►
From YouTube: CEAC 01182023 Video
Description
Code Enforcement Advisory Committee Meeting
A
B
D
E
D
E
D
E
Thank
you,
and
so
everyone
knows
I
Vice,
chair
Watson
did
reach
out
after
the
last
meeting
and
said
he
had
a
health
issue
that
prevented
him
from
being
able
to
be
in
the
last
two
I.
Don't
know
if
that's
still
ongoing,
that's
what's
been
going
on
and
does
anyone
have
a
motion
to
approve
our
minutes
from
the
11
16
meeting.
G
D
E
You
this
is
the
point
where
we
would
open
up
our
hearings
to
the
public.
I,
don't
see
any
attendees,
everyone
is
currently
a
panelist
who's
connected.
So
there's
no
one
present
to
address
us
from
the
public.
So
we'll
move
on
as
I
wrote
you
all
good
manager
Lewis
reached
out,
and
it
was
unfortunately
his
schedule
prevented
him
from
being
able
to
join
us
tonight
and
that's
why
I
switched
it
to
being
zoomed
tonight
and
then
in
person
next
time.
E
C
Yes,
I
do
have
a
report,
the
on
January
3rd.
When
we
came
back
there
was
on
the
on
the
agenda:
a
council
Bill
3,
which
was
to
approve
a
bill
for
an
ordinance
amending
various
sections
of
the
public
Offense
Code
to
my
mirror,
changes
in
state
law
and
ensure
compliance
there
was
and
and
approve
an
amendment
was
approved
and
it
it
passed
with
one
approved
Amendment.
C
G
C
A
couple
weeks
I
actually
think
it
would
be
a
good
idea
for
maybe
you
all
to
look
at
that
if
you
had
time
and
just
weigh
in
on,
if
you,
if
you
have
anything
that
you
would
like
me
to
consider,
it's
just
helpful
to
have
other
eyes
on
it.
So
the
amendment
that
got
passed
and
if
you
go
back
and
watch
the
January
3rd
meeting
under
the
discussion
on
Council
Bill
3,
you
will
see
there
was
quite
a
bit
of
discussion.
E
C
C
E
C
C
The
other
thing
is,
we
did
boarding
commission
interviews
on
the
ninth,
which
I
believe
was
last
week,
and
so
there
I
believe
there's
one
opening
on
Code
Enforcement
advisory
committee.
At
this
point,
the
person
that
Council
suggested
go
in
there
that
person
wasn't
interested
I
mean
he
actually
applied
for
something
else
and
then
Council
a
lot
of
times
will
ask
people
if
they
want
to
when
want
to
serve
in
another
area,
but
then
staff
always
calls
to
make
sure
well
that
person
wasn't
interested.
There
is
a
possibility
on
January.
C
No,
this
will
be
February
6th,
also
we're
doing
boarding,
Commission
appointments,
and
so
Council
will
discuss
it
at
that
point.
So
we
may
get
another
member,
but
I'm,
not
sure
that
we
will
other
than
that
I
mean
things
are
just
slowly
getting
back
to
normal.
Last
night
we
had
a
meeting.
The
only
thing
on
the
schedule
was
a
public
hearing
for
the
Sam's
Automotive.
The
meeting
got
the
public
hearing
got
postponed,
Council
had
to
vote
on
it
because
it
had
already
been
posted
by
the
time.
C
C
There
were
a
bunch
of
things
that
that
troubled
me
and
and
I
may
I'm
going
to
go
back
and
review
it
before
the
next
meeting
to
see.
If
there's
the
one
thing
that
I
thought
was
egregious,
it
had
put
in
there
and
and
Council
agreed
with
the
amendment
that
false
it
was
false.
Reporting
of
animal
cruelty
was
not
was
not
a
crime.
I,
don't
remember
exactly
how
it
was
awarded,
but
that
that
did
get
taken
out.
E
Wow,
okay
sounds
reasonable,
I'll
review
that,
and
probably
a
good
good
idea
for
all
of
us
too,
and
if
anyone
has
any
thoughts
on
that,
send
them
to
me
and
as
well
as
and
you
know
them
they
can.
If
there's
any,
you
know
specific
points
or
anything
anyone
wants
to
discuss,
then
we
can
get
that
into
our
agenda
for
next
time.
D
E
D
C
C
D
E
D
Think
it's
on
there,
because
February
6th
has
so
many
items
on
it
that
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
very
long
meeting
and
if
you
guys
want
to
review
Council
Bill
3
I
can
send
it
to
you
all.
Okay,
but
I.
Don't
you're
gonna
have
to
call
a
special
meeting
in
order
to
have
it
heard
before
February
or
to
review
it
as
a
as
a
body
before
February
6.
E
D
D
Anybody
has
anything
the
changes
were
incorporated
into
the
document
and
they're
not
they're,
not
outlined
like
with
strikeout
or
anything.
They
were
incorporated
into
the
document,
so
Council
Bill
3
is
sitting
up
for
appointment
or
for
approval
on
February
6th,
and
that
document
is
the
one
that
I
can
send
to
you
all
right.
C
D
E
Okay
and
then
just
to
finish
that
thought,
Ms
Wilson
will
send
that
to
us.
Please
everyone
review
and
if
you
have
any
concerns
or
thoughts,
you
can
certainly
share
them
directly
with
councilmember
Russell
and
send
them
to
me.
I
think
it's
something
that's
worth
us
having
a
special
meeting
in
between
for
us
to
discuss
it.
Let
me
know
that
I'll
be
looking
at
it
myself
and
see
if
I
think
there's
anything
important
that
we
should
discuss
and
potentially
share
Thoughts
with
the
city
council
before
that
Second
hearing
when
they
vote
on
it.
E
A
E
E
E
E
D
E
E
E
B
Trash
carriers,
weren't
picking
up
everything,
so
the
trash
was
left
out
there,
one
thing
kind
of
led
to
another
and
and
pretty
soon
it
became
sort
of
a
you
know,
the
typical
sort
of
next
door
stuff,
where
somebody
gets
upset
about
something
and
pretty
soon
somebody's
jumping
on
their
back
and
everything
part
of
it
had
to
do
with
code
enforcement
and
how
there
seemed
to
be
a
feeling.
The
code
enforcement
was
not
proactive
on
noticing
this
stuff
and
so
I
jumped
in
and
basically
said
they
are
proactive.
B
E
E
I
think
that
you
know
this
is
certainly
worth
probably
a
multiple
directions
on
our
part,
one
being
discussion,
which
I
would
definitely
feel
better
going
in
depth
on
it,
with
code
manager
Lewis
in
participation
with
the
discussion,
because
he'll
be
able
to
inform
us
about
what
they
can
and
can't
do
what
they
are
and
are
not
doing.
You
know
from
a
good
enforcement
perspective,
but
I
think
this
also
warrants
you
know
one
of
our
communication.
E
Our
main
communication
tools
is
that
quarterly
Inglewood
magazine,
which
we
do
have
some
real
estate
to
post
Topics
in
and
that's
what
our
communication
subcommittee
is
all
about,
is
coordinating
with
City
staff,
to
figure
out
what
articles
we're
going
to
put
in
there.
What
topics
we're
going
to
put
in
there?
What
information
we're
going
to
put
in
there
and
then
also
the
all
the
social
media
that
the
city's
doing
I
would
say:
okay,
the
change
to
so
many
different
people's
service
alone
warrants.
E
You
know,
updated
communication
to
the
public,
but
but
certainly
the
the
issues
that
you
brought
up
and
I'll
try
and
find
that
thread
and
take
a
look
at
a
t
to
be
aware
of
what
what
you
saw
but
I
I
think.
That's,
that's,
probably
a
a
hot
topic
for
information
like
you
brought
up,
so
that
everyone
is
kind
of
clear
on
what
you
know
what
the
rules
are
and
how
they're
enforced
Etc
ball.
Through
now,
we
don't
typically
engage
directly
with
next
door.
E
Threads
I've
been
involved
in
other
committees,
where
a
lot
of
discussion
around
what
we
were
discussing
went
on
there
and
some
people
got
involved
and
but
the
the
city
doesn't
tend
to
at
least
from
my
observation.
I
haven't
really
been
engaged
there
in
quite
a
while,
but
I.
You
know,
I
think
it
is
it's
great
that
you,
you
know,
spoke
up.
Hopefully
you
weren't
harassed
or
attacked
as
I
know
that
can
happen
on
there.
So
I
don't
know
any
other
thought.
Oh
go
ahead.
Councilmember
Russell.
C
Thank
you
and
I.
Just
I
haven't
seen
the
thread.
I
generally,
don't
do
next
door.
Unless
people
send
me
the
threads,
but
I
will
say
this.
We
kept
Waste
Management
because
we
don't
have
an
alley
anyway.
So
it
didn't
impact
us
I
know
a
lot
of
people
left,
but
I'm
kind
of
wondering.
If
are
our
Waste
Management,
did
not
pick
up
two
blocks
away.
They
picked
up
so
between
Christmas
and
New
Year's,
one
of
them
they
picked
up
on
schedule.
C
Then
the
next
one
they
were
post
supposed
to
pick
up
on
Saturday
and
they
didn't
pick
up
till
the
following
Monday,
and
so
some
of
the
problem
is
with
Waste
Management
itself.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
was
and
I
think.
Maybe
some
of
the
trash
cans
in
the
street
could
be
because
of
the
snow
I
mean
people
had
to
put
their
trash
cans
farther
out.
Perhaps
right.
B
And
let
me
clarify:
if
I
can
about
this,
it
wasn't
necessarily
the
issue
of
the
trash
that
was
front
and
center.
What
I
saw
was
more
of
an
issue
of
people
not
having
a
clear
understanding
of
how
to
engage
with
code
enforcement
to
follow
up
and
that's
where
I
kind
of
stepped
in
I
did
not
mention
that
I
was
a
citizen
representative
of
that
committee.
Believe
me.
F
E
E
Communicating
with
the
public
how
to
communicate
with
and
track
requests
with
code
enforcement,
maybe
something
like
that
unless
someone
has
a
suggestion
on
a
better
wrap-up
of
that
concept,
because
it's
not
necessarily
just
about
trash.
It's
more
about
any
code
enforcement
communication
right
right.
E
G
E
E
E
Basically,
data
streams
that
I
felt
were
completely
unreasonable,
so
I
uninstalled
the
app
rather
than
allow
it
to
run
on
my
phone.
It
doesn't
need
to
know
where
I
am.
It
doesn't
need
access
to
my
phone
records.
It
doesn't
need
any
of
that
stuff
if
it
was
a
reasonable,
app
I
would
install
it
and
use
it,
but
otherwise
I'm
going
to
go
through
the
website.
Remember
chisel.
F
F
F
F
If
my
as
an
example,
if
my
dog
gets
picked
up
and
three
hours
later,
I
pick
it
up
what
penalties
fees
ramifications
are
there
for
me,
the
answer
I
heard
was
we
take
it
Case
by
case
now
again,
if
I'm
wrong,
then
it's
a
communication
challenge
but
I
think
we
we
we
process,
we
dialogue.
We
talk
about
these
things
and
then,
in
my
own
mind
after
the
meeting.
F
If
a
neighbor
came
up
to
me
and
said
so,
talk
to
me
about
trash
removal,
where
are
we
what's
the
status
I'd
have
a
hard
time
answering
it
anything
we
could
do
whether
it's
in
the
quarterly
magazine
or
on
the
app
or
the
website
to
distill
it
down
to
in
a
nutshell,
this
is
what
it
means
and
like
in
Rick's
example:
I.
Just
guess,
I
I,
don't
know
this,
but
I
just
guessed.
There
were
probably
people
out
there
saying
in
a
nutshell:
what's
it
mean
what
what's
going
on
with
codes?
What's
right?
D
B
D
E
What
I
heard
and
I
like
that
I
think
that's
a
great
idea.
Remember
Chisholm
kind
of
a
top
level
like
you
know,
so
we
could
have
a
discussion
about
what
are
all
the
things
like.
Certainly
there's
a
lot
of
Code
Enforcement
that
most
public
never
really
interfaces,
but
the
topics
that
the
the
public
is
most
likely
to
wonder
about,
engage
about
ask
about.
We
could
even
kind
of
do
like
a
sampling
of
what's
on
next
door.
E
What
people
are
asking
about
that
touches
on
it
and
come
up
with
a
list
of
the
thing
you
know
like.
Obviously,
animal
enforcement
stuff
is
going
to
be
high
on
there
trash
snow
weeds,
the
things
that
we
hear
about
the
most,
the
things
that
you
know
we
could
even
go
by
the
code
enforcement
report
to
us
that
shows
what
the
most
incidents
you
know,
they're
touching
the
public
on.
A
Or
maybe
they
could
also
make
like
a
I,
don't
know
you
know
like
a
tiny
URL
like
a
more
direct
link.
That's
you
don't
have
to
click
through
three
things,
but
I
literally
just
put
Englewood
compliance
FAQ
and
that
these
came
up
and
they
do
have
it
by
category
already
so
yeah,
maybe
just
reviewing
it
and
then
making.
Maybe
that
could
be
what
we
asked
them
to
communicate
in
the
when
I
get
that
contact
with
that
with
the
gentleman
you
know.
E
E
B
B
You
know
Facebook,
stuff
and
and
all
of
that
and
and
see
if
it's
meeting
our
needs
and
I
think
the
idea
of
going
through
and
saying
hey.
You
know,
what's
new
and
using
that
that
Forum
as
a
place
to
put
out
the
new
things
as
well
as
put
out
the
bullet
points
as
well
put
out
the
FAQs
I
I
think
that
we
need
to
be
doing
sort
of
a
more
proactive
approach
to
communicating
with
everybody.
It
seems
to
be
important
to
everybody.
D
So
yeah,
thank
you.
The
city
of
Inglewood
has
a
Facebook
page
communication.
The
Communications
Department
takes
care
of
that
I
think
they're
also
on
Inglewood
next
door,
which
would
be
a
good
place
for
this
fact
sheet
to
be
let
out
or
for
you
guys
to
let
the
public
know
that
you're
having
a
meeting,
because
if
you
were
going
to
be
talking
about
Council,
Bill
3
this
meeting,
it
would
be
on
your
agenda
and
that's
the
notification
to
public.
D
E
And
that's
what
member
read
of
it
has
been
starting.
The
and
obviously
the
point
of
contact
has
changed
on
that
and
we
had
a
pretty
good
thing
going
with
former
member
coordinating
with
the
city
on
I
know:
they're
on
Facebook
next
door,
Instagram
I
mean
I've,
seen
things
related
to
what
we've
put
out
on
all
of
those
before
so
we
you
know
the
the
channels
are
there.
E
F
Just
to
add
to
that
I
I
think
all
Chan
all
channels
are
good.
So
the
more
the
better
a
couple
a
couple
points:
nobody
cares
until
it's
their
problem.
These
are
either
they
garbage
is
in
the
front
of
my
house
or
my
dog
is
gone
and
I'm
getting
my
dog
this
afternoon.
Then,
all
of
a
sudden,
it's
a
very
sailing
issue
to
me
and
I-
want
to
get
answers
really
fast.
F
So
in
our
communication,
thinking
I
really
think
our
bias
should
be
towards
that
quick
response
to
the
agitated
citizen
who
is
upset
or
concerned
about
something
at
the
moment,
the
other
and
so
anyways
that
just
has
to
go
into
the
communication
strategy
of
people.
Don't
go.
Look
at
codes
for
the
fun
of
it,
they're
going
to
look
at
codes
because
they're
upset
about
something
or
they're
confused
about
something.
So
I
think
we
have
to
factor
that
in
the
other
thing
is
I.
F
Think
back
to
our
role,
sometimes
in
some
of
our
discussions
where
the
code
says:
X,
Plus
y
That's,
fine,
easy
to
understand
and
then
inevitably
there's
this
shade
of
gray
Zone
where
well.
What
does
that
mean?
Does
that
mean
I
can
do
it
or
I
can't
do
it,
and
if
the
answer
is
well,
it's
up
to
the
department
and
we'll
determine
it
to
our
best
ability
at
that
time.
I,
don't
like
that
answer.
I
understand
it,
but
I
think
citizenry
should
understand
that
so
I
mean
just
using
dogs
as
an
example.
F
F
That's
fine
tell
people
that,
because,
if
I'm
in
that
zone
of
Case
by
case
basis,
I
want
to
know
who
to
call
I
want
to
know
the
phone
number,
because
what
you're
telling
me
it's
up
to
me
and
I
have
to
negotiate
with
the
city,
which
is
fine,
but
just
tell
me
that
so
I
don't
I'm,
not
accusing
anybody
of
anything,
but
people
can
get
lost
in
the
code
discussion
and
you
can
look
at
these
codes
and
go
I.
Don't
know
what
the
heck
they're
talking
about
I,
don't
know
whether
I
can
or
I
can't.
F
But
if
the
answer
is
it's
up
to
the
discretion
of
the
department
or
it's
up
it's
up
for
us
to
decide
what,
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
I
think
we
should
put
it
out
there
I
think
citizens
should
know.
Oh
it
behooves
me
to
negotiate
it
behooves
me
to
pick
up
the
phone,
because,
if
not
I'm
going
to
get
lost
in
the
codes,
does
that
make
sense?
I
mean
am
I
making
sense
on
that.
E
E
You
know
how
things
are
enforced
and
you
know
not
that
I'm
accusing
our
code
enforcement
of
acting
and
bias,
but
when
they're,
when
there
isn't
a
fixed
protocol,
then
that
is
at
risk
when
you've
got
different,
enforcers
and
different
attitudes
of
those
having
something
enforced
upon
them
and
I
I
appreciate
your
point
significantly
and
I.
I
do
think
that
where
there
is
points
of
discretion
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
we
should
be
at
the
very
least
us
on
the
could.
E
The
citizen
code
enforcement
advisory
commission
should
be
clear
when
that
is
the
case,
what
it
means
how
it
applies,
and
it
would
be
ideal
to
include
that
type
of
information,
clearly
in
our
fact
sheet
or
boiled
down
way
of
citizens
understanding
the
rules.
I
I
really
appreciate
your
point
on
that.
A
Yeah
I
was
just
going
to
say,
I
double
checked.
The
I
did
email
the
updated
contact
about
seven
days
ago,
and
they
don't
they
haven't,
replied
yet
so,
if
I
don't
hear
from
them
by
the
end
of
this
week,
I'll
call
them
on
Monday
and
see
if
I
can
find
a
number
for
them
to
move
that
along
a
little
bit.
Okay,.
E
D
A
E
E
E
D
E
E
Okay,
yeah
I
I
didn't
I'm,
not
sure
what
if
there
was
anything
left
for
us
to
look
on
the
title,
15
vehicles
on
maximum
or
vehicles
or
maximum
number
of
vehicles
per
household
I
mean
that's
specifically
in
the
I
mean
that
was
something
that
went
through
like
a
ballot
initiative.
If
I
remember
right,
so
it's
actually
written
into
our
code,
including
whether
the
vehicle
has
to
be
covered
or
not
stuff
like
that.
That
was
like
a
whole.
E
There
was
a
whole
ballot
initiative
that
was
brought
up
quite
a
while
back
and
passed
so
I'm,
not
sure
if
this
was
to
or
do
either
of
you
know
what
like,
why
that's
even
in
our
priorities,
I
wasn't
our
priorities.
I
I
worked
on
it
as
part
of
the
committee,
but
it
was
mainly
our
former
chair
who
was
the
strongest
influence
on
what
these
were
and
so
I'm
not
really
sure
what
what
we
were
addressing
with
that
one
does.
D
E
E
E
E
E
Our
recommendation
was
that
they'd
negotiate
more
directly
with
the
haulers
to
see
if
they
could
get
all
the
points
that
we
gathered
from
citizens
that
were
most
important
to
include
in
a
single
hauler
system
that
the
haulers
had
rejected
from
The
requester
Proposal.
But
this
was
written
in
here
after
or
prior
to
the
result
of
that
committee
made
a
recommendation
Council
making
the
decision
on
how
they
were
going
to
move
forward.
So
we
were
thinking
that
once
Council
made
a
decision
that
we
would
have
to
review
code
changes
to
accommodate
that.
E
But
at
this
point
there
really
hasn't
been
any
change
from
the
city.
Side,
there's
only
been
change
from
the
the
hauler
side
and
what
you
know
this
big
change
recently,
where
Waste
Management
has
stopped
providing
alley
service,
and
it's
it's
not
really
clear
to
me
if
Republic
is
still
offering
Ali's
service
to
people
who
don't
already
have
it.
You
know
that
they
are
still
servicing
the
Allies.
But
it's
not
clear
to
me.
If
that's
something
that
they're
offering
to
you
know
new
or
switched
customers.
C
The
one
thing
that
I
do
know
when
the
letter
came
out
from
Waste
Management,
a
lot
of
people
did
call
Republic
and
even
though,
during
the
time
that
all
the
discussions
were
going
on,
Republic
was
not
taking
any
new
customers
in
the
alley,
but
they
have
picked
up
people
that
want
alley
pickup.
So
that
is
out
there.
C
E
It
was
originally
considered
as
part
of
the
potential
attempt
to
reduce
use
of
our
off-leash
parks
by
people
who
don't
live
in
the
city,
but
code
code
manager
Lewis
in
his
talks
about
that
has
de-emphasized
it
at
least
that's
my
understanding
that
that's
not
something,
that's
currently
on
the
table
or
being
pushed
forward,
but
certainly
if
it
were
to
be,
then
that
would
be
a
discussion
that
we
would
take
on
our
bylaws.
We
already
took
care
of.
E
E
Okay,
we've
already
done
a
lot
of
work
on
that.
So
we
have
some
of
you
are
on.
While
we
reviewed
all
the
changes
for
the
some
of
the
language
in
the
way
the
code
was
was
very
specific
to
like
dog
and
cat,
and
there
were
situations
where
code
manager,
Lewis
and
his
team
were
unable
to
appropriately
enforce
like
animal
cruelty
to
like
a
lizard,
so
that
has
been
addressed.
Code's
been
updated.
E
You
know
posts
on
Facebook
and
Instagram,
and,
and
things
like
that,
for
you
know,
topics,
some
of
which
were
related
to
our
topics,
but
we're
working
to
get
that
going
again
rid
of
it
and
Vice
chair
Watson,
once
he's
back
with
us
are
doing
the
subcommittee.
So
how
about
anything
else?
Does
anyone
else
aware
of
any
specific
topics,
anything
other
than
what
we've
already
talked
about,
that
you
know
aspects
of
the
code
or
things
that
the
you
know
constituents
other
fellow
citizens
are
aware
of
or
bringing
up
or
concerned
about.
E
C
E
I,
don't
know
the
impression
I
got
from
code
manager
list
because
we
were
going
to
discuss
it
today
and
then,
when
he
said
he
wouldn't
be
able
to
be
here.
I
I
wrote
to
him
and
City
attorney
Niles,
who
had
expressed
that
it
wasn't
an
urgent
thing
that
you
know
I.
Let
them
know
we'll
just
put
it
on
our
next
meeting
and
neither
of
them
suggested
that
that
would
be
a
problem
at
all.
City
attorney.
Niles
said
this
is
the
way
it
is
is
the
way
it's
been
for
a
long
time.
E
C
And
I
mean
it
could
have
been
in
the
study
session-
I,
just
I,
don't
remember,
but
if
they
and
I
don't
think
code
manager,
Lewis
would
have
brought
it
forward
if
it
doesn't
need
to
be
acted
on.
At
some
point,
I
mean
if
it
already
had
been
so
I'm.
Assuming
that
that
we
didn't
it's
so
it's
possible
that
it
was
in
a
study
session,
foreign.
E
Is
this
so
for
the
rest
of
you
to
know
what
we're
talking
about
it's
it's
around,
adding
a
new
fee
for
if
someone
has
a
code
enforcement
interaction
on
their
property
and
code
enforcement
has
to
go
and
inspect
the
follow-up
that
they
take
care
of
it,
and
that
happens
more
than
one
redo
per
year.
They
want
to
charge
a
fee
for
that.
So
I
think
it
needs
further
discussion,
because
there's
some
ambiguity
in
what
I
read
about
it
and
I
didn't
want
us
to
try
and
discuss
it
in
detail
without
code
manager
Lewis.
E
Have
on
our
table
to
address
and
for
our
next
meeting
going
with
our
standard
date
that
would
be
on
February
15th
at
6
pm,
and
this
one
will,
since
we're
going
to
do
the
quarterly
in
person
we'll
make
that
one
in
person.
Since
we
switched
this
one
to
zoom
and
then
remember
Russell,
do
you
have
anything
else
for
us.