►
From YouTube: Cupertino City Council Meeting - March 1, 2022 (Part 2)
Description
Coverage of the March 1, 2022 Cupertino City Council Teleconference Meeting. Part 2 of 3.
A
C
A
Item
number:
one
is
a
proclamation
declaring
march
as
youth
arts
month
on
behalf
of
those
who
advocate
for
art
education
to
all
elementary
middle
and
secondary
students,
and
so
we're
very
grateful
for
that.
We
have
the
arts
coordinator,
sophia
fohas,
representing
the
santa
clara
county
office
of
education
here
today,
to
present
some
slides
and
to
receive
the
proclamation
and
so
welcome
sophia.
D
Thank
you,
mayor,
paul
and
members
of
the
city
council.
Thank
you
for
inviting
me
to
speak
on
the
agenda
tonight.
My
name
again
is
sophia
fojas.
I'm
the
arts
coordinator
in
charge
of
our
inspiration,
the
arts,
education
initiative
of
the
santa
clara
county
office
of
education,
I'm
here
to
speak
to
you
about
march,
as
youth
arts
month
next
slide.
D
D
D
In
celebration
of
youth
arts
month,
the
santa
clara
county
office
of
education
again
hosts
its
annual
young
artist
showcase
this
year
for
students
tk
through
12
in
our
public
schools.
The
santa
clara
county
has
the
largest
collection
of
youth
art
of
any
county
office
in
the
state.
This
year's
theme
is
contact
zones.
The
places
where
we
belong,
a
digital
slideshow
of
all
the
entries
will
be
presented
at
the
2022
arts
as
emancipatory
education
virtual
conference
in
partnership
with
san
jose
state's
lurie
college
of
education.
D
D
A
Well,
sophia,
thank
you
so
very
much
for
being
here
to
accept
this
proclamation
and
for
suggesting
it.
I
know
that
we
all
very
deeply
value
arts,
and
especially
in
education,
it's
so
critical
in
everything
that
we
do
frankly,
and
it's
really
nice
to
be
able
to
see
that
recognition
here
and
to
provide
it.
And
so
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
ask
our
members
of
staff
to
turn
off
your
cameras
so
that
we
can
have
a
quick
screenshot
photo
with
the
proclamation
indicated.
A
E
E
You
so
for
everyone,
if
you
have
not
been
to
the
santa
clara
office
of
education
building,
you
must
visit
it's
an
art
gallery
and
it
has
all
kinds
of
arts
made
by
students
from
all
different
schools
in
different
medium,
just
amazing
too,
at
every
different
corner.
It's
just
an
amazing
thing
to
walk
through
it
so
visit
that
building
great,
thank
you
and
the
architecture
itself
is
great.
It
has
river
flowing
into
the
building.
The
architecture
itself
is
amazing.
Yeah.
Thank
you
good
stuff.
A
Okay,
I
don't
see
any
further
hands
raised,
and
so
let
us
go
on
to
item
number
two
at
this
time.
Item
number
two
is
a
proclamation
proclaiming
march
as
american
red
cross
month.
We
have
our
old
friend
and
stalwart
of
the
american
red
cross
local
chapter
in
cupertino,
red
cross,
silicon
valley,
stuart
chesson,
here
stuart
welcome
and
thank
you
as
well
for
suggesting
this.
It
is
a
great
reminder
every
year
that
we
have
so
many
deeply
deeply
felt
needs
in
our
community
and
across
the
country
and
world.
A
F
Yeah,
maybe,
hopefully
shorten
it
a
little
bit,
but
yes,
I'm
stuart
chesson,
I'm
a
resident
of
cupertino
and
a
longtime
volunteer
for
american
red
cross,
and
this
is
red
cross
month
and
our
main
task
is
to
try
to
eliminate
human
suffering,
with
the
generosity
of
our
volunteers
and
of
our
donors.
Next
slide,
please.
F
Our
international
red
cross
does
the
measles
and
rubella
vaccinations,
and
we
train
many
people
in
cpr
and
other
life-saving
type.
Next
slide,
please,
and
so,
there's
been
over
in
santa
clara
county
we've
gone
to
200
222,
different
fires
in
here.
So
unfortunately,
it
happens
here
all
too
often
and
we
do
help
veterans
in
the
county
as
well
as
collecting
the
blood
and
we've
had
over
9
000
people
trained
in
the
santa
clara
county
area.
F
So
we're
one
of
the
best
known
red
organizations
nonprofits,
you
ask
somebody,
they
know
what
red
cross
is,
and
almost
every
country
knows
of
red
cross
may
not
know
everything
we
do,
but
they
do
know
next
slide.
Please
so
there's
all
sorts
of
disasters
and,
as
you
know,
the
disasters
have
been
increasing.
Unfortunately,
so
it's
I
don't
think,
there's
a
rest
period
anymore
during
the
years
next
slide.
F
So
in
2014
we
would
go
to
one
major
disaster,
and
now
it
has
been
it's
tripled
in
2020,
with
with
the
rise
of
the
climate
changes
that
have
been
going
on
next
slide,
please
so
with
home
fires.
You
know
people
have
this
fire,
they
don't
know
what
to
do
and
we
get
volunteers
to
come
out
there
and
help
and
a
lot
of
people
don't
even
have
any
insurance,
and
so
they
have
nowhere.
No
to
turn
and
less
times
we
can
give
them
financial
assistance.
F
F
So
we've
done
this
and
we've
unfortunately
had
to
go
to
some
fires,
but
luckily
nobody
that
we
know
of
has
died
where
we've
installed
an
alarm
and
we
hope
to
do
more
of
these,
especially
as
the
covid
risk
goes
down
that
we
go
into
homes
and
actually
install
these
next
slide.
Please
blood,
bank
or
40
of
the
blood
supply
next
slide,
and
we
try
to
hold
next
slide.
Please
we
try
to
hold
these
blood
drives
in
many
places
at
workplaces,
schools,
colleges
and
so
we're
it's
important
to
keep
these
things
up.
F
Blood
has
a
short
shelf
life,
so
we
have
to
constantly
keep
replacing
these
and
then
military.
We
help
the
military
as
much
as
possible
on
that,
whether
it's
when
they
go
next
slide,
please,
whether
they're
getting
sent
overseas
to
help
support
the
defense
of
the
united
states
and
whether
having
problems
like
housing
or
other
financial
problems
or
even
family
support,
because
these
are
hardships
on
on
people
next
slide.
F
F
So
now
we
have
mannequins
that
feedback
to
say.
Are
you
compressing
hard
enough
to
see?
Where
can
you
move
the
blood
around
the
brain
and
other
vital
organs?
Next
slide?
Please
so,
and
we
try
to
help
the
vulnerable
people-
and
this
is
like
ukraine-
we're
doing
a
lot
there
in
ukraine,
with
the
ukrainian
red
cross,
as
well
as
other
countries
around
ukraine,
where
we're
taking
the
immigrant,
the
people
that
are
going
to
the
other
countries
to
try
to
get
away
from
any
of
the
battles,
and
they
have
no
place
to
stay
next
slide.
F
F
A
A
A
A
Oral
communications
relates
to
communications
over
any
item
that
is
not
on
our
agenda
from
members
of
the
public.
You'll
have
three
minutes
to
speak.
As
with
all
items,
please
have
your
hand
raised
by
the
time
that
the
first
person
is
done
speaking
and
if
you
do
have
your
hand
raised
on
the
zoom
function,
I
would
go
ahead
and
call
on
you
for
oral
communications.
A
H
H
H
So,
as
you
develop
cupertino
city
plans
moving
forward,
I
strongly
urge
the
city
council
to
include
more
dolas.
In
fact,
memorial
park
would
be
an
ideal
next
candidate,
with
several
grassy
and
protected
areas
that
would
work
our
community
would
be
even
more
vibrant
as
a
result.
Thank
you
again
for
this
opportunity
to
speak.
A
G
Thank
you,
mayor
darcy.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
you
all
up
to
date
on
some
new
bill
housing
bill
legislation.
Actually
it
is
pertaining
to
housing.
Even
though
it's
parking
there
was
a
bill
last
year
called
ab
4001,
which
was
introduced
by
laura
friedman,
who
is
a
legislator
from
southern
california,
and
this
was
going
to
reduce
parking
minimums
across
the
state.
So
cities
could
not
say
that
certain
amount
of
parking
was
required
for
new
construction.
G
G
G
G
If
you
are
planning
to
have
no
parking
spaces
or
parking
garages
in
this
new
high-rise
apartment
buildings,
which
is
what
they're
pushing
with
the
bills,
you
would
have
no
cars.
Why
in
the
world,
would
a
developer
include
ev
recharging
sites,
so
this
bill
is
going
to
wind
up
doing
more
damage
than
it
would
good.
The
other
thing
is
too:
it
sends
a
message
to
people
that
may
be
living
in
affordable
housing
that
they
shouldn't
be
driving
cars.
G
They
have
no
right
to
drive
cars,
let
alone
electrical
vehicles,
and
you
know
I'm
saying
right
now:
no
one
has
the
right
to
make
that
decision
for
a
family
or
an
individual
living
in
any
type
of
housing,
affordable,
high
income.
That
is
really
a
leading
question
and
it's
pushing
the
rights
of
people.
So
I
think
that
this
bill
should
be
amended
or
it
should
just
not
pass.
I
am
hoping
that
the
governor
will
not
sign
it.
He
didn't
sign
it
last
year
and
I'm
hoping
that
will
be
the
same
thing
again
this
year.
I
I
I
Oh
by
the
way,
thanks
for
getting
rid
of
the
questionable
green
water
that
was
there
for
years,
so
I
really
appreciate
that
so
memory
part
has
a
lot
of
room
for
everyone.
Even
cat
people,
the
softball
field
to
me
is
perfect
for
dollar,
because
it's
80
fans
and
barely
used
in
the
morning
so,
like
connie
said
to
said,
the
obvious
dollar
is
great
for
the
community,
the
doctor
to
hang
out
sniff
each
other
buds,
brag
and
gossip
and
occasionally
argue
and
human
will
get
to
do
the
same,
hopefully
minus
the
sniffing
part.
I
So
I
have
make
friends
and
acquaintances
there
that
I
wouldn't
have
in
normal
day-to-day
routine
around
town.
On
a
personal
note,
I'm
not
young
and
built
like
brad
pitt
anymore,
so
pulling
an
85
pound.
Husky
is
a
real
challenge.
There
is
no
comparison
for
kubo
to
enjoy
running
freely
and
playing
in
a
big
field
versus
unleashed.
I
So
my
doctor
told
me
kubo
is
adding
years
to
my
life,
so
this
is
the
least
I
can
do,
for
him
is
to
fight
for
a
dollar
beside
any
additional
activities
or
exercise
could
easily
turn
me
into
asian
brad
pitt.
Again
again
again,
I
did
not
write
that
so
the
sad
part
about
this
is
that
we
move
as
a
family
from
mountain
view
25
years
ago,
and
now
we
drive
there
to
let
him
play
in
mountain
view.
I
So
that's
that
that
doesn't
make
sense
to
me.
So
we
we
do
this
almost
every
morning,
just
so
he
can
play
all
the
parks
in
mountain
view,
is
dollar
by
the
way
until
10,
30
and
some
parks
are
all
day.
So
it
makes
sense
for
me
to
add
more
dollar
around
here,
plus
asian
brad
pitt
and
cupertino
no
brainer.
A
Thank
you
and
that
concludes
our
oral
communications
for
this
evening.
Our
next
section
on
our
agenda
is
reports
by
council
and
staff
item
number
three,
our
brief
reports
on
our
council
member
activities
and
brief
announcements.
Would
anyone
like
to
provide
a
no
more
than
one
minute
synopsis
of
an
announcement
or
activities
councilmember
moore.
J
Thank
you,
mayor,
paul
I'll,
go
pretty
quickly.
Yesterday
I
attended
a
two-hour
vta
chairperson
training,
which
is
great
timing
as
we're
hopeful
that
we'll
be
moving
back
it
to
in-person
meetings
going
back
in
time.
On
friday,
the
february
18th
I
attended
the
state
of
the
valley.
One
data
point
is
that
silicon
valley's
population
declined
in
2021
for
the
first
time
in
more
than
a
dozen
years
and
saturday
of
february
26th,
I
attended
the
westport
groundbreaking,
which
had
the
honor
of
the
presence
of
congressman,
roe,
khanna
and
supervisor
sumidian
in
attendance.
Thank
you.
K
Thank
you
mayor
park.
I
had
to
go
fast
too,
I'm
I
did
attend
the
february
17th.
The
center
today
called
tessie's
task
force
on
families
on
student
mental
health
issues,
because
we
do
have
a
mental
health
work
program.
So
that's
really
a
very
enlightening
meeting
because
it
says
ending
the
silence
with
empathy
and
versus
sympathy.
K
So
I
really
like
that
what
they're
talking
about-
and
I
want
to
specially
emphasize-
I
went
to
a
roller
club
in
gilroy
and
I
listened
to
their
mayor's
state
of
the
city
address
and
it
really
she
talks
about,
translate,
translate
transit.
So
I
think
that's
one
of
our
targets
too.
We
really
like
we
need
good
transit
assistant
in
silicon
valley
and
just
to
follow
up
with
council
member
moore's
groundbreaking
in
westport.
I
really
want
to
thank
the
staff,
because
I
think
we
have
multiple
staff
there
setting
tens
videotaping.
E
On
the
19th
I
attended
the
san
francisco
chinese
new
year
parade
hosted
by
api
coalition,
many
elected
officials
joined
on
the
20th.
I
attended
the
speech
contest
hosted
by
confucius
and
yeah
by
a
con
someone
who
hosts
the
confucius
a
new
ceremony
and
then
on
the
26th.
I
attended
the
westport
opening
too.
E
It
was
great
that
way
finally
have
a
groundbreaking
for
that
and
on
the
28th
I
attended
a
county
youth
homelessness,
demonstration
program
meeting
and
they
are
they
receive
hud
funding
every
year
and
they
are
talking
of
trying
to
talk
about
priorities
on
how
to
spend
that
money.
It's
interesting
to
hear
there.
They
have
a
specific
use
subcommittee
on
that.
Thank
you.
C
C
Next,
one
on
march,
18th,
silicon
valley
at
home
had
a
round
table
on
housing
element
and
we
had
people
councilmen
from
all
our
surrounding
communities
and
so
hearing
the
sharing
of
ideas,
I
think,
is
really
going
to
help
us
to
understand
how
we're
going
to
do
this
within
the
confines
of
silicon
valley.
So
I'll
say
that
the
third
one
I'll
just
mention
is
you
know
I
was
so
happy
to
hear
the
proclamation
for
red
cross
and
stuart
talking.
C
You
know,
and
I'm
so
happy
that
he
actually
mentioned
the
ukrainian
crisis.
That's
in
playing
out
and
when
I
looked
on
the
internet
for
places
to
help
red
cross
was
right
there.
So
all
of
us
were
so
lucky
that
we're
in
a
place
with
a
democracy
and
we're
free.
We
need
to
be
very
aware
that
that's
not
the
case
everywhere
and
a
lot
of
people
are
currently
dying
in
ukraine,
so
hopefully
we
can
all
find
ways
to
help.
Thank
you.
A
I
do
want
to
let
our
members,
the
public,
know
that
we
did
keep
it
very
limited,
invite
with
regard
to
mainly
just
speakers
and
council,
so
that
we
could
respond
adequately
to
the
the
coveted
pandemic
conditions.
So
it
was
a
great
thing
to
be
able
to
put
together
I'm
happy
to
to
do
it.
We
had
a
lot
of
free
planning
and
as
someone
mentioned
yes,
indeed,
our
staff
did
put
in
saturday
time,
particularly
deborah
nashmento
and
our
video
crew.
They
really
did
a
great
job.
A
A
I
did
meet
with
assembly
member
mark
berman
over
the
course
of
the
time
since
we
last
met
regularly
and
we
talked
about
vta
options,
as
you
might
be
aware,
assemblyman
bourbon
put
to
forward
a
bill
last
year
with
regard
to
what
do
with
the
vta
board
essentially,
and
so
he
and
I
had
a
very
good
conversation
last
year.
A
year
ago,
I
just
joined
the
board,
and
so
I
was
really
happy
that
he
was
taking
the
bill
off
of
the
table
or
at
least
extending
it
into
a
two-year
bill
at
that
point.
A
They
have
a
new
museum
display
there
as
well,
as
I
think,
also
the
the
history,
the
chinese
historical
society
museum
there,
which
I
think
would
be
quite
fitting
so
great
thanks
very
much
and
we
are
on
to
item
four,
which
I
believe
is
our
regular
council
assignment
updates.
And
so
these
are
our
committee
assignments
that
are
approved
in
december
of
every
year.
Vice
mayor
chow,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
Would
you
like
to
report
out
on
your
council
committee
assignments,
since
our
last
regular
meeting.
E
And
then
that
we
also
prepared
we
also
had
on
the
february
23rd,
we
had
the
very
first
city
council
special
meeting
with
the
legislators,
where
we
invite
dave,
cortese
and
evan
law
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
city.
I
think
we
agree
on.
We
will
find
common
ones
on
things
that
we
can
work
on
and
then
this
year
specif
specifically
it's
a
year.
We
might
request
potential
funding
for
infrastructures,
so
maybe
funding
for
affordable
housing
or
other
infrastructure
needs.
The
city
may
have.
Thank
you.
J
Hey
thank
you
mayor
paul,
so
I'm
also
on
the
lrc,
and
it
was
great
to
meet
our
new
lobbyists
that
it
appears
to
be
four
generations
from
joe
gonzalez
and
sons,
which
is
very
exciting.
It
looks
like
they've
been
in
sacramento
since
the
late
60s,
and
we
had
at
that
at
our
initial
meeting
on
the
17th.
We
had
the
the
father
and
two
sons
on
our
meeting,
so
it
was
very
exciting
to
meet
them
and
and
hear
how
they
go
and
advocate
for
us
in
sacramento
on
the
24th.
C
Yeah,
so
being
on
the
silicon
valley,
clean
energy
committee,
I'll
bring
forth
the
item
of
interest
for
this
one,
and
that
is
it's
no
surprise.
Everybody
has
been
watching
power
bills,
go
up
and
they're
going
to
go
up
again
in
march,
but
rest
assured
the
the
customers,
those
of
us
who
get
our
power
via
silicon
valley,
clean
energy,
their
rates,
they
will
go
up,
but
they
will
still
be
below
pg
e's
rates,
so
don't
get
shocked
when
you
do
see
it.
C
Your
rates
are
still
going
to
be
below
pg
e
only
by
one
percent,
but
that's
still
below.
They
also
put
three
million
dollars
into
a
fund
for
low-income
residents.
So
by
all
means,
look
at
the
website
see
if
you
qualify,
because
they
have
three
million
dollars
set
aside
to
assist
those
in
the
lower
income
groups,
realizing
that
power
rates
are
going
up
so
I'll
leave
it
with
that.
Thank
you
very
much
mayor.
C
A
A
One
of
the
follow-ups
from
a
prior
vta
board
meeting
was
a
connection
with
caltrans
to
try
to
get
a
group
together
to
clean
up
the
the
wayside
litter.
So
a
couple
of
follow-ups
from
that
caltrans
has
followed
up
and
we're
scheduling
a
meeting
so
really
appreciative
of
our
city
manager
and
his
outreach
efforts
there
and
and
being
willing
to
take
those
meetings
with
us
related
to
that.
A
Actually,
with
regard
to
the
lawrence
midi
project
and
litter,
we
actually
did
have
a
good
meeting
with
water
district
representatives,
and
so
they
mentioned
us
a
creek
cleanup
day
on
may
21st,
so
mark
your
calendar
for
that
that's
saturday
may
21st,
and
hopefully
we
can
get
a
good
volunteer
group
together
and
working
on
that
you
know.
I
know
I
did
want
to
express
my
appreciation
to
our
city
manager,
as
well
as
our
city
attorney
for
being
there
over
the
course
of
this
weekend
on
saturday
for
the
lawrence
betty
groundbreaking.
A
That
was
very
nice
to
see
that
kind
of
support
from
from
our
our
direct
hire
staff
from
you
know,
council
republic,
and
a
couple
of
other
items.
With
regard
to
the
committee
assignments,
we
had
our
west
valley,
mayors
and
managers
meeting
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
let
jim
provide
any
updates
from
there.
I
think
that,
that's
always
a
you
know
very
useful
meeting
to
have.
We
talked
to
our
local
fire
chief
and
it
was.
A
It
was
an
interesting
discussion
and
I'll
share
one
tidbit
of
it,
which
I
I
thought
was
kind
of
fascinating.
We
had
our
mayor
of
monte,
cerino,
ask
the
fire
chief,
because
he
had
been
in
charge
of
controlled
fires
in
the
santa
cruz
county
mountain
range
area,
and
you
know
for
a
while
it
kind
of
fell
off,
because
he
moved
on
from
that
position
and
so
mayor
lahi
of
montessori
know.
A
I
said
to
him:
you
know
it's,
it's
really
on
you
as
mayor
and
don't
expect
to
get
any
credit
out
of
it,
and
so
I
think
if,
if
we
end
up
kind
of
taking
on
that
perspective
in
public
service,
not
only
does
it
serve
us
quite
well,
because
a
lot
of
people
are
very
happy
to
accommodate
that
kind
of
thinking,
but
it
also
keeps
us
going
forward
with
regard
to
making
sure
that
we're
optimizing
our
our
service.
So
you
know,
I
think,
frankly
we're
doing
that.
A
You
know
to
the
extent
that
it's
you
know
not
not
widely
recognized
or
universally,
so
you
know
I
I
think
at
the
end
of
it,
it's
really
just
a
matter
of
making
sure
we're
doing
the
right
things
for
for
the
community
at
large.
So
you
know,
thanks
for
all
that,
all
that
support,
and
so
I'm
gonna
go
on
to
item
number
five,
which
should
be
our
city
managers
update,
and
so
yes,
it
is
jim.
Do
you
have
a
city
manager's
update
for
us
today?
Yes,.
L
Actually,
I
I
do
a
couple
of
just
a
couple
items,
but
I
think
this
one
we've
been
hearing,
not
just
myself
but
previous.
You
know:
city
managers
talk
about
this
for
the
last
couple
years.
This
might
be
one
of
my
last
ones
and
that's
on
the
covet.
So
as
of
february
24th
2022,
the
county
of
santa
clara
public
health
department
announced
that
the
seven
day
rolling
average
for
the
new
covet
cases
was
at
501.
L
At
or
below
the
550
mark
for
seven
consecutive
days,
then
the
indoor
masking
requirement
would
no
longer
be
mandatory,
beginning
march
2nd,
which
is
going
to
be
tomorrow
and
as
of
this
evening,
I
just
I
just
pulled
it
up
as
we
were
sitting
here.
The
county
health
website
is
now
showing
327
cases
on
a
rolling
average,
so
that
means
we've
hit
that
mark.
So
as
of
tomorrow,
the
mask
mandate
is
going
to
be
repealed
within
santa
clara
county.
L
The
governor
also
signed
a
executive
order
today,
also
removing
that
potential
for
any
kind
of
masks
indoors
so
that
that
has
been
removed.
But
in
saying
all
that
there
still
is
the
ability
to
be
out
there
and
be
tested.
We
all
need
to
still
maintain
being
safe.
You
know
wash
your
hands
and
do
everything
we've
been
doing
for
the
last
couple
years.
County
of
santa
clara
will
continue
the
pcr
testing
at
the
cupertino
center
testing,
that
was
on
february
21st
resulted
in
235
tests
administered,
but
this
was
a
decline.
L
When
you
compared
to
january
31st,
we
did
have
15
citizen
corps,
volunteers
staffed
and
supplemented
the
clinical
services.
Testing
will
return.
Excuse
me
on
monday
march,
7th
so
a
week
from
today
or
a
week
almost
a
week
today
from
9
30
a.m,
to
4,
30
p.m,
and
appointments
can
be
scheduled
at
the
usual
www.scccfreetest.org.
L
M
L
Nice
fun
one
is
we're
going
to
be
having
it's
coming
up
to
that
easter
time.
The
big
bunny,
5k
and
kids
fun
run
on
saturday
april
16th,
the
city
of
cupertino
will
hold
the
annual
big
bunny,
5k
and
kids
fun
run
at
the
cupertino
civic
center.
This
is
a
fun
family
oriented
event,
that's
become
a
tradition
in
many
households
and
promotes
a
positive,
healthy
connected
community.
So
registration
for
the
5k
race
and
the
kids
run
are
at
reg
for
rec.org,
so
rankforrec.org.org.
A
Jim
and
so
let's
go
on
to
our
consent:
calendar
those
are
items
six
through
nine.
Are
there
any
members
of
our
council
that
would
like
to
pull
any
items
on
our
consent
calendar
this
evening,
seeing
no
hands
raised.
I
will
go
to
our
members
of
the
public.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
that
would
like
a
consent?
Calendar
item
pulled
and
we
have
gene
badord,
welcome
gene
and
this
isn't
subject
to
the
three
minutes.
Just
if
you
have
a
particular
item
on
consent
that
you
like
pulled.
A
Item
nine,
okay,
very
good,
so
let's
go
ahead
and
pull
item
nine,
and
would
anyone
like
to
make
a
motion
for
consent,
calendar
items
six
through
eight,
as
recommended
on
our
on
our
agenda
councilmember
way
so
moved
and
council
member
more
second,
thank
you,
madam
city
clerk.
Would
you
please
take
a
vote?
A
roll
call
vote
on
items
six
through
eight.
G
M
A
Okay,
very
good,
so
let's
go
ahead
and
bring
this
and
I'm
taking
it
that
the
member
of
the
public
pulled
this
out
of
curiosity
as
to
what
it
is,
and
so
let's
go
ahead
and
provide
an
opportunity
for.
Oh,
so
gene
has
her
hand
raised
again
gene.
Let
me
let
me
take
this
a
little
bit
out
of
order,
since
you
pulled
it.
Would
you
like
to
just
briefly
share
with
us
the
reason
why
you'd
like
it
pulled
so
that
we
can
inform
our
processing
of
this.
N
It's
a
recognition
of
excellence
in
public
finance
compared
to
thousands
of
other
public
entities.
It's
really
quite
impressive
that
this
is
the
24th
consecutive
distinguished
budget
presentation
award
by
the
city.
Every
new
city
manager
has
commented
about
cupertino's,
strong
financial
position,
and
this
is
a
tribute
to
our
strong
finance
department
and
its
collaboration
with
other
city
departments.
N
As
a
member
of
the
community,
I'm
saddened
that
zak
zark,
our
finance
manager,
has
decided
to
move
on
from
the
revolving
governance
door
here
in
cupertino
zach,
you
have
been
knowledgeable
and
thoughtful
when
I
have
had
questions
about
city
finances,
your
reports
are
well
written
and
understandable.
To
folks
like
me,
who
aren't
financial
professionals,
we
will
miss
your
strong
contributions
to
our
city
government.
A
O
Yes,
actually,
I
think
gene
did
an
excellent
job,
providing
a
summary
that
it's,
a
national
award
from
the
government
finance
officers
association.
The
city
has
received
it's
the
24th
consecutive
year.
I
actually
want
to
just
take
a
moment
and
take
and
thank
city
manager,
jim
troop,
I
think
so
often
we
go
through
and
we've
gotten
this
award
consecutively
and
we
include
it
at
the
budget
and
kind
of
go
on
our
merry
way
and
don't
take
the
opportunity
to
really
recognize
and
realize
the
achievement,
because
there
are
several
different
categories.
O
We
were
rated
by
three
different
raters:
it's
not
it's,
definitely
not
a
rubber
stamp
and
it's
really
a
tool
that
we
use
to
make
sure
our
budget
is
in
line
with
all
the
best
practices
when
it
comes
to
our
budget
book,
and
it
was
really
jim's
idea
to
bring
this
award
forward
and
so
big
thank
you
and
kudos
to
him
and
again
a
big
thank
you
to
all
the
department
directors
and
to
their
teams
anytime.
We're
up
here.
Talking
about
the
budget.
It's
it's
a
group
effort.
It's
zach
is
wonderful.
O
A
A
I'm
often
often
very
impressed
by
the
knowledge
of
our
members
of
our
community
in
terms
of
the
internal
personnel
workings
of
our
cooperating
city,
employee
pool-
and
I
have
been
over
the
course
of
years,
because
it
seems
sometimes
that
members
of
the
public
know
more
about
what's
going
on
with
our
employee
pool
than
members
of
council,
which
I
I
find
very
interestingly
informed,
mr
city
manager,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
Would
you
like
to
say
a
few
words.
L
Just
real
quick
I'll
make
a
very
quick
mirror.
Thank
you.
It
says,
award
and
really
what
it
should
be
saying
is
an
accreditation
because
it
goes
through
the
process
of
does
it
meet
all
of
the
standards
on
a
professional
budgeting
level,
and
something
that
I
need
to
point
out
too,
is
if
the
city
ever
decided
to
do
some
kind
of
a
bond
issue.
You
know
going
out
for
debt
of
some
kind,
there's
all
different
kinds,
one
of
the
things
the
bond
reading
agencies
will
do
is
they
will
ask
to
look
at
your
past
budgets.
L
K
K
A
Great,
thank
you
very
much,
councilman
way,
yeah,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
put
in
my
two
cents
here
I
I
often
say
this
externally.
I
think
we
have
at
this
point
really
a
straight
a
staff,
and
so
I
pegged
it
at
95
percent.
I
do
see
a
lot
of
work
from
the
public
sector.
You
know
particularly
from
my
colleagues
on
council,
the
of
course
last
four
years
or
so
in
terms
of
really
getting
into
those
details.
A
You
know
a
few
years
ago,
but
I
think
we
were
still
very
good
what
what
a
lot
of
members
of
the
public
that
don't
see
is
the
hours
and
hours
of
pouring
into
not
just
the
statutory
requirements,
not
just
the
details
of
our
budgets,
not
just
you
know,
reading
and
pouring
over
the
various
issues
and
how
they
interrelate
with
each
other,
but
how
those
improvements
get
made
over
time,
and
so
I
can
tell
you
right
now.
You
know.
Last
year's
audit
committee
was
comprised
of
vice
mayor,
chow
and
council.
A
A
I
you
know,
I
also
you
know,
had
a
bit
of
a
learning
curve,
but
you
know
to
this
day
I
can
honestly
say
that
every
time
I
go
in
there,
I
see
more
things
and
am
constantly
in
a
in
a
learning.
You
know
educational
type
of
process,
but
but
I
think
you
know
to
really
really
be
fair
to
the
public
representatives.
A
A
I
I
say
is
you
know
it's
important
and
has
their
place,
but
I
I
don't
think
we
should
give
short
shrift
to
you,
know
the
the
hours
upon
hours
and
days
and
years
upon
years
of
work
that
has
been
done
in
order
to
get
us
to
the
point
collectively,
where
we're,
I
think,
in
a
fantastic
position
and
we're
in
a
fantastic
position
for
for
a
reason
so
well.
Thank
you
very
much
and
appreciate
this
opportunity
to
discuss,
applaud
and
keep
the
work
going.
A
Our
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
item
number
10,
which
I
think
a
lot
of
our
attendees
are
here
today.
For
so
really
happy
to,
you
know
see
the
turnout.
Our
second
reading
of
ordinances
have
none
under
public
hearings
is
where
item
10
lies,
and
that
is
the
consideration
of
a
vacation
of
a
public
pedestrian
walkway
easement
through
track
9405,
which
runs
through
campo
de
la
lozano
subdivision,
located
near
20138
rodriguez
avenue
and
so,
mr
city
manager.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
the
presenter
of
this
item.
L
P
P
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
mayor
members,
council.
My
name
is
chad
mosley,
I'm
the
assistant
director
of
public
works.
The
item
presented
for
council
consideration
is
the
vacation
of
a
public
pedestrian.
Walkway
easement
council
approved
a
resolution
to
notice
the
public
of
its
intent
to
vacate
this
easement.
On
february
1st,
the
city
has
posted
the
required
notices
of
the
vacation
and
conformance
with
the
california
streets
and
highways
code.
P
P
P
The
granting
of
the
easement
and
installation
of
the
walkway
was
condition
of
approval
for
the
development
when
it
was
constructed
in
2002.,
the
portion
of
regner,
creek,
trail
adjacent
to
the
property
was
constructed
with
a
development
and
has
been
open
to
the
public
view
to
public
use.
Since
that
time
the
trail
continued
eastward
from
the
development
and
connected
to
the
sidewalk
on
de
palma,
lane
located
on
the
right
side
of
this
image.
P
P
Removing
this
public
access
walkway
reduces
connectivity
for
for
the
public.
However,
the
expansion
of
the
ragnar
creek
trail
provides
for
alternative
points
of
connection
for
the
residents
of
cupertino,
including
access
to
the
civic
center
and
entrepreneur
parking
near
the
trailhead
on
rodriguez
avenue,
council
members.
More
for
councilmember
moore's
request
staff
did
review
the
concern
regarding
ragnar
creek
trail,
creating
a
situation
that
would
entice
residents
to
jaywalk
across
rodriguez
at
rodriguez
avenue,
since
the
trail
runs
east-west
in
this
vicinity
and
allies.
P
Roughly
parallel
with
rodriguez
avenue,
the
intersections
at
each
end
of
rodriguez,
avenue
at
torrey
and
blaney
provide
for
legal,
protected
pedestrian
crossings.
A
trail
user
coming
from
the
west
can
use
the
protected
intersection
at
torrey
and
cross
rodriguez.
Only
400
feet
from
the
trailhead,
while
a
trail
trail
user
from
the
east
would
likely
access
the
trail
at
the
bellini
trailhead
or
across
rodriguez
at
rodriguez
at
laney
continue
along
the
south
side
of
rodriguez
to
the
trailhead.
P
Although
the
trail
provides
for
an
alternative,
the
more
pleasant
means
of
pedestrian
and
bicycle
travel
in
relation
to
rodriguez
avenue
is
not
currently
being
constructed
with
any
other
amenities.
Aside
from
mobility,
that
would
that
should
further
entice
pedestrians
to
illegally
across
the
street,
especially
since,
even
with
jaywalking,
it
may
involve
some
backtracking
of
pedestrian
bicyclists.
P
A
I
see
a
number
of
hands
raised
at
this
point
and
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
call,
on
the
first
hand,
raise
that's
ravathi
narasimhan,
and
so
we
have
three
minutes
for
each
comment.
I
do
ask
that
members
of
the
public
keep
your
comments
relatively
concise,
given
the
volume
of
comments
today
and
with
regard
to
your
hands.
Please
have
your
hand
raised
by
the
time
that
ravathi,
our
first
speaker
is
done
speaking
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
after
ravathi
is
done.
A
A
Q
Q
Q
Cuperino
city
council
would
give
the
easement
away
of
approximately
a
million
dollars
in
value
in
public
funds
to
the
eight
private
homeowners.
The
private
homeowners
have
even
asked
the
city
to
cover
thousands
of
dollars
in
application
costs
for
vacating
the
easement.
There
are
far
better
uses
of
our
tax
dollars
than
giving
public
easement
property
away.
Q
Q
Q
A
Marilyn,
sherry
dinosaurs,
helene,
davis,
john
zoo
jano
banks,
and
I
apologize
if
that's
a
mispronunciation,
gary
vishrup
or
gary
versha
c
malinska
kevin
liu
jennifer,
sheeran
connie,
cunningham
juliette
sharon
stella
jean
badourd
shintsu,
tagi
sadati,
christina
young
lily
koban,
someone
identified
as
caller
8761,
which
I
assume
is
on
the
phone
eric
linskog,
janet
vanzorin
and
stephen
scharf,
and
so
our
first
speaker.
Our
next
speaker,
I
should
say,
is
marilyn.
Sherry.
Welcome,
maryland.
R
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
paul.
Thank
you,
council
members
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak.
I
urge
you
to
vote
no
on
this.
I
really
think
voting.
No
voting
yes
on
this
is
sets
a
bad
legal
precedent
for
loss
of
control
of
all
public
easements,
currently
controlled
by
the
city.
Why?
Wouldn't
the
residents
along
other
easements
decide
to
have
their
easements
closed
too?
How
could
the
city
continue
safe,
walking
and
biking
programs
when
so
many
of
them
rely
on
other
public
easements?
That
could
be
contested
based
on
this
decision.
R
Voting
yes
displays.
Favoritism
members
of
the
council
who
vote
yes,
show
the
voters
of
cupertino
that
they
are
happy
to
put
the
desires
of
the
owners
of
eight
pieces
of
property
in
an
hoa
over
the
long
identified
needs
of
hundreds
of
residents
who
use
the
connector
to
the
regner.
Creek
trail
daily.
R
Excuse
me,
after
all,
over
20
years
of
the
owners
of
these
eight
properties,
have
signed
a
legal
agreement
that
includes
this
easement.
So
why
do
they
have
any
right
to
close
off
that
access?
Now,
council,
members
who
vote
yes
show
a
lack
of
respect
for
decades
of
planning
by
the
citizens
of
cupertino
voting.
Yes,
is
a
vote
against
diversity,
equity
and
inclusion.
R
The
cupertino
parks
and
recreation
and
master
plan
states
that
over
80
percent
of
cupertino
residents
wish
for
more
trails
and
connecting
paths
in
our
city.
Any
council,
member
who
votes
yes
on
the
closure
of
the
lozano
elaine
access
path
is
clearly
voting
against
one
of
our
city's
core
priorities:
getting
greater
connectivity
among
neighbors
and
residents.
S
S
Early
gets
me
on
blaney
or
rodriguez
early
and
they're
busier.
So
it's
not
necessarily
better.
As
a
parent,
I
encourage
families
to
allow
their
children
to
walk
or
bike
to
school
studies
show
that
the
most
common
concern
of
parents
is
safety,
specifically
cars
and
we're
spending
millions,
as
you
heard
earlier,
to
provide
safer
routes
to
school
and
and
to
drive
to
zero
accidents.
S
Easements
citing
this
precedent,
as
you
heard
earlier,
and
it
wasn't
that
apparent
that
sufficient
consideration
was
given
to
the
impacts
and
that's
part
of
the
reason,
I'm
here
tonight
to
make
sure
that
at
least
I'm
heard
on
this
and
I'm
part
of
the
80
of
residents
which
wish
for
more
access
and
connectivity
and
trails
in
our
community.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
considering
my
perspective
and
I
urge
you
to
do
the
right
thing
for
our
community
and
vote
no
on
closing
the
path
between
lozano
lane
and
reagano
creek
trail.
T
Right,
I
did
good
catch.
Thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
paul
and
cupertino
council
members,
I'm
helene
davis,
a
long
time,
cupertino
resident
and
a
former
parks
and
recreation
recreation.
Commissioner,
I'm
here
to
ask
you
to
vote
no
on
closing
the
lozano
lane
path
and
to
not
bring
it
up
again
for
review.
T
When
you
consider
your
vote,
please
keep
in
mind
the
needs
of
the
community
over
the
perceived
concerns
of,
in
this
case,
a
very
few.
This
path
was
already
open
and
has
been
in
use
for
20
years.
The
homeowners
have
known
about
this
easement
and
its
eventual
connection
to
the
regnart
creek
trail,
since
they
purchased
their
homes.
Every
homeowner
signed
their
acknowledgement
of
the
trail
easement.
T
U
Hello,
my
name
is
zhang
zhu.
I
am
the
living
cupertino
lozano
land.
Thank
you
to
mayor
dasi
and
the
city
manager
and
the
member
of
the
city
council
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak
earlier.
Today
I
sent
a
picture
to
the
city
I'd
like
to
share
for
when
I
speak.
The
pdf
name
is
item
10
public
work
away.
Jay-Z.
U
Great
yeah
last
one
thank
you.
The
picture
shows
the
workery
in
red
dotted
line.
I
overlay
a
car
accident
picture
on
top
of
it
to
indicate
the
location.
As
you
can
see,
the
accident
happened
on
the
walkway
access
point.
In
fact,
the
car
literally
hit
the
walkway
entries
pillar.
This
accident
happened
a
few
years
ago.
U
The
load-
lord
radius,
is
quite
deceivable
at
this
spot
because
of
the
load,
curvature
driver
often
didn't
anticipate
or
realize
the
situation
at
the
corner
and
the
too
late
to
response.
If
you
drive,
if
you've
ever
tried
to
drive
on
this
load,
you
will
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
It's
not
rare
that
you
over.
I
often
hear
those
angry
car
honking
near
the
trees.
U
So
far
the
workweek
is
lightly
used.
However,
if
it
becomes
a
true
head,
the
probability
tragedy,
the
probability
of
tragedy
will
go
up.
The
workweek
is
not
planned
as
true
hand.
Never
we
never
heard
that
this
is
a
true
hand
and
also,
in
fact,
the
workweek.
The
ownership
is
the
hoa
it's
not
the
city.
The
city
is
just
the
use
of
it
is
the
own.
The
ownership
of
the
worker
is
the
hoa
on
the
map.
You
can
see
just
a
few
hundred
feet
away
on
the
west.
There
is
a
very
safe
chill
access
point.
U
A
V
Well:
hey
hi,
my
name
is
yano
banks
and
mayor.
You
pronounced
my
name
perfect.
I
agree,
I'm
a
resident
of
lamar
court,
my
family
and
I
have
lived
in
cupertino
for
24
years.
We
border
the
existing
wonderful
section
of
the
ragnar
creek
trail
nearest
to
creekside
park's,
beautiful
bridge
this
park.
This
walkway
have
been
an
incredible
asset
to
our
property
and
property
value.
We
are
thrilled
to
live
along
this
trail,
my
family
and
I
are
huge
supporters,
as
you
can
imagine,
of
the
regner
creek
trail
and
its
expansion.
V
V
The
council
has
been
incredibly
accommodating
to
all
residents
who
border
this
wonderful
community
enhancing
trail.
You
have
done
more
than
enough.
What's
more,
this
proposal
just
makes
no
sense.
It
blocks
a
key
path
along
the
trail
interrupting
the
enjoyment
for
all
for
the
accommodation
of
maybe
two
homeowners.
V
V
W
Okay,
is
that
better?
Yes,
okay,
mayor
paul
and
council
members,
thank
you
for
letting
me
speak
on
this.
I
am
a
long
time
resident
of
cupertino.
I
live
on
stand
hall
lane.
I
am
very
excited,
as
others
are
to
have
this
regnar
trail
being
started,
and
I
keep
watching
the
progress.
I'm
looking
forward
to
being
able
to
use
it.
W
We
are
very
unhappy
with
the
concept.
We
can't
understand
how
you
could
consider
giving
away
an
access
that
we
keep
trying
to
get
more
of
rather
than
less
of
in
our
city,
as
others
have
said,
you
know
these
people
have
already
signed
agreements
saying
that
the
easement
will
be
there.
It's
been
fair
for
20
years
and
the
the
concept
of
just
letting
a
few
residents
get
closed
off
area
and
hurt
the
rest
of
the
count
the
city
is
just
beyond
me.
W
X
Hi
kristen,
thank
you
for
putting
up
my
slide,
respected,
mayor,
paul
vice
mayor,
ciao
and
council
members.
I'm
speaking
here
today,
like
the
other
residents
before
me,
to
urge
you
to
keep
open
the
lazano
lane,
access
path
to
the
rigner
creek
trail,
and
you
can
see
here
similar
easements
in
cupertino
that
have
actually
some
of
them
go
along
close
to
more
homes
like
three
or
four
homes
that
have
been
open
for
decades,
that
have
been
used
daily
with
zero
complaints,
and
this
is
just
a
sampling
of
them.
X
I'm
sure
there
are
more
if
I
spent
a
little
bit
more
time
looking
for
them.
So
closing
this
access
path
is
premature.
The
rigor
trail
open
yet,
and
there
is
zero
data
with
which
to
justify
a
decision
like
this.
We
don't
know
how
many
people
are
going
to
use
this
access
path.
We
don't
know
how
many
people
will
cross
the
road
and
where
we
don't
know
like
a
staff,
hasn't
even
completed
an
exploration
of
a
possible
crosswalk
solution
under
rodriguez.
X
There
is
zero
data
on
which
to
base
this
kind
of
decision.
Closing
this
access
path
is
also
legally
reckless.
It
will
have
far-reaching
implications
for
the
dozens
of
similar
access
paths
shown
here
all
around
the
city.
If
you
close
this
path,
just
residents
adjacent
to
all
these
other
paths
will
now
have
a
legal
precedent
to
rely
upon
to
demand
that
the
paths
near
their
homes
be
closed
as
well,
impacting
a
quality
of
life
of
thousands
of
cupertino
residents.
X
Closing
this
path
is
also
fiscally
irresponsible.
It's
not
fiscally
responsible
to
gift
land
of
approximately
a
million
dollars
in
value
to
eight
private
homeowners
and
very
hard
to
justify
treating
these
eight
homeowners
differently
than
the
homeowners
adjacent
to
all
these
other
easements
around
the
city
and,
honestly,
closing
this
access
path
looks
like
favoritism.
Giving
this
one
million
dollar
value
land
to
the
hoa
to
create
their
own
private
little
park
using
city
land
would
be
a
failure
on
the
council's
part
to
be
faithful.
X
Stewards
of
our
shared
city
resources
gifting
the
ho
way,
an
additional
four
thousand
three
hundred
sixty
eight
dollars
to
cover
the
cost
of
the
permit,
really
increases
the
appearance
of
inappropriate
favoritism.
Again
no
study
was
done
by
city
staff.
No
data
has
been
collected,
no
justification
given
beyond
vague
fears
about
perceived
safety.
X
Is
this
how
the
city
is
going
to
make
decisions
that
impact
thousands
of
residents
moving
forward?
Is
this
going
to
be
our
new
process?
I
also
want
to
address
a
comment
by
chad,
mosley
about
jaywalking
crossing
rodriguez.
That
spot
is
not
actually
legally
jaywalking.
I
looked
up
california
law
on
this.
It
states
that
it's
considered
jaywalking
only
if
there's
an
adjoining
intersection
controlled
by
a
traffic
signal
device
like
a
traffic
light,
then
a
pedestrian
cannot
cross
the
road
at
a
place
except
within
a
crosswalk
and
by
control
they
mean
a
signal.
X
Y
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes
welcome,
I'm
sorry,
okay!
Yeah,
thank
you
for
having
me
to
talk.
I
think
this
is
a
question
of
a
balance
of
addressing
the
affected
neighbors
concerns
and
also
the
negative
impact
on
the
people
using
the
trail.
Okay,
the
city
council,
I
remember
very
virtually
when
they
approved
this
trail.
They
want
to
take
care
of
the
concerns.
Y
Just
ask
yourself
by
having
this
open
is
going
to
mitigate
the
concerns
or
make
it
worse,
because,
right
now,
the
small
community
is
encircled
by
people
and
not
belonging
to
this
area.
Right,
and
so
this
is
the
the
the
answer
to
this
is
okay,
obviously
you're
not
addressing
the
concerns,
because
you
promise
to
address
the
concerns.
Second,
the
negative
impact
by
closing
this
one.
Y
Y
Y
It
only
takes
about
three
to
four
minutes
to
walk
three
to
four
minutes
to
work.
The
distance
is
about
15
to
16
100
feet.
People
love
nature,
just
take
a
few
minutes,
walk
along
the
trail.
Is
that
big
enough?
Actually,
if
you
split
it's
only
about
two
minutes
work
each
way
to
access
at
the
alternative
access
points
which
are
much
wider
right,
I'm
very
glad
that
homure
mentioned
that
he
attended
gatherings
of
empathy
and
sympathy.
Y
Y
Z
Good
evening,
mayor
paul
and
city
council
members,
thank
you
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak
today
as
a
long-time
advocate
for
walking
and
biking
in
cupertino.
I
was
surprised
to
see
this
agenda
item
come
up
when
all
the
access
pass
to
the
ragnar
trail
had
been
decided
in
a
vote
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
as
you've
heard
from
the
enormous
amount
of
emails
you've
received
over
80
residents
by
my
accounting.
This
access
pass
should
not
be
closed.
Z
One
argument
may
be
that
a
crossing
is
needed
and
I
agree
a
crossing
would
be
helpful
and
have
other
benefits
to
slowing
traffic.
However,
today,
on
rodriguez,
you
see
many
people
crossing
it
and
all
day
long
and
I
do
use
rodriguez
a
lot.
I
ride
my
bike
to
the
library.
I
use
it
as
a
a
way
to
bike
to
target
things
like
that.
So
I
use
it.
These
residents
are
not
jaywalking.
I
think
sema
mentioned
that
earlier.
Z
Z
Another
argument
may
be
that
this
opening
may
not
be
necessary,
as
there's
other
entrances
to
the
regnet
trailer
close
enough
for
people
to
use
those.
Instead,
we
all
know
that
asking
someone
to
backtrack
hundreds
of
yards
to
reach
a
trail.
You
know
three
or
four
minutes,
especially
for
someone
possibly
trying
to
make
it
to
school.
Z
It's
not
going
to
encourage
usa,
the
closest
alternative
entrance
doesn't
even
mitigate
the
crossing
issue.
People
will
still
cross
rodriguez
just
farther
west.
I
urge
you
tonight
to
not
close
this
access
path
by
following
your
city,
goals
of
connectivity
and
the
desires
of
80
of
your
residents,
who
wish
for
more
trails
and
connecting
paths.
You've
heard
from
many
of
us
and
we
are
asking
you
to
keep
it
open.
Thank
you.
A
AA
Oh
dear
mayor,
vice
mayor
and
council
members,
as
a
senior
bicyclist
who,
whose
opportunities
for
outdoor
exercise
are
limited,
these
protected
bike
lanes,
offer
exercise
and
access
to
the
outdoors
and
opportunity
to
go
places
without
driving
a
car
throughout
the
city.
I've
been
very
excited
about
the
pedestrian
and
bike
plan
ever
since
I
first
heard
about
it
and
have
been
following
it
very
closely.
AA
So
I
encourage
you.
I
urge
you
to
vote
no
on
this
particular
item.
This
access
path
has
been
used
since
the
lozano
and
the
palma
condominiums
were
built
as
you've
heard
many
times
tonight.
Almost
20
years
ago,
every
homeowner
in
the
hoas
nearby
signed
an
agreement
when
they
purchased
their
homes,
stating
that
there
would
be
a
pass.
AA
AA
The
city
council
has
agreed
in
its
master
plans
that
cupertino
would
encourage
more
connectivity
in
the
city,
and
residents
have
overwhelmingly
agreed
with
this,
and
I've
been
at
many
meetings
where
people
have
spoken
out
in
favor
of
ragnar
creek
trail,
including
the
ones
for
them
it
was
approved.
After
all,
of
the
talking
was
completed,
making
this
change
goes
against
those
wishes
and
the
city's
stated
goals.
AA
I
would
I
could
also
talk
about
the
specific
needs
of
residents
at
waterfall
condominiums
and
built
more
apartments
as
well,
and
if
a
crosswalk
turns
out
to
be
needed,
they
can
be
added.
So
please
thank
you
for
listening
to
all
of
us
and
please
I
urge
you
do
not
close
the
access
path
to
the
ragnar
creek
trail
along
lozano
lane.
AA
AB
Many
high
schoolers
many
elementary
school
students
live
in
the
biltmore
apartments
and
waterfall
condominiums.
They
would
actively
benefit
from
the
safer
commute
that
the
lozano
pa
lane
path
would
offer
them.
I
know
that
I,
when
I
went
to
eden
elementary
school,
would
have
made
use
of
this
path
to
get
to
the
cubricino
library
more
easily.
AB
AB
This
is
something
that
I
feel
incredibly
passionately
about,
and
so
I
urge
you
to
vote
no
on
giving
the
lozano
lane
easement
to
homeowners.
I
hope
that
we
as
a
city
can
move
towards
a
more
connected,
equitable
and
sustainable
future
for
everyone
for
our
students,
one
step,
one
easement
at
a
time.
Thank
you.
A
AC
AC
Oh
right
now
I
don't.
I
give
your
email,
your
the
slides
before
every
every
of
you,
so
I
I'll
refer
this
right
now.
I
I
do
not
refer
to
those
and
just
the
pictures.
I
will
refer
later.
Okay,
our
homeowners
have
never
signed
any
document
which
mentions
for
future
trail
use,
whoever
purposely
spreading
the
untrue
news
on
cupertino
matters
have
ruined
our
name.
Our
names,
please
formally
correct
those
at
the
same
place
and
apologize
to
us.
AC
This
easement
was
designed
in
2002
to
provide
sole
connectivity
to
creek,
to
the
creek
from
large
logical
road
for
utility
servicing,
mainly
creek,
servicing,
along
with
pedestrian
pathway.
This
is
because
other
connections
to
this
creek
point
were
all
blocked
with
fences
by
the
city.
When
these
fences
are
now
removed.
This
easement
is
actually
redundant
number
two.
When
this
easement
was
initially
built,
the
level
of
the
entries
were
was
expected
to
be
very
low,
so
it
is
narrow,
closely
surrounded
by
lights,
light
posts,
parked
cars
and
many
plants.
AC
Please
see
page
six
of
my
slides,
but
once
this
path
is
used
as
a
trail
head,
the
level
of
entry
will
definitely
overwhelm
our
small
hoa.
We
not
the
city
are
paying
for
odd
maintenance
of
this
private
land.
We
cannot
afford
own
predicted
liabilities
and
maintenance
needs
in
a
long
run.
True,
hats
should
not
be
running
inside
a
private
properties
and
three
safety
is
another
concern,
especially
for
young
students.
Please
refer
to
page
five
of
my
slides.
This
is
the
same
thing
as
john
to
just
show.
There
is
no
pedestrian
crossway
near
lozano
entrance.
AC
Visibility
is
very
poor.
I
do
not
want
to
repeat
what
john
says:
let's
move
to
number
four
several
safer
and
wider
trail
heads
are
available
just
minutes
away
on
public
lands,
maintenance,
repairs
and
revisions
on
public
lands
are
much
easier
to
prevent
future
safety
and
legal
concerns.
So
please
vote
for
closing
these
this
easement.
Thank
you.
N
N
AD
Okay,
all
right
mayor,
paul
and
dear
council
members
and
your
community
members
actually
everyone.
I
really
appreciate
that
everyone
here
is
taking
their
time
to
participate
in
this
discussion.
I'm
a
resident
at
campotizano
lozano,
I'm
asking
the
council
members,
please
consider
not
to
open
access
to
the
ragnar
trail
or
for
this
walkway
in
this
eastmans.
AD
First
of
all,
I
actually
want
to
say
that
I'm
100
supportive
of
a
more
walking
and
biking
friendly
community,
just
the
same
as
a
lot
of
passionate
people
here
me
myself,
actually,
by
to
school
of
elementary
school
to
graduate
school
all
the
way
over
two
decades,
it's
great
to
see
the
positive
changes
and
that
have
happened
in
cupertino,
safer
pedestrian
walks
and
bike
lanes
added.
I
think
those
are
fantastic.
AD
The
point
I
want
to
make
here
is
that
safety
should
be
the
number
one
priority.
We
should
plan
well
and
set
up
our
infrastructure
to
provide
convenience
and
connectivity,
but
we
safety
in
mind
right.
Safety
should
be
number
one.
So
this
walkway
in
this
easement-
and
I
admit
there-
there
is
utility
in
terms
of
convenience
and
collectively
this
convenience
comes
at
a
great
cost
of
city
risk.
AD
As
some
of
you
already
mentioned,
it
increases
probability
of
pedestrian
crashing
rodriguez
without
using
the
crosswalk
right,
whether
it's
jaywalk
or
not,
the
the
risk
is
there
and
it's
increased
and
human
behaviors
are
predictable
and
number
two.
The
north
end
of
the
pathway
is
at
kind
of
like
the
most
dangerous
spot,
along
rodriguez
between
the
library
and
bernalillo
right.
So
the
curvature
of
the
road
is
pretty
terrible
and
the
visibility
of
the
westbound
in
incoming
traffic.
When
you,
when
you
come
into
this
walkway,
is
it
it's
very
difficult
to
see?
AD
Income,
traffic
and
and
a
traffic
acid
picture
actually
shows
that
these
two
points
combined?
You
can
already
see
that
there
will
be
an
increase
in
pedestrian
and
cyclists,
collisions
and
and
static
statistics
and
probability
work
right.
Trust
me
that
works,
so
the
city
of
capotino
pedestrian
transportation
plan
published
in
2018
reports
that
eight
sixteen
percent
of
pedestrian
injuries
happened
when
the
pedestrian
is
not
in
the
crosswalk
by
across
sixteen
percent.
That's
wining
six
right,
so
someone
will
get
hit,
hope
it's
not.
AD
It
will
not
be
you
or
me
or
your
child
or
my
child,
but
someone
will
get
hit
and
that
would
be
someone's
child
right
and
I
don't
think
we
should
wait
until
that
happen
when
we
have
data
to
address
this
problem.
So
if
we
don't
encourage
people
to
use
ragnar
trail
properly,
we
I
think
we
should
guide
them
using
the
proper
behavior
like
using
the
well-constructed
pathway
or
entrance
on
the
west
side
on
the
east
side
on
the
on
the
library
side
on
the
on
the
benign
side.
AD
A
AE
AE
AE
AE
AE
AF
AG
AG
We
have
noticed
a
high
number
of
cases
of
misuses
of
the
easement
and
our
homeowner
association
is
bearing
the
financial
consequences
of
the
misuse
solely
all
other
audience.
Attending
this
bearing
or
this
hearing
are
not
paying
for
it.
When
looking
into
the
documents
for
the
new
ragnar
trail,
a
quick
trio,
including
the
feasibility
studies,
lozano
eastman
was
not
identified
as
a
trio
hat
primary
or
secondary
for
the
new
project,
nor
is
it
equipped
with
appropriate
infrastructure
to
safely
accommodate
users
crossing
rodriguez
to
enter
the
eastman
which
our
community
members
have
made.
AG
Numerous
observations
of
dangerous
crossings
on
rodriguez,
and
many
of
you
know,
the
rodriguez
has
a
sharp
curve
where
cars
have
low
visibility
into
the
pedestrians
crossing
the
road
entering
the
easement
when
they
drive
into
the
curve
the
planet
trail
heads,
on
the
other
hand,
have
the
appropriate
infrastructure.
The
pavement
high
visibility
crossroads
away,
finding
signs
traffic
signaling,
all
the
other
features
that
facilitate
the
hikers
to
enter
the
trail.
It
seems,
like
the
city
has
made
great
investment
into
ensuring
pedestrians
safely
pedestrian
safety.
AG
So
why
don't
we
guide
people
to
use
the
high
quality,
trailhead
entrances
and
close
off
lozano
easement
to
avoid
this
loophole
for
uncontrolled
pedestrian
crossings?
In
addition,
I
don't
believe
the
necessity
of
the
easement
is
the
same
as
20
years
ago,
when
the
project
has
added
official
trailheads
on
rodriguez
avenue.
Only
two
minute
walk
from
the
eastman,
as
well
as
on
the
benelli
avenue,
which
is
equipped
with
more
appropriate
infrastructure
for
hikers
to
ingress
and
aggress.
AG
Practically
speaking,
the
lozano
easement
is
no
longer
needed
to
serve
as
a
connectivity
point
of
rodriguez
avenue
and
the
pump
department
lane.
The
previous
statement
from
a
previous
community
member,
not
recognizing
the
danger
of
crossing
rodriguez,
worries
me
even
more
on
the
misuse
of
the
easement
as
an
access
point,
I
urge
you
all
to
vote
yes
to
ensure
all
users
can
use
this
new
trail
safely
and
happily
in
the
future.
Thank
you
very
much.
AH
Yeah
welcome
hi,
sorry,
I
am
I'm
lily
and
I'm
living
right
in
front
of
the
trail,
and
I
that
pathway
is
so
narrow.
I
have
a
tricycle
myself
and
if
somebody
gonna
ride
a
bike
and
coming
one
coming,
one
going
and
pedestrian
that
is
very
narrow
and
there
definitely
is
going
to
be
some
accident
over
there
and
there
is
no
need
for
it.
AH
I
kind
of
don't
like
it.
That's
it
is
okay,
we
are
eight
resident
here.
First
of
all,
we
didn't
sign
for
a
trail
or
giving
away
anything.
We
just
signed
for
a
short,
a
small
pathway
for
few
neighbors
to
pass
now,
thanks
to
other
residents,
they
make
us
look
like
a
criminal,
eight
homeowner
criminal.
We
are
here.
We
are
only
looking
at
our
safety
and
security
for
ourselves.
I'm
a
senior
citizen
and
others
also,
so
my
husband
also,
we
just
want
to
this
pathway,
be
closed.
AH
So
not
everybody
has
a
good
intention
when
they
are
walking
from
here.
There
are
lots
of
criminal
things
going
on
also
so
when
the
road
pathway
is
open,
is
much
easier
to
come
to
our
property
and
we
don't
have
a
park.
As
that,
lady
said,
it's
just
a
parking
lot
with
some
grass
on
it.
It's
not
a
park
and
that
pathway
it
doesn't
work.
A
million
dollars
is
not,
I
don't
know,
but
what
kind
of
thing
they
are
saying?
AH
A
AF
A
AF
Hi,
my
name
is
thanks.
My
name
is
vivian
thanks
member
and
order
by
community
members
and
competitive
citizens
for
today's
meeting
again
my
name
is
vivienne.
I
live
on
lozano
link
and
then
I'm
very
proud
copenhagen
citizen.
Unfortunately,
I
feel
being
attacked
in
this
meeting.
I've
been
portrayed
as
selfish
and
also
greedy
hoa
owner,
but
I
wanted
to
point
out
based
on
facts
and
not
assumptions
as
well
as
exaggerated
statement,
because
I
heard
some
of
those
statements
being
repeated
many
times
throughout
this
call.
So
let
me
kind
of
stay
on
the
the
facts.
AF
First,
there
are
additional
primary
and
secondary
access
point
to
this
new
project,
which
did
not
exist
before
so
connectivity
and
access
point
to
the
new
trail,
actually
indeed
increased
versus
before
so
also
the
easement.
The
virtual
easement
was
not
planned
as
a
trailhead
and
the
easement
is
for
pedestrian
pathway,
not
a
bike
way.
So
these
are
all
fat
and
not
opinion.
AF
AF
It's
worse
than
you're
walking,
because
there's
no
flashlight,
no
stop
sign
to
want
people
to
slow
down
and
watch
the
surrounding
actually
it's
more
dangerous
than
when
there's
a
stop
sign
and
people
stray
walking
because
at
least
there's
a
stop
silence,
there's
some
flashlight
and
these
people
know
that
it
should
slow
down.
Also,
I
want
to
point
out
something
that
I
didn't
mention
before
these
pathway
directly
faced
the
major
entrance
of
bill,
moore,
there's
a
lot
of
cars
in
and
out
through
that
parking
from
filmore.
AF
I
also
wanted
to
point
out
that
just
one
second,
I
also
wanted
to
point
out
the
original
eastman.
That's
not
include
nighttime
usage,
not
include
a
high
level
traffic,
and
all
this
will
be
definitely
increased
from
this
point
of
time.
So
I
also
wanted
to
mention
that
we
should
not
be
portrayed
as
selfish
and
greedy
hoa.
AI
Good
evening
may
paul
and
city
council
members,
I'm
a
cupertino
resident,
I'm
also
a
member
of
the
city's
bike
paid
commission,
although
speaking
here
as
myself,
so
the
city
has
spent
a
fair
bit
of
money
and-
and
we
all
spent
a
little
bit
of
time
on
you
know
developing
the
ragna
creek
trail
as
such,
we
should
have
as
much
access
to
a
trail
as
possible
and
not
not
less.
If
anything,
we
need
more
access
to
our
our
parks
and
trails.
AI
And
I
would
say
that
the
argument
that
we
shouldn't
have
this
walk
path
there,
because
it
happens
to
you
know
intersect
essentially
with
the
street,
is
flawed
because
trails
and
paths
that
don't
run
along
roads
they
by
their
nature,
will
you
know
intersect
with
roads
from
motor
vehicles
where
there
is
not
a
road.
So
that's
not
the
reason
to
close
this
path
and
trail.
If
that
was
the
reason,
we
need
to
close
a
whole
lot
of
maths
and
drills,
it
simply
doesn't
make
any
sense.
AI
A
AJ
A
AJ
AJ
I
feel
that
the
homeowners,
when
they
purchased
their
homes,
that
there
was
an
intent
there
for
this
little
path,
to
connect
to
the
trail
and
and
that
a
bigger
trail
would
be
built.
I've
already
heard
many
statements,
as
have
you
in
favor,
of
keeping
the
trail
open
so
I'll.
Try
to
keep
this
short
and
just
say
that
I
really
agree
with
most
of
what
has
been
said
there
and
as
far
as
the
safety
part
is
concerned,
it
seems
to
me
that
if
issues
come
up
after
the
trail
is
open,
they
can
be
addressed.
AJ
AK
AK
You
know
first
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
this
public
walkway
access
is
nothing
like
russia
attacking
ukraine.
That
was
really
uncalled
for.
There's
no
reason
that
the
city
should
give
up
this
easement
for
this
walking
path.
As
some
of
these
owners
pointed
out,
it's
not
supposed
to
be
used
by
bicycles.
AK
There
should
be
a
sign
to
that
effect.
There
is
no
sign
there
like
now.
This
is
a
public
walkway.
It
benefits
cupertino
residents.
How
many
more
times
is
the
ragnar
creek
trail
going
to
be
on
the
council
agenda
residents
advocated
for
this
easement
when
the
housing
project
was
built
back
in
2002
to
2003,
the
easement
was
agreed
to
by
the
developer
when
the
city
council
approved
the
project
thanks
to
the
advocacy
by
residents
at
the
time.
AK
There
were
a
lot
of
residents
walking
across
rodriguez,
mid
block,
despite
the
lack
of
a
crosswalk
and,
as
other
speakers
have
explained,
crossing
a
street
mid-block
between
non-signal
intersections
is
not
jaywalking
and
is
not
illegal,
and
it
was
disappointing
to
hear
that
term
used
improperly
by
the
city
engineer
and
during
council
discussion.
I
would
urge
council
members
to
use
the
accurate
verbiage
regarding
them.
AK
AK
AK
It's
not
used
much
now,
but
once
the
trail
is
open,
it
will
likely
be
used
by
a
lot
more
residents,
including
students,
people
walk
into
creekside
park
or
cupertino
high
school
would
have
to
backtrack
about
600
feet.
To
get
to
the
entrance
they'd
not
want
to
add
a
quarter
mile
round
trip
to
their
walk.
It
doesn't
seem
like
a
huge
distance,
but
it
would
be
enough
to
prevent
residents
from
accessing
the
path
and
instead
walking
along
rodriguez
up
to
blaney.
AK
We
want
to
encourage
residents
to
walk
and
cycle
when
possible
and
reduce
dependence
on
motor
vehicles.
Yesterday,
I
also
went
along
the
path
from
the
trail
to
rodriguez.
The
pavement
is
in
poor
condition.
It
should
be
repaved
immediately.
So
there's
no
trip
and
falls.
The
council
needs
to
consider
the
needs
of
all
residents,
it's
residents
that
benefit
benefit
from
this
path.
Thank
you
vote.
No.
AK
B
B
A
Members
of
the
public
that
wish
to
share
a
document
must
email.
Prior
to
speaking,
for
up
to
three
minutes.
I
see
okay,
well,
we'll
adjust
that
to
indicate
a
reasonable
amount
of
time.
I
think,
probably
within
the
first
10
minutes
would
be
reasonable,
but
yeah
go
ahead
and
add
that
to
the
public
comments
and
written
materials
after
the
meeting,
and
if
you
like,
you
can
go
ahead
and
indicate
whether
this
is
in
favor
or
against.
Briefly,
for
the
email
comment.
A
J
Okay,
thank
you,
mayor,
paul,
okay,
so
I'm
I'm
looking
at
the
agenda
packet,
the
information
that
we
have
and
a
couple
of
things
bother
me
from
the
report,
so
more
information
that
I
would
like
is
we're
not
seeing
an
entire
kind
of
like
a
satellite
view
showing
all
the
way
to
blaney
and
torrey,
I
believe,
are
the
two
end
streets
with
the
crosswalks.
So
I
would
like
to
have
that
information
for
the
tracked
map.
We
were
only
given
one
page
sheet
three
of
three.
J
I
would
want
the
complete
document
and
if
there
is
a
verbal
written
easement
document,
I
would
I
want
to.
I
want
to
see
that
with
the
actual
language,
I
do
see
that
it
says
10
foot,
pedestrian
pathway,
easement
on
the
track
map
a
couple
of
problems
I
have
with
the
easement.
As
I
see
it
is
that
it
has
two
jogs
in
it
which
reduce
the
width
of
it
down
to
5.85
feet
in
one
location
and
6.51
in
another.
J
Also,
when
I
look
at
where
the
the
path
connects
with
rodriguez
there,
there
is
no
ada
compliant
ramp
and,
as
it's
been
mentioned,
there's
no
crosswalk.
There,
additionally,
were
you
to
head
straight
north
after
meeting
up
with
rodriguez
from
leaving
that
path,
you
are
going
to
go
into
a
driveway
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
street,
so
if
there
is
to
be
a
crosswalk
installed,
it
needs
to
be
offset
from
that
ramp.
J
I'm
curious
for
just
some
historical
information.
When
was
this
path
last
open,
it
looks
like
it
was
to
attach
rodriguez
to
la
palma,
and
the
the
easement
map
appears
to
show
that
there
was
not
a
prior
regard
trail.
I
had
heard
something
about
there
being
a
regnart
trail
open
at
one
time,
I'm
wondering
if,
if
that
did
exist,
could
I
hear
a
little
bit
about
that
history
and
did
this
path
project
this?
The
vacation
issue?
Did
this
go
to
the
bike,
ped,
commission
and
go
or
to
the
planning
commission
or
we
are?
A
M
K
K
When
was
the
new
the
original
developer
that
I
want
to
confirm
that,
and
second,
is
a
couple
of
residents
actually
said
about
open
access
for
utilities,
so
is
it
just
for
pedestrian
crossing
or
there
is
use
for
utilities
or
something
so
that's
a
little
confusing,
whether
it's
just
an
access
or
actually
it's
for
utilities
too.
If
it's
for
utilities,
it
would
be
very
not
wise
to
give
it
away
because
it
might
have
some
extra
use
in
the
future.
K
So
I
want
to
clear
that,
and
also
I
did
walk
to
pick
the
trail
twice
today
this
morning
and
then
you
know
back
and
forth
and
went
to
both
future
openings
and
assess
the
refrigerator's
road
conditions.
So
I
I
do
believe
that
council
member
moore's
question
of
how,
for
safety
reasons,
if
we
do
want
to
keep
the
trail,
how
do
we
install
flashing
lights
and
things
like
so
I
guess
the
staff
can
maybe
future
can
answer
that
in
the
future.
A
E
Here
so
the
orange
is
shows
all
the
trail,
I
think
back
in
2002
when
there
was
a
wall,
and
the
trail
is
only
from
this
easement
to
to
palma.
I
think
it's
only.
That
part
is
very
short
and
that's
the
only
access
point
to
the
trail
at
that
time.
So
I
think
it
makes
made
sense
at
that
time
to
require
the
easement
and
the
at
that
time.
Cupertino
library
is
not
open,
yet
library
opens
in
2004.
E
So
I'm
curious,
what's
the
number
of
estimated
strengths
using
this
easement
back
in
2002,
compared
with
the
the
number
of
residents
who
would
use
this
trail
with
the
new
rigonous
creek
trail,
and
also
my
understanding,
is
the
hoa
pays
for
the
very
nice
landscaping
and
watering
or
to
keep
the
landspeak
space
scaping
and
the
pavement
and
all
the
other
landscaping
features
so
with
the
increased
use
if
there
need
to
be
more
maintenance
fee?
Who
should
pay?
For
that?
E
But
it
didn't
identify
this
easement
and
so
now,
so
we
didn't
know
about
this
potential
danger
of
people
crossing
the
walk.
If
this
path
is
left
open,
very
likely,
tiny
kids
who
would
be
rushing
to
go
to
school,
to
eat
an
order
to
brickside
park
to
mount
to
cupertino
high,
I
welcome
that
they
would
use
the
trail,
but
then,
if
they
rush
and
cross
the
street
and
something
accident
happened,
who
will
be
liable,
the
city
and
for
this
street
I
was.
E
I
visited
there,
this
particular
street,
maybe
because
of
the
curve,
but
also
because
it's
very
wide.
It's
40
feet
wide
according
to
the
city
staff,
much
wider
than
other
neighborhood
street.
Those
cars
are
driving
faster,
it's
much
faster
than
other
street,
and
I
looked
at
the
the
other
crossing
for
the
feasibility
study.
This
is
the
on.
The
left
is
east
estate,
where
we
have
come.
A
Out
with
where
I
didn't
give
a
calculation,
we
also
never
made
it
so
okay,
so
you
see
you're
at
that.
At
that
point,
let
me
let
me
check
in
with
council
member
willie
to
you
know,
round
off
the
the
first
round
of
council
comments,
questions
and
then
I
will
bring
it
over
to
staff
to
answer
some
of
the
questions
that
have
been
posed
by
by
council
in
this
first
round,
so
councilman
willie.
C
I
think
questions
have
already
been
pretty
well
laid
out,
but
I
do
have
a
few,
but
I'd
really
like
to
start
off
because
to
me
it's
the
most
important
thing
is:
we
need
to
listen
to
all
the
residents.
Anyone
who
wants
to
tell
us
what
their
thoughts
are
we're
here
to
listen
to
them
and
so
whether
they
like
the
path
or
they
don't
like
the
path.
I
hope
we
all
will
respect
everybody's
opinion.
C
People
come
from
different
directions
and
have
different
views.
So
that
being
said,
you
know
my
questions
would
be
some
of
which
have
already
been
raised.
It's
very
hard
for
us
to
make
a
essentially
a
forever
decision
without
more
of
the
details,
and
so,
in
addition
to
the
ones
that
have
already
been
laid
out,
the
speed
vice
mayor
brought
up
the
speed
on
rodriguez.
I
I
think
we
really
should
have
city
staff
telling
us
on
that
on
that
road.
C
C
C
C
Is
it
truly
only
for
walking
and
is
that
going
to
be
maintained
where
we
now
will
be
having
a
very
nice
ragnar,
creek
trail,
for
which
I'm
thinking,
kids
and
adults
are
going
to
be
riding
their
bikes,
and
I
think
we
can
all
appreciate
that
at
many
intersections,
not
if
everybody
gets
off
the
bike
and
walks
across
the
the
intersection
they
come
down
on
many
intersections
and
just
ride
right
through.
So
if
the
path
is
truly
only
five
six
feet,
does
that
present
a
safety
issue?
C
C
I
I
do
feel
we
really
want
connectivity
in
cupertino,
but
I
do
think
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
questions
the
details
are
all
put
in
front
of
us
so
that
we
can
support
the
the
best
decision
for
the
community.
I
think
yeah.
I
think
that
pretty
much
covers
it,
but
I
I
would
also
echo
I
really
think
we
needed
a
couple
photographs.
C
A
Well,
thank
you,
councilmember,
let's
go,
let's
go
to
staff
and
let
me
start
with
with
chad,
chad,
if
you
could
address
the
questions
that
were
posed
by
council
and
then
I'll
go
to
our
city
attorney
chris
and
and
if
anyone
else
from
staff
would
like
to
provide
some
input.
Please
feel
free
to
do
so
and
you
can
raise
your
hand
if
you
have
some
input
points
there,
but
let's
go
to
chad.
Welcome
back
yeah.
P
P
She
had
also
requested
information
regarding
the
track
map
that's
fairly
easily,
provided
we
have
provided
page
three
page.
One
of
the
track
map
does
discuss
the
easements
and
it
states
here.
We
also
hereby
dedicate
to
the
city
of
cupertino
and
easement
for
pedestrian
pathway
purposes,
as
shown
over
lot
one.
So
the
easement
is
for
pedestrian
pathways.
P
P
P
This
was
requested
to
come
straight
to
city
council,
and
we
have
done
that
and
when
this
was
originally
installed,
the
pathway,
the
walkway
came
down
to
regner
creek
and
the
pathway
continued
along
regnart
creek
until
it
reached
de
palma
lane
and
that
was
kind
of
the
original
concept
of
the
regnar
creek
trail.
I
don't
think
it
was
officially
designated
the
regnar
creek
trail,
but
it
was
officially
a
trail
at
that
point
in
time.
P
Council
member
way
asked
about
pedestrian
only
access
again,
the
easement
is
the
only
place
where
pedestrian
access
is
public.
Pedestrian
access
is
permitted,
but,
yes,
there
are
public
utility
easements.
Also
within
this
area.
If
you
vacated
the
pedestrian
access
season
tonight,
you
would
not
be
vacating.
The
public
service
season
for
utilities,
with
respect
to
a
crosswalk
at
along
rodriguez
staff,
believes
that
we
can
facilitate
getting
a
crosswalk
installed
in
there.
P
P
We
believe
we
could
get
a
crosswalk
that
meets
highway
design
standards
by
situating
at
about
65
feet,
west
of
where
that
walkway
hits
the
sidewalk.
We
need
to
do
further
evaluation
of
that,
but
we
believe
that's
quite
possible
with
that
stated,
I'm
not
necessarily
sure
I
recommend
it.
As
stated
this
is
on
a
curve.
P
It's
never
a
good
idea
to
put
crosswalks
on
a
curve,
so
we
could
probably
meet
the
necessary
safety
requirements.
Is
established
by
the
design,
the
highway
design
manual
with
that
stated,
there's
kind
of
a
common
sense
aspect.
It's
not
necessarily
the
greatest
idea.
To
put
it
on
a
curve
doesn't
mean
we
couldn't
provide
adequate
sight
lines
to
ensure
that,
but
you
know
we
typically
try
not
to
recommend
placing
crosswalks
on
curbs
council
member
chow
had
requested
the
number
of
estimated
pedestrians
in
2002
compared
to
now.
I
do
not
have
that
information.
P
Maintenance
is
currently
performed
by
the
homeowners
association,
and
I
believe
that
would
continue
as
we
proceed
into
the
future.
The
easement
language
does
not
indicate
that
the
city
has
the
even
the
right
to
maintain.
It's
basically
provides
pedestrian
access.
Only
with
respect
to
the
liability
question,
I
would
defer
to
our
city
attorney
on
that.
P
P
P
P
When
I
did
look
at
the
pedestrian
crossing
with
sight
lines,
I
anticipated
a
speed
limit
of
35
miles
an
hour
just
to
provide
a
little
additional
conservative
safety
measures
there
again,
I
think
we
can
get
a
pedestrian
crosswalk
that
meets
those
site
guidelines
for
35
mile
per
hour.
Speed
limits
the
original
agreement.
It
wasn't
necessarily
agreement,
as
stated
in
the
track
map,
it
was
strictly
an
easement
for
pedestrian
access,
and
the
width
of
the
existing
pathway
is
only
about
four
and
a
half
feet.
Maybe
five.
P
A
AL
Yeah
yeah,
so
yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
There
were
a
couple
questions,
so
the
the
jaywalking
issue
it's
crossing
the
street
at
this
location
would
not
be
a
violation
of
the
vehicle
code.
You
know
you
know
generally,
because
the
the
adjacent
in
intersections
aren't
signalized.
You
know
the
the
pedestrian
would
have
to
yield
to
traffic
in
that
situation,
but
it's
not
necessarily
a
violation
of
the
vehicle
codes
across
the
street.
AL
You
know-
and
I
mean
I
think
perhaps
the
the
more
significant
question
is-
is
whether
it's
you
know
safe
to
cross
the
street
at
this
location-
and
this
is,
you
know,
an
unsignalized
area.
It
is
a
non-major
street,
it's
fairly
routine
in
the
city
to
have
uncontrolled
crossings
in
this
kind
of
area,
and
so
it
becomes
a
question
of
of
really
traffic
design,
and
you
know
engineering
judgment
as
to
whether
it
it's
safe
here
and.
O
AL
You
know
that
the
fact
that
the
property
owners
maintain
the
easement,
I
think,
reduces
the
city's
risk
of
liability
to
a
certain
extent,
and
there
would
also
have
to
be
you
know,
a
dangerous
condition
of
public
property
that
the
city
knew
about
or
or
should
have
known
about,
and
so
that
would
have
to
be
something
you
know
most
commonly.
You
know
that's
something
like
a
raised
sidewalk,
something
like
that
and
it's
it's
not.
It
has
to
be
something
out
of
the
ordinary
to
to
give
rise
to
liability.
AL
A
Okay,
thank
you
chris.
Let's
go
to,
I
think.
Councilmember
moore
had
her
hand
raised
first
and
then
we'll
go
back
to
advice,
no
okay,
so
let's
go
to
vice
mayor
chow
and
then
councilmember
moore
I'll
continue
the
timers
here
and
so,
let's,
let's
try
for
another
three
minutes
without
having
to
take
them
from
there.
P
And
additionally,
you
know
drivers
are
attempting
to
maneuver
the
curve,
as
opposed
to
in
straightaways,
where
they're
just
kind
of
keeping
their
car
steady
with,
with
with
attempting
to
maneuver
their
curves
the
curve
and
potentially
an
obstruction
like
a
pedestrian.
In
the
way.
It
just
creates
a
more
difficult
situation
for
a
driver
to
perceive.
E
E
Yeah
and
h.o.a
is
still
liable
for
paying
for
the
maintenance
fee
and
watering,
which
I'm
I
think
is
about
two
thousand
dollars
a
month
according
to
them
plus
removal
of
liters
and
any
pavement
split,
also
it
with
increased
usage.
There
might
be
increase
in
maintenance
fee.
So
if
there
is
an
increase
in
maintenance
fee
because
of
the
use
who
should
city
cover
the
increase
since
it
back
in
2002
that
all
the
trail
was
not
meant
to
be
to
to
to
even
include
access
to
library,.
P
M
J
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so
I
I
would
like
chad,
if
you
could
pull
up
the
the
google
earth
drop
a
pin,
and
we
can
take
a
look
at
that
that
path
you
can,
you
can
see
it
from
the
the
street
view
pretty
easily
so
that
we
all
have
a
good
idea.
Yeah
there
you
go
okay,
so
it
so
perhaps
you
can
zoom
in
a
little
bit.
I
don't
know,
but
it
looks
like
it's
kind
of
an
asphalt
path,
a
little
bit
rough
surface.
J
So
I
think
the
car
is
able
to
come
up
to
the
curb
and
overhang
part
of
the
path.
That's
something
that
would
need
to
be
just
double
check
and
the
condition
of
the
asphalt
is
is
not.
It
looks
a
little
rough
right
at
the
edge
of
this.
The
the
back
of
the
sidewalk,
so
you
have
what
looks
like
there's
a
curb,
but
I
don't
know
that.
There's
a
wheel
stop
for
those
vehicles
before
they
get
to
the
curb
at
the
end
of
their
at
the
end
of
their
parking
spot.
J
J
It's
a
possibility,
so
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
about
that
and
then
and
then,
if
I
understand
correctly-
and
perhaps
chris
could
talk
about
this
one
more
time.
So
if
the,
if
there
is
say,
there's
a
there's,
a
trip
on
that
path
say
that
the
the
asphalt
gets
rougher,
we
have
some
weather.
Who
knows
too
much
traffic.
Someone
has
a
trip,
they
fall.
What's
the
city's.
What's
the
city's
liability
there
again.
A
P
And
if
you
wouldn't
mind
mayor,
I
just
want
to
state
quickly
that
the
the
width
of
the
trail
is
between
four
and
a
half
and
five
and
a
half
feet,
depending
on
where
you're
at
at
the
location,
where
those
cars
pull
up
adjacent
to
the
trail.
It's
about
five
and
a
half
feet
there,
and
if
a
car
were
to
overhang,
let's
say
two
feet,
you
would
have
three
and
a
half
feet
clear,
which
would
still
meet
ada
with
requirements.
M
K
Thank
you
mia
paul,
so
I
want
to
follow
with
council,
remember,
moore's
comments
and
also
because
I
did
walk
the
trail
and
the
car.
The
old
car
is
parking
there
and
I
feel
pretty
safe
working
on
it,
but
the
service
is
rough.
So
actually
that
wasn't
my
question.
You
know
if
more
pedestrians,
you
know
the
trail
opens
there
will
be
more
pedestrians.
K
So,
according
to
my
understanding,
the
hormone
association,
because
this
is
just
easement-
they
still
own
the
property
and
when
we
have
easement,
we
all
have
easement
in
our
properties.
We
have
to
maintain
our
yard
and
and
the
condition
of
where
we
live.
The
easement
belongs
to
the
right
to
use
for
the
city
or
for
utilities.
So
my
my
question
is
sort
of
the
same
is
well,
you
know.
K
P
A
E
E
So
I
think
that's
what
we
are
here
for
we
shouldn't
be
ignoring
an
issue
simply
because
a
smaller
number
of
resets
will
be
affected,
and
I
totally
agree
that
there
should
not
be
any
favoritism,
such
as
the
one
given
to
the
gates
at
linda
vista
trail,
which
is
an
area
that
doesn't
have
such
safety
concerns.
I
still
have
not
gotten
an
answer
on
who
agreed
to
install
the
gates
and
link
the
vista
trail
without
notifying
anyone
and
allocated
nine
thousand
dollars
a
year
on
going
to
open
and
close
the
gates.
E
That's
a
gift
from
the
city
annually.
I
do
wish
this
kind
of
favoritism
is
disclosed
to
the
public,
so
that
public
is
aware
of
the
decision-making
process
and
can
weigh
in
as
we
do
tonight,
for
the
in
the
future,
and
for
this
I
pedestrian
death
is
at
a
30
year.
High
and
then
during
the
pandemic
with
the
reduction
of
traffic,
in
fact,
in
fact,
the
pedestrian
death
has
increased
by
21.
E
I
I
think
there
are
if
you
live
in
an
urban
city
walking
by
biking
taking
a
longer
route
in
order
to
reach
your
destination,
because
there
is
no
crosswalk,
it's
a
common
daily
life.
People
should
be
used
to
that.
There
is
no
crosswalk.
I
take
a
few
more
steps,
so
to
use
the
crosswalk
to
cross
cupertino
is
moving
into
a
busier
and
urban
city.
People
should
be
used
to
that
and
there
are
access
points
to
reginald
creek
trail.
E
J
Thank
you,
mayor
paul.
I
I
do
want
to
mention
that
the
linda
vista
trail
does
have
a
flashing
lighted
crosswalk
added
at
it,
and
I
would
personally
I'd
like
to
see
staff
come
back
with
the
crosswalks
mapped,
both
with
and
without
the
lozano
lane
path.
So
because
you
have
one
of
the
entrance
points
is
closer
to
city
hall
and
which
to
me
is
the
the
more
obvious
entrance
point
to
the
trail
and
in
in
my
opinion
there
there
ought
to
be
a
crosswalk
near
that
location.
J
There
was
a
member
of
the
public
who
showed
a
map
indicating
there
were
several
other
of
these
easements
providing
access
to
areas
in
the
city,
and
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
take
that
information
and
come
back
to
us.
This
would
be
my
request.
I
don't
know
if
the
other
council
members
agree
with
us,
but
bring
that
information
back
to
us
to.
Let
us
know
what
those
easements
are
like.
I
looked
at
the
one
at
the
head
of
alderbrook
and
it
was
very
wide
with
a
with
a
ramp
up
protective
bollards.
J
You
could
easily
bring
a
bicycle
up
and
up
and
back
through
there,
and
it
was
not
very
close
even
to
the
to
the
residential
homes.
So
I'd
like
to
know
a
little
bit
about
the
others.
If,
if
you
find
that
that's
an
exercise
that
only
probably
three
sample
ones
would
be
useful
beneficial
to
us
that
that's
fine,
but
I'd
like
to
know
what
those
paths
are
like.
J
I
have
been
on
one
near
the
linda
vista
trail.
That
has
the
stairways,
I
believe,
that's
a
city-owned
easement
and
I
am
curious
about
it,
because
that
one
really
seems
like
a
liability
but
leave
that
to
the
attorney.
So
those
are
right
now.
My
my
two
requests
and
whether
also
are
we
going
to
be
doing
something
or
is
the
city
have
a
proposal
for
how
you're
going
to
keep
bicycles
from
making
that
obvious
turn
onto
that
trail?
J
A
A
Okay
sounds
good,
so
here's
my
motion.
The
motion
is
that
I
move
that
council
direct
staff
to
place
a
pedestrian
pathway,
no
cycling
or
similar
sign
on
both
sides
of
the
campo,
the
lozano,
pedestrian
pathway,
easement
and
return
to
council
after
gathering
usage
and
safety
data
at
these
at
this
season
for
one
calendar
year
or
earlier,
if
needed,
with
recommendations
based
upon
that
data,
and
so
that's
my
that's
that's
my
motion.
A
C
Yeah
so
in
this
instance
it's
an
existing
hat.
As
I
see
it,
it's
an
existing
path
that
has
been
open
has
always
had
potential
safety.
I
definitely
am
very
concerned
about
safety,
but
we're
not
introducing
a
new,
although
somebody
might
argue
about
the
number
of
people
using
it.
Would
you
know
if
it
was
twice
as
many
people,
then
maybe
it's
twice
as
much
of
a
safety
possible,
but
at
any
rate
it's
something.
That's
been
open.
C
There
are
some
concerns,
and
so
with
that
I
would
still
be
of
the
mind
right
now
to
keep
it
as
a
pedestrian.
Only
you
read
my
mind
with
the
signage
on
both
sides
that
it's
a
walkway.
I'm
really
glad
that
we
got
to
see
the
pictures,
because
I
do
from
those
pictures.
If
I
saw
somebody
walking
and
a
bicycle
trying
to
maneuver
around
them.
It's
probably
gonna
be
okay.
C
If
that
person
had
a
child
walking
beside
them,
and
then
you
have
the
bicycle
now
I
I
think
you've
exceeded
the
capacity,
so
the
the
signage
requirement,
I
think,
does
that
allowing
city
staff
to
consider
an
actual
signal
crosswalk
or
maybe
it's
just
a
painted
crosswalk.
I
would
not
being
the
traffic
person.
All
I
can
do
is
is
say
what
my
thoughts
would
be.
C
I
think
when
we
all
come
to
a
a
yellow
crosswalk,
no
matter
where
it
is
whether
it's
at
an
intersection
or
mid
mid
block,
we're
going
to
be
on
the
lookout
that
that
is
a
crossing
point
and
you
know
around
schools.
They
actually
put
those
little
mini
signs
in
the
middle
to
indicate
that
it
is
a
crossing
point,
so
I
think
those
could
be.
Would
it
need
to
be
signalized
I'd
leave
it
for
staff
to
come
back.
C
C
J
Hey,
thank
you
mayor
paul.
So
this
is
a
civil
engineering
issue
and
in
particular
it's
a
safety
issue
and
the
path
is
currently
not
open.
So
it's
my
preference
that
we
would
ask
staff
to
come
back
with
the
potential
future.
Crosswalks
walks
mapped
both
with
and
without
lozano
lane,
letting
us
know
how
it
will
be
a
safe
area
for
crossings.
J
J
Okay,
okay,
I
moved
staff
come
back
with
the
crosswalks
mapped
with
and
without
the
lozano
lane
crossing
letting
us
know
how
to
be
a
safe
area
for
crossings
and
have
staff
suggest
the
proper
signage
and
safety
precautions
and
share
information
about
three
example.
Other
trail
crossings
within
the
city
that
have
easements
yeah.
A
M
A
P
Just
gonna,
I
was
gonna
briefly
state
that
I
could
put
together
an
explanation
for
each
of
those
easements
that
were
indicated
in
that
letter
and
and
provide
that
to
counsel.
Not
necessarily.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
come
back
to
a
public
meeting
for
that.
I
can
provide
it
to
you
through
a
member
of
council
that
way
you
can
at
least
see
that
information.
P
If
you
want
to
bring
this
item
back
and
further
discuss
and
deliberate
it
that's
your
choice,
but
I'm
trying
to
see
if
I
can't
spare
both
you
and
the
public
with
kind
of
hashing
this
out
further.
I
could
potentially
even
additionally
do
a
little
more
investigation
on
sight
lines
for
the
crosswalks,
both
near
the
walkway,
as
well
as
down
by
city
hall,
as
councilmember
councilmember
moore
had
suggested,
and
I
can
provide
that
in
a
member
of
council
also,
I'm
just
giving
that
as
a
as
an
option,
but
I
will
do
as
you
correct.
J
May
I
adjust
my
substitute
motion
then,
because
I'm
I'm
I'm
really
with
regards
to
the
other
easements
and
trail
trail
entrances.
That's
just
extra
information
that
I'd
like
to
know
because
I'm
curious
about
what
what
they
all
are
and
and
how
they
kind
of
came
about
the
history.
I
just
find
that
really
kind
of
fascinating,
so
going
back.
Then
I've
trimmed
my
requests
down.
A
B
Yes,
I
believe
I
can
read
it
back
so
council,
member
moore,
revised
promotion
for
staff
to
come
back
with
a
crosswalk
crosswalks
mapped
both
with
and
without
the
lozano
lane.
Entrance
letting
council
know
how
to
be
safe
in
the
area
for
crossings
and
have
staff
suggest
proper
signage
and
safety
precautions
for
the
trail.
P
J
I
would
want
to
come
back
at
it
at
a
future
meeting,
so
I
I
don't
think
that
this
would
take
particularly
long
in
order
to
figure
out
where
those
crosswalks
should
should
best
be
placed
within
without
the
the
entrance.
I
think
that
would
be
fairly
simple
and
with
that,
when
we
say
crosswalks,
I'm
I'm
envisioning
what
you
have
at
linda
vista
with
the
the
solar
powered
about
sixteen
twenty
thousand
dollars
per
unit.
It
looked
like
to
have
those
installed
on
each
side
of
the
street.
J
A
A
E
A
Okay,
you're
gonna
go
ahead;
okay,
all
right,
so
your
hands
raised
and
councilmember,
I
didn't
mean
to
cut
you
off.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
you
know.
Procedurally,
you
know
correct
going
forward
with
our
discussion.
So
let's,
let's
go
to
you
vice
mayor
ciao.
If
you
have
comments
I'll
remind
you
that
council,
member,
more
substitute
motion
is
on
the
table
at
this
point.
Okay,.
E
I
might
have
an
amendment,
but
I
need
more
information
first,
so
the
rigor
creek
trail
is
not
open,
but
the
access
point
to
lasagna
easement
is
open,
so
people
are
using
that
I
see
people
jail
walking
across
the
street,
whatever
you
call
that,
but
it's
open.
So
when
will
the
regina
trail
actually
be
fully
open?
So
we
can
assess
the
usage.
P
Yeah
I'll
need
to
verify
that
exact
timing
because,
like
I
said
there
is
going
to
be
some
additional
construction
that
has
to
do
with
fencing
and
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
going
to
hamper
trail
usage
I'll
need
to
investigate
that
and
give
you
a
little
more
detail.
But
we're
hoping
to
have
the
trail
project
finished
very
soon
and
again
have
maybe
a
little
bit
of
minimal
disturbances
for
the
fencing
as
it
continues
to
be
installed.
E
Yeah
I
like
your
original
motion,
that
we
staff
come
back
after
a
year
to
assess
the
usage,
because
I
really
am
wondering
leaving
the
access
point
at
lozano.
If
my
encourage
dangerous
road
crossing,
whether
it's
jay,
walking
or
not,
crossing
at
a
curved
road
is
dangerous.
As
a
traffic
engineer
has
pointed
out,
and
it's
so
and
then
I
anticipate
a
lot
of
use
of
the
trail
by
younger
students
who
think
they
are
getting
to
safety
place,
but
the
safety
of
a
trail
is
only
as
safe
as
the
weakest
link,
which
is
the
crossing.
E
So
I
would
like
to
propose
an
amendment
that,
on
at
the
third
year
of
the
opening,
let's
bring
back
with
an
option
to
discuss
whether
on
the
access
point
at
lazaro
eastman
should
remain
given
our
information
of
crosswalk
at
largano
or
not
because
without
the
crosswalk
at
last
unknown.
Maybe
then
there
is
a
question
of
should
we
even
keep
that
as
access
point.
A
J
Okay,
could
it
be
stated
some
something
like
that?
We
evaluate
the
safety
situation
along
rodriguez
after
proposed
changes
have
been
made
in
in
in
during
a
one
year
time.
I
something
like
that
because
we're
we
want
to
look
at
it
after
a
year,
but
we
want
to
see
it
after
we've
done
whatever
we're
doing
so.
J
The
the
substitute
motion
is
asking
to
have
have
the
the
the
staff
comes
back,
giving
us
their
proposal
for
where
these
crosswalks
would
be
with
it,
whether
we
have
the
vacation
of
the
easement
or
not
so,
we've
got
one
scenario
where
you
might
have
a
have
a
crosswalk
close
to
lozano
or
not,
and
then
one
where
it-
and
you
have
one
probably
near
the
other
entrance
by
city
hall
and
then
you'll
have
another.
You
know
the
other
suggestion
where
you
perhaps
just
have
one.
A
Yeah,
I
I
mean
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
call
in
on
chat
here,
but
I
think
you're
making
some
assumptions
with
regard
to
what
staff
would
come
back
and
suggest
from
hearing
the
discussion
tonight.
I
think
it's
possible
that
staff
would
come
back
and
suggest
that
the
best
thing
at
this
time
would
put
no
would
be
to
put
no
crosswalks
on
rodriguez.
But
let
me
let
me
go
to
chad
at
this
time.
So
chad
did
you
have
some
commentary
and
follow-up
to
this.
M
A
E
P
M
J
J
W
A
A
A
Yeah.
Okay,
so
let
me
let
me
share
the
original
motion
here.
Okay,
so
I
think
this
is
it
yeah,
so
this
should
be
the
original
motion
and
then
and
then
and
then
based
on
based
on
the
comments
and
discussion,
my
modified
motions
spoke
to
and
I'll
just
remind
everyone
that
this
is
not
on
the
table
or
my
original
motion's
not
either.
But
I
move
that
council
direct
staff
to
place
the
pedestrian
hold
on
pathway,
no
cycling
or
similar
sign
on
both
sides.
A
Okay,
let
me
let
me
try
to
do
this
again
document
three
three,
so
this
is
my
modifications
so
here
to
evaluate
and
place
the
evaluate
and
is
a
reaction
to
councilmember
moore's
comment
about
getting
staff's
recommendation
there,
which
I
think
speaks
to
what
what
chad
was
saying
a
moment
ago
and
then
following
legal
notice
of
completion
of
the
ragnar
creek
trail
was
another
time
point
that
was
indicated
indicated
by
chad.
I
I
think
you
know.
Let
me
just
say
this.
A
I
think
the
substitute
motion
is
different
and
I
acknowledge
that
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone's
clear
about.
What's
on
the
table
right
now,
that's
councilmember
moore
substitute
motion
and
that's
a
request
to
bring
this
back
as
early
of
a
date
as
possible
with
regard
to
trying
to
map
out
some
options
for
you.
AL
A
Yeah,
so
I
mean
what
I
heard
council
vice
mayor.
Ciao
was
a
year
out
from
because
this
is
what
councilmember
moore
suggested
a
year
out
from
when
any
modifications
based
upon
the
exercise
that
she
was
contemplating
in
her
substitute
motion
was
completed,
which
is
to
say
that
if
staff
was
to
come
back,
you
know
hypothetically
and
say
you
know
you
could
put
a
crosswalk
here,
because
that's
what
I
heard
chad
was
saying.
A
So
my
understanding
of
what
the
substitute
motion
says
based
upon
your
discussion,
is
that
if
that
crosswalk
comes
in,
it
would
be
a
year
after
those
modifications
were
made
based
upon
the
current
exercise,
that's
contemplated
by
the
substitute
motion,
so
that
that's
my
understanding.
You
know
based
upon
the
discussion,
but
I
think
you
know-
and
this
is
a
reason
why
I
ask
people
to
write
down
their
motions
so
that
we
can
understand.
A
You
know
have
a
common
basis,
so
I
I
I
would
basically
refer
this
over
to
the
city
clerk
to
read
back
what
she
has
been
reporting.
As
the
original
motion,
you
know
together
with
the
amendment.
Otherwise
we
really
don't
have
a
common
basis
to
to
discuss
the
motion.
That's
on
the
table,
because
you
know
we
could
have
three
people
with
three
separate
understandings
and
you
know.
A
Frankly,
I
mean
I
I
have
that
training
to
kind
of
you
know
winnowing
on
like
what
was
discussed
and
but
I
think
that
not
everyone
does
and
so
like
that.
That
thing
might
float.
You
know
in
people's
minds
as
we're
kind
of
going
along
and
having
ideas.
So
my
suggestion
would
be
that
we
asked
our
city
clerk
what
what
her
understanding
of
the
substitute
emotion,
what
the
amendment
is
right
now.
B
J
My
concern
is
that
we
are.
We
have
now
created
a
a
reason
for
people
to
cross
rodriguez,
be
it
at
lozano
or
at
the
the
larger
entrance
just
to
the
east
of
the
city
hall.
We
will
have
a
collection
of
people
crossing
the
street
and
that
we
need
to
essentially
gather
them
together
into
one
location
safely,
to
cross
whether
it
has
the
flashing
lights
or
not.
But
I
am.
J
I
am
concerned
that
you're
going
to
have
essentially
now
two
attractive
nuisances
on
the
south
side
and
people
will
be
kind
of
willy-nilly
crossing
the
street
all
over
the
place,
rather
than
having
them
gathered
together
in
a
in
a
safe
location.
So
if,
if
it
can
be
proven
that
that's
that
that
is
not
not
a
problem,
I
I
definitely.
I
don't
want
to
see
a
safety
situation
where
we
have
a
pedestrian
or
or
a
little
kid
on
a
bicycle.
Have
an
accident
out
there.
J
A
Maybe
we
need
another
crosswalk,
which
I
understand
is
what
you're
saying,
but
I'm
also
not
hearing
from
staff,
any
indication
whatsoever
that
they
would
be
coming
back
in
two
weeks
or
two
months
and
recommending
that
crosswalk.
So
I
I
you
know,
I
appreciate
the
concern.
I
just
don't
know
how
this
course
of
action
gets
us
closer
to
alleviating
what
your
perception
of
the
correction
might
be,
so
I'm
I'm
kind
of
leaning,
I'm
kind
of
leaning
against
supporting
this
motion.
For
that
reason,
but
I'm
open
to
hearing
what
other
feedback
points
there
are.
A
P
Just
briefly,
typically,
you
know:
crosswalk
placements
usually
are
accompanied
with
kind
of
pedestrian
volume
studies
and
since
we're,
you
know
going
to
be
evaluating
usage
data
for
both
the
trail
and
lozano.
That
may
be
an
opportunity
to
also
try
and
get
pedestrian
volume
fishing
room
volumes
for
potential
crosswalks,
just
as
an
fyi
that
may
be
an
option
there.
K
Yeah
all
right,
thank
you,
mayor
paul.
I
think
we're
making
a
lot
of
assumptions
and
then
we
don't
have
data.
So
I
I
do
like
your
modified
motion
because
we
need
to
collect
data
before
we
can
make
any
assumptions.
I
I
just
don't
think
that
staff
can
come.
I
I
don't
think
we
we
need
to
wait
for
another
two
months,
a
few
weeks
and
for
the
staff
to
come
up
with
recommendations
that
with
no
data
like
chat,
said
so
I
do
believe
we
can.
K
We
need
to
make
this
decision
tonight
and
then
do
it,
a
data
driven
decision
later,
and
so
I
I
would
think
it's
too
pretty.
You
know,
there's
no
data.
How
do
you
say
which
pedestrian?
How
many
you
know
crosswords
you
can
do
so.
I
just
don't
think
that
we
need
to
postpone
this
decision
now,
but
we
can
collect
data
after
the
trails
open
and
then
work
on
staff
recommendations.
E
E
B
E
E
And
then
for
the
easement,
I
asked
ask
the
staff
about
the
easement
sema
brought
up,
and
the
staff
said
is
that
most
of
them
are
owned
by
other
public
agencies
like
water
district
and
the
city
maintains
some
of
them
and
the
other
agency
maintains
the
some
of
them.
If
we
bring
back
more
information
about
easement,
I
I
am
especially
interested
in
those
owned
by
private
property
owners,
and
I
would
like
to
know
whether
the
city
maintains
them
or
not,
and
how
were
those
decisions
made,
and
that
would
be
interesting
to
know.
Yeah.
E
Just
oh
wait:
the
did
when
the
other
comment
and
about
the
motion,
I
think
I
I
share
of
council
member
moore's
concern
that
it's.
On
the
one
hand
I
think
mayor
paul
was
right.
We
should
get
some
data,
but,
on
the
other
hand,
this
next
year
we
are
seeing
open
season
cross
the
walk.
We
will
see
what
happens
and
the
staff
strongly
has
stated
that
a
crosswalk
near
lo
lozano
lane
is
not
recommended.
E
So
whenever
this
decision
comes
back
with
crosswalk
location,
I
would
like
us
to
also
consider
the
value
of
the
access
point
at
lozano
easements,
because
if
it's
really
not
appropriate
to
install
crosswalk
there,
then
leaving
that
excess
point
is
probably
waiting
for
everything
to
have
to
happen.
So
we
really.
That
should
be
something
we
consider
together
at
that
time.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
A
No
vice
president,
thank
you
very
much
and
yeah.
I
I
have
to
say
I
do
appreciate
the
discussion
and
you
know
I
am
starting
to
be
swayed
by
the
idea
of
coming
back
earlier
with
some
value
add
in
this
so
kirsten.
I
would
just
say
that
paragraph
you
just
added
and
copied.
I
would
put
it
behind
the
next
paragraph,
because
that's
after
the
amendment
so
then-
and
now
let
me
go
to
councilmember
moore
just
to
verify.
Councilmember
moore.
Are
you
okay
with
adding
that
hours
of
operation
language
there
as
the
original.
A
M
B
A
E
J
Mayor
paul
and
vice
vice
mayor,
I
believe
the
first
part
actually
kind
of
it.
It's
vaguely
I
vaguely
crafted
the
first
part
enough,
so
that
that
safety
issue
is
is
is
covered
by
the
stat
staff.
Coming
back
and
saying
dude
we
could
have
a
crosswalk
here
and
here
or
or
you
know,
our
wreck.
Our
preferred
recommendation
is
this:
if
we
have
one
crosswalk,
we
put
it
here
and
and-
and
we
think
you
know
this
about
that-
crosswalk
or
we
could
have
two
crosswalks
and
that
this
is
our
opinion
about
it.
J
E
A
E
AI
J
A
I
don't
know
how
staff's
gonna
go
about.
You
know
evaluating
it,
but
but
I
I
do
see
you
know
it's
a
very
legitimate
point
in
terms
of
you
know
weighing
the
weighing
the
you
know,
the
costs
and
benefits
of
a
future
action
here,
so
vice
mayor
trial.
I
assume
that
you're
going
to
go
ahead
and
accept
that.
A
Yeah,
okay,
all
right
so
we've
got
a
we've
got
a.
I
don't
know
how
many
amendments
the
substitute
motion
there
are,
but
here
it
is,
and
then
we
also
had
vice
merch.
Has
your
your
original
amendment
stands
so
we're
worse
kirsten
if
you
can,
just
where
it
says:
ciao
amended
the
substitute
to
direct
staff
to
return
to
council
one
year
et
cetera.
Sorry,
so
that's
still
part
of
the
motion
at
this
point.
A
J
A
Because
it
became
amended
by
that
paragraph,
the
amended
substitute
motion
and
then
and
then
again
that
same
language
amended
should
be
added
to
the
next
paragraph
to
mod
modified,
the
amended
so
that
that
should
make
it
a
correct
yeah.
And
then
that
would
encapsulate
the
amendment
in
this
shorter
paragraph.
Two
paragraphs
above
okay.
So.
A
I
I
think
you
can
be
cleaned
up.
You
know
with
the
minutes,
but
the
understanding
is
that
you
have
this
last
paragraph
together
with
that
shorter
paragraph
there,
as
as
the
substitute
motion,
that's
been
amended
and
and
modified
a
couple
times
so
all
right,
I
don't
see
any
further
hands
raised,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead,
and
so
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
call
for
a
vote
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
read
this
out
as
the
substitute
motion.
A
The
substitute
motion,
that's
on
the
table
after
modifications
and
amendments
is
as
follows:
more
chow
modified
the
amended
substitute
motion
to
direct
staff
to
come
back
with
the
crosswalk
map,
both
with
and
without
the
lozano
land
entrance
informing
council.
How
will
be
a
safe
area
for
crossings
and
have
staff
suggest,
I
think,
should
we
have
staff
suggesting
proper
signage
and
safety
precautions
and
hours
of
operation
for
the
trail
entrance
and
considering
the
value
of
access
points
at
the
lozano
easement
at
that
time
and
to
come
back
at
a
future
meeting?
A
A
K
Yes,
I
need
a
cleft.
I
have
a
clarification
question
regarding
the
this
proposed.
This
motion
doesn't
mean
that
the
staff
need
to
come
that
we're
not
making
decisions
tonight
and
staff
need
to
come
back
in
a
certain
future
time
for
us
to
discuss
this
easement
again,
because
we
we
have
that
additional
information
on
the
crossword
proposals.
A
In
addition
to
the
hours
of
operation
issue
that
was
raised,
you
know
vis-a-vis
another
trail
at
a
different
part
town,
and
I
think
those
are
the
the
points
that
I
had
heard
that
would
be
coming
back
in
the
near
future
and
then
from
there.
If
we
make
a
decision
as
to
whether
to
implement
infrastructure
at
that
time,
then
that
would
become
part
of
the
data
that
is
ultimately
considered
a
year
out
from
the
formal
opening
of
the
trail.
So
so
that's
that's.
The
motion
on
the
table
councilmember
way.
K
A
A
A
A
I
don't
want
to
eventually
hear,
but
I
think,
if
you're
looking
at
the
very
general
civic
center,
I
mean
crosswalks
in
general,
have
been
you
know,
kind
of
brought
up
by
the
public,
but
you
know
I
won't
go
to
areas
outside
of
this
particular.
You
know
easement
at
this
time.
So
yeah
is
that.
Does
that
answer
your
questions.
A
A
suggestion
that
the
the
closure
of
the
easement
come
back,
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
you
know,
data
points
that
are
being
requested
here
and
it
really
focuses
more
on
potential
crosswalks
here,
but
yeah,
okay,
so
customer
way
your
hand
is
still
raised.
Did
you
have
any
further
comments
or
questions?