►
From YouTube: CEAC 10-15-2021 Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
B
Yeah
I'm
one
of
those
I
think
siri's
always
watching
me
and
listening
to
me.
I
know
she
is.
A
D
C
E
C
E
Hello,
everybody
I'm
going
to
call
this
regular
meeting
of
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee,
this
october
20th,
to
order
hello,
everyone
maureen.
If
you
could
go
ahead
and
do
roll
call,
please.
D
Sure
everyone
is
here
but
chair
bowden
here
vice
chair
green.
C
E
Wonderful.
Thank
you.
Next,
on
our
agenda
is
item
number
two
consideration
of
minutes
from
our
previous
meeting
and
at
in
september,
would
someone
please
move
to
approve.
E
E
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
vote
to
approve
the
minutes.
Please
vote
by
a
show
of
hands.
If
you
approve
the
minutes.
E
Kara,
tara
and
I
can't
see
you
cara
and
tara,
just
if
you,
if
you
can't
do
your
there,
you
go.
I
thank
you,
looks
like
unanimous
appreciate
it.
So
the
minutes
are
accepted.
Next,
on
our
agenda
is
the
public
forum?
Do
we
have
any
attendees
maureen.
D
C
D
I
won't
put
her
on
video
because
she
didn't
want
to
be
put
on
video
last
time.
Okay,.
G
Yeah
I
had
a
question
what
she
had
the
email.
We've
got
had
his
issues
for
code
enforcement.
So
why
can
we
move
it
from
new
business
to
code
enforcement?
Can
we.
E
Well,
he's
he'll
still
be
here:
okay,
okay,
moving
forward
I'd
like
to
recognize
code
manager,
lewis
for
code
enforcement,
significant
events.
F
Hi
everyone:
how
are
you
doing
tonight?
It's
good
to
see
you
all,
so
I
wanted
to
start
out
with
just
talking
a
little
bit
about
october.
If
you're
not
aware
the
governor
has
declared
october
as
code
enforcement
appreciation
month,
the
city
did
recognize
that
and
celebrated
it
yesterday,
along
with
other
milestones
regarding
our
planning
division,
which
is
part
of
code,
they
did
receive
additional
certifications.
The
entire
team
is
now
certified
with
the
planning
department,
which
is
a
huge
accomplishment.
F
Most
cities
don't
have
the
entire
team
certified
as
well
as
fire
prevention
week.
We
did
celebrate
all
of
those
yesterday
and
some
kind
words
were
said
by
the
different
divisions
and
the
fire
marshal
does
also
fall
within
on
the
city
code.
So
we
really
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
recognized
the
the
hard
work,
dedication
and
contributions
that
everyone
from
the
building
department,
community
development
zoning
are
all
recognized
in
the
work
that
they
do
to
keep
our
community
healthy
and
safe.
F
I
wanted
to
give
you
a
few
technology
updates.
Our
body-worn
cameras
have
arrived,
they're
currently
being
programmed
and
tested,
and
we
hope
to
have
those
rolled
out
next
week
as
part
of
the
police
department
plan,
with
all
officers
that
take
enforcement
action
wearing
a
body
worn
camera,
so
that
is
rolling
out.
F
We
continue
to
upgrade
our
technology
in
our
vehicles,
allowing
us
to
be
more
flexible
out
in
the
field
and
as
part
of
that,
we've
now
started
the
installation
of
printers
we're
trying
to
be
more
proactive
with
reducing
our
waste
and
going
more
electronic,
which
would,
rather
than
having
those
triplicate
quadruple,
forms
that
we
fill
out.
It
would
be
automatically
transmitted
through
our
reporting
systems
to
the
courts
and
there'll
be
one
single,
smaller
printout
that
would
be
handed
to
a
subject
or
for
a
violation.
A
F
Technology,
I'm
really
excited
that
the
city
continues
to
increase
its
gis
programming
and
I
think
some
of
you
have
seen
hot
spots
in
the
past
and
we've
utilized
our
technology
to
increase
our
proactive.
F
Enforcement
and
within
the
last
five
years
I
did
a
presentation
about
when
I
first
came
on
within
the
last
five
years
code
enforcement
has
gone,
has
actually
increased
its
proactive
enforcement,
which
is
officer,
initiated
activities,
an
additional
43
in
the
last
five
years.
F
I
think
we're
leading
the
way
so
many
departments
have
really
stepped
back
and
have
cut
or
limited
some
of
their
code
enforcement
capabilities
or
have
been
unable
to
keep
up
with
crumbling
infrastructures,
and
so
this
really
speaks
to
the
vision
that
our
council
has
had
our
city
managers
at
and
the
forethought
in
in
moving
code
enforcement
forward-
and
I
know
council
member
russell.
F
I
greatly
appreciate
your
support
of
our
division
and
the
work
and
the
transparency
that
you've
held
us
to
within
code
enforcement,
advisory
committee
and
council,
and
really
moving
code
enforcement
in
a
positive
direction.
So
I
really
wanted
to
thank
council,
but
specifically
council
member
russell
for
all
the
work
she
does
specifically
related
to
code
enforcement.
So
thank
you
for
that.
F
Those
visions
those
dollars
are
paying
off
within
our
community
and
I'm
really
proud
to
say
that
our
division
is
is
also
fully
staffed.
I
should
knock
on
something
we're
one
of
the
few
divisions
in
the
city
of
inglewood
that
that
does
have
a
relatively
low
attrition
rate.
We
are
fully
staffed
and
as
of
next
week,
our
park
ranger
will
be
fully
trained
and
brought
on
board
as
a
solo
officer.
So
that's
adding
an
additional
expertise
out
into
the
field.
F
So
I'm
very
happy
to
announce
that
I
think
you
all
have
re
received
the
statistics.
F
We've
done
the
best
that
we
can
within
the
system
and
generating
a
report
for
you
all
without
having
to
manually
hand
count
stuff,
and
I
wanted
to
one
of
the
biggest
changes
that
you're
going
to
notice
is
the
way
the
numbers
are
reported.
I
we
tried
within
the
programming
parameters,
to
put
in
as
much
information
and
detailed
stuff
that
you
all
have
been
asking
for,
so
we
really
try
to
include
as
much
that
we
can
pull
without
manually
counting
reports.
F
The
way
that
this
counts
is
differently
than
the
previous
program.
The
previous
program
counted
reports
is
open,
so
when
a
case
was
opened,
it
would
be
counted
statistically.
This
report
count
only
counts
those
reports
that
are
closed,
so
the
numbers
are
a
little
bit
different.
Only
because
it's
taking
into
consideration
the
close,
not
necessarily
all
of
the
open
cases
and,
as
you
know,
open
cases
can
go
any
anywhere
from
a
couple
days
to
a
couple
months,
depending
on
the
circumstance
and
the
code.
So
that's
the
biggest
difference
that
you'll
see
within
this
report.
F
I
wanted
to
just
get
some
feedback
from
you
all
to
see
if
this
report,
if
you're
liking,
the
way
that
you
view
this
and
some
of
the
things
that
you're
seeing
I'm
kind
of
what
the
feedback
is
and
if
I
can
provide
any
direction.
If
there's
anything
that
we
can
do
to
possibly
make
this
beneficial
to
the
committee
and
to
be
transparent
within
the
community.
E
David,
thank
you
dave.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
had
a
question
on
the
sixth
line.
It
says
ending
case
number
epd.
What
does
that
refer
to.
F
So
if
you
all
know
we're
trying
to
also
track
the
number
of
cases
that
we've
opened
and
closed-
and
this
makes
it
a
little
bit
easier
for
us
to
understand
so
when
it
says
case
ending-
that's
the
report
number
that
we
ended
on
for
the
month.
F
So
we
we
started,
we
started
may
at
zero
because
we
went
to
that
new
reporting
system
and
then
they're
numerically
added
so
you'll
see
that
we
start
at
482
and
at
the
end
of
september
we
ended
at
21.82.
So
that's
the
number.
That's
the
number
that's
been
generated
for
the
report
that
was
taken.
C
A
E
F
Need
to
let
you
know
that
when
we
do
generate
a
case
number,
it
may
not
be
all
encompassing
of
that
contact.
It's
still
a
single
case
number.
There
may
be
additional
notes
or
additional
subjects
that
are
attached
to
that
case
number.
For
example,
if
we're
doing
enforcement
in
a
park,
and
we
happen
to
contact
12
people,
that
number
is
not
captured
because
the
single
event
it's
the
same
with
the
police
department,
it's
a
single
event
that
may
have
multiple
violations
attached
to
that.
F
G
Actually,
I'm
kind
of
confused
because
the
listing
under
animal
control-
how
do
we
know
what
code
section
that
is
involved
in
that?
Because
it
just
says
livestock.
F
So
we're
not
able
to
break
things
out
specifically
by
the
code
number.
That's
that's
not
possible
in
this
system,
so
we
have
to
physically
assign
a
generic
tab
to
pull
that
information.
So
these
are
the
specific
tabs
that
were
selected,
and
these
are
consistent
with
what
we
also
have
to
report
to
the
state.
So
we
made
the
the
tab
consistent
with
that
general
content.
G
F
G
F
F
So
this
is
a
subcategory
that
we
have
to
report
out
on,
so
the
charge
isn't
livestock.
That's
when
we
we
would
have
to
put
a
subcategory,
assign
it
to
livestack.
There
may
be
a
cruelty
neglect
associated
with
the
livestock,
but
we
have
to
do
a
sub
category
of
livestock
in
order
to
report
that
accurately
to
the
state.
F
Correct,
for
example,
we
may
investigate
a
report
of
a
prohibited
animal.
It
also
may
be
livestock
like
a
llama
or
a
pig
or
a
horse
that
a
gentleman
had
last
year
in
his
backyard.
So
we
still
have
to
list
it
as
livestock
so
that
we're
able
to
pull
that
out.
But
we
have
more
than
one
category.
We
take
the
primary
category,
which
would
be
the
number
of
animals,
and
then
that
is
the
livestock
when
it's
broken
out
as
a
specific
subsection.
F
Potentially-
and
that's
the
only
section
that
would
do
that,
but
that's
the
only
way
the
system
allows
us.
As
you
can
see,
we
may
only
have
five
or
six
livestock
reports
over
the
year
because
most
of
our
livestock
is
some
of
our
livestock
is
allowed,
so
example
chickens.
It
may
be
associated
with
noise,
it
may
be
associated
with
odor,
it
may
be
associated
with
quotes
and
neglect.
F
F
C
F
F
Is
complicated
we
don't
own
this
program.
This
program
is
shared
between
multiple
jurisdictions
and
we
had
to
pay
an
additional
fee
to
build
out
a
specific
code
enforcement
category.
We
can
evaluate
and
look
at
this,
we're
still
in
the
infancy.
So
if
there's
changes
that
we
want
to
see,
we
can
propose
those.
It
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
we
can
make
that
change.
F
For
example,
we
are
looking
at
proposing
a
voucher
program.
The
only
way
to
monitor
for
illegal
dumping.
The
only
way
to
categorize
that
is
we'd
have
to
put
a
sub-category
within
one
of
these
that
with,
for
example,
case
status,
we
would
be
able
to
enter
and
we
submitted
that
voucher
status,
but
we
have
to
actually
go
through
the
county.
It
is
very
difficult
to
change
things.
It's
not
a
it's.
Not
an
easy
process
is
what
I'm
trying
to
explain,
and
I
apologize
for
that.
E
What
does
permits
issued
reflect.
A
F
C
Is
there
any
way
to
have
an
a
sense
of
the
total
pending
cases
compared
to
what
has
been
closed?.
F
Am
I
able
to
provide
that
information
and
it
closed
it?
Changes
daily
code
officers
could
open
20
cases,
they
could
close
50
cases
there's
just
no
accurate
way
of
working
on
or
providing
statistical
information,
so
the
system,
the
way
they
programmed
it
was
to
do
it
on
the
back
end
of
when
cases
were
closed.
F
I
can
view
each
individual
officer
within
a
queue
it's
very
confusing,
because
we
have
a
bunch
of
cues
that
are
in
place
that
I
have
to
scroll
through
to
utilize,
so
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
to
count
those
to
capture
them
to
present
to
you,
because
it
changes
hourly
minute
daily.
So
this
is
the
most
accurate
snapshot
or
the
snap
photo
snap
of
what
has
been
closed,
because
that's
that's
the
most
accurate
way
to
report
this.
F
C
F
F
Ours
is
different
because
we
are
not
only
the
investigating
officer
where
the
or
the
initiating
officer
that
takes
the
complaint,
where
the
investigating
officer,
where
the
officer
that
closes
the
case
based
off
of
what
the
status
is,
we're
also
the
probationary
officer
that
has
to
continue
to
do
the
follow-up
on
specific
court
order
cases.
So
it's
it's
not
just
a
workflow
we're.
Actually
we
had
to
put
all
the
different
workflows
from
the
police
department
into
one
code
enforcement
template,
workflow.
F
Those
are
typically
used
for
animals
or
a
call
for
service
where
we're
unable
to
locate
that
call
for
service,
or
let's
say
the
dog,
was
running
at
large.
When
we
responded,
the
dog
was
no
longer
there,
so
that
would
be
unable
to
locate.
E
Well,
you
know
it
certainly
is
a
lot
more
information
than
we
got
with
the
prior
report
in
terms
of
the
detail
and
for
the
case
status.
So,
what's
the
difference
between
total
between
case
type
on
the
front
page
and
then
case
status
on
the
back
page.
F
The
case
status
is
primarily
utilized
when
we
close
out
a
case.
So
what
was
the
ultimate
final
outcome
of
that
case?
So,
for
example,
you'll
see
a
bait.
That
would
be
a
situation
where
we've
abated
that
case
and
we've
closed
it.
Not
all
cases,
one
to
notice
of
violation
is
issued.
F
We
close
the
case
with
the
notation,
but
we
don't
change
the
status
of
that
case
unless
it's
been
escalated.
So,
for
example,
we
may
issue
a
warning
that
case
would
be
closed
immediately
under
after
the
warning.
If
it
was
a
notice
of
violation
and
we
went
back
so
we
put
a
notice
on
the
door
for
weeds,
we
went
ahead
and
did
a
re-inspection
within
seven
days.
We
go
ahead
and
put
a
notation
on
the
file
that
they're
in
compliance,
and
we
close
the
case.
F
There's
no
way
of
closing
it
as
technically
in
compliance
the
incompliance
ones
that
you're
seeing
is,
we
may
have
done
some
follow-up
work
on
that
and
gone
back,
and
the
court
may
have
redirected
us
to
try
and
close
out
the
case
prior
to
going
to
court.
F
More
and
then
summons
pending,
I
think
you
might
ask
about
that.
Summon
pending
is
typically
used
for
dogs.
So
if
we
were
to
pick
up
a
dog
running
at
large
and
we
transport
it
to
the
shelter
at
the
time
that
summons
may
have
been
pending,
while
we're
waiting
for
the
owner
to
come
forward.
F
Public
relations
typically
is
when
we've
taken
some
type
of
action
and
education
is
taking
place,
so
we
may
have
met
with
an
owner
of
a
property
and
explained
some
of
the
code
to
them.
They
may
have
called
on
the
phone
to
report
something
and
have
a
conversation,
and
so
we
would
close
it
as
public
relations.
We
use
that
a
lot
in
people
that
are
seeking
information.
We
also
use
it
a
lot
within
our
park
system.
E
H
E
H
And
thank
you
dave
for
the
report.
I
appreciate
this.
I
do
have
a
question
on
the
under
grass
and
weeds.
Does
the
summer
season
end
in
august
I
mean:
are
we
just
using
temporary
help
during
the
summer
months.
F
We
are
using
temporary
help
and
enforcement
doesn't
stop,
as
you
are
aware
of
what
occurred
within
the
last
two
weeks
along
bellevue
avenue.
So
we
do
continue
most
of
it's
not
proactive
weed
enforcement,
because
we
are
still
working
on
some
of
our
major
cases.
If
we
do
see
situations
that
are
considered
major,
the
officer
does
investigate
that
and
if
we
do
receive
complaints,
we
of
course
investigate
those
as
well.
That's
a
great
question.
H
Well,
thank
you,
and
I
just
have
one
more
question
remind
me:
does
have
we
have
we
hired
somebody
or
was
it
in
a
totally
different
part
department
than
code
enforcement
where
one
person
was
going
to
even
though
it
was
seasonal,
they
would
perhaps
be
available
more
or
are
we
talking
about
that
for
future
budget?
Maybe
in
2022.
H
F
H
F
My
computer's
being
sensitive
tonight
so
based
on
what
the
budget
was
last
year,
we
do
just
hire
the
seasonal
person
for
the
summer,
just
like
we
do
other
departments
next
year.
I
do
believe
there
is
an
item
to
have
two
seasonal
people,
as
you
all
can
see
from
the
statistics
we
we
are
overworked,
I
shouldn't
say
overworked:
we
we
have
a
considerable
amount
of
responsibilities
and
we
did
inspect
9277
properties
this
summer
for
growth,
weeds
and
growth,
and
we
did
issue
1443
the
seasonal
person
did
of
weeds.
F
We
only
get
a
snapshot
of
that
specific
moment
at
that
specific
time
within
the
growing
season
of
that
particular
house.
So
we're
hoping
next
year-
and
I
think
it
is
a
it-
is
in
the
budget
to
have
two
seasonal
people,
so
they
were
able
to
double
that
weed
enforcement,
alley,
side
and
front
of
property.
H
F
Are
not
seasonal
and
the
park
ranger
position
is
actually
defined
as
park,
ranger
animal
welfare
so
they're
also
doing
animal
welfare
investigations
alongside
code
enforcement.
That
was
the
way
that
we
were
able
to
do
the
budget
to
split
it
between
police
and
the
parks
budgets.
F
We
are
hoping
to
have
additional
programming
within
the
winter
months
because,
as
you
all
know,
we
have
unpredictable
weather,
it
could
be
snowy
one
day
and
two
days
later
at
70
and
I'm
wearing
sharks
and
playing
tennis.
So
we
do
you
have
increased
enforcement
activities
that
will
take
place
seasonally,
we're
also
hoping
to
add
more
programming
where
we'll
have
walks
with
the
ranger.
We'll
have
some
nature
hikes
we'll
do
more
of
the
community
relations,
not
just
enforcement
within
our
parks,
which
is
really
what
our
community
has
been
asked
asking
for.
F
H
Thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate,
and
I
appreciate
it's
not
always
easy
when
you
change
software,
apparently
no.
F
F
So
I
appreciate
your
patience
and
bringing
this
forward
because
we
we
really
are
implementing
a
lot
of
things
over
a
one-year
period
and
it
can
be
tough
if
you've
ever
gone
through
that
at
work
with
this
implementation
of
multiple
different
programming
and
technology
issues.
E
Further
carson.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
code
manager,
liz
and
I
had
a
question
about
the
body.
Cams
are
those
the
same
for
code
enforcement
as
police
officers.
F
So
we've
had
an
initial
training.
We
are
getting
issued
the
cameras
tomorrow
and
we'll
start
an
additional
training
phase
of
about
a
week.
Just
so
everyone
can
get
used
to
wearing
them
the
technologies.
F
C
F
They
are
constantly
recording
only
video
they're,
not
constantly
recording
audio,
and
then
they
tape
over
themselves,
usually
depending
on
use
within
a
12
to
24
hour
period.
These
are
great
questions
by
the
way.
How.
F
F
They
are
activated
whenever
an
enforcement
action
is
taken
based
on
our
policy,
so
if
we're
out
doing
regular
patrolling
it's
not
on
and
they're
only
on
our
person,
unlike
the
police
they're
on
every
single
car,
so
when
they
activate
their
lights
or
they
turn
on
their
camera
or
they
go
over
a
certain
speed,
they
automatically
activate
within
the
car.
We
don't
have
those
capabilities
within
code
enforcement.
C
F
The
visual
portion
of
the
camera
is
always
recording.
The
audio
portion
is
the
only
one
that's
recorded
when
the
camera
is
activated.
A
F
F
Their
requirement
now
is
whenever
they're
approaching
a
call
for
service,
so
they
get
a
call
they're
supposed
to
activate
it
prior
to
arriving
to
the
scene
or
when
they
have
an
encounter,
for
example,
they're,
maybe
driving
down
the
street
and
someone
flags
them
down.
C
F
C
F
Yes,
initially,
code
enforcement
was
excluded
from
the
body
camera
program.
We
had
serious
conversations
about
what
would
be
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city
and
then
the
best
interest
of
transparency
with
the
community,
and
we
decided
to
go
above
and
beyond
what
is
required.
It's
actually,
above
and
beyond
an
industry
standard
for
code
enforcement.
F
Again,
that's
why
I'm
saying
the
city
is
leading
the
way
in
the
way
that
it's
approaching
its
enforcement
actions
and
really
devoting
its
time
to
making
sure
that
transparency
and
protection
is
happening
for
all
all
that
are
involved.
C
H
E
All
right
well,
thank
you
dave
for
all
this
information.
I
it's
great
to
get
started.
I
think
we're
going
to
be
learning
right
along
with
you
as
we
move
forward.
So
I'm
sure
we'll
have
more
questions
and
thank
you
for
feeling
all
of
those
questions.
Of
course,
okay,
moving
forward
we'll
have
we'll
go
to
agenda
item
number
four,
which
is
an
update
from
city
council
liaison
russell
peter
russell.
H
Thank
you
it's
great
to
be
here
this
evening
so
and
it's
great
to
have
the
code
enforcement
department
fully
staffed
and
the
city
attorney's
office
is
now
also
fully
staffed.
So
that
is
a
blessing
for
the
city
and
the.
I
do
appreciate
all
that
code
enforcement
has
to
do
and
and
in
the
last
couple
of
weeks
there
was
an
issue
that
was
in
the
newspaper
about
weeds
on
bellevue
and
and
so
I'm
sure,
the
code
enforcement
officers
were
busy
issuing
notices
of
violation.
H
And
then
monday
night
city
council
gave
consensus
to
the
city
manager
to
get
the
city
to
to
cut
the
weeds.
This
one
time
because
they're
pretty
tall-
and
I
I
have
a
few
concerns
about
the
safety
of
those
citizens-
that
back
up
to
bellevue,
they
don't
have
access
from
their
fence
and
some
of
them
have
to
walk
four
blocks
to
get
back
behind
their
fence
to
to
trim
the
weeds.
H
But
anyway,
I
am
very
glad
to
hear
that
code
enforcement
is
becoming
more
proactive
and
I
knew
that
was
happening
and
it's
overwhelming.
I
think
it
takes
a
while
to
change
things.
But
I
appreciate
all
that
this
committee
does
also
and
the
direction
that
you
give
and
it's
been
very
helpful.
So
that's
all
that
I
have
tonight.
I
think,
unless
you
all
have
questions.
E
Okay
looks
like
there
are
no
questions,
so
we'll
move
forward
with
agenda
item
number
six
for
communications
update
from
monica.
Please
remember,
johnson,.
A
B
Oh
sorry,
communications,
hello,
yep.
We
can
hear
you.
Oh
okay,
sorry!
I
actually
had
a
question
because
I
haven't
gotten
the
the
magazine
outreach
that
they
usually
do
for
the
winter
article
and
it
seems
like
it's
late
in
the
game.
So
maybe
I
can
reach
out
to
vanessa.
B
Is
that
yeah
yeah
I'll
reach
out
to
her
but
she's
been
making
posts
and
everything
looks
good
on
that
front
and
then
but
they're
putting
in
something
in
the
magazine
about
snow,
buddies
and
I'm
sure
they'll
do
it
online
and
that
will
be
upcoming.
B
So
I
think
is:
did
they
change
the
name
of
keith,
englewood,
beautiful
or
whatever?
That
committee
was
the
other
show
I'm
talking
about.
H
Yes,
they
did,
we
did
change,
I
think
the
name
and
the
direction
yeah
committee
a
little
bit
something
about
sustainability.
I
think
it
was.
B
B
H
B
B
H
B
Well,
I
they
gave
me
the
editorial
like
I
got
the
editorial
version
like
from
slate
and
the
kind.
I
would
send
my
article
to
the
copywriter
and
I
got
the
the
email
for
the
topic
for
submission,
but
I
never
got
the
anything
further.
They
usually
send
you
a
thing
like
you
need
to
submit
it
by
this
day
and
that's
really
weird.
F
I'm
not
sure
what
and
I
apologize.
I
don't
know
what
I'm
not
involved
in
that
process.
I
get
the
same
notifications
to
submit
my,
but
I
just
reviewed
and
signed
off
on
the
final
draft
of
our
portions,
and
there
is
something
in
there
about
snow
buddies.
There
is
something
about
wildlife.
There
is
something
about
trash
cans,
okay,
so
it
there's
a.
There
is
a
they're
kind
of
reformatting
it
a
little
bit,
so
it's
gonna
look
a
little
different
with
more
boxes
and
stuff,
but
your
information
is
in
there.
Oh.
B
Okay,
so
I
submitted
the
the
topics,
all
those
topics
and
I
submitted
you
as
a
a
source
for
that
they
might.
They
just
went
ahead
and
wrote
it.
F
So,
typically,
what
slate
does
just
so
that
this
this
team
understands
they'll
typically
will
take
all
the
submissions
and
articles
and
they
even
they
even
take
my
articles
and
they
rewrite
them
and
format
it
to
spacing
and
change
a
few
verbiage
things.
I
think
the
only
people
they
don't
really
do
that
for
is
for
council
members,
but
they
do
take
all
of
our
information
and
they
reformat
it
and
change
it
around,
but
they
do
take
our
ideas.
F
B
E
Do
think
you
know
we
had
talked
about
at
their
last
meeting
that
the
communications
team
seemed
to
be
you
know,
taking
on
once.
We
provide
them
with
the
direction
they
seem
to
be
taking
on
more
of
the
role,
which
is,
I,
I
think,
probably
what
we
want,
especially
when
they
they
interact
directly
with
dave
anyway.
So
thank
you
for
all
that
you
do
monica.
E
All
right
moving
on
are
there
any
further
questions
for
member
johnson,
okay,
seeing
none
then
we'll
move
to
item
number
seven,
which
is
new
business.
The
first
new
business
item
that
I
would
like
to
discuss
is
an
email
that
we
receive
from
a
resident
regarding
milkweeds.
E
The
the
resident
herself
did
not
know
that
she
had
milkweed
and
there
was
a
concern
from
the
neighborhood,
the
neighbor,
considering
the
fact
that
monarch
butterflies
actually
utilize
the
milkweed
for
food
and
a
defense.
So
the
concern
was
that
code
enforcement
is
forcing
the
cut
down
of
milkweed,
which
is
a
critical
component
to
our
ecosystem,
and
that's
simply
not
the
case.
E
The
we
rely
on
the
owners
to
know
what
they
have
in
their
yard.
In
this
case,
the
owner
was
given
a
heads
up
by
their
neighbor
and
then
that's
in
and
the
neighbors
who
wrote
the
email,
but
our
code
enforcement
officers
are
not
botanists
they're,
not
you
know,
experts
in
gardening,
so
when
they
see
tall
weeds
or
when
they
receive
a
complaint
for
tall
weeds,
they
issue
the
directive
to
have
them
cut
down
and
it's
up
to
the
owner
to
know
that
they
have
milkweed.
E
C
E
It's
a
verbal
conversation.
If
they've
received
a
notice
on
their
door,
then
they
pick
up
the
phone
and
call
code
enforcement.
Let
them
know
that,
yes,
they
do
have
weeds,
but
in
the
midst
of
the
weeds
there
is
milkweed
which
they,
which
is
should
not
be
cut
down,
and
at
that
point
that's
the
extent
of
my
knowledge,
so
code
enforcement
officer
code
manager,
lewis.
If
you
would
like
to.
F
F
It's
very
generalized.
We
do
work
with
our
residents.
For
example,
this
comes
up
frequently
when
we
start
posting
danny.
Lions
are
one
of
the
first
things
that
we
start
hearing.
Complaints
about
and,
and
you
can
have
dandelions
you
can
have
as
many
dinosaurs
as
you
want,
as
long
as
they're,
not
over
six
inches.
Well,
the
problem
is
the
life
cycle
of
a
dandelion,
as
you
all
know,
within
20.
If
you
don't
know
within
24
hours,
shoot
up.
F
Many
of
our
residents
have
expressed
concerns
that
this
is
early
food
for
pollinators,
and
so
it
kind
of
works
within
that
14
to
21
day
notice
of
violation
where
we
allow
them
a
little
more
time
before
we
take
the
more
heavy-handed
approach
with
those
types
of
weeds.
We
can't
exclude
someone
from
ordinance,
but
if
they
can
articulate
something
was
intentionally
planted
as
landscaping.
F
We
had
a
situation
several
years
ago,
where
somebody
was
was
a
resident
was
very
angry
about
the
thistles
in
this
person's
jar
and
when
we,
when
we
posted
it,
the
resident,
contacted
us
and
said
these
aren't
thistles
I
intentionally
planted
this.
I
brought
these
back
from
scotland.
I
do
crafts.
I
utilize
these.
This
particular
variety
of
a
thistle
in
my
cottage
industry,
and
I
can
and
conveyed
that
to
the
city
attorney
at
the
time,
and
and
there
would
be
no
way
we
can
convict
grass
and
wheat
because
it
was
an
intentionally
planted.
F
If
you
were
to
come
to
my
house
right
now,
I
have
an
ornamental
grass,
that's
11
feet
tall,
but
it's
intentionally
planted
ornamental
grass,
so
this
is
kind
of
where
it
gets
into
some
tricky
language
and
articulation
and
and
how
the
city
would
move
forward
with
with
grass
and
weeds
and
again
we
can
we
kind
of
go
off
of
the
status
of
what
the
stateless
says
noxious
weeds.
But
again
that's
not.
We
can
prove
our
case
that
something's
over
six
inches,
we
can't
necessarily
prove
the
use
or
what
that?
A
F
F
So
again
this
this
is
something
that
we
would
work
with
the
homeowner
on
in
future
situations.
G
Yeah
I
just
wanted
you
answered
most
of
my
question
and
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
when
I
read
that
email
it
sounded
like
code
enforcement,
went
over
there
and
told
her
she'd
get
a
big
fine.
If
she
didn't
do
what
they
told
her
to
right,
then
I
don't
know
if
that's
true,
but
you
follow
the
process
and
you
have
instructed
all
of
your
personnel
to
follow
the
process.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
the
process
is
door
hanger.
G
F
No,
we
still
have
a
we
do
have
the
process,
our
our
weeds
notice
is
strongly
written.
It
does
not
mean
immediately.
We
still
outline
the
process,
even
within
that
notice.
In
that
notice
it
does
talk
about
the
abatement
process
that
homeowner
did
not
ever
communicate
with
us.
We,
I
know
we're
talking
about
specific
case.
I
do
have
the
permission
to
talk
about
this
specific
case,
so
at
the
request
of
the
homeowner
and
of
miss
brown.
So
just
so,
you
all
are
aware,
and
typically
I
wouldn't
discuss
an
individual
case.
F
The
homeowner
also
had
additional
weeds.
It
wasn't
just
this
one
particular
patch
and
she
had
no
idea
of
what
these
items
specifically
were
planted
in
in
her
yard,
and
so
it
was
an
educational
opportunity
this
year
for
that
particular
homeowner
and
code
enforcement
for
future
years,
so
that
that
homeowner
can
better
articulate
and
again
not
all
milkweed
comes
up
every
year.
It
may
not
have
receded
itself.
It
may
not
have
the
ideal
conditions
for
that
particular
property.
F
It
is
not
an
easy
which
is
part
of
the
problem,
we're
having
with
the
with
monarch
butterflies.
It's
not
an
easy
cultivated.
Landscape
item.
G
F
We
have
several
situations
in
the
city.
We
have
one
strip
of
land
where
they
plant
wildflowers.
They
go
to
seed
people,
think
they're,
weeds
they're,
not
they
were
intentionally
planted,
wildflowers
that
have
to
re-seed
themselves
every
year.
So
it's
kind
of
one
of
those
gray
areas
where
we
try
to
stay
within
the
boundaries
of
code,
but
to
also
honor
the
homeowners
and
and
some
of
their
intentionally
planted
landscape
items.
E
Is
there
further
comment
regarding
miss
brown's
email
on
milkweed?
E
I
have
a
question
on
protocol
since
miss
brown
sent
us
an
email
and
has
not
attended
the
meeting
so
she's
not
hearing
our
discussion.
How
am
I
supposed
to
respond
to
her?
I
mean:
do
I
respond
to
her
email,
dave.
F
So
you
are,
as
the
chair
you're
more
than
welcome
to
reach
out
to
her,
because
she
did
submit
this
to
writing
in
you
to
you
and
I'm
I'm
sure
maureen
can
can
clarify
this.
I
have
had
conversations
with
miss
brown
about
this,
and
so
she
understands
our
position
I'll
say
it's
very
disappointing
that
this
occurred
this
year.
I,
like
I
said
we
are
big
on
pollinators
and
and
protecting
them
and
working
forward
and
again
I'm
I'm
looking
at
this
from
a
learning
experience
for
everyone
involved.
E
E
I
got
stuck
at
work
and
I
have
to
leave
the
building
so
I'm
going
to
call
a
20-minute
recess
so
that
I
can
leave
the
building
and
get
home,
I'm
not
that
far
from
home,
but
next
on
our
just
there's
two
items
next
on
our
discussion
that
I
think
are
important.
Number
one
is
an
update
on
our
bylaws.
So
if
you
have
not
had
a
chance
to
review
our
bylaws,
please
do
that
while
we're
at
a
20-minute
rest
and
then.
E
G
E
Okay,
is
there
any
discussion
on
that
recommendation.
E
I
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
postponing
it
at
all.
I
don't
think
we
there's
anything
in
the
bylaws
right
now.
That
is
negatively
impacting
our
ability
to
work
together
and
and
follow
our
our
you
know
our
purpose.
So
I
don't
have
any
burning
issues
at
this
point
unless
somebody
else
has
a
concern
that
they
want
to
address
between
now
and
march.
I
I
am
fine
with
postponing
the
conversation
until
next
march.
E
Okay,
I
agree
all
right
so
so
everyone
look.
Please
look
at
the
priority
list,
which
is
actually
left
over
from
our
conversation
this
time
last
year,
so
I
just
basically
provided
an
update
to
where
we
are,
and
then
I
also
listed
what
we
had
said.
We
also
wanted
to
cover
that
we
didn't
get
to
so
it's
just
a
beginning
point.
We
I
just
want
to
hear
you
know
what
what
are
things
that
we
should
be
working
on,
especially
dave
for
code
enforcement.
E
If
there's
any
burning
issues
that
you
would
like
to
see
us
to
address,
and
likewise
council
member
liaison
rita,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
speaking
up,
if
there's
anything
you
know
of
that
needs
to
be
covered,
and
then
I'll
give
you
an
update
on
our
presentation
to
city
council
two
weeks
ago,
and
then
I
will
be
back
with
you
guys,
let's
meet
back
at
7
25,
and
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
do
this.
E
Can
you
hear
me
got
it?
Okay
took
a
little
bit
longer
to
close
than
I
expected
and
I'm
pretty
dark
hold
on
turn
the
light
on.
E
There
we
go
so
this
time
of
year,
we've
just
made
it
a
routine
to
review
what
we're
working
on
and
why
we're
working
on
it,
and
especially
wanting
to
hear
any
you
know
priorities
that
code
enforcement
has
any
issues
that
they
see
because
a
lot
of
the
code
that
we've
changed
over
the
past
several
years
has
been
based
on
input
from
the
code
enforcement
team
and
then
also
what's
going
on
with
city
council.
F
One
concern:
that's
starting
to
trickle
back
in
again
is
regarding
the
scooters,
we're
starting
to
get
more
reports
and
complaints
about
scooters
being
left
in
places
being
ridden
on
sidewalks
dealing
with
bike
lanes,
and
so
this
is
starting
to
trickle
in
again,
and
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
the
purview
for
your
department
to
take
up
or
if
you
want,
if
you
even
have
the
power
to
take
that
up.
It
is
just
something
to
put
on
your
radar
that
this
is
it's
coming
and
there
are
no
rules
regarding
it.
F
It
could
be
a
conversation
of
both
because
we're
running
into
parking
issues
we're
running
into
obstruction
of
right-of-way
issues
when
they're
being
abandoned,
so
it
kind
of
goes
over
the
gamut
of
several
different
agencies
or
different
departments.
Excuse
me.
F
It
is
it's
also
been
discussed
by
the
transportation
subcommittee.
I
think
they've
had
conversations
not
real
recent,
but
in
within
the
last
year
I
believe
they've
had
conversations
about
it
as
well.
So
it's
again
it's
something
that's
creeping
up
and
I
know
we're
all
trying
to
to
come
up
with
alternative
ways
of
transport,
but
it's
now
starting
people
are
getting
them
abandoned
in
their
front
yard
and
oh.
A
F
It's
it's
starting
to
become
a
burden
where
we're
needing
to
report
it
to
the
different
to
the
different
agencies
that
rent
those
out
to
come
and
pick
them
up
we're
also
dealing
with.
We
have
no
regulations
regarding
shopping
carts.
F
Several
communities
have
taken
this
up
because
it
is
causing
an
undue
blight
and
burden
into
the
city
of
inglewood,
we're
finding
them
abandoned
in
different
areas.
The
city's
having
to
to
retrieve
them
stores,
aren't
being
as
cooperative
and
retrieving
them,
they're
being
left
in
alleys,
they're
being
left
in
parks,
they're,
just
they're
just
everywhere,
and
so
we're
really
having
a
frustration
in
code
enforcement
as
well
as
public
works
and
the
nuisance
that
these
shopping
carts
are
creating
and
the
is
really
not
taking
any
ownership
or
responsibility
and.
A
F
There's
ordinances
in
other
cities
where
they
actually
charge
fines
to
to
stores
they
charge
theft,
charges
through
police
departments.
They
also
have
ordinances
that
require
them
to
have
anti-theft
devices
where
you
can't
take
them
out
of
parking
lot.
So
I'm
pretty
sure
most
of
you
have
seen
them
all
over
the
neighborhoods,
and
we
can't
keep
up
in
this
is
not
just
homeless
people,
so
those
that
are
experiencing
difficulties,
we're
seeing
just
everyday
people
using
them
to
take
groceries
back
and
forth
and
then
leaving
them
behind
their
apartment
complexes.
H
Thank
you.
The
one
thing
when
code
member
louis
was
talking
about
the
the
stores.
I
know
that
when
I
take
an
older
lady
to
walgreens,
walgreens
rarely
has
any
carts,
but
they
were
saying
that
their
carts
cost.
It
was
somewhere
around
500
and
some
odd
dollars
a
piece
and
when
you
have
smaller
stores
like
walgreens,
but
I
know
I've
talked
to
the
people
at
king
supers
and
the
people
that
are
stealing
them
just
push
really
hard
until
it
breaks
the
wheels
to
get
across
the
parking
lot.
H
F
There
really
isn't
an
answer
and
thank
you
for
bringing
those
points
up.
It
really
has
been
difficult
and
we've
really
had
a
hard
time,
communicating
with
the
stores
to
try
and
get
their
cooperation,
whether
they
hire
someone
that
goes
in
the
neighborhoods
to
go
pick
them
up.
We
have
a
whole
graveyard
over
at
the
city
warehouse
over
at
public
works
of,
I
would
say,
a
couple
hundred
disabled
broken
carts
that
have
been
found
throughout
the
city.
H
E
Cohen
your
hand
is
raised.
Yes,.
G
Am
I
unmuted
yeah?
Yes,
I
get
confused
and
tongue-tied
when
that
happens
anyway.
It's
not
within
our
purview,
currently
shopping.
Carts
aren't
we'd
have
to
get
direction
from
the
city
council
to
take
it
up.
If
it's
something
we
could
actually
deal
with,
but
I
think
council
member
russell
is
correct.
It's
something
that
it's
not
really
part
of
our
code.
As
far
as
scooters
are
concerned.
G
That
is
a
situation
where
it
has
been
part
of
the
vehicle
code
before
those
scooters
for
a
while.
All
you
could
do
is
ride
them
on
the
sidewalk.
You
couldn't
ride
them
in
the
streets
and
then
that
changed-
and
it
also
is
not
part
of
our
purview
at
this
current
time.
G
So
it's
another
thing:
we'd
have
to
get
direction
from
city
council
for,
but
I
think
it
could
be
something
the
communication
subcommittee
could
deal
with
from
an
educational
standpoint,
and
we
do
need
to
get
the
merchants
involved
in
this
because
it's
their
stuff,
that's
being
stolen
and
they
have
security
guards
all
over
the
place,
usually
police
and
they
could
keep
an
eye
out.
And
if
somebody
tries
to
leave
the
parking
lot
with
a
cart,
they
could
stop
it.
F
Okay,
thanks
for
your
feedback,
I'm
just
concerned
because
it
is
an
extreme
drain
on
the
city
and
they
are
illegally
being
dumped
throughout
the
city
and,
as
we
deal
with
the
concerns
related
to
illegal
dumping-
and
I
know
council
is
really
working
on
this
and
we're
still
trying
to
work
out
the
details
of
a
voucher
program
to
be
announced
to
try
and
help
with
that.
F
We
are
currently
in
the
final
phases
of
implementing
a
voucher
program
that
I
believe
city
council
has
discussed
related
to
illegal
dumpings,
where
a
portion
of
the
fee
associated
with
illegal
dumping
would
be
reimbursed
to
the
owner
once
they're
able
to
file
a
police
report
and
prove
that
they've
paid
an
extra
fee
to
have
those
illegally
dumped
items
removed.
Again,
it's
it's
in
the
final
phases.
It's
not
official
to
be
announced,
but
it
is.
E
Interesting,
well,
I
don't
know
if
you've
ever
ridden
a
scooter
dave.
Your
son
certainly
will
be
shortly,
but
they
actually
encourage
you.
That's
one
of
the
selling
points
that
you
can
leave
the
scooter
wherever
you
want
and
it
will
be
picked
up
and
there's
actually
people
that
I
know
that
they
go
around
or
at
least
they
used
to.
I
don't
know
if
they
still
do
it,
but
they
go
around
it.
E
C
Sorry,
I've
tried
out
the
scooters
a
few
times
and
the
some
of
the
companies
do
require
you
to
return
them
to
certain
spots
and
some
don't,
and
I
think
that
that
may
be
a
municipal
rule.
Type
thing
too,
like
some
municipalities
do
some
kind
of
official
allowing
of
different
companies
to
operate
within
their
borders.
C
But
I've
experienced
both
where
you
could
leave
it
anywhere
and
where
you
have
to
leave
it
in
a
certain
spot
or
it's
going
to
keep
charging
you
unless
you
take
it
to
one
of
those
spots
or
it's
going
to
charge.
You
extra
so
there's
a
pretty
easy
built-in
incentive
to
make.
You
have
to
return
them
to
particular
places
based
on
how
they
charge
for
it.
H
Thank
you.
I
know
that
we
had
a
company
and
I
think
it
might
have
been
bird
scooters.
It's
been
several
months
ago
come
and
talk
to
city
council
about
the
program
and
the
bottom
line
is
currently
englewood
is
not
participating
in
the
program.
I
believe
that
littleton
is,
and
so
it
does
create
a
problem
because
they
don't
come
into
inglewood
to
pick
them
up.
Unless
someone
would
call,
I
believe,
in
and
complain
if
they
said.
H
If
they
had
a
contract
with
inglewood,
then
I
think
their
it
would
be
much
easier
for
them
to
pick
up.
So
I
think
that's
that's
part
of.
What's
going
on
with
the
problem,
you
know
people
leaving
them.
I
mean.
I
know
that,
there's
in
my
neighborhood
there's
been
two
or
three
different
bicycles,
left
they'll
put
them
in
somebody's
yard.
The
people
move
them
out
of
the
yard
they
end
up
in
the
street.
So
I
don't
know.
A
F
F
No,
those
are
more
of
the
the
trouble
sticking
areas
that
we're
having.
I
think
we're
really.
We
don't
have
any
major
suggestions
that
would
make
our
lives
easier,
like
the
ordinance
that
you
just
did
with
changing
animals
for
in
pounds
or
dealing
with
snow
or
working
on
the
trees
or
mist.
I
think
those
are
very
helpful.
I
would
I
know
you
have
this
on
your
purview.
I
think
council
has
asked
for
you
to
flush
out
a
little
bit
more
on
the
trees
and
presenting
some
ideas.
H
E
Well,
that's
that's
encouraging.
I
mean
it's
actually
encouraging
to
me
because
you
know
we've
done
this
exercise.
You
know
every
year
for
the
past,
for
I
think
four
or
five
years
now
and
pretty
much
everything
that
city
council
has
requested
or
code
enforcement
has
brought
to.
Our
attention
has
been
addressed.
E
So
that's
really
encouraging
to
me,
but,
as
you
can
see,
some
of
the
priorities
that
we
had
identified
for
2021
three
of
them
are
currently
in
progress.
One
is
you
know
tree
and
shrub
code
in
anticipation
of
eab,
secondly,
dangerous
dog
code
and
thirdly,
to
review
bylaws
and
we'll
still
keep
that
on
there,
because
we
know
we
have
to
do
it
in
2022..
I
can't
believe
I
just
said
that
word
2022.
E
further
things
that
we
had
put
on
our
radar
and
did
not
get
to
number
four
is
committee
guidelines
for
communication
with
the
community,
especially
regarding
community
inquiries,
and
this
specifically
relates
to
social
media
conversations
that
come
up
on
instagram
or
with
twitter
or
on
next
door.
E
A
lot
of
a
lot
of
it
happens
regarding
code
and
currently
we
do
not
respond
to
those.
Nor
is
the
city
allowed
to
respond
to
those,
and
the
idea
here
was
that
do
do
we
want
to
put
in
a
procedure
in
place
where,
when
we
see
something
come
up
regarding
code,
that
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
steps
up
as
the
authoritative
resource
on
everything
code
and
try
and
answer
those
questions
for
the
community.
E
Secondly,
the
remainder
was
animal
licensing
and
I
would
propose
that
we
take
this
off
of
our
priority,
because
we
know
that
that
is
something
now
that
is
being
addressed
at
the
city
level
and
if
it
does
come
into
play,
actually
maybe
we
leave
it
on
because
if
it
does
come
into
play,
that
definitely
will
impact
code,
but
only
if
the
city
decides
to
go
that
direction.
E
Let
me
comment
on
that.
Nope.
Okay,
there
was
a
request
to
update
the
ally,
weeds
ordinance
and
I
can't
remember
why
we
felt
like
there
was
a
need
to
update
the
alley:
slash
weeds
ordinance,
colleen.
Of
course
you
remember.
Thank
you.
G
Specifically
that
we
ever
even
put
that
on
as
a
priority,
because
ally
is
a
whole
different
ball
of
wax
and
the
weed
ordinance
is
the
weed
ordinance
and
it
doesn't
need
to
be
updated
unless
we
want
to
increase
the
height
of
weeds
or
specifically
eliminate
certain
types
of
grass
like
native
grasses.
A
E
I
you
know,
I
honestly
cannot
recall
why
we
that
that
ended
up
there
and
I
I
would
actually
have
to
go
back
to
our
minutes,
and
I
didn't
do
that
before
our
meeting.
So
I
I'm
actually
going
to
leave
that
as
an
open
item
and
let
me
see
if
I
can't
get
some
more
background
on
that
to
give
it
the
respect
it
deserves.
E
Number
seven
was
title
vii
chapter,
one
on
public
safety,
animals
and
foul
in
general.
That
was
relating
to
some
changes
that
we
were
looking
at
to
be
in
line
with
state
law,
and
it
had
to
do
specifically
with
off
leash
co-manager
louis.
Do
you
have
any
insight
here.
F
Yes,
I
I
think
it
possibly
could
be
taken
off
of
your
radar.
F
We
do
have
a
new
deputy
city
attorney,
who
does
specialize
in
a
lot
of
different
areas
in
one
area
that
they
will
most
likely
evaluate
within
the
next
year.
To
two
would
be
some
changes
to
title
seven,
but
I
think
the
major
changes
that
needed
to
be
done.
This
body
has
already
addressed
to
make
sure
our
jobs
are
easier.
I
know
that
there
were
some
concerns
about
changing
parking
dogs
to
be
more
consistent.
F
It
would
probably,
if
you
remember
the
chicken
discussion,
this
would
probably
go
down
that
path
where
you
may
not
be
able
to
make
any
progress,
because
it
is
so
taxing
that
the
city
attorney's
office
may
need
to
want
to
review
that
make
some
adjustments
because
it
has
been,
I
don't
know,
20
years
and
then
bring
that
forward
to
you
all.
That
would
be
my
suggestion.
E
Thank
you
coin.
Yeah.
G
The
there
we
made
a
change
domestic,
you
know
to
domesticated
animals,
but
they
didn't
follow
through
on
10,
11
and
14
of
1a.
G
It
still
says
dogs
and
cats
there.
So
we
need
to
ask
them
to
finish
the
job
and
change
that
to
domestic
animals,
but
there
are
some
changes
that
need
to
be
made
because
we
made
that
change.
G
But
that's
up
to
the
committee.
If
we're
going
to
do
any
comprehensive
review,
which
is
our
job,
is
to
do
a
comprehensive
review
and
just
changing
that
one
from
dogs
and
cats
to
domesticated
animals
actually
made
it
really
hard
to.
I
think
it
just
needs
to
be
reviewed
and
we
at
least
need
to
get
them.
E
Okay,
thank
you
cohen,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
leave
that
on
the
eighth
item
that
we
had
identified.
That
was
based
on
the
recommendation
from
the
trash
committee
that
is
looking
like
at
a
single
source
provider,
and
we
put
that
on
our
radar
in
case
that
proposal
came
through
and
there
would
be
changes
needed
to
support
that
that
revision
and
I
so
I
would
recommend
keeping
it
on
because
that's
that
proposal
has
not
come
through
yet
is.
Would
that
be
right?
Carson
I
mean.
E
I
Yeah
hi,
I
just
wanted
to
ask
on
you
know
the
point
that
callie
makes
on
the
you
know
the
dogs
and
cats
definition,
and
I
know
this
came
up
a
while
ago.
Did
we
ever
get
a
new
city
attorney?
Does
anybody
know?
Yes,
we
did
all
right.
E
I
I
E
I
E
Have
to
identify
that
doesn't
mean
yeah
that
doesn't
mean
yeah.
That
doesn't
mean
we
can't
have
a
conversation
with
her
and
give
her
a
heads
up
and
she
may
say
I'm
just
going
to
go
ahead
and
take
care
of
it,
because
it's
obviously
needs
to
be
updated.
But
just
you
know
from
a
process
perspective.
That's
that's!
What's
supposed
to
happen.
E
Kara
dave.
F
Just
to
give
you
that
update-
and
I
I
don't
think
I
explained
it
properly
so
when
you
all
made
the
adjustment
that
already
triggered
the
review
of
the
rest
of
the
title
because
of
missing
the
city
attorney
for
a
while
and
not
having
that
deputy
city
attorney
that
specializes
in
that
area,
like
our
previous
one,
did,
that
has
kind
of
been
put
on
the
side
due
to
some
other
pressing
matters
within
the
city.
So
the
title,
seven,
reorganization
and
slight
updates
is
still
in
process.
F
We
have
had
conversations
about
it,
it's
just
not
in
the
phase
where
we
can
present
it,
yet
only
because
we're
basically
triaging
a
bunch
of
other
things
within
the
city.
I
guess
is
the
best
way
to
put
it.
E
Thank
you
so,
at
this
point
we've
this.
That
was
our
2021
priorities.
The
only
other
thing
I
can
think
of
is
you
know,
based
on
what
I've
been
hearing
is
the
off-leash
excuse
me
task
force
recommendation
I
want
to
sneeze,
but
I
don't
want
to
sneeze
that
proposal.
I
think,
is
going
back
to
city
council
and
it
may
also
impact
code.
Would
we
want
to
put
that
on
our
radar
when
that
proposal
comes
out.
E
H
Actually
I
apologize
for
not
giving
an
update
on
this.
Two
weeks
ago
we
passed
a
resolution
of
changing
the
off
leash
dog
parks
and
then
this
last
monday
night
it
got
changed
to
an
ordinance
by
really
one
council
member
wanted
to
make
it
an
ordinance,
and
so
everybody
agreed.
So
we
voted
on
first
reading
this
last
monday
night,
really
taking
away
awfully
privileges
at
centennial
park
altogether.
H
There
is
a
permanent
fence
going
up
in
jason
park
and
then
a
temporary
fence
during
certain
seasons
for
the
ball
field
at
jason
park,
and
then
there
is
a
permanent
fence
going
to
go
up
from
dunkin
park
splitting
the
park
in
half
and
so
the
off
leash
dogs
would
have
half
of
it.
So
it
already
has
gone
to
an
ordinance,
and
so
I
mean
it
is
possible
that
when
a
new
council
is
seated
that
could
change,
it
also
could
change.
H
I
think
part
of
the
reason
the
council
member
that
really
wanted
to
bring
it
forward
is
an
ordinance
would
give
the
citizens
an
opportunity
to
do
a
referendum.
You
can
do
a
referendum
on
a
an
ordinance,
but
not
on
a
resolution
so,
but
it
also
then
becomes
codified
into
law
and
it
will
be
written
in
the
munich
code
when
it's
an
ordinance,
so
so
for
right
now
it's
going
to
be,
I
mean
I,
I
think,
probably
whatever
happens.
H
If,
if
nothing
happens
to
change
it
council
may
look
at
this
again
in
a
year
just
to
see
how
it's
working.
I
know
that
a
lot
of
the
off
leash
dog
people
are
not
happy,
but
so
we'll
we'll
go
from
there,
but
so
it
has
been
taken
care
of,
to
a
certain
extent.
H
The
ordinance
will
not
be
under
parks,
it
will
be
written
under
dogs-
I
I
think,
but
it
if
we'd
have
left
it
as
a
resolution.
It
would
have
been
under
parks
you're
exactly
right
about
that.
But
because
it's
been,
I
don't
know
what
title
it
will
go
under,
but
it
will
be
written
into
the
munich
code.
I
don't
think
it's
under
parks,
but
you
might
be
right.
I
don't
know
for.
G
Sure,
but
it's
a
park
rule
is
what
I'm
saying,
and
so
it
will
it'll
it's
the
parks
department.
That's
doing
it.
It's
mentioned
in
title
11,
the
park's
title
where
they
did
a
rule
about
leashing
dogs
in
parks
and.
G
G
H
G
That's
only
for
at
large
dogs,
so
how's
it
amending
that
if
it's
a
park
rule
there's
something
screwy
about
that.
Yeah.
E
We
don't
need
to
cover
that
here,
I'm
just
going
to
put
it
on
our
list
of
things
to
look
into
if
necessary,
and
I
think
dave.
You
had
your
hand
raised.
E
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
the
committee
now:
are
there
any
priorities
that
we
haven't
already
discussed,
that
you
think
that
we
should
put
on
our
priority
list
for
2022.
G
Colleen
yeah
on
the
next
page
from
2020,
you
said,
considered
and
removed
I'd
like
to
look
into
title
15
on
vehicles,
because
the
citizens
initiative
of
2011,
which
repealed
a
particular
code
that
had
been
an
ordinance
that
had
been
done
in
2011..
G
It
says
that
it
was
done
by
a
vote
of
the
people,
but
those
two
things
do
not
reflect
what
the
citizen
initiative
said.
There
were.
There
was
a
real
problem
when
they
put
the
citizen
initiative
in.
G
Revised
accordingly,
that
was
the
only
one
that
should
have
been
revised
and
it
wasn't
and
they
took
out
a
lot
of
the
model
transportation
code
out
of
the
title
11
on
vehicles
and
transportation.
G
A
E
Otherwise,
what
I'm
going
to
do
we're
running
out
of
time
here,
I'm
going
to
update
this
list
and
then
at
our
next
meeting
we
can
prioritize.
You
know
the
first
couple
things
and
see
where
we
stand.
E
I
had
a
sorry:
where
did
I
stop?
How
did
that
happen?
Prioritize,
okay,
okay,
priority
so
I'll
put
together
our
list
and
we'll
address
we'll
finalize
that
at
our
next
meeting
we're
running
out
of
time-
and
I
wanted
to
give
you
an
update
on
our
council
presentation
and
then
I
had
a
question
about
procedure
from
council
liaison
russell
on
how
we
move
forward.
So
briefly,
the
carson
and
I
presented
a
city
council
on
the
24th.
E
I
believe
something
like
that
and
the
presentation
went
very
well.
The
council
received
our
input
and,
and
they
were
very
grateful
for
the
all
the
work
that
had
been
done
by
this
committee.
There
were
some
really
good
questions
raised.
If
you
haven't
looked
at
it,
I
I
suggest
you
do,
and
but
there
were
some
follow-up
tasks
that
they
are
asking
us
to
provide,
and
I
listed
up
what
those
tasks
are.
My
question
to
to
you
rita
is:
how
do
we
go
about
that?
E
H
I
totally
spaced
that
out
and
so
aren't
in
this
is
it
on
page,
like
26
the
items
to
consider.
E
We
did
there,
there
was
no
material
we
well.
There
was
no
material
in
the
agenda
packet
on
this
item.
I
just
was
going
to
share
with
everybody
what
council
asked
us
to
do,
but
when
we
do
it,
I'm
not
sure
how
to
present
it
back
to
council.
Is
that
a
separate
presentation
or
do
we
respond
in
memo
form.
C
Your
list
is,
I
was
just
going
to
say,
I
remember
russell.
The
list
that
chair
bowdoin
put
is
on
page
two,
the
unfinished
business
a1
is
the
list
of
what
council
asked
us
for?
Isn't
that
right
share
button.
H
Okay,
so
I
mean
I
guess
what,
when
you
address
those,
I
you
know,
if
you
do
it
in
a
meeting,
you
actually
could
send
that
information
to
council.
H
I
believe
the
city
attorney
should
be
working
on
it
right
and
bringing
back
what
you
all
asked
for
is
that
correct.
E
In
terms
of
code,
yes,
but
these
were,
this
was
really
more
information
about
what
other
cities
are
doing,
that
that
mayor
olson
asked
us.
One
of
them
was
to
do
a
matrix
on
code,
comparison
and
program,
comparison
between
the
cities
that
we
had
researched,
okay,
and
so
I'm
saying
we're
from
we
can
do
it.
I
just
don't
know
how
to
send
it
back
whether
it's
some
reason.
H
E
I
think
we'll
follow
that
path
of
action.
You
know,
even
though
mayor
olson
requested
it
it's
something
that
maybe
the
rest
of
council
and
the
new
mayor
would
want
to
have
that
information,
so
we'll
we'll
we'll
plan
on
moving
forward
with
that.
E
Thank
you
we're
over
our
scheduled
time.
So
I'm
going
to
oh,
let's
schedule
our
next
meeting,
which
I
believe
will
be
november.
What
did
I
say?
I
looked
at
that
18th
17th.
E
Right
yeah
november
17th,
because
the
following
week
is
thanksgiving
all
right
so
with
that,
I'm
going
to
call
this
meeting
to
close
and
thank
you
all
very
much
for
your
attention
and
input
today
and
allowing
me
to
transport
from
work
back
to
home
so
that
we
could
finish
the
call
have
a
have
a
good
weekend
bye.
Thank
you.