►
From YouTube: 1-14-19 City Council Workshop
Description
Des Moines City Council workshop on Monday, Jan. 14, 2019 in Des Moines, Iowa.
Agenda: http://www.dmgov.org/Government/CityCouncil/Workshop%20Agendas/20190114%20Council%20Work%20Session.pdf
Help us caption & translate this video!
https://amara.org/v/C0svF/
A
D
E
F
Thank
you
to
him.
Thank
you
for
having
me
this
morning.
I
did
hand
out
a
short
presentation
that
I'll
be
going
over.
That
summarizes
the
stack
of
deliverables
that
we
provide
to
the
city
as
part
of
the
audit,
but
we'll
give
you
some
highlights
and
I'll
open
it
up
for
any
questions
that
you
may
have
in
regards
to
that.
F
As
Tim
indicated,
I'm
Heidi
Hopkirk
with
RSM
and
I
was
the
apartment
on
the
engagement
we
were
out
here
for
about
a
month
in
October
and
then
worked
through
the
review
process
of
the
financial
statements
and
the
audit
was
issued
in
early
December.
So
today,
I'm
going
to
go
over
some
auditor
communication,
some
summarized
financial
performance
and
then
talk
through
the
single
audit.
F
So
first
our
auditor
communications.
As
an
auditors,
we
have
responsibilities
of
auditing
the
city
under
three
sets
of
standards,
two
of
the
sets
of
standards
we'll
talk
about
later
in
regards
to
internal
controls
and
the
federal
programs.
But
to
start
I'm
going
to
talk
about
the
financial
statements
and
under
those
auditing
standards,
you
received
an
unmodified
or
clean
opinion.
F
It's
due
to
the
implementation
of
a
new
standard.
That's
normal,
and
all
your
peers
would
also
have
that
Restatement
in
the
current
year,
the
standard
was
in
regards
to
post
employment
benefits.
In
the
past,
it's
been
recorded
on
a
funding
level
basis,
so
it
looked
at
how
much?
Where
were
you
you
required
to
pay?
How
much
did
you
pay
resulting
in
a
liability
and
the
current
year
it
changed,
and
now
it's
recorded
based
on
an
actuarial
calculation
calculated
amount
of
the
unfunded
portion.
So
there's
a
larger
liability
recorded.
F
All
the
information
is
summarized
in
regards
to
the
Restatement
in
note
15
of
the
financial
statements,
along
with
the
new
disclosure
related
to
those
post
employment
benefits.
In
addition
to
the
post
employment
benefits,
you
implemented
a
new
standard,
it's
rare,
but
the
accounting
board
allowed
you
to
stop
doing
something
this
year.
So
it's
part
of
your
business
type
activities
or
those
enterprise
funds.
F
In
the
past,
you
were
required
if
you
had
a
long
term
project
to
take
part
of
the
interest
cost
of
the
debt
and
included
as
part
of
the
capitalized
amount
of
the
capital
asset.
The
board
decided
that
to
be
consistent
with
the
governmental
side
of
the
financial
statements,
where
that's
not
being
done
that
they
would
allow
you
to
stop
capitalizing
or
moving
those
interest
costs
from
an
expense
to
a
capital
asset.
So
all
interest
expense
now
remains
as
an
expenditure
within
those
statements
for
those
proprietary
funds.
F
As
always,
your
financial
statements
have
management
judgment
and
estimates,
and,
as
your
auditors,
we
look
at
those
that
are
significant.
We
do
our
own
estimating
and
testing
of
underlying
data.
In
some
cases,
we
use
third
parties
to
help
us
with
that.
It
is
detailed
in
the
reports
of
the
council,
if
you're
interested
in
those
areas
that
we
look
at,
but
as
part
of
our
testing,
we
had
no
concerns
and
believe
that
all
of
those
were
reasonable.
F
In
the
current
year
there
is
no
audit
adjustment,
so
the
numbers
that
the
management
provided
us
at
the
beginning
of
the
on
it.
We
concurred
with
and
made
no
adjustments
to
those.
There
was
one
uncorrect
atmos
statement.
These
are
items
that
we
find
that
both
management
and
us,
as
the
auditors
believe,
are
immaterial
to
the
financial
statements
in
the
current
year.
It
had
to
do
with
grossing
something
up
instead
of
netting
it.
The
standards
require,
as
part
of
the
pension
deferrals,
that
the
projected
versus
actual
earnings
on
the
pension
investments
over
the
year
be
Dannette.
F
It
management
shows
us
as
a
gross,
so
it
is
just
an
amount
on
the
statement
of
net
position
or
the
balance
sheet
gross
up
on
each
side,
as
it
asked
as
a
deferred
inflow
and
a
deferred
outflow.
So
there's
no
revenue
or
expense
impact
or
net
position
impact
on
that
we
had
no
significant
issues
that
we
discussed
with
management.
Nor
did
we
just
have
any
disagreements
with
management
nor
encounter
any
difficulties
in
performing
the
audit.
We're
not
aware
any
consultation
with
other
other
than
a
couple
of
other
auditors.
F
We
rely
on
as
part
of
the
report
related
to
two
of
your
component
unit,
so
we
receive
their
audits
and
rely
on
their
information
to
include
within
the
city's
Cafer
as
part
of
our
opinion,
any
questions
on
the
Auditor
communications
before
we
turn
to
the
financial
okay,
the
next
page
is
looking
at
the
revenues
for
all
the
governmental
funds.
This
includes
your
general
fund
special
revenue,
capital
projects,
debt
service.
In
total,
you
saw
a
decrease
of
about
fifteen
million
dollars
or
five
percent
in
the
current
year.
F
F
Miscellaneous
revenues
decreased
about
four
point:
seven
million
dollars
in
the
prior
year.
You
received
that
final,
what
I'm
going
to
call
a
payout
or
those
monies
from
the
state
in
regards
to
the
franchise
fee
settlement,
so
they
held
the
money
paid
out
to
the
citizens
and
then,
after
that
time
had
elapsed,
that
people
could
request
those
dollars.
F
The
next
page
looks
at
those
same
funds,
the
expenditures
and
in
the
current
year
you
had
an
increase
of
about
eighty
nine
million
or
twenty
six
percent
in
total
expenditures.
The
largest
area
is
coming
from
the
debt
service,
and
this
is
partly
because
of
where
you
or
refunding
bonds
are
recorded
in
the
accounting
world.
So
in
the
current
year
you
had
refunding
bonds
of
forty
four
million
dollars.
So
what
that
means?
Is
you
issued
new
bonds
to
pay
off
old
bonds
and
because
of
the
type
of
refunding
they
were?
F
The
payoff
of
the
old
bunch
goes
through
this
debt
service.
So
you
use
bond
proceeds.
Not
operating
cash.
I
do
want
to
clarify
that
to
pay
part
of
those
expenditures.
If
you
remove
that
44
million
dollars,
then
there
was
just
a
slight
increase
due
to
normal
principal
and
interest
payments
on
your
bonds.
F
F
Next,
we'll
look
at
the
general
fund,
and
here
we
look
at
the
general
fund,
the
equity
portion
of
the
fund
and
look
at
the
unrestricted
and
and
equate
that
to
the
number
of
days.
What
this
is
telling.
You
is
as
a
moment
in
time
on
June
30th.
If
no
more
revenues
would
come
into
the
city
that
your
unrestricted
fund
balance
would
be
able
to
fund
your
expenditures
for
about
75
days.
In
addition,
the
city
hat
does
have
a
policy
to
look
at
the
unassigned
fund
balance.
F
F
The
last
piece
of
financial
information
we'll
look
at
is
those
enterprise
funds,
those
business
type
activities.
We
look
at
those
by
each
type
of
activity
or
fund
and
we're
looking
at
the
operating
income
before
depreciation
expense,
which
is
a
non-cash
transaction
and
millions.
The
two
areas,
I
would
point
out
is
you
did
see
a
decrease
in
parking,
and
that
was
mainly
due
to
the
new
ramp,
and
then
you
also
saw
a
decrease
in
the
solid
waste
system.
F
There
really
wasn't
any
one
particular
thing
within
the
solid
waste
system,
we
did
see
a
decrease
in
recycling
revenue
of
about
two
hundred
thousand,
along
with
increased
expenditures
in
workers,
comp
and
vehicle
maintenance
in
the
in
the
year.
So
the
combination
of
all
of
those
moving
in
the
same
direction
caused
the
the
decrease
overall
in
the
operating
income.
F
The
last
piece
I'm
going
to
speak
to
is
the
compliance
reporting.
These
are
two
additional
sets
of
standards
that
we
audit
the
city
under
the
first
is
governmental
auditing
standards.
This
is
where
we
look
at
your
internal
control
and
compliance
over
the
financial
statements
themselves.
In
the
current
year,
we
found
no
deficiencies
within
that,
nor
no
compliance
root
finding
in
the
prior
year
there
was
a
finding
here
which
was
remediated
or
corrected
by
management
we
tested
for
that
and
saw
that
that
was
corrected.
Then
the
last
area
is
the
single
audit.
F
This
is
where
we
test
your
federal
expenditures,
those
federal
grants
and
awards
that
you
receive
and
the
related
expenditures
in
the
current
year.
As
part
of
that
audit,
we
tested
two
programs,
the
Community
Development
Block
Grant
and
the
highway
planning
and
construction.
As
a
result
of
that
testing,
you
received
unmodified
opinions
on
both
of
those
programs
we
get
in
the
details.
We
test
for
compliance,
we
test
for
internal
controls
and,
as
part
of
that
again,
there
were
no
internal
control
deficiencies
report
it.
Nor
did
we
find
any
compliance
errors
or
findings.
F
As
part
of
that
detailed
testing
for
those
programs
and
as
a
result
of
those
two
programs
we
tested
about
49
percent
of
those
federal
dollars,
the
federal
government
provides
certain
percentages
that
we
have
to
test
for,
and
this
was
about
the
required
percentage.
That's
all
I
have
for
a
formal
presentation
before
I
turn
it
over
for
questions.
I
do
want
to
thank
Tim
and
his
staff
within
the
finance
department,
along
with
the
treasurer's
department
and
many
other
departments
within
the
city
that
provide
us
information
and
answers
through
the
audit
process.
F
F
Planning
and
construction
highway
planning
yeah
so
that
federal,
the
federal
yeah,
the
federal
grant
portion,
so
some
you
might
receive
outside
grant
monies.
We
don't
subject
that
to
testing
in
the
details.
It
would
only
be
those
coming
through
the
federal
grant
program,
so
sometimes
there's
allocation
dollars
that
won't
be
included
in
there.
Well.
C
Development-
you
split
said
that
was
on
the
expenditure
side
on
page
five,
you
said
that
was
Dudek
non
non
federal
grants.
Could
you
give
me
just
some
examples,
son
here
on
that
I.
F
A
D
G
Well,
tomorrow,
at
5:30
at
the
MSC
building,
there's
a
house
the
public
to
come
in
and
learn
a
little
bit
more
about
financing
101
why
things
can
be
paid
for
either
general
fund
or
out
of
road
use
or
out
of
an
Enterprise
Fund.
So
it's
good
of
an
educational
tool
at
this
particular
time
we
thought
that
was
probably
the
best
method,
because
we're
still
kind
of
in
flux,
whether
we're
gonna
have
sales
tax
or
not.
We
thought
that
conversation
can
take
later
take
place
later,
so
it's
just
kind
of
an
educational
opportunity
for
individuals.
G
The
January
28th
meeting
is
kind
of
coming
to
close,
where
everything
we've
talked
about
and
everything
we
presented
to
see
if
there's
any
changes.
In
other
words,
we've
already
went
through
the
CIP,
or
at
least
the
preliminary
portion
of
it
today
we're
going
to
go
over
the
operations
of
it
and
then
and
then
we'll
meet
again
on
the
28th
to
see
what,
if
anything,
needs
to
change,
then
kind
of
give
an
outline
of
when
we
think
everything
will
come
together.
We'll
need
to
set
a
public
hearing
in
the
latter
part
of
February
for
I.
G
Believe
it's
March
10th
will
be
our
public
hearing
on
our
budget
that
is,
after
by
the
way
after
sales
tax,
so
we'll
be
able
to
bring
a
budget
forward
with
or
without
sales
tax.
To
that
particular
time
also
gives
you
a
little
bit
of
time
after
the
28th
again
to
let
us
know
her
before
that.
If
you
see
some
things
that
you
want
us
to
change
or
look
at
before,
we
get
to
that
point.
So
that's
the
schedule,
the
we
did.
We
stole
enough
already.
G
We
can
always
do
without
it
then
work
right,
so
we're
gonna
talk
about
housing
services.
Housing
services
really
has
two
components:
they're
the
section
8,
which
is
our
about
your
program
as
well
as
our
public
housing
program.
That's
that's
the
building's
we
own
on
general
there's
about
3100
families
or
individuals
that
we
serve
through
our
section
8
and
there's
still
at
least
3,000
each
year,
where
we
can't
get
to
everybody
that
has
at
least
applies
for
the.
G
This
this
graph-
or
this
excuse
me
this
pie-
chart,
shows
you
what
the
y
20
recommended
budget
is.
You
can
see
it's
a
little
over
22
million,
almost
23
million
dollars.
I
should
state.
Is
that
a
lot
of
that
we
don't
have
any
control
over
and
that'll?
Be
our
next
slide
that
we
talk
about,
but
primarily
the
happen
housing
assistant
assistance
payments
make
up
about
71%
of
what
that
is,
that
22
million,
so
I
won't
go
too
deep
into
this.
That
just
tells
you
the
total
budget.
G
G
This
slide
does
illustrate
the
recommended
budget
for
FY
2013,
that
it
excludes
the
HAP
that's
done
by
the
federal
government
and
capital.
So
you
can
see
public
housing
is
41%
of
the
6.2
million
dollars.
The
section
8
is
about
the
same
about
42
percent
and
then
the
central
office
of
that
piece
as
well.
E
G
Is
still
part
of
housing?
I'm?
Sorry
all
right
this
next
one
is
our
operating
revenues
and
expenses.
You
can
see
in
2018
where
we
came
in
at
and
each
and
each
program
in
FY
19.
You
can
see
what
we
adopted
and
then
what
we
amended
to
and
then,
ultimately,
what
we're
recommending
so
I
would
call
your
attention.
In
19,
we
anticipated
of
about
a
four
hundred
and
fifty
six
thousand
dollar
in
shortfall.
It
came
out
better
than
that
it
was
closer
to
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
is
what
our
shortfall
was
of
that
shortfall.
G
We
did
add
a
new
piece
to
it:
we're
asking
some
of
our
neighbors
to
participate
in
the
cost
of
the
section
eight
and
in
19
we
identified
that
we
actually
were
able
to
bill
out
about
seventy-five
thousand
dollars
of
that
shortfall,
that
the
suburbs
would
pay
and
remember
it's
that
that
that
the
number
that
we're
asking
them
to
participate
in
is
the
same
cost.
Our
Des
Moines
residents
pay
for
the
ones
that
are
actually
inside
the
city
limits.
G
So
when
we're
building
it
out,
it
makes
up
the
shortfalls
for
each
one
of
the
units
that
we
have
in
FY.
2008
will
be
about
two
hundred
and
fifty
three
thousand
and
totaled
between
the
two
programs.
Again,
that's
down
from
our
previous
year
of
that
about
ninety
one
thousand
dollars
would
be
public
housing
and
102
would
be
the
city
section
of
the
hundred
and
twenty-five
excuse
me
the
section
eight
about
a
hundred
and
two
thousand
dollars
for
that
piece.
The
suburbs
are
those
that
we
go
out
and
do
outside
of
the
des.
G
D
G
Surprise,
the
next
slide
is
the
fy2008
and
ship
for
public
housing
and
for
section
8,
it's
it's
somewhat
similar
to
what
you
saw
in
the
previous
page,
only
in
a
graph
format,
so
again
the
shortfall
that
we're
looking
at
from
public
housing.
It
lists
that
number,
which
my
eyesight
can't
see
it's
about.
Ninety
one
thousand
dollars
and
the
shortfall
in
the
section.
Eight
piece
is
one
hundred
and
two
thousand
dollars.
D
G
G
This
is
the
slide
that
we,
of
course,
I,
think
you'd
asked
about,
or
actually
maybe
it
was
you
Josh
should
ask
about.
So
this
does
list
the
the
cities
that
are
signed
in
a
twenty
eighty
agreement
with
us.
You
can
see
the
three
that
are
highlighted
that
didn't.
We
have
not
gotten
a
signature
from
that.
Yet
at
this
point
and
again
it
just
kind
of
lists
what
I
talked
about
before,
but
what
they're
share
for
city
would
be
in
total
on
the
outside
the
mountain
in.
E
G
I
And
it's
interesting
that
if
you
look
at
at
the
southern
edge
of
Ankeny
they're,
getting
ready
to
like
double
the
sights
of
the
Toro
Baker
went
there
I
mean
they
have
really.
They
have
really
gotten
a
lot
of
businesses
to
move
up
there,
but
yet
they
don't
have
the
people
that
live
there.
They
can
commute
from
Des
Moines
but
they're
sure
getting
you
know.
We
lost
Baker
2
to
Ankeny
that
we
that
probably
shouldn't
have
happened.
I.
E
D
B
D
G
This
slide
illustrates
the
operation
of
the
HUD
revenues,
and
you
can
see
that
as
we've
didn't
in
previous
presentations,
that
number
just
goes
up
and
down
it's
very
difficult
to
determine,
or
it's
going
to
fall
last
year
for
the
public
housing
piece
of
it.
We
actually
got
about
92%,
we're
estimating
that
might
get
90%
of
that
funding.
G
As
far
as
why
don't
we
put
these
put
this
budget
together
for
and
then
at
the
section
8
piece
last
year
in
19
was
80
80
percent
and
we're
projecting
that
number
could
be
a
little
bit
lower
and
in
in
transparency
things
us.
As
you
know,
the
federal
government
is
slowed
down
right
now,
and
some
of
those
things
might
affect
us
in
the
future.
Things
about
when
we'd
get
those
payments.
G
The
slide
illustrates
staff
reductions
that
have
taken
place
over
time.
You
can
see
back
in
2011,
the
FTEs
were
49
the
FTEs
in
49
FTEs
and
then
in
2019,
it's
just
a
little
over
33,
so
you
can
see.
We've
had
a
drop
over
time
and
some
things
up
here
that
that
shows
how
we
were
able
to
kind
of
get
through
that
piece.
So
the
section
8
with
agreements
with
but
municipalities
for
section
8
expenses,
those
were
the
change
director
retirement.
G
We
did
have
a
director
retire,
we're
still
working
through
how
that's
going
to
look
currently
I
believe
that's
under
community
and
development.
That's
managing
at
this
time.
We
continue
to
do
things
differently,
like
online
programming,
applications
that
speeds
up
the
process
and
then
increase
use
of
contracts.
So
we're
continuing
to
try
to
go
on
other
individuals
that
in
other
entities
within
the
hopefully
in
the
Des
Moines
area,
where
we
can
get
more
contracts
out
there,
because
in
the
end,
is
the
more
you
have
of
contracts,
the
more
it
it
dilutes.
G
G
J
We're
Pro
Tem
members
of
City
Council,
Chris
Johansen
community
volume
under
challenges
and
opportunity.
It's
looking
for
the
next
fiscal
year.
Obviously,
the
first
ones
future
of
federal
funding,
unknown
back
in
December
I
know
when
we
added
this
to
the
slide.
I,
don't
think
we
were
projecting
they're
gonna,
be
in
a
shutdown
at
this
point,
but
that
is
a
circumstance
we're
under
right.
Now.
Next
one
is
rad,
which
is
the
rental
assistance
demonstration
program.
This
is
a
program
where
you
can
convert
existing
public
housing
property
to
section
8
project-based
assistance.
J
J
For
example,
if
there's
a
public
housing
multifamily
project
that
the
federal
government
looks
at
what
the
operating
subsidy
is
and
the
capital
funds
that
goes
to
make
operate
that
building
if
they
change
the
funding
to
section
8
rental
assistance,
if
the
building's
able
to
operate
better,
they
would
encourage
us
to
to
convert
it
to
that
type
of
assistance.
What
that
would
look
like
is,
instead
of
the
Des
Moines
municipal
housing
agency,
owning
the
property
you'd
partner,
with
a
could
be
a
non-profit
or
a
private
developer,
and
they
they'd
actually
own
and
maintain
the
building.
J
C
J
It
works
just
like
our
project,
but
our
project-based
section,
8
voucher
program
right
now,
you'd-
have,
for
example,
50
unit
building.
You
have
50
vouchers
tied
to
each
individual
individual
unit
after
a
year.
If
the
individual
want
to
leave
and
move
to
another
unit,
they'd
it
be
issued
another
voucher
and
they
go
to
another
unit,
and
then
the
existing
unit
would
still
have
those
vouchers
still
be
50
units
in
there,
so
that
that's.
J
A
way
to
keep
the
property,
affordable
and
I
think
when
you
look
at
some
of
our
property,
one
of
the
concerns
we've
always
had
if
you,
if
you
looked
they've,
always
been
affordable,
housing
and
I
think
when
you're,
if
you
want
to
try
to
keep
affordable
units
in
the
community,
this
is
one
way
to
do
that
in
the
past.
If
you
were
looking
to
sell
or
dispose
of
public
housing
property
like
we
have
some
in
the
past,
you
do
you
are
at
that
risk
of
losing
affordability.
So
this
is
one
way
to
keep
it.
E
The
new
shelter
downtown
it
wouldn't
have
been
built
anyway,
close
to
what
it
was
without
a
project-based
about
your
program,
which
is
the
first
time
we
used
it.
Not
just
us,
I,
think
and
I
want
to
and
I
actually
think
more
of
those
projects
is
the
way
to
way
to
really
address
our
affordable
housing
crisis
for
the
lower-income
people,
not
the
60
or
80
percent
of
median
Henderson,
there's
a
lowest
level,
so
I'm
a
big
fan.
J
J
J
Last
opportunity
on
here
is
the
project-based
vouchers
just
to
kind
of
piggyback
after
councilman
Coleman's
comments.
This
is
one
that
we
just
did
I
think
you
remember,
I,
think
it
was
last
council
meeting
there
was
a
new
low
income
housing
tax
credit
project
by
d-max
urban
campus.
We
did
award
some
some
vouchers
for
that
program
annually.
This
is
something
we're
going
to
be
looking
to
do
more
in
the
future.
J
D
G
G
D
My
first
conversations
with
the
city
manager
were
simply
education.
They
did
not
realize
there
was
already
section
8
in
their
community,
and
so
they
needed
to
get
up
to
speed.
Some
of
their
landlords
are
already
taking
advantage
of
that,
and
it's
not
as
simple
it's
just
saying
in
the
future.
You
won't
have
that
program.
They've
already
got
landlords
that
are
expecting
that
income
on
a
monthly
basis,
so
they
needed
to
become
educated
first,
so
I'll.
Let
I'll
make
a
more
contact
with
them
and
get
the
final
answer
out
of
HUD.
D
As
far
as
what
our
options
are.
You'll
recall
that
the
heightened
sensitivity
to
this
topic
is
that
there
is
now
Des
Moines
taxpayer
money
going
into
this
program,
and
so
it
was
very
clear
to
me
made
clear
to
me
by
Council
that
if
City
of
Des
Moines
is
paying
for
this
program,
should
we
be
paying
for
housing,
it's
not
located
in
Des
Moines,
and
so
that
message
will
be
made
crystal
clear
too,
very
under.
E
G
We
go
and
now
know
that
now
the
next
presentation
is
actually
operating
budget
I
do
one
again
say:
I
will
go
as
fast
as
or
slow
as
you'd
like
I
do
want
to
point
one
thing
out
before
we
get
started:
there
are
no
increases
in
the
levies
for
a
general
operating
the
general
operating
levy.
In
other
words,
this
does
not
mean
the
CIP
portion
we
talked
about
earlier.
The
things
you're
about
to
see
today
is
there's
no
increase
in
the
levy
of
that
of
our
operations
portion
of
it.
G
G
This
slide
is
the
general
fund
sources
and
use,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
sources
of
funds
59%
about
60%,
of
what
we
collect
in
our
general
fund.
Sources
comes
from
property
taxes,
other
another
large
segment
of
that
is
fees
and
charges
of
that
piece
as
well.
These
and
charges
include
things
generated
from
service
programs,
indirect
cost
allocations,
short
pilot
and
things
of
that
nature.
G
The
other
side
of
it
is
actually
how
we
expend
it,
and
if
you
have
any
questions
about
the
revenues
would
be
happy
to
go
into
that
on
the
expenditure
side,
the
use
of
funds
again,
just
like
it's
always
been
personal
services,
is
the
largest,
although
my
recollection
is
last
year
that
was
about
80%
of
the
budget,
so
you
can
see
it's
down
77,
so
the
percentage
of
the
budget
has
gone
down
for
personal
services
for
the
upcoming
FY
20,
but
get
questions
on
this
slide.
Dan.
What.
G
This
slide
illustrates
a
five
year
history,
as
well
as
what
we're
anticipating
for
FY
20
to
point
out.
19
has
a
little
anomaly
there.
You
see
it's
kind
of
spiking
up
to
where
our
revenues
appear
to
be
higher,
predominantly
that
the
reason
for
that
is
we're
in
the
process
of
selling
one
of
our
garages,
so
we'll
recognize
that
revenue
in
FY,
19
and
then
in
20
will
expend
a
portion
of
those
and
that's
what
you'll
see
a
little
bit
of
deficit
in
the
20
side
of
the
of
the
graph.
In
that.
G
G
This
is
a
major
general
fund.
Revenues
slide
again,
egregious
slides.
What's
made
up
of
it,
we
do
show
the
arrows
of
what
we're
anticipating
for
next
year
so
and
it'll
be
graphs
on
these,
but
the
taxable
valuations
were
anticipating
going
up,
our
franchise
fee
is
staying,
steady
hotel-motel
is,
is,
is
increasing
up
and
our
building
permit
fees
have
leveled
off
from
the
19
and
we'll
have
some
graphs.
You
can
see,
take
a
look
and
more
in
depth
than
some
of
these
so
questions
there.
G
This
graph
is
our
history
since
2009
our
ten-year
history
of
what
our
taxable
valuations
have
been
in
the
changes
and
again
it's
important
to
point
out
as
well
as
we're
trying
to
forecast
in
the
future,
is
really
difficult
to
always
determine
where
we're
going
to
be
at
that.
So
you
can
see
it
going
up
and
down
quite
a
ways
and
that
that
does
somewhat
limit
us
to
going
too
far
out
trying
to
forecast
what
what
those
valuations
might
be.
G
However,
the
Green
Line
or
the
second
line
you
can
see
down,
there
is
called
our
I
think.
That's
our
status
quo
is
what
we
would
call
it.
We
need
about
a
three
point:
two
percent
increase
every
year
to
kind
of
keep
up
with
the
previous
year's
expenditures,
and
then
the
last
line
on
there,
which
is
red
and
illustrated
here,
is
our
average,
and
you
can
see
that's
about
a
two
point:
six,
three
percent.
So
again,
we've
had
some
pretty
good
years.
You
can
see.
G
Last
year
we
had
a
really
good
year
and
skin
compared
our
3.2
percent,
and
this
year
we're
anticipating
about
a
four
point.
One
increase
in
this
section
of
the
revenues,
but
again
we're
always
playing
catch-up,
those
years
that
we
were
under
what
we
needed
and
a
lot
of
times
when
we're
able
to
get
over
that
three
point:
two:
we
have
to
utilize
and
go
back
and
get
some
things
that
got
left
behind
questions
about
this.
H
G
D
H
G
This
this
is
our
history
for
our
franchise
fee.
That's
the
5%
that
we
currently
put
on
our
gas
and
electric
I
just
want
to
remind
you
that
these
are
weather-related
so,
depending
on
the
temperatures
at
any
given
year,
we
could
have
whatever
news
that
go
up
or
down
we're
anticipating,
because
we
can't
know
exactly
what
next
year's
weather
patterns
are
going
to
be,
that
we
would
stay
status
quo
and-
and
we
use
the
same
for
the
19
budget
as
we
did
for
the
20,
but.
C
G
E
C
G
This
sliders
are
hotel-motel
tax.
You
can
see
that
it's
gradually
going
up
over
time,
which
is
good
things.
I
would
like
this
again,
the
shout
out
for
the
OED
staff.
That's
been
working
with
the
private
sector
to
bring
more
hotels
in
which
generates
more
people
in
here
that
stay
in
in
Des
Moines,
as
well
as
the
type
of
activities
that
come
in
there
are
different
conventions
and
stuff.
We
can
get
as
we
add,
more
hotel
rooms.
So
again,
that's
you're.
Seeing
that
increase
go
up
and
again,
I
would
like
to
thank
the
OED
staff.
G
This
slide
illustrates
building
permits.
You
can
see
in
2016
the
city
Pete
about
a
700
million
dollar
building
permit
value
data
currently
we're
projecting
that
number
to
be
about
500
million
in
FY
21
FY,
19
I
do
want
to
point
back
farther
when
we
got
started.
Our
average
was
closer
to
about
250
million.
G
So,
although
we've
dropped
from
that
peak,
we're
still
relatively
a
lot
higher
than
we
were
four
or
five
years
ago
in
our
process,
questions
about
what
this,
at
least
on
the
evaluation
side
and
obviously
with
our
actual
revenue
side
that
goes
with
it.
So
in
again,
in
2016,
it
peaked
I
believe
it
was
about
six
million
dollars
of
the
revenue
when
we
were
at
our
peak
this
year,
we're
estimating
our
revenue
from
building
permits
to
be
about
four
point:
five
million
dollars.
E
Questions,
maybe
maybe
less
you
and
more
Scott
or
the
building
department
I'd
be
interested
in
the
number
of
permits.
I
mean
I
know
we
get
a
report
quarterly,
but
can
we
have
like
a
graph
that
kind
of
tracks
this
because
I
know
sometimes
the
big
spikes
are
because
of
one
or
two
big
projects?
I
just
be
interested
in
what
the
overall
you
know
this
is
almost
10
years.
What's
the
ten-year
trend
in
terms
of
building
permits
taken
out.
D
G
I
I
D
And
and
that's
kind
of
tebab
statement
that
we
saw
a
peak
for
two
years
in
16
and
17,
and
we
have
come
down
from
that
number
to
about
five
hundred,
roughly
five
hundred
million,
maybe
550d
bounces
between
500
550
of
expected
new
construction
valuation,
that's
what's
on
their
permits
and
their
fees
are
based
on
that.
So
the
fee
fees
that
we
generator
on
that
500
to
550
million
annually
in
and.
I
D
We
can
check
on
what
that
number
was,
but
that
would
not
have
been
budgeted
as
expected,
so
it
would
not
have
affected
our
actual
de
budget
and
that
would
have
been
small
or
single-family
home
repair
fees.
So
you're
talking
hundreds
of
dollars
so
I
one
of
the
things
we
can
extract
councilman
Coleman,
if
this
is
what
you
were
looking
for,
was
some
of
the
larger
projects
that
have
really
bumped
the
numbers
up
and
at
years
to
show
what
the
outliers
might
have
been.
C
Maybe
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
you
in
terms
of
what
you're
asking,
but
we
get
the
that
building.
Permit
requires
everything
that
breaks
it
down
by
categories
and
that's
on
a
monthly
basis,
but
I.
It
might
be
helpful
to
look
at
the
tenure
trend
for
those
various
categories
in
a
sort
of
graphic
form
like
this.
You.
E
C
E
E
E
G
G
G
This
slide
illustrates
with
the
general
fund
is
by
department,
as
you
can
see,
from
fire
police
they're,
the
largest
pieces
of
our
general
fund
about
62%
of
it
again
it
in
there
there's
a
large
piece
that
talks
about
administrative
services
as
well,
and
it's
illustrated
on
the
graph.
That's
that
includes
the
city
clerk,
so
a
manager,
finance,
Human,
Resources
information,
technology,
legal
and
mayor
and
council,
so
that
makes
up
about
20%
of
our
general
fund
Department
other
than
that
any
other
questions
I
think
it's
illustrated
on
on
what
they
are
they're
questions.
G
This
one
has
to
take
a
little
there's
a
little
narrative
to
this.
You
can
see
an
FY
19,
we're
expecting
to
have
a
very
large
increase
in
our
balance,
but
that's
part
of
what
we're
doing
when
we're
selling
the
garage
so
you're
getting
some
of
them
you're
getting
the
revenue
pieces
of
it
as
a
sell
it
in
19
and
in
20.
You
see
a
deficit.
What
we're
starting
to
expend
some
of
those
dollars
that
we
that
we
got
from
selling
the
garage
into
those
future
years.
G
D
B
G
This
is
our
road
use
tax
button.
Obviously
the
majority
of
what
we
get
is
Road
use
funds.
There
is
a
piece
Illustrated
on
there
for
I
think
that's
called
Street
maintenance
and
things
of
that
nature.
Some
of
that
comes
in
from
our
gaming
money
that
comes
into
the
fund
to
pay
for
things
as
the
monies
we
get
from
Prairie
Meadows
for
the
gaming
portion
of
that.
So
that
makes
up
a
piece
of
what
you're,
seeing
in
that
7%.
G
On
the
use
of
funds,
again
Street
maintenance,
you
can
see
all
the
items
that
are
listed
on
their
street
maintenance
or
the
major
use
of
that
again,
you
might
ask
the
question
about
transfers.
Again,
that's
transferring
monies
into
the
CIP
into
debt
services
and
then
the
general
fund
is
what
makes
that
one
that
particular
piece
of
the
pie.
I
I
G
This
illustrates
our
road
use
taxes
that
we
that
we
get
revenues
we
talked
about
and
Road
use
taxes,
there's
other
elements
that
go
into
it,
but
primarily
they're,
calculated
by
a
population
of
the
community
as
well
as
the
fuel
consumption.
Those
are
the
major
drivers
of
what
what
those
are
there.
A
few
other
components
to
get
into
that
piece.
So
obviously,
just
as
councilman
amanda
mom
said,
is,
as
as
other
type
of
vehicles
start
to
get
more
either
electric
or
not.
G
That
could
drop
down
the
amount
of
Road
use
funds
that
come
in
because
now
you're
not
using
as
much
as
fuel
as
you
were
before,
but
other
than
that.
We're
just
we're
assuming
a
status
quo
revenue
and
then
what
we're
going
to
collect
and
what
we
collected
in
nineteen
and
what
we
will
collect
in
twenty.
G
This
next
slide
illustrates
concerns
and
challenges
for
that
we
would
that
we
would
phrase
outside
the
city's
purview
to
try
to
correct,
but
commercial
rollback
is
one
of
those
things
that
is
in
place
and
it's
a
ninety
percent,
so
that
has
affected
us
over
time.
The
second
one,
the
apartment
rollback
there
was
a
new
category
multi-residential
that
was
created
in
the
past
by
the
legislature.
G
C
E
C
G
Illustrate
what
that
amount
is
at
the
next
slide,
the
rising
cost
that
certain
things
like
health
care,
pensions
and
construction
things.
Those
things
continue
to
grow
that
sometimes
are
out
of
our
control
and,
lastly,
the
legislature
I
think
just
did
open
up
today,
right
and
I'm
not
sure,
what's
on
their
docket,
that
we
never
know
when
we're
putting
a
budget
together.
What
might
change
during
the
time?
So
basically
those
are
out
of
our
control
and
that's
what
we
illustrate
here.
G
This
is
the
slide
here
that
talks
about
the
multi
res
classification
that
was
put
into
place
and
I'll
just
cut
to
the
last
thing,
and
so
over
the
eight-year
period
or
anticipating
about
I'm,
not
quite
nineteen
and
a
half
million
dollars
worth
of
previous
revenues.
We've
got
through
our
through
our
taxes
that
we
no
longer
get
during
that
period
of
time,
so
it
does
affect
when
we're
trying
to
budget
what
we're
doing
and
what
resources
we
do
have
questions
what.
H
B
D
D
C
The
piece
that
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
possible
to
get
this
data,
but
I'd
be
really
curious.
How
much?
How
much
of
this
multi-residential
is?
Is
you
know
big
apartment
complexes
versus
how
much?
How
much
of
this
would
be?
What
would
otherwise
be
single-family
homes,
like
you
know,
a
home
that
converted,
you
know
like
we're,
gonna
see
on
our
agenda
tonight,
a
11:45
in
1147,
24th
Street.
C
Those
were
at
one
point
homes,
but
there
are
six
units
in
each
of
those,
and
you
know
you,
you
walk
around
the
the
Drake
neighborhood
because
have
just
there
this
weekend
with
our
small
pilot
team.
What
looking
at
houses
I
mean
they're,
a
bunch
of
homes
there
that
are
four
or
five
units,
how
much
of
those,
because
those
should
be
in
the
multi
residential
roll
back,
how
many
fit
that
category
versus
they're?
Also
in
that
same
neighborhood,
a
bunch
of
apartment
buildings
I
mean
from
a
policy
perspective.
G
I
give
this
shot,
so
what
you're
saying
is,
but
but
if
it
was
a
house
to
begin
with,
it
was
already
at
the
residential
piece.
I
think
that's
what
Scott
said.
So,
if
there's
homes
out
there,
they
already
are
at,
are
there
at
the
residential
valuations
worth
of
apartments,
that
they'll
become
apartments
they're,
actually
going
to
be
a
little
bit
higher
and
then
eventually
by
2024,
then
they'll
be
the
same
as
what
the
residential
is.
I'd,
maybe
I,
misunderstood
I.
D
D
D
E
D
C
I
mean
those
properties,
I
think,
have
a
different
impact
on
our
neighborhoods
than
even
a
large.
A
large
apartment
buildings
maintained
differently.
They
they
have
a
different
impact
on
neighborhoods
in
the
feel
of
the
street.
Learning
is
so
looking
at
them
as
a
separate
category
makes
sense
eventually.
E
G
So
I
believe
this
is
the
last
slide.
This
is
our
concerns
and
challenges
that
both
are
operating
in
capital
budget.
So
these
are
things
that
are
are
in
in
our
control,
so
the
aging
infrastructure,
including
facilities,
there's
things
that
have
some
concerns
and
challenges
there.
The
neighborhood
improvements
by
removal
apply
improvement
of
the
housing
stock,
the
neighborhood
streets
and
sidewalks,
and
the
corridor
improvements,
and
you
know
the
public
safety
service
demands,
staffing
and
development.
G
I
think
we've
got
fire
stations
coming
up
as
well
those
equipment
and
then
the
last
illustrates
the
demand
for
a
high
level
of
service
for
growing
and
diverse
population.
So
those
are
some
of
things
we
see
as
concerns
and
challenges
that
you'll
take
up
during
this
budget
process
to
see
what
we
can
do
with
that.
That's
all
we
have,
but
if
there's
more
information
to
eat
or
have
questions,
I
try
to
answer
it.
But
if
there's
more
things
you
can
even
let
Scott
know
I'll
try
to
pull
that
data
up
view.
G
So
we're
getting
reminder
on
our
last
council
meeting
of
January
we've
presented
just
about
everything
to
you
at
this
particular
time.
So
that's
kind
of
a
catch-up.
Is
there
any
changes?
If
not
we'll
talk
a
little
bit,
how
the
sales
tax
works
through
our
state
budget
form,
so
we
can
see
how
that
fits
in
there
and
then,
if
there's
any
data
changes
you'd
like
to
see
us
do
any
one
of
these
things.
That
would
be
the
best
time
to
tell
us
before
we
start.
G
That
discussion
that's
got
to
see
where
at
and
make
sure
there's
he
doesn't
anticipate
it
and
less
changes.
We're
probably
ready
to
probably
not
ready
to
go
in
the
capital
yet
because
I
think
there's
still
some
a
little
bit
that
I've
heard
about
the
the
operations.
If
there's
nothing
changes
from
this
point,
we
could
probably
get
that
to
you
laugh
with
her
cuz.