►
From YouTube: April 20, 2023, Special Finance Committee Meeting
Description
April 20, 2023
Special Finance Committee Meeting
A
A
A
C
Thank
you,
chairman
I,
have
a
question
that
I
want
to
propose
to
the
Director
of
Finance
or
the
legal.
In
my
review
of
The
Levy
ad,
which
I
check
every
year
it
and
again
it
could
be
a
scribbon.
Is
there
or
not
when
I
do
the
calculation?
The
levy
comes
out
to
the
increased
lives
about
1.4
percent,
but
the
article
reads:
2.83
and
I
went
back
two
years
just
to
see
if
maybe
I
misunderstood
it
in
the
two
previous
years,
the
posted
rate
increase.
So
the
levy
agrees
to
the
calculation.
F
C
D
So
after
Consulting
with
solicitor
Ross
and
on
the
issue
we're
in
agreement
that
it
needed
to
be
re-advertised,
so
what
discriminator
is
actually
higher,
it
would
certainly
be
an
issue
if,
if
it
were
less
perhaps,
but
if
you
look
at
section
6.11
of
the
of
the
charter
relative
to
the
levy,
this
Council
has
you
know
two
opportunities
at
which
they
they
must
adopt
a
levy
after
hearing
on
the
budget
and
then
only
at
that
time
delivered
to
the
tax
assessor.
An
accurate
resolution
on
the
levy,
so
we
should
be
in
compliance.
A
C
C
692
it
reduced
reduced
to
181.557-349,
which
in
turn
makes
the
tax
levy
increase
from
two
million
five.
Seventy
eight
seven,
ninety
three
to
five
million
five.
Ninety
eight
one,
thirty
six
4
million.
Excuse
me
four
million
498
136.,
which
in
turn
increases
the
levy
not
to
what
was
advertised
at
2.83,
but
it
increases
it
to
2.53.
D
The
the
former
proposed
Levy
was
a
2.83.
Now
it's
2.53,
which
translates
through
to
a
calculated
Levy
increase
of
2.53
and
not
1.40.
The
advertised
Levy
was
283,
Which
is
higher
than
the
2.53
and
there's
really
no
bait
and
switch
in
terms
of
the
advertisement.
It's
just
a
scrivener's
error.
It's
that
simple.