►
From YouTube: Columbus Ga Planning Advisory Comm Meeting 02 20 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
Say:
February
20th
meeting,
not
January
I,
guess
I'm
still
an
opposition
that
we're
already
in
2019.
Sorry
I
would
like
to
remind
those
in
the
audience
and
those
watching
on
television
that
this
is
the
first
hearing
of
any
rezoning
text,
change
or
special
exception
requests
brought
before
us
today
before
we
start
hearing
these
cases.
If
you
are
in
the
audience
and
you
have
a
cell
phone,
please
check
to
make
sure
it's
either
silenced
or
off.
Since
we
are
being
televised.
A
We
will
first
hear
a
reading
of
the
staff
report
for
the
case
by
the
planning
staff
and
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
request.
We
will
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak,
for
or
against
that
request,
or
to
ask
any
questions
about
the
request.
The
commissioners
will
have
any
needed
discussion
on
the
case
and
once
a
motion
is
made
and
seconded
by
the
Commission,
a
vote
will
take
place
and
a
recommendation
will
be
rendered.
The
case
will
go
back
to
the
planning
department
for
their
independent
recommendation.
A
If
a
favorable
recommendation
is
given,
then
the
case
is
forwarded
to
the
City
Council.
With
two
independent
recommendations,
if
the
Planning
Department
makes
a
recommendation
for
denial,
the
applicant
will
have
ten
days
from
the
receipt
of
a
letter
stating
the
denial
to
notify
the
Clerk
of
Council
that
they
are
requesting
to
be
placed
on
the
City
Council's
agenda.
The
City
Council
of
Columbus
will
hold
a
public
meeting.
It's
called
the
first
reading
and
the
said
council
shall
consider
the
case.
Review
pack
and
Planning
Department
recommendations
and
hear
discussion
on
the
matter.
A
Council
will
make
a
final
decision
at
a
second
public
meeting
called
the
second
reading.
As
far
as
our
minutes
go
commissioners,
you
were
given
an
opportunity
to
review
the
minutes
that
were
sent
out
for
the
giant
from
the
January
16th
meeting
in
the
February
6
meeting.
I,
don't
know
if
anybody
has
any
changes
or
anything
that
needs
to
be
made
to
those,
and
if
we
don't,
then
we're
going
to
submit
those
as
approve
and
I
do
want
to
take
a
moment
to
see.
A
If
anybody
has
anything
and
I
don't
see
anything,
so
we
will
accept
those
that's
submitted.
Thank
you
all
right.
Well.
That
will
bring
us
to
our
first
case
in
this.
First
case
is
ar
e
ZN
0
1
1
9
0
0
9
5.
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
0.89
acres
of
land
located
at
11:47
6th
avenue.
The
current
zoning
is
LMI
light
manufacturing,
industrial
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
UPT
uptown.
The
proposed
use
is
apartments
office,
warehouse,
Ken,
Henson
is
the
applicant,
and
this
property
is
located
in
council
district
7
Woodson
mr.
C
General
and
use
is
consistent
for
planning
area
D.
Current
land
use
designation
as
mixed-use
futures
high
density
mix
use.
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
use.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
a
property
is
served
served
by
all
city
services.
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
by
three
hundred
and
twenty
twenty
six
trips.
C
If
used
for
mixed
use,
it
will
remain
a
level
a
the
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
Columbus
consultant
for
commercial
usage,
no
school
impact,
buff,
no
buffer
requirements,
no
Fort,
Benton
recommendation,
no
DRI
recommendation,
30
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
Property
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
The
Planning
Department
received
no
phone
calls
or
emails
regarding
the
rezoning
there's
no
additional
information.
Commissioners.
A
D
A
D
What
it
says
speak
that
means
that
the
mic
is
on
ok,
I'm,
Ken,
Henson
I
live
at
six
one,
two
Broadway
and
I'm
here
for
the
applicant
1147
LLC,
which
owns
this
property.
That
has
multiple
addresses.
It's
11,
47,
6th,
Avenue
I,
think
it's
512
12th
at
12th
Street,
and
then
it
has
an
address
off
of
the
back
on
Fifth
Avenue.
D
It's
a
an
irregular
shape,
piece
of
property,
and
it
was
the
original
coca-cola
bottling
plant
that
opened
in
Columbus
around
1905
1906
and
they
added
a
warehouse
off
the
back
in
the
20s
and
tsys
has
used
it
as
a
way
house
since
the
1990s.
So
we
hope
to
convert
it
to
office
apartments,
maybe
a
microbrewery
under
the
new
definition.
D
A
D
No
I
want
to
thank
you
for
hearing
this
I
guess.
Most
of
you
know
we
had
a
little
glitch
yesterday.
I
want
to
thank
John
for
for
bringing
this
forward,
but
after
the
realizing
we
had
this
glitch
I
looked
at
the
application
and
I
should
have
attached
more
information
and
I
think
the
forum
can
probably
be
improved.
I
think
you
don't
ask
for
multiple
addresses
I,
think
it
I'll
ask
for
a
survey.
D
If
there's
one
available,
I
think
it
ought
to
ask
for
the
the
tax
map
and
have
the
applicant
Circle
and
actually
show
on
the
map,
what
property
he
owns
and
and
what's
gonna
be
resumed.
I
think
it
ought
to
have
a
box
to
attach
additional
information
that
might
be
helpful.
I
think
that
would
have
avoided
the
glitch
and
and
quite
frankly,
I
should
have
attached
all
that,
but
but
it
didn't
well.
A
D
And
then
the
other
thing
is:
if
I
think
it
might
be
helpful
if
you
sent
out
the
staff
report
to
the
applicant
when
they
notify
him
of
the
date
of
the
of
the
hearing,
I
think
that
you
know
I've
done
a
lot
of
rezoning,
Xand
I,
don't
you
know
sometimes
when
something
goes
awry
you
realize?
Well,
maybe
there's
some
things
that
we
can
do
to
improve
the
process.
A
I
do
appreciate
those
recommendations
and
I
really
think
that's
a
good
one
to
let
the
applicants
have
a
copy
of
the
staff
reports.
Hopefully
they
can
look
at
it
and
see
if
there
are
any
mistakes.
Thank
you
very
much
for
thank
you.
I'm
doing
here.
A
motion
I
did
ask
the
against,
but
thank
you
did
you
know
how
much,
how
often
I
do
forget
those
things?
B
F
B
A
Yeah
Thank
You.
Mr.
brain.
Sorry,
no
thank
you
and
when
we
did
have
a
second
yeah,
let
me
say:
okay,
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hand
and
it
is
unanimous,
so
we
will
submit
that
for
approval
and
thank
you
for
again
for
those
suggestions.
That's
always
helpful.
All
right
that
moves
us
on
to
our
next
case,
which
is
ar
e
ZN
0
1
1
9
0
0
1
6,
and
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
0.77
acres
of
land
located
at
46
20
Warm
Springs
Road.
A
C
Ma'am
general
land
use
is
inconsistent
for
planning
the
area
B
current
land
use
designation
is
general
commercial
futures
light
manufacturing
industrial
commit
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
a
proof
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
by
11
trips.
If
used
for
building
and
construction
trade
use.
C
The
building
the
level
of
service
remain
at
the
level
P
the
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
Columbus
consolidated
government
for
commercial
usage,
no
school
impact,
no
buffer
requirements,
no
fort
benning
recommendation,
no
DRI
recommendation,
35
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subjects
properties
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
The
Planning
Department
Department
received
no
phone
calls
or
emails
regarding
the
rezoning
there's,
no
additional
information.
All.
A
G
Name
is
Donna
Blankenship.
My
address
is
51:36
East,
tymberlee
or
Court
mr.
Columbus
3-1
907,
and
it's
pretty
simple.
We've
been
in
this
location
for
47
years
under
the
neighborhood,
but
everybody
around
us
has
pretty
much
already
upgraded
to
general
and
we
just
want
to
be
upgraded
to
general.
Also.
H
G
G
H
G
E
A
B
A
G
A
C
Yes,
ma'am
the
request
is
them
in
the
text
of
the
you
do
in
regards
to
Table
three
point,
one
point:
one:
microbreweries
and
micro
distilleries
chapter
three
alcohol
beverages,
chapter
or
section
3.21,
microbreweries,
section
three
point:
two
micro
distilleries
in
Chapter
13
definitions
to
read
is
follow
as
far
as
the
table
three
point,
one
point:
one
micro,
distill
distilleries
and
micro
breweries
would
be
permitted
in
UPT,
CR,
D,
G,
C
and
L.
Am
I
all.
A
B
B
C
A
J
You
good
morning,
I'm
brian
cielito
addressed
1206
tavaa
new,
I'm
the
executive
vice
president
of
economic
development
at
the
Columbus
Chamber
of
Commerce
help.
We
also
represent
this
morning
the
development
authority
of
Columbus,
the
entity
appointed
by
City
Council
to
help
recruit
new
companies
and
new
businesses
to
Columbus
also
work
with
existing
companies
on
expansions
all
in
the
sake
of
job
creation
and
capital
investment.
J
We
are
working
with
a
company
who
is
interested
in
locating
a
brewery
or
micro
brewery,
as
the
kind
of
the
common
parlance
is
in
in
Columbus,
we've
been
working
directly
with
the
planning
department
at
first
we
thought
this
was
a
zoning
check-the-box.
Let's
make
sure
we
have
the
right
zone
in
place
come
to
find
out.
J
We
need
a
text
amendment
to
the
you
do
to
even
allow
for
a
brewery
to
operate
in
Columbus,
and
so
this
request
is,
is
essentially
to
pave
the
way
not
only
for
this
company,
but
for
also
for
other
companies
and
other
breweries
that
may
want
to
locate
in
in
Columbus
micro,
breweries
of
breweries,
as
you
may
have
read,
or
experienced
in
other
jurisdictions
across.
Not
only
this
state
of
Georgia,
but
also
throughout
the
southeast
is
its
big
business.
In
fact,
it's
a
brewery.
J
Tourism
is
even
a
term,
so
you
know
having
a
second-largest
city
in
Georgia.
We
don't
have
a
brewery
here
and
some
would
question
why?
Don't
we
and
up
until
this
point
we're
not
allowed
through
the
you
do
to
have
this
this
type
of
business
operate.
So
the
request
is
for
a
an
amendment
to
the
text
of
the
you
do
to
pave
the
way
for
breweries.
Thank.
H
J
I
might
just
comment
I
to
have
kind
of.
This
has
been
a
learning
process
for
me
and,
and
you
may
think,
of
the
cannon
brew
pub
on
uptown
that
on
Broadway
they
are
a
restaurant
kitchen.
That
also
happens
to
brew
beer.
I
said
this
would
be
truly
a
brewery
mm-hmm
without
the
restaurant
component.
That's.
A
F
Hear
a
motion
as
the
resident
millennial
interested
in
this
I
would
like
to
make
sure:
okay
in
the
case
of
our
ezn
0
1
1,
9,
0,
1,
5,
5,
a
request
to
change
but
to
amend
the
text.
The
unified
development
ordinance
in
regards
to
table
three
point:
1
point:
1,
micro,
breweries
and
micro
distilleries
chapter
3,
alcoholic
beverages,
section,
3,
point
2,
1,
micro,
breweries,
section,
3,
point
2,
micro
distilleries
and
chapter
13,
with
the
definitions
to
read,
is
presented
in
the
staff
port
I
move
that
we
approve
the
text.
Amendment
and.
A
On
here's
mr.
Davis
Erin,
we
have
a
second
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hand.
It
is
unanimous,
so
we
will
submit
that
for
approval
and
I
just
have
to
say,
I'm
happy
to
see
this
come
forward.
If
nothing
else
really
from
the
tourism
standpoint,
it
does
give
us
one
more
attraction
for
people
to
to
make
a
vacation
in
our
community
and
put
dollars
into
into
I.
Think
that's
good!
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right.
That
brings
us
to
our
next,
which
is
our
e
ZN
0
2
1
9
0
1
9.
A
A
H
C
B
B
One
for
up
to
six
adults
will
have
a
personal
care
for
7
to
18
adults.
Okay
and
then
we
have
foster
care
for
up
to
six
children
on
24-hour
service
and
we're
gonna
have
group
foster
care
from
7
to
15
children
for
minors
and
juveniles.
Now
it
doesn't
say
24-hour
care
I'm
just
curious
as
to
why
it
doesn't
say
24-hour
care,
and
then
it
also
talks
on
this
group
foster
with
or
without
meals.
B
C
B
B
B
Well,
you
know,
I,
you
know
once
again,
I
think
this
is
all
a
lot
of
a
thing,
but
I
just
seem
like.
Maybe
if
there
was
some
sort
of
a
problem
on
these
things,
if
we've
got
a
child
defined
now,
then,
if
do
we
have
a
child
minor,
juvenile
and
adult
properly
defined
later
on
in
case
there's
a
problem
that
can
suck?
That
was
the
question.
Okay,.
K
C
A
It
is
defined
somewhere.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Any
other
questions,
commissioners,
all
right.
If
the
applicant
will
please
come
forward
or
do
it.
A
L
A
Do
I
have
a
second
mr.
Kiner,
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hand.
It
is
unanimous,
so
this
will
go
for
it
as
as
a
recommendation
for
approval,
thank
you
and
lastly,
we
have
a
special
exception.
This
is
e
ex
CP
12
1
8
2
5
1.
This
is
a
request
for
special
exception
use
at
30:19,
North
Lumpkin
Road.
The
current
zoning
is
our
M
f1,
which
is
residential
multifamily
one.
The
proposed
use
is
a
boardinghouse
Charles
Wright
is
the
applicant,
and
this
property
is
located
in
council
district
3
huff
mr.
Renfro.
Yes,.
C
Ma'am
access
is
revealed
the
type
of
Street
providing
access
to
the
use
of
be
adequate
to
serve
the
purpose.
The
proposed
special
exception
use,
North
Lincoln
Road
will
provide
adequate
access
for
a
boardinghouse.
This
section
of
North
look
North
Lumpkin
Road
is
a
mana
arterial,
Artie
road
traffic
and
pedestrian
safety
is
or
will
access
into
and
out
of
the
property
be
adequate
to
provide
for
traffic
and
pedestrian
safety.
C
The
anticipated
volume
of
the
traffic
flow
and
access
by
emergency
vehicles,
access
into
and
out
of
the
property
in
question
will
provide
for
adequate
traffic
and
pedestrian
safety
and
emergency
vehicles
will
have
adequate
access
in
to
the
principal
structure
and
assess
reuse
adequacy
of
public
facilities
are
or
will
public
facilities
such
as
school,
water,
sewage,
sewer
utilities,
police
and
fire
protection
be
adequate
to
serve
the
special
exception.
Use
services
such
as
water,
sewer
utilities,
police
and
fire
protection
won't
be
adequate
and
serve
the
proposed
use
at
this
location.
C
Protection
from
the
burst
effects
are,
will
refuge
serve
service
parking
and
loading
areas
on
the
property
be
located
or
screened
to
protect
other
properties
in
the
area
from
such
a
versatile,
Ike,
glare
or
odor,
the
property
is
surrounded
by
other
RMF
and
GC
uses
parking
service
in
north.
You
should
be
adequate
and
provided
provided,
as
stated
within
the
you
do.
C
Noise
light
glare
and
odor
should
be
limited
due
to
the
nature
of
the
location,
hours
of
operation
will
the
hours
and
the
manner
of
the
operation,
of
the
special
exception
use,
have
no
adverse
effects
on
the
other
other
properties
in
the
area.
The
hours
of
operation
for
this
will
not
have
an
adverse
impact
on
the
neighboring
properties
in
this
area.
Compatibility
or
the
height
size
or
location
of
the
building
or
structures
on
the
property
be
compatible
with
the
height
size,
character
or
location
of
the
buildings
or
other
structures
on
the
neighborhood
properties.
C
The
structures,
height,
size
and
location
should
match
the
uses
found
in
other
RMF
properties.
The
location
surrounded
by
single-family
residential
uses,
Country
Council
District
is
3.
55
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
property
have
been
notified
by
mail
of
the
proposed
special
exception
use.
The
Planning
Department
received
five
phone
calls
and
emails
regarding
the
rezoning.
The
five
responses
were
in
opposition
and
there's
no
additional
information.
C
A
I
For
some
more
holiday
here
on
I
can't
hear
very
well:
okay,
the
name
is
Charles
right:
I,
stared,
1319,
North,
Lumpkin,
Road
and
I
have
a
house
where
I'm
living
at
it's
a
log
house
I
have
a
three
empty
bedroom.
I
live
by
myself.
I
want
to
run
them
out
to
people
I'm
retired,
from
work.
They
help
with
my
alcohol
all.
A
Right,
Thank,
You
commissioners.
Are
there
any
questions
for
the
applicant
for
mr.
right
and
we
have
a
question,
no
questions,
all
right.
We
have
no
one
in
the
audience,
so
I'm
not
going
to
ask
if
there's
anyone
that
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
or
against
it,
since
we
don't
have
anybody
here.
Do
I
have
a
motion.
You're
here
motion
amongst
the
commissioners,
mr.
Brannon
sure.
F
A
I
B
A
That's
all
of
our
cases,
I
do
have
actually
two
bits
of
new
business.
There
is
a
would
like
to
make
sure
that
the
public
is
aware
that
we
have
a
public
meeting
that
will
be
held
Thursday
February
the
28th,
to
discuss
the
reason
we
proposed
text
amendment
to
allow
wellness
and
fitness
facilities
with
a
special
exception
in
a
historic
district.
This
came
before
us
at
the
last
planning
and
Advisory
Commission
meeting.
The
purpose
of
this
meeting
will
be
to
hear
your
concerns
and
answer
any
questions
related
to
this
proposal.
A
H
A
M
A
A
M
A
Want
you
to
leave
the
mic
yet
because
of
that
I
want
to
bring
up
just
another
point
of
clarification
every
year.
At
some
point,
we
as
commissioners
have
a
case
come
forward
where
we
have
an
applicant
that
reaches
out
to
us
individually
and
wants
to
meet
with
us
privately
to
discuss
an
upcoming
application
and
I
know.
Mr.
Johnson,
you
and
Miss
I
think
mr.
Renfro
of
all
advised
us
in
the
past
that
that's
not
a
good
idea.
A
We
are
not
supposed
to
meet
with
applicants
individually,
I
think
you've
encouraged
us
more
than
anything
to
just
have
people
email
us
their
questions
or
concerns.
Don't
even
have
a
phone
conversation
and
that's
happened
again.
We
have
a
to
cases
coming
up
where
I
know
I've
been
contacted
individually.
I
know
some
of
these
commissioners
have
and
I
just
want
you
to
reemphasize
to
the
commissioners
what
the
rule
is
here
so
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page,
because
there's
been
some
some
questions
in
just
some
confusion
about
what
we
can
and
can't
do.
Yeah.
M
And
you're
correct
you
just
don't
want
to
put
yourself
in
a
situation
where
it
comes
back
and
bites
you
later
legally
y'all
are
covered
by
the
city,
but
if
it's
something
that
the
city
says
well,
you
really
stepped
out
there
and
you're
on
your
own.
Now
you
don't
want
to
be
in
that
situation.
So
y'all
are
doing
everything.
Fine
I
know
Bobby
had
the
same
response
that
you
did
and
that
that's
the
appropriate
response.
Well.
A
H
A
True
but
I
mean
you
know,
but
I
just
wanna
make
sure
we're
all
on
the
same
page,
in
our
understanding
that
if
an
applicant
or
even
a
citizen
wants
to
meet
with
us
privately
or
have
a
conversation
on
the
phone
about
a
case,
we're
really
not
supposed
to
be
doing
that
it
needs
to
be
done
in
writing
through
email.
So
is
there
any
other
new
business?
Do.
I
M
A
I
K
A
A
A
C
K
A
Know
oftentimes,
when
that's
happened
in
us,
I
think.
Another
thing
that
might
be
putting
amongst
commissioners
is,
if
you
do
have
people
pulling
you
aside
in
the
public
that
want
to
share
shoot
an
email
out
to
the
rest
of
the
Commission
so
that
we
all
kind
of
have
an
idea
of
we
don't
need
to
know
the
details
of
the
conversation.
But
if
you
have
someone
that's
concerned,
it
might
be
helpful
to
share
that
as
well,
but
that's
a
good
point
because
we
do
want
to
be
good
servants
to
the
public.
Anything
else.
That's
it!