►
From YouTube: 04 Jan 2022
Description
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/129034?handle=3C7358A3989F49D6A2C8C46514951FFB
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/129033?handle=D792A2658A7F424381A2849FDA8EC775
I. Mayor Joe Jefferson, Mayor Pro Tem Rick Gillit, City Manager Eric Keck and Acting City Attorney Dugan Comer will discuss upcoming agendas for Regular Council meetings and Study Sessions.
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/129034?handle=3C7358A3989F49D6A2C8C46514951FFB
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/129033?handle=D792A2658A7F424381A2849FDA8EC775
A
A
A
A
B
Merciful,
father,
who
causes
the
rain
to
fall
and
the
sun
to
shine
on
rich
and
poor
citizen
and
public
servant
righteous
and
unrighteous
cause.
Now
your
mercy
and
peace
to
be
poured
out
from
heaven
may
our
words
be
kind
and
true
our
decisions
be
wise
and
may
the
outcomes
of
our
actions
bring
about
justice,
peace
and
unity.
May
our
city
flourish
by
your
grace
in
the
name
of
the
father
son,
holy
spirit,
amen,.
A
B
B
C
A
D
B
E
E
A
Thank
you.
Moving
on
to
jenna
item
six
appointments,
communications,
proclamations
and
recognition.
Tonight
we
want
to
recognize
the
winners
of
the
holiday
decorating
contest
here
in
inglewood,
city
council
will
recognize
the
holiday
lighting
contest
winners
in
each
of
the
following
categories:
best
house
best
block
in
neighborhood,
best
business
and
show
stopper.
Tonight
we
have
neighborhood
resources
coordinator,
madeleine
hinkless,.
G
Okay,
that's
okay!
So
thank
you,
council.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
recognize
the
winners
for
the
annual
holiday
decorating
contest
the
holiday
decorating
contest
has
been
going
on
for
many
years
in
the
city
of
englewood.
I
would
also
like
to
thank
the
sustainability
commission
for
judging
this
year's
contest.
G
Now,
let's
recognize
the
winners.
When
I
call
your
name,
you
will
receive
your
certificate
from
mayor
sierra
and
I'm
also
going
to
take
your
picture
for
best
neighborhood.
The
award
is
presented
to
nancy
forrester
and
gabby.
Torres
for
santa's,
corner
nancy
and
gabby
have
been
neighbors
for
the
past
four
years.
Nancy
has
been
putting
up
her
holiday
holiday
display
for
the
last
16
years
and
has
a
way
of
getting
all
of
her
neighbors
to
participate
every
year.
G
Okay,
the
first
showstopper
award
goes
to
ron
and
melanie
clower.
Their
display
is
an
accumulation
of
things
they
have
gotten
over
the
past
26
years.
It
has
gotten
so
big
that
when
they
want
to
add
something
they
need
to
take
something
out
they
enjoy
seeing
the
joy
their
display
gives
to
so
many
people.
G
Okay
and
then
the
best
house
award
is
going
to
present
going
to
be
presented
to
ronald
nelson
ronald
is
joining
us
via
zoom.
His
display
is
called
lights
on
le
pawn.
Ronald
also
won
an
award
in
2020
for
his
full
display
show
when
visitors
come
in,
they
tune
into
91.9
fm
and
enjoy
a
synchronized
light
show
with
music.
G
A
A
There
is
an
expectation
that
the
presentation
will
be
conducted
in
a
respectful
manner.
Council
may
ask
questions
for
clarification,
but
there
will
not
be
any
dialogue
tonight.
Please
limit
your
presentations
to
five
minutes
and
written
materials
for
presentation.
Two
council
may
be
submitted
to
the
city
clerk.
So
first
up
tonight
is
miss
kathleen
bailey,
an
inglewood
resident.
She
will
address
council
and
assistant
city
clerk.
Do
we
happen
to
have
miss
bailey
online.
E
A
A
A
B
E
E
C
E
A
H
H
However,
recent
case
law
across
the
nation
has
called
into
question
the
enforceability
of
similar
municipal
ordinances
and
policies,
particularly
presenting
due
process
challenges
by
claimants,
who
have
been
subjected
to
exclusions
from
parks
and
libraries,
particularly
so
for
a
variety
of
different
issues.
Safety
concerns
legal
violations,
rule
violations
based
on
that
case
law.
We,
the
city
attorney's
office,
identified
a
need
for
revision
of
inglewood's
trespass
and
park.
Ejectment
municipal
code
sections,
7-6-2
and
11-4-3.
H
In
order
to
ensure
that
what
was
drafted
is
both
a
legally
sound,
enforceable
method
based
on
taking
into
consideration
the
concerns
identified
by
courts
in
those
decisions
that
have
been
issued,
as
well
as
balancing
in
order
to
balance
the
the
court's
concerns
for
the
need
for
due
process
protection
of
people
subjected
to
exclusions.
At
the
same
time,
balancing
the
the
need
for
protection
of
the
inglewood
citizens
and
the
city
staff.
H
Which
applies
to
violations
of
rules
and
regulations
and
currently
does
authorize
removal
of
a
person
from
city
property
under
certain
circumstances,
and
the
proposed
amendments
to
that
section
would
provide
that.
A
person
who
commits
a
rule
violation
may
be
subject
to
a
variety
of
different
potential
responses,
which
would
include
potentially
a
verbal
warning
and
an
opportunity
to
seize
or
correct
the
rule
violation
that
is
being
engaged
in
possibly
ejectment
from
the
city
property,
where
the
rule
violation
is
occurring
for
24
hours.
H
So,
for
example,
littering
it's.
It's
envisioned
that
there
would
be
two
different
tiers.
One
tier
would
be
for
lesser
rule
violations
and
the
second
tier
for
more
significant
rule
violations,
so,
for
example,
littering
would
fall
under
tier
one,
and
based
on
that,
you
may
again
all
the
responses
are
potentially
available,
such
as
a
verbal
warning
calling
law
enforcement,
ejectment
and
exclusion,
but
the
but
the
key
difference
would
be
that
the
exclusion
that
may
occur
for
littering
would
be
less
than
it
would
be,
for
example,
threatening
an
assault
on
on
a
city
sac
member.
H
So
the
proposed
amended
municipal
code,
section
11-4-3,
would
provide
for
a
very
robust
appeals
procedure.
That's
protective
of
due
process
rights
for
those
who
are
subjected
to
it,
including
providing
for
an
exclusion
from
city
property
to
go
into
effect.
Four
days
after
issuance,
unless
timely
and
properly
appealed,
providing
for
an
exclusion
from
city
property
to
be
stayed
if
timely
and
properly
appealed
until
resolution
of
that
appeal
and
also
providing
an
alternative
avenue
of
permitting
a
person
issued
an
exclusion
to
file
a
written
request
to
modify
the
exclusion.
H
If
no
appeal
is
pending
and
facts
or
circumstances
change.
So
that's
a
that's
a
more
that's
another
option
available
to
people
who
may
be
subjected
to
a
notice
of
exclusion,
and
these
these
provisions
again
were
based
directly
upon
in
reaction
to
concerns
raised
by
due
process
challenges
to
other
ordinances
in
the
nation,
such
as
providing
for
an
exclusion
that
doesn't
immediately
go
into
effect,
but
rather
there's
a
window
of
opportunity
to
appeal
before
that
exclusion
goes
into
effect
and
also
the
the
stay
if
it
is
appealed.
H
So,
just
a
couple
of
other
things
that
I
wanted
to
point
out
is
the
part
of
the
proposed
amendment.
To
section
11-4-3
is
that
it
would
be
expressly
applicable
to
to
city
property,
including
parks,
and
that
was
something
that
is
a
little
bit
different
from
the
current
version,
where
it
is
only
expressly
applicable
to
parks.
H
You
got
the
same
30
days,
exclusion
or
the
same
60
days,
exclusion
here,
there's
a
variety
of
potential
responses
and
so
and
that
those
responses
also
will
have
guidance
through
that
code
of
conduct
which
will
be
posted
throughout
the
city,
and
there
will
be
also
addendums
that
will
be
provided,
which
will
be
specific
to
certain
facilities.
Such
as
the
library,
so
the
library
might
have
certain
unique
aspects
that
wouldn't
necessarily
be
applicable
throughout
the
city,
and
so
in
recognition
of
that
we
will
also
post
an
addendum
where
relevant
in
certain
facilities.
A
D
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
the
presentation.
It's
very
helpful.
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
One
is
in
the
appeals
process
that
you
laid
out
for
us
to
protect
you
process
and
the
first
bullet
there
is
that
it
wouldn't
go
into
effect
until
four
days
after
issuance.
Is
that
going
to
be
standard
for
every
ejection
or
exclusion,
because
or
would
it
go
into
effect
immediately
in
any
cases,
can
you
help
clarify
that.
H
So,
yes,
I
can't
clarify
that
so
that
would
that
four
days
before
it
goes
into
effect,
that
provision
is
specific
to
notices
of
exclusion.
So
if
a
person
is
subjected
to
it
receives
a
notice
of
exclusion,
then
that
exclusion
wouldn't
go
into
effect
for
four
days
and
that's
to
allow
them
time
to
file
an
appeal.
An
ejectment
is
different,
so
an
ejectment
would
go
immediately
into
effect
and
that
would
be
subjected.
They
would
be
subjected
to
the
ejectment
from
that
city
property,
where
the
rural
violation
occurred
and
that's
important.
H
It
is
not
all
city
properties,
it
is
specific
to
where
the
rural
violation
is
occurring
for
24
hours,
so
that
would
go
immediately
into
effect,
but
even
in
those
situations
it
is
intended
that
a
verbal
warning
would
be
issued
to
give
an
opportunity
to
seize
or
correct
the
rule
violation.
That's
occurring
with
a
few
certain
exceptions
such
as,
if
it's,
if
a
dangerous
behavior
is
occurring.
For
example,
a
verbal
warning
may
not
be
required
in
that
situation,
and
it
would
still
be
if
an
ejection
was
issued.
D
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
clarification.
Can
I
ask
one
more
question
and
then
my
second
question,
I
think
you
answered
this
at
the
end,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
I'm
quite
clear
that
the
code
of
conduct
and
the
rules
and
regulations
will
be
clearly
posted
in
each
facility
when
this
goes
into
effect,
so
that
all
citizens
have
clarity
on
what's
being
expected
in
city
facilities,
facilities
and
parks.
Yes,.
H
So
the
code
of
conduct
is
going
to
be
posted
posted
in
public
areas
so
that
everyone
can
be
aware.
Everyone
who
is
everyone
who
is
entering
city
property
has
an
opportunity
to
review
and
be
aware
of
what
their
what
is
expected
in
terms
of
standards
of
behavior
on
city
property
and
then,
like,
I
said,
for
there
there's
envision,
that
there
may
be
addendums
and
certain
facilities
where
there's
unique
aspects
such
as
the
library
great.
Thank
you.
I
I'm
I
guess
asking
if,
in
that
last
line
of
number
one
police
officer
could
be
changed
to
law
enforcement
officers
or
officers
and
my
intent
there
is
to
pick
up
code
enforcement,
although
we
have
one
park
ranger,
when
the
park
ranger
isn't
available
is
not
on.
Duty
is
sick,
whatever
code
is
probably
the
ones
that
are
going
to
be
taking
care
of
that,
and
I
think
the
police
officer.
I
H
Sure,
and-
and
I
I
understand
what
you're
saying
and
I
think
that
that
would
be
fine
to
change
that
from
englewood
police
officer
to
inkwood
law
enforcement.
The
concern
was,
we
didn't
want
to
state
just
law
enforcement
generally
because
they
need
to
have
jurisdiction
here.
But
absolutely
I
think
that
it
would
be
permissible
to
change
it
from
englewood
police
officer
to
englewood
law
enforcement
to
in
order
to
address
that
concern.
J
H
J
H
So
I'm
not
specifically
aware
of
any
such
instance
where
a
restraining
order
was
involved.
This
is
envisioned
more
as
a
more
as
an
instance
where
people
are
engaging
in
misconduct
and
and
violating
different
rules
of
the
city
that
this.
These
are
different
options
that
can
be
used
to
respond
to
that
behavior
in
order
to
ensure
the
public
safety
and
the
safety
of
staff
members.
But
in
an
instance
where
there's
where
there's
dangerous,
behavior
occurring
or
violence
being
threatened
against
a
city
staff
member,
we
have
it's
my
recommendation
that
law
enforcement
be
utilized.
H
If
there's,
if
there's
a
danger
to
someone,
that's
criminal
conduct
that
may
be
occurring
and
it
is
important
to
involve
law
enforcement,
and
that
is
also
one
of
the
one
of
the
responses
that
is
available
always
is
to
utilize
law
enforcement
to
call
them
an
and
a
citation
or
fine
may
be
issued
or
an
arrest
may
occur.
For
example,
if
someone
is
threatening
someone,
if
it
rises
to
the
level
of
criminal
conduct.
J
Okay,
that
that
helps
me
so
this
process,
I
would
describe
as
something
similar
to
having
your
name
written
on
the
board
when
you
were
in
you
know
elementary
school
or
what
have
you?
You
know,
you're
on
the
naughty
list,
sit
in
timeout
for
a
while
and
come
back
when
you're
when
you're
finished,
with
your
punishment.
H
Well,
there
I
think,
there's
more
teeth
to
it
than
that
in
the
sense
of
you
can.
The
potential
exclusion
can
be
relatively
lengthy
if
you
engage
in
one
of
the
more
serious
rule
violations
and
like
I
said,
if
you
violate
that
exclusion
that
can
result
in
a
trespass
prosecution
which
is
not
insignificant.
So
we
do
believe
that
this
has
been
carefully
balanced
to
protect
due
process
rights,
but
at
the
same
time,
have
some
teeth
so
that
there
is
protection
of
city
staff.
A
J
J
If
member
woodward's
concern
is
that
we
are
not
capturing
code
enforcement
or
giving
code
enforcement
the
authority
to
act
in
these
cases,
my
suggestion
would
be
that
we
alter
and
add
code
enforcement
rather
than
changing
inglewood
police
officer
or
park
ranger
to
law
enforcement
officer.
That
is
an
amendment
that
I
could
support.
F
Yes,
for
the
most
part,
the
ordinance
gives
the
city
manager
also
discretion
to
designate
who
can
issue
these
things
and
who
can
enforce
them.
So
I
think
that
would
respond
to
council
member
woodward's
concerns,
because
the
city
manager
could
designate
a
code
enforcement
officer
to
do
these
things
as
well.
K
Thank
you
mayor.
I
also
am
not
in
support
of
changing
this.
I
do
believe
that
the
way
it's
worded
is
sufficient,
and
so
I
I'm
in
favor
of
leaving
it
the
way
it
is.
I
greatly
appreciate
the
work
that
you
have
done
on
this,
and
I
appreciate
the
presentation
because
it
has
been
very
concerning
especially
we've
gotten
notification
from
the
librarians.
A
C
B
E
E
E
C
E
E
E
H
A
Thank
you.
Moving
on
to
council
bill
3,
an
intergovernment
agreement
with
the
mile
high
flood
district
for
the
design,
right-of-way
acquisition
and
construction
of
drainage
and
flood
control
facilities
in
the
south
engwood
basin.
Here
tonight
is
carrie
everson,
with
the
stormwater
program
manager,
with
the
public
works
department
to
provide
a
short
presentation.
L
Thank
you
mayor
and
council
members,
carrie
evenson,
stormwater
program
manager
for
the
city.
The
item
before
you
is
an
intergovernmental
agreement
between
the
mile
high
flood
district
and
the
city
of
englewood.
It
is
for
the
final
design
and
construction
of
drainage
and
or
flood
control
improvement
project
in
the
south
englewood
basin.
L
The
project
has
yet
to
be
identified
because
we
are
waiting
on
the
city-wide
master
or
major
drainage
way
plan.
That's
currently
underway.
They
needed
some
additional
information
for
surveying
which
they're
currently
getting
once
we
have.
That
document,
that's
going
to
give
us
some
additional
information,
some
new
information
on
potential
priorities
and
projects
in
the
south
englewood
basin
and
we'll
work
with
mile
high
to
select
a
project
based
on
the
outcome
of
that
plan,
and
really
this
is
another
effort
by
the
city
to
attempt
to
get
some
additional
stormwater
funding
from
some
other
sources.
L
I
L
L
K
Thank
you,
so
I
I
guess
I
have
some
questions.
Did
you
get
the
email
from
the
citizen
about
questions
about
how
this
money
was
going
to
be
allocated
if
it
so?
Can
you
address
that
question
a
little
bit
I
mean
I
guess
what
I'm
wondering
is.
We've
already
funded
some
of
this
correct,
and
so,
if
we
end
up
recovering
some
of
our
825
000,
we
would
be
able
to
spend
that
someplace
else.
D
L
Yes,
absolutely
so
the
point
and-
and
the
reason
to
do
it
now,
rather
than
to
wait
for
the
mdp-
is
because
this
825
000,
that
is,
with
the
mile
high
flood
district,
is
their
fiscal
year
2021
funds.
So
we
need
to
have
everything
in
place
so
that
they
can
encumber
and
basically
lock
those
dollars
in
place
and
put
those
aside
for
us.
If
we
don't
approve
it,
then
that
825
goes
to
someone
else
within
the
mile
high
flood
district
group.
Great.
Thank
you.
B
E
E
A
F
Mayor
and
members
of
the
city
council
we're
here
tonight
on
the
second
reading
of
an
ordinance
regarding
authorized
public
consumption.
Normally
we
would
not
do
a
second
powerpoint,
but
we
do
have
some
new
information,
so
I
did
prepare
a
short
powerpoint
tonight.
As
you
recall,
as
part
of
the
coven
19
response.
The
city
authorized
public
consumption
of
alcohol
in
certain
public
areas
to
allow
for
social,
distancing
and
restrictions
on
restaurant
capacity.
F
F
Sorry
did
I
nope
okay,
I
apologize
for
that
december.
13Th.
2021
city
council
adopted
council
bill
53
on
the
first
reading
to
authorize
public
consumption
on
the
city
paseos
in
the
3400
block
of
south
broadway,
doing
so
removed
public
right-of-way
from
areas
that
were
otherwise
previously
authorized
for
consumption
of
alcohol.
F
So
the
following
factors
supported
consumption
in
the
city
paseos.
They
are
a
public
area,
but
they
are
a
defined
area
with
structures
on
two
of
their
four
sides,
which
would
allow
us
to
post
signage
regarding
the
public
consumption
and
the
only
licensee
that
is
currently
licensed
to
sell
takeout
cocktail
cocktails
is
located
near
those
paseos.
F
F
We
did
receive
58
additional
survey,
responses
that
were
people
both
within
the
district
and
outside
of
it.
10
responses
were
received
from
businesses
within
3,
200
and
3
400
blocks
of
south
broadway.
These
are
areas
where
public
consumption
was
previously
authorized,
but
three
of
the
ten
responses
were
from
businesses
that
were
previously
reported
to
council
70.
F
We
did
ask
the
inkwood
downtown
development
authority
to
analyze
the
survey
results
and
to
weigh
in
on
the
city
council
action,
and
they
were
supportive
of
it.
They
noted
that
the
survey
respondents
generally
like
the
idea
of
outdoor
public
consumption
because
it
does
support
local
restaurants
and
bars
and
it
enlivens
our
downtown
south
broadway
district.
F
F
So,
even
though
council
and
the
public
were
in
favor
of
this,
unless
and
until
state
law
changes,
adding
that
section
to
our
public
consumption
ordinance
does
not
make
public
consumption
legal
in
those
areas
on
public
property
and
just
for
council's
reference
here
is
a
map
of
the
3200
block
of
south
broadway,
and
you
can
see
going
through
the
middle,
maybe
about
two-thirds.
There
is
an
alleyway,
but
otherwise
it's
all
private
property,
so
this
ordinance
doesn't
affect
the
consumption
of
alcohol
on
private
property.
At
all,
only
public
property
that
is
not
right-of-way.
F
B
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you,
city
attorney.
Niles.
Would
it
be
since
this
that
we
would
be
dependent
on
a
state
law
change
in
order
to
expand
these
areas?
Would
it
be
possible
for
city
council
to
adopt
a
resolution
sending
a
message
to
our
to
the
state
legislators
that
this
is
something
we're
interested
in.
F
A
K
D
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
want
to
say
that
I'll
be
supporting
this
tonight,
but
I
would
like
us
when
the
little
dry,
creek
plaza
project
is
complete
and
or
if
the
state
takes
action
for
us
to
bring
this
back
up
and
consider
some
of
the
comments
that
city
attorney
niles
mentioned,
that
there
were
good
suggestions
from
business
owners
and
continue
to
look
at.
Should
we
expand
this,
especially
if
other
businesses
in
the
city
do
get
those
licenses
so
open
to
reconsidering,
but
will
be
supportive
tonight.
A
E
E
E
E
A
A
Don't
have
much
tonight,
but
I
do
just
want
to
provide
a
thank
you
to
city
manager
louis
as
well
as
the
england
police
department
for
providing
resources
to
obviously
the
fires
from
last
week
and
superior
and
louisville
and
boulder
as
well
just
really
appreciate
them,
providing
helping
hand
where
needed,
because
obviously,
we've
been
in
similar
situations
in
terms
of
emergency,
and
I
just
appreciate
that
we
they
were
able
to
take
advantage
of
some
of
to
help
from
our
side.
So
nothing
else.
D
Thank
you
mayor.
I
echo
your
thanks
and
just
thank
you
to
all
of
the
city
staff
who
worked
over
the
holiday,
replacing
water
pumps
and
all
sorts
of
things.
We
have
incredible
staff
here,
but
I
did
want
to
bring
up
one
issue
that
was
of
concern
to
me
the
last
couple
of
weeks,
which
is
the
reduced
hours
at
the
library.
D
I
understand,
there's
a
variety
of
reasons
for
the
decision,
but
I
do
think
that
when
we
make
a
significant
change
like
that
in
services
that
our
citizens
receive
that,
that's
something
that
should
at
least
this
council
should
discuss
before
that
decision
is
made.
So
I
wanted
to
bring
that
to
this
body
and
see
if
anyone
has
any
similar
concerns,
and
maybe
something
for
us
to
think
about
moving
forward.
A
Thank
you,
member
noon,
camp.
Any
comments
from
council
regarding
this,
I
would
be
in
favor
of
just
understanding
the
issues
if
we
can
make
that
a
council
request
to
just
find
out
what's
driving
that
you
know,
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
place
to
start,
but
obviously
I
would
be
concerned
about
just
reduced
services
overall
in
the
city,
including
the
library,
so.
J
J
M
E
B
I
just
wanted
to
return
to
the
idea
of
seeing
what
other
advocacy
or
working
with
cml
possibilities
we
could
do
to
help
the
state
along
on
that.
I
don't
know
if
we
have
enough
support.
If
that
would
be
a
study
session
item,
potentially
or
or
possibly
just
a
draft
of
resolution,
we
don't
a
study
session
would
be
necessary
to
is
there.
Could
we
go
around
and
see
if
there's
support
from
council
to
move
move,
something
like
that
forward.
A
D
I
N
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor
I'd
like
to
to.
If
we
were
to
present
it
to
the
policy
committee,
I
definitely
want
to
have
a
since.
I
would
be
speaking.
I'd
want
to
have
a
really
thought
out.
I'd
want
us
to
do
our
diligence
and
and
ensure
that
it
that
we
do
believe
overwhelmingly
oops
that
it
would
be
favorable
to
a
a
solid
percentage
of
the
rest
of
the
municipalities
in
the
state.
N
A
J
J
J
I
was
also
busy
the
past
two
weeks
remember
nina
camp
and
I
toured
the
south
platte
renew
plant.
I
would
encourage
any
council
members
who
haven't
been
there
yet
to
take
the
tour.
It's
actually
a
remarkable
operation,
a
very
large
facility.
I
was
pretty
tired
at
the
end
of
the
day,
having
walked
55
acres
for
three
hours
on
my
feet,
my
father,
who
did
some
engineering
work
there
a
couple
decades
ago,
also
joined
me.
J
J
J
J
I
think
I
think
the
old
method
led
to
a
more
robust
discussion.
We
had
mics
that
would
work.
Everybody
was
in
a
close
proximity.
I
just
think
it
was
better.
So
that's
one
item
that
I
would
like
to
explore
in
the
future
and
mayor
if
you'd
like
to
take
a
brief
pull
on
that,
I
have
two
other
items
or
yeah
two
other
items
after
this.
A
D
A
K
I
happened
to
sit
on
the
city
council
when
the
city
attorney
and
the
city
manager
were
removed
from
the
diocese.
The
problem
that
was
going
on
at
the
time
is
that
the
city
attorney
sat
on
one
side
of
the
mayor
and
the
city
manager
said
on
the
other
side
of
the
mayor.
There
were
discussions
going
on
out
of
purview
of
the
public
and
right
now
where
the
city
manager
and
the
city
attorney
set.
They
have
microphones,
they
are
not
part
of
the
elected
body.
N
I
would
mayor
sierra-
I
am
I'm
not
willing
to
say
either
way
if
I'm
in
favor,
of
having
a
discussion
in
the
absence
of
any
data.
I'd
like
to
understand
president
I'd
like
to
understand
best
practice
across
municipalities,
past
and
current
before
we
have
a
discussion
and
I'd
like
to
use
that
data,
along
with
the
the
thoughts
of
course,
as
member
noonan
cut,
mentioned
the
opinions
and
input
from
our
our
attorney
and
manager
teams.
N
A
J
J
J
J
Mayor
sierra
and
I
did
the
roll
call
for
the
three
shifts
on
christmas
day
visiting
our
officers,
who
were
serving
on
one
of
the
more
difficult
days
to
serve
in
the
police
department
and
this
exposed
something
that
I
had
previously
been
aware
of,
but
not
as
acutely
as
I
am
now.
It
also
kind
of
dovetails
neatly
into
the
trespass
discussion
we
had
earlier
this
evening,
and
that
is
the
difficulty
we
are
currently
having
with
incarcerating
individuals
who
commit
public
offenses,
and
I
don't
know
how
this
body
deals
with
that.
J
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mayor
proton
ward.
I
guess
I'll
ask
the
last
question.
I
guess
we
can
just
specifically
just
talk
about
the
plexiglas
offline.
If
needed,
I
would
be
in
favor
just
remove
it
as
well,
but
I
would
be
in
favor
of
having
a
discussion
about
just
what
our
policy
is
on
on
jailing
and
speaking
to
the
sheriff
or
just
arapahoe
county
on
what
we
would
need
to
do
in
order
to
see
some
change
in
terms
of
what
we
learned
on
christmas
day.
N
N
Haven't
seen
my
little
hand
up,
I
just
read
an
email,
I'm
sure
you
all
read
from
our
city
attorney
about
the
12-foot
distance
and
the
masking
requirement,
and
not
all
seven,
not
everyone
present
in
person
is
wearing
a
mask.
So
while
you
cannot,
I
believe
I
read
that,
while
we're
unable
in
council
chambers
to
maintain
that
12
foot
distance,
I
hope
I'm
remembering
this
correctly
masks
are
required.
N
F
I
will
only
add
the
tri-county
health
department
order
regarding
masking
does
not
refer
to
any
sort
of
plexiglas
partition.
It
does
refer
to
enclosed
rooms.
That
would
provide
an
exception
to
masking,
but
the
plexiglas
doesn't
do
that.
So
it's
my
understanding
too,
that
a
prior
counsel
had
requested
it
just
as
an
additional
means
of
blocking
potentially
an
airborne
illness,
but
but
whether
or
not
to
leave
them
up
would
be
a
choice
for.
A
Yeah,
I
think
just
in
my
just
personally
in
terms
of
plexiglass,
I
I
just
on
this
side.
There's
no
one
on
me
I'll
be
happy
to
have
this
removed,
I'm
pretty
like
enclosed
in
here
so
yeah.
So
that
was
just
my
feeling
on
it.
Anything
else
remember
wink
that
you
wanted
to
add,
or
no
any
other
comments
regarding
council
members
choice.
I
A
A
M
Thank
you
mayor.
I
too
have
a
handful
of
items.
I
guess
in
response
to
member
ward's
question
to
myself
and
the
city
attorney.
This
is
some
not
something
that
we've
discussed
with
anyone
on
council
or
each
other
for
that
matter,
but
I
have
certainly
will
respect
the
will
of
council
on
that.
I've
worked
for
two
cities
who
have
had
the
city
manager
and
the
city
attorney
sitting
with
the
council
and
two
that
haven't.
My
only
comment
would
be
I,
as
you
notice,
even
during
this
meeting,
you
know
I'm
running
back
and
forth.
M
Trying
to
you
know
talk
to
staff,
I
sometimes
need
to
take.
You
know
someone
in
the
hallway,
even
citizens
that
I'm
talking
to
so
it
could
be
a
little
distracting
for
me
in
particular
to
be
at
the
diocese,
because
I'm
constantly
communicating
with
staff
and
getting
information
for
council.
So
that
would
be
my
only
way
in
moving
on
to
the
library,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
the
comments
and
the
questions
with
regard
to
hours.
M
We
did
send
that
out
in
a
friday
report,
so
I
do
want
to
let
council
know
that
you
were
notified,
but
I
agree.
It
was
a
bit
after
the
fact,
and
certainly
if
the
library
board
did
not
weigh
in
on
that
that
was
an
absolute
mess.
So
I'll
look
into
that
and
find
out
about
that.
With
regard
to
the
decision
itself,
I
really
feel
like
we
can
probably
call
this
a
temporary
move.
You
all
have
received
emails
from
library
staff
about
with
questions
concerns
about
their
security.
M
We
have
had
serious
concerns
with
our
current
security
contract,
which
is
now
expired,
we're
essentially
on
a
month
to
month
and
trying
to
get
a
handle
on
what
our
next
steps
are.
The
city
attorney
has
been
very
involved
with
that
we've
been
very
involved
with
city
staff
and
what
would
be
burp
best
with
the
court
with
the
library
with,
if
in
general,
trying
to
figure
out
what's
best
for
that.
M
So
I
appreciate
staff's
diligent
work
on
that,
but
one
of
the
problems
is:
we
have
not
been
able
to
have
those
security
personnel
at
the
library
for
the
required
number
of
hours
that
we
have.
We
are
open
55
hours
a
week
in
the
library,
and
so
we
really
had
a
problem
with
staffing,
both
the
security
position
as
well,
as
you
know,
with
all
departments
in
the
city
just
being
short
staffed
in
general.
So
I
think
it
was.
M
There
are
actually
a
number
of
issues
that
council
has
raised
that
we're
working
on
some
responses
for
what's
the
training
that
library
staff
is
receiving,
you
know
with
regard
to
security,
how
is
the
police
department,
interacting
with
library
staff
you've,
asked
questions
about
co-responders
being
housed
at
the
library,
so
we're
putting
together
information
for
you
on
that?
That
will
hopefully
be
helpful
and
provide
a
little
bit
better
picture
on
that.
M
M
That's
currently
out
for
public
review
and
we're
getting
some
good
feedback
from
inglewood
engaged
on
that
so
assistant
city
manager,
dodd,
will
be
going
over
that
with
you
and
then
our
facilitator
will
really
be
leading
you
through
a
priority
setting.
So
you
will
know
what
the
community
priorities
are
from.
Englewood
engage
but
really
it'll
be
up
to
you
to
really
set
those
priorities
on
on
how
we
rank
all
the
different
things
that
are
in
the
strategic
plan
by
outcome
area.