►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
We
have
a
second
any
discussion,
all
in
favor
aye.
Any
opposed
motion
passes
the
consent
agenda,
a
1
payroll
October,
29th
2018
through
November
11
2008
een,
two
million
nine
hundred
sixty-five
thousand
three
hundred
seventy
two
dollars
and
forty-seven
cents,
payroll,
November,
12,
2008
een
through
November
25th
2018
in
the
amount
of
two
million
eight
hundred.
A
Seventy
four
thousand
eight
hundred
sixty
three
dollars
and
sixty
cents
bills
lists
November,
27
2018
in
the
amount
of
three
million
nine
hundred
twenty
one
thousand
eleven
dollars
and
32
cents
bills
list
December,
11,
2000
18
in
the
amount
of
23
million
three
hundred
thirty
six
thousand
three
hundred
eighty
six
dollars
and
fourteen
cents.
It's
for
action.
A
to
purchase
of
insurance
staff
recommends
approval
to
purchase
the
outlined
policies
at
a
total
cost
of
five
hundred
fifty
six
thousand
five
hundred
twenty
four
dollars.
A
The
policies
will
renew
all
insurance
coverage
for
the
city
of
Evanston
for
fiscal
year.
2019,
both
insurance
brokers
are
in
the
third
year
of
a
three-year
contract
award
to
place
insurance.
Coverages
premium
quotations
receive
reflected
the
tighten
tightening
of
insurance
markets
across
all
sectors.
There
was
a
slight
increase
in
cumulative
total
pricing
for
all
policies
by
six
hundred
eighty
dollars,
which
excludes
the
workers,
compensation
and
the
new
policy
for
environmental
liability
funding
will
be
from
the
following
funds.
Insurance
fund
account
in
the
amount
of
500
twenty-five
thousand
is
for
action.
A
A
three
staff
recommends
the
City
Council
review
and
place
the
2018
post
bond
issuance
report
on
files
for
action
to
accept
and
be
placed
on
file.
A
six
staff
recommends.
City
Council
authorized
the
city
manager
to
execute
a
purchase
order
in
a
response
to
bid
1858
to
award
the
2019
21
uniformed
contract
to
silkscreen
express
for
a
term
of
three
years
with
a
not
to
exceed
amount
of
180
$7,500
funding
for
the
2019
will
be
from
Public
Works
Agency
clothing
fund.
This
is
for
action.
A
A
seven
staff
recommend
City
Council
authorized
the
city
manager
to
execute
an
agreement
for
the
emergency,
purchase
of
equipment
and
services
to
install
kid
food
and
well
1230
clean
agent
fire
suppressant
system
at
2020,
Asbury
service
center
data
room
with
Phoenix
Fire
construction
in
the
amount
of
thirty
four
thousand
nine
hundred
forty
five
dollars.
This
is
for
action.
A
Eight
staff
recommend
City
Council
authorized
the
sole
source
purchase
of
three
Dell
PowerEdge
servers
to
MC
storage
area
network
appliances
and
additional
related
equipment
for
Dell
technologies
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
forty
one
thousand
one
hundred
seventy
three
dollars
and
forty
four
cents.
This
purchase
enables
IT
to
replace
failing
infrastructure
in
the
city's
data
center
that
support
critical
city
services.
A
A
nine
staff
recommends
that
he
Council
authorized
the
city
manager
to
execute
a
three-year
single
source
service
agreement
for
the
building
automation,
services
with
Schneider
Electric
in
the
amount
of
thirty
six
thousand
one
hundred
sixty
seven
dollars
for
fiscal
year,
2019
37,000,
five
dollars
for
twenty
twenty
and
thirty
seven
thousand
eight
hundred
sixty
nine
dollars
for
twenty.
Twenty-One
to
cover
hardware,
software
and
service
visits
for
HVAC
services
in
16
city,
buildings
and
property,
initially
in
2019.
This
is
about
27
percent
increase
from
2018.
A
Due
to
the
addition
of
coverage
for
eight
more
locations
in
following
years,
20,
20
and
21,
this
is
less
than
3
percent
increase.
Each
year,
funding
will
be
from
facilities
fund,
a
11
staff
recommend
City
Council
adoption
of
resolution,
111
r18
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
negotiate
the
lease
of
office
space
with
Evanston
Development
Corporation
at
the
rate
of
three
hundred
twenty
four
dollars
and
fifty
cents
per
month.
For
12
months,
we
beginning
January,
2nd
2019
for
275
square
feet
of
space.
On
the
third
floor
of
the
Civic
Center
suite
3601.
B
A
Excuse
me:
a
12
staff
recommend
City
Council
approval
resolution,
107
r18
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
enter
into
an
agreement
for
an
eight
month,
renewal
lease
with
mut
light
theater
for
space
that
noise,
the
monthly
rental
rate,
is
three
thousand
180
$3.62,
which
includes
a
2%
increase
for
2018
rates,
a
13
and
that's
for
action.
A
12
is
for
action.
A
13
staff
recommends
to
the
council
approval
resolution,
108
r18
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
enter
into
an
agreement
for
a
nine
month,
renewal
lease
with
Evanston's
children
choir
for
studio
space
at
noise.
A
The
monthly
rent
is
one
thousand
three
hundred
sixty
two
dollars
and
ninety
two
cent
cents,
which
is
also
a
two
percent
increases
for
action.
A
fourteen
staff
recommends
that
the
council
approve
of
resolution
106
our
18
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
enter
into
22
renewal
agreements
for
12-month
lease
for
the
artist
leases
for
studios
at
the
noise.
Center
fees
include
a
2
percent
rental
rate
increase
from
2018.
As
for
action,
a.
A
16
staff
recommend
City
Council,
adopt
resolution.
109
r18
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
execute
an
easement
agreement
with
a
property
owner
at
324,
Dempster
Street
for
a
two
and
a
half
foot
wide
by
75
feet
long
easement
in
the
alley
adjacent
to
property.
The
easement
would
be
granted
for
50
year
periods
for
action,
a.
A
17,
a
17
staff
recommends
that
city
council
adoption
of
ordinance,
121
Oh
18,
directing
the
city
manager
to
donate
an
ambulance
owned
by
the
city
to
the
north,
regional
Major,
Crimes,
Task,
Force
major
crash
assistance
team.
This
vehicle
has
been
determined
to
be
surplus
as
a
result
of
a
new
vehicle
replacement
being
put
into
service.
This
is
for
introduction
and
we
have
a
public
comment.
C
A
Could
you
say
Lao
che
chuan?
Thank
you
at
1633
or
inton
avenue,
modern
and
alderman
fisk
is
requesting
suspension
of
the
rules
for
introduction
and
action
at
at
our
City
Council
meeting
today
is
for
introduction
and
action.
A
23
local
liquor,
commissioner,
recommends
to
the
council
adoption
of
ordinance
157
amending
class
H
liquor
license
from
1
to
2
for
colectivo
coffee
roasters
doing
business
as
colectivo
coffee
at
716,
Church,
Street,
Ottoman
Fisk
is
requesting
suspension
of
the
rules
and
introduction
in
action
at
our
City
Council
meeting.
B
I'm
sorry,
my
thing
being
requested
to
authorizes
a
manager
to
negotiate
the
lease
for
office
space
with
Evanston
development
cooperative
at
the
rate
of
three
hundred
and
twenty
four
dollars
and
fifty
cents
per
month
for
12
months,
beginning
January
2
for
275
square
feet
of
space.
On
the
third
floor
of
the
Civic
Center
suite
3601
I
move
approval.
Second,
what
I'd
like
to
comment
on
is:
it
seems
that
most
of
our
rentals
for
outside
users,
either
in
the
lower
level
or
on
the
first
floor
and
I
I,
mean
the
more
you
read
these
days.
B
D
Good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
Eric
Astoria,
sistent
city
manager,
I
think
we
have
many
challenges
with
the
building
that
we're
currently
in
with
regards
to
security.
We've
done
many
security
surveys
over
the
years
with
the
police
department,
and
there
are
many
recommendations
that
have
been
brought
forward
that
we've
some
implemented
when
we
have
had
funding
and
some
that
have
not
yet
been
implemented
due
to
funding
issues.
D
So
there
is
obviously
a
concern
with
having
tenants
on
floors
other
than
the
first
or
second
ground
floor,
but
there
wouldn't
be
any
other
concern
other
than
I
wouldn't
say
that
there
would
be
a
greater
concern
than
what
presently
exists
for
the
other
tenants
that
rent
any
other
space
in
the
building.
So.
B
If,
if
this
organization
decides
to
meet
with
people
on
Sundays
or
in
the
evenings
or
when
there's
nothing
else
going
on
at
the
Civic
Center,
people
would
be
free
to
walk
around
the
building
if
they
get
lost
and
my
I'm
just
I'm,
just
suggesting
opportunities
shouldn't
be
provided
when
we
don't
have
to
provide
them
and
that
by
that
I
mean
access
and
so
I'm
concerned
about
them.
It's.
D
A
concern
that
we
share
and
when
we
talk
with
potential
tenants
about
leasing
space
in
this
building,
we
give
them
a
broad
overview
of
the
constraints
that
come
along
with
leasing
the
space.
That
is
why
the
rent
is
what
it
is,
because
you
cannot
access
the
building
on
Sundays,
and
so,
if
you
rent
the
space,
you
will
not
access
the
building
on
Sundays
and
people
have
to
accept
that
or
or
look
other
places.
D
As
for
nighttime
I
mean
most
of
the
tenants
that
we
allow
have
a
primary
daytime
presence
and
limited
off
hours
so
that
we
don't
have
the
issues
that
you've
described.
I
would
say
in
this
instance,
my
discussions
with
the
tenant,
the
the
night
use
was
limited
and
not
outside
of
what
I
would
consider
to
be
standard
office
hours
well,.
A
A
Excuse
me:
a
for
staff
recommend
City
Council
authorized
a
city
manager
to
execute
a
contract
for
Chandler
HVAC
improvements,
phase
2
project
with
amber
mechanical
contractors
in
the
amount
of
$362,000.
This
project
will
be
funded
from
the
capital
improvement
fund,
which
has
an
available
budget
of
$555,000
for
this
project.
A
further
breakdown
of
funding
can
be
found
on
the
corresponding
transmittal
memorandum.
B
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
just
want
to
raise
to
the
committee.
You
know
when
I
see,
contracts
like
this
and
I.
Think
of
all
the
local
contractors
like
cahill,
probably
is
one
of
the
larger
I
always
ask.
Are
we
making
all
attempts
to
reach
out
to
our
local
local
folks,
first
Dave,
or
is
this
specialized
that
we
don't
have
anyone
local
who
can
manage
it?
A
job
at
this
size.
F
B
E
A
G
G
H
A
E
J
I,
don't
have
a
question
per
se,
but
I
do
have
a
concern
being
that
this
was
originally
taken
out
and
the
memo
says
because
of
budget
limitations,
and
we
all
know
now
that
were
on
the
backside
of
the
Fountain
Square
project
that
it
went
over-budget.
So
I
won't
object
to
this,
but
I
did
just
want
to.
Personally,
it
gets
voiced
a
little
bit
of
frustration
that
we
didn't
do
this
at
the
time,
because
we
were
concerned
about
the
budget
and
we
since
I've
gone
over
the
budget
and
now
with
this
additional
$900,000.
J
H
Do
Dave
stomach
Public,
Works,
Agency
director,
when
we
first
looked
at
the
concept
of
Fountain
Square,
there
was
actually
three
individual
areas
that
we
were
proposing
to
improve.
It
was
when
we
awarded
the
initial
contract
that
the
TIF
fund
did
not
appear
to
have
appropriate
funding
to
do
more
than
the
the
main
project,
as
a
TIF
area
is
closing
and
in
audits
conducted
on
at
if
there
is
additional
funding
left
in
the
fund
to
be
able
to
afford
this
project.
H
So
it
it's
not
tied
to
like
the
city's
budget,
because
this
is
coming
from
the
TIF
and
slowly
from
the
TIF.
The
the
first
project
did
go
over.
There
were
change
orders
on
it,
but
with
the
liquidate
damages
and
the
actual
work
completed,
this
project
will
actually
close
significantly
below
the
original
bid
price.
The
current
project,
that
of
wrapping
up
right
now,
and
that's
also
helping
to
to
have
funds
available
for
this
second
phase
of
the
Fountain
Square
area.
J
10
staff
recommends
that
City
Council
authorized
city
manager
to
extend
the
contract
for
the
management
and
operations
of
three
city-owned
self-park
facilities
to
SP
plus
municipal
services
in
Chicago,
in
the
amount
of
1
million
five
hundred
thirty
thousand
$198
for
2019,
with
no
intentional
extensions.
This
was
released
in
RFP
15
65
for
introduction
for
action.
Excuse
me.
J
C
A
The
motion
first
staff
recommends
City
Council
approval
resolution,
110
r18
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
amend
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement
for
the
city-owned
real
property
located
at
1714
20
Chicago
Avenue
to
Chicago
Avenue
Partners
LLC.
The
first
amendment
to
the
contract
executed
in
July
2018
established
an
approval
period
which
expires
at
5:00
p.m.
Central
time
on
December
12
2018,
and
we
have.
K
Good
evening,
Jack
Weiss
50
year
resident
of
Evanston
former
president
of
design
Evanston,
currently
a
board
member
former
member
of
the
of
the
Preservation
Commission
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
Board
of
design,
Evanston
I
urge
you
to
deny
the
request
by
Chicago
Avenue
partners
to
extend
by
six
months
the
approval
period
for
the
purchase
agreement
on
the
property.
This
is
a
second
request
by
the
developer
to
extend
the
approval
period.
It's
clear
to
us.
The
developer
is
struggling
to
meet
his
financial
design
and
zoning
issues
for
the
proposed
building.
K
As
you
all
know,
dapper
unanimously
rejected
this
project.
We
further
recommend
that
the
city
revise
and
reissue
the
RFP
for
the
sale
of
this
property
to
specify
residential
use
instead
of
the
current
commercial
use,
this
property
is
zoned
residential
and
should
remain
so,
especially
for
that
completely
residential
block
of
Chicago
Avenue.
Thank
you.
Thank.
L
Hi,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
I'm
here
to
speak
to
a
15
about
the
second
extension
of
six
months
for
the
developer
of
the
library
parking
lot
I've
been
following
this
project
very
closely
for
a
long
time.
I
know
a
lot
about
it,
and
I
really
feel
that
this
second
extension
should
not
be
granted
and
here's
why
the
city
entered
into
a
sales
agreement
that
had
very
clear
requirements,
a
building
height
of
11
stories
and
the
replacement
of
75
public
parking
spaces,
plus
the
minimum
required
by
zoning.
That's
286
spaces
at
all.
L
The
building
that's
scheduled
to
go
before
planned
Commission
on
Wednesday
is
not
11
stories.
It's
13,
it
does
not
have
286
parking
spaces,
it
has
a
hundred
and
twelve
and
there
are
not
75
public
parking
spaces.
There
are
only
21.
The
difference
in
these
numbers
is
significant.
It
is
improbable
that
a
second
six-month
extension
would
see
13
stories
reduced
to
11
and
112
parking
spaces
stretched
to
286
when
the
first
Excite
extension
didn't
yield
those
changes.
If
the
developers
had
been
able
to
meet
the
contract
requirements,
they
would
have
done
so
by
now.
L
M
So
I
don't
think
they
did
a
deep
enough
marketing
plan
that
most
people
would
from
a
business
standpoint.
Object
to
that
was
not
objected
to
in
terms
of
the
amount
that
we
were
going
to
get
forward
from
the
city.
I
think
selling
land
right
now
when
we
have
affordable
housing
needs,
is
not
very
wise
because
there's
not
enough
portable
housing.
M
We're
good
not
going
to
be
able
to
meet
plan,
and
we
can
prevent
that
if
we
start
looking
at
local
people,
whether
it's
local
businesses,
which
we
saw
the
last
meeting
where
that
was
a
real
big
item
and
we
want
to
do
economic
development,
but
you
can
do
people
development
if
you
have
businesses
that
support
people
like
package
pick
or
like
the
non
profits
which
were
initially
excluded,
and
now
that
we
know
that
we
have
such
a
great
need.
Nonprofits
are
supplying
some
other
things.
M
We
can't
afford
so
I'm
saying
it's
not
prude
in
terms
of
uses
of
public
funds
to
go
the
route
of
supporting
an
investor
that
is
outside
he's,
not
even
the
business.
All
he
is
doing
is
lending
land
to
something
people
don't
know
about.
It's
called
a
rock
climbing
wall,
I
think
that's
exclusive
package.
M
Big
is
inclusive
and
I
think
that
those
considerations
far
outweigh
need
to
be
vetted
if
at
all,
if
at
all,
to
make
a
wise
decision
from
the
council
in
terms
of
affording
all
residents
opportunities
and
especially
supporting
local
businesses
and
local
residents
I,
don't
think
this
is
as
inclusive
as
it
could
be.
Delaying
the
at
this
decision
right
now
would
be
a
real
benefit
to
include
in
citing
trust
or
everything
so
inspiring
trust
in
the
city
in
terms
of
rushing
things,
because
in
the
past
that's
happened.
M
This
meeting
in
terms
of
seeing
what's
going
on
is
not
clear.
This
is
related
to
a
rock
climbing
wall
cuz.
It's
not
stated
in
here
people
who
are
not
following
this.
Don't
know
that
and
we
got
this
notice
in
the
afternoon
on
a
Friday
and
we're
told
it's
48
hours.
Well,
if
you
don't
count
the
weekend,
it's
24,
plus
what
3
hours
so
27
hours
I
think
I've
made
it
something
of
a
positive
statement
for
the
council
consider
every
other
week.
M
That
way,
you
guys
can
get
things
done
and
we
have
a
little
time
to
read.
People
are
not
rushed
into
trying
to
think
of
things
and
I
think
it
excludes
a
lot
of
people
who
have
families
or
whatever,
and
you
ask
why
people
don't
come.
If
you
don't
have
time
to
think
about
things,
and
you
want
to
have
time
pretending
to
think
about
things
you
can't
even
I
can't
even
do
it
and
I
have
some
time.
M
So
it's
really
hard
to
think
that
you're,
not
excluding
people
and
that
you
have
some
control
over,
which
means
you
can
change
that
and
I.
Don't
see
anything
that
says
from
the
city's
standpoint
that
doing
a
meeting
every
other
week
would
be
to
anybody's
disadvantage.
It
would
be
to
everyone's
advantage.
That's
the
City
Council
itself,
complaints
about
getting
hit
with
things
right
away.
Thank
you.
Miss
price.
Thank.
B
E
B
B
B
First
of
all,
I'm
having
a
board
meeting
on
January
9
to
discuss
this
project.
It
will
not
look
good
if
the
council
approves
us
tonight,
and
then
we
have
a
neighborhood
board
meeting.
So
I
am
at
I
will
not
be
supporting
the
suspension
of
the
rules
and
for
those
of
you
who
are
concerned
about
peckish
pig,
that
ship
has
sailed,
I
believe
they're,
making
other
plans
in
the
city
of
Chicago.
B
So
there
are
other
issues
with
this
project,
but
peckish
pig
is
not
the
reason
to
delay
this
information,
for
the
community
is
a
reason
to
delay
it
so
I'm
going
to
move
introduction
and
ask
that
the
council
well
I'm
not
going
to
support
suspension
of
the
rules.
So
I'd
love
to
hear
what
other
people
have
to
say.
A
N
I've
been
following
this,
you
know
property
for
a
while,
because
I'm
concerned
been
concerned.
There's
been
many
kind
of
ideas
for
this,
but
this
property
is
contiguous
to
a
park
and
it's
basically
contiguous
to
the
animal
shelter
city
uses
it
for
storage
and
someone
will
say:
well,
that's
not
the
best
use.
Well,
you
know.
Mr.
N
stone
bag
needs
to
come
up
with
a
number
of
how
much
it
costs
to
store
all
this
stuff
somewhere
else,
and
he
hasn't
probably
done
that
and
in
the
the
issues
to
me,
a
million
dollars,
eight
hundred
thousand
for
that
building.
That
building
was
built
for
four
million
dollars,
so
we're
selling
it
for
a
million.
N
You
know
we
have
a
budget
crisis,
but
we
keep
on
giving
our
assets
away
and
that's
a
serious
problem
to
me
to
you
know,
give
assets
away
to
people
and
pretend
we're
getting
something
of
value
back,
because
they're
developing
and
doing
something.
Well,
it's
all
for
their
benefit.
It
doesn't
benefit
the
taxpayer.
So
yes,
there's
an
increment,
but
as
some
of
you
recall,
the
Economic
Development
Department,
they
even
put
the
property
on
the
tax
rolls
and
screw
that
up.
N
But
the
last
people
that
were
in
there
we
all
know
that
so
the
real
issue
to
me
is
you
know.
Fiscal
prudence
here
is
to
basically
you
know
basically
to
get
a
lot
more
money
for
that
or
not
sell
it
and
keep
it
because
you
know
just
pretending.
We
have
budget
crisis,
we're
going
to
sell
these
assets
for
pennies
on
the
dollar.
N
Someone
pointed
out
to
me
with
the
legal
bills
for
James
Park
and
one
one
month
we
paid
close
to
a
million
dollars
in
legal
fees,
so
I
mean
you're,
gonna,
sell
this
asset
off,
and
then
you
know
we
have
this
message:
James
Park
we're
paying
all
this
money
for
it's
just
not
acceptable
to
be
doing
this
with
our
assets
and
mr.
Bob
ku.
It's
putting
it
on
the
agenda
tonight
to
sneak
it
through
when
you
know,
there's
all
these
other
things
going
on
with
Harley
clerk.
It's
typical
what
he
does.
N
He
overloads
the
agenda
to
a
thousand
pages
and
that's
not
acceptable
to
the
public,
so
people
nobody's
looking
for
all
the
stuff
and
he's
passing
it
through.
It's
unacceptable!
Okay
and
that's
how
what
I
understand
this
I
will
make
one
or
two
other
very
minor
comments.
Mr.
stone
BEC
is
stating
that
you
know
we're.
Holding
retainage
are
basically
giving
the
contractor
money
unfound
in
square
and
that's
fort.
Why
we
have
money?
Well,
we
may
be
sued,
because
another
contractor
already
did
this.
When
we
did
this
retainage
deal.
N
This
is
not
done
and
it
will
cost
could
cost
the
city
money
in
legal
fees
and
that's
not
acceptable
that
money
should
be
held
back
from
this
and
and
for
the
legal
problems,
because,
as
we
all
know,
you
know
we're
six
and
a
half
a
million
at
James
Park.
Then
you
basically
don't
have
the
money
you're,
basically
raising
gonna
raise
property
taxes
for
all
these
legal
problems.
Thank
you.
So
thank.
A
E
O
19
is
an
ordinance
amending
the
city
code,
section
3,
4
6
e
to
allow
the
sale
of
alcoholic
liquor
greater
than
six
point:
seven,
six,
fluid
ounces
and
wine
greater
than
six
point.
Three:
two
fluid
ounces:
the
mayor
has
requested
the
suspension
of
the
rules
for
introduction
and
action.
Second,
second,.
J
Fleming,
that's
okay,
I
just
have
a
quick
question.
Cuz,
obviously
we're
gonna
do
all
three
of
these.
What
goal
are
we
trying
to
accomplish
here?
I
was
a
little
bit.
Let's
look
all
the
same
to
me
and
I
assume
we're
trying
to
level
the
playing
field.
But
if
someone
could
just
explain
to
me
if
someone
here
from
the
Liquor
Commission.
B
B
B
They
were
little
larger
cans,
they
weren't
the
kind
in
a
little
six-pack,
but
they
were
still
selling
individual
cans.
So
it
seemed
to
the
liquor,
commissioner,
and
to
the
other
members
of
the
Commission,
of
which
I
am
not
part
of
that.
It
was
true
that
this
this
was
unfair,
so
but
I
think
you
haven't
heard
the
end
of
the
story.
Yet
on
the
issue
of
the
small
bottles
that
does
not.
This
is
not
addressing
that,
but
I
think
the
the
mayor
is
going
to
do
their
autumn.
E
B
A
We
get
a
motion
on
that
in
a
second
darlin
favor,
any
opposed
it
moves
for
introduction
in
action.
A
20
liquor
license:
Commissioner
recommend,
City
Council,
adoption
of
ordinance,
154
Oh
18
amending
city
code,
section
3,
4
6
to
allow
sale
of
alcoholic
liquor
greater
than
six
point:
seven,
six,
fluid
ounces
and
wine
greater
than
six
point.
32,
fluid
ounces.
Mayor
Haggerty,
request
suspension
of
the
rules
for
introduction
in
action
at
our
City
Council
meeting.
It's
our
introduction
in
action.
Second:
is
there
any
discussion
all
in
favor
any
opposed
it
moves?
J
Ordinance
161
ohh
18
amending
city
code,
section
10,
11
8
in
section
10,
11,
22,
resident
parking,
only
districts,
the
transportation
and
parking
committee
and
the
staff
recommend
we
adopt
this
ordinance
amending
the
city
code
for
residential
parking,
only
districts
for
district
s
to
become
EBS
district
3,
with
the
review
of
the
changes
after
six
months
to
be
presented
to
the
parking
and
transportation
committee
in
the
second
half
of
2019.
This
is
for
introduction.
Second,.
F
C
C
A
You
James,
and
so
this
was
discussed
with
some
concern
at
our
November
12th
APW
meeting
concern
for
fees
for
low-income
residents
and
there
has
been
some
language
included
in
the
ordinance
and
I'll
read
it
verbatim.
The
city
manager
may
waive
or
reduce
the
fees
charged
in
section
9
to
3.
If
the
individual
demonstrates
a
financial
hardship,
waiver
or
reduction
in
fee
shall
not
create
a
precedent
and
performed
at
his
or
her
sole
discretion.
E
E
We
have
over
the
years
and
you've
all
received
the
reports
and
city
manager's
report
that
comes
out
on
the
monthly
basis.
I
think
we've
done
an
excellent
job
of
working
with
our
contractors
and
staff
in
terms
of
compliance
or
the
past
three
years.
Our
compliance
have
it
priest.
Meanwhile,
the
fees
that
we're
levying
have
gone
down,
and
so
when
we
first
made
the
change
the
ordinance
for
those
that
are
new
moving
from
100
dollars
a
day
to
1%.
E
There
was
a
lot
of
concern
from
our
staff
from
our
city
manager
that
somehow
this
was
going
to
have
a
great
a
negative
impact
in
terms
of
the
folks
who
would
bid
on
on
future
jobs
and
I.
Think
we've
seen
quite
the
opposite
that
again
compliance
he
has
gone
up
and
we've
started
to
increase
our
fees.
So
over
the
past
several
years,
we've
received
reports
that
we've
had
over
eighty-five
thousand
dollars
in
in
our
fund
and
a
recent
inquiry
about
myself
and
alderman
Simmons.
E
We
found
out
that
somehow
and
I
mean
Hitoshi
can
speak
to
this.
That
dollars
were
not
properly
assigned
to
our
accounting
we've
sort
of
gone
back
and
forth
to
sort
out
some
money,
but
there's
still
approximately
eighteen
thousand
dollars.
That's
been
missing
back
in
2013,
so
again,
being
conscious
of
the
time.
I
just
wanted
to
raise
that
awareness
that
this
conversation
is
going
on.
So
that's
on
the
front
end
and
I'm,
hoping
that
working
with
our
staff
that
we'll
be
able
to
identify
those
where
those
dollars
are,
but
currently
in
2013,
sac
construction.
E
There's
an
outstanding
violation,
amount
of
two
thousand
Boulder
contract,
there's
a
outstanding
outstanding
balance
of
nine
thousand
Chicago,
paving
three
thousand
four
hundred
Eleanor
construction,
4,100
nfe
Moran,
sixty
seven
sixty
seven
hundred
so
I'm
hoping
when
we
have
a
little
bit
more
time.
Chair
Simmons
that
we'll
be
able
to
talk
about
this
review.
E
The
policy
in-depth
some
of
the
conversations
that
we've
had
on
a
very
preliminary
basis
and
altima
Simmons
took
the
lead
on
this
is
how
do
we
expand
the
the
fund
to
provide
better
opportunities
for
workforce
development,
apprenticeship,
training,
any
type
of
support
to
community
groups
that
will
help
move
our
residents
from
working
labor
to
Union
and
so
I?
Don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
make
comments
now
attached
or
come
back.
Madam.
I
Chair
the
members
of
the
committee
good
evening.
It
is
this
a
chief
financial
officer,
so
we
looked
at
it
and
I
think
I
mentioned
or
bracelet
that
we
did
kind
of
like
internal
audit
or
looked
at
the
numbers
you
know,
and
so
so
right
now
after
we
replay
some
of
the
amounts
and
I
think
I
sent
the
email
to
you
and
alderman
Simmons
the
balance
in
the
LEP
violation.
The
penalty
account
is
around
58,000
371.
The
$18,000
you
are
referring
to
is
the
numbers
before
our
ERP
system,
the
new
world
system.
I
So
we
don't
have
the
records
in
the
system.
So
what
we
are
trying
to
do
right
now,
locate
the
2013
invoices
to
make
sure
whether
the
contractor
paid
the
penalty
or
not,
and
once
we
establish
those
things
we
can
transfer
that
18,000
so
which
will
bring
the
balance
to
around
75,000
and
other
4,100
is
the
actual
expenses
out
of
the
reality
penalty.
A
Thank
you.
So,
as
mentioned
it's
important
that
we
have
a
clear
procedure:
I
guess
we
don't
need
a
policy,
but
we
definitely
need
to
make
sure
that
final
payments
are
not
released
before
fees
are
collected
on
this,
so
that
we
are
maximizing
that
fund,
as
we
are
working
on
that
committee,
to
expand
opportunities
for
our
residents
I'm,
also
looking
at
a
possible
way
to
move
past
the
reimbursement
fee.
A
I
You
write
it
I've
already
instructed
over
accounts
payable
and
the
Jaron
Johnson,
who
end
of
this
program
to
like
work
with
the
department
who
initiates
the
invoice.
If
it
involves
the
any
invoice
with
the
LEP
penalty,
they
can
work
directly
with
the
Accounts
Payable
and
the
accounting.
So
we
make
sure
that
the
LEP
account
gets
the
credit
for
their
share.
Thank.
E
You
thank
you
so
part
of
what
I'm
asking
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
committee.
So
the
way
our
MWBE
committee
is
structured
is
that
we
are
subcommittee
to
our
Economic
Development
Committee,
and
so
these,
if
we
make
the
changes
to
the
ordinance,
it's
my
suggestion
to
the
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
that
we
bring
it
here
to
a
pnw
versus
going
through
economic
development.
That's
just
a
question
that
I'm
asking
I'm
looking
at
autumn
and
rainy.