►
From YouTube: CEAC 12-15-2021 Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
C
C
D
C
Yeah,
so
I'm
I'm
registered
with
on
twitter
with
the
city
and
instagram,
so
whenever
they
post
anything,
I
get
it.
So
they
posted
a
picture
of
that.
Let's
go
ahead
and
get
started.
It
looks
like
we've
got
plenty
of
people
we're
the
lucky
ones
that
have
power.
C
C
Inc
they
don't.
They
have
a
yeah
there's
some
in
inglewood.
If
you
they
have
a
map
that
they
give
you.
Okay,
that
identifies
the
the
areas
that
don't
have
power.
So
I.
E
Believe,
if
any
of
you
guys
know
a
good
fence
guy,
my
back
fence
blew
over
today.
C
C
E
A
C
Okay,
let's
go
ahead
and
get
started.
I
want
to
welcome
everybody
and
call
this
regular
meeting
of
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
on
this
december
15th
2021..
D
F
C
C
H
Hi
good
evening,
everyone,
it's
good
to
see
you
first
off,
I
overheard
some
of
you
speaking
about
the
current
weather
events.
The
city
has
been
extremely
busy,
including
code
enforcement.
Today,
we've
had
multiple
trees,
power
lines,
fencing
that
has
blown
down
animals
that
have
been
out
and
about
that
we've
needed
to
reunite.
A
H
A
whole
providing
traffic
support
where
we
needed
to
close
down
streets
temporarily,
as
well
as
making
sure
that
families
are
reunited
with
their
pets.
So
we
had
a
full
team
here
today
and
it's
a
good
thing,
because
we
we've
been
busy
since
around
nine
o'clock
this
morning
and
it's
all
happened
on
a
major
trash
day.
So
trash
is
blowing
around
the
neighborhoods.
Trash
cans
have
fallen
over.
It
really
is
going
to
take
some
time
to
clean
up
and
to
assess
the
damages
that
have
happened
in
the
city.
H
H
H
We
are
continuing
to
take
the
stance
of
education.
We
do
not
have
in
this
latest
mandate.
The
city
has
no
enforcement
authority
other
than
to
provide
education.
The
enforcement
is
completely
civil.
At
this
point
and
with
some
particular
businesses,
their
licensing
could
be
in
jeopardy,
whether
it's
a
liquor
license
or
other
types
of
state
regulated
license
or
tri-county.
Health
correctly
try
county
health
licensing,
but
as
of
right
now
we
are
seeing
an
overwhelming
voluntary
compliance,
we're
seeing
a
few
spot
situations
here
and
there,
but
overwhelming
I
think
the
community
we're
tired
of
this.
H
I
mean
we're
all
tired.
We
all
have
coveted
fatigue
and
we're
all
doing
the
best
that
we
can
we're
really
trying
to
be
empathetic
and
polite
and
professional
when
working
with
businesses
body
cameras.
As
you
all
know,
we've
been
up
and
running
for
a
little
over
a
month.
I
can
report
that
it
is
a
very
successful
program.
H
We
are
being
able
to
utilize
these
not
only
for
cases
and
for
testimony
within
court,
but
these
are
public
records.
Should
they
be
needed
for
particular
reasons
and
meet
certain
criteria,
so
we're
quite
happy
that
we
have
them.
It
really
demonstrates
the
level
of
training
and
professionalism
that
our
code
enforcement
officers
receive,
especially
when
dealing
with
people
who,
who
may
not
have
had
any
education
in
the
past
about
code
enforcement
at
time.
H
At
times
you
all
know
it
can
be
a
bit.
Stressful
people
really
do
take
pride
in
their
homes
and
their
animals,
and
it's
very
difficult
to
receive
direction
from
a
government
agency,
and
so
it
just
it
highlights
how
professional
we
are
in
working
with
those
individuals,
not
just
from
the
standpoint
of
providing
education
but
making
sure
we
do
follow
up
when
necessary,
especially
with
certain
victims
of
crimes
that
we
experience.
So
I
couldn't
be
happier
with
that
program.
H
Evictions
have
started
back
up
again
within
the
city
of
inglewood,
which
has
impacted
the
code
enforcement
division.
The
sheriff's
office
is
a
pro
doing
approximately
50
evictions
per
day
within
arapahoe
county.
That
has
impacted
citizens
here
in
inglewood
inglewood
is
doing
everything
that
they
can
to
connect
people
with
resources.
Before
this
this
takes
place,
as
well
as
the
the
arapahoe
county
sheriff's
office.
We
don't
want
to
ever
see
somebody
lose
a
place
to
live,
especially
currently
in
her
current
climate.
H
H
And
then
next
would
be
statistics
and
I
wanted
to
see
if
there
were
any
specific
questions
I
did
combine,
because
I
was
late
with
october.
You'll
see
I'm
going
to
be
doing
the
year
to
date,
so
you'll
see
october
and
november
in
that
report
that
we
sent
you
and
I'm
not
seeing
any
unusual
trends
with
the
statistics.
H
H
Property
conditions
that
had
dumping
an
overwhelming
amount
of
debris,
other
items
that
may
have
been
on
the
properties
and
towards
the
end
of
beginning
of
october.
We
still
because
we
were
in
the
growing
season
and
didn't
have
snow.
Yet
we
did
do
some
weed
grass
and
overgrowth
and
weed
abatements
within
the
city.
H
Any
and
all
park
rules
violations.
Since
we
brought
on
the
park
ranger,
we
needed
a
way
to
capture
those
violations,
and
so
that
could
be
anything
from
somebody
smoking
in
a
park
to
perhaps
burning
on
a
no
burn
day.
So
they
we
had
several
days
that
we
did
not
have
or
allow
for
any
kind
of
grilling
within
the
parks
and
we
bagged
them.
So
it
could
be
those
violations.
H
It
could
be
animals
that
may
be
aggressive
towards
wildlife
or
wildlife
issues.
We're
really
trying
to
capture
most
of
that
stuff
within
the
park,
rules,
violation
and
there's
a
whole
long
list
of
them.
I
probably
should
send
that
to
the
body
to
be
distributed,
because
there
are
a
host
of
them
from
what
you
can
do
at
centennial
park
on
the
lake
to
up
to
and
including
the
type
of
leash
or
how
long
the
length
of
your
leash
must
be
for
utilizing
a
park.
B
H
Code
enforcement
was
also
nominated
for
award
for
outstanding
team
contribution
and
and
that
stemmed
from
a
lot
of
our
work
with
communications
and
walter
wednesdays,
and
getting
a
lot
of
really
changing
and
flipping
the
conversation
about
how
and
this
body
specifically
too
changing
the
conversation
where
people
understand
and
recognize
the
importance
of
code
enforcement,
the
code
enforcement
and
park
ranger
and
how
we
contribute
to
the
community
in
a
positive
way
and
and
the
professional
steps
that
we
continue
to
take
towards
our
profession.
So
you
all
deserve
a
big.
H
C
F
Yeah,
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
You
mentioned
us
something
about
the
up
crime.
What
crimes
do
you
actually
deal
with.
F
Yeah,
you
said
that
we
there
was
an
uptick
of
crime
in
inglewood
and
that
something
about
your
professionalism
and
dealing
with
this.
H
So
maybe
I
was
mistaken
in
utilizing
that
I,
I
think
it's
also
under
important
to
understand
when
it
comes
to
collaborative
work
with
the
police
department.
The
code
enforcement
division
is
is
the
first
line
defense
in
keeping
larger
crimes
from
occurring
within
the
city
of
inglewood.
H
We
it's
a
national
statistic,
studied
science
that
when
you
utilize
the
broken
windows,
theory
that
if
you
have
an
increase
in
code
enforcement
violations,
it
sometimes
can
attract
other
more
serious
crimes
or
it
could
be
a
nexus
for
other
crimes.
And
so
we
really
do
evaluate
those
those
hot
spot
maps.
We
work
closely
with
the
impact
team
and
we
receive
referrals.
F
Oh,
thank
you
very
much.
My
second
question
is
you
said
the
code
enforcement
division
got
nominated
for
four
awards:
who's
the
nominating
organization
and
who's
going
to
award
those
awards.
H
For
an
award,
not
four
awards
for
an
award-
and
this
is
a
peer,
recognized
city
award
and
it
was
a.
F
Nomination,
okay,
now,
my
final
question
is
that
I've
been
hearing
from
several
people,
mostly
englewood,
unleashed
that
there
were
179
park
violations,
jason
park
dog
park
violations,
but
nobody's
ever
been
able
to
find
out
what
those
were,
and
apparently
that
was
reported
to
city
council.
I
wasn't
a
party
to
that.
I
didn't
know
anything
about
it,
but
it
came
up
again
in
a
in
a
conversation
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
have,
if
you
were
able
to
provide
that
information
to
council,
can
you
provide
it
to
us
specifically.
H
I
am
not
in
a
position
to
have
a
conversation.
That's
already
been
rehashed
with
city
council
and
city
councils
already
made
those
decisions
that
information
was
provided
in
the
council
request.
You
can
you're
happy
to
look
at
the
council
requests
regarding
enforcement.
All
of
that
information
was
captured
under
a
council
request
that
council
member
wink
made
and
was
a
made
available
to
all
of
council.
C
D
Worries,
congratulations,
code
manager
list,
I'm
glad
we
have
your
leadership
in
the
city.
You
deserve
that.
I
have
a
few
questions.
One
was
back
on
the
body
cams,
so
doesn't
the
state
rules
make
it
so
that
the
recordings
automatically
become
available
or
something
like
that
or
how
does
that
work?
If
someone
wants
to
view
a
recording
of
a
body
cam.
H
So
the
state
law
does
not
apply
to
the
code
enforcement
division
because
we
are
not
post
certified
peace
officers,
so
the
rules
regarding
officers
are
different
than
those
that
would
be
filed
under
their
criminal
justice
records.
Recording
a.
D
Reporting
act:
okay,
thank
you,
and
so,
if
someone
did
want
to
view
a
code
enforcement
body,
cam
recording,
would
it
be
like
a
quora
request
or
how
would
it
work.
H
So
code
enforcement
cases
do
not
fall
under
quora,
they
do
fall
under
criminal
justice
records
reporting
you
any
citizen
can
come
and
request
the
copy
of
a
police
report
from
the
code
enforcement
department
by
coming
to
the
police
department
or
going
online
to
submit
that
request.
There
is
a
fee
for
that.
H
Yes
and
I'm
not
sure
of
the
cost
associated
with
the
video,
but
somebody
could
request
that
information.
D
H
There
are
certain
that
just
want
to
point
out.
There
are
certain
exceptions
so
like
if
it
involves,
if
we
happen,
to
respond
to
a
case
that
has
criminal
activity
that
might
involve
a
minor
or
domestic
violence
or
some
type
of
medical
condition.
Those
are
usually
excluded.
So
if
we
were
to
enter
a
home
where
someone
may
be
incapacitated
or
may
have
passed
away,
some
of
those
videos
may
not
that's.
An
example
may
not
be
available
to
the
public.
D
Okay,
thank
you
on
the
statistics.
I
I
think
you've
answered
this
before,
but
it's
not
in
my
head
very
clear:
if
do
you
always
only
tick
a
single
category
or
if
something
apply
like
an
animal
violation
in
a
park?
Would
that
only
tick
the
the
park
one
and
not
the
the
relevant
animal
one
or
would
it
tick
both
of
them.
H
This
primarily
captures
the
most
severe
or
the
primary
case
that
we
would
open
under
that
report.
So,
for
example,
if
we
were
to
go
to
a
home-
and
we
the
most
serious
issue
at
that
time-
was
a
dog
bite
that
would
be
categorized
as
a
dog
bite.
But
then
there's
multiple
extra
charges
we
can
add.
The
statistic
is
only
captured
under
the
primary
case,
so
they
could
have
outdoor
storage
grass
and
weeds
trash.
H
D
Oh
interesting,
so
if
you
went
to
a
home
to
deal
with
a
dog
bite,
but
then
you
identified
other
violations,
those
would
all
be
under
the
dog
bite.
It
wouldn't
be
separate
recordings
of
the
other
violations
that
you,
identifier,.
H
We
can't
distinguish
between
a
case
because
it's
just
like
a
police
case,
so
it's
per
incident
so
I'll
use
the
extreme
example
of
a
police
case.
You
go
to
a
shoplifting,
you
see
somebody
that's
been
shoplifting,
then
you
get
into
a
foot
pursuit
they
carjack
someone.
H
Then
they
go
down
the
street
and
they
crash
all
of
that's
captured
into
one
primary
report.
But
this
statistic
is
reported
from
the
primary
major
violation,
because
that's
the
way
the
case
would
be
filed.
D
H
We
could
potentially
run
into
situations
we
run
into
this
a
lot
where
we
may
run
into
somebody
that
has
been
reported
for
barking
dog.
It
turns
out
that
they
have
now
six
animals
they
may
be
living
in
in
conditions.
That
would
be
considered
cruelty
and
neglect.
So
we
would
take
the
most
severe
of
that,
which
would
be
the
cruelty,
neglect
and
categorize
that
under
that,
because
it's
the
higher
of
the
categories.
D
Okay
and
then
I'm
curious
about
the
procedure
that
and
like
what
the
rules
are
around
barking
dogs.
Can
you
give
us
like
a
high
like
a
high
level
of
how
that
works?
Someone
reports
a
barking
dog
when
is
that
a
problem?
Is
there
a
decibel
limit?
Is
there
a
time
limit?
What
is
the
procedure
for
dealing
with
those
type
of
reports.
H
And
so
my
observations
or
the
observations
of
a
police
officer
do
not
count
as
the
neighborhood.
So
we
can't
write
a
violation
solely
based
on
an
observation.
We
have
to
have
two
or
more
separate
residents,
complain
and
be
willing
to
testify
in
court,
because
it's
the
way
that
it's
been
written
constitutes
a
nuisance
of
the
neighborhood.
H
It's
very
complicated.
The
city
manager
has
directed
the
city
attorney's
office
to
evaluate
that
and
we're
looking
to
make
a
change
that
maybe
come
before
council
directly,
but
it
would
involve
only
one
complainant,
but
they
would
need
to
provide
be
able
to
one
testify
how
the
nuisance
is,
how
it
impacts
them
and
provide
additional
proof,
such
as
a
video
recording
ring,
recording
or
something
to
that
effect.
H
Coupled
with
our
observations
that
way,
we're
not
running
into
this
concern
that
we
have
now
where
we
may
only
have
one
neighbor
complaining
about
the
nuisance,
but
nobody
else
wants
to
cooperate
and
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
right
now
is.
Is
we
run
into
that
frequently
where
one
neighbor
gets
frustrated,
that
the
others
don't
want
to
file
a
complaint
or
be
a
part
of
a
complaint?
D
Interesting
yeah,
I
didn't
realize
that
was
a
currently
potentially
updated
thing,
but
I
can
I'm
aware
of
a
couple,
a
situation
where
a
single
person
could
be
the
one
who's
affected,
so
that
does
make
sense.
Thank
you
and
then
I
have
one
more
question.
I
had
a
neighbor
ask
me
about
the
the
rules
and
how
they're
enforced
around
trash
and
recycling
bins
and
where
they're
kept
etcetera.
H
So
trash
bins
cannot
be
put
on
on
the
front
street
side
of
your
property
until
24
hours
prior
to
or
after
your
trash
service.
H
We
are
running
into
some
concerns
regarding
alleyway
pickup
versus
street
side
pickup,
where
that
has
been
refused
by
trash
hauling
services.
H
That
some
type
of
a
resolution
or
conclusion
to
the
single
hauler
service
comes
up,
because
I
do
realize
that
there's
quite
a
few
things
that
are
in
that
rfp
and
the
conditions
that
do
require
going
back
to
alley
side.
The
way
the
city
was
designed
versus
street
side.
Only-
and
this
is
a
very
heated
conversation-
I'm
sure
some
of
you-
some
of
you-
have
actually
participated
in
those
conversations
and
it's
been
set
before
council.
So
I'm
not
sure
what
the
next
steps
are
when
that's
bringing
being
brought
forward.
D
G
Hi
hi,
my
quick
question
is
this:
is
back
to
what
carson
was
talking
about
with
the
multiple
violations
in
a
single,
stop
or
incident.
G
G
H
H
We
are
going
through
some
upgrades
to
the
rms
system
in
january,
and
so
that
would
be
something
that
I
would
bring
forward
to
ask
is
how
can
we
better
capture
multiple
violations,
rather
than
just
a
single
incident
track?
H
It
had
the
same
issues,
the
old
system,
where
we
can
only
capture
one
case,
and
I
think
that
also
comes
down
to
the
way
that
we
would
need
to
move
forward
with
enforcement
and
the
judicial
portion,
because
everything
has
to
be
captured
in
one
case
and
presented
to
the
court
in
one
case,
because
then
we
run
into
issues
regarding
some
constitutional
law
and
multiple
cases
over
multiple
days
could
potentially
jeopardize
the
case.
G
H
We
so
that's
also
a
great
question
parking.
We
have
to
capture
separately
a
parking
violation,
be
completely
separate
than
what
would
be
on
the
on
the
property,
so
that
would
be
two
different
cases,
because
the
ticket
itself
is
a
summons
and
gets
generated
separately.
So
those
that's
one
statistic
that
would
have
already
pulled
out
separately,
but
that's
a
good
point.
C
Okay,
further
questions
for
code
manager,
lewis
seeing
none.
Then
we
will
proceed
to
our
next
topic,
which
is
an
update
from
our
city
council
liaison,
rita
russell.
I
Thank
you
very
much.
First
of
all,
I
too
would
like
to
congratulate
code
supervisor
lewis,
our
code
manager
on
your
award,
and
I
do
appreciate
codes,
work
and
also
the
work
of
this
committee.
I
The
council,
the
last
council
meeting
on
monday
night,
was
the
last
council
meeting
for
the
year.
We
will
resume
city
council
meetings
on
january
4th
and
actually
we
will
be
back
in
council
chambers
on
january
4th.
I
We
have
not
been
there
in
probably
almost
two
years,
I
think
in
march,
when
we
quit
meeting
and
then
even
when
we
came
back
to
city
hall,
they're
updating
some
of
the
equipment
in
council
chambers,
but
that
will
be
done
hopefully-
and
I
just
I
wanted
to
bring
up
tri-county
health
because
tri-county
health
is
going
to
be
disbanded
on
december
31st
of
this
year.
I
State
law
requires
that
all
counties
must
have
a
health
department,
and
so
the
county
commissioners
right
now
are
working
on
developing
a
health
department
for
the
county
itself,
and
so
we
don't
know
what
that's
going
to
look
like
yet.
But
we
have
been
assured
that
we
will
have
one
because
it's
required
by
state
law,
but
tri-county
health
is
is
going
away.
I
I
think
that's
all
that
I
have
oh
boarding.
Commission
interviews
will
be
january
10th
and
11th
so
anyway.
That
is
my
update.
Unless
you
all
have
some
questions.
C
I
had
I
had
a
question
rita.
Why
is
tri
tri-county
health
going
on
a
way
I
mean?
I
know
douglas
county
opted
out
because
they
were
frustrated
with
the
with
the
decisions
and
the
mandates
that
were
coming
out,
but
I
wasn't
aware
that
arapaho
and
adams
county
had
the
same
concerns.
Was
it
just
because
one.
I
Well,
really,
I
believe
that
douglas
county
withdrawing
put
financial
pressure
on
the
system,
because
douglas
county
is
a
very
big
county
and
there
that's
a
lot
of
money
and
then,
in
october,
adams,
county
withdrew
also
so
that
left
arapahoe
county
by
themselves.
So
it
really
and
perhaps
douglas
county
precipitated
the
whole
thing.
So
that's
basically,
I
think
why.
F
Yeah
I'm
kind
of
confused
because
I
thought
douglas
county
said
that
they
were
still
under
contract
and
paid
to
try
county
health
for
another
year.
I
Yeah,
you
know
we
have
not
been
updated
on
that,
so
I
don't
really
know
what's
going
to
happen.
I
remember
hearing
that
also,
but
we
have
gotten
an
email,
so
I
mean
it
could
be
that
some.
I
There
may
be
an
interim
position
where
I
don't
know.
Perhaps
code
manager
lewis
knows
the
answer
to
that
question.
Regarding.
H
The
finances
it
it
becomes
very
confusing
and
without
getting
into
too
many
political
weeds,
because
each
county
has
its
own
set
of
governments
and
their
own
elected
officials,
and
they
do
what's
best
for
their
cities
and
their
counties.
I'm
gonna
look
at
this
and
this
is
the
way
I'm
gonna,
because
code
enforcement
works
very
closely
with
tri
county.
Let's
take
out
the
covid
component,
we
work
very
closely
on
a
number
of
things,
and
so
this
is
a.
H
H
Not
only
are
they
responsible
for
the
food
safety
they're
responsible
for
restaurants,
food
handling,
other
vaccination
programs,
secession
programs,
smoking
reduction,
programs,
childhood
immunizations,
education,
communicable
diseases,
specifically
regarding
animals.
So
this
is
I'm
looking
at
this
as
a
win-win.
H
Yes,
it's
sad
that
this
long
standing
historical
program
has
ended,
but
I'm
looking
at
it
from
the
standpoint
is
arapahoe
county
and
the
citizens
of
inglewood
are
going
to
get
the
services
that
they
deserve
in
a
more
focused,
more
clear,
more
concise
manner
that
our
citizens
request
and
our
elected
officials
are
going
to
hold
them
accountable.
For
so
I
think
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
very
positive.
I
So,
and
I
do,
I
am
aware
that
there
are
a
lot
of
things
that
that
we
need
a
health
department
for
so
anyway,
I
think
moving
forward,
it's
going
to
be
fine
in
the
financial
situation.
They'll
they'll
work
that
all
out,
because
there's
contracts
and
stuff
people
enter
into
so
I'm
sure
that's
all
governed
by
that.
So
thank
you.
C
G
Yes,
but
you
answered
the
question
it
was
about.
It
was
about
the
contracts
and
the
timing,
because
the
end
of
this
year
obviously
would
mean
a
couple
more
weeks
and.
C
Further
questions
for
rita
russell
seeing
none
then
we
will
move
forward
to
communications
topics
so
recognizing
monica
on
as
chair
of
the
subcommittee
on
communications.
E
How's
that
you
hear
me
yes,
okay,
hi
everyone,
robert,
it's
nice
to
hear
you
chime
in
tonight
and
manager.
Louis
congratulations!
You
guys
deserve
recognition
for
all
the
good
work
and
thankless
work
that
you
do
so.
Thank
you,
okay.
E
So
here's
what
I
have
in
the
next
magazine,
I
talked
with
vanessa
and
she's,
going
to
get
articles
put
in
about
mitigating
weeds
before
they
get
out
of
hand
per
manager,
lewis's
recommendation
and
also
we're
gonna
hit
home
on
the
emerald
ash
borer
again
and
just
start
up
that
whole
thing
that
we
did
last
year
and
so
that's
just
kind
of
its
own
thing.
Now
they
take
care
of
it,
and
then
I
spoke
with
dave
lee
today
for
about
your
questions
regarding
our
tree
city
status
and
I'll.
E
Just
tell
you
everything
he
told
me
and
then
you
can
ask
questions
if
you
have
any.
First
of
all,
our
most
current
application
for
tree
city
status
went
in
october
and
the
state
forester
says
it
is
okay,
and
if
the
state
forester
says
it's
okay,
it's
pretty
much
a
go.
E
Julie
shared
with
me,
an
email
that
dave
lee
had
communicated
prior
about
the
first
requirement
to
be
a
tree
city
which
is
having
a
entity
that
could
be
a
controlling
board
or
city
arborist,
and
we
do
satisfy
that
criteria
according
to
the
state
forester
and
that
entity
is
the
parks
and
recreation
committee.
Who
is
happy
to
do
that
and
will
continue
to
do
that
and
they
have
an
arborist
on
that
controlling
body.
E
E
E
E
Most
of
the
trees
that
are
coming
in
are
around
a
hundred
dollars
and
they're
selling
them
for
30
each
this
year.
They
did
something
different,
which
is
probably
why
they
did
two
things
differently,
which
is
probably
why
some
people
weren't
able
to
get
a
tree
in
the
past.
E
You
didn't
have
to
order
or
pay
for
the
tree
prior.
I
guess-
and
this
year
they
ordered
less
trees
because
they
had
found
themselves
with
surplus
in
years
past.
So
it
was
a
combination
of
them
ordering
less
trees
because
they
had
a
surplus
and
creating
this
reservation
system
that
you
had
to
go
online
and
prepay.
E
So
it
was
more
efficient,
but
people
got
closed
out.
He
is
in
favor
of
expanding.
However,
the
budget
has
been
set
for
next
year,
so
no
additional
funds
will
go
into
it
this
coming
year,
however,
there's
some
other
good
news,
which
is
that
a
hopefully
in
the
next
year,
an
assistant
city,
forester,
will
be
hired
and
that
person
will
be
tasked
with
securing
additional
grant
monies
and
expanding
programs
to
support
eab
mitigation,
as
well
as
that
rbd
program.
E
E
To
safely
dispose
of
trees
or
treat
trees
or
any
other
programs
to
help
people
or
replace
trees,
so
he
responded.
Yes,
they
have
thirty
thousand
dollars
set
aside
for
a
voucher
program
to
do
just
that.
I'm
just
gonna
read
this
email
to
you.
E
He
says
he
also
wanted
to
expand
on
the
arbor
day
tree
sale.
In
past
years
we
have
been
left
with
a
good
number
of
unsold
trees.
E
E
E
F
I
actually
have
started
looking
into
all
the
tree
city,
all
the
other
jurisdictions
that
are
infested
with
eab
and
their
tree
programs
and.
F
Oops
knocking
things
over
here
boulder
has
a
rather
extensive
program
and
they
just
recently
got
the
tree
city
of
the
world
designation,
which
means
that
they're
at
the
top
at
the
top
and
they're
very
few
that
have
that
designation
and
it
requires.
F
And
it
can
be
just
a
staff
member,
a
city
department
or
a
group
of
citizens
standard
two.
They
set
the
rules,
the
city
has
to
place
a
law
or
an
official
policy
that
governs
the
management
of
forest
and
trees.
F
F
Standard
four
is
allocate.
The
resources
has
a
dedicated
annual
budget
for
routine
implementation
of
the
tree
management
plan,
standard
five
celebrate
the
achievements
and
annual
celebration.
F
F
And
I
I
want
to
know
which,
if
we
have
done
any
of
that,
because
there
are
several
organizations,
both
state
and
independent-
that
cooperate
with
the
arbor
day
foundation
to
plant
trees
and
they
planted
approximately
a
thousand
trees
a
year.
Since
2013.
F
So
helena
is
there
is
that
on
public
property,
what
it's
both
private
and
public?
In
fact,
boulder
has
a
city
a
tree,
a
city
right-of-way
street
tree
program
where
they,
a
citizen,
can
request.
F
I
want
a
street
tree
in
my
right
of
way
and
the
city
comes
out
and
examines
the
location
determines
what
tree
would
thrive
there,
whether
the
location
is
valid
or
not,
and
the
only
thing
they
ask
this
citizen
to
do
the
homeowner
to
do
is:
keep
it
watered
and
mulched.
The
city
is
responsible
for
all
street
trees,
all
right
away
trees,
and
they
don't
make
the
citizen
responsible
for
any
of
it.
The
only
thing
they
have
to
do
is
if
they
request
a
street
tree,
the
city
will
plant
it
pay
for
it.
F
You
just
have
to
water
it
and
mulch
it,
and
it's
a
big
tree.
You
know
it's,
it's
still
a
sapling,
but
it's
already
either
five
gallons
or
15
gallons,
and
that's
the
case
with
their
arpa
day
foundation
too.
F
They
give
away
thousands
of
trees
a
year,
okay,
but
they
also
sell
they
subsidize
the
arbor
day
foundation,
and
that's
why
I
suggested
that
we
maybe
partner
with
some
of
the
tree
suppliers
because
they
might
be
willing
to
sell
in
you
know
wholesale
bulk
to
the
city
at
a
much
lower
cost
than
the
100
bucks
for
a
15
gallon
tree
and
you're.
Saying
that
that's
what
the
city
is
paying
for
it,
but
then
they're
selling
it
for
30..
F
E
F
E
Okay,
so
I
will
go
back
with
that
question
to
dave
lee
and
I
will
also
approach
the
parks
and
rec
commission
they're
not
in
session
this
month,
but
I'd
be
happy
to
ask
them
about
that
and
it
sounds
like.
Maybe
that
could
be
something
parks
and
rec
can
look
into
kind
of
comparing
and
contrasting
what
arvada
and
boulder
are
doing
they're.
F
Yeah
they
are
and
they've
got
more
trees,
but
they're
working
really
hard,
but
they
also
don't
prohibit
any
trees.
I
can't
find
anybody
that
has
a
prohibition
against
trees.
They
don't
boulder,
also
doesn't
recommend
or
encourage
pesticides
on
that
on
for
emerald
ash
borer
because
they
think
it's
environmentally
unsound
and
that
it
will
affect
too
much.
You
know
poison
the
ground,
it'll
poison,
ground
water,
whatever,
so
they
don't
encourage
it,
but
they
don't
prevent
it
either.
F
But
they're
they've
got
a
a
big
push
of
diversity
and
they
don't
hold
citizens
responsible
for
right-of-way,
okay.
But
I'm
more
concerned
about
that.
You
know
the
grants
that
are
available
and
why
we
haven't
applied
for
any
of
them
and
both
are
bada
and
boulder,
and
I
haven't
gone
any
farther
than
that
because
they're
the
ones
most
affected
right
now
and
I'm
gonna
move
in.
F
You
know,
look
at
longmont
and
westminster
also,
but
they
you
know,
a
real
big
push
and
they've
been
expanding
on
their
programs,
their
arbor
day
programs-
and
I
don't
see
why
we
can't.
E
Sure-
and
I
did
not
specifically
ask
dave
lee
if
we
have
received
any
grants,
so
I
can.
I
we
just
were
talking
kind
of
into
the
future,
but
I'm
happy
to
revisit
your
questions
and
it
really.
I
I
don't
know
how
everybody
else
feels
about
this,
but
the
parks
and
rec
committee,
since
they
are
that
governing
board.
E
I
think
this
is
a
great
topic
for
them
to
tackle
and
get
back
to
you
asan,
because
we've
got
our
own
fish
to
fry
over
here,
working
on
the
tree
and
shrub
code
and
they're,
a
great
committee-
and
I
know
they
care
about
this
topic
as
well
and
there's
some
pretty
diligent
people
on
that
committee.
So,
if
everybody's
okay
with
that
I'll,
just
take
these
follow-up
questions
and
hit
back
with
dave
lee
and
that
parks
and
rec
committee.
C
And
just
so
cohen,
I
think
you
you're
you've
been
doing
your
research.
That's
why
you're
so
knowledgeable.
So
it's
interesting
to
learn
about
those
programs.
Those
programs,
you
and
carson
are
compiling
into
a
single
document
for
city
council,
as
they
requested.
Is
that
how
that
all
came
about.
F
Well,
I
guess
we're
going
to,
but
I
know
carson
was
busy
and
I
just
got
started
on
it
and
didn't
get
back
to
carson
with
any
of
it.
But
I
started
by
hand
because
I
don't
have
word
so
I
don't
have
excel
sort
of
a
matrix
and
I
included
do
they
subsidize
nobody
subsidizes,
except
for
giving
away
trees,
which
boulder
does-
and
I
believe
our
bada
does
too.
F
But
I
haven't
they're
not
as
transparent
in
what
they're
doing,
but
they've
had
some
interesting
videos
which
I'd
recommend
people
if
they're
interested
in
what
some
cities
are
doing.
Looking
at
the
videos
that
arbata
has
produced
in
their
efforts
to
plant
public
trees
and
provide
for
citizens.
F
But
the
subsidies
nobody's
really
doing
that,
except
for
giving
away
free
trees
and
subsidizing
the
cost
of
larger
trees.
F
I've
got
subsidy
prohib,
you
know
whether
they
prohibit
freeze
who's
responsible
for
right
of
way,
education,
pesticides,
their
tree
city
status
and
both
arbata
and
boulder
go
above
and
beyond
this
basic,
barely
anything
tree
city,
usa,
you
know
it's.
36
years
we
haven't
raised
the
budget
of
two
dollars,
so
it's
worth
not
the
two
dollars.
It
was
worth
in
the
36
years
ago,
but
it's
like
worth
about
25
cents
right
now,
but
anyway
also
do
they
have
a
urban
forestry
department.
F
What's
the
budget
for
trees,
how
many
ash
trees
do
they
have?
How
many
are
they
trying
to
save?
How
many
trees
are
they
planting
to
try
to
overcome?
Do
they
have
a
management
plan?
Boulder
has
a
66
page
one.
It's
pretty
elaborate.
F
And
that's
about
it,
I
don't
think
we
need
to
go
any
further
than
that,
but
I
would
think
that
all
of
that
would
be
important
in
a
matrix.
Let
the
the
city
know
what
we
need
to
do
so.
C
I
had
a
question,
you
know.
One
of
the
reasons
why
we
wanted
to
talk
to
dave
was
that
city
council
had
requested
what
you
know
us
to
provide
what
the
tree
city
standards
were,
and
we
were
trying
to.
You
know
preempt
the
secondary
question,
which
is:
do
we
meet
the
criteria
for
the
tree
city
standards
and
dave
has
answered
the
question
yes
is?
Was
he
aware
that
city
council
had
asked
that
for
a
document
on
tree
city.
E
I
let
him
know
that
this
was
for
the
city
council
information
session
and
that
and
that
we
needed
to
make
sure
that
we
fit
all
the
criteria.
So
I
mean,
if
you
want
me,
to
go
back
and
get
details
on
the
other
three
standards.
C
E
E
I
I
just
took
his
word
for
that,
since
he's
the
ar
and
arborist.
C
E
Yes-
and
I
can
follow
up
with
him,.
E
F
One
other
I'm
gonna,
send
you
the
email,
but
my
one
of
my
questions
is
what
about
I
didn't
know.
The
parks
and
rex
had
a
budget.
The
committee
had
a
budget,
so
are
you
sure,
because
you're
enabling
legislation
doesn't
say
anything
about
trees?
It
just
says
recreation,
and
you
know
that's
all
there
is
there
is
that
you
give
advice
on
recreational
opportunities
but
and
there's
no
budget
listed
and
we
don't
have
a
budget,
and
I
don't
know
of
any
commission
that
does
have
a
budget,
but.
E
I
I
wasn't
through
the
committee,
I
believe
it's
through
the
department's.
You
know
part
the
park
service
has
a
budget
right.
Yes,
that
open
space,
you
know,
whatever
dave
manages,
has
a
budget,
and
so
like
just
like
this
body,
we
are,
we
are
advisory,
but
we
advise
on
where
to
allocate
funds
that
sometimes
so
that's
come
up
in
all
of
our
discussions
in
our
various
committees
and
that's
how
the
departments
have
reacted
or
responded
to
those
concerns
so
yeah,
it's
not
coming
from
the
parks
and
recreation
committee.
E
Yeah,
I'm
sorry
and
I
and
I
don't
know
what
all
the,
what
different
divisions
or
specific
budgets
those
monies
come
from.
E
F
But
it
sounds
like
that:
actually,
the
open
space
manager
department,
since
it's
titled
by
an
arborist
I
mean
harbors-
holds
that
title
and
there's
going
to
be
another
arborist
on
board
that
they're,
actually
the
responsible
department,
not
parks
and
recs.
So
I
would,
I
would
say
that
that
would
qualify
us,
but
but
not
the
parks
and
recs
commission
would
qualify
us
because
you
don't
really
have
any
authority
over
because
you're
just
an
advisory
committee,
a
tree
board
actually
would
have
authority
and
a
budget.
F
But
the
open
space
manager
is
the
one
that
actually
has
the
authority
and
he
is
set
aside
out
of
his
budget.
Thirty
thousand
dollars
for
a
voucher
program.
F
Yeah,
so
that's
what
I
think
is
happening,
and
I
would
be
satisfied
with
that,
but
not
with
claiming
that
the
parks
and
recs
was
a
tree
board,
because
your
enabling
legislation
doesn't
give
you
that
authority
over
any
money.
F
So
but
anyway,
beside
that,
you
know
I'm
satisfied,
but
I
would
just
like
to
at
least
equal
and
you
know,
grow
the
department
or
grow
the
tree
city
designation
to
the
point
where
we
could
also
get
a
gold
leaf
reward,
because
right
now
it's
not
working
to
enhance
our
enhance
our
tree
canopy.
Okay,
anyway,
that's
all!
I
have
I'll
send
you
something:
okay,.
D
Yeah,
I
was
just
gonna
address
your
question.
I
have
not
worked
on
it
yet
I
traveled
a
lot
since
our
last
meeting,
but
I
definitely
planned
on
coordinating
with
member
dickerson
and
I'm
glad
you've
already
done
so
much
research
thanks
and
I'll
work
with
her
to
turn
it
into
the
matrix.
You
know
because
we
we
set
the
deadline
of
the
february
meeting.
I've
definitely.
D
And
I'll
stay
on
top
of
that,
and
thanks
remember
johnson,
for
all
this
info-
and
I
I
know
it's
kind
of
been
addressed
in
all
of
this
discussion,
but
unless
there
was
different
communication
between
dave
lee
and
that
state
forester
than
the
email
that
I
saw
previously,
that
was
only
about
criteria.
One
I
felt
like
criteria.
One
was
definitely
covered
since
they
were
the
ruler
and
they
said
it
was
good.
But
I
I
haven't
seen
any
information
or
heard
any
details
about
how
inglewood
qualifies
for
the
budget
part
and
definitely
curious.
D
You
know
how
that
you
know
where,
where
that
qualification,
you
know
how
we
qualify
for
that,
and-
and
it's
not
that
I've
dug
into
the
city
budget
to
know
how
much
is
designated
to
cover
that
one
criteria.
That's
that
says,
a
per
capita
amount
of
the
city
budget
needs
to
go
to
trees,
but
I
mean,
if
we're
going
by
the
letter
of
the
standards
that
is
one
of
the
standards
is
related
to
a
per
capita
amount
of
budget.
Going
to
that.
So
I'm
I
don't
know
if
your
conversation
addressed.
D
D
E
I'll
go
I'll,
have
a
written
dialogue
with
him
going
forward
and
I
will
forward
you
the
answers
to
these
questions,
so
you
can
put
them
in
your
report
that
you're
giving
to
the
city
cool.
E
Yeah
and
all
of
colleen's
questions,
and
then
anybody
else
just
yeah.
It
just
helps
me
because
this
is
not.
This
is
not
something
I'm
well
versed
in
I'm
just
getting
started
on
this
another.
C
E
C
C
C
C
We
I've
just
listed
everything
that
we
decided.
We
wanted
to
talk
about
in
no
priority
order
and
that's
something
that
I
wanted
to
address
today
and
then
other
meaning.
There
were
things
that
we
wanted.
We
said
we
wanted
to
do,
but
it
really
wasn't
a
priority.
It
was
just
more
like
a
task,
so
I'll
review
those
things
right
now.
Do
you
want
me
to
share
my
screen,
so
you
guys
can
see
what
I'm
talking
about.
C
Great
okay,
I'm
gonna
make
this
a
little
bit
bigger,
so
in
progress,
we're
working
on.
You
know
tree
and
shrub
codes,
responding
to
city
council
questions
from
our
presentation
and
then
also
moving
forward
with
a
recommendation
on
programs
that
the
city
should
consider
to
help
residents.
C
The
second
thing
is
the
dangerous
dog
code.
We've
had
that
on
our
agenda
for
the
past
couple
of
meetings,
we've
just
never
been
able
to
get
to
it,
and
then
you
know
we.
We
had
started
that
a
couple
of
years
ago,
and
I
I
think
you
know
our
plan
was
to
start
working
on
that
after
we
finished
the
tree
portion
to
prioritize.
C
There
are
seven
agenda,
seven
items,
one
is
committee
guidelines
for
communication
within
the
community
and
really
specifically,
that's
relating
to
social
media
and
questions
that
occur
on
next
door,
instagram
or
twitter
relating
to
city
code,
and
I
mean
there
continues
to
be
so
many
questions
that
come
up
in
it.
I
bite
my
tongue
because
I
really
want
to
respond,
but
I
think
we
need
to
have
a
process
in
place
to
make
sure
that
we
are
responding
appropriately
when
those
questions
come
up.
C
Animal
licensing,
that
is
if
the
city
does
move
forward
with,
requiring
that
so
that's
kind
of
an.
If,
if,
if
we
do
go
that
direction,
then
we
recognize
there
will
be
some
some
code
changes
that
will
be
needed.
Due
to
that
there
was
a
comment
on
updating
our
alley
and
weeds
ordinance.
C
Then
reviewing
trash
removal
after
the
recommendations
come
from
the
single
trash
hauler
committee,
the
number
seven
was
title:
15
on
the
maximum
number
of
vehicles
per
household,
a
voucher
program
for
legal
dumping
and
then
scooters.
C
The
fact
that
we
are
our
code
really
doesn't
address.
You
know
the
use
of
scooters
in
the
city
and
going
into
other.
These
are
just
things
that
we
wanted
to
do.
We
need.
We
know
that
we
need
to
review
the
bylaws
we're
supposed
to
do
that.
Every
year
we
decided
to
do
that
in
march
of
this
coming
year.
C
We
also
need
to
elect
a
chair
and
a
vice
chair
in
march,
and
then
we
wanted
to
circle
back
with
the
city
attorney
on
finishing
the
wording,
changes
for
animals
and
foul
dogs
and
cats
and
making
sure
it
was
consistent.
We
had
identified
it
for,
but
they
were
supposed
to
go
through
and
get
that
done,
and
I
we
said
that
we
would
just
contact
her
and
ask
the
question
and
then
lastly,
the
2022
media
plan.
F
Okay,
with
the
screen
up,
I
couldn't
get
to
unmuting
myself.
Since
we
don't
have
we
don't
know
if
animal
licensing
is
going
to
happen,
I
would
put
that
at
the
bottom.
F
And
the
voucher
program
has
nothing
to
do
with
us.
You
know
that's
in
the
works,
so
I
wouldn't.
I
would
strike
that
and
scooters.
I'm
not
sure
we
have
the
authority
to
deal
with
vehicles.
C
Was
a
council
request
that
came
through
on
scooters
and
the
attorney
for
the
city
actually
responded
to
that?
I
haven't,
I
haven't
read
it
yet.
I
just
found
it
when
we
were
in
the
meeting
earlier
today,
but
there
are
some
portions
of
code
that
do
cover
it.
So
I'm
we're
not
going
to
go
through
that,
but
I
I'm
happy
to
make
that
available
as
we
move
forward
and
I
lost
my
place
here.
F
Sorry,
well,
I
would
definitely
put
it
at
the
bottom
because
unless
we
are
directed
to
address
the
issue-
because
it's
not
one
of
our
it's
not
one
of
the
things
we're
allowed
to
address.
C
But
we
had
identified,
the
committee
had
identified
that
that
was
something
that
we
did
want
to
address
because
there's
no
rules,
you
know
what
we
talked
about
was
there's.
There
doesn't
appear
to
be
any
rules
for
the
use
of
scooters.
F
Well,
I
would
suggest,
then
we
request
of
counsel
if
they
want
us
to
address
it.
C
Okay,
anybody
else
david,
your
your
code
manager,
louis
you.
H
Had
your
video,
I
did,
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
an
update
regarding
the
voucher
program
that
has
been
completed
and
we
do
have
that
in
place
for
illegal
dumping.
Yes,
it's
a
small
reimbursement
program
up
to
50
per
household
per
calendar
year
for
reimbursement
to
for
illegal
dumping.
H
C
H
Provide
that
update,
I
we're
finalizing
just
a
few
small
little
minor
changes
to
the
processes.
But
yes,
we
are,
we
are
inspecting
taking
a
report
and
providing
the
documentation
for
the
vouchers
where
they
can
go
to
the
city
and
prove
that
an
extra
charge
was
added
to
them
for
a
specific
item
that
would
have
been
illegally
dumped
and
reported
to
the
police
department,
and
then
they
would
receive
a
check
for
fifty
dollars
got.
C
C
C
And
then
scooters
we
may
not
we're
not
sure
that,
but
we're
still
going
to
leave
it
on
our
radar.
F
Another
thing
julie,
one
other
thing
I
would
like
to
move
up
to
one
of
the
top
priorities.
Maybe
third
is
the
title
vii
issue,
because
that
is
the
primary
responsibility
of
ours.
Is
animals
and
animal
welfare.
C
C
F
C
Again,
what
we
have
on
number
11
for
title
17
is
title:
7
was
to
finish
the
changes
that
we
had
identified
for
animal
impoundment
and
if
there
is
additional
changes
that
you're
recommending
that
we
we
make,
then
that
needs
to
be
prioritized
like
everything
else.
That's
what
I
said.
So
I
we've
not
talked
about
that.
F
So
well,
we
have
before
yeah
it
just
never
got.
It
was
put
on
the
back
burner
because
of
the
one
language
change
to
domesticated
animals.
We
didn't.
We
chose
not
to
go
forward
with
anything
else
and.
H
So
when
you
all
submitted
your
recommendations
and
council
made
those
changes,
it's
already
triggered
a
comprehensive
review
from
the
city
attorney's
office
regarding
the
title-
seven,
so
that's
already
with
them.
So
that's
currently
in
review
as
of
right
now,.
F
All
the
definitions
are
now
passe
and
there
is
an
issue
now
by
the
way,
the
domestic
animal
definition
is
written
that
it
it's
confusing
on
the
animals
in
general
that
prohibit
livestock.
C
H
I
can
say
I
don't
I
don't
see
a
problem
or
we
create
is,
with
this
board,
be
creating
something
that
doesn't
exist
and
what
would
be
the
purpose
or
what
would
serve
the
purpose
of
changing
that?
If
there's
no
urgency,
no
concern,
no
immediate
speaking
as
the
person
who's
a
subject
matter
expert
and
the
person
that
is
working
in
this,
I
guess
I
would
ask:
why
would
those
changes
be
made
if
we
have
no
conflict
or
concern.
C
Okay,
and
and-
and
my
comment
is
that
we
know
that
the
city
attorney
is
working
on
that
section,
so
I
don't
want
to
waste
any
more
time.
I
don't
want
to
spend
any
more
time
on
this
committee
until
we
know
what
those
changes
are
and
the
the
definitions
that
was
part
of
our
recommendation.
We
can
ask
the
question
where
those
stand
and
that's
why
I've
kept
it
on
this
list
that
it's
not
going
to
be
a
priority.
C
So
we
really
just
have
three
items
left
to
prioritize
committee,
guidelines,
updating
alley
and
weeds
ordinance
and
then
the
maximum
number
of
vehicles
per
household,
I'm
okay
with
leaving
it,
as
is
because
you
know
the
two,
the
first
two
items,
trees
and
dangerous
dog
codes.
I
mean
by
the
time
we
finish
those
two
we
may
have
a
different.
C
You
know
thinking
on
what
we
should
be
working
on
next.
Does
anybody
have
a
problem
with
us,
leaving
it
the
way
it
is
right
now
and
again
to
me:
priorities
are
good
the
day
you
set
them
and
it's
something
that
we
constantly
look
at
and
adjust
to.
As
you
know,
the
needs
of
the
community
and
community
and
city
council
direction
changes.
We
we
adjust
too.
So
it's
just
it's
not
set
in
stone.
It's
just
what
we
start
the
year
out
with
dave
your
hand
is
rates
raised.
I
just.
H
Wanted
to
give
a
caution
to
this
committee
regarding
number
five,
the
title
15.
that
is
this
was
a
citizen
initiative
that
was
voted
on
and
whether
or
not
it
it
some
interpretations
was
done.
The
court
has
already
made
some
specific
rulings
in
regards
to
that
and
those
rulings
have
not
been
challenged
in
higher
courts
so
making
changes
and
making
those
recommendations
you
just
understand
you
would
have
to
go
back
through
a
citizen-initiated
vote
to
make
a
change
to
that
particular
situation.
C
The
person
that
headed
that
committee
is
is
my
neighbor
two
doors
down
colleen
your
hands
raised.
Yeah
can.
F
You
hear
me:
yes,
okay,
yes,
I
had
the
dubious
honor
of
dealing
with
this
issue
and
the
citizen
initiative
was
specific
not
to
limit
to
one
and
so
therefore
it
never
got
changed
properly.
F
If
it
were
changed,
it
should
have
no
number
next
to
it.
So
you
know
if
it's
going
to
be,
in
conformance
with
the
citizen
initiative,
it
was
not
in
conformance
with
the
citizen
initiative.
In
fact,
the
citizen
initiative
was
misapplied
all
the
way
through
the
vehicle
code.
They
took
out
half
of
the
model
transportation
code
and
didn't
address
the
issues
that
were
specific
to
the
citizen
initiative,
which
was
there
should
be
no
limitation
to
two
vehicles
per
household
of
any
kind.
C
We're
just
deciding
what
we're
going
to
be
addressing
next
and
and
my
my
proposal
is:
we
know
we're
already
working
on
trees
and
dangerous
dog
code.
We
have
a
couple
of
things
that
we
need
to
do
down
here,
which
are
going
to
be
on
our
agenda
that
the
first
of
the
year
when
we
get
those
things
done.
These
are
the
things
that
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
talking
about,
and
at
that
time
I
would
recognize
we
go
through.
C
I
would
recommend
we
go
through
and
re-prioritize,
because
a
lot
of
time
will
have
passed
and
other
things
may
have
come
up.
So
if
your
guys
are
okay
with
that,
I'm
going
to
leave
it,
as
is,
unless
anyone
has
any
strong
feelings
about
three
four
and
five
being
reordered
all
right.
Otherwise
we're
just
going
to
go
ahead
and
enter
this
into
our
documents.
C
C
Okay,
all
right!
Second,
to
our
agenda
for
unfinished
business
is
just
the
eab
follow-up
there
were.
We
made
a
lot
of
assignments
at,
but
our
last
meeting,
and
we
I
did.
We
decided
that
we
would
have
these
tasks
completed
and
ready
to
review
at
our
february
meeting,
but
I
wanted
to
put
it
on
our
agenda
today.
In
case
anybody
had
any
questions
or
follow-up
issues
that
they
wanted
to
address
as
as
they're
working
on
these.
C
I
know
cohen
you
with
you
and
carson
are
working
and
I've.
I've
started
looking
at
tree,
shrub
authority,
you
know
in
other
cities-
and
I
and
I
know
member
johnson
has
already
talked
with
dave
lee,
but
if
you
guys
don't
have
any
follow-up
questions,
then
we
don't
need
to
spend
any
time
on
it.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
if
you
guys
have
any
questions
we
set
a
time
set
aside
time
today
to
work
on
it
coin.
Your
hand
is
raised.
F
I
thought
that
maybe
some
things
should
be
included
in
this
matrix,
like
whether
things
are
subsidized,
whether
the
trees
are
pre.
You
know
any
trees
are
prohibited.
What's
the
tree
city
status,
are
they
home
rule
as
well
as
any
programs
and
the
authority?
F
So
I,
as
I'm
going
through
it,
I'm
determining
whether
or
not
there
is
an
urban
forestry
department
for
the
cities
I'm
looking
at.
Do
we
want
to
talk
about
which
cities
we
want
to
look
at?
How
many
do
we
want
to
look
at
and
whether
the
matrix
should
include
authority
and
subsidies
and
other
things.
C
Well,
you
know
your
first
question
was
in
terms
of
the
the
cities
that
you
guys
look
at
with
our
the
research
that
we
did.
I
think
we
had
five
or
six
cities.
F
Do
you
recall,
I
don't
recall-
and
things
have
changed
since
then,
and
I'm
thinking
that
the
cities
that
are
most
affected
right
now
are
the
ones
that
we
should
probably
look
at
longmont,
westminster,
arbada
and,
of
course,
boulder
since
they're
the
most
active.
F
But
as
far
as
the
matrix
goes
shouldn't,
I
would
like
to
include
everything
there,
whether
there's
an
authority,
whether
they're
doing
any
subsidies,
how
they
are
handling
the
tree
city
and
what
their
status
is
like.
Boulder
is
tree
city
of
the
world,
and
it's
one
of
the
very
very
few
arvada
has
the
gold
leaf
award
and
what
they're
doing
to
expand
their
programs
or
if
they
are,
and
maybe
even
how
many
public
trees
that
are.
You
know
that
they're
dealing
with
I
just
wanted
to
know
what
we
do.
F
You
know
I've
already
got
this
information
for
two
cities.
Do
we
want
to
do
it
for
other
cities
that
are
in
the
path
of
this
that
have
that
are
infested
like
westminster,
longmont,
maybe
even
fort
collins?
We,
I
don't
think
we
did
any
of
those.
C
Well,
yeah,
and
I
I
think
what
I
would
like
is
I
mean
I
know
you
verbally
said
what
you're
looking
at
and
then
in
terms
of
what
criteria
you're
comparing
each
city
on
it
would
be
helpful
just
to
see
the
list.
C
C
I'm
not
okay!
Thank
you
all
right!
So
the
next,
the
last
piece
that
we
were
working
on
for
eab
was
we
identified
programs
and
resolutions
that
the
city
should
encourage.
This
city
should
consider
to
help
residents
moving
forward,
and
obviously
this
is
going
to
tie
into
the
research
that
carson
and
cohen
are
doing
on
what
other
cities
are
doing.
C
C
One
was
to
incentivize
residents
to
proactively
treat
or
remove
undesirable
trees
with
either
a
voucher
program,
financial
support
to
cut
down
a
tree,
the
ability
to
safely
dispose,
although
that
sounds
like
that's
now
been
addressed
with
the
voucher
program
that
is
in
the
budget
for
this
year,
establish
a
budget
and
fund
to
assist
homeowners
with
you
know,
disposal
again
and
then
a
program
to
provide
desirable
trees
at
a
low
cost.
Again.
C
C
Canopy
one
is
to
expand
the
arbor
day,
sale
to
help
residents,
replace
trees,
assigned
authority
within
parks
and
recs
to
recommend
programs
and
provide
expertise,
resources
to
property
owners-
and
it
kind
of
sounds
like
we're
already
moving
in
that
direction,
with
the
hiring
of
a
of
a
a
second
arborist
and
then
lastly,
was
community
information
is
is,
is
is
to
arm
code
enforcement
with
some
information
on
eab
so
that
if
they're
asked
that
they
can
hand
that
out-
and
the
comment
was
dave-
lee
might
already
be
working
with
communications,
but
but
we
don't
know
that
yet
so
I
just
kept
it
on
here.
G
C
So
the
code,
the
way
it's
written
right
now
is
that
residents,
if
they
work
with
an
arborist,
it
has
to
be
on
the
approved
list
of
arborists.
That's
on
the
city
website.
Now,
whether
or
not
we
enforce
it
that's
another
issue,
but
we
were
thinking
that
maybe
if
we
worked
with
inglewood
based
businesses
that
they
would
be
more
likely
to
help
us
with
this
issue
and
that
we
might
be
able
to
offer
them,
like
you
know,
free
advertising
on
the
website
or
or
in
the
newsletter
it.
C
I
think
the
I
don't
know
I
know
the
list
is
out
there
on
the
website.
I
know
colleen,
didn't
you
look
at
that
at
one
point,
do
you
recall
how
many
were
inglewood-based
businesses
there
were.
F
About
five
and
I've
learned
since
then
that,
even
though
they
aren't
officially
licensed
specifically
that
inglewood
automatically
license
says
anybody
that
is
licensed
in
denver
or
lakewood
so,
and
they
limit
the
idea
of
arborists
to
those
that
have
the
state
certification
for
pesticide
application.
G
Sorry,
I
guess
my
point
was
more
shouldn't.
It
be
contact
with
group
of
englewood
recommended
arborists,
as
opposed
to
inglewood
arborists
that
I
think
that
was.
G
G
D
E
C
And
we
were
brainstorming,
and
maybe
I
should
have
taken
that
out
of
there,
but
I
mean
it
was
just
one
way
that
what
we
you
know
the
city
could
be,
you
know
possibly
sell
the
idea
and
and
secure
you
know
lower
rates,
but
the
next
step.
Would
these
proposals
or
resolutions
would
go
just
like
we
did
before
it
would
be
in
an
email
to
rita,
to
take
to
city
council,
and
I
recommend
that
we
we
send
this
with
the
questions
or
our
answers
to
the
questions
that
they
had.
C
So
are
there
any
further
comments
to
what
we're
looking
at
here,
any
anything
anybody
that
objects
to
I
saw
carson
do
a
thumbs
up.
F
Yeah,
I
think
it's
fine
the
way
it
is,
but
I
would
like
a
little
more
emphasis
on
the
importance
of
the
tree.
Canopy,
that's
something
that
arvada
and
I'm
sure
other
cities
have
done.
F
Arvada
and
boulder
are
very
vocal
about
how
it
lowers
the
temperature,
provides
conservation
of
water,
cleans
the
air
and
how
important
the
tree
canopy
is
for
those
environmental
ideas,
and
I
can
provide
you
with
what
they
say
that
you
know
which
suggests
that
they
make
a
bigger
deal
out
of
our
tree
canopy
than
is
currently
being
done
with
inglewood.
So
we
need
something.
F
Well,
that
is
the
the
relationship
since
eab
is
going
to
take
out
so
many
of
the
of
the
trees,
a
good
20
in
boulder
that
it
it
just
emphasizes
the
importance
of
planting
and
and
saving
trees
that
are
significant
or
historical
or
valuable.
C
Okay,
so
again,
these
are
programs
or
resolutions,
and
I
I
don't
I'm
not
hearing
a
program
or
a
resolution
there,
but
I
do
think
you
know
the
fact
that
we
recommended
that
the
an
authority
be
established
within
the
city
and
the
city
council
asked
for
examples
of
how
that
authority
would
look,
might
address
what
you're
talking
about,
but
but
please
go
ahead
and
forward
to
me
what
you're
referring
to,
and
we
can
see
if
we
can
add
that
otherwise,
I'm
going
to
put
this
to
rest
and
leave
it,
as
is
with
the
exception
of
the
ch
of
changing
this.
C
This,
the
opening
paragraph
here
to
not
just
inglewood
arborist
but
inglewood,
approved
or
qualified
arborists
and
we'll
move
forward
with
that,
and
when
we
submit
our
documents
or
our
response
to
city
council
we'll
include
this
okay,
everybody
all
right.
I
see
a
yes
and
a
go
all
right.
Thank
you
all
very
much
for
your
patience,
your
ideas.
This
has
been
a
lot
of
work
and
we
are
we're
wrapping
it
up
and
it's
kind
of
exciting.
Let's
see
the
next
thing
on
our
agenda
is
topics
for
future
meetings.
C
E
C
And
then,
if
we
have
time,
we
can
also
start
talking
about
dangerous
dog.
We've
tried
to
do
that
several
times.
C
E
To
know
that
dave
and
his
team
and
our
all
the
other
police
are
out
keeping
our
neighborhoods
and
pets
and
property
safe
on
days
like
today,
it's
really
nice
to
know
it's
very
comforting.
Thank
you.
D
White,
I
was
just
gonna
say
last
time
you
asked
about
info
on
the
trash
thing,
so
the
in
regard
to
where
that
stands.
We
actually
just
had
a
meeting
last
night.
We
have
another
one
coming
up
the
you
know
what
our
committee
did
is
we
put
a
huge
amount
of
effort
into
defining
an
rfp
based
on
what
our
understanding
of
what
citizens
wanted
is
and
put
that
was
put
out,
and
only
two
companies
responded
waste
management
and
republic.
D
Neither
of
them
provided
proposals
that
cover
the
requirements
of
the
rfp
so
and
they're
different
things
that
you
know
like
republic
is
fine
with
doing
all
ally
service
for
waste
and
recycling
and
waste
management
is
try.
It's
very
ambiguously.
D
Trying
to
push
against
that
republic
is
trying
to
not
allow
opt
out
at
all,
and
you
know
so,
there's
problems
with
both
of
them
and
we're
still
evaluating
the
proposals.
We
don't
know
what's
going
to
end
up
coming
out
of
our
committee
as
a
recommendation
to
city
council.
So
that's
where
that
stands.
D
D
D
D
So
you
know,
I
don't
know
if
I
I
you
know
that
is
our
regular
there's.
I
think
of
the
one
two
three
four
five,
six
of
the
eight
meetings.
If
I
do
get
into
it,
there's
three
of
them
that
conflict
with
our
regular
meetings.
I
would
really
like
to
participate
in
it.
I
don't
know
if
that's
gonna
disqualify
me
or
if
there
is
any
chance
that
we'd
be
able
to
meet
on
a
different
night.
D
It's
the
january
19th
february,
16th
and
march
16th
dates.
That
would
be,
you
know.
If
I
do
get
onto
that
committee,
could
we
possibly
meet
on
a
different
night
and
so.