►
From YouTube: Dearborn Heights Study Session 2/4/20
Description
The Dearborn Heights Study Session taking place Tuesday, February 4th, 2020.
Part 1 covers 5G Technology starting at 0:00
Part 2 covers the Treasurer Position Vacancy starting at 30:10
Part 3 covers Ordinance H-19-06 starting at 52:20
A
B
Evening
I
was
asked
to
come
down
here
to
redress
this
issue.
We
had
prepared
an
ordinance
based
upon
the
existing
FCC
rules
that
have
been
kind
of
adapted
in
the
state
of
Michigan
through
state
legislation
as
well,
as
we
pointed
it
out,
the
ordinance
well.
First
of
all,
the
state
and
the
federal
government
have
taken
virtually
all
control
of
these
with
the
idea
that
these
are
going
to
be
rolled
out.
B
The
state
in
passing
their
legislation
did
carve
out
certain
areas
where
the
local
municipality
would
have
some
control
and
some
ability
to
regulate
locations
and
everything.
What
we
did
is
we
prepared
an
ordinance
that
basically
called
for
city
regulation
to
the
maximum
extent
allowed
by
state
law
it
was
presented.
It
did
go
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
a
formal
for
a
hearing
on
it.
The
Planning
Commission
did
make
a
recommendation
to
council
and
it
was
considered
by
council
and
it's
my
understanding,
it's
being
brought
up
again
tonight.
B
A
B
C
B
Was
the
intent
of
the
ordinance
again?
This
has
largely
been
taken
over
by
the
federal
FCC
and
state
law.
Regarding
the
roll
out,
the
state
and
the
federal
government
have
a
the
policy
that
these
are
going
to
go
out.
I
mean
the
name
of
the
state
law
is
is
basically
well
it's
known
as
the
small
wireless
communications
facilities
deployment.
Act
I
mean
it
is
the
the
state
policies.
This
is
going
to
happen
and
again
the
state
law
carved
out
certain
areas
where
there
would
be
local
regulation
that
would
be
allowed.
B
C
B
D
E
Evening,
madam
chair
members,
the
Council
of
mark
is
correct.
You
do
retain
some
regulation
control
over
historical
districts,
your
downtown
districts,
what
you
may
call
them
downtown
development
district,
maybe
and
certainly
residential
districts.
What
we've
done
is
we
have
taken
the
power
that
you
have
and
we've
taken
it
to
the
limit,
giving
you
all
the
power
that
we
can
under
the
under
the
law
and
because,
when
you
are
correct,
the
lobby
in
the
telecommunications
industry
is
very
strong.
E
I
have
been
immersed
in
it
for
20
years
and
the
law,
the
lobby
in
Washington
DC,
was
strong.
So
the
mandate
came
down
probably
about
five
or
six
years
ago.
This
will
happen
and
it's
a
mandate
to
the
states
to
roll
it
out,
and
so
the
state
has
mandated
it
to
the
local
communities
to
make
it
happen,
and
here's
what
you
can
control
and
what
you
can't
control
and.
D
E
Don't
know
the
I'm,
not
a
scientist,
even
though
I'm
juris
doctor
I'm
only
a
lawyer,
but
what
I
can
tell
you
is
that
all
the
equipment
that
is
licensed
to
be
on
these
poles
by
the
federal
government
have
gone
through
a
vetting
process
with
the
FCC
and
they
have
looked
at
all
of
the
the
rads
or
the
radiation
or
the
noise
and
all
of
the
the
things
that
could
be
inconvenient
or
potentially
harmful
to
the
residents
of
the
community.
All
of
those
have
been
looked
at.
E
D
F
So
obviously,
you
know
more
so,
as
I've
been
doing
research
about
this,
this
new
technology
and
I'm
sure
you've
been
reading
a
lot
about
not
just
cities,
states
or
even
countries
are
actually
opposing
this
technology
or
even
trying
to
control
these
companies
where
these
boxes
will
go.
There's
some
some
countries
or
some
places
they're
making
these
companies
use
Hightower's
away
from
residents
that
they're
they're
not
harmful
to
residents
the
radiation.
E
I
can
tell
you,
as
far
as
the
pro
you
are
absolutely
correct:
the
order
came
from
Washington
DC
to
the
states.
The
states
have
then
passed
the
law
that
mark
referenced,
a
small
wireless
communications
deployment
act
and
what
we
now
have
the
ability
to
do
as
a
city.
This
same
all
right.
These
are
being
deployed
as
we
stand
here
and
they
are
deployed
as
we
stand
here
this
evening.
So
what
can
we
do
as
a
city?
E
We
also
have
the
ability
to
control
the
loading
on
poles
or
get
information
on
the
loading
of
poles,
so
that
they're
not
overburdened
and
ugly
in
the
in
the
community,
which
we
live
in
which
we
are
promoting
for
people
to
come
and
move
to
and
businesses
to
come
and
do
business
here
now
the
negative
is,
if
you
don't
adopt
an
ordinance,
you
lose
all
control.
The
companies
are
gonna,
get
their
license
from
the
state,
their
approvals
from
the
federal
government
and
they're
gonna
start
putting
in
there
they're
called
nodes
on
the
poles
wherever
they
want.
E
Not
only
that,
but
before
the
maintenance
of
your
right
away,
makan
would
also
be
you're
not
going
to
get
the
recurring
fees.
We've
have
prepared
us
as
part
of
the
package
of
documents
before
you
a
fee
schedule
which
complies
with
the
state
law
and
those
fees
are
used
for
right
away
management
and
maintenance,
and
you
would
be
losing
those
fees
much
like
the
Metro
Act
fees
that
you
get
about:
seven
cents
per
lineal
foot
or
your
cable
franchise
fees,
where
those
fees
are
dedicated
to
your
right-of-way
maintenance.
Same
thing.
E
F
I'm,
sorry,
this
so
the
sec,
the
same
question
is
okey,
so
you
know
some
places
or
some
countries
they
obviously
the
youth.
They
they
want
the
technology,
but
they
required
these
companies
to
put
towers
away
from
residential
areas
which
serve
the
same
purpose.
You
can
do
the
same
thing
or
even
better,
but
I
think
they're.
Looking
at
this
is
because
of
cost
it's
going
to
cost
them
more
money
to
put
high
towers
with
repeater
towers,
so
they
can
have
that
technology.
So
is
the
state
saying
that
or
the
government
federal
whoever's
mandating
this?
F
Are
they
saying
you
can
you
can
use
the
towers
or
you
can
use
the
nodes
and
people's
backyards
because
I
mean
all
the
residents
that
I've
talked
to
they're
very
concerned
about
the
health
risk?
So
that's
one
of
my
questions
is
why
why
can't
the
state
or
the
city
say
we
can
have
high
towers
or
you
know,
antennas
with
repeater
towers
that
can
achieve
the
same
goal
as
putting
these
things
in
people's
yards
and.
B
Just
you
know
let
Mike
follow
up,
but
just
a
more
global
concept
is
this:
industry
is
highly
regulated
by
the
federal
government.
So
really
the
federal
government
can
drives
the
deployment
of
these
things
in
this
country.
The
federal
government
has
already
addressed
this
and
has
already
adapted
regulations
that
the
companies
have
to
comply
with.
The
federal
government
has
also
recognized
that
each
state
has
some
input
the
state
of
Michigan
based
upon
what
the
FCC
did
also
considered
this.
B
They
did
some
hearings,
I
believe
on
this,
and
they
came
up
with
a
series
of
regulations
that
are
applicable
to
all
the
municipalities
in
the
state
and
I
guess
what
I
wanted
address
is
you
need
to
recognize
that
as
a
city,
you're,
you're,
basically
just
part
of
the
state
government,
you're
subject
to
state
regulations
in
a
lot
of
areas?
This
is
one
of
them.
Now
the
state,
when
they're
adapting
their
regulations,
recognized
that
there
was
important
local
concerns
over
this.
B
So
rather
than
just
cut
you
out
totally
when
the
state
adapted
their
regulations,
they
carved
out
small
areas
where
local
municipalities
would
still
have
some
control
and
what
our
ordinance
does.
Is
it
adopts
those
areas
where
we
still
have
control
so
the
decision
about
how
high
things
can
be,
how
separate
they
can
be
that
kind
of
thing,
that's
all
done
by
the
FCC
in
the
state.
It's
just
in
these
small
areas
that
the
state
allowed
local
control.
That's
the
extent
of
your
ability
to
regulate,
and
this
ordinance
was
designed
to
maximize
that
ability.
E
Only
other
thing
would
be:
is
your
cell
tower
agreements
are
generally
long
term
agreements
most
likely
30-year
agreements,
those
are
still
in
effect
and
while
the
technology
might
vary
from,
what's
on
your
tower
to
what's
on
the
small
cells,
your
long
term,
revenue-generating,
cell-tower
releases
are
still
enforceable
and
effective.
Thank.
G
I've,
had
you
know
a
couple
different
people
call
me
tell
me:
no,
it's
not
as
dangerous
as
it's
made
out
to
be,
but
we
have
one
particular
resident
that
sends
out
a
lot
of
information
to
all
of
us
on
this.
As
a
matter
fact,
he
came
and
spoke
at
one
point
in
a
confusing
part.
To
me.
This
thing
is
so
potentially
dangerous:
okay,
potentially
dangerous
I'm,
not
a
scientist,
how
it
passed
through
the
federal
government,
the
state
government
and
yet
no
major
newspapers,
no
major
like
channel
two,
four,
seven
ABC,
CNN,
Fox,
etc.
G
I
mean
I,
never
heard
really
much
about
it.
So
now
I'm
starting
to
wonder
I'm,
just
thinking
from
your
perspective,
what
do
you
know
about
the
potential
I
know?
That's
not
your
field
of
expertise,
but
you
said
you've
dealt
with
this
about
the
potential
dangers
of
this.
That's
the
first
question,
the
second
quarter.
First
of
all,
it
looks
like
it's
being
rolled
out
because
if
you
watch
the
Super
Bowl
or
anything
else,
I'm
always
he's
5
g
5
g
5g.
So
this
thing
is,
it
doesn't
look
like
I
think
it's
done.
G
It
looks
like
it's
pretty
much
done.
The
other
thing
is
I'm,
not
gonna,
speak
on
behalf
of
the
council,
but
I
for
one
would
like
to
see
this
full
council
chair
maybe
come
back
to
the
council
to
revote
on
this
to
at
least
have
whatever
little
control
we
can
have,
which
seems
like
almost
like
a
petty
amount.
I
think
it's
just
like
a
little
tidbit
and
then
get
out
of
here.
You
know
we're
making
all
the
decisions,
that's
what
seems
like.
E
A
D
B
I
mean
procedurally,
there
I,
don't
believe,
there's
any
deadline
for
adopting
an
ordinance.
If
that
was
the
question.
Procedurally,
if
there
was
going
to
be
a
motion
to
reconsider
that
would
have
been
had
to
have
been
done
at
the
last,
the
meeting
where
it
was
voted
down,
it
would
have
had
to
be
done
by
the
next
meeting.
So
you
can't
do
this
on
reconsideration,
but
I
do
believe.
The
Planning
Commission
has
done
a
hearing
on
this
and
made
a
recommendation.
I
think
you
can
set
it
for
another.
H
G
E
E
It
won't
be
a
large
tower
and
then,
as
far
as
your
question
about
the
the
research
on
the
potential
various
opinions
on
the
health
issues,
what
I
can
say
is
I
think
it's
a
lot
like
when,
when
you're
looking
for
a
lawyer
in
a
in
a
lawsuit,
you'll
find
your
experts
on
this
side
of
the
case
for
the
plaintiff
you'll
find
your
experts
on
this
side
for
the
defendant.
They
will
each
roll
out.
There
are
arguments
vigorously.
E
And
you'll
always
find
information.
That's
out
there
and
one
of
the
other
significant
things
that
I
wanted
to
address
with
you
as
a
council
as
a
whole
is
there
is
in
fact
a
ruling
from
the
FCC
that
says
your
denial
of
a
permit,
whether
it's
cell
tower
or
5g
cannot
be
based
upon
those
claims,
because
those
issues
have
had
their
day
and
they've
been
argued
and
vetted
completely
in
front
of
the
FCC.
E
I
Give
me
a
couple
minutes:
does
it
got
a
little
bit
to
say
here?
No
5g
I've
done
a
lot
of
research.
I
talked
a
lot
of
people
on
this,
and
5g
is
a
very
powerful
radiation.
Okay,
that's
it
that's
it's
radiation
and
it's
it's
the
plusses.
It
can
go
into
places
that
4G
can't
and
going
deep
basements
the
tall
buildings
it
can
go
out
far
out
in
the
country.
I
You
can
go
right
through
the
lungs
of
a
senior
citizen,
go
right
into
a
fetus
of
a
pregnant
woman
and
there's
been
less
than
five
years
of
research
done
on
this.
That's
the
fact
they
don't.
They
won't
say
how
many
might
only
been
two
years,
but
it's
less
than
five
years
of
research
has
been
done.
On
these
towers,
I
contacted
Verizon
I
mean
of
Comcast
Xfinity.
I
I
As
far
as
how
much
control
we
have
there
they're
not
saying
it
because
I
think
they
don't
want
to
say
it,
and
maybe
they
can't,
but
we
have
almost
zero
control
where
these
go,
except
in
a
historical
district
like
they
said,
or
some
other
smallest
in
your
backyard.
You
have
no
control.
We
have
no
control
about
anybody's
backyards.
Well,.
E
I
would
defer
or
I'm
sorry
differ
in
your
opinion,
there
first
of
all
you're
correct
that
the
usual
placement
will
be
on
dte
poles.
They
have
a
separate
pole
attachment
agreement
with
DTE,
but
yet
there
are
is
a
per
pull
agreement.
I'm,
sorry
fee
that
the
city
will
receive
I
agree
with
you.
It's
not
going
to
be
a
very
large
amount
of
money,
but
there
will
be
some
money
they'll
go
into
your
right
away,
maintenance
fee
fund.
E
This
pole
here
is
in
a
residential
district.
It's
in
you
know
this
residence
backyard.
They
have
expressed
an
interest
to
not
have
it
there.
Where
else
can
we
find
a
location
that
is
not
so
obtrusive
for
that
resident,
and
so
it
opens
up
a
dialogue
and
I
can
tell
with
my
work
in
Lansing
against
the
providers.
The
consensus
has
always
been
with
the
Michigan
Public
Service
Commission
work
together,
don't
work
against
each
other.
So
if
you
open
up
that
dialogue
engineer
to
engineer,
they
will
find
a
solution
in
generally
90%
of
the
time.
E
In
my
experience
in
20
years
doing
telecommunications
that's
been
the
case,
but
there
is
some
control
in
those
areas
and
this
ordinance
seizes
upon
that
ability
to
take
control.
If
you
don't
have
the
ordinance,
we
have
no
enforcement
ability
and
when
our
residents
I
don't
want
this
facility
in
my
front
yard,
side,
yard
or
backyard
well,.
I
Everybody's
gonna
call
everyone's
got
one
in
their
backyards
and
coincide.
They
don't
want
it
there,
because
I
witnessed
my
neighbor
directly
across
the
street
from
me
five
different
times
that
I
seen
a
truck
come
out
there
and
first
they
had
a
map
and
they
located
a
pole.
They
took
several
pictures
of
the
pole,
took
elevations
of
the
pole,
send
up
a
drone
and
took
a
area
checked
out
all
the
trees
in
the
area.
I
How
high
the
trees
are,
because
that's
a
main
factor
is
they
want
a
pole
that
has
a
fewest
amount
of
trees
around
them
and
yeah.
So
guys,
what's
a
chance
in
that
he
says
he
goes,
there's
gonna
be
a
ton
on
that
pole.
I
says
well
for
sure.
He
says.
There's
no
doubt
in
my
mind
he
says:
that's
the
pole.
They
want
that's
the
pole,
they're
gonna
get
and
that's
straight
from
the
contractor
of
sawing.
These
usually.
E
I
E
I
H
B
They're,
the
ones
that
have
made
this
decision
they
have
taken
most
of
the
ability
to
regulate
away
from
the
city
governments,
away
from
local
municipalities,
not
just
the
city,
but
all
local
municipalities
in
Michigan,
and
so
really
what
it
would
take
would
be
a
change
in
state
law
and
perhaps
a
change
in
FCC
regulations.
But
at
the
moment
the
FCC
in
the
state
have
made
the
determinations
and
they
feel
this
is
the
best
way
to
proceed.
Marc.
I
J
K
Largest
I
did
not
want
this
to
happen.
I
had
heard
all
nurse
to
one
side
realize
that
we
didn't
have
a
lot
of
choice,
but
we
did
this
and
control
through
this
ordinance.
That's
what
I
reached
out
to
you
said
we're
gonna
work
on
putting
the
organs
together.
One
thing
I
will
tell
you
is
that,
prior
to
that
ordinance,
not
passing
Verizon
was
coming
in
plans
to
Larry
and
his
staff
irregular
basis
instead
of
schedule
of
hungry,
recording
those,
and
they
were
really
receptive
to
get
Larry
get
a
suggestion.
K
Like
you
know,
I've
read
their,
can
you
can
you
find
another
spot?
Maybe
a
couple
you
know
yards
down
or
something
in
the
nature
and
they
did
and
what
what
what
that
process
did
was.
Indeed,
Larry
control
to
Larry
got
to
make
the
final
approval
sort
of
speed
once
it
didn't
pass.
As
the
attorney
had
mentioned
now,
they
just
took
the
state
and
they're
putting
them
up
everywhere.
We
we
don't
even
you
know
we
have
to
be
made
aware
of
it,
but
we
have
no
control
over
it.
So
thank.
B
H
B
A
A
A
F
A
M
Good
evening,
Council
and
residents
so
some
of
the
responsibilities
of
the
city
treasurer
collect
property
taxes
and
to
distribute
the
funds
to
the
various
agencies,
which
would
be
the
school
districts.
The
county,
the
state,
the
tax
collections
about
seventy
million
dollars
annually
receive
all
monies
from
other
four
other
bills
belonging
to
the
city,
water
bills,
animal
license,
building,
Department,
etc.
Monitor
the
cash
flow
of
the
city
invests
the
available
funds
according
to
the
public
act
20,
and
we
have
a
also
have
our
own
investment
policy
of
the
city
issue
and
manage
the
local
debt.
M
So
that
would
be
the
bonding
we're
talking
about
bonding
for
some
water
and
sewer
projects
and
installment
purchase
agreement
so
that
we
use
to
purchase
the
street
sweepers,
and
things
like
that.
You
manage
that
make
sure
those
debt
gets
paid
very,
very
important,
administrate,
the
two
cities
pension
systems
with
planned
participants
of
about
695
individuals
and
the
combined
assets
of
the
retirement
systems
of
220
million
dollars,
you're
automatically
a
trustee
and
the
Police
and
Fire
pension
board
act.
345
pension
board,
that's
part
of
the
act
345,
but
the
city
treasurer
will
serve
in
that
capacity.
C
M
He
shall
file
a
bond
and
such
amount
was
as
such
securities
as
shall
satisfy
the
council.
Okay.
Well,
these
since
I've,
been
here,
I've
only
been
bonded
once
hasn't
been
through
the
city,
but
through
the
county,
because
we
were
collecting
the
county's
tax
revenues
and
the
county
treasurer
was
bonding
the
local
treasures
over
there
money
that
we
were
collecting
this
as
the
city,
treasurer
I
am
covered
under
the
city's
policy
with
Michigan
municipal
risk
management
Authority,
and
it's.
M
M
I
I
wouldn't
know
I
mean
you
know
the
funds
that
are
available
I
mean
I,
told
you
we're
collecting
over
70
million
in
in
tax
revenues
annually.
That's
just
that.
You
know
that
doesn't
count
water
bill
payments,
which
is
you
know.
Probably
you
know
millions
of
dollars.
I
probably
should
have
researched
that
before
I
came.
D
M
But
I
mean
we
so
we've
haven't
trimmed
in
place.
Internal
controls
and
a
lot
of
things
that
you
know
to
individuals
would
need
to.
You
know,
move
money
and
have
callbacks
to
individuals
separate
from
the
individual
initiating
and
things
like
that.
But
I.
You
know
the
amount
of
somebody's
bonding
I
saw
again.
It
sounds
like
according
to
the
charters.
It
would
be
something
that
the
council
would
place.
You
know,
you
know.
If
you
read
that
a
charter
section
it
sounds
like
this,
you
know
you
guys
would
make
that
determination
and
not
necessarily
mean
like.
D
G
A
couple
things
that
I
want
to
talk
to
you
about
and
I
know
still
not
clear.
We
received
an
email
from
the
counselor
to
our
attorney
city
attorney
in
regards
to
when
the
next
person
will
take
over
and
told
whether
it's
gonna
be
until
the
next
general
election
or
whether
it's
gonna
be
until
2021
and
his
opinion,
was
it
be
until
November.
G
So
with
that
being
the
case
and
I'm
not
trying
to
put
you
on
the
spot
and
if
you
feel
I'm
putting
you
on
the
spot,
then
just
say
I
don't
want
to
answer
it,
but
is
there
any?
Let's
start
with
that
first
question:
is
there
any
way
possible
to
make
things
simpler
here
that
you
could
continue
through
at
least
this
coming
November.
M
M
G
The
second
thing
I,
when
I
said
discuss
this
with
you
might
at
least
I
might
put
my
personal
preference,
my
personal
preference,
whoever
we
personally
appoint
as
a
counsel.
They
only
runs
through
this
coming
November
and
we
allow
the
residents
to
elect
somebody
and
and
I
know
one
of
your
concerns
about
that
was
in
terms
of
retirement
cuz.
G
Day
difference
but,
okay,
so
question
to
you
and
I:
don't
know
the
logistics
of
how
this
could
be
worked
out,
but
I
was
thinking
if
we
could
subcontract
you
and
use
you
as
an
outside
source
to
still
do
our
treasury
work,
where
we
could
still
do
it
to
where
the
residents
will
elect
the
next
treasurer.
This
coming,
November
and
again
the
logistics
would
have
to
be
worked
out.
You
stay
for
an
extra
week.
We
pay
for
just
a
week
or
vice
versa,
again
work
out
logistics,
but
my
concern
is
I.
G
Don't
want
this
thing
to
be
an
appointment
by
us
as
a
council
to
pick
somebody
that
maybe
is
maybe
not
as
good
as
maybe
they
should
be,
but
to
be
able
to
won
this
thing
for
a
whole
year.
That's
where
my
real
concern
would
be
solved.
If
you
could
stay
longer
or
we
could
subcontract
you
for
a
week
or
you
could
extend
one
thing,
we'll
subtract
one
thing
to
make
this
thing
work
that
would
be
great
just
making
a
statement
here
and
I'm
not
putting
you
on
a
spot
to
make
a
decision.
Now.
G
G
It
says
they
need
a
bachelor's
agreement,
I'm
not
back
to
my
work,
mind
a
bachelor's
degree
in
accounting,
finance,
business
or
public
administration,
with
emphasis
on
accounting
and
a
minimum
of
two
years
government
experience
or
ten
years
of
recent
municipal
treasurer's
office
experience
and
that's
for
the
deputy
treasurer
mm-hmm.
So
for
this
act
a
for
myself,
that's
what
I
would
preferably
be
looking
for
with
the
next
person.
With
that
being
the
case,
what
would
you
feel
would
be
the
best
way
to
try
to
find
somebody
I
mean?
M
I
mean
I
think
there
are
poly
individuals
in
the
community
that
have
qualifications
that
this
council
might
feel
comfortable
with.
But
unless
you
kind
of
advertise
and
go
out
to
the
community
to
find
out
who
might
be
interested
and
have
them
come
forward,
I
mean
it
would
just
be
speculation.
I
have
spoken
with
a
few
people,
I
think
qualified
individuals
for
this
position.
M
You
know
Lynne
sitting
here,
you
know:
she's
worked
in
my
office
for
10
years.
I
think
you
know
I
think
she
could
have
any
11
years
so
that
you
know
like
so
she
she
knows
what
kind
of
goes
on
in
the
municipal
treasurer's
office,
but
there
are
individuals
and
our
communities
that
worked
have
worked
at
Wayne
County
in
the
treasurer's
office,
and
so
who
know
you
know
about
tax
law.
They
live
in
our
community.
Would
they
apply
or
would
they
come
forward?
M
N
N
H
N
John,
there's
not
a
lot
of
us
that
work
here
at
that
time
and
you
would
tell
them
what
or
you
tell
me
we
can
advertise
it
on
the
website,
some
sort
of
public
notice.
If
you
want
it
the
paper,
we
could
put
something
together.
You
know
what
do
you
want?
Do
you
want
the
city
application?
It's
not
required.
Obviously,
in
an
appointment,
you
want
to
resume
a
cover
letter.
That's
what
I
would
recommend.
C
M
I'll
be
available
to
answer
questions
for
them
or
and,
like
I
said
a
couple.
People
have
approached
me
and
I've
sitting
down
with
them
and
talked
about.
You
know
some
of
these
things
that
I
do,
and
you
know
things
like
that
and
I
know
the
council's
the
Secretary
has
done
the
research
of
when
the
prior
clerk
was
so
she
has
some
of
that
background
on
the
process
that
the
counselor.
O
O
Of
vacancies
in
elective
office,
it
tells
you
when
a
vacancy
occurs
in
any
elective
office.
The
vacancy
shall
be
fed
but
filled
by
appointment
wearing
of
it,
and
then
in
this
one
it
did
say
the
next
general
election
will
be
held
on
so
and
so
in
order
to
be
considered
for
the
vacancy,
you
must
have
a
two-year
resident
and
registered
voter
I.
Think
that's
energy.
O
N
G
G
I
G
I
M
Like
I
said,
I
I
haven't
only
been
bonded
once
here
and
it
wasn't
by
the
city.
It
was
through
the
county,
but
you
know
the
Charter
says
you
know
that
the
person
should
file
a
bond
if
the
council
security
bond
satisfactory
to
the
council,
so
it
sound
like
you
know,
in
a
way
that
the
council
could
say
you
know
you
need
to
have
this
here
and
the
person
would
have
to
you
know,
but
even
those
are
kind
of
legal
questions
kind
of
outside
of
my
realm
I'm,
just
telling
you
the
experience
that
I've
had
thing.
E
A
D
I
know
there
was
a
case
with
the
city
of
Dearborn.
When
someone
applied
for
a
position,
they
did
a
criminal
background
check
and
then
the
person
they
did
have
a
criminal
record
and
the
person
sued
so
I
think
it's
important.
We
have
to
decide
how
much
of
a
background
check
we
want
to
have
regarding
the
Queen,
even
I.
D
M
And
you
know
anybody
that
works
in
the
treasurer's
office.
We
do
as
much
background
check
as
we
can
very
obviously,
and
so
I'll
defer
to
the
HR
director,
because
I
have
to
lean
on
her
to
you
know,
make
sure
that
gets
done
in
their
office,
handles
that
for
our
police
and
fire
and
for
our
general
employees
and
so
I
think
that
would
make
a
lot
of
sense
to
have
a
background
sense.
Yes,.
N
We
have
had
background
checks
and
I've
been
one
of
the
people
that
pushed
it
when
I
first
got
here,
even
if
part-time
employees
I
will
say
for
the
appointment
of
city
clerk,
there
were
no
background
checks
done
at
that
time.
You
know,
barring
that
it's
not
illegal
I,
don't
see
why
it
wouldn't,
for
this
particular.
G
G
N
G
A
A
L
Again,
Rosetta
Street
I
came
here
today
to
pay
taxes.
I
wasn't
prepared
with
your
subject
matter
just
on
what
I
learned.
This
is
what
I
think
I
think
you
need
to
sit
down
for
this
temporary
position
for
only
six
months
and
it's
gonna
be
very
hard
because
nobody
with
the
kind
of
experience
that
was
outlined
here,
it's
leaving
his
job
to
do
a
job
for
six
months,
so
you're
gonna
have
to
find
a
retired
person
that
you
probably
easily
can,
but
the
hooker
and
this
question
is
the
election.
Any
fool
can
run
for
treasurer.
L
You
can't
stop
and
based
on
your
idea
of
qualifications,
nobody
mentioned
that
there
are
factions
in
this
city.
One
faction
or
another
is
going
to
present
their
person
who
may
not
qualify
at
all,
but
they
have
the
political
power
to
be
elected.
However,
the
solution
is
this:
you
need
to
change
the
Charter
so
that
you
have
an
appointed
a
controller,
then
you're
gonna.
If
you
could
do
that
quickly
within
that
six
months
of
that
appointment,
then
you
could
advertise
and
people
with
similar
positions
will
be
applying
for
the
job.
L
That
is
the
only
sensible
thing
to
do
this
city
got
lucky
20
years
ago
by
out
getting
him
who
was
qualified
so
deal
with
only
what
you
could
control
change,
that
Charter
make
sure
you
get
a
controller
and
the
first
suggestion
you
better
find
some
retired
people
that
have
that
expertise.
I
certainly
do
not
thank.
A
D
A
P
P
P
C
G
C
Attorney
was
okay,
but
they
never
applied
for
anything
they
just
they
just
showed
up
here
and
threatened,
so
I
mean
if
the
applicant
came
before
us,
I
mean
this
is
what
I've
been
thinking
all
along
I
mean
the
they're
given
something
in
the
ordinance.
They
were
given
the
ordinance
I'm
sure,
and
it
states
right
it
at
all.
They
have
to
do
is
come.
The
applicant
needs
to
come
forward
and
nobody's
come
forward.
Well,.
G
A
G
P
D
So,
in
other
words,
is
we
have
it
on
the
agenda?
Someone
needs
to
make
the
motion
second
and
say
we
deny
the
application,
because
we
already
have
seven
hookah
lounges
that
are
license,
and
this
would
violate
the
moratorium
or
you
know
something
along
those
lines,
as
opposed
to
just
saying
it
dies
for
lack
of
support.
Yeah.
P
D
A
P
D
You
made
amateur
hell,
it's
been
constant,
I
think
we
need
to
agree,
and
but
we
can
have
the
clerk
or
not
agree,
call
you
and
say
cuz
Gary,
fraught
of
reason.
He
didn't
write
the
ordinance
see
his,
maybe
some
feelings
about
it.
So
the
clerk
can
call
you
and
say,
and
that's
a
council
decision
we
can
get
some
guidance.
I
have.
C
D
O
K
H
K
A
P
C
C
P
A
P
C
D
I
You
know
we
allow
seven
now
if
somebody
either
wants
to
sell
theirs
or
the
years
up
and
they
don't
they
don't
desire
to
renew
it.
Do
we
have
the
ability
to
say,
okay,
we're
just
gonna
go
at
six
and
then
you
know,
or
do
we
have
to
go
back
to
seven?
Is
it
a
reliable
or
legally
responsible
to
go
back
up
to
seven.
A
O
C
K
O
F
C
C
A
C
I
think,
like
he's
the
attorneys
telling
us
at
a
court
of
law,
his
attorneys
could
be
with
him.
I
mean
I
want
to
do
this
as
right
as
possible.
I
mean
with
him.
He
would
have
if
I
was
the.
If
I
was
the
applicant
I'd
want
to
be
here
too
I
mean
that
just
only
makes
sense
that
they
can
either
be
here
for
this
put
his
best
foot
forward,
but
that's
the
that's
the
out.
That's
been
in
that
ordinance,
since
it
was
written
way.