted
to
NC
neighborhood
commercial,
which
is
a
true
neighborhood
commercial
use.
D
Well
along
a
lot
of
these
major
arterials
like
Manchester
and
veterans
that
were
in
the
county,
it
converted
a
lot
of
those
properties
to
neighborhood
commercial
use
when
they're
fully
regional
and
commercial
type
commercial
activities,
I
mean
community
commercial
activities,
so,
as
users
have
come
along
that,
don't
are
not
compatible
with
the
use
size
or
the
use
of
the
property.
Folks
have
been
rezoning
for
the
last
15
years
or
so
properties
in
these
and
make
and
Road
these
three
specific
areas
from
NC
to
GC.
E
Morning,
Michael
Wright,
sixty-eight,
23,
Whitesville
Road.
Thank
you.
Will
he
pretty
much
hit
the
nail
on
the
head?
The
only
thing
that
I'd
like
to
add
is
there
would
be
no
construction
eating
no
permits
needed
for
site
everything.
Staying
the
same
there
as
far
as
the
building
that's
their
interior.
There
might
be
some
building
permits
to
change
the
interior,
but
also,
if
you
were
to
look
at
a
map
of
the
general
commercial,
actually,
those
properties
that
neighbor
it
right
behind
it.
E
A
G
A
You
doing
here
a
sec
mr.
Bollinger,
alright,
so
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hand.
It
is
unanimous,
so
that
will
pass
with
a
recommendation
for
approval.
Thank
you
all
right.
That
brings
us
to
our
next
case,
which
is
our
e
ZN
0
1
1
9
0
0
0
7,
and
this
is
a
request
for
text
amendment
to
amend
the
text
of
the
unified
development
ordinance.
The
you
do
in
regards
to
table
three
point:
1
point
1
and
create
section
3
point
2
point:
7,
3
health
and
fitness
facility.
Mr.
Renfro,
yes,.
B
Ma'am,
excuse
me
this
is
a
request.
I
mean
the
text
of
the
you
do
to
guard
the
table:
3.1
health,
health
and
fitness
facilities
to
read
as
follows
on
the
in
table
by
permitting
health
and
fitness
facilities,
with
a
special
exception
in
the
historic
district
and
then
create
section.
Three
point:
two
point:
seven
three
regarding
health
and
fitness
facility,
which
are
the
health
and
fitness
facility
located
located
in
the
historic
zoning
district,
shall
not
be
permitted
outright.
B
As
a
principal
use
said
to
you,
subject
the
following
criteria
to
be
considered
for
special
exception
uses
provided
in
Section
three
point:
one
point:
one
and
section
ten
point
two
point:
seven
letter
A
a
health
and
fitness
facility
shall
be
required
to
occupy
our
building.
That
is
in
that
encompasses
15,000
square
feet
or
more
of
gross
floor
area.
A
health
and
fitness
facility
shall
only
be
permitted
in
an
existing
structure
built
prior
to
2019.
I
Up
on
that,
though,
it
isn't
it
the
case.
The
way
this
is
written,
that
even
if
they
don't
meet
the
parking
standards
now
they
could
make
changes
to
meet
them,
because
it
says
that
it
shall
be
only
permitted
in
existing
structures,
but
it
looks
like
the
way
I
read
it.
It
shall
be
required
to
meet
the
parking
standards,
but
that
doesn't
say
that
must
have
parking
must
meet
parking
standards
currently,
so
it
seems
like
that
might
not
an
issue.
J
I
G
K
I
Right,
it
is
correct.
I
had
a
separate
question
for
staff
who
exactly
has
submitted
this
version
of
the
requested
amendment?
Is
it
the
gym
owner
or
it
is
the
gym
owner?
Okay,
some
of
the
communications
we've
received
have
expressed
concern
that
it
was
not
a
property
owner
that
has
requested
this
text.
Amendment
is
that
an
issue
for
the
city
is
our
non
property
owners
allowed
to
request
text
amendments.
D
Property
is
not
in
question,
so
anyone
can
file
a
text
amendment
to
change
any
use.
Okay,
thank
you.
It's
winning
code!
If
this
is
approved,
then
the
special
exception,
if
approved,
would
have
to
be
signed
by
a
property
owner,
because
it's
property,
specific
text
amendment
is
not
property
specifics.
Thank
you.
Anyone
in
this
room
can
file
one.
A
Commissioners,
any
other
questions
regarding
the
staff
report,
all
right.
If
the
applicant
will
I'm
a
column
for
the
applicant,
no
I'm,
not
calling
for
the
applicant,
am
I
no
I'm,
not
okay,
so
before
we
get
started,
many
of
you
were
here
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
a
month
ago,
when
we
had
this-
and
this
is
the
point
where
I
call
and
ask
for
anyone
in
the
audience
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
or
against
this
request,
and
I
just
want
to
remind
you
of
the
rules
that
we
have
here
for
that.
A
This
is
an
important
issue
for
many
of
you.
We
have
heard
from
a
lot
of
you,
but
what
we
are
not
going
to
do
is
hear
from
every
single
one
of
you
today.
I
ask
always
if
there
is
a
group
spokesperson
for
the
in
favor
or
oppose,
and
if
there
is
that's
great,
that
spokesperson
can
come
forward
when
called
otherwise
it's
going
to
be
random.
A
You
know
I'll
call
someone
up
here,
but
you
all
cannot
come
up
individually
unless
you're
going
to
tell
us
something
that
that
person
has
not
said
we're
not
going
to
sit
here
and
hear
I'm
opposed
or
I'm
opposed
or
I'm
opposed
or
I'm
in
favor
I'm
in
favor
of
them
in
favor.
So
just
want
to
make
that
really
clear.
A
So
saying
that
do.
Is
there
a
group
spokesperson
for
the
group
that
is
in
favor?
Is
there
a
group
spokesperson?
Okay,
so
raise
your
hand
if
you
would
like
to
come
forward
to
speak
in
favor
all
right.
Mr.
green
you'll
come
forward
and
state
your
name
and
address
and
then
give
us
a
brief
overview
of
the
in
favor
stance.
Good.
J
Morning,
my
name
is
Fred,
green
and
I
live
at
7:45
Broadway.
You
know
two
other
structures
within
the
historic
district.
This
is
a
tough
issue
for
our
neighborhood
as
y'all
know.
I
do,
however,
feel
that
certainly
the
use
were
the
current
Jim
is,
is
appropriate
and
I
feel
like
they're.
The
things
that
have
been
put
into
the
text
amendment
give
some
protection
to
those
that
are
opposed.
J
A
lot
of
what
I
heard
going
into
this
issue
is:
oh,
my
god
that
can
buy
the
house
next
door
to
me
and
put
a
gym
in
well
with
this
verbage
that
can't
happen.
So
I
think
it
affords
many
of
those
that
are
opposed
while
it
may
not
have
changed
their
mind.
Some
protections
and
I'm
grateful
for
that.
Commissioners.
A
Do
any
of
you
have
any
questions
for
mr.
green
all
right?
Thank
you.
Okay!
Thank
you.
So
mr.
green
speaking
on
behalf
of
those
who
are
in
favor
is
there
anyone
who
wants
who
is
in
favor
of
this
that
is
going
to
tell
us
something
completely
different
than
what
we
just
heard.
Mrs.
Williams.
L
Good
morning,
Kathy
Williams
731,
first
Avenue
in
the
historic
district.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
just
wanted
to
let
the
pack
members
know
that
many
many
many
years
ago
now
I
was
on
the
original.
You
do
committee.
When
we
looked
at
all
of
the
restrictions
that
we
wanted
to
put
in
place
and
zoning
we
pay
particular
attention
to
the
historic
district
and
I
was
not
a
resident
of
the
historic
district
at
the
time,
but
I
remember
a
long
period
of
time
weeks
that
we
discussed
it.
L
L
We
seem
to
have
moved
towards
being
a
more
exclusive
neighborhood
and
that's
fine
if
what
that's
what
the
neighbors
want,
but
the
you
do
committee
put
in
place
the
special
exception
rule
for
exactly
this
reason,
because
we
recognize
that
any
zoning
classification
should
not
exclude
everything
and
we
did
not
know
what
the
future
held.
We
did
not
know
what
the
historic
district
or
any
area
would
become,
so
we
allowed
for
special
exceptions
so
that
this
body
and
the
neighbors
could
have
input
in
the
future
of
their
community.
L
The
special
exception
rule
protects
private
property
rights
in
that
it
allows
a
private
property
owner
to
say,
I
think
now.
This
is
a
good
use
of
this
property.
Of
course
it's
up
to
you
to
determine
that,
but
this
is
not
opening
zoning
for
historic
district
for
health
and
spas,
and
what
yoga
studios
are
anything
it's
very
specific,
with
the
compromise
that
was
so
appropriate
to
put
into
the
special
stipulation
for
the
special
exemption
for
the
historic
district
in
that
it
narrows
down
to
this
use.
For
this
address,
that's
what
the
you
do.
L
A
A
Anyone
else
who
wants
to
speak
in
favor,
reminding
you
that
we
need
to
hear
something
different.
Okay.
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
in
opposition,
or
is
there
a
group
spokesperson
for
the
opposition
side?
Yes,
ma'am.
If
you'll
come
forward
and
state
your
name
and
address
for
us,
please.
F
F
F
Zoning
should
be
fluid
perhaps
and
that
there
what
you
did
30
years
ago
may
not
stand
today.
However,
I
don't
think
that
changing
zoning
should
be
done
as
a
major
response
to
solve
a
problem,
and
that's
what
this
has
felt
like
a
problem
arose:
I,
don't
know
how
it
arose.
I,
don't
I,
don't
care
how
it
arose
really,
but
we're
making
a
change
to
a
one-of-a-kind
neighborhood
in
order
to
accommodate
a
problem
and
I
think
a
lot
of
us.
That's
really
that's
really
our
concern
here.
F
It's
fine!
If
we
need
to
look
at
the
you
do
for
our
neighborhood,
but
let's
do
that
in
a
thoughtful
and
reasoned
way
with
input
from
everybody
in
the
neighborhood,
instead
of
just
just
making
a
decision,
let's
see
what
we
can
come
up
with
to
solve
this
problem.
I
think
that's
a
major
concern
for
a
lot
of
us.
In
addition,
the
definition
of
health
and
fitness
facility
seems
very
broad
and
very
vague
to
a
lot
of
us
with
I
presume
that
you
all
have
a
definition
of
what
health
and
fitness
facility
is.
If
you.
K
F
Are
very
familiar
with
it,
but
I
mean
it
even
includes
the
serving
of
alcohol
I.
Don't
think
that
we
understand
how
that
figures
into
a
health
and
fitness
facility,
and
so,
if
you
choose
to
move
forward
with
this,
we
would
like
for
you
to
take
the
hard
look
at
the
definition
of
a
health
and
fitness
facility
and
perhaps
tighten
that
up
a
little
bit
and
by
all
means
get
rid
of
the
serving
of
alcohol
and
a
health
and
fitness
facility.
I
Setting
aside
the
specific
case
here
for
the
text,
amendment
as
a
whole,
it
seems
like
the
opponents
are
arguing
that
no
health
and
fitness
facility
should
be
allowed.
There
shouldn't
be
the
possibility,
but
there
has
been
a
yoga
studio
in
the
historic
district
for
two
or
three
years
now
had
there
been
any
negative
effects
of
that
on
the
neighborhood,
not.
F
That
I'm,
aware
of
most
of
us,
probably
or
many
of
us,
probably
didn't
even
know
that
it
was
there
and
operating
a
yoga
studio,
is
in
a
very
small
space.
It's
also
a
very
quiet
pursuit,
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
noisy
activity,
and
we
don't
know
how
it
got
there
and
it's
not
again.
It's
really
not
about
it's
not
about
this
particular
facility.
It's
about
changing
the
you
do
too
for
development
in
a
neighborhood
as
a
response
to
a
problem.
It's
not
I,
just
don't
I,
think
planning
by
its
definition.
F
The
word
planning
is
something
that
you
do
in
a
reasoned
and
and
thoughtful
way.
It's
not
something
that
you
do
as
a
response
to
solving
a
problem
and
I.
Think
that's
that's
our
concern.
I
also
and
I'm.
Sorry
I,
know
I
said
I
was
through,
but
you
know
the
application
from
the
Planning
Department
for
a
text.
F
Amendment
asked
a
lot
of
questions
about
how
how
the
particular
text
amendment
applies
to
the
comprehensive
plan
and
we've
not
heard
anything
here
today
that
talks
about
that
and
I
really
would
like
to
I
mean
if
we're
gonna
move
forward.
If
you're
gonna
move
forward,
let's
hear
how
that
applies
to
the
comprehensive
plan
going
forward
for
our
neighborhood
and
for
our
city,
I.
A
K
C
It's
just
my
voice
this
morning
say
ma'am
I'm
gonna
pose.
Maybe
your
question
back
to
you
and
I
would
invite
anybody
in
the
room
who
can
respond
to
my
concern
to
respond
to
it:
okay,
I'm
all
for
entrepreneurship,
I
was
a
owner
on
a
private
company
for
many
years,
and
I've
waged
all
the
wars
for
payroll
meeting
payroll
and
accounts
receivable
and
all
the
rest
of
it.
So
I
fully
support
entrepreneurship
and
individual
business
people,
but
I
do
have
concerns
I'm
very
concerned
about
the
process
that
has
led
us
to
this
point.
C
C
The
certificate
of
occupancy
was
rejected
on
the
in
the
week
of
the
8th
of
October,
because
it
was
not
consistent
with
uses
allowed
uses
in
the
historic
district
sometime
after
the
week
of
the
8th
of
October
I'm,
not
certain
when
operations
must
have
started,
because
somebody
blew
the
whistle
and
called
a
complaint
into
the
city
on
the
12th
of
November,
apparently
continued
in
the
facility
and
until
at
least
the
3rd
of
December.
When
the
city
special
enforcement
person
went
to
the
facility
to
tell
them
they
had
to
get
a
occupancy
permit.
C
That
finally
resulted
in
a
city
council
meeting
on
the
11th
of
December
and
a
PAC
meeting
and
another
council
meeting
and
today,
okay.
So
in
summary,
in
my
opinion,
which
I'm
very
concerned
about,
is
business
operations
continued
for
weeks
without
a
certificate
of
occupancy
and
the
lessee
knew
about
that?
Okay,
it
doesn't
seem
right
to
me.
Can
somebody
answer
my
question?
What.
D
It
was
determined
it
was
a
government
facility
operated
by
state-owned
institution,
one
of
the
neighbors
brought
it
up.
How
are
they
operating
there?
We
told
him
it's
a
government
facility.
She
requested
that
it
be
forward
to
the
city
attorney.
It
was
forwarded
to
see
attorney.
He
came
back
with
case
law
and
said.
Yes,
it
is
a
government
facility.
It
is
exempt
from
zoning
that
neighbor
then
got
with
a
real
estate
attorney,
who
looked
at
the
case
law
closer
and
countered
that
he
had
misinterpreted.
G
D
D
Far
as
this
decision
goes,
no,
there
was
an
issue
on
the
front
end
with
filing
for
the
permit.
This
is
a
box,
and
this
is
essentially
just
one
big
open
box
and
when
the
contractor
filed
the
permit,
they
just
filed
it
as
an
open
box
to
put
in
two
bathrooms.
They
didn't
put
a
use
for
it,
it
would
have
been
caught.
Then
mm-hmm.
K
C
Kenner
the
timeline
which
was
I
attended
the
public
meeting
about
the
annex
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
The
timeline
which
is
City
distributed
doesn't
talk
about
the
issue
of
the
jurisdiction
because
of
the
government
ownership
and
so
forth
until
sometime
in
November.
Okay.
So
what's
what
one
wanted?
This
whole
issue
concerning
the
the
jurisdiction
of
the
city
versus
not
jurisdictional
to
see
arise
it
doesn't
it's
not
much
into
the
timeline
until
Wallington.
D
November,
no,
it's
not
mentioned
in
the
timeline.
The
timeline
was
done
by
John
Hutchison
director
of
codes.
When
we
came
in
here
to
the
Planning
Commission
in
January,
when
we
got
to
that
slide,
I
explained
what
had
happened
in
that
month
with
the
emails
going
back
and
forth
between
essentially
two
attorneys,
so
it's
I
mean
it's
on
the
record.
It's
not
in
that
presentation,
though,.
G
D
G
G
A
M
K
M
D
D
A
G
D
D
D
H
With
regards
to
the
concern
about
alcohol
consumption,
because
I
do
see
that
as
a
as
a
concern
to
be
addressed
at
least
mm-hmm,
my
cursory
reading
of
city
ordinance
would
be
because
that
building
a
but
the
his
Heritage
Park
I
believe
mm-hmm
that
you
would
not
be
able
to
get
an
all
for
on
premise:
alcohol
license
for
this
location.
You.
H
A
H
D
200
in
City,
Park,
Park
so
and
you
and
and
and
the
Larry
that
ordinance
it
would
be
on
premise
what
I
mean
you're,
not
a
restaurant,
so
you
got
to
get
a
liquor
license
and
then
they
go
out
300
feet
and
if
you
got
residential
there,
and
this
and
other
personally
I
don't
be
kind
of
defeating
the
purpose
of
getting
a
liquor
drink.
If
you've
been
working
out
all
afternoon.
H
D
That
you
know
somebody
on
the
fringe
might
I,
don't
know,
sir
4th
Street
Baptist
Church
is
one
of
them
that
would
qualify
under
this
they're,
not
going
anywhere
they've
been
here
for
150
years,
they're
not
going
anywhere,
but
you
know
that
got
put
in
the
you
do
and
oh
five,
a
lot
of
cutting
and
pasting
I'm
sure
from
other
jurisdictions.
With
your
consultants,
I
don't
have
any
heartburn
about
it
being
amended
mister!
Well,
that's
the
pursuit.
Y'all
were
after
mr.
A
N
D
A
I
had
only
had
well
I
think
we're
finished
with
you
for
that
I'm
sorry,
I
had
only
had
one
spokesperson
in
opposition,
so
I
only
had
called
one
time
so
I
do
feel
as
though
I
need
to
say
if
there's
another
member
of
the
audience,
who
wants
to
speak
in
opposition,
giving
us
information
that
we
have
not
heard
already
yes
ma'am
if
you'll
come
forward
and
state
your
name
and
address,
and
just
be
aware
that
we
need
to
hear
something
we
haven't
heard
yet.
O
Where
are
they
going
to
park
where
that's
already
a
congested
area
they'll
park
on
7th
Street
and
8th
Street
and
all
down
front
Avenue?
We
also
right
across
the
street,
have
the
Space
Science
Center.
We
have
the
Civic's
of
a
Trade
Center,
so
my
worry
is
that
what
we're
doing
is
much
like
what's
happening
on
8th
Street,
which
is
very
hard
to
negotiate
during
business
hours
any
day
of
the
week
because
of
a
restaurant
and
the
narrowness
of
those
streets.
O
The
second
question
I
have
has
to
do
with
parking,
and
the
map
of
that
area
was
sent
out.
The
parking
lot
at
that
particular
facility
shows
that
there
is
a
break
it
that
entire
parking
lot
does
not
belong.
All
those
places
do
not
belong
to
that
facility.
They
that
building
most
of
them
in
fact
belong
to
the
trade
center
is
parking
lot
number
two.
So
my
question
is.
O
A
B
O
Other
question
has
to
do
generally
with
the
alcohol,
because
the
alcohol
issue
is
not
simply
for
that
particular
facility
to
correct
should
another
facility
on
3rd
or
one
of
the
other
buildings
that
is
eligible.
They
could
in
fact,
and
so
I.
One
of
our
concerns
is
that
issue
was
generally
not
just
simply
for
this
particular.
G
I'm
sorry,
mr.
Rogers,
for
point
of
clarity,
what
we're
considering
today
is
to
amend
a
text
not
to
approve
a
specific
case,
so
once
the
text
is
amended,
any
applicants
that
desire
to
be
a
part
of
this
exception
would
have
to
come
back
and
request
a
special
exception.
So
today
we're
only
looking
at
a
min
the
text
for
the
possibility
of
this
special
exception.
If
someone
comes
back
later
to
request
that
right,
that's.
B
A
J
That's
okay,
I
guess:
I
was
just
sitting
there
thinking
you
know
and
I
know.
This
is
not
a
myth.
I
have
to
do
with
the
the
text
amendment,
but
what
I've
heard
is.
Why
would
any
gym
or
spa
so
yeah
I
want
to
sell
alcohol?
Have
y'all
ever
been
for
two
owned
to
a
resort
and
had
a
massage
and
they
give
you
mimosa
while
you're
waiting
to
calm
down?
That's
where
the
alcohol
might
play
into
that?
I
was
just
thinking
before.
A
We
don't
before
we
have
any
further
conversation.
I'm
gonna
do
what
I
did
the
last
time,
because
I
know,
because
we've
heard
from
so
many
of
you
that
it
is
important
for
each
of
you
to
feel
as
though
you
are
being
heard
and
I
have
discussed
this
with
the
planning
department
about
what
I'm
about
to
do
so
I'm
going
to
ask
that
if
you
are
a
property
owner,
a
property
owner-
and
you
are
in
favor
of
this
text,
amendment
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
please
stand
is.
A
Owner
in
the
historic
district,
if
you
are
a
property
owner
in
the
historic
district,
I'm
gonna,
ask
that
you
stand
and
mr.
Renfro
is
gonna
get
a
count.
So
please
do
not
sit
down
just
yet,
and
if
you,
if
I,
have
any
residents
in
there
who
are
not
property
owners,
sit
tight,
I'm
gonna
include
you
two
in
a
minute.
All
right,
please
be
seated
if
you
are
a
property
owner
in
the
historic
district,
and
you
are
in
opposition
this,
please
stand
property
owners
in
opposition.
A
Please
remain
standing
now
if
you'll
all
have
a
seat.
We're
gonna
do
one
more
vote
because
we've
heard
from
lots
of
people
but
the
property
owners
I
wanted
to
just
to
have
a
distinct
count.
Anyone
anyone
in
this
audience
who
is
in
favor
of
this
request,
please
stand
and
stay
standing.
This
is
anyone
in
the
audience
who
is
in
favor,
so
we
have
a
lot
of
folks
standing
who
are
not
property
owners.
A
And
I'm
doing
this
ready
have
a
seat
because
and
I'll
use
myself
as
a
personal
example:
I
don't
own
any
property
in
the
Liberty
district.
I
have
never
worked
in
the
Liberty
district
I.
Don't
have
family
that
lives
in
Liberty,
District
and
I.
Don't
know
property
there,
but
I
care
about
what
happens
to
the
Liberty
district.
So
I
show
up
for
those
sorts
of
things.
H
A
D
H
Date
where
we
were
gonna
add
it
to
all
say:
let
me
get
the
where
we're
gonna.
Do
it,
where
we're
gonna,
add
something
where
we
are
creating
three
point,
two
point:
seven,
three
uh-huh
and
it's
got
all
the
extra
conditions
about
15,000
feet.
Existing
structures.
I
was
gonna,
add
a
letter
D
saying
no.
On
on
or
off
premise
alcohol
sales
will
be
permitted.
I.
O
H
A
K
K
K
A
A
Are
there
any
other
questions
and
you
know
other
questions
up
here?
All
right
do
I,
hear
a
motion.
I
believe
I
did.
H
H
A
Approval
we
wrote
I
thought
I
thought,
that's
what
you're
saying
I'm
doing
here
a
second
all
right,
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hand.
All
right,
hang
on
keep
your
hands
up,
keep
your
hands
up:
1
2,
3,
4,
5
5
in
favor.
All
of
those
opposed
one,
two
three
opposed,
so
this
will
go
forward
with
a
recommendation
for
approval
to
City
Council,
and
that
brings
us
to
the
end
of
our
cases.