►
From YouTube: Cupertino City Council Meeting - May 17, 2022 (Part 1)
Description
Coverage of the Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Cupertino City Council Meeting. Part 1 of 2.
A
A
I'm
here,
thank
you
very
much,
madam
city
clerk
and
our
first
and
only
item
on
the
agenda
for
the
special
meeting
at
5.
30
is
a
consideration
of
the
council
work
plan
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year,
which
will
start
at
the
beginning
of
the
month.
After
next.
On
july,
1st
that'll
go
from
july
1
2022
until
june
30th
2023
we've
visited
the
work
plan
a
few
times
now
in
council,
and
so
mr
city
manager,
jim
troop.
A
I
understand
that
we
do
have
a
staff
presentation
and
I
do
commend
the
staff
for
putting
together
the
work
plan,
particularly
the
deputy
city
manager,
katie
namura,
who's
taken
the
laboring
ore
and,
I
think
done
a
really
good
job,
consolidating
a
lot
of
the
information
from
our
past
meetings.
It's
a
very
ambitious
work
plan,
albeit
one
that
has
proven
some
really
good
success
in
the
last
couple
of
years
in
putting
forward
particular
projects,
and
so
mr
city
manager,
would
you
like
to
introduce
the
item
or
the
presenter
for
this
item?.
C
D
D
Of
equivalent
sides
would
then
be
maybe
traded
out,
but
it
would
need
to
be
in
the
same
department
to
make
sure
the
bandwidth
constraints
are
still
satisfied,
and
so
here
are
all
the
items
in
the
proposed
work
program.
This
is
also
in
attachment
b,
again
there's
38
items.
You
will
note
that
some
of
these
items
skip
numbers.
D
We
are
using
the
reference
numbers
from
attachment,
a
which
include
all
of
the
items
so
that
we
can
have
one
number
to
refer
to
each
item
in
case
that
would
facilitate
council
discussion,
and
so
the
recommendation
is
to
adopt
the
fiscal
year.
2022-2023
city
work
program,
and
we
will
the
next
step
in
this
kind
of
process
is
for
budget
adoption.
Once
the
work
program
is
adopted,
those
budget
numbers
will
be
included
in
the
final
for
adoption
by
council.
A
Okay,
great,
thank
you
very
much
katie.
Let's
go
to
questions
or
comments
from
our
members
of
the
public
here
and
I'll
just
remind
everyone,
so
we're
going
to
go
by
order
of
hands
on
zoom.
If
you
are
on
your
phone,
please
press
star,
9,
to
raise
your
hand.
I
believe
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
anyone
on
the
dice
and
we'll
go
by
the
first
hand
raised
on
the
zoom
function.
A
Everyone
will
be
provided
three
minutes
and,
within
the
time
of
speaking,
for
the
first
person
with
her
hand,
raised
you'll
need
to
either
raise
your
hand
on
zoom
or
get
your
blue
card
in.
I
don't
see
any
members
of
the
general
public
here
in
community
hall
right
now,
but
in
addition
to
the
the
live
participants,
we
can
also
have
emails
come
in
during
the
time
that
the
first
person
is
speaking
and
if
you
email
your
comments
to
city
clerk,
all
one
word
at
cupertino.org
during
that
time.
A
B
A
Sure
so,
louise
just
repeat
that
the
city
clerk
says
that
we're
having
some
technical
issues
with
displaying
your
video
right
now
and
she
has
forwarded
that
video.
I
do
notice
that
we
have
another
hand
raised
from
deepa,
mandraker
and
so
louise,
if
you
would
be
okay
with
us,
going
to
deepa
first,
while
we
sort
out
the
technical
issue.
F
A
The
city
clerk
is
able
to
play
that
video,
and
so
let's
go
ahead
and
start
with
deepa,
then
thank
you.
Louise
and
deepa
I'll
turn
on
your
allow
to
talk
function
on
zoom
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
make
you
the
first
speaker
same
goes
as
as
long
as
deepa
is
giving
her
comments.
Please
raise
your
hand
or
get
your
blue
card
in
or
email
cityclerk
at
cupertino.org.
To
get
your
comments
right
into
the
record.
Welcome
diva.
G
Thank
you.
So
much.
Can
you
hear
me
great
awesome,
so
I
actually
had
videos
as
well
as
photos,
I'd
love
for
some
of
those
photos
to
be
shared
here
as
well,
while
I'm
speaking
christine.
Thank
you
so
much.
I
see
the
email
and
you
could
very
well
just
scroll
down
that
email
to
see
the
photos
while
the
videos
are
coming
on.
If
that's
fine
with
you,
dear
city,
council,
members,.
B
G
Yeah,
I
do
have
a
few
more
photos,
so
videos
photos
if
we
can
yeah
dear
city,
council
members.
Thank
you
so
much
for
working
with
us
through
this
intense
prioritization
process
and
where
we
are
with
the
with
the
dollar
prioritization
right
now,
dogs
off
leash
area
has
been
a
passion
of
mine
since
2017
I
have
been
engaged
with
the
city
council
in
one
form
or
the
other,
as
well
as
the
parks
and
recreation.
G
It's
great
to
see
such
a
grassroots
movement,
having
such
an
impact
on
the
city's
plans
and
to
be
one
of
the
top
priorities
to
be
considered
for
next
year.
I
am
representing
the
quinlan
nal
dogs
group,
which
is
an
area
attached
to
the
memorial
park
and
is
very
well
shaded,
with
lots
of
redwood
trees.
G
If
somebody
can
show
the
other
pictures,
you
will
get
a
chance
to
see
the
other
dogs
playing.
The
video
was
really
short,
it'd
be
great.
If
kirsten,
you
can
show
the
other
pictures
as
well.
If
not,
please
send
it
to
the
city
council
offline
as
well.
There.
You
can
see
it's
very
shaded.
It's
it's
hilly!
The
dogs
love
it.
If
you
scroll
down
you'll,
see
more
pictures
and
more
dogs,
you
know,
and
we
love
it.
G
It
has
a
road
on
one
side
which
is
not
much
used
from
driving
perspective
because
it's
just
a
dead
end.
It
does
worry
us
a
little
bit,
but
we
are
still
fairly
comfortable,
encouraging
other
dogs
and
you
know
keeping
them
under
control
and
having
a
lot
of
fun
over
here.
The
dogs,
little
dogs,
big
dogs,
all
of
them
come
here,
have
a
lot
of
fun,
get
along
well
with
each
other,
and
I
look
forward
to
initiating
the
quinlan
dogs
off
leash
trial.
G
We
have
over
40
members
in
our
whatsapp
group
and
we
have
over
20
25
dogs.
Different
dogs
come
at
different
times
of
the
day,
but
what
we
are
asking
for
is
two
hours
in
the
evening,
one
hour
before
sunset
to
one
hour
after
sunset,
so
it
matches
the
seasonal
timings,
and
I
am
truly
appreciative
of
the
city
council
for
having
worked
through
this
prioritization.
G
A
F
F
You
probably
recognized
me
from
previous
meetings
as
luis
sadati,
the
main
dole
leader
tonight.
However,
I
will
be
highlighting
my
role
as
the
main
leader
for
my
dog
group
organized
for
future,
linda
vista
for
little
dogs
and
delicate
dogs.
The
video
I
just
showed
you
and
the
previous
videos
I
have
shown
you
all
were
from
our
group
organized
for
eventual
linda
vista,
little
and
delicate
dog
group.
We
have
at
linda
vista's
group,
99
members
and
growing
for
linda
vista.
The
video
at
the
beginning
of
the
speech
tonight
is
an
example
of
our
video
collection.
F
We
have
so
far
collected
57
days
of
one
hour,
videos
and
pictures
with
corresponding
counts
of
number
of
dogs,
adults
and
children.
We
have
saved
each
video
with
date
and
data
stamps
as
evidence
for
each
data
point.
The
data
from
these
saved
videos
have
been
collected
in
a
spreadsheet
for
linda
vista
group.
When
dollars
are
under
operational
status
in
the
future,
we
would
be
happy
to
share
our
data
with
the
professional
city
staff.
F
F
I
H
Yes,
thank
you
that
was
the
video
hi.
This
is
vasantha
and
thank
you
city
council
for
having
me
here
for
this
opportunity
to
speak,
and
I
want
to
thank
each
of
the
council
members
for
their
high
votes,
enabling
dolas
to
achieve
a
top
priority.
We're
really
grateful
for
that,
as
you
can
see,
I'm
from
the
monte
vista
park
in
cupertino,
so
I
represent
the
group
of
dogs
there.
So
I
would
like
to
say
that
we
have
a
very
vibrant,
organized
and
very
well-behaved
group
of
dogs
at
the
mountain
vista
park.
H
So
we
have
a
very
organized
play
group
and
we
are
really
looking
forward
to
be
considered
for
a
future
trial
for
dola.
So,
as
you
can
see,
the
video
represents
our
dogs
dressed
up.
This
was
the
halloween
dog
party
last
october,
so
we
were
able
to
achieve
this
with
a
lot
of
coordination
and
we
can
ensure
that
you
know
we
had
a
lot
of
fun
with
the
adult
members
as
well
participating.
H
So
our
group
was
very
organized
with
each
of
us
taking
a
high
level
of
responsibility
to
ensure
that
our
dogs
stay
within
the
area
we
clean
up
after
the
dogs
and
are
very
encouraging
and
very
welcoming
to
people
who
join
us.
So
thank
you,
city,
council,
again
for
this
high
voting
as
well
as
to
be,
I
would
request
you
a
request,
monitor
vista
park
to
be
considered
for
the
future
trial
of
dollar.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
B
B
A
J
D
And
so
the
difference
between
attachment,
a
attachment,
a
lists,
all
items
that
were
rated
by
council,
so
you
can
see
how
each
of
them
rated
and
you
can
see
what-
how
that
all
panned
out
based
on
how
each
council,
member
rated
each
item
that
is
attachment
a
attachment
b,
is
the
proposed
city
work
program
so
based
on
bandwidth
constraints.
Other
considerations.
D
This
is
what
we
are
proposing
for
the
fiscal
year,
23
city
work
program,
and
so
in
terms
of
process.
What
I
would
imagine
is
based
on
what
is
in
attachment
b.
If
there's
any
item
that
council
really
feel
strongly
should
be
in
attachment
b's
list.
That
is
not
that
that
be
up
for
discussion
and
then
perhaps
evaluating
which
item
to
maybe
trade
it
out
for
etcetera.
J
So
I'm
not
sure
that
what
what
this,
what
this
is
going
to
accomplish
with
regards
to
spending
more
money
on
this
particular
item,
it
seems
to
me,
is
that
we
already
have
it
and
that
we
need
to
update
what
we've
already
have
online,
and
I
was
wondering,
what's
different
in
in
your
thinking
or
or
from
what
council
told
you.
What
do
you
think
is
different
about
this
item
from
what
we
already
have
on
our
website.
D
This
was
an
item
that
was
added
by
and
proposed
by
a
council
member
and
so
and
it
rated
highly
or
relatively
highly,
and
so
we
wanted
to
see
what
we
could
do
to
address
it.
We
thought
we
could
do
something
more.
This
item
would
also
include
that
kind
of
planning
and
evaluating
what
do
we
already
have?
How
should
we
expand
and
how
does
that?
Look?
D
For
example,
you
could
have
an
interactive
map.
Perhaps
that
kind
of
shows
points
of
interest
places
to
go
and
little
blurbs
about
each
one.
There's
a
lot
of
different
things
we
could
do.
I
don't
have
the
answer,
what
it
will
look
like,
because
I
think
that
would
be
the
work
that's
conducted
with
this
item.
D
D
A
I
see
you
got
it
so
in
I
guess
it
would
be
the
attachment
perhaps
b
the
or
maybe
it's
c,
the
proposed
city
work
program.
I
know
the
gap
between
priority
item
20
on.
Oh
there's,
not
an
enumeration
on
my
printout,
but
it
says
development
accountability,
which
is
priority
number
20,
which
I
I
assume
was
in
a
four-way
tie
at
least,
and
then
it
goes
to
prior
number
20.
A
Well,
probably
it's
also
priority
number
20
and
the
next
one.
It
says
residential
and
mixed
use,
residential
design
standards,
but
the
reference
jumps
to
23..
So
so,
I'm
assuming
by
by
that
you
mean
that
reference
numbers,
21
and
22
dropped
off
the
recommended
list.
Is
that
right?
That's
correct,
okay,
so
and
that's
based
upon
what
you're
describing
here,
because
you
checked
in
with
staff
and
it
looks
like
those
were
not
able
to
make
it
in
because
of
bandwidth
recommendations
or
the
like?
A
Okay.
So
if
I,
if
I
go
back
to
that
other
file,
I
see
reference
number
21
was
housing.
Ownership
strategies
and
22
was
rena-related.
General
plan
updates
and
rezoning
and
they're
both
they're,
both
rated
as
a
project
size
large,
and
so
what
happens
to
those
items
at
this
point,
if
we
take
the
staff
recommendation,
do
they
just
not
make
it
on
the
list
at
all
of
the
38
work
plan
items.
D
A
Right
well-
and
I
noticed
that
the
homeless
jobs
program
gets
on
there
and
I'm
just
kind
of
thinking
about
consolidation,
perhaps,
but
there
did
seem
to
be
a
bit
of
a
kind
of
a
dichotomy
if
you
will
in
the
viewpoints
of
of
council.
But
if
you
look
at
this
proposed
list,
reference
number
five
also
priority.
Five
was
the
homeless
jobs
program
reference
13
priority
11
was
support
for
the
unhoused
and
I'm
fairly
certain
that
another
item
even
got
votes
as
well.
It's
near
the
end,
I
think
housing
programs
for
the
end.
A
That's
not
really
the
unhoused
issue,
though,
so
maybe
that
did
fall
off
based
upon
your
your
your
formal
rating.
So
so,
if
we
were
to
combine
two
of
these
items,
okay,
so
we're
talking
about
item
reference
number
five,
the
homeless
jobs
program,
together
with
the
support
for
the
unhoused
reference
number
13,
which
are
respectively
priorities,
five
and
eleven,
and
for
11
there
was
a
tie.
A
A
Yeah,
so
so
this
is
what
I'm
thinking.
Okay,
we
we
have
two
priority
items
in
the
top
20,
and
what
I'm
hearing
is
the
top
20
is,
you
know,
a
manageable
amount
for
staff
if
we
were
to
combine
two
of
those
and
the
priority
somehow
moved
up.
Is
that
something
that
would
affect
the
work
from
at
least
your
perspective?.
D
Okay,
to
answer
the
question:
it
would
whether
or
not
they're
combined
in
the
list
or
not,
they
would
still
take
the
same
amount
of
resources
and
work
to
do
so.
It's
not
going
to
really
change
a
lot.
I
will
say
it
is
harder
in
a
sense
of
reporting
out
it's
easier
to
report
out
and
give
better
updates
on
particular
projects
if
they're
not
all
combined
but
other
than
that,
it's
going
to
be
the
same
amount
of
work,
whether
we
combine
them
in
a
list
or
don't.
A
D
Oh,
no,
all
48,
I
no
all
30
items
in
attachment
b
are
being
proposed
for
inclusion
in
the
fiscal
year.
23
work
program
because
stuff
believes
we'll
be
able
to
make
some
good
progress
on
them.
So
all
38,
I'm
sorry!
If
I
confused
by
adding
the
top
20
piece,
I
just
wanted
to
emphasize
that
we
were
able
to
get
all
of
those
priorities
in
before
anything
got
cut
off.
So
I
just
that
was
just
a
point
I
was
trying
to
make,
but
all
38
that
are
in
attachment
b
right.
A
Okay,
great
and
then
I
guess
my
final
question
and
I
apologize
to
my
colleagues
I'm
going
to
take
the
liberty
of
being
more
specific
in
this
one.
I
try
to
make
my
former
questions
more
more
general,
as
applicable
to
everyone's
perspectives,
and
you
know,
speaking
of
that,
I
actually
have
one
more
katie.
Would
it
be
useful
to
go
through
a
tie,
breaking
exercise
in
your
mind
as
pertains
to
these
top
38?
A
D
D
A
Okay,
fair
enough,
fair
enough.
Well
let
me
let
me
take
that
liberty
now
for
my
individual
item
lawrence
mitty.
I
don't
think
we
should
be
describing
it
as
a
master
plan.
Now
I
think
lauren
smitty
is
a
park
design
right
now.
We
had
a
really
good
comment
from
the
public
coming
by
email
in
the
last
couple
of
weeks,
and
that
has
to
do
with
the
the
name
of
the
park,
and
so
what
I
would
request
is
that
we
renamed
this
item
to
be
lawrence,
mitty
park
delivery
or
something
to
that
effect.
A
I
don't,
I
don't
think
we're
at
the
master
plan
stage
anymore:
we've
purchased
the
property
we've
annexed,
the
property.
A
consultant
has
been
engaged
and
is
starting
to
do
the
work
on
the
outreach.
So
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
moving
the
goalposts
forward
as
opposed
to
kind
of
prolonging
the
experience.
I
could
see
the
prolonging
of
the
experience
prior
to
annexation,
but
now
that
annexation
has
been
completed,
there
really
are
no
obstacles
with
regard
to
in
this
particular
space.
A
J
All
right,
thank
you,
katie.
I
was
wondering
if
I
could
have
some
more
clarification.
I'm
looking
at
attachment
a
at
this
point,
reference
number
13
and
how
it
reads
is
that
we
are
going
to
develop
a
specific
plan
for
facility
development
with
supportive
services,
which
sounds
like
we
are
planning
to
build
a
homeless
shelter
and
we
are
going
to
be
preparing
a
specific
plan,
for
that.
Am
I
understanding
that
correctly.
A
Yeah
yeah!
No,
let
me
let
me
do
that.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that.
So
I
I
wrote
this
item
and
and
yes,
councilmember
moore
you're,
referring
to
the
second
sentence
of
the
project
objective,
which
reads:
a
specific
plan
would
be
generated
which
includes
considerations
and
recommendations
for
and
then
the
first
ticked
off
category
is
facility
development
with
supportive
services.
Yes,
I
do
think
that
we
we
need
a
facility
for
the
unhoused
with
supportive
services
in
our
in
our
community.
I
I
think
that
you
know
done
right.
A
It
can
be
much
better
than
what
we
have
right
now,
which
is
an
unhoused
issue
that
that
crops
up
with
with
visibility
on
regular
occasion,
but
it
is
certainly
just
there
on
a
continual
basis.
So
I
I
think
significant
amounts
of
support
needs
to
be
going
into
not
just
financially
supporting
this,
but
delivering
this
in
such
a
manner
that
it
doesn't
turn
into
something
that
you
know.
People
find
you
know
undesirable
in
the
community,
so
yeah
just
to
just
clarify
on
that.
A
J
Moore,
okay,
thank
you.
So
I'm
wondering
if
this
should
be
somehow
connected
with
the
eli
item,
because
we're
looking
essentially
if
you're,
if
you
are
building
a
homeless,
shelter,
you've
identified
some
properties
within
the
eli
item
and
my
concern
with
this
one
is
that
we
don't
have
a
property
really
identified.
A
A
And-
and
I
think
that
to
consolidate
them
might
be-
you
can
categorically
a
little
bit
conflated
so
so
you
know
my
preference
would
be
to
keep
them
distinct
from
each
other,
so
that
we
can.
But
I
hear
what
you're
saying
I
mean
just
in
terms
of
the
property,
you
know
kind
of
relationship
right.
I
I
don't
I'd
like
to
keep
everything
as
open
as
possible,
but
you
know
the
fact
matter
is
some
of
this
has
to
do
with
property
that
really
hasn't.
A
You
know
kind
of
been
put
in
front
of
the
city.
What
I
will
say
about
the
outback
steakhouse
site,
however,
is
that
the
county
has
come
in
and-
and
it
has
talked
about
wanting
to
develop
it
with
measure
a
funding
for
bmr
units,
and
I
I
think
the
other
property
that
you
identify
is
is
part
of
the
conversation,
but
I
don't
know
how
far
into
it
it's
gone,
such
that
we
can
get
into
you
know
really
specific
details.
A
J
J
So
I'm
I'm
concerned
that,
if
we
do
were
to
actually
I
identify
some
potential
sites
that
the
simeon
property
possibly
could
be
problematic
and
that
we
might,
for
reasons
of
equity,
need
to
look
at
other
locations
throughout
the
city
rather
than
condensing
all
of
the
housing
at
one
one
location
and
again
that's
from
ab686.
So
I'm
wondering
if
perhaps
we
want
to
edit
this
a
little
bit
to
talk
about
site,
selection
and
identification,
especially
since
we're
working
on
the
housing
element
now
and
there
is
something
within
the
ab686.
A
Well,
you
know,
let's
put
it
this
way.
I
mean
cards
on
the
table.
I
understand
that
you
know
shelter
for
them.
House
is
not
a
politically
popular
thing
to
put
anywhere
frankly,
and
I
think,
as
you
get
into
more
affluent
areas,
you're
going
to
get
more
pushback,
I
I'll
put
that
on
the
table
also
put
on
the
table.
You
know
I'm
seven
months
out.
A
I
could
be
very
clear
about
it
and
just
say
I
think
we
need
to
put
in
the
facility.
You
know
I'll
I'll
be
equally
clear
about
the
notion
that
I
agree
with
what
you're
saying
you
know
all
the
density
shouldn't
be
in
one
particular
area
of
town,
and
you
know
the
fact
is
there
if
you're,
if
you're
talking
about
furthering
fair
housing,
we
shouldn't
be
looking
at
less
density
in
some
areas
and
more
density,
just
as
a
matter
of
course
than
others.
A
So
so
I
would
say:
let's
have
a
full
full
geographically
ranged
conversation
about
where
these
facilities
could
go,
how
they'd
be
supported
and
leave
it
at
that
I
mean
I
I
I
don't
know
that
it
really
would
make
sense
at
this
point,
since
you
know
this
has
garnered
some
significant
support.
It
may
not
have
garnered
particular
you
know
support
from
any
given
individual
council
member,
but
you
know
looking
over
the
you
know
kind
of
individual
perspectives.
I
you
know
I'm
not
going
to
turn
this
into
a
kind
of
a
filibustering
opportunity.
A
K
A
I
say
I
halfway
through
this
fiscal
year,
I'm
out
so
I
mean,
if
other
people
don't
feel
that
that's
as
high
of
a
priority,
then
you
know
it
probably
gets
a
little
bit
lost
in
that
you
know
conversation
of
the
of
the
several
agenda
items
but
but
I
will
say
you
know
on
this
on
this
item.
If
you
look
around,
you
know
encampments
on
wolf
encampments.
You
know
in
lawrence
many
encampments.
A
You
know
in
various
areas
there's
a
triangle
in
the
lawrence
committee,
not
lawrence
committee,
but
lawrence
280,
stevens
creek.
You
know
near
calvert
kind
of
confluence.
If
you
will
that
you
know,
has
a
number
of
encampments.
You
know
tents
right
now,
so
I
mean
that's
in
san
jose.
I
think
you
know.
A
I
look
at
measure
a
funding
and
I
think
you
know
a
lot
of
this.
Money
is
going
towards
transit.
Oriented
developments
in
you
know
various
parts
of
the
county
and
it's
not
really
going
towards
unhoused
support,
which
is
you
know,
councilmember
moore
part
of
what
you
talked
about
as
a
chair
of
the
vta
policy
advisory
committee
last
week.
So
I
mean
you
know
it
it's
it's
something
that
I
I
think
it's
stipulated
that
it's
it's
tough
to
bring
in,
but
you
know
as
a
priority.
A
L
Thank
you,
so
the
support
for
the
house,
the
if
I
were
on
on
the
county
supervisor
board
this
is
what
I
would
support,
but
as
cupertino
as
a
city
we,
the
state
allocated
and
the
county
decided
to
allocate,
I
think,
34
of
our
tax
property
tax
to
the
county
to
provide
all
these
services
when
the
city
only
gets
seven
percent
of
that
property
tax
funding
and
therefore
the
county
provide
a
lot
of
supportive
services.
They
have
social
workers
to
support
so
to
support
homeless.
L
It's
a
very
complex
problem
that
we
don't
have
a
single
city
staff
who
is
in
that
area
our
only
two
case,
workers
at
senior
center
to
service
seniors
are
removed,
so
we
had
to
have
zero
person
on
that
and
in
terms
of
any
housing
for
shelter.
This
is
all
county,
it's
a
county's
responsibility,
and
so
I'm
confused.
L
Why
is
that
now?
Under
our
jurisdiction?
Even
I
mean,
of
course
we
should
do
everything
to
support
the
county
in
what
they
are
doing
and
work
with
them.
For
example,
the
the
plan
to
end
homeless.
We
should
create
our
plan,
but
that's
in
support
of
the
county
plan
as
much
as
we
can
to
address
this
important
issue,
so
if
there
could
be
a
homeless,
shelter
or
or
low-income
housing
and
in
a
county
property
like
simian
property,
we
should
support
that
and
that's
already
covered
in
the
number
one
item
in
our
list.
L
L
So
I
understand
that
I
was
a
little
confused
too.
So
the
attachment
b
has
38
items
of
those
are
in
the
proposed
work
program.
If
we
adopt
today
and
attachment
a
has
all
the
items
that
were
we
ranked
and
some
of
those
made
to
the
list.
Some
of
those
not
and
kt
says
the
top
20
made
it
to
the
list,
but
some
items
after
20
made
it
some
items
didn't.
L
So
I
think
we
should
talk
about
what
didn't
number
21
is
home
ownership
strategies
which
I
think
is
more
important
than
homeless
for
a
community
like
cupertino.
You
want
to
stop
people
from
getting
into
homeless.
You
want
to
provide
middle-income
housing.
You
want
to
be
allow
people
to
be
able
to
build
wealth
through
homes
through
home
ownership.
L
L
L
Isn't
included
this?
I
cannot
see
so
the
20,
the
one
above
which
include
the
home,
share
program
and
possible
bmr
middle
income.
Housing
are
not
included,
I'm
guessing.
That
might
be
a
staffing
issue.
I
just
want
some
clarification
on
that,
so
that's
actually
partially
included
right
and
then
we
have
the
youth
and
team
social
media
engagement.
I
want
to
pitch
for
this
item
a
little
bit
because
this
is
proposed
by
the
team
commission.
L
L
A
Yes,
I
was
about
to
ask
for
some
responses
to
your
comments
and
so
katie
or
jim
or
anyone
from
staff.
Would
you
care
to
for.
For
my
part,
I
thought
the
last
comment
was
particularly
interesting.
I
mean
if
there
was
a
suggestion
from
one
of
the
commissions
and
it
wouldn't
necessarily
make
it
on
the
you
know,
city
work
program,
priority
list:
does
that
necessarily
preclude
the
commission
itself
from
taking
it
up
as
an
item
in
what
they
do
over
the
course
of
the
year?
That's
a
good
question.
C
I
I
C
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
take
a
look
to
see
what
kind
of
time
that
might
take
of
staff
to
see
if
it
is
something
we
can
fit
in
there.
If
it's
something
we
can
do,
we
could
have
it.
I
don't
know
what
we'll
call
it
a
little
side
item
on
there,
but
not
having
it
be
part
of
the
38.
I
think,
would
help
us
at
this
point.
A
I
L
C
D
A
A
A
Other
items
with
same
priority
number
or
items
that
should
be
completed
since
they
are
already
underway,
are
necessary
to
complete
due
to
impact
of
the
state
laws
and
requirements,
and
then
item
22,
which
is
the
one
related
to
the
arena,
related
general
plan
items.
This
item
is
being
removed
because
this
work
is
included
in
reference
number
12.,
which
looks
like
oh
and
by
the
way,
katie.
I
think
you've
managed
to
create
a
pretty
good
nomenclature.
That's
clear
reference
12
is
the
arena
related
general
plan
updates
and
rezoning.
L
A
M
So
thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
katie.
I
actually
read
the
attachments,
all
three
of
them
real
carefully
and
I
actually
can
see
why
21
is
not
included.
It's
a
large
project
and
there
are
three
zeros
on
it.
So
I
look
at
how
how
not
just
a
number
1.6
but
how
council
members
rate
it.
So
if
three
council
members
put
zero-
and
I
see
a
lot
of
them-
are
not
making
your
list-
maybe
that's
not
how
you
see
it,
but
that's
how
I
see
it
22.
M
I
remember
vividly
I
think,
because
vice
mayor
chow
added
something
to
it,
it's
exactly
the
same
as
11
or
12,
but
I
didn't
like
what
was
added
on
the
heart
of
city.
So
I
you
know
we
separate
this.
I
remember
this.
We
separated
21
22,
exactly
actually
that
language
is
already
in
the
other
subject.
So
I
am
very
pleased
with
this
list.
M
I
think
it
encompasses
a
wide
range
of
our
priorities
and
I
think
a
lot
of
covered
every
council
member's
focus
so,
and
I
am
actually
surprised
that
this
the
staff
chose
38
and
I
think
it's
a
lot
of
staff
time.
So
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
being
really
gung-ho
and
I'm
going
to
pick
up
a
lot
of
things,
so
I
I
think
we
really
gave
this
a
lot
of
thoughts.
This
is
the
fifth
time
we
met
for
city
work
plan.
I
thought.
M
A
Great,
thank
you
very
much,
councilmember
way.
Councilman
wooley!
Do
you
wanna
make
any
comments
at
this
time
before
we
bring
it
back
to
further
around
the
comments
and
in
fact
councilman
willie
once
you
can
get
on
speaking,
I
might
ask
for
a
motion
to
move
forward
on
this
item.
Given
the
the
time
at
this.
At
this
point,
councilmember
willie.
N
So
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
wasn't
going
to
somehow
be
forgotten,
but
with
it
being
on
the
cip.
I
think,
as
councilman
moore
had
previously
said.
Sometimes
it
gets
confusing.
What's
on
the
work
plan
versus
what's
on
the
cip,
and
so
some
things
that
I
feel
oversight
is
important
and
and
input
is
important
like
memorial
park,
by
putting
it
on
the
work
plan,
allows
us
to
get
regular
updates
and
give
feedback
slash
direction,
but
in
something
like
the
seismic
upgrade.
N
You
know
if
I
read
the
description
here:
examine
seismic
retrofits
upgrades
and
remodels
to
existing
city
hall
and
so
to
me
that
really
does
sound
exactly
like
what
we
were
ending
with
on
the
cip
city
hall
line
item.
You
know,
staff
brought
us
what
their
recommendation
was,
which
was
a
three-story
parking
garage
and
things
that
I
think
maybe
are
beyond
perhaps
beyond,
what's
truly
needed.
N
But
this
is
essentially
that,
in
my
view
and
from
a
from
a
city
safety
standpoint,
I
think
by
having
it
in
the
cip
versus
the
work
plan,
because
the
work
plan
has
a
lot
of
subjectivity
to
it
and
we
don't
want
subjectivity
with
safety.
We
definitely
want
to
be
sure
that
all
our
concerns
are
being
addressed,
but
memorial
park
with
or
without
a
dola,
I
mean
those
are
good
reasons
to
have
it
in
the
work
plan
so
that
we
can
help
to
make
sure
that
the
community
is
getting
what
they'd
really
like
to
see.
N
So
so
I'm
wondering
whether
or
not
17
really
belongs
on
this
list.
Well,
why
not
just
leave
it
and
move
forward,
because
I
I'm
concerned
that
city
staff
is
overloaded
with
the
work
plan
and
so
trying
to
find
places
to
to
economize
on
staff
time
and
bring
it
back
into
something
a
little
bit
more
manageable.
I
truly
feel
about
30,
maybe
34
items
from
our
history
from
the
past
three
years.
N
C
Thank
you
and
I
see
matt
that's
on
here
too.
Thank
you,
marin,
councilman,
really,
the
it's
it's
one
of
those
things
it's
if
it's
on
the
work
plan.
It
focuses
it
more.
You
know
if
it's
on
cip,
so
it's
sort
of
a
double
shot.
You
know
it's
in
two
places.
I
do
think
at
times
it's
confusing.
Why
is
it
in
one
and
also
in
the
other?
N
Or
maybe
it
doesn't
have
much
in
the
way
of
budget
here,
because
no
500
000
is
in
the
bed.
Yet
that's
commas,
there's
a
not
not
a
dot
so
yeah
five
hundred
thousand,
when
we
had
our
cip
meeting
and
we
I
felt
had
somewhat
of
a
direction,
although
we
said
to
bring
the
cip
back
to
us
for
final.
You
know.
N
N
We
need
to
truly
understand
before
we
move
forward
with
you
know
in
the
in
the
design
phase.
So
I
had
said
my
last
word
was:
I
would
support
you
know,
because
you
need
money
to
to
make
progress,
and
so
I
said
I'd
support
something
on
the
lines
of
like
500
000,
for
city
staff,
to
get
us
the
the
answers
to
all
of
our
questions,
so
that
then
we
can
make
good
direction
in
terms
of
how
we're
going
to
move
how
cities
should
be
moving
forward
with
city
hall.
Well:
here's
500
000.
N
I
would
definitely
not
like
to
double
count:
500
000
here
and
500
000
in
the
cip.
I
was
fully
intending
to
bring
that
five
hundred
thousand
dollar
number
again
tonight
during
this
cip
and
I
would
tend
to
think
that's
where
the
five
hundred
thousand
belong
but
again
I'll
leave
it
for
your
comments
and
also.
C
O
O
Way
by
by
leaving
it
in
both
places,
as
the
city
manager
mentioned,
it
emphasizes
it
a
little
bit
more.
But
in
any
case,
this
is
an
item
that
we
know
that
there's
additional
work
to
be
done
and
we'd
like
to
move
forward
with
that
work.
The
500
000
level
is
a
good
starting
point
for
us
to
do
that
and
to
be
able
to
bring
some
studies
and
some
information
back
to
the
council
to
continue
the
progress.
O
A
Okay,
thank
you,
councilmember
willie,
councilmember,
moore
and
vice
mayor
chow.
Do
you
do
you
guys
mind
if
I
just
make
some
brief
comments
before
going
back
to
you?
This
dovetails
off
of
council
member
willie's
comments.
I
will
say
I
want
to
explain
probably
the
most
significant
vote
change
I
made
in
this
round
that
had
to
do
with
removing
all
support
whatsoever
from
anything
having
to
do
with
city
hall,
and
I
moved
it
over
to
parking,
as
recommended
by
the
library
commission.
A
So
if
you
look
at
attachment
a
there's,
a
five-point
vote
for
that
and
there's
another
one-point
vote
for
that
and
the
staff
allocation
was
twelve
thousand
dollars
is
very
minimal.
It's
basically
signage
with
regard
to
encouraging
people
to
park
elsewhere
to
get
the
library
in
return.
I
also
I
moved
that
five
points
from
the
city
hall
project
because
I
felt
that
it
had
not
been
handled
properly
because
we
were
in
the
middle.
A
And
I
see
you
know
I
look
at
some
of
the
beams
there
of
wood
that
are
in
decay
and
should
have
been
addressed
during
this
time,
where,
basically,
nobody
was
in
city
hall,
except
perhaps
myself
and
a
couple
of
other
people
over
the
course
last
couple
of
years.
So
you
know
this
was
this
was
a
very
deliberately
considered
transfer
of
votes.
A
The
seismic
retrofits
of
city
hall
did
get
nonetheless
a
lot
of
support.
I
would
be
willing
to
move
all
of
that
support
towards
this
project
in
the
work
program
as
now
described,
but
it
needs
to
be
understood
that
that
is
seismic
retrofits
and
because
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
was
a
good
working
environment,
additional
monies
needed
to
make
that
working
environment
within
the
context
of
that
existing
building,
now
to
come
back
at
us
and
basically
say:
hey,
let's
have
a
three-story.
A
You
know
parking
garage
out
here,
give
us
four
million
dollars
and
that's
why
we're
looking
at
it
in
advance
for
the
next
fiscal
year
without
vetting
it
at
all
to
any
of
the
council
members.
You
know,
I
I'm
not
understanding
where
that
you
know
kind
of
fits
within
the
process,
so
I
just
I
want
to
make
it
really
clear
how
my
vote
got
changed.
A
I
think
it
was
always
very
clear
that
this
council
unanimously
supported
safe
workplace
environments
and
if
we
need
to
have
a
conversation-
and
we
need
to
create
a
subcommittee
of
our
council
to
investigate
the
assertions
that
are
being
made
to
us
upon
first
impression
prior
to
the
end
of
this
fiscal
year
and
while
we're
considering
the
next
fiscal
year
and
these
are
being
put
fully
baked
on
a
platter
with
this
false
choice
between
safety
and
not
safety.
I
think
that
we
really
need
to
come
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
examine
some
of
these
assertions.
A
I
will
also
say
that
I
coincidentally,
had
the
opportunity
to
meet
the
person
who
supervised
virtually
all
of
the
upgrades
to
city
hall
in
1986,
and
I
learned
that
some
seismic
retrofitting
was
already
done.
That
was
yesterday
over
at
the
groundbreaking
ceremony
which
all
of
our
council
attended
for
the
canyon
crossing
project.
So
I
think
that
there
are
significant
amounts
of
work
that
can
be
done
from
our
council
again.
I
would
recommend
a
subcommittee
working
together
with
city
manager
and
the
director
of
public
works
to
try
to
investigate
this
in
in
thorough
detail.
A
I
I
think
that
it's
extremely
disconcerting
to
hear
that
seismic
retrofits
have
gone
from
an
estimate
of
20
million
dollars
to
become
somewhat
comparable,
somehow
comparable
to
the
price
of
a
brand
new
city
hall,
which
was
always
priced
out
at
least
60,
if
not
70
or
more
million
dollars.
At
this
point,
so
councilmember
moore
and
then
vice
mayor
chao.
And
then
I
will
ask
that
we
put
a
motion
on
the
table
so
that
we
can
consider
it
and
hopefully
vote
on
it
before
we
start
with
our
regular
meeting
council
member
moore.
J
J
J
So
for
me,
because
we
have
a
separate
cip
and
it
is
part
of
our
agenda,
it's
a
where
we
need
to
prioritize
these
items
in
the
cip
and
it
has
state
law
associated
with
it.
For
these
items,
government
code
65403
outlines
what
each
one
should
have
for
information
provided
and
and
in
our
policy
we
have
a
five-year
cip
program
which
we
are
supposed
to
be
approving.
J
I
I
personally
don't
support
approving
this
work
program
with
the
cip
items
on
here,
so
for
for
me
to
approve
it,
I
would
need
to
have
the
cip
items
removed.
We
will
be
addressing
them
in
on
item
40
and
at
some
point
we're
supposed
to
be
prioritizing
the
cip
items
so
just
to
let
you
know
how
I
feel
about
this
particular
list
as
it
stands.
Thank
you.
J
Not
at
all
so
under
the
cip,
it
would
be
discussing
the
description
of
the
scope
of
work,
total
cost
estimates,
future
cost
estimates,
future
operating
and
maintenance
cost
and
how
the
project
will
be
funded,
so
we'll
be
looking
at
it
in
terms
of
what
funding
is
available
for
that
specific
part
of
our
budget.
So
we
have
the
cip
portion
of
our
budget,
and
this
reminds
me
a
little
bit
of
when
we
were
looking
at
field
use
and
and
the
order
of
items
in
in
that
particular
agenda.
J
Where
here
we,
you
would
be
approving
these
cip
items
under
the
work
plan
and
then
you're
going
to
be
looking
at
the
cip
items
separately,
and
there
could
be
items
which
are
on
this
list
that
perhaps
wouldn't
rank
very
highly
on
the
cip
list.
But
you
would
be
looking
at
them
again
in
a
in
a
different
light.
So
you
could
actually
have
something
show
up
in
this
list
ranked
differently
from
when
you
look
at
the
cip
budget.
So
this,
I
think,
definitely
should
have
the
cips
taken
care
of
separately.
J
A
J
J
Okay,
I
don't
see
how
that
project
should
be
ranked
against
the
the
library
expansion
for
instance,
or
you
now
we
have
a
homeless
shelter,
a
project
being
looked
at.
Those
are.
These
are
very
expensive
capital
improvements
versus
things
that
could
actually
be
policy
changes.
For
instance,
I'd
like
to
see
within
the
budget
some
policy
implemented.
It
should
having
a
few
thousand
dollars
worth
of
staff
time
to
generate
and
implement
policy
does
not
rate
up
against
the
a
40
million
dollar
project.
So
I
just
I
don't
feel
that
they
belong
together.
J
Other
cities
are
not
doing
it
this
way,
and
I
I
find
it
pretty
confusing,
but
you're.
You
know
you're
welcome
to
keep
the
cips
in
there.
If
that's,
what,
if
that's,
what
you
choose,
but
I'd
also
think
that
when
you
get
to
the
cip
item
later
in
the
meeting
that
you
you
might
find
that
you
have
already
ranked
your
cips,
the
ones
that
are
on
this
list,
you've
already
ranked
them
and
then
you're
going
to
get
to
another
list
where
you're
going
to
see
those
items
again
and
actually
the
homeless
shelter.
J
A
Well,
I
mean
there's
no,
there's
no
cip
for
a
homeless
shelter.
At
this
point
right
I
mean
it's,
it's
it's
purely
conceptual
at
this
time,
so
I
I'd
be
fairly
surprised
if,
even
when
he
went
to
the
level
of
you
know
introducing
a
discussion
about
some
kind
of
a
master
plan.
There's
no
budget-
that's
that's
put
in
for
cip
for
a
homeless
shelter
under
the
sport
program,.
J
So
mayor
paul,
I
do
agree
with
you
it
and
it
says,
but
it
does
say,
facility
development
with
supportive
services,
and
I
don't
feel
that
this
300
000
is
coming
anywhere
near
covering
what
it
will
actually
end
up
costing
and
for
a
cip
item.
You
need
to
show
you
need
to
show
the
description
and
scope
of
work,
total
cost
estimate,
future
cost
estimate,
future
operating
and
maintenance
costs
and
how
that
project
is
going
to
be
funded
and.
A
I
A
A
L
A
We
are
now
at
6,
41.,
we'll
come
back
in
three
minutes
and
and
then
some
for
our
regular,
a
regular
meeting
of
may
17,
2012
and
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
continue
this
item
to
that
regular
meeting
and
the
precise
placement
will
be
determined
under
postponements
and
orders
of
the
day.
Thank
you
very
much.
Our
special
meeting
is
adjourned
and
we'll
see
you
in
a
few
minutes.
A
A
A
And
I'm
here,
thank
you
very
much,
madam
city
clerk.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
tonight
is
consideration
of
a
proclamation
to
the
silicon
valley,
clean
energy
authority,
in
recognition
of
its
fifth
year
anniversary
of
operations
for
jurisdictions
that
include
cupertino
and
allow
our
residents
to
purchase
completely
clean
carbon
neutral
energy.
And
so
I
understand
that
we
do
have
a
member
of
silicon
valley,
clean
energy
authority
staff
and
so
welcome.
Please,
if
you'd
like
join
us
on
the
on
the
dice
and
we'll
present
the
proclamation
to
you
all
right.
A
K
I'm
honored
to
be
here
on
behalf
of
silicon
valley,
clean
energy.
As
you
know,
garish
palestine
is
on
vacation
this
week,
so
he
sent
me
in
his
place.
He
is
proud
to
be
a
part
of
this
community,
proud
to
serve
this
community,
along
with
all
the
other
members
of
spce,
oh
and
by
the
way
I'm
monica
padilla
chief
operating
officer.
A
A
Okay,
thanks
very
much
and
item
number
two
on
our
agenda
is
a
proclamation
recognizing
public
works
week,
which
we
recognize
every
year,
we're
very
grateful
to
our
hard-working
members
of
our
public
works
staff.
It's
wonderful
that
we
have
through
our
city
manager
hired
a
new
public
works
director
who
is
with
us
today
through
zoom,
and
so
our
city
manager,
I
believe,
will
be
accepting
the
proclamation
for
public
works
week
on
behalf
of
the
city
staff
and
we'll
go
up
in
the
diocese.
Do
that.
A
A
C
O
O
As
you
said,
mr
mayor,
they
start
early
they're
out
there
first
thing
before
light
in
the
morning
working
they're
out
there
late
at
night,
working
they're
called
for
emergencies
and
for
urgent
issues,
they're
building
the
projects,
they're,
keeping
the
city
running
so
a
great
team
all
the
way
around
and
I'm
proud
to
be
a
part
of
it.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
acknowledgement,
great.
A
A
L
A
We're
actually
curious,
we
recognize
we
recognize
the
parks
and
recreation
department
or
recreation
community
services
department.
I
believe
it's
in
the
month
of
july.
It
might
be
june,
but
public
works
week
actually
prior
to
the
pandemic,
had
turned
into
quite
a
really
great
community
event,
and
now
that
we.
A
Of
the
public
works
department
as
well
as
our
new
director,
we
can
make
note
of
the
fact
that
the
community
had
become
begun
to
become
welcome
to
the
corporation
yard,
to
visit
various
stations
within
the
corporation
yard,
and
I
will
say,
director
morley.
Your
your
predecessors
did
a
fantastic
job,
making
sure
that
everything
got
very
organized
within
the
corporation
yard
and
also
opening
up
to
the
public
over
the
course
of
time
so,
the
first
year
they
did
it.
A
L
A
Commission
or
I'm
sorry,
the
recreation
community
services
department
is
online
happy
to
recognize
anybody
who
wants
to
raise
their
hand
to
speak
to,
and
I
do
see
joanne
mcgreeny,
our
director
of
recreation,
community
services
has
turned
on
her
zoom
video
did
you
want
to
speak
to
that?
Was
it
in
july
or
june
jan?
It.
B
A
A
A
Five
35
recommended
for
postponements
to
a
future
meeting.
I
I
will
also
say
oh
and
I
I
think
let
me
let
me
just
say
this
at
the
outset
of
our
meeting.
I
think
it's
actually
a
really
good
thing
that
we're
having
a
particularly
busy
week
right
now,
because
we
have
a
convergence
of
the
work
plan,
the
capital
improvement
program
as
well
as
the
budget.
A
A
I
think
you
do
95
of
everything
that
you
do
up
to
the
day
of,
and
then
you
wait
for
the
chaos
to
ensue
for
that
five
percent
that
you
just
can't
you
know,
plan
out
and-
and
you
inevitably
have
to
you-
know-
deal
with
on
the
day
of
so
so
that's
basically
our
day
of
for
the
year.
At
this
point,
so
so
we
do
have
a
number
of
items
that
are
recommended
for
postponement
until
our
may
19th
meeting.
A
We
did
not
want
to
notice
a
special
meeting
tomorrow
for
thursday
and
not
let
the
public
know
what
we
were
considering
essentially
on
this
regular
meeting,
and
that's
why
there
are
so
many
items
on
postponement
for
recommendation
of
postponement
to
thursday
of
this
week.
So
if
you're
following
us
here
or
at
home
you'll
recall
at
the
end
of
our
last
regular
meeting
in
april,
we
signed
posted
to
this
by
saying
we
will
have
thursday,
I'm
sorry
our
first
meeting
in
may,
I
should
say
our
first
regular
meeting
in
may.
A
A
So
I
will
entertain
a
motion
to
accept
the
postponements,
as
recommended
with
item
19,
being
moved
to
our
regularly
scheduled
meeting
in
august
at
this
time
and
council.
Member
way,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
Would
you
like
to
make
that
more
moved?
Okay,
would
anyone
like
to
second
council
member
way's
motion
and
councilman
willie?
A
A
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
any
items
that
are
not
on
our
agenda,
and
so,
if
you
have
any
communications
to
the
council
in
that
regard,
please
raise
your
hand
on
zoom
or
fill
out
a
blue
card
right
now
I
see
three
hands
raised
on
zoom.
They
are
muni
matapatla
and
jenny
and
connie
cunningham,
and
so
please
have
your
hand
raised
on
zoom
before
the
first
speaker
is
done.
There
are
also
two
other
ways
to
be
heard
in
oral
communications.
A
I
do
have
a
request
from
a
member
of
the
public
to
consolidate
time
onto
a
longer
communication
and
so
whether
that's
oral
communication
or
in
a
different
communication
during
this
meeting,
I
just
want
you
to
know
that
we're
going
to
go
ahead.
I
I
had
instituted
a
mechanism
for
doing
this
a
while
back
internally,
I
I
you
know
in
the
interest
of
full
disclosure.
A
I
don't
specifically
remember
exactly
when
it
was,
but
it
was
more
than
a
year
ago
I
think
at
the
beginning
of
my
last
mayoral
term
in
2021
and
the
the
general
gist
of
it
is,
if
you
want
to
consolidate
time,
go
ahead,
we're
going
to
put
a
cap
on
that
at
nine
minutes,
and
so
for
every
person
that
you
add
to
your
consolidation,
we'll
give
you
two
extra
minutes.
So
if
you've
got
two
people
consolidating
we'll
give
you
five
minutes.
If
you
have
three
people
consolidating
we'll
give
you
seven.
A
A
A
P
Thank
you
boy.
You
guys
caught
me
off
guard.
I
dropped
my
tablet
anyway.
Yes,
thank
you
for
the
very
interesting
meeting
tonight.
Hi,
I'm
jennifer
griffin
and
I
just
wanted
to
you
know
with
the
with
the
ongoing
drama
of
the
housing
element.
I
won't
go
into
that.
I
want
people
to
remember
that
we
still
have
these
housing
bills
that
are
being
churned
out
by
politicians
in
sacramento
and
just
I'll
briefly
touch
on
two.
P
There
is
one
I
didn't
have
time
to
look
up
the
name,
but
this
is
by
laura
friedman,
and
this
is
eliminating
parking
standards,
parking
minimums
for
cars
across
the
state.
This
is
a
rehash
of
her
bill
from
last
year.
This
one
was
reintroduced
like
the
day
after
the
previous
one
had
been
expired,
and
this
is
to
eliminate
you.
A
city
cannot
require
parking
for
new
apartment
complexes,
etc.
P
Totally
irrational
bill
does
not,
you
know
some
people
they
need
to
have
some
people
need
cars.
Okay,
that's
all
I'll.
Go
on
that
one.
The
other
one
that
is
really
just
is
a
mind-boggling
is
ab2011,
and
I
got
the
name
correct.
This
is
buffy
wicks.
I
think
it's
all
says
scott
weiner's
bill
that
will
allow
you
to
build
housing
ministerially
with
no
sequel
investigation
on
any
type
of
commercial
property.
P
P
P
It
is
mind-boggling
to
me
that
these
have
even
been
allowed
to
proceed.
I
understand
the
trades
are
interested
in
them.
Yes,
okay,
but
that
means
that
if
you
build
housing
on
a
contaminated
tech
site,
that
means
that
everyone
living
there
could
be
subject
to
massive
health
problems.
The
construction-
and
I
just
cannot
believe
that
anyone
if
the
governor
signs
this
bill
and
he
ought
to
be
removed
immediately
from
office-
that's
my
take
on
it
and
why
they're
pushing
this,
I
have
no
idea.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
jennifer
and
so
we'll
go
on
and
before
we
go
on
to
our
next
hands
raised
in
zoom.
I
just
want
to
let
everyone
know
that
I
do
have
three
blue
cards
they've
been
consolidated,
that's
between
peggy,
griffin,
lisa,
warren
and
govind,
and
I
I
want
to
mention
as
well
that
muni
metapatella
had
also
added
his
name
to
this,
and
so
there
is
that
maximum
nine
minutes.
If
anyone
wants
to
add
to
that,
that's
that's
perfectly
fine.
A
E
I
wanted
to
speak
to
the
housing
element
that
we
are
working
on
in
our
city.
Right
now,
on
april
26
2022,
I
attended
the
planning
commission
meeting
on
the
housing
element,
lists
and
maps
of
suggested
sites
were
included
in
that
long
discussion.
That
evening,
I
am
particularly
concerned
with
the
possibility
of
displacement
of
people
from
their
existing
homes.
E
E
E
I
ask
that
the
report
be
revised
to
please
tell
us
what
the
reasons
were
for
including
sites
on
the
list
and
the
map,
because
the
ones
that
were
recommended
and
the
ones
that
weren't
recommended
were
not
consistent
with
with
them
being
included
or
not
included.
So
the
whole
thing
needs
to
be
taken
a
look
at
before
it
comes
to
to
you
at
the
city
council.
A
Thank
you
very
much
connie
and
we
will
go
on
to
our
blue
cards
at
this
time
and
again
we
have
blue
cards
from
peggy
griffin,
as
well
as
lisa
warren
and
govind
and
muni's
hand
was
seated
over
to
peggy
for
her
time
and
so
peggy
you'll
have
nine
minutes
to
provide
your
comments.
Madam
city
clerk.
Are
there
any
further
blue
cards
at
this
time
for
members
of
the
public
that
are
here,
live
with
us?
No.
B
A
Q
Thank
you
good
evening.
This
presentation
is
intended
to
bring
awareness
for
the
need
to
inform
and
prepare
the
city
and
the
cupertino
residents
of
the
impact
of
the
new
valco
rise
project.
Since
significant
changes
in
the
details
can't
be
easily
understood,
the
city
must
provide
the
following:
a
3d
model
of
the
entire
rise
project
to
scale.
Q
It
would
help
cupertino
residents
to
fully
grasp
the
new
project
proposal.
Marketing
drawings
just
do
not
provide
a
true
perspective.
It
could
also
be
used
as
a
marketing
tool
both
for
the
city
and
for
the
developer,
a
shadow
study
showing
the
impacts
to
these
neighboring
properties.
People
are
considering
solar.
They
need
to
know
whether
or
not
it's
even
going
to
be
useful,
no
reduction
of
required
fees.
The
impacts
of
our
to
our
city
are
significant.
Q
Some
of
the
significant
changes
in
the
new
rise
proposal
are
more
office.
Employees
over
750,
more
employees,
that's
200
square
feet
per
employee.
This
is
about
15,
more
bus
loads
of
employees
daily,
greater
sizes
for
residential
units
means
more
families,
significant
surge
in
students
on
the
east
side.
Q
Additional
resources
to
cater
to
increases
in
people
count
need
for
more
open
space,
more
parks
and
recreational
facilities
across
the
city,
the
buildings
have
increased
in
height
and
density
parking
is
reduced.
So
where
will
new
residents
and
office
workers
park
their
vehicles?
The
city
must
do
a
formal
impact
analysis.
Q
Some
of
the
the
changes-
the
summary
here
is
using
usable
square
footage
which
I
will
explain
in
the
next
slide.
Over
five
hundred
thousand
square
feet
increase
in
total
usable
space,
total
usable
office
space
increased
by
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
square
feet
residential
unit
space
increased
by
almost
665
000
square
feet.
Q
Q
Q
But
if
you
have
a
ceiling,
that's
17
feet
high,
it's
above
15
feet,
so
that
square
footage
gets
counted
twice
and
becomes
200
square
feet.
If
you
remove,
but
the
usable
space
is
really
still
a
hundred
square
feet
now.
What's
the
difference
is
between
2018
and
the
rise
project?
Was
they
took
this?
What
I
call
airspace
and
converted
it
to
real
space?
They
lowered
the
ceilings,
so
it's
below
15,
so
you
could
add
a
whole
new
floor
and
still
the
total
square
footage
would
be
200.,
that's
what
they
did.
Q
Q
Summary
of
tower
and
building
changes,
there
are
seven
towers,
they're
all
now
239
feet,
plus
there
were
five
lower
towers,
but
they've
been
increased
to
the
239
feet.
All
seven
towers
now
are
seventy
percent
wider
in
bulk
they
will
be
less
visible
between
the
tire
top
towers
and
the
majority
of
the
building
heights
have
increased
three
to
four
levels:
higher.
Q
Q
Summary
of
retail
changes,
increase
of
retail
space
by
8
832
feet,
33
feet,
there's
no
retail
on
the
east
side
of
wolf.
What
this
means.
There
are
three
office
buildings
and
two
residential
buildings.
All
the
employees
will
need
to
cross
the
street
to
go
to
lunch.
There's
no
coffee
shop,
no
sandwich
shop,
there's
nothing.
Q
Q
The
city
selected
valco
as
one
of
the
sites
for
the
arena,
the
previous
2015-2022
arena
cycle
and
made
the
corresponding
general
plan
amendments.
It
is
unclear
if
the
housing
units
being
developed
under
this
proposal
will
be
counted
against
the
previous
or
the
next
upcoming
arena
cycle,
but
either
way
the
city
needs
to
prepare
itself
for
this
change.
Thank
you.
A
A
Okay,
seeing
none
then
we'll
go
on
with
the
leave
of
counsel.
I
I
need
to
open
up
post
moments
and
orders
of
the
day
again
in
order
to
continue
our
item
and
place
the
item
from
our
special
meeting
at
5
30..
So
that
was
our
work
program.
We
continued
it
to
this,
and
so
can
I
have
leaves
of
counsel
I'll
just
go
by
voice
leave.
A
Is
that
okay
councilmember
way,
councilmember
willie
and
councilmember
moore
vice
mayor,
ciao,
okay,
so
we'll
reopen
postponements
and
orders
of
the
day
for
the
express
purpose
of
placing
the
next
item
from
our
special
meeting
in
the
agenda.
I
propose
that
we
place
it
after
our
upcoming
set
of
items
and
those
are
basically
the
updates
from
council
and
staff.
A
A
I
don't
see
any
take
okay,
because
councilman
wooley
moves,
and
would
anyone
like
to
second
that
and
councilmember
way
seconds
any
discussion
on
this?
So
that's
continuation
of
the
work
program
item
to
just
before
item
number
40.,
madam
city
clerk.
Could
you
please
take
a
roll
call
and
actually
know
what
let's
vote
with
our
lights
on
this.
A
Great
thanks
very
much.
The
next
items
on
our
agenda
are
items.
36-39-36
is
a
set
of
brief
reports
on
council
member
activities
and
brief
announcements,
and
so
we
limit
this
to
about
a
minute,
and
so
one
thing
I
will
note
for
the
benefit
of
our
members
of
the
public.
We
have
added
a
report
on
subcommittee
assignments
and
so
that's
item.
A
38
we've
created
a
few
subcommittees
over
the
course
of
last
fiscal
year
and
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
provide
an
opportunity
for
those
subcommittees
to
report
out
briefly
at
the
beginning
of
our
meetings,
and
if
there
is
a
requirement
or
a
request
to
have
a
longer
subcommittee
report
or
something
agendized
as
something
more
in
depth
than
an
update,
then
this
would
be
the
opportunity
to
request
it
for
a
future
agenda
and
so
we're
at
item
36
again.
That's
brief
reports
on
council
member
activities
and
brief
announcements.
A
N
Thank
you
mayor,
so
brief
update,
so
the
cities
association
meeting
conference
in
sacramento,
I
found
it
to
be
very
informative.
I
actually
met
councilmen
and
mayors
from
other
cities
and
got
to
discuss
with
them
some
of
the
issues
that
we
have
specifically
the
housing
issues
and
the
homeless
issues
and
the
sessions
that
they
had.
I
found
very
helpful.
N
M
M
It's
a
wonderful
you
from
museum
art,
so
I
would
recommend
everybody
go
see
it
and
on
the
on
the
actually
may
nice
councilman,
william,
I
actually
went
to
the
rice
and
to
check
out
the
changes
and
asked
questions
and
that's
just
a
session
for
question
asking,
and
I
also
attended,
read
a
brief,
a
budget
overlay
with
overview
a
session
with
staff.
Of
course,
the
may
11
14
cities
association
city
leaders
summit.
I
went
with
the
peninsula
division
to
see
in
person.
M
We
met
senator
a
lot
of
legislators,
assembly,
member
mark
berman
assembly,
member
evan,
lowe
assembly,
member
kevin
mullin
assembly,
member,
robert
rivers
and
senators,
dave,
cortese,
senator
josh,
becker
and
senator
scott
winner.
I
think
one
of
the
topics
we
talked
is
about
the
surplus
that
the
state's
having
we're
hoping
that
they
will
allocate
to
put
it
into
infrastructures.
M
J
J
J
You'll,
have
the
welcoming
a
presentation
on
the
housing
element
and
affirmatively
furthering
fair
housing,
breakout
rooms,
a
panel
with
four
to
five
panelists
representing
neurodivergence
and
developmental
disabilities,
homelessness
and
affordable
housing
veterans
in
racial
discrimination,
and
then
we'll
have
time
for
questions
and
how
to
stay
involved
moving
forward.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
everyone's
aware
that
that's
coming
up-
and
I
think
we
might
have
the
cep-
subcommittee-
make
a
presentation
under
your
subcommittee
in
a
moment.
But
thank
you.
A
L
L
And
yeah,
I
don't
remember
other
items
and
then
yesterday
I
attended
the
kenyan
crossing
groundbreaking
also
I
talked
with
so
it's
amazing
that
this
they
were
able
to
put
underground
parking
on
with
retail
in
such
a
site
without
compromising
the
quality.
That's
I
think,
a
model
we
should
follow,
and
I
also
visited
the
volkl
rice
on.
L
A
I
A
I
A
Event.
The
second
item,
I'll
report
out
on
is
the
league
of
california
cities
meeting.
I
thought
it
was
really.
It
was
amazing.
It
was
a
great
recommendation
from
our
city
manager,
jim
troupe,
and
I'm
really
glad
that
all
of
our
council
members
signed
up
for
it.
I'm
sorry
vice
merchant
that
you're
under
the
weather,
but
the
nice
thing
about
it,
is
that
there
were
parallel
sessions
for
for
the
days
for
the
two
days
of
the
conference
and
each
of
those
sessions
were
covered
by
our
council.
A
I
made
sure
that
that
happened,
so
we
had
really
valuable.
You
know
discussions
and
panels
there.
The
very
last
panel
that
I
attended
actually
had
a
developer
there.
Talking
about
you
know
the
various
things
happening
throughout
the
state,
and
I
will
say
you
know
I
got
up
and
made
a
comment
about
sb
35
and
whether
you
know
it
is
appropriate
for
housing
laws
to
go
ahead
and
be
invoked,
and
actually
you
know
exacerbate.
A
You
know
significant
parts
of
the
housing
crisis
such
that
you
know
you
are
looking
at
a
project
that
could
you
know
in
in
our
in
our
case,
under
a
ministerial
review
process,
deliver
what
is
a
significant
amount
of
housing,
but
also
create
much
more
pressures
on
housing,
thus
create
a
net.
You
know
deleterious
impact
on
that
which
it's
you
know
purporting
to
help
alleviate.
So
you
know,
I
think
we
basically
have
you
know
an
agreement
right
now
throughout
that
you
know
it's
good
to
have.
A
You
know,
direct
conversation
that
was
essentially
the
communication
I
got
back
from
that
comment,
which
is,
you
know,
have
have
direct
communications
and
the
the
nice
thing
about
what
we're
doing
this
year.
Vis-A-Vis.
You
know
this
particular
project
is
that
we
are
having
direct
communications.
As
a
couple
of
my
you
know,
colleagues
alluded
to
we're
having
sit-downs
with
the
applicant,
and
I
I
think
you
know.
For
my
part,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
attacking
each
other
by
proxy.
A
I
I
just
want
to
say
stay
tuned.
It
was,
it
was
a
really
excellent
event.
We
had
a
number
of
people,
we
had
some
80,
some
odd
people
actually
show
up.
We
were
booked
out
on
sign
ins,
but
of
course
you
know
with
attrition
the
fact
it
was
free.
The
fact
that
we
do
have
escalated
rates
of
covid
throughout
we
we
did
end
up.
You
know
in
the
80
to
90
range,
which
is
actually
quite
significant.
A
My
take
home
message
from
that
is
stay
tuned.
I
think
most
of
the
benefit
is
going
to
be
in
the
follow
up,
we'll
update
the
website,
we'll
get
the
video
of
the
event
out
there,
and
I
think
that
it
was
just
you
know,
a
really
great
effort
by
all
involved,
including
our
video
staff,
our
sustainability
staff
city
managers
office,
and
you
know
various
volunteers
and
speakers
that
came
in
to
talk
about
various
aspects
of
the
plastics
issue.
A
So
thanks
a
lot
for
council's
support
on
that
they,
we
allocated
very
significant
amounts
of
funding
to
make
sure
that
this
you
know,
program
went
off
without
a
hitch
and
it
certainly
did
so,
and
so
that's
very,
very
much
appreciated.
So
at
this
time
we
are
on
to
the
next
item
on
our
agenda.
I
believe
that
is,
item
number
37..
That's
our
report
on
committee
assignments.
A
L
I
yeah
I
missed
it.
I
mean
the
cosd252
meeting.
Is
a
committee
assignment?
So
besides
the
walk
audit
items
on
cosd
is
also
doing
a
survey
for
a
new
parcel
tax
and
the
bond
major,
because
their
current
bond
major
is
up.
They
have
renovated
every
building.
Now
they
need
to
prepare
bond
for
the
next
facility
improvement.
For
so
that's
coming
up.
Yeah.
A
N
So
we
are
continuing
to
to
move
that
bar
down
the
road
in
terms
of
getting
more
and
more
renewable
energy
getting
away
from
the
fossil
fuels.
The
other
noteworthy
thing
is
they've
put
12
million
dollars
into
a
fund
for
ev
chargers,
and
the
target
would
be
1100
ev
chargers
within
the
silicon
valley,
clean
energy
territory.
So
it's
beyond
just
cupertino,
but
I
think
with
that.
N
M
Thank
you,
mary
paul.
Very
briefly,
I
also
attended
the
strategic
partner
meeting
with
cosd
with
vice
mayor
ciao.
I
was
a
little
late
because
coming
from
another
meeting,
but
I
did
catch
up
on
a
safe
route
to
school
reports
and
the
strategic
future
collaborations
on
traffic
around
schools,
especially
after
school
consolidation,
the
walk
by
school
planning,
so
I
think,
a
future
activity-
collaboration
with
csd
will
be
constituted
on
traffic
will
be
very
good.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
J
Thank
you
so,
on
last
thursday,
the
12th
I,
while
in
sacramento
from
the
hotel
room,
I
chaired
the
vta
pac
meeting
and
we
were
visited
by
assembly
member
berman
who
spoke
about
ab2181,
which
would
change
the
makeup
of
the
vta
board,
and
I
did
state
that
I
am
opposed
to
ab2181
and
I
was
opposed
to
ab
1091
as
well
and
on.
We
finally
did
get
to
discuss
the
tod
item
and
we
added
a
a
couple
of
additions
to
the
prioritization
list,
which
will
go
to
the
board,
which
mayor
paul
is
sits
on.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
customer
more
vice
mayor
ciao
did
you
want
to?
Oh,
I
actually
already
provided
your
updates,
okay,
so
that
that
was
actually
a
really
good
lead
in
into
my
committee
assignment
report
out
and
that's
on
the
vta
board.
Thank
you
very
much
councilman
moore
for
that.
So
the
vta
board
meeting
actually
takes
place
before
the
policy
advisory
committee
meeting.
It's
just
one
of
those.
A
We're
talking
something
on
the
order
of
10
figures
right
now.
So
that's
in
the
billions
it
will.
Probably
I
I
don't
want
to
jinx
anything
but
it'll
probably
break
you
know
into
the
11
figures.
When
all
said
and
done
right
now,
it's
in
the
high
it's
in
the
nines,
supposedly
under
the
ftas,
the
federal
transportation
administration's
estimate,
which
added
a
couple
of
billion
dollars
onto
it
since
the
vta's
last
estimate.
A
A
I
guess
the
the
nutshell
encapsulation
is
that
significant
numbers
of
approvals
were
made
to
move
this
forward
from
the
vta
perspective,
while
at
the
same
time
one
of
the
measures
that
was
supported
was
to
go
ahead
and
look
into
the
possibility
of
re-examining
the
general
engineering
single
bore
versus
double
bore
kind
of
approach
to
this
through
a
separate
mechanism.
But
as
of
right
now,
functionally
we're
looking
at
single
bore
large
hole
with
the
hole
being
a
bit
deeper
to
avoid
some
of
the
top
level
on
the
ground
types
of
disruptive
considerations.
A
J
Last
week,
mayor
paul
myself
as
city
manager,
jim
troop
and
our
finance
director
and
treasurer
christina
alfaro
met
to
discuss
the
budget
format
for
our
monthly
treasurer's
report,
and
in
that
we
we
have
some
negotiating
going
on
about
what
can
be
in
the
monthly
report.
But
so
far
we
would
suggest
that
we
have
a
cover
resolution
with
signatures
from
the
treasure
and
whomever
else
is
necessary
and
we
would
reference
both.
J
The
state
and
local
code
requiring
the
monthly
statement,
have
a
simple
table
indicating
the
money
movement
and
we
would
have
fund
balances
shared
for
parkland
dedication,
etc
and
account
statements
for
each
account,
which
would
include
the
main
checking
and
two
other
checking
accounts,
the
115
opeb
leif
accounts
and
and
any
others
that
that
we
need
to
be
reporting
on
and
the
the
treasurer
would
like
to
share
us
special
items
potentially
to
have
a
highlight
item.
For
instance,
the
the
money
that
came
in
for
a
park.
J
Improvements
could
be
discussed
and
highlighted
each
month
to
share
something
special
with
the
public
and
then
the
other
subcommittee.
I'd
like
to
report
on
is
the
is
with
regards
to
the
cep,
and
we
have
met
four
times
now
for
about
two
hours.
Each
and
the
cep
is
the
community
engagement
plan,
strategic
advisory
committee,
which
consists
of
myself
vice
mayor
chao,
the
planning
commission,
chair
scharf
and
the
housing
commission,
chair,
tessa,
parish
and
we've
met
with
our
consultant
emc
and
our
last
meeting
also
included
a
sub
consultant
from
west
valley
community
services.
J
So
that
is
andy
flower
from
emc
and
kylie
clark
from
west
valley.
Community
services,
so
we've
been
discussing
the
community
engagement
plan
necessary
for
our
housing
element
process
and,
as
I
stated
earlier,
we've
been
working
out
and
discussing
the
agenda
that
we
would
be
having
that
emc
will
be
having
for
their
meeting
on
monday.
So
that's
monday
may
23rd
I'm
going
to
make
another
plug
for
it.
May
23rd
from
6
30
to
8
pm
here
in
community
hall
right
and
I'd
like
to
make
those
the
other
subcommittee
reports
at
another
time.
Thank
you.
A
L
Yeah
for
the
housing
elemental
community
subcommittee,
I'd
like
to
add
that
the
the
the
current
plan
is
to
have
three
community
meetings.
So
may
23rd
is
the
first
one.
There
will
be
two
more
but
then
there
is
no
plan
for
any
focus
group
meeting
on
specific
groups
to
outreach
too,
and
we
are
told
that
there
is
no
budget
in
the
current
contract.
L
But
then
I,
when
I
see
other
cities,
housing
element,
they
have
a
long
list
of
focus
groups
that
they
did
reach
out
to
since
we
don't
have
budget.
So
I
am
suggesting
that
we
conduct
a
survey,
a
written
survey
that
different
organizations
can
reply,
respond
with
written
comments.
Then
we
can
include
those
in
housing
element,
that's
cost
efficient
and
we
also
recommend-
and
this
one
I
didn't
mention
at
the
meeting.
This
is
I'm.
L
Evening,
yeah,
and
what
we
did
comment
on
is
for
the
two
remaining
community
meetings.
It's
better
that
they
are.
We
have
different
partners,
work
with
the
schools
or
and
to
be
held
in
different
geographical
locations,
but
we
are
unsure
whether
these
comments
would
be
received
by
staff
or
not
because
we
found
the
experience
has
been.
We
made
comments,
but
we
don't
really
know
what
the
staff
will
implement
or
not.
Thank
you.
C
I
C
Current
wave
is
fueled
highly
by
the
contagious
omicron
variant
bay
area.
Communities
are
seeing
increases
in
reported
cases,
levels
of
virus
and
the
sewer
sheds,
as
we
say
and
hospitalizations
actual
case
rates,
are
likely
higher
than
those
reported
because
of
widespread
use
of
home
testing.
So
I've
been
following
this
almost
on
a
daily
basis.
It's
on
my
home
page
and
it's
slowly
gone
from
142
to
250
to
three
to
four.
So
today
was
772
cases
on
a
rolling
average
wow
hospital
rate
hospital.
C
C
Freetest.Org
and
the
other
one,
the
federal
government
has
just
opened
up
a
third
round
of
the
free
test,
be
mailed
to
your
home.
If
you
go
to
the
website,
it's
under
the
special
dot
up
usps.com
test
kit
site
that
will
you
can
log
in
and
get
some
more
sites,
and
also
if
you
would
like
to
apply
to
be
the
city
of
cupertino's
next
poet,
laureate
the
city
of
cupertino
has
begun
the
recruitment
to
select
the
2325
poet
laureate.
C
This
position
is
an
honorary
post,
sponsored
by
the
city
of
cupertino
and
seated
in
the
cupertino
library,
the
poet
laureates
poems
will
be
featured
in
events,
programs
and
publications,
with
the
goal
of
raising
awareness,
interest
and
participation
in
poetry,
literature
and
language
among
cupertino
residents.
Applications
are
available
at
cupertino.org
poet,
laureate
or
at
the
quinlan
community.
Center
applications
will
be
accepted
until
wednesday
june
1st
at
5
pm
for
questions
or
additional
information.
Please
email,
poet,
laureate
cupertino.org.
A
A
This
is
approximately
7
45
our
work
plan
item
from
our
study
session,
so
just
to
give
everyone
an
orientation
of
where
we
are
in
the
evening.
We
have
three
items
remaining:
there's
the
work
plan,
there's
the
following
item:
item
number
40,
which
is
going
to
be
our
capital
improvements
program
and
then
finally,
the
budget.
Our
first
look
publicly
at
the
budget
on
item
number
41..
A
A
So,
if
you're
keeping
track
of
time
around
8
20
we'll
start
up,
you
know
according
to
how
I'm
trying
to
allocate
the
time
with
cip,
that's
item
40
and
then
roughly
roughly
around
10
10.,
I'd
like
to
conclude
that
take
another
break
around
10,
15.,
we'll
start
with
a
budget
and
then
we'll
conclude
with
the
budget
by
midnight
our
our
time
to
finish
our
regular
meetings.
Now
with
regard
to
the
rest
of
the
agenda,
that's
been
continued
until
thursday.
A
You'll
see
the
notice
going
out
for
that
sometime
tomorrow,
and
that
will
be
a
virtual
meeting.
Given
the
city,
manager's
update
and
the
rest
of
what's
been
happening,
we're
keeping
a
very
close
eye
on
what's
safe
and
advisable.
I
will
note
that
you
know
very
consistent,
I
think,
with
the
practice
of
our
community.
There
are
actually
no
members
of
the
public
here
live
right
now
and
there
haven't
been
from
the
very
beginning
of
the
meeting,
which
is
not
surprising,
which
you
know.
Actually,
I
think
I
I
take
that
back.
A
There
have
been
a
few
members
of
the
public
here
at
the
very
beginning
of
the
meeting,
but
we
don't
have
any
right
now
and
so
we'll
be
visiting
the
advisability
of
continued.
You
know
notice,
hybrid
meetings,
I
think
you
know,
depending
upon
the
rates,
but
as
for
thursday,
that
will
be
a
virtual
meeting.
A
So
right
now
again
we're
back
to
the
work
program
continued.
I
believe
we
left
that
off
with
vice
mayor
chao
and
vice
mayor
chow
want
to
make
some
comments
when
we,
you
know,
concluded
that
to
adjourn
and
continue
to
this
point
in
time,
so
vice
mayor
ciao,
would
you
like
to
start
us
off
with
your
comments
on
the
work
program
at
this
time.
L
L
I
think
before
this
meeting
I
didn't
read
the
items
in
detail
because
I
did
not
expect
there
will
be
significant
modifications
to
the
description.
Even
the
scope
of
this
work
that
we
have
ranked
after
three
meetings,
and
so
I
was
expecting,
we
would
just
come
and
see
receive
a
prior
earned
priority
order,
but
I
am
surprised
to
find
out
some
of
the
items.
L
One
of
them
is
the
youth
who
work.
The
original
intent
is
to
provide
incentives
so
that
high
schoolers
could
be
hired
or
college
students
could
be
hired
with
a
discount
with
some
supplement,
but
this
has
been
turned
into
a
new
item
that
will
work
with
the
partner
organization
to
create
a
six-week
summer,
fully
paid
internship
position
for
10
years
this
this,
my
original
intent,
was
not
for
this
to
be
a
summer
intern.
L
It
should
be
a
year-round
position
because
it's
very
valuable
for
youth
to
get
this
kind
of
work
experience
during
the
year
on
not
just
summer.
So
this
is
totally
a
different
program
and
now
I'm
surprised
to
find
out
this
is
included,
but
it's
a
totally
different
item
and
and
I'm
we-
and
this
is
after
we
ranked
and
discussed
for
a
long
time
and
last
time
I
fought
so
hard
to
modify
the
item
when
people
didn't
even
want
to
modify
it.
But
then
now
we
see
so
much
modification
and
another
one
is
the
visitor
center.
L
I
think
the
current
description
says
that
we
will
have
an
online
visitor
center,
but
then
the
idea
of
having
a
digital
map,
so
people
can
identify
interesting
locations
for
photo
ops
to
post
on
social
media
is
crossed
out.
I
think
this
one
is
very
important
in
this.
We
should
because
that's
what
will
bring
traffic
to
cupertino
if
we,
if
people
start
posting
interesting
locations
in
cupertino
and
to
visit,
so
that's
essential.
I
think
for
for
the
item.
L
L
And
I
I
propose
that
after
we
adopt
a
work
program,
let's
rank
it
again.
The
reason
is
some
of
the
items
rectified
by
some
council
member
got
dropped
off,
so
this
ranking
is
different.
Now,
the
ranking
after
it's
adopted
is
important,
because
staff
then
is
clear
on
the
priority
when
there
are
resource
challenges,
and
also
we,
if
we
are
putting
focus
on
top
10
items,
then
those
are
the
top
10
abstinence
of
the
adopted
program.
Okay,
so
now
for
the
motion-
oh
one
more
thing,
I'd
like
to
so
for
the
motion.
L
L
A
P
I
L
Reasonable,
I
don't
know
this
is
just
a
suggestion
and
the
economic
development
committee
and
the
manager
can
work
out
a
better
deal
plan.
But
this
is
more
like
a
grant.
We
don't
need
an
external
partner
to
administer
it
because
then
we
that
would
add
an
administered
cost
and
then
someone
would
need
to
work
with
the
use.
So
this
would
be
simply
be
a
grant
and
then
maybe
a
public
campaign
to
encourage
people
to
get
this
grant.
L
I
A
L
A
L
L
L
So
this
is
attachment
a
for
visitor
center,
so
the
second
sentence
is
crossed
out
which
says,
ideally
a
digital
map
to
identify
locations
to
visit
or
for
photo
apps
to
post
on
social
media.
I
think
this
is
essential
for
the
success
of
online
visitor
center,
I'm
okay
with
crossing
out
the
offline
part.
A
A
It's
student
internship
program:
oh
it
looks
like
under
justifications
and
considerations.
There's
an
added
sentence
that
states
assumes
the
internships
would
be
paid
and
targeted
for
high
school
students.
I
I
did
not
write
that
in
my
considerations
or
the
project
objective
initially,
and
so
I
I
I
I
am
not
assuming
that
these
internships
would
be
paid.
I
think
it
actually
speaks
to
one
of
the
comments
that
you
made
for
the
youth
who
work
item.
So
I'm
not
assuming
a
paid
internship
here.
A
So
if
other
council
members
want
to
support
that,
you
know
based
upon
what
was
set
forth.
My
recollection
of
what
I
had
written
up
was
not
something
that
you
know
and
when,
when
students
approach
me,
I'm
not
sure
what
the
experiences
of
other
council
members
have
been.
They
seem
to
just
want
to
essentially
volunteer.
R
A
A
So,
okay,
so
so
attachment
a.
If
you
look
at
reference
number
10
under
justification
considerations
before
before
states
proposing
council
members
notes,
there
is
a
sentence:
that's
been
added
that
states
quote
assumes
the
internships
would
be
paid
and
targeted
for
high
school
students.
The
part
about
high
school
students
is
fine
because
it
seems
like
the
inquiries
that
we
get
are
by
and
large
from
high
school
students,
but
the
assumption
that
it's
paid
is
not
something
that
I
was
thinking
that
that
would
be
part
of
the
program.
L
L
A
A
Summer
break,
but
I
I
didn't
have
an
intern
last
year,
for
I
think
pretty
obvious
reasons.
You
know
we're
mid
pandemic,
but
this
year
as
it's
looking
right
now
in
terms
of
our
collective
rankings,
it
looks
like
we
probably
do
want
to
have
the
ability
to
take
on
interns.
As
you
know,
subcommittee
members
to
report
back
out
at
the
end
of
the
summer,
I'm
getting
confused,
look
from
councilmember
moore
did
you
want
to
say
something
or
what's
the
situation
here.
J
So
it
looks
like
they
would
be
working
for
various
departments
in
the
city
during
during
a
pandemic,
and
then
staff
who
may
or
may
not
be
working
on
site
would
I
I'm
going
to
assume
would
need
to
have
to
to
be
at
city
hall
or
some
other
location
in
order
to
train
these
interns,
I'm
going
to
assume
so
I'd
actually
like
to
hear
more
from
staff
how
they,
how
they
feel
about
this
particular
item.
Thank
you.
A
A
What
I,
what
I
had
envisioned
if
we
passed
this
going
forward,
is
that
we
have
a
subcommittee
going
forward
this
summer
for
anybody
who
would
like
to
be
on
it.
We
would
share
our
our.
We
would
share
our
experiences
with
the
idea
in
mind
that
we're
looking
to
implement
a
summer
program
in
the
summer
of
calendar
year
2023,
so
in
this
upcoming
summer
2022.
A
I
actually
already
have
four
or
five
pending
requests
for
internships,
and
I
do
have
some
thoughts
as
to
how
to
situate
people
to
work
on
particular
projects.
But
I
don't
have
an
expectation
in
this
upcoming
summer
that
staff
would
be
involved
in
identifying
projects
that
potential
interns
could
work
on.
My
thinking
is
that,
if
we
gave
an
eight
or
nine
month
lead
time,
we
could
come
up
with
a
list
of
projects
in
coordination
with
staff.
A
After
about
the
august
or
perhaps
september
time
frame,
once
the
subcommittee
reported
out
on
these
experiences
with
the
interns,
with
an
eye
on
looking
at
how
we
could,
potentially
you
know,
have
a
program
so
as
described
by
staff
within
the
rest
of
the
justifications
and
considerations
and
objectives
that
they've
added,
I
generally
don't
see
an
issue
with
the
idea
of
having
a
coordinator
with
having
an
orientation
with
having
an
exit.
You
know
kind
of
interview
process.
A
I
think
those
are
those
are
positive
things,
but
in
terms
of
placement
and
in
particular
departments-
and
as
you
know,
we
are
still
mid
pandemic
because
obviously
this
hasn't
ended.
Yet
I'm
not
looking
at
this
as
something
that
we're
going
to
implement
right
away
in
this
upcoming
summer.
I
I
want
to
take
it
step
wise
and,
of
course,
if
it
turns
out
to
be,
you
know
hazardous,
you
know.
A
With
regard
to
the
worldwide,
you
know
kind
of
health
situation,
then
you
know
there's
flexibility
in
this
as
to
whether
to
you
know,
go
forward
with
it
as
as
contemplated
so
so
let
me
I'll
go
back
to
you
vice
mayor
ciao,
after
visiting
staff,
so
so
jim.
I
know
that
you
had
also
some
discussions
and
staff
has
had
some
discussions
as
to
how
best
to
implement
this
program,
and
you
were
looking
at
templates.
That's
how
I
was
thinking
about.
A
You
know
how
this
would
go
forward,
because
I
know
that
there
are
projects
within
various
parts
of
the
city
that
just
don't
get
done
over
time,
they're
back
burnered,
and
I
thought
that
those
would
actually
be
pretty
good
potential
projects
for
student
interns.
So
so
so
jim
did.
You
have
thoughts
on
this.
You
know
and
as
councilmember
moore's
noting
you
know
what
were
your
you
know
kind
of
feedback
points,
and
you
know
staff's
idea
of
going
forward
with
this
item.
C
They
were,
they
would
love
to
have
someone
who's
in
the
planning
area
to
come
in
and
help
with
permitting
and
that
type
of
thing,
so
that
that
would
be
a
big
benefit
from
others.
You
know
I
had.
I
had
pretty
much
good
responses
from
everybody
and
I
knew
council
had
some
wants
and
desires
to
have
some.
So
I
think
it's
it's
a
doable
process.
We
also
looked.
I
can't
tell
you
the
names
right
now.
C
L
A
I
A
A
Actively
gotten,
particularly
when
I've
been
mayor
inquiries
from
students
and
yes,
specifically
high
school
students,
whether
there
are
internship
opportunities
in
city
hall
and
in
the
mayor's
office
and
as
a
you
know,
a
council
member
intern
as
well
over
the
course
of
you
know
my
time
on
council.
So
so
I
I
would,
I
would
stick
with
the
summer
right
now.
High
school,
I
think,
makes
sense.
You
make
a
great
point
with
regard
to.
We
do
have
painted
interns
from
college
and
I
completely
agree.
A
K
C
A
L
A
A
L
A
L
I
A
Accept
that
as
second
or
okay
great,
so
those
are
my
requested
amendments
to
the
motion.
Vice
mayor,
you
stated
that
you
had
further
amendments
that
you
wanted
to
make,
but
I
do
see
a
hand
raised
from
council
member
moore
and
councilmember
whale
checking
with
you.
You
have
no
modifications
to
make
council
member
more.
Did
you
have
any
modifications
or
comments
on
the
motion
on
the
table.
J
I
just
want
to
clarify
and
for
for
members
of
the
public
watching
from
home.
So
are
we
basing
this
off
of
attachment
b
down
to
a
certain
number
and
which
number
are
you?
Are
you
cutting
this
off
on,
because
I
was
kind
of
curious
what
the
what
the
council
thought
about
items
which
only
scored
an
average
of
one
if
those
are
going
to
be
included
because
I'd
be
inclined
to
cut
it
off
at
one
rather
than
moving
on
there
and
and
as
I've
stated
before,
I
I
still
don't
support
the
the
city
store.
J
I
think
there's
a
bandwidth
issue
for
staffing
and
then
product
storage
is
an
issue
the
visitor
center,
as
I
mentioned
before,
it's
already
on
the
city
website,
it
has
a
map.
This
item
is
a
little
bit
duplicative
as
well,
and
I'm
really
concerned
about
the
staffing
bandwidth
for
having
so
many
items
here.
J
I
A
In
terms
of
her
comment,
when
you
said
you
would
cut
off
at
average
of
one,
would
you
include
the
ones
that
had
the
average
of
one
or
would
you
require
that
it'd
be
above
that
that
would
be
greater
than
one
greater
than
one
right?
Okay,
so
you're,
basically
saying
anything
with
a
sum
total
rating
of
greater
of
six
or
greater
it.
A
Noted
that
actually,
that
stops
at
item
that
stops
at
item
28
reference
number
28,
which
is
the
community
engagement
on
alternative
transportation
and
parking
and
cross-referencing
that
to
attachment
b,
it
looks
like
that
would
be
priority
number
27,
so
that
would
cut
off
anything
after
that
which
is
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11
12..
So
that's
12
items,
it's
just
just
to
clarify.
Are
you
trying
to
ask
for
a
friendly
amendment
to
the
motion,
or
is
that
just
a
comment
and
some
thoughts
that
you
have.
L
J
L
Plan,
so
my
motion
also
include
oh
did
I
forget
to
mention
that
I
have
done
here.
Is
that
also
direct
staff?
I
think
I
forgot
to
mention
that
direct
staff
to
collect
rankings
of
the
adopted
work
program
items
from
the
council
so
that
the
staff
is
clear
on
the
priorities
when
there
are
unexpected
resource
challenges.
L
I
A
Amendment
yes,
city
attorney!
No,
actually,
let's
do
this,
because
the
request
from
council
member
moore
is
distinct
from
what
vice
mayor
chao
is
now
suggesting,
and
so
vice
mayor.
Instead
of
instead
of
going
to
a
different
amendment,
can
you
simply
state
whether
you
accept
the
friendly
amendment
from
council
member
moore,
because
that
sounded
like
a.
L
A
L
A
L
A
L
A
What's
your
structured
threshold
for
being
able
to
prioritize?
So
let's
say
one
item
costs.
You
know
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
there's
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
available
and
another
item
cost
250
000.
So
how
are
you
supposed
to
know
how
to
allocate
your
threshold
resources?
I
mean
that's.
A
L
A
Councilmember
willie,
would
you
accept
that,
as
a
friendly
amendment
sure,
okay,
council,
member
willie
accepts
your
suggestion
to
re-rank
it?
Well,
then,
let
me
ask
you
this:
when
do
you
suggest
that
we
bring
this
back
to
council
because
we
sit
on
the
second
meeting
in
may?
Our
first
meeting
in
june
is
on
june
7th.
C
I
C
A
L
A
Okay,
so
so
so
your
motion
vice
mayor
chow,
is
to
have
us
re-rank
every
item.
If
this
motion
passes
on
a
scale
of
one
to
five
and
apparently
we're
adopting
the
same
methodology
that
we
used
last
time
to
send
to
katie
cc
or
city
manager
off
a
grid
by
a
certain
date,
that's
not
communicated
to
other
members
of
the
council,
but
that's
brought
in
and
that's
are
you
considering
that
finalized
or
is
that
for
approval?
A
A
A
C
A
M
M
I
think
it's
the
fifth
time
we'll
talk
about
it
and
if
vice
mayor
is
concerned
about
the
priorities-
and
I
do
believe
we
can
approve
it
today
and
then
when
it,
when
the
rep,
when
the
staff
reports
on
the
quality
report
or
monthly
report,
we
can
talk
about
what
we
prefer
to
do
at
that
time.
That
doesn't
affect
the
decisions
making
right.
A
I
I
I
I
know
another
logistical
difficulty
here:
what's
to
stop
anyone
from
voting,
all
of
them
five
or
all
of
them,
one
I
mean
there's,
there's
really
no
kind
of
forced
ordering
here.
That's
that's
being
proposed,
I
mean
virtually
anything
can
happen
with
regard
to
the
prioritization.
They
could
all
end
in
a
tie.
L
A
L
C
C
C
C
A
L
A
L
A
Okay,
so
your
your
suggestion
at
this
point,
although
the
motion
on
the
table
is
to
give
everyone
the
ability
to
rank
one
through
five,
your
suggestion
now
is
to
give
everyone
five
fives,
thirteen
threes
and
thirteen
ones.
We
have
a
suggestion
from
the
city
manager
to
force
a
ranking
from
one
through
38..
What
do
you
want
to
do?
Because
we
have
a
motion.
L
A
N
I
A
J
We
know
that
the
the
arena
item
is
moving
forward
automatically,
so
it
became
a
question
of
whether
or
not
to
put
points
on
items
which
we
already
knew
are
are
in
the
in
the
works,
and
I
think
that
that
kind
of
muddied
up
the
waters
in
our
scoring
personally,
I
would
go
consider
having
more
threes
and
and
perhaps
reducing
the
total
number.
So
you
could
go
with
a
you
know:
five
fives
fifteen
threes
and
then
and
then
end
at
eighteen
months.
I
A
J
A
Think
that's
fair!
So,
okay,
you
know
I
can.
Let
me
revisit
this
with
vice
mayor
chow
and
the
seconder
vice
mayor.
Would
you
be
willing
to
modify
the
ranking
system
to
five
fives
fifteen
threes
and
remind
me
again,
council
member
more
how
many
ones
ten
ones?
Okay,
would
you
be
willing
to
modify
the
ranking
system
accordingly
in
order
to
garner
the
support?
I
I
I
think
it's
advisable.
Frankly,
I
mean
you
know.
L
N
N
So
for
the
seismic
upgrade
I,
I
would
tend
to
think
that
we
should
put
parentheses
around
the
description
and
say
see
the
cip
for
the
true
definition,
having
a
definition
in
the
work
plan
and
a
definition
in
the
cip
which
we're
going
to
spend
a
lot.
I
feel
we're
going
to
all
spend
a
lot
of
time
defining
on
how
the
seismic
upgrade
process
should
work
in
the
cip,
so
by
keeping
it
here
means
we're
going
to
get
the
quarterly
update
and
be
able
to
give
feedback.
N
A
J
Okay,
the
the
issue
is
with
regards
to
the
the
homeless
shelter.
That
item
should
have
it
pulled
out
as
as
a
separate
cip,
and
if
it's
going
to
be
in
the
cip
budget
it
needs
to.
According
to
our
policy
from
our
from
our
cip
budget,
we
need
there's
information
that
needs
to
be
provided
that
hasn't
been
provided
for
it.
So
I'm
I'm
having
some
problems
with
that
particular
item,
because,
if
you're
trying
to
make
a
connection
to
it
in
the
cip,
it
doesn't
show
up.
J
That
we
have
mayor
paul,
we
have
an
error.
This
item
is
actually
a
cip
item
in,
in
my
belief
that
if
you're
going
to
have
a
specific
plan
for
a
facility
for
the
unhoused,
that
to
me
is
a
cip
item
and
it
needs
a
whole
lot
of
discussion
and
it
should
be
in
the
cip
budget
with
dollar
amounts
and
funding
and
more
information.
A
Okay,
given
the
fact
that
that's
not
pertinent
to
councilman
wooley's
comment,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
ask
council
member
willie
with
regard
to
that
comment
on
the
seismic
retrofits
of
city
hall,
would
you
be
willing
to
add
to
this
item
to
your
suggested
amendment
that
we
form
a
subcommittee
on
this
on
this
topic?
With
regard
to
the
seismic
retrofits
of
city
hall,.
N
A
Okay,
so
this
is
what
I'm
going
to
do
at
this
point.
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
address
council
member
moore's.
You
know
query
with
regard
to
the
the
homeless,
unhoused
item
and
cips
subsequent
to
this.
But
let
me
ask
vice
mayor
ciao:
will
you
accept
council,
member
willie's
friendly
amendment
to
your
motion.
L
Can
no
way
I'd
like
to
accept
a
modified
version
so
here
on
the
screen.
This
is
my
original
motion.
I'd
like
to
request
that
each
item
that
also
appear
in
the
cip
plan
be
marked
as
search
on
the
work
program
that
we
adopted
and
it's
clear,
because
it's
not
only
the
that
one
item,
many
many
items
also
appear
under
cip
and
also,
I
would
also
add,
from
a
subcommittee
for
the
seismic
retro
feed
of
city
hall.
A
M
M
A
C
O
We
we
don't
know
based
on
the
work
program
as
it
stated
today
whether
this
is
a
public
facility,
a
private
facility,
a
partner
facility.
All
of
that
is
stuff
that
would
be
worked
out
through
the
initial
stages
of
the
evaluation
of
the
assessment
or
the
work
on
the
program,
in
my
mind,
very
similar
to
other
projects
that
develop
over
time
and
start
with
a
scoping
or
a
master
planning
process.
Where
you
don't
know
the
the
the
long-term
construction
costs
or
needs,
because
you
don't
have
the
scope
of
the
project
yet.
A
A
L
So
it's
whether
or
not
there
will
be
cip
project
coming
out
of
that
is
unsure
yet,
but
then
I
do
want
to
modify
some
of
the
language
so
that
it
does
fall
within
our
jurisdiction
that
we
are
not
overstepping
our
bound
as
what
a
city
of
cupertino
can
do.
So
this
is
the
edit
that
I
propose
for
the
item
underscored
are
the
addition
to
the
item.
The
rest
is
the
same
as
the
original
item
so.
A
So
we
can
read
the
material
that's
on
here.
It
seems
that
you
are
trying
to
emphasize
that
this
is
within
the
county
jurisdiction,
and
so,
if
that's
stipulated,
I
will
go
ahead
and
as
the
person
that
wrote
this
endorse
your
changes,
that's
fine.
I
always
intended
for
us
to
have
a
partnership
with
the
county
on
this
topic,
and
I
agree
with
your
point,
and
so,
if
that's
your
amendment
and
you
have
no
further
comment
I'll-
ask
your
seconder
whether
he
would
support
this
as
the
amendment.
A
J
I
A
I
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Let's
take
a
five
minute
break
with
a
time
check
we're
a
little
bit
before
9
45.
So
let's
go
ahead
and
reconvene,
I'm
sorry
8
45!
So
let's
reconvene
at
8
47
with
regard
to
the
the
time
I
think
we'll
probably
be
able
to
allocate
a
little
over
an
hour
and
a
half
for
each
of
our
remaining
items.
Thanks.