►
From YouTube: Cupertino City Council Meeting - May 17, 2022 (Part 2)
Description
Coverage of the Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Cupertino City Council Meeting. Part 2 of 2.
A
Okay,
everyone
so
we're
back
we're
on
item
number
40
and
that's
the
consideration
of
a
study
session
on
the
capital,
improvements
program
or
the
cip,
and
we
do
have
a
staff
presentation.
This
is
from
susan,
michael,
the
capital
improvements
program
manager,
welcome
susan,
and
so,
if
you'd
like
at
this
point,
please
take
away
the
presentation.
A
Yes,
of
course,
I
I
apologize.
I
was
just
going
back
on
my
agenda
indication
director
morley
of
public
works.
Please
take
it
away.
B
Just
a
short
presentation
for
you
on
my
screen:
you
should
be
able
to
see
that
presentation.
B
And
just
wanted
to
bring
us
back
to
where
we
were
at
the
last
meeting
when
we
were
talking
about
our
cip.
There
are
several
cip
projects
that
are
multi-year
annual
cip
projects.
These
are
appropriated
annually
for
things
that
are
in
progress.
We
would
like
the
council
to
continue
these.
I
think
they've
been
great
projects
for
us,
so
it
makes
sense
to
continue
on
with
them.
B
We
do
have
a
number
of
unfunded
projects,
cip
projects.
These
are
projects
that
we've
identified
as
being
needs
and
programmed
over
the
course
of
five
years.
I
will
note
that
project
number
five,
the
dom
burnett
bridge
led
lighting-
can
come
off
the
list.
We
were
able
to
accommodate
and
complete
that
one
in-house
this
year
as
one
of
our
department's
special
projects,
but
otherwise
this
shows
that,
in
addition
to
the
40
projects
we
already
have
in
process,
there
are
significant
additional
needs
throughout
throughout
the
city.
B
We
do
have
seven
projects
that
we're
asking
you
to
consider
for
the
next
fiscal
year.
These
seven
projects
generally
complement
work.
That's
already
been
done
and
move
along
priorities
and
efforts
throughout
the
city
so
within
within
the
cip.
These
would
be
key
for
us
moving
forward.
These
are
limited
this
year
because,
as
I
mentioned,
we
already
have
40
in
progress,
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
managing
to
our
capacity.
B
And
with
that
that
that
pretty
much
completes
the
report,
I
will
say
that
we
did
provide
a
staff
report
with
additional
information
from
our
last
meeting.
That
additional
information
supports
some
of
the
conversation
on
topics
that
we
were
discussed
by
the
council
of
what
what
your
interests
were,
so
that
we'll
that
will
bolster
the
conversation,
hopefully
for
the
rest
of
the
evening.
And
that
concludes
my
presentation.
B
So
from
here
we'll
we'll
respond
to
your
questions
in
the
conversation.
A
Okay
sounds
good,
so
well.
Thank
you
very
much.
So
let
let's
go
ahead
and
bring
this
to
I
you
know
I
I
wonder
with
that
that
that
that
level,
whether
we
have
members
of
the
public
with
hands
raised
on
the
cip,
so
so
let
me
let
me
try
to
see
if
we
we
do
have
members
of
the
public
so
we're
on
item
40.
A
This
is
a
capital
improvement
program
and
are
there
any
members
of
the
public
that
would
like
to
speak
on
the
cip
and
and
yes,
we
immediately
have
hands
raised.
One
is
from
jenny
and
one
is
from
rhoda
fry
and
so
jenny
per
the
usual
practice.
We'll
have
the
three
minutes
per
speaker
we'll
go
to
our
zoom
hands
raised
and
then
we'll
go
to
blue
cards.
A
I'll
note
that
there
are
no
members
of
the
public
here
tonight
anymore,
I
should
say,
and
then
we'll
go
to
any
emails
that
come
in
to
city
clerk
at
cupertino.org
during
the
time
that
our
first
speaker
is
speaking
and
again,
that's
jenny
and
then
again
with
consolidation
of
time.
I
think
that
it
may
not
be
applicable
here,
but
to
remind
everyone
if
you
want
to
consolidate
time
with
other
people,
you'll
be
adding
increments
of
two
minutes
for
each
person
that
you
add
up
to
nine
minutes,
total
okay,
so
jenny
welcome.
C
Thank
you,
mary
paul
hi.
Yes,
you
guys
are
doing
a
great
job.
There's
lots!
It's
like
the
multimedia
show
going
on
here,
I'm
glad
to
see
the
stockholmer
house
on
there.
You
know
things
move
along
at
their
own
progress
and
I'm
just
really
glad
that
this
little
old
house
is
still
out
there
and
if
you
guys
can
just
make
it
watertight
and
then
I'd
like,
I
hope
we
can
have
a
plan
for
it.
C
You
know
down
the
road
it
you
know
things
take
time,
but
I
I
think
that
we
could
have
really
really
great
future
with
this
house
in
terms
of
a
historic
site.
I
I
remember
sitting
in
the
audience
years
ago,
when
there
there
was
the
talks
about
rehabilitating
the
orange
orchard.
That
was
probably
what
about
eight
years
ago.
You
all,
then
put
the
trail
in
you
know
there
were
discussions
about
what
how
wide
it
was
going
to
be.
C
I
mean
I
don't
what
has
that
been
like
six
seven
eight
years
and
I
think
the
final
completion
of
this
is:
is
the
house
and
it
it's
just
it's
sitting
there
it's
waiting
and
to
me
it's
kind
of
like
the
the
ultimate
completion
of
that
entire
piece
of
land.
What
do
we
do
with
the
house?
The
house
has
been
there
the
entire
time
that
the
orchard's
been
there.
I
think
the
orchard
was
planted
in
the
30s
and
the
trail
now
goes
out,
etc,
but
we
can't
ignore
that
piece
of
that
little
house
sitting
there.
C
It
has
to
be
finished
and
have
its
place
in
that
park.
Land,
and
I
predict
a
great
future
for
it
and
as
long
as
we
can
keep
it
watertight
and
then
just
come
up
with
a
plan
for
it.
You
know,
even
if
we're
still
doing
this
five
to
ten
years
from
now,
that's
fine
old
houses
sit
there
quietly
until
someone
does
something
with
it
anyway.
Thank
you
for
poking,
along
with
stockholmer
house
it'll.
Steve
still
be.
I
hope
it's
still
be
there
a
hundred
years
from
now,
but
as
a
really
great
asset
for
cupercino.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
jennifer
and
let's
do
a
quick
check
here.
We
have
rhoda,
followed
by
peggy,
madam
city
clerk.
I
assume
there
are
no
blue
cards
because
there
are
no
people
in
the
in
the
chambers.
A
And
were
there
any
emails
that
came
in
during
this
time,
while
jennifer
was
speaking,
no.
E
E
Good
evening,
council
members,
you
know
a
long
time
ago
I
was
reading
the
general
plan
and
it
talked
about
these
sips
needing
to
include
cost
of
ownership.
E
You
know
when
we
look
at
a
product
like
okay,
I'm
gonna
buy
a
printer
and
do
I
buy
a
you
know?
How
do
I
decide
between
two
printers?
If
you
get
the
printer,
that's
cheaper,
you
might
actually
wind
up
spending
more
in
an
ink
right.
We
know
that
so
part
of
the
sip
needs
to
include
the
cost
of
ownership
and
at
some
point
that
seems
to
have
disappeared
from
the
general
plan,
and
I
I
think
that
we
need
to
bring
it
back,
which
brings
me
to
this
the
blackberry
farm.
E
This
idea,
this
flashpad,
has
been
there
for
a
really
long
time.
At
one
point,
it
was
seventy
thousand
dollars
and
was
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Now
it's
five
hundred
thousand
dollars.
There
was
a
slide.
The
slide
was
installed
around
2012
and
then
there
were
improvements
made
to
it.
So
I
just
you
know
with
something:
that's
only
10
years
old,
it
just
doesn't
make
sense
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
is
cost
of
a
splash
pad.
This
is
a
half
a
million
dollars.
I
sent
an
email
earlier
about.
E
You
know
there.
There
was
some
talk
about
well,
the
splash
pad
would
be
less
expensive
to
operate.
Would
it
be?
It
would
eliminate
a
a
job
of
a
a
job
right
for
for
a
student,
and
I
think
it's
nice,
that
the
city
provides
jobs
for
our
youth
and
you
know
to
make
a
pencil
out
assuming
there's
no
maintenance
either
way.
You'd
be
looking
at
41
years
to
pencil
out
splash
pad
at
blackberry
farm
to
replace
the
slide
does
not
make
sense.
E
We
really
need
to
invest
in
our
parks
that
are
that
are
in
really
poor
shape
like
memorial
park
or
like
let's
build
out
the
the
mini
park.
This
just
does
not
make
make
sense.
The
other
thing
that
seems
to
has
disappeared
off
the
sip,
because
I've
talked
with
parks
and
rec
in
the
past
is
that
there
was
30
some
odd
trees
that
were
planted
in
the
parking
lot.
Blackberry
farm
years
ago,
they've
all
died
and
I
think
those
need
to
be
replaced.
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
thing.
E
The
other
thing
I
was
a
little
concerned
concerned
about
was,
I
saw
one
report
that
said
the
splash
pad.
If
the
splash
pad
doesn't
get
approved,
then
the
slide
goes
away
completely.
I
thought
that
it
looked
at
first
that
it
was
going
to
be
a
replacement,
and
then
I
was
looking
at
attachment
b
and
the
splash
pad
wasn't
there
at
all,
so
I
thought
that
it
actually
been
removed.
So
I
was
very
surprised
to
see
it
in
in
this
in
this
report.
A
Thank
you
very
much
rhoda
and
our
next
and
final
speaker
on
this
item.
Number
40
is
peggy
griffin,
welcome,
peggy.
D
Good
evening,
council,
members
and
staff,
I
agree
with
rhoda
as
far
as
what
she
said
about
the
splash
pad
half
a
million
dollars,
and
if
in
and
the
way
I
read
it
was,
if
you
don't
approve
the
splash
pad,
the
slide
is
going
away
anyway.
What
does
it
take
to
refurbish
it?
You
know
a
job
a
summer.
Job
now
is
is
particularly
for
swimming
is
pay.
It
pays
well
and
gets
kids
out
working
which
they
need
to
do
the
library
parking
structure.
I
I
spoke
before
it.
D
Nobody
wants
it
as
far
as
three
stories
with
parking
on
the
roof
overlooking
neighbors
the
last
time
the
city
hall
was
discussed.
It
was
talked
about
putting
the
parking
under
city
hall,
so
I
wonder
about
that
and
the
major
recreational
facilities
use
and
market
analysis
what
about
first
doing
memorial
park
instead
of
looking
for
other
alternatives
to
work
on
fix
memorial
park.
First.
Thank
you.
A
F
Thank
you
mayor.
I
would
like
to
ask
a
clarification
question,
so
I
read
this
three
times
and
every
time
I
read
it,
I
get
something
new,
but
this
I
have
a
question
on
the
developing
of
the
cip.
I
understand
council
identified
priority
is
on
one
of
the
priorities
and
the
other
priorities
do
I.
I
don't
need
to
share
this.
I
can
just
read
it:
okay,.
A
The
other
priority,
perhaps
councilman,
if
you
just
for
the
benefit
of
everyone
else,
just
indicated
what
page
you're
on.
A
F
Fly
share
screen,
yes,
and
did
I
find
it
which
one
is
it
searchable
right
there?
Now?
I
can't
see
it.
Can
you
see
it?
You
can't
see
it.
Oh
there
you
go.
Actually,
I
can
see
it
okay,
so
my
question
for
staff
is
when
you
develop
your
cip
and
if
I
look
at
the
seven
programs
that
you
suggest
that
the
staff
pro
suggested
there
are
three
actually
our
council
priorities.
F
There
are
four
that
has
something
to
do
with
health
and
safety
and
that's
according
to
staff's
expertise
and
analysis
that
they
can.
This
is
my
question
for
the
staff
that
they
are
proposing
this,
because
there's
a
need
for
safe
and
health,
health
and
safety,
and
then
there
are
other
ones
that
conforming
with
with
our
master
plans.
They
are
public
inputs,
such
as
parking
for
for
library
and
positive,
that's
public
input,
because
we
did
have
a
traffic
study
done
in
2020.
F
I
believe
so.
I
do
and
then
external
funding
that
one.
I
know,
because
I'm
going
to
put
a
little
input
on
that
as
a
school
board.
Member
we've
done
three
major
bound
and
we've
done
almost
more
than
20
improvement
projects.
We
have
something
ready
to
go
and
then,
when
the
state
or
federal
has
facility
fund
available,
we
can
apply
right
away.
So
we
actually
leverage
a
lot
of
state
and
federal
funding
because
we
have
project,
that's
ready
to
go
done,
the
scoping
done
the
so
external
funding
is
very
important.
F
I
don't
see
anything
right
here,
so
my
my
question
for
staff
is
when
you
are
developing
this
seven
priorities.
I
understand
our
council
believe
that
council
priority
is
very,
very
important,
which
I
think
you
probably
take
it
into
account,
but
the
other
three.
How
do
you?
How
do
you
process
this?
Is
it
through
department,
through
managers
or
through
parking
recreation?
So
how
is
that
process
going.
A
Thanks
for
the
question
council
member
way
and
city
manager
troop,
would
you
like
to
start
off
staff
on
that
answer?.
G
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor
and
council
and
council
member
way
so
like,
like
you,
said,
we're
going
to
first
look
at
what
is
the
council
priorities?
Is
there
anything
in
there
that
we
know
may
not
be
on
the
work
plan,
but
we
know
it's.
G
It
wants
to
be
done,
for
instance,
the
stockholmer
house,
you
know
looking
and
we've
gone
through
and
we've
we've
all
walked
through
the
homes
looked
at
them,
so
we
know
that's
a
priority,
so
we
throw
that
on
there
other
ones
you
know
such
as
the
the
splash
pad
was
put
on,
because
the
pool
itself
it
may
look
like
it's
in
good
condition,
but
it's
out
in
the
sun,
the
rain,
the
wind,
the
sun
in
just
10
years
of
the
elements
where's
that
fiberglass
down,
so
we
have
to
you,
know
either
replace
it,
replace
it
or
try
and
somehow
fix
it.
G
We
also
send,
I
forgot,
they
told
me
the
reports
that
have
to
go
into
cal,
osha.
They
have
to
come
out
and
inspect
it.
It's
it's
very
onerous
on
what
we
do
on
that
part.
So
if
we
go
back-
and
we
say
okay,
you
want
to
continue
it.
We'd
have
to
do
a
new
slide
and
it's
very
expensive
too
and
yes,
we
still
would
have
people
working
there.
We
just
wouldn't
have
to
have
the
two
people
on
one
site,
because
you
have
one
at
the
top
slide
want
the
bottom
slide.
G
Someone
could
be
over
the
splash
pool.
Another
could
be
a
lifeguard
in
the
regular
pool.
So
you
know
it
would
be
good
in
that
direction.
So
we
have
to
look
at
that
as
the
public
health
and
safety,
and
I
forgot
that
list
up
there
now,
but
we'll
get
with
the
different
department
heads
and
discuss
with
them.
What
are
other
needs
as
they're,
going
around
doing
their
jobs
and
work?
What
are
things
that
have
popped
up
that
we
know
something
has
to
be.
You
know
done
and
considered.
Maybe
a
report
came
in.
G
A
Great
thank
you
very
much
city
manager,
troop
and
I'll,
just
mention
master
plans
and
external
funding
or
the
other
two
correct.
G
H
A
No,
I
think
jim's
description
is
very
appropriate,
so
it's
good
to
see
that
set
forth.
It's
excellent,
so
councilmember
way
anything
else
at
this
point
before
we
move
it
to
another
council
room
just.
F
So,
with
our
first
study
session
and
following
with
this
one,
this
is
actually
for
the
council
to
put
input
and
get
scoping
and
because
I
did
hear
the
input
from
public
that
there
is
no
public
input.
So
when
do
we
get
public
input
say
if
council
say
we
want
to
do
the
splash
pad
or
we
want
to
do
the
gentlemen-
all
inclusive
playground,
the
bathroom
facility?
Do
we
have
a
time
that
we
accept
public
input?
Well,
that's.
A
That's
that's
fair
councilman,
so
so
this
has
been
noticed
right,
and
so
we
did
have
a
couple
of
members
of
the
community
talk
about
a
particular
project,
but
perhaps
we
want
to
take
that
back
to
our
city
manager.
Public
works
director
capital
improvements,
program
managers.
Anyone
have
input
on
on
that
question.
When
does
the
public
input
process
take
place
here?.
G
Just
for
my
I'm
going
off
my
prior
experience
and
and
matt
can
chime
in
too
is
is
just
when
we
do
these
different
sessions
on,
because
people
will
put
them
out
there
before
like
this
is
not
the
first
time
we've
talked
about
it.
So
people
have
that
ability
to
review
it
and
look
at
it
and
then
well,
not
here,
but
come
forth
on
zoom
or
something
to
make
any
comments
or
suggestions.
They
also
have
all
five
council
members
that
they
can
send
in
their
comments
and
thoughts
and
whatnot
on
on
the
projects.
B
B
So
it's
a
continuous
process
that,
where
we're
capturing
that
public
input
so
that,
although
this
is
the
sort
of
the
culmination
of
that
where
the
public
can
come
and
provide
direct
input
to
the
council,
we
we're
hearing
them
throughout
the
entire
process,
whether
it
be
at
a
commission
meeting
when
we're
out
in
the
public
when
we're
out
of
sight
when
our
partners
are
are
providing
input
that
they
hear
from
their
customers
like
mark
parks
and
rec
who
operate
the
facilities
on
a
regular
basis,
so
that
the
input
is
is,
is
significant
for
these
projects.
B
These
projects
will
evolve
very
very
much
so
today
is
just
the
sort
of
the
next
step
in
the
process.
This
will
bring
the
projects
into
ultimately
a
cip
and
we'll
develop
that
cip
program
and
we'll
continue
the
outreach
in
an
ongoing
way
throughout
the
course
of
the
project,
and
susan
may
have
additional
input
on
this
item.
Great.
H
Thank
you
just
one
quick
point
is
that
thank
you,
mayor
is
that
we
do
also
rely
on
our
relationships
and
our
reports
to
the
commissions
we
do
regularly
visit,
especially
by
compete
and
parks
and
rec,
because
that's
where
a
lot
of
our
projects
reside.
So
we
are
in,
I
believe,
good
communication
with
commissions
and
rely
on
community
input
at
that
point
as
well.
A
Great
thanks
very
much,
and
so
let's
go
on
to
councilmember,
moore,
okay
and
then
vice
mayor
ciao.
I
Thank
you
so
so
we
do
have
input
on
these
projects
from
the
the
planning
commission
and
and
what
they
thought
of
of
them,
because
I
didn't
see
it
in
the
packet.
So
I
was
wondering
if
that's
one
of
the
attachments.
G
J
I
A
I
Was
wondering
if
someone
could
pull
up
attachment
c?
And
I
I
think
it
should
potentially
be
retitled,
because
I
believe
this
is
supposed
to
be
the
five-year
cip.
I
I
know
we're
focusing
on
the
top
seven:
the
blackberry
farm
pools,
splash
pad
city
hall,
renault
city
lighting,
the
led
lighting,
buffered
bike
lanes,
the
all-inclusive
play
area,
jolly
men,
major
recreation
facilities,
use
and
market
analysis
and
the
stockholmer
burn
and
bless
inspection
reports
and
analysis.
But
if
you
scroll
down
there's
many
projects
in
the
in
the
gray
shaded
area
which
are
they
are
less
expensive.
I
Because
when
I
look
at
this
table-
and
I
think
it's
supposed
to
be
presenting
it
to
us-
and
maybe
it
is-
and
I
just
not
following
it
when
I
look
at
the
column-
marked
revenue
funding
sources
with
the
dashes
that
that
concerns
me,
especially
with
the
city
hall
renovation,
because
the
budget
is
at
79.6
million,
proposed
funding
of
4
million,
and
then
that
would
be
in
fiscal
year.
2024
21.6
million
and
then
54
million
in
2025.
I
is.
Are
we
anticipating
that
our
our
general
fund
is
going
to
have
that
much
extra
that
it
can
fund
these
items?
I'm
I'm
concerned
about
that.
What
was
what's
the
anticipated
funding
source
for
for
this
very
expensive
project.
A
Let
me
start
thank
you
very
much.
Councilmember
moore
and
director
morley
thanks
for
jumping
in
there.
B
Yeah,
thank
you.
Let
me
start
with
the
first
part
of
your
question,
which
is
sort
of
the
five-year
cip
versus
the
one-year
cip,
we're
bringing
you
sort
of
a
five-year
outlook
of
what
the
cip
could
look
like.
This
is
the
opportunity
to
provide
input
to
us
as
we're
as
we're
structuring
that
so
that
we
can
bring
it
back
to
you
for
approval
at
the
at
a
future
meeting.
B
So
certainly
there's
an
opportunity
to
move
things
around
now.
What
we've
done
is
provided
you
with
what
we
think
is
the
best
program
to
accommodate
our
staffing
abilities.
So
if
there's
something
that
that
looks
like
it
wants
to
move
forward
or
you'd
like
it
to
move
forward
in
in
the
timeline,
we
we'd
like
you
to
provide
that
input
to
us
and
then,
to
the
extent
that
we
can
do
that,
we'll
make
that
adjustment
as
we
bring
forward
the
the
next
version
of
this
of
the
proposed
cip.
B
B
So
these
are
really
conceptual
level
budgets
on
some
of
these
bigger
projects
and
and
later
on
in
the
process
as
the
as
the
scoping
gets,
refined,
we'll
have
solid
numbers
and
from
there
we
we
would
begin
the
discussions
with
the
council
on
what
the
appropriate
funding
source
would
be,
and
the
council
can
have
the
opportunity
at
that
point,
to
provide
input
on
the
scope,
the
size
of
the
project,
the
ability
to
deliver
the
project
based
on
financial,
financial
assets
or
or
potential
capacity
for
other
other
funding
opportunities,
so
that
this
isn't
a
done
deal.
A
I
You
I'm
still,
I
and
I
think
perhaps
it
would
have
been
a
benefit
to
the
council
if
the
policies
were
included
as
an
attachment,
and
perhaps
that
could
be
brought
up
and
put
on
the
screen,
but
just
to
to
really
hone
in
on
what
we've
got
here
for
policy
which
possibly
needs
to
have
some
alterations.
I
But
because
it's
saying
projects
included
in
the
cip
will
have
complete
information
on
the
need
for
the
project.
The
project,
justification,
description
and
scope
of
work,
total
cost
estimates,
future
cost
estimates,
future
operating
and
maintenance
costs
and
how
the
project
will
be
funded.
Council.
A
I
But
they
they
each
have
this
the
the
cip
policy
in
it
and
and
then
it
says,
an
objective
process
for
evaluating
cip
projects
with
respect
to
the
overall
needs
of
the
city
will
be
established
through
a
priority
ranking
of
cip
projects.
I
So
what
I'm
concerned
about
here
is
whether
or
not
we
truly
have
complete
information,
and
I
feel
that
because
projects
moving
forward,
what
we're
being
told
is
that
we'll
get
more
information
as
it
becomes
available.
So
we
possibly
don't
have
complete
information,
and
that's
why,
like,
when
I
was,
which
would
the
the
project
has
changed
now,
but
looking
at
the
homeless,
shelter
concept
that
understanding
what
that
will
ultimately
cost
us
in
the
future
to
me
is
pretty
important
and
then
the
other
item
which
I.
A
Will
before
you
I'm
going
to
show
you
before
you
go
on
some
more
sure.
Can
you
tell
us
what
page
you
were
on
you
know,
because
you.
I
You
had
a
particular
one,
I'm
in
I'm
looking
at
2020
to
2021
and
in
that
item
it's
in
the
the
I
would
call
it
the
forward
on
page
roman.
A
I
L
A
Ordinary
item
here
so
yeah
so
again:
fiscal
policies,
capital
improvement
policy
and
then
you're
talking
about
ranking
somewhere.
I
So
we
under
policy
the
first,
the
first
paragraph
there.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
really
are
we
really
following
this?
Where
are
we
really
getting
all
the
information
that
the
policy
states
that
we
will
be
receiving
and
then
we
need
to
be
ranking
these
these
items,
so
we
need
to
come
up
with
this
subjective
process.
If
we
don't
already
have
it
to
to
prioritize
the
the
list.
A
I
A
I
Well,
I
I
I'm,
I
I'm
not
sure
I
can
bring
this
back
up,
but
you
had
been
discussing
having
a
subcommittee
regarding
the
seismic
design,
since
we
have
brought
that
up
regarding
city
hall,
and
I
and
I
was
reading
the
documents
earlier
today-
I
if
it
can
be
suggested
now
I
would
I
would
volunteer
to
serve
on
that
subcommittee
since
it
is
interesting
to
me
the
how
the
seismic
load
safety
factor
changed
in
the
code
from
1.25
to
1.5,
and
so
I
am,
I
think
I.
A
Think,
let's,
let's,
let's
take
that
when
it
comes
back
to
us
on
june
7th,
since
that's
part
of
the
direction
to
come
back
in
a
consent,
calendar
item
which
of
course
is
councilman
white
noted
could
be
pulled
and
perhaps
expressly
for
this
reason
to
identify
the
subcommittee
members
anything
else,
councilmember
moore
before
we
move
on
to
vice
mayor
chow,
please
move
on!
Thank
you,
okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
Vice
mayor
ciao,.
M
M
Planning,
commission,
the
minimum
role
is
to
for
general
plan
conformance,
but
it
doesn't
really
prevent
them
from
providing
input
even
suggesting
projects
just
like
like
they
did
for
work
program,
and
so
I
wonder,
among
all
the
projects
that's
proposed
right
now
was
anyone.
That's
added
us
through
input
from
any
commission.
A
Vice
mayor
you're,
asking
a
question
of
staff,
and
so
let's
refer
that
to
city
manager,
troupe
or
other
members
of
staff.
G
Thank
you
mayor
and
vice
mayor.
I'm
gonna
have
to
actually
ask
staff,
like
our
director
matt,
to
see
if,
if
he
had
any
discussion
with
these
individuals.
B
So
our
our
commissions
receive
frequent
inquiries
from
us
and
they
provide
input
to
us
pretty
much
throughout
the
year,
but
for
for
the
easy
ones.
The
bike
and
ped
commission
provided
input
into
this,
and
I
was
there
for
that
meeting
and
their
pr.
Their
projects
are
identified
in
the
staff.
With
the
initial
staff
report,
the
parts
and
rec
commission
did
the
same
and
their
input
is
provided
in
the
staff
report
as
well
and
then
prior
when
we
were
working
on
the
library
project.
B
The
library
commission
also
provided
input,
so
there's
outreach
continually
with
the
commissions
and
there
are
significant
influencer
on
what
projects
go
forward.
B
B
We
bring
that
all
together,
we
have
a
discussion
about
it
and
we
make
our
proposed
ranking
and
that's
what
you
have
now
is
our
proposed
ranking
of
the
project.
So
the
seven
projects
that
we
propose
going
forward
in
the
next
fiscal
year,
additional
projects
that
we
propose
be
ranked
to
go
forward
in
future
years.
M
Two
through
five,
for
example,
for
back
and
pet
commission.
What
is
their
ranking
among
all
the
bike
pad
projects?
I
thought
they
ranked
the
carmen
bridge
pretty
high.
So
what?
What
exactly
are
their
ranking?.
A
Vice
mayor
chao
one
moment,
I'm
sorry
councilmember
roy.
You
wanted
to
commission.
A
Okay,
I
I
I'm
sorry,
let
me
let
me
go
ahead
and
let
vice
mayor
chow
continue
and
finish
with
her
comment.
M
Oh
right,
oh
the
in
the
last
staff
report
yeah
now
I
remember
reading
that
okay.
So
then,
so
they
ranked
their
bollinger
highest
on
okay.
M
So
then,
so
then
the
for
the
list
that
we
are
seeing
right
now
and
so
my
understanding
now
is
the
staff
ranked
them
and
what
are
the
criterias
for
ranking?
What
how
how
how
are
they
ranked?
Could
you
clarify
yeah.
B
And
through
the
mayor,
we
we
did
just
finish
a
conversation
about
the
rankings
and
the
matrix
of
what
elements
go
into
that
and
that's
for
the
check
boxes
across
commission
input
general
plan,
those
kinds
of
things
go
into
it.
So
there's
a
there's,
a
whole
process.
We
go
through
every
year
to
incorporate
various
factors
into
the
rankings,
including
these
commission
input.
M
A
Okay,
thank
you
vice
versa,
and
we
have
a
hand
raised
from
our
city
manager.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
vice
mayor.
G
Charlotte's
question
just
briefly
and
if
matt
wants
to
chime
in
after
so
part
of
that
is
once
we
get
rankings
from
other
people
say
it's
the
bike
and
pet
or
whoever
it
might
be.
We
also
then
have
to
look
at
what
is
the?
How
much
staff
do
we
have
available
to
work
on
whatever
the
project
may
be,
the
other
big
one
is:
do
we
have
any
funding
for
it?
So
if
we
don't
have
any
funding
for
it,
but
we
do
on
these
three
up
here,
then
those
are
going
to
take
priority.
G
While
we
look
for
another
item
that
might
take
more
funding,
you
know
be
at
the
carmen
avenue
bridge.
We
don't
have
any
funding
for
that.
We
know
it's
going
to
be
a
few
million
dollars
or
more
so
we'll
have
to
find.
Where
can
we
get
that
versus
if
it's
a
smaller
fifty
thousand
dollar
for
the
stockholm
house,
you
know
we
can
we
can
easily
do
that?
One.
So.
G
Of
it,
there's
not
a
it's,
it's
not
a
precise.
Did
you
check
every
box,
it's
it's
subjective
and
sometimes
something
might
be
more
efficient
to
be
number
two,
the
number
one.
So
we
have
to
just
go
through
all
of
those.
B
Yeah
so
there's
a
great
explanation
for
this
and
I
think
susan's,
probably
the
best,
with
the
knowledge
to
speak
to
them.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
jim
and
matt.
Susan
welcome.
H
Thank
you
mayor
and
council.
The
bollinger
road
improvements
project
is
a
high
priority
for
the
bike
and
ped
commission.
There
was
a
study
done
in
2019.
I
believe,
and
a
couple
options
came
from
that
study.
H
We
actually
want
to
proceed
with
the
project,
but
there's
two
mitigating
factors.
We
need
to
have
more
input
as
to
which
options
from
that
study
to
proceed
with,
and
the
other
one
is,
as
noted
by
council
in
the
previous
session,
is
that
we
need
to
coordinate
efforts
with
west
san
jose
in
order
to
move
that
project
forward.
H
We
needed
a
little
bit
more
time
in
order
to
scope
it,
since
we
just
came
to
the
conclusion
that
the
right-of-way
was
not
a
problem
any
longer
and
that
we
can
proceed
with
that,
but
we
have
it
in
our
projected
fiscal
year
2024
program,
so
that
we
would
begin
the
design
process
then
and
part
of
this.
J
A
Okay,
so
why
don't
you
see
if
you
can
wrap
those
up
and
then
I'll
go
and
then
councilman
willie?
If
you
had
any
comments
so.
M
A
B
B
So
the
information
that
you
provided
last
time
and
the
information
you
provide
tonight
will
incorp
will
will
incorporate
to
the
best
of
our
ability
into
into
the
future
cip
proposal,
so
so
that
we're
continuing
to
gather
the
information.
I
don't
think
we
had
direction
out
of
the
last
meeting.
I
think
we
might
have
started
down
the
road
of
some
some
motions,
but
not
quite
got
there.
So
if
there
is
a
direction
through
emotion
or
just
through
regular
input,
either
way
it
works.
It
works
fine
for
us
in
developing
the
cip.
B
So
we
would
take
the
information
from
the
from
the
beginning
of
the
study
session,
because
this
is
the
continuation
of
that
study
session.
So
we
would
take
the
information
from
the
the
beginning
of
the
of
the
study
session
and
from
the
conclusion
of
the
study
session
and
hold
all
of
that
into
the
proposed
cip.
M
So,
okay,
so
it
sounds
like
even
though
the
staff
recommendation
for
today
is
not
exactly
to
adopt
or
do
anything,
but
we
have
to
make
give
clear
guidance
and
direction
otherwise.
Next
time
we
don't
know
which
comment
would
get
in
or
not
right.
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
feedback
and
for
the
dollar
amenities.
M
I
understand
that
dog
leash,
I
mean
dog
dishes
could
be
considered
park
amenity,
but
when
I
proposed
that
last
time
I
meant
to
potential
fencing,
for
example,
for
the
queen
land,
no
area,
because
that
area
is
right
right
next
to
a
road.
It's
an
area,
that's
rarely
used
by
anyone,
but
that
which
is
why
it's
ideal
for
dola,
but
that's
a
potential
fencing
that
might
not
be
covered.
So
I'm
a
little
confused
so
in
case
on
there
is
a
need
for
that.
What's
the
proper
process
to
include
this
item
should
we
include
this
now?
G
So
over
at
quinlan,
that's
going
to
be
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
matter,
susan,
that
will
be
part
of
the
full
memorial
park
master
plan.
Is
that
not
correct
so
to
to
go
and
budget
or
start
planning
for
something
there
when
we
don't
have
the
master
plan
yet
so
we
would
rather
wait.
We
don't
want
to
put
in
a
product
fencing
or
whatever
it
is,
if
that's
not
the
best
place
for
it.
So.
M
G
What
we
don't
know
for
sure,
yet
until
the
master
plan
is
done
and
the
two
items
that
you're
talking
about
85
percent
of
the
one
will
have
to
be
done
regardless
of
whatever's
whatever
we
do
has
to
be
done.
The
other
15
yeah,
it's
some
irrigation
and
whatnot-
is
not
there,
but
it'll
be
another.
Two
years,
probably
before.
J
M
Okay
for
the
amphitheater
also,
I
really
think
that
I
should
wait
for
the
master
plan,
because
how
that
fit
in
with
the
rest
of
the
master
plan,
we
don't
know
there
are
many
options
we
can
go
with
that
and
I
think
that
really
needs
to
also
come
to
the
council,
so
the
public
can
provide
input
on
what
kind
of
things
they
want
to
see
at
the
amphitheater
and
then
for
the
deanza
bike
lane.
My
comment
last
time.
B
With
if
I
may,
with
with
respect
to
the
amphitheater
and
the
improvements
at
at
memorial
park,
we
we
are
under
following
previous
council
direction
to
move
forward
with
those
projects
out
of
the
parks
and
rec
master
plan.
There
was
significant
input
from
the
public
that
those
were
highly
desirable
and
that
they
should
not
wait
and
they
should
move
forward
so
we're
under
that
direction
from
the
council.
B
If
the
council
wishes
to
change
that
direction,
although
the
design
of
those
efforts
are
are
moving
forward
and
in
process,
especially
the
the
pawn
reconfiguration,
the
council
can
give
us
direction
to
to
change
direction.
We'd
want
to
hear
that
in
a
sort
of
a.
A
F
Because
if
I
read
it
correctly,
I
was
here
last
year,
so
I
the
pound
and
the
amphitheater
were
20
21,
2021-2022,
cip
plan
yeah.
J
M
J
A
A
So
let
me
go
ahead
and
take
the
take.
The
dice
back,
we'll
we'll
go
through
another
round
and
you'll
you'll
have
an
opportunity
to
share
your
your
remaining
thoughts
here
so
councilmember
willie
did
you
want
to
go
before
me
or
my
mine
shouldn't
be
too
long,
but
go
right
ahead.
All
right!
Thank
you.
A
Let
me
go
ahead
and
share
the
policies
again,
because
I
think
that
those
are
good
to
kind
of
visit
here
in
the
context
of
a
project
or
two
okay.
So
let
me
read
the
second
paragraph
here
under
policy
projects
included
in
this
cip
will
have
complete
information
on
the
need
for
the
project.
A
So
the
question
that
I
want
to
ask
is
vis-a-vis,
specifically
what's
going
on
with
the
million
dollars
that
we
allocated
and
is
in
the
current
fiscal
years,
cip
for
the
parking
improvements
to
the
civic
center,
as
well
as
the
seismic
retrofitting
of
city
hall.
Now,
when
you
take
these
two
items
in
conjunction
with
each
other
as
well
as
you
know,
frankly
the
comments
that
were
just
made
with
regard
to
the
amphitheater
of
memorial
park-
and
you
know
the
other
item
related
to
that
park.
J
A
Seems
like
we
should
have
you
know
more,
even
treatment
with
regard
to
these
particular
items
here
in
the
civic
center,
so
I'm
just
wondering
how
was
it
that
we
were
able
to
visit
upon
the
public
a
a
nearly
80
million
dollar
project
that
councilmember
moore,
very
you
know
very
correctly
pointed
out
that
in
two
years
in
the
future
we
have
a
54
million
dollar
encumbrance
identified
without
really
any
kind
of
indication
as
to
how
the
project
will
be
funded.
And
you
know
I.
A
I
thought
it
was
a
very
understated
question,
but
it
was
you
know.
Are
we
expecting
to
get
that
money
and
to
my
knowledge,
that's
that's
the
definitive.
No,
we
we
don't
have
the
expectation
to
get
54
million
dollars,
and
so
why
are
we
in
the
midst
of
the
current
work
program
in
the
current
fiscal
year
being
asked
to
visit
upon
the
civic
center,
something
frankly
completely
different
when
you
consider
these
two
aspects
of
the
policy?
So
that's.
That's.
First
part
of
my
question.
A
Second,
part
of
the
question
is
having
to
do
with
the
prioritization
of
these
items,
and
I
I
think
we
do
have
commissions
for
a
reason,
the
planning
commissions,
its
scope
is
fairly
broad,
and
so
just
because
there
is
a
specific
delineation
of
compliance
and
conformity
with
the
general
plan.
That
doesn't
mean
that
we
can't
ask
that
commission
to
go
ahead
and
look
at
capital
improvement
program
projects,
and
you
know,
provide
an
advisorial
ranking
for
instance.
So
I
I
don't
see
why
we're
constrained
necessarily.
A
I
know
that
it's
late
in
this
cycle
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year,
but
if
we
were
provide
to
provide
very
explicit
direction,
why
would
we
not
be
able
to
ask
for
that
kind
of
evaluation
and
advice
from
our
planning
commission
and
to
the
extent
that
the
answer
is
we
can't
what
would
need
to
change
in
order
to
allow
us
to
do
so?
So
those
are
my
questions
and
so
feel
free.
You
know
from
staff
and.
J
A
Extent
that
you
missed
any
of
the
items
I'll
go
ahead
and
you
know
revisit
them.
B
If
I,
if
I
can
mayor
yes,
please
with
with
respect
to
the
the
city
hall
project,
I
I
think
it's
incumbent
on
staff
to
provide
you
with
the
project
as
we
see
the
best
alternative,
but
also
with
the
options
and
we've
done
that
we've
got
a
list
of
options
for
you
at
this
point,
so
you
can
see
that
there
are
opportunities
to
adjust
that
project.
B
Our
recommendation
is
that
once
you
start
to
to
weed
through
those
options
that
it
starts
to
make
sense
to
do
the
bigger
project,
but
we
would
certainly
expect
that
that
to
be
that
to
be
a
conversation
as
the
project
develops.
So
as
I've
mentioned,
this
is
very
broad
conceptual
level,
scope
and
there's
much
work
to
be
done
before
we
get
to
a
final
scope
on
that
project.
B
So
much
much
discussion,
many
meetings
with
the
council
to
be
had-
and
we
would
hope
to
begin
to
begin
that
process
process
so
that
we
can
address
the
needs
of
at
the
facility
with
with
respect
to
the
long-term
funding
for
that
project.
B
B
The
great
example
is
transportation
projects
where
we
get
them
to
that
shovel
ready
state
so
that
35
percent
design
state,
where
they're
ready
to
go
so
that
we
can
compete
for
for
other
other
people's
money
and
bring
that
to
the
community
so
that
those
are
those
are
strategic
elements
of
the
of
the
cip
that
that
we,
that
we
move
forward.
A
B
Yeah,
and
so
the
the
discussion
with
the
council
may
ultimately
be
that
the
council
that
we
that
we
can't
afford
that
or
we
can
afford
a
lesser
scope,
but
we
we
feel
it's
incumbent
upon
us
to
bring
this
forward
as
a
need,
so
that
you
can
incorporate
it
into
the
full
discussion
of
the
cip
and
balance
it
with
the
other
needs
that
the
city
has.
So
it's
a
it's
a
big
picture.
B
Look
and
like
I
said
this
is
our
opportunity
to
have
that
discussion
with
you
and
to
see
where,
where
you
stand
on
that
and
where
you
want
us
to
move
forward
or
where
you
don't,
okay,.
A
And,
and
on
behalf
of
staff,
I
I
take
it
that
if
the
direction
is
essentially
conform,
the
activity
with
regard
to
the
existing
work
plan
and
the
prospective
future
work
plan
staff
would,
you
know,
take
all
measures
to
try
to
do
so.
Correct.
A
Okay,
great
and
then
with
regard
to
evaluation
and
working
together
with
our
our
planning
commission
to
try
to
get
some
get
some
conformance
with
these
policies
and
rankings
city
manager.
Troop
did
you.
I.
I
think
you
probably
wanted
to
speak
to
the
prior
item,
we're
discussing
as
well.
G
I
was
gonna,
do
I
saw
chris
hit
his
button,
but
I
was
just
gonna
say
currently
the
the
commission's
I'll.
Let
chris
do
it
is
just
they
don't
their
background
for
the
planning
commission
is
not
to
do
more
than
just
compliance,
but
council
could
say
no
we
want
to
send
it
back
to
them.
We
want
them
to
review
it
and
do
do
whatever
or
we
can
go
back
as
a
council,
and
you
can
adjust
the
planning
commission
to
do
more,
but
I'll
let
chris.
K
So
so
the
rankings
wouldn't
ordinarily
be
conducted
by
the
planning
commission.
So
the
the
you
know,
the
planning
commission's
jurisdiction
under
the
code
is
to
review
for
a
general
plan
conformance,
I
think,
that's
standard
across
most
jurisdictions
in
california.
It's
you
know
it's
typical
to
have
the
commissions
with
jurisdiction
over
public
works
and
parks
participate
in
the
process,
because
these
are
public
facilities.
K
A
Okay,
great
well,
I
let
me
glom
onto
that
very
last
statement
that
you
made
so
there's
flexibility
within
the
code
to
make
a
reference
to
the
planning
commission
if
it
chose
to
do
so
for
council
and
so
to
the
extent
that
we've
gotten
pushback
in
this
go
around.
It
sounds
like
this
is
really
more
a
matter
of
timing.
Is
that?
A
Because,
if
we're
at
this
stage
and
we're
saying
you
know
to
help
us
out
with
kind
of
assessing
the
recommended
action
right,
the
recommended
ranking
provided
by
staff,
we
would
like
to
have
our
planning
commission
evaluate
this
in.
In
terms
of
you
know
their
own
suggested
rankings,
that's
something
that
would
be
within
our
purview
to
to
ask
for
correct
right.
K
Yeah
these
are
these
are
policy
considerations,
mayor
but
I'd,
say
it's
a
matter
of
timing
and
a
matter
of
expertise.
Just
because
you
know
the
planning
commission
does
not
typically
oversee
you,
know:
public
works
or
or
parks.
You
know
their
their.
Their
jurisdiction
is
typically
over
development
and
long-range
planning.
So
so
those
those
are
the
considerations
I
would
I
would
keep
in
mind,
but
those
are
policy
considerations
for
that.
A
I
see
so
so
one
of
the
okay,
okay,
fair
enough,
so
those
are
those.
Those
are
my
my
critical
questions.
I
I
had
another
topic,
but
let
me
go
ahead
and
bring
this
to
council
member
willie
because
he
because
he
hasn't
had
a
chance
to
speak.
I
I
appreciate
these
these
answers
and
I'll
just
round
this
out
by
saying
that
you
know
we
can
have
an
improved
process
over
time.
O
You
mayor,
thank
you,
matt
for
a
lot
of
the
information
you've
been
supplying.
O
The
first
thing
that
I
would
toss
out
is
that
I'm
real
happy
that
councilman
moore
did
find
that
policy
page,
because
I
I
really
do
feel
that
as
time
as
time
has
progressed
just
like
with
the
work
plan
and
probably
with
the
budget,
we're
learning
more
and
more
how
to
be
involved,
which
I
think
historically
has
not
been
utilized.
O
O
If
I
get,
you
know
a
wrong
interpretation,
but
the
list
of
all
the
items
there
I
get,
you
know
29
items
and
so
I'll
start
off
with
you
know
just
like
with
the
work
plan,
I
feel
the
ranking
is
a
strong
message
to
the
community,
and
so
when
I
I
look
at
you
know,
this
is,
and
I
see
number
one
blackberry,
farm,
splash
pad
and
then
city
lighting
up
at
the
top,
and
I
see
memorial
park
in
lawrence
midi
park.
O
You
know
down
there
at
22
and
23.
I
I
would
hope
that
in
the
future
we
kind
of
use
similar
thinking
with
the
work
plan
and
create
the
list
that
you
know
really
does
have
the
priority.
O
Specifically,
when
there's
more
than
one
item
dealing
with
a
particular
place,
I
think
equity
means
rather
than
do
everything
pertaining
to
one
place.
It
really
is
spread
across
blackberry
farm
we've
got
splash
pad,
we've
got
golf
course:
we've
got
bocce
ball
and
then
linda
vista
park.
Picnic
area
is
down
at
18
portal
park.
Picnic
area
is
down
at
19.
O
So
so
I
do
think
that
you
know
it
how
we
rank
them.
Everybody
in
the
community
benefits
rather
than
too
much
focus
on
blackberry,
farm
and
well.
We
didn't
have
enough
staff
time
to
do
anything
on
porto
park,
so
I'm
not
sure
that
what
I've
just
said
really
plays
out,
but
in
terms
of
conveying
to
our
community
that
that's
how
we're
trying
to
be
sure
we
have
equity
throughout
the
community.
O
Maybe
I'm
confusing
that,
but
major
wreck
facility
market
analysis
would
seem
like
that,
belongs
to
parks
and
rec
to
really
determine
you
know
how
the
facilities
should
be
changed,
expanded
whatever
to
get
maximum
community
usage,
and
so
I
I
asked
that
question.
I'm
not
sure.
If
maybe
at
the
end,
you
can
answer
touch
on
a
couple
of
these
number.
25
major
feel
major
facilities
program,
they're,
not
ranked
they're,
not
numbered
on
your
list
but
they're
in
order,
and
I
gave
each
one
one
number
so
number
25
major
facilities
programming
there
again.
O
In
terms
of
you
know,
facility
programming,
I
mean,
we've
got
the
city
hall
annex
you
know
the
tory
building
and
you
know
how
those
types
of
facilities
will
get
utilized
to
the
best
of
the
community's
desire.
O
Okay,
then
two
smaller
ones
that
I'd
like
to
bring
up
carmen
bridge.
You
know
it's
got
two
lines:
design
and
construction
construction,
1.4
million.
So
I
was
contacted
by
some
very
passionate
residents
about
the
carmen
bridge
and
they
clearly
said
if,
if
the
city
will
commit
to
putting
x
amount
of
money
in
they're
willing
to
go,
look
for
the
money,
that's
needed
to
complement
it,
but
they
said
if
the
city
just
has
it
sitting
there
as
a
line
item
with
with
no
allocation.
O
They
said
that
basically
they
can
go
in
and
try
and
find
funding.
But
it's
going
to
be
a
big,
no
because
the
city
hasn't
made
a
commitment.
So
with
that
I'd,
be
supportive
of
you
know
getting
the
ball
rolling.
If
it's
expected
to
be
estimated
to
be
1.4
million
and
we
were
to
say:
okay,
let's
go
ahead
and
say:
let's
allocate
500
000
and
see
if
they
can
go
and
drum
up
another
million
boy
bingo,
it
would
be
funded
the
next
time
we
visit
it.
O
The
other
one
would
be
the
stocker
meyer
and
blesch
house
at
the
canyon
crossing
groundbreaking
met
with
sharon
of
the
historical
society,
and
she
mentioned
wow,
the
blush
house
and
the
stocker
mile
house.
But
the
blush
house
would
be
an
excellent
place
for
the
city's
museum
that
is
currently
at
quinlan
and
by
being
at
something
like
the
blush
house,
man,
you
could
put
some
some
items
that
are
vintage
for
that.
O
It
may
be
that,
ultimately,
it
doesn't
seem
plausible
finance
wise
how
much
for
the
city
to
maintain
the
house
for
them
to
use
the
house
as
a
historical
museum.
Well
we're
paying
for
quinlan,
you
know!
So
if
it,
if
it
is
possible
to
take
advantage
of
those.
The
fact
that
the
stocker
meyer
house
is
right
next
to
it
and
is
older,
and
they
could
take
that
group
of
kids
right
out
the
back
door
and
walk
over
to
stocker
mile
and
say
you
just
saw
what
was
1930s
and
1940s.
O
Let
us
go
show
you
the
1870s,
nothing,
not
a
full
structure,
but
at
least
this
is
where
they
were
there's
their
orange
groves.
Things
of
that
nature,
so
I'm
getting
a
little
bit
passionate,
but
that's
why
we're
on
the
city
council
so
I'll,
make
those
comments
and
take
the
ball
and
run
with
it.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
council
member
willie
and
let's
go
in
for
the
next
round
of
comments
here.
A
quick
time
check
we're
a
little
bit
past,
9,
50
and
so
about
another
20
25
minutes
available
for
this
item.
So
let's
go
to
councilmember
more.
I
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so
just
a
it's,
a
quick
reminder
of
our
previous
cip
totals
that
we've
had
in
for
fiscal
year,
2020
2021,
the
cip
total
of
all
categories
was
63.4
million
dollars
fiscal
year
2021-22,
the
grand
total
was
74
million
dollars
and
now
we're
looking
at
a
grand
total
of
around.
I
believe
it's
around
120,
no
158
million
dollars.
So
that's
quite
a
jump.
I
think
most
of
that
is
encompassed
in
the
city
hall,
which
can
be
done
in
a
variety
of
ways.
I
So
going
back
to
our
fiscal
policy
and
what
our
job
is
that
we
have
an
objective
process
for
evaluating
the
cip
projects
with
respect
to
the
overall
needs
of
the
city
and
will
be
established
through
a
priority
ranking
of
the
cip
projects.
So
in
my
mind,
we
need
to
rank
these
items.
The
ranking
the
projects
will
be
used
to
allocate
resources
to
ensure
priority
projects
are
completed
effectively
and
efficiently.
So
you,
mayor
paul,
you
did
have
a
question
about
how
to
make
sure
that
lawrence
mitty
ranks
highly.
I
I
Our
job
is
to
put
these
items
in
a
ranked
list
and
I
don't
understand
how
we
have
not
been
following
the
policy
and
ranking
these
items
in
the
in
the
past,
but
that
is
what
we
are
supposed
to
be
doing
so
I'm
concerned
about
how
we
are
going
to
go
about
ranking
these
existing
projects
and
then
we've
got
new
projects
on
the
list
and
with
regards
to
new
projects,
I
don't
really
know
what
we
are
supposed
to
do
with
the
the
the
the
ones
that
are
in
the
shaded
gray
area.
I
I
think
that
poses
a
little
bit
of
a
problem
if
we're
going
to
be
trying
to
rank
that
whole
list.
So
if
anyone
can
throw
out
some
suggestions
for
how
we're
going
to
rank
these
projects,
I
would
welcome
it,
but
that's
our
job.
Thank
you.
A
City
manager,
trip
jim,
you
have
any
suggestions
for
ranking
existing
projects
that
are
funded.
Those
are
our
category
three
item
projects
as
councilmember
moore
points
out.
They
they're
not
ranked
they're.
G
Yeah,
that's
well
and
the
one,
the
gray
area
we're
not
looking
at
right
now,
unless
you
guys,
unless
the
council
wants
to
say,
get
rid
of
that
one
for
sure
and
move
one
out.
What
do
you
mean
right.
A
So
you
can
see
you
know.
Lauren
smith
is
particularly
hard
for
me
to
kind
of
really
talk
about
objectively,
but
I
I
can
say
that
it's,
it's
really
much
harder
for
us
to
push
it
back
now
that
it's
been
annexed,
like
I
said
earlier
in
this
meeting
right,
but
I
kind
of
had
some
understanding
earlier
when
we
hadn't
annexed
it
and
you
know
we're
trying
to
push
it.
You
know
forward,
but
it
was.
It
was
a
12-year
slog
to
get
it
purchased
right
and
then
we
ended
up
having
the
pandemic.
A
We
did
miss
a
couple
of
cycles.
Frankly
in
the
san
jose
you
know,
but
but
but
if
you
know
to
councilman
moore's
point,
if
we
had
rankings
right-
and
we
had
prioritized-
you
know
rather
highly-
then
it
would
be
more
difficult.
I
think
for
us
to
kind
of
look
aside
and
say:
oh
well,
you
know
this
is
just
something
that's
funded,
but
we
we
missed
a
cycle
right,
I
mean
so
so
how
would
we
go
about
if
we
were
talking
about
these?
A
I
category
three
projects
that
are
funded
and
the
thing
is
like
category
three
sounds
kind
of
like
a
misnomer
right.
You
you
have
category
one,
it
seems
higher,
but
category
three
is
an
existing
project
that
is
funded.
How
would
we
go
about
prioritizing
this
if
we're
trying
to
figure
out?
You
know
where
the
bandwidth
should
end
up
for
for
stuff
that
we
have
money
for
it's
already
on
the
list.
J
G
Oh
matt
has
a
thing:
yeah
I'll
have
to
go
to
matt,
because.
I
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
lawrence
middy
is
in
the
gray
area
lawrence
mitty
park,
design
and
construction,
so
that
would
apparently
not
be
considered
on
the
list
for
new
projects
if
you're
looking
at
this
year.
So
that
to
me
is
problematic
right.
A
So,
let's,
let's
go
to
director
morley
with
the
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
this
mat
yeah.
B
So
I
think
this
dialogue
is
great,
so
thank
you
very
much
for
the
input.
A
couple
of
things
that
I'm
hearing
one
is
that
the
cat,
the
category
nomenclature
on
our
projects,
which
are
you
know,
projects
that
we're
recommending
projects
that
are
funded
projects
that
are
unfunded
is,
is
a
little
unclear
to
you.
So
we
can
make
that
adjustment
for
future
years
and
not
call
them
categories,
one
two
and
three.
B
What
we're
trying
to
do
there
is
demonstrate
our
our
categories
of
project
projects
in
terms
of
where
we
have
money
for
them
so
we'll
make
we
can
make
that
adjustment
in
terms
of
rankings
we've
we've
tried
ranking
projects
in
the
cip.
Previously,
I
I
think
what
hap
what
works
best
for
us
is
having
a
move.
These
projects
forward,
ranking,
and
I
don't
move
these
projects
forward,
ranking
so
sort
of
a
go,
no
go
on
off
type
of
a
ranking.
B
The
reason
being
is
that
there's
many
opportunities
over
a
course
of
a
year
that
come
up
that
that
could
move
a
project.
That
is
that
you
that
you
might
rank
as
number
three
up
to
number
number
one
and
a
great
example
of
that
is
grant
funding
where
there's
a
grant
opportunity.
That
means
it
gets
expedited.
B
So
so
it's
important
to
to
leave
a
little
bit
of
flexibility.
That
being
said,
simply
your
declaration
at
a
meeting
like
this
or
when
we
bring
the
cip
to
you
that
that
there
are
specific
projects
that
are
of
higher
import
to.
You
is
a
way
for
for
you
to
carry
that
message
to
us
and
we'll
bring
that
forward
in
our
in
our
project
delivery
with
respect
to
lawrence
mitty,
we
do
have
dollars
associated
with
that
project.
Currently
for
design.
B
We
hear
you,
I
think
what
we're
hearing
from
the
council
tonight
is
that
you'd
like
to
see
that
project
not
go
into
a
master
planning
phase,
but
rather
just
go
straight
through
the
design
phase,
and
we
can
certainly
make
that
adjustment
and,
if
that's,
if
that's
the
the
consensus
that
we're
getting
from
the
council,
that's
an
easy
one
to
make,
and
so
that
would
that
would
change
and
move
move
dollars
around.
A
Well,
I
think
director
morley
on
that
point.
If
I
may,
I,
I
guess,
there's
just
a
consistency
issue
between
category
three
lawrence
mitty,
which
is
described
as
a
master
plan
with
a
full
budget
of
you
know,
5.4
million
remaining
and
then,
if
you
look
at
category
one
new
projects,
it's
described
in
the
gray
area
as
lawrence
committee
park,
design
and
construction
and
under
the
total
project
budget
it
only
says
tbd
there
does.
A
There
doesn't
seem
to
be
an
indication
that
you
know,
in
fact,
for
the
last
eight
years,
we've
had
all
this
money
set
aside
for
it.
So
I
I
guess
part
of
that
is
consistency
in
in
treatment,
because
if
one
were
to
look
at
this
for
new
projects,
category
one,
it
almost
looks
like
well
we're
going
to
try
to
find
the
money
somewhere
and
you
know
to
call
it
design
and
construction
sounds
great
under
under
new
projects,
but
it's
already
existing.
A
It's
been
in
category
three
for
at
least
six
years
at
this
point,
so.
A
Okay,
well
so
we
have
councilman
ward
with
a
hand
still
raised.
Then
we'll
go
to
councilman
our
way
for
this
next
round.
Then
vice
mayor
ciao
and
back
to
me
and
then
we'll
see
if
councilmember
willie
has
any
follow-ups.
I
A
I
was
told
that
it
was
already
allocated
for
lauren
smitty
in
2015,
and
it's
just
stayed
there
and
actually
in
in
in
some
of
those
early
budgets
in
2016
2017.
I
had
to
specifically
ask
hey:
what's
going
on
with
this
money?
Is
it
moving
forward
to
the
next
year?
And
you
know
that
was
answered
in
the
form
of
by
then
city
manager
and
dave
brandt
and
our
our
you
know
current.
You
know
administrative
services
director,
so
so
it
has
been
moving
forward
for
the
last
six
years.
A
I
Okay,
well,
mayor
paul,
we
do
have
these
special
revenue
funds
fund,
280
the
park,
dedication
fund
and
it
did
have
9.6
million
dollars.
I
think
there
was
some
more
added
to
it
from
the
westport
project
and
then
there
was
the
issue
with
the
zones
zone,
one
two
and
three
and
where
that
money
would
be
allocated
within
the
city,
so
I
think
I
I
think
there
actually
does
need
to
be
some
information
provided
in
this
table
that
we
have
for
the
revenue
funding
sources.
I
A
Well,
it
makes
sense
to
me,
but
but
I
think,
for
the
benefit
of
the
public
and
the
rest
of
the
conversation
since
we're
both
on
the
audit
committee,
we
had
a
meeting
with
our
city
manager,
as
well
as
with
christina
the
director
of
admin
services,
just
just
to
clarify
your
comment:
there
is
a
park
mitigation
fee
and
so
that's
in
a
fund,
and
then
there
are
zones
under
the
quimby
act
that
that
divide
our
city
into
three
geographic
areas,
and
so,
if
the
mitigation
fee
comes
from
a
particular
project
in
a
particular
area
in
a
particular
zone,
I
should
say
then
the
park
that
needs
to
get
improved
is
in
that
zone,
so
so
from
apple
park,
for
instance,
that
came
from
a
particular
zone
that
money
was
parked
so
to
speak
in
in
lauren
smitty,
and
it's
been
there
for
a
number
of
years.
A
I
pointed
out
in
this
conversation
which
we
had
last
tuesday
right,
because
that
was
the
last
meeting
I
took
before
the
sacramento
you
know
conference.
I
I
pointed
out,
I
was
on
this.
I
was
on
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
for
seven
years,
and
now
I've
been
on
the
council
for
seven
years,
and
that
was
never
explained
in
in
14
years.
That
was
never
explained
by
staff
that
were
under
the
quimby
act
were
divided
into
three
zones
in
the
city
and
that
needs
to
be
communicated
right.
A
That
needs
to
be
communicated
just
like
when
we
had
all
this
money
from
from
westport
come
in
how
come
in
the
five
months
since
it's
been
in,
neither
our
parks
and
recreation
commission
nor
our
city
council
has
become
aware
of
where
this
nine
million
dollars
is
going.
Now,
presumably
it
is
going
to
memorial
park
and
not
that
might
be.
You
know,
precipitating
some
of
the
activity,
but
we
need
to
you
know,
get
informed
about
this
and
so
councilman
moore.
A
Yes,
I
do
understand
what
you're
saying,
but
I
think
that
it
probably
needs
to
have
been
clarified
to
the
public
and
and
certainly
not
not
not
in
your
second
round
comments
here
through.
You
know
our
regular
process
of
kind
of
communicating
and
outreach,
because
this
is
just
really
great
information
to
be
sharing
and
also
through
public
process.
We
probably
even
though
I
think
it
seems
fairly
obvious-
that
money
from
the
westport
part
mitigation
fee
would
be
going
to
memorial
park.
A
I
think
our
members
of
the
public
would
have
something
to
say
about
it
if
they
realized
that
we
had
this
money
and
they
would
go
to
memorial
park
improvements
so
yeah.
I
appreciate
the
comments.
Did
you
have
any
others
at
this
point
before
we
go
on
to
council
member
way
for
the
second
round
of
commons.
I
Well,
I
have
some
questions
on
two
other
special
revenue
funds
within
the
budget.
The
the
transportation
fund
27
number
270,
which
has
over
10
million
in
it,
looks
like
10.8
million
dollars
in
that
fund,
and
we
have
a
traffic
impact
of
special
revenue
fund
number
271.
I
Thousand
dollars,
but
the
10.7
million
dollars
in
the
transportation
fund,
I'm
curious
what
that
would
go
to
if
that's
something
that
would
help
fund
the
buffered
bike
lanes,
for
instance,
or
could
it
go
to
the
i280
trail?
Okay,.
B
Thank
you
yeah,
so
we
we
will
absolutely
look
at
where
we
can
allocate
funds,
especially
in
our
special
funds
that
have
some
restrictions
to
them
to
achieve
projects
like
the
280
trail
or
the
dams,
the
bike
lanes.
So
we
can
provide
that
report
out
and
the
allocation
of
funding
with
the
proposed
cip
and.
B
We
were,
we
came
into
tonight,
thinking
that
we
were
going
to
do
a
master
plan
for
for
lauren
lawrence
midi.
B
It
sounds
like
that
we
want
to
change
that
direction
a
little
bit,
so
we
we
can
do
that
and
look
at
the
use
of
the
funds
and
and
we'll
bring
back
the
proposal
on
how
to
use
those
funds
across
the
project
by
not
so
the
idea
with
a
master
plan
is
that
you
take
a
a
project
which
is
ultimately
going
to
be
huge
and,
and
you
scope
it
and
then
phase
it,
so
you
can
phase
construction.
B
So
the
the
big
numbers
with
lawrence
midi
may
be
a
challenge,
so
we'll
have
to
do
a
little
bit
of
work
on
the
on
the
funding
for
that
one.
But
I
think
there's
a
there's
an
opportunity
to
recast
that
a
little
bit
with
respect
to
to
memorial
park.
We
have
some
needs
there
as
well,
but
again
it's
going
to
be
a
master
plan
process
where
we
have
phases
and
the
council
can
have
the
decisions
along
the
way
on
what
phases
to
implement
in
what
order.
A
Okay,
director
morley-
I
I
I
do
want
to
thank
you-
that's
a
really
clear
and
concise,
straightforward
answer
and
that's
that's
a
very
good
place
to
start.
A
It
comes
as
a
surprise
to
me
quite
frankly
that
we're
we're
actually
sticking
this
master
plan
into
the
lauren
smitty
process,
and
that
was
what
where,
where
staff's
head
was
on
this,
I
was
under
the
impression
that
we're
under
a
design
and
construction
exercise,
but
in
fact
there
was
a
more
of
an
extensive
master
plan
with
phasing
you
know
out
there,
councilman
moore
did
you
have
further
follow-ups
at
this
point
before
we
go
on
to
council
member
way.
I
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
we
need
to
have
some
updates
in
the
in
our
budget
book
page
109
on
the
fund
balances
and
the
special
funds,
I'm
not
sure
that
they
are
accurate.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
as
pertains
to
okay,
the
I
I
guess,
there's
a
nexus
here
to
capital
improvement
program,
all
right,
councilmember
way,
your
comments
and
follow-ups.
F
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so,
like
council
member
willie,
I
am
very
passionate
about
one
specific
project
of
my
11
years
on
school
board.
We've
done
over
15
capital
improvement
projects
and
I'm
very
excited
about
our
city
hall
project.
So
I
did
extensive
research
on
city
hall
history.
So
let
me
share
this
with
you.
F
So
what
I
did
is,
I
started
the
history
right
2006.
This
assessment
report
from
akh
2011
structural
analysis
from
akh
2012.,
essential
service
facility
analysis
from
akh
2014,
seismic
study
tipping
by
by
tipping
mar
and
2021
city
hall
tier
1,
seismic
evaluation
by
m
e.
So
I
went
through
all
the
reports
and
I
do
believe
this
is
a
public
safety
health
concern
for
not
just
for
our
staff
for
people
staff
for
people
who
visit
city
halls.
F
If
something
happens,
so
I
understand
we
have
budget
restraints,
sorry
wrong
side,
and
so
what
an
exciting
part
of
being
a
public
official
is
we
actually
not
just
have
the
obligation
of
allocating
funds
make
sure
of
physical
health
that
our
city
is
running?
Well,
we
provide
service
to
our
residents,
but
we
also
have
the
ability
and
the
motivation
to
find
funding
for
the
needs
that
we
have
so
I
do
understand
this
is
a
daunting
project.
F
It's
looking
at
79.6
million
dollars
and
without
even
if
we
want
a
underground
parking,
it's
probably
going
to
be
more
so
the
scoping
that
I
think
the
the
staff
is
proposing
is
just
a
scoping.
It
takes
money
for
somebody
to
come
analyze.
What
are
the
options
that
we
have,
but
if
we
have
a
shuffle
ready
project,
that's
been
scoped
analyzed
ready
to
go.
We
can
have
opportunities
to
look
for
funding
and
they
are
opportunities
for
various
sorts
of
funding
that
I
believe
if
we
can
engage
a
professional
finance
consultant
that
provide
us
options.
F
F
So
I
listened
to
vice
mayor's
comment
last
time
it
apparently
we
had
done
something
either
tin,
gordon
or
roger
lee
had
some
reports
on
on
this
project
in
2020
18
2019,
where
I
think
councilmember
moore
and
I
were
not
on
the
council,
so
I've
asked
for
that
report
and
I
think
matt
was
going
to
look
for
it.
Okay,
so
I'm
very
interested
in
knowing
what
that
report
reports
and
to
go
forward.
F
If
you
look
at
this
money-wise,
oh
where's,
the
money
looking
at
the
money,
so
the
report
did
say
our
staff
report
did
a
very
good
job.
If
we
do
the
city
hall
replacement,
plus
the
parking,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
a
three-story
parking,
it
could
be
because,
with
our
parking
analysis,
there
is
a
need
for
parking
for
our
civic
center
and
library,
especially
with
our
library
extension.
We're
going
to
have
a
lot
of
people
want
to
visit
us.
F
So
with
that
the
scoping
may
be
80
million
dollars
with
renovation
and
instead
of
replacement
renovation,
it
could
be
60
million
dollars.
If
we
don't
work
on
the
parking,
the
city
replacement
only
maybe
55
million,
and
if
we
just
do
the
renovation,
it's
38
million.
These
are
options
for
us
to
look,
but
I
would
like
to
have
the
opportunity
to
have
professionals
provide
us
a
detailed
analysis
of
what
our
options
are.
As
for
the
funding,
if
we
put,
I
don't
know
one
two,
three
million
dollars
into
it.
F
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
councilman
way,
and
I
believe
it
was
vice.
Martial
is
next
followed
by
councilmember
willie
and
then
myself,
vice
mayor
ciao,
any
follow-ups
or
comments
at
this
time.
M
Okay,
I
had
three
questions,
but
I
had
more
okay,
so
I'll
actually,
regarding
the
dollar
fencing,
the
city
manager
did
not
really
answer
my
question.
My
question
is:
I
use
the
memorial
park
area
as
an
example.
If
we
identify
an
area
that
needs
fencing,
but
it
could
be
monta
vista
park.
So
in
terms
of
the
process,
what
is
the
ex
the
right
process
if
we
identify
fans
it
might
be
needed
to
for
one
of
the
dollar.
A
I'm
not
sure
who
to
refer
this
question
to
between
the
city,
manager
and
public
works
and
parks
and
rec.
A
G
The
first
thing
is,
as
we've
been
talking
since
I've
been
not
just
here
tonight,
but
since
my
arrival
is,
you
know,
doing
the
public
outreach,
so
we
really
need
to
do
the
outreach.
We
know
those
that
are
that
want
the
dolas
enjoy
it,
but
we
still
have
to
go
out
and
do
that
outreach
to
make
sure
you
know
it's.
Is
it
the
right
park?
It's
the
right
place
in
whatever
park,
so
we
need
to
make
sure
that
part
is
done,
the
fencing
itself
and
I'll
look
at
matt.
I
don't
think
or
christine.
G
I
don't
think
we'll
have
an
issue
from
a
cost
perspective,
because
it's
you
know
we're
not
fencing,
10
acres
or
anything.
You
know
it's
a
smaller
cost,
most
likely
chain
link
of
some
kind.
You
know
three
feet
tall
or
whatever
it
takes
to
keep
them
in.
I
don't
think
that's
going
to
be
as
onerous
to
find
that
funding
as
it
is
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
outreach
we
have
the
right
park.
We
have
the
right
place
in
the
park.
We
have
the
accommodations
leading
up
to
it.
That's
that's
the
part.
M
M
M
B
B
Matt,
do
you
have
any
idea,
yeah
you're
right
on
there?
The
the
cost
of
the
fencing
and
implementation
of
the
fencing
is
fairly
straightforward.
I
think
we
were.
We
were
working
under
guidelines
of
what
the
process
would
look
like
towards
establishing
sort
of
a
going
from
a
pilot
to
a
more
more
installed
type
of
dollar,
and
so
there
was
a
little
bit
of
work
still
to
to
go
as
you
as
you
had
mentioned,
city
manager.
M
Okay,
that's
fine!
So
for
the
dianza
bike
lane.
I
I
think
I
commented
the
last
time
I
am
not
sure
just
painting
the
is
sufficient
for
that
area.
I
would
like
other
options
to
consider
to
be
considered
because
it
is
a
very
busy
street,
but
I
didn't
see
any
change.
So
is
there
a
any
reason?
This
is
not
accepted.
G
I'm
gonna
ask
matt
on
that.
One
thing.
B
We
haven't
made
any
we
haven't,
made
any
changes
to
to
what
we
had
in
the
initial
meeting
as
a
continuation
of
the
study
sessions
going
on
tonight.
The
bike
plan
that
we
have
does
have
buffered
bike
lanes
noted
for
that
area
by
the
painted
lines:
work
a
lot
better
when
there's
a
lot
of
driveways,
which
is
typical
for
dianza.
So
that
would
be
the
the
recommended
solution
for
that
particular
corridor.
M
G
M
G
No,
that's
typically,
that
you
have
the
five-year
outlook
you
we
I've
been
places
where
there
will
be
a
large.
You
know
we
could
have
multiple
books
almost
of
projects,
but
a
lot
of
those
would
be.
You
know
the
first
year
second
year
after
the
fifth
year,
and
then
there
might
be
another
one
where
it's
out
for
a
total
of
10
years
and
those
are
just
if
we
ever
got
to
them
kind
of
ideas.
M
So
that
might
be
it's
better
to
call
it
five-year
outlook,
because,
with
the
five-year
cip
plan,
I
would
expect
we
say
carmen
bridge
next
year:
stephen's
quick
phase
three
in
the
following
year,
so
those
are
so
you'll
have
projects
identified
for
year,
two
and
three
that
will
be.
M
M
J
M
The
staff
report
still
says
that
the
splashpad
concept
is
included
in
the
parks
and
rec
system
master
plan.
So
I
want
to
clarify
this
is:
what's
included
for
blackberry
farm
for
splash
pad
the
blackberry
farm
is
did
not
was
not
identified.
The
master
plan
says
that
water
play
features
such
as
splash
pads
spray
play
area.
Interactive
should
be
geographically
dispersed
in
the
city
and
specifically
about
blackberry
from
pro
complex.
M
It
did
not
talk
about
any
expansion.
It
just
talked
about
continue
to
operate,
that's
all
so
it
did
not
mention
so
so
it
really
is
not
complying
with
the
master
plan
to
add
splash
pad
at
blackberry
farm.
I
would
recommend
that
we
replace
that
item
by
identifying
identifying
a
location
for
a
splash
pad,
so
that
water
play
area
is
job
gratifically,
disturbed
in
the
city
to
comply
with
the
plan
mayor.
I
I
I
just
I
I
want
to
point
out
that
the
vice
mayor
is
sharing
the
indication
that
perhaps
the
planning
commission
should
have
made
a
finding
that
the
proposed
projects
are
actually
not
compliant
with
the
general
plan
and
and
other
other
plans
within
the
city.
I
Council
member
willie
said
something
somewhat
similar
with
regards
to
equitable
distribution
and
and
that
that's
been
an
ongoing
problem
with
regards
to
parks
in
particular,
because
they
there's
there's
so
few
of
them
on
on
the
east
side
of
cupertino
that,
when
improvements
are
made,
it
tends
to
always
be
inequitable
because
of
that
lack
of
lack
of
distribution
of
these
parks.
A
We're
going
to
move
on
vice
mayor
ciao,
it's
yeah,
I'm.
J
A
Second
round
comments
and
then
we'll
entertain
your
motion,
advice,
councilmember
way.
F
Actually,
I
I
kind
of
agree
with
the
equity
things.
So
maybe,
when
we
do
lauren's
ex
lauren
smitty
park
plan,
we
can
do
a
splash
pack
there
and
that
would
be
great
and
but
for
blackberry
farm.
I
think
it's
not
because
they,
the
staff,
want
to
put
a
splash
pad
it's
because
the
slide
is
oh,
they
need
to
replace
it
with
something,
and
I
I
think
that
this
to
disperse
it
evenly
throughout
the
city,
I
don't
see
a
splash
pad
on
blackberry
farm
either.
F
A
F
A
O
Great
thank
you
mayor.
I
would
just
like
to
follow
up
and
touch
on
a
few
points.
Of
course,
safety
is
fundamental.
Safety
is
fundamental,
but
if
we're
incorrectly
characterizing
something
then
we're
not
doing
people
service.
If
we're
driving
a
ford,
that's
two
years
old,
it's
never
been
in
an
accident,
it's
a
safe
vehicle.
O
O
O
They're
all
around
san
francisco
and
they're
city
hall
is
a
one-story
building
with
a
basement,
go
to
san
francisco
and
look
at
the
old
buildings
or
downtown
san
jose
five
stories.
10
stories,
20
stories,
the
the
concern,
goes
up
with
story
height.
So
we
need
to
keep
things
in
perspective
by
all
means.
We
want
the
experts
to
do
a
thorough
analysis
and
bring
us
back
what
the
true
options
are,
and
the
options
are
many
different
things
that
have
not
been
brought
to
us.
O
Should
the
eoc
be
moved
out
because
with
the
codes
say,
if
the
eoc
is
in
city
hall,
it's
considered
a
risk
category
four,
just
like
a
hospital
with
emergency,
whereas
if
it's
not
in
there,
then
it's
a
risk
category
two,
and
that's
where
your
that's,
where
your
factors
of
1.01.25
1.5
come
from.
What's
it
classified
as
so,
where
might
the
eoc
go?
O
Maybe
even
community
hall
that
was
built
in
1977.,
so
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
have
that.
Another
important
factor
in
in
staff's
recommendation
was
to
enlarge
city
hall
from
24
000
square
feet
to
36
000
square
feet,
12
000
square
feet
in
19
in
2019
staff,
said
they
wanted
an
additional
10
000
square
feet.
We
bought
torrey
5600
square
feet,
we've
just
given
them
half
of
what
they
asked
for
now.
O
So
these
factors
need
to
come
to
us
so
that
we
can
determine
what's
the
right,
the
right
decision
for
this
community
we've
got
an
annex
building
that
needs
to
be
integrated
into
city.
We
need
to
look
and
see
how
city
staff
is
going
to
be
working
going
forward.
We
need
to
truly
look
at.
Is
the
eoc
going
to
be
here
or
moved
out?
O
O
Oh,
it's
not
safe
that
80
million
dollars
can't
can't
get
given
back
to
us.
Once
we've
signed
up
it's
gone
and
that's
going
to
be
that
our
community
is
going
to
have
to
service
for
30
years.
So
you
know
please,
let's,
let's
be
sure,
we're
we're
not
jumping
without
really
having
the
situation.
Well,
understood
a
project
of
that
scope
clearly
needs
to
be
done
with
city
council
and
the
community's
input
and
the
city
manager
and
how
the
staff
is
going
to
be.
O
A
You
I'm
going
next.
I
know
people
have
their
hands
up,
but
vice
mayor
ciao
I'll
go
to
you
with
regard
to
your
emotion
after
after
my
comments.
So
so
thank
you
for
that
councilmember
willie.
I
I
think
speaking
to
that
and
also
examining
our
current
fiscal
year.
If
video
you
can
put
up
the
shared
screen
thanks,
we
actually
have
two
items
that
have
to
do
with
the
civic
center
as
well
as
city
hall.
Already
in
our
current
fiscal
year,
my
cursor
is
on
the
civic
center
parking
analysis.
A
A
million
dollars
is
allocated
to
that.
The
remaining
balance
is
848
351,
the
city
hall
and
community
hall.
Improvements
is
another.
Existing
work
plan,
item
programming
and
feasibility.
Five
hundred
thousand
dollars
is
allocated
to
that.
The
remaining
balance
is
four
hundred
and
fifty
one
thousand
nine
hundred
sixty
dollars.
This
is
as
of
march
21st
2022,
but
I'm
not
expecting.
A
lot
has
been
done
similar
to
not
not.
A
whole
lot
was
done
in
the
first
three
quarters
of
the
fiscal
year.
A
So,
if
you
add
up
451
848
000,
you
get
roughly
1.3
million
dollars.
You
know
my
suggestion
is
that
city
staff
take
what
city
council
is
telling
you,
and
you
know
I.
I
realized
that
these
numbers
are
no
longer
in
equilibrium
with
each
other,
which
is
good.
You
know
it's
good
that
we
we
have.
You
know
these
hard
numbers
repeated
through
our
finance
department.
There
was
no
way
that
there
was
is
basically
equal
to
retrofit
and
to
make
a
new
city
hall,
it's
a
20
million
delta.
A
As
of
right
now
I
I
suggest
that
we
go
back
and
do
the
work
that
we've
already
empowered
in
this
current
fiscal
year
and
finish
it
in
the
next
fiscal
year
when
you
combine
that
with
our
work
plan
discussion,
hopefully
we
put
together
this
this
subcommittee
and
it
can
work
with
our
city
manager
and
our
director
of
public
works
with
good
leads
from
the
community.
A
You
know
the
the
again
the
person
who
who
who
made
the
retrofits
in
1986
a
couple
years
prior
to
the
lone
prieta
quake
that
john
is
speaking
of
a
moment
ago,
is
still
around
and
and,
as
you
know,
willing
to
talk
to
us.
So,
let's,
let's
take
advantage
of
what
we've
already
empowered
and
directed
finish
that
work,
and
you
know
see
what
our
options
really
are.
A
I
I
don't
see
that
any
of
us
have
a
desire
to
create
an
unsafe
condition
or
have
an
unsafe
condition
perpetuate,
but
it
does
seem
that
as
we're
pushing
back
a
little
bit
more
over
just
the
last
couple
of
weeks,
the
story
is
changing
a
little
bit.
It's
no
longer
really
the
same
cost
to
build
a
new
city
hall
and
to
do
these
retrofits
and
enhancements
and
improvements
to
existing
city
hall.
So
well
I
mean
let's,
let's
follow
this
path
and
see
where
it
takes
us.
A
Maybe
we
get
more
cost
savings.
Maybe
we
get
you
know
better
value
for
our.
You
know,
plans
for
the
future
and
then
the
other
a
couple
of
items
I
wanted
to
speak
about
before
we
entertain
a
motion.
Bollinger
road,
you
know,
bollinger
road
is
a
real
issue
in
terms
of
public
safety.
We've
had
a
couple
of
pedestrians
crossed
that
street
in
the
last
several
years
three
years
at
the
most
they
got
hit.
A
They
were
killed,
and
so
I
I'm
I'm
I'm
all
for
bike
lanes
and
bike
infrastructure.
But
if
we're
not
working
with
san
jose
to
try
to
figure
out
how
to
make
that
safe,
then
I
really
wonder
whether
we're
really
focusing
upon
the
right
thing
there.
So
so
that's
my
comment
on
that
memorial
park
changes
director
morley
had
indicated
that
he
would
need
some
explicit
direction
on
the
amphitheater
and
the
ponds.
You
know
vis-a-vis,
where
we
were.
I
think
things
have
changed.
A
You
know
we
have
significant
amount
of
money
in
the
park
mitigation
fee
and
again
you
know
these
are
zones
broken
down
in
cupertino
into
three
zones,
I'm
assuming
that
the
westport
park
mitigation
fee
is
allocated
in
memorial
park.
But
when
you
really
look
at
the
budget,
it
doesn't
look
like
there's
been.
You
know
a
specific
fund
identified
in
a
particular
zone
for
the
westport.
You
know
park
mitigation
fee,
so
so
we
should.
We
should
examine
that.
A
I
think
the
the
equation
has
changed,
though,
assuming
that
it's
in
that
same
zone,
that's
literally
across
mary
avenue,
so
that
that
yeah
certainly
that's
something
that
we
can
look
at
lauren
smitty,
you
know
personally,
I
just
want
to
see
a
good
space.
Ultimately
and
not
you
know,
foot
dragged
and
not
you
know
dragged
for
the
purpose
of
basically
prolonging
the
experience
such
that
people
might,
you
know,
be
opposed
to
it.
You
know,
look
we've
bought
it.
We've
annexed
it
we've
cons.
We've
we've
engaged
a
consultant.
A
Let's
get
this
done
in
an
efficient
and
effective
manner.
I
mean
that's
really
my
bottom
line
on
that
yeah.
So
so
those
are
my
comments
before
you
know.
If
we
want
to
give
more
specific,
explicit
instruction
to
staff
at
this
time
and
vice
mayor
ciao,
you
had
indicated
that
you
wanted
to
put
forward
okay.
So
why
don't
we
at
this
point
since
we've
gone
through
two
rounds
of
comments?
I
Not
really
so
just
to
bring
this
back
up.
We,
it
says
that
we,
the
objective
process
for
evaluating
cip
projects,
will
be
established
through
a
priority
ranking
of
cip
projects.
So
we
we
need
to
be
ranking
these.
So
that's
that's
our
policy,
we're
supposed
to
rank
them
going
back
to
the
eoc
item.
So
in
1986
the
eoc
emergency
operations
center
was
brought
into
the
lower
floor
of
of
city
hall,
and
it
had
been
a
previous
basement
area.
I
They
opened
up
the
north
wall
and
added
glass,
so
they
changed
the
configuration
and
as
council
member
willie
was
explaining
that
the
the
seismic
load
factors
have
changed
throughout
the
years
and
when
you,
when
you
go
to
add
an
eoc
to
the
building,
it
puts
you
in
versus
category
four
and
currently
I
believe
it's
a
1.5
load
factor
for
your
seismic
load
as
opposed
to
a
1.0,
so
you're
you.
It
increases
the
amount
of
seismic
design,
essentially
that
you've
got
to
do
on
the
on
the
building.
I
Where
you
have
a
small
courtyard
there
now,
but
could
this
building
be
expanded
and
have
the
eoc
put
there?
But
I'd
actually
like
to
hear
strategically
about
where,
where
an
eoc
would
most
appropriately
be
located
in
the
city?
To
me,
I
think
where
the
sheriffs
are,
but
it
that's
it
that
might
not
be
the
best
place,
but
I
think
we
should
look
in
terms
of
of
that
and
then
and
then
work
work
from
there.
I
So
to
me,
the
basement
of
city
hall
is
not
is
not
perhaps
the
best
location
and
then
we
might
want
to
have
it
separated
out.
So
I'd
like
to
actually
have
some
advice
on
that,
because
it
makes
a
difference
for
the
for
the
renovation
of
the
building
yeah.
That's
it.
Thank
you.
G
G
If
we
don't
have
that
because
we
do
contract
out
for
both
of
those,
then
it
usually
will
reside
somewhere
within
the
city
facility.
I
would
recommend
what
you
know.
The
the
match-up
with
the
sheriff
is
a
good
idea,
but
I
think
the
other
side
is
having
them
have
a
separate
one
from
theirs,
because
they'll
already
have
an
eoc
that
they
will
have
a
sheriff
has
a
large
one
but
having
a
a
substation.
G
If
you
will
of
our
own
that
they
can
send
their
deputies
to
for
us
and
the
other
cities
that
they
surround
and
help
out
yeah
is
it?
Is
it
in
the
city
hall?
Is
it
an
addition
here?
It's
it
should
be
somewhere
accessible
going
down.
Mary
avenue
is
a
little
tougher
just
because
it's
you
know
towards
a
dead
end,
more
or
less
it
does
have
space
restrictions
over
there.
G
G
Just
a
satellite
office
for
them
I
can,
I
can
do
a
follow-up,
but
it
wouldn't
be
the
same
type
of
setup
that
we
would
have
here
from
my
understanding.
Okay,.
M
M
Yeah
before
that,
I
would
like
to
share
some
comments
about
the
city
hall,
I'm
very
passionate,
also
about
earthquake
retrofit
for
the
city
hall
and
esther,
and
we
should
know
that
everyone
should
know.
We
already
have
adopted
the
item
in
these
years,
but
cip
plan,
and
this
item
specifically
says
we
will
bring
this
building
up
to
the
co
to
meet
code
standards.
M
So
this
include
retrofit.
If
it's
not
clear,
we
can
make
it
so
that
it
includes
retrofit
and
then
this
item.
It
has
not
come
to
the
council
for
any
study
session
or
any
update,
and
so
that's
just
focus
on
implementing
what
we
already
have.
No
one
is,
I
think
we
all
approve
this.
We
all
think
that
virtual
fit
is
important.
As
for
the
funding,
the
previous
city
council
back
in
2015
also
considered
a
five
million
dollar
budget
for
a
design
firm
to
design
and
design
city
hall.
M
M
A
M
A
M
With
the
following,
today's
recommendation
is
not
to
adopt
anything
okay.
A
M
A
M
This
is
a
major
item.
I
don't
think
we
have
the
funding
for
any
outcome.
That's
coming
from
the
plan.
That's
not
spend
more
month,
dollar
planning
something
we
cannot
afford
and
remove
city
hall
renovation
and
replacement
library
parking
garage
design
construction.
Since
we
already
have
an
existing
item.
That's
not
complete.
The
existing
item
already
include
retrofit.
That's
complete
that
item.
M
I
guess,
if
we
do
that,
then
we
don't
have
to
do
this.
The
first
two
items
I
can
remove
that
and
anyway
I'll
just
finish
that,
so
I
would
like
to
see
an
estimate
of
staffing
for
each
project
to
help
with
prioritization,
because
we
for
the
ones-
that's
not
in
the
recommendation.
We
know
we
get
an
answer.
There
is
no
time,
but
how
much
is
effort
compared
with
those
that's
on
the
list
and
those
as
that's
off
list?
M
We
don't
know,
we
only
see
dollar
amount,
but
dollar
amount
of
our
construction
and
design
cost,
which
is
usually
done
by
consultant.
So
how
much
is
a
staffing
cost?
I
think
we
need
to
know
that,
specifically
comparing
these
three
bypass
projects.
I
would
like
to
know-
and
I
would
like
to
ask
this-
is
very
important-
that
staff
should
come
to
the
council
to
get
approval
for
conceptual
design
of
any
cip
project
and
so
that
so
the
public
can
provide
input
before
going
ahead
with
the
design
and
construction.
M
For
example,
there
is
no
approved
conceptual
design
for
both
the
pond
and
the
amphitheater
project,
and
I
searched
and
I
searched.
I
couldn't
find
a
conceptual
design
for
the
pond
and
the
staff
pointed
out
a
very
old
plan
on
some
agenda
that
no
one
approved
and
and
it's
the
same
thing,
city
hall,
annex
it
seems
it's
already
going
out
for
a
bit,
but
we
have
not
even
approved
the
conceptual
plan.
A
K
A
A
Well,
but
you
did
say,
city
attorney
that
that
we
could
instruct
staff
to
go
back
in
the
future
within
the
purview
of
our
our
authority.
To
you
know,
look
at
you
know
rankings,
for
instance,
when
we
were
talking
about
it,
but
we
don't
need
to
put
the
put
it
in
this
motion
right
I
mean
we
we
could
basically,
then,
where
would
we
put
this.
K
I
guess
well
perhaps
I
mean
the
vice
mayor
could
clarify
her
intent.
I'm
not
sure
if
the
intent
was
to
to
to
amend
the
municipal
code
to
alter
the
the
parks.
A
A
A
Okay,
okay,
the
council
directs
direct
staff.
That's
fine!
Okay!
So
is
there
a
second
for
this
motion,
okay
hand
raised
from
councilmember
wooly.
Are
you
seconding?
A
Yes,
okay,
good
all
right
now
we
have
a
hand
raised
from
councilmember
moore
and
then
one
from
councilmember
way.
I
Okay,
so
because
the
policy
states
that
we
need
to
be
ranking,
I'd
like
to
kind
of,
simplify,
simplify
and
make
a
suggestion
that,
alternatively,
we
go
to
attachment
c
and
we
rank
the
category
one
new
projects-
that's
there's
like
25
of
them,
so
eight
fives,
eight
threes,
nine
ones,
and
then
we
move
down
to
category
three.
Existing
projects
funded
and
there's
looks
like
there's
24
of
those
eight
fives,
eight
threes
and
eight
ones,
and
we
come
back
with
the
with
the
total
ranking
at
at
our
next
meeting
on
this
item.
A
I
Suggested
here,
mayor
paul,
this
is
not
a
friendly
amendment.
This
is
simply
to
come
back
with
a
ranking
of
new
projects
and
category
three
existing
projects
funded.
I
don't
think
we
for
the
existing
projects
with
multi-year
funding.
I
don't
think
that
there's
any
qualms
with
the
ada
improvements,
playground,
replacement
park,
amenity
improvement,
okay,.
A
Oh
substitute
motion,
yes,
so
you're
substituting
the
entirety
of
vice
mayor
chad's
motion
with
your
suggestion.
Is
that
correct
correct?
Is
there
a
second
for
vice
mayor,
sorry,
council
member
moore's
motion
forcing
a
ranking
comment:
do
you
want
to
second
it
for
the
purpose
of
comment,
or
do
you
want
to
just.
O
L
O
J
A
Okay,
well
let
me
let
me
let
me
go
back
and
ask
again
we'll
go
to
the
movement
of
the
substitute
motion
council.
Member
moore.
Would
you
be
willing
to
reconsider
your
substitute
motion
to
incorporate
vice
mayor
chow's
motion
contents?
I.
A
O
M
A
I
To
see-
and
I-
and
I
think
this
might
provide
us
as
a
council
with
some
of
our
opinions
about
how
the
rankings
should
be,
but
I
would
like
to
actually
see
us
go
through
the
exercise
of
ranking
the
category
three
items.
Vice.
I
Okay-
and
I
I
just
for
the-
I-
want
us
to
go
through
the
exercise-
to
see
what
our,
what
our
feelings
are
about
these
projects,
because
we
do
have
the
prerogative
to
change
the
cip,
changing
the
scope
of
projects
and
and
things
of
that
and
re-prioritizing
the
projects,
because
we
don't
really
have
a
sense
of
how
they're
prioritized.
A
J
A
Okay,
so
timing,
can
we
can?
Can
we
parallel
the
timing
with
our
with
our
other
rankings
for
work
plan
where
council
will
be
sending
in
these
rankings
to
staff
by
by
noon
next
friday?
Is
that
a
workable
timing?
A
Jim?
Is
that,
okay,
with
regard
to
providing
us
some
kind
of
ranking
sheet.
G
G
A
Right
there
existing
projects,
they're,
funded
and
okay,
so
take
it
under
advisement,
but
with
you
know,
an
eye
on
the
reality
of
the
situations.
Okay,
so
vice
mayor,
you
have
a
motion
on
the
table
and
let
me
ask
your
seconder
councilmember
willie.
Are
you
okay
with
those
modifications?
Yes,
okay
motion
has
been
amended
and
those
amendments
are
seconded
any
other
comments
at
this
point.
Councilmember
way.
Yes,.
A
This
point,
no,
it
seems
like-
and
let
me
just
check
in
with
staff,
so
that
we
have
a
common
understanding
here.
The
cips
are
coming
back
to
us
following
this
direction
to
staff
correct.
L
Christine
alfora,
director
of
administrative
services.
Thank
you,
sorry,
mayor.
Is
it
okay?
If
I
respond.
A
Oh,
no,
please
go
ahead.
Yes,
christina.
L
P
P
A
One
more
question:
okay,
councilmember
boy.
F
So
I
do
have
an
issue
that
the
blackberry
found
pool
thing
is
totally
off.
That
slide
is
not
safe.
What
do
you
want
to
stop
to
do
about
it,
and
when
we
talk
about
equity,
there
is
no
splash
pad.
You
know
website
either
you
have
to
say
east-west,
so
I
really
think
we
need
to
include
that
in
at
least
be
considered
right
in
the
ranking.
A
Okay,
councilman
way,
you
know
we
can
ask
vice
mayor
chao
if
she
would
be
willing
to
put
that
back
into
the
blackberry
farm
plan.
But
my
understanding
of
promotion
is
to
remove
that
from
the
considered
items
being
ranked
by
us
and
to
replace
that
with
a
more
broad-based
geographic
consideration
of
where
to
place
those
splash
pads
within.
M
Our
city
that
does
not
exclude
the
blackberry
from
right-
it's
just
says
way
to
consider
splashpad
geographically
dispersed
in
the
city.
We
could
install
two,
that's
true
and,
and
also
I
think
the
staff
report
said
already
that
if
we
don't
do
splash
pad
they'll
just
remove
the
slide,
so
that's
understood
it
will
be
removed.
M
A
Okay,
let's,
let's,
let's
not
get
in
there,
okay,
all
right!
So
so
that's
please
that's
collateral
to
your
motion.
At
this
point,
I
think
the
clarification
has
been
provided
and
all
right,
let's
go
ahead
and
vote
vote
with
our
lights
on
the
motion
on
the
table.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
city
clerk,
all
right
so
we're
I
think,
moving
along
nicely
here.
It's
just
shy
of
11
o'clock.
Let's
return
at
1105..
A
Hopefully
we
can
get
some
significant
work
done
on
the
budget
in
this
remaining
hour
that
we
have
when
we
come
back
all
right,
we'll
see
in
a
few
minutes.
A
A
J
G
We
trust
you
a
little
bit,
but
there
you
go
so
I
just
you
know
good
evening
to
the
mayor
and
council
and
and
before
we
do
jump
into
it.
One
I
want
to
just
say
this
is
exciting:
it's
the
first,
my
first
budget
here
in
cupertino,
not
my
first
budget
but
the
first
one
here
for
the
city.
So
it
is
very
exciting
and
I'm
pleased
to
be
able
to
prison.
Well,
not
me,
but
christina
and
everybody
will
be
presenting
a
balanced
budget.
G
G
I
don't
know
who
has
that
okay,
so
the
next
one
is
just
just
the
objectives
of
the
study
session,
we're
going
to
receive
comments
and
questions
from
the
council
and
public.
That
would
have
to
be
the
ones
on
the
zoom
and
gather
requests
and
then
return
for
the
updates
for
a
final
budget
here
in
in
june.
J
G
That's
our
that's
our
goal
for
tonight,
but
some
of
the
themes
that
we
have
for
this
budget
that
we're
working
on
you
know
we
are
into
a
new
normal.
We
came
through,
we
thought
with
the
pandemic.
You
know
it
is
creeping
up
a
little
bit
we're
continuing
to
build
on
a
strong
fiscal
foundation.
I
can
tell
you
that
we,
you
know
having
been
in
other
cities.
We
are
the
envy
of
many
cities
because
of
our
financial
stability.
It's
it's
incredible.
I've
told
so
many
people
of
how
strong
financially
we
are.
G
So
that
is
really
good,
as
well
as
balance
balancing
multiple
priorities.
You
know
we,
we
are
a
very
busy
city.
I
keep
telling
people
that
too.
We
have
so
many
things
going
on.
You
know,
as
the
city
emerges
from
covet
19
pandemic,
we're
defining
our
future
and
the
opportunities
and
challenges
that
the
future
presents,
and
we
do
so
on
solid
footed,
solid
financial
footing.
In
the
past
years,
the
city
experienced
a
steady
stream
of
one-time,
but
also
ongoing
revenues
since
fiscal
year
2013.
G
Some
of
these
increases
include
property
tax
rates
going
from
5.6
to
7.
So
that's
a
nice
growth
for
the
city,
increased
sales
tax
through
a
sales
tax,
localization
agreement
for
apple
park-
that's
also
been
fabulous.
It
was
a
great
thing
that
we
had
that
agreement
done.
Increased
share
of
the
city's
increasing
the
city's
share
from
about
50
to
65
percent
is
part
two
of
our
sales
tax
sharing
agreements.
G
G
The
tot
occupancy
rate
from
10
to
12
we
added
four
new
hotels
and
established
a
collection
agreement
for
with
airbnb
for
short-term
rentals,
which
we're
one
of
the
few
cities
that
were
able
to
do
that.
So
that's
really
good
on
the
sale
of
prune
ridge
avenue
and
one
time,
construction,
tax
related
to
apple
park.
G
The
city's
budget
has
grown
at
a
tempered
pace
with
the
city
making
strategic
investments
while
setting
aside
reserves.
Some
of
these
investments
include
the
pavement
maintenance,
49.2
million
and
increasing
our
pavement
index
from
63
to
85,
and
I
think
it's
actually
maybe
a
little
bit
higher
and
that
too,
I
told
someone
the
other
day
that,
and
they
said
no
way.
I've
never
ever
heard
that
high
evening
of
a
pci
anywhere
in
her
in
her
long
career
too.
G
G
So
these
prudent
pass
decisions
place
the
city
in
a
favorable
financial
position
with
strong
reserves,
unassigned
fund
balances,
which
is
great
because
you
can
put
those
to
wherever
you
want.
The
city
also
will
need
to
balance
the
need
for
additional
capital
investment
above
the
annual
2.5.
That's
forecast,
2.5
million
forecasted
increased
personnel
costs
for
additional
positions
to
meet
the
service
needs
and
potential
increases
salary
benefits
due
to
labor
negotiations.
P
A
Great,
thank
you
very
much
director
alfaro,
and
I
just
want
to
note
that
there
is
a
half
hour
allocation
for
it.
Do
you
think
that
you
can
get
done
by
the
11
35
mark.
A
P
Our
annual
budget
cycle-
this
is
a
little
a
different
take
on
the
chart
that
we
normally
show.
We
wanted
to
be
able
to
describe
to
council
how
our
budget
process
works,
to
get
us
to
this
proposed
budget.
Hearing
that
we're
at
so
we
actually
start
planning
for
the
next
fiscal
year's
budget
in
december
of
the
current
fiscal
year,
and
what
we
do
is
we
take
the
adopted
budget
and
we
go
ahead
and
pull
out
any
one-time
expenses
that
were
approved
by
the
city
council.
P
In
addition,
we
update
any
salary
and
benefit
costs
based
on
the
most
known
cost
of
living
adjustments,
health
rate
changes
and
retirement
rate
changes.
In
addition,
we
go
ahead
and
increase
our
material
accounts
by
cpi
and
for
our
contract
contract
accounts.
We
do
an
increase
there
by
cpi
or
based
what's
on
what's
currently
in
the
contract,
and
what
that
does
is
that
creates
the
new
baseline
operating
budget,
that's
necessary
for
the
next
fiscal
year,
departments,
review
that
baseline
budget
and
then
bring
forward
budget
proposals
for
the
next
fiscal
year
that
can
include
one-timer
ongoing
charges.
P
As
I
said,
any
items
approved
by
the
city
manager
get
presented
to
council
for
consideration
as
part
of
the
proposed
budget,
and
we
have
that
study
session
in
may
that's
what
we're
currently
in
right
now.
City
council
has
also
broken
out
a
couple
different
aspects
of
the
budget
into
different
study
sessions,
including
the
city,
work
program,
capital,
improvement
program
and
community
funding,
and
so
what
happens?
Is
we
take
information
from
those
study
sessions
and
we
use
them
to
help
build
the
final
budget?
That's
presented
to
council
in
june.
P
P
Along
with
you,
can
do
an
interactive
version
of
our
budget
with
our
transparency
portal
and
the
list,
the
items
are
listed
there,
the
links
on
how
you
can
get
there.
We
also
wanted
to
mention
again
our
award-winning
resident
tax
calculator
and
budget
forecast
tool
and
provide
a
link
for
how
you
might
want
to
be
able
to
get
to
those
tools.
In
case
you
get
through
the
budget
document
and
you're.
P
Just
like
I
need
more
budget,
you
can
go
and
use
those
tools
if
you'd
like
moving
on
to
our
agenda,
which
is
a
pretty
packed
agenda,
but
we're
going
to
try
to
get
through
it
here
relatively
quickly,
we're
going
to
go
over
the
fiscal
year.
2223
proposed
budget
overview,
then
we'll
take
a
more
focused.
Look
at
just
the
general
fund
go
over
three
different
forecast
scenarios
for
the
general
fund
come
back
and
finish
up
all
the
other
funds,
except
for
the
general
fund
and
give
you
a
quick
update.
P
There
then
we'll
go
through
the
proposed
budget
request,
we'll
go
over
any
outstanding
issues
and
challenges
and
then
cover
next
steps
so
jumping
right
into
our
proposed
budget
overview.
The
recommended
proposed
budget
totals
100
waiting
for
the
slide
to
advance
there.
We
go.
The
recommended
proposed
budget
totals
125.5
million
across
all
funds
and
is
funded
by
128.8
million
in
revenue,
resulting
in
an
increase
to
fund
balance
across
all
funds
of
3.3
million
dollars.
The
proposed
budget
does
not
include
funding
for
cip
councilwork
program
and
community
funding.
P
P
This
results
in
an
increase
to
fund
balance
of
almost
700
000
enterprise
funds,
show
a
use
of
fund
balance,
and
this
is
actually
planned,
based
on
drawing
down
existing
fund
balance
for
resource
for
the
resource
recovery
fund,
which
is
associated
with
operating
costs
related
to
the
collection,
disposal
and
recycling
of
solid
waste
performed
under
a
franchise
agreement.
In
addition,
parks
and
recreation
enterprise
funds
are
also
using
fund
balance
due
to
an
uptick
in
revenue
versus
having
general
funds
subsidize.
P
So
next,
if
we
take
what
is
being
requested,
so
I
talked
about
the
base
budget
level
and
that
there's
additional
requests
above
that
funding
above
this
base
level,
whether
it's
one
time
or
ongoing,
must
be
requested
and
approved.
In
total,
we
received
9.6
million
dollars
in
budget
requests
across
all
funds
that
are
recommended
for
city
council
consideration.
P
Q
In
the
interest
of
time,
I'll
be
focusing
on
the
larger
categories
in
this
chart,
general
fund
revenues
are
proposed
at
93.7
million.
We
can
see
the
city's
largest
revenue
sources
are
sales,
tax,
property
tax
and
hotel
or
transient
occupancy
tax
charges
for
services
are
also
a
large
category,
but
the
majority
is
due
to
the
cost
allocation
plan,
which
allocates
indirect
and
overhead
costs
between
funds.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
I'll
also
draw
your
attention
to
intergovernmental
revenue.
Intergovernmental
revenue
is
decreasing
by
4.7
million,
as
last
year's
budget
included.
Grant
funding
due
to
the
american
rescue
plan
act
in
total
general
fund
revenue
is
proposed
at
93.7
million,
an
increase
of
four
million
or
four
percent
last
year's
adopted
budget.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Thirdly,
the
forecasts
are
assuming
that
the
city's
facility
debt
will
be
paid
off
in
fiscal
year,
2030
saving
2.7
million
annually,
as
mentioned
earlier.
The
city
also
has
two
section:
115
pension
trusts,
but
two
section
115
trusts,
including
a
pension
trust
as
well
as
an
opeb
trust
for
retiring
health
costs.
Q
Q
And
finally,
the
forecasts
assume
recessions
every
four
years
for
all
revenues.
Historically,
business
cycles
are
between
four
to
five
years
on
average
and
while
the
timing
of
the
sessions
is
uncertain,
the
recessionary
assumptions
allow
the
city
to
forecast
revenues
more
conservative
based
on
the
city's
prior
experience
with
recessions.
Revenues
are
projected
to
be
flat
during
these
times,
and
why
do
we
do
this?
Q
Q
Q
All
time
salaries
are
projected
to
increase
at
2.75
annually,
and
our
forecast
includes
an
assumption
of
five
fte
and
vacancy
savings
due
to
attrition
in
line
of
historical
experiences
due
to
labour
currently
underway.
Potential
costs
of
living
adjustments
or
colas
are
not
included
in
this
forecast.
Q
Materials
are
projected
to
increase
by
the
consumer
price
index
or
cpi
an
average
of
2.5
over
the
forecast
period.
Contract
services
are
projected
to
increase
by
cpi
annually,
except
for
the
law
enforcement
contract.
For
the
terms
of
this
contract
of
the
santa
clara
county
sheriff's
office,
it
has
projected
an
increase
at
cpi,
plus
two
percent.
Q
Special
projects
are
projected
to
increase
by
cpi
from
a
base
of
two
million
and
finally,
the
city
budget
transfers
between
funds
to
ensure
that
all
funds
have
sufficient
fund
balance.
Transfers
are
projected
to
increase
by
cpi
and
we
are
projecting
2.7
million
annually
to
the
debt
service
fund
until
the
debt
is
paid
off
in
fiscal
year.
2030.
Q
We
also
project
3
million
annually
annually
to
the
transportation
fund
and
2.5
million
annually
to
the
capital
reserve.
In
the
past,
transfers
to
the
capital
reserve
were
not
included
in
proposed,
adopted
budgets.
Instead,
funds
were
transferred
at
mid
unit,
but
the
city
is
now
budgeting.
These
transfers
to
facilitate
cip
budget
forecasting.
Q
L
Q
Q
Q
Q
In
forecast
a,
we
can
see
that
the
surplus
increases
in
fiscal
year
2024
as
tot
starts
to
recover
and
as
well
due
to
increases
in
sales
tax
decreases
in
fiscal
year.
2025
and
2029
are
due
to
the
recessionary
assumptions,
and
we
can
also
see
the
impact
of
the
facility
that
being
fully
paid
off
in
fiscal
year,
2030
leading
to
an
increase
in
the
surplus
in
2031..
Q
Q
Q
Now
I'll
move
on
to
the
all
funds
summary
so
I'll
be
discussing
all
funds
except
for
the
general
fund,
so
for
all
funds
except
the
general
fund.
Total
revenues
are
proposed
at
35.1
million
and
total
expenditures
at
32.5
million.
Unbalance
is
increasing
by
2.6
million
due
to
an
increase
in
bmr
housing
limit.
Q
Q
Q
Finally,
special
projects
are
decreasing
as
city
work
program
projects
are
also
not
included.
The
cip
and
city
work
program
projects
will
be
updated
in
the
final
budget.
In
total,
expenses
are
decreasing
by
26.6
million,
but
in
the
final
budget,
expenses
are
expected
to
be
higher
once
the
once.
The
cip
and
work
program
is
included
now
I'll
hand
it
back
to
christina
to
go
through
the
expense
requests
by
department.
A
Okay,
quick
time
check
about
10
minutes
left
on
the
allocation
here
so.
P
Yeah,
we
will
move
through
the
rest
of
these
slides,
pretty
pretty
quickly.
Okay,
great
thanks
all
right.
So
we
look
at
the
proposed
budget
and
we're
going
to
show
you
requests
by
departments
we're
going
to
walk
you
through
those
requests.
As
well
again,
the
proposed
budget
request
9.6
million
dollars
in
additional
funding
above
base
level,
and
in
this
chart
you
can
there
we
go
in
this
chart.
P
P
The
parks
and
recreation
commission
carried
a
unanimous
motion
to
recommend
a
city
council-
ninety
six
thousand
four
hundred
and
sixty
dollars
and
forty
six
cents
in
funding.
Just
as
a
note
here,
whenever
this,
if
council
chooses
to
move
these
recommendations
from
the
parks
and
rec
commission
forward
and
adopt
it
as
part
of
the
budget,
we
will
need
to
round
up,
as
our
system
does
not
allow
for
decimals
in
our
budget
module.
P
So
just
next
moving
on
to
our
administration
department,
which
consists
of
the
city
manager,
city
attorney,
city,
clerk's
office,
that
includes
sustainability,
communications,
emergency
management
and
economic
development
divisions
and
their
eco.
This
department
is
increasing
by
five
percent
over
last
year's
adopted
budget
or
three
hundred
and
seventy
nine
thousand
dollars.
The
department
is
requesting
two
new
full-time
positions,
a
limited
term
communications
analyst
and
an
administrative
assistant.
All
new
position
requests
will
be
discussed
in
a
little
more
detail
in
an
upcoming
slide.
P
Moving
to
the
administration
special
projects,
the
administration
department
is
requesting
220
000
in
ongoing
and
one-time
special
projects
as
listed
in
the
table,
and
we're
not
going
to
go
into
a
lot
of
detail
for
these.
But
we
want
to
leave
time
for
questions.
Should
there
be
specific
questions
on
some
of
these
special
project
items
moving
on
to
our
law
enforcement
department.
P
This
consists
primarily
of
our
city
law
enforcement
contract
with
santa
clara
county
sheriff's
department,
and
this
is
increasing
by
7
percent
over
last
year's
adopted
budget
or
approximately
1
million
dollars.
The
increase
is
due
to
the
negotiated
increase
in
the
contract
with
the
sheriff's
office,
which
thomas
mentioned
earlier.
P
Our
innovation
and
technology
department
budget
is
increasing
by
26
over
last
year's
adopted
budget
or
1.7
million
dollars.
The
increase
increase
is
primarily
due
to
the
transfer
of
one
and
a
half
positions
from
the
city
manager's
office
as
part
of
a
reorganization
of
the
video
division
between
it
and
city
manager.
In
addition,
the
department
is
requesting
additional
funds
for
infrastructure
and
application
enhancements.
P
P
Next,
moving
on
to
our
administrative
services
department,
the
administrative
services
department
budget
is
increasing
by
28
over
last
year's
adopted
budget
or
2.2
million.
The
increase
is
primarily
due
to
the
request
for
two
additional
full-time
positions
and
significant
increases
in
general
liability
and
property
insurance.
P
The
administrative
services
department
is
also
requesting
265
thousand
dollars
and
one-time
special
projects,
parks
and
recreation
department
budget
is
decreasing
by
4
under
last
year's
adopted
budget
or
607
thousand
dollars.
The
decrease
is
primarily
due
to
a
reduction
in
cost
allocation
cost
and
is
offset
by
a
requisition.
P
A
request
for
a
new
community
outreach,
specialist
position,
parks
and
recreation
is
not
recommend
is
not
requesting
any
additional
special
projects,
but
the
next
slide,
as
we've
presented
in
previous
years,
shows
the
different
festivals
that
have
fees
waived
by
the
city
and
city
paid
expenses
and
total
festival
cost
next.
Our
community
development
department
budget
is
decreasing
by
12
or
1.8
million
dollars
due
to
a
decrease
in
one-time
special
projects.
The
decrease
is
offset
by
a
request
for
five
new
positions.
This
department
did
not
have
any
additional
budget
requests.
P
Our
public
works
department
budget
is
decreasing
by
one
percent
over
last
year's
adopted
budget
or
204
thousand
dollars.
The
decrease
is
primarily
due
to
a
decrease
in
cost
allocation
charges
and
is
offset
by
a
request
for
two
new
positions.
P
P
Okay,
this
is
the
last
department
the
non-departmental
department
budgets
are
decreasing
by
43
under
last
year's
adopted
budget
or
10.8
million.
This
department
consists
of
transfers
out
for
the
general
tree
and
capital
reserve
funds.
In
addition,
this
department
also
includes
the
city's
debt
service
payment
and
the
decrease
is
primarily
due
to
cip
transfer
out
costs
which
are
not
currently
being
included.
P
The
city's
proposed
budget
doc
make
sure
we
get
to
it,
we're
on
the
right
side.
Sorry,
the
city's
proposed
budget
document
is
printed
on
may
by
may
1st
every
year
to
allow
the
public
and
council
at
least
two
weeks
to
review
the
document
before
this
study
session
to
meet
the
printing
deadline.
Changes
after
a
certain
date
or
after
the
print
date,
do
not
make
it
in
the
document
and
are
presented
to
counsel
as
part
of
this
study
session
or
the
final
budget
hearing
and
adoption.
P
Some
of
those
changes
include
removing
the
fuse
fellow
special
project
and
replacing
it
with
a
two-year
limited
term
analyst
position
due
to
changes
and
available
outside
funding.
In
addition,
as
mentioned
previously,
the
budget,
the
final
budget
may
add
for
council's
consideration
funding
for
the
work
program,
cip
and
community
funding.
In
addition,
we
will
update
fund
balance
projections
to
take
into
account
additional
sales
tax
revenue
recommended
as
part
of
the
third
quarter
financial
report.
P
Next,
we
just
want
to
include
just
the
I
know
we
just
talked
about
cip,
so
I
won't
belabor
this,
but
this
just
as
a
as
a
data
point
for
council
to
to
remind
council
of
what's
currently
what
we
currently
discussed
at
the
study
session.
So
this
slide
will
be
obviously
updated
before
final
budget
comes
before
you.
P
Next
moving
on
to
issues
and
challenges,
thomas
already
mentioned
the
cdtfa
audit
and
for
our
most
recent
communication
with
the
cdtfa
indicate
they
have
narrowed
the
scope
of
their
audit
and
are
awaiting
documentation
from
the
taxpayer
that
they
should
receive
in
30
days.
So
around
mid-june.
The
results
of
this
audit
could
have
significant
impacts
to
the
city's
budget.
P
As
more
information
becomes
available,
staff
will
update
council
on
the
impacts,
if
any,
when
they
are
known
as
things
open
up
again
and
the
world
gets
back
to
normal,
we
will
continue
to
monitor
property
and
transient
occupancy
or
hotel
tax
for
impacts
and
or
recovery
trends.
The
city
continues
to
have
a
large
concentration
of
taxes
with
one
single
taxpayer
that
makes
it
susceptible
to
the
volatility
of
this
taxpayer.
P
We're
going
to
move
through
this
next,
three
or
four
slides
relatively
quickly
just
wanted
to
summarize
overall
staff
is
requesting
a
total
of
13
new
positions.
This
includes
two
limited
term
positions
in
the
administration
department.
The
management
analyst
position
listed
here
is
not
currently
in
the
proposed
budget.
P
So,
in
conclusion,
we
will
wrap
up
the
current
fiscal
year,
reporting
on
may
19th
with
the
third
quarter
financial
report.
We
will
continue
fiscal
year,
2223
budget
discussion
tentatively
scheduled
for
june
7th,
with
the
consideration
of
the
operating
and
capital
budget
adoption.
Lastly,
we'll
report
on
how
we
end
the
current
fiscal
year
and
give
an
update
as
to
where
we
stand
as
of
the
first
three
months
of
the
new
fiscal
year,
with
the
first
quarter
report
slated
to
go
before
council
in
november
of
2022.
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you
very
much
director
alfaro.
Let's
go
to
our
members
of
the
public
and
we'll
remind
everyone
that,
if
you
have
your
hand
raised
by
the
time
that
the
first
speaker
is
concluded
speaking
then
you'll
be
called
on
on
zoom,
then
we'll
go
to
blue
cards.
There
are
still
no
members
of
the
public
avail
present
in
the
chambers.
A
Also
during
the
time.
The
first
first
person
is
speaking.
If
you
email
your
comments
to
city
clerk,
one
word
at
cupertino.org,
then
up
to
three
minutes
of
your
email
will
be
read
into
the
record
by
the
city
clerk.
So
right
now
I
see
one
member
of
the
public
with
a
hand
raised
that
is
rhoda
fry
welcome.
Rhoda
you'll
have
three
minutes.
E
Good
evening,
council
members,
I've
got
a
couple
of
questions
on
the
budget
once
again
going
back
to
the
500
000
splash
pad
that
has
been
proposed
to
replace
an
aging
pool
slide.
The
pool
slide
was
installed
in
2012.
E
the
first.
As
far
as
I
can
tell
the
first
time
I
saw
the
proposal
for
splash
pad
was
actually
in
2015.,
so
in
2015
there
was
no
talk
about
osha
inspections
or
extra
staffing,
etc,
and
at
that
time,
in
2015,
the
cost
for
this
new
splash
pad
was
going
to
be
690
000,
not
500,
000,
and
that
continued
through
this
six
cycle,
2015
16,
17
18,
it
was
690
k,
so
I
don't
understand
how
it
can
get
less
expensive
and
why
now
it's
about
replacing
an
aging
slide,
etc?
E
Okay,
so
the
other
question
I
have
is
about
enterprise
funds,
so
enterprise
funds
are
there
to
kind
of
give
you
a
profit
and
loss
picture
for
things
that
the
city
does
to
collect
money.
So
I
I
recall
way
back
when
I
think
that
the
senior
center
might
have
been
in
an
enterprise
fund.
I
don't
see
it
there
anymore,
be
kind
of
good
to
see
like
who
are
we
serving
people
within
the
city
outside
the
city.
E
At
one
time,
blackberry,
farm
pool
picnic,
business
wasn't
an
enterprise
fund,
it
appears
to
no
longer
be
an
enterprise
fund.
The
the
golf
is
in
an
enterprise
fund,
and
so
you
order
to
use
a
facility.
You
have
to
pay
a
fee,
so
you
can
kind
of
tell
whether
they're
making
money
or
losing
money
or-
or
you
know,
breaking
even
obviously,
you
know
apar
parks,
plain
old
parks.
They
cost
money
for
the
city
to
to
use
and
there's
no
entrance
fee.
But
there's
not
an
enterprise
fund
for
the
pool
picnic
business.
E
You
pay
a
fee
to
use
to
use
the
facilities.
It
would
be
good
to
understand
where
we're
at
with
that
that,
and
also
as
far
as
resident
non-resident
use
and
how
many
people
are
served.
I
thank
you
very
much
and
have
a
good
evening.
A
N
N
N
N
Yes,
the
budget
does
call
for
adding
13
additional
positions,
including
a
purchasing
manager,
as
recommended
by
moss
adams
in
the
internal
audit
report,
as
well
as
three
planners.
I
support
these
additions,
but
it
takes
time
to
recruit
new
employees
and
time
for
them
to
get
up
to
speed
on
specifics
in
the
city.
N
A
Thank
you,
gene
we'll,
take
it
back
to
council
at
this
point,
and
so
would
anyone
like
to
start
us
off.
We
have
15
minutes
left
in
this
meeting,
and
so
I
will
give
everyone
assurances
that
we
will
go
ahead
and
continue
this
to
may
19th
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
ask
for
an
allocation
of
an
hour
for
this
study
session
to
conclude
on
may
19th,
but
right
now
we
have
about
15
minutes
left.
A
Let
me
go
ahead
and
try
to
divvy
this
out
fairly
and
and
proportionally
so
we'll
take
a
few
minutes
from
council
on
an
initial
round.
If
there's
additional
time
we'll
go
ahead
and
revisit
people
that
still
have
comments,
so
councilmember
moore,
you
have
your
hand
raised
first.
I
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so
looking
at
page
37
of
the
budget,
and
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
providing
and
thomas
in
particular
for
providing
answers
to
a
multitude
of
questions.
Looking
on
page
37
of
the
budget,
I
just
want
to
bring
up
that.
We've
got
number
eight
well,
it's
unit
number
844
traffic
engineering,
the
lawson
middle
school
bikeway
is
being
written
up
as
a
special
project
which
we
haven't
yet
decided
on
that
and
traffic
engineering.
There's
a
planned
transportation
project,
80
thousand
dollars.
It
doesn't
say
what
what
that
item
is.
I
So
I'd
like
to
hear
a
little
bit
more
about
that
and
you
can
come
back
at
the
next
meeting
and
provide
that
information.
That
would
be
great.
There
was
an
update
today
from
thomas
fiscal
year,
2021-22
special
projects
update
and
in
it
was
valko
town
center
ongoing
the
rise
development
for
2
million
2
million
147
two
dollars,
and
and
and
it
was
the
information
that
we
got
when
I
asked
a
question
about
it-
was
that
it
was
approved
back
in
oh
gosh.
I
It
was,
I
believe,
20
2019,
and
when
I
go
back
to
2019
there
are
some
more
valco
expenses
and
revenue
which
I
think
I
we
need
to
see
a
complete
tally
here,
because
we're
showing
we're
showing
of
14.7
million
coming
in
for
construction
plan
check.
No,
I'm
sorry.
I've
got
that
backwards.
I
14.7
in
expenses
for
falco
construction
plan
check
and
revenue
of
22.5
million
building
inspections
of
expense
of
5.4
million,
but
the
revenue
is
7.2
million
and
the
let's
see-
and
this
this
item
here,
which
we're
showing
just
a
portion
of,
is
2
million,
2
million
and
then
146
dollars,
but
the
the
revenue
is
2.3
million.
So
all
of
these
are
actually
net
positive
for
us,
and
so
I'm
one
we're.
I
I
What's
going
on
for
the
ongoing
valco
expenses
and
to
that
question
I
am
not
sure
how
these
special
projects
are
being
accounted
for
in
the
long
term,
because
it
these
you
have
ongoing
projects,
but,
unlike
some
of
the
other
ones,
I'm
not
necessarily
seeing
you
know
what
happened
to
a
project
that
was
from
2019,
it's
not
showing
up
in
our
book
and
then
it's
just.
It
showed
up
in
the
special
projects
update.
I
So
that's
a
little
bit
confusing
now
you're
showing
some
fund
balances
also
in
in
the
budget,
and
when
the
audit
committee
received
the
march
2022
report
on
the
fund
balances,
we
end
up
with
a
different
totals.
For
instance,
the
park
dedication
in
the
budget
is
showing
a
a
special
revenue
fund
balance
of
2.2
million.
But
when
I
look
at
the
the
march
2022
report,
it's
22.2
million
and
that's
that's
a
significant
difference.
It's
huge.
A
I
A
Let
me
let
me
visit
the
other
council
members
at
this
point
before
going
back
to
your
three
minutes.
Well,
actually,
let's,
since
we're
going
in
order
here,
councilmember
moore
vice
mayor
chow
has
yielded
her
three
minutes
to
you
so
we'll
have
you
continue
this
time.
I
Okay,
well,
one
thing
that
I
found
missing
in
our
in
our
budget
is
has
been
certain
policies
and
I'd
like
to
direct
fellow
council
members,
attention
and
staff
to
the
the
the
city
of
chico,
their
budget
policies.
Fiscal
year,
2020
2021.
I
I
Bp-9
and
and
10
in
particular,
and
I
think
that
we
as
as
a
council,
we've,
been
a
little
bit
light
on
providing
guidance
and
policy
within
our
budget,
and
I
think
that's
it's
been
problematic.
So
I
I
would
like
to
have
some
comments
on
those
two
pages
from
staff
when
we
come
back
and
oh
that's
fast,
when
we
come
back
on
the
on
the
19th.
J
I
And
then
in
particular,
this
changes
in
between
departments
right
where
you're
at,
if
you
could
scroll
down
just
a
tiny
bit
yeah,
so
expenditures,
will
be
appropriate
at
the
department
level.
I
Appropriation
transfers
between
departments
requires
approval
of
the
administrative
services,
director
manager
and
or
city
council
based
on
the
following
amounts
under
and
then
they
they
qualify
for
each
one
when
it
has
to
come
to
council,
okay,
so
we've
we've
had
we,
we
have
some
pretty
significant
true
ups
throughout
the
year,
and
I
think
that
this
this
could
change
that
a
little
bit.
So
I'd
like
to
hear
some
comments
on
on
those
types
of
changes.
I
Lastly,
I
mean
I
can
go
back
to
the
the
fund
balance
discrepancies
if
you
like,
but
there
were
discrepancies
with
regards
to
the
bmr
housing
transportation
fund
and
I'd
like
to
understand
the
capital
improvement
fund
that
we
have
listed
here,
because
I
don't
believe
that
when
we
were
looking
at
the
cip
budget
that
this
capital
improvement
fund
was
was
being
discussed
as
having
a
yet
another
potential
source
of
funding
for
the
the
items
that
were
on
the
list
and
I'll
leave
it
with
that.
I
There's
I
have
more,
but
I
need
to
kind
of.
A
Okay,
well,
that's
good!
Your
consolidated
time
is,
thank
you
arrived.
So
would
anyone
like
to
go
next
on
a
few
minutes
prior
to
continuing
councilman
willie.
O
P
A
Okay,
thank
you
councilmember
willie
and
customer
white.
Did
you
have
any
comments
or
remarks
follow-up
questions
at
this
time?
Okay,
I'll
go
ahead
and
exceed
my
time.
At
this
point
we
have
about
five
minutes
left
and
councilman
moore.
You
have
your
your
hand
raised.
A
A
What
what
makes
me
wonder
you
know
when
we
break
down
these
costs
and
expenses
is
how
we
break
it
up
in
accordance
to
cost
allocation.
So
when
you
look
at
council
and
commission
expenditures,
that's
really
not
a
reflection
of
compensation
and
benefits.
A
A
A
So
I
I
think
that
that's
that's
a
more
fair
metric
to
lead
by
when
you're
talking
about
these
various
breakdowns,
but
but
I
see
councilmember
moore
you're
at
the
overhead
projector
and
you
have
the
community
funding
policy
in
front
of
you
here.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
that.
I
Yes,
so
one
one
comment
about
the
policies
that
we
have
in
in
our
budget
book.
I
would
like
to
see
what
the
source
of
the
policy
is
if
it
was
done
by
resolution
and
then
some
something
about
the
revision
date
or
you
know
the
year
it
was
approved,
who
approved
it
that
type
of
thing
for
community
funding.
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
the
community
funding
grants
shall
not
exceed
20.
I
believe
it's
20
000
per
applicant
per
year
and
to
receive
consideration.
I
The
grant
requests
must
be
made
or
sponsored
by
a
501c3
non-profit
organization
and
be
awarded
only
once
per
project
and
on
the
back
side,
the
grant
recipients.
Shall
we
submit
a
written
report
to
the
parks
and
rec
department
to
show
proof
that
the
grant
funds
have
been
spent
in
the
manner
and
for
the
purposes
stated
on
the
application,
and
then
they
have
a
time
frame
for
it.
I
But
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
when
we-
because
this
item
is
coming
to
us,
we
already
have
community
funding
policy
and
evaluation
criteria
and
a
cost
amount
total,
and
there
is
a
range
which
I'm
sure
you
know.
We
can
go,
go
past
it,
but
there
is
a
range
suggested
in
total
funding
available.
So
it's
to
me
when
I
read
this
policy
it.
I
look
at
90
000
as
a
hard
stop,
but
it's
we
can
we'll
we'll
be
looking
at
this.
I
I
believe
on
the
19th,
and
so
we
have
these
policies
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
the
grant
requests
are
actually
meeting
this
policy
that
we.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much,
councilmember
moore
and
at
this
point
I'll
make
a
follow-up
comment
as
well,
so
just
to
clarify
this
to
get
more
of
an
idea
of
how
the
various
employment
dollars
are
divvied
up.
If
you
could
bring
that
back
to
us,
probably
not
in
two
days
right,
but
maybe
that's
you
know
not
not
that
hard
to
do.
A
If
you
could
break
it
down
by
the
same
departments,
you
can
start
with
the
council
on
commissions
and
then
go
through
the
various
departments:
administrative
services.
You
know,
city,
manager's,
office,
the
I.t
department,
public
works
parks
and
rec.
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
breakdown
to
see
where
those
allocations
are
going
now.
With
regard
to,
I
think,
some
of
the
misrepresentations
made
by
members
of
our
public
in
the
past.
A
You
know
here
you
have
an
allegation
of
a
toxic
environment
based
upon
some
kind
of
a
spursion
cast
and
stated
that
well,
the
employee
turnover
is
an
indicator
of
that.
I
think
it
would
behoove
us
to
get
a
sense
of
where
we
sit
in
the
market
with
regard
to
that
employee
turnover
because
turnover
is
quite,
is
quite
prevalent
everywhere.
A
We
go
right
now
and
if
you
were
just
to
look
at
the
various
types
of
interactions
coming
out
from
other
jurisdictions,
they're
not
as
economically
stable
and
the
quality
of
the
articles
and
that
type
of
press
from
an
objective
perspective
is,
is
really
quite
different
than
what's
you
know
actually
going
on
in
cupertino.
I
you
know
I
I
don't
say
this
lightly.
A
When
we
make
these
kinds
of
aspersions
that
border
on
the
edge
of
slander
in
in
public,
then
we
really
need
to
be
held
accountable
to
these
types
of
you
know
statements
and
on
a
similar
vein.
Previously,
when
we
talk
about
the
unfilled,
the
unfilled
ftes
that
are
available,
we
have
this
every
year,
there's
turnover
every
year,
but
that
is
not
a
reflection
of
whether
we
are
going
ahead
and
so
to
speak,
driving
people
away.
A
A
If
you
have
an
availability
there,
you
don't
necessarily
fill
it
up
right
away,
and
so
we've
made
those
historically
very
fiscally
responsible
decisions,
which
is
part
of
the
reason
why
we're
in
such
good
fiscal
health
right
now
so-
and
I
analogize
this
to
something
I'll
just
share
this-
you
know
there's
a
particular
you
know
community
member
that
likes
to
you
know
basically
email,
I
guess
the
city
manager
and
and
myself,
and
maybe
a
couple
of
other
council
members
every
now
and
then
it
just
basically
casts
just
complete
aspersions
that
are
completely
unfounded
and
I'll.
A
Tell
you
the
most
recent
one
because
he
does
read.
You
know
this,
this
kind
of
missive
that
you
know
this.
Member
of
the
community
who's
accusing
us
of
you
know
creating
a
toxic
environment
has
has
just
you
know,
kind
of
hurled,
past
the
fence,
and
he
says
you
know
150
cities
in
america.
A
A
So
you
know,
thank
you
very
much
for
entertaining
that
set
of
comments.
My
fellow
colleagues
and
our
staff
we
are
at
midnight.
A
A
A
M
I'd
like
to
make
a
request
that,
when
we
come
back
like,
for
example,
the
things
that
that
that's
not
finalized
like
the
community
grant.
Yes,.
A
M
P
I
think
that's
something
we
could
do,
but
also
understand
that
those
numbers
will
be
different
because
you're
adopting
different
cips
and
different
work
program
items
with
different.
But
so
you
could
do
it
for
the
comparison,
but
the
reality
is
at
the
end
of
the
day.
Those
are
still
going
to
be
differences,
because
those
numbers
are
going
to
be
different
this
year
than
they
were
last.
J
M
There
is
a
great
resignation.
This
term
is
used
everywhere,
because
not
only
in
public
agencies
in
private
companies,
people
are
resigning
for
flexible
hours
for
a
better
life
work,
balance.
A
Okay,
versa,
thanks
very
much
so
so
we're
at
the
point
where
we're
adjourning
to
5
30
councilmember
more
you
had
your
hand
raised.
Did
you
have
some?
We.
N
A
Recommend,
emotion,
okay,
so,
may
I
call
for
a
motion
to
continue
this
item
41
to
our
special
meeting
on
may
19th,
2022.
councilmember
way,
you
have
your
hand
raised
so
moved
and
council
member
moore.
Would
you
like
to
second?
Second,
your
recommended
motion.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
and
councilmember
way.
You
have
a
comment.
A
Okay,
my
colleagues,
if
you
could
send
any
questions
to
perhaps
jim,
as
well
as
christina,
let's
say
by
the
close
of
business
tomorrow,
5
pm
on
wednesday,
or
rather
later
today.
Technically,
that
would
be
behoove
the
process
of
our
continuation.
So.
A
We
won't
get
the
answers.
There's
there's
some
time
to
disseminate
those
5
30
p.m.
On
thursday
may
19th,
that
would
be
the
motion
on
the
table.
Continuing
this
current
item
41
as
well
as
the
rest
of
our
special
meeting,
please
vote
with
your
lights.