►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 3-11-2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right
good
evening,
everybody
and
welcome
to
the
Monday
March
11th
2019
Evanston
City
Council
meeting.
We
have
a
packed
room
here
and
thousands
of
people
watching
from
home.
We
have
I
bet
you
didn't
know,
that's
that's
the
viewership
back
at
home,
we've
got
eight
aldermen
here.
We
also
have
alderman
Rouge
sentences
at
the
National
League
of
Cities
meeting.
Who
is
calling
in
so
she
will
be
in
attendance
here.
A
So
we
have
all
not
an
alderman
here
this
here
this
evening,
I'm
gonna
switch
things
up
just
a
little
at
the
beginning
of
this
meeting
and
I'm,
going
to
ask
the
city
manager
for
announcements
first
and
then
go
to
the
city
clerk
and
then
I'm
going
to
do
mayor,
announcements,
proclamations
and
I
and
I
want
to
say
a
few
things
before
we
get
into
public
comment
in
regards
to
Holly
Clark
right
so,
city
clerk.
Why
don't
we
start
with
you,
since
the
city
manager
is
getting
alderman
roost
Simmons
on
the
line.
B
Not
used
to
going
first
year
so
we
have
elections.
Starting
early
voting
begins
on
Monday
March
18th.
So
you
can
come
here
to
the
Civic
Center
to
vote
for
district
65
school
board,
candidates,
district
202,
Oakland,
Community,
College
Board,
and
for
those
of
you
who
are
in
South
Evanston,
you
can
vote
for
Ridgeville
Park
District.
The
clerk's
office
is
happy
to
announce
that
we're
going
to
have
an
interactive
experience
for
folks
who
come
to
vote.
B
You
know,
small
sampling
of
it
is
out
there
in
the
ante
room,
so
we
hope
folks
will
enjoy
coming
to
vote
and
having
a
unique
experience
here
in
Everett
Evans
in
the
Civic
Center
we're
looking
to
increase
voter
participation
in
school
board
elections,
which
tend
to
be
the
lowest
voter
turnout
elections
we
have.
But
for
those
of
you
who
are
concerned
about
your
property
taxes,
the
school
board,
the
various
school
board
represent
about
70%
of
your
property
taxes.
Well,
the
the
city
represents
about
17%
speaking
of
Elections.
B
We
all
of
us
know
that
we
had
a
bit
of
confusion
with
our
elections
when
we
were
running
with
the
filing
deadlines,
and
so
the
clerk's
office
has
been
working
diligently
to
solve
that
issue
and
we
are
hoping
to
make
a
presentation
to
the
Rules
Committee
at
the
next
Rules
Committee.
Regarding
that,
so
we're
looking
for
a
reference
to
the
Rules
Committee.
So
we
can
tackle
our
election
issues
well
before
our
election.
A
Comes
up
all
right,
I
think
everybody
up
here
is
on
board.
With
that
clerk
Rita
have
you
been
coordinate
because
I
know
at
the
Rules
Committee
meeting
we
also
test
our
legal
department
to
work
on
this
issue
as
well.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
both
offices,
so
can
we
do
about
this
Kim
just
to
be
efficient
and
everything
else
can
we
just
coordinate
and
make
sure
your
presentation
and
and
the
law
departments
is
the
same
evening
for
the
real
great.
A
B
A
Don't
want
you
to
miss
the
vote
and
then
the
day
of
is
Tuesday
April,
2nd
correct.
That
is
correct,
excellent,
all
right
city
manager.
Do
you
have
any
announcements
tonight?
Okay,
all
right!
So
mayor
announcements
today
got
a
few
things.
First
off
a
big
thank
you
to
the
Evanston
Chamber
of
Commerce
for
hosting
the
mayor's
state
of
the
city
address
which
we
had
last
Friday.
A
A
Nonetheless,
there
is
still
too
much
violence
here.
In
Evanston
we
did
have
Chicago
man
a
33
year
old
Chicago
man
shot
and
killed
here
in
Evanston
on
Friday
on
Friday
evening
in
the
1823
to
1827
Simpson
block
chief
cook
chief
cook
is
here
and
I
spoke
with
the
the
chief
I
know.
The
alderman
aldermen
did
as
well
alderman
Ruth
Simmons
and
the
north
regional
crimes.
Major
Crimes,
Task
Force,
has
been
established
as
investigating
this.
This
horrific
crimes
are
our
thoughts
and
prayers
with
the
family
of
this
Chicago
man
who
was
killed
here
recently.
A
As
a
lot
of
people
know,
this
is
the
month
of
women.
I
think
every
month
should
be
of
women,
but
this
particular
month
we're
celebrating
you
know
women
achievements
and
we
have
a
proclamation
celebrating
women
in
public
office,
and
so,
whereas
the
month
of
March
is
Women's
History
Month
celebrating
the
significant
achievements
and
contributions,
women
of
all
races,
ethnicities
and
backgrounds
have
made
in
the
world
and
whereas
women
playing
a
central
role
and
the
life,
vitality
and
diversity
of
our
communities
and
are
essential
to
ensuring
the
city
of
Evanston
is
well
represented
at
all
levels.
A
Government
wear
as
well.
The
20th
century
was
a
pivotal
time
of
growth
for
women
entering
politics.
Women
remain
underrepresented
in
many
fields,
and
thus
providing
opportunities
to
support.
Women
in
public
office
is
imperative,
whereas
all
five
elected
officials
representing
Evanson
in
the
Illinois
General
Assembly
are
women.
For
the
first
time
ever
and
six
of
the
city's
nine
wards
are
represented
by
women
on
the
Evanston
City
Council.
You
look
right
up
here.
A
Now,
therefore,
I
Stephen,
Howard,
Haggerty,
mayor
of
the
city
of
Evanston,
do
hereby
proclaim
today,
do
hereby
poking
in
March
19th
2019,
as
celebrating
women
in
public
office
today,
and
call
upon
the
people
of
Evanston
to
unite
as
we
support
the
success
of
women
in
public
office
and
observe
every
March
19th
with
appropriate
activities,
events
and
programs.
This
city
is
truly
a
leader
when
it
comes
to
women
in
leadership
positions
in
our
in
our
elected
government
and
and
I.
A
And
I
know
we
have
lots
of
lots
of
head-scratching
always
going
on
about
okay,
these
older
people.
Are
they
older
men?
Are
they
older
women
in
light
of
this
Proclamation?
If
you
want
to
get
up
tonight
all
night
and
just
say
all
the
women
to
any
of
us,
including
the
men
up
here,
you
can
do
that
all
right,
thereby
I
proclaim
that
if,
with
all
the
powers
vested
in
me
as
the
mayor
of
our
fine
city,
I
have
a
another
Proclamation
I'm
not
going
to
read
all
of
it
on
this
one.
A
A
Colon
cancer
is
the
second
leading
cause
of
cancer
among
men
and
women
in
the
United
States
one
in
20
men
in
one
in
24,
women
will
be
diagnosed
with
colon
cancer
in
their
lifetimes.
There
are
now
more
than
1
million
survivors
of
colon
cancer.
Here
in
the
United
States.
The
national
goal
established
by
the
national
colon
cancer
round
tables
80%
of
americans
ages,
50
and
older,
be
screened
in
every
community.
A
In
observing
this
month
provides
a
special
opportunity
to
offer
education
on
the
importance
of
early
detection
and
screening,
so
I
am
declared
declaring
this
colon
cancer
Month
and
I
would
ask
Matt
Rogers
to
come
up.
I
want
to
present
this
to
Matt
and
I'd.
Ask
Matt
to
say
a
couple
words
as
someone
who
is
dealing
with
colon
cancer.
D
Thank
You
Mary
Hegarty.
This
is
something
that
I
never
thought
I'd
be
speaking
about,
but
last
August
I
was
diagnosed
with
stage.
3
colorectal
cancer
and
I'd
have
undergone
chemotherapy.
Radiation
have
had
surgery
and
I'm
now
going
through.
My
second
round
of
chemo
sounds
like
a
lot,
but
the
beautiful
thing
about
colon
cancer
is
when
it's
caught
early,
it
is
100%
able
to
be
taken.
Care
of
my
prognosis
is
very
good.
We
expect
when
May
rolls
around
that
I
will
be
100%
cancer-free
and
then
I
don't
have
to
worry
too
much
about
it.
D
D
So
early
detection
is
the
key
I
know
it's
not
a
pleasant
experience
to
prepare
for
a
colonoscopy.
I've
done
it
a
couple
times
now,
but
it
is
something
that
can
save
your
life
and
so
I
just
am
taking
this
opportunity
to
speak
out
and
encourage
everyone
to
get
screened.
Talk
to
your
doctor
about
your
risk
factors
and
make
sure
that
you
spread
the
word
to
your
friends,
families,
loved
ones,
because
it's
easy
to
take
care
of
when
it's
caught
early,
and
so
that's
kind
of
my
mission
now
is
to
educate
people
about
that.
A
Some
thoughts
that
I
have
with
the
council
in
regards
to
Hart
in
regards
to
Harley
Clarke
I've
spent
a
lot
of
time,
obviously
working
on
this
issue
over
the
years
as
the
chair
of
the
Harley
Clarke
Advisory
Council
in
meetings
with
lots
of
groups
and
folks
that
are
represented
here
today.
I'm
sorry
that
you
have
to
see.
A
Okay,
so
real
real,
quick!
The
question
is
you
know
what
do
we
do
with
this
beautiful
mansion
on
the
lakefront
I
will
say
this
is
one
of
the
most
beautiful
pictures.
I
have
ever
seen
the
heart
of
the
Harley
Clarke
mansion
and
credit
goes
they're
friends
of
Harley
Clarke
for
taking
that
and
I
think
that
was
taken
during
the
polar
vortex.
A
All
right,
where
have
we
been
I'm,
gonna
try
to
go
through
this
really
quickly.
I
think
everybody
knows,
but
I
want
folks
again
at
home,
anyplace
else,
we've
been
through
four
different
options.
All
of
those
options
have
been
rejected.
There
was
the
private
option.
With
a
Pritzker
boot
boutique
hotel
failed.
Six
to
three.
There
was
the
Illinois
Department
of
Natural
Resources
command.
A
Ultimately,
the
state
would
drew
from
that
saying
they
didn't
have
any
money
which
does
seem
to
be
true.
The
state
doesn't
have
much
money.
That's
a
big
challenge
here
in
Illinois.
The
other
was
the
lake
house
garden
proposal
that
failed
seven
to
two.
That
was
when
the
City
Council
moved
forward
for
a
non-profit
solution.
A
It
was
the
only
proposal
that
was
submitted,
and
then
we
went
through
a
whole
discussion
in
the
last
year
about
whether
we
salvaged
and
demolished
the
mansion,
initially
thinking
that
that
was
an
avenue
to
go
down
and
then,
ultimately,
after
a
citizen
referendum,
changing
that
what
had
been
the
problems.
Okay-
and
these
are
the
problems
again
in
my
in
my
eyes
as
somebody
who's
followed
this
really
closely.
There
is
no
community
consensus
and,
let
me
be
clear:
I
don't
think
there
will
ever
be
community
complete
community
consensus
on
what
to
do
with
the
Harley
Clark.
A
Nonetheless,
the
issue
has
been
around
for
a
while
and
we
need
to
set
a
path
forward
and
hopefully
reach
a
resolution
and
and
move
on
to
other
important
issues.
There's
been
insufficient
time
to
assess
the
property
I,
don't
think
we
have
ever
given
adequate
time.
This
is
a
20,000
square,
foot
building
and
the
first
time
around
the
Pritzker
team
and
others
get
six
hours
to
go
through
that
through
that
building.
That
was
something
I
found
out
when
I
chaired
the
committee
and
I
was
quite
surprised
by
that.
A
We
didn't
give
that
much
time
for
the
other
group
to
go
through
there.
I
think
that
that's
a
that's
a
real
process
issue
I
think
there
was
an
insufficient
amount
of
time
given
for
the
last
RFP
in
the
two
months.
I
wasn't
surprised
that
there's
only
one
proposal,
I,
don't
really
feel
like
we've
tested
the
market
out
there
I
think
to
do
so.
A
You
need
to
offer
a
much
longer
period
of
time
to
submit
the
proposals
and,
lastly,
there's
been
a
tremendous
amount
of
distrust
sort
of
an
in
civility
that
has
built
up
over
time
in
regards
to
her
in
regards
to
Harley
Clark
I
think
it's
making
it
challenging
for
us
to
move
forward
when
there's
a
lot
when
there's
a
lack
of
trust
when
things
have
been
said,
very
sort
of
unkind,
things
about
lots
and
lots
of
people
with
their
elected
officials
or
other
people
that
create
a
more
challenging
environment
for
us.
What
does
the
community
want?
A
Okay,
now,
if
we
look
at
the
community
in
terms
of
the
elected
body,
the
community,
you
know
based
on
City
Council
votes,
I,
couldn't
tell
you
what
the
community
and
what
the
community
wants
other
than
we've
rejected
everything
if
we
base
it
based
on
this
referendum.
You
know,
80%
of
the
voters
said
and
we're
all
familiar
with
the
referendum.
So
I'm
not
gonna
I'm
not
going
to
read
that
all
right.
But
what
does
the
community
want?
According
to
the
referendum,
they
want
a
mansion,
that's
preserved,
including
all
the
buildings
in
the
gardens
they
want.
A
Public
access
and
use
of
the
mansion
they
want
a
use
consistent
with
the
lakefront
master
plan
and
they
want
minimal
or
no
public
taxpayer.
Money
use
I.
Think
there's
there's
a
pretty
consistent
opinion
that
we
don't
have
any
public
money
to
use
towards
this
mansion.
Nor
does
anyone
want
to
use
any
towards
this
mansion.
What
does
the
community
want?
Logically,
you
carry
this
all
forward.
They
don't
want
private
investment,
they
don't
want
it
to
be
sold.
They
don't
want
City
money
in
the
mansion.
They
don't
want
it
to
be
demolished.
A
They
don't
want
commercial
use,
as
it
needs
to
be
consistent
with
the
lakefront
master
plan.
Those
problems,
in
my
opinion,
created
by
a
strict
interpret,
interpret
ation
of
their
of
the
referendum.
No
one's
going
to
invest
in
a
mansion
unless
they
own
the
building
I
feel
very
very
strongly
about
that.
You
are
not
going
to
get
somebody
that's
going
to
put
5
million
or
10
million
bucks
into
that
mansion.
If
you
say
that
is
still
City
property
I
think
the
city
can
lease
the
land
under
the
mansion.
That's
common.
A
It
exists
in
many
in
many
places,
but
if
you're
not
giving
somebody
a
long-term
lease
to
that
building,
it's
unlikely
that
you're
going
to
find
anyone
willing
to
put
that
in
no
commercial
use
to
remain
compliant
to
the
lakefront
and
the
master
plan
means
restricted
revenue
opportunities.
You
know,
restaurant
events
face,
you
know
very,
very
limited
use
of
that.
No
private
investment
in
the
mansion,
as
it
would
at
best
be
quasi
public
and
not
limit
not
completely
accessible
and
usable
by
the
public.
Again
I
think
you
can
interpret
the
referendum
in
different
in
different
ways.
A
My
suggestion
for
moving
forward
accept
the
general
premise
that
residents
want
us,
the
City
Council
and
myself
and
others
to
work
harder
to
save
the
mansion.
Don't
strictly
interpret
the
referendum.
There
will
be
people
that
get
up
and
say
you
need
to
strictly
interpret
this
referendum.
Honestly,
there
was
probably
four
or
five
different
elements
in
that
I
couldn't
tell
you
that
everybody
that
voted
for
this
referendum
voted
for
all
of
the
you
know.
All
of
those
elements
may
have
been.
A
They
just
wanted
you
to
try
harder
to
save
the
mansion
or
may
have
been
that
it
was
because
there
was
limited
and
no
tax
dollars
or
it
may
have
been
because
they
wanted
public.
You
know
access
and
use
to
the
mansion,
I,
don't
know
and
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
know
unless
we
broke
down
and
did
referendums
all
around
town
on
these
different
things.
Don't
assume
that
every
resident
was
agreeing
with
every
condition
of
the
referendum.
How
do
we
move
forward?
A
My
suggestion
is
that
we
issue
a
new
RFP.
We
set
a
due
date.
That's
18
months
from
the
release
of
the
RFP
I.
Think
there
needs
to
be.
You
know
real
good
work
done
on
this.
Rfp
I
think
the
RFP
itself
almost
needs
to
be
like
a
marketing
package
that
you
might
see
that
comes
out
of
the
real
estate
community
in
terms
of
really
pitching
this
property
and
what
what
it
could
be
or
what
the
potential
uses
are.
A
I
think
a
lot
of
the
work
that
has
been
done
by
community
groups
could
be
appended
to
this
as
different
ideas
that
they
have
set
it
aside
for
private
nonprofit
or
foundations
willing
to
grant
public
use.
Okay,
let
me
be
very,
very
clear:
Lighthouse
Beach
remains
exclusively
public
and
always
will
alright.
Under
no
circumstances
are
we
talking
about
the
sale
of
Lighthouse
Beach,
provide
adequate
time
for
interested
parties
to
assess
the
property.
We
talked
about
that
earlier.
I
think
it's
really
really
important
that
sufficient
time
be
granted
for
anybody.
A
That's
considering
a
submitting
a
bid
on
this.
Have
third
party
hosts
interested
bidders
I.
Think
it's
really
important
during
this
18-month
process
that
potential
bidders
present
their
ideas
to
the
community
for
feedback.
Okay
as
part
of
it
as
part
of
this
process.
The
typical
way
it
works
is
we
issue
an
RFP.
We
collect
the
RFPs
of
the
city
does,
and
then
we
start,
then
then
we
start
this
whole
process,
given
what
we've
been
through
I
think
we
could
all
benefit
by
having
you
know,
potential
bidders
come
forward.
A
We
could
have
a
you
know,
independent
third
party
or
group
here.
That
is
hosting
that
I
think
we
should
establish
a
community
panel,
along
with
the
city
and
a
business
panel,
to
evaluate
the
proposals.
Okay.
This
is
similar
to
if
we
look
at
chief
cooks
right
here
when
chief
cook
was
hired-
and
this
is
something
the
city
manager
does
for
the
fire
chief
and
other
scene
positions
is,
he
will
establish
different
panels?
A
Okay,
so
he'll
have
a
city
panel
they'll
have
a
peer
panel,
which
is
other
police
chiefs
in
the
case
of
chief
cook
in
the
area
who
will
come
in
and
evaluate
the
candidates
that
are
applying
for
our
job
and
then
he
will
have
a
community
panel
of
community
representatives
I'm
suggesting
something
similar
here.
My
suggestion
would
be
that
the
City
Council
members
recommend
people
in
the
community
that
would
serve
on
those
panels
and
that
the
mayor
would
ultimately
select
the
six
people
or
eight
people
whatever's
on
the
community
panel
I'd
suggest.
A
We
also
have
a
business
panel
and
in
a
city
technical
panel,
on
that
the
information
that's
gathered
from
those
panels
and
the
recommendations
from
those
panels
would
then
be
presented
to
the
City
Council
for
their
consideration.
Discussion
and
ultimately
decision
okay,
if
there
are
no
acceptable
private,
nonprofit
or
foundation
proposals
and
in
an
effort
to
continue
to
try
to
save
the
harly
Clark
mansion
from
demolition.
A
I
would
then
propose
that
the
City
Council
consider
issuing
an
RFP
for
private
solutions
again,
lighthouse
beach
would
be
exclusively
public
and
it's
not
part
of
that
we'd
be
talking
about
a
long
term.
Lease
in
this
case
I'd
suggest
that
the
RFP
process
doesn't
need
to
be
18
months,
but
could
be
12
months
again.
A
Community
input
is
obtained
by
prospective
bidders
during
the
RFP
process
and
that's
what
we
just
talked
about,
and
then
proposals
are
a
valuable
evaluated
by
a
community
panel,
business
panel
and
city
technical
panel
and
feedback
provided
to
the
council.
So
these
are
all
process
changes
that
are
done
and
an
adequate
adequate
time.
That's
given,
obviously
this
isn't.
This
is
my
suggestion
for
the
community
to
to
think
about
and
comment
on,
and
certainly
it's
the
City
Council's
decision
on
how
we
move
forward
on
this
on
this
issue.
A
There
are
other
options
you
know
one
is
we
do
nothing.
We
just
allow
this
issue
to
cool
down
before
setting
a
new
process
in
place.
Another
option
is
weary,
zoned
a
single-family
and
we
sell
the
home.
I
mean
again.
These
are
things
that
I've
heard
from
people
that
have
come
and
met
with
me
so
that
that's
where
I'm
getting
here
again,
the
beach
wouldn't
be
sold
that
remains
exclusively
public.
We
could
immediately
sign
this
to
a
legitimate
person
or
organization
with
a
plan.
A
Somebody
comes
forward
right
now,
and
the
city
manager
we'll
talk
in
a
little
bit
after
public
comment
about.
If
people
have
counsel
could
just
pick
somebody
to
say,
okay,
we're
going
to
go
that
route
or
we
could
lobby
the
state
to
try
to
turn
this
into
a
state
park.
That's
another
idea,
that's
been
floated,
you
could
probably
add
a
five
six
and
seven
with
other
suggestions,
and
maybe
people
will
during
public
during
public
comment.
A
Excuse
me
and
then
in
conclusion,
Harley
Clark
and
I
said
this
in
the
state
of
the
city.
The
other
day,
Harley
Clark
does
present
an
opportunity
to
our
city
and
to
to
our
to
our
city.
It
is
going
to
require
smart
planning
and
a
thoughtful
process.
In
my
opinion,
our
job
is
to
reset
the
table
in
a
smart
and
thoughtful
manner
so
that
we
can
ultimately
resolve
this
issue.
A
A
A
B
A
Okay-
okay,
all
right!
So
everybody
we
have
30
speakers
that
are
signed
up
for
public
comments.
So
that's
gonna
mean
that
each
person
gets
a
minute
30
seconds
clerk
reads:
going
to
keep
the
he's.
Gonna
keep
the
timer
on
this.
The
timer
goes
off.
If
it
does,
if
you
haven't
finished
up
before
the
minute
30,
which
would
be
ideal,
then
I'm
gonna,
give
you
a
quick
nudge
and
just
say:
hey
I!
A
Need
you
to
wrap
it
up
in
like
5
or
10
seconds,
so
we've
got
a
lot
of
speakers
tonight
and
and
I
would
like
to
try
to
get
through
this
efficiently.
So
we
can
have
a
good
conversation
about
Harlan
Clark,
as
well
as
other
issues
that
are
before
the
council
this
evening.
The
first
speakers
that
we
have
Mary.
E
My
name
is
Mary
was
in
ski
and
I'm,
actually
stunned
with
the
statement
that
you
just
made
me
or
hair
goatee,
because
eighty
percent
of
the
voters
voted
to
save
and
I
agree
that
there's
a
percentage
of
those
voters
who
maybe
just
wanted
the
mayor
wanted
to
save
the
mansion,
but
I
think.
Undoubtedly
the
majority
of
those
voters
want
to
have
a
space
where
we
can
come
together
as
a
as
a
community
and
I
think
that
you
have
the
ability
to
bring
this
together
and
help
make
that
happen
now.
F
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Neil
gamble:
I'm
the
chairman
of
Mayor
haggerty's,
employer,
Advisory,
Council,
otherwise
known
as
MEAC
data
from
this
Illinois
State
Board
of
Education
shows
about
20%
of
ETH
students
graduate
each
year,
but
do
not
pursue
any
further
education.
20
to
25
percent
of
ETH
grads
each
year
start
higher
education,
but
don't
finish,
this
totals
nearly
half
of
each
graduating
class
of
800.
This
doesn't
even
include
the
kids
from
other
schools
that
are
coming
back
to
Evanston
for
help.
We
got
a
large
number
of
employers
in
Evanston
who
complain.
F
They
can't
find
good
people
for
many
careers
that
they
do
offer
that
don't
require
College
and
I'm
talking
about
careers,
not
jobs.
This
position
is
going
to
work
very
closely
and
very
deeply
with
the
employers
in
this
community
who
really
want
to
work
with
the
high
school
to
develop
programs
starting
from
the
freshman
year.
F
Niak
has
87
members,
39
of
them
are
from
25
employers,
and
some
of
them
here
tonight
and
they've
already
signed
up,
and
we
also
have
people
from
Oakton
local,
not-for-profit
sandy
ths
and
we're
looking
at
this
funding
here
as
seed
money.
To
get
this
thing
rolling
in
a
long-term
sustainable
way,
and
this
position
complements
not
duplicates
woody
ths
local
not-for-profits
and
the
city
programs
too,
and
I
urge
you
to
vote
for
this
and
give
it
a
shot.
Give
us
a
chance.
Thank.
A
G
So
Mary,
Rosinski
and
I
usually
agree
on
many
many
things.
I
interpreted
that
presentation
a
little
bit
differently,
so
mayor,
Haggerty,
I,
will
say
I.
Actually
thank
you
for
your
presentation,
I
interpreted
it
that
you
were
actually
looking
for
community
input
through
this
process.
So
thank
you
for
your
presentation.
I
thought
it
was
lovely.
What
I've
just
handed
all
of
you
is
a
copy
of
that
photograph.
G
Unfortunately,
quick
photos
at
Walgreens,
don't
print
very
beautifully,
so
pay
attention
to
the
one
that
mayor
Haggerty
showed
you
Mayor,
hey
I,
think
you
guys
know
me:
I'm
Jen,
shader,
seventh
Ward
many
many
years
as
old
as
I
am
I've.
Been
there
all
my
life
mayor,
Haggerty
city
manager,
Bob
quits
and
City
Council
members
on
behalf
of
the
Friends
of
Hurley
Clark
I,
want
to
start
by
thanking
you
in
advance
for
the
discussion
you
will
have
tonight
regarding
the
Harley
Clarke
buildings
and
Jen's
Jensen
Gardens.
We
hope
by
opening
the
door
to
more
options.
G
Harley
Clarke
won't
be
viewed
as
a
burden,
but
an
opportunity
set
in
the
middle
of
the
lighthouse
Landing
complex.
We
firmly
believe
that
one
day,
these
city
assets
will
once
again
be
the
pride
of
our
city,
just
as
they
were
when
they
were
first
built
and
we
hope
to
be
involved
in
helping
with
next
steps.
We
think
mayor
Haggerty
said
it
best
at
his
State
of
the
City
address
last
week
when
he
said
I
want
an
adaptive,
functional
reuse
of
Harley
Clark
that
creates
a
special
place
for
residents
and
visitors
alike.
G
But
in
order
to
get
that
we
have
to
be
more
thoughtful
and
thorough,
we
have
to
have
a
more
thoughtful
and
thorough
process.
We
couldn't
agree
more.
So
many
people
in
groups
have
showed
continued
interest
and
commitment
to
this
issue.
We
have
heard
the
people
80%
of
whom
have
participated
in
the
referendum.
We've
heard
the
council
who
voted
not
to
demolish.
We
have
heard
the
mayor,
and
importantly,
we
have
heard
alderman
Wilson
about
compromise.
Now
is
the
time
for
everyone
to
work
together.
G
We
look
forward
and
hope
to
have
the
opportunity
to
work
with
the
city,
the
experts
at
landmarks,
Illinois
and
the
people
we're
willing
to
provide
the
brainpower
and
manpower
and
to
do
the
homework
and
legwork
necessary
to
find
a
sustainable
solution.
Perhaps
a
private
public
partnership
that
is
equitable
for
all.
Some
of
the
original
founders
of
safe
Harley
Clark
have,
since
moved
forward
form
the
strategic
professional
board
of
friends
of
Harley
Clark
in
hopes
of
supporting
the
city
and
the
property
as
the
process
moves
forward
with
supportive
funding.
G
In
parallel
to
the
process
which
you
are
discussing
tonight.
Among
other
things,
utilizing
the
Friends
of
Harley
Clark
professional
advisory
board,
we'd
like
to
be
able
to
assist
in
the
technical
aspects,
strategic
partnerships
and
fundraising
efforts
for
renovation
and
restoration
of
the
buildings
and
gardens.
We
also
bring
to
the
table
and
exist
an
existing
adaptive,
reuse
committee,
experts,
donations,
enthusiasm,
media
attention
and
unbridled
commitment
short
term.
G
In
fact,
interest
in
support
of
our
effort
comes
from
people
in
dozens
of
states
in
at
least
two
countries.
We
believe
that
in
alignment
with
the
city
will
strengthen
that
network
and
enhance
interest
in
this
beloved
landmark.
At
this
point,
we
believe
safe,
Harley
Clark
will
stay
active
in
alignment
with
the
Harley
Clark
community
group,
who
have
been
hosting
the
community
conversations.
G
We
look
forward
to
those
groups
sharing
their
learnings
with
both
friends
and
the
city,
and
we
all
agree
that
people
from
all
wards
of
all
backgrounds,
ages
abilities
who
may
not
previously
have
who
may
not
have
previously
accessed
Harley
Clark,
be
represented
in
the
process
and
will
ultimately
enjoy
this
jewel
on
the
lakefront,
an
avid
stone.
Finally,
we
look
forward
to
your
leadership
and
building
Harley
Park
into
an
incredible
attitude,
an
asset
and
look
forward
to
the
opportunity
to
partner
with
you
throughout
this
process.
Thank
you.
Alright,.
A
A
I
A
B
H
Thank
you,
Mary!
Thank
you,
City
Council
and
city
clerk
and
city
manager,
Dan
coin
from
the
Ninth
Ward
and
last
time
I
spoke
I
made
the
claim
that
the
Ninth
Ward
is
the
coolest
and
I
did
some
research
since
then,
and
actually
interviewed
my
immediate
neighbors
and
we
have
consensus.
A
hundred
percent
of
us
agree.
It
is
the
ninth
ward.
Just
want
you
to
know
that
I
do
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
our
voters.
H
We
have
a
couple
candidate
forums,
this
Wednesday
and
next
Wednesday
and
I
think
it's
imperative
that
we
take
a
look
at
the
candidates.
There
are
wanting
to
serve
our
community,
especially
our
school
districts,
because
I
believe
that
our
youth
are
our
best
investment
in
our
community
period
and
I.
Think
it's
a
neurosis
that
if
only
10
or
10
20
percent
of
our
registered
voters
actually
vote
so
I'm.
Just
calling
all
voters
and
evanston
to
please
pay
attention
and
please
vote,
there's
an
opportunity.
Wednesday.
H
J
Good
evening
so
I
have
a
letter
here,
written
by
Pete,
Davis
assistant,
superintendent
of
curriculum
and
instruction.
So
dear
city
council,
we
can
all
agree
that
all
students
should
graduate
from
e
th
s
with
the
skills
necessary
to
pursue
a
path
that
leads
to
a
successful
career
and
life.
Part
of
the
work
is
building
viable
career
pathways
for
students
directly
and
entering
the
workforce
from
high
school.
That's
what
makes
the
mayor's
employer
Advisory
Council
and
the
new
Youth
job
center
Career
Partnership
Manager
position
a
game-changer
e
th
s,
five-year
graduation
rate
is
95
percent.
J
J
While
we
are
ahead
of
the
national
percentage
for
students
graduating
from
college,
we
know
that
some
students
start
and
then
leave
college
for
a
variety
of
reasons.
This
all
goes
to
importance
of
having
viable
career
opportunities
here
in
Evanston
and
the
infrastructure
to
connect
to
connect
the
supply
of
18
to
24
year
olds
to
local
demand
for
employees.
J
Do
our
work
with
MEAC
e
THS
administrators
participate
in
a
series
of
employer
visits
during
the
summer
and
fall
each
of
these
visits
broaden
our
view
of
what
is
up
available
to
students
seeking
a
career
right
out
of
high
school.
More
importantly,
there
are
career
opportunities
right
now
in
Evanston.
That's
why?
Having
funds
earmarked
for
the
elevate,
Evanston
initiative
to
fund
a
new
youth,
Job,
Center
career
partnership
manager
position
is
so
important.
J
We
need
to
accelerate
this
work
to
meet
the
needs
of
today's
18
to
24-year
olds
who
have
who
live
in
Evanston
and
do
not
possess
post-secondary
degrees.
We
need
to
move
from
talking
about
and
building
pathways
to
careers,
to
placing
recent
graduates
into
these
established
local
career
pathways
through
this
curriculum
and
course
offerings.
Each
EHS
has
internal
structures
in
place
to
support
the
pipeline.
J
What
we
do
not
have
is
an
external
bridge
to
employers
that
is
a
workforce
development
issue
and
requires
employer
and
community
participation
et
HS
does
not
receive
workforce
development
or
career
placement
funding.
The
youth,
Job
Center
career
partnership
manager
position
is
mission,
critical
for
adults,
ages,
18
to
24
to
access
the
pathways
being
developed
by
the
mayor's
employer,
Advisory
Council,
sincerely
Pete
Davis.
Thank
you.
I
think.
K
A
L
This
role
is
a
yjc
employee,
but
it
represents
a
strengthened
partnership
between
the
yjc,
the
city
of
Evanston
et
HS,
as
you
just
heard,
the
employers,
some
of
whom
are
in
the
room
and
nonprofit
partners
who
are
working
in
collaboration
with
each
other
and
really
working
to
ensure
that
we
are
not
duplicating
services
and
making
things
complimentary.
This
person
will
work
with
the
employers
who
MEAC,
as
you
heard,
to
reduce
barriers
that
exist
in
moving
into
the
workforce
in
in
and
into
local
career
opportunities,
as
they
mentioned,
not
just
into
jobs
and
actual
careers.
L
These
employers
are
eager
to
hire
young
people,
retain
them,
develop
them,
keep
them
and
grow
them
into
these
careers.
But
many
of
these
young
people
just
don't
know
about
these
options,
and
the
connections
have
not
been
made
previously.
So
this
role
will
focus
on
three
things:
helping
ETH
s,
students
and
recent
graduates
up
to
age.
25
know
all
of
their
career
options
and
make
choices
based
upon
their
individual
needs
and
interests
versus
what
others
think
might
be
best
for
them.
They'll
also
help
them
find
support
when
they
need
it
or
want
it.
L
So,
returning
alumni,
who
have
maybe
dropped
out
of
college
and
need
some
support,
can
be
referred
to
agencies
and
also
working
with
employers
to
implement
some
of
the
best
practices
around
hiring.
How
you
support,
how
you
provide
orientation
and
continue
to
grow
employees
into
careers.
Too
often,
our
nonprofits,
providing
direct
services
are
focused
on
addressing
challenges
that
really
shouldn't
exist
in
the
first
place.
Our
agencies
really
need
to
move
into
thinking
about
the
systemic
barriers,
how
we
address
them
and
how
we
mitigate
them.
L
Otherwise,
we
will
always
be
trying
to
solve
a
problem
that
shouldn't
have
existed
in
the
first
place,
and
this
actually
gives
us
a
chance
to
solve
one
of
those
problems
that
shouldn't
exist.
We're
asking
you
to
support
an
effort
focused
on
prevention,
building
upon
what
exists.
It's
complimentary
to
the
services
that
are
currently
happening,
not
duplicating
efforts
in
this
work.
Our
high
school
leadership
team
wants
it.
Employers
want
it.
Nonprofits
wanted
most
of
all
the
young
people
want.
It
I
encourage
you
to
build
equitable
opportunities
for
all
young
people
in
evanston.
By
supporting
this.
M
You
thank
you
all
for
the
opportunity
speak
with
you
as
I
also
share
my
passion
for
the
mirror's
employee,
Advisory
Council
I'm,
a
member
I'm
part
of
the
community
I'm
born
and
raised
in
Evanston
and
traveling
throughout
my
world
in
the
corporate
world.
We
find
now
that
it's
very
difficult
to
get
corporations
together
to
do
anything
and
when
you
can
get
25
to
30
businesses
together
to
look
out
for
the
interest
of
our
our
students
in
our
community.
That's
an
admirable
point
to
take
I'm
simply
here,
because
I
am
from
Evanston
and
everything
I
attend.
M
I'm
doing
is
to
benefit
our
community
intellect
for
you
to
strongly
consider
an
opportunity
for
us
to
move
forward
as
a
community
to
provide
an
additional
source
for
our
students,
as
this
is
also
going
to
allow
them
a
national
reach.
Most
of
the
corporations
that
are
here
have
a
national
reach
and
that's
also
going
to
help
students
if
they
choose
to
move
to
another
state.
They'll
have
a
resource
to
utilize.
Here
then
evidence
then,
will
be
known
for
that
being
able
to
help
our
students
and
our
residents
throughout
the
country,
which
is
unique.
M
In
my
experience
and
again,
it's
generational
we're
not
only
providing
jobs
were
providing
careers
and
with
the
guidance
and
the
soft
handoff
from
the
school
to
corporations
there'll
be
the
intent
of
a
long
term
relationship
which
corporations
will
appreciate
that,
hopefully,
in
turn
will
draw
people
to
Evanston
because
ever
since
cultivating
a
workforce
hand-in-hand
with
the
community.
So
thank
you,
okay.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
Of
people
don't
know,
Brian,
Brown
and
I
are
brothers
from
another
mother,
Kevin
Brown,
Ninth
Ward
I'm
here
as
a
staff
member
who
represents
the
youth
and
young
adult
division
for
the
city
of
Evanston
and
in
2012,
with
the
encouragement
of
the
City
Council.
At
that
time,
youth
and
young
adult
division
began
making
connections
with
our
workforce
infrastructure,
the
Chicago
Cook
workforce
partnership,
it's
supporting
satellites
at
Howard,
Area,
Community,
Center,
national
able
network,
the
youth,
Job
Center
of
Evanston
and
other
workforce
development,
community-based
programs
and
agencies.
I
And
at
that
time
we
worked
with
former
Evanston
youth
initiative
members.
You
may
remember
them,
along
with
the
Evanston
150,
which
a
lot
of
us
have
forgotten
about,
but
they
had
a
committee
focusing
in
focusing
upon
opportunity
youth
to
highlight
the
need
for
additional
opportunities
for
those
in
the
16
to
24
age
group
and
at
the
city
we
started
to
build
a
supportive
infrastructure
of
Workforce,
Development
and
Family
Services.
I
That
would
address
the
community
concerns
and
focus
upon
workforce
development
and
training,
health
care,
transportation,
alternative
recreation,
civic
engagement
and
other
supportive
services
and
the
infrastructure
included.
Expanding
the
mayor's
Summer
Youth
Employment
Program
and
creating
best
practice,
workforce
training
initiatives
like
the
city
of
Evanston,
youth,
Job,
Center,
building
career
pathways
to
sustainable
employment
program.
I
A
N
Evening,
mayor
Haggerty,
council
members
in
Clark
Reed,
my
name
is
Darlene
Cannon
I'm
here
to
represent
the
highlight
our
Community
Engagement
community.
As
you
know,
we've
had
several
meetings
with
hundreds
of
Everson
citizens
that
participated
from
all
wards
and
that
we
are
busy
planning
our
next
meeting,
which
will
be
held
in
the
parasol
room
here
at
the
Civic
Center
on
Thursday
April
4th
from
6:30
to
8:30,
and
we
wanted
to
encourage
the
City
Council
members
to
attend.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
O
Hi
mr.
Wittenberg
fifth
Ward
so
I'm
here
to
speak
tonight
on
behalf
of
many
residents
who
are
concerned
about
the
city's
compliance
to
4u
laws.
So
a
group
of
us
started
by
submitting
a
FOIA
request
asking
how
many
four
year
requests
were
denied
last
year
in
full
or
in
part
by
the
law
department
before
being
forwarded
to
the
FOIA
officer
or
one
of
his
designee,
and
how
many
of
those
denials
from
the
law
department
failed
to
disclose
that
it
was
lost
after
sponsible
for
the
denial.
O
So
the
answer
was
40%
40%
of
hundreds
of
records
actually
more
than
a
thousand
almost
1300
records,
so
under
Evanston
Illinois
law,
only
the
city's
designated
for
a
officer.
So
in
this
case
its
clerk
Reed
is
authorized
to
receive
process
and
grant
requests
for
public
records.
Section
nine
of
Illinois
FOIA
law
states,
each
public
body,
denying
a
record
for
public
for
public
records
shall
notify
the
requester
in
writing
of
the
names
and
the
titles
or
positions
of
each
person
responsible
for
the
denial.
O
So
I
went
to
the
clerk's
office
and
I
spoke
to
basically
everyone
there
on
staff
and
they
know
that
records
are
being
unlawfully
denied.
They
can't
release
the
records
in
these
cases
because
the
law
department
is
withholding
the
records
from
the
clerk,
so
172
G
of
Evanston
city
code
reads:
the
city
clerk
shall
be
the
custodian
and
keeper
of
all
the
books,
records,
ordinances
and
papers
of
the
city.
O
So
then
we
looked
into
the
basis
provided
in
these
denials
section
1.2
of
State
for
Yale
Law
reads:
all
records
in
the
custody
or
possession
of
a
public
body
are
presumed
to
be
open
to
the
public.
Anybody
that
asserts
that
a
record
is
exempt
from
disclosure,
has
the
burden
of
proving
by
clear
and
convincing
evidence
that
it
is
exempt,
goes
on
to
say
that,
additionally,
they
need
to
not
just
cite
the
code
but
the
detailed
factual
basis
for
that
exemption
and
a
citation
supporting
that.
O
So
just
to
sum
up
mayor,
you
spoke
earlier
about
public
trust.
How
can
we
trust
the
city
when
you're
ignoring
laws
that
and
laws
of
the
state
when
it
comes
to
transparency
and
rights?
And
you
know
this
I've
emailed
you
multiple
times
of
things
you
personally
assured
me
of
and
now
that
it's
being
floated
you're
just
ignoring
them.
Those
questions
aren't
rhetorical.
I
actually
would
like
these
issues
resolved
specifically
to
me
and
in
John
Hall.
Thank.
P
Think
I
think
one
thing
is
very
clear:
is
that
passion
is
the
way
to
do
the
most
good
in
a
community
and
I
applaud
everybody
whose
courageous,
including
the
students
under
your
program,
mayor
Haggerty,
in
terms
of
the
employer,
Advisory
Council
I,
wrote
this
note
regarding
an
imperative.
It
kind
of
overlaps.
With
this
discussion,
I
didn't
know
you
were
having
and
so
I
call
it.
P
Safeguarding,
affordable
home
stock
enhances
meaningful
job
creation
and
more
livable
community,
and
it
comes
with
regard
to
the
question
of
passion,
because
when
I
chose
my
career
I
did
that
and
there's
so
much
passion
and
what
people
could
be
doing
in
these
jobs.
It's
a
fantastic
opportunity.
It's
it's!
The
excitement
I
had
as
a
scientist.
Only
this
is
working
with
your
hands
and
making
the
community
better
and
making
people's
lives
better
and
having
instant
smiles
as
opposed
to
waiting
a
you
know
a
year
to
find
out.
P
If
your
study
worked
Evanston
tree
building,
warehouse
and
youth
job
center
programs
are
in
the
midst
of
inspiring
and
generate
a
generation
of
careers
with
purpose,
creativity,
craftsmanship
and
deep
ties
to
the
community
through
the
trades,
because
they're
interviewing
right
now
as
young
as
you
young
people,
I'm
speaking
to
you,
guys,
who
are
what
18
to
24
as
young
people
go
through
the
selection
and
apprenticeship
application
process.
Take
a
closer
look
around
Evanston.
P
Think
of
what
uplifts
you,
your
friends,
your
family,
what
little
things
excite
you
to
make
great
things
happen
and
that's
the
core
of
job
satisfaction
and
passion
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
thanks
to
our
very
own
polar
vortex,
your
experience
gives
you
the
whys
and
some
house
to
pursue
climate
resiliency
on
your
own
homes
or
helping
an
overlooked.
Neighbor
down
the
street
in
the
end,
choose
a
career
that
makes
you
feel
good
about
helping
others
and
working
with
teams
who
share
the
same.
P
Our
shared
community
brings
out
the
best
in
us
whenever
someone
reaches
out
or
holds
on
that's
the
equity
in
the
practice
of
being
human.
That's
what
doing
good
change!
That's
what
doing
good
change
as
a
community
goal?
What's
that's?
What's
driving
community
change?
Another
is
have
three
paragraphs.
Another
is
climate
disaster
resilience
which
I
think
your
career
or
job
choice
could
help
with
enthusiasm.
P
Like
you,
the
young
people
here
disasters
predictably
lead
this
discovers
and
everything
to
show
show
that
lead
to
greater
gentrification,
which
can
segregate
widening
inequality
and
eliminate
affordable
single-family
homes
like
yours,
for
to
fighting,
affordable
small
homes
now
as
best
practices
to
preserve
scattered
neighborhood
homes,
decreasing
the
risk
of
Jeff
ocation
and
improve
chances
of
saving
lives
from
trauma
and
devastation
of
climate
change
disaster.
It's
urgent
imperative,
overdue
and
right
to
spare
Mary
many
low-income
patient,
long-standing
residents
hanging
by
a
threat
now
from
losing
their
homes
them
in
their
homes,
losing
them
in
their
homes.
P
Q
City
manager,
I
am
here
to
talk
about
the
for
the
80
plus
people
who
voted
to
save
Harlan,
Clark
I.
Think
your
proposal
has
some
strong
points,
primarily
because
you're
talking
about
involving
the
community
I
think
one
of
the
weakness
is
a
year
and
a
half
is
just
too
long.
Evanson
Lake,
hearten
house
and
Gardens
has
spent
five
years
developing
a
very
detail,
a
very
if
it's
an
effective
program,
so
the
matter
is
now
not
so
much
to
spend
a
whole
long
time
trying
to
get
the
community
involved.
The
community
is
involved,
as
mr.
Q
cannon
indicated,
we
had
a
meeting
on
the
28th
and
the
parasol
room
that
was
filled
to
capacity.
So
the
problem
is
that
the
public
servants
who
sit
up
here
on
as
members
of
council
haven't
been
involved.
So
I'm
glad
that
you
finally
are
saying
we
should
be
involved
in
this
process
with
the
people
whom
we
serve
and
so
that
my
experience,
of
course,
with
civil
rights
and
politics
and
being
black
all
my
life.
Q
All
my
life
is
that
sometimes
you
are
kind
of
kicked
to
the
curb,
because
you
are
advocating
the
position
that
may
be
unpopular
to
the
people
having
control
so
I
think
that
the
fact
that
the
Friends
of
Harlan,
Clark
and
other
groups
that
receive
Hanukkah
aukerman
moving
on
this
thing
is
that
you
feel
antagonism.
That's
not
what
we
are
about
the
purpose
of
to
get
everybody
involved
in
this
process,
so
we
can
save
what
is
next
to
the
symbol
of
our
city.
Q
This
lighthouse
is
a
symbol
of
the
city
of
Evanston,
and
so
next
to
that
should
be
something
every
person
in
the
city
can
can
be
a
part
of,
and
that
this
one
way
I
want
to
mention,
because
I've
had
some
experience
in
business
in
real
estate,
and
that
is
the
concept
of
a
real
estate
investment
trust,
which
would
let
many
people
come
in
number
one,
but
also
avoid
the
takeover
from
a
big
predator,
with
a
lot
of
money,
grabbing,
zing
and
running
away
with
it.
That's
just
one
concept.
Q
A
B
A
R
The
community
group,
the
heart
o'clock
community
group,
is
going
to
meet
on
the
4th
of
April
and
I
I,
believe
it
well
served
the
city
staff,
the
citizens
and
the
City
Council
to
join
in
promoting
and
encouraging
the
city,
the
citizens
and
staff
participation.
At
these
events,
we've
had
two
events
and
hundreds
of
participants
already
I
believe
the
direction
to
the
staff
should
include
ongoing
and
continuing
communication
with
the
citizen,
engagement
groups
and
in
this
way,
I
believe
will
will
know
who
is
listening
and
whether
or
not
they're
being
heard
and
represented
by
the
council.
A
S
Gonna
read
something
briefly
and
then
I'm
out
of
your
way
made
concern
on
behalf
of
the
others
in
North
Shore
n-double-a-cp.
We
would
like
to
express
our
support
of
the
Holly
Clark
mansion
community
engagement
efforts.
More
specifically,
we
are
supportive
of
the
effort
to
ensure
African,
American
and
other
minorities,
easy
access
and
regular
use
of
this
public
lakefront
property.
This
must
be
a
high
priority,
as
the
city
of
Evanston
and
others.
S
Move
forward
with
plans
for
development
records
show
that
residents
in
the
fifth
Ward
predominantly
african-american
voted
overwhelmingly
on
the
referendum
in
favor,
of
keeping
the
beautiful
historic
lakefront
mansion
available
for
public
use
and
2013.
The
Illinois
Department
of
Natural
Resources
encourage
discussions
with
City
Council
about
purchasing
the
mansion
as
an
office
and
public
coastal
education
center.
While
this
deal
failed,
it
left
an
impression
on
residents
that
the
property
and
home
have
unlimited
potential
for
serving
as
a
public
Community
Center.
While
the
city
will
receive
any
number
of
proposals
for
how
the
mansion
should
be
utilized.
S
We
want
to
be
assured
that
its
future
programs
and
events
will
keep
in
mind
the
african-american
community,
as
well
as
the
Latino
beliefs.
Haitian
Jamaican
and
other
minority
communities
in
our
town.
We
fully
anticipate
that
we
will
have
a
the
presence
in
the
mansion
so
that
future
generations
will
know
that
we've
strived
for
Beloved
Community
in
the
truest
sense
of
the
word.
A
T
The
plan
committee
that
just
met
had
no
reference
at
all
and
no,
where
was
it
mentioned,
that
a
block
of
homes
affordable
for
the
people
who
lived
there
between
Wesley
and
Jackson
on
Emerson
Street
were
already
sold
and
that
they
would
not
be
the
future
homes
would
not
be
affordable
for
any
of
the
people
who
live
there.
Now.
What
is
the
purpose
of
having
a
housing,
affordable,
housing
committee
and
having
them
speak
of
committee
means
I,
don't
understand
what
what
is
going
on.
Thank
you.
U
U
Sanctuary
city
could
mean
a
bucket
of
ideas,
if
only
if
the
shoe
fits
wear
it.
Okay,
shoe
fits
wear,
it
mean
if
you
there,
you
did
it
acknowledge
it.
If
the
council
members
would
have
just
wrote,
agreed
to
give
liberty
to
everyone
in
this
city,
you
didn't
have
to
single
out
the
undocumented
people,
because
we
know
who
you
aren't
talking
about
the
Mexican
people,
the
Cuban
people,
the
Puerto
Rican
people,
the
African
people,
if
I'm
wrong.
Please
correct
me,
someone.
U
U
Do
you
know
why
and
how
this
profiling
came
about
because
you
people
in
Everson
who
make
those
decision
made
it
harder
on
people,
black
people,
colored
people
that
looks
like
me:
okay,
brown,
black
high,
yellow,
pink,
whatever
you
want
to
say
that
fall
under
that
category.
It
is
wrong
for
you
to
do
that.
A
U
A
You
thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr.
krei,
and
thank
you
everybody
for
coming
out
for
for
public
comment.
As
always,
it
was
a
lively
discussion
about
of
by
a
variety
of
issues
we're
now
going
to
move
on
to
the
agenda.
The
first
item
of
business
is
the
special
order,
which
is
the
Harley
Clark
mansion
and,
and
this
is
open
for
discussion
this
evening,
so
a
city
manager,
I,
don't
know
if
you
or
the
city
staff
had
anything
or
we
can
just
open
it
up.
Okay,
all
right,
so
we'll
open
it
up
now,
alderman
Wilson.
V
It's
my
I
guess
opinion
that
for
the
most
part,
these
these
prior
committees
community
conversations,
the
meetings
that
have
happened
recently,
I
feel
like
they've,
pretty
well
vetted.
The
community
perception
on
I'm
sorry
expectations
for
what
the
properties,
accessibility
and
use
should
be
within
some.
You
know
within
some
parameters
so
and
I
think
mr.
Johnson
may
be
mentioned.
The
time
frame
somebody
mentioned
in
time
frame
I
feel
like
that's.
That
time
frame
is
too
long.
I
think
it's
important
to
for
the
city
to
maintain
ownership
of
the
property.
V
So
my
strong
inclination
is
to
do
something
along
the
following
lines.
So
I
think
we
start
with
the
prior
committee
that
ultimate
revell
was
on.
They
came
up
with
some
use
parameters
as
far
as
what
the
community's
expectations
for
access
and
use
of
the
property
are,
but
I
think
that
we
have
to
broaden
that
a
bit
I
think
we
have
to.
V
Can
you
know
make
you
make
sure
that
we
have
city
ownership
of
the
property
I
think
we
should
allow
proposals
to
consider
use
of
the
main
house
or
the
coach
house,
or
both
we
might
get
a
great
idea
for
the
main
house.
We
might
get
a
great
idea
for
the
coach
house,
but
somebody
might
not
have
a
great
idea
for
using
them
both
together,
so
I
think
we
should
build
that
into
whatever
the
RFP
looks
like
I
feel
like.
V
We
should
not
require
the
ideas
and
the
applicants
to
be
501,
C,
3s
I'm,
not
saying
I
want
like
a
big
corporation,
that
you
know
crank
out.
Some
sort
of
you
know
commercial
enterprise.
It's
you
know
the
economic
engine
of
the
North
Shore,
but
the
501
C
3
in
and
of
itself
is
an
impediment
to
some
groups
or
organizations
who
might
otherwise
be
able
to
put
something
together.
Potentially
there
could
be
good
use,
so
I
want
to
take
that
requirement
out.
V
I
think
it's
important
to
allow
a
greater
window
of
access
for
people
to
see
the
property
I
think
and
it's
going
to
take
us.
Certainly,
minimum
of
weeks
probably
a
little
bit
longer
to
develop
the
actual
RFP
I
think
after
it's
issued
I'm
much
more
comfortable
with
six
month
period
for
it
to
be
open
and
get
the
responses,
the
actual
evaluation
of
the
responses.
What
I
would
like
to
see
is
a
alchoholic
committee.
You
don't
have
to
call
it
a
committee,
but
but
generally
a
group,
including
staff
and
community
members,
to
evaluate
the
proposals.
V
A
V
I
guess
to
kind
of
answer
that
we
know
that
some
people
are
probably
interested,
but
if
it's
an
18-month
period
we're
looking
at
18
months
to
close
it
months
to
evaluate
and
I
think
we'll
probably
I
would
say,
but
for
sure
we're
gonna
lose
ideas
that
are
interested
now,
because
people
probably
aren't
gonna
wait.
You
know
through
a
two-year
process
with
that,
much
in
certainty
and
then
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
to
build
in
that
community
participation
through
the
RFP
process.
So
not
not
in
the
front
end.
V
You
know
we're
just
waiting
around
for
the
ideas
18
months
for
the
ideas
to
roll
in
I'm,
suggesting
get
the
ideas
and
then
bring
the
community
into
that
evaluation
process
so
that
we
can
more
thoroughly
vet
them.
Instead
of
just
kind
of
like
waiting
for
the
ideas
that
may
or
may
not
come
and
if
they
don't
come,
then
that's
super
unfortunate,
but
I
think
we
will
I.
Think
it's
been
publicized
enough
that
we're
gonna
get
some
responses.
A
W
Thank
you.
Mr.
mayor
I
think
there's
been
an
incredible
amount
of
visioning
a
lot
of
time
spent
on
it
and
and
and
I
don't
disagree
with
the
visioning.
That's
gone
on
in
the
past.
I
think
the
lake
house
and
Gardens
proposal
was
certainly
well
thought
out.
I
think
one
of
the
mistakes
that
we
made
as
a
council
is
that
we
didn't
get
out
in
front
of
the
issue
and
say:
we've
looked
at
this
building.
This
is
our
building.
W
We've
never
come
out
with
those
numbers
and
I
think
until
we
do
we're
just
we're
really
being
unfair
to
folks
who
have
a
real
interest
in
doing
something
with
the
building
I
think
we've
got
to
step
set
standards
because
part
of
that
referendum-
and
you
remember
the
discussion
that
was
here
that
night
when
we
were
voting
on
whether
or
not
to
appeal
the
preservation
commission's
denial
of
the
certificate
of
demolition,
is
that
the
majority
of
folks
on
the
council
said
no
public
money,
no
public
money.
So
a
lot
of
the
plans
that
you
outlined
mr.
W
mayor
are
probably
going
to
require
public
money.
We
just
need
to.
We
need
to
understand
that
going
forward
and
we
need
to
be
very
clear
in
what
we're
saying
is
that,
while
we
agree
with
the
visioning,
we
respect
the
visioning.
We
respect
the
time
that
people
have
put
in.
This
is
what
the
budget
for
this
is
mr.
city
manager.
How
many
how
many
recreation
centers
do
we
have
in
Evanston
right
now.
X
X
W
And
I
think
that
was
understanding.
The
the
funding
challenges
that
we
have
going
forward
is
really
what's
what's
informing
the
council
about
how
to
move
forward
if,
at
all,
with
with
barley,
Clark
I
have
been
caught
in
the
discussion
between
well,
we
can't
raise
money
until
we
have
control
of
the
house
and
we
and
therefore
you're
not
being
fair
to
us
now
as
people
who
have
to
make
decisions
in
terms
of
our
fiduciary
responsibility
at
all
the
taxpayers
in
Evanston.
That's
not
something
we
can
do
so
I
hope,
I,
hope.
W
The
public
respects
respects
that
I
just
have
not
seen
anything
that
says
to
me
that
there
is
a
way
to
have
a
public
use
for
this
building.
That's
actually
going
to
pay
for
it,
but
I'm
more
than
willing
to
say
if
our
staff
wants
to
go
in
there
and
give
us
a
or
update
the
numbers
that
we've
had
before,
and
they
estimate
I
think
that
Lake
House
had
was
five
million
dollars
without
into
shape
to
do
the
events
that
they
wanted
to
do
to
support
the
programs
that
they
wanted.
W
So
I'm
going
to
I'm
going
to
ask
staff
to
come
back
and
tell
us
what
what
these
numbers
are
now,
maybe
there's
a
way
we
can
turn
the
coach-house
into
affordable
housing.
Well,
if
you've
been
in
the
coach
house
recently,
there's
a
lot
of
money
that
has
to
go
into
that
Coach
house
before
anyone
could
live
in
there.
Where
is
that
money
going
to
come
from
where
we
have
an
affordable
housing
fund?
Do
we
want
to
spend
our
affordable
housing
dollars?
We've
got
a
couple
million
dollars
coming
in
from
831
Emerson.
W
Is
that
where
we
want
to
put
affordable
housing
dollars?
Maybe
it
is
the
council
can
decide
that.
But
my
point
is
that
there
are.
There
are
real
choices
that
need
to
be
made
here
and
there
it
involves
real
money
and
we
don't.
We
don't
have
it
and
then
it
sounds
like
it
sounds
like
that.
There's
not
public
dollars
out
there
either.
W
Even
the
State
Park
that
the
mayor
alluded
to
I
mean
that's
a
lot
of
money
in
order
that
friends
of
Harley
Clarke,
now
that
they've
formed
that
organization
in
order
to
comply
with
the
state's
mandate
to
be
even
be
eligible
to
become
a
state
park,
they're
going
to
have
to
raise
a
certain
amount
of
money
for
the
state
even
to
take
over
that
land.
Do
we
want
that?
W
Do
we
want
the
state
to
take
our
local
public
land
and
run
it
as
a
state
park
in
order
to
keep
Harley
Harley
Clark
house
I,
don't
know
how
many
people
are
gonna
have
to
answer
that
question.
I
am
not
willing
to
put
any
public
money
into
the
house
because
I
just
don't
see
the
way
out.
I,
don't
see
a
way
that
that
that
can
happen,
but
I'm
certainly
willing
to
listen.
But
I
do
think
that
we
we
started
off
on
the
wrong
foot.
W
W
But
for
those
of
us
sitting
up
here,
we've
got
to
pay
for
it.
We
and
we've
got
to
know
how
it's
going
to
be
paid
for,
even
if
we're
not
using
your
taxpayer
dollars,
we
need
to
know
how
it's
going
to
be
paid
for
because
we're
turning
over
a
city
asset
city
land
in
the
city
facility
to
you.
So
that's
my
strong
recommendation
that
we
start
there
before
before.
We
do
anything
else
before
we
decide
to
go
out
for
an
RFP
or
do
anything
else.
A
You
alderman
Fitz
can
I
agree.
I,
don't
want
to
see
a
dollar
of
taxpayer
money
go
into
the
Harlan
Clark
mansion.
We
have
so
many
other
needs
here
in
the
city.
We
can't
afford
to
do
that.
You
know
my
personal
opinion
has
long
been
documented,
which
is
I.
Think
you
know
the
the
most
viable
way
to
save
the
mansion
is
to
you
know,
have
private
dollars
go
into
the
mansion
through
you
know,
some
kind
of
commercial
use
I
recognize
that
that
is
not
what
you
know.
Many
people
here
think.
A
Hence
the
reason
I
put
forward
this
18-month
RFP
process
you
know
in
going
out
to
the
marketplace
for
private
nonprofits
and
foundations.
I
feel
strongly
that
it's
those
you
know,
organizations
that
come
in
here
that
will
best
be
able
to
assess
the
mansion
and
figure
out.
You
know
what
it's
going
to
take
to
repair
that
mansion
and
put
a
program
together
to
actually
operate.
A
You
know
in
a
financially
viable
way
personally,
I,
don't
think
it's
in
our
best
interest
to
send
city
staff
out
or
to
have
to
get
a
consultant
or
whatever
it
may
be,
to
figure
out
what
the
cost
is
to
properly
repair.
This
mansion
I
think
through
the
RFP
process
and
another
reason
why
I
think
18
months
is
the
appropriate
amount
of
time
is.
You
know
it
gives
a
significant
amount
of
time
to
assess
the
property
to
figure
out.
You
know
what
you
think.
A
W
Mr.
Muir
affecting
just
really
quickly
respond
to
that
I
I'm,
not
saying
that
we
need
to
have
it
down
to
the
last
dollar,
but
we
do
need
to
have
an
idea
of
what
it
would
cost
to
put
that
house
into
shape,
even
to
open
the
doors,
and
without
that
we
can't
even
make
a
a
judgment
about
who
we
should
be
targeting.
Okay,.
Y
I
think
last
week
or
two
weeks
ago,
I
asked
for
the
numbers
in
terms
of
how
much
we
spent
I
think
this
year,
the
last
six
months
on
the
Holly,
Clark,
mansion
and
I.
Don't
think
that
those
numbers
have
been
provided
to
me
because
we
keep
saying
no
public
money
into
it
and
I
realized
that
we're
talking
about
development
type
money,
but
we
also
spend
money,
monthly,
I'm
sure
to
cut
the
grass
and
maintain
the
building.
Y
So
we
have
to
consider
that
so
I
have
a
couple
of
thoughts
based
on
what's
been
said
so
far
in
terms
of
the
public
comment
about
the
public
meetings.
I
would
just
speak
for
myself,
not
others
I.
You
know
I
I,
guess
in
theory,
I
like
the
idea
that
I
could
come
to
a
public
meeting
and
people
are
giving
their
opinion
and
nobody's
expecting
me
to
give
an
opinion.
Y
If
you've
ever
followed
our
schedule,
we
have
lots
and
lots
and
lots
of
meetings
already
and
I
do
have
family
that
I'd
like
to
see
occasionally
in
the
evening
in
terms
of
the
mayor's
proposal.
I
do
think
18
months
is
too
long
and
not
necessarily
to
get
the
most
viable
proposals,
but
because
18
months
is
easily
gonna
be
24
months
and
we're
gonna
have
an
election
and
you're
gonna
have
some
very
issue
of
new
people
sitting
here
and
I.
Y
Clarke
was
still
out
there,
but
I
did
not
enjoy
sitting
in
the
seat
and
responding
to
you
know
some
very
frustrated
people
who
were
frustrated
about
things
that
have
been
before
I
sat
in
this
seat,
so
I
don't
want
to
leave
whatever
form
of
new
council.
There
is,
with
their
first
order
of
business
mayor
looking
at
these
rfp's
in
terms
of
Ottoman
Wilson
I.
Do
like
some
things
about
your
proposal.
I
also
agree.
We
should
not
limit
it
to
a
non-profit.
Y
However,
I
think
even
by
saying
that
we're
going
to
have
citizens
who
are
up
in
arms
because
that's
they're
going
to
tell
us
everyone
said
they
don't
want
to
sell
it
and
they
don't
and
I
know
you
said
don't
say
but
I
don't
know
how
we
again
go
against
the
public
perception
that
if
you
have
any
kind
of
for-profit
there
that
we
still
have
ownership,
no
matter
I
think
how
many
times
you
say
that
some
people
are
going
to
just
here
for
profit
and
think
that
we've
sold
off.
You
know
the
whole
Lake.
Y
So
while
I
agree
that
in
order
to
get
the
best
use
and
most
fancy
responsible
for
the
taxpayers,
it
might
not
be
a
non-profit,
I,
think
I'm
just
concerned
with,
unless
we
are
all
going
to
stand
firm.
If
we
have
an
awesome
for-profit
coming
here,
we're
gonna,
you
know,
ignore
the
angry
mob
with
people
and
go
with
that
I'd
hate
to
have
a
for-profit
in
that
situation
where
they
come
forward.
Y
And
then
we
have
three
hours
a
couple
of
comment
and
we
say:
oh
nevermind,
you're,
a
non-profit,
you
know
you're
a
for-profit,
so
we're
not
gonna.
Go
with
you,
ottoman
Fisk
I.
Do
you
know
I
think
the
five
million
dollars
was
a
little
stuck
in
my
head
in
terms
of
the
price
point.
It's
not
as
important
to
me.
Y
If
we
go
out
to
an
RFP,
because
we'd
have
some
time
for
people
to
go
in
with
their
own
contractors
and
inspectors
and
decide
for
themselves
how
much
the
building
you
know
what
they
think
the
cost
is
gonna
be
they
should
do
that
anyway.
I
am
more
interested
in
I,
guess
communicating
what
we
spend
on
the
building
currently
and
that's
another
issue
with
the
18
months.
Y
For
me,
I
mean
that's,
we
obviously
have
insurance,
but
we
pay
a
lot
on
insurance
for
a
variety
of
things
and
so
I
the
longer
we
have
the
building
sitting
there
that
we
are
responsible
for
the
maintenance,
the
more
money
that
we
are
potentially
spending
on
the
building,
and
we
continue
to
say
we
don't
want
to
spend
any
money
of
the
building.
So
those
are
my
thoughts
great.
Z
Z
Nine
months
would
put
us
at
December
it's
about
the
show
you
can
make
a
person
in
nine
months.
We
should
be
able
to
office
proposals,
and
you
know
when
you
went
to
the
PowerPoint.
One
of
the
problems
it
seems
to
be
repeating
is
that
we
just
consider
one
thing
at
a
time.
So
if
we
do
like
a
nine-month,
everybody
bring
everything
we'll
look
at
it
and
then
we
still
end
up
with
it
in
an
18-month
time
frame.
Z
I
know,
obviously
the
referendum
results
and
people's
preference
for
something
in
conformance
with
the
referendum,
but
I,
don't
know
why
we
wouldn't
at
least
invite
all
offers
I
mean
it
would
still
be
the
same
process
in
terms
of
opening
the
mansion
to
everybody.
The
parasol
room
meetings
can
continue.
Obviously
we're
all
aware
of
the
community
preference
for
something
in
conformance
with
the
referendum
and
I,
don't
know
why
we
would
limit
ourselves
when
that
seems
to
be
one
of
the
mistakes.
That's
been
repeated
in
every
failed
proposals
that
were
just
looking
at
one
thing.
Z
So
why
don't?
What
I
would
propose?
Our
can
ask
for
everyone
up
here.
To
consider
is
we
say,
like
December,
31st,
be
a
deadline
or
whatever
pick
a
day,
Christmas,
whatever
bringing
your
offers
like
that,
are
75%
formulated,
we
open
them
all
up.
We
have
a
public
discussion
of
them.
We
narrow
it
down
to
viable
ones.
Z
They
were
process
from
where
we're
still
probably
making
a
decision
within
18
months
and
if
there
is
an
amazing
secret
person
out
there
with
this
idea
that
they've
been
too
shy
to
share
like
this
is
their
opportunity,
if
not
like.
In
all
likelihood,
the
parasol
room
people
will
have
gotten
far
enough
down
the
road
where
they've
got
their
finances,
figured
out.
Z
Sarah,
Shasta
quills
out
her
amazing
fundraising,
all
those
things
all
have
happened
and
we
can
kind
of
do
what
we
probably
should
have
done
a
couple
months
ago
or
like
we
got
this
new
offer
or
like
worst-case
scenario,
where
we
all
right
now.
This
is
what
this
thing
we
don't,
but
I
would
propose
that
we
don't
do
the
18
months
right
off
the
bat
we
have
a
halfway
point
or
even
so,
yeah
once
you
wrap
up
the
budget.
That's
the
time
we
dig
into
Holly
Clark
of
being
here.
AA
AA
So
when
I
look
at
this
I
see
that
we
first
we
have
to
prepare
an
RFP
which,
as
you
were
saying,
everybody
has
a
different
idea
for
what
should
be
in
the
RFP.
So
I
think
that's
going
to
take
some
time
to
figure
out
what
we
would.
What
the
parameters
would
be.
Maybe
we
should
do,
is
aldermen
suffered
and
said
and
make
it
very
broad.
AA
You
know,
let's
see
when
everybody
comes
in
with
I
worry
a
little
bit,
that
we
might
get
everything
in
the
kitchen
sink
and
then
that
might
be
a
little
hard,
but
maybe
we
can
narrow
the
parameter
somewhat.
I
agree.
I,
think
the
18
months
is
probably
a
little
too
long.
I.
Think
six
months
is
too
short
a
period
of
time
to
go
in
the
middle.
AA
It
doesn't
necessarily
mean
to
me
that
the
entire
house
has
to
be
open
every
single
day
for
the
public,
but
I
do
think
in
my
mind
that
at
periods
during
the
day
during
the
year
or
regularly
at
least
the
first
floor
is
open
to
the
public
I'm.
It
might
be
the
entire
mansion,
but
at
least
the
first
floor.
Calm
rooms
would
be
open
to
the
public
I
I,
don't
have
any
thoughts
about
what
the
best
use
of
the
of
the
mansion
is,
but
I
would
still
like
to
have
some
ability
for
the
pie.
AA
AA
A
V
V
Instead
of
choosing
to
do
a
501c3
and
jump
through
all
those
hoops,
maybe
they
just
decide
to
form
an
LLC
to
operate
some
use
that
we
think
is
a
really
great
idea,
but
they
might
not
be
enough
for
profit
or
they
might
not
be
a
501c3
I
realize
you
know,
maybe
that's
less
likely
because
of
the
funding
challenges
whatever
but
I.
Don't
you
know
to
ultimate
suffering
this
point?
I,
don't
want
to
you,
know
kind
of
preclude
the
ideas
at
this
point.
V
I
think
you're,
right,
I
think
what
we've
done
is
we've
been
too
limiting
and
I.
Think
if
we're
gonna
be
more
if
we're
gonna
be
more
transparent
about
the
process.
A
lot
of
the
concerns
are
the
fear
about
what
happens
if
X
doesn't
happen.
So
if
this
doesn't
happen,
people
are
afraid
that
it's
going
to
be
this
other
thing.
I'll
mayor
I
understand
your
concept
on
the
tiered
kind
of
you
know
way
of
doing
it,
but
I'm
fearful
that
that's
going
to
present
fear
in
the
community
like
okay.
V
If
we
don't
get
the
great
thing
in
the
18
months,
oh
god,
then
that's
gonna,
be
this
terrible
thing
and
people
are
gonna
kind
of
gear
up
for
defending
against
the
alternative.
I
would
rather
get
all
of
the
alternatives
on
the
table
and
we'll
say
they're,
good
or
bad
and
and
move
forward
through
that
you
know
nine
months.
You
know
that's
okay,
you
know!
That's
the
that
I
think
that
you
know
it
kind
of
gets
us
through
our
budget
sees
so
you
know.
V
Maybe
we
get
through
our
budget
and
then
we
kind
of
pick
that
up.
I
am
particularly
interested
in.
As
far
as
the
evaluation
of
the
proposals
to
include
community
members
who
have
been
involved
in
the
process,
I
think
it's
important
to
to
include
that
voice
and
those
voices
in
that
in
the
vetting
before
it
comes
to
the
council
for
consideration
again,
it's
not
to
say
that
they're
going
to
make
a
decision,
but
they're
deeply
involved.
V
They're
deeply
engaged
in
this,
and
hopefully
from
the
conversations
I've
had
people
are
going
to
be
open-minded,
they're,
gonna,
look
at
these
and
and
hopefully
give
them
a
fair
consideration.
You
know
if
you're
considering
a
proposal,
I'm
gonna
say
the
first
thing
you
need
to
do
is
like
do
a
couple:
google
searches
and
see
what
didn't
work.
Okay,
just
like
look
them
up
figure
out.
What
didn't
work
I
think
we're
pretty
clear
on
what
wouldn't
what's
not
gonna
fly
in
the
community,
so
don't
put
forth
the
proposal
that
you
know
for
sure
is
gonna.
V
You
know
create
a
firestorm,
but
I
don't
want
to
be
so
limiting
this
time
around,
so
that
we're
not
going
to
potentially
get
ideas
that
might
be
good
ideas
and
and
I
think
the
nine
months
would
give
enough
time
for
that.
The
use
parameters,
I
think
have
been
pretty
well
vetted.
So
if
we
stick
with
kind
of
those
use
parameters
from
the
500
RFP
open
it
up
to
something
beyond
not-for-profits
make
sure
that
we're
clear
that
at
the
city
maintains
ownership
include
the
community
in
the
vetting
committee.
AB
AB
What
I
really
liked
was
the
way
if
we
could
encourage
people
who
have
an
idea
to
basically
test
the
waters
with
the
community
in
sort
of
more
informal
kinds
of
conversations
before
before
they
actually
submit
their
proposal,
as
well
as
including
the
community
in
some
kind
of
a
vetting
process
after
the
proposals
come
in
I.
Think
that
would
be
really
good,
I,
not
sure
exactly
how
many
months
except
I
do
think.
18
months
is
too
too
long.
AB
I
could
live
with
12
months,
but
anyway,
some
somewhere
in
the
nine
to
12
months
and
another
idea
of
Alderman
Wilson's
that
I
would
like
to
see
included
is
if
so,
if
a
group
has
an
idea
for
the
house,
and
another
group
has
an
idea
for
the
coach-house,
you
know
that
we're
not
necessarily
looking
for
one
proposal
for
the
whole
property.
Keep
that
pretty
open-minded
there.
W
X
X
Local
Realtors,
who
say
I
have
a
client
who
would
like
to
buy
the
mansion
period.
So
without
you
know,
clearly
a
private
home
use,
so
I
haven't
heard
from
at
least
a
dozen
of
those
over
the
last
four
or
five
years.
Eric
I'm,
not
sure
how
many
you've
heard
from
some
of
them
have
probably
been
duplicates.
Was
we've
not
kept
a
precise
tally
of
who
we've
heard
from.
AC
Corrected
mr.
mayor
members
of
council,
I
started
keeping
a
list
basically
the
midway
through
last
year,
but
there's
certainly
been
a
lot
of
phone
calls
from
Realtors
most
of
the
time
with
offer
to
purchase
the
property
for
use
as
a
single-family
home
I've
gotten
a
couple
from
commercial
real
estate
firms
looking
to
do
anything
from
residential
care
facility
to
a
retirement
facility
to
assisted
living
center,
lots
of
interest
and
people
using
the
mansion
for
filming
purposes,
whether
it
be
commercial,
small
clips
or
large
films,
I've
gotten.
Some.
AC
AC
Some
viability
concerns
with
the
current
condition
of
the
mansion.
If
specially,
if
electricity
needed
to
be
utilized
for
anything
or
you
know,
we
don't
keep
the,
we
don't,
keep
it
in
a
state
for
that
kind
of
purpose
at
Prez,
but
we
could
consider
it
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
Some
of
them
have
been
northwestern
students,
I'ma
men,
community
members.
So
in
that
case
we
could,
you
know,
look
at
what
kind
of
staff
involvement
would
be
needed
and
review
it,
but
there's
also
just
been
lots
of
just
inbound
questions.
So
can
I
see
it.
AC
X
Then
mr.
Feniger,
a
local
author
of
some
renown
as
I,
talked
that
no
one's
talked
with
the
mayor's
talk
with
Alterman
wilson
about
some
ideas
that
she
has
tried
to
flesh
out
for
a
I
think,
primarily
a
writer's
retreat.
So
that's
probably
the
most
developed
proposal
in
the
last
year
or
two
that
we
have
heard
in
the
midst
of
all
the
other.
W
So,
if
I
can
continue
with
my
comments,
so
what
I
would
like
to
have
as
an
updated
appraisal
of
the
property
I
think
we
we
have
one.
That
certainly
is
within
the
past
couple
of
years.
So
if
that
could
be
shared
with
council
I
like
to
know
the
permitted
and
special
uses
under
os
zoning
space,
I
I
know
we
could
rezone
to
r1,
because
it's
adjacent
to
r1
I'm,
not
sure
commercial
fits
in
with
that
or
whether
we
would
be
considering
a
zoning
change
to
commercial
use,
which
I
would
consider
to
be
real
spot.
Zoning.
W
So
now
we're
doubling
back
on
a
number
of
questions
that
we
have
already
had
answers
to
hard
those
answers
still
relevant,
but
I'm
absolutely
agreeing
that
if
we,
if
we
open
the
door
to
an
RFP
that
everybody
should
come
on
in,
if
the
property
is
worth
three
million
dollars
to
someone
who
wants
to
take
on
the
project
as
a
single-family
house,
&
rezone
it
that's
something
that
we
should
consider
as
much
as
any
public
use
of
the
property
I
mean
to
do
to
do
anything.
Otherwise
this
is
just
not
responsible,
I.
W
Think
now,
I
would
go
back
to
I.
Think
all
of
us
struggled
a
little
bit
to
try
to
figure
out
what
the
referendum
actually
meant
and
I
talked
to
a
lot
of
folks
about
how
they
voted
and
what
they
were
voting
for.
A
lot
of
people
actually
voted
because
they
liked
the
house
and
they
liked
the
the
way
it
sits
on
the
property
they
liked
to
drive
down
Sheridan
Road
and
see
it
they've
never
been
in
it.
They
were
never
there
when
it
was
having
our
classes
or
anything
like
that.
W
They
would
like
the
house
to
be
there.
Well,
if
that's,
if
that's
the
majority
view
of
this,
then
maybe
it
does
make
some
sense
to
reach
out
and
see
if
there's
somebody
who
would
want
to
buy
it
and
put
in
the
amount
of
money
that
it
would
need
to
be
restored
as
a
single-family
house,
if
it's
only
for
public
use
only
only
for
public
use,
then
that's
that's
a
whole
other
set
of
dynamics
that
we
have
to
deal
with,
and
that's
lots
of
money.
W
Basically,
a
commercial
event
space,
which
was
my
concern
with
the
with
the
lake
house
proposal.
So
there
there's
a
lot
to
talk
about
in
terms
of
what
we
want.
The
RFP
to
look
like,
but
in
to
conclude,
I
would
support
an
RFP
that
just
opens
the
door
to
everyone,
because
I
think
that
again
is
the
responsible
thing
for
us
to
do,
and.
A
My
question
to
the
council
would
be
if
we
open
it
up
for
ever
everything
and
I
totally
see.
You
know
some
positives
with
that.
The
efficiency
and
everything
else
and
let's
see
what
the
marketplace
is
willing
to
offer,
should
we
be
taking
a
straw
vote
up
here.
So
potential
proposers
have
some
confidence
that
this
council
actually
would
consider.
You
know,
selling
selling
the
mansion
I
mean
what
you
just
suggested.
For
instance,
you
know
I'd
hate
for
people
to
put
a
whole
proposal
together
when
there
aren't
five
people
up
here.
A
That
say
you
know,
selling
selling
the
mansion
is
is
a
possibility,
like
we'll
sell
to
a
single
you
know,
family,
to
buy
and
to
fix
up
or
the
same
with
commercial.
You
know
we'll
turn
this
into.
You
know
a
little
boutique
bed-and-breakfast
or
something
whatever
it
might
whatever
it
might
be.
If
you
know,
I
certainly
would
want
to
know
if
I
was
bidding
on
this.
That
again,
there
are
at
least
five
people
up
here
that
did
a
straw
vote
that
said,
yeah
I'd
consider
a
commercial
option.
I
go.
W
Ahead,
I,
don't
think
we
can
do
that
until
we
really
talk
through
the
the
RFP
I.
Don't
see
some
of
the
responses
there
there
may
be,
there
may
be
a
small
commercial
use.
There
may
be
someone
who
wants
to
buy
it
for
a
B&B
in
the
house
itself.
That's
and
leave
part
of
the
house
open
for
public.
That's
that's
where
we
started
this
with
Mert
did
all
that.
W
With
with
Colonel
Pritzker
a
long
time
ago
was,
do
you
have
enough
money
to
put
into
this
house
and
keep
part,
keep
it
open
for
the
public,
but
also
run
a
small
V
and
V
in
the
house,
and
the
answer
to
that
was
no.
That
was
not
cost-effective,
so
we've
we've
we've
been
there,
but
I
think
it's
worthwhile.
Now
that
we've
been
through
this
whole
process
and
whoever
is
going
to
be
responding
to
the
RFP
will
certainly
be
informed
of
where
the
city's
gone.
A
W
AD
Some
ideas
that
I
have
for
it
I
agree
with
alderman
suffered
in
or
alderman
woman
suffered
in
and
alderwoman
Fisk.
It
should
be
an
open
proposal
shouldn't
be
restricted
that
the
property
must
be
sold
because
otherwise
there
is
no
way
we
can
maintain
our
position
that
City
money
will
not
be
spent
on
it.
AD
AD
Regarding
aldermen
alderwoman
Ravel
community,
she
said
there
has
to
be
community
use
and
I
think
there's
a
big
distinction
between
community
use
and
public
access,
and
that
has
to
be
defined
because
almost
anything
other
than,
for
example,
a
private
residence.
Any
commercial
use
is
going
to
have
public
access,
so
we
have
to
be
very
careful.
Community
use
would
be
a
museum,
you
know
an
event
space,
but
public
access
would
be
yeah,
so
there's
there's
a
distinction
there.
So
those
are
my
thoughts.
A
V
No
I'd
like
to
I'll
just
make
a
motion
for
lack
of
light
on
there,
so
I
move
that
and
Odin
radiant
and
Mayor
Haidee.
Your
points
are
well-taken
and
I've
I've
thought
long
and
hard
about
the
idea
of
selling
the
property,
and
you
know
for
a
variety
of
reasons-
money
of
course,
being
one
of
them.
There's
there's
some
appeal
to
that.
V
But
what
I
don't
want
to
do
is
find
ourselves
in
a
situation
where
whoever
purchases
it
can't
live
up
to
what
they
were
promised,
we've
already
lost
control
of
the
property,
then
we're
done.
The
other
thing
is
that,
as
far
as
access
to
the
surrounding
property
is
concerned,
if
it
was
a
single-family
home,
it's
not
going
to
be
comfortable
for
people
to
use
the
space
as
it's
used
now,
you
know,
I
show
up
there
and
I
go
for.
You
know,
jogs
and
runs
and
stop
on
my
bike
ride.
V
If
somebody's
living
there
I'm
not
going
to
feel
so
comfortable
like
jogging
right
by
their
window
and
I,
think
people
are
not
going
to
feel
comfortable
going
and
hanging
out
on
the
beach
and
watching
the
moon.
Come
up
things
like
that,
so
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
have
the
staff,
prepare
an
RFP
and,
of
course,
subject
to
review
in
consideration,
but
that
the
RFP
prepared
in
such
a
way
that
it's
generally
conforming
to
the
prior
requests.
V
That
and
that
the
reviewing
and
evaluation
committee
include
members
of
the
public
and
numbers
of
the
manat.
Although
officially
organizations
but
I
think
there's
been
enough
community
leadership
that
that
the
that
the
mayor
could
find
a
good,
solid
group
of
engaged
citizens
to
participate
in
that,
but
that
that
we
get
a
draft
of
an
that
looks
like
that.
Did.
V
AA
V
M
V
V
A
You
help
us
understand
all
the
Middle's
alderwoman
wilson.
Somebody
says:
okay,
I've
got
this
idea
generally
people
up
here
like
it,
you
know
and
I'm.
Gonna
put.
You
know
ten
million
dollars
into
this
mansion.
If
it's
fix
it
up
nicely
and
all
of
that
who,
when
the
right
mind,
is
going
to
do
that
and
they
don't
own,
the
building.
I
mean
I,
understand
the
land
under.
It
would
absolutely
remain
city
land
and
be
and
be
leased,
but
you
take,
for
instance,
the
Drake
Hotel
in
Chicago,
my
understandings,
that's
actually
on
city
of
Chicago
land.
A
V
Now
here's
my
opinion
and
it's
almond,
Fisk
mentioned
the
the
Pritzker
team,
evaluated
the
property
and
determine
that
using
it.
For
you
know,
restored
bed-and-breakfast
would
not
work
so
I
just
think
that
there's
this
universe
of
things
that
are
not
feasible,
so
the
idea
of
putting
ten
million
dollars
into
it
for
a
hotel
probably
isn't
going
to
work.
This
is
an
opinion
statement.
My
opinion
is
that
the
likely
use
that's
going
to
come
forward
and
be
the
most
appealing
to
the
community
and
maintain
that
access
is
not
going
to
be
the
use.
V
That's
going
to
restore
it
to
its
former
grandeur,
so
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
use
that
repairs
the
building,
maintains
the
building
and
keeps
it
in
generally
good
condition.
But
things
like
you
know,
fabulous
event,
space
for
a
high
end.
You
know
catered
events,
that's
probably
the
math
isn't
going
to
work
unless
we're
required
to
put
money
into
it.
A
restaurant
I,
don't
think,
is
gonna
work
unless
we
pay
for
it
and
we're
not
willing
to
do
that.
V
V
But
it's
going
to
be
something
along
the
lines
of
you
know:
Museum,
II
or
art
center
II,
or
things
of
that
nature
so
again
maintaining
that
community
access
I
could
be
wrong,
and
so,
but
I'm
and
I'm
willing
to
listen
to
the
other
ideas,
but
I
think
that's
what's
going
to
happen,
but
I
think
we
should
leave
it
open
enough
so
that
those
other
day
ideas
can
come
forward
if
they,
if
they
choose
to
okay.
Thank.
AC
W
If
we're,
if
our
goal
really
is
to
try
to
come
and
to
some
resolution
of
this
matter
in
the
next
18
months,
I,
don't
see
that
as
a
way
forward
and
frankly,
I'm
I
I
think
it's
not
really
fair
to
the
council
not
to
fully
understand
who's
out
there
and
who
has
an
interest
in
this
property.
I
think
alderman.
Rainey
is
absolutely
right
in
that.
W
We
need
to
know
that
who's
ever
coming
in
has
the
resources
to
run
and
maintain
and
take
care
of
the
building
in
a
responsible,
financially
responsible
way.
Again
we,
the
lake
house,
house
and
Gardens
there
was
a
study
done
that
if
they
did
not
fulfill
their
event
quota,
it
was
going
to
take
roughly
11
to
15
million
dollars
in
order
to
have
an
endowment
that
could
operate
and
run
that
house.
In
the
absence
of
events-
and
that's
these
are
these
are
all
numbers
that
that
are
floating
and
need
again
to
be
part
of
our
discussion.
W
Again,
putting
putting
obstacles
in
our
way
of
fully
understanding
who
is
out
there
who
actually
can
do
this
work
now,
alderman
Watson
I.
Remember
very
well
your
motion.
How
much
money
do
we
have?
Could
we
put
in
there
I
think
we
came
up
with
about
$650,000
to
get
the
building
working
so
that
maybe
we
could
move
some
rec
programs
in
there
and
the
city
obviously
didn't
have
the
money
to
do
that.
W
W
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think
we're
there
yet
and
I
understand
your
your
interest
in
moving
this
ahead,
but
I
think
we're
moving
it
ahead
and
in
really
the
wrong
direction
that
will
limit
us
from
making
making
good
decisions
going
forward
and
I
don't
care
what
those
decisions
are.
But
I
do
care
about.
Having
all
the
information
available
to
make
the
right
decision,
when
I'm
called
to
do
that,
thank.
B
X
A
Seeing
seeing
none
city
clerk
can
take
the
role
on
this
on
this
motion
and
again
just
so
everybody's
klett
me
just
make
sure
I
want
to
make
sure
everybody's
clear
on
this
motion
its
and
correct
me.
If
I'm
missing
anything
here,
alderman
Wilson,
it
was
generally
conforming
to
fire.
Rfp
city
would
maintain
ownership
of
the
land.
A
A
V
Major
elements:
the
community
members
in
the
evaluation
committee-
yes,.
A
B
AB
Y
O
A
X
H
X
V
AD
U
AD
V
A
Did
say
generally
confront
me
I,
don't
know
generally
conforming
to
prior
ones.
The
last
one
that
we
did
did
speak
definitely
to
financial
capacity.
Maybe
we
didn't
really,
you
know,
hold
them
on
that,
but
I
think
you
know
hopefully
I
mean
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
mr.
city
manager,
but
I
think
you've
heard
of
a
robust
conversation
tonight.
You
know
the
history
you've
been
around
for
the
whole
history
and
can
help
put
together
a
really
good
RFP
for
this
council
under
react.
AA
J
AC
A
Z
Sorry
m1
purple
the
minutes:
the
regular
City
Council
meetings
at
February,
25th,
2019
and
March
2nd
2019
for
action
item.
A1
is
payroll
February
for
2019
through
February
17th
2019
in
the
amount
of
three
million
one
hundred
twenty
two
thousand
seven
hundred
dollars
and
seventy-five
cents.
A
two
is
bills
list:
March
12th,
2019
credit
card
activity,
not
including
Amazon
purchases
for
the
period
ending
January
26
2019
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
fifty
three
thousand
sixty
eight
dollars
and
53
cents.
Z
A
three
is
off
a
four
is
a
contract
with
Java
and
paving
for
Lovelace
park
tennis
court
rehabilitation
item.
Eight
five
is
a
contract
with
landscape
concepts;
Management
Inc
for
Green
Bay,
Road
landscape
maintenance
day.
Six
is
a
contract
of
clean
slate
Chicago
LLC
for
2019
mowing
services;
a
seven,
a
contract
with
Visio
sewer
of
Illinois
LLC
for
the
2019
CIP
P
sewer
rehabilitation
contract
a
project;
a
eight
is
a
sole
source
purchase
of
hot
mix.
Asphalt
from
builders
asphalt,
a.
Z
Nine
is
a
soul
source
contract
for
the
purchase
of
concrete
and
flowable
fill
with
oohs
Inga
ready-mix
Inc.
A
ten
is
a
purchase
and
lease
of
city
vehicles
11
has
been
removed.
A
12
is
a
sole
source
agreement
with
Robo
think
LLC
for
youth
classes
and
camps.
A
13
is
the
2019
non
park.
Special
events.
A
14
is
a
nine
month
lease
for
studio
109
at
noise,
Cultural
Arts
Center
a
15
is
a
nine
month
lease
for
Studio
B
12
in
the
noise
Cultural
Arts
Center.
Z
A
16
is
a
one-year
lease
agreement
for
office
space
at
the
Lorraine
H
Morton
Civic
Center.
A
17
is
a
one-year
lease
agreement
for
the
apartment
located
at
12:23
Simpson
Street
a
18
is
a
there's.
A
loan
agreement
with
police
chief
Demetrius
cook
a
19
is
a
sale
of
surplus
property
fleet
vehicles.
A
20
is
off
a
21.
Is
the
ordinance
601
nine
sale
contract
for
a
city
on
real
property
located
at
17
29
dodge
Avenue
to
Evanston
Township
High
School
District
number
202
a
22.
Is
you.
Z
C
X
A
U
A
AB
P1
ordinance
21-0
19
granting
a
special
use
to
expand
a
craft
alcohol
production
facility,
Sketchbook
Brewing
Company
at
8:21,
823,
Chicago
Avenue.
The
applicant
has
complied
with
all
zoning
requirements
and
meets
all
of
the
standards
for
a
special
use
for
this
district
Alderman.
When
request
suspension
of
the
rules
for
introduction
in
action
at
our
meeting
this
evening.
AB
So
this
is
for
introduction
in
action.
P
2
as
ordinance
22,
0
19,
a
special
use
permit
for
a
planned
development
at
9:10,
938,
Custer,
Avenue
and
amending
the
zoning
map.
The
Ahmet
map
amendment
would
rezone
from
a
transitional
manufacturing
employment
district
to
a
mixed
juice,
employment
district
and
a
special
use
for
a
planned
development
for
40
single-family
attached
townhomes
in
five
standalone
buildings
that
feature
interior
courtyards,
two-car
attached
garages,
her
dwelling
unit
and
building
height
of
four
storeys.
The
proposal
includes
six
site
development
allowances.
This
is
for
introduction.
A
Y
A
A
C
C
G
C
You
Lucas
and
central
Evanston
I'd,
also
like
to
move
item
Oh
for
the
entrepreneurial
support
program.
Application
economic
development
community
recommends
the
approval
of
City
Council
financial
assistance
through
the
entrepreneur,
support
program,
totaling
2,500
nets
for
the
Nelson
career,
curators
and
then
item.
Oh
five
is
the
Evanston
Development
Corporation
request
financial
assistance.
The
Economic
Development
Committee
was
recommending
the
approval
of
City
Council
of
60,000
in
Community
Development
Block
Grant
funding
for
that
corporate.
E
B
B
Q
A
A
I
AD
T
C
I'm,
so
by
the
way,
thank
you
very
smitten.
If
I
could
just
speak
briefly
to
this,
so
maybe
not
this
specific
bid,
but
I
think
that
this
bid
is
an
example
of
many
opportunities.
They
can
go
to
a
local
contractor
and
we
have
companies
like
nature's
perspective
and
other
large
contractors.
One
of
the
discussions
that
I
had
with
director
stone
Beck
is
one
of
the
barriers
is
the
bonding
and
the
insurance.
C
That's
that's
being
asked
for
amount
of
our
smaller
businesses,
so
I
think
I'm
gonna
try
to
raise
this
in
our
MWBE,
but
I
would
like
for
a
city
for
us
for
us
as
a
council
to
look
at
these
opportunities
and
really
focus
on
our
local
businesses
and
figure
out.
What
are
the
barriers
from
them
bidding
on
it,
and
so
I
will
say
this
to
our
city
manager
and
staff.
C
AC
Sorry
yeah
Oh
mr.
mayor
members
of
the
committee
I
had
talked
with
Kevin
Brown
earlier
about
speaking
to
this
item,
because
we
had
discussed
your
concerns
earlier
and
I
I.
Don't
think
that
everybody
recalls.
One
of
the
reasons
that
we
went
was
clean
slate
originally
was
because
they
offer
a
transitional
job
program
where
former
incarcerated
persons
can
get
employment
and
he's
worked
extensively
with
clean
slate
to
get
local
Evanston
residents
employed
with
the
service.
So
that's
a
just
a
counterpoint
to
the
discussion
that's
been
had
earlier
this
evening.
So.
C
Y
I
make
a
comment:
real,
quick,
I'm.
Sorry,
just
I
appreciate
that
I
I
think
I
agree.
You
know
those
kind
of
things
can
be
put
in
there.
I'd
again
diverge
just
to
say
some
of
our
community
might
not
appreciate
that
they
might
not
be
supportive
of
that
and
you
going
to
act
like
we
don't
have
people
like
that
here,
but
that
you
know
we
might
want
to
say
this
offer
some
kind
of
community
benefit,
but
I
I
would
hate
for
this
company
for
people
to
say
I
don't
want
ex-offender.
Y
You
know
to
start
another
kind
of
negative
campaign
against
this
company
being
that
they
obviously
I,
think
Paul
or
whoever
was
up
here
except
we've
been
dealing
with
it
for
several
years
and
they're
doing
great
work.
So
I
do
appreciate
you
bringing
that
up.
I
do
support
Ottoman
Braith
way,
though,
and
really
trying
to
continue
to
push
where
there
might
be
other
barriers.
Y
A
AD
B
A
AE
Z
Eleven
is
the
service
provider
given
with
YWCA
Evanston
Northshore
staff,
recommends
city
council,
authorize
the
city
manager
to
sign
a
six-month
service
provider,
agree
with
the
YW
CA
evidence
in
Northshore,
which
will
cost
$75,000.
The
service
agreement
will
supplement
victim
services
with
training
for
law
enforcement,
24-hour
crisis
intervention
and
set
aside
two
beds
for
a
victim
of
domestic
violence.
Z
The
funds
will
be
provided
from
the
Health
and
Human
Services
service
agreements
fund,
with
a
year-to-date
budget
amounts
of
$75,000
city
council,
previously
approved
to
fund
to
current
full-time
victim,
advocate
positions
for
six
months
and
eliminates
one
vacant
victim
advocate
position.
This
is
for
action.
A
AD
We
had
a
very
detailed
discussion
in
our
committee
and
several
of
my
concerns
were
addressed,
but
I
just
want
to
address
the
council
on
one
issue,
and
that
is
I'm
very
concerned
that
this
statement,
written
by
staff,
the
recommended
action
that
this
service
agreement
will
supplement.
Current
Victim
Services
with
training
for
law
enforcement,
24-hour
crisis
intervention
and
set-aside
of
two
beds
for
victims
of
domestic
violence.
AD
It
can
be
supplemented,
it
absolutely
can
be,
and
the
time
is
going
to
come
very
soon
when
the
effort
is
going
to
be
made
to
replace
it
and
I'm
asking
you
to
please
be
sensitive
to
this
issue.
I
know
it
is
the
of
the
YWCA
that
it
becomes
our
singular
Victim
Services
program
and,
while
I'm
sure
they
would
do
a
lovely
job
they
are.
AD
They
are
not
the
community
Victim
Services
program
that
the
community
knows,
although
they
have
been
doing
this
work
for
many
years
and
we've
been
financed,
we've
been
assisting
them
with
financing
for
many
years
and
we
should
continue
to
do
that,
but
as
a
supplement
to
our
program.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
Y
Ottoman
Rainey
said
I
had
called
her
mom
and
I
agree
with
my
concern
about
Victim
Services
in
the
long
run
for
me,
I
think
I'm
there's
still
some
lack
of
clarity
in
terms
of
how
this
duplicates.
You
know
what
we
already
do.
What
there's
some
concern
about?
The
you
know
there
was
conversation
about
going
to
court
with
people
and
I
know
that
the
Y
is
currently
they
are
filing
these
letters,
not
letters
orders
of
protection,
but
I
know
some
of
our
clients
also
would
like
people
to
attend
court
with
them.
Y
Y
We
had
a
very
labored
conversation
and
we
talked
about
wanting
to
make
sure
the
24-hour
support
was
there
and
understanding
the
two
women
who
were
in
place
couldn't
do
this
and
while,
while
the
Y
talks,
you
know
this
contract
talks
about
what
it
will
do,
there
will
be
24-hour
crisis
line,
but
still
this
does
not
fulfill.
You
know
the
24-hour
support
and
we
you
know
it's
over
and
over
again
to
all
the
community.
Things
were
going
to
be
great,
and
this
was
going
to
be
the
same.
Y
K
C
It's
a
wonderful
day
so,
for
those
that
did
not
have
an
opportunity
to,
you
know,
hear
what
we
discussed.
An
administrative
Oh
boss,
I
just
wanted
to
share
a
couple
of
thoughts,
because
we
did
have
a
lengthy
conversation
and
one
of
the
specific
questions
that
I
asked
was
just
I
asked
the
folks
from
the
Y
and
also
our
city
staff,
to
outline
you
know
where
there
is
difference
and-
and
it
was
pretty
clear
to
me
and
of
course,
to
Karen
and
in
our
staff
I
want
to.
Thank
you
all
for
your
thoughtful
comments.
C
I,
don't
think
anyone
here
would
disagree
that
this
is
a
very
important
topic.
I
think
the
YWCA
is
wonderful
reputation
in
the
community
for
serving
this,
but
specific
population
goes
without
question.
The
two
things
that
were
very
clear
to
me
that
was
outlined
is
the
need
for
ongoing
training,
and
the
wise
participation
and
working
very
closely
with
our
police
department
was
something
that's
notable
and
I
and
I've
said
this
before
and
I
think.
This
is
such
a
valuable
piece
and
I
just
congratulate
Karen
and
our
staff,
embracing
it.
C
It's
the
work
with
the
actual
abuse,
which
happened
to
be
men
and
we're
not
currently
doing
that
and
they
bring
that
to
the
table,
and
so,
when
I
think
about
the
services
did
I
just
mentioned,
as
well
as
the
fact
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
work
24
hours,
the
restrictions
that
we
had
before
was
all
staffing
and
money.
We
only
have
two
people-
and
this
was
a
budget
conversation
that
we
all
had.
It's
like
all
of
a
sudden.
C
Some
of
us
here
have
an
amnesia
about
this
and
it
was
difficult
to
find
the
staff
we
advertised
for
them
and
we
couldn't
find
us
the
staff
after
we
went
through
like
rounds
and
rounds
of
discussion
on
how
to
figure
it
out.
So
this
contract
that
landed
in
our
lap
was
based
out
of
a
discussion
that
we
had
several
months
ago,
so
Karen
I
just
want
to.
Thank
you
very
much
with
a
very
thoughtful
proposal,
director,
thomas
smith.
A
AF
AF
AF
X
AF
A
Z
I
am
820
is
a
grant
agreement
with
youth
Job
Center
to
provide
funding
for
a
career
partnership
manager
staff
recommends
the
City
Council,
authorize
the
city
manager
to
sign
a
grant
agreement
with
youth
Job
Center
to
provide
funding
in
the
amount
of
$90,000
to
help
cover
the
cost
of
a
career
partnership
manager.
The
position
will
help
facilitate
the
partnership
between
the
youth
job
center,
the
mayor's
employer,
Advisory
Council
of
as
in
Township,
High,
School
and
other
community
partners
who
are
dedicated
to
supporting
youth
and
young
adults.
Z
L
X
L
L
But
we
as
the
youth
Job
Center,
trying
to
offer,
as
we
ask
employers
to
do
living
wage
with
benefits,
and
so
we
have
to
add
in
wage
benefits,
local
travel,
miscellaneous
equipment,
there's
laptop
there's
some
of
the
needs
for
just
setting
up
in
the
first
year
that
wouldn't
be
in
a
subsequent
year.
So
that's
it
that's
the
budget
and
we
can
I
think
it
was
included
in.
X
X
On
the
job
description
for
the
position,
what
work
is
unique
to
the
services
already
currently
provided
by
our
hot
reach,
Department
and
the
Career
Services
at
ETH
si?
Maybe
it
set
another
way?
How
is
this
different
than
the
work
that
e
th
s
is
already
doing,
and
the
work
that
our
youth,
adult
staff
does
well.
L
And
that's
a
really
great
question
and
I
could
probably
spend
about
two
hours
sharing
a
lot
about
that,
but
I
would
say
that
Y
JC's
work
historically
has
been
helping
young
kids
get
jobs,
especially
high
school
students,
and
that
is
based
on
the
research
that
a
first
positive
job
experience
really
sets
a
very
different
trajectory.
But
in
the
last
couple
of
years
we've
started
recognizing
how
much
that's
not
enough
for
young
people,
and
we
see
it
too
often
with
young
adults
who
come
back
and
they've
struggled.
L
They
didn't
launch
successfully
when
they
graduated
from
high
school
and
then
the
barriers
start
stacking
up
and
when
they're
22
or
23
and
sleeping
on
someone's,
couch
and
and
maybe
have
a
criminal
background.
It's
a
lot
tougher
to
get
him
there.
So
we've
moved
more
into
helping
young
people
think
about
careers,
but
our
positions
basically
are
still
constructed
as
job
training
and
job
placement.
This
moves
really
into
career,
but
it
moves
beyond
the
individuals
themselves.
L
It
also
moves
into
what
the
employers
can
do
to
support
that,
how
they
can
get
in
front
of
the
young
people
and
as
well
as
at
the
high
school
there's
a
high
school
leadership
that
really
wants
to
embed
career
and
much
more,
for
example,
this
week
as
career
week
at
ETA
chess.
But
it's
one
week
a
year
and
everything
else
is
college.
It
should
be
monthly.
It
should
be
at
the
very
least
quarterly.
So
this
position
is
super
complementary
to
the
work
that
we
do
and
I
would
say,
the
outreach
team
does
as
well.
L
X
L
I
think
in
the
long
term,
that's
absolutely
something
that
we
as
a
collaborative
do
would
do.
This
is
not
a
fully
youth,
Job
Center
led
initiative.
This
is
truly
a
partnership.
Youth
Job
Center
is
going
to
hire
the
person
we're
all
going
to
supervise
the
high
school,
provides
space
access
to
counselors
access
to
teachers.
It's
one
of
the
things
we
struggle
with
quite
for
is
getting
in
front
of
the
people
that
have
so
much
influence
on
the
young
people,
and
then
the
city
is
supportive
and
the
mayor's
employer.
L
L
X
L
I
can't
really
speak
on
behalf
of
e
th
s,
but
what
I
can
say
from
my
observations
is
that
it
is
a
college
prep,
school
and
but
part
of
that
is
that
all
high
schools
are
held
accountable.
Now,
how
many
kids
go
to
college?
Did
we
see
the
same
thing
in
every
city?
It's
it's
the
kind
of
the
federal
mandate
for
the
last
two
decades.
L
This
helped
every
young
kid
get
to
college,
because
that's
how
they
can
get
a
good
job
and
what
we've
missed
out,
and
that
is
two
things
the
first
one
is
it
doesn't
fit
for.
Everyone
in
the
second
is
there's
whole
industries
that
are
really
viable
and
necessary
in
our
infrastructure
that
have
been
devalued
in
that
so
the
school
leadership
that
we're
working
with
is
very
excited
about
this
and-
and
my
understanding
is
sometimes
it's
evanston
pressure
that
keeps
it
really
focused
on
helping
every
kid
get
to
college.
L
X
V
You
more
comments
and
questions,
but
I'd
recently
commented
on
the
idea
of
the
importance
of
us
tearing
down
barriers,
and
you
know
this
is
doing
that
in
bridges,
and
so
we've
heard
from
our
staff
we've
heard
from
our
team
of
and
from
mr.
Brown
and
and
I
have
faith
in.
You
know
their
understanding
of
what
the
needs
are.
V
So
I
respect
that,
and
hopefully
we
can
be
supportive
of
this-
some
of
grateful
for
the
fact
that
this
ultimately
this
was
grant
money
that
that
came
our
way
and
to
me
this
seems
like
an
excellent
use
of
that
grant.
Money
and
I
think
this
is
really
going
to
be
impactful,
particularly
in
view
of
that
contextual
history.
The
mr.
Brown
walk
through
you
know,
it's
been
tried,
here's
what
we
learned
and
here's
how
we
can
actually
hopefully
make
it
work
this
time.
Thanks
for
that.
L
We
have
and
I
I
will
be
a
hundred
percent,
honest
I,
that's
on
me
and
I'm
gonna
figure
out
how
to
deal
with
that.
I
did
not
realize
you
know.
This
was
actually
published
in
the
Evanston
Roundtable
back
in
November
that
the
mayor's
fund
was
going
to
support
this
and
elevate
Evanston
and
mayor's
employer,
Advisory,
Council
and
I'll
confess
naivety
in
not
recognizing
I
needed
to
put
a
pause
on
it
because
you
know
we're
looking
at
from
our
perspective,
the
June
15th
deadline.
Once
those
seniors
are
gone,
it
is
so
much
harder
to
catch
them.
L
A
Know
we
just
I
would
just
add
the
the
value
of
this
partnership,
and
it
really
is
a
partnership
between
the
city
y
GA,
c
and
e
th
s
and
having
it
located
at
the
high
school
is
not
to
do
something
that
just
high
school
should
be
the
only.
The
fact
of
the
matter
is
I
mean
you
heard
this
statement
from
Pete
Davis,
22
percent
of
the
kids.
A
If
it
is,
you
know
producing
the
kind
of
results
that
we're
expecting
institutionalizing.
It
means
that
when
kids
do
go
off
to
college
for
a
year
and
drop
out,
they
know
that
they
can
go
back
to
this
position.
Okay
and
this
person
will
will
help
them
and
there's
tremendous
value
in
that,
because
I,
worry
and
I
know
a
lot
of
us
do
up
here
about
these.
These
young
people
who
have
graduated
and
are
sort
of
meandering,
all
the
men
braithwaite
then
alderman,
Rainey
yeah,.
C
AD
Third,
all
the
woman
Rainey,
yes,
I'm
very
pleased
with
this
effort
and
I
found
that
the
passion
of
those
people
who
are
involved
in
the
committee
or
the
project
are
is
very
real.
However,
I
am
disappointed
that
the
city
has
not
produced
any
results
or
outcomes
of
all.
This
has
nothing
to
do
with
you,
but
you
are
reminding
me
of
the
of
all
the
efforts
that
we
been
making
over
the
last
four
or
five
years
in
youth,
employment,
etc,
etc.
AD
We've
spent
a
lot
of
money,
and
several
of
us
on
this
council
have
asked
for
information
to
show
some
of
the
outcomes.
Some
of
the
results,
some
of
what
have
our
efforts
produced.
Do
we
have
any
of
us
just
saying?
No,
we
don't
have
any
evidence
of
any
outcome.
That's
that's
all
I
really
thought
by
tonight.
AD
We
would
get
some
response
and
we
haven't
so
I
like
knowing
that
those
are
some
of
the
that's
some
of
the
things
that
you're
going
to
do,
and
that's
really
important,
because
it
it
gives
us
encouragement
to
keep
the
money
coming.
You
know
and
to
keep
the
support
coming,
but
the
city,
the
city,
needs
to
say
something
about
what
we're
doing
instead
of
coming.
You
know
every
budget
saying
we
need
more
money
for
this
new
program
and
we
have
multiple
programs
so.
T
L
I
respond
is
that
I
just
want
to
say
one
thing:
I
really
appreciate
you
saying
that,
and
one
of
the
things
that
gets
harder
when
stronger
ship
when
partnerships
get
stronger,
is
that
nobody
owns
the
outcome
anymore
and
that
quite
the
same
way,
I
mean
we
have
to
together
really
move
these
young
people
into
paths
that
will
work
for
them.
But
it's
us
collectively
that
are
doing
it
and
I
have
to
say
we
love
our
relationship
with
the
youth
and
young
adult
division.
L
AD
Of
you
to
say
that,
but
we
need
to
know
that
too
and
I'm
sure
some
people
who
are
more
connected
will
know
that.
But
I
remember
way
back
when,
before
you
probably
even
heard
of
the
youth
Job
Center,
we
would
say
that
to
engineer
and
and
Janette
and
others
after
her
figured
out
a
way
to
produce
outcomes,
and
it
was
amazing.
The
information
she
gleaned
from
her
clientele
I
mean
just
amazing
and
so
I
was
always
very
impressed
by
that,
because
she
could
prove
and
others
could
prove
that
her
work
really
mattered.
AD
A
AA
Thank
you,
Karen
very
much
for
this
program.
I
think
it's
terrific
and
I
have
one
or
two
questions.
Actually
I
was
at
the
conference
that
almond
Simmons
is
at
right.
Now,
six
or
seven
years
ago,
the
first
time
I
went
to
a
workshop
on
Workforce,
Development
and
I
heard
about
what
Louisville
was
doing.
AA
Louisville
worked
with
their
school
systems
to
start
developing
and
changing
curriculum,
and
then
they
linked
the
curriculum
and
taking
the
courses
and
getting
both
certification
and
then
associate's
degrees,
with
specific
jobs
with
employers,
and
that
was
the
success
was
that
they
had
they
had
all
the
pieces
together
and
I.
Think
from
what
we've
heard
here,
and-
and
this
is
something
we
have
been
talking
about-
a
lot
was
that
we
were
missing
the:
where
is
the
job
where's,
the
first
start
and
with
the
career
and
I?
AA
Think
that's
what
we're
we're
getting
all
of
the
pieces
joined
together,
I
hope
here,
and
so
my
question
is,
is
what
is
the
et
HS
thinking
about
in
terms
of
possibly
changing
the
curriculum
or
emphasizing
other
skills,
because
you're
right?
It
is
a
college
prep
school.
At
this
point,
and
that's
because
of
federal
mandates
and
and
the
way
the
testing
is
going.
These
days
and
I've
talked
to
people
who
graduated
years
ago,
who
talked
about
other
skills
that
they
learned
and
parts
of
ETH
s
that
nobody
goes
to
anymore.
AA
F
I
know
that,
but
I
said
no,
but
you
can
Job
Shadow
and
you
can
also
do
it
come
to
the
classes
say
what
does
it
like
to
be
an
entrepreneur
like
starving
for
two
years
and
why
not,
but
II
ths
is
invent,
is
it
is
investing
at
the
point?
They're
gonna
bring
these
employers
in
and
I'll.
Give
you
one
anecdotal
thing:
if
you
don't
mind
when,
when
we
went
to
see
the
eight
employers
on
a
third
one,
dr.
Davis
stood
up
in
in
public
and
said,
I
cannot
believe
what
I'm
seeing
here.
AA
A
W
W
Thank
you,
so
I
just
had
a
question,
so
the
$90,000
is
for
the
first
year.
What
happens
in
year
two
well.
L
Right
away,
when
we
get
started,
we
will
start
to
look
for
additional
funding.
You
know,
funding
in
a
non-profit
is
unfortunately,
here
over
a
year
every
year
we,
the
clock,
ticks
and
we
turns
over
and
we
start
raising
our
funds
all
over
again.
We
would
love
if
we're
on
metric
and
we're
making
strides
that
it
would
be
considered
again
next
year,
but
really
to
give
a
couple
years
to
think
about
how
do
we
go
after
a
longer
term,
more
sustainable
funding
and
sometimes
that's
with
larger
funders
and
multi-year
grants.
H
A
Y
L
You
know
it's
a
great
question
and
I
it
came
through
all
of
us.
I
mean
it
emerged
over
time.
It
wasn't
that
we
needed
up,
but
we
started
thinking
about
this
as
a
position.
What
happened
was
the
mayor's
employer
advisory
council
started
convening
in
that
first
in
June
there
were
about
40
people
there
and
they
walked
through
HHS,
Career
and
Technical
Education
facilities,
which,
if
you
haven't
seen,
you
need
to
term
they're
phenomenal,
and
nobody
knows
about
him.
L
And
so
what
happened
during
that
time
was
started.
Really.
The
recognition
of
what
was
missing
and
what
was
missing
really
is
this
lack
of
connection
between
the
great
work
happening
in
the
school
the
employers
needs
and
what
they're
trying
to
do
in
really
best
practices
around
building
a
strong
workforce
and
to
kind
of
ease
that
mismatch.
That
has
happened
for
too
long
and
left
both
sides
slightly
frustrated.
That's
where
the
position
came
in.
It's.
F
All
that
I'll
make
one
other
comment.
This
was
a
born
of
discussions
with
a
THS
with
dr.
Bayliss
Shelley
gates.
It
was
also
including
cradle
to
career
and
and
Karen,
of
course,
and
a
couple
you
know
some
of
the
MEAC
folks
that
were
present
in
some
of
these
visits.
They
said
we
just
don't
have
the
bridge,
we
just
don't
have
the
connection,
and
it
became
pretty
obvious
pretty
early
that
this
kind
of
position
would
work
well
and
again,
it
was
a
consensus
deal.
I
would.
A
Just
all
that
alderwoman
I
would
just
add
I,
you
know
attended
several
of
the
the
mayor's
employers,
Advisory
Council
work
with
different
folks
in
the
community
that
are
parts
of
it
and
kept
hearing
really
really
positive
response
about.
Finally,
feeling
like
the
community
was
coming
together
to
work,
you
know
really
cohesively
on
this.
In
this
fall,
I
went
to
Neal
and
I
said:
hey,
you
know,
workforce
development
is
important
to
me.
I
am
thinking
about
making
an
investment
with
a
good
neighbor
fund
in
this
area.
How
could
we
best
put
that
money
to
work?
A
And
then
you
all
started
to
do
your
thing
drafted
a
proposal
and
said
we
all
think
and
again
this
is
everybody.
This
is
this
is
Neal,
and
that
group
this
is
y
jc--.
This
is
e
THS.
All
saying
we
think
this
is
good
and
again
I
like
the
fact
that
it's
a
real
collaboration,
I
think
good
things
come
from
that.
Y
X
Sent
a
statement
which
reads:
workforce
development
is
a
goal
we
all
share
and
I
appreciate
mayor
Haggerty
expressing
it
as
a
goal
for
our
city
designating
good
neighbor
grant
funds
was
an
important
statement.
I
do
not
support
funding
$90,000
for
the
new
position.
I
want
to
see
impact
from
the
limited
resources
we
have
and
use
more
of
our
money
to
directly
empower
residents
and
not
continue
to
create
jobs,
committees
and
organizations
that
curate
the
same
list
of
tools
and
resources
to
job
seeking
residents
that
have
already
proven
insufficient.
X
It's
my
opinion
that
$90,000
is
better
spent,
investing
in
the
skill
set
capacity
and
credentialing
of
our
residents
or
expanding
the
proven
workforce
development
services
already
provided
by
our
staff
$90,000
toward
one
job
to
encourage
our
local
businesses
to
hire
locally
and
stop
the
most
responsible
use.
I
was
hoping
I
learned
more
about
the
Job
Description
and
could
enthusiastically
support
it.
But
after
meeting
with
the
elevate
committee
members
I
do
not
support
this
funding.
X
My
recommendation
is
that
a
member
from
elevate
monitor,
MW
EBE
committee,
if
not
participate,
so
that
informed
decisions
are
made
all
around
relevant
discussions
include
immediate
local
workforce
gaps
evident
by
non-compliant
trade
contractors
on
our
CIP
projects.
An
example
of
a
great
use
of
$40,000
is
supporting
rebuilding
warehouse
that
will
equip
30
residents
with
certification
that
will
qualify
them
to
be
employed
as
well
as
10
residents
that
will
receive
PA
ID
training,
I,
oversee
paid
training,
I
believe
the
$90,000
should
be
split
between
our
current
workforce
development
and
apportioned
to
subsidize
training.
X
Kevin
Brown
presented
a
report
last
week
which
show
partnerships
with
a
hundred
employers
and
outcomes,
and
I
would
like
to
see
these
funds
use
to
expand
the
existing
effort
of
what
has
measurable
outcomes.
I
do
not
support
this,
as
proposed
I
would
like
to
see
further
input.
The
workforce
has
been
clear.
They
want
to
hire
locally,
but
our
workforce
is
not
prepared.
X
Y
Y
You
know
I
again,
absolutely
so.
I
grew
agree
with
a
lot
of
what
she's.
What
she
said.
I
think
the
issue
for
me
is
is
that
we
have
a
lot
of
in
this
city
a
lot
of
nonprofits
a
lot
of
collaboration,
a
lot
of
initiatives.
They
also
agree.
They
all
don't
integrate
this
one
hopefully
will
in
great.
But
what
what
my
disconnect
is
is
that,
as
we've
put
money
into,
for
instance,
creative
career
in
other
other
places,
I
still
don't
necessarily
see
them
come
into
fortune.
Y
I
just
think
they
do
take
time,
but
as
I
communicate
it
to
you
all
they
take
time,
but
at
the
same
time
residents
are
calling
all
the
time
say
they
don't
have
any
more
time
whether
it's
you
know
a
young
person
like
a
for
a
job
or
it's
a
senior
looking
for
property
tax
help.
Whatever
it
is
and
being
that
you,
we
talked
about
these
big
changes
that
need
to
happen
at
the
high
school.
Y
So
you
know
how
I
love
the
idea
of
some
more
hands-on
kind
of
training
for
people
who
are
looking
for
jobs
now
I
would
love
to
make
me
get
the
key,
this
mayor's
youth
or
mayor's
workforce
in
a
better
situation,
so
that
everybody
has
some
skin
in
the
game.
So
to
speak.
To
get
this
going,
I
would
love
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
counselors
over
at
the
high
school
website
when
I
look
at
it,
if
they
want
to
be
not
so
college
focus
which
I
appreciate
I
think
that
they
can
maybe
start
to
use.
Y
C
AE
C
A
B
Y
B
W
C
A
Z
There's
item
822
orders,
1509
Tina,
many
portions
of
city
code,
title
seven
public
ways:
chapter
eight
trees
and
shrubs
staff
recommends
that
City
Council
adopt
more
than
1500
19,
which
will
amend
portions
of
the
city
code,
title
7,
public
ways,
chapter
8,
trees
and
shrubs
to
correct
staff.
Title
updates
and
clarifying
public
park
way
allowed
plantings.
Sir.
A
Y
Yeah
I
put
this
up.
I
forgot
so
last
week
I
made
an
ask
up
staff
to
add
bike
lanes
because
I
was
we
know.
We
have
bike
lanes
down
dodge
and
I
thought
bikers
talked
about
trees
and
bushes
and
such
they're
in
the
bike
lane
path.
So
I
pulled
this
off
because
that
was
amended
earlier,
but
it
anyway
so
I
emailed
everybody
that
amendment
so
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
the
ordinance
as
amend
it
and
I'm
happy
to
read
that.
Y
B
A
Y
A
X
AD
Y
Y
Z
AD
X
AD
A
A
A
AD
Want
to
announce
that
this
week
is
the
fifth
anniversary
of
peckish
pig
and
they're,
asking
everybody
to
come
for
all
sorts
of
free
things
and
I
have
a
meeting
on
Wednesday
night
for
lot.
18
parking
lot
for
the
people
on
the
wait
list.
Some
of
them
have
been
on
the
wait
list
since
2016
they're
having
a
meeting
to
resolve
their
long
wait
so
hope
to
see
people
there.
Thank.
Y
Y
You
know
response
in
the
way
that
they
have
worked
on
the
case
and
I
want
to
encourage
neighbors
to
continue
to
call
was
particularly
for
the
shots
fired.
I've
thank
you
for
the
neighbors
are
called,
and
we
just
want
to
continue,
encourage
everyone
to
do
so
on,
particularly
as
we
get
up
to
the
summer
months
when
we
know
historically
that's
when
crime,
it's
it's
more
get
worse.
C
K
H
C
X
B
I
just
want
to
make
two
quick
notes,
since
we
to
the
alderwoman
thing
today,
I
just
want
to
note
that
in
1892
I've
been
really
into
Evanston's
history.
Recently
in
1892
we
had
over
200
women
vote
in
our
municipal
election.
It
was
the
first
time
women
were
able
to
vote
in
Evanston.
It
was
years
before
women
actually
got
suffrage
in
the
nation.
So
Evanston
was
a
leader
in
allowing
women
to
vote
in
our
elections.
That
was
in
1892
and
Leslie.
B
I
just
want
to
say,
you
know,
I
also
I
live
in
the
fifth
Ward
and
the
young
man,
who
has
thus
far
been
nameless,
I,
want
to
say
his
name.
Angel
hey-zeus
Miranda
was
the
young
man
who
was
killed
here
in
a
city,
and
you
know
it.
It's
always
unfortunate.
Only
have
incidents
of
this
sort
happened
in
our
city.
So
that's
thank.
V
We
went
to
five
Illinois
compiled
statutes:
ilcs
120,
/,
2a
I
move
the
City
Council
convene
into
executive
session
to
discuss
agenda
items
regarding
personnel
in
litigation.
These
agenda
items
are
but
it's
our
permitted
subject
to
be
considered
an
executive
session
and
are
enumerated
exceptions
under
the
Open
Meetings
Act.
These
exceptions
are
five
ILCs
120,
/,
2a,
c
1
and
c
11.
Is
there
a.