►
Description
Governor Gavin Newsom today submitted his 2021-22 State Budget proposal to the Legislature – a $227.2 billion fiscal blueprint that provides funding for immediate COVID-19 response and relief efforts where Californians need it most while making investments for an equitable, inclusive and broad-based economic recovery.
With the end of the COVID-19 pandemic in sight, the Governor’s Budget prioritizes key actions that will urgently help the California families and businesses impacted most. It proposes $372 million to speed up administration of vaccines across all of California’s 58 counties, bolstering the state’s all-hands-on-deck approach to swift and safe vaccine distribution. It also includes a $14 billion investment in our economic recovery and the Californians who most need relief – those who have lost their jobs or small businesses, or are facing eviction – advancing direct cash supports of $600 to millions of Californians through the Golden State Stimulus, extending new protections and funding to help keep people in their homes and investing in relief grants for small businesses. As part of this investment in California’s future, the Budget intensifies the Governor’s commitment to equity in and for our school communities, reflected by the highest levels of school funding – approximately $90 billion total – in California’s history. The commitment includes investments to target the inequitable impacts of the pandemic on schools and families, including $2 billion to support and accelerate safe returns to in-person instruction, $4.6 billion to help students bounce back from the impacts of the pandemic and $400 million for school-based mental health services.
In addition to these measures to support Californians through the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Budget also advances long-term strategies for an equitable, broad-based economic recovery so the state can emerge from the pandemic stronger than before. Building on actions the state has taken to support California’s businesses throughout the pandemic, including emergency aid and regulatory relief, the 2021-22 State Budget makes investments across sectors and proposes supports for businesses of all sizes, including $777.5 million for a California Jobs Initiative, which focuses on job creation and retention, regional development, small businesses and climate innovation.
The Budget recognizes how COVID-19 has disproportionately impacted Californians who were already struggling before the pandemic, exacerbating decades-long inequalities. Accordingly, it works to expand opportunity for some of the hardest hit Californians and help them get ahead. The Budget also proposes one-time and ongoing investments totaling $353 million to support California’s workers as they adapt to changes in the economy brought about by COVID-19. It lifts up proven, demand-driven workforce strategies like apprenticeship and High-Road Training Partnerships and advances collaboration between higher education and local workforce partners.
This Budget is built on the prudent fiscal management that has helped the state weather the COVID-19 Recession in 2020, and with an improved revenue forecast entering 2021. Through the end of this pandemic and beyond, it advances the Governor’s sustained focus on increasing opportunity through education, including early education; increasing the affordability of health care and housing, and effective governance.
The Budget makes new proposals to address the affordability of health care and housing, and supports the increase in the state’s minimum wage to $14 per hour. The Budget includes significant new strategies to reduce the impacts of climate change, with focused investments to support the state’s zero-emission vehicle goals and an additional $1 billion to address a comprehensive wildfire and forest resilience strategy.
Finally, the Budget promotes effective government with additional investments to improve the state’s ability to respond rapidly to emergencies and continues the critical work to improve government efficiency and bring government services into the digital age.
Recorded January 8, 2021.
For more information regarding the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in Cupertino, please visit https://www.cupertino.org/coronavirus
A
B
Disparities
obviously
have
come
to
the
fore
and
must
be
addressed,
and
I
want
folks
to
know
that
our
budget
reflects
an
understanding
of
those
realities
and
an
intentionality
in
terms
of
addressing
those
realities.
Now
the
predicate
in
terms
of
our
focus
on
a
budget
is
the
reality
of
getting
out
of
the
freezers
and
ministering
into
people's
arms.
These
vaccines.
B
We
must
do
that
in
order
to
safely
reopen
for
in-person
instruction
our
schools
to
reopen
our
small
businesses,
as
well
as
businesses,
large
and
small,
all
across
the
state
of
california.
Our
goal
must
be
to
provide
more
resources,
more
discretion,
more
opportunity
for
low-wage
workers
for
workers
at
all
spectrums,
to
provide
more
resources,
allow
for
more
investment,
more
spending
in
our
economy
and
clearly,
as
always,
and
understandably,
urge
and
focus-
must
be
and
maintain
our
focus
and
vigilance
on
the
issue
of
wildfire
preparedness
in
this
state.
B
But
here
again
I
want
to
contextualize
I'm
here
on
january,
8th
last
year
here
on
january
10th.
Last
year,
less
than
a
year
ago,
we
were
talking
about
a
10-year
expansion
of
our
economy.
Here
in
the
state
of
california,
we
talked
about
how
we
had
weathered
the
great
recession
from
a
12.3
percent
unemployment
rate
and
brought
down
the
unemployment
rate
to
a
record
low,
3.9
percent.
B
We
were
discussing
whether
or
not
it
was
117
or
118
consecutive
months
of
net
job
growth
in
the
state,
regardless
a
record
number
of
months
back
to
back
with
consecutive
job
growth,
one
out
of
seven
jobs
in
the
united
states
of
america
were
created
right
here
in
the
state
of
california.
We
were
reflecting
on
the
fact
that
we
had
an
average
an
average
gdp
growth
of
3.9
over
the
prior
five
years.
B
That
was
less
than
one
year
ago
today,
when
we
presented
the
budget,
it
was
a
budget
that
reflected
21
billion
dollars
in
reserves
a
record
high.
We
had
focused
a
lot
of
energy
picking
the
baton
up
from
the
extraordinary
work
that
governor
brown
did
paying
off
that
wall
of
debt.
We
had
just
fulfilled
our
commitment
to
do
that
with
an
additional
four
and
a
half
billion
dollar
payment,
paying
off
the
37,
or
rather
34.7
billion
dollar
wall
of
debt,
and
we
were
starting
to
talk
about
our
long-term
liabilities.
B
Less
than
a
year
ago,
still
on
january
26th,
we
had
the
first
reported
case
of
covet
here
in
the
state
of
california
and
everything
changed
so
much
so
that
we
were
experiencing
what
the
rest
of
the
nation
for
that
matter.
People
around
the
globe
were
experienced
and
you
can
see
here
the
chart.
This
is
the
united
states
real
gdp
growth.
While
it's
been
relatively
consistent
with
a
few
dips.
B
Nothing
like
you
see
in
the
far
right
of
this
chart
projected
gdp
decrease
of
26
and
a
half
percent
actually
manifested
more
acutely
with
a
decline
of
31
and
a
half
percent
in
the
spring
of
2020..
California
was
not
immune
to
that
contraction.
Our
unemployment
went
from
3.9
to
16.4,
just
in
a
few
months,
our
gdp
growth
again
at
3.9.
B
Today,
by
on
where
we've
been
on
this
journey
together
over
the
last
12
months,
the
numbers
changed
dramatically
a
60
billion
dollar
swing,
but
our
values
did
not
change.
We
collectively
working
with
the
legislature.
We
made
tough
choices
to
temporarily
bridge
to
a
brighter
future.
We
drew
down
those
reserves
we
had
been
building
for
years
and
years.
We
committed
ourselves
to
government
efficiency,
not
just
rhetorically,
but
we
started
looking
at
travel
and
cell
phones.
We
started
looking
at
car
purchasing
strategies
to
consolidate
leases,
telework
online
services.
B
Our
public
employees
gave
back
close
to
10
percent
of
their
salaries.
My
staff
gave
back
10
percent
of
their
salaries.
We
postponed
many
of
those
supplemental
payments.
We
deferred
a
lot
of
investment
I'll
talk
about
that
in
a
moment
and
we
advanced
cuts.
We
refer
to
them
as
trigger
cuts
in
hope
and
expectation
that
we
can
get
some
more
support
from
the
federal
government.
At
the
time.
B
Is
we
didn't
impact
our
public
education
system
in
a
meaningful
way,
at
least
to
this
degree,
no
permanent
cuts,
no
permanent
layoffs?
We
actually
provided
5.3
billion
dollars
of
federal
funding,
to
focus
on
the
issue
of
learning
loss
and
just
address
the
issue
of
equity,
broadly
defined,
roughly
80
percent
of
that
investment
into
a
frame
of
equity.
B
Looking
at
the
issues
of
learning
loss
in
the
context
of
supports
for
distance
learning
and
address
some
of
the
challenges
associated
with
those
with
special
needs:
low-income,
english
learners,
we
focused
our
efforts
and
our
energies
to
extend
and
commit,
even
in
that
climate
to
our
earned
income
tax
credit.
We
went
from
400
million
dollars
two
years
ago
to
1.1
billion,
that's
been
distributed
in
the
last
few
months.
Here
in
the
state
of
california,
we
didn't
make
cuts
to
cal
works.
So
often
you
see
welfare
cuts.
We
didn't
make
cuts
to
medi-cal.
B
So
often
you
see
medical
cuts
to
the
most
vulnerable.
We
continued
our
expansion
through
covered
california
and
our
subsidies
up
and
through
supporting
the
middle
class.
We
invested
in
job
growth
and
we
invested
in
our
economic
recovery
and
we
ultimately
landed
on
a
202.1
billion
dollar
balanced
budget,
not
an
easy
journey,
a
challenge
the
likes
of
which
we've
never
experienced
in
such
a
contracted
period
of
time
numbers
changed,
but
our
values
did
not.
Where
are
we
today,
in
the
context
of
this
moment?
B
Clearly,
california's
posed
and
poised
for
an
economic
recovery
that
unemployment
that
peaked
at
16.4
percent
is
now
literally
cut
in
half
a
lot
of
work
still
to
do,
but
the
employment
rate
has
been
cut
in
half.
We
are
in
a
different
position:
vis-a-vis
even
the
rest
of
the
country.
You
can
see
reflected
here
us
versus
california,
in
terms
of
our
real
gdp,
always
outperforming
the
rest
of
the
nation.
B
This
is
a
chart
that,
just
because
of
the
nature
of
how
it
was
constructed,
appears
to
be
a
v-shaped
recovery
when
we
know
it's
more
like
a
u-shaped
recovery,
but
the
gist
of
what
you're
seeing
here
is
reflected
in
the
fact
that
california
is
not
only
poised
for
recovery,
we're
seeing
real
signs
of
recovery
in
our
state
and,
as
a
consequence,
today
we
are
presenting
a
spending
plan,
an
investment
plan,
a
balanced
budget,
it's
227
billion
dollars,
164.5
billion.
That
is
reflected
in
the
general
fund.
B
Here's
the
remarkable
news
I
I
humbly
submit
considering
where
we
were
just
a
few
months
ago,
as
we
worked
together
in
june
to
address
that
54
billion
dollar
shortfall.
Here
we
are
just
a
few
months
later
with
a
budget
that
now
enjoys
34
billion
dollars
in
resiliency
and
that's
defined
by
what
we
have
in
our
reserves
and
what
we
are
enjoying
in
terms
of
a
surplus.
Let's
look
at
the
reserves
here
we
are
again
reserves
that
are
actually
higher
than
this
time.
B
Last
year,
we're
projecting
22
billion
dollars
in
reserves,
a
record
high
in
this
budget.
15.6,
you
see
in
the
rainy
day
reserve
the
school
stable
stabilization
reserve,
who
would
have
imagined
three
billion
dollars
in
the
public
education
stabilization
reserve
operating
reserve.
We
are
posing
a
2.9
billion
dollar
cushion
in
our
safety
net
reserve,
which
was
established
years
ago,
holly
mitchell
and
others
450
million
dollars.
We
are
committing
more
now,
not
less
than
even
a
year
ago
to
address
our
long-term
liabilities.
B
9.5
billion
now
not
nine
point
one
billion
dollars,
three
billion
dollars
of
additional
payments
to
spurs
cert,
stirs
and
pers
and
into
our
retiree
health
care.
Six
point:
five
billion
additional
over
the
next
three
years,
so
9.5
billion
to
pay
down
those
long
term
obligations.
I
I
hear
you
we
recognize
our
responsibility
and
yes,
we
know
that
10
billion
dollars
roughly,
is
a
drop
in
the
bucket,
but
how
many
states
are
using
general
fund
to
pay
down
long-term
retirement
liabilities
like
the
state
of
california?
B
We
are
projecting
if
you
include
the
operating
reserve,
2.9
billion
a
15
billion
dollar
budget
surplus
for
the
fiscal
year
we
are
projecting.
More
importantly,
we
are
proposing
to
the
legislature
a
record
investment
in
our
public
schools,
unprecedented
in
california's
history,
85.8
billion
dollars,
the
highest
investment
per
pupil
that
the
state
has
ever
ever
advanced.
B
We
are
investing
in
our
energy
and
our
focus
to
deal
with
the
disproportionate
impacts
of
this
pandemic
on
the
issues
impacting
our
low-income
communities
disproportionately
and
that's
why
we're
putting
4.6
billion
dollars
up
to
extend
learning
time
to
provide
supports
to
our
schools
more
summer
school
and
before
and
after
school
programming?
Other
supplemental
supports
in
this
flexible
package,
but
an
additional
4.6
billion.
That's
building
off
the
5'3
last
year
in
learning
loss
this
year.
B
We
want
to
focus
this
again
flexibility
similar
last
year,
but
more
emphasis
more
focus
on
extending
learning
time
because
of
the
clear
challenges
and
strife
that
so
many
of
our
families
are
struggling
with
with
the
current
distance
learning
model.
3.84
percent
cola
this
year
and
we
are
providing
because
this
is
often
asked.
So
I
just
thought
I'd
provide
it
up
front,
an
additional
3.8
billion
dollars
above
the
prop
98
guarantee.
B
B
If
you
want
to
address
the
issue
of
achievement,
we
know
there's
no
greater
boost
to
achievement
than
teacher
preparation
period
full
stop.
We
know
that
there's
no
real
debate
about
that
in
terms
of
at
least
the
data
as
it
relates
to
that.
We
also
know
the
programs
that
work
and
we
made
investments
in
the
last
few
years,
and
a
number
of
these
programs
are
very
familiar
to
all
of
you,
but
we
can't
do
enough,
and
so
this
year,
we'll
make
another
down
payment
on
doing
more
in
tertia
training
and
recruitment.
B
These
are
grant
programs,
our
golden
state
teacher
grant
program
and
our
residency
program.
That's
focused
on
special
needs,
low-income
communities,
great
programs
classified
school
employees.
This
is
important.
Credentialing
program
may
not
seem
like
a
lot,
but
it's
important
taking
employees
and
getting
them
credentialed
getting
them
the
credentials,
so
they
become
real
employees
with
the
credential
professional
development
working
in
partnership
with
uc.
On
this
subject
matter,
expertise
around
reading
and
math
urban
and
ethnic
studies,
and
it's
an
exciting
novel
partnership
that
we're
advancing
this
year.
I
am
committed.
B
I
said
this
when
I
first
got
here,
not
just
interested
to
invest
in
special
education.
I
hope
you'll
take
a
look
at
this
slide.
1.5
billion
dollars,
we've
invested
just
in
the
last
two
years
in
special
education,
545
million
ongoing
this
year
we're
investing
in
additional
again.
This
is
our
proposal
to
the
legislature,
an
additional
300
million
dollars
to
focus
on
infants,
toddlers
and
preschooler.
I
was
one
of
these
kids
with
learning
disability.
B
I
am
all
in,
and
so
just
wanted
to
highlight
this
investment
because
we're
looking
at
historic
investments
in
special
education
in
this
state.
I
referenced
a
moment
ago,
those
deferrals
we
have
about
13
billion
dollars
in
referral
deferrals
in
our
k-12
system,
I'll
talk
about
the
billion
plus
in
the
community
college
k-14
in
a
moment,
but
of
those
deferrals
roughly
two-thirds
of
those
deferrals
we
are
paying
off
this
year,
there's
about
3.7
billion
remaining,
but
9.2
billion
we
will
pay
down.
If
again,
the
legislature
adopts
the
principle
of
this
budget.
B
The
issues
around
immediate
action
are
paramount.
We
can't
wait
in
this
environment.
We
can't
wait
as
we
traditionally
have
for
the
fiscal
year
to
end
to
adjudicate
and
die
in
dialogue
around
the
give
and
takes
the
budget
there's
certain
things
that
require
urgency
and,
as
I
said
in
the
outset,
I'll
end
on
this.
What
our
urgency
package
is.
It
certainly
includes
this
or
referred
to
as
immediate
action
that
we
hope
to
see
in
the
next
few
weeks
and
that's
a
two
billion
dollar
investment
to
safely
can't
do
it
safely.
B
We
can't
do
it
but
to
safely
reopen
our
schools
for
in-person
learning.
That's
our
default
safely.
Reopening
schools
for
in-person
learning.
In
order
to
do
that,
our
testing
programs
have
to
be
in
place.
Protocols
are
partnerships,
management,
labor
administrations,
districts,
school
sites,
all
that
has
to
be
put
in
place.
B
We
talked
a
lot
about
this
in
the
last
few
weeks,
but
the
focus
is
on
our
youngest
kids,
first
tk
to
two
and
then
build
on
that
age
cohort
through
the
spring
and
fund
the
needs
of
our
low-income
english
learners
and
foster
youth
again,
an
eye
on
equity
and
look,
I
don't
think
this.
My
wife
is
here
today.
We
know
this
through
our
lived
experience
with
two
very
young
kids
and
two
well
at
least
kids.
That
are
a
little
older.
B
I
don't
know
if
11
is
not
behind
as
young,
but
it's
very
challenging
to
have
a
four-year-old
who
you're
most
the
time
saying,
don't
look
at
the
screen,
get
off
a
screen
to
say:
hey,
look
at
this
screen
in
order
to
address
the
needs
of
a
distance
learning
environment.
We
know
it's
challenging
and
those
kids
are
falling
through
the
cracks
and
we
have
all
the
support
in
the
world.
B
I
can't
imagine
what's
happening
for
millions
of
other
children.
This
is
why
this
is
so
important,
and
we
know
for
again
for
that
younger
cohort,
that
the
social
emotional
benefits
of
in-person
instruction
are
foundational,
not
least
of
which-
and
my
wife
will
be
the
first
to
remind
not
just
me,
but
all
of
us
we're
going
to
be
serious
about
equity
defined
from
a
gender
paradigm.
B
Women
cannot
re-enter
the
workforce
disproportionately
unless
we
address
the
importance
and
the
imperative
of
getting
our
kids
back
safely
in
schools
to
address
more
broadly
reopening
our
schools,
but
also
reopening
our
businesses
and
providing
that
workforce
that
our
businesses
need
in
our
recovery.
So
that's
why
we're
promoting
a
two
billion
dollar
immediate
action
package
and
promoting
that
and
directing
it
to
the
legislature?
That
said,
here's
the
estimate
people
are
asking.
What
are
we
projected?
What's
anticipated
to
be
received
from
the
new
federal
act?
That
was
just
provided.
B
We
estimate
about
six
points
and
this
number
will
change.
I
I
say
this
is
anticipated.
Please
put
this
as
estimate
about
6.7
billion
by
the
way
this
is
additive.
This
will
not
substitute
we're
going
to
have
enough
another
6.7
billion
dollars
to
invest
in
our
school
system.
This
budget,
the
budgets
in
the
printer
that
went
to
the
printer,
was
done
before
we
got
the
details,
which
literally,
are
coming
in
every
day
of
the
new
federal
relief
package.
B
So
this
entire
budget,
please
caveat
with
that.
Consideration
here
is
a
specific
proof
point
of
6.7
billion
dollars
that
we
will
work
with
the
legislature
to
prioritize
in
terms
of
additional
investment
above
the
investment
that
I
just
laid
out.
Let's
talk
about
investments.
We
talked
a
lot
last
year
about
our
parents
agenda
foundational,
and
that
is
our
investment
in
early
childhood
and
early
childhood
supports
ece
issues
of
zero
to
three,
not
just
three
to
five,
not
just
head
start,
but
early
head
start
not
just
preschool,
but
tk.
B
All
the
frameworks
build
the
architecture
of
life.
Now,
since
2019
we've
invested
about
400
million
dollars
of
ongoing
funding,
a
lot
more
in
one-time
funding
to
advance
our
child
care
and
our
ece
programs
in
the
state
again,
a
down
payment
on
a
commitment
that
we
have
advanced
more
formally
by
the
creation
of
a
master
plan
working
group
that
put
out
a
master
plan
for
early
learning
and
care.
They
just
put
out
a
report.
B
It's
a
big
number
to
achieve
the
ultimate
goal
of
providing
quality
quality
care
for
all
four-year-olds
and
all
income
eligible
three-year-olds
to
have
the
appropriate
ratios
to
have
the
appropriate
reimbursements
to
do.
All
of
that
is
going
to
take
years.
Nice
being
honest
with
folks,
not
naive
about
challenge,
even
if
you
wanted
to
do
it,
you
couldn't
spend
all
the
money
and
provide
the
quality,
that's
foundational
in
terms
of
the
expansion.
But
now
we
have
a
plan.
We've
never
had
a
plan
before
a
lot
of
hard
work
and
leader.
B
You
know
we
so
many
leaders
in
this
space
that
worked
hard
on
that
plan
and
we're
just
we
want
to
commit
to
a
down
payment
on
that
plan.
250
million
for
incentive
grants
to
match
some
of
the
work,
that's
happening
with
early
tk
programs
up
and
down
the
state,
the
infrastructure
investments.
Again,
we've
got
to
build
out
these
classrooms.
It's
a
big
impediment,
200
million
dollars,
more
professional
development
in
this
space
and
obviously
more
ongoing
support
for
child
care.
You
recall:
we
consolidate
our
child
care
functions
and
we've
now
got
them
under
one
roof.
B
So
we
look
forward
to
working
with
member
mccarty
and
others.
Who've
been
just
incredible
champions
in
this
space
and
working
to
adjudicate
the
merits
and
demerits
of
of
which
supports
we
should
provide
which
priorities
we
should
advance.
First.
In
terms
of
those
efforts,
I
want
to
talk
now
about
higher
education
and
that's
a
framework
of
concern
for
many
of
us
that
have
watched
a
significant
number
of
people
drop
out
of
our
higher
education
system
because
of
this
pandemic.
B
We
as
a
consequence,
want
to
prioritize
our
re-engagement
with
students
that
have
left
and
you'll
see
that
reflected
in
subsequent
slides
and
further
investment.
We
need
to
make
further
investment.
We
need
to
invest
in
more
ongoing
support.
We
do
not
believe
it's
time
for
tuition
increase
or
fee
increases,
and
we
do
believe
it's
time
to
invest
more
in
student
aid
across
the
spectrum
and
that's
exactly
what
this
budget
proposes.
B
Community
colleges
specifically
we're
looking
at
250
million
a
quarter
billion
dollars
of
financial
aid
grants,
we
hope
some
early,
not
immediate
action
with
the
legislature
on
this
because
of
the
urgency
of
the
moment
and
concerns
basic
needs
becoming
more
and
more
important.
Food
and
housing,
so
that's
why
that
number
is
a
little
higher
than
it's
been
in
the
past
100
million
mental
health.
I
could
spend
the
entire
time
talking
about
k-12
education
in
the
issues
of
mental
health
and
well-being.
B
We
can
talk
entire
budget
about
those
issues
of
wellness
associated
with
this
pandemic,
but
real
resources.
We
are
now
providing
for
community
college
specific
to
advance
the
mitigation
of
those
behavioral
health
issues
as
a
specific
task
at
least
proposal
in
this
budget.
Enrollment
growth,
modest,
more
professional
development-
and
yes,
I
you
know
I
am
committed.
This
is
stubborn
to
addressing
the
I'll
say
it,
the
racket,
that
is
textbooks
in
this
country,
usurious
costs
associated
with
textbooks,
and
so
we're
going
to
do
more.
B
This
year
we
do
a
little
last
year
on
open
source
textbooks
more
on
that.
I
can
assure
you
coming
soon,
because
we
in
california
have
an
obligation
to
disrupt
that
entire
system
nationwide.
It
relates
to
deferrals.
I
mentioned
the
13
billion,
two-thirds
of
which
we
address
k-12.
Here's
roughly
similar
percentage.
We
are
addressing
1.13
billion,
the
community
college,
326.5
million
dollars
remaining.
It
relates
to
issues
of
education
workforce.
B
Obviously,
a
big
part
of
what
community
college
does
not
exclusively
community
college,
but
community
college
is
a
real
driver.
We're
providing
this
budget
he's
proposing
350,
3
million
dollars
of
new
workforce
development
investments.
Perhaps
the
most
important,
the
biggest
investment
we
are
proposing
is
250
million
a
quarter
of
a
billion
dollars
to
focus
on
linkages
between
our
higher
education
system
and
gainful
employment.
B
This
has
been
is
that
we
have
to
do
better
in
this
space
at
the
end
of
the
day,
and
people
can
debate
this,
and
you
know
we
we
can
all
go
back
and
forth.
What's
the
utility
of
a
degree,
is
it
about
citizenship?
Is
it
about
creative
thinking?
Is
it
about?
You
know
it
could
be
a
lot
of
things
or
is
it
just
about
getting
a
job,
people,
land
different
places
and
whatever
their
values
are
that's
where
they
land?
B
I
happen
to
think
it's
many
many
things,
but
it's
also
about
getting
a
job,
especially
in
this
economy,
and
so
we've
got
to
connect,
what's
really
happening
in
our
workforce,
to
what
we're
educating
in
terms
of
that
human
capital
coming
conveyed
of
that
conveyor
belt
for
talent,
the
csus
ucs
and
community
colleges.
So
we
want
better
alignment,
and
so
we've
been
talking
about
this.
We
got
to
start
doing
something
about
this
in
much
more
meaningful
way.
B
Remember
we
put
together
this
future
work
commission
really
looking
about
where,
where
future
of
work
fundamentally
is
going,
we
by
the
way
put
that
together
before
this
pandemic,
we've
just
seen
that
accelerate
new
work.
Styles,
new
arrangements,
telework
all
that's
happening
in
terms
of
platform
providers
and
the
gig
economy,
the
digitification
of
our
engagement
and
all
that
requires
now
renewed
energy,
renewed
thinking
and
us
to
move
much
more
expeditiously
and
that's
what
this
250
million
dollars
reflects.
B
Apprenticeships
can't
no
substitutes
for
these
high
road
training,
partnership
programs,
work-based
learning,
just
a
real
believer
in
work
based
learning
can
intellectualize
things.
You
can
experience
things.
The
reason
cal
poly
is
one
of
the
finest
universities
in
the
world,
both
cal
poly's,
not
just
cal
poly,
san,
luis
obispo,
but
also
pomona,
and
so
work-based
learning
is
foundational.
We
also
have
some
partnerships
with
uc
uc
prime
around
healthcare,
12.9
million
anyway
you'll
see
a
lot
more
energy
and
investment
in
the
workforce
place.
Let's
talk
csu
the
two
systems
csu
and
uc.
B
We
are
proposing
786
million
dollars
in
new
money,
ongoing
and
one
time
deferred,
maintenance,
emergency
financial
aid,
computing
talent
initiative,
not
just
the
uc,
should
be
focusing
on
computational
investments
and
and
focusing
on
education
in
that
space,
but
csus
as
well,
and
clearly
professional
development
as
always
needed.
So
additional
425
million
at
the
csu
you
see
could
see
similar
investment
in
one
time
as
it
relates
to
the
subject
matter.
Projects
I
mentioned
and
to
help
our
k-12
educators,
more
professional
development,
emergency
financial
aid
you'll
see
a
number
there.
20
million
institutes,
science
and
innovation.
B
I
want
to
applaud
former
governor
davis
did
something
deserves
a
lot
more
attention.
He
developed
these
partnerships
that
are
still
thriving
across
this
state
to
focus
on
taking
sort
of
an
academic
discipline
and
translating
it
into
a
meaningful
construct,
meaning
manifesting
an
intellectual
frame
and
creating
frameworks
to
advance
and
accelerate
innovation
and
discovery
and
the
entrepreneurial
spirit
that
defines
the
best
of
the
state,
their
institutes
across
the
state
partnerships,
biotherapeutics
bioinnovation
issues
related
I.t
across
the
spectrum.
B
We
want
to
invest
some
money
in
that
space
and
really
invest
more
energy
in
building
on
those
outstanding
partnerships,
so
361
million
dollars
in
the
uc
space,
but
here
again
is
a
significant
slide
and
a
significant
part
of
the
conversation
we'll
be
having,
with
the
legislature
upwards
of
three
billion
dollars
of
additional
support
for
higher
education,
3
billion
2.9
anticipated
coming
from
that
federal
act.
I
know
a
lot
of
folks
were
disappointed
that
that
federal
stimulus
wasn't
even
larger.
B
I
I
I'm
disappointed
because
I
do
think
more
discretionary
money
needed
to
come
to
states
and
local
governments
in
particular,
but
you
got
to
acknowledge
these
are
significant
investments
that
will
enhance
our
efforts
here
in
the
state
substantially
and
provide
a
real
injection
of
support,
particularly
uc
and
csu.
So
2.9
billion
dollars
look
forward
to
working
with
the
legislature
in
terms
of
and
obviously
leaders
and
the
two
new
leaders
at
csu,
and
you
see
the
board
of
trustees
and
the
regions
to
make
those
investments
and
to
make
sure
those
investments
are
well
utilized.
B
Speaking
of
investments
not
lost
on
anyone,
the
importance
imperative
of
continuing
our
investments
and
testing
and
contact
tracing
isolation,
quarantine,
focusing
yes
on
vaccinations,
which
imagine
maybe
the
only
reason
anyone
showed
up
today
to
talk
about
vaccinations
as
well
as
additional
supports
across
the
spectrum
for
state
response
we're
putting
4.4
billion
into
this
budget.
Not
all
of
that
is
general
fund.
B
We
expect
a
substantial
portion
disproportionate
number
that
to
be
reimbursed,
but
this
is
the
dollar
figure
remember
13
billion
last
year,
in
the
last
at
least
fiscal
year
and
4.4,
at
least
since
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic,
13
billion
4.4
billion
emergency
response
we're
putting
related
to
covet
relief
in
this
budget
372
for
vaccines.
Here's
a
slide,
that's
also
important,
anticipating
additional
resources
coming
from
the
feds
additional
350
million
for
vaccines
and
1.7
billion
for
testing
and
tracing.
B
So
that's
an
open-ended
question
is:
do
we
use
that
money
to
offset
these
investments,
or
do
we
add
on
top
and
that's
a
question
for
the
legislature?
That's
a
question
we
have
to
dialogue
and
I
want
to
make
this
crystal
clear.
So
people
understand
the
federal
supports,
with
the
exception
of
the
prop
98,
the
federal
supports
have
discretion
in
terms
of.
Do
you
add
more
support,
or
do
you
substitute
the
general
funds
support
and
then
redirect
those
dollars?
B
There's
discretion
in
that
bucket
there's
not
in
terms
of
those
school
dollars
k
through
12.,
and
so
the
question
are
the
98
dollars
more
broadly
defined,
and
so
the
question
here
is:
is
this
vaccine
number
additive,
or
can
we
use
a
portion
of
it?
How
much
flexibility
exists?
Is
it
really
1.7
for
testing
and
tracing?
Can
we
find
more
support,
use
some
more
of
those
dollars
for
vaccinations.
B
Psas,
culturally
competent
outreach
address
some
of
the
stickiness
as
it
relates
to
people
wanting
to
administer,
or
even
rather
receive
these
vaccinations.
So
again,
all
that
will
be
debated,
all
that
be
discussed,
and
obviously
we
have
a
real
partner
in
12
or
so
days
with
president-elect
biden.
That
will
make
that
task
a
lot
easier
and
we
look
forward
to
that
now.
One
task-
that's
not
easy,
is
getting
this
economy
moving
again.
We
mentioned
the
16.4
unemployment
rate
peaking
out
in
may
it's
half
that
today
it's
still
stubbornly
too
high.
B
I
want
to
get
back
down
to
those
historic
low
numbers,
3.9,
roughly
four
percent.
We
want
to
do
even
better
than
that.
So
we're
looking
at
four
and
a
half
billion
dollar
economic
recovery
package-
we
socialized
this
a
few
days
ago,
so
I
won't
belabor
it
too
much,
except
to
say
we
have
some
immediate
action
that
we
hope
we
can
take
together
in
partnership
with
the
legislature.
B
That's
575
million
dollars
in
small
business
grants.
These
are
grants,
not
loans.
These
go
to
non-profits,
not
just
small
businesses
and
cultural
institutions,
we're
also
looking
for
fee
waivers,
70.6
million
dollars
fee
waivers
just
to
give
you
a
spectrum
at
least
a
cents
about
59,
000
bars
and
restaurants
licensed
in
the
state
of
california.
This
would
go
directly
to
those
businesses
that
have
been
disproportionately
impacted
by
stay-at-home
orders
and
this
pandemic
induced
recession
cosmopolitan.
B
This
is
manicurist
and
barbarian
barbering
folks
in
that
service
industry
as
well,
would
be
beneficiaries
of
these
fee
waivers
as
well
about
55
000
establishments
in
that
cohort.
That
would
benefit
from
these
fee
waivers
so
want
to
get
these
grants
out.
This
575,
as
you
know,
builds
on
the
money
that
we're
getting
out
right
now.
These
are
five
to
twenty
five
thousand
dollar
grants
that
we
are
putting
out.
In
fact,
we
just
opened
this
process
up,
encourage
people
to
learn
more
about
it.
B
Covet19.Ca.Gov
covid19.ca.gov
make
themselves
aware
of
the
first
half
a
billion
dollars
and
then,
with
immediate
early
action,
we
could
provide
an
additional
500
million,
get
over
a
billion
plus
dollars
of
grants
out
the
door
as
quickly
as
possible
to
help
our
businesses
at
this
incredibly
challenging
moment.
We
also
are
promoting
more
investment
in
our
cal
competes
program
about
180
million,
existing
tax
credits
about
250
million
dollars
of
a
new
grant
program.
Credit
program
that
would
be
administered
through
the
same
construct.
That's
well
defined
through
the
cal
competes
process,
but
just
expand
the
universe.
B
We
think
this
will
increase
our
competitiveness,
our
retention
strategies,
we're
not
going
to
roll
over
we're
not
giving
up
on
economic
development
and
we're
not
rolling
over
giving
up
in
terms
of
our
dominance
in
terms
of
startups
innovation,
entrepreneurialism
and
world-class
headquartered
companies.
So
that's
part
strategy
to
make
an
investment
in
that
space.
Our
main
street
hiring
tax
credit
thousand
dollar
tax
credit
for
employees,
a
hundred
thousand
per
business.
We
put
a
hundred
million
dollars
up
last
year,
at
least
a
few
months
ago
with
the
budget.
B
We
want
to
build
on
that
with
another
100
million
dollars.
We've
got
loan
guarantees,
but
125
million
dollars
in
that
space,
and
I
bank
these
are
folks
that
fall
through
the
clocks
and
the
sba
loans,
not
getting
the
ppp
loans
from
the
feds,
and
we
want
to
provide
additional
supports
in
that
very
successful
program.
Women
minority-owned
businesses
that
disproportionately
benefited
from
those
current
investments.
We
want
to
build
on
that
success.
B
We
have
the
sales
tax
exclusions,
I'm
going
to
talk
about
that,
a
little
bit
more
in
a
moment
to
push
out
the
boundaries
innovation,
especially
as
it
relates
to
green
energy
transportation,
and
then
this,
what
seems
modest.
But
to
me
it's
significant.
These
are
ten
thousand
dollar
seed
grants
in
the
california
dream
fund.
These
are
important
grants
for
people
that
truly
fall
through
all
the
cracks,
and
this
is
a
real
lifeline
for
many
many
businesses
and
what
seems
rather
insignificant
from
a
cow
competes
frame.
B
A
few
thousand
bucks
few
hundred
bucks
could
be
the
difference
between
keeping
those
lights
on
or
turning
them
off
permanently,
and
so
that's
what
that
35
million
represents.
We
are
putting
additional.
I
just
want
to
mind
you,
the
52
billion
dollar
five-year
capital
plan,
I'm
not
including
roughly
10
billion
dollars
that
we're
investing.
B
Thank
you
all
the
leaders
on
sb1,
thank
you
to
the
voters
for
doing
the
right
thing
in
terms
of
supporting
sb1
getting
those
dollars
out,
people
say
well.
What
are
we
doing
on
infrastructure
we're
putting
out
close
to
10
billion
dollars
this
year?
We're
talking
about
evm
structure
in
a
second,
these
infill
infrastructure
grants
I'll
also
talk
about
in
a
second,
but
I
wanted
just
to
highlight
on
this
screen
additional
300
million
dollars
in
deferred
maintenance,
some
parks,
our
judicial
branch,
the
courts,
water
systems
in
the
state.
This
is
additive,
another
300
million.
B
This
is
stimulating
in
terms
of
the
economic
benefits,
direct
and
indirect
jobs
that
are
created
from
these
types
of
investments.
You
see
on
this
slide,
that's
why
we
are
highlighting
it
here:
the
300
million
on
deferred
maintenance.
We
hope
legislature
will
consider
even
putting
more
resources
in
this
space.
We
think
that's
critical
in
addition
to
our
five-year
52
billion
dollar
capital
plan.
Here's
the
resources
we
anticipate
close
to
3
billion
in
transit,
state
highways
transit
can't
come
at
a
better
time,
particularly
for
our
transit
agencies.
Again,
this
is
just
hats
off
to
speaker,
nancy
pelosi.
B
Her
credible
leadership
stubbornness
on
the
other
side,
aside,
her
incredible
leadership,
her
stewardship
her
faith
and
devotion
to
this
cause
of
helping
you
all
of
us
get
through
this
very
challenging
time.
Demonstrably
exampled
here
in
this
roughly
3
billion
dollar
investment
in
our
transit
systems,
which
have
been
battered
by
this
recession,
as
well
as
investments
in
our
roads,
bridges
and
highways.
Speaking
of
investments,
we
think
there's
urgency
to
get
money
into
people's
pockets.
B
You
recall
that
first
slide
and
that's
why
we're
proposing
a
golden
state
stimulus
to
basically
make
those
six
hundred
dollar
checks
that
people
are
starting
to
receive
from
the
federal
government
to
get
them
to
be
twelve
hundred
dollars.
We
wanna
get
roughly
four
million
checks
out
within
three
weeks
of
me
signing
this
package.
B
We
can
get
these
dollars
out
quickly.
Louise
reyes,
all
these
incredible
leaders
that
were
on
a
zoom
call
the
other
day
promoting
this.
Just
thank
you
for
your
leadership,
your
support
of
this
effort,
leadership
of
the
speaker
and
pro
tem,
so
many
others,
including
clearly
our
two
budget
chairs,
ting
and
skinner.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration
of
this
program.
B
We
want
with
urgency
to
move
with
immediate
action
to
get
two
and
a
half
billion
two
point:
four
billion
dollars
into
the
pockets
of
four
million
californians
to
help
them
with
evictions
to
help
them
with
rent
to
help
them
with
utilities
to
help
them
with
child
care,
help
them
with
food,
helping
with
the
spectrum
of
supports
they
so
desperately
needed
this
moment
and
that's
wise
preference.
In
extension,
on
the
victim
moratorium,
we
have
to
get
that
done
july
or
rather
january.
B
B
We
need
to
move
to
get
that
extension
as
it
relates
to
additional
supports,
there's
about
2.6
billion
dollars
that
the
federal
government
is
offering
this
state
and
jurisdictions
with
populations
north
of
200
000.,
meaning
the
2.6
billion.
You
see
reflected
in
this
slide
of
additional
support
for
rent
and
utilities
coming
from
the
federal
government.
Not
all
of
that
comes
to
the
state
about
1.4
billion
does,
and
1.2
billion
goes
to
those
local
jurisdictions
a
little
smaller
than
the
last
corona
virus
cares
act.
B
These
are
again
municipalities
with
200
000
population,
not
the
old
half
a
million,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure.
The
key
here
is
to
make
sure
the
state
and
locals
are
working
collaboratively
to
make
sure
whatever
we
do
is
state
level
with
our
existing
supports
and
other
programs
we're
doing
strategically
and
thoughtfully,
and
that
it
parallels
our
thinking
and
our
strategies
around
addressing
the
evictions
question
by
the
end
of
the
month.
B
So
all
this
is
happening
in
real
time
and
it's
an
incredible
moment
in
terms
of
anxiety
but
incredible
moment
of
opportunity
to
address
these
issues.
I
know
david,
so
many
others
are
working
on
this.
Our
pro
tem's
been
incredible,
tony
atkins
on
this,
so
many
folks
committed
to
this
cause
working
overtime.
We
look
forward
to
that
engagement
over
the
course.
The
next
number
of
days,
not
just
weeks
here
on
the
housing
front
convictions
to
housing.
B
Here's
what
we've
done
the
last
few
years,
billions
of
dollars
unprecedented-
I
I
know
we
say
that
a
lot
and
means
nothing
in
terms
of
well.
What
does
it
produce?
Well,
it's
produced
a
lot
just
not
enough
and
good
enough.
Never
is
no
one's
night,
but
we've
done
an
unprecedented
amount
of
tax
credits.
B
Unprecedented
number
of
dollars
been
vested
in
loans,
infrastructure
grants
the
likes
of
which
we've
never
done
in
the
past,
and
we
finally
got
that
excess
land
survey
done
and
we've
got
partnerships
in
south
lake
tahoe
and
stockton
and
sacramento
more
work
still
to
happen
in
that
space.
I
just
want
to
remind
you
of
some
of
that
work.
We
want
to
build
on
that
half
a
billion
dollars
want
to
put
additional
investments
in
a
low
income,
housing
tax
credit
program,
we're
going
to
put
additional.
This
was
the
reference
a
few
slides
ago,
additional
500
million.
B
There's
two
programs:
one's
a
brownfields
program:
250
million
there's
another
just
more
traditional
infill
grant
igg
program
or
iig
program
that
we
did
last
year:
sidewalks
roads,
lighting
utilities.
This
was
an
impediment
that
came
out
of
our
conversations
with
the
cities
in
particular,
but
also
some
counties
around
getting
housing
going,
the
inability,
particularly
for
small
communities,
to
even
invest
in
the
surrounding
infrastructure,
and
so
that
slowed
down
housing
production
and
starts.
B
We
want
to
address
that
half
a
billion
dollars
we're
putting
back
in
this
budget
and
building
on
what
we've
done
the
last
few
years
and
then
no
substitute
again
for
these
incredible
apprenticeship
programs.
But
if
we're
going
to
accelerate
our
production,
we
got
to
have
a
workforce
and
that
workforce
we
hope
to
support
through
that
construction
apprenticeship
program.
Here's
also
two
new
things:
we're
doing
one's
creating
this
new
housing
accountability
unit.
It's
all
about
accountability
at
all
levels
of
government.
You
recall
certainly
folks
down
hunting
the
beach
recall
two
years
ago.
B
We
were
not
shy,
but
we
wanted
to
go
after
what
we.
What
we
believe
was
the
neglect
in
terms
of
addressing
the
issue:
housing,
meeting
the
housing
goals
and
meeting
the
goals
that
that
the
state
needs
to
advance
in
order
to
create
some
supply
demand
balance
because
of
the
current
imbalance,
because
the
lack
of
production
in
this
state-
and
so
we've
got
this
new
technical
assistance
program,
a
new
unit
we're
going
to
create-
and
let
me
just
make
this
clear
to
all
my
friends-
I
was
a
former
member
of
our
county
board
of
supervisors.
B
This
is
to
monitor
city
council
meetings.
This
is
to
monitor
board
of
supervisor
meetings,
planning,
commission
meetings,
we're
not
going
to
wait
for
an
article
to
be
written
to
be
proactive
in
terms
of
holding
local
government
accountable
to
increasing
housing
production.
So
that's
the
point
of
this
unit
and
then
the
implementation
of
ab434.
B
B
It's
all
about
reorganizing,
addressing
time
value
of
money
to
decision
making.
This
is
in
particular
for
rental
properties,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
implementing
that,
and
so
I
just
want
folks
to
know.
Thank
you
to
legislative
leaders
that
money
is
in
the
budget
and
you
know
our
housing
leaders.
You
know
them
all
from
the
pro
tem
to
scott.
We
all
I
mean
I
I'm
not
doing
justice
to
so
many
members
of
the
legislature
that
have
been
champions
in
this
space.
Thank
you
for
that
hard
work.
B
Here's
the
investments
we've
made
on
homelessness.
Just
one
again,
contextualize
got
a
lot
more
work
to
do
here,
we're
just
getting
going.
It's
been
challenging
here,
but
we're
just
getting
going
we're
mindful.
We
know
exactly
what
to
anticipate
in
the
next
year,
2-3
as
it
relates
to
the
dust
settling
on
this
pandemic
and
the
impacts
of
this
pandemic
in
terms
of
the
prospects
that
we
are
going
to
be
challenged
with
even
more
homelessness
in
this
state.
B
Now
we
haven't
been
shy,
we
haven't
been
timid
and
we
haven't
used
the
pandemic
as
excuse
not
to
move
forward.
1.2
billion
dollars,
1.16
billion
dollars
has
been
invested
in
cities
and
counties
in
our
cocs.
Just
in
the
last
two
years,
we
did
this
in
april,
something
called
project
room
key
in
april
of
this
I
mean
just
a
few
months
ago,
we
were
able
to
get
23
000
people
support
homeless
individuals,
it's
unprecedented
in
california's
history.
B
I
know
23
000
is
not
123
000,
but
it
was
significant
and
we
still
have
close
to
15
000
units
of
room,
key
housing
in
our
portfolio
at
least
the
portfolios
of
cities
and
counties
all
up
and
down
the
state.
We
created
a
new
program
in
june,
really
got
up
and
running
in
july
august
september
october,
not
just
in
five
six
months
called
project
will
refer
to
it's
really
home
key
project
room
key
home
key,
and
we
invested
with
the
incredible
support
of
the
legislature,
credible
support.
B
B
B
A
master
plan
for
aging
comes
out
of
just
common
sense
and
it's
self-evident
any
of
us
watching
anyone's
seen
experiencing
what's
happening
in
this
country,
not
just
the
state
disproportionate,
now
number
of
seniors
we're
starting
to
see,
or
at
least
large
number
of
seniors
we're
starting
to
see
on
our
streets
in
sidewalks,
and
so
we
need
to
do
more
in
that
space,
1.75
billion
we're
recommending
for
the
legislature
to
consider-
and
yes,
we're
bringing
back
cali
talked
a
lot
about
this
last
year.
This
was,
unfortunately
impacted
our
investments
into
complete
transformation
of
our
medical
system.
B
Our
medicaid
medicaid
nationwide
medi-cal,
here
in
the
state
of
california,
want
to
invest
1.1
billion.
That's
all
in
not
just
general
fund.
In
this
calais
proposal.
As
my
dad
used
to
love
say
god's
delays
are
not
god's
denials,
while
this
may
have
been
delayed
last
year,
we're
committed
to
the
cause
this
year.
This
is
about
payment
reform,
changing
incentives,
investing
in
prevention,
looking
at
brain
health
and
physical
health.
B
B
Why-
and
I
know
it's
a
big
part
of
dr
galley
and
my
entire
health
care
teams,
why
this
is
exciting
and
and
there's
so
many
wonderful,
dr
wood
and
so
many
members
of
the
legislature,
pan
there's
so
many
wonderful
leaders
in
this
space
that
rambula
helped
amplify
these
efforts,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
them
for
their
work
on
this
and
their
commitment
to
it.
Talk
about
work.
We
got
to
commit
to
doing
more
to
help
our
kids
and
their
health
needs.
B
I
remind
folks
that
the
brain
is
part
of
the
body,
and
so
we
need
to
address
the
issue
of
brain
health
and
physical
health,
and
the
issue
of
early
screening
is
foundational
ad
prevention,
but
creating
a
greater
stronger
school-based
model
of
care
for
behavioral
health
is
fundamental
wellness,
early
prevention,
suicide
prevention-
god
bless
suicide
prevention,
so
400
million.
That's
all
in
200
general
fund,
200
million
matched
the
fed's
commitment
in
that
space,
200
plus
million
dollars.
There's
an
old
2006
bond
that
was
passed.
B
A
lot
of
the
money
was
spent,
but
a
lot
of
money
was
relinquished.
A
lot
of
money
came
back.
We
can
use
it
with
discretion
on
this
jails,
facilities,
bond
kind
of
like
this
at
least
the
frame
jail
facilities,
bond
money's
available,
we
could
put
200
million
and
we
can
use
that
money
for
residential
mental
health
facilities,
so
building
on
that
1.75
billion
and
some
of
the
resources
there,
an
additional
200
million
here
to
provide
resources.
B
So
repurposing
of
this
is
something
we
are
proposing
to
the
legislature,
and
then
we
got
to
deal
with
this
in
issues
of
incompetent
stand,
and
this
is
this
tough
stuff.
It's
part
of
our
state
hospital
system.
We've
had
three
pilots,
these
demonstration
projects
we
want
to
scale
them.
That's
why
you
see
that
reference
of
233
million
of
the
304.5,
but
we
have
to
deal
with
ists.
B
We
want
to
look
at
fairview
of
a
lot
of
proposals
in
this
space.
A
lot
we've
comprehensive
proposal
in
this
space,
a
lot
of
work
to
do
in
this
space,
but
this
is
foundational.
It's
principled
and
yes,
there's
a
legal
requirement
to
do
the
right
thing
as
well.
We
should
have
needed
that,
but
we
are
committing
to
a
long-term
process
of
investing
in
the
ist
space.
Speaking
of
investments
hunter
another
half
a
billion
dollars.
This
is
substance
abuse,
as
well
as
mental
health,
that
we
do
anticipate
coming
into
space
from
the
federal
government.
B
So
again,
legislature
really
look
forward
to
working
with
you
on
these
resources.
It
can
be
supplementary
could
be
additive,
we'll
work
together,
we'll
figure
that
out
now,
let's
talk
about
health
care,
so
we
move
from
mental
health
more
broadly
to
physical,
not
just
mental
health.
Here's
a
lot
of
work,
we've
done
that
men,
individual
mandate,
this
expansion
and
the
deepening
of
those
subsidies
into
the
middle
class.
No
other
state
in
america
does
that
into
the
middle
class
supporting
subsidies
for
our
public
option.
We
provided
eligibility
for
everyone,
regardless
their
status
up
to
26.
B
We,
we
created
this
commission
the
notion
of
changing
our
payer
system
and
I've
long
believed
in
a
single
payer
model.
I
just
believe,
ultimately,
that's
where
this
country
is
going
to
go.
It's
a
question
how
you
get
there,
so
we
really
need
to
answer
all
those
tough
questions,
because
really
the
end
of
the
day,
they're
only
tough
questions
in
this
space,
and
so
we
created
this
commission.
B
It
was
created
a
few
years
ago,
but
we've
actually
got
people
now
working
on
this
question,
with
real
resources
to
back
up
their
contribution
and
their
efforts
prop
56,
we
started
investing
money.
There
wasn't
previously
invested
loan
repayment
programs
and
the
like.
We've
talked
a
lot
about
reducing
costs.
Lowering
prescription
drug
costs
talked
about
more
cost
targets,
transparency,
consequences
for
failing
to
meet
targets
and
how
we
can
do
more
to
expand
eligibility
and
deepen
subsidies.
So
here's
what
we're
proposing
this
year.
B
Last
year,
we
talked
about
this
office,
fair
health
care,
quality
and
affordability.
This
year,
we're
going
to
get
it
done.
This
fundamentally
is
an
office
that
will
address
that
provider.
Consolidation
issue
we'll
address
some
of
the
regional
disparities
and
why
in
northern
california
or
southern
california,
the
cost
structures
are
so
different.
No
excuse
for
that.
We
have
to
address
those
head
on
to
be
forthright
about
that,
and
we've
got
to
target
costs
in
all
sectors,
all
sectors
and
hold
folks
to
account
more
transparency.
B
It's
tough,
no
one
says
this
is
easy
in
this
office
about
the
umbrella
begin
that
process
anew.
We
also
as
part
of
our
master
plan
for
aging.
Thank
you
to
all
the
leaders
that
just
put
that
master
plan
out
creation
of
this
office
of
medicare
innovation
integration.
This
is
all
about
some
of
the
wobbler
issues
of
medicaid
medicare.
This
is
all
about
integration.
B
More
broadly
and
looking
at
keeping
people
at
home
keeping
supports,
the
whole
idea
is
allow
people
to
live
in
place,
live
in
dignity,
dress,
transportation
needs
support
their
long-term
care
by
being
innovative.
So
it's
not
just
skilled
nursing
facilities.
It's
not
just
these
larger
constructs
that
we
have
inherited
from
an
industrial
mindset,
but
some
of
these
new
supports
that
are
part
and
parcel
of
a
more
flexible,
innovative,
community-based,
culturally
competent
strategy.
So
that's
broadly
what
that
medicare
innovation
and
integration
office
will
do
but
more
important
than
anything
else.
B
Its
capacity
to
do
something
big
now
presents
itself
with
the
binding
administration
coming
in.
So
we're
really
really
excited
about
the
creation
of
both
of
these
offices.
Moving
forward.
We
also
are
committed
to
the
cause
of
acknowledging.
What's
worked.
Telehealth
has
really
worked
been
amazing.
We
did
some
immediate
executive
orders,
codified,
trailer
bills
legislation.
A
lot
of
good
work
was
done,
legislative
leaders
across
the
spectrum
on
telehealth.
We
want
to
put
an
additional
94.8
million
dollars
into
maintaining
our
expanded
flexibilities
that
were
authorized
during
this
pandemic
into
telehealth
remote
patient
monitoring
as
a
new
benefit.
B
Specifically,
look
for
adults
with
type
1
diabetes,
no
more
important
benefit
than
this
continuous
glucose
monitoring.
It
has
not
been
an
expanded
medical
benefit.
Now
it
will
be
again
if
the
legislature
concurs
and
then
there's
that
1.4
billion
you
may
recall
those
suspensions
in
the
budget
may
have
been
on
your
mind,
a
few
of
you
that
may
be
familiar
with
it.
We
suspended
again
back
to
those
trigger
cuts,
deferral,
suspensions
to
balance.
Last
year's
budget
prop
56,
supplemental
payments,
ihss
in
home,
supported
services,
doug
moore
doug
that
suspension's
gone
to
april
barrett
gone.
B
We
finally
are
addressing
those
issues.
Thank
you
guys
both
of
you
for
your
strong
advocacy
and
support.
That's
at
seven
percent
we're
going
to
get
that
moving
again
developmental
service
rates.
So
many
you
know
leader
somebody.
I
think
I
can
go
through
the
list.
I
was
thinking
of
fraser
and
others
incredible
leaders
in
developmental
services.
Thank
you
for
your
support
and
leadership
in
that
space.
Those
suspensions
are
off
1.4
billion
impact
to
the
general
fund,
but
we
are
in
a
position
we
can
afford
to
do
that.
B
The
master
plan
for
aging
I
talked
about
all
the
things
that
are
in
other
parts
of
the
budget,
we're
just
doing
some
direct
supports
and
also
first
lady,
former
first
lady
maria
shriver
and
her
work
on
alzheimer's.
She
talked
about
the
importance
of
a
new
senior
advisor
position.
We're
going
to
do
that
talked
about
these
blue
zone
community
grants
we're
going
to
begin
to
seed
those
grants,
more
data,
sharing,
more
systems,
connectivity,
more
research,
media
awareness,
all
of
that
part
of
a
package
for
the
master
plan
for
aging
and
homelessness.
B
Speaking
of
a
package
comprehensive
one
billion
dollar
commitment
to
wildfire
resiliency
and
emergency
response,
one
billion
dollar
package
we're
going
to
provide-
and
this
is
always
among
the
first
questions-
does
that
mean
more
firefighters?
Yes,
at
least
30
more
crews,
15
members
per
crew,
143
million
dollars
continue
our
investment
in
c-130s,
these
large
air
tankers,
better
suppression,
technology,
night
capacity,
faster,
safer
blackhawk
helicopters
replace
those
old
hueys
48
million
new
lidar.
B
We
delayed
that
last
year
surrounding
remote,
censoring
and
lidar
to
really
start
mapping
with
more
sophistication
specificity,
our
remote
monitoring,
but
really
start
pre-positioning
with
more
understanding.
More
nuance:
using
technology
to
really
map
and
research,
our
fire
prone
areas
in
the
state,
and
then
yes,
maybe
it's
just
because
I
am
fifth
generation
san
franciscan
earthquake,
early
warning
system-
please
be
mindful:
we
live
in
the
state
of
california.
B
It
is
spectacular
for
a
reason
at
least
topographically
geographically
mother
nature
will
remind
us
of
that,
and
so
we
need
to
be
prepared
and
mindful
that,
because
of
technology,
we
may
learn
a
few
seconds,
hopefully
10,
20
30
seconds
before
the
direct
impacts
through
this
early
warning
system.
I
don't
know
of
another
system
like
at
least
in
the
united
states,
japan,
others
have
some
interesting
systems,
but
we're
proud
of
that
we're
going
to
put
an
additional
17.3
million
dollars
in
investment
in
that
space
cap
and
trade.
B
B
We
had
a
good
november
auction,
I
think
over
584
million,
don't
quote
me,
but
roughly
that
was
the
auction
receipts,
so
we're
in
a
position:
1.4
billion
dollar
investment.
Now
in
the
cap
and
trade
we're
going
to
accelerate
our
efforts,
I
don't
know
if
you
you
saw
it,
you
know
we'll
continue
what
china
is
doing
on
electric
vehicles.
I
mean
this.
This
is
where
the
world
is
going.
You
want
to
be
big.
B
Broadly,
it's
also
very
personal.
It's
about
equity
but,
more
importantly,
it's
about
accelerating
that
pace
of
investment
to
the
future,
and
so
we
want
to
accelerate
our
zev
infrastructure
investments
with
the
securitization
strategy.
We
want
equity
to
be
a
principle
of
this
effort
when
only
people
behind
this
not
just
about
expensive
fancy,
cars
and
the
rest
of
us
are
left
behind.
That's
the
clean
cars
for
all
program
about
495
million
one
space
or
400
plus
million
in
that
space
across
the
board
on
the
equity
side,
a
billion
plus
in
the
infrastructure
side,
climate
innovation.
B
We
want
to
I
reference
just
a
moment
ago.
I
want
to
create
some
sales
tax
exclusions
on
the
manufacturing
side
to
promote
alternative
energy
and
investments
and
alternative
transportation
as
well.
So
that's
just
a
jump
start
to
be
more
competitive.
In
that
space
hundred
million
dollars,
300
million.
We
want
to
put
up
in
environmental
justice
new
dollars,
toxic
cleanups,
it's
not
just
exide
excite.
Is
it
priority?
B
You
can
see
that
reflected
here,
an
additional
separate
from
the
300
additional
50
million
dollars
close
to
50
million
in
that
space,
but
we
need
to
invest
in
more
energy
to
address
all
of
these
other
sites
up
and
down
how
many
other
excites
do
we
have
and
we
need
to
start
put
money
up.
We
need
to
start
investing.
300
million
is
a
drop
in
the
bucket,
I'm
not
naive,
but
it's
a
start
to
begin
to
investigate
these
highly
contaminated
properties.
B
B
My
wife
again
here
in
terms
of
regenerative
strategies,
soil
management
so
fundamental
to
our
efforts,
we're
putting
real
money
in
this
space,
sigma
that
remarkable
work
that
was
done
before
we
got
here
on
sigma.
We
need
to
provide
some
support
and
grants.
It's
a
hundred
million
dollars
to
help
with
sigma
our
sustainable
groundwater
management
program,
which
now
is
in
place
and
then
obviously
direct
assistance
to
small
farmers,
mid-size
farmers.
B
B
We
want
to
be
punitive
to
bad
actors
that
are
flagrant,
but
we
also
are
mindful
in
that
transition
the
work
we
have
to
do
to
help
support
that
and
there's
resources
in
that
space
and
by
the
way,
speaking
of
resources,
600
million
dollars
of
federal
money
for
farmers
and
ranchers
as
well.
We'll
work
with
the
legislature
to
look
forward,
melissa,
artado,
so
many
others
already
now
reaching
out.
How
can
we
wisely
make
these
investments?
Speaking
of
agriculture?
B
We
just
have
a
few
more
slides,
important.
We
consider
food
insecurity
last
year,
in
addition
to
our
baseline
budget,
we
passed
on
supporting
our
food
banks
and
tribes
and
our
food
programs.
We
did
two
significant
enhancements:
a
75
million
dollar
enhancement
and
then
in
october,
an
additional
90
million
dollars
that
just
started
going
out
that
90
million
dollar
enhancement
to
our
food
bank
and
tribes.
B
So
this
is
on
top
of
that
additional
30
million
this
california
assistance
program
which
helps
refugees,
legal
immigrants,
11.4
million
and
again
she's
in
the
front
row
farm
to
school
investment,
my
wife
cat
taylor,
so
many
others
nonprofit
leveraging
these
resources
making
sure
we're
investing
in
healthier.
More
nutritious
food
for
our
kids
across
the
spectrum
and
supporting
ag
in
that
process,
so
it's
more
of
a
catalyst
fund,
not
substituting
other
work,
but
really
encouraging
smarter
investments
in
our
public
schools.
B
We
want
also
speaking
of
smart
investments,
to
continue
to
improve
government
efficiency,
not
just
rhetorically
but
substantively,
and
then
address
the
issue
of
bringing
services
in
the
state
into
the
digital
age.
I
wish
I
could
just
go
like
this,
and
dmv
is
upgraded,
edd's
upgraded,
you
know,
cal
I
mean
name
it.
You
know
care
the
whole
system.
You
know
we've
inherited
stuff.
Going
back
to
the
seven.
I
wrote
a
book
about
being
on
the
leading
and
cutting
edge
of
1976
in
terms
of
rit
and
trust.
B
Me
that's
been
made
abundantly
clear
to
not
just
me
to
all
of
you
in
this
last
year,
so
we
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
to
bring
government
in
the
digital
age.
Just
brief,
a
few
slides
on
that
got
a
half
of
500.
Excuse
me:
50
million
dollars
in
cyber
security,
we're
doing
cyber
security
odds
across
the
spectrum,
every
single
state
department.
By
the
way
you
may
recall,
last
year
we
created,
we
invested,
wasn't
created,
but
it
wasn't
funded.
B
Last
year
we
funded
our
cyber
security
integration
center
and
just
in
time
with
some
of
the
revelations
of
what
occurred
federally,
of
which
we
were
not
immune
as
a
state
to
its
impact.
So
cyber
security
is
still
top
of
mind.
We
want
additional
investment
in
that
space.
That
office
of
digital
innovation.
We
created
got
some
wonderful
talent
now
assembled
there.
We
want
them
to
start
sprinting
in
terms
of
their
work.
B
What
are
you
looking
at
more
consumer-based
services,
consumer-based
interfaces,
meeting
people
where
they
are
meaning
taking
government
services
not
just
online
but
getting
in
people's
hands
and
their
devices
meeting
people
where
they
are
from
search
to
suggest
reminder,
prompts
all
kinds
of
new
strategies,
new
ways
of
thinking
about
technology
and
then
on
the
relates
to
the
state
workforce.
We
want
to
make
those
five
percent
across
the
board
cuts
permanent.
B
B
4
million
people
get
the
benefit
of
that
program
if
we
move
quickly
and
then
address
in
real
time
how
to
appropriately
distribute
that
2.6
billion
from
the
federal
government
as
it
relates
to
federal
funds
for
rental
support,
not
just
for
renters,
but
also
for
small
landlords
that
are
also
the
beneficiary
of
that
resource,
as
well
as
address
immediately.
This
eviction
moratorium
question,
which
impacts
not
just
tenants
you
and
I,
but
also
commercial
tenants,
businesses,
llc's,
escorts
and
the
like
that
are
also
vulnerable
in
this
environment.
B
B
I
even
reminded
this,
but
you
need
to
be
reminded
of
the
gan
limit,
because
who
would
have
thought
just
for
the
second
time
I
think
it
was
1986
confirmed
that
I
think
it
was
1986
the
last
time
that
the
gang
limit
was
exceeded.
We
project
will
be
exceeded
by
about
102
million
dollars,
just
a
projection.
We're
going
to
know
more
the
answer.
Your
question
is:
what
does
that
mean?
B
You
know
what
it
means,
some
of
you
that
money
has
to
be
given
back
to
taxpayers,
50
50
back
to
schools,
but
we're
we.
This
is
projected
we're
really
not
going
to
know
exactly
what
the
dollar
figure
is
until
the
may
revise,
and
so
in
may
we'll
have
more
clarity
on
whether,
in
fact
we
did
pass
that
gan
limit.
So
that's
the
broad
strokes
presentation.
I
have
never
promoted
being
succinct
in
these
budget
presentations.
Certainly
that
was
example
in
the
last
two
prior
budget
presentations.
B
I
personally
take
pride
in
getting
into
the
details
of
budgets.
I
think
it's
foundational,
I
think
it's
fundamental
in
terms
of
the
work
of
governing.
We
talk
in
terms
of
rhetorical,
but
for
me
it's
not
rhetorical
budgets
being
reflections
of
our
values,
while
we
use
those
value
slides
on
multiple
occasions
in
terms
of
this
presentation,
always
mindful
of
those
most
in
need,
always
framing
our
considerations
around
broad-based
economic
recovery,
equity
and
inclusion,
we're
all
better
off
when
we're
all
better
off.
B
We
look
forward
to
working
collaboratively
over
the
next
weeks
and
months,
working
on
the
immediate
package,
some
additional
early
action
and
ultimately
landing
on
a
budget
that
will
do
justice
to
the
state
and
make
us
proud.
We
are
in
a
much
better
fiscal
footing
than
anyone
could
have
imagined
even
a
few
months
ago.
C
Thank
you
governor.
This
is
adam
beam
with
the
associated
press.
I
wanted
to
ask
you
about
the
4.6
billion
dollars
that
you
are
proposing
for
school
districts
to
potentially
use
for
things
like
summer
school.
I
just
wanted
to
ask:
what
do
you
expect
the
districts
to
do
with
this
money?
Do
you
expect
them
to
ex
like
adjust
their
school
calendars
into
the
summer
or
adopt
a
year-round
school,
and
do
you
have
buy-in
from
the
districts
and
the
teachers
to
do
something
like
that?
Well,.
B
We've
been
talking
a
lot
to
the
districts.
We've
been
talking
a
lot
to
the
teachers,
we're
going
to
be
meeting
on
monday
with
seven
large
urban
district
superintendents.
To
talk
more
about
some
of
their
concerns,
I
think
substantially.
A
lot
of
their
concerns
are
addressed
very
directly
in
this
budget,
directly
addressed
with
that
4.6
billion
dollars
in
appropriation,
but
providing
flexibility,
providing
the
ability
to
address
not
just
learning
loss,
but
to
extend
the
time
that
we
are
educating.
Our
kids
is
foundational.
B
You
can
see
I'll
bring
back
that
slide.
You
can
see
again.
We
just
referenced
two
things,
and
this
is
your
question
adam
summer
school
before
and
after
school
programs,
but
extending
that
school
year
is
in
essence,
what
summer
school
begins
to
do.
Extending
the
hours
is
really
the
kind
of
flexibility
that
we
are
providing
with
these
resources,
and
we
want
because
of
the
way
we've
framed
the
way
we've
organized
our
system
of
education.
B
We
want
localism
to
ultimately
be
determinative
in
terms
of
what
works
for
them
to
supplement
those
educational
supports
how
to
do
that
when
to
do
that,
we
want
to
provide
the
flexibility,
that's
reflected
in
this
additional
4.6
billion
dollars
of
extended
learning
money,
and
so
we
look
forward
to
the
creativity
that
comes
back
from
leas,
but
certainly
we
work
with
the
legislature
to
clarify
our
expectation.
We
look
forward
to
working,
not
just
tony
thurman.
C
B
What
we
hope
to
do
with
this
money
is
address
these
inequities
to
address
the
realities
that
distance
learning
has
not
met.
Everybody's
needs
equally,
and
that's
exactly
what
this
is
intended
to
do.
We
want
to
provide
flexibility
because
one
size
does
not
fit
all
different
cohorts:
different
populations,
different
dynamics,
different
governance,
different
leadership
want
to
provide
that
flexibility,
but
we've
got
to
invest
in
more
time
and
attention
to
those
most
at
need,
and
that's
fundamentally
what
that
4.6
billion
dollars
represents.
D
D
They
said
that
your
plan,
you
know,
allows
local
teacher
unions
an
effective
veto
on
reopening
because
it
encourages
schools
to
reopen,
but
doesn't
compel
them
to
do
so,
even
when
public
health
circumstances
show
that
it
could
be
safe.
So
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
would
be
open
to
a
plan
that
requires
schools
to
reopen
in
person
when
it
is
safe
or
if
you're
committed
to
allowing
local
teacher
unions
to
you
know,
decide
whether
that
can
happen.
Well,.
B
B
This
budget
reflects
the
vast
majority
of
their
concerns
that
were
highlighted
in
that
letter
concerns
around
equity,
that's
demonstrable
in
terms
of
the
budget.
We've
just
put
out
the
historic
funding
that
we
have
put
out.
The
additional
supports
coming
from
the
federal
government
that
will
only
further
the
cause
of
addressing
equity.
B
B
We've
had
robust
and
energetic
conversations,
not
only
with
teachers,
unions,
but
represented
bargaining
unions
across
the
spectrum,
and
we
will
continue
to
engage
them
and
support
local
superintendents
in
that
effort.
But
one
thing
I
know-
and
forgive
me
I
know
it's
stale-
it's
rote
and
I've
repeated
it
on
multiple
occasions,
but
I
think
it's
important
to
repeat
in
this
context.
B
Fist
versus
an
open
hand
is
a
distinction
for
me,
that's
important,
and
that
distinction
is
reflected
in
providing
incentives
for
the
kind
of
behavior
we
want
to
see
and
we
share.
I
believe
I
don't
have
the
opportunity
to
talk
to
each
and
every
one
of
those
superintendents.
We
share
the
same
goal
for
safe
reopening
for
in-person
education,
but
our
approach
is
not
to
do
it.
Top-Down
and
mandate.
D
It
where
there
are
school
districts
where
such
collaboration
has
not
proven
to
be
the
reality.
Do
you
see
a
role
for
the
state
to
take
a
heavier
handed
approach
and
make
that
collaboration
happen
in
a
way
that
it
hasn't
so
far
in
the
in
the
largest
school
districts
that
serve
the
most
children
in
the
state?
That's.
B
E
Hi,
governor
sophia
bollag,
here
from
the
sacramento
bee,
this
budget,
like
all
california
budgets,
is
really
dependent
on
tax
revenue
from
the
state's
highest
earners.
As
you
are
well
aware,
and
so
I'm
wondering
what
are
you
doing
or
what
are
you
planning
to
do
to
keep
the
next
elon
musk
or
another
california
billionaire
from
leaving
the
state.
B
Well,
we're
so
proud
of
doordash
and
their
ipo
were
so
proud
of
airbnb
in
their
ipo,
so
proud
of
what
salesforce
did
in
terms
of
making
investment.
Another
california-based
company,
one
of
the
largest
proposed
mergers
in
america.
All
of
that
energy
is
happening
still
here
in
the
state
of
california.
We're
really
proud.
B
The
biggest
complaint
we
were
having
in
the
state
was
stress
and
gentrification
cities
like
san
francisco,
because
too
many
people
wanted
to
descend,
and
so
the
fundamentals
haven't
really
changed.
The
state
is
still
this
remarkable,
remarkable
home
to
more
dreamers
and
doers
than
any
other
part
of
the
globe,
so
we're
going
to
build
on
what's
working,
we're
going
to
acknowledge.
What's
not,
but
one
thing.
I
also
want
to
acknowledge.
E
B
It's
also
these
incredible
universities,
private
as
well
stanford
university,
usc,
incredible
labs,
lawrence
livermore
lawrence
berkeley,
labs,
sandia,
labs
scripps.
Those
are
the
economic
engines
ultimately
of
human
capital,
the
birthplace
of
life
science
and
biotech
1979.
Interestingly
1979
gan
limit
was
established.
We
also
were
the
birthplace
of
biotech
and
bioinnovation,
so
you
build
on
those
strengths.
B
We
also
have
put
out
and
I'll
go
to
the
slides
billions
and
billions
of
dollars
of
additional
supports.
The
cal
competes
grants
go
directly
to
your
question.
We've
never
provided
this
level
of
new
support.
In
some
time,
the
main
street
hiring
tax
credits.
The
loan
guarantees
fee
waivers
cross.
The
spectrum
grants
to
help
the
ecosystem
of
job
creation,
job
growth,
housing
investments
go
directly
to
your
question.
B
The
investment
in
addressing
quality
of
life
homelessness,
the
investments
in
schools,
not
just
higher
education.
The
issue
of
k-12
investments,
early
child
education
substantively
addresses
your
question.
Child
care
address
you
forgive
me.
I
I'm
here
not
to
provide
a
tweet,
144
character
response,
but
a
comprehensive
response.
That's
not
just
about
tax
credits,
not
just
about
traditional
metrics,
to
which
some
people
see
the
world
but
more
comprehensively
about
creating
an
ecosystem,
creating
a
climate
for
entrepreneurialism,
something
I
know
a
lot
about
I'll.
Remind
you
I'll,
remind
everybody.
B
I
didn't
start
in
politics.
I
started
in
the
private
sector.
I
took
pen
to
paper
out
of
college
and
got
13
people
to
invest
in
an
idea,
and
I
grew
that
business
to
20
plus
businesses
across
the
state.
No
trust
funds
in
my
family
didn't
inherit
anything
wasn't.
A
family
business
was
an
idea.
I
took
pen
to
paper
so
when
it
comes
to
issue
of
entrepreneurialism
when
it
comes
to
issues
small
businesses,
when
it
comes
to
the
issue
of
risk,
taking
I'm
the
beneficiary
of
this
state
and
all
that,
it's
provided.
B
There's
no
state
on
planet
earth
that
I'd
rather
do
business.
In
than
the
state
of
california,
I'm
proud
of
this
state
if
you're
looking
just
for
the
cheapest
place,
to
be
that's,
not
the
game
that
separates
our
game
from
game
play
elsewhere,
but
if
you're
looking
for
an
ecosystem,
there's
no
other
state
in
the
world
that
is
further
along
than
this
state,
we'll
acknowledge
the
areas
of
stress
we
have
to.
B
B
There
was
no
availability
in
the
convention
center
at
san
francisco
convention
center
and
comes
up
with
an
idea
to
rent
the
mattress
that
only
happens
in
california
happened
in
san
francisco
and
that
ipo
has
created
tens
of
thousands
of
jobs.
And
what
did
he
say?
He
said
I'm
doubling
down
on
california,
head
of
door
dash
doubling
down
on
california
salesforce
one
of
the
most
dynamic
software
anywhere
in
the
world.
I
mean
I
thought
the
cloud
was
in
the
sky
until
they
came
along
it's
a
byproduct
of
oracle.
B
Now
it's
one
of
the
fastest
growing
software
in
the
world.
Look
at
the
investments
mark,
benioff
is
making
in
this
state
and
how
committed
he
is
in
the
state,
I'm
just
proud
of
all
that,
and
but
I'm
mindful
some
of
the
headlines
but
boy.
This
budget
reflects
the
state's
doing
pretty
damn
well,
and
we
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do
to
help
small
medium-sized
businesses,
but
folks,
at
the
top
doing
pretty
damn
well,
but
I
don't
begrudge
that
success.
G
Thank
you
governor.
I
have
two
questions
for
you
and
I'm
happy
to
repeat
them.
If
I
need
to
my
question
about
the
expansion,
the
long
hoped
for
expansion
of
medi-cal
to
undocumented
seniors,
you
have
previously
given
commitments
to
fund
this,
and
it's
not
in
the
budget
this
year.
So
I'd
like
you
to.
Please
explain
that
and
then
my
second
question
really
is
the
is,
I
think
the
question.
That's
on
a
lot
of
people's
minds.
G
California,
and
you
have
given
them
immense
responsibility
during
the
pandemic
and
they're
on
the
front
lines
and
really
steering
california's
pandemic
response
and
local
health
departments
and
public
health
leaders
say
the
existing
funding
formula
is
nowhere
near
enough
to
really
adequately
control
this
virus
and
do
what
they
need
to
do
so.
My
question
for
you
on
the
local
health
money,
which
is
not
included
in
the
budget
for
public
health
agencies,
is
our
local
public
health
agency
is
not
a
big
enough
priority
in
the
middle
of
the
pandemic.
For
you.
Thank
you.
B
So
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
mindful
put
our
house
in
order
strong
fiscal
foundation.
I
have
not
been
shy.
Quite
the
contrary,
in
terms
of
expanding
healthcare,
investment,
health
care
coverage,
put
it
up
against
any
governor
in
america.
I'm
also
not
shy
about
acknowledging.
We
have
a
lot
more
work
to
do
and
I
believe
in
universal
coverage
and
you're
correct
that
last
year.
B
These
are
just
choices
and
we
look
forward
to
engaging
the
legislature
and
furthering
that
dialogue
and
that
discussion,
you
know
where
my
heart
is.
You
know
where
my
head
is,
but
right
now
the
resources
are
scarce
when
you
move
forward
and
I'm
mindful
of
that
until
we
have
some
more
clarity,
so
we
hope
to
architect,
we
got
to
26,
we
hope
to
architect
something
working
with
the
legislature,
and
I
look
forward
to
that
engagement
and
I
know
there's
some
incredible
advocates
and
senator
dorazo
and
others.
B
So
many,
I
think
all
of
us
share
vast
majority
of
us
at
least
the
goal
of
universal
health
care.
Now,
as
it
relates
to
supporting
health
and
health
care,
we
we
care
deeply
about
that
investment
care.
Deeply
about
that
commitment.
It's
demonstrable
in
the
health
care
investments
we've
made,
and
this
relates
to
this
pandemic-
the
health
care
investments
that
we've
promoted
as
well
in
this
presentation
and
are
promoting
in
the
budget
that
we're
submitting
to
the
legislature.
B
B
B
We
are
providing
resources
across
the
spectrum
in
terms
of
the
federal
dollars
that
are
going
to
be
going
going
out
and
supporting
subsequent
efforts
on
contact
tracing.
You
saw
the
numbers
testing
vaccinations,
all
the
other
supports
in
terms
of
isolation,
quarantine.
You
saw
that
package
of
supports
all
of
that
supporting
the
local
health
officer
infrastructure.
So
we
are
committed
to
that
cause
committed
to
those
partnerships
committed
to
addressing
the
spirit
of
your
question.
H
Governor
john
meyer,
from
los
angeles
time,
don't
want
to
talk
about
vaccination
money
for
a
moment
in
this
budget.
You,
you
mentioned
372
million,
but
my
early
read
doesn't
find
a
lot
of
specificity.
You
offered
some
ideas
the
other
day.
So
are
these
just
ideas?
Do
you
have
details
you're
asking
the
legislature
for
on
how
to
spend
that
money,
and
it's
also
not
in
your
most
urgent
priority
list
of
money,
you're
asking
the
legislature
to
take
action
on.
B
Yeah
we
will
back
these
up.
As
you
know,
these
are
budget
proposals
and
we
will
work
with
the
legislature
on
filling
the
blanks
through
what
you
know.
Well,
others
may
not
be
familiar
with
called
a
trailer
bill
in
the
trailer
bill,
will
lay
out
nuance
and
detail
as
it
relates
to
vaccinations.
We
have
a
comprehensive
vaccination
plan.
I
want
to
go
specifically
to
your
point
of
concern,
or
at
least
reflected
consideration
and
concern,
as
it
relates
to
vaccination
protocols
and
processes.
B
B
They
have
been
working
very,
very
publicly
and
collaboratively
with
the
third
group
of
60
members,
a
community
advisory
committee.
They
meet
consistently,
they
just
met
on
wednesday
and
they
had
a
public
discussion
to
lay
out
in
detail
our
vaccination
strategy.
So
I
want
to
make
it
crystal
clear
in
a
very
transparent
way.
B
We
have
laid
out
a
vaccination
blueprint
and
we
update
it
and
iterate
it
on
a
consistent
basis,
proof
point:
just
yesterday
we
updated
our
guidelines
related
to
vaccinations
I'll
go
to
a
slide
here
in
a
brief
moment,
so
everybody
can
familiarize
themselves
with
what
we
put
out
yesterday.
So
we
can
answer
the
specific
question
around
planning
in
terms
of
the
utilization
of
vaccinations.
B
As
you
recall,
the
first
phase
for
vaccinations
is
phase
1a.
It's
about
3
million
people
that
prioritizes
healthcare
workers
and
residents
in
long-term
congregate
settings
not
just
skilled
nursing
facilities,
but
residential
care
facilities
and
assisted
living
facilities.
We
recognize
some
of
the
bottlenecks.
It's
not
unique
to
california,
quite
the
contrary,
talking
to
governors
all
across
the
country,
some
of
the
bottlenecks
in
terms
of
prioritization
a
lot
of
that
through
the
spirit
of
the
cdc
and
the
guidelines
they
put
forth,
but
certainly
that
we
put
out
with
our
guidelines
working
group.
B
So
we
laid
out
a
strategy
within
each
phase.
There's
three
tiers,
I'm
not
offering
those
tiers
for
you
today,
but
they're
available
on
our
covid19.ca.gov
website,
specific
tiers,
specific
vaccination
strategy.
What
we
did
yesterday
is
we
updated
the
guidelines
recognizing
some
of
the
bottlenecks
in
terms
of
this
cohort,
and
now
we
are
allowing
people
more
flexibility
at
the
local
level
county
level,
but
also
providers
across
the
spectrum,
more
flexibility
in
terms
of
moving
between
tears.
B
This
is
tier
one
and
two
of
the
next
phase,
which
lat
flexibility
allows
us
to
go
into
different
cohorts,
different
ages
within
different
sectors
of
our
economy.
So
we're
loosening
this
up.
We
have
a
specific
goal
of
a
million
vaccinations
within
the
next
10
days
that
we
want
to
administer,
and
that's
part
of
our
vaccination
plan
now
money
that
we
have
in
the
existing
budget.
We
are
halfway
through
the
fiscal
year
system
budget.
B
So
that's
all
part
and
parcel
of
the
broader
vaccination
plan.
This
new
money
that
we'll
put
up
will
help
support
those
existing
efforts,
help
amplify
areas
in
this
case
which
need
to
be
amplified,
and
that
is
culturally
competent.
Peer-To-Peer
engagement
to
encourage
communities
that
have
historically
and
for
good
reason,
felt
reticent
to
take
vaccines.
B
To
begin
to
have
those
vaccines
more
safely
administered,
we
want
to
do
more
psas.
We
want
more
partnerships
with
cbo's
that
is
part
of
the
work
we're
doing
in
real
time
with
the
legislative
support.
In
fact,
we
had
a
number
of
legislators
on
yesterday.
A
zoom
call
talking
about
some
of
these
efforts
as
a
preview
to
this
year's
budget.
They'll
all
be
part
and
parcel
of
our
trailer
bill,
so.
H
If
I
could
just
follow
up
quickly
governor,
so
I
think
what
part
that
I
hear
you
saying
is
that
some
of
this
is
to
be
determined.
372
million
feels
like
a
very
specific
number,
so
I
thought
there
might
be
more
detailed
plans
on
that,
but
as
a
part
of
this
too,
who
ultimately
is
accountable
in
california
for
the
vaccine
distribution?
If,
if
it
goes
well,
if
it
doesn't
go
well,
who
does
the
public
hold
accountable?
Well,
they.
B
Always
hold
the
governor
accountable
regardless,
and
so
you
will
others
will
when
in
doubt,
things
go
well.
They'll
celebrate
the
success
of
all
the
local
partners.
It's
part
and
parcel
of
any
role
of
responsibility.
I'm
used
to
it
being
an
entrepreneur
at
the
end
of
the
day,
buck
stops
with
the
person
that
had
the
privilege
of
signing
the
paychecks
as
mayor
and
certainly
as
governor.
So
I
recognize
that
role
and
responsibility.
It's
interesting.
I
it's
not
a
just
an
interesting
point.
B
I
think
there's
a
sense
that
the
governors
have
somehow
received
vaccines,
and
then
the
governors
decide
where
the
vaccines
go.
The
state
of
california
has
not
received
one
dose
of
vaccines.
State
didn't
receive
any.
The
state
was
a
conduit
through
these
advisory
committees,
of
where
the
vaccines
go
and
goes
to
local
partners.
Well
established
I'll,
remind
folks
who
may
not
be
familiar.
B
Every
year,
the
state
of
california
distributes
roughly
19
million
doses
of
the
flu
vaccine.
We
have
a
well-established
criteria
for
distribution.
Only
10
percent
of
those
vaccines
are
actually
administered
through
the
county,
90
percent
through
a
network
of
providers.
So
it's
through
that
network
of
providers
that
we're
looking
to
distribute
the
vaccine.
B
Now
this
is
the
states
larger
than
21
states
combined.
I
wish
in
many
respects
I
you
know,
was
just
managing
a
small
city.
The
challenge
is
how
one
holds
accountable.
All
these
levers
and
all
these
levels
of
government
all
these
clinics
partners
help
all
the
whole
spectrum,
and
therein
lies
the
challenge
and
application
in
implementation,
and
so
we're
working
through.
B
All
of
that,
we
had
a
wonderful
call
yesterday,
with
you
know:
panoply
of
leaders,
business
leaders,
labor
leaders,
local
state
leaders,
folks,
planned
parenthood,
community
clinics
across
the
spectrum,
hospitals
and
the
like,
as
well
as
dental
association,
medical
association,
legislative
leaders
trying
to
work
through
all
of
these
nuances
and
details.
We
socialize
the
372
million
and
by
the
way
keeley
will
get
up,
and
I
I
recognize
you
want.
The
actual
372
million
keith
will
come
up
in
a
moment
in
the
budget,
talk
about
broad
strokes.
B
What
that
trailer
bill
will
actually
look
like,
because
there
is
a
framework,
and
that
is
a
specific
number
based
upon
the
framework
of
building
supports
based
on
existing
plans.
But
I
would
give
you
as
a
preview
of
a
framework
that
we're
working
off
of
broadly
where
those
dollars
will
be
distributed,
and
so
we'll
work
with
these
partners
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do.
And
but,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
governor
takes
responsibility
for
whatever
anyone
wants
to
put
on
his
or
her
plate.
And
I
happily
accept
it.
I
I
B
We're
blessed
with
the
supports
we
did
receive
and
I
highlighted
those
supports,
because
I
thought
it
was
important
to
acknowledge
what
we
are
the
beneficiary
of
and
by
the
way.
What
I
didn't
acknowledge
just
interesting
about
18.6
billion
dollars
is
reflected
in
those
stimulus
checks
that
are
coming
from
the
feds
into
the
state.
We
have
billions
more
reflected
in
the
ppp
loans
that
will
come
into
the
state
and
other
supports
that
were
not
part
of
the
presentation
so
we're
we
will
be
the
beneficiary.
B
We
estimate
what
about
a
hundred
billion
dollars
over
a
hundred
billion
dollars
of
supports
that
are
coming
into
the
state.
One
has
to
be
forthright
and
acknowledge
that
up
front
as
it
relates
to
your
question.
Specifically,
I
think
the
biggest
disappointment
was
the
support,
in
particular
to
cities
and
counties
and
as
a
former
county
mayor
as
a
former
county
supervisor.
I
am
very
very
mindful
of
the
burdens
and
pressures,
particularly
as
it
relates
to
sales,
tax
revenue,
property
tax
revenue
that
those
cities
and
counties
are
facing,
and
so
that
would
be
and
answer
your
question.
J
Hi,
governor
katie,
orr
kqed
news
back
on
the
vaccines
we've
heard
you
talk
about
a
lot
of
groups
that
are
involved
lot
of
committees.
Is
there
a
concern
that
maybe
the
state
is
spending
too
much
time
deciding
who
gets
the
vaccine
and
not
focusing
on
actually
getting
the
vaccines
out
to
people?
I
mean
we
know
some
states,
they
just
have
a
broad
category
and
people
go
get
them
also.
When
will
people
know
it's
their
turn
to
get
a
vaccine
or
how
will
they
know
it's
their
turn?
B
Yeah
I
made
this
clear
in
the
past.
I'll
repeat
it
today
that
we,
we
will
accept
the
vaccine
I'll,
wait
until
my
turn
and
wherever
we
are
in
the
age
cohort
and
the
vulnerability
matrix
that
we've
put
out
and
socialized
that's
where
that
date
will
fall
now.
Look
as
it
relates
to
the
prioritization
of
the
vaccines
we
want.
We
do
prioritize
our
health
care
workers.
B
We
want
to
vaccinate
the
vax
vaccinators,
I
think
that's
foundational
and
helping
our
seniors,
particularly
in
congregate
facilities
I
think,
is
wise
and
I
think
that's
the
best
approach
and
that's
underway,
and
we
have
been
in
ministry
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
more
than
any
other
state
now
per
capita.
We
have
work
to
do
but
more
than
any
other
state,
as
it
relates
to
the
comments
I
just
made
in
relation
to
the
previous
question,
I
think
it's
important
that
I
once
again
show
you
this
slide.
B
We
are
allowing-
and
this
goes
directly
to
your
question-
we
are
allowing
now
flexibility
based
upon
the
health
order
we
put
out
yesterday,
tomas
aragon,
our
health
director,
put
out
new
guidelines
yesterday,
based
upon
the
input
we've
been
receiving
from
all
of
our
county
partners
in
particular,
but
also
our
institutional
partners
across
the
spectrum
that
they
were
looking
for.
More
flexibility,
and
this
is
the
flexibility
into
phase
1b
and
different
tiers
that
they're
now
being
afforded,
and
so
we
want
to
provide
more
flexibility,
more
discretion.
B
But
within
these
broader
parameters
we
are
going
after
as
it
relates
to
enforcement,
because
I
know
there's
been
discussion
before.
If
people
are
monetizing,
vaccines,
vaccines
cost
nothing.
None
of
you
will
pay
a
penny
for
vaccines.
You
should
not
someone's
charging,
they
shouldn't
be
charged
if
someone's,
somehow
monetizing
the
vaccines
or
people.
B
You
know
some
well-known,
very
rich
person,
that's
young
and
in
great
health-
and
you
know
she
and
he
the
rest
of
their
family
50
folks
and
I'm
going
to
want
to
have
a
big
party
and
they're
all
getting
a
vaccination
party,
a
flagrant
violation.
But
we
want
to
go
after
that,
but
people
using
common
sense
and
saying
I'm
low
on
my
dose.
You
know
we're
running
out
I'm
low,
not
on
my
dose.
B
I
have
about
extra
three
or
four
doses
in
this
vial
and
there's
no
one
that
showed
up
in
line
or
this
person
decided
last
minute
not
to
take
it
and
then
there's
this.
You
know
64
year
old,
seniors
there
saying
well
by
definition,
we
want
to
allow
that
flexibility,
so
common
sense
go
after
the
flagrant
support
common
sense
and
now
formally
to
your
question,
providing
more
flexibility
between
these
phases.
J
B
K
Thank
you
governor
a
big
picture
question
about
this
year.
Specifically,
how
do
you
balance
the
the
need
for
taxes,
the
need
for
revenue
with
the
real
pain
that
people
are
feeling
right
now
I
mean
how
do
you
think
about
this
in
a
way,
because
there's
some
that
may
like
flee
california
or
be
frustrated
with
the
business
situation
in
this
state,
but
then
others
that
are
that
are
clearly
hurting
so
much
right
now,.
B
B
The
efforts
over
the
last
18
months,
investments
unprecedented
in
terms
of
getting
money
in
the
pockets
of
the
most
vulnerable
californians
4
million,
with
that
2.4
billion
dollar
golden
state
appropriation
that
we
hope
to
advance.
So
I
think
we're
finding
that
balance.
At
least
that's
what
we're
proposing
is
a
balanced
approach
consistent
with
our
values.
Mindful
of
those
stresses
that
you
rightfully
bring
up
in
this
year's
budget.
So
that's
you
know
this
budget,
I
hope,
is
an
answer
subsequently
that
question,
but
make
no
mistake.
L
Hi,
governor
maribel
lopez,
univision
and
my
question
is
about
the
golden
the
stimulus
golden
package.
There
are
communities
out
there
that
they
lack
of
information.
They
don't
get
enough
information.
They
maybe
understand
that
if
a
money
is
coming,
help
is
coming,
but
they
they
need
more
information.
B
Well,
the
answer
is
yes:
we
have
an
amazing
partnership,
called
listos
listos
been
established
to
the
office
of
emergency
services.
This
dose
has
been
central
in
our
efforts
to
reach
out
to
diverse
communities
across
the
spectrum
in
a
very
culturally
competent
way
bottom
up
as
it
relates
to
our
emergency
management,
wildfire
mitigation
and
recovery
efforts.
B
B
B
There
were
some
lessons
learned,
we're
taking
all
of
that
and
the
construct
of
partnership
that
was
established
with
community-based
organizations
as
well
as
state
partners,
individual
actors-
and
we
are
now
using
those
lessons
and
beginning
to
translate
those
efforts
into
more
testing
and
more
vaccination
outreach
efforts.
So
that's
a
second
strategy
in
parallel
with
listos
to
do.
I
think
exactly
what
you
rightfully
suggest
is
critical
in
a
state
as
diverse
as
the
state
of
california.
L
I'm
talking
now
that
government
19
and
the
same
community,
especially
phone
workers
they
are,
they
are
not
getting
enough
information,
they
go
to
work
every
day
every
day,
some
of
them
they
get
sick.
Others
live
in
fear
of
getting
sick,
and
this
is
putting
them
in
a
position
that
some
people
are
taking
advantage
of
them
talking
with
some
organizations.
They
said
that
they
go
there
every
day
and
basically
they
live
in
a
limbo.
B
So,
there's
a
lot
more
support
in
this
space
for
farm
workers
than
have
been
in
the
past,
including
on
the
food
side
of
the
spectrum,
where
a
big
part
of
that
last
90
million
dollars
that
we
put
in
in
october
for
food
banks
and
tribes
also
was
targeted
to
help
support
our
farm
workers
as
well.
I
want
to
ask
my
team
to
provide
you
a
comprehensive
list.
You'll
see,
all
kinds
of
other
protections
relates
to
sick
leave
and
relates
to
issues
of
paid
leave
and
issues
related
to
workers
comp.
B
L
B
So
big
part
of
john's
question
about
where's
the
372
million
dollars
going
to
be
used,
we're
going
to
build.
I
reference
this
obliquely.
Let
me
now
take
advantage
of
your
question
to
explain
more
specifically,
a
big
part
of
our
effort
is
to
amplify
our
peer-to-peer
engagement
to
amplify
our
outreach
to
amplify
our
partnerships
with
community-based
organizations
trusted
messengers.
B
We
did
that,
as
you
recall,
directly
with
mixed
status,
families
and
individuals
that
were
here
without
documentation
in
the
state
of
california
a
few
months
ago,
through
an
unprecedented
effort
to
provide
125
million
dollars
in
direct
supports
to
people,
regardless
of
their
immigration
status,
and
we
built
a
framework
of
partnerships
throughout
the
state
of
california,
with
cbo's
with
trusted
messengers.
So
building
off
of
that,
we've
got
a
whole
new
suite
of
outreach
efforts.
We
just
need
to
fund
them
at
the
next
level
that
will
be
part
of
the
trailer
bill.
B
B
I'll
also
give
you
a
little
bit
of
backup
to
the
packet
of
outreach
that
we'll
be
doing
package
that
includes
these
trusted
messengers,
as
it
includes
more
specific
outreach
to
our
farm
workers,
not
just
in
the
central
valley,
the
central
coast
throughout
the
state
of
california.
So
you
can
see
specifically-
and
maybe
you
guys
can
help
promote
as
well
on
your
network,
those
psas
and
those
partnerships
as
well,
which
could
go
a
long
way
to
help
us.
M
Governor
carla
maranachi
from
politico,
you
consistently
describe
california
as
america's
next
coming
attraction,
a
place,
that's
inventing
the
future,
and
yet
california
is
not
inventing
the
future
when
it
comes
to
getting
these
vaccines
out.
It's
in
the
bottom
tier.
You
noted
today
different
groups
with
experts,
100
experts
and
three
tiers,
etc
to
to
help
get
this
out.
But
what
what
we
hear
from
readers?
Who
want
me
to
ask
you?
You
have
used
your
emergency
powers
as
governor
in
the
past,
sometimes
with
to
criticism.
M
If
this
isn't
an
emergency,
what
is
what
is
stopping
you
from
doing
that
from
from
bringing
in
the
national
guard
or
anything
else,
you
need
to
do
and
specifically,
what
can
you
promise
californians
when
it
comes
to
when
they
can
get
the
vaccine
and
when
they'll
be
notified?
And
then,
if
I
can
add
another
question,
do
you
support
the
call
for
impeachment
or
the
invoking
of
the
25th
amendment
that
the
house
speaker
has
asked
for
let.
B
Me
just
take
that
off
the
table.
I'm
focused
on
the
distribution
of
vaccines
answering
the
first
part
of
your
question
as
a
priority
and
presenting
a
balanced
budget
to
legislature
and
engaging
in
in
in
these
issues,
with
priority
and
more
focus
as
it
relates
to
the
issue
of
the
vaccinations
goals.
One
million
vaccines
by
the
end
of
next
week,
specifically
the
specific
guidelines
are
presented
in
these
slides.
Let's
bring
back
the
slide,
so
there's
no
ambiguity,
no
confusion.
B
I
want
to
encourage
people
to
go
to
the
covet19.ca.gov
website.
Covet19.Ca.Gov
website
learn
more
about
where
the
prioritization
is
in
terms
of
these
vaccines
I'll
remind
people.
We've
only
received
we're
in
receipt
of
2
million
50
000
doses.
As
of
last
night,
those
numbers
change
hourly
and
daily,
we'll
update
the
numbers
tomorrow,
so
we
have
2
million
that
we've
received.
B
We
have
three
million
people
that
are
in
that
first
cohort,
even
if
all
two
million
doses
were
applied,
it
represents
a
de
minimis
number
of
californians.
There's
simply
no
other
doses
that
we
have
to
distribute
that's
frustrating
for
everybody,
but
I
also
think
it's
an
important
point
to
remind
people
of
if
this
nation
and
by
the
way
california,
is
not
unique.
If
we're
today
at
just
shy
of
30
percent
distribution
of
the
vaccines
summer,
20
25,
we
were
25
three
days
ago,
we
may
be
33
we're
33
percent.
B
A
few
days
prior,
which
was
one
of
the
top
tier
it
just
goes
day
to
day,
depends
when
you
look
at
the
data
still
inexcusable,
but
if
this
country
administered
all
the
vaccines
it
diminished,
I
mean
it's.
A
very
small
percentage
of
americans
would
have
it
so
the
reality
is,
you
know,
there's
this
sort
of
false
notion
that
we're
in
a
race
to
reopen
with
the
vaccines.
B
Well,
that
may
be
true,
but
there's
this
false
pretense
that
somehow
the
vaccines
are
plentiful
when
they're
not
they're,
still
in
a
frame
of
scarcity,
and
so
we
are
preparing
for
the
day
where
there's
a
framework
of
abundance.
We
look
forward
to
that
with
the
next
administration,
but
we're
in
a
scarcity
frame
now
and
and
we've
tried
to
prioritize
within
that
security
scarcity
frame,
but
we
now
acknowledge
that
was
the
change
yesterday,
specifically
that
we
needed
to
loosen
up
those
tears
and
we
have
now
so
we're
going
to
see
faster
administration.
B
You'll,
see
that
hold
me
accountable.
You
will
next
week
I
told
you
the
gold
million
end
of
the
week
10
days.
So
that's
the
goal
specific
goal.
You
have
specific
plan
trying
to
hold
folks
accountable
at
all
levels
across
the
spectrum.
That
was
our
deeper
conversation
yesterday,
after
100
conversations
over
the
course
of
last
many
many
months
we've
been
working
on
this
for
some
time.
B
Similar
struggles
are
happening,
most
other
states
in
the
country,
not
an
excuse,
so
we
are
committing
ourselves
with
resolve
to
address
those
issues
and
I'm
very
mindful
of
the
urgency
to
do
so.
So
as
more
vaccines
come
into
the
state,
we
will
then
broaden
the
spectrum
to
include
the
folks
on
this
slide.
This
is
phase
one
c.
This
may
include
many
more
of
you,
folks
that
are
watching
folks.
B
That
may
be
here,
maybe
even
you
carla
in
this
sector
phase
1c
are
individuals
50
and
over,
but
also
16
to
64
that
have
medical
conditions
and
or
disability.
That's
that
next
phase,
but
this
phase
has
to
happen
or
will
only
happen
when
we
have
millions
and
millions
of
doses
that
currently
are
not
available,
but
we're
preparing
for
that
and
with
urgency.
We
are
preparing
for
that.
Now
you
asked
about
the
national
guard.
We
have
the
national
guard,
we
are
using
the
national
guard.
We
have
national
guard
strike
teams
that
are
administering
these
vaccines.
B
You
ask
about
emergency
powers.
You
don't
need
to
exercise
your
emergency
powers.
You
need
to
exercise
your
role
and
responsibility
to
encourage
state
agencies,
local
governmental
actors,
to
move
more
quickly
and
be
more
flexible.
We
did
that
this
week,
specifically
with
the
dentists
and
now
dentists,
can
administer
the
shots.
We
did
that
through
what
you
may
others
may
refer
to
as
an
emergency
declaration.
It
was
just
a
simple
waiver
where
we
did
provide
pharmacy
techs
the
ability
to
administer.
B
We
have
dozens
and
dozens
of
individuals
and
job
descriptions
now
where
people
can
administer,
and
so
we
have
been
exercising
those
that
authority
just
to
clear
the
decks
on
those
concerns
or
that
question
in
particular
the
issue
of
the
national
guard.
So
we're
going
to
do
more
of
that
and
we're
going
to
broaden
the
spectrum
of
those
supports.
There's
new
dollars
coming
in
will
allow
us
to
do
more
of
that,
but
the
most
important
thing
I
think
we
did.
M
B
B
I'm
focused
on
the
budget,
so
forgive
me
on
the
latter
part
of
that
question
and
the
follow-up,
but
specifically
again,
when
will
the
majority,
which
suggests
20
million
californians,
have
access
to
the
vaccine,
no
human?
Being
the
president
on
down
current
and
future
president
anthony
fauci
himself
could
not
answer
that
question.
The
ceo
of
pfizer
can't
answer
that
question
ceo
moderna,
jay
and
jay
folks
out
there
ask
for
oxford.
B
Can't
answer
that
question
it's
when
the
vaccines
are
produced
at
scale
and
made
available
to
the
state,
then
we
can
answer
the
question.
20,
plus
million
californians
can
have
access,
we're,
hoping
that
happens
in
the
first
quarter
of
next
year
or
this
year
and
we're
hoping
by
april
may
we're
really
starting
to
scale
across
all
of
these
phases
across
all
of
these
tiers
and
we've
dealt
substantially
with
all
of
the
impediments
and
all
the
logistical
challenges.
B
But
we
are
in
a
scarce
frame,
just
2
million
doses.
Having
arrived,
4
million
people
prioritizing
the
vaccinators
that
vaccinate,
or
rather
we
want
to
vaccinate
the
vaccinators
and
health
care
workers
as
a
first
priority
and
then
seniors
in
congress
cities
and
now,
with
these
two
tiers,
which
I
hope,
the
slides
still
up
to
broaden
the
flexibility
so
that
there's
no
waste
in
terms
of
the
distribution
and,
as
I
said,
here's
your
next
thing
to
hold
me
accountable
to
1
million
doses
within
the
next,
not
10
days.
N
B
That's
part
of
the
negotiations,
part
of
the
give
and
take
part
of
the
back
and
forth
what
made
the
last
negotiation
successful.
Is
that
every
time
I
was
asked
about
it
in
public,
I
didn't
answer
the
questions
specifically
in
an
effort
to
create
a
process
of
trust
with
the
critical
groups
that
we're
currently
negotiating
with
and
to
express
my
respect
for
the
legislative
leaders
that
are
working
overtime
to
advance.
This
cause
I'll
maintain
that
stubbornly.
B
N
B
We
are
resolved,
we
are
committed.
The
reason
I
amplified
the
point
today
on
multiple
occasions
in
this
presentation
is
that
it's
a
top
priority
for
me
and
I
know
the
legislative
leaders,
and
so
we
are
going
to
find
a
way
to
get
it
done,
just
as
we
did
the
last
time.
So
that's
what
I
would
say
we
see
you,
we
hear
you
we're
very
mindful
of
your
anxiety,
your
stress
and
we
will
get
something
done.
O
Hi,
governor
alexi
casa
from
the
san
francisco
chronicle,
you
mentioned
a
couple
days
ago,
wanting
to
use
this
budget
process
to
more
quickly
get
the
federal
rent
relief
to
californians.
But
I
haven't,
we
haven't,
heard
any
specifics
yet
on
how
that's
going
to
happen.
So
what
is
the
state
specifically
doing
to
get
that
money
to
people?
When
should
people
who
need
it
expect
to
get
it
and
how.
B
So
it's
2.6
billion
dollars,
1.4
comes
to
the
state.
1.2
billion
of
the
2.6
goes
to
districts
with
populations
larger
than
200
000..
There's
flexibility
that
resides
within
both
buckets.
What
we're
currently
trying
to
do
specific
to
your
question
is
work
across
the
jurisdictions
csac.
It's
our
county
partners,
league
of
cities,
our
city
partners
and
working
with
legislative
leaders
that
care
deeply
about
this,
including
the
two
leaders,
the
assembly
and
the
senate,
and
their
staffs
to
figure
out
a
partnership,
a
process
to
partner,
to
make
sure
we're
amplifying
efforts,
not
duplicating
efforts.
B
We
have
to
be
mindful
of
a
spectrum
of
considerations.
You
may
recall
in
the
deal
that
we
established
and
announced
late
august,
that
expires
on
january
31st
that
there's
a
payback
provision
of
25
percent
that
goes
into
effect.
There's
also
considerations,
not
just
as
I
noted
earlier
tenants,
but
also
small
landlords
that
are
under
the
gun
and
stress
as
it
relates
to
banking
relationships
and
the
like,
and
so
all
of
those
have
to
be
considered.
We
are
in
the
midst
of
exchanging
ideas,
not
only
with
legislative
leaders
but
key
coalition
partners.
B
The
same
partners
that
helped
us
bring
this
original
deal
to
the
fore
and
ultimately
through
the
legislative
process
and
signature,
so
all
of
that's
happening
in
real
time
now
in
the
2.6
billion.
It's
important
to
note
that's
the
commitment
from
the
feds.
Those
dollars
are
just
starting
to
come
in,
so
we
can't
put
something
out
that
hasn't
come
in
yet,
and
so
those
dollars
are
coming
this
week,
we're
starting
to
see
some
of
the
loosening
of
the
dollars.
B
We
are
deeply
engaged
and
deeply
mindful
that
this
needs
to
happen
in
days,
not
weeks
because
july,
or
rather
january
31st
is
around
the
corner,
and
if
we're
going
to
move
legislation,
you
have
to
have
an
agreement
very
very
shortly,
both
on
the
moratorium
and
both
on
the
distribution
of
those
federal
dollars
to
parallel
and
to
support
those
broader
deals.
We
have
to
have
those
in
the
next
number
of
days
or
at
least
within
the
next
week,
or
so.
O
B
B
There
are
all
kinds
of
considerations:
here's
just
to
lay
it
bare
here's.
What
I'm
trying
to
avoid
that
the
cities
get
billion
plus
dollars
and
they
do
they
go
in
20
different
directions.
State
gets
in
and
we
duplicate
some
of
the
directions.
We
replicate
them,
but
we
go
in
another
direction:
we're
not
amplifying
we're
not
coordinating
we're,
not
supported.
We
may
use
cdfis
any
cdfis,
they
may
not.
They
may
use
trusted
existing
partners
with
rental
assistance
programs.
B
They
have
philanthropic
all
that
all
that
has
to
be
part
of
a
broader
and
I
use
cdfis
just
as
a
proxy
for
the
kind
of
intermediaries
that
exist,
not
literally
but
figuratively,
in
that
rental
frame.
As
a
former
mayor,
san
francisco
has
dozens
of
different
partners
and
non-profits,
not
just
state
rather
local,
administering
functions
at
the
county
level.
So
the
state's
mindful
that
we're
working
through
all
those
issues
we're
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
rules
and
flexibility
are
with
the
federal
dollars,
see
how
far
we
can
go.
B
O
B
I'll
just
be,
let
me
be
canada
with
you.
I
have
people
that
that
have
my
cell
phone
that
are
desperate
for
a
vaccine
and
I'm
just
being
honest
with
you,
as
a
human
being
when
I
I
just
had
a
back
and
forth
with
someone
that
used
to
work
for
us
incredible
woman
worked
for
me
in
the
health
and
human
service
agency,
when
I
was
a
county
supervisor
retired.
B
B
Maybe
that's
the
answer
to
the
question.
Is
that
it?
Well
that's
a
good
way
to
end
I'm
young
still
reasonably
young
and
healthy,
not
sure
after
those
questions,
but
god
bless
all
of
you.
Thank
you
for
the
president
of
this
time
and
now
for
the
show
you've
been
waiting
for
which
is
the
and
by
the
way.
Let
me
just
thank
keely
and
her
team.
As
always.
Forgive
me,
you
know
rockstar
budget
team,
our
finance
team
hd,
who
you
know
we
joke.
I
say
who's.
B
B
B
Thank
you
in
advance
for
for
the
seriousness
of
purpose,
I
know
we
will
have
an
extraordinary
give
and
take
this
dialectic,
we're
all
well
familiar
with,
but
the
spirit
of
this
moment
I
think,
and
the
values
that
we
speak
to
today.
I
think,
really
will
define
the
next
few
months
and
I'm
confident
in
our
capacity
to
do
big
things
and
do
them
quickly,
and
so
thank
you
to
the
legislature
in
advance
with
that
keeley
bosser
and
the
finance
team
to
actually
answer
all
the
detailed
questions
on
this
year's.
P
P
Good
afternoon,
I
just
want
to
start
by
saying
thank
you
again
to
the
department
of
finance
the
whole
team.
It's
a
huge
effort
every
year,
all
through
the
holidays,
but
this
year
on
top
of
an
incredibly
difficult
year,
and
so
just
really
a
lot
of
appreciation
for
all
of
their
commitment.
Under
these
unprecedented
conditions
that
we're
all
living
with.
P
P
P
I
thought
maybe
I'd
just
start
with
crosswalking
between
our
surplus
and
the
laos.
Since
that's
the
last
point
of
reference
that
everybody
really
has
focused
on,
theirs
was
a
26
billion
dollar
number,
as
opposed
to
the
past.
We
actually
have
a
very
similar
view
of
the
revenues
to
the
lao
and
that's
not
a
big
difference
in
the
surplus
number.
The
two
pieces
that
are
different
are
the
interpretation
of
proposition
two
in
the
current
year.
That's
about
four
and
a
half
billion
dollars
worth
of
the
difference.
P
The
second
piece
is
that
their
estimates
just
do
not
reflect
all
of
the
expenditures
on
emergencies,
especially
wildfires,
and
some
of
the
coveted
response
emergencies
that
we
had
the
had
of
that
information
so
that
they
will
be
adjusting
their
numbers
when
they
come
out
later
this
month,
just
a
little
bit
also
about
federal
funds.
Obviously
the
stimulus
was
put
to
bed
well
after
we
were,
we
were
putting
our
budget
finalizing
our
budget,
so
those
monies
are
not
reflected
in
the
budget.
P
We
are
working
real
time
on
different
technical
things
that
we
will
need
to
to
work
with
the
legislature
in
terms
of
appropriations
or
other
current
year,
language
that
will
allow
us
to
move
quickly
to
move
those
monies
through.
They
are
also
not
reflected
in
our
economic
estimate,
because
it
is
over
a
hundred
billion
dollars
coming
into
the
state
from
that
stimulus
that
that
does
have
an
impact,
and
we
will
reflect
that
impact
in
our
updated
revisions
in
april.
C
P
No,
those
are
not
gone,
those
were
temporary,
they
were
for
a
three-year
period
and
the
budget
still
reflects
those
proposals
from
last
year
that
were
enacted
by
the
legislature.
There.
There
are
a
few
things:
there's
no
general
tax
increases
there's
there.
There
are
some
issues
that
are
specific
to
certain
parts
of
the
budget,
for
example
the
department
of
toxic
substances
control.
We
continue
to
pursue
major
reforms
there,
not
just
in
how
that
department
and
their
mission
is
funded,
but
also
governance,
changes
to
that
department,
so
that's
still
reflected
in
the
budget.
P
P
That
increase
would
support
not
just
the
reduction
of
harmful
pesticides
in
our
agricultural
system,
but
it
also
will
be
supporting
the
transition
to
those
more
integrated
and
regenerative
approaches
that
have
fewer
use,
fewer
toxic
pesticides.
So
those
are
two
pieces
that
do
require
two-thirds
vote
and
we'll
be
asking
the
legislature
to
adopt.
C
P
So
yeah,
no,
it's
there's
a
significant
revision
upward
in
the
revenue
forecast.
There's
no
other
way
to
say
that
three
things
that
are
really
the
impacts.
First
of
all,
we
got
it
wrong
in
april
about
how
deep
the
recession
was
going
to
be.
Second
of
all,
we
also
got
it
wrong
that
there
was.
There
was
more
inequality
in
the
impacts
of
this
pandemic
than
we
expected,
and
then
the
third
thing
is
just
that
the
stock
market
has
gone
up
and
up
and
up
which
was
not
in
our
forecast.
P
P
So
we
do.
We
see
the
highest
level
ever
in
capital
gains,
185
billion
dollars
in
capital
gains,
that's
resulting
in
18
and
a
half
billion
in
tax
revenues.
That
is
a
an
old
story
about
the
volatility
of
revenues,
but
it's
still,
it
still
exists
today.
That's
that's
something!
That's
really
driving
some
of
those
prop
2
deposits,
which
are
obviously
really
critical
to
us.
Maintaining
the
stability
and
being
able
to
support
programs
over
the
long
term.
P
Kind
of
absorbed
into
the
budget-
yes,
yes,
so
so
the
the
roughly
15
billion
dollar
surplus-
and
we
we
have
sort
of
a
different
frame
here
than
we've
had
in
the
past.
But
the
34
billion
dollars
of
resiliency
is
a
combination
of
our
reserves
and
also
the
discretionary
surplus.
But
we
always
build
the
operating
reserve
into
our
discretionary
surplus
because
that's
a
choice
we
could
choose
to
spend
that,
but
we
choose
to
leave
some
in
that
operating
reserve.
P
P
P
P
Usually
the
other
thing
is
housing
and
homelessness.
There's
2.3
billion
dollars
on
housing
and
homelessness,
780
around
786
million
for
uc
and
csu.
We
are
building
in
again.
Emergency
response
is
still
the
primary
day-to-day
for
government
right
now
on
the
covid
19
pandemic,
and
we
have
built
in
an
estimate
of
another
700
million
that
we,
some
of
it.
We
don't
know
what
is
going
to
come
up
around
the
corner,
but
important
to
hold
space
in
our
budget
to
make
sure
that
we
can
address
the
emergencies
as
they
come
up.
P
We
have
about
a
billion
dollars
in
money
going
towards
different
health
and
human
services
efforts,
including
cal,
aim,
also
a
innovative
new
big
idea
on
addressing
the
population
that
we
refer
to
as
the
incompetent
to
stand
trial
population.
These
are
populations
that
are
often
being
held
in
our
jails.
Waiting
for
transfer
to
state
mental
hospitals,
then
we
also
have
a
whole
host
of
other
adjustments
that
add
up
to
about
a
billion
too.
So
that's
that's.
P
Those
are
the
broad
strokes
of
where
the
the
governor
has
prioritized
this
surplus,
the
biggest
one
being
jobs
and
economic
recovery
and
making
sure
that
the
state
is
well
positioned
to
accelerate
its
recovery.
Once
we
have
the
pandemic
under
control
and
people
are
vaccinated,
and
so
that's
a
very
high
priority
really
important
to
note
that
when
we
talk
about
discretionary
surplus,
that
doesn't
include
the
proposition
98
estimate,
and
so
that's
also
a
huge
priority
for
this
budget.
Q
Yes
good
afternoon
and
thank
you
for
taking
my
question,
I'm
interested
to
hear
to
the
sense
that
it's
known,
perhaps
either
from
a
sheer
financial
commitment
or
scope
or
simply
the
same.
Is
there
a
sense
yet
of
what
may
be
the
state's
most
significant
I.t
project
in
this
budget
that
we
might
see
head
to
procurement
this
year.
P
So
we're
we're
continuing
so
one
of
the
things
that
we're
doing
and
the
governor
went
through
this,
but
we're
making
some
major
investments
in
the
department
of
technology
to
have
that
agency
be
able
to
really
get
in
and
spot
problems
before
they
occur.
In
the
recent
years.
There's
been
a
lot
of
triage
and
emergencies
that
the
department
of
technology
has
leaned
in
on
and
has
supported,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
that
they
are
also
having
a
proactive
ability
to
get
in
there.
P
There
are
lots
of
projects
that
are
in
the
the
pipeline,
and
so
I
don't.
I
don't
know
that
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
speak
specifically,
but
we
continue
to
work
to
support
the
a
new
payroll
system
for
the
state.
That's
going
to
be
a
very
big
deal
working
very
closely
with
the
state
controller's
office
and
with
the
government
operations
agency
and
cal
hr,
who
are
all
all
of
government
will
be
involved
similar
to
our
fiscal
budget
system.
So
that
will
be
a
very
big
undertaking.
D
Hi
laurel
rosenhall
with
cal
matters,
the
summary
chart
by
agency
describes
an
almost
82
reduction
in
epa
or
environmental
protection
and
a
more
than
300
percent
increase
in
labor
and
workforce
development.
Those
being
two
huge
changes
can
you
just
give
us
a
sense
of
what
what's
included
in
those
reductions
and
increases.
P
So
a
lot
of
those
are
are
probably
driven
by
the
backing
out
of
one
time
money
and
I'm
going
to
have
to
get
back
to
you
specifically
on
those
high
level.
Those
changes,
because
I
don't
have
that
at
my
fingertips.
But
I
am
the
workforce
development
there's
a
large
increase
in
additional
money
for
workforce
development
that
we
have
in
the
budget
and
that's
that's-
that's
probably
a
portion
of
the
labor
and
workforce
piece
in
terms
of
epa.
I
need
to
get
back
to
you.
I'm.
D
P
A
bond
or
help
yeah,
no,
I
mean
there
are
so
many
different
strategies
that
have
already
been
introduced
in
the
legislature,
and
it
is
a
high
priority
for
the
governor
to
work
collaboratively
with
the
legislature
to
to
make
significant
progress
on
a
broadband
for
all
plan.
That
really
addresses
some
of
the
really
nagging
issues
that
the
state
has
faced
for
years,
not
just
in
urban
areas
but
in
the
rural
areas.
P
It's
going
to
take
different
strategies
and
we're
going
to
want
to
position
ourselves
to
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
additional
federal
monies
that
we're
anticipating
as
well.
So
we
don't
have
a
specific
proposal
is
the
is
the
short
answer
and
we
want
to
work
directly
with
the
legislature
on
the
shared
priority,
to
really
make
meaningful
progress
and
and
expanding
broadband.
Thank.
D
P
So
we
have,
we
have
a.
We
have
a
statement
on
this
specifically,
we
we
hope
to
be
able
to
restore
the
pay
reductions
in
the
budget
year,
but
we
are
going
to.
We
need
to
look
at
the
may
revision
to
see
if
that
is
something
that
can
be
afforded
and
we'll
make
a
determination
at
that
time,
and
we
would
also
plan
to
restore
anything
through
the
collective
bargaining
process
once
we
make
that
determination.
E
P
P
Correct
so
we
would
work
with
the
legislature,
as
we
have
throughout
the
year
on
emergency
spending
allocations
through
working
with
the
joint
legislative
budget
committee
and
thinking
and
and
making
sure
that
we're
identifying
and
and
working
with
them
collaboratively
on
how
to
address
these.
These
emergency
expenditures
that
are
driving
real
costs
that
impact
the
budget.
E
P
Since
so,
since
we've
been
in
the
covet
19
emergency,
we
have
this
account.
The
disaster
response
emergency
account,
and
that
is
the
money
that
we
do
notify
the
legislature
when
we're
transferring
money
into
that
account,
and
then
we've
had
a
regular
cadence
of
meetings
in
briefings,
especially
when
exceptional
new
expenditure
items
are
coming
up,
and
so
we
we
can
continue
to
do
that.
E
P
So
it's
also
just
an
estimate
of
what
the
spending
is.
It
doesn't
necessarily
assume
how
it's
paid
for
we,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
and
hold
space
in
the
general
fund,
but
there's
an
opportunity
for
it
to
off
be
offset
by
federal
funding.
Again
we
put
this
budget
together
before
we
knew
what
the
final
federal
actions
were
going
to
be.
E
So
the
way
I
understand
the
way,
those
the
governor's
proposing
that
those
be
allocated
is,
you
would
take
the
families
who
received
an
eitc
benefit
from
the
2019
tax
year.
So
those
who
received
it
last
year
and
then
you
would
also
give
it
to
itin
filers,
who
will
be
eligible
for
the
2020
year
so
who
are
filing
their
taxes
this
year.
Will
that
leave
out
any
families
who
were
not
eligible
in
2019
but
and
who
do
not
have
who
are
not
itin
filers
but
who
are
eligible
in
2020.
P
Possibly
and
that's
something
that
we're
looking
at
the
so
I
mean
I
think
when
we
put
this
proposal
together,
I
think
the
the
this
is
again
before
the
federal
government
acted
and
to
extend
the
ui
benefits.
The
the
plan
was
to
get
it
out
as
quickly
as
possible
and
because
the
eitc
filings
really
are,
you
know
very
dependent
on
you
getting
your
w-2
and
you
know
filing
your
federal
tax
return.
P
At
the
same
time,
those
deadlines
meant
that
those
those
individuals
would
not
get
that
payment
until
march
april,
which
is
when
most
eit
seafilers
do
file,
and
so
we
wanted
to
go
quickly
and
that's
why
we
we
used
the
2019
recipients
as
as
the
as
the
pool.
Certainly
there
has
been
a
lot
of
changes
to
people's
individual
household
income
and
there
are
potentially
some
individuals
who
didn't
qualify
in
2019
that
couldn't
qualify
in
2020
and
so
that
that
is
something
that
we
are
looking
at
and
we're
continuing
to
work
with
the
legislature.
E
P
P
G
Yes,
thank
you
billy.
Thank
you
kelly.
I
wanna
I'm
just.
I
wanted
to
just
run
through
some
questions
really
on
the
three
of
them
for
fact
checking
around
the
covid
expenditure
approach.
Expenditures.
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
I
absolutely
can
okay.
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
the
governor
presented
a
slide
showing
4.4
billion
for
testing
and
for
vaccines
and
co
and
and
tracing
in
the
budget
when
it
talks
about
those
things
it
talks
about
those
both
programs.
G
P
So
it's
on
page
46
and-
and
this
is
a
table
that
you
will
be
familiar
with,
because
it's
one
that
we've
been
updating
throughout
the
pandemic
and
we
actually
updated
it
a
few
times
this
fall
since
the
budget
act,
budget
act
estimate
again.
These
are.
These
are
slightly
different,
because
these
are
estimates.
This
is
an
emergency.
We
it's
dynamic.
P
We
do
try
and
project
and
plan
some
expenditures
and
that's
what
the
4.4
billion
reflects
so,
but
but
the
4.4
billion
is
in
comparison
to
what
was
included
in
the
2020
budget
act,
and
so
some
of
it
are
related
to
things
that
are
already
in
process
like
like
the
valencia
lab,
like
the
increased
contact
tracing
that
we've
been
doing,
like
all
of
the
cdcr
emergency
expenditures
to
manage
and
reduce
the
spread
in
the
prisons.
So
it
is
a
slightly
different.
P
M
P
So
so
not
a
new
office
in
housing,
but
a
new
office
of
health
care,
affordability
and
that's
something
we
will
need
to
work
with
the
legislature
on
establishing
that's
something.
We've
been
working
on
from
pre-pandemic
times
really
important
to
increase
cost
transparency
and
also
work
to
reduce
the
cost
of
health
care.
So
we
can
move
more
closely
to
expand
health
care
to
all
californians
and.
P
I
P
P
750
million
will
build
on
the
home
key
efforts
to
purchase
motels
around
the
state
that
really
provide
a
very
good
and
cost
effective
way
to
stand
up
a
lot
of
housing
quickly.
But
then
we
have
two
other
additional
strategies:
recognizing
that
there
are
a
lot
of
complex
needs
in
the
homeless
population
and
there's
different
continuum
of
care.
That's
needed.
We
have
750
million
for
health
care
services
that
will
specifically
support
grants
to
counties,
to
build
or
to
to
purchase
facilities
for
short-term
mental
health
stays
and
to
support
individuals
that
are
experiencing
mental
illness.
P
The
second
piece
is
250
million
through
the
department
of
social
services
to
really
take
extra
care
to
purchase
and
expand
or
rehabilitate
our
residential
care
for
the
elderly
homes,
which
are
small
homes
that
are
an
incredibly
important,
a
part
of
our
senior
housing
continuum,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
and
wrap
around
those
homes
to
both
preserve
and
grow.
The
availability
of
those
low-cost
options
for
seniors.
F
Ducky
boss,
cal
matters,
yes
hi
there,
so
the
budget
document.
Thank
you
so
much
for
taking
these
questions.
The
budget
document
references,
1.3
billion
in
food
assistance
for
california,
and
I'm
wondering
if
you
are
getting
information
about
what
that
will
look
like
is
that
more
pandemic
ebt
or
continued
snap
benefits
or
something.
P
New
stay
tuned,
I
mean
we're,
checking
websites
daily
and
also
working
directly
with
our
members
of
our
our
staff
that
work
in
washington
dc
to
to
make
sure
that
we're,
following
all
of
the
guidance
that
the
federal
government's
putting
out
on
those
new
money.
So
we
will
have
to
get
back
to
you
on
what
exactly
that
additional
money
will
be
able
to
be
allocated
too.
O
Hi
kelly,
it's
alexi
from
the
san
francisco
chronicle.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
something
you
mentioned
earlier.
I
think
you
said
there
were
about
a
1.3
billion
dollars
in
suspensions
that
were
being
reversed.
Was
this
is
separate
from
the
program
cuts
that
the
the
state
had
hoped
to
use
the
federal
money
yeah.
P
P
Last
year
there
was
these
programs
that
we
were
suspending
and
they
were
not
suspended
in
the
in
the
current
fiscal
year
they
were
suspended
starting
july
1
of
2021
and
and
most
of
them
december
january,
1
2022,
and
so
those
programs
have
not
been
cut.
A
lot
of
them
are
recent
expansions
to
the
state's
health
and
human
services
programs,
but
they
also
include
a
seven
percent
reduction
in
ihss,
as
well
as
some
reductions
in
provider
rates,
so
those
things
have
not
been
cut.
P
They
weren't
cut
last
year
and
now
we're
actually
proposing
to
further
delay
those
suspensions.
We
keep
them
on
the
the
governor.
We
have
proposed
to
keep
them
on
the
books,
if
you
will
for
future
years,
because
we
obviously
do
have
structural
deficits
starting
in
2223,
and
it
may
be
that
we
will
need
to
use
those
suspensions
to
help
balance
our
budget.
P
Those
are
those
cuts
happened
starting
july
1,
and
we
have
various
proposals
that
make
additional
investments
in
all
of
the
areas
that
were
cut.
The
judicial
branch,
uc
and
csu
are
both
getting
three
percent
growth.
The
judicial
branch
is
getting
3.6
percent
growth,
I
believe
a
cola
there,
as
well
as
child
support
services.
There
have
been
restorations
made
in
that
program
as
well,
given
the
revised
revenue
estimates
and
then,
of
course,
our
state
employees.
I
talked
about
that
earlier.