►
From YouTube: February 2, 2021 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
D
C
A
C
C
Okay,
it's
now
702
rather
than
701,
so
let's
go
ahead
and
call
the.
D
C
Call
the
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
the
february
2nd
2021
meeting
to
order
and
nancy.
I
would
like
to
call
on
you
to
call
the
roll
okay.
D
D
F
B
Ms
townley
is
absent
ms
griffin
here
and
acting
chair
austin
here.
B
C
C
All
right,
then,
the
first
thing
on
the
agenda,
which
is
in
on
a
clipboard-
and
I
can't
see
the
top
of
the
next
page-
is
to
approve
the
minutes
from.
C
You're
at
thank
you,
for,
I
wrote
it
down
call
on
brad,
but
I
I
just
overlooked
it.
So
I'd
like
to
call
on
brad
power
for
a
brief
update
on
wayne.
D
Thank
you
very
much
good
evening.
Members
of
the
commission.
I
just
wanted
to
join
you
just
for
a
few
seconds
and
just
give
you
an
update
that
wade.
Burkholder
will
not
be
joining
you
this
evening.
He
has
been
called
out
of
town
to
attend
to
a
pretty
serious
family
matter,
so
we're
not
entirely
sure
when
his
return
will
be
scheduled,
hopefully
it'll
be
before
the
next
meeting.
D
But
if
not,
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
he's
not
going
to
be
with
you
this
evening,
but
you're
in
john
in
dan's,
very
capable
hands
and
you're
very
much
aware
of
what
the
agenda
item
is
this
evening.
So
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
that
news
and
just
let
you
know
that
that's
due
to
his
absence.
So
thank
you,
ms
chair
and
I'll.
Let
you
get
on
with
the
rest
of
the
meeting.
Thank
you.
C
B
G
D
C
Just
one:
oh
there
you
are,
I
was
just
about
to
say,
kate.
I
think,
as
a
member
you
have
to
be,
you
have
to
be
able
to
see
your
shining
face
so
you're
back
now.
That's
great!
Thank
you,
okay.
So
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
elections
of
the
chair
and
vice
chair
and.
C
Okay,
so
am
I
to
call
for
nominations
for
chair
first
or
vice
chair
nancy,
chair,
please,
okay,
I'm
looking
for
nominations
for
chair
of
planning
and
zoning
for
the
upcoming
year.
C
A
D
D
D
D
C
Thank
you
very
much
all,
and
then
I
would
like
to
call
for
nominations
for
vice
chair.
D
G
A
D
D
C
C
If
I
might
for
just
a
brief
minute,
I'd
like
to
recognize
that
we
have
a
new
alternate
for
our
planning
and
zoning
commission
mcdonaldson
who's
joining
us
for
the
first
time
tonight
may
can
you
spend
maybe
a
minute
and
just
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
yourself
before
we
proceed
with
the
rest
of
the
business.
D
Sure
yeah
thank
you,
nice
to
meet
you
all.
Virtually
I'm
meg.
I've
lived
in
inglewood
for
about
five
years
now.
I.
D
D
D
C
We
some
we
get
those
sometimes
okay
at
this
point,
I'd
like
to
turn
it
over
to
john
for
our
study
session
on
the
city
center
center
city
center
inglewood
redevelopment.
C
You
know
it's,
I
don't
see
it
on
my
agenda,
maybe
just
printed
out
goofy,
but
that's
you're,
absolutely
right.
We
should,
because
it
looks
like
we
may
have
somebody
here
from
the
public
too,
in
the
public.
D
C
J
I'm
going
to
start
sharing
my
screen
and
we'll
pick
up
with
the
my
last
slide
that
we
left
off
with.
So
let
me
get
started
with
that.
J
J
J
Okay,
so
at
the
end
of
our
last
study
session,
we
got
through
all
of
the
material
all
of
the
tribal
report,
all
the
areas
that
we
wanted
to
cover,
and
so
then
it
was
time
for
me
to
go
back
and
to
reflect
on
what
I
thought
were
the
major
things
that
I
had
heard
in
the
all
the
different
stay
sessions-
and
this
is
my
this
is
my
takeaways
from
our
previous
study
sessions.
J
Hotel
use
is
okay
to
add
to
the
mu,
b1
zone
district,
a
green
agreement
with
focusing
ground
floor,
commercial
requirement
on
broadway,
but
also
the
commission.
Some
members
would
like
to
also
consider
portions
of
inglewood
parkway.
J
J
This
is
37
micro
units
with
zero
off-street
spaces
for
an
occupancy
of
72
percent,
and
I
think
the
developers
thought
that
locating
these
apartment
buildings
in
areas
that
were
very,
very
close
to
high
employment
areas
such
as
cherry
creek
or
downtown
denver
that
that
they
would
still
get
demand
for
these
apartment
buildings
because
of
the
work
would
be
so
close
to
the
buildings
themselves.
J
Occupancy
is
a
little
bit
lower
though
there
is
there
still
is.
Obviously
people
do
still
like
cars
and
not
everyone
has
bought
into
this
concept.
J
J
J
This
is
being
built
by
little
cap
wilson,
capital
partners,
which
is
the
same
outfit
that
built
the
oxford
station
apartments,
and
this
will
be
a
market
rate
project
with
140
units
with
155
off
street
spaces,
for
a
parking
ratio
of
1.1,
and
this
project
is
has
not
been
completed
yet
so
we
don't
have
an
occupancy
for
it
and
a
little
bit
farther
up
the
street.
We
have
the
denizen
apartments
at
alameda
station
once
again.
J
This
is
also
an
income
restricted
property
at
1170
ash
street,
which
is
around
the
ninth
and
colorado
area,
which
has
which
is
the
former
university
of
colorado,
medical
campus,
which
has
been
redeveloping
slowly
over
time,
and
this
project
has
112
units
with
92
off
street
spaces
for
a
parking
ratio
of
0.82,
and
it
is
100
occupied.
J
And
so
I've
also
included
in
your
packet
this
this
recent
report
that
just
came
out
in
december
the
rtd
residential
parking
and
stationary
study.
J
J
I
can't
remember
exactly
how
many
properties,
but
it
was
well
over
a
hundred
that
they
analyzed
for
market
rate
housing
around
stations.
Forty
percent
of
the
provided
parking
is
not
used
at
peak
time
for
market
rate.
The
average
space
is
provided
was
1.23
spaces
and
they
found
a
utilization
rate
of
0.74
spaces
for
income
restricted
properties.
J
They
found
that
50
of
the
provided
parking
is
not
used
at
the
peak
time.
In
these
properties,
0.72
spaces
were
provided
on
average
and
only
0.36
of
the
spaces
were
utilized.
J
J
So,
based
on
the
desire
to
look
at
a
two-tiered
system
of
a
quarter
mile
and
a
half
mile,
I
took
the
original
map
that
I
had
done
and
I
have
now
added
the
half
mile
radius
there
just
beyond
cherokee
and
so
that
and
so
I've
colored
the
blocks
that
would
fall
under
the
half
mile
radius
in
the
pink
color
and,
of
course,
the
color.
The
yellow,
color
properties
would
fall
under
the
quarter
mile.
J
Radius
and
so
based
on
that,
I
decided
to
go
ahead
and
see
if
I
could
make
a
chart.
J
That
would
make
some
sense
to
everyone
about
how
we
might
be
able
to
step
things
down,
based
on
based
on
our
existing
requirements
going
to
the
half
mile
radius
and
then
to
the
quarter
mile
radius
for
multi-unit
residential.
Our
existing
requirement
is
1.5
spaces
per
unit
going
to
the
half
mile
distance.
We
could
step
that
down
to
one
space
per
unit
and
then
for
the
quarter
mile
going
down
and
matching
the
denver
rate
of
0.75
spaces
per
unit.
J
We
could
also
then
add,
based
on
the
report,
a
multi-unit
residential
income,
restricted
requirement
which
would
be
once
again.
We
have
1.5
units
required
today
spaces
per
unit.
Then
we
could
go
because
income
restricted
housing.
People
are
much
less
likely
to
have
cars.
We
would
go
down
to
a
0.75
per
unit
at
the
half
mile
radius
and
then
at
the
quarter
mile
down
to
a
0.5
unit
space
per
unit
count
for
the
hotel.
J
I
have
we
we've.
We
have.
Our
existing
requirement
is
one
space
per
unit
going
down
to
the
half
mile.
We
could
go
down
to
0.75
spaces
per
unit
and
then
the
quarter
mile
at
a
point,
a
half
space
per
unit
for
an
office
depart
or
retail
development
of
10
000
square
feet.
Our
existing
rate
is
3.33
spaces
per
1000
square
feet
which
would
produce
34
parking
spaces
for
10
000
square
feet
at
a
half
mile.
J
We
might
decide
to
go
down
to
2.5
spaces
per
thousand,
which
gets
us
that
would
would
get
us
at
25
spaces
for
10
000
square
feet
and
then
a
quarter
mile.
We
would
drop
down
and
meet
the
denver
station
area
number
at
1.25
spaces
per
a
thousand
square
feet
which
would
be
13
spaces
and
then
for
restaurant.
J
We
have
a
whopping
10
per
thousand
existing
today,
which
would
be
a
hundred
spaces
which
is
way
too
much
even
for
our
to
even
anywhere
it's
too
much
and
then
a
half
mile.
We
could
go
down
to
3.5
space
per
thousand,
which
would
be
35
spaces
and
then
finally,
a
quarter
mile
at
two
per
thousand
or
20
spaces.
J
And
similarly,
based
on
the
discussions
on
density,
I
thought
that
maybe
that
would
the
half
bound
the
quarter.
Mile
might
make
some
sense
as
well
here
too,
for
today
we
have
no
minimum
density
in
the
mu,
b1
and
typically,
typical
density
tends
to
be
around
50
to
70.
Units
per
acre
can
be
higher,
but
it's
usually
in
that
range
for
the
half
mile
we
could
establish
and
the
quarter
mile
we
could
both
establish
75,
acre
minimum
and
125
acre
maximum,
which
is
what
the
stationary
master
plan
from
2013
recommended.
J
However,
based
on
what
was
said
about
that,
we
didn't
want
to
limit
necessarily
the
types
of
dome
we
could
get
right
near
the
station.
We
have
also
put
in
this
potential
suggestion
that
we
have
this
opportunity
to
negotiate
a
higher
level
through
our
tsa
overlay
zone
district
for
that
quarter.
Mile
and
similarly,
with
the
height,
our
existing
requirement
is
100
feet
and
I
chose
to
propose
125
feet
for
the
half
mile,
which
would
include
that
chase
tower
building,
which
is
about
120
feet,
so
that
would
cover
that.
E
Oh,
I
think
he
knows.
No,
I'm
not.
I
can't
I'm
sure
he's
there.
I'm
sure
he's
trying
to
get
back
on.
E
I
was
going
to
ask
john
if
there's
a
way
to
limit
the
hotel
use
to
the
city
center
area
and
not
the
entire
mub1,
because
the
city
is
going
to
be
asked
to
do
some
public
finance
for
public
improvements
in
the
city
center
area,
and
I
think,
there's
a
rationale
for
that
we've.
You
know,
as
everybody
probably
is
aware,
we've
really
been
trying
to
motivate
hotel
development
at
city
center,
rather
than
let
it
kind
of
happen
organically
other
places
in
the
downtown
area.
E
So
that
that'd
be
a
question
for
him.
Also
john
and
I
were
talking
today
and
it
relates
to
our
ongoing
negotiations
with
skb
and
with
l
r.
We
were
talking
about
maybe
not
doing
this
bifurcated
approach
at
quarter
mile
and
half
mile,
and
just
extending
the
parking
and
height
aspects
out
to
a
half
mile
and
one
one
of
the
things
that's
coming
up.
That
I
think
is
relevant
to.
E
A
And
as
long
as
you
brought
that
up,
which
I
think
is
a
great
idea
to
enhance
the
the
trolley,
would
that
keep,
I
guess
is
the
the
goal
to
keep
the
entire
loop
that
goes
through
swedish
on
some
sort
of
a
higher
level
or
whether
it
be
maybe
a
smaller
circulator
for
the
downtown
or
the
you
know,
the
city
center
development
area
and
then
with
a
further
loop
that
encompasses
swedish.
E
E
Having
said
that,
though,
you
know
there
are
ways
to
add
technology
to
the
to
the
transit
element
here
and
let
it
be
a
little
bit
more
on
demand,
and
so
I
think,
there's
opportunities
to
kind
of
tailor
the
schedule
to
where
the
where
the
passengers
are
coming
from,
and
so
you
could
kind
of
have
the
best
of
both
worlds
have
a
basic
loop.
E
But
if
you're
getting
high
higher
demand
from
the
you
know,
let's
say
the
eastern
portions
of
the
city
center
area,
then
the
the
routing
would
be
adjusted
accordingly
and
I
think
that's
one
of
the
things
we're
talking
about
potentially
making
available
to
the
developers
and
that
should
be
really
attractive
to
them.
E
E
In
okay,
okay,
geez
someone:
what
do
you
think
I
had
to
do?
I
just
walked
him
through
our
discussion
about
the
half
mile
quarter
mile,
and
also
a
discussion
we
didn't
have,
which
is
trying
to
by
the
overlay
trying
to
limit
hotel
as
it
used
to
just
the
city
center
area.
But
I'm
kind
of
probably
out
of
things
to
talk
about.
E
It
cut
out,
let's
see
right
it,
it
cut
out
right
at
the
end
of
your
chart,
and
what
do
you
think
about?
Can
you
just
call
in
to
the
telephone
number?
I
think
the
only
problem.
E
E
Oh
poor,
john
poor
john,
so
his
computer
completely
completely
froze
on
him
and
he
couldn't
even
he
can't
even
shut
it
down.
So
he's
he's
gonna,
try
to
call
in
and
then
nancy
can
you
take
back
the
share
the
screen
function.
E
E
D
H
B
B
B
K
Okay,
so
how
when
did
I
cut
off
what
what
did
I?
What
was
the
last
thing
I
said.
K
We
have
a
hundred
feet
today,
but
the
chase
tower
is
actually
120
feet,
so
I
thought
well
maybe
125
feet
would
be
a
good
place
to
create
a
standard,
and
we
might
do
that
for
both
the
half
mile
and
a
quarter
mile,
but
with
the
caveat
that
we
within
the
quarter
mile
at
the
city's
discretion,
this
may
be
negotiated
higher
through
a
tsa
overlay,
and
then
I
so
that
that
was
my
conclusion
of
this
slide
and
then
I
wanted
to
say
that
said
that
I
want
at
this
point,
I
wanted
to
throw
it
open
to
the
group
to
begin
discussing
and
commenting
on
this
proposed
system,
and
then
I
guess
I
realized
I
had
lost
you
all,
so
I'm
gonna
throw
it
open
now
for
discussion.
K
So
let's
go.
B
Michelle
I
or
chair
I'm
gonna,
have
to
let
you
know
with
sharing
screen.
I
cannot
see
any
of
you,
so
I
will
not
be
able
to
see
hands.
C
C
Well,
you
know
right
now,
I'm
trying
to
the
standard.
A
C
Okay,
well,
I
think
then
we'll
just
since
I
for
what
side
by
side
gallery
is
that
where
I
went
well,
I
can
see
everybody
up
and
down,
but
okay.
So
who
would
like
to
speak
to
this
first?
A
I
ask
you
a
quick
question:
this
is
colin.
Yes,
I
believe
you're
starting
to
say
that
potentially
combining
the
half
mile
and
quarter
mile
requirements
also
right
when
you
cut
out
so
maybe
we
could
just
discuss
that
really
quickly
high
level
the
thought
process
before
on
that
before
we
go
into
further
discussion,
sure.
K
Okay,
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
you
are
referring
to.
E
God
it's
dan.
I
used
your
absence
to
advocate,
at
least
for
some
consideration
of
you
know
what
you
and
I
had
discussed
today,
just
combining
and
going
out
to
the
full
half
mile.
E
I
I
felt
like
well,
I
had
a
question
about
parking,
but
what
is
defined
as
peak
time
and
then
related
to
the
quarter
mile
and
a
half
mile
I
mean
I
can
understand
that
for
some
of
the
maybe
parking
requirements
on
office,
retail
and
restaurant,
but
for
the
multi-unit
residential
I
mean
my
memory
and
I
apologize
to
everybody
for
missing
the
last
meeting.
I
So
I
don't
know
if
something
came
out
of
that,
but
I
I
feel,
like
we
talked
quite
a
bit
about
parking
for
residential
and
that
a
half
a
mile
for
some
people
is
a
long
way
to
walk
and
they're,
not
necessarily
using.
I
don't
know.
I
just
thought
like
we
had
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
for
the
multi-unit
residential,
why
the
difference
between
quarter
and
half
mile
was
important
because
we
didn't
want
to
go
to
the
lower
amount
for
the
quarter
mile.
I
I
mean
I
guess
if,
if
we're
gonna,
say
okay,
everything
parks
at
the
half
mile
amount,
then
I
think
we're
defeating
what
we
were
trying
to
do
last
time,
which
was
reduced
parking
where
it
made
sense.
So
I
mean
I
I'm
obviously
not
opposed
to
more
discussion
on
that,
but
I
think
for
some
of
this
stuff
parking,
the
restaurant
parking
has
always
been
weird.
I
mean
at
10.
For
a
thousand
I
mean
that's
just
crazy,
but
some
of
this
other
stuff.
I
I
just
feel
like
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
trying
to
come
to
a
compromise
on
that.
So
I
mean,
if
somebody
has
a
a
reason
why
we
shouldn't,
I
guess
I'd
like
to
hear
it,
but
I
would
have
to
push
for
then
the
half
mile
parking
requirements
for
the
whole
thing
as
opposed
to
the
quarter
mile,
that's
sort
of
where
I
am
oh.
E
Well,
two
two
quick
items
and
I
don't
want
to
steal
john's
thunder,
but
one
of
the
things
as
our
discussions
with
l
r
continue
the
future
redevelopment
of
what
we
refer
to
as
block
d,
which
is
where
ross
and
petco
are
currently
located
would
fall
outside
of
the
quarter
mile,
but
inside
the
half
mile,
and
so
to
the
extent
that
we
can
kind
of
tee
that
up
for
development
and
we're
talking
development,
that's
10
years
down
the
road.
E
I
think
that
really
helps
our
overall
negotiations
with
them
that
shouldn't
that
shouldn't
drive
your
considerations,
but
it
is
a
factor
and
then
the
other
thing
is
we.
We.
We
have
had
some
serious
discussion,
as
I
mentioned,
about
really
making
the
developers
contribute
to
the
trolley
and
certainly
with
a
reduction
in
the
parking
from
the
current,
very,
very
high
requirement.
E
There's
a
big
rationale
that
they
should,
because
their
savings
in
terms
of
what
they
build
will
be
considerable.
I
mean
they
could
take
a
fraction
of
their
construction
savings
and
really
help
fund
some
really
significant
improvements
to
the
trolley
and
obviously,
at
that
point
the
whole.
The
whole
thing
becomes
much
more
sustainable
and
totally
agree
with
the
concept
that
most
people
are
not
going
to
walk
the
half
mile
as
a
practical
matter.
Most
people
are
not
going
to
walk
the
quarter
mile
either
so.
I
I'm
talking
about
englewood
citizens
who
want
to
come
downtown
who
are
coming
from
their
home
they're
going
to
drive.
I
mean
they
may
use
the
trolley
to
go
from
downtown
to
over
to
city
center
or
maybe
go,
but
they
are
going
to
want
to
park
their
car
somewhere
they're
not
going
to
walk
from.
You
know
their
home
that
what?
If
you?
If
you
look
at
the
area
of
that
south,
you
know
sort
of
that
southeast
quadrant,
you
know
what
are
they
going
to
do
hop
on
the
bus
to
get?
I
E
Well,
you
can
certainly
take
the
most
the
more
conservative
approach
and
distinguish
between
the
two
distances.
One
of
the
things
to
remember
is
you
know.
Today
we
have
we.
The
city
have
an
obligation
to
provide
910
shared
rtd
parking
spaces.
E
Those
are
not
used
at
during
the
evenings
or
during
the
weekends
as
practical
now,
very
few
of
them
are
being
used
during
the
day.
Right
now
we
are
going
to
approach
rtd
about
reducing
that
shared
parking
requirement,
maybe
by
a
third
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
there's
still
going
to
be
a
big
big
pool
of
available
parking.
That's
dedicated
during
the
daytime
work
days
to
to
rtd.
H
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
I
actually
thought
that
john
and
dan
laid
out
a
really
well
thought
out
and
and
referenced
set
of
recommendations
based
on
this
rtd
residential
parking
study
and
also
what
they
showed
us
last
time.
I'm
curious
what
the
name
of
this
rtd
study
is
just
like
I'd.
Look
it
up
later,
but
based
on
the
numbers
that
you're
showing
and
also
I'm
cross
referencing
with
the
parking
comparison
chart.
You
showed
us
last
time
compared
to
denver
aurora
and
the
tribe
a
recommended
amount.
H
The
hash
trial
numbers
for
restaurant
and
office
retail
are
substantially
more
than
any
of
those
other
jurisdictions
provide
at
the
quarter
so
denver.
If
you're
looking
at
page
44
of
the
pdf,
I
think
it
is
denver
requires
13
retail
for
10,
000
square
feet,
aurora
15
and
triba
recommended
15
at
half
mile
we're
saying
25
and
then
at
the
quarter
mile
we're
saying
13..
H
H
H
D
K
K
There
are
some
members
who
want
to
push
it
more
towards
a
more
a
less
parking,
centric
development
and
others
are
a
little
bit
concerned
about
that.
Because
of
of
just
you
know,
this
is
not
something
that's
been
tried
in
englewood
before,
and
so
I
think
it
was
sort
of
the
the.
I
really
took
the
the
tiered
suggestion
from
kate
townley.
F
I
have
a
little
concern
about
the
the
amount
of
parking
that's
going
to
be
offered,
and
it
is
I'm
not
talking
about
the
quarter
mile
or
a
half
mile.
F
But
I'm
I'm
talking
about
the
the
bell:
cherry
hills,
apartment
building,
that's
on
broadway
and
I
I
drive
by
there
all
the
time,
and
so
this
weekend
I
went
out
down
there
and
I
counted
the
cars
that
are
on
the
street
street
parking
and
there
was
78
cars
on
the
street
and
I
looked
it
up
and
that
that
unit
has
a
parking
of
604
spaces
for
350
units.
F
That's
the
1.5
per
studio,
one
bedroom,
two
bedroom
and
a
two
two
spaces
for
the
three
bedroom
and
if
we
reduce
that
is
that
going
to
force
more
cars
out
on
the
street?
Or
you
know
if
you
get
within
a
quarter
mile
or
a
half
mile,
you're
going
to
have
less
cars
if
they're
using
rtd.
F
But
that's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
extra
cars,
no
spaces
for
them
to
fan
out
down
there
that
when
you
pack
in
the
apartments
down
there
and
there's
no
place
for
them
to
park
on
the
street,
you
have
no
street
parking
down
there.
F
So
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
the
the
amounts
of
parking.
I
realize
that
you
cut
down
the
parking
and
that
lures
the
developer
in
to
it's
going
to
be
a
little
cheaper
to
build
down
there,
but
and
then
that
apartment
was
the
built
by
alta
and
that's
the
one
that
was
going
in
over
on
the.
What
is
the
earth
earth
track
parking
lot,
so
they're,
basically
trying
to
build
at
350
units
and
350
units
with
the
with
the
experience
that
we
have
it's.
F
F
That
that's
a
concern
of
mine,
though
you
know
one
one
word
on
the
trolley.
I
I
really
like
the
idea
of
how
expanding
out
the
trolley,
but
I
the
on-call
trolley,
I'm
not
sure
if
that
would
work
very
well,
but
it
seems
like
it's
just
a
continuous.
F
D
I'm
in
favor
of
reducing
the
parking
requirements
because
I
believe
that
the
developers
will
determine
if
they
want
more
more.
I
D
If
that
makes
sense
to
them,
but
I
think
that
that
can
be
twisted
a
little
bit
where
similar
to
what
carl
said
if
there's
a
lot
of
free
parking
just
outside
you
know,
on
the
streets
areas
like
that
that
it's
kind
of
you
know
that's
where
I
would
see,
we
would
need
to
put
in
guidelines
to
police
that
and
raise
the
minimum.
So
I
mean
I
would
prefer
to
kind
of
fix
that
so-called
free
parking
problem
of
spillover
that
you
see
outside
of
a
lot
of
the
buildings.
D
I
D
The
decision,
but
not
you
know.
I
D
Them
make
a
have
a
disingenuous
decision
based
on
those.
E
There's
also
been
more
focus
on
discussion
about
taking
a
certain
percentage
of
tenants
who
don't
have
cars
so
that
that
drives
the
requirement
down
and
there's
now
technology
that
allows
that
to
be
to
be
monitored,
and
so
it's
really
this
idea
of
making
the
developer
accountable
for
the
parking
generation
from
their
particular
project
much
more
than
in
the
past,
where
in
the
past
it
was
just
kind
of
the
static
approach.
E
You
know
you
build,
you
know
you
build
1.75
per
unit
and
that's
it
you
know
so
there's
I
I've
seen
our
department
take
a
much
more
proactive
approach
in
terms
of
some
of
these
other
ideas
that
really
limit
that
on
street.
A
I
do
have
a
comment.
I
think
we
also
need
to
focus
on
what
we're
looking
at
here
in
the
the
tod
area
in
the
future,
looking
kind
of
a
development.
The
trends
are
going
away
from
cars
as
much
as
I
love
driving
my
car
there's
a
generation
coming
behind
us,
that's
not,
and
if
we're
putting
in
too
much
parking,
it's
it's
gonna
be
a
bit
of
a
waste
in
the
future
and
especially
as
these
projects
come
online
and
and
the
development
density.
A
As
long
as
we
can
get
the
density
in
there
that
increases,
I
think
the
thoughts
of
less
parking
in
these
areas
is
is
the
way
to
go
again.
It's
not
everywhere
in
the
city
and
not
for
every
development,
even
as
close
as
broadway
is
it's
still
a
little
bit
further
away,
and
so
I
think,
for
this
specific
location
in
this
redevelopment,
we
should
consider
that.
D
G
Yes,
so
I
definitely
see
both
sides
of
the
coin,
but
I
tend
to
think
that
we
should
have
less
parking
near
city
center
right
now
as
it
stands,
there's
just
so
much
parking
and
not
a
lot
of
activity
compared
to
the
parking-
and
I
know
things
are
going
to
be
completely
different.
But
to
me
I'm
scared
to
build
too
much
parking,
I'm
not
as
scared
of
not
having
enough,
because
I
feel
like
that's
kind
of
a
problem
we
have
right
now
and
then
from
like
a
developer
perspective.
G
Parking
is
a
huge
amenity
for
a
lot
of
people
that
live
at
apartments.
So
if
they
feel
like
that's
going
to
be
what
their
target
audience
needs
or
wants
they're
going
to
want
to
plan
for
that
and
pay
for
that.
I
remember
on
that
proposed
turndown
over
near
sports
authority
project,
they
were
going
to
be
investing
30
000
in
a
parking
per
parking
space
in
the
parking
that
was
going
to
be
built
in
the
bottom
of
the
building,
so
it
was
built
into
the
building.
G
So
I
just
know
that
developers
are
willing
to
spend
a
lot
of
money
for
parking,
and
so,
if
it's
a
need
that
they
have,
I
think
it's
better
for
us
to
to
lower
the
minimum
so
that
they
don't
have
to
have
such
a
high
mag
or
such
a
high
minimum
that
they
have
parking
that
they
don't
need,
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
if
you
have
parking
at
your
apartment,
it's
going
to
impact
your
unit
price,
no
matter
what,
especially,
if
you're,
not
paying
for
that
parking,
because
it's
essentially
everybody's
paying
for
that
parking.
G
G
C
Okay,
diane,
you
have
your
hand
up.
H
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
echo
what
kate
said
and
and
also
just
bring
it
back
to
the
bring
it
back
to
the
englewood
forward
plan.
You
know,
I
think,
that
we
know
from
that
plan
that
city
council
wants
a
more
walkable
pedestrian,
friendly,
safer
and
sustainable
city,
especially
at
the
city
center,
and
I
think
that
this
is
the
place
to
have
less
parking.
This
is
the
place
to
have
more
people
walking,
and
I
think
that
you
know
this
rtd
study.
Just
I
mean
it.
H
Just
bears
numbers
to
the
idea
that
the
parking
spaces
when
there
are
over
0.74
parking
spaces
provided
for
market
rate
residential
they're
not
utilized,
so
it
would
be
terrible
of
us
to
waste
space
and
reduce
activity
in
favor
of
parking,
and
I-
and
I
also
would
just
mention
I
don't
see
anything
about-
you-
know
more
sustainable
means
of
transportation
bike
electric
cars-
things
like
that-
I
mean
that's-
definitely
also
something
that's
included
in
english
forward
and
and
if
that's
something
we
could
consider.
I
F
Yeah
I
I
also
would
like
cars
to
be
reduced
in
over
the
general
population,
but
and
they
will
be,
though
their
gm
is
going
to
start
making
non-petroleum
driven
cars
in
2035..
F
F
I
don't
know,
I'm
guessing
80
of
the
people
would
be
going
downtown
and
20,
maybe
going
south
to
the
mineral
station
or
whatever,
but
you
still
have
there
there's
nothing
that
goes
west
and
there's
nothing
that
goes
east
and
the
east
is
a
big
thing
and
the
west
is
also
a
lot
of
traffic
there.
You're
gonna
have
a
lot
of
cars
going
east
and
west,
and
that's
has
nothing
to
do
with
a
quarter
mile
or
a
half
mile
circular.
F
It's
and
another
thing
that
takes
up
space
that
that
I'm
in
favor
of
is
green
space.
I
mean
you
have
a
lot
of
buildings
going
in
there.
The
people
that
are
gonna
be
down
in
that
area
are
not
there's
nothing
going
down
there
for,
except
for
the
light
rail.
The
the
city
center
is
going
to
be
gone,
the
fountain
that's
down.
There
is
going
to
be
paved
over
with
the
street
that
goes
through
there.
F
There's
there's
not
going
to
be
anything
for
people
to
go
down
there
for,
except
for
life,
rail
or
if
you
go
home
to
your
apartment,
so
I'm
not
sure
the
the
quarter
mile
and
the
half
mile
thing
is
it's
it's
useful,
but
the
the
percentage
of
people
that
are
going
to
be
using
that.
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
that
large
and
again
people.
F
We
live
in
colorado.
There's
mountains,
five
miles
away
that
people
are
going
to
go
up
there
on
them
on
the
weekends
they
they
have
a
lot
of
recreation
around
here
us.
You
can't
do
that
with
on
light
rail
and
light
rail
right
now
is
really
really
low,
but
it
will
come
back,
they're
saying
that
60
will
come
back,
but
it's
it's
really.
F
It's
amazing
that
that
north
parking
lot
over
there
north
of
the
light
rail
station
in
the
daytime-
there's-
maybe
that's
a
600
700,
maybe
800
spaces
over
there,
but
there's
like
25
cars
in
there
during
the
day.
I
don't
I
don't
know
how
people
are
getting
around,
but
it's
electric
cars
would
have
to
be.
That
should
be
a
portion
of
the
parking,
though
they
should
have
electric
car
charging
stations
in
the
apartments.
C
Well,
I
do
have
a
few
comments
that
I'd
like
to
bring
forward.
First
of
all,
I
I
agree
some.
I
agree
with
some
of
judy's
comments.
The
people
are
going
to
get
in
their
car
and
go
there,
and
especially
with
the
restaurant.
I
don't
think
we
need
the
10
spots
per
thousand
square
feet.
Anything
like
that.
C
I'm
not
opposed
to
reducing
it
somewhat,
but
restaurants,
don't
necessarily
rely
upon
people
close
in
close,
they
draw
people
from
all
over
the
city
potentially,
so
I
do
have
some
concerns
about
reducing
it
too
much,
in
particular
for
for
restaurants,
of
course,
from
the
last
meeting,
you
all
know
that
I
am
really
also
very
much
concerned
about
the
hotel
anecdotally.
I
have
been
talking
to
some
people
about.
C
You
know
a
hotel
down
there
by
the
light
rail
station
and
if
we
reduced
the
parking
down
to
0.5
per
unit
pretty
much,
I
think
the
rationale
behind
that
was
that
people
are
going
to
fly
into
town
and
take
the
light
rail
all
the
way
down
to
the
city
of
englewood
station.
I
think
that
that's
nonsense.
C
To
be
honest,
I
I
think
that
that
would
take
an
enormous
amount
of
time
first
off
and
that
people
would
more
likely
be
renting
a
car
at
the
airport
and
driving
it
to
the
hotel
and
parking
it
there.
So
I
am
very
concerned
about
reducing
that
down
to
0.5
per
unit
and,
of
course,
there's
people
that
have
to
work
at
the
hotel
as
well.
So
I
would
I
think,
at
the
last
meeting
I
I
looked
at
some
of
the
other.
C
So
it
was
cited
earlier
that
in
denver,
75
percent
of
the
of
the
people,
I
think,
was
the
quote
that
cars
oh
and
only
seven
percent-
have
no
car
and
that's
the
lower
income
people.
I'm
sorry,
I
should
not
have
said
the
75
75
percent.
C
Seven
percent
have
no
car,
so
I
can
understand
a
lower
ratio
for
some
of
the
multi
family
developments
that
also
include
some
subsidizing,
some
way
shape
or
form
housing,
and
then
I
I
think
I
the
elephant
in
the
room
that
I
haven't
heard
from
anybody
is
covet.
C
I
think,
carl,
your
observation
that
there's
only
25
cars
in
the
parking
for
the
light
rail
station-
that's
probably
true
now,
but
before
we
had
no
parking
and
they
were
actually
considering
expanding
the
parking
over
that
little
green
space,
that's
down
to
the
north
of
it.
That
has
is
that
one
of
the
ditches
or
something
that's
there.
So
I
think
we
have
to
under
remember
that
we're
in
a
a
temporary
situation,
hopefully
a
temporary
situation
with
kovid
and
that
people
are
not
using
mass
transit
because
they
don't
want
to.
C
They
don't
want
to
be
in
close
quarters
with
other
people.
They
want
to
be
in
their
cart
where
they're,
safer
and
then
also
back
going
on
to
the
trolley
thing
anytime,
you're
talking
about
mass
transportation
via
the
trolley
or
the
light
rail
taking
those
or
just
buses.
That
means,
if
you're,
going
to
take
it.
That
means
you
have
to
allow
for
extra
time
it
I
used
to
a
long
time
ago,
when
I
lived
down
close
to
capitol
hill.
C
I
would
take
the
bus
downtown
and
then
take
the
bus
up
to
see
you
and
the
amount
of
time
you
have
to
spend
to
go
anywhere
in
this
city
if
you're
using
mass
transportation
is
crazy
unless
you're
parking
at
a
light
rail
station
and
going
downtown
to
you,
know,
metro
or
something
like
that.
So
I
think
those
are
sort
of
realities.
C
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
everybody
thinks
about
in
terms
of
this,
because
forcing
people
into
mass
transit
any
anywhere
means
that
you're
forcing
people
into
using
additional
time
in
their
day
to
get
where
they
want
to
go.
C
C
Well,
I've
got
this
mixed
up
a
little
bit,
but
anyway
they
you
know.
First
of
all
that
study
was
done
in
just
about
a
month
ago
and
again,
all
of
those
numbers
are
reflecting
what's
going
on
with
covid,
so
I'm
a
little
reluctant
to
take
everything
that
was
in
the
rtd
study
as
what
we
necessarily
have
to
take
as
gospel.
We
need
to
look
ahead
and
the
good
news
is:
is
that
we're
not
going
to
decide
anything
tonight
about
this
stuff?
C
So
we
do
have
time
over
the
next
few
months
to
sort
of
hopefully
see
how
this
covert
thing
shakes
out,
because
right
now
rtd
is
bankrupt.
Basically,
nobody
is
riding
the
light
rail
so
anyway,
I
just
wanted
to
put
those
things
forward.
G
Comments,
sorry,
I
can
find
you,
I
think,
I'm
still
taking.
D
This
all
in
and
I
apologize-
I
didn't-
have
a
chance
to
review
this
beforehand,
so
I
don't
have
any
additional
comments
right
now:
okay,.
A
I
have
one
quick
question
and
this
might
spark
a
little
bit
of
a
debate.
Do
we
think
that
more
people
would
be
using
parking
spots
like
if
they're
not
leaving
their
house
because
of
kovid,
and
these
are
at
you
know,
market
rate
places
like
are:
are
people
home
during
this
study?
Do
you
think,
or
do
you
think
that
there's
less
people
at
home?
I
guess,
do
you
understand
the
question?
I'm
asking
there's
anybody
else.
K
Yes,
that's
that's.
What
rtd
is
implicating
in
the
study.
Is
that
because
of
kova,
because
of
the
stay
at
home
order,
and
also
because
of
high
unemployment
for
lower
income
people
that
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
people
at
home
during
the
day
than
pre-covert,
and
so
they
think
that
this
doing
the
study
during
covid
is
is
even
more
persuasive
than
if
it
was
done
before.
A
I
could
see
going
both
ways
on
that.
So
thank
you
for
the
clarification
on
that.
So
just
more
of
a
question
I
had.
C
Yeah
and
colin,
I
think
that
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
hint
at
anecdotally.
We
did
see
that
parking
lot
down
there
at
the
englewood
light
rail
station.
That
parking
lot
was
was
full
and
now
it's
not,
but.
A
K
I
I
would
believe
their
data
much
more
as
being
valid
if
they
counted
cars
during
the
day
and
then
did
it
at
midnight
when
everybody's
home
sleeping
and
could
show
me
that
that
was
because
that's
really
when
there
is
an
issue
is
when
everybody's
home
so
saying
that
everybody's
home
during
the
day
you
know,
I
don't
see
how
that
is
necessarily
any
that's
just
picking
saying
well,
this
is
what
we
think
is
happening.
I
I
mean
you
need
more
data
than
that.
If
they
had
taken
two
counts,
one
at
midnight
and
won
it
between
ten
and
three
I
might
we
might
have
something
valid
to
talk
about
number
wise,
but
you
know
I
just
I.
I
don't
like
just
using
one
study
number
and
saying
that's
what
we're
gonna
make
our
decisions
on,
but
so
we
I.
C
K
Why
don't
you
share
your
density?
Thought
too.
I
K
So
you
are
correct
in
the
that
the
height
limit
will
prevent
will,
can
act
as
a
barrier
to
a
certain
level
of
density,
because
you
can
only
go
so
high
and
you
really
can't
go
lower.
K
However,
it
there
is
some
wiggle
room
based
on
how
they
design
things
and
if
they
make
the
units
small,
really
small,
if
they
made
them
all
micro
units,
they
could
put
a
lot
more
density
than
you
might
imagine
there
if
they
did,
that
a
big
part
of
the
the
reason
why
we
wanted
to
put
we
wanted
to
put
a
limit
on.
K
So
that
is
that's
a
large
part
of
why
we
thought
about
doing
that
and
putting
because
we,
yes,
we
realized
that
a
height
limit
can
will,
of
course
limit
the
density.
But
there
are
tricks
around
to
get
around
that
to
maybe
put
a
lot
more
density
than
you
thought
they
could,
and
so
we
thought
it
would
just
be.
H
Yeah,
I
just
had
a
couple
questions
on
the
hotel
question
or
hotel
conversation
in
the
recommended
quarter.
Mile
half
mile
station
radii
standards
we
listed
johnny
listed
0.5
spaces
per
unit
at
the
quarter
mile
and
0.75
per
unit
at
the
half
mile,
going
back
to
the
denver
and
aurora
tod
parking
requirements
for
hotels,
they
put
50
at
100
units,
and
so
I'm
curious.
If
that
is,
does
that
seem
do
we
have
we
had
any
conversations
with
folks
in
denver?
Nor
is
that
being
reasonable?
H
H
Is
there
data
reflecting
the
typical
travel
method,
because
I
would
think
just
anecdotally,
I
would
guess
a
majority
of
people
pre-coded
we're
taking
uber
rather
than
renting
a
car.
I'm
sure
some
people
would
rent
a
car
if
they
weren't
coming
to
meet
someone
in
englewood
and
go
into
the
mountains
or
something
like
that.
But
I'm
just
curious.
If
that
would
actually
be
a
higher
number
of
travelers
would
be
coming
by
uber
or
similar
rideshare.
K
Those
are
good
points.
We
have
not
contacted
anyone
at
the
city
and
county
of
denver
to
ask
about
whether
they
have
those
experiences
with
the
hotels.
At
that
rate,
I
do
have
a
contact
there.
I
could
see
what
they
might
be
able
to
produce
upon
that
and
you,
you
are
probably
very
correct
in
the
fact
that
people
a
lot
of
people,
especially
people
under
say
50-
are
that
probably
is
a
lot
better.
A
deal
to
take
uber
than
to
rent
a
car.
H
I
do
also
know
some
people
at
the
city
of
aurora
if
it's
helpful
to
contact
them
about,
you
know
their
requirement
and
whether
that
works
for
them.
If
you
guys
don't
have
any
contacts.
C
And
just
another
idea
is,
I
think,
that
there's
a
big
difference
between
hotels
that
are
located
in
the
core
of
the
city
and
county
of
denver
versus
people
who
go
to
hotels
that
are
banned,
also
the
airport,
those
people
I
can
see
taking
uber
or
something
like
that.
I
think
that
people
going
to
hotels
that
are
not
in
this
core
of
the
city
and
county
of
denver
or
at
the
airport
they
may
have
different
uses,
and
maybe
the
tourism
board
could
help
us
on
that.
I
Tag
on
that
I'd
be
really
interested
to
know
about
places
like
arvada
or
golden
who
have
more
of
a
they're,
not
necessarily
destinations
like
denver
is
going
to
be
so
it's
more
of
an
eclectic
mix
of
people
who
are
going
to
be
coming
there.
If
they
have
experience
with
you
know
the.
I
can't
think
that
there's
a
there's,
not
a
hotel,
near
arvada,
that's
coming
to
mind,
but
there's
a
number
of
hotels
now
they've
been
there
forever
just
outside
golden.
C
I
I
can
tell
you
judy,
I
did
look
up.
Golden's
requirements
for
hotels,
their
parking
requirement
and
golden's
is
one
parking
spot
plus
per
unit
per
hotel
room,
plus
one
parking
spot
for
every
two
employees.
E
Yeah,
let
me
just
mention
I
I'm
I'm
gonna
advocate
that
that's
probably
overkill
in
today's
world.
You
know
I
I
watch
the
station
because
it's
outside
our
building
outside
the
office.
There
are
a
lot
of
people
coming
and
going
with
bags
at
inglewood
city
center
station.
Now
it
may
be.
You
know
three
four
five
an
hour,
but
you
know
you
add
it
up
and
it's
a
lot
and
that's
what
contributes
to
the
success
of
the
a
from
union
station
to
the
airport.
You
know
every
everything
feeds
into
that.
E
There
are
very
few
downtown
residents
per
se
who
are
going
and
grabbing
that
to
the
airport.
It's
all
the
lines
that
feed
in
and
land
at
union
station,
so
just
just
a
thought
on
that
and
we
are
continuing
to
talk
to
a
hotel
operator
and
developer,
and
so
I
I'd
encourage
us
to
try
to
keep
the
parking
low
and
don't
just
don't
forget
about
the
fact
that
we
have
this
huge
pool
of
surplus
parking.
E
That's
rtd
shared
parking,
that's
sitting
there
currently
spread
on
two
lots
and
it's
going
to
continue
to
be
available,
so
we
should
really
take
advantage
of
that.
Financially
and
what
we're
trying
to
do
here,
you
know
that's
a
pool
that
meant
hardly
any
other
location
has
to
work
with,
and
it's
it's
not
going
to
go
away.
We
may
have
success
in
reducing
it,
but
it's
still
going
to
be
there
and
it's
going
to
be
in
the
hundreds
of
parking
spots,
just
a
thought.
G
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
add
to
dan's
thought
he
actually
gave
me
this
idea,
but
I've
heard
a
lot
of
positive
feedback
about
the
light
rail
from
the
airport
into
the
airport,
and
I
believe
it's
15
to
get
there
from
here
that
compares
to
like
40
or
50
for
an
uber
and
then
like
200
for
a
rental
car,
so
for
people
that
have
lower
budgets
or
are
younger
and
they
can't
afford
that
rental
car
and
they
might
not
even
be
able
to
afford
that
uber,
so
that
person
is
most
likely
going
to
stay
in
inglewood
instead
of
downtown
denver.
G
So-
and
I
mean
another
thing:
that's
crazy
is
my
next
door
condo
just
sold
in
like
four
days,
so
people
are
like
fighting
for
houses
to
buy
here,
and
I
just
I
think
that
that
area
is
going
to
end
up
being
a
heavy
commuter
area,
because
that
price
is
not
going
to
be
continue
to
be
super
affordable
forever.
You
know,
people
are,
you
know,
trading
in
their
cars
to
just
go
environmentally
friendly,
not
for
budget
reasons
but
for
lifestyle
choices.
So
I
think
that's
something
that
we
should
kind
of
contemplate.
F
Residential
areas
there,
what
can
you
expand
on
that?
A
little
bit
will
will
the
three
apartment
buildings
that
go
in
will
any
of
them
be
doing.
F
That
well
will
they
have
income
restricted
is.
Is
that
like
what
is
it?
The
tax
break
for
the
apartment
buildings
were
schedule,
eight
schedule
eight.
I
think
it's
called.
K
So
it's
no!
No,
it's
not
section
eight
housing,
but
it
is
income
limited.
So
you
there
is
for
these
types
of
properties.
They
don't
they're,
not
people
who
qualify
for
section
eight.
They
do
have
typically
lower
income
jobs,
and
so
there's
a
limit
to
how
much
money
you
can
make
to
qualify
to
live
there.
C
Well,
it
sounds
to
me
like
we
have
parking
is
going
to
be
another
topic,
unfortunately
john,
that
we're
going
to
have
to
come
back
to
at
some
point.
Oh
I'm
sorry,
kate,
you
have
your
hand
up.
G
I
was
just
wondering:
does
inglewood
have
a
program
to
incentivize,
affordable
projects,
because
I
know
I
can't
think
of
the
names
of
them,
but
there's
an
affordable
project
at
first
in
broadway
they
are
trying
to
find
like
more
housing
for
teachers
and
people
with
lower
salaries.
There's
an
affordable
and
income
restricted.
G
I
mean
sorry
age
and
income,
restricted
development
going
up
in
highlands,
ranch
near
like
a
shopping
area,
and
so
I
thought
that
was
cool
and
I
know
that
these
developers
are
getting
kickbacks
from
their
communities
to
come
in
and
help
fill
this
need.
And
so
I
was
hoping
and
wondering
if
englad
has
anything
like
that
set
up,
because
maybe
we
can
incentivize
the
developers.
I
I
can
actually
speak
to
that.
The
housing
authority
works
with
the,
so
the
developers
only
are
going
to
do
it
if
they
can
get
awarded
tax
credits.
So
it's
a
very
complex
situation
and
a
number
we've
had
a
number
of
so
the
ones
right
at
floyd
and
broadway
are
work.
They
call
workforce
housing,
so
it's
that
middle
workforce,
that
they're
targeting
also
at
the
corner
of
dartmouth
and.
I
Whatever
that
is
there
jason,
I
don't
know,
but
over
the
winslow
crane
area,
those
are
also
workforce
housing.
There
was
a
senior
one
right
next
to
the
s
albert
or
I
guess
it's
a
safeway,
sorry
that
was
a
senior
income
restricted,
so
the
the
housing
authority
has
worked.
I
was
on
the
commission
for
five
years.
They've
worked
really
hard
any
time
this.
The
developers
come
in
and
ask
for
the
support
they
need
from
the
housing
authority
in
the
city
for
their
tax
credit
projects.
I
They,
the
city
and
the
housing
authority,
have
always
supported
them.
It's
just
they
have
to
have.
They
have
to
get
their
project
accepted,
and
so
we
actually
have
quite
a
few
that
have
been
built
just
in
the
last
10
years.
The
housing
authority
is
also
working
on
a
13
or
maybe
more
so
over.
They
they're
in
a
a
project
in
cooperation
with
sheridan.
I
believe
over
at.
I
Oxford
and
federal
they're
use
there's
some
empty
lots
that
are
chained
up
they're,
going
to
actually
build
some
town
homes
there
that
are
going
to
be
all
section
8
units
and
also
some
up
at
zuni
and.
I
G
C
K
Okay,
well
I
don't.
My
computer,
as
I
was
saying,
is
totally
froze
up
and
it
won't
even
turn
off.
So
yes,
and
so
you,
I
guess,
whoever
is
running
the
show,
I
guess
it's
nancy.
She
can
flip
to
the
next
slides
and
I
think
dan
will
need
to
go
through
them.
K
E
And
I
I
think
I
mean
I
everybody's
seeing
it,
but
do
you
want
to
just
highlight
what
your
recommendation
is.
K
Okay,
I'll
just
try
to
do
my
best
from
memory,
so
we
understand
why
there
is
this
desire
to
make
to
extend
the
ground
floor
requirement
to
inguint
parkway.
We
we
get
it,
we
get
that.
We
understand
why
you
would.
That
would
seem
to
be
desirable.
K
K
K
So
the
other
point
that
we've
also
need
to
make
is
that
the
parcels
that
are
on
broadway
are
much
different
than
the
parcels
on
englewood
parkway,
when
you're
dealing
with
a
main
street
corridor,
you're
dealing
with
very
small
parcels
that
are
typically
50
to
100
feet,
wide
and
125
feet
deep
and
when
you're
and
then
on
england.
Parkway
you're
dealing
with
acreages
of
part
parcels
with
large
numbers
of
acres
and
the
way
the
requirement
reads
now
is
that
you
would
have
to
50
of
the
ground
floor
of
a
building
on
a
three
acre
parcel.
K
That's
a
lot
of
ground
floor.
That's
a
big
box
and
the
city
center
area
was
a
big
box
power
center,
but
it
hasn't
been
doing
performing
very
well
for
some
time
now
and
has
really
been
surpassed
in
the
market
by
the
river
point
shopping
center
and
all
the
action
is
going
over
there
and
and
even
then
that
is
probably
not
as
hopping
as
they
would
like
to
be
either.
And
so
we
we.
K
We
think
we
might
have
a
lot
of
trouble
filling
up
these
that
entire
parkway,
with
with
commercial
activity
everywhere
along
that
corridor,
and
so
we
still
feel
that
we
would
recommend
not
requiring
that
along
the
parkway.
K
Our
observations
of
the
light
rail
stations
that
in
the
metro
is
that
there
is
very
little
retail
at
most
of
these
stations.
They
typically
have
mostly
relied
on
retail,
existing
retail,
that
is
in
proximity
to
the
station,
and
so
there's
not
very
good.
Examples
of
really
successful
stationary
retail
areas
that
are
that
extensive,
and
so
I,
as
I
believe
that
those
were
the
points
that
I
made
on
those
last
three
slides
dan,
might
want
to
make
some
additional
comments
as
well.
K
K
So
I
guess
at
this
point
we'd
like
to
hear
from
the
commission
members
if
we've
convinced
you
or
not,.
A
So,
looking
at
the
redevelopment
approach
site
plan
from
I
think,
one
of
the
previous,
the
january
20th
packet,
there
is
retail
proposed
still
in
kind
of
the
existing
area
across
some
art,
walk
apartments
and
then
is
along
the
what's
the
festival,
street
and
kind
of
around
the
civic
center
station,
so
kind
of
in
that
core
area
right
next
to
the
station-
and
I
know
we
all
agreed
on
broadway
having
retail
I,
I
guess
I
would
love
to
see
the
retail
on
inglewood
parkway,
but
I
also
can
understand
and
appreciate
you
know
you
can't
have
it
everywhere,
and
so,
if
we
as
long
as
we're
incentivizing
it
like
you'd,
said
and
have
some
control
over
it
later,
I
guess
I
would
be
open
to
that.
A
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
having
a
place
to
go.
As
you
know,
diane
said
a
lot
of
times.
You
know
there
needs
to
be
a
reason
for
people
to
go
down
here.
There
needs
to
be
something
you
know
the
restaurants
and
the
bar
areas
and
activity
areas
down
here
can't
just
be
residential,
or
else
it
doesn't
work.
A
It
needs
to
be
a
true
mixed
use
kind
of
a
facility,
so
I
think,
as
long
as
we're
supporting
it
next
to
the
station,
supporting
it
on
broadway
and
then
maybe
not
a
requirement
on
old
hampden,
or
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
other
areas
that
we
were
looking
at.
If
the
festival
street
continued
along
that
corridor,
I
think
zones
were
incentivizing
it
or
somehow
making
it
a
priority.
I
think
that's
good,
I
don't
know
if
we
necessarily
need
to
have
it
be,
especially
not
50.
A
C
H
Yeah
hi,
I
I
I
think
you
laid
out
a
good
case
for
that
and
I
agree.
Broadway
is
a
more
kind
of
cool
commercial
corridor
that
could
more
easily
be
made
into
a
sort
of
bustling
center
for
us
because
of
those
small
lots,
I
think
it
has
that
kind
of
character
and
flavor.
I
I
think
as
far
as
englewood
parkway
itself,
I
you
know
when
I
say
that
it
needs
to
have
a
place
to
go,
or
you
know
something
to
see
is
almost
like.
H
You
know
I
think
I
mentioned
like
you:
don't
want
to
take
a
trolley
from
broadway
to
city
center
and
like
get
great
views
of
the
walmart,
so
I
could
see
carl
brought
up
earlier.
The
open
space
issue
like
I
could
see
that
being
something
that
could
be
thought
of
in
that
manner
or
along
that
corridor
too.
That's
sort
of
my
two
cents,
as
I
get
a
new
friend
to
help
me
consider
these
proposals.
I
Okay,
yeah
just
real
quick.
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
understand
so
we
had.
How
does
this
affect
the
discussion
that
we
had
so
for
people
who
don't
want
to
take
the
trolley
from
broadway
to
englewood
city
center?
I
I
mean
if
there
is
some
way-
and
I
think
maybe
what
we
were
talking
about
in
terms
of
trying
to
get
something
along
there
is.
It
is
not.
It
does
not
feel
safe
to
walk
there.
You
can't
walk
on
englewood
parkway
and
feel
safe.
It's
there's
too
many
cars
they're
going
too
fast.
I
I
The
whole
review
for
us
so
much
of
what
they
talked
about
was
you
know
there
needs
to
be
bike
lanes
along
there.
There
needs
to
be
nice,
attractive,
walking
paths.
There
has
to
be
some
way
that
it
feels
like
it's
connected.
So
I
think
that's
what
we've
been
talking
about
wanting
to
do,
whether
it's
stores
on
front
edges
or
but
there
there
has
to
be
some
way
for
us
to
say
this
is
what
we
want
and
how
do
we
make
it?
So
the
the
property
owners
are
on
board
with
that.
I
The
the
properties
that
are
close
to
englewood
parkway,
but
I
mean
we
need
to
do
something
different
or
we're,
never
going
to
make
that
connection
between
broadway
and
city
center
and
the
light
rail.
It's
always
going
to
feel
like
two
distinct
different
things,
so
I
don't
know
how
we
incentivize
that
I
think
that's
what
we
were
trying
to
do
here,
but
it
just
seems
like
that.
I
It
has
gotten
lost
in
in
in
the
discussion
along
here,
and
I
don't
know,
maybe
I'm
the
one
only
one
who
lost
it,
but
we
haven't
talked
about
it.
So.
E
E
So
in
this
case
the
city
is,
has
selected
a
development
partner,
they're
trying
to
work
with
that
development
partner
to
address
some
of
these
things,
they're
trying
to
force
the
seller
of
the
former
weingarten
property
to
address
these
things,
and
so
we're
talking
right
now
about
terminating
the
underlying
ground.
Lease
on
that
big.
You
know
three
square
block
portion
that
fronts
on
to
hampton
and
in
in
consideration,
get
certain
things
back
like
all.
Those
blocks
would
then
have
developer
covenants
on
them.
E
The
other
thing
that's
going
to
improve
a
lot
is
you
know,
we
have
two
big
dead
spaces
in
there,
which
is
inglewood,
plaza
and
englewood
marketplace
directly
east
of
city
center
and
both
of
those
are
getting
close
to
redevelopment,
as
it
meant
as
a
matter
of
fact,
englewood
plaza,
which
is
where
hobby
lobby
is
in
that
big
massive
empty
parking
lot.
E
They
are
coming
forward
with
a
redevelopment
scheme
that
includes
at
least
one
multi-family
project
and
then
an
additional
future
project
so
that
all
of
a
sudden
will
activate
that
space
and
with
a
lot
of
people
a
lot
of
activity
and
fill
in
that
gap
that
big
gap
in
there
that
feels
so
unsafe
today.
So
there
is
a
lot
that
goes
hand
in
hand
with
the
redevelopment
and
is
kind
of
supported
by
the
rezoning
that
you're
working
on.
But
it's
it's,
it's
not
going
to
be
a
rezoning
answer
by
itself.
E
G
Yes,
judy's
comment
made
me
think
of
some
other
ideas
too.
So
it
kind
of
ties
back
to
what
I
was
saying
about
my
parking
anxiety
with,
because
I
can
see
that
area
from
my
window
right
here
and
so
I
always
walk
down
englewood
parkway,
and
it's
not
that
I
feel
like
it's
dangerous,
but
I
feel
like
it's
created
just
to
get
to
walmart
like
I
feel
like
when
I'm
walking
on
it.
G
I
have
this
whole
like
this
could
be
so
cool
feeling,
but
everything
is
a
parking
space
and
every
parking
space
is
empty
and
that's
been
how
it's
felt
for
five
years,
where
I
live.
It's
like
a
very
car
focused
and
walmart
focused
spot,
and
I
guess
what
I
was
kind
of
getting
to.
I
lost
my
train
of
thought,
but
it
tied
right
back
to
what
judy
was
saying.
Sorry
guys,
let
me
see
if
I
can
get
it.
G
Think
I
know
what
it
was
so
basically
I
when
I
think
about
neighborhoods
with
busy
streets
where
you
see
a
lot
of
people
hanging
out,
you
see
an
activation
of
people
getting
places
and
people
exercising
you
don't
see
anyone
exercising
on
inglewood
parkway.
So
I
wonder
what
that
piece
is
that
we're
missing
over
there?
What
is
it
is
it
landscaping?
Is
it
you
know
what
is
uninviting
about
that
area?
Do
we
need
some
shared
spaces
where
there's
a
park
right
there?
That's
bigger!
G
That's
attracting
people
that
are
going
to
run
from
my
house,
you
know
through
to
the
library,
because
right
now,
it'd
be
kind
of
weird.
If
you
went
running
from
my
house
to
the
library,
but
in
other
neighborhoods
in
denver,
that
would
be
normal.
So
I
think
maybe
it's
like
that
part
of
inglewood
is
feeling
disconnected
from
the
rest
of
inglewood
and
we
need
to
bring
it
into
like
our
neighborhood
culture
of
more
of
like
a
I
always.
This
is
cheesy,
but
inglewood
means
wooded
nook,
and
I
always
come
back
to
that.
G
I
love
that
and
I
just
feel
like
that
area
kind
of
loses
the
inglewood
character.
E
Hey
that
that's
a
great
comment,
kate,
let
me
the
one
thing
I
forgot,
and
it's
a
key
element
in
this
whole
thing
is
that
you
know
the
downtown
development
authority
has
been
approved,
we're
moving
forward
to
activate
it.
There
are
applications
for
board
members
that
are
being
taken
right
now
and
the
whole
idea
there
is
that
the
dda
will
become
the
champion
of
downtown
and
one
of
their
top
missions
is
really
this
idea
of
connecting
city
center
broadway
and
the
medical
district.
E
So
there
will
be
somebody
and
a
board
of
really
good
people
who
are
worrying
about
that
on
a
daily
basis.
Now,
and
one
of
the
things
that
came
out
of
the
downtown
matters
effort
was
a
real
connection
with
the
manager,
the
store
manager
there
at
walmart,
really
good
guy,
who
really
gets
this
stuff
and
wants
to
be
a
participant
in
activating
their
parking
lot
in
the
frontage
on
ingoid
parkway.
E
So
I
think
just
for
ongoing
conversation.
E
This
is
really
helpful
because
I
think
john
and
I
can
continue
to
try
to
put
the
rezoning
changes
in
the
context
of
some
of
these
other
tools
that
you'll
be
involved
with,
and
that
really
have
the
opportunity
to
get
to
some
of
the
outcomes
that
you're
talking
about.
F
Yeah
I
keep
hearing
people
talking
about
walking
traffic
between
like
broadway
and
the
city
center,
but
with
these
three
build
three
apartment
buildings
and
the
hotel
built
the
city
center
is
not
going
to
be
there
anymore.
F
F
Basically,
the
light
rail
is
is
where
people
will
be
going
to
and
and
maybe
the
hotel,
if,
if
the
hotel
has
enough
rooms
in
it
to
to
document
occupancy,
there'll
be
a
little
traffic
there,
but
the
inglewood
parkway
from
the
from
the
light
rail
a
couple
blocks
down,
it's
been
50
percent
empty
for,
since
it
was
built
basically
and
the
the
reason
I
was
told
that
they're
empty
was
the
these.
F
The
previous
city
manager
was
saying
that
they
were
charging
too
much
for
a
rent.
People
didn't
want
to
pay
the
rent
for
them,
but
is?
Is
that
really
the
reason?
Or
is
it
just
that
nobody
wants
to
be
down
in
that
area?
F
E
E
Finally,
of
all
that
retail
space,
that's
in
the
western
art,
walk
building,
there's
about
18
000
square
feet
in
there
and
possibilities
under
consideration
include
putting
a
city
department
in
there,
perhaps
putting
part
of
the
library
in
there
perhaps
putting
part
of
the
museum
of
outdoor
arts
in
there
so
really
activating
that
area
in
combination
with
the
festival,
retail
street
concept.
E
So
yeah,
if
you
look
at
the
past,
sure,
there's
a
lot
of
mistakes,
a
lot
of
flaws,
but
I
think
everything
that
we're
working
on
right
now
that
the
rezoning
is
part
of
really
tries
to
address
all
that.
F
One
thing
that
I've
seen
in
the
south
end
of
the
3400
block
of
broadway
on
the
east
side,
mostly
yeah,
actually
on
the
west
side
too,
that
a
lot
of
stores
are
empty
down
there
and
they're
one
less
than
block
away
from
that.
The
the
bell
cherry
hills,
300
350
units
apartments
down
there,
there's
a
lot
of
people
in
there,
but
still
the
broadway
is
there's
shops
going
out
of
business
on
the
south
end
of
the
3
3400
block
there
constantly
yeah.
E
E
That's
probably
about
a
six
block
walk,
but
there
are
some
significant
redevelopment
projects
in
the
queue
for
south
broadway
there
and
again
part
of
what
the
dda
needs
to
do
is
establish
a
marketing
strategy
for
south
broadway
and
really
reach
out
and
try
to
attract
some
new
tenants
because
nobody's
doing
that
right
now,.
F
Yeah,
that's
that's.
One
of
the
suggestions
I
had
for
dda
was
the
east.
The
east
parking
lot
behind
the
3
400
block
there.
That's
a
really
large
parking
area
back
there,
but
it
is,
it
smells.
There's
grease
pits
back
there,
there's
dumpsters
back
there,
the
asphalt's
bad,
the
wire,
the
overhead
wiring
is
looks
like
the
wires
are
going
to
fall
down.
E
E
F
Let's
see
behind
the
east
of
the
3400
block,
it's
be
it's
basically
between
the
3
400
block
on
broadway
and
the
old
safeway.
C
C
Thank
you
very
much
nancy.
We
have
gotten
off
the
topic.
Thank
you.
So
can
we
move
john
or
dan?
Do
you
have
some
more
slides
to
talk
about
briefly
because
we
are
at
8
52
right
now.
K
C
All
right
well
I've.
This
is
not
the
end
of
these
discussions.
Obviously,
so,
if
we
can,
then
let's
move
off
of
this
and
go
to
staff's.
C
B
Okay,
if
I
could
just
add
at
our
next
meeting,
I
would
remind
you
it
will
be
on
a
wednesday
again
due
to
presidents
day,
so
it
will
be
on
the
17th
and
you
will
be
considering
another
vacation
of
a
right-of-way.
This
one
will
be
at
1375
east
hampden.
It
is
the
old
bullock,
fortuary
site,
okay,.
C
Thank
you
for
the
heads
up
on
that
commissioner's
choice.
C
F
You're
you're
official,
thank
you
and
may
welcome
them,
so
I
have
nothing.
Thank
you.
I
Oh
yay,
another
pitch
for
the
chamber.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
follow
the
chamber
on
social
media,
but
they
are
doing
a
business
of
the
week
every
week.
So
that's
been
very
successful
and
businesses
are
very
appreciative
of
that
added
that
added
exposure.
I
There
also
is,
I
believe,
this
week
again
is
another
leadership
exchange.
So
if
you're
inclined
to
get
involved
as
a
citizen
that
it's
not
you
don't
have
to
be
a
member
of
the
chamber,
the
chamber
is
just
trying
to
be
a
part
in
getting
that
going,
but
the
intention
is
to
have
just
citizen
leaders
come
together
and
see
what
they
can
do
to
help
the
businesses
in
englewood
and
it's
not
a
dda.
I
It's
more
of
a
young
professionals
group
for
networking
and
just
you
know,
doing
some
fun
stuff
with
the
city
in
mind,
attracting
people
to
come
into
the
city
and
see
what
we
have
to
offer.
So,
if
that's
something
you're
inclined
to
do,
please
consider
that
and
that's
all
I
got
thanks.
C
H
I
just
want
to
congratulate
you
and
judy
for
your
election
and
also
thank
you
to
dan
and
john
for
putting
together
these
presentations
and
dealing
with
the
extended
number
of
sessions
we're
going
through
on
them.
H
But
I,
but
I
also
just
want
to
say,
I'm
encouraged,
even
though
I
know
we
are
not
always
being
eye
to
eye
on
each
of
the
details
of
this,
that
it's
it's
great,
that
we
can
have
this
conversation
and
and
talk
about
it
and
and
and
keep
going
forward
and
seeing
where
we
can
get
to
making
an
angle
is
the
best
place.
It
can
be.
G
Also
wanted
to
say
congrats.
Thank
you
welcome,
so
welcome
meg,
thank
you
to
staff
and
nancy
and
then
congrats
to
judy
and
michelle
on
your
new
positions.
Y'all
are
gonna
rock
it
this
year
and
also
I
was
gonna
also.
I
am
not
just
copying
everything.
Diane
said
I
wanted
to
thank
everybody
for
the
thoughtful
conversation
tonight.
I
love
how
we
bring
all
these
different
perspectives
and
then
come
out
with
new
ideas.
I
think
that's
really
amazing
for
the
city.
A
I
just
wanted
to
maybe
give
a
little
follow-up
from
what
judy
said.
The
english
exchange.
I
went
to
one
of
the
meetings
and
it
was
informative
and
exciting,
see
what
they're
doing
as
well.
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
gonna
be
able
to
make
it
this
week,
but
it
wasn't
interesting
and
definitely
worthwhile
event
to
to
go
to
so
that
was
good,
but
other
than
that.
Nothing
else.
Thank
you
except
congratulations
again.
C
Thank
you
and
thank
you
very
much
for
your
support.
I
could
do
not
not
do
these
meetings
without
nancy,
that's
for
sure
and
without
the
other
staff.
So
I
I
think
we
all
need
to
thank
staff
for
for
all
of
the
stuff.
They
do
to
listen
to
us
and
keep
us
moving
forward.
C
If
there's
nothing
further,
is
there
if
there's
anything
for
them,
raise
your
hand
quickly,
see
no
hands
raised.
I
will
say
that
this
meeting
is
adjourned
and
thank
you
very
much.