►
From YouTube: CEAC Meeting 05192021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
F
F
F
E
E
E
D
D
E
E
H
E
Yeah,
let's
go
ahead
and
start
with
roll
call.
So
I'll
just
welcome
everybody
to
this
regular
meeting
of
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
on
this
may
19
2021
and
then
let's
go
ahead
and
do
roll
call.
Please.
E
D
Present
as
of
605
pm
is
member
underwood
member
johnson
and
alternate
member
watson
and
member
franzia
payne.
Okay,
thank.
E
E
So
we
do
have
a
quorum.
However,
some
of
the
people
that
are
missing
are
on
the
agenda,
so
we
might
just
have
to
skip
over
some
of
those.
E
E
Thank
you
carson,
a
second
second,
thank
you
sonia.
Are
there
any
corrections
or
discussions.
E
Okay,
so
please
vote
by
a
show
of
hands
to
approve
the
minutes
as
written
and
that's
unanimous,
I,
like
your
hand
coin.
Is
that
one
of
those
slappers
good?
Thank
you
all.
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
public
forum.
Do
we
have
any
attendees
from
the
public.
B
I
may
need
to
jump
not
jump
off,
but
leave
for
a
couple
minutes
to
handle
something.
So
just
if
you
ask
a
question,
I'm
away
you'll
know
where
I
am
so.
The
first
update
is:
we've
moved
into
our
rms,
which
is
our
remote
systems.
B
The
public
has
really
appreciated
us
being
in
the
parks
being
a
visible
deterrent
and
also
being
available
to
ask
questions
because
there's
a
variety
of
questions
and
they
see
the
code
trucks
and
it's
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
come
and
ask
us
some
questions.
So
we
are
spending
extra
time
in
a
variety
of
our
parks
throughout
the
city.
A
B
B
What
what
it
looked
like,
how
to
defend
ourselves-
and
we
actually
a
couple
of
our
members
put
on,
suits
and
experience
what
it
was
like
to
be
attacked
by
dogs.
So
it's
an
invaluable
lesson
and
resource,
and
it
also
taught
them
how
to
defend
themselves
and
show
others
how
to
defend
themselves.
It
is
a
necessary
valuable
asset
and
we
haven't
had
a
training
like
this.
B
B
B
Her
parents
were
both
a
nurse
as
well
as
a
lead
investigator
with
scotland
yard,
so
it
was
fun
to
hear
her
stories
growing
up
and
then
learning
a
little
bit
about
what
we
need
to
do
to
care
for
ourselves
as
animal
control
officers
working
in
a
very
high
stress,
high
profile
environment.
So
that
was
greatly
appreciated
and
I'm
so
happy
that
we
were
able
to
attend
that
multi-hour
course.
B
We've
started
our
weeds
inspection.
We
started
that
this
week
it's
been
a
little
complicated
with
the
weather
and
unusual
growing
season.
We
have
prioritized
our
major
thoroughfares
and
major
traveled
cross
streets.
First
before
we
go
into
the
residential
area
as
you've
all
seen,
the
weather
has
not
cooperated.
It's
it's
become
very
difficult
for
some
of
our
residents
to
get
out
there
and
know
and
when
they
have
scheduled
plans,
it
rains,
and
then
many
of
you
know
that
have
homes
you
can't
really
mow
after
it
rains
it
just
doesn't
work
right.
B
The
unusually
hot
weather,
coupled
with
the
rain,
has
just
exploded
our
grass
and
weeds
throughout
the
entire
city,
including
on
city
properties
and
so
city
maintenance.
Crews
are
also
having
a
struggle
keeping
up
with
those
routine
maintenance
issues
and
then,
as
many
of
you
have
have
heard,
the
park
ranger
has
resigned
and
we
are
actively
posted
and
looking
for
a
new
park
ranger
to
fill
that
position.
E
Dave,
I
know
that
you
know
you
can't
share
personnel
issues
with
your
staff,
it's
very
disappointing
to
learn
that
our
park,
ranger
resigned
after
how
many
months
three
months.
E
B
However,
the
city
manager
did
speak
to
that
last
night
or
monday
night,
you're,
all
more
than
welcome
to
hear
what
he
said
from
the
monday
meeting
just
after
on
scheduled
public
comment
or
maybe
council
member
russell
might
want
to
elaborate,
I'm
just
not
I'm
prohibited
by
by
policy.
From
speaking
on
that.
A
E
I'm
sorry
to
hear
that,
because
I
know
some
people
had
met.
Alyssa
right
had
met
her
and
were
very
pleased
with
with
her.
So
I'm
I'm
sorry
to
hear
that
we've
taken
a
a
slide
backwards.
Another
question
for
you,
you
mentioned
that
we
were
going
to
the
new
system.
Was
that
installed
this
month.
B
So
we
did
trans
transition
in
may
at
the
beginning
of
may
to
the
new
rms
system
reporting
system
which
allows
us
basically
we're
capturing
all
of
our
information
and
data
on
an
official
police
server.
Since
we're,
we
are
part
of
that
law
enforcement
community
and
so
we're
on
the
exact
same
reporting
system
as
the
police
department,
as
well
as
many
police
departments
throughout
the
state.
B
I
don't
I
have
not
been.
We
have
not
scheduled
that
type
of
data
collection
training
yet
as
to
how
to
obtain
that
information.
B
Hopefully,
because
we
have
not
closed
out,
may
we
do
it
on
the
month
and
we
just
started
I
hopefully
by
the
june
meeting,
we'll
have
the
closeout
of
the
former
system,
because
that
that
portion
is
going
away
so
I'll
have
all
that
data
to
present
from
january
february,
march
and
april
and
I'll
include
that
in
the
packet
I'll
get
that
to
maureen
okay,
do
you
want
to
see
that
by
a
monthly
statistic?
Do
you
want
to
see
it
as
a
quarterly
close
out?
Well,
how
would
you
like
to
see
that.
E
In
the
past
we
had
a
monthly
update.
I
think
it
was
valuable
to
learn
about.
You
know
the
issues
that
are
going
on
in
the
city.
You
know
more
frequently
than
quarterly,
but
I
don't
know
what
that
entails.
Please.
B
People
yeah
I'll,
go
ahead
and
do
the
monthly
report,
but
again
moving
forward.
I
don't
know
what
that
data
is
going
to
look
like
or
if
it's
going
to
translate
into
looking
the
same,
I
just
don't
have
that
training
or
expertise,
yet
I'm
just
completing
the
module
for
entering
and
as
a
supervisor.
I
have
specific
functions
and
approval
stuff
that
I'm
having
to
go
through.
B
It
does
we
can
be
sitting
in
our
truck,
completing
our
reports
or
after
we
have
a
contact
or
enter
a
ticket
and
enter
it
directly
into
our
computer
system.
Okay,.
B
E
E
G
What
about
the
the
community
submitting
of
requests?
Does
that
already
go
into
the
new
system,
then.
B
No
so
the
way
the
community
submits.
I
know
it's
being
rebranded,
I'm
not
on
that
committee.
I
can't
really
speak
to
the
information,
but
there
is
a
rebranding
of
the
q
alert
system
or
the
online
reporting
system,
and
I
know
some
of
you
have
used
that
system.
I've
seen
the
reports
that
have
come
through,
I
think
that's
an
invaluable
tool,
not
just
for
the
code
enforcement
division,
but
that,
depending
on
how
you
classify
the
report
goes
directly
to
that
responsible
party
for
that
division
within
the
city.
So
it
could
be
waste
water.
B
B
F
Hi,
I
was
talking
to
one
of
my
friends
who
lives
in
littleton,
and
I
thought
it
was
a
very
interesting
app
that
the
city
of
littleton
does
it's.
They
call
it.
Is
it
a
violation
and
people
content,
take
pictures
and
send
it
into
the
city
and
the
gps
sends
the
location
to
the
city
and
they
can
see
like
weeds
trash
anything
that
anybody
has
in
question
and
they
can
be
anonymous
and
they
can
send
it
in
and
it's
under.
Like?
Is
this
a
violation?
B
System
is
very
similar,
you
can
take
pictures
and
it
does
log
a
gps
if
you'd,
like
every
city
has
something
a
little
bit
different.
This
was
the
system
that
was
brought
on
a
couple
years
ago.
I
can't
say
that
it's
going
to
be
the
forever
system,
it's
the
system
that
we
have
now
and
you
can
file
it
to
a
degree
anonymously.
However,
if
you
want
to
give
an
email
address
or
a
phone
number
or
somewhere,
you
can
get
a
text,
we
always
still
want
to
provide
that
customer
service
feedback
component.
B
B
It
allows
the
city
to
look
at
how
long
a
complaint
may
go
unanswered
and
it's
not
a
24-hour
emergency
type
system.
We
do.
There
are
warnings
that
pop
up
for
certain
things.
That
say
you
need
to
call
9-1-1
for
this
complaint,
but
it
allows
it
holds.
Staff
responsible
for
responding
to
those
it
allows
the
city
to
see
how
long
it
takes
for
that
response.
In
some
circumstances,
the
data
can
be
collected
as
to
what
the
resolution
was
for
that
particular
complaint.
E
Yeah,
my
experience
has
been
it's
very
easy
to
use
since
I'm
out
walking
a
lot
with
my
dog.
E
If
I
see
something
I
I
do
take
a
picture
of
it
and
and
send
it
in
through
the
app
I
just
did
it
this
week,
I'm
one
of
those
people,
I'm
struggling
to
cut
my
yard,
because
it's
so
rainy,
but
one
of
our
neighbors
is,
is
in
a
lot
worse
shape.
The
weeds
are
up
to
my
knees,
so
I
did
take
a
picture
of
the
yard
and
senate
and
you
know
for
weed
control,
and
I
received
an
email
back
confirming
that
the
city
had
received
my
concern
and
that
they
call
it
report
a
concern.
E
And
then,
a
day
later,
I
was
notified
that
the
issue
had
been
closed
and
then
I
was
given
an
update
on
terms
of
the
weed
priority,
like
david
mentioned,
that
the
city
is
focusing
on
the
more
the
business
areas
first
before
they
go
into
the
residential
area.
So
I
it
was
nice
because
I
knew
that
my
concern
was
received
and
then
I
was
informed
when
the
ticket
was
closed
and
the
resolution.
So
it's
very
easy.
E
C
You
very
much-
and
I
actually
all
I
can
remember-
is
because
it
kind
of
caught
me
by
surprise.
C
We
had
one
public
speaker
come
for
unscheduled
public
public
comment
and
was
talking
about
off
leash
dogs
and
had
commended
the
park,
the
new
park
ranger
and
her
work
at
jason
park,
and
then
it
came
up
that
she
had
resigned,
which
you
know
totally
caught
me
off
guard,
and
so
I
don't
remember
what
else
was
shared.
I
don't
think
it
probably
was
a
lot.
The
mayor
asked
the
city
manager
to
share
a
few
things,
but
really,
I
think
all
city
staff
is.
C
It
has
to
do
exactly
what
manager
lewis
did,
and
I
think
it's
probably
just
protection
for
the
city,
so
you
can
go
back
and
and
listen
to
that,
but
it
was.
I
didn't,
hear
anything
until
the
meeting
on
monday
night
either,
but
the
truth
is
city
council
isn't
always
made
aware
when
someone
when
someone
resigns
unless
it's
a
director.
C
However,
I
think
the
mayor
asked
the
met
the
city
manager
to
respond,
because
you
know
this
person
was
public.
You
know
in
the
public
more
so
anyway.
That's
all.
I
really
can
tell
you
right
now
too.
C
The
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
share
is
that
next
monday,
night
city
council
will
be
doing
boarding
commission
interviews
I
the
packet
came
out
today.
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
go
over
to
city
hall
to
pick
it
up
yet,
but
do
we
have
any
openings
on
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
or
are
we
fully
staffed.
E
Okay,
so
are
there
three
positions
that
were
up
for
renewal?
All
three
of
those
have
been
have
requested
to
be
reappointed,
so
if
that
flows
through,
then
we
have
seven
members.
Okay,.
C
Okay,
that'll
be
great,
so
really,
I
think
oh
city
council
will
be
going
back
to
in-person
meetings
and-
and
I
think
hybrid
meetings,
however,
that
may
change
now
that
there's
an
all
clear
and
everything
is
open,
but
on
june
7th
we
should
be
going
back
to
city
hall,
and
so
I
also
know
that
once
that
happened,
boards
and
commissions,
I
think,
also
will
be
able
to
go
back.
C
So
that
may
be
something
that
you
all
want
to
keep
in
mind,
perhaps
for
the
next
meeting
so
and
I'm
assuming
that
we
will
be
able
to
do
zoom
for
a
while,
although
I
don't
have
you
heard
anything,
maureen.
D
About
that
I
know
that,
even
though
the
city
council
will
be
doing
hybrid
meetings,
I
was
informed
that
committees
will
not.
They
will,
because
it's
too
expensive,
so
committees
will
either
need
to
meet
in
person
or
meet
via
zoom.
There
is
nothing
saying
that
you
cannot
meet
me.
C
Okay,
I
appreciate
that
and
there's
also
probably
nothing
to
say
that
you
can't
meet
in
person,
but
we're
not
going
to
do.
Hybrid
meetings
and
city
council
may
have
to
revisit
this
on
june
7th
also
because
it
is
fairly
substantial
to
do
hybrid
meetings
even
for
city
council.
So
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you,
marie
you're,
welcome
and
other
than
that.
I
don't
think
I
have
anything
else.
C
C
Actually,
I
talked
to
the
city
manager,
just
before
I
came
on
to
the
meeting.
They
were
in
the
process
of
taking
down
all
the
mask
signs,
taking
away
the
one-way
signs
and
and
just
getting
city
hall
back
open
to
normal
and
they're.
Not
what
he
said
is
you
know,
masks
are
welcome,
but
not
required,
because
they
want
everybody
to
feel
welcome,
because
there
are
probably
a
few
people
that
will
want
to
continue
to
wear
masks.
So
so,
as
of
this
afternoon,
I
believe
city
hall
is
open
and
maybe
manager
lewis
has
something
on
that.
C
B
Yes,
so
the
policy
was
just
updated
today
and,
as
of
tomorrow,
masks
will
not
be
required
in
city
hall.
It
is
open.
There
will
be
different
signage.
Like
the
council
members
stated,
we
want
everyone
to
take
their
own
personal
accountability
into
consideration.
B
If
you
feel
like
you
need
to
wear
a
mask
for
your
own
personal
protection
or,
if
you're
not
vaccinated,
then
we
do
encourage
citizens
to
do
that,
but
we
will
not
be
doing
any
kind
of
mask
enforcement
within
our
city,
properties
or
buildings,
and
this
goes
for
city
staff
as
well,
interacting
with
the
public
it
it
is
not
mandated.
E
D
C
E
H
The
parks
and
recreation
committee
plans
to
meet
in
a
park,
and
I
don't
know
if
that
would
satisfy
the
requirements
for
public
comment.
I
suppose,
if
they
post
it
early
enough,
people
can
actually
come
to
the
meeting,
but
that's
what
they're
planning
to
do-
and
I
just
wanted
to
throw
it
out
there,
because
part
of
our
work
has
a
lot
to
do
with
the
parks.
So
it
might
be
a
nice,
a
nice
and
safe
way
to
meet
if
it's
possible.
C
H
Well,
after
hearing
what
you
just
said
about
not
being
able
to
do
hybrid,
I
don't
know
if
that
is
going
to
get
tabled
so,
but
from
what
I,
from
what
I
was
told
or
what
I
gathered
from
the
meeting
was
that
this
is
something
that
they
used
to
do
and
that
they
were
going
to
resume,
that
it
was
a
summertime
kind
of
tradition
with
their
committee
because
they
can
see
their
work
and
talk
about
and
take
public
comment
and
they've
also
done
outside
of
our
of
the
meetings.
H
They've
done
meet
ups,
where
you
know
like
when
something's
happening
with
a
dog
park
or
a
skate
park
or
whatever,
and
they
invite
the
public
to
come,
and
members
of
the
committee
come
and
they
can
talk
and
ask
questions,
and
you
know
so,
and
I
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
great
thing
for
this
committee
to
do.
You
know,
for
a
multitude
of
reasons,
just
in
light
of
what's
happened
recently,
like
that's
part
of
our
job,
is
to
communicate
to
the
community
why
code
enforcement
is
necessary,
helpful
beneficial.
H
D
D
Audio
recorded,
that's
the
only
thing,
that's
actually
required,
so
as
long
as
they
post
the
agenda,
where
the
meeting
is
going
to
be,
they
record
it
and
and
the
public
is
aware
of
where
the
meeting
is
at.
I
don't
see
why
you
guys
cannot
meet
in
a
park,
but
the
meeting
has
to
be
audio
recorded
and
it
has
to
be
posted,
giving
the
address
of
where
everybody's
going
to
be
at,
because
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
and
you
guys
should
do
that.
C
B
E
Thank
you.
I
I
had
a
question
and-
and
it's
I
know
you
know,
I
talk
with
my
friends
a
lot
about
it,
because
it's
kind
of
contentious
is
with
my
job.
We
were
required
to
provide
proof
that
we
had
been
vaccinated
and
we
also
had
to
sign
an
affidavit
that
we
had
been
vaccinated
is,
is
city
staff
required
to
do
anything
like
that.
B
So
the
official
update
with
that
has
not
been
released.
My
understanding
is
that
that
is
not
going
to
be
as
of
right
now
that
is
not
a
requirement.
So
we
are,
we
are
taking
people
at
their
word.
I
don't
know
if
that
will
change,
it
doesn't
sound
like
it
is
a
possibility
at
this
time.
B
E
H
H
However,
I
think,
in
light
of
everything
that's
going
on
and
all
like,
we
have
a
lot
of
pressing
matters
on
our
plate
right
now
and
we
need
to-
and
we
talked
about
this
at
the
last
meeting-
submitting
a
list
of
topics
that
are
not
necessarily
articles
in
the
magazine,
but
our
topics
that
we're
generating
commentary
about
in
all
of
the
media
platforms
that
we
have
available.
H
So
I
think
you
know
we
started
off
the
year
right
with
the
interview
with
dave
lewis,
talking
about
what
code
enforcement
does,
why
they're
important
to
the
community
that
they
are
peace,
officers,
etc,
etc.
I
thought
it
was
a
great
article,
but
it's
become
really
clear
that
the
community
needs
a
little
more
information
on
that.
H
So
I
I
would
like
to
go
to
the
next
meeting
with
the
with
chris
hargis
team,
with
some
topics
that
include
things
that
have
come
up
in
our
meetings:
the
jurisdiction
of
the
code
enforcement
team,
the
dog
parks,
the
possible
licensure.
H
What
should
you
do
if
you're
in
an
incursion
with
an
animal
animal,
animal
or
animal
to
person
like
what
are
the
rules
around
that?
Why
is
it
important
to
report
something?
Even
if
you
don't
want
to
upset
your
neighbors?
I
think
it's
a
great
topic,
because
it
I
mean
it's
very
real
to
everyone.
We
all
want
harmony
on
our
block,
but
we
also
want
to
live
in
a
safe
community.
H
So
I
I
these
are.
We
need
to
generate
that
list,
so
if
anybody
has
wants
to
contribute
to
that
right
now
or
send
an
email,
I
would
assume
that
anything
anybody
put
on
the
list
would
be
fair
game
or
do
we
need
to
approve
it
before
we
would
you
like
to
discuss
those
topics
right
now?
How
do
we
proceed.
H
G
H
So
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
is:
we're
definitely
doing
eab,
we'll
most
likely
in
the
for
the
fall
article.
We
need
to
have
a
topic
and
you
know
we
did
ally's
aunt
last
year,
but
I
really
think
that
I
just
I
think,
I'm
asking
you
guys
what
you
think,
but
I
think
that
we
really
need
to
talk
about.
H
Like
the
role
of
code
enforcement
and
maybe
get
a
little
bit
into
animal
control
and
how
what
a
service
they
provide
in
that
regard
and
what
citizens
protocols
would
be,
and
why
that
why
that's
important,
I
you
know,
I
think
part
of
our
messaging
needs
to
be
that
code
enforcement
is
an
equation.
That
includes
you,
you
know,
and
if
you
don't
participate
in
it,
you
can't
expect
results.
H
Oh
got
it:
okay,
anna,
I
I
mean
honestly,
I
haven't
thought
about
this
for
a
few
weeks,
but
I
you
know
we
do
need
to
have
a
fall
topic
and
we
do
have
the
media
plan
outlined
and
the
eab
plan,
as
you
saw
in
the
last
meeting,
is
pretty
developed
and
they
will
continue
doing
that,
but
I
think
for
fall.
H
We
can
move
on
to
another
topic
for
the
magazine
article
and
we're
not
just
limited
to
eab
and
as
timely
topics
come
up.
I
think
that
it's
appropriate
to
address
them.
I
mean
we
just
lost
a
park,
ranger
we're
going
to
be
changing
dog
parks
next
year,
potentially,
like
all
of
these
things
are
happening.
E
F
Yes,
well,
we
know
what
city
council
has
decided
by
them
about
the
recommendations
with
all
the
parks,
because
I
think
people
would
be
very
interested
and
to
know
how
city
council
is
moving
forward
and
what
changes
will
be
happening,
because
I
know
I
tuned
into
the
the
results
of
when
city
council
was
talking
about
the
results
from
the
surveys
and
they
had
a
very
large
amount
of
listeners
that
night
and
people
watching.
E
I
was
thinking
along
the
same
lines,
sonya
that
I
you
know
I
next
on
the
agenda
we'll
learn
about.
You
know
the
presentation
to
city
council
and
I
I
didn't
get
to
watch
it,
but
I
was
thinking
that
you
know
like
you
that
maybe
there's
a
topic
that,
even
if
it
hasn't
been
approved
that
we
can
pick
up
to
reinforce
the
direction
that
that
recommendation
is
going.
And
I
don't
know
what
that
would
be,
because
I
I
don't
know
how
that
presentation
went.
F
I
I
just
thought
it
would
be
a
good
interest,
great,
maybe
even
with
you,
explaining
how
the
app
works
like
about
with
like
sending
things
into
the
city,
because
I
had
no
idea.
My
friend
who
lives
in
littleton
was
telling
me
about
their
app,
and
I
didn't
know
that
we
had
an
app
that,
like
is
this.
F
Or
even
a
breakdown
of
like
how
do
you
do
it
and
let
the
city
know-
and
that
might
be
an
interesting
way
to
because
if
I
talk
to
neighbors
like
when
we
have
our
neighborhood
watch
meeting,
everyone
always
has
a
question
like.
Is
that
neighbors
friends
allowed
to
be
there
like
that
or
is
allowed
to
be
falling
down?
Is
my
neighbor
allowed
to
have
all
those
cars
in
his
backyard?
E
I
agree
I
most
people
don't
know
that
we
have
an
app
in
the
way
that
it's
the
button
is
worded.
It's
report
a
concern.
It's
not
report
your
neighbor
it.
You
know.
F
E
H
On
in
the
magazine
or
in
social
media-
and
I
think
if
we
move
early,
we
can
get
more
than
one
space
we've
done
it
in
the
past
and
if
they
want
to
hit
home
on
eab,
I
mean,
I
think,
springtime
is
the
time
to
treat
for
eab,
but
I
it
should
just
be
a
constant
reminder
for
the
next
couple
of
years,
but
yeah.
I
think
that
we
can
work
to
get
that
done.
H
I
think,
and
we
have
all
the
other
venues
open
to
us.
Also
so
I
mean
having
a
video
that
shows
that
app
on
social
media
would
be
great.
You
know
I'd
love
and
I
don't
I
don't
know
if
dave
is
camera
shy,
but
I'd
love
to
do
some
spots
with
him,
because
I
think
when
he
you
can
really
see
his
passion
for
the
work
that
he
and
his
team
do,
and
you
know
after
after
I
speak
with
him.
H
I
really
understand
why
their
role
is
important,
whether
you're
annoyed
that
you
have
to
follow
the
rules
at
times
or
not
like
it,
helps
you
to
understand
and
it
humanizes
the
code
enforcement
office.
So
I
I
would
welcome
that.
Also,
no
pressure
dave,
but
I
just
think
that
the
more
we
can
put
a
you
like
humanize
the
code
enforcement
department
and
help
the
community
realize
the
importance
of
the
work
that
they
do,
the
better
the
better
off
we
all
will
be.
E
Regarding
eab,
she
presented,
I
can't
think
of
her
name
right
now
for
some
reason,
but
she
presented
the
communications
plan
for
eab.
Do
you
know
when
they're
going
to
start
like
the
social
media
component
of
that
for
eab
they've.
H
Started
some
of
it
and
I
need
to
get
on
the
horn
with
them
about
moving
forward.
I'm
I
that's
yeah.
I
need
to
get
and
get
in
with
them.
H
Doing
the
tree
wraps
and
the
and
they
put
out
a
few
things-
and
I
don't
know
if
the
englewood
herald
has
come
through
yet
and
our
article
went
out
and
but
we
need
to
get
a
few
more
things
on
there
over
the
summer.
H
E
G
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
support
both
of
those.
I
really
like
the
idea
of
talking
about
the
code
enforcement
officers
and
what
they
do,
and
you
know
communicating
to
the
public
more
about
them
and
the
app
as
well
and-
and
this
is
probably
not
really
appropriate
for
this
portion
of
the
meeting.
But
since
we're
talking
about
the
app
I
went
to
try
and
install
it
again
and
personally,
I'm
not
going
to
install
it
because
it's
extremely
invasive
it
requires
access
to
your
contacts.
G
Location
phone
photos,
media
files,
I'd
like
you
know,
it's
definitely
not
an
app
that
allows
for
any
form
of
anonymous
submission,
and
I
would
like
to
see
it
not
require
any
of
that,
because
technically
it
doesn't
need
to
for
it
to
do
what
it
needs
to.
E
Any
other
questions
or
comments
for
member
johnson.
E
Monica
fyi,
I
met
the
neighbor
matt,
who
has
the
ash
tree?
It's
got
leaves
on
it
now
great,
it's
it's
pretty.
It's
his
yard
looks
nice
and
visually
that
might
be
an
option
and
he's
he's
he's
personable,
so
he
he
might
adoption
yeah.
H
That's
this
is
the
month
to
do
it.
This
is
what
we've
been
waiting
for,
and
I'm
just
at
the
next
week
I'll
be
more
open
to
work
on
that
a
little
bit
more,
but
everybody
has
the
appropriate
contacts.
H
I
believe-
and
I
can
shoot
an
email
over
to
them
and
just
get
the
ball
rolling
on
the
summer
campaign,
but
the
other
topics
I
think,
are
really
worth
doing
so
if
anybody
has
an
objection
to
them,
I
won't
put
them
on
the
list,
but
I
you
know,
I
think
that
all
of
the
topics
that
were
just
mentioned
are
viable.
J
H
For
fall,
article,
do
you
guys
want
to?
Because
if
we
can
start
thinking
about
that
now,
then
I
can
start
working
on
it
and
ask
for
I
can
ask
for
two
spaces
now
and
then,
if
you
can
give
me
what
the
other
topic
is,
then
I
can
start
generating
content
and
working
with
a
copywriter.
So
we
can
get
like
a
more
substantial
presence
in
the
next
quarter.
E
Is
it
okay,
if
we
just
summarize
what
those
topics
we
just
talked
about,
one
was
to
do
something
with
the
off-leash
recommendation
that
maybe
there's
a
topic
that
we
can
pick
up
from
that
recommendation
to
reinforce
the
direction
it's
going,
yeah
and
and
specifically.
H
Because
parks
and
rec
is
talking
about
the
dog
parks,
maybe
the
licensure
component
has
more
to
do
with
code
enforcement,
and
that
was
in
the
survey.
So
we
could
report
those
results.
We
can
report
what
city
council
responded
to
and
we
can
put
some
information
about
how
this
benefits
other
communities
you
know
like.
How
could
this
benefit
you?
If
we
licensed
dogs
in
in
englewood?
A
H
Know
like
that
could
be
a
whole
article
right
just
around
that
and
then
and
then
the
other
one,
how
how
do
the
apps
work,
highlighting
employees
or
just
highlighting
what
you
know
code
enforcement
is
quote.
Enforcement
is
essential
to
keeping
our
community
safe,
clean,
beautiful.
G
I'd
rather
not
see
licensing
as
something
that's
going
into
media
communications
before
it's
something
that
we've
even
debated
for
sure.
Okay,
I've
got
strong
feelings
on
the
opposite
of
that,
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
discuss
that
as
a
committee
and
really
explore
it,
since
it's
definitely
not
required
for
licensing
or
getting
your
dog
back
or
several
other
aspects.
H
Sure,
okay,
it
just
I
the
only
reason
I
bring
it
up
is
because
it
seems
like
that
topic
had
more
to
do
with
code
enforcement
than
the
actual
dog
parks,
because
that's
more
parks
and
rec,
because
they
are
parks
and
because
it
was
part
of
the
survey.
So
but
definitely
a
topic
for
this
committee
going
forward
sounds
like.
I
Yes,
I
agree
with
carson.
I
also
have
very
strong
feelings
opposite
of
licensing
and
we
can
discuss
that
at
another
time.
But
one
of
the
major
considerations
is
it's
very
expensive.
It
really
doesn't
serve
a
great
purpose
and
in
denver
less
than
10
of
the
dogs
are.
E
Licensed
well
from
communications,
I
think
I
mean
when
once
we
we
hear
about
the
results
of
the
survey
and
the
city
council's
reaction
to
the
results
that
maybe
there
is
a
topic
that
we
can
pick
up
from
that
and
focus
it
on
it.
And
I
don't
know
what
it
is.
But
I
I
agree
until
it
becomes
a
code
in
terms
of
licensing
your
dog.
We
probably
ought
not
to
go
there,
but
there.
E
The
third
area
that
we
talked
about
was
code
enforcement
itself
and
reinforcing
the
need
for
code
enforcement
and
how
it
benefits
us.
As
a
city.
H
I
love
that
okay,
great
yeah,
it's
a
it's
a
partnership
right,
it's
a
partnership
model.
I
love
it.
It
doesn't
work
if
you
don't
participate
and
can't
leave
it
all
on
them,
they're
not
allowed
to
they're
they're.
They
have
their
hands
tied
in
so
many
ways
and
and
a
lot
of
times
when
we
think
we're
being
a
good
neighbor.
We're
really
we're
we're,
not
really
helping
the
community.
E
And
then,
our
from
our
last
meeting,
the
other
topics
that
we
came
up
with
was
public
responsibility
for
reporting
dog
attacks
and
why.
H
H
About
the
community
right,
what
might
seem
hard
right
now
is
actually
might
make
things
better
down
the
road
right.
Okay,.
G
Maybe
even
about
that
process
like
what
that
the
experience,
why
it's
important
to
report
and
then
what
to
expect
from
the
process.
Since
it
wasn't
even
clear
to
you,
chair
boden,
when
you
went
through
it.
E
E
E
Monica
is
this
something
that
you
can
walk
us
through.
I
mean
I
I
I
have
the
the
survey
results.
Presentation
queued
up
on
my
computer.
Well,.
H
Yeah,
if
you
want
to
present
them,
that's
great,
did
you
did
all
of
you
get
a
chance
to
look
through
them
or
watch
the
city
council
meeting
I
mean
I
I
because
if
you
did,
you
have
the
same
information
as
I
do.
H
What
I
can
tell
you
is
that
the
the
council
asked
a
lot
of
good
questions
to
the
company
that
did
the
survey
and
they
decided
that
the
the
task
force
that
I
was
a
part
of
we'll
meet
one
more
time
and
we'll
make
final
recommendations,
and
then
council
will
act
on
that
and
remember
russell.
Am
I
correct
in
that
statement
yeah
so.
H
The
recommendations
as
they
stand
right
now,
may
change
a
little
bit
and
are
you
were
you
able
to
present
the
yes?
H
You
want
me
to
if
you,
if
you
would
like
yeah-
and
it
seemed
to
me
and
remember-
russell-
go
jump
in
if
you
would
like,
but
it
seemed
to
me
that
the
most
controversy
was
around
jason
park
and
that
mo
and
that
we
got
a
better
than
expected
response
and,
as
the
meeting
was
a
highly
attended,
this
is
for
people
who
this
relates
to
it's
pretty
important
to
them
and
for
people
who
lived
within
half
a
mile
of
dog
parks,
their
usage
and
their
concern
was
probably
more
prevalent,
but
that
overall,
it
appeared
that
all
of
the
or
the
majority
of
the
respondents
were
concerned
with
the
safety
and
cleanliness
of
the
parks,
and
I
think
the
usage
probably
depended
more
upon
who
actually
had
dogs,
which
I
think
is,
if
I
recall,
over
40
of
the
population,
so
the
recommendations
as
they
stood
or
as
far
as
the
survey
results
went
they
asked
about.
H
H
H
They
were
talking
about
giving
special
licenses
for
our
dog
parks
for
non-residents,
like
I
think,
but
jason
people
supported
the
general
ideas
that
we
were
pushing
for
fencing
and
but
but
jason
parks
seemed
to
be
the
most
controversial
ones,
so
I
mean
that's
kind
of
where
it
stands
until
we
meet
again
and
reap
and
present
again
to
the
council.
H
So
that's
about
it.
Half
of
our
households
have
a
dog,
yep
and
so
and
but
you're
really.
If
you
live
more
than
a
half
mile
away
from
a
dog
park,
you're
it's
from
what
I
gathered
from
the
presentation
it
they
weren't
using
those
parks
nearly
as
much
as
the
people
who
were
immediately
living
near
them
and
and
personally
speaking
from
the
meetings,
the
the
off-leash
dog
task
force
committee,
the
p,
the
neighbors
who
live
nearby
are
really
invested,
whether
they're
for
it
or
against
it.
They
they're
they're.
H
All
in
so
there's
a
lot
of
strong
opinions,
but
we
do
have
to
make
some
compromises
and
we
have
to
make
the
parks
work
for
everyone.
So
I
think,
going
back
and
having
one
final
session
where
we
hash
it
out
and
go
back
to
the
city
council
will
be
beneficial
and
then
it's
going
to
be
in
council's
hands.
H
So,
but
if
you,
the
plan
is
to
put
fences
in
some
parks
and
to
make
more
dog
parks
overall
so
that
there
and
that
are
more
representative
of
the
spaces
in
the
city,
because
right
now,
they're
concentrated
in
the
south
and
the
west.
So
so
and
that's
why
they're,
adding
emerson
and
the
beltway
and
yeah-
and
I
can't
I
can't
remember
the
name
of
the
park-
that's
just
a
little
bit
south
of
here,
so
jason!
H
No
jason
is
jason-
is
the
one
that
they
really
are
defending
and
want
to
keep
and
not
put
a
fence
in
and
not
limit
the
space
that
they
have.
It's
it's
pretty
contentious
because
that's
the
a
place
where
there's
athletic
fields
that
are
in
use
and
they're
trying
to
I
I
that's
just
the
one
that
comes
up
the
most.
That
is
the
most
contentious.
B
So
monica
and
I
will
be
going
back
I'll-
be
one
of
the
staff
representatives
and
monica
on
behalf
of
this
committee,
as
well
as
parks
and
rec
on
june
9th.
B
Maybe
it
might
be
helpful
to
get
a
little
feedback
so
that
monica
can
present
that
on
june
9th
as
to
what
your
feedback
would
be
about
this
recommendation
and
anything
you
might
have
concerns
or
things
that
you
are
happy
to
see
in
this
report.
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
to
give
that
direction
to
your
liaison
from
this
board.
H
H
And
I
know
a
lot
of
you
live
near
emerson
park.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
any
feelings
about
emerson
park
becoming
an
off-leash
and
officially
an
leash
park.
I
know
there's
been
some
contentious
encounters
in
that
park
right.
The
truth
is
that
the
citizens
treat
it
like
it's
an
off
leash
dog
park
and
it's
not
and
if
you're
in
faith
favor
of
it
becoming
so
that
would
be
good
to
hear.
H
A
F
Green,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
yeah,
oh
good
good.
Yes,
I
think
emerson
park
would
be
great
as
a
off
leash
park,
because
a
lot
of
people
like
to
socialize
there
and
walk
their
dogs
over.
But
since
it's
since
code
enforcement
has
been
coming
regularly
for
the
last
year,
a
lot
of
times
when
I
walk
by
there's
no
one
in
the
park,
it's
just
it's
empty
now.
F
So
I
think
a
lot
of
people
would
like
to
be
able
to
use
it
again,
and
that
would
be
wonderful,
but
we'll
just
have
to
see
what
council
says
about
it,
and
I,
like
the
idea
of
cushing
park,
becoming
an
off
leash
dog
park,
because
there's
a
bit
of
an
issue
with
quite
a
few
homeless
people
and
drug
usage
there
and
I've
lived
in
the
city
for
quite
a
while
and
years
and
years
ago,
bates
in
logan
park
was
like
that
we
used
to
have
homeless
people
we
used
to
have
drug
usage,
and
for
a
couple
years
it
was
an
awful
leash
dog
park
and
having
people
with
dogs
come
cleared
it
all
out,
because
there
was
there
was
no
more
privacy,
and
so
people
had
to
go
to
another
place.
F
So
they
could
do
things
without
people
bothering
them
or
without
being
so
noticeable.
So
I
do
like
the
idea
about
cushing
park
as
well,
because
I
know
when
I've
gone
on
clean
up
projects
or
helped
my
friends
with
the
pollinator
garden
across
the
street
by
the
depot.
F
I've
noticed
that
it
needs
more
families
and
more
people
to
come
and
play
with
their
dogs
just
to
equalize
out
just
to
clean
it
up
a
little
bit.
H
A
Can
I
sorry
this
is
sonya's
husband?
Can
I
just
interject
a
little
bit
too
yeah?
Oh
sorry,
I
I
run
regularly.
Obviously
I
just
obviously
live
in
the
same
house
and
just
sony's
point
about
emerson
park
when
people
used
to
gather
there
with
their
dogs.
A
G
Yeah,
I
am
in
favor
of
all
the
recommendations
towards
off
leash.
I
think
that's
great.
I
also
think
that
it's
nice,
that
the
recommendations
and
the
plan
did
not
make
them
all
fenced
in.
G
I
think
as
much
as
possible,
not
fenced
in
is
better,
and
I
really
like
what
member
strom
and
her
husband
just
told
us
about,
and
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
You
know
my
aversion
to
licensing.
Is
you
know,
that's
something
that
I've
been
proud
of
being
someone
who
lives
in
inglewood,
as
opposed
to
denver
that
we
don't
have
unnecessary
regulation
like
that,
I
feel,
like
you
know,
anyone
who
cares
about
their
daw,
I
mean
it
doesn't
change.
There
are
rules
around
vaccination.
G
They
already
have
to
have
the
tags
that
say:
they're
vaccinated
and
those
tags
do
have
identifying
markers
and
anyone
who
cares
about
their
dog
and
wants
to
get
it
back
is
going
to
have
their
phone
number
on
their
dog
as
well.
I
mean
getting
the
dog
back
is
not
a
real
argument
for
licensing,
and
if
this
movement
towards
licensing
happens,
then
I
would
argue
that
it
should
be
in
return
for
something
like
what
boulder
has,
where
it's
a
off-leash
everywhere
voice
command
option.
G
So
if
we're
going
to
be
making
people
have
to
get
licenses,
which
I
feel
are
completely
unnecessary
and
over
regulation
for
no
value,
then
let's
get
something
for
it,
which
would
be
allowing
a
citizen
to
show
that
they
have
voice
control
and
never
have
to
use
a
leash
in
the
city.
H
Carson,
I
believe
that
topic
came
up
in
the
parks
and
rec
meeting.
I
think
christina
underhill
mentioned
something
about
looking
at
those
programs
such
as
the
one
in
boulder
that
I
I
am
also
familiar
with,
so
that
your
point
has
been
iterated
at
some
point
by
someone
and
just
so
you
know
that
that's
being
discussed.
G
G
I
think
I
think
we
should
make
it
like.
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
we're
working
on
and
that
you
know
chair
bowdoin's
own
experience
has
made
super
clear
is
the
dangerous
dog
thing
needs
to
be
a
streamlined
process?
If
a
dog
is
attacking
or
dangerous,
they
need
to
be
identified
and
dealt
with
quickly,
so
that
there's
not
any
further
risk
from
them.
But
most
dogs
are
not.
Most
dogs
are
friendly.
Most
dogs
are
good.
Most
dogs
can
run
much
faster
than
their
owners
and
really
need
time
off
leash.
G
So
anything
we
can
do
to
make
it
so
that
inglewood
continues
to
be
a
great
place
with
lots
of
off-leash
parks
that
encourages
that,
and
you
know
I
have
no
problem
with
people
who
live
outside
of
inglewood
utilizing
our
parks
with
friendly
dogs,
but
if
they
bring
a
dangerous
dog
that
should
be
you
know
immediately
enforced.
I
mean
I'm
for
immediate.
You
know
quarantining
by
code
enforcement
of
a
dog
that
attacks
someone
not
allowing
it
to
go
back
to
the
owner
and
potentially
hurt
someone
else.
H
And
as
far
as
when
dogs
attack
people,
I
believe
that
is
the
case,
but
not
when
dogs
attack,
other
dogs
and
so
there's,
maybe
something
to
discuss.
Yeah.
I
Yes,
I
agree
with
sonya
and
I
agree
with
carson
wholeheartedly
as
far
as
fencing
emerson
park.
That
would
be
a
disaster,
and
I've
been
in
inglewood
now
for
about
23
years
and
for
the
entire
23
years.
Until
last
year,
I
was
in
emerson
park
in
the
meet-up
group
that
came
in
about
4
30
in
the
afternoon
and
stayed
for
about
an
hour
or
so,
and
we
all
were
socializing,
but
we
were
socializing
with
our
dogs.
I
We
were
playing
with
them,
alternating
throwing
balls
for
them,
teaching
them
helping
each
other
teach
the
dogs
to
be
obedient,
and
there
were
no
problems
and
over
200
people
in
the
area
signed
a
petition
to
leave
it
alone.
I
I
I
He
would
die
in
a
nanosecond
but
off
leash
at
emerson.
He
got
along
with
all
the
dogs
and
all
the
dogs
cut
along
with
him,
so
I
agree
and
we
kept
all
the
homeless
people
out.
We
kept
the
park
clean
and
it
was
that
way
at
bates,
logan
too,
for
the
entire
time
I
was
there
and
now,
even
though
the
park
is
not
being
used,
the
ballpark
is
not
being
used
very
often
and
the
people
that
wanted
to
play
with
their
dogs
in
the
ballpark.
I
H
Well,
that's
good
see
that,
as
far
as
I'm
aware,
there's
not
a
plan
to
immediately
put
fencing
at
emerson
park.
So
really
if
the
recommendations
go
through
as
they
stand
exactly
what
you're
describing
is
what
will.
E
Happen
code
manager,
louis,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
B
I
just
want
to
reemphasize
monica
did
touch
on
this,
so
emerson
park
is
not
being
recommended
as
a
fenced
park.
That
is
not
part
of
the
recommendation
that
went
forward
to
council.
I
I
don't
believe
that
is
even
an
option
for
the
committee
and
then
bates
logan
is
not
up
for
discussion
at
this
time.
It's
going
to
stay
as
a
park,
the
way
that
it
is
currently.
J
Hi
yeah,
I
just
would
like
to
sorry
I'm
trying
to
get
my
camera
on.
Oh
there
we
go
just
make
sure
that
all
of
the
the
kids
get
serviced
here.
I
guess
you
could
say
we
have
a
lot
of
youth
sports
that
use
those
fields,
and
I
think
we
need
to
make
sure
that
there's
no.
J
I
don't
know,
what's
the
right
word,
to
say,
endangerment
for
the
kids
based
on
dogs
running
loose
when
they're
practicing
baseball
or
soccer
or
softball
or
whatever,
because
we
use
those
fields
for
practice.
J
B
Robert
thank
you
so
much
for
bringing
that
information
forward.
I
do
want
to
let
this
committee
know
that
youth
sports
is
represented
on
the
off
leash
task
force
committee
and
those
are
very
serious
conversations
that
are
being
had
and
one
of
the
primary
concerns
in
these
recommendations.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
re-emphasizing
that
that
is
a
major
consideration
with
this
moving
forward.
D
Thank
you
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
state
that
my
husband,
who
is
retired,
he
takes
our
15
month
old
german
shepherd
to
canine
corral
pretty
much
every
day.
That
is
a
fenced
in
dog
park.
It's
a
dog
park
only
and
we
have
never
had
any
problems
there.
The
dogs
all
run
around.
They
have
a
great
time,
they're
very
friendly,
so
I
don't
see
how
there's
any
dangerous
situation
that
is
created
with
the
fenced-in
dog
park.
I
also
want
to
say
that
the
people
there
are
very
good.
D
G
Code
manager,
lewis,
what
like
dog
waste?
What
how
is
that
enforced?
Do
you
do?
Does
a
code
enforcement
officer
have
to
see
it
themselves
or
what
happens
if
someone
reports
it
like?
What
does
how
just
overall
on
that,
because
I
think
that's
really
important.
I
mean
clearly
like
for
everyone
to
enjoy
these
parks
with
dogs,
that's
really
dependent
on
people
being
conscious
and
serious
about
picking
up
after
their
dogs.
B
Carson
poopoo
happens
and
not
to
make
light
of
what
you
said.
It
is
one
of
those
more
difficult
things
to
prove
a
code
officer
actually
has
to
see
a
dog
use.
It
does
it
do
its
business
either
in
a
park
or
in
someone's
yard,
and
then
the
person
actively
walk
away
or
not
engage
in
removing
it.
A
citizen
is
more
than
welcome
to
come
forward,
but
they
are
the
witness
and
therefore
by
constitution.
B
B
G
B
So
from
hearing
from
the
maintenance
crews,
it
does
possess
present
a
a
problem
also
from
youth
sports
they're,
the
ones
that
are
mainly
using
these
fields
where
they
don't
see
the
landmines
and
they,
the
family
members,
are
encountering
them.
B
H
A
lot
of
you
have
said
all
the
things
I
was
going
to
say,
but
being
in
the
task
force
that
the
topic
of
the
dog,
waste
and
youth
sports
have
come
up
and
I'm
a
I'm,
a
youth
sports,
coach
and
a
dog
owner.
So
I
definitely
appreciate
both
sides
of
the
argument.
It
is
interesting
to
me
that
exactly
this
argument
is
being
made.
H
There's
lots
of
dog
waste
in
the
park,
but
the
people
who
use
the
unfenced
areas
swear
that
they
always
pick
up
their
dog
waste
and
that
they
even
go
and
pick
up
dog
waste
from
other
people,
because
they
appreciate
that
there's
an
off
leash
park,
but
it
I
think
it
is.
It
sounds
like
it's
more
of
an
issue
in
the
unfenced
dog
parks,
potentially
because
of
a
diffused
sense
of
responsibility.
H
When
you're
in
a
fenced-in
designated
dog
park,
you're
you're
in
a
dog
park-
I
don't
know,
but
but
all
of
those
points
are
brought
up
vociferously
in
the
meetings
so
and
that's
why
it's
taken
so
long
to
come
to
a
consensus
and
even
after
we've
come
to
a
consensus.
H
People
are
like
wait.
I
didn't
get
everything
we
I
wanted.
Well,
that's
not
what
a
consensus
is
so,
hopefully
we'll
make
some
good
compromises
and
some
good
solutions
I
think
duncan
park
is
gonna,
be
a
great
addition.
It's
it's
just
a
a
little
bit
south
here
in
washington
and
it
sounds
like
emerson.
H
I
I
used
to
go
through
the
park
every
morning,
bates
logan
and
emerson,
and
pick
up
anything
I
saw
and
as
soon
as
we
were
surveilled
and
ticketed
for
having
a
dog
off
leash,
I
stopped
going
so
I
and
I
noticed
that
there
was
a
lot
more
poop
in
the
park,
but
every
time
I
would
pick
up
before
this
all
came
down
at
emerson.
I
The
people
who
are
actually
playing
with
their
dogs
watch
their
dogs
and
we
do
pick
it
up,
so
it
just
there's
just
no
way
to
determine
between
it.
But
the
point
always
was
that
the
people
who
wanted
to
play
with
their
dogs
in
the
park
didn't
want
to
do
it.
While
there
were
people
using
the
ballpark
for
sports,
so
we'd
always
make
sure
there
was
nobody
there.
I
I
But
that's
okay
with
me:
it's
just
the
ones
that
have
you
know,
use
the
ballpark
without
any
permits
and
make
it
difficult
for
the
rest
of
us
because
they
have
their
dogs
and
they're
not
paying
any
attention
to
them.
But
that's
neither
here
nor
there.
The
fact
is,
we've
all
you
know
the
people
that
run
off
leash
and
play
ball
with
their
dogs
in
the
parks
are
very
respectful
and
we
do
pick
up
our
poop
and
sometimes
a
lot
of
others.
E
If
I
could,
if
I
could
add
a
couple
comments,
monica
I
too
use
baits
logan
park
and
I
I
think
the
parks
and
recreation
department
does
a
really
good
job
on
keeping
that
car
park
clean
and
it's
it's
a
beautiful
park.
I
love
to
walk
through
it.
E
I
have
noticed
several
times
when
there
are
sports
and
especially
like
the
soccer
kids,
you
know,
teams
that
are
playing
there
or
practicing
that
I've
seen
dogs
run
through
their
games
before
so
so
I
and
and
that
that
bothered
me
I
felt
like
the
owners
should
not
be
leaving.
You
know
letting
their
dogs
off
leash,
let
alone
you
know,
having
them
run
through
the
midst
of
a
youth
sports
game.
E
Secondly,
we
do
have
coyotes,
I
have
a
deck
outside.
My
house
and
my
dog
lays
on
the
deck
at
night
and
she
alerts
me
when
a
coyote
goes
by
and
for
mike.
What
I
can
tell
is,
we
have
two
coyotes
in
the
neighborhood
and
they
just
simply
they
walk
down
the
middle
of
the
street
and
they
are
definitely
coyotes.
So
so
we
we
have
to
be
careful
when
we
talk
about
the
dog
poop,
because
it
could
very
well
be
not
a
dog.
E
Let's
see
the
in
terms
of
I'm
I'm
of
the
opinion
that
licensing
dog
is
a
good
thing.
I've
never
lived
in
a
city
that
didn't
have
a
licenser
program.
The
last
city
I
lived
in
was
centennial
and
we
they
required
licensing
and
at
some
point
when
they
we
were
having
dog
poop
problems.
E
Part
of
your
license
is
you
had
to
submit
a
fecal
sample
and
they
would
basically
do
you
know,
register
your
dog
and
if
poop
was
found,
they
could
run
it
through
a
database
and
identify
who
the
dog
was
now
whether
yeah
they
actually
did.
That
or
not.
I
don't
know,
but
I
can
tell
you,
as
a
dog
owner,
I
made
damn
sure
that
my
dog
never
left
any
poop
anywhere.
I
mean.
E
E
I
think
we
had
to
pay
12
a
year
to
license
our
dogs
and
lastly,
I
wanted
to
thank
both
monica
and
code
manager,
lewis
for
representing
this
committee
on
you
know
for
the
off-leash
task
force
and,
being
you
know,
meeting
doubly
on
this
issue.
I
know
it's
been
a
long
process,
but
I
really
do
appreciate
the
thoroughness
that
the
team
has
done.
H
So
council
pushed
it
back
to
us
to
solidify
our
recommendations
now
that
the
survey
has
been
completed
because
the
survey
went
out
and
then
the
task
force
didn't
meet
again
so
now
the
results
are
back.
The
council's
been
consulted
and
been
able
to
ask
their
questions
so
we're
just
going
to
reconvene
and
make
the
final
recommendations
is
what
I
understand:
manager,
lewis
and
also
manager
lewis.
I
julie.
H
I
remember
you
sharing
your
story
about
centennial
last
year
when
we
talked
about
licensing,
but
I
feel
like
dave
lewis
officer
lewis,
really
does
a
good
job
of
explaining
how
licensing
can
be
beneficial
to
a
community,
because
my
I
misguidedly
thought
that
it
would
be
a
source
of
revenue
and
I
was
totally
wrong,
but
when
he
spoke
about
why
licensing
can
be
helpful,
it
really
resonated.
So
I
don't
know
if,
if
dave
would
like
to
speak
on
that
thanks.
B
I'm
going
to
hold
off
on
speaking
about
licensing
at
this
time
only
because
the
primary
purpose
of
the
license
when
it
was
brought
up
in
the
committee
was
because
the
off-leash
community
was
asking
for
these
licenses.
It
was
not
the
city
that
was
pushing
this.
They
wanted
to
utilize
these
funds
to
pay
for
an
additional
ranger
or
to
pay
for
maintenance,
and
they
really.
B
We
did
find
that
a
a
huge
majority
of
people
that
visited
our
offlish
park
areas
and
our
canine
corral
actually
do
not
live
in
the
city
of
inglewood,
so
they
were
taking
advantage
of
our
beautiful
resources
and
not
being
not
participating,
and
so
that
was
the
with
the
tax
revenues.
So
that
was
kind
of
a
the
reason
that
the
off-leash
folks
wanted
that
they
wanted
people
to
pay
a
fee
to
use
the
off-leash
parks,
and
then
people
that
lived
outside
of
the
city
would
pay
a
larger
fee
to
utilize.
B
Our
the
beautiful
facilities
that
the
the
citizens
of
ingo
whitmer
are
maintaining.
I
think
that
we're
going
to
table
that
whole
conversation,
because
it's
not
something
that
was
tremendously
in
favor
and
it
is
a
much
more
in-depth,
more
robust
conversation
to
have
in
the
future.
But
thank
you
modern
monica
for
bringing
that
up
and
the
centennial
poop
thing
is
a
real
story.
Dna
testing.
I
know
you
wanted
to
talk
about
that
briefly.
B
Many
apartment
complexes
are
requiring
that
as
part
of
the
registration
for
an
apartment
building,
they
actually
go
and
pick
up
the
poop
and
send
it
off
for
testing
and
they
send
a
nice
little
fine
to
their
apartment
owner.
So
that
is
something
that
can
be
done.
Is
it
something
that
this
the
citizens
of
eagle
would
want
to
have?
I
can't
answer
that
question
for
you.
So
that's
something
also
for
a
future
conversation
with
licensing.
If,
if
and
when
you
want
to
move
down
that
path-
and
I
don't
foresee
that
in
the
immediate
future.
B
The
next
process
would
be
to
send
their
final
recommendations
to
council.
Council
can
have
three
options,
one
they
can
adopt
it.
The
way
the
recommendations
are
set
forth.
Two,
they
can
make
changes
to
the
recommendations
and
adopt
that
or
three
they
can
choose
to
do
nothing.
So
that's
kind
of
the
next
step
and
none
of
these
plans
would
be
implemented
in
probably
until
fall.
Whatever
council
decides.
E
E
E
G
A
E
Well,
I
find
another
question:
did
council
give
you
any
direct
feedback
or
any
directions
for
the
for
your
proposal,
or
was
it
just
you
know?
Thank
you
for
the
information
now
go
back
and
come
back
with
a
firmer
recommendation.
H
I
don't
remember
all
of
the
questions
that
were
asked.
I
I
I
remember
councilman
sierra
asking
like
who
who
was
represented
by
the
answers
he
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
survey
responses
really
truly
represented
the
majority
of
the
constituents,
be
there,
be
they
dog
owners
or
not,
and
I
kind
of
think
I
mean-
maybe
you
remember
russell-
can
speak
to
this,
but
I
gathered
that
they
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
results
were
representative
and
that
they
that
the
recommendations
would
serve
everyone,
which
would
be
the
obvious
objective
of
the
council.
H
So
I
I
think
they're
just
looking
for
us
to
clean
it
up
a
little
bit
and
they
and
they
understand
that
we're
trying
to
work
with
two
two.
H
You
know
a
lot
of
people
in
the
middle,
but
two
groups
on
the
ends
that
are
pretty
you
know
want
it
their
way.
So
maybe
member
russell
could
chime
in
on
that
because
she
was
there.
C
Thank
you.
My
takeaway
really
was
that
the
council
really
wanted
to
give
the
task
force
an
opportunity
to
weigh
in
on
the
survey
results
and
get
closure.
C
You
know
for
them
to
have
one
more
opportunity
to
look
at
things
and
and
get
closure
before
the
final
recommendations
came
to
council.
I
mean
a
council
really
did
not
weigh
in
on
what
they
wanted
or
or
what
they
thought.
They
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
task
force
had
an
opportunity
to
go
back
and
address
that,
and
so,
when
it
comes
forward
this
next
time,
then
council
will
probably
debate,
and
I
have
no
idea
which
direction
it
will
go
so.
C
But
I
do
appreciate
task
force's
hard
work
on
this
and,
and
it
is
a
very
difficult,
it's
a
very
difficult
decision.
It's
a
very
difficult
problem
I
mean
early
on.
I
think
this
was
not
before
any
of
the
surveys
and
the
task
force
gave
some
recommendations.
C
One
of
the
council
members
suggested
that
all
of
the
suggestions
would
be
equally
unacceptable
to
all
sides.
So
so
I
mean
so
I
guess
that
that
still
could
be
a
danger.
So
that's
all.
I
really
have
thank
you.
Thank
you.
E
H
I
think
the
meeting's
june,
9th
or
somewhere
abouts
and
perhaps
then
there's
a
there's,
even
a
mediator
for
this,
like
it's,
not
just
the
citizens,
there's
a
professional
mediating,
the
conversation,
so
they
put
together
the
what
everybody
came
up
with
and
presented.
So
that
will
be.
I
don't
know
if
that
will
happen
at
the
next
meeting.
I'm
sure
it
will
be
as
soon
as
they
can
put
it
together,
but
it
probably
will
be
easier
for
them,
since
we
already
have
that
whole
document.
H
The
original
proposal
to
work
with
so
I
mean
we've
made
a
lot
of
great
progress
and
I
think,
having
the
survey
and
having
the
task
force
has
really
is
really
going
to
help
inform
counsel
because
that's
what
they
need.
They
need
the
information
so
that
they
can
make
the
best
decision
for
everyone
in
the
community.
So
thank
you.
Member
russell.
E
Thank
you
any
further
questions
for
member
johnson,
all
right,
so
we're
gonna.
We
can
move
on
to
7b,
which
is
review
of
dangerous
dog
code.
The
document
attached
isn't
the
dangerous
dog
code
in
in
our
meeting
packet,
so
they're.
What
I,
what
I
can
do
today
is
share
with
you,
the
progress
that
we
made
and
this
dates
back
to
2019.
E
We
had
a
member
pardon
me.
No,
we
we
had
a
member
that
kind
of
she.
She
took
this
on
and
kind
of
dove
into
the
dangerous
dog
code
and
off
the
top
of
my
head
and
and
colleen.
You
were
and
dave
you.
I
think
you
all
were
part
of
the
committee
at
that
time,
but
what
we
noticed
was
we
weren't
enforcing
some
of
the
existing
code,
which
was
number
one
dogs
had
to
have
a
microchip
and
number
two.
E
So
what
I'll
do
is
all
I've
got
all
those
documents
and
I
will
put
them
in
our
meeting
packet
for
the
our
june
meeting
and
then
I
can
walk
you
all
through
that
coin.
Did
you
have
anything
else
that
you
wanted
to
share?
If
you,
if
you
have,
if
your
memory
serves
you
better
than
mine,
I.
I
Have
I
found
all
the
documents
that
I
was
given,
including
the
colorado
revised
statutes
on
dangerous
dogs,
but
I
had
the
code
printed
out
and
all
of
the
notes
on
the
discussion
and
primarily
we
were
looking
at
how
to
identify
dangerous
dogs
and
it
didn't
work
out
real
well
and
of
course,
we've
lost
four
of
the
13
dangerous
dogs
at
the
time.
I
So
there
was
a
concern,
but
it's
very
clear
from
the
code
that
a
dangerous
dog
one
that's
been
adjudicated
dangerous,
cannot
be
in
the
public
parks
unless
they're
very,
very
carefully,
muzzled
and
very
carefully
leashed,
and
they
have
to
stay
away
from
crowds.
That's
there
and
it
should
be
in
force.
But
since
there
are
only
nine
of
them
and
mostly
are
now
maybe
10-
I
don't
know
if
they've
actually
adjudicated
the
dog
that
attacked
your
dog
as
dangerous,
yet
it'll
be
in
june
yeah.
So
nine
currently
have
been
adjudicated
dangerous.
I
I
Are
they
still
alive,
and
perhaps
I
you
know
put
give
I
like
a
vest
or
something
that
if
they
do
go
out,
you
know
that
we
know
that
they're,
a
dangerous
dog
and
so
people
can
avoid
them,
but
they
need
to
be
muzzled,
they're
not
really
allowed
in
the
park.
I
After
that
there
they
were
waiving
the
permit
fees
for
dangerous
dogs,
and
that
was
an
issue
that
we
couldn't
get
any
any
action
on
or
any
information
on.
Why
so?
Those
are
the
issues
on
dangerous
dogs,
but
since
there
are
so
few
of
them
that
have
been
adjudicated
dangerous,
I'm
not
sure
that
we
should
spend
a
heck
of
a
lot
of
time
on
it,
because
I
don't
anticipate
too
many
of
these.
I
E
Code
manager
louis,
do
we
currently
have
a
way
to
identify
a
dangerous
dog
if
they
decide
to
go
to
a
park.
So
the.
B
Way
that
the
ordinance
has
been
interpreted
by
by
the
courts
as
well
as
the
previous
city
attorney
is,
the
tagging
has
been
satisfied
by
requiring
the
microchip.
So
as
part
of
the
permit,
all
dangerous
dogs
are
required
to
be
microchipped,
so
we
do
not
weigh
permit
fees.
Every
single
dangerous
dog
permit
fee
is
paid
for
at
the
court.
If
they
fail
their
inspection,
they
are
required
to
pay
an
additional
fee
for
every
time
we
have
to
go
out
to
do
the
inspection
for
the
dangerous
dog
we
currently
muzzling
is
not
required.
B
That
is
an
option
that
the
court
can
order.
Some
dogs
have
been
ordered
to
be
muzzled,
but
that
is
at
the
discretion
of
the
court,
and
the
city
cannot
exclude
dogs
from
parks.
That
has
to
be
a
court
order
that
goes
in
place
unless
this
body
and
council
chooses
to
change-
and
I
think
that
was
a
recommendation
that
was
made
at
one
time
during
this
process
and
the
city
attorney
said
that
might
become
complicated
with
someone's
personal
rights.
So
I
think
that
was
kind
of
kind
of
left
in
the
air.
B
B
A
tag
on
someone's
collar
is
not
going
to
be
sufficient
in
in
identifying
a
dog
until
they're
too
close.
We
do
know
every
single
dog
that
is
under
the
dangerous
dog
permit
that
has
been
adjudicated.
We
take
photographs,
we
know
where
they
live.
We
check
up
on
them.
We
make
sure
that
they're
in
compliance
with
the
ordinance.
So
that
is
not
something
that
we
treat
lightly
and
we
do
make
sure
that
we
understand
where
those
dogs
are
at
all
times,
and
we
are
adding
two
more
to
that
to
that
list.
B
They
have
not
been
approved
for
their
dangerous
dog
permit,
as
of
yet
as
far
as
parks
park
attacks.
I
know
coween
mentioned
this.
I
believe
within
the
last
year
we
did
have
an
attack
at
jason
park
and
we
did
have
an
attack
at
centennial
park.
G
Yeah
I
I
caught.
I
joined
right
at
the
end
of
that
we
had
one
of
the
meetings
where
that
previous
member
went
over,
like
we
went
over
everything
that
she
had
given
us
and
all
that
identification,
information
and
stuff
and
code
manager
lewis
like
what
I
thought
that
what
she
had
come
up
with
and
what
you
guys
had
worked
on
on
that
sounded
great
from
because
I
remember
there
being
you
know.
G
Right,
no,
I
know
it's
not
law.
Now
I
was
just
I
was
going
to
ask
you
like.
Is
you
said
that
a
marker
on
the
collar
wouldn't
be
enough?
I
mean,
even
if
the
entire
caller
was
red
and
maybe
if
they
were
required
to
have
a
red
leash
or
something
because
they
wouldn't
be
allowed
to
do
off-leash
if
they
had
a
dangerous
dog
right.
B
Well,
so
the
park
rules,
the
way
park
rules
are,
is
that
a
dangerous
dog
or
a
dog
that
is
aggressive
is
not
supposed
to
be
at
a
park.
It's
part
of
the
general
rules,
so
but
I
I
that
would
be
a
park
rules,
violation
that
they
would
receive
and
it
necessarily
wouldn't
it
would
go
hand
in
hand
with
they're
not
supposed
to
get
any
similar
violations
within
two
years,
and
so,
if
they
receive
that
violation
and
again
the
dangerous
dog
only
lasts
for
two
years.
B
So
we
do
have
a
time
frame
on
that
case
and
then
a
penalty
hearing
is
is
held
in
the
judge
determines
what
to
do
to
kee.
If
the
dog
needs
to
still
be
registered,
or
if
it's
completed,
it's
we'll
call
it
doggy
probation.
B
No,
nobody
can
tell
from
a
microchip
or
just
the
tag,
because
the
way
it's
reds
right
now
is
it
says,
tag,
and
so
the
courts
interpreted
that
as
a
microchip
as
a
way
to
track
it.
This
ordinance
was
written
before
we
had
microchips,
so
the
tag
won't
work.
Personally,
I
don't,
I
don't
think
dogs
should
be
that
have
been
adjudicated
should
be
in
any
public
setting
at
for
a
time
period
until
the
dog
can
be
reassessed.
B
Is
that
an
option?
I
don't
know
that's
what
I
was
proposing
moving
forward
with
a
a
leash
or
a
vest
or
some
type
of
a
collar
caller,
which
would
be
an
added
expense
not
to
the
city,
but
we
need
to
make
sure
we
pass
that
expense
on
to
the
adjudicated
dog
as
part
of
the
the
permitting
process.
So
we
may
need
to
look
to
council
to
approve
that
that
fee.
B
E
F
Forgot,
oh,
I
was
just
a
few
years
back.
I
had
a
dog
that
was
very
hyper
sensitive
to
other
dogs,
and
our
my
veterinarian's
office
would
always
have
us
would
was
trying
to
get
everyone
who
had
a
dog
that
needed
more
space.
Or
do
you
need
to
be
away
from
other
dogs
to
have
like
a
large
caution
ribbon
on
your
leash,
so
other
people
would
see
it
and
would
give
you
a
little
more
space
or
put
their
own
dogs
on
leash,
so
it
wouldn't
run
at
your
dog
and
it
never
really
caught
on.
F
F
We
used
to
walk
down
broadway
to
stay
away
from
a
lot
of
other
dogs
and
get
a,
but
that's
what
my
veterinarian's
office
was
suggesting
at
the
time,
but
I
don't
think
it
ever
caught
on
with
everybody
else.
E
So
you
just
heard
code
manager,
lewis
speak
to
the
fact
that
when
the
our
code
was
written,
microchipping
wasn't
available.
So
that's
an
indication
of
how
dated
our
code
is,
and
I
think
it
does
warrant
a
review
and
and
dave.
If,
if
I
could
ask
in
our
next
meeting
after
we,
we
look
at
all
that,
if
you
could
share
with
us
the
current
process,
because
I
think
the
current
process
differs
than
what
is
different
than
what
the
code
is.
E
My
recollection,
after
speaking
with
tracy,
was
that
if
the
dog
that
attacked
us
is
adjudicated
as
a
dangerous
dog,
she
has
to
have
a
sign
on
her
house,
so
that
type
of
thing
would
be
helpful
to
know
what
the
what
the
current
process
is
for
a
dangerous
dog.
So
we
can
understand
how
it's
different
than
the
way
code
is
written.
Now,
what
I'll.
E
B
The
application
for
a
permit,
so
you
understand
what
that
looks
like
and
the
areas
that
we
have
to
complete.
Okay,
but
basically
they
do
have
to
have
an
escape
proof
enclosure.
They
have
to
be
microchipped.
In
some
cases
they
are
required
to
have
extra
insurance.
They
are
required
to
put
signage
on
their
house
anywhere.
B
Someone
is
going
to
enter
so
the
gates,
the
front
area
that
identifies
the
property
as
being
dangerous
and-
and
those
are
the
major
steps
that
that
we
have
most
people
tend
to
fail
that
permitting
because
they
don't
have
the
escape
clue.
B
They
also
the
animal
also
has
to
be
spayed
or
neutered,
so
they
either
failed
it
because
they
don't
have
the
escape
proof
area
or
they
fail.
The
permit
process
because,
like
we're
going
through
with
a
case
of
an
adjudicated
dog
they're
refusing
to
get
their
animals
spayed
or
neutered,
so
those
are
the
two
areas
where
we
find
the
most
resistance
and
non-compliance,
and
then
they
end
up
being
in
contempt
of
court.
E
And
so
what
you
just
mentioned
there,
our
code
does
not
reflect,
what's
actually
happening,
so
it
would
be
helpful
to
understand
that
and
then
we
can
get
code
in
place.
The
other
thing
I
recall
now
that
you
brought
that
up
carson
was
that
we
learned
that
our
animal
dangerous
dog
code
is
very
much
in
line
in
line
with
colorado
statute.
E
I
I
recall
talking
about
that,
so
that'll
be
helpful.
To
have
that
information.
B
I
just
have
one
more
update
from
the
state
legislation
legislature
it
it
was
tabled
for
this
year,
because
the
legis
there's
just
too
much
going
on
with
budgetary
stuff,
but
we're
trying
to
put
municipal
ordnance
violations
as
part
of
the
now
the
statewide
registry
for
dangerous
stocks.
E
And
I
was
also
going
to
let
the
committee
know
we
were
attacked,
walking
down
the
street
on
a
sidewalk.
My
dog
was
leashed
and
her
dog
bolted
out
of
the
front
door.
I
guess
her
screen
door
wasn't
latched
bolted
out
of
the
front
door
and
she
had
a
fence
in
their
front
yard,
but
it
wasn't
complete
all
the
way
around
the
yard
and
he
ran
down
the
fence.
E
You
know
got
around
it
and
then
came
at
us,
so
so
some
of
the
safeguards
that
you
were
referring
to
dave
is
it's
it's
good
to
hear.
I
haven't,
walked
down
that
street
since
so
we're
closing
in
on
our
two-hour
meeting.
So
if
there
are
no
other
further
questions
regarding
dangerous
dog
code,
we'll
put
that
on
the
agenda
for
our
next
meeting.
I'd
like
to
ask
what
other
topics
you
all
would
like
to
discuss
at
the
june
meeting.
H
I
Yes,
our
unfinished
business,
but
I
wanted
to
reiterate
something
that
carson
our
vice
chair
brought
up.
In
the
last
meeting
on
the
changes
to
title
11,
chapter
5
on
trees
and
shrubs,
he
said
it
would
be
easier
to
work
with
the
actual
code,
and
I
did
that
today,
actually
last
couple
of
days
I've
been
working
on
it.
Would
that
be
helpful
to
anybody?
I'm
sorry!
What
did
you
do?
I
If
we
could,
if
we
do
it
that
way
it
might
it
might
it
takes
into
account
most
of
the
suggestions
that
were
made
on
the
list
that
you
sent
out,
but
it's
just
it's
just
a
you
know
a
cleaner
way
of
looking
at
it
and
and
discussing
it
and
I'd
like
to
if
we
you
know
when
we
go
forward
with
this
I'd
like
to
use
the
existing
code
and
go
through
it
line
by
line
and
make
comments,
or
you
know,
suggestions
or
get
agreement,
and
I
can
you
know
it's
available,
I
can
send
it
out
to
everybody.
E
Listen,
let's
do
that
and
we
can
include
it
in
the
agenda
packet
and
the
google
drive.
The
shared
drive
that
we
have.
E
There
is
a
clean
copy
of
existing
code
out
there
for
everyone
to
see,
but
I
do
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
view
what
you
what
the
work
that
you've
done
cohen,
but
I
do
want
to
remind
everybody
that
we
are
not
writing
code,
we're
we're
providing
a
list
of
recommended
changes
to
the
code.
So
I
don't
want
to
see
what.
I
I'm
doing
is
what
I
did
just
notes
that
suggested,
and
I
also
did
it
on
your
summary
of
code
changes
and
revisions.
I
also
made
up
similar
notes
on
that
in
case.
That
was
better.
So
I
can
you
want
me
to
send
that
out
to
everybody
or
send
it
to
you.
E
Go
ahead
and
send
it,
what
do
you
all
prefer?
Would
you
guys
like
it
with
our
meeting
packet,
or
would
you
like
to
see
it
now
or
both.
G
I
G
I
I
didn't
track
change,
I
just
I
I'm
not
real
familiar
with
that
and
I
didn't
want
to
screw
it
up.
So
basically,
what
I
did
is
just
in
red.
I
made
some
notes
and
then
on
the
summary
of
the
code
changes
I
did
the
same
thing
because
some
of
it
doesn't
fit
in
the
actual
existing
code
quite
the
same
way,
so
I
could
send
both
of
them.
G
Maybe
just
send
it
to
chairboard
and
then
chair,
bowdoin
can
put
it
in
the
drive
and
let
us
know
where
they
are.
Will.
E
Do
that's
a
great
idea,
maureen,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
D
I
was
going
to
make
the
same
suggestion
that
remember
green
just
made
great
thank.
E
You
any
other
topics
for
our
june
meeting
other
than
to
address
our
unfinished
business
for
eab.
Also
talk
about
dangerous
dog
anything
else.
H
I
would
I
I
don't
know
if
I'm
a,
I
can
tell
you
about
the
meeting
that
we
have,
but
council
will
ultimately
make
the
decision
and
and
steve
the
moderator
will
put
together
the
proposal,
so
I'm
gonna
say
nothing
hard
or
official.
So,
okay,.
E
Another
question
our
june
meeting
will
be
the
16th
of
june.
How
would
everyone
like
to
conduct
the
meeting?
Would
you
like
to
continue
with
zoom,
or
would
you
like
to
try
an
in-person
meeting
at
a
park,
or
do
you
want
to
go
back
to
city
hall?
What's
the
consensus
of
the
team
carson,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
G
I
mean
personally,
I
favor
the
zoom
I
am
able
to
you
know
I
mean
it's
partly
because
I've
worked
from
home
since
2002
and
I'm
the
most
efficient.
This
way
I'm
able
to
sit
in
a
chair,
I'm
not
gonna,
have
glare.
I
can
use
two
screens.
I
can
take
extensive
notes.
I've
got
our
agenda
up
with
documents.
I've
got
my.
I
mean
I've
taken
seven
pages
of
notes
during
this
meeting.
G
I
Kind
of
I'm
on
the
fence,
I
prefer
to
see
people
and
make
sure
that
they're
actually
paying
attention.
You
know
I
can
see
their
faces
and
know
they're
really
there,
but
I'm
the
longer
we've
been
doing
this
zoom,
the
better
I
feel
about
it
and
I've
had
a
sick
puppy
for
a
while,
and
I
don't
like
to
leave
him
for
two
or
three
hours
and
so
I'd
say
I'm
more
in
favor
of
zoom
than
anything
else.
Right
now,.
H
Monica
I
think
zoom
is
convenient
and
efficient,
but
I
would
I
prefer
it
to
city
hall,
but
if,
if
something
that
is
relevant
to
a
park
comes
up
and
then
you
can
only
really
do
it
in
the
summer,
so
if
we
can
do
one
or
two
meetings
in
a
in
a
place
that
is
important
to
code
enforcement,
I
think
maybe
we
should
make
an
attempt.
H
Otherwise
I
also
prefer
zoom.
I
do
I
agree
with
you:
I'm
able
to
flick
between
screens
and
see
everything
and
get
a
lot
done
so,
but
for
you
know
for
one
or
two
months,
I
I
think
it
might
be
nice
to
meet
you
know,
especially
maybe
in
emerson,
because
that
came
up
a
bit.
You
know
today
or
jason
park
some
of
these
places
that
are
top
of
mind
to
folks
robert.
J
G
Yeah,
I
I
mean
I
get
that
I
I
appreciate
the
getting
together
in
person
and
I
like
the
park
idea.
I
wouldn't
want
that
to
be
a
regular
thing.
I
mean
I
don't
think
we'll
be
nearly
as
efficient
with
looking
at
documents
and
taking
notes
and
stuff,
but
I
think
that
that
that
sounds
nice.
I
and
I
am
totally
open
to
doing
one
or
a
couple
of
our
meetings
at
a
park,
and
I
like
how
code
manager
louis
mentioned,
we
could
have
a
pavilion.
E
Okay,
so
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
is
consensus
that
we'll
stick
with
zoom,
at
least
for
our
june
meeting.
I
I'm
I'm
in
agreement
with
everything
that
you
all
have
said.
I
do
miss
the
camaraderie
and
seeing
people
and
interacting
and
in
the
you
know,
hanging
out
a
little
bit
afterwards
and
chatting
so
I
I
do
miss
that
aspect
of
it
and
maybe
we'll
get
back
to
that
one
day,
but
I'm
I'm
hearing
we're
not
there
yet
coheen.
I
Yeah
one
real
quick
note:
we
can't
do
it
at
emerson,
there's
no
facility
there,
but
bates
logan
does
have
a
pavilion
and
it
has
electricity.
If
we
need
it
and
covering
in
case
it
rains
or
what
you
know.
So
we
don't
have
to
sit
out
in
the
sun
but
yeah.
I
wouldn't
want
to
do
it
as
a
regular
thing,
because
the
audio
won't
be
very
good.
If
there's
wind,
that
audio
will
not
pick
it
up
and
if
there's
somebody
playing
in
the
ballpark
there's
that
will
end
it
right.
There
yeah.
I
B
I
I
just
want
to
bring
this
to
the
to
the
top
of
yours
attention,
I'm
going
to
be
on
an
extended
leave
in
july,
and
I
would
really
like
to
attend
the
july
meeting.
If
all
of
you
would
consider
setting
it
a
week
earlier
on
the
14th,
you
don't
need
to
make
a
decision
now,
but
I
just
wanted
to
let
everybody
know
that
I'd
like
to
attend
on
the
4th
18th
other
than
that
I
won't
be
able
to
attend
for
the
rest
of
july
and
potentially
part
of
august.