►
From YouTube: Columbus Ga Planning Advisory Comm Meeting 02 06 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
This
is
the
meeting
February
6th
meeting
of
the
planning
Advisory
Commission.
We
will
I
want
to
remind
those
let's
blow
me
back
up,
never
mind
those
in
the
audience,
those
watching
on
television,
that
this
is
the
first
typically
the
first
hearing
of
any
rezoning
or
text
change
or
special
exceptions.
Sometimes
we
do
have
to
table
something
and
hear
it
again.
We
will
first
hear
a
reading
of
the
staff
report
for
the
cat
case
by
the
planning
staff
and
then
we'll
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
request.
A
We
will
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak,
for
or
against
that
request
or
to
inquire
about
the
said
request.
The
commissioners
will
have
any
needed
discussion
on
the
case
and
once
a
motion
is
made
and
seconded
by
the
Commission,
a
vote
will
take
place
and
a
recommendation
will
be
rendered.
The
case
will
go
back
to
the
Planning
Department
for
their
independent
recommendation
and
if
a
favorable
recommendation
is
given,
then
the
case
is
forwarded
to
City
Council
with
two
independent
recommendations.
A
If
the
Planning
Department
makes
a
recommendation
for
denial,
the
applicant
will
have
ten
days
from
the
receipt
of
a
letter
stating
the
denial
to
notify
the
Clerk
of
Council
that
they
are
requesting
to
be
placed
on
the
City
Council's
agenda.
The
City
Council
of
Columbus
will
hold
a
public
meeting
which
is
called
the
first
reading
and
the
said,
cancel
shows
consider
the
case,
review
pack
and
Planning
Department
recommendations
and
hear
any
discussion
on
the
matter.
The
council
will
make
a
final
decision
at
a
second
public
meeting
called
a
second
reading.
A
A
We
will
submit
those
as
accepted
all
right,
and
then
that
brings
us
to
our
first
agenda
item
today,
and
this
is
our
e
ZN
11
1
8
2
155,
and
this
is
a
request
for
a
text
amendment
to
amend
the
text
of
the
unified
development
ordinance,
also
known
as
the
you
do.
In
regards
to
Section
four
point:
six
point:
four:
a
and
4.6.1
2f
and
thirteen
point
one
point
one
tree
or
mr.
Johnson:
do
you
have
the
staff
report
for
us
I
do.
B
I'm,
pretty
much
gonna
repeat
what
you
just
said
and
leave
it
to
these
guys
are
easy
in
11,
18
21
55
request
to
amend
it
takes
to
the
you
do
and
Section
four
point:
six
point:
four
City
arborist
to
amend
existing
paragraph,
a
section
four
point:
six
point:
twelve
tree
protection
and
planting
plan
requirements
to
amend
existing
paragraph
F
in
Section.
Thirteen
point:
one
point:
one:
new
definitions
for
sections:
to
amend
existing
definitions
to
read
as
follows,
and
yet
staff
report
I
will
let
them
go
in.
A
C
I'm
bill
Consul,
Eddie,
3650
ginger
Drive
in
Columbus
on
the
chair
of
the
Columbus
tree
board,
so
we're
here
today
to
present
the
text
to
amend
the
UDL
in
reference
to
what
happened
last
spring
on
jr.
Allen,
where
some
trees
were
cut
down
by
state
d-o-t
and
a
request
by
one
of
the
vendors
there,
and
we
submitted
this
text
before
there
were
concerns
among
the
commissioners
here
for
the
reference
to
private
protected
trees,
and
we
felt
that
was
unnecessary
for
the
real
meaning
of
this.
C
So
we
remove
them
so
we're
here
today
to
present
the
rest
of
this
and
mentioning
that
it's
violation
for
anybody
to
cut
protect.
It
would
cut
trees
that
are
covered
by
the
ordinance
or
beautification
or
public
protected
trees,
and
then
in
13
1
1.
We
defined
the
beautification
trees
and
public
protected
trees
and
exceptional
specimens.
A
D
Mann
first
I
just
like
to
say
thank
y'all
for
reviewing
the
text
and
bringing
back
something
that
helps
make
sense
for
everyone.
So
thank
y'all.
We
appreciate
y'all's
patience
getting
through
this
process
and
so
in
the
case
of
or
easy
in,
11
18
to
155
a
text
amendment
to
change
the
you
do
specifically
amending
section.
Four
point:
six
point:
four:
a
recommend
that
we
approve
this
text
amendment
any.
A
A
So
we
have
a
second
all,
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hand
and
it
is
unanimous,
so
we
will
send
that
forward
with
a
recommendation
for
approval.
Thank
you
very
much.
That
brings
us
to
our
next
case,
which
is
our
easy
n
1
2
1
8
159,
and
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
0.40
acres
of
land
located
at
28
70
Christine
Road.
The
current
zoning
is
sfr,
which
is
single-family
residential.
The
proposed
zoning
is
sfr
3,
which
is
single-family
residential
3.
The
proposed
use
is
residential
houses.
B
You,
madam
chair,
are
easy
in
12
18
21
59
in
this
case
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
playing
planning
area
e
current
land
use
designation
is
single-family
residential,
and
that
is
also
the
land
use
designation
for
future.
It
is
compatible
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
liable
in
a
flood
way
in
floodplain
area.
The
developer,
Dunedin
improved
drainage
planning,
part
of
issuance
of
a
site
development.
Permit
property
is
served
by
OC
services.
Annual
average
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
by
22
trips.
If
use
for
residents,
we
use
level
of
service
will
remain
at
a.
B
The
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
Columbus
Claudia
government
for
residential
usage.
No
school
impact
no
buffer
requirements.
This
is
not
within
Fort
being
sent
occations.
This
is
not
a
dr
I-40
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
Properties
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request,
plane
Department
received
one
call
or
email
approving
the
rezoning,
no
additional
information,
and,
of
course
you
have
your
attachments.
I
will
say
that
this
is
probably
the
fourth
or
fifth
lot
in
this
area
that
has
come
in
since
the
you
do
to
be
split.
B
A
E
Good
morning
my
name
is
ass.
Jam
know
some
of
you
I
wanted
knowing
the
rest
of
you.
It's
just
a
lot.
A
simple
lot,
long
lot
cut
it
in
half
and
put
it
all
build
up.
Another
twelve
fourteen
or
square
foot
home
Dustin
go
three-bedroom
two-bath!
That's
all
that's
the
reason
for
the
splitting
a
lot
into
I
think.
A
F
Chairs
are
released
to
matter
are
easy
in
twelve
eighteen,
twenty
one,
fifty
nine
a
request
to
resolve
point:
four:
zero
acres
of
land
located
at
twenty
seventy
Christine
roll,
currently
zoned
F
SFR
to
proposed
on
an
SF
are
three
and
hearing
that
is
compatible
with
usage
from
the
staff
here.
I
move
that
we
approve
there's
only
one.
A
A
Zero
one,
one,
nine
zero
zero
four
five,
and
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
0.13
acres
of
land,
located
at
eight
to
zero
Fifth
Avenue.
The
current
zoning
is
G
C,
which
is
general
commercial.
The
proposed
zoning
is
our
M
f1,
which
is
residential
multifamily
one.
The
proposed
use
is
a
carport
Catrina
Chester
is
the
applicant
and
the
property
is
located
in
Council,
District,
seven
woods
and
mr.
Johnson.
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Our
easy
no.1,
that's
19
45.
This
case
is
not
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
planning
area.
D
currently
and
used
single-family
future
land
use
is
mixed-use.
It
is
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
Property
does
not
lie
within
a
flood
way
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
need
an
approved
drains
playing
a
part
of
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
The
property
assert
is
served
by
all
city
services.
B
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
by
nine
trips
if
used
for
residential
use,
but
the
level
of
service
will
remain
at
eight
sites
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
Columbus
casada
government
for
residential
usage.
There's
no
school
impact.
The
site
shall
include
a
category
a
buffer
along
all
property
lines,
bordered
by
the
GC
zoning
district.
B
The
three
options
under
category
a
are
number
three
five
feet
with
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
in
your
feet
and
a
wood
fence
for
masonry
wall
I
would
ask
that
we
have
a
condition
to
not
apply
the
buffer.
In
this
case.
This
is
not
within
Fort
buildings.
Notification
rains:
it's
not
a
dri
45
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
Properties
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
requests.
B
B
So
she's
I
do.
B
A
A
G
B
A
E
F
A
Right
so
that
question
without
even
being
spoken,
was
answered.
Do
we
have
any
other
questions?
Commissioners
for
the
applicant,
do
I
hear
a
motion?
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
this?
So
you
know
what
anyone
in
the
audience
would
like
to
speak
against.
So
do
I
hear
a
motion.
Mr.
Greenblatt,
yes,.
A
Until
you're
a
second,
that's
it
all
right,
and
so
we
have
a
motion
to
approve
in
a
second
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hand
and
it
is
unanimous,
so
that
will
obviously
go
forward
as
approval
and
then
that
can
get
you
to
you
next
step
and
hopefully
you'll
be
finished.
By
that
point,
thank.
F
You
real
quick
mr.
Chester,
well,
first
of
all,
that's
a
beautiful
area
and
I'm
glad
she
chose
to
live
in
the
area.
The
city
is
working
extremely
hard
to
try
to
revitalize
the
Liberty
district.
So
I
hope
that
if
you're
not
already
involved,
you
can
get
involved
some
of
those
efforts
so
that
we
can
make
sure
we
bring
the
late
this
trip
back
to
the
historic
presence
that
it
had
here
in
this
city.
It's
so
vital
and
it
just
happened
to
be
Black
History,
Month,
Madame,
chair
and
so
I
think.
F
H
G
A
Thank
you
and
best
wishes
team.
Thank
you
thank
all
right,
all
right.
So
that
brings
us
to
a
special
exception.
Is
it
do
we
have
right?
Are
you
mr.
right?
Okay,
so
he
the
applicants
down
here
so
we're
gonna
table
that
one
all
right.
So,
lastly,
then,
oh
I
guess
I
should
say
it's
a
special
exception:
exc
P,
1,
2,
1,
8,
2,
5
1.
The
applicant
is
not
here
so
we'll
table
that
for
our
next
meeting
as
far
as
new
business
goes,
there
is
any
new
rezoning
special
exception
use
and
text.
A
Also
any
of
our
past
cases
are
available
for
to
view
on
the
PAC
Trello
board
and
that's
a
long
string
for
me
to
read
out,
but
if
you
need
to
see
any
past
cases
and
speaking
primarily
to
the
public,
if
you
have
any
problem
with
that,
please
call
the
planning
department
I,
don't
believe
we
have
any
anything
else
that
we
need
to
to
announce.
Our
next
meeting
is
scheduled
for
February
the
19th,
and
so
we
will
see
you
back
here,
February
19th.
We
are
adjourned.