►
From YouTube: Participatory Budgeting Committee - Feb. 17, 2022
Description
This video is the first meeting of the Participatory Budgeting Committee.
A
Councilmember
newsman
we
just
introduced
our
guest
taya
crum
as
well
as
torrance
terence
from
maria
haddin's
office,
will
be
here
as
well.
So
first,
you
know,
we,
I
think,
are
all
generally
familiar
with
participatory
budgeting
here
in
this
on
this
call,
so
I'll
turn
over
to
taya.
To
maybe
talk
a
bit
about
your
work
and
give
us
share
some
insight
and
matthew.
I
don't
know
if
you
have.
I
know
you've
also
done
some
pb.
B
I
was,
I
was
just
about
to
say
that
I
think
starting
off
with
taya.
It
sounds
like
a
good
idea.
C
Okay,
go
ahead;
okay,
thanks!
So
much,
I'm
really
honored
to
be
here
today,
and
I
appreciate
so
much.
The
invitation
matt
said
that
it
would
be
helpful
to
provide
just
some
background
and
like
an
overview
on
what
pb
is
so
I
did
a
little
powerpoint.
Would
that
be
helpful
or
sure.
A
Sure
we
do
also
have
a
member
of
the
media
here,
bill
smith,
and
so
maybe
good
just
for
that
purpose
as
well.
C
Okay,
so
can
everyone
see
this.
A
So,
yes,
if
you
click
the
slideshow
button,
it'll
make
it
full
screen.
D
C
Yep
there
we
go
okay,
so
I'm
just
gonna
go
forward,
so
I
just
prepared
a
really
quick
kind
of
what
is
participatory
budgeting
and
where
has
it
happened
and
how
does
it
work
just
to
level
that
a
little
bit
like
I
mentioned
so
the
definition
that's
used
both
here
and
actually
across
most
of
the
globe,
is
that
participatory
budgeting
is
a
democratic
process
in
which
community
members
directly
decide
how
to
spend
part
of
a
public
budget,
and
just
it's
a
pretty
simple
definition.
C
C
So
how
does
pb
work
well,
pb
is
typically
an
annual
cycle,
and
the
first
year
is
usually
a
lot
of
time
is
spent
really
designing
the
process
and
I'll
get
it.
I
have
another
slide
that
dives
into
that
in
a
little
bit
more
deep,
deeper
detail,
but
every
year
you
revisit
the
design
of
the
process
so
that
you
learn
from
the
lessons
of
the
previous
year
and
you
tweak
it
and
improve
it.
But
the
first
phase
of
the
process
really
begins
with
thinking
through.
C
How
do
we
customize
this
basic
framework
to
meet
our
unique
community,
and
then
you
move
on
to
idea
collection,
and
that
is
where
you
really
spend
some
time.
Educating
the
residents
and
the
people
who
were
will
participate
on
what
is
pb
and
what
is
the
pot
of
money
that
you're
using?
How
can
it
be
spent?
C
What
are
the
rules
and
restrictions
around
that
money
and
then
really
spending
doing
some
needs
assessment,
as
well
as
gathering
ideas
from
residents?
The
next
phase
is
proposal,
development.
Where
then,
residents
typically
spend
some
time
developing
these
project
proposals
narrowing
down
ideas
and
really
fleshing
those
projects
out
with
the
assistance
of
experts
from
the
city
and
developing
full
project
proposals
that
then
go
on
to
a
public
vote?
And
then
the
last
phase
is
implementation
and
monitoring
which
can
take
anywhere
from
a
few
months
to
years
depending
upon
the
projects.
C
C
They
really
depend
the
impacts
that
you
achieve
depend
upon.
You
know
who's
involved,
so
developing
a
steering
committee,
an
advisory
committee
and
who
sits
around
that
committee
can
help
determine
on
whether
or
not
you
meet
the
impacts
and
the
goals
that
you've
decided
set
for
your
process,
and
so
there's
a
couple
examples.
So
if,
if
distributing
funds
more
equitably
is
one
of
your
goals,
setting
equity
criteria
during
the
proposal,
development
phase
is
really
a
way
to
enhance
that
goal.
D
Thanks
tayl,
for
that
I
appreciate
it.
This
is
councilmember
vern
speaking,
so
I
guess
around
the
equity
piece.
How
have
have
diverse
cities
if
cities
have
even
done
this,
because
I
know
this
can
happen
at
all
all
levels
of
you
know.
I
know
public
schools,
for
instance,
have
done
this
before
so,
but
assuming
some
some
cities
have
tackled
this.
D
C
I
think
one
of
the
key
ways
is
setting
equity
criteria,
for
which
proposals
make
it
onto
the
ballot,
and
so
you
know
that
can
include
you
know
everything
from
you
know
their
I've
seen
different
tools
come
out.
The
participatory
budgeting
project
has
one
tool:
that's
available
on
a
resource
library
through
people
powered
that
I'm
on
the
board
for
that's
available
for
download
I'd,
be
happy
to
send
it
to
you
and
it's
a
checklist
that
people
have
to
look
through.
C
You
can
create
your
own,
but
it's
thinking
through
things
like
what
is
the
need
that
this
project
is
addressing?
Where
is
the
project
located?
Which
communities
are?
Is
it
benefiting
so
thinking
through?
All
of
those
different
criteria,
in
terms
of
you
know
how
the
project
is
meeting
that
need
that's
one
of
the
ways
in
chicago.
C
We
also
have
created
something
called
like
an
equity
ballot
where
we
will,
knowing
that
people
tend
to
vote
close
to
home
right
if
they
see
a
project,
that's
located,
where
close
to
where
they
live,
they're
going
to
vote
for
that
over
something,
maybe
that's
far
farther
from
their
home.
C
We
will
think
about
areas
that
there's
a
higher
voter
turnout
and
areas
where
there
may
be
a
loader
lower
voter
turnout,
which
typically
is
more
marginalized
communities
and
will
pair
those
projects
together
on
the
ballot,
so
that
when
people
are
voting,
they're
voting
for
like
a
park,
project
right
and
there's
two
park
projects
that
are
paired
together
rather
than
I'm
voting
for
this
project,
because
it's
close
to
my
house
so
there's
ways
to
kind
of
think
about
enhancing
equity
through
tools
like
that,
making
it
a
specific
goal
for
your
process,
partnering
with
organizations
that
can
help
you
outreach
and
make
sure
that
more
marginalized
communities
are
involved
and
having
them
on
your
advisory
committee
so
that
they
have
a
stake
in
the
game
is
another
way
and
they're
invested
in
the
process.
D
Yeah
that
one
about
you
know
putting
two
parts
together,
instead
of
people
having
to
decide
between
a
park,
that's
closer
to
them,
that
they
utilize
more
often
in
a
park
that
they
do.
I
like
that
that
that
really,
that
really
gets
it
at
what
what
what
what
my
question
was.
Okay,
I
probably
have
a
few
other
things,
but
I'll
kick
it
back
to
either
mayor
bishop
or
councilman
reid.
D
A
Okay,
as
well
as
our
clerk
mendoza,
okay,
if
there
are
any
other
questions.
F
A
Well,
actually,
yeah.
I
was
going
to
move
to
that
next
to
to
continue
to
frame
us
in
you
know,
really
figuring
out.
What
I
want
to
determine
here
is
is
this
something
we
can
do
internally
as
a
city
or
do
we
need
a
community
partner,
so
we
can
get
the
ball
rolling
on
having
staff
prepare
an
rfq
to
determine
you
know
exactly
who
that
partner
is
going
to
be.
A
I
think
great
c's
institute
is
a
potential
partner
and-
and
there
may
be
a
few
others
out
there
across
the
nation
and
so.
D
A
So
councilman,
if
you
have
no
questions
that
will
help
us
determine
you
know
that
that
and
and
may
your
best
also,
if
you
have
any
questions,
feel
free
to
jump
in.
G
F
Thank
you
guys,
sorry,
I'm
audio
only
so,
hopefully
the
presentation
will
be
available.
I
can
go
back
and
look
at
that
later,
but
I
just
have
some
great
practical
questions
and
if
there's
somebody
from
chicago
on
the
call
who
might
be
able
to
answer
this
that'd
be
great,
but
how
do
we
actually
have
the
community
members
vote?
F
I'm
assuming
this
is
not
going
to
be
on
the
ballot
through
the
the
county
clerk
yeah.
So
it's
not
a
voting
day
thing.
But
what
is
that?
What
does
the
process
look
like?
When
is
it
electronic?
Is
it
a
person?
What
are
the
options?
I.
A
Can
start-
and
you
can
maybe
fill
in
because.
A
Did
a
lot
of
research
on
this
there?
It's
we're
really
open
to
and
numerous.
E
A
It
could
be
online
if
we
so
chose
it
and
it
could
be
a
paper
ballot.
I
know
the
49th
ward
under
alderman
moore.
I
did
paper
ballots
and
you
know
they
allowed
anyone.
You
know
to
vote
that
was
over
the
age
of
I
believe
in
their
office.
They
did.
You
know,
16
some
offices,
let
folks
as
young
as
14
vote.
You
know
you
didn't
have
to
be
a
citizen
to
vote.
You
know
your
citizenship
status
was
not
a
barrier
to
voting,
but
yeah.
C
Yeah,
absolutely
that's
one
of
the
decisions
you'll
have
to
make
is
who
can
vote,
but
you
there's
a
number
of
ways
you
can
vote
paper
ballot
is
is
one
of
the
options
the
other
I've
seen
people
do.
Google
forms
stanford
has
a
crowd
sourcing
tool
that
they
often
make
available
for
free.
If
you
allow
them
to
conduct
a
research
survey
afterwards
and
it
it's
a
really
good
tool,
we've
used
it
that
you
can
do
for
virtual
voting.
There's
pb
platforms
for
a
first
year,
they're,
typically
kind
of
pricey.
C
C
You
can
have
those
are
the
the
main
ways
in
which
I've
seen
people
vote,
but
I
think,
having
I
would
say
best
practice
would
be
to
have
a
hybrid
option
where
you
could
do
paper
and
some
kind
of
online
voting
option
for
for
people
as
well.
We've
done,
we've
had
really
good
success
with
with
google
forms,
so
it
could
be
as
simple
as
that.
C
C
You
know
what
would
what
are
the
rules
for
for
voting
and
it
I've
seen
things
across
the
world
everything
from
in
paris.
They
did
your
honor
system,
you
literally
logged
into
a
platform
with
an
email
address,
and
you
could
vote
in
in
chicago
as
councilman
reed
said
it's
14
years
of
age
or
older,
and
you
live
in
the
ward
and
there's
a
list
of
evidence.
You
can
provide
everything
from
a
driver's
license
to
the
city
id
card
to
a
bill
that
has
your
address
on
it.
C
So
it's
it's
something
to
consider
in
terms
of
how
restrictive
you
want
it
versus
how
much
participation
you'd
like
to
have
some
cities
have
had
votes
that
include
children
as
young
as
five
in
chicago.
We
do
14.
C
That's
a
great
question
so
logistically
the
way
that
it
worked
in
person
was
there
were
two
options
you
could
go
into
the
ward
office.
You
provide
your
name
address
and
you
there.
The
age
requirement
is
14
years
of
age
or
older,
and
so
you
could
provide
a
school
id
or
they
had
an
oath
form.
Where
you
could
say
I
swear.
C
I
live
in
the
49th
ward
and
I'm
14
years
of
age
or
older
and
you
sign,
and
then
you
could
vote
and
online.
It
was
a
similar
form
and
in
other
words
they
had
people
take
a
picture
if
it
was
online
and
they
would
have
to
email
that
in
it
would
be
verified
by
a
staff
person
and
then
they
would
be
sent
a
voter
code
and
in
person
they
would
have
to
show
proof
and
then
they
would
be
allowed
to
vote.
A
And
I
will
also
add
to
that
member
knew
some
of
that,
because
you
know
we
get
to
the
you
know
the
process
part.
E
A
Process
is
designing
the
the
rules
for
voting
in
some
ways,
I
think
in
the
49th
ward
in
particular
folks,
you
know
they
made
mobile
voting
stations.
A
Out
to
a
train
station
and
folks
could
vote
on
site
so
just
specifically
to
the
point
of
having
to
go
into
the
ward
office
or
just
online.
You
know
there's
a
multitude
of
places
that
we
could
set
up
for
folks
to
to
go
to
vote.
F
F
Let's
keep
it
simple
and
you
know
not
go
not
make
it
too
complex
not
go
overboard,
but
we
need
to.
D
As
a
follow-up
to
this
thread,
I'm
interested
to
know,
because
you
said
the
that
there's
some-
you
know
software
programs
that
have
been
developed
specifically
for
pb
to
run
pv
processes,
and
you
said
it,
it
costs
a
lot.
What
what
are
the
costs?
D
You
know
our
fan
and-
and
I
say
that,
because
you
know
if
it's,
if
there's
a
software
company
that
has
designed
a
tool
for
bb,
not
only
does
it
make
it
easy
to
do
this
online,
but
they'll
have
apps
and
other
tools
that
make
it
easy
to
collect
and
count
and
keep
track
of
balance,
no
matter
where
we
are
so
councilman
marie
brought
up,
which
is
you
know,
I
worked
with
him
on
this
research
back
when
he
was
a
city
clerk.
D
But
what
is
really
exciting
to
me
is
that
this
this
this
the
opportunity
to
set
something
up
at
a
community
center
or
where
we
can
bring
the
vote
to
people
as
opposed
to
having
them.
You
know
giving
them
a
having
a
space
where
they
go,
but
we
can
really
set
it
up
where
it's
convenient
for
them,
grocery
stores
or
whatever
it
is,
and
I
feel
like
if
we
work
with
somebody
that
has
created
tools.
That's
considered
the
needs
of
these
processes
that
that
that
might
be
a
really
good
opportunity
to
explore.
C
Well,
the
prices
really
vary
depending
upon
how
many
features
it
has
like.
I
mentioned
the
if
you
were
to
go
with.
If
you
wanted
something
just
for
the
vote,
and
you
were
interested
in
like
the
stanford
crowdsourcing
tool,
I've
worked
with
them
for
years.
I'd
be
more
than
happy
to
connect
you
and
they
typically
don't.
C
I
don't
think
they
charge
for
or
as
long
as
you
do
like
are
willing
to
participate
in
the
research
that
they
do,
which
is
like
just
a
quick
little
survey
afterwards,
they're
they're
researching
different
voter
methodologies,
and
if
the
order
of
the
projects
on
the
ballot
makes
a
difference
in
terms
of
voter
choice
and
they
you
know,
if
you
had
a
tablet
or
laptops,
you
could
take
that
it
could
make
it
vote
mobile
to
different
locations.
C
We
did
that
we've
done
that
we've
had
tablets
and
taken
them
to
parks
and
had
people
vote
online
that
way
or
virtually
that
way
in
many
different
wards
over
the
years.
So
that's
that's
one
option:
that's
pretty
low
cost.
If
you
were
interested
in
developing
like
a
full
platform
where
people
could
submit
ideas,
they
could
track
how
those
ideas
moved
through
the
proposal.
Development
phase,
whether
or
not
they
were
selected
for
the
vote
and
then
had
a
ballot.
C
A
Sure
and
and
then
following
that
same
line,
so
that's
maybe
for
some
of
the
tech
that
we
need
to,
or
you
know
and
other
things
even
paper
ballots
have
ever
cost.
G
A
10
to
30
on
that
end,
what
about
what
do
you
think
the
cost
for
a
pb
implementation
partner
is
for
either
consultant
or
I
don't
know,
what's
really
out
there
fully
other
than
places
like
the
great
cities
institute.
C
Well,
there's
there's
national
partners
there's
other
people
who,
I
think
you
know
would
would
want
to
try
it,
and
I
know
you've
got
you've,
got
a
lot
of
resources
in
northwestern
too.
So
I
think
it
would
again
kind
of
probably
vary
depending
upon
their.
You
know,
expertise
and
experience
and
probably
you'd
see
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
I
would
say
for
a
first
year,
maybe
30
to
75k
somewhere
in
that
neighborhood
for
and
then
you
might
want
to.
C
A
I
mean
that
sounds
pretty
reasonable
for
saying
that
we're
overall
going
to
need
to
spend
roughly
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
to-
or
you
know,
to
administer
and
oversee
a
2.5
million
dollar
process
know
the
percentage
of
the
total.
You
know
the
2.5
million
again
mary
beth.
Maybe
you
can
do
that
faster
than
I
can,
but
you
know
that
sounds
fairly
reasonable.
D
C
So
and
that's
that
that's
less
expensive
in
terms
of
time
and
it's
less
time
consuming
than
having
residents
be
the
ones
who
are
developing
the
project
proposals,
but
residents
have
more
ownership
when
they're
the
ones
developing
project
proposals
and
they
develop
more
skills
and
they
there's
sometimes
a
greater
level
of
trust.
So
again,
it
kind
of
depends
on
what
you're
trying
to
accomplish.
D
Yeah,
no,
I
I
agree
councilman
reed.
I
think
that
it's
it's
reasonable
and
I
think
we're
also
having
other
conversations
or
we
you
know,
there's
community
advocates
who
have
talked
about
other
models
for
public
participation
that
are
that
will
require
much
more
structural
change
than
this,
and
so
I
think,
there's
a
way
if
that
doesn't
happen,
that
a
pb
could
happen
because
in
some
ways
it
gets
at
the
same
thing,
it
provides
a
different
way
for
people
to
actually
engage
and
participate
in
a
local
government.
D
So
I
think
it's
it's
a
good
investment
and.
A
D
E
A
You
want,
I
do
want
to
know
to
count
to
remember.
E
A
G
A
Of
that
is
open.
I
would
wonder
what
do
you
think,
so
I
I
think
the
direction
is
going
to.
We
want
to
do
the
two
million
you
know
in
one
year.
But
what
do
you
think
the
timeline
you
know
if
we
were
at
the.
A
Process
here
you
know:
if
we
want,
what
do
you
think
the
timeline?
How
long
do
you
think
it
takes
to
go
from
where.
E
A
Now,
to
actually
having
folks
begin
to
vote
on
a
pb
on
pb
proposals.
C
People
vote
in
the
winter
months,
but
it's
much
better
to
do
voting
when
it's
warmer,
especially
if
you
want
to
do
if
you
want
to,
like
I
heard
councilman
burns
talking
about
doing
voting
and
pop-up
like
pop-up
voting,
is
much
more
successful
when
it's
warmer,
you
know,
and
you
can,
you
know,
really
leverage
events
that
the
city
already
has
going
on
for
other
things,
so
that
you're,
it's
not
everything
has
to
be
a
pb
only
event
too
right,
so
lots
of
and
you
the
city,
does
so
many
other
great
things.
A
D
I
think
summer
summer
voting
is,
is
what
I
would
support.
F
If
we're
looking
at
voting
this
summer,
then,
like
that's,
a
fairly
limited
time
frame
to
actually
get
projects
on
the
ballot,
so
I'd
like
to
talk
about
what
that
process
looks
like
and
whether
these
projects
are
generated
by
individuals
in
the
community
generated
by
institutions
in
the
community
or
or
coming
coming
from
the
city
or
some
combination
thereof.
F
A
F
A
For
a
discussion
in
and
of
itself,
but
I
think
generally
you
know
my
idea
would
be
that
we
allow
you
know
whatever.
E
A
Come
up
and
there's
typically
in
this
process,
a
feasibility
study,
you
know,
there's
you
know
an
assessment
from
staff
or
from
citizen
panels
or
you
know.
However,
again,
however,
we
designed
this
as
I
would
assess
the
feasibility
and
and
kind
of
move
projects
along,
and
so
I
think
it
could
be
as
low
as
100
or
it
could
be
as
high.
As
you
know,
a
million
dollars,
depending
on
our
guidelines.
F
Yeah
well,
let's
just
keep
in
mind
if
we're
accepting
projects
as
low
as
100,
we
could
have
500
projects
that
come
in,
and
you
know
the
staff
time
to
evaluate
those
projects,
and
you
know
verify
that
there
are
for
compliance
and
to
handle
the
reporting
pay
for
working
all
that
overhead
stuff.
You
know
it's,
it
may
make
sense
to
have
a
higher
bar
than
a
hundred
dollars.
D
Yeah,
I
think
it's
it's
what
say
we're
in
the
weeds.
I
think
it's
a
good
question
for
the
next
next
step,
which
is
probably
the
advisory
committee
and
working
groups
and
all
that.
But
that's
a
good
question,
though.
A
I
have
today
I
understand,
but
what
I
think
it
does
again
back
to
you
know
what
we're
discussing
here
today.
It
leads
us
to
maybe
saying
again
that
it
makes
sense
for
us
to
have
a
partner
who.
E
A
Experience
in
in
doing.
E
E
A
Looking
to
do
it
this
summer,
you
to
help
us
very
quickly
assess
assess
those
that
kind
of
that
kind
of
stuff.
D
Yeah
I
mean,
and
so
before
the
call
councilman
region
I
talked
about.
Is
this
money,
the
money
we
need
for
this
program?
It
will
likely
come
out
of
what
has
been.
D
So
the
money's
there,
so
it's
really
just
you
know,
I
don't
know
how
this
is
gonna
work,
but
bringing
a
recommendation
to
full
council
to
to
vote
on
at
some
point,
but
I'm
definitely
behind
everything.
I've
heard
today.
Obviously
we
have
to
figure
out
who
the
partner
is
and-
and
I
think,
if
we're
gonna
do
it,
we
should
do
it
right.
We
should
do
it
with
tech.
D
You
know
I'm
a
you
know
political
consultant
and
organizer,
and
I
can
tell
you
it
is
a
lot
easier
to
do
these
things
with
technology
to
support
it,
and
I
would
not
want
to
do
this
any
other
way.
I
think
it'll
be
a
really
good
investment
and
again,
I
do
think,
there's
a
role
for
pb
and
evanston
on
a
permanent
basis.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
councilmember,
there's
any
further
discussion
on
this
from
the
committee.
A
Okay,
I
have
one
last
question:
is
it
common?
I
I
do
remember
now.
You
sparked
my
memory
earlier
about
facilitators.
Are
facilitators
typically
compensated.
C
The
way
that
we
we've
typically
done,
it
has
tried
to
build
capacity
in
the
community
and
so
how?
If
you're
going
to
have
residents,
be
the
ones
who
create
the
project
proposals
we
train
them
or
or
you
know,
their
volunteer
leaders
from
the
advisory
committee
or
and
then
they
get
specialized
training
and
they
can
suggest
ideas
for
project
proposals,
but
they
can't
like
champion
them.
A
I
I
guess
we're
looking
at
a
a
cost
of
somewhere
between.
You
know,
what's
being
kind
of
wide
here,
you
know
somewhere
from
100.
You
know
you
know
as
low
as
you
know,
50,
maybe
as
high
as
you
know,
150
000.
You
know
to
implement
this,
particularly
in
an
expedient
time
frame.
A
If
we're
looking
to
get
this,
you
know
done
and
and
have
people
voting,
you
know
in
the
fall
or
you
know
over
the
summer
late
summer,
so
I
guess,
does
this
committee
believe
that
we
should
instruct
staff
to
issue
an
rfq
for
a
partner,
the
pb
partner.
G
I
would
I
would
really
like
to
do
that,
because
I
think
it'd
be
important
to
see
what
we
got,
but
I
just
want
to
caution
that
we're
very
time
sensitive
and
we're
not
obviously
looking
at
a
lot
of
options
that
exist
anyhow.
So
I
think
we
might
want
to
ask
ourselves
the
question
whether
it's
sole
source
procurement
situation.
A
I
I
would
I
not
against
that
idea
at
all,
so
I
guess
I'll
open
up
open
that
up
to
the
committee.
How
do
folks
feel
about
that.
D
That
was
going
to
be
my
very
thought
one.
I
I
don't,
and
this
is
a
question
for
taylor,
how
many
partners
yeah
so
yeah.
I
agree.
I
think
we
should
just
you
know,
I'd
love
to
hear
who
tara
would
recommend,
but
yeah
just
see
who
that
per
that
organization
is
and
through
a
direct
negotiation
with
them.
C
There's
two
co-directors:
there:
sherry
davis
and
christina
christiana
banks,
they're
an
organization
that
they've
done
this
work.
They've
got
the
experience.
They've
got
the
expertise
for
sure
they
they
would
come
their.
The
first
name
that
comes
off
the
top
of
my
head.
B
Thanks,
I
just
also
wanted
to
mention
maybe
to
his
being
modest,
but
I
think
the
great
cities
institute
could
also
be
a
potential
partner.
Maybe
there's
a
reason
that
that
hasn't
come
up,
but
I
think
that
they
could
do
the
job
and
they
have
experience
doing
it
in
this
area.
C
I'd
have
to
take
a
take,
a
look
at
that
and
I'd
have
to
consult
with
my
my
director
for
a
couple
of
reasons.
We've
got
a
couple
pending
new
pending
contracts,
especially
if
we're
looking
at
a
a
june
of
this
year
timeline
if
it
was
a
june
of
next
year
timeline
that
might
be
a
little
a
little
different,
but
I
I'd
have
to
get
back
to
you.
A
A
Okay,
so
I
think
it
is
the
direction
of
this.
A
A
Project
and
if
there's
another
favorite
organization
we
think
of
and
you.
A
Capacity
if
usc
does
not
have
capacity,
then
we'll
go
to
the
pb
participatory
budgeting
project
and
maybe
a
third.
A
Makes
sense
so
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
formalize
that
in
a
motion
to
instruct
staff
to
or
if
we
feel
that
just
direction
is
solid
enough
and
we've
also
lost
house
number
burns.
F
I
become
consensus
of
the
committee.
A
A
All
right,
well,
I've
seen
no
further
questions
for
taya.
I
want
to
thank
you
very
much
for
the
insight
looking
forward
to
receiving.
I
think
you
said
you'd
be
able
to
share
a
few
resources
with
us.
The
the
presentation
we
gave
for
for
councilmember
nusma
can
take
a
look
at
it
and
you
know
maybe
the
press
performs
I
don't
know,
and
so
that's
extremely
helpful.
C
Oh,
thank
you
so
much
for
inviting
me.
It
was
a.
It
was
really.
It
was
an
honor
to
speak
with
all
of
you
today.
I
shared
the
presentation
with
matthew
and
I'll
also
send
along
the
link
to
the
digital
participation
guide,
so
that
you
all
have
that
at
your
fingertips
as
well.
I
don't
know
if
it
would
be
helpful,
but
there's
also
some
research
briefs
on
different
goals
and
findings
around
pb.
If
you're
interested,
I
can
share
those
as
well.
A
Yes,
please,
I
think
this
particular
crew
here
is
the
kind
of
folks
that
enjoy
that
stuff.
Okay,.
C
C
G
A
Oh
jonathan,
we
have
one
more
bit
of
business,
which
is
to
just
set
a
regular
meeting
schedule
for
this
committee
and
I'm
sure
hoping
that
you'd
be
here
for
that
or
that
I'd
be
able
to
text
you
or
reach
out
to
but
ready
here.
So.
A
A
Yeah
yeah,
so
generally
it's
thursday
at
one
o'clock
every
other
week
open
for
folks.
A
And
bobby
councilman
burns
we're
deciding
our
tail
was
dismissed
and
we're
deciding
our
regular
meeting
schedule.
F
F
Could
pump
it
back
to
130?
I've
got
a
standing
12
30
thursday
call
that
usually
doesn't
go
more
than
half
an
hour,
but
sometimes
it
does.
E
Yeah,
that's
that's
fine!
For
now
there.
D
A
It
for
1
30
every
other
thursday
matthew
yeah.
I
guess
you
can
get
that
on
the
calendar.
You
know
so
both
we
and
the
community
are
aware
of
this.
I
guess
a
quick
closing
determining
what
what
do
you
all
think
our
next
steps
you
know
next
next
meeting
discussion
should
be,
I
guess,
by.
A
We
may
have
had
some
movement
on
determining
who
our
partner
potential
partner
is
I'd.
Just
love
to
hear
from
you,
where
you
think.
A
I'm
sorry
so
yeah
we
decided
that
directly
engaging
with
a
partner
makes
sense
in.
G
A
Sole
source
of
single
source,
you
know
bid
or
whatever
we
want
to
call
it
was-
was
appropriate.
We
determined
that
the
great
cities
institute
was
an
option,
but
taya
has
to
confirm
whether
they
have
capacity
to
do
something.
A
Frame
this
yeah
story,
budgeting
project
was
another
and
there
may
be
a
third
out
there
that
we
could
engage
with
either
one
of
those
for
some
reason.
F
Then
for
our
next
meeting
I
would
suggest
we
talk
about
application
criteria.
E
A
Well,
I
guess
I
guess
what
maybe
makes
sense
is
at
the
next
meeting.
Hopefully
we
have
a
partner,
a
potential
partner
engaged
and
we
should
maybe
let
them
tell
us
from
their
expertise
what
you
know.
Maybe
they
think
some
of
the
next
steps
should
be
so
maybe
getting
into
the
weeds
a
bit
more
once
we've
located
a
partner
makes
sense.
F
A
A
Committee
or
citizen
committee
that
will
be
you
know
the
the
true
leaders
of
this
maybe
make
sense
as
well
yeah
yeah,
okay,
so
I
think
those
will
be
the
two
discussion
items
for
our
next
meeting
the
next
hour.
I
think
that
that
that
seems
about
right
so.
A
And
I
will
connect
at
some
point
this
week
and
begin
those
conversations.
A
Okay,
just
seeing
no
further.
Is
there
anything
else
from
the
committee
nope?
Okay,
so
you
know
further
business
before
us.
We
are.