►
From YouTube: City Council Regular - 15 Aug 2022
Description
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/143600?handle=11BF674D5CEC44B8BE8D56E846AA1C90
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/143599?handle=90889A05ABFA45D3AF5CA5F2C33E1554
1. Study Session Topic
Director of Public Works Maria D'Andrea will be present to u pdate City Council on progress on this multi-agency study being led by the City of Englewood. 6:25 pm-6:45pm
Director of Public Works Maria D'Andrea will be present to provide an overview of the Complete Streets Initiative & Applicability to Englewood Street Network. 6:00pm-6:25pm
Director of Finance Jackie Loh will be present to review the I nvestment Policy Statement (IPS) for the City's 401(a) and 457 Retirement Plan. 6:45pm-6:55pm
2. Call to Order
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Roll Call
5. Consideration of Minutes of Previous Session
a. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of August 1, 2022.
6. Appointments, Communications, Proclamations, and Recognition
7. Recognition of Scheduled Public Comment
Steven Kelly, an Englewood resident, will address Council.
Doug Cohn, an Englewood resident, will address Council.
Jacob Gilbert, an Englewood resident, will address Council.
8. Recognition of Unscheduled Public Comment
9. Consent Agenda Items
a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading
CB 45 - Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Centennial to provide interconnectivity between traffic signal systems for public benefit.
CB 40 - Allow Court and Prosecution staff to hand documents to defendants and witnesses, and to authorize Court to withdraw bench warrant and instead serve summons to defendants in lieu of arrest
CB 44 -A mending Englewood Municipal Code Title 4, Chapter 1, Section 4-1-2 concerning the annual required adoption of the City's investment policy.
b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading.
CB 36 - Amending Englewood Municipal Code to mirror Colorado statute and provide clarity of offenses for filing in Englewood Municipal Court.
CB 43 - IGA with Arapahoe County for Coordinated Election Services
CB 42 - The Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) Special Initiative Grant
c. Resolutions and Motions
Approval of Englewood Police Benefit Association (EPBA) Contract
10. Public Hearing Items
11. Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions
a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading
CB 46 - Update to the current off-leash ordinance.
b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading
c. Resolutions and Motions
2022 Budget Supplemental #3
Approval of a contract to provide security services for EEF and Civic Center properties.
Resolution adopting the changes to the Reserve and Investment Policy
12. General Discussion
a. Mayor's Choice
Executive Session for discussion of a personnel matter under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(2)(f) for the purpose of annual employment reviews and not involving: any specific employees who have requested dis...
Executive Session f or a conference with the City attorney for the purpose of receiving
legal advice on specific legal questions under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(b)
b. Council Members' Choice
13. City Manager’s Report
14. Adjournment
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/143600?handle=11BF674D5CEC44B8BE8D56E846AA1C90
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/143599?handle=90889A05ABFA45D3AF5CA5F2C33E1554
A
B
Good
evening,
thank
you,
mayor
and
city
council,
so
this
item
tonight
we'll
be
giving
a
brief
overview,
as
you
mentioned,
of
complete
streets
and
what
that
means.
So
really.
This
is
intended
to
be
just
an
informational
item
to
city
council
to
start
to
get
the
ball
rolling
in
terms
of
what
is
possible
within
the
city
of
englewood
and
how
we
plan
to
go
about
our
design
process
for
two
projects
that
are
currently
on
our
radar
screen
in
terms
of
moving
forward
with
the
complete
streets,
evaluation
and
implementation.
B
B
So
this
is
the
definition
here
of
from
the
national
complete
streets
coalition.
You
can
read
that
for
yourself,
but
really
it's
more
about
not
just
one
concept
but
really
a
framework
for
working
within
that
for
planning,
design,
implementation
and,
ultimately,
maintenance
of
roads.
That
really
factor
in
all
of
those
aspects,
as
well
as
making
it
safe
and
accessible
for
really
all
users,
and
I
think,
that's
the
if
there's
one
key
element
to
take
away.
It's
redesigning
streets
so
that
they
are
safe
and
usable
for
all
users.
B
B
It's
also
where
we
put
all
of
our
utilities,
as
you
can
imagine,
underneath
the
ground
there's
a
variety
of
uses
that
we
don't
see
every
day,
but
also
use
that
public
right
away
to
make
it
more
connected
and
really
ultimately,
depending
on
how
we
design
the
street.
It
really
can
contribute
or
take
away
from
the
feel
and
character
of
a
particular
neighborhood
or
a
particular
corridor.
B
Majority
of
those
have
multiple
lanes
so
again:
they're
moving
traffic,
usually
at
a
pretty
higher
volume
of
or
higher
speed
limit
above
30
miles
per
hour
and
almost
almost
to
a
t
there,
as
you
can
see,
97
have
commercial
land
uses.
So
what
does
that
mean?
People
are
trying
to
get
there
on
foot
or
by
other
means
of
transportation,
and
I
can't
do
that
in
as
safe
a
manner
as
possible.
B
It's
like
we
have
to
take
care
of
all
of
that
and
make
sure
that
that's
still
managed
to
continue
to
work
so
that
we
all
have
internet
and
we
have
water
and
we
have
our
sanitary
sewers
taken
care
of
and
all
the
variety
of
other
uses
that
occur
within
the
public
right
away.
But
all
of
that
taking
up
that
space
is
also
a
consideration
for
why
it's
so
challenging
to
do
some
of
this.
Similarly,
different
land
uses
have
different
access
needs.
B
So
when
we
start
to
like
when
we
look
along
u.s
285
we'll
talk
about
that
project
here
in
a
minute,
while
everybody
wants
driveway
access
to
their
businesses
as
much
as
you
have
driveway
access
now
you
have
conflicts
with
pedestrians
and
bikes.
You
also
tend
to
start
to
impact
the
traveling
public
as
they're
going
down
the
street,
because
you
have
so
many
people
slowing
down
stopping
to
get
in
and
out
of
those
driveways.
So
really
it's
mixing
all
of
that
together.
That
makes
this
such
a
challenge
and
really
in
the
past.
B
We
truly
have
designed
this
more
utilitarian
just
to
move
vehicles.
So,
instead
of
thinking
about
these
alternate
modes
of
transportation,
we've
been
so
focused
on
just
moving
traffic,
doing
it
as
efficiently
and
effectively
as
possible.
We've
kind
of
let
those
other
uses
go
by
the
wayside
and
now
we're
having
to
the
challenge
is
going
back
and
trying
to
retrofit
to
make
all
of
this
work
within
the
limited
space
that
we
have.
B
Some
of
the
design
elements
that
you
need
that
we
can
take
into
consideration.
As
you
can
see,
there
is
possibly
looking
at
modifying
and
that
usually
means
narrowing
vehicle
lanes.
So
with
the
american
association
of
state
highway
transportation
officials
there's
an
official
book
on
what
the
lane
widths
can
be
or
should
be,
and
they
can
vary
down
to
10
feet
depending
on
how
what
the
type
of
roadway
that
you
want.
The
type.
B
Typically
though
roadways
are
designed
for
a
typical
arterial
are
12
feet
wide,
so
there's
actually
two
feet
wider
there
and
that
allows
cars
to
actually
go
faster
right.
Then
maybe
you
would
might
want
them
to
be
so
again.
We've
been
kind
of
doing
this
cookie
cutter
approach,
where
we
look
at
wider
roadways
to
move
traffic
faster,
where
we
can
actually
take
a
step
back
and
see.
Does
this
make
sense
to
make
them
this
wide?
B
What
does
that
give
us
opportunities
to
do
is
to
look
at
other
uses
for
that
same
space,
so
putting
in
potentially
bike
lanes
additional
vehicle
parking
transit
lanes,
but
also
looking
at
some
of
those
aesthetic
amenities.
That
also,
then,
add
to
again
the
feeling
and
the
comfort
of
people
who
travel
along
the
streets.
So
things
like
lighting.
B
B
It
also
talks
about
some
of
the
other
design
elements.
That's
that
table
on
the
right
there
under
the
blue
columns
about
what
that
road
should
consider
when
we're
looking
at
that.
So
this
was
really
a
helping
a
tool
for
us,
as
we
started
to
look
at
putting
our
application
together
to
the
arapahoe
county
transportation
forum
to
consider
federal
dollars
for
this
type
of
improvement.
B
B
So
you
can
see
here
one
of
the
graphics
that
we've
developed.
This
is
on
the
east
end
of
that
project,
where
we
actually
do
have
room
within
the
right
of
way
that
we
can
actually
add
a
landscape
median
in
the
middle.
So
right
now
we
have
all
pavement
with
some
pretty
fairly
narrow,
sidewalks
and
then
just
butting
up
to
where
the
the
public
or
the
private
land
takes
over.
So
you
can
see,
we've
redesigned
that
cross
section.
B
We've
got
11
foot
travel
lanes
with
a
11
foot
median
we've
got
a
sidewalk
on
the
west
side
or
excuse
me
the
south
side
at
seven
feet,
which
is
really
nice
and
wide
right
now.
Most
of
our
sidewalks
within
town
are
about
42
inches,
so
just
under
four
feet.
This
would
provide
for
a
seven
foot
walk,
which
is
very
comfortable
to
have
two
people
walking
side
by
side
and
then
on
the
right.
You
can
see
a
multi-use
path
there
of
10
foot
wide
would
allow
for
both
biking
and
walking
that's
separated
from
the
actual
traffic.
B
This
is
just
a
cross-sectional
view
of
that
same
section
that
I
talked
about
that
starts
to
take
into
consideration
there,
how
you
see
where
the
buildings,
especially
on
the
north
side,
that
existing
parking
garage
for
swedish
there
and
just
how
that
would
start
to
look
as
you're
traveling
down
the
street
kind
of
that
corridor
effect.
If
you're
in
that,
in
that
roadway.
B
Similarly,
on
south
broadway,
now
again,
if
you
go
back
so
again,
this
old
hampton
was
called
a
neighborhood
connector
street,
as
recommended
by
dr
cogg,
and
this
broadway
is
actually
called
a
regional
connector
street.
So
a
little
bit
of
a
different
mix.
As
you
can
see
there,
modal
priority
is
given
high
to
pedestrians,
bus
truck
traffic
as
well
as
vehicles
and
a
little
bit
lower
or
medium
there
for
bicycle
traffic,
and
so
what
we've
done
in
response
to
that?
B
Taking
that
into
consideration-
and
this
just
has
a
whole
different
mix
of
uses-
that
you
can
get
into
more
detail
there
on
that
right.
So
what
we've
done
is
looked
at
the
opportunity
to
do
bicycling,
not
on
broadway,
given
the
high
volumes
and
the
kind
of
relatively
higher
speeds
of
broadway,
but
do
that
on
sherman,
which
is
just
a
couple
blocks
to
the
east.
B
So
really,
we
would
have
good
signage
and
really
point
all
the
bikes
not
to
use
broadway,
but
instead
for
a
north-south
route,
if
they
want
to
travel
between
the
south
end
somewhere
around
bellevue,
all
the
way
up
to
the
regional
trail
along
dry,
creek,
boulevard
or
dry
creek,
road
or
trail.
Excuse
me
is
that
they
would
be
on
sherman,
not
on
broadway,
and
we
would
improve
sherman
such
that
that
would
allow
for
that.
B
So
talking
a
little
bit
more,
how
can
we
implement
complete
streets
within
the
community?
This
a
lot
of
it
starts
with
just
more
education
and
training
for
staff.
So
that's
not
just
engineering
staff,
that's
also
community
development,
our
planning
staff,
as
well
as
economic
development
and
some
and
our
finance
folks
as
well.
Really
it's
all
aspects
of
that
that
go
together.
B
And
finally,
if
there
is
interest
there
is
sample
policies
available
through
the
national
complete
streets
coalition
as
well
as
I
believe
dr
cogg
has
a
sample
policy
as
well.
If
council
was
interested
in
pursuing
that
there
is
a
current
grant
project
program
available,
the
current
administration
has
identified
5
billion
nationwide
over
the
next
five
years
to
put
towards
this
so
safe
streets
and
roads
for
all.
There's
a
current
opening
right
now,
foreign
ss-4a
grants
and
really
again,
as
that
last
bullet,
shows
there.
B
A
C
B
B
C
C
If
there
is
other
places
that
these
trucks
can
park
to
deliver
freight
and
you
know
their
product
because
I
don't
know
how
how
we
change
that.
But
I
know
if,
if
they're
parking
there,
that's
going
to
shut
down
the
lanes,
so
I'd
like
to
make
that
a
console
request
that
we
check
with
those
people.
So
we
don't
get
too
far
into
this
great.
I'm
sure.
D
A
D
Mayor,
thank
you
director,
deandre.
I
really
like
this.
I
want
to
say
that
first,
because
I
think
this
is
just
this
is
like
the
dream
street
right
for
somebody
who
walks
everywhere,
and
so
I
would
love
to
walk
down
the
street.
That
being
said,
was
it
in
this?
This
is,
requires
all
new,
concrete,
flat
work
ever
all
the
way
along
because
you're
totally
restructuring
the
the
street
and
the
widths
of
everything
in
this
process
was.
Was
it
ever
were
other
alternatives
considered
that
wouldn't
require
that
I
mean.
D
E
D
B
I
we
did
create
this,
is
there
were
three
alternatives
for
the
created,
so
we
did
look
at
options
where
it
was
just
the
sidewalk
without
a
multi-use,
and
I
believe
we
looked
at
on
street
bike
lanes
as
well.
We
kind
of
gave
them
carte
blanche
to
start
from
scratch,
so
we
could
certainly
go
back
and
look
at
a
more
limited
disruption.
B
I
think
we
were
trying
to
get
the
maximum
of
trying
to
do
that
balance
between
roadways
and
that
those
bike
pad
elements.
So
I
would
say
that
was
the
direction
that
was
given,
but
we
could
go
back
and
look
at
that
and
see
if
we
can
keep
the
curb
line
kind
of
where
it
is
and
still
maybe
add,
the
median.
D
Yeah,
I
would
just
that's
something
I'm
curious
about.
I
know
that,
there's
a
you
know
a
grant.
You
know
available
here
that
allows
us
to
do
a
lot
more
beyond.
Maybe
what
we
normally
would.
I
think
I
I
think,
the
when
I
see
a
map
with
with
you
know
all
these
different
opportunities
for
complete
streets
on
all
these
places
in
englewood.
D
I'm
just
seeing
dollar
signs,
because
this
is
the
most
expensive
way
to
add
walkability
to
a
city,
and
I
think
about
how
how
far
that
same,
you
know
the
amount
of
money
it
would
take
to
do
one
street
how
far
that
would
go
in
executing
our
walk-in
wheel
plan,
for
example.
So
I
think
there's
there
are
trade-offs
financially
to
be
considered
here,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
just
because
they're
they
look
beautiful.
D
You
know
all
that
fresh
concrete
and
all
that
wide
walking
space
is
awesome
and
I
would
love
to
see
it
everywhere.
I
would
hate
to
go
down
this
path
and
have
all
of
our
money,
get
sucked
up
into
short
little
pieces
of
beautiful,
complete
streets
project,
but
actually
not
get
the
interconnectivity
around
the
city
that
we
that
I
think
we
really
want.
So
that's
just
kind
of
my
feedback,
but
I
do
love
it
and
I
hope
it
gets
done.
D
B
Yeah,
we
definitely
have
not
taken
it
to
the
level
in
south
broadway,
as
we
have
with
old
hampton.
So
I
think
we're
looking
at
more
keeping
it
the
way
that
it
is
and
just
doing
some
enhancement
at
certain
locations,
as
opposed
to
the
quarter
y
or
quarter
long
kind
of
improvements,
because
that
would
be
very.
D
D
Why
would
we
choose
sherman
to
put
a
bike
lane
on
instead
of
they
said
perhaps
logan,
because
logan
connects
all
the
way
through
to
denver
and
everything,
and
so
they
were
just
one
they
did.
You
know
they
were
just
wondering
if,
if
what
the,
what
the
reasoning
behind
that
was
and
what
I'm
hearing
tonight
is
that
it's,
because
how
close
it
is
to
broadway
that
gives
it
a
nice
easy
alternative
to
broadway
or
is
there
another
reason
not
necessarily.
B
B
To
go
back
and
see
why
that
was
chosen
over
logan
as
a
north
south
street,
when
we
were
evaluating
this
project
of
south
broadway,
it
was
just
that
it
happened
to
be.
That
was
the
north-south
route.
So
it's
not
necessarily
the
proximity.
It's
nice
that
it's
only
a
couple
blocks
but
logan
with
the
traffic
signals
could
also
be
an
alternative,
but
there
may
have
been
some
reason
within
the
walk
and
wheel
why
we
chose
sherman
overlapping.
H
B
Yes,
so
this
graphic
is
not
intended
for
the
entire
length
of
the
street.
This
is
just
on
the
very
east
end
where
we
can
make
the
median
work
as
we
get
further
west.
You
do
have
we
do
have.
We
need
to
continue
to
use
the
center
turn
lane,
and
so
there
are
still
pockets
of
that
center
turn
lane,
because
you're
right
to
your
point
that
they
still
need
to
access
both
the
south
and
the
north
sides
of
the
street
and
right
in
front
of
the
synergy
building
right
in
front
of
swedish.
H
B
And
part
of
this
is
also
good
signage,
so
way.
Finding
of
how
do
you
get
to
those
particular
lots?
So
people
aren't
meandering
through
the
neighborhoods
being
two
blocks
off
of
hampton,
so
how
people
get
in
and
out
of
the
medical
district
in
general?
How
they
find
the
right
parking
lot
is
going
to
be
very
important
and
will
be
a
part
of
this
project
as
well,
and.
H
And
I
think
it
should.
I
mean
one
night
I
was
over
there.
Some
guy
was
looking
for
the
emergency
room,
he
was
on
the
south
side
of
the
hospital
and
he
couldn't
get
there
and
he
was
panicking
yeah
and-
and
I
gave
him
directions,
but
you
know
because
of
all
the
construction
over
there.
Even
now
they
need
directions
too.
B
I
B
Not
they're
not
set
at
all
so
again,
we've
started
the
process
with
a
community
advisory
group
with
the
old
hampton
avenue
that
was
convened
by
through
the
dda.
So
that's
been
very
valuable
to
get
that
input
of
you
know
what
do
we
want
this
street
to
look
like?
We
have
not
done
that
process
for
south
broadway,
so
old.
Hampton,
I
would
say,
is
a
little
bit
further
ahead
in
that
regard,
but
none
of
this
has
been
set
in
stone.
Yet
we
are
still
waiting
to
see
if
we're
going
to
move
forward
with
the
project.
B
I
Very
helpful,
thank
you.
I
actually
had
the
opportunity
to
sit
down
one
of
those
meetings
and
I
do
remember
that
the
majority
of
those
present
were
concerned
about
the
multi-use
path
yeah,
given
the
fact
that
it's
in
the
medical
district
and
for
folks,
maybe
on
wheelchairs
or
different
things,
trying
to
cross
a
10
foot
path
where
there's
two-way
bike:
traffic,
two-way
pedestrian
traffic
wheelchairs,
like
a
lot
happening-
and
I
think
you
know
in
line
with
some
of
them-
anderson's
comments,
I'm
curious.
I
How
do
I
I
love
the
complete
streets
project,
but
how
do
we
think
about
this
in
a
way
that's
consistent
and
holistic
in
the
city
and
not
just
a
bunch
of
piecemeal
projects
that
then
don't
talk
to
each
other
very
well.
So
this
right
here
looks
really
beautiful,
but
if
you're
a
cyclist,
how
does
this
connect
with
the
other
very
different
kinds
of
bike
lanes
that
we
have
in
our
walk-in
wheel
plan?
I
B
Yeah
and
I
think
so,
the
blue,
as
I
mentioned
here,
the
blue
hashed
areas
show
those
connections
on
either
end.
So
I
would
say,
though,
certainly
like
the
sidewalk.
That's
on
the
east
that
travels
into
cherry
hills,
village,
and
I
believe
part
of
that
is
denver
on
the
north
side.
There
is
really
not
at
the
scale
of
what
we're
talking
about
along
old
hampton,
so
you
there
is
a
connection
there,
but
not
necessarily
all
of
a
sudden.
It's
like!
B
Oh
I'm,
on
this
wide
10
foot
path,
and
now
I'm
on
a
four
foot
sidewalk
you
know.
So
definitely
I
think
while,
but
we
think
this
is
a
value
in
this
location
because
of
the
number
of
pedestrians,
because
of
that
kind
of
intent
of
that
wellness
district
and
that
it
makes
sense
to
do
this
in
this
location
because
of
that
because
of
the
regional
draw
and
the
opportunity
for
people
to
travel
along
this
in
that
regard.
B
I
Them
I
appreciate
that
and
I
think
that's
my
main
point
of
feedback.
I've
actually
spoken
with
some
cyclists,
who
have
seen
some
of
these
ideas
and
said:
hey
fyi.
This
is
this
can
be
really
confusing
when
we've
experienced
other
places-
and
I
would
hate
for
us
to
do
all
of
this
work
and
then
find
out
that
maybe
it's
not
the
most
functional
approach,
so
I
have
a
little
flag
there,
but
I
think
that,
as
we
continue
to
discuss
the
project
it
being
discussed
holistically
within
our
full
walk-in
wheel
plan
is
really
important
to
me.
B
Thank
you.
I
forgot
to
talk
to
that
point,
so
I
think,
before
we
would
move
forward
with
this,
I
think
there's
an
educational
component
of
that
probably
signage
as
well,
so
we
don't
want
to
build
something
that
people
don't
feel
comfortable
on.
So
if
you
are
in
a
wheelchair
and
you
feel
like
bikes
are
whizzing
past
you
or
scooters
or
whatever
we
don't
want
that
either.
So
looking
at,
I
think
other
examples
around
the
country.
Is
that
a
signage
thing
is
that
an
education
thing
or
does
this
make
sense
in
this
location?
B
J
J
This
plan
appears
to
show,
I
think
it
might
be
the
next
slide.
Okay,
the
detail
or
the
one,
the
previous
one,
sorry,
the
detail:
roadway
typology,
regional
connector
street,
oh
okay,
when
we
look
at
this
plan,
we
see
no
parking
parallel.
Instead,
we
have
bike
lanes
and
we
see
one
traffic
lane
along
broadway
and
a
reserve
bus
lane
for
a
bus
that,
in
my
observation,
not
too
many
people
actually
ride.
J
You
know
I
used
to
commute
downtown
on
a
daily
basis,
for
my
job
and
rtd
was
running
to
zero
limited,
which
was
a
very
convenient
route
for
me
to
get
it
just
a
couple
blocks
away
from
my
house.
It
doesn't
run
on
this
part
of
town
anymore,
so
your
option
is
basically
to
take
the
train
in
or
to
stop
at
every
block
along
broadway.
As
you
travel,
the
the
bottom
line
is
eliminating
a
traffic
lien
on
broadway
is
not
something
I
could,
I
think,
ever
support
under
any
circumstances.
J
B
Sure,
and-
and
thank
you
for
that
clarification,
so
these
are
taken
straight
out
of
what
dr
cogg
would
recommend
for
this
type
of
roadway.
Really,
though,
our
initial
our
effort
would
be,
is
how
do
we
make
this
specific
to
broadway?
We
are
not
proposing
to
put
dedicated
bike
lanes
on
broadway,
nor
to
remove
one
lane
of
trav
travel
in
each
direction,
but
this
is
what
came
from
dr
cogg
for
this
type
of
roadway
in
the
entire
regional
metro
area.
B
As
a
consideration
that
you
might
want
to
consider
this,
we
would
not
consider
that
for
broadway,
but
some
of
these
other
elements
may
be
very
applicable
or
they
may
be
applicable
for
roadway,
let's
say
out
in
lakewood,
or
something
like
that,
so
that's
very
generic,
really.
The
intent
is
that
there
is
no
singular
design
prescription
for
complete
streets.
We've
got
to
look
at
the
context
of
the
roadway.
What
is
it
what
is
happening
in
and
around
that
area
and
what
makes
sense
for
our
community.
D
D
That's
where
you
get
really
dangerous
roads,
where
you
have
a
lot
of
commercial
activity
as
well
as
high
speeds,
and
there
are
other
ways
other
than
complete
streets
of
dealing
with
that
one
one
I
would
want
to
keep
on
a
radar
is
the
idea
of
doing
a
road
diet
where
you
do
actually
reduce
lanes
and
often
road
diets.
There's
there's
evidence
that
some
types
of
road
diets
don't
reduce
the
the
ability
to
carry
traffic
volume,
but
they
do
make
the
streets
safer
and
they've
done.
D
A
A
B
B
B
This
was
a
project
that
was
led
and
initiated
by
the
city
of
englewood,
so
lowell
boulevard,
knox
court
on
the
west
end,
which
is
the
last
signal
before
you
go
west
and
becomes
basically
a
freeway
all
the
way
to
I-25
on
the
east
so
again
about
just
about
six
and
a
half
miles.
As
you
can
see
there,
it
really
is
a
critical
roadway
within
the
denver
metro
area
and
serves
as
not
only
a
gateway,
but
also
a
major
thoroughfare
thoroughfare
to
access
jobs,
neighborhoods
and
other
regional
destinations.
B
So
really
we
initiated
this
effort
because
there
have
been
23
previous
studies
done
on
this
segment
of
of
the
roadway
that
might
be
chunks
of
it.
You
know
pieces
done
by
englewood
pieces
done
by
cheerios
village,
things
done
by
cdot
against
the
larger
effort,
but
really
bringing
together
all
of
the
communities
in
that
area,
so
sheridan,
arapahoe,
county,
englewood,
cherry
hills,
village,
denver
as
well
as
c
dot
to
say
what
does
do.
We
want
this
to
look
like
how
do
we
want
this
roadway
to
operate?
B
And
how
can
we
share
and
look
at
some
of
those
come
up
with
a
shared
vision
of
what
we
want
the
corridor
to
operate
as
won't
go
into
a
lot
of
detail?
But
if
you
look
on
the
top
there,
you
can
see
that
the
speed
limit
changes
from
west
to
east
pretty
significantly
and
even
varies
from
eastbound
and
westbound.
So
as
you
get
closer
to
happy
canyon
road,
you
can
see
that
westbound
is
40
miles
per
hour
and
45
eastbound.
So
there's
a
lot
of
inconsistencies.
B
The
green
shows
two
lanes
of
travel.
While
the
orange
portions
show
three
lanes
of
travel,
so
it
is
very
not
consistent
along
the
corridor.
You
can
also
see
how
the
volumes
drop
actually
from
the
west
about
61
000
vehicles
per
day,
all
the
way
as
you
approach
I-25,
to
about
42
000
vehicles
per
day,
so
kind
of
opposite
of
what
you
might
expect
is
that
it's
people
not
traveling
necessarily
into
town
but
out
of
town
or
more
travel
out
in
the
west
end
of
town.
So
you
can
see
here
too.
B
We
need
to
plan
for
the
future,
so
in
2050,
based
on
the
travel
projections,
we're
anticipating
that
those
volumes
of
traffic
will
increase
significantly
and
really
within
again
that
regional
area,
you
can
see
that
the
volumes
are
areas
kind
of
outlined
in
green
there.
Our
project
scope
area
is
that
it
will
increase
significantly
in
that
next
30-year
time
frame.
B
B
B
B
I
want
to
do
this,
but
really,
how
can
we
look
at
that
collectively
and
then
set
that
as
a
goal
for
all
of
us,
as
individual
agencies
to
work
on
developing
early
action
items
so
similar
to
the
santa
fe
pel,
where
we're
starting
to
take
off
some
of
the
projects
by
using
some
of
the
money
that
was
available?
We're
looking
at?
B
So
that's
more
of
our
area,
where
it's
much
there's
a
lot
more
traffic
signals
a
lot
more
opportunities
to
slow
down
a
lot
more
businesses
and
just
buildings
much
closer
up
to
the
side
of
the
street.
So
you
get
different
feels
again.
We
started
to
get
into
a
lot
of
the
detail
already
of
what
those
specifics
are
in
terms
of
traffic.
So
you
can
see
here.
B
Similarly,
then
it
goes
down
to
three
two
and
one,
so
you
can
see
there's
opportunities
there
to
really
improve
safety
if
we
make
improvements
to
those
intersections,
we've
also
looked
at
cut
through
traffic,
so
the
thick
line
in
red
orange
and
yellow
is
hampton
avenue.
The
green
line
to
the
surface
is
over
in
sheridan
and
denver
where
it
connects
with
federal
boulevard.
So
you
can
see
that
in
the
pm
peak
there's
people
getting
off
again.
B
Similarly,
on
the
east
end
in
the
morning,
people
are
trying
traveling
down
happy
canyon
to
get
to
quincy.
I
must
I'm
assuming,
as
opposed
to
getting
on
I-25,
to
take
that
short
route.
An
interesting
kind
of
fact
that
we've
already
found
too,
is
that
80
of
the
trips
along
the
entire
quarter
are
trips
of
five
miles
or
less
so
they're
short
trips.
There
are
people
not
necessarily
traveling
all
the
way
from
the
west
to
the
east,
or
vice
versa,
but
they're,
making
very
small
trips.
B
B
We've
also
looked
at
not
only
where
the
bike
and
trail
facilities
are,
for
example,
but
also
where
the
usage
is,
and
we
can
find
different
data
sources.
To
start
to
get
to
this,
we
did
establish
a
community
advisory
committee.
This
is
made
up,
you'll,
see
a
lot
of
familiar
names
on
that
list,
but
also
that
again
encompasses
a
wide
range
of
stakeholders,
so
not
only
within
the
city
of
englewood,
but
also
cherry
hills,
village
denver
as
well
as
some
of
our
other
partners
and
private
entities
as
well.
B
We
have
established
a
project
website
which
is
on
our
inglewood
engaged
page,
so
we've
been
pointing
everybody
there,
including
folks
from
other
communities,
are
pointing
them
to
our
webpage
and
on
there
you'll
find
a
project
fact
sheet.
We
have
participated
at
a
number
of
community
events,
so
we're
starting
to
get
the
word
out.
I
know
that
they
were
just
at
the
silent
disco
event
last
week,
as
well
as
several
of
the
neighborhood
nights
and
movies
in
the
park.
B
I
think
200
responses
there,
where
we
asked
people
to
actually
put
a
map
or
a
pin
on
a
map
in
the
corridor
and
talk
about
what
are
their
issues
that
they're,
seeing
in
terms
of
safety,
congestion
or
areas
that
need
improvement
for
one
reason
or
another.
So
you
can
see
there,
the
green
is
actually
safety.
That's
got
the
largest
chunk
of
them,
but
there's
also
quite
a
bit
of
others.
So
bike
pad
is
that
darker
blue
color
and
then
a
fair
amount
for
transit
and
congestion
as
well.
B
B
We
are
going
to
have
an
open
house
as
well
go
to
that
in
a
minute
here
on
tuesday
august
30th,
so
two
weeks
from
tomorrow
at
englewood,
high
school
and
again
we're
reaching
out
to
the
public
to
get
their
feedback.
So
we've
already
gotten
information
back
through
that
survey.
Now
we
want
to
reach
out
to
the
broader
public
again
along
the
entire
corridor,
to
invite
people
to
come
to
that
and
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
what
they
see
as
a
vision
for
285
and
opportunities
that
we
can
make
along
that
corridor.
J
K
I'd
probably
just
add
to
it
that
red
light
cameras
are
kind
of
controversial,
because
there
have
been
studies
that
have
shown
that
you
have
an
increase
in
rear
end
crashes,
when
you
add
a
red
light
camera,
mostly
because
of
sort
of
like
an
unpredictable
response
to
the
red
light,
some
people
will
slam
on
their
brakes.
Some
will
try
to
get
through
it,
so
so
it
is.
It
is
certainly
known
to
create
some
issues.
So
so
that's
that
that
is
a
fair
point.
K
I
think
one
of
the
other
issues
with
those
high
crash
locations
which
are
which
start
in
the
in
the
west
end
is
because
you
have
a
transition
from
a
really
high
speed,
65
mile,
an
hour
freeway
to
essentially
a
45
mile,
an
hour
principal
arterial
or
expressway.
So
you
have
a
lot
of
turbulence
and
traffic.
A
lot
of
lane
changes
a
lot
of
speed
differentials,
so
that
really
contributes
to
the
high
number
of
crashes.
K
You
see
there
and
then
there's
also
certain
other
aspects
of
it,
because
there's
a
lot
of
pedestrian
calls
at
these
intersections.
So
you
have
constantly
traffic
being
stopped
at
these
intersections.
So
you
have
that
added
complication
as
well,
so
it
creates
a
lot
of
turbulence
is
probably
a
right
word
to
use
there,
which
creates
opportunities
for
crashes.
So
that's
that's
sort
of
what
we're
seeing.
J
D
D
one
of
the
things
you
see
with
these
kind
of
projects,
where
you're,
adding
lanes
potentially
adding
lanes
to
a
road.
Is
it
actually
induces
increased
demand
or
increases
traffic
as
well?
I
I
remember
when,
when
they
read
at
the
intersection
where
you
get
on
from
santa
fe
onto
I-25
northbound,
they
added
added
lanes
to
that
that
on-ramp
and
immediately
traffic
was
ever
been
as
bad
as
it
was
before.
B
B
So,
as
you
know,
many
of
the
areas
along
the
corridor,
we
could
probably
barely
fit
in
a
sidewalk
where
there
isn't
one
right
now,
so
the
intent
is
not
to
just
wholesale
go
in
now
that
doesn't
mean
that,
like
within
this
graphic,
there
might
be
a
small
area
that
would
make
sense
to
add
that
third
lane,
where
it
might
be
missing
a
very
small
gap,
but
wholesale
adding
lanes,
is
not
on
the
table.
Okay,
really,
the
intent
is,
could
we
add
a
right
turn
lane
that
might
make
a
traffic
flow
a
whole
lot
better?
B
C
C
It's
you
have
a
left
hand,
turn
left
hand
and
right.
I
believe
it
may
be
a
right,
also
yeah,
and
I
noticed
mainly
what
that's
being
used
for
our
u-turns
coming
from
the
east,
making
a
u-turn.
So
if
you're
coming
off
pearl
street,
which
is
only
a
block
long
at
that
point,
because
then
it
goes
to
hosanna
and
it's
and
it's
all
medical
related.
C
You
come
out
of
there
you're
going
to
make
your
right
turn
to
to
go
probably
down
to
clarkson.
What
I
do
is
to
get
to
go
the
other
way,
I'm
not
going
to
take
a
left
turn
on
there,
but
anyway,
I
think
we
ought
to
have
a
sign,
and
I
assume
this
is
c
dot-
that
no
right
to
her,
no
u-turns
in
that
little
gap.
There
I
mean
it's
very,
very
small
and
it's
sure
it's
just
dangerous.
B
That's
great
and
those
are
exactly
the
kinds
of
things
that
we
want
to
evaluate
it's
things
that
can
make
a
big
impact
for
relatively
small.
You
know
investment
is
things
like
that.
Where
do
we
have
a
pattern
of
crashes
there
or
a
pattern
of
u-turns
that
is
again
to
using
guav's
term
cause
or
add
turbulence
to
the
system?
Yep.
E
B
E
B
H
H
B
Potentially,
yes,
so
the
first
question
about
modifying
access.
I
think
we
would
look
at
that
again
to
eliminate
some
of
those
left-hand
turns
one
way
or
the
other,
for
example,
in
that
stretch
between
clarkson
and
logan.
So
we've
got
a
lot
of
those
three-quarter.
What
we
call
three-quarter
movements,
you
can
turn
up
towards
the
hospital
area
and
it
might
be
better
to
consider
closing
some
of
those
right
now
they're
restricted
in
the
pm
three
to
six
pm.
B
I
think
you
can't
even
make
that
turn
per
the
sign,
so
maybe
concentrating
people
at
like
the
intersection
of
clarkson
to
get
up
to
the
hospitals
which
feeds
into
our
old
hampton
project
of
just
focusing
them
there,
instead
of
giving
them
like
six
opportunities
to
turn
and
get
to
the
hospital.
So
that's
definitely
on
the
table,
as
is,
I
think
out
in
the
further
on
the
western
portion
of
town,
is,
for
example,
at
the
intersection
of
river
point
parkway.
H
And
I
I
think,
on
some
of
the
smaller
streets,
how
how
they
took
care
of
it
on
western
broadway
on
hampton,
is
they
make
the
island
go
through
some
of
those
intersections?
So
you
can
only
turn
right,
yeah
instead
of
turn
left,
but
I
think
we
also
need
to
be
careful
because,
like
on
pearl
it
it's
only
a
block
long
when
you
turn
to
the
south,
so
they
need
access
into
and
out
of
their
street
too.
E
H
B
Yeah-
and
so
that
might
mean
you
know,
some
people
are
inconvenienced
from
the
way
that
they
get
there
now
to
their
property,
but
again
for
the
greater
good.
It
might
mean
yeah
going
around
the
block,
but
it
would
improve
overall
travel
and
safety
within
the
corridor,
but
there
may
be
some
of
those
trade-offs.
H
Right,
okay,
thank
you
and
then
I
just
have
one
other
thing
and
it's
more
really
of
a
concern,
and
that
is
looking
at
the
stakeholders
in
here
and
really
in
looking
at
this,
and
the
only
reason
I
think
about
this,
because
a
lot
of
people
have
asked
me
how
many
people
live
in
the
city
of
englewood
and
really
probably
the
pres.
The
ceo
of
the
chamber
and
and
greg
madison
are
the
only
two
people.
A
A
Not
only
just
you
know
the
two
that
we
talked
about
earlier
tonight,
but
the
oxford
bridge
285,
the
dartmouth
bridge,
all
the
improvements
we've
seen
with
bike
lanes
across
the
city
that
has
come
under
your
watch,
also
just
putting
a
process
in
place
for
the
alleys
we
had
that
meeting
soon.
Thereafter
after
the
july
2018
as
well,
we
didn't
have
a
plan
in
place.
You
put
a
process
in
place
in
terms
of
just
greeting
the
city,
the
alleys
in
the
city
and
so
and
obviously
the
streets
as
well.
A
So
a
lot
has
happened
under
your
watch.
I'm
very
thankful
for
what
you've
done
for
the
city
we're
going
to
miss
you.
Hopefully
we
can
see
you
next
week.
I
don't
see
you
on
the
agenda,
so
I
wanted
to
say
something
tonight,
while
we
asked
you
somehow
so,
but
director
deandre.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
tonight
and
thank
you
for
everything.
You've
done.
A
So,
council,
I
know
we
still
have
one
agenda
item
we're
at
seven
o'clock.
I
know
we
want
to
get
some
public
comment,
but
director.
Lo,
do
you
happen
to
have
anyone
with
you
tonight
to
discuss
the
next
item,
or
is
it
possible
that
we
could
get
through
this
within
five
minutes?
And
I
just
don't
want
to
keep
our
public
comment
waiting?
Is
that
okay
with
council?
If
we
do
that,
since
we
have
someone
online
director
low,
if
you
could
just
come
and
speak
tonight
about
the
401
and
457
retirement
plan,.
L
L
Is
with
us
and
is
available
to
answer
any
consoles
questions,
so
I
will
not
give
you
a
definition
of
cities,
401
a
and
a
457
plan.
Basically,
the
staff,
the
the
authority
and
the
responsibility
for
investing
and
the
retirement
planning
belong
to
the
employees,
but
in
2019
the
city
contract
universe,
to
serve
as
a
co-fiduciary
with
the
city
and
to
provide
some
solution
to
our
401a
and
457
plan.
For
example,
are
the
current
record-keeping
fees
reasonable
for
our
participants,
employees
and
their
beneficiaries,
and
also
investment
options?
L
Are
they
too
many
or
too
few
for
our
staff
to
choose
from
and
also
how
can
we
reduce
investment
fees,
so
universe
accomplish
what
we
ask
them
and
they
also
help
us
to
create
an
informal
advisory
committee
for
the
city
to
recommend
the
this
help
the
city
to
select
the
the
investment
product?
This
committee
consists
of
the
staff
from
finance
and
human
resources.
Recently,
the
city
manager's
office
also
has
a
representative
on
the
committee.
L
So
the
purpose
of
the
investment
policy
statement
is
to
ensure
a
prudent
process
for
investment
selection
for
our
staff
and
also
to
control
the
cost
administrative
fees
and
also
we
act
solely
on
the
based
on
the
interests
of
the
participants
in
the
beneficiaries.
I
also
want
to
make
sure
we
have.
We
provide
investment
education
to
the
staff
so
tonight,
once
the
council
adopts
investment
policy,
the
committee
informed
advisory
committee
will
have
authority
to
select
and
monitor
investment
options
for
the
plans.
L
C
I
just
have
one
comment,
and
that
is
regarding
in
innovest
who
I
had
the
opportunity
to
work
with
as
a
chair
of
nerf
or
the
non-emergency
retirement
pension
board
here,
for
I
don't
know
how
many
years
a
lot
of
years
and
they
are
about
as
thorough
as
they
come,
and
I
learned
so
much
on
investing
and
stuff.
I
just
couldn't
recommend
them
high
enough,
so
I'm
really
pleased
with
them
as
the
advisor.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
A
O
A
No
agenda
item
six
for
tonight
we're
moving
on
to
recognition
of
scheduled
public
comment.
Public
comment:
the
deadline
to
sign
up
to
speak
for
scheduled
public
comment
is
wednesday
by
5
pm
prior
to
the
meeting
through
the
city
clerk's
office.
This
is
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
address
city
council.
There
is
an
expectation
that
the
presentation
will
be
conducted
in
a
respectful
manner.
Council
may
ask
questions
for
clarification,
but
there
will
not
be
any
dialogue
and
please
limit
your
presentation
to
five
minutes
up.
E
N
P
A
P
P
It
is
designed
to
give
if
it's
pushed
on
it's
not
supposed
to
win
a
battle
against
an
athlete
or
a
person.
Perhaps
some
type
of
signage,
such
as
what
would
be
there
would
help
inform
the
public
to
stay
off
this
somewhat
fragile
fence.
So
signs
saying
this
is
the
fragile,
fragile
fence.
Please
stay
off.
You
know,
take
care,
something
like
that
or
another
sign
that
says:
gate
200
feet
this
way
that
might
inform
the
public
to
know
that
actually
there's
a
gate
at
the
end
of
the
free
300-foot
fence.
P
P
P
Ask
me
how
I
know:
how
much
does
it
cost
to
replace
a
poll?
Do
you
know?
Was
this
option
presented
to
you
put
some
time,
effort,
signage
and
money
to
replace
a
few
poles
into
this
and
see
if
it
works,
see
what
happens
in
the
fall
before
you
spend
ten
thousand
dollars
on
a
permanent
fence?
This
is
a
knee-jerk
response.
P
P
If
you're
going
to
stay
the
course
and
not
discuss
any
changes
for
centennial
park
stay
the
course
at
jason
park
right
now,
stick
with
a
temporary
fence,
invest
in
some
replacement
poles
if
necessary
and
create
some
signage
that
could
inform
the
public
about
the
nature
of
the
fence
and,
more
importantly,
let
the
newness
of
the
fence
wear
off
about
these
two
petitions.
You
were
given
by
citizens
271
signatures
from
taxpaying
citizens
that
want
you
to
not
make
any
changes
at
these
two
parks.
P
P
Representative
woodward,
you
said
the
other
day
that
the
parks
needs
to
be
a
people's
park.
Well,
it
is
every
dog
at
that
park
and
those
parks
has
a
person
with
them
a
citizen.
It's
incorrect
to
imply
that
this
is
not
a
people's
park.
You
disregard
a
large
community
of
citizens.
When
you
make
a
statement
like
this
and
when
you
said
there
could
be
pickup
games
well,
there
could
today
there
could
be
pickup
games,
there's
nothing
preventing
people
from
getting
a
pickup
game
going.
P
H
H
A
M
M
So
in
late
2020,
the
city
commissioned
a
survey
of
englewood
residents
regarding
their
opinions
on
the
future
of
the
off
leash
program.
This
was
a
statistically
valid
survey
administered
by
a
firm
that
conducts
scientifically
sound
surveys.
Survey
invitations
were
sent
to
5
000,
random
english
households
and
520
responses
were
received,
which
exceeded
the
target
number
of
responses.
M
This
is
the
most
democratic
input
the
city
has
ever
received
on
off
leash
parks.
Most
of
the
input
the
city
receives
about
the
off-leash
program
comes
from
a
handful
of
the
most
passionate
individuals,
so
the
survey
data
is
invaluable
in
getting
an
accurate
read
on
how
angloid
residents
feel
at
large.
M
So
this
image
is
taken
straight
from
the
survey
and
it
shows
the
fencing
proposal
for
jason
park
that
was
presented
to
survey
takers.
It
reads:
the
future
proposal
would
be
to
allow
off-leash
dogs
in
a
three-sided
fenced-in
dog
park,
open
to
the
parking
lot
side.
Yellow
dotted
lines
in
the
image
below
the
remaining
areas
of
the
park
would
require
a
dog
to
be
on
leash.
Note
that
the
image
does
not
show
any
openings
or
gates
of
any
kind
in
the
fence
bordering
the
northwest
portion
of
the
park.
M
The
question
makes
no
mention
of
gates
or
openings.
There
also
isn't
any
implication
that
this
fence
would
be
temporary.
The
northwest
portion
of
the
park
is
simply
labeled.
Sport
field
only
no
off
leash,
and
then
this
image
is
taken
from
the
survey
results
packet
with
some
crude
illustrations.
On
my
part,
it
shows
a
breakdown
of
responses
to
the
jason
park,
fencing
proposal.
I
showed
you
in
the
last
slide.
M
The
question
is:
how
much
would
you
support
or
oppose
a
fenced
off-leash
dog
area
or
park
at
each
of
the
following
parks?
The
bar
chart
for
jason
park
shows
that
65
of
residents
either
strongly
support
or
somewhat
support
the
fenced
area,
while
only
15
percent
strongly
oppose
or
somewhat
oppose
it.
This
means
that
for
every
person
who
opposed
the
fenced
area,
more
than
four
people
supported
it.
M
So,
in
spite
of
the
grievances,
you'll
hear
from
passionate
off-leash
supporters,
a
permanent
fence
with
gates
and
allowing
any
off-leash
activity
in
the
in
the
northwest
northwest
sports
field
are
major
concessions
to
off-leash
supporters
that
go
against
the
wishes
of
englewood
residents
at
large
and
that
don't
address
the
problems
pirate
youth
sports
has
had
with
young
children.
Stepping
in
dog
feces.
Making
this
fence
temporary
or
having
no
offense
whatsoever
would
go
even
further
against
the
wishes
of
englewood
residents
in
the
youth
sports
league.
That
does
so
much
good
for
englewood
kids.
M
So
please
pass
the
ordinance
tonight,
while
it
falls
short
of
what
englewood
residents
want
for
jason
park,
as
demonstrated
by
the
survey's
landslide
results,
it's
a
step
in
the
right
direction.
Please
don't
give
in
to
the
will
of
vandals
who
destroy
city
policy
property
and
please
don't
bypass
the
will
of
anglewood
residents
in
favor
of
a
small
but
very
loud
minority.
A
G
G
I
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
madeleine
synchros,
for
I
think
fox
for
coordinating
the
event
and
the
city
council
you
offer
authorizing
because
it
you
have
to
put
some
money
into
the
deal
and
city
manager,
lewis
and
mrs
noonan
kemp
and
mrs
russell
for
visiting
my
my
little
party
and
also
police
chief
watson
and
when
the
fire
truck
came.
All
the
little
kids
were
just
very
impressed.
So
that
was
awesome.
G
G
G
I
was
encouraged
to
take
some
time
and
study
the
instructions
I
spent
a
couple
of
hours
trying.
I
could
not
make
it
work,
so
I
printed
out
a
copy
of
my
of
the
application
and
brought
it
down
here
and
hand
delivered
it
and
the
folks
said
well.
Well,
I
accept
it,
but
you
have
to
pay
a
25
fee
for
a
paper
application.
F
G
G
G
We
need
more
clear
directions.
I
had
the
same
problem
with
another
portal
with
the
city,
the
muni
revs.
Now
I've
needed
to
pay
some
for
some
sales
tax
for
my
book
and
for
two
special
events
that
one
in
april
out
of
bellevue
park
and
then
the
the
one
by
the
fire
department
in
may-
and
I
owed
the
city
nine
dollars
in
sales
tax.
G
G
Somehow
we
need
to
make
the
portals
more
friendly
for
us
old
guys.
Maybe
there
could
be
a
class
on
on
how
to
use
the
portals.
Maybe
you
could
hire
me
to
write
down
like
three
pages
of
instructions.
Click
here,
click
here
click
here.
If
you
get
this
answer
whatever
anyway,
that's
all
I've
got
tonight,
but
I
I
would
really
like
to
see
if
there's
some
easier
way
for
for
us,
regular
folks
to
use
the
the
portal.
Thank
you.
G
I
A
A
That
now
concludes
scheduled
public
content,
we're
moving
on
to
unscheduled
public
comment.
Same
rules
apply
just
limited
to
three
minutes,
and
actually
I
forgot
to
state
it's
my
turn
tonight
to
respond
to
public
comments.
So
I
think
we
only
have
one
person
up
tonight.
Mr
jeremiah
kell
clark
here
to
speak
on
the
5g
tower.
Q
Jeremiah
call
clark
at
union
and
galapagos,
so
hello
again,
I'm
here
once
again
to
ask
that
you
please
help
us
remove
the
5g
cell
tower.
That's
slated
to
be
installed
at
4709,
south
galipago
street.
We
want
to
thank
you
for
your
help,
setting
up
a
neighborhood
meeting
about
this
with
public
works
on
wednesday
we'd
like
you
to
take
a
minute
and
imagine
if
you
were
in
our
shoes,
imagine
that
this
tower
was
slated
to
go
in
your
yard
or
nearby.
Q
After
last
week's
study
session,
it
was
reiterated
that
legally
speaking,
options
are
limited.
However,
they
also
made
it
clear
that
if
it
was
important
enough
to
the
city,
there
is
room
for
conversation
and
that
no
one
wants
to
take
legal
action
for
the
residents
in
this
area.
It
is
certainly
important
enough.
Q
Q
Unfortunately,
this
representative
has
not
been
helpful
in
answering
most
of
our
questions
and
refuses
to
acknowledge
our
pleas
to
help
set
up
a
meeting
with
them.
So
I'm
here
once
again
asking
that
you
as
our
record
representatives,
please
be
our
voice
and
ask
att
to
move
this
tower.
There's
a
lot
of
room
between
doing
nothing
and
subjecting
the
city
to
legal
consequences.
Q
Att
has
already
bought
their
initial
installation
attempt,
and
they
did
it
once
again
this
time
by
installing
equipment
on
private
property
and
lying
to
the
residents
about
what
they
were.
Even
installing
mayor
pro
tem
ward.
In
last
week's
study
session,
you
indicated
that
you'd
like
to
punish
them
for
their
actions
while,
as
we
know,
unfortunately,
the
city
is
quite
limited
in
its
power
to
do
so.
This
could
be
an
opportunity
to
at
least
hold
them
accountable
and
not
reward
bad
behavior.
Q
A
Q
C
A
A
N
N
However,
the
allowing
parts
of
the
park
to
be
reserved
or
closed
off
and
then
unused
and
then
unused
and
still
unavailable
to
dog
owners
in
the
public
is
a
waste
of
outdoor
space
and
money
paid
by
taxpayers
towards
englewood's
park
and
rec
fences
also
are
separators
and
I
don't
think
we
need
to
add
more
separation.
We
need
communities
to
come
together
and
work
together
to
find
better
solutions
that
accommodate
everyone.
Dog
owners
included.
A
F
F
Weiss
4140
south
jason
street
as
well
yeah
we've
lived
by
the
jason
street
park
for
nine
or
ten
years
now
and
pretty
much
right
across
the
street.
I'm
there
at
least
once
a
day
with
the
dogs,
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
think
we
get
the
most
value
out
of
community
spaces
when
they're
used
to
their
maximum
ability
and
I've
seen
that
park
when
it's
awfully
showers
and
on
leash
hours
and
the
math.
F
You
know
the
major
majority
of
users
of
that
park
are
the
dog
owners
and
on
those
leashed
hours
the
park
that
those
sections
of
the
park
are
almost
always
empty.
So
I
just
want
to
make
clear
that
there's
a
great
community
of
dog
owners
that
use
that
park
and-
and
you
know
it
has
that
whole
fenced
area
for
families
and
stuff
and
even
still
the
dog
side,
gets
a
lot
more
usage
than
the
other
side.
A
H
A
You
any
other
questions
see
none.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
tonight.
Thank
you
and
I'm
assuming
that
does
conclude
unscheduled
public
comment,
all
right,
perfect,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
just
respond
now,
thank
you
very
much
everyone
for
coming
tonight
and
and
speaking
on,
the
issues
that
are
important
to
you
so
to
mr
kelly,
mr
gilbert,
miss
leclaire
and
mr
weisseit.
Thank
you
very
much
for
speaking
on
the
offline
stock
parks.
A
Obviously
we
are
going
to
be
reading
or
voting
on
an
orders
tonight
on
the
permanent
fest
for
jason
park.
I
completely
understand
the
passionate
pleas
from
both
sides
of
the
public
on
this.
It's
been
something
that
we've
been
talking
about
for
over
four
years.
Now,
it's
not
an
easy
conversation
for
council
to
have,
or
at
least
an
easy
decision
for
council
to
have.
A
I
I
thought
it
brought
a
little
bit
of
confusion
to
over
the
weekend
as
well,
so
there
I
may
say
something
tonight
in
terms
of
what
the
wording
states
for
tonight,
but
obviously
this
is
something
that
we've
been
discussing
for
a
long
time
and
you
know
we're
not
gonna
make
everyone
happy
with
any
type
of
decision,
regardless
of
which
way
we
go.
So
I
just
want
everyone
to
know
that
this
is
something
that
is
buried
up
up
our
council,
but
obviously
we
will
be
deciding
something
tonight.
A
Mr
mr
cohn,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
comments
on
national
night
night
out.
I'm
sorry
that
you're
having
issues
with
the
portals,
both
the
muni
revs
as
well
as
the
what
was
it
the
ims
system.
Maybe
I
can.
I
can
ask
city
manager
if
we
happen
to
have
any
type
of
documentation
to
kind
of
help,
members
of
the
public
when
they
are
filling
those
out,
not
sure
if
there's
nothing
in
place
now,
but
with
muni
res.
A
I
wonder
if
we
could
do
something
with
the
library
in
terms
of
a
class
or
any
type
of
documentation.
I
think
that
would
be
one
ass,
but
I'm
guessing
mr
cohen,
that
you're
not
the
only
one,
that's
having
issues
with
these.
I
know
that
we've
heard
about
this
in
the
past,
especially
since
we
went
to
the
licensing
issue.
I
think
that
there
was
something
some
confusion
there
as
well,
but
but
no,
I
wonder.
A
I
appreciate
that,
mr
cohen,
sorry,
I
wasn't
able
to
make
it
to
your
house
during
the
national
night
at
all,
but
thank
you
very
much
for
hosting
for
15
years
now,
16
years,
so
thank
you
and
then
mr
kell
clark.
Thank
you
very
much
for
speaking
on
the
cell
tower
and
thank
you
for
coming
for
with
a
solution
as
well.
Obviously
there
will
be
a
conversation
with
members
of
council
here
on
wednesday.
A
A
So
maybe
that's
something
that
we
could
just
discuss
on
wednesday,
but
I
know
that
there
just
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
heartburn
about
just
moving
into
another
block
that
may
have
the
same
type
of
concerns,
but
at
the
very
least
we
can
have
that
conversation
on
wednesday
and
see
what
type
of
actions
we
could
take
in
that
case.
So,
mr
kill
clark,
thank
you
for
coming
tonight.
I
think
I
captured
everything
if
there's
anything
that
members
of
council,
any
council
request
or
anything
else
that
they
want
to
state
remember
russell.
A
C
Yeah
speaking
of
that
meeting,
could
public
works
or
public
works
provide,
maybe
a
map
of
the
greenway
there
and
show
it
I
mean
if
it
maybe.
It
sounds
like
a
really
good
idea
to
me,
but
you
know
I
don't
know
what
a
t
and
d
would
think
of
it,
but
it
seems
like
it
could.
It
goes
for
a
way,
so
there's
some
places
that
we
could
certainly
put
it
along
and
and
pick
up
what
they
need.
I
would
think
so.
A
A
A
R
R
R
E
B
B
E
A
A
L
A
J
A
A
S
Good
evening,
mayor
and
council,
so
we
do
have
a
proposed
update
to
the
ordinance
which
removed
the
word
temporary,
as
a
temporary
fence
did
not
work
at
jason
park.
This
is
the
new
proposal
for
what
the
the
fence
will
look
like.
We
have
added
additional
three
gates
to
the
system,
so
a
total
of
five
gates
running
down
the
middle
three
pedestrian
gates
that
are
three
feet
wide
and
two
10
foot
wide
gates
towards
the
middle
of
the
fields
there.
S
So
the
gates
will
be
left
open
unless
rented
by
a
sports
organization
or
or
an
individual
it'll,
be
up
to
the
the
sports
organization
or
individual
to
close
those
gates
if
they
wish
to
keep
off
leash
from
entering
those
fields
during
the
off-leash
times,
and
we
do
not
propose
putting
locks
on
these
gates,
they'll
have
the
latches
that
will
fall
down
the
only
time
we
may
lock.
These
gates
is
for
maintenance
purposes
if
we
need
to
rest
the
field
for
turf
gross
growth
or
repair.
S
H
H
H
Okay,
as
long
as
I'm
okay
with
that,
as
long
as
they
can
still
use
it,
when
the
sports
teams
are
not
there,
because
my
understanding
was
that
the
only
thing
that
we
wanted
to
change
was
from
temporary
fence
to
permanent
fencing
and
then
the
other
question
that
came
up
in
in
the
public
comment
tonight
about.
Is
it
ten
thousand
dollars
that
it's
going
to
cost
because
we
were
told
4
700
that
night
correct,
correct.
S
Did
we
actually
purchased
new
posts
to
fix
what
we
had
and
those
new
posts
were
again
broken,
so
it
was
250
for
twelve
new
posts.
The
initial
cost
for
that
temporary
fence
was
twenty
seven
hundred
dollars,
so
it
could
last
a
long
time
if
we
were
to
redo
the
temporary
fence,
but
we're
hoping
with
more
of
a
permanent
fence.
The
money
will
go
a
lot
longer.
H
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
this
question
is
more
for
council.
Were
we
going
to
re-evaluate
this
at
the
end
of
a
year?
Also,
if
this
is
working,
I
mean
you
know.
We
talked
about
that
with
centennial
park,
that
we
decided
to
leave
things
that
way
and
then
at
the
end
of
a
year,
and
when
is
the
end
of
a
year.
C
C
Okay,
so
a
pickup
game-
I
don't
know
if
any
are
going
on
anymore.
They
used
to
go
on
where,
in
the
afternoon,
people
used
to
come
and
play
a
game
and
saturdays
or
sunday,
especially
you'd,
find
groups
out
there,
not
organized
groups
and
those
were
encouraged
prior
to
this
ever
being
prior
to
there
being
a
leash
law
in
the
inglewood.
C
D
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you,
director
underhill.
I
am
honestly
having
a
hard
time
understanding
how
the
wording
in
the
ordinance
accomplishes
the
sports
use
off-leash
area.
If
I
look
at
the
7
1
a
3
b
1,
it's
the
or
b
under
b.
It
says
that
there's
a
prohibition,
but
a
dog
may
be
off
leash
at
the
following
parks
and
it
describes
jason
park
so
on
the
north
side
of
the
park
only
as
separated
by
fencing
from
the
south
playground
area,
but
in
the
north
east
corner.
D
Only
when
the
north
to
south
temporary
fencing
is
installed,
which
would
be
always,
and
so
that
sounds
to
me
as
though
it
reads
that
if
that
fence
is
there,
then
there
the
the
off
leash
area
of
the
park
is
only
on
the
north
east
side,
and
so
we
would
be
if
we
allow
them
to
go
into
the
sports
use
area.
When
it's
not
being
utilized,
we
would
be
violating
our
own
ordinance.
Am
I
am,
I
misunderstanding,
something
or.
I
Thank
you
pro
member
woodward's
question
about
reserve
versus
open
use
just
to
make
sure
I
have
this
correct
when
if
this
permanent
fence
goes
up
and
the
gates
are
open,
folks
can
go
back
and
forth
the
entire.
As
it
reads,
the
entire
north
section
of
the
field
will
be
available
for
off
leash.
But
again
it's
only
during
those
hours,
correct,
correct,
so
remember,
woodward's
point
from
11am
to
6pm
people
could
play
those
pickup
games.
There
could
be
that
open
use
because
those
are
not
off
leash
dog
hours
anywhere
in
the
park.
T
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
I
wanted
to
follow
up
with
councilmember
anderson's
comment
and
I
I
would
request
that.
We
also
read
it
with
the
next
couple
of
words
when
you
stated
when,
when
north
to
south
fencing
is
installed
to
separate
the
off-leash
portion
of
the
park,
what
we
had
anticipated
is
that
it
would
have
a
significant
number
of
gates
that
would
be
largely
open
during
these
off-leash
hours,
so
that
fencing
wouldn't
be
separating
those
areas.
A
A
And
actually
remember
russell
I'll
answer
your
question.
I
think
this
is
probably
the
best
portion
to
I
to
answer
your
question,
but
I
do
believe
that
we
should,
as
part
of
the
one
year
which
started
last
november.
I
think
we're
planning
on
meeting
again
in
january
on
this
topic.
We
should
be
talking
about
it
holistically
from
what
was
decided
a
year
ago,
so
this
would
be
part
of
it.
So
obviously
we
would
have
new
data
points
available
that
the
temporary
fencing
didn't
really
work
for
the
three-week
period,
depending
on
where
we
go
tonight.
A
A
A
No,
I
can
understand
that
viewpoint.
I
don't
think
it
needs
to
obviously
by
having
the
word
permanent
in
there,
it
makes
it
seem
like
it's
permanent,
but
obviously
council
is
free
to
change
their
mind
based
on
new
data,
so
I'll
go
in
with
an
open
mind
in
january.
I
guess
my
point
remember:
woodward.
C
Anything
else
yeah.
I
have
just
one
little
change
to
the
original
one
and
that
I
remember
listening
to
this
online,
this
discussion
and
that's
in
the
very
let
end
of
b1
from
november
1
through
february
28th,
and
it
was
brought
up
well
what,
if
there's
a
leap
year
and
all
this
stuff.
Why
don't
we
just
say
from
november
1
to
march
1.
A
Thank
you
remember,
I
wanted
to
say
just
through
the
end
of
february,
because
to
me
march
1
is
the
start
of
march.
If
you
say
to
march
1st,
I'm
confused
on
whether
or
not
it's
at
the
end
of
the
day
of
march
1
and
it
starts
march,
2nd
I'd
rather
just
say
through
the
end
of
february.
So
okay,
but
I
I
get
what
you're
saying
yeah.
A
A
I
You
mayor,
so
I
appreciate
some
of
the
comments
that
have
already
been
brought
up
about
some
of
the
confusion,
with
the
way
that
the
ordinance
reads
now.
I
agree
with
that
and
actually
was
in
conversations
with
director
underhill
on
the
city
attorney
earlier
today
about
how
we
can
clarify
the
intent
of
temporary
before
fence.
We
are
now
serving
with
the
idea
of
these
gates.
I
So
I
think
that
the
gate
piece
needs
to
be
tied
in
here,
so
we
could
change
it
to
say
that
when
the
instead
of
the
temporary
fence
that
the
north
to
south
fence,
when
the
gates
are
closed,
that's
when
it's
separated
versus
when
the
gates
are
open
when
the
gates
are
open,
it's
the
entire
north
side.
When
the
gates
are
closed,
it
would
separate
the
off
leash
portion
from
the
portion
of
the
sports
field.
D
I
think
that's
that's
moving
in
the
right
direction.
The
one
concern
I
see
is
that
if
you
know
somebody
just
decides
to
close
the
gate,
if
it's
a
gate
that
anybody
can
close,
then
the
ordinance
would
essentially
be
saying
anybody
can
can
close
that
down.
So
maybe,
when
you
know
when,
when
the
sports
field
is
is
reserved
and
in
use
and
the
gates,
the
central
gates
are
closed
or
something
something
that
affects.
So
it's
not
just
a
matter
of
you
know.
J
J
I
I'm
happy
to
tie
it
to
the
reservation
as
well.
I
just
bring
up
that.
We
might
want
to
say
reservation
and
gate
closed,
because
if
you
are
in
the
park-
and
you
don't
know,
if
there's
a
reservation,
you
know-
maybe
it
started
and
they're
not
quite
there.
Yet
they
also
it's
as
director
underhill
said
incumbent
on
the
person
who
made
the
reservation
to
close
the
gates
that
that
also
would
be
visible.
S
The
goal
for
the
parks
department
is
to
post
when
the
reservations
are
occurring,
so
there
will
be
a-frames
like
we've
had
this
last
june
posted
stating
when
reservations
are
occurring,
so
it
was
fairly
consistent.
I
think
it
was
like
monday,
through
thursday,
4
p.m
to
7
p.m.
Something
like
that.
We'll
continue
to
do
that
for
as
long
as
we
need
to
okay,
that
might
be
sufficient.
D
Yeah
I
like
the
the
idea
of
sticking
with
the
reservation.
Then
you
could
just
you
could
have
the
reservation
sheet,
maybe
even
on
the
gate
or
on
the
gate
when
it's
closed,
have
a
sign
that
says
you
know
not
not
available
when
when
reserved
right
there.
Next
to
the
reservation
sheet
or,
however,
you
want
to
use
it,
but
I
think
the
reservation
makes
the
most
sense.
As
mayor
pro
tem
said,.
D
J
D
A
H
C
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
the
wording
and
I
make
sure
because
we're
changing
nowhere
in
here
are
we
talking
about
now.
It's
not
going
to
be
a
temporary
fence,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
covering
what
we
need
to
cover
in
the
ordinance
to
make
the
change
that
we're
making.
Can
you
say
the
language
one
more
time.
Remember
anderson.
I'm
sorry.
D
I
will
try
my
best
when,
let's
see
on
the
north
side
of
the
park,
only
is
separated
by
fencing
from
the
south
playground
area,
but
in
the
northeast
corner
of
the
park.
Only
when
the
north
west
corner
of
the
park,
as
separated
by
a
fence
is
reserved,
and
only
during
the
hours
of
6
a.m,
to
11
a.m
and
6
p.m,
to
11
p.m.
I
Okay,
do
we
need
to
add
more
clarity
to
say
the
northwest
corner
of
the
park
is
reserved
by
the
north
south
fence,
because
that's
how
it
is
written?
Currently,
it
says
north
south
temporary
fencing.
Now
I
would
say,
as
separated
by
north
south
fencing
we
just
take
out
the
word
temporary,
but
it's
always
going
to
be
installed.
So
I
just
want
to,
I
feel
like
maybe
the
wordsmithing
of
the
language
isn't
quite
right,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
don't
know
this.
T
Yes,
I
agree.
I
had
the
same
concern
because
without
referring
to
the
fence
at
all,
then
it's
where
the
fence
is.
It
makes
that
geographical
designation
a
little
bit
unclear,
so
I've
been
typing
along
and
what
about
when
the
northwest
corner
of
the
park,
as
separated
by
north
to
south
fencing,
is
reserved.
D
A
C
O
J
I
do
have
one
possible
amendment,
a
resident
called
me
earlier
this
week
and
we
had
a
conversation
about
the
final,
whereas
clause,
and
it
says,
whereas
after
vandalism
of
temporary
fencing-
and
this
wasn't
indicated
that
the
word
vandalism
is
a
it's
a
pretty
active
verb
and
might
seem
somewhat
accusatory
towards
any
particular
group.
So
I
would
propose
an
amendment
to
change
the
word.
Vandalism
to
damage.
D
S
U
A
U
A
E
C
A
C
A
Not
seeing
where
it
stays
for
each
of
the
parks,
my
my
preference
would
be
to
change
it
for
all
the
parks
just
because
I
think
the
intent
was
always
to
change
the
hours
on
march
1st
it's
just
one
day,
but
I
like
the
clarity
of
just
the
fact
that
on
a
leap
year,
regardless
of
the
year
we're
going
to
be
starting
on
march
1st,
so
all
right,
my
second
I
go
yeah.
I
will
second
that
amendment
motion
now,
there's
any
comments
from
council.
H
O
A
A
B
A
B
V
We
we
are
here
this
evening
in
response
to
the
questions
and
concerns
raised
at
the
meeting
on
august
1st.
As
to
the
recommendation
for
allied
universal
to
be
approved
for
the
security
contract,
references
were
contacted,
the
responses
were
positive,
documentation
of
the
questions
posed
and
the
responses
for
each
were
included
in
the
console
packet.
The
response
also
include
notes
from
municipal
court
as
to
their
experience,
working
with
allied
for
over
20
years,
a
letter
from
allied
addressing
your
concerns
about
their
services
and
staff
based
on
recent
media
reports
is
also
included.
V
I
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
bringing
this
back.
I
appreciate
you,
including
the
notes
from
the
reference
checks
and
the
packet
that
was
very
helpful.
I
did
have
a
question
from
the
letter
that
we
received
from
allied.
They
noted
that,
because
the
city
of
inglewood
has
not
established
specific
training
requirements
for
armed
officers,
that
they
would
use
their
own
training
standards
for
the
officers
that
they
provide,
can
you
help
us
understand
what
circumstances
at
the
city
might
establish
our
own
standards
for
something
like
that.
B
I
B
B
C
R
Yeah
jeremy
lee
I'm
the
regional
vice
president
for
allied
universal.
I
live
in
larkspur
to
answer
your
question
is
yes,
that
review
will
be
based
on
the
desire
of
the
contract,
so
we
could
review
it
every
six
months.
I
have
contracts
that
ask
for
a
yearly
review
or
six
months,
so
we
can
decide
what
that
looks
like
for
the
post
orders.
All
new
hires
have
to
review
that
the
post
orders
and
then
again,
every
six
months
or
every
year
afterwards
for
incumbent
officers.
R
C
R
So
there's
no
minimum
for
for
the
city
here,
however,
we
we
follow
what
we're
doing
for
rtd,
which
is
our
largest
contract.
So
we
have
all
our
security
professionals
qualify
quarterly.
So
that
way
in
case
they
we
wanted
to
some
have
them
work
at
rtd.
If
we
needed
to
cross
train
them,
they're,
not
meeting
a
requirement
that
rtd
has
they're
not
missing
that
requirement,
so
our
current
qualification
is
four
times
a
year.
C
R
A
A
J
The
additional
clarification
that
we
received
on
this
contract
was
very
helpful
to
me,
in
particular
the
memo
from
allied
explaining
some
of
the
things
that
were
stated
at
our
most
recent
council
session
and
how
the
record
differs
from
those
statements.
Yeah
was
extremely
helpful
and
it's
important
to
me
operating
on
this
diocese,
that
the
statements
that
come
across
towards
the
public
are
true
and
to
the
extent
that
they're,
not
we
correct
that
record.
So
I
appreciate
you
going
through
those
and
getting
that
corrected
for
us.
J
I
will
also
say
that,
because
this
was
a
competitive
contract,
seeing
the
score
sheets
was
helpful
to
me,
as
well
as
the
reference
checks.
I
have
not
heard
any
complaints
personally
about
the
way
allied
has
conducted
itself
to
date
at
the
city
center,
so
I
am
confident
in
renewing
this
contract
and
extending
it
to
a
larger
area.
Thank
you.
D
To
echo
mayor,
pro-tem,
ward's
statements
and
also
just
add,
I
mentioned
at
the
last
council
meeting
when
we,
when
we
discussed
this
before
that
that
I
heard
enough
information
that
gave
me
gave
me
enough
reason
to
say
hey.
Let's
wait
wait
on
this,
but
I
wasn't
wasn't
opposed
to
this
contract
at
the
time
and
and
I'm
very
thankful
that
we
were
able
to
get
more
information
and
appreciate
the
work
you
guys
put
in
on
the
letter
and
I'm
supportive
tonight.
A
A
A
N
L
L
Just
want
to
ask
council
to
approve
the
reserve
policy
investment
policy
we
presented
to
council
on
august
1st,
so
we
asked
council
to
consider
approve
the
resolution
adopting
the
changes
to
the
following
section
of
city's
2016
financial
policies,
including
investment
policy
and
general
fund
balance
policy.
So.
I
Yes,
thank
you
for
bringing
this
forward.
I
know
this
has
been
a
very
long
conversation
in
the
making
and,
if
I'm
missing
it
in
the
council
communication,
please
point
me
to
it,
but
there
were
some
questions
just
last
week
and
we
were
talking
about
this
policy
coming
forward
about
how
we're
determining
the
percentage
of
what
number
is
it
the
previous
year?
Is
it
the
current
year?
Can
you
provide
clarity
for
us
of
how
we're
calculating
this
in
the
reserve
policy?
No.
L
L
A
D
A
H
Actually,
this
is
justification
for
why
I'm
gonna
vote,
but
I
I
have
some
concerns,
and
this
is
on
page
eight.
It
is
under
policy
directives
and
operational
guidelines.
I'm
gonna
read
the
opening
paragraph
right
there.
It
says
the
gfoa
recommends
at
a
minimum
that
general
purpose
governments
maintain
and
aggregate
unrest,
restricted
fund
balances
in
their
general
fund
of
no
less
than
two
months.
Sixteen
point:
six:
seven
percent
of
regular
general
fund
operating
revenues
or
expenditures,
whichever
is
most
predictable.
H
The
gfoa
notes,
however,
that
larger
government
entities
may
appropriately
maintain
a
lesser
level
due
to
more
predictable
contingencies,
higher
revenue,
diversification
and
less
revenue
volatility.
Then
we'll
skip
a
couple
sentences.
Gfo
a
recognizes
that
entities
with
a
range
of
designated
reserves
may
have
sufficient
liquidity
to
meet
this
divine
defined
standard
through
inclusion
of
funds
formally
designated
for
other
purposes
yet
available
for
redesignation
should
circumstances
warrant.
H
H
I
I
believe
that
we
are
putting
at
risk,
I'm
not
saying
that
I'm
against
ratcheting
and
sliding,
but
I'm
thinking,
I'm
really
thinking
that
the
government
finance
office
is
recommending
that
smaller
governments
keep
the
16.767
percent
or
two
two
months
of
revenues,
and
I
don't
mind
if
we
ratchet
up,
but
I
really
think
that
our
bottom
number
should
be
sixteen
point.
Six
seven
percent,
rather
than
twelve
percent.
H
E
J
I
think
that's
a
reasonable
concern.
It's
not
one
that
I
share.
I
think
the
risk
of
us
going
down
to
12
is
actually
relatively
low
policy.
Wise
we've
managed
our
budget
effectively
to
date,
but
I
think
that
going
down
to
12
is
an
option
that
we
need
to
have
in
our
toolkit
for
times
when
the
economy
is
not
performing
as
well
as
we
would
like,
and
the
important
part
about
this
policy
to
me
is
that
it
provides
flexibility
to
the
council.
J
It
sets
a
reasonable
policy
range
and
it
allows
us
to
put
money
away
in
in
good
years
and
to
draw
off
of
that
for
continuity
of
services
in
leaner
years.
I
think
this
is
a
good
start.
We
don't
have
a
specific
guideline
for
when
the
when
we
ratchet
and
when
we
slide.
That
might
be
something
that
we
want
to
consider
next
year,
but
for
this
year
I'm
happy
adopting
this
policy
as
a
as
a
good
start
to
some
more
refinement
of
our
financial
policies.
D
I
understand
council
member
russell's
concern
as
well
and
similar
to
mayor
pro
team
ward.
I
think
this
is
one
of
the
what
the
point
of
the
having
the
reserve
is
to
be
able
to
use
it
when
times
when
times
necessitate
using
it.
This
gives
us
a
standard
for
which
to
use
it,
because
if,
if
the
economy
really
turns-
and
we
have
to
dip
into
our
reserves,
we
will
regardless
of
policy.
This
just
gives
us
a
little
guidance
to
to
to
direct
to
direct
that.
D
L
I
Yeah
I
want
to
bring
up
the
question
that
I
raised
earlier
and
frankly
asked
this
council.
Do
we
want
to
pick
a
consistent
baseline
that
we
use
year
over
year?
I
think
something
that's
attractive
to
me
about
ratchet
union
sliding
is
that
it
gives
us
a
way
that
we
can
respond
to
what's
happening
in
the
economy,
and
we
can
see
this
year.
We
were
able
to
save
more
this
year.
I
We
needed
to
spend
more
so
that
we
don't
have
a
reduction
in
city
services
when
the
economy
is
low,
but
if
we
are
constantly
picking
a
different
baseline
every
year
and
choosing
how
we
want
to
measure
it.
That
raises
a
concern
for
me
and
I
don't
want
to
remove
flexibility
from
this
council
that
we
need,
but
for
this
to
be
an
effective
policy,
I
do
wonder
if
we
should
pick
something
consistent.
A
H
H
D
D
I
L
Yeah,
if
I
could
have
put
a
numbers,
do
this
council
want
to
revise
its
investment
policy
by
incorporating
a
baseline?
I
heard
from
our
last
conversation
the
three
possibilities.
One
is
based
on
2021
auditor
financials.
We
usually
have
the
information
in
june.
Also,
do
you
want
to
based
on
2022
estimates
the
halfway
through
or
would
you
like
to
use
2023
propose
a
budget
unless
you
want
to
have
a
fourth
option.
I
Just
and
all
that
number
would
work
right,
and
I
just
I
think
that
the
reason
I'm
bringing
this
up
is
because
last
week
it
seemed
that
we
were.
We
were
all
talking,
I
think,
number
one
we
were
talking
about
the
audit.
My
brandon
was
talking
about
2022.,
so
I
think
we
need
to
just
get
on
the
same
page
so
we're
we
all
know
what
we're
measuring.
C
C
We
were
able
to
respond
prior
to
approving
the
budget,
and
so
I
think
the
answer
is
for
me.
The
answer
is
that
we
would
be
looking
at
it.
We
wouldn't
have
a
baseline
so
to
speak,
or
if
we
had
a
baseline
it'd
be
one
of
those
two
options
or
we
would
be
always
being
aware
of
where
the
market
is.
Thank
you.
A
I
guess
where
I
kind
of
stand
tonight
and
mayor
pretend,
let
me
know
if
I'm
misconstruing
your
words,
but
I
almost
would
be
in
favor
of
just
voting
on
the
policy
as
is
and
then
making
changes
or
having
a
discussion
later
on
in
the
year
on
what
the
baseline
should
be,
because
I
just
need
to
put
a
little
bit
more
thought
into
this.
Obviously
you
know
previous
years
audited
numbers.
It's
a
known
number
2022
is
a
little
bit
more
reliable.
A
D
Yeah,
I
think
it's
too
far
behind
to
rely
on
2021
numbers
when
we're
when
we're
looking
forward
to
2023.
So
I'm
good
with
an
estimate
or
a
projected
budget
numbers
for
the
current
for
current
year,
or
you
know
I
would
kind
of
like
to
look
at
a
composite
like
you
know,
we
may
have
maybe
doing
okay
on
our
budget
for
our
current
year,
but
the
economy
is
not
looking
as
as
good
as
we
might
might
want
it.
That's
that's
kind
of
the
situation.
D
I
Yeah,
I
appreciate
the
discussion
and
I
hear
where
the
mayor
is
coming
from,
but
I
think
if
we
pass
it
without
the
baseline,
it's
an
incomplete
policy
that
won't
actually
be
effective
and
the
way
I
view
this
entire
change
is
that
we
can
try
it.
It
doesn't
mean
that
we
will
do
it
forever.
I
think
you
know
this
is
obviously
something
new
and
I
think
giving
it
a
shot
to
work
is
is
an
opportunity.
I
think
that
we
can
do
it
in
a
way.
I
That's
judicious
and
stewards
taxpayer
resources,
and
so
I'm
inclined
to
include
the
baseline
as
a
way
to
actually
give
this
an
honest
attempt
and
would
lean
towards
member
mayor
pro
tem.
Excuse
me
on
how
we
measure
it
so
that
we
can
kind
of
have
a
holistic
view
looking
ahead.
This
is
what
we
need
for
operating
expenses
that
we
need
for
capital.
This
is
what
we
can
put
in
reserves.
I
I
think
that
makes
the
most
sense
and
then
to
try
that
for
a
year
and
then
to
review
was
that
the
right
baseline
did
it
work?
Do
we
have
what
we
need?
I
think,
but
I
think
if
we
try
to
move
forward
and
try
this
for
a
year
and
we
don't
include
the
baseline,
that
I
don't
think
will
actually
have
all
the
data
that
we
need
to
make
the
decision
it
doesn't
mean
we
can't
change
it
later.
So
that's
where
I
stand
on.
So
that's
where
I
stand
on
that.
I
I
just
have
a
question
on
assigned
fund
balance,
and
this
has
also
been
part
of
the
conversation.
This
is
the
change
on
page
seven.
My
understanding
is
obviously
before
I
was
on
this
council.
We
had
amassed
a
very
large
unassigned
fund
balance
that
we
let
grow
above
our
reserve
policy
and
that
the
previous
council
decided
to
spend
down
on
capital
projects,
and
the
way
we
have
this
awarded
now
is
that
you
know
the
fun
to
expend
the
funds
requires.
Action
of
counsel
potential
uses
are
listed
and
not
all
inclusive
lists.
I
Do
we
want
to
consider
requiring
counsel,
maybe
not
to
say
they
have
to
go
to
capital
or
they
have
to
do
something,
but
at
the
end
of
every
fiscal
year
we
make
a
decision
about
what
we
do
with
those
taxpayer
resources.
If
they
are
an
above
our
reserve
policy
and
one,
I
don't
want
to
again
remove
necessary
flexibility
of
this
council,
and
so,
if
we
feel
like
that's
necessary,
I'm
happy
to
not
push
this
forward.
I
E
L
E
E
L
H
J
J
J
L
J
Maybe
annual
operating
revenue
is
fine,
because
that
tells
us
a
point
in
time,
but
what
I'm
trying
to
capture
is
that
we're
basing
it
on
revenue
and
when
we
go
to
do
the
budget
cycle.
We
look
at
our
projected
revenue
and
we
look
at
how
much
we
have
and
the
difference
between
what
we
have
or
what
we'll
have
at
the
end
of
the
year
is
our
reserve.
J
L
L
T
L
J
A
L
A
I
I
Just
so
I'm
clear
and
and
on
what
we're
doing
here
and
and
director
low
can
weigh
in
the
idea
is
how
do
we
get
the
baseline
for
the
projections
for
the
future
year
for
2023?
Right
so
is.
Could
this
also
be
worded
based
on
the
projected
operating
revenues
or
expenditures?
Whichever
is
more
predictable?
J
That
doesn't
solve
the
consistency
problem
of
what
number
we
use
on
an
annual
basis.
So
if
we
use
revenue
in
2023
and
then
in
2024,
we
use
expenditures,
we
may
actively
be
changing
what
our
baseline
percentage
is
just
based
on
the
projected
number
the
next
year.
So
there's
no
not
as
much
consistency
there.
I
L
L
A
J
J
J
Withdrawn,
I
I'm
still
comfortable
with
it,
because
it
sets
a
direct
and
exact
standard
for
what
percentage
we're
shooting
at
where
the
target
is
because
right
now
we
have
two
targets,
revenue
and
expenditure
and
we
could
throw
a
dart
at
revenue
or
we
could
throw
a
dart
at
expenditure.
This
says
we
always
throw
the
dart
at
revenue
and
we
try
to
hit
this
range
12
to
21.4
percent.
D
Member
anderson,
this
to
me
this
doesn't
like
I
thought
we
were
trying
to
decide
whether
it's
current
year
or
or
projected
so,
but
this
doesn't
this
doesn't
say
what,
like
I
feel
like
the
language
needs
to
be
like
at
the
beginning.
It
needs
to
say
something
like
at
the
beginning
of
the
budget
process.
D
Each
year
a
reserve
range
of
12
to
21.4
percent
based
on
on
current
year
projected
revenues,
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
know
if
just
adding
projected
clarifies
it
enough.
Maybe
it
does
but
and
I'm
just
overthinking
it,
but
that's
that's.
The
thought
that
occurs
to
me
is
projected
from
win
to
win.
D
D
D
I
I
see
pros
and
cons
to
both
current
year
and
projected
here.
I
do
want
to
know,
though,
at
the
beginning
of
paragraph
one
under
section
five,
it
does
say
that
the
city
will
make
an
annual
determination,
so
I
think
we
already
have
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
that
we
have
to
make
the
annual
and
that's
already
built
in,
I
could
go
either
way.
I
think
remember.
Russell
has
a
point
that
we're
talking
about
2023
generally
making
a
determination
based.
D
D
I
L
J
Th,
this
is
how
we
solve
for
the
remainder
in
the
equation
in
the
2023
budget.
So
the
question
we're
asking
here
is:
when
we
plan
for
2023
how
much
money
do
we
want
to
have
left
over
after
we
take
in
our
revenues
and
we
spend
our
money,
that's
the
percentage
that
we're
solving,
for,
which
is
why
I
would
use
the
projected
revenues
as
the
target.
So
we
as
we
project
into
2023,
we
have
an
idea
of
how
we've
performed
in
2022.
J
We
have
a
projection
for
how
much
money
we'll
have
at
the
end
of
2022,
which
informs
the
budget
planning
for
2023,
and
so
I
would
set
the
percentage
of
of
the
reserve
at
target
as
a
projection
for
the
following
year,
because
that's
I
mean
that's.
Ultimately,
the
question
we're
trying
to
solve
is
how
much
money
do
we
leave
in
our
savings
account
when
we
plan
our
budget.
D
Anderson,
sorry,
I
guess
the
challenge
is
on
we
we
I
mean
we
have
to
choose
a
number
based
on
our
projected
revenue
for
for
the
we.
We
have
to
apply
our
number
to
the
projected
revenue
for
the
coming
year
for
2023,
but
I
don't
know
how
we
can
both
base
it
on
that
and
apply
it
to
that
as
well,
because
if
we're
ratcheting
up
and
ratcheting
down,
what
are
we
ratcheting
up
from
or
what
are
we
sliding
down
to?
D
And
so
we've
got
to
have
a
starting
point
to
know.
Oh
this
year
we
were,
you
know
we
project
that
at
the
end
of
2022
we
will
have
a
reserve
balance
of
of
you
know,
17
percent,
and
so
we
should.
You
know
we're
we're,
then
in
a
position
to
base
based
on
that.
That
tells
you
we
had
a
good
year
right
because
we're
above
16.7
or
we've
gone
up
from
the
previous
year,
or
something
like
that,
so
we
could
ratchet
up
from
there.
D
So
I
don't
know
I'm
having
a
hard
time
understanding-
and
I
got
my
mind
wrapped
all
in
circles
around
this.
So
maybe
I've
got
pretzel
brain
going
on,
but
I'm
having
a
hard
time
getting
to
where
I
understand
how
we
can
how
we
can
base
it
on
the
previous
year.
We
have
to
deal
with
the
or
based
on
the
coming
year.
We
have
to
deal
with
that
number,
but
I
think
we
need
to
start
somewhere
else.
C
It's
it's
a
number
that
we
can
start
at
and
we
can
ratchet
either
way
as
things
go
on
as
revenue
revenue
is
one
of
those
things
that
we
have.
We
don't
have
a
whole
lot
of.
I
mean
we
have
some
control
over
that,
but
not
a
whole
lot.
Once
we've
set
and
put
expenses
in
motion,
we
have
more
control
over
expenses,
I
mean
if
the
economy
is
shot
is
gone,
downhill,
real,
bad,
quick.
C
J
I
think
the
important
question
is
16.7
percent
of
what
that's,
what
we're
trying
to
determine.
Is
it
16.7
of
the
projected
revenues
that
we
have
at
the
end
of
the
current
year
that
we're
working
in
the
end
of
the
future
year
that
we're
projecting
into
or
is
it
expenses
now?
I
would
posit
an
argument
for
revenues
being
the
projected
baseline,
because,
although
we
can't
control
them,
although
we
can't
control
them,
they
the
the.
J
If,
if
we
under
project
our
revenue,
then
we
have
a
surplus
and
that
generally
is
perceived
as
good.
But
if
we
over
project
our
revenue,
then
our
percentage
target
is
actually
larger,
giving
us
a
larger
cushion
to
land
on,
because
we
over
projected
our
revenue.
So
we
have
direct
control
over
expenditures,
as
you
pointed
out,
and
not
over
revenue,
but
I
think
using
revenue
as
the
target
helps
us
kind
of
have
a
better
nicer
size,
cushion
that
we
can
work
with
if
we
need
it.
H
H
E
J
It
allows
our
taxpayers
to
have
expectations
for
how
we
handle
their
money
in
general.
If
we
set
a
16.7
percent
target
every
year
as
a
fixed
point,
and
we
consistently
are
out
of
compliance
with
that
number,
either
too
much
or
too
little,
then
we
are
telling
our
taxpayers
that
we're
going
to
do
something
with
their
money
that
we
are
actively
not
doing
so
having
a
range
allows
us
to
say
you
know.
Sometimes
the
numbers
are
going
to
be
slightly
different,
but
this
is
our
policy
that
we
intend
to
adhere
to.
H
D
So
I
feel
like
we're
spinning
our
wheels
a
little
bit
at
this
point,
and
I
am
honestly
not
comfortable
voting
on
any
amendment
to
this
without
having
some
time
to
sit
down
and
really
think
it
through.
So
I
propose
that
we
just
vote
on
this
policy
as
is,
or
you
know,
alternatively,
table
it,
but
I'd
rather
just
vote
on
it,
because
I
I'm
in
agreement
with
the
general
motion
of
this
thing,
but
adding
more
specificity
to
it
without
without
thinking
through
it.
A
A
I
I
appreciate
remember
anderson's
comments
and
I
don't
necessarily
disagree
with
them,
but
I
I
do
have
a
question
for
director
lo.
If
we
pass
this
as
is
tonight,
what
baseline
will
we
use?
That
is
still
an
outstanding
question
to
me
of
how
will
we
even
implement
this?
If
we
do,
we
need
to
come
back
and
make
that
decision.
L
I
Okay,
I'm
happy
to
move
forward
with
this
and
to
not
continue
to
take
time
on
it
it's
getting
late,
but
I
would
like
my
preference
to
be
for
this
to
come
back
and
be
with
some
more
information
and
a
recommendation.
It's
interesting
that
staff
is
currently
using
projected
revenue.
I
think
that's
helpful
for
us
to
know,
but
I
would
like
us
to
make
a
decision
on
this
for
it
to
be
effective.
A
A
C
L
We
heard
council's
comment
about
the
budget
supplemental
process,
so
we
put
a
more
vigorous
process
around
the
budget,
supplemental
approval
process,
we're
going
to
discuss
with
council,
and
I
also
want
to
give
council
an
overall
overview
of
the
2022
budget
supplementals
a
year-to-date
budget
supplementals.
Then
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
2020,
the
third
budget,
supplemental,
which
is
very
purposeful
and
intentional.
We
bring
this
to
your
attention
and
we
want
to
explain
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
L
So
what
we
did
about
the
budget
supplemental
process
is
department
will
identify
any
additional
changes
and
also
will
answer
the
question
if
the
current
budget
is
sufficient
to
absorb
the
new
cost,
if
it's
a
personnel
related
any
person,
mid-year
personnel
adjustment
need
to
be
approved
by
city,
manager's
office
and
human
resources
and
here's
our
current
thought
process,
because
it's
really
a
delegated
balance.
We
don't
want
to
spend
any
additional
funding
for
any
contract
without
bringing
the
request
to
council.
L
However,
if
some
departments
can
absorb
additional
costs
for
personnel
related
request,
we
want
to
find
a
way
to
let
council
know,
because
we
want
to
ensure
full
transparency,
so
we're
thinking.
What's
the
best
way
to
let
the
council
know
the
current
the
current
thought
process
is,
we
probably
could
incorporate
those
personnel
changes
into
our
monthly
financial.
We
will
not
present
account
council
on
a
monthly
basis,
but
on
a
quarterly
basis.
We
can
give
council
list.
This
is
the
personnel
changes,
because
that
has
compound
effect
on
the
future
budgets.
So
this
is
our
current
process.
L
The
leaders
directors
will
discuss
this
approach
on
wednesday.
So
after
we
decided
to
determine
to
bring
this
request
to
council,
the
finance
staff
is
going
to
collaborate
with
city
attorney's
office
to
prepare
the
presentation
and
resolution
for
council's
approval.
So
this
is
a
process
we
implemented
to
put
a
more
rigorous
process
into
the
budget.
Supplemental
process.
L
L
Overview
so
2021
we
asked
for
2.9
million
of
that
370
000
goes
to
general
fund.
We
adjust
the
people's
salary
to
the
midpoint
of
90
midpoint.
That's
the
major
increase,
also
other
fund.
We
allocate
2.5
million
from
unsigned
fund
balance
to
fund
a
285
exchange
project
for
budget,
supplemental
2,
the
general
fund.
We
have
1.2
million
additional
revenue
from
plan
review,
but
we
allocate
2.9
million
from
assigned
fund
balance
to
pay
off
the
cop
and
also
allocate
1.7
million
from
oppa
from
other
projects
for
budget
supplemental
3.
L
I
want
to
give
spend
more
time
to
bring
this
change
to
you.
So
here's
a
summary
so
for
the
budget,
supplemental
three
we
want
to
because
council
know
the
city
negotiate:
two
two-year
contract
employment
contract
with
the
collective
bargains
units,
our
englewood
employee,
associate
and
association
and
england,
with
the
police
benefits
association.
L
All
the
all
the
other
employee
groups
will
receive
a
5
increase
in
2023
over
the
january
2022
increase.
However,
the
2022
implantation
of
the
2023
eea
and
epba
contract
by
paying
both
groups
70
of
the
5
increase,
was
the
city's
good
faith
effort
to
address
the
cova
impact
related
to
inflationary
price
increases
experience
expressed
by
the
members
and
to
spread
the
cost
increase
over
2020
to
2023.
L
We
really
want
to
absorb
the
impact
between
2020
to
2023,
potentially
2024..
Another
budget
supplemental
is
funded
by
arpa.
You
may
recall
we
allocated
258
thousand
dollars
for
a
capital
project
for
cross
purposes.
We
still
have
a
remainder
88
000
that
needs
to
be
reclassified
from
arpa
fund
balance
to
the
capital
project
fund
and
also
for
the
bridge
house.
L
A
L
L
A
I
I
A
C
A
A
A
Let
me
see
here
all
right,
perfect.
I
guess
I
do.
I
just
read
this
now,
I'm
just
trying
to
think
now
it's
getting
late
in
the
night,
so
I
moved
to
go
into
executive
session
tonight
and
move
to
hold
an
executive
session
pursuant
to
crs
246-4024
f1
for
personal
matters,
to
discuss
the
annual
performance
review
of
city
manager.
J
O
O
A
A
A
A
E
E
E
E
E
E
B
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
A
All
right,
everyone,
the
time
is
now
10
or
excuse
me.
11
28
and
the
executive
session
has
been
concluded.
President
at
the
executive
session
of
the
following
persons:
mayoral
daniel
sierra
mayor
pro
tem,
stephen
ward,
council
member,
rita
russell
joe
anderson,
chelsea,
noonan
camp
jim
woodward,
cheryl,
wink
city
manager,
sean
lewis,
city
attorney,
tamra
niles.
I
move
to
close
the
executive
session.
May
I
have
a
second.
J
O
A
The
record,
if
any
person
who
participated
in
the
executive
session
believes
that
any
substantial
discussion
of
any
matter
is
not
included
in
the
motion
to
go
into
executive
session
occurred
during
the
executive
session
or
that
any
improper
action
occurred
during
the
executive
session
in
violation
of
the
open
meetings
law.
I
would
ask
you
ask
that
you
state
your
concern
for
the
record.
A
D
Had
one
quick
thing
from
a
follow-up
from
our
budget
conversation
at
previous
council
meetings,
I
we
had
talked
about
that
we
weren't
quite
to
a
place
of
having
a
structurally
balanced
budget.
I
wanted
to
see.
If
for
for
future
presentations,
we
could
get
some
options
on
what
it
would
take
to
actually
get
our
operational
expenses
in
line,
so
we
could
have
a
structurally
balanced
budget.
So
that's
all
I
have.
J
Yes,
we
also
discussed
two
upcoming
community
meetings
this
week,
wednesday,
the
17th
at
4
p.m,
galapagos
union
to
discuss,
5g
matters
and
then
thursday,
the
18th
at
I
believe
it's
5,
30
p.m,
near
bellevue
park
to
discuss
the
shooting
incident
that
occurred
on
the
pan
street,
as
several
of
my
peers
on
council
have
expressed
interest
in
attending
those
meetings.
I
believe
we
should
probably
officially
notice
them
as
official
council
meetings
or
gatherings
on
those
dates.
A
C
C
That
concerns
me
being
being
a
senior
and
stuff,
but
I
see
a
lot
of
people
being
over
at
mali.
Quite
a
bit.
I
see
a
lot
of
people
like
that
that
are
having
problems
with
computers.
I
mean
you
know.
I
think
I
was
working
on
a
computer
before
some
of
you
were
born
and
it's
just
passed
me
by
or
I
would
have
one
of
these
instead
of
this
stack
of
papers
here,
but
anyway
I
would
like.
C
C
I
understand
that
the
stanley
cup
was
in
town
over
at
craig
hospital
brought
by
joe
sakic
and
both
buildings,
the
patients
from
both
buildings.
Some
were
able
to
get
out
onto
the
plaza
and
see
it,
but
everybody
was
able
to
get
to
windows
and
stuff
and
at
least
look
down
and
see
it,
and
he
from
what
I
heard
repeated
his
commitment
to
craig
hospital
and
the
work
that
they
do,
that
he
does
or
that
they
do.