►
From YouTube: Columbus Ga Planning Advisory Comm Meeting 04 03 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
You
well
good
morning.
First
thing
we'd
like
to
do
is
say:
please
silence
your
cellphone's
turn
them
off
during
this.
During
this
time
we
don't
want
any
distractions
and
I
remind
those
in
the
audience
of
those
watching
on
television
that
this
is
the
first
hearing
of
any
rezoning
text,
change
or
special
exception
requests
brought
before
us
today.
We
will
first
hear
a
reading
of
the
staff
report
for
the
case
by
planning
staff
and
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
overview
of
the
request.
A
Commissioners
will
have
time
for
needed
discussion
on
the
case,
and
once
a
motion
is
made
and
seconded
by
the
Commission,
a
vote
will
take
place
in
a
recommendation
will
be
rendered.
The
case
will
go
back
to
the
Planning
Department
for
their
independent
recommendation.
If
a
favorable
recommendation
is
given,
then
the
case
is
forwarded
to
the
City
Council,
with
the
two
independent
recommendations.
A
If
the
planning
department
takes
makes
a
recommendation
for
denial,
the
applicant
will
have
ten
days
from
the
receipt
of
a
letter
stating
the
denial
to
notify
the
Clerk
of
Council
that
they
are
requesting
to
be
placed
on
city
council
agenda.
The
City
Council
of
Columbus
will
hold
a
public
meeting
first
reading
said:
Council
will
shall
consider
the
case,
review,
PA,
C
and
Planning
Department
recommendations
and
hear
discussion
on
the
matter.
Council
will
then
make
a
final
decision
of
a
second
public
meeting,
which
is
called
the
second
reading
all
right.
A
We
have
a
very
short
agenda
today.
First
thing
on
the
agenda
is
to
approve
the
minutes
from
March
xx,
2019
and
I.
Think
what
we
do
here
is
it
has
anyone
on
the
Commission
notice,
anything
that
needs
to
be
changed.
You
would
bring
it
up
now
and
so
we'll
consider
those
good
okay
all
right.
Thank
you
very
much.
We'll
come
to
our
first
case
this
morning,
which
is
a
rezoning
or
zoning
case
are
easy
in
zero.
Three
one:
nine
zero,
three
five
nine!
A
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
nine
point:
three:
three
acres
of
land
located
at
sixty
eight.
Ninety
River
Road
current
zoning
is
ro
residential
office
with
conditions
proposed.
Zoning
is
ro
residential
office
with
amended
conditions.
The
proposed
used
is
residential,
condominiums
George
Mize
is
the
applicant.
This
property
is
located
in
Council
District
two
mr.
Davis,
and
we
will
hear
from
mr.
Renfro
first
on
the
staff
report.
Yes,.
C
Sir
General
Wayne
uses
inconsistent
in
planning
area.
A
current
land
use
designation
is
rural,
residential
futures
and
mixed-use.
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
foot
plain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
The
average
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
by
two
hundred
and
four
trips.
C
If
used
for
condo
town
hotel
house
type
use,
the
level
of
service
will
remain
a
level
of
service,
be
the
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
cone
consolidated
government
for
residential
use,
there'll
be
no
no
school
impact
buffer
requirement.
The
site
shall
include
a
category
C
buffer
along
the
property
line
bordered
by
this
SFR
to
zoning
district.
C
The
three
options
under
category
C
are
20
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees,
understory
trees
and
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
and
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall
30
feet
of
underserved
natural
buffer.
No
response
from
Fort
Benning,
no
response
from
DRI
recommendation.
The
surrounding
zones
owning
north
is
ro
residential
office.
South
is
residential
office,
ESA's
single-family
residential
to
Wes's,
our
residential
estate
115
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
C
Property
were
notified
of
the
original
rezoning
request.
The
Planning
Department
received
three
phone
calls
regarding
the
rezoning
additional
information.
River
Road
roundabout
is
under
construction,
and
then
this
far
is
in
the
previously.
This
area
was
slated
to
become
an
office
park
that
that
traffic
report
for
that
would
have
been
561
compared
to
the
204
trips
for
the
condominium
town,
Town
town
house
use.
There
are
16
conditions
with
this
and
I
will
let
the
applicant
speak
to
those
when
he
gets
up.
Okay,.
D
Just
removed
add
up,
this
gets
to
the
conditions,
but
it's
more
a
question
for
the
city,
conditions,
12
and
13.
The
way
they're
being
changed
seems
to
make
it
much
more
difficult
to
eventually
widen
River
Road.
Do
you
know
whether
the
city
or
the
state
have
any
interest
and
eventually
widening
for
roads
as.
B
F
E
I'm
George
I'm
with
the
law
firm
of
Page,
crinum,
one-one-one,
Bay,
Avenue
I'm
here
today,
representing
your
applicant
as
well
as
the
developer,
the
applicant
and
owner
of
the
property
has
l
RW
group
here
with
me
on
behalf
of
the
l
RW
group,
is
mr.
Andy
Robinson
the
developer
of
Steve
Corbett,
a
well-known
local
developer,
having
developed
over
3,000
apartment
units,
2,500
single
family
lots
over
900,
single-family
residences,
Steve
kind
of
he
kind
of
specializes
in
upscale
high-end,
residential
developments
and
Steve
is
with
me
today
our
engineers
and
surveyors
of
noon
weeks.
Mason
and
Vincent.
E
We're
seeking
to
do
today
if
okay,
we've
got
it
up
there,
just
give
you
a
kind
of
an
overall
site
plan
of
what
we're
trying
can
I
get
the
norm.
Ice
cream,
well,
they're,
okay,
what
we're
seeking
to
do
is
rezone
number,
actually
change
conditions
on
about
nine
point:
three:
three
acres
of
land,
which
is
located
just
south
of
the
intersection
of
mably
Road
and
River
Road,
just
kind
of
sandwich
between
thrive
at
Green,
Island
and
River,
plays
both
retirement
communities.
E
The
property
is
currently
is
on
Darlow
with
conditions,
and
we
see
to
keep
the
property
zoned
ro
with
changed
conditions
and
we'll
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
later.
But
what
Steve
is
proposing
to
do
is
to
develop
35
high-end,
high-quality
single-story,
residential
condominium
units.
The
unit
will
be
predominantly
duplexes,
there'll
be
about
2,000
square
feet.
Apiece
they'll
have
double
garages.
They'll
have
porches.
They'll
consists
primarily
of
brick
with
minor
hardiplank
accents.
Now
give
you
an
idea
of
what
Steve
has
in
mind.
We've
got
three
full
pictures
of
those.
Could
you
see?
E
They're
they're
they're
high
quality
high
in
development,
but
we're
looking
for
such
you
know:
sales
prices
in
the
260
to
280
thousand
dollar
range.
But
in
order
to
do
that,
we're
going
to
have
to
change
some
conditions
and
I
think
you
may
have
in
your
packet
a
copy
of
the
old
ordinance.
Oh
seven,
85
and
John
wanted
me
to
go
through
these
with
you,
I'm
happy
to
do
it.
E
The
same
okay
conditions:
1
2,
&
3
deal
with
building
size,
building,
height,
building
numbers
we're
going
to
have
to
seek
to
delete
all
three
of
those
conditions
and
in
lieu
of
that
we're
going
to
put
something
like
limited
to
35
single-story
residential
condominium
units
condition.
Number
seven
with
building
materials
needs
to
be
modified.
E
To
add
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
put
hardiplank
on
the
property
not
to
exceed
more
than
20%
of
the
total
exterior
coverage
item
TM
deals
with
garbage
picked
up
well
that
that
item
really
doesn't
apply
now,
because
this
property
is
going
to
be
serviced
by
garbage
trucks
as
any
other
residential
subdivision
in
the
city.
Getting
to
the
question
of
number
12,
we
propose
that
be
deleted.
Number
12
is
the
one
that
says
the
developer
is
to
reserve
property
for
the
widening
of
right-of-way
of
a
River
Road
couple
thoughts
about
that.
E
It
doesn't
say
how
much
I
question
whether
or
not
that's
even
an
enforceable
sort
of
a
condition,
but
really
practically
it's
not
necessary.
You
got
at
that
point
of
River
Road
you've
got
130
foot
wide,
River,
Road
and
you've
got
pavement
that
averages
about
30
feet,
so
there's
plenty
of
room
there
for
widening
and
if
John
indicated
there's
been
no
indication
that
River
Road
is
going
to
be
wide
there
or
not
so
I.
Don't
think
that
condition
that
stated
even
needs
to
be
there
condition
number
13.
E
There's
a
there's,
a
our
neighbor
to
the
South
River
place
its
closest
building
to
the
edge
of
the
pavement
if
94
feet
so
we'll
be
further
away
from
River
Road
than
our
neighbor
to
the
south,
and
of
course,
number
16
is
the
one
that
requires
that
it
be
in
office
Park.
That
needs
to
be
deleted
so
that
we
can
do
the
residential
condominium
development.
E
We
believe
the
proposed
residential
development
is
consistent
and
compatible
surrounding
land
uses,
as
you
guys
know,
except
for
that
northwest
quadrant
intersection
of
River
Road
in
Mountain
Brook,
pretty
much
all
of
the
current
you
south.
There
is
residential
as
far
as
buffering
goes,
of
course,
as
John
mentioned
we'll
have
to
buffer
in
the
quarter.
For
the
you
do.
In
addition
to
that,
the
current
zoning
ordinance
requires
two
conditions:
two
additional
buffering
conditions,
both
of
which
will
remain
condition.
Number
four
requires
a
10-foot
densely
planted
evergreen
buffer
along
the
North
line
that
will
stay.
E
It
also
item
number
five
requires
a
30-foot
buffer
along
the
river
road
right-of-way.
That,
too
will
say
a
newbie
planted
with
plant
material.
Very
various
hikes,
both
of
those
two
buffering
conditions,
will
remain.
We
anticipated
some
questions
on
traffic
as
John
indicated.
That's
what
most
of
the
people
talked
about,
but
also,
as
he
indicated,
that
shouldn't
be
a
concern
we
we
got
Lou
Meeks
to
look
into
it
and
it's
consistent
with
what
the
city
found,
and
that
is
that
the
traffic
count
will
actually
decrease
with
the
residential
development
as
opposed
to
the
office
park.
E
This
is
particularly
true:
it's
not
going
to
be
a
problem
because
our
target
market
is
going
to
be
seniors
and
retirees
as
Johnny
indicate
all
public
facilities
and
infrastructure
are
located
at
the
site.
There
be
no
negative
impact
to
those
facilities
and
infrastructure.
The
sees
not
going
to
have
to
make
an
investment
an
additional
investment
in
that
regard,
the
developers
going
to
provide
substantial
economic
benefits
to
the
city
and
its
citizens,
including
a
creation
of
numerous
construction
jobs
during
the
build
out
process.
E
Together,
the
increase
in
business
for
local
contractors,
suppliers,
electricians
formers
and
others
that
support
the
construction
industry.
We're
also
gonna
have
a
substantial
increase
in
the
tax
base
for
a
valorem
tax
purposes,
thus
providing
an
economic
return
to
the
city
again
without
requiring
additional
investment
on
the
city's
part.
In
particular,
we
anticipate
increasing
ad
valorem
taxes
from
about
ninety
seven
hundred
dollars
a
year
to
over
one
hundred
forty
five
thousand
dollars
a
year.
E
In
addition,
the
city
is
going
to
recognize
a
boom
in
the
form
of
sales
tax
receipts
from
the
sale
and
purchase
of
millions
of
dollars
of
construction
materials.
We
believe
our
application
and
request
meet
all
the
requirements
for
rezoning.
We
believe
that
the
oil
classification
has
changed
is
consistent
compatible
with
surrounding
land
uses.
Again,
our
public
facilities
and
infrastructure
are
in
place.
There
be
no
negative
impact
to
those
facilities
in
infrastructure
and
believe
this
developments
will
provide
a
substantial
benefit
to
the
community
in
terms
of
job
creation
and
tax
revenue
generation.
Therefore,
we're
special
requests.
E
D
Is
the
entity
mr.
Dudley
I
do,
and
this
may
be,
for
the
city
or
for
you
on
condition,
13.
The
proposal
that
we
have
said
in
part
and
no
structure
shall
be
constructed
within
35
feet
of
the
eastern
edge
of
river
road.
As
said
road
presently
exists
and
from
what
you
say,
it
sounds
like
you
want
that
to
read
within
35
feet
of
the
eastern
edge
of
the
right-of-way,
all
right,
River,
Road,
yes,
okay,
so
is
that
exact
language
acceptable?
It.
B
E
E
Y'all
want
to
keep
that
end
and
just
said,
building
shall
be
no
more
than
two
stories
and
heights
building
which
front
River
Road,
which
I
don't
know
that
there
really
ain't
gonna
be
fronting
River
Road
right
shall
be
one
story
in
hiding
any
other
building
she'll
either
be
one
story
of
two
stories
that
we
could
certainly
leave
that.
But
the
reason
I
deleted
is
because
it
was
relating
to
the
buildings
in
the
office
apartment.
So
I
was.
E
Would
say
I
think,
because
what
I've
told
the
residents
I
would
rather
delete
it
because
they're
not
going
to
be
any
two
story:
buildings,
just
one
story
and
and
we've
we've
told
the
residents
going
to
be
one
story.
So
if
we
could
delete
that-
and
I
may
be
speaking
against
my
client
here
a
bit,
but
we
did
tell
everybody
that
it'd
be
a
single-story
residential
development.
B
F
A
Other
questions,
gentlemen.
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you!
Mr.
Maddox,
you
all
right
is
there
anyone
the
audience
would
like
to
speak
for
this
case.
I
think
we've
already
heard
that
and
by
the
looks
of
it,
there's
probably
no
one
here
that
wants
to
speak
against
it.
So
commissioners,
I'd
like
to
open
the
floor
for
a
motion
all
right.
F
Mr.
Greenblatt,
yes
regarding
case
or
easy
in
0
3
1
9,
0,
3,
5,
9,
applicant
George,
Maas
owner
ldlr,
W
Group
LLC
at
6890,
River
Road,
approximately
nine
point:
three:
three
acres
current
zoning
is
ro
with
conditions.
The
proposed
zoning
is
RA
with
RO,
with
amended
conditions,
I
move
that
we
approved,
based
on
the
fact
that
it
is
compatible
with
these
experiences.
Okay,
question.