►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Thank
you
and
I
would
like
to
ask
that
if
you
have
your
cell
phone
with
you,
please
silence
it
so
that
we
don't
hear
it
going
off
while
we
are
live
on
television.
Thank
you.
I
would
like
to
remind
those
in
the
audience
and
those
watching
on
television.
This
is
the
first
hearing
of
any
rezoning
text,
change
or
special
exception
requests
brought
before
us
today.
We
will
first
hear
the
reading
of
the
staff
report
for
the
case
by
the
planning
staff
and
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
that
request.
A
We
will
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak,
for
or
against
that
request
or
to
inquire
about
anything.
Regarding
the
request,
the
commissioners
will
have
any
needed
discussion
on
the
case
and
once
a
motion
is
made
and
seconded
by
the
Commission,
a
vote
will
take
place
and
a
recommendation
will
be
rendered.
The
case
will
go
back
to
the
Planning
Department
for
their
independent
recommendation
and
if
a
favorable
recommendation
is
given,
then
the
case
is
forwarded
to
City
Council
with
two
independent
recommendations.
A
If
the
Planning
Commission
makes
a
recommendation
for
denial,
the
applique
applicant
will
have
ten
days
from
the
receipt
of
a
letter
stating
the
denial
to
notify
the
Clerk
of
Council
that
they
are
requesting
to
be
placed
on
the
City
Council's
agenda.
The
City
Council
of
Columbus
will
hold
a
public
meeting
which
is
called
the
first
reading
and
then
the
said
council
shall
consider
the
case.
Review
pack
and
Planning
Department
recommendations
and
hear
discussion
on
the
matter.
Council
will
make
a
final
decision
at
a
second
public
meeting,
also
called
as
the
second
reading
commissioners.
A
We
you
were
given
minutes
earlier
in
the
week
from
mr.
Renfro
I'm,
hoping
that
you've
had
an
opportunity
to
look
over
those
minutes.
We
can
submit
them
as
approved
unless
anybody
has
any
questions
or
recommendations
for
change
of
any
errors
that
need
to
be
corrected.
I
see
that
so
we
will
submit
those
as
approved.
Thank
you
so
we'll
jump
right
into
our
first
case.
We
have
two
cases
that
are
here
today
coming
before
us
today.
A
The
first
one
is
our
e
ZN
0
2
1
8
0
3
0
6,
and
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
0.26
acres
of
land
located
at
3713
Claymore
Road,
which
is
a
zoning
of
SF
R
2,
which
is
single-family
residential.
The
proposed
zoning
is
RM
f1,
which
is
residential
multifamily,
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
a
single
is
uses.
Single-Family
right,
wait
is
the
applicant
and
this
property
is
located
in
council
district
5
Baker.
B
D
Yes,
ma'am
general
land
use
is
inconsistent
planning
area
e.
Current
current
land
use
designation
as
single-family
residential
future
land
use,
designation
as
single-family
the
compact
it
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses
environmental
impacts.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodplain
and
footway
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
improved
drainage
plan
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
has
served
all
city
services,
no
traffic
impact.
D
D
The
three
options
under
the
category
B
are
15
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees,
understory
trees
and
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs,
ornamental
grass
per
100
linear
feet
and
a
wood
fence
or
Mason
masonry
wall
20,
feet
of
undisturbed,
natural
buffer
or
meaning
recommendation
no
DRL
and
no
recommendation
attitude
of
property
owners,
50
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
this
subjects.
Property
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
case,
the
Planning
Department
received
no
phone
calls
or
emails.
Thank.
A
E
F
A
E
E
F
F
C
C
A
A
E
A
D
F
A
I
guess
it
would
be
worth
making
sure
we
know
that
the
staff
report
is
is
incorrect
in
the
information
that
was
attached
is
incorrect
if
it,
if
that's
important
to
to
note
in
our
minutes,
ok
I
think
we're
clear
on
that
anybody
else
up
here.
How
many
questions
all
right
if
the
applicant
would
owe
mr.
Bollinger
I'm?
Sorry,
no,
no,
no
you're,
fine
and.
G
E
F
D
A
F
A
The
right
address
and
the
right
plan
written
that's
key,
so
that's
good
to
know.
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
Well,
if
the
applicant
would
like
to
come
forward
and
give
us
a
brief
overview
state,
your
name
and
address.
A
H
A
E
H
H
Right,
Wade
and
I
live
at
1401
Bing
would
drive.
Thank
you
tearing
clothes
apologize
so
when
I
purchase
all
this
property
I
was
not
able
to
purchase
the
property
that
I'm
rezoning
today,
so
I
developed
a
subdivision
and
then
just
recently
purchased
half
of
the
property.
The
house
was
located
on
claim
Oh.
So.
H
A
No
questions,
thank
you.
Like
you,
mr.
Wade,
we
do
not
have
anybody
in
the
audience,
so
I
am
NOT
going
to
ask
for
anyone
to
to
speak
for
or
against
this
case,
since
we
don't
have
anybody
other
than
another
applicant
in
our
next
case.
So
I'm
commissioners,
if
there
is
no
further
discussion,
do
I
hear
a
motion.
Mr.
Greenblatt,
yes,.
C
Regarding
in
case
our
easy
end
at
0,
2
1,
8,
Oh
306
applicant
is
right.
Wade
owner
is
Carol
M
Wade,
the
location
is
3.
7,
8,
4
gram
weigh
0.26
acres.
Current
zoning
at
that's,
a
bar
to
proposed
owning,
is
in
rem,
f1
single
family.
Although
it
is
inconsistent
with
general
land
use,
it
is
compatible.
I
move
that
we
approve
it.
Mr.
A
Bollinger,
just
a
second
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hand.
It
is
unanimous,
so
we
will
submit
that
as
approved.
Thank
you
for
coming
in
this
morning.
Our
next
cases
are
easy:
n,
0,
2,
1,
8
0
3
0
8,
and
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
0.32
acres
of
land
located
at
49.
Oh
seven
and
4909
11th
Avenue.
The
current
zoning
is
sfr
4,
which
is
single-family
residential
4,
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
RMF
1
residential
multi-family
1.
The
current
and
proposed
use
is
residential
duplex
buildings.
A
D
General
and
uses
in
consistent
planning
area
F,
current
land
use,
designation,
single-family,
residential
future
land
use,
designation,
single-family
residential
compatible
with
existing
use.
Yes,
and
by
the
environmental
impacts.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
develop
permit
if
a
permit
is
required.
The
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
No
traffic
impact
traffic
engineering.
This
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
Columbus
consolidated
government
for
commercial
usage,
no
report
from
school
impact
buffer
requirement.
D
The
site
shall
include
a
category
a
buffer
along
all
property
lines,
bordered
by
the
GC
joning
district,
the
three
options
under
K
category
a
are
five
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet,
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
understory
trees
and
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100,
linear
feet
and
or
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall
20
feet
of
undisturbed
natural
buffer.
No
recommendation
from
fort
benning
notable
recommendation
from
the
are
41
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subjects.
Property
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
A
I
You
I'm
David
Fox.
They
live
at
902,
Cooper
Avenue
here
in
Columbus
and
I'm,
representing
NeighborWorks
Columbus
LLC,
which
is
c-h-I
asset
management
which
actually
owns
the
two
two
parcels
in
question.
Our
use,
of
course,
is
to
build
two
1-bedroom
1-bath
rental
duplexes,
and
we
found
in
Bellwood
and
this
sort
of
follows
on
other
zonings
that
we've
done
previously.
I
This
is
for
senior
housing
primarily
and
we
found
a
need
for
especially
the
low
low
low
income,
senior
housing,
and
so
the
one-bedroom
seemed
to
be
the
the
right
product
at
the
time.
As
you
probably
remember,
we've
we've
resumed
and
built
for
two-bedroom
two-bath
senior
duplexes
in
the
same
area
about
about
two
blocks
away.