►
From YouTube: Administration & Public Works Committee Meeting 9/212015
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
A
The
the
far
east
driveway
in
and
out
of
the
shopping
center,
which
several
of
us
opposed
even
existing,
has
become
exactly
the
problem.
We
thought
it
would
be
right
and
it
it
just
is
terrifying
for
people
to
cross
the
street
there.
They
leave
target
to
go
the
bus
stop,
and
so
this
is
going
to
help
with
that,
there's
going
to
be
some
sidewalks
put
in,
which
are
just
really
essential
and
then
on
the
western
entrance.
A
You
know
when
you,
when
you
drive
into
the
western
entrance
of
the
jewel
target
shopping
center,
where
there
is
a
light
there
is
this
very
dysfunctional
configuration
of
streets
going
this
way
that
way
and
straight
ahead
and
that's
going
to
be
reformed,
corrected
made
easier
and
more
sensible
and
less
dangerous.
So
that's
it!
That's
what
it
is
occasion
and.
A
E
That's
me:
oh
that's
sorry,
I
was
so
excited,
I,
a3,
approval
of
design
and
architectural
services
for
the
proposed
Howard
Street
Theater.
E
A
D
Thank
you
first
question:
I
have
this
was
disapproved
once
by
the
council
at
two
million
dollars,
so
the
first
question
I
would
be
asking:
what
is
the
scope?
This
architectural
firm
is
doing
in
looking
at
the
documents
I
saw
before
there
was
no
scope
for
the
work.
So
what
are
the
architects
really
doing
here
for
our
money?
D
Because
are
they
doing
a
million
dollar
project
$500,000
project
or
what
are
they
doing?
So?
What
are
we
spending
money
on?
Because
if
it
comes
back
again
at
two
million,
are
we
going
to
disapprove
it
so
I
need
an
you
know.
It's
a
citizen
I'd
like
to
know
where
why
we're
spending
this
money
like
this
is
my
biggest
thing,
then
the
other
question
I
had
the
last
time.
I
looked
at
the
list
when
we've
approved
some
other
items
here
we
had
sixty
thousand
dollars
showing
up
as
the
amount
of
money
on
the
TIF.
D
So
the
question
is:
where
is
all
this
money
coming
from?
Do
this?
We
keep
approving
things
in
this
tiff
and
where's
the
money
for
all
of
this
on
then.
The
other
thing
is
depending
on
how
much
this
costs
are.
We
going
to
subsidize
this
as
taxpayers,
basically
when
this
comes
through,
because
you,
if
you
borrow
money,
you
basically
pay
every
year
for
that,
and
these
buildings
are
off
the
tax
rolls.
So
there's
no
taxes
coming
in
in
these
groups
that
do
this.
These
theaters
aren't
making
big
money.
D
A
D
F
Johanna
Leonard
acting
deputy
city
manager
I'll
just
briefly
speak
to
the
item
before
you.
First,
the
howards,
the
proposed
Howard
Street
Theater
is
now
the
contemplated
space
is
7
17
to
7
23.
If
you
recall,
this
is
a
different
space
than
we
had
before.
The
space
we
had
before
was
7
27
27
29,
which
was
a
building
to
west
from
the
site.
F
We're
currently
thinking
of
the
idea
behind
this
site
is
to
try
to
keep
it
on
us
on
a
larger
footprint
on
a
on
a
one-story
level,
which
we
understand
from
speaking
to
people
in
the
construction
industry
that
this
would
keep
a
lower
cost
building
overall.
So
right
now,
what
we're
looking
to
get
is
an
architect
to
work
with
space
planning
management
and
also
have
come
to
the
negotiation
table
with
a
potential
theater
to
have
the
architectural
services.
F
So
we
can
figure
out
what
it
is
that
we
could
potentially
build
and
what
that
might
cost
in
terms
of
buildings
being
on
the
tax
rolls
or
not
on
the
tax
rolls
all
of
the
buildings.
The
city
on
Howard
Street
are
paying
property
taxes,
with
the
exception
of
7
27
27
29
we've
petitioned
to
have
717
removed
from
the
tax
rolls,
but
if
the
building
has
a
tax
generating
use
in
it
that
by
the
county's
rules,
they
have
to
be
that
we
pay
property
taxes
on
those
buildings.
A
B
F
F
B
Called
ballpark
ten
thousand
dollars
a
month,
correct
I'm,
opposed
to
this
in
the
sense
that
we
have
no
money
to
pay
for
it.
As
the
backup
said
this,
is
we
don't
know
how
much
this
is
going
to
cost,
but
approximately
I
even
say
how
much
it
says
a
portion
will
be
done
with
TF
revenues
in
order
to
do
that,
what
would
we
have
to
do
to
raise
enough
revenue
in
this
account
to
actually
build
a
facility?
Would
you
say
I'll.
G
Yes,
halsman
Miller
members
of
the
committee,
the
howard
ridge,
tiff,
is
one
year
away
from
having
the
first
step
down
on
the
415
Howard
agreement,
we're
right
now.
One
hundred
percent
of
the
tax
increment
or
the
tax
bill
that
for
fifteen
Howard
pays
that
will
then
go
to
eighty-five
percent
and
then
I
think
down
to
70,
70
foot
and
so
on.
That
bill
has
fluctuated
between
300,000
and
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
at
its
top
and
and
we
know
that
from
what
we've
been
getting
into
the
TIF
so
long
term.
G
But
the
TIF
will
have
the
tip
will
have
15
15
years,
approximately
15
years
of
payments.
It
will
have
between
10
and
15
years
of
revenue
coming
in
so
depending
on
what
the
total
bill,
for
instance,
of
what
there
was
the
desire
on
the
part
of
the
council
to
do
a
1
million
dollar
bond
issue.
For
ten
years.
It
would
have
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
a
80
to
90
thousand
dollar
payment
a
year.
Maybe
love
for
a
tenure.
G
I'm
sorry
would
have
about
a
hundred
and
ten
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollar
payment
per
year,
which
all
things
you
know
that
if
the
building
maintains
its
value
and
the
TIF
also
maintains
its
value,
we
will
certainly
have
sufficient
funds,
just
as
we've
had
in
Washington
National
and
the
downtown
TIFF
for
the
private
development.
So
the
timing
is
such
to
do
the
planning
this
year
and
then
look
at
where
we're
at
as
far
as
a
revenue
source
for
moving
forward
when
we
actually
have
a.
B
Believe,
okay,
see
I
still
see.
This
is
kind
of
putting
the
cart
before
the
horse.
We
don't
know
we're
basically
saying
the
architects,
let's
design
something
we
don't
know
what
we
can.
Actually
what
the
arts
group
will
actually
raise.
We
don't
know
how
much
this
is
actually
in
the
costs
in
the
long
term.
C
C
C
F
This
has
to
be
the
next
step
right
and
so
in
order
we
have
certain
theater
companies
that
are
engaged
and
interested,
but
they're,
looking
at
all
of
their
options
right
now,
whether
they're
here
or
someplace
in
Chicago.
We
know
that
there's
over
200
theater
companies
in
Chicago
that
exists
and
are
doing
well
and
are
occupying
different
spaces,
but
less
than
150
spaces
for
those
theaters
to
occupy.
So
we
we
understand
that.
F
If
this
makes
sense
to
build
and
and
if
we
need
a
BRI
engineer
and
redesign,
so
we
can
fit
to
a
budget
that
works
for
for
us,
as
well
as
the
theater
company,
because
another
piece
of
negotiation
would
be
returning
to
council.
It
later
date
saying
here's
how
much
it's
going
to
cost
and
here's
our
theater
partner
and
they're
going
to
raise
X
and
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
potentially
spend
this.
But
we
won't
spend
it
until
they
raise
their
money.
So
so
comment
being
able
to
have
that
partnership
agreement.
B
F
Submitted
their
tax
return,
so
we've
we
have
a
sense
of
where
they're
at
financially
and
there
were
several
theater
companies
that
did
submit
when
we
did
the
request
for
proposals
earlier
this
year
that
didn't
have
the
financial
capacity,
so
we
didn't
move
forward
with
them.
I
think
most
most,
the
theaters
are
hesitant
to
move
forward
because
they
want
to
see
that
we're
making
this
next
step
towards
planning
and
they
want
they
want
to
see
up.
Just
as
we
want
to
see
a
good
partnership
in
what
they
can
raise,
we
want
to.
B
A
E
F
F
E
E
You
know,
I
think
that
we
as
a
council
back
bought
into
this
vision,
a
revitalizing
howard
street
and
on
this,
is
a
next
step
and,
although
maybe
I
don't
want
to
say
risky,
but
it's
just
a
chance
that
have
to
do
to
make
this
vision
come
become
a
reality.
Otherwise
we're
just
sitting
there
with
buildings
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
why
we
purchased
the
buildings.
At
least
that's
not
why
I
voted
to
purchase
the
buildings.
What
to
have
them
sit
there.
A
Just
to
address
mostly
alderman
Miller's
concerns
about
our
not
really
having
good
information.
We've
we've
had
numerous
meetings
of
a
focus
group
that
had
people
on
it,
who
are
so
highly
skilled
and
involved
in
the
theater
industry,
including
including
tim
evans,
who
runs
north
lake
theater,
including
mark
whose
last
name
I
what
okay,
one
of
who
is
a
MacArthur
grant
resident
at
the
Chicago,
Liga
theaters
and
the
Chicago
lead
of
theaters
executive
director,
entertainers,
etc.
Who
were
involved
in
this?
A
Who
have
recommended
this
process
to
us
and
who
have
vetted
that
believing
we
learned
our
lesson
the
first
time
around
and
we
knew
that
we
did
not
do
the
best
job
possible
on
the
first
go
round.
So
these
are
people
who
have
been
advising
us
free
of
charge,
pro
pro
bono,
giving
us
their
best
insight.
These
are
people
who
have
worked
with
the
various
theaters
that
we
were
going
to
be
presenting,
so
we
felt
really
confident
they
reviewed
their
financial
documents.
A
You
know
they
have
sold-out
performances
and
highly
skilled
awards,
but
once
we
present
the
the
groups
and
and
you're
free
to
have
the
economic
develop
packet,
it
is
really
amazing
the
the
awards
they've
gotten
and
Chris
Jones,
the
theater
critic
has
embraced
both
these
theaters
and
you
know,
has
told
us
at
any
time.
We
need
more
advice,
we
can
go
to
him,
but
we
think
we've
had
some
pretty
exceptional
advice
and
counsel
by
theater
professionals,
and
this
this
was
the
original
vision
for
Howard
Street.
This
was
the
original.
A
This
was
going
to
be
what
promoted
the
street.
We
have.
You
know
peckish
and
ward
8,
another
restaurant
on
its
way,
we're
showing
another
building
to
somebody
else
soon.
These
people
are
all
waiting
for
this
to
happen.
This
is
going
to
be
the
the
jewel
in
the
crown
of
Howard
Street.
Also
in
terms
of
increment
for
this
TIF
district,
there
there's
a
purchase
and
for
741
Howard
right
now,
that's
a
build
building,
an
excess
of
a
million
dollars.
There
is
an
offer
and
agreed
upon
offer
on
701
Howard
I
mean
we
have
generated
this
excitement.
A
A
building
had
not
been
sold
on
Howard
Street
for
overweight.
Over
10
years,
the
745
Howard
was
last
building
bought
and
sold,
and
you
know,
since
we
got
involved,
people
are
interested
in
the
street.
They
they
truly
are.
So
that's
a
good
thing
there
has
been.
There
has
been
a
an
appraisal
on
a
property
that
we
do
own,
that
is
in
excess
of
150,000
more
than
we
paid
for
it.
A
That
didn't
happen,
because
we
waited
for
somebody
to
come
along
with
23
million
dollars
to
build
all
those
buildings.
We
bonded
for
23
million
dollars,
because
our
financial
staff
sat
down
and
projected
revenues
over
the
23
years
21
years
and
that's
how
we
did
it.
That's
how
you
can't
you
can't
make
things
happen
if
you
wait
for
the
increment
to
drink,
to
trickle
in,
if
you
have,
if
you
have
certain
projects
that
are
going
forward,
that
are
going
to
make
money
now,
will
the
theater
make
a
lot
of
money?
A
The
theater
wrote
won't
make
a
lot
of
money
for
themselves.
They
don't
seem
to
do
that,
but
they
do
generate
revenue
and
we
have
all
sorts
of
accounting
studies
showing
how
much
money
theaters
generate
in
terms
of
revenue
for
other
people,
and
so
that
that's
very
important
and
if
we
do
not
sell
the
theater
building
to
the
theater
we're
in
a
position,
as
this
Leonard
told
us
today
to
use
tax,
increment
financing
money
or
pay
bonds
that
we
sell
to
to
recoup
the
revenue
from
the
increment.
A
We
can
use
that
kind,
TIFF
money
to
build
out
the
theater.
If
we
sell
the
theater,
we
can
so
we're
only
interested
in
selling
all
the
other
buildings.
I,
don't
think
we've
decided
we
want
to
sell
the
the
7
21
23
building
so
I
understand.
There
are
people
who
have
objections
to
test
and
I
can
under
that.
Have
objections
to
tips
and
feel
that
it
is
diminishing
their
their
ability
to
use
other
taxes
I
it.
It
doesn't
always
work
like
that.
We've
not
made
any
mistakes
so
far,
we've
not
made
any
mistake.
B
I'm
just
trying
to
let
me
remain
I
know,
and
let
me
respond
to
that,
because
here's
with
all
due
respect
to
the
committee
I
no
doubt
about
their
qualifications
and
they
probably
are
the
most
experienced
theatre
people
that
we
could
actually
bring
together.
But
I
haven't
seen
anything
that
says
their
plan
is
legit
and
you
were
saying
we
there's
two
groups
out
there.
We
have
no
business
plan,
we
have
no
nonprofit,
fundraising
capital
plan.
B
We
have
nothing,
that's
been
presented
to
us
to
say
you
know
what,
when
we
go
down
this
path
towards
building
a
theater,
we're
going
to
have
a
tenant
in
it
that
can
want
to
help
with
the
capital
costs
and
two
will
actually
be
there
in
the
coming
years
and
in
before
we
invest
all
this
money
and
start
this
process
in
forty
thousand
dollars
isn't
a
ton
of
money,
but
when
we
begin
this
process,
we're
moving
down
that
path
and
as
the
steward
of
our
taxpayer
dollars,
I
can't
good
hard
do
that.
Well,.
A
B
I,
do
I
get
that
and
I
want
to
make
it
clear
that
cool.
We
don't
have
a
plan
that
I've
seen
yet,
and
so,
if
we
had
a
good
plan,
maybe
I
could
support
it,
but
I
don't
see
a
plan,
we're
just
we're
doing
these
incremental
steps
that
costs
you
no
money
here,
costs
money
here
and
eventually
we'll
have
a
theater
and
we've
never
seen
a
plan
to
put
it
together.
B
H
To
see
it
aldrin
Randy
members
of
the
committee,
I
guess
I
really
want
to
address
the
last
part,
which
is
the
plan
and
and
in
this
council
in
this
committee,
has
been
working
on
it
for
the
last
several
years
and
certainly
all
the
Miller
we
can
get.
You
notes
minutes
of
the
various
meetings
that
have
taken
us
to
this
point
so
but.
B
H
We've
been
on
the
hook
for
several
years
and
I
think
what
we're
trying
to
do
and
and
what
staff
is
trying
to
to
be
of
assistance
here,
is
to
bring
this
to
fruition.
We
have
another
property
issue
on
later
this
evening,
which
has
a
lot
of
similarities
to
it,
is
going
to
try
to
come
up
with
a
plan
that
makes
sense.
H
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
now
is
come
up
with
a
second
plan,
as
I
think
alderman
Rainey
said,
would
be
great
if
there
was
a
different
process
and
if
there
was
an
easier
process
and
if
we
were
working
with
partners
that
had
the
financial
wherewithal
to
do
their
own
visioning
to
come
up
with
us,
but
we
don't
and
that's
not
the
nature
of
this
particular
endeavor.
What
the
nature
is
is
that
we
need
to
continue
to
make
this
investment.
H
B
H
The
problem
and
I
think
that's,
ultimately
the
decision
for
the
City
Council
and
that
I
think
kind
of
perhaps
brings
this
conversation
full
circle
is
that
this
investment
is
what
your
staff
is
recommending
that
we
need
to
do
to
get
to
that
point.
If
the
council
agrees,
we
will
move
forward.
If
the
council
does
not
agree,
we
will
not
move
forward
and
then
we'll
have
a
different
discussion
as
to
what
to
do
with
these
buildings.
So
I
think
that's
what
this
really
comes
to.
H
If
we
are
able
to
make
this
investment,
we
will
be
able
to
come
back
to
the
council
with
a
plan.
They'll
be
fully
I
think
address
all
of
the
issues
that
you're
very
appropriately
raising,
but
we're
not
there
yet,
and
so
we
move
forward
with
this
investment
this
evening
or
these
projects
end
and
then
the
City
Council
has
a
different
set
of
discussions
in
these
two
have
ok.
A
A
Capabilities
to
several,
maybe
four
or
five
groups,
these
are
people
who
have
the
capacity,
but
they've
had
locations
for
20
30
years
and
didn't
need
a
new
location.
So
I'm
just
saying
that
it's
not
like
somebody
just
called
us
up
and
said
they
want
to
be
our
theater.
They
they
know
they
have
an
obligation
and-
and
yes,
they
are
going
to
put
together
a
plan.
They
cannot
ask
their
boards
to
conduct
a
capital
campaign
until
they
have
something
some
campaign
to
conduct
and
we
haven't
told
them.
Maybe
why
I.
C
Think
for
me
to
it's
the
bigger
picture
of
Arts
in
evanston,
we've
been
since
what
2011-2012
there
have
been
a
number
of
groups
that
have
done
the
citywide
studies
about
what
we're
looking
for
in
developing
Evanston
is
a
is
a
mecca
for
the
arts,
including
theater,
and
this
is
what
this
fits
into-
that
larger
city,
wide
vision
for
what
the
recommendations
were
from
those
other
experts
and
the
other
studies
we're
making
this
happen
to.
So
this
is
the
implementation
of
a
larger
cultural
arts
plan
for
the
city.
A
A
All
right
next
is
resolution
85
ar-15
utilities,
easement
agreement
with
Northwestern
University
for
emerson
street.
This
is
an
easement
for
50
years
that
will
allow
for
an
electrical
conduit
or
tubing
under
the
street
for
providing
electricity
to
their
buildings.
This
will
be
a
5500
dollar
easement
fee.
It's
an
annual
I
think
they're
going
to
pay
it
all
at
once
right.
They
are
because
we
might
not
be
here
in
15
years
so
anyway,
specimen.
D
A
I
You,
madam
chair
I'd,
like
move
item
a5
resolution
96
dash
R
dash
15
contract
extension
with
Groot
industries
for
solid
waste
collection
staff
is
recommending
City
Council's.
Adoption
of
this
resolution
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
execute
the
contract
amendments
to
the
waste
services
agreements
with
Groot
and
renew
the
agreements.
All
agreements
include
a
decrease
in
monthly
costs
for
the
first
year.
This
is
for
action.
I
C
C
G
You
alden
grover
and
during
the
negotiations,
a
catherine
hurley
and
I
met
with
representatives
of
representatives
of
croute
Frank
held
agon,
is
here
tonight
from
grood,
also
for
any
questions
that
we
might
not
be
able
to
answer
from
our
beginning
negotiations
back
in
March.
My
group
came
to
us
with
a
10-year
plan
originally
for
a
wide
variety
of
service
changes,
and
the
city
has
been
in
on
again
and
off
again
and
we're
now
back
on
again
in
discussions
with
Skokie.
G
As
far
as
looking
at
intergovernmental
provision
of
solid
waste
services,
skokie
has
slightly
different
services
and
the
city,
but
they
are
interested
in
talking
again.
Their
contract
is
up
in
one
year
and
while
we
wanted
to
do
one
year,
our
choice
was
one
year
at
no
increase
or
two
years
at
a
five
percent
decrease
for
the
residential
refuse
and
residential
yard
waste,
and
we
felt
that
that
was
a
very
equitable
deal
up
going
forward
and
the
ten
percent
decrease
for
the
commercial
represented,
also
a
good
deal.
G
The
one
reason
for
the
city
pressing
for
these
decreases
is
our
knowledge
from
being
a
part
of
the
solid
waste
agency
of
northern
Cook
County
and
although
Groot
is
not
compelled
to
take
their,
they
have
to
take
the
our
residential
waste,
their
commercial,
not
necessarily
so,
but
we
have
seen
a
fifteen
percent
decrease
in
our
tipping
fee
through
swank.
So
we
know
that
there
is
the
potential
for
costs
to
go
down.
So
we
stayed
with
our
position
that
costs
needed
to
go
down
for
our
services
and
then.
E
I
guess
it's
only
board
five,
but
but
I
continue
to
have
complaints.
I've
been
saying
this
forever
and
I
was
waiting
for
us
to
really
get
to
on
the
contracts
this
year
and
Chris.
We
kept
doing
the
extension
so
I
know
we
were
where
we
have
to
do
this
now,
but
I'm
not
pleased
I.
We
have
garbage
cans
left
in
alleys.
We
have
garbage
cans
thrown
down
in
people's
yards,
it's
just
not
good
service
and
we've
complained
about
it.
E
I've
complained
about
it
from
the
beginning
and
because
my
residents
call
me
with
that
and
I'm
sure
they
call
311
they
have
to
so
it's
it's
a
service
issue.
For
me,
in
terms
of
when
are
they
going
to
improve
those
services
and,
like
I
said,
if
it's
only
Ward
5,
then
it's
only
worth
five
but
I
have
those
complaints.
I
I
I
If,
when
we
do
open
up
the
bidding
in
2017,
if
other
companies
are
going
to
be
able
to
to
bid
on
the
contract
as
well,
one
of
the
other
complaints
that
I've
received
from
our
neighbors,
particularly
the
contractors,
is
that
group
right
now
is
the
only
company
that
they
can
use
for
containers
and
the
price
of
containers
have
steadily
been
on
the
rise.
I,
don't
have
any
information
in
front
of
me,
but
I've
received
that
feedback,
so
I'm
concerned
about
that
as
well.
I
E
I
E
H
H
I
think
there
are
some
very
long-term
opportunities
with
the
village
of
skokie,
which
we
would
like
some
additional
time
to
to
flesh
out,
but
ultimately,
if
it
turns
out
that
the
council's
not
satisfied
with
the
service
and
would
only
like
to
look
at
a
one-year
extension
I
mean.
Certainly
during
that
time,
I
think
we'll
know
where
we
stand
with
what
the
villages
goki
and
my
sense
is
that
the
council
would
be
comfortable
with
no
rate
increase.
So
if
that
makes
sense,
mr.
H
E
H
Well
and
I
think
we
see,
as
you
see
in
31,
yeah
I,
think
there's
a
smattering
around
the
community
and
I
think
it
comes
to
community
standards,
I
think
in
in
some
areas.
Perhaps
that
there's
a
sensitivity
greater
than
other
areas,
not
to
say
that
it's
probably
any
different
service.
I
think
that
some
folks
are
just
the
more
kind
of
to
it
than
perhaps
another
neighborhood.
So
I
think.
H
H
And
again,
my
experience
with
with
solid
waste
either
provided
by
city
forces
or
provided
by
private
contractors
is.
It
is
a
cyclical
sort
of
thing
and
you
need
to
tighten
it
up.
You
tighten
up
working
with
a
contractor
to
tighten
it
up.
Working
with
city
staff
members
and
my
experience
with
grood
and
the
six
years
I've
been
here
has
been
pretty
much
that
that
there
had
been
times
when
we've
had
to
talk
with
them.
We
brought
them
into
the
311
process.
H
I
think
that
improved
a
lot,
but
certainly
there,
drivers
change
issues,
change
and
we
just
have
to
so
I,
don't
know,
there's
any
systemic
problems
that
I
have
seen,
but
I
think
it's
something
that
constantly
has
to
be
monitored
in
order
to
make
sure
that
the
community
standard
in
evanston,
which
I
would
dare
say,
is
different
than
the
community
standard
or
Northbrook
or
glenview,
or
will
matter
anywhere
else
that
the
community
standard
in
evanston
is
followed.
So.
A
I'll
tell
you
this:
you
could
not
beat
the
surface
when
city
employees
collected
the
cosmic.
In
fact,
I
won
an
election
solely
on
the
basis
of
my
support
for
the
garbageman,
because
my
opponent
said:
let's
go,
you
know
out
for
bid
on
and
and
that
that
was
a
big
issue
in
that
people
love
the
yeah.
Thank
you
all
my
bracelet,
and
although
and.
I
Thank
you
for
your
recommendation
to
hold
I'm
I
hope
that
we
move
in
that
direction.
As
a
committee,
and
then
you
said
something
also,
that
was
very
helpful,
which
is
I,
would
love
to
see
a
report,
maybe
from
the
beginning
of
33
11
year
today,
taking
a
look
at
all
the
calls
and
then
you're
identifying
the
trends
that
you
you
just
stated
earlier
and
in
addition
to
that
I
know:
ottoman
homes,
I've
made
direct
emails
to
James,
May
worm
and
he's
keeping
a
stack
of
those.
I
So
for
the
representative
group
I
can
tell
you
that
the
controls
or
the
Department,
the
complaints
that
I've
heard
in
terms
of
service
is
with
Miss
trash,
your
drivers
and
their
interactions
with
residents
and
also
when
larger
buildings
call
your
ditch
patch.
Those
are
the
two
I
mean
that
was
a
summary
of
the
phone
calls
that
I
received
and
then
we'll
have
more
information
from
our
three
or
one
report.
C
H
So,
madam
chair,
mr.
Lyons
I,
think
we're
we're
kind
of
off
cycle
today
with
our
meetings.
So
I
think
we
would
be
looking
at
the
12th
of
October
to
come
back
and
then
I
think
have
intermediate
meetings
between
now
and
then
as
appropriate
with
any
member
of
the
Council,
and
we
can
work
to
get
the
data
that
should
be
fairly
straightforward
from.
G
G
Our
point
is
that
the
extension
is
here
and
I
will
just
one
point
of
clarification
that
the
contract
itself
just
says.
Three-Year
extension
is
our
option,
and
so
we
are
very
you
know.
The
one
of
our
negotiations
was
to
get
it
down
to
two
years
in
that
situation,
and
so
I
just
would
say
that
the
service
issues,
I'm
sure
group
has
is
very
much
interested.
They
want
to
have
the
best
product
possible,
and
I
have
another
idea
that
I'll
revisit
with
members
of
council
that
we've
done
with
other
service
related
contracts
to
help
close.
H
This
up,
I
think,
though,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
the
bigger
issue
is
that
there
may
be
a
better
way
to
do
this
moving
forward,
and
I
think
that
looking
at
skokie
as
a
partner,
you
know
swank,
which
we
are
a
member
of-
is
also
going
through
some
transitions,
which
are
still
not
as
clear
as
perhaps
they
will
be
as
far
as
the
transfer
station
issues.
So
there's
a
lot
of
things
in
flux,
but
if
a
two-year
agreement
doesn't
make
sense
you'd,
rather
you
know
we
look
back
on
our
electric
franchises.
H
H
H
H
E
A
Right
and
I'll,
it's
one
minute,
you
know
when
we
all
right
next
is
alderman
Miller,
move.
B
A
G
A
G
Are
a
taxing
body,
but
they
issue
I'll,
be
happy
to
be
quiet
and
bring
it
back
later,
but
the
present,
the
other
reason
that
we're
doing
it
this
way
is
that,
right
now
the
library
has
a
current
amount
of
debt
service
that
they're
paying.
That
is
in
the
amount
of
just
over
five
hundred
thousand
dollars,
and
so
there
then
going
to
begin
to
do
capital
projects
that
keeps
that
amount
of
debt
service
and
keeps
their
facilities
up
to
date.
So.
G
G
G
A
I'm
just
wondering
why
they
can't
issue
their
own
death.
Okay.
So
anyway,
that's
a
question.
I
have
and
I'd
like
to
do
I'm
good
on
hold,
because
we
don't
know
all
right.
All
those
in
favor
of
approving
going
to
the
bond
market
say
I
all
right.
That
ends
our
meeting
adjourned
for
those
of
you
who
may
not
know
we're
going
to
have
a
ceremony
now
whereby
we
will
be
naming
this
room.