►
From YouTube: Equity & Empowerment Commission - Jan. 20, 2022
Description
This video talks about various items related to the Equity and Empowerment Commission.
B
B
A
A
C
D
E
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
My
job
and
getting
my
junior
ready
for
college
takes
plenty
of
my
time.
That's
a
job
in
itself,
right,
jane,
fellow
mother,
of
three
sons.
So
with
that,
we
wanted
to
engage
in
conversation
about
nominating
current
commissioners
who
would
be
interested
in
these
positions
and
carla
I'll
put
this
out
there.
I'm
the
one
who
is
leaving
carla
is
still
staying
on
our
commission,
and
I
hope-
and
I
won't
speak
on
your
behalf-
is
willing
to
stay
on
as
a
ch
as
a
chair
but
matthew.
A
G
All
right,
so
I'm
happy
to
stay
on
as
a
chair
again,
if
the
other
people
who
want
to
step
up
that's
fine,
too,
I
feel
like
I
have
some
goals
that
I
want
to
achieve
on
this,
while
I'm
here
in
this
commission
like
seeing
stuff
through,
not
that
I'm
doing
it
all
by
myself
by
any
means.
Two
of
those
things
are,
you
know
getting
this
whether
it
turns
out
to
be
biannual
or
whatever
survey
off
the
ground
so
that
we,
you
know
we're.
G
D
First,
the
order
of
business
and,
if
carl
is
willing,
then
let
me
make
it
formal
and
nominate
her
for
continuing
chair
of
the
equity
empowerment
commission
for
another
year.
Please,
and
thank
you
carla,
very
much
and
then
second
alejandra,
congratulations
and
thank
you
to
you
for
all
your
service
on
this
commission.
D
It's
been
really
wonderful
to
be
in
the
same
space
with
you
here
and
do
all
this
work
and
and
and
follow
your
lead
on
so
many
things.
So
would
you,
if
you
can,
if
you
would
share
the
name
of
the
organization
where
you're
going
to
in
our
chat?
It's
got
a
website,
I'd
love
to
know
more,
but
congratulations
and
thank
you
and
yeah
thanks
for
saying.
Yes,
much
appreciated.
A
Thank
you
jane.
Yes,
this
has
been,
this
sure
has
been
a
ride.
I
think
the
we
have
really,
you
know
been
digging
our
hands
into
really
identifying
the
kind
of
vision,
aspiration
and
goals
that
we
want
to
lead
in
this
city.
It's
been
a
bumpy
road.
I
don't
know
how
clear
the
vision
was
at
first,
it
really
didn't
seem
very
clear
and
we've
really
leaned
into
it,
and
so,
and
I
really
appreciate
carla's
engagement.
A
She
really
has
been
a
force
and
really
challenging
us
to
be
focused
on
goals
and
making
sure
that
we
are
not
getting
pulled
or
taken
out
of
focus
of
what
we
want
to
do,
and
so
just
know.
While
I
served
as
chair
for
less
than
a
year
really,
this
role
requires
you
to
participate,
as
you
already
do,
participating
in
our
monthly
meetings.
A
My
role
has
been
to
support
that
by
helping
the
kind
of
like
the
business
side,
getting
the
agenda
together
and
facilitating,
and
so
you
know
filling,
my
role
would
be
for
somebody-
maybe
who's
open
to
helping
get
together
with
the
city
managing
staff,
to
put
agendas
together
and
to
be
supportive
and
facilitating
these
meetings
and
making
sure
that
we're.
I
don't
know
if
I
want
to
necessarily
say,
follow
robert's
rules
of
order
because,
as
you
know,
you
know
that
is
not.
G
And
I
don't
know
I
was
gonna
say
just
to
put
some
guidelines
around
that
piece
of
meeting
with
the
city
manager
normally
kimberly,
well
kimberly's
gone
now,
but
matthew
would
reach
out
to
us
about
a
week
and
a
half
before
the
meeting.
We
will
have
a
short
15-minute
meeting
where
we
discuss
what
are
the
things
that
need
to
go
on
the
agenda
and
kind
of
figure
out.
If
there's
any
documentation,
we
want
to
set
up
send
out
in
the
pre-email.
D
G
If
you
have
interest,
I
don't
want
to
call
somebody's
name
and
then
they
feel
on
the
spot
and
they
like
say
okay
and
then,
but
this
is
not
really
what
I
want
to
do.
You
can
feel
free
to
send
me
alejandra
a
private
message
if
you
don't
want
to
call
it
out
whatever
but
like
if
anybody
has
interest
or
if
anybody
feels
like
they'd
like
to
they'd
like
to
have
put
their
foot
in
the
game,
and
one
of
us
or
both
of
us
have
a
meeting
with
you
to
kind
of
discuss.
G
G
C
F
C
New
commissioner,
and
so
this
is
a
new
appointment
and
I
don't
want
to
you
know,
there's
people
who
have
been
on
this
who
have
been
on
this
commission
longer
than
me
and
no
more
than
I
do
so.
That's
the
only
reason
why
I'm
hesitant
so
I
you
know
so
I
put
my
pinky
toe
in
and
wait
for
everyone
else
to
decide
what
they
want
to
do
all
right.
G
And
I
would
I
mean
just
to
kind
of
add
to
that
when
lashandra
still
first
came
to
our
commission,
she
shared
with
us
that
what
she
does
for
a
living
is
equity
in
more
of
a
school
capacity.
But
this
is
kind
of
her
bread
and
butter,
and
so
I
couldn't
think
of
a
better
partner
to
help
move
along
in
that
way.
E
Well
I'll
go
ahead
and
say,
I
think,
I'm
probably
the
only
other
one
of
the
other
few
people
that's
been
out
here
the
longest.
So
if
you're
worried
about
getting
in
front
of
me,
don't
worry
about
it.
I
am
not
in
the
capacity
to
take
on
the
chair
or
co-chair
role,
so
you
all
are
more
than
welcome
to
raise
your
hand,
if
that's
what
you
would
like
to
do,.
C
G
D
May
I
make
it
formal,
then,
and
nominate
lashandra
rayfield
for
the
position
of
co-chair
of
the
equity
empowerment
commission.
So
we
have
two
nominees
and
and
lashandra.
If
you
decide
in
talking
to
carla
that
it's
not
something
I'll
withdraw
the
nomination,
but
just
to
create
some
momentum
in
that
positive
direction.
C
C
A
Okay,
all
right:
well,
we
have
two
nominations.
We
can,
please
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
carla
or
myself
with
any
questions.
We'd
love
to
make
ourselves
available
to
answer
your
questions,
but
I
believe
the
next
step
is
for
us
to
answer
those
questions
make
ourselves
available
in
our
next
meeting.
We
will
take
those
formal
nominations
and
take
a
vote.
A
G
A
A
G
Was
it
after
mathematical,
weekend
or
february,
either
way,
I
think
it's
a
little
pushback
because
of
the
holiday,
but
at
this
point
and
matthew
can
kind
of
tell
us
a
little
further
as
soon
as
the
said,
patrick
from
the
city
is
complete
with
the
translation,
it
will
be
good
to
go
out.
Many
of
you
may
not
remember.
G
I
can't
remember
if
you
were
here,
because
this
kind
of
started
a
while
ago
there
was
a
meeting
we
had
where
we
had
an
excel
spreadsheet,
where
we
put
in
sort
of
a
list
of
the
people
that
don't
always
respond
to
these,
and
we
made
a
commitment
to
do
more
than
just
the
hey,
the
mayor
emailed
it
out
and
who
did
we
get
affluent
white?
Ladies,
I
mean
the
statistics
say:
I'm
not
just
making
that
up.
G
We
have
a
list
of
people
and
organizations
that
we're
going
to
send
it
with
with
an
email
asking
them
to
share
this
within
their
community,
then
because
we
have
the
demographics,
we'll
be
able
to
say,
oh
who
are
we
not
hearing
from
that?
We
want
to
hear
from
right.
We
can't
say
we
want
to
hear
about
because
housing
is
in
there.
We
want
to
hear
the
perspective
of
homeless
folks
and
then
the
mayor
sent
an
email
right
who
may
who
sometimes
have
cell
phones
with
internet.
G
They
use
at
the
library
another
place,
but
they
don't
have
it
consistently.
So
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
figuring
out
what
organizations
have
contact
with
homeless
folks
and
we're
finding
a
way
to
get
it
to
them
so
that
they
can
get
it
in
front
of
them.
So
we're
sort
of
gonna
hunt
down
not
in
a
kind
of
crazy
hunger
games
way.
G
But
if
we
say
we
want
community
engagement
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
fulfill
these
groups,
we're
going
to
hunt
down
those
groups
and
make
sure
we
get
there,
so
maybe
multiple
phases,
and
then
we
may
come
back
to
this
brainstorming
of
like
hey
guys.
We
said
we
wanted
to
get
x
population
and
we're
really
sucking
brainstorm
again.
Who
do
you
know
who's
within
that
community?
Who
can
send
it
out
to
list
their
friends?
C
Is
there
I
think
that
was
the
spreadsheet
and
whatnot
was
before
I
joined,
but
is
there
like
a
a
cut
score
that
we're
looking
for
we're
looking
for
70
of
this
particular
population
across
the
board,
we're
looking
for
80,
I
know
100
will
be
awesome,
but
is
there
is?
What
are
we
saying?
Is
it?
If
we
hit
this
percentage,
then
we
feel
like
that's
a
good.
G
Yeah
and
so
there's
I
mean
what
I
always
say,
I
like
stuff
to
be
proportional
to
the
population
right
and
some
of
those
things
are
easy
us
to
figure
out.
We
have
numbers
that
tell
us
like
how
many,
what
percentage
of
communitization,
what
percentage
communities
whatever
right,
but
we
don't
have
necessarily
what
percentage
of
community
has
a
disability,
for
instance
right.
G
G
Has
survey,
I
don't
have
broad
scale,
I've
only
done
surveys
within
organizations
and
then
we
try
to
make
sure
that
all
we
normally
have
within
that
organization,
because
it's
normally
these
are
often
most
of
the
time
they're
anonymous.
We
just
try
to
make
sure
that
we're
getting
feedback
from
each
department,
but
so
anybody
who's
used
to
like
more
public
forums.
If
you
have
any
ideas,
but
on
the
stuff
we
have
data
for
we'll
look
at
proportion.
The
rest,
I
don't
have
an
answer.
A
D
So
when
we've
done
surveys
things,
I'm
I
don't
manage
those
parts
of
our
community
engagement.
We
understand
that
a
scientifically
sound
kind
of
sampling
is
more
than
2
000
people
responses,
but
2
000
out
of
how
many
just
2
000
from
whatever
example
right.
So
if
you've
got
two
to
three
thousand,
for
you
know
samples
that
is
scientifically
a
good
sampling.
D
That's
what
we
always
get
a
lot,
many
more
in
our
surveys
that
we
do
our
public
opinion
surveys,
but
that's
what
I
understood
what
it
takes,
but
to
carla's
point
it's
about
seeing
if
you
can
get
more
representational
of
the.
What
the
actual
demographic
share
is
for
each
demographic
in
our
in
our
community,
so
I
did
post
the
the
snapshot.
The
data
snapshot
that
my
agency
chicago
metropolitan
agency
for
planning,
prepares
for
every
one
of
the
284
municipalities
in
our
region
and
including
a
bunch
of
chicago
neighborhoods.
D
G
This
is
very
useful,
a
couple
of
things
here
we
can
equate.
So
while
we
don't
know,
we
don't
know
social,
not
economics
in
here,
but
if
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we're
hearing
from
you
know
different
socioeconomic
groups,
we
do
have
education
and
in
some
spaces
those
kind
of
parallel,
and
then
we
have
the
languages.
G
So
I
was
actually
thinking
of
certain
communities
like
we
often
think
of
well
sorry,
we
don't
often
enough
think
of
the
latinx
community,
but
when
we
are
thinking
about
communities
that
are
non-white
or
black,
we
tend
to
just
go
there
next,
but
you
know
we
have
quite
we
have
a
decent
eastern
eastern
european.
You
guys
can
hear
my
kids
shout
in
the
background
eastern
european
folks
and
different
asian
populations
that
often
get
ignored,
and
so
I
think,
with
the
languages
we
can
sort
of
make
some
sort
of
appropriate.
D
E
D
D
C
D
And
if
you're
ever
interested
in
talking
to
folks
about
how
we
do
this
august
2021
release,
it
was
updated
this
one
in
2021,
it's
kind
of
interesting,
because
it
does
track
some
other
indicators,
including
work
from
home.
Where
do
you
commute
to
where
do
most
people
commute
in
and
out
of?
What's
your
water
source?
A
A
Their
engagement
in
surveys
historically
so
wouldn't
would
having
an
equitable,
like
kind
of
like
an
equity
commitment
mean
that
we
would
want
a
higher
percentage
of
folks
who
have
not
participated
in
surveys.
Or
will
we
be
satisfied
at
keeping
it
to
the
current
percentage
of
the
population?
You
get
what
I'm
saying.
A
G
Yeah,
I
would
say
we
would
put
the
maybe
give
you
know
ourselves,
goals
of
a
window
and
the
percent
of
the
population
would
be
the
floor
of
the
window.
I
mean,
I
guess,
if
you're
talking
about
equity,
these
are
the
people
it
most
affects.
I
mean,
and
not
only
racially
right.
I
mean
we're
supposed
to
be
focused
on
race,
but
we
took
the
opportunity
we
discussed
this
before.
A
And
then
do
we
have
do
we
have
the
sign
up
sheet
that
we
can
share
with
folks
again
so
that
people
could
put
in
maybe
whether
it's
a
list
serve.
They
have
access
to
or
different
institutions
that
commissioners
can
recommend
that
the
survey
be
shared
with,
because
I
know
I
can
recommend
at
least
three
different
institutions
that
I
can
provide
access
to
for
the
survey
to
be
sent
out.
For
instance,
you
know
I
work
with
evanston
latinos
and
I
know
they
have
on
facebook
at
least
a
lister
of
700
evanston
individuals.
A
I
also
work
with
lens
with
the,
which
is
a
latino
group
that
works
at
eths,
so
they
have
a
lot
of
parents
and
then
also
my
family's
part
of
saint
nick's
church,
and
they
have,
I
believe,
probably
the
highest
latino
population
in
a
religious
institution
in
evanston.
So
do
we
have
the
link
carla
of
where
people
can
sign
up
and
provide
that
I'm.
G
Looking
for
it
now,
I
will
share
it
as
soon
as
I
find
it,
but
then
also
we
will
send
it
out
again,
matthew
I'll
make
sure
I
send
it
to
you
to
send
out
sort
of
in
the
packet
for
next
time,
so
people
can
kind
of
do
it
on
their
own
as
well,
not
just
while
we're
working
on
it
here.
So
I'm
looking
for
it
now.
D
G
Outreach
aside
from
email
text
as
well,
but
aside
from
the
emails
from
the
mayor
and
the
all
the
person,
is
that,
if
somebody
you
know
sends
you
the
email
you're
more
likely
to
take
it
seriously,
as
opposed
to
hey
the
maya
emailed
right
like
in
his
regular
monthly
email.
I
mean
cool
guy
and
everything,
but
like
so
I'm
gonna
be
asking
you
guys
to
think
about
one
sending
up
sending
it
out
to
your
group
of
friends
or
network
or
whatever,
but
also
think
about
the
other.
G
People
who
are
in
your
network,
who
you
know
sort
of
will
have
their
own
network.
That
might
be
slightly
different
to
you.
You
guys
and
kind
of
I'll
I'll,
be
sending
out
I'll,
be
creating
an
email
that
can
go
to
sort
of
those
other
nodes
of
networks
where
you're
asking
that
person
to
then
share
it
to
theirs
as
well.
Again,
if
there's
a
personal
commitment
or
personal
attachment
to
these
requests,
they're
way
more
likely
to
get
filled
out.
C
G
Matthew,
that's
beyond
my
sort
of
tech
grade,
but
maybe
something
worth
sharing
asking
patrick
and
I
know
I
have
ex.
I
have
experience
getting
them
where
I
see
like
three
questions
in
the
email
and
I'm
like
all
right,
I'll
answer
these
three
and
then
I
click
the
submit
and
then
I
was
like
well
damn,
there's
some
more
and
that's
kind
of
how
it's
going
to
be
for
ours,
because
I
think
there
are
four
pages.
We
divide
it
up
and
we
the
whole
point
in
dividing
it.
G
When
you
do
these
surveys
is,
if
somebody
doesn't
complete
it.
At
least
you
got
the
initial
information,
and
so
that's
why,
rather
than
having
all
you
know,
15
questions
on
one
page
and
somebody
gets
bored
halfway
through
and
you
get
nothing
out
of
it
because
they
never
press
submit
but
ask
patrick.
If
that's
I
I
don't
know.
B
C
Yeah
I
just
just
that
just
talked
about
I'm
just
thinking
about
like
the
elderly,
like
you
know,
going
to
a
second
site
going
to
a
second
page
people
who
are
not
necessarily
the
links
here.
They
don't
know
that
the
blue
means
that
it's
a
hyperlink.
You
know
things
like
that.
It's
always
nice
to
have
the
survey
right
there.
So
thank
you
for
looking
for
doing
that.
A
G
G
G
G
So
I
wanted
to
go
and
see
what
are
the
people
who
know
what
they're
doing
with
municipalities
doing
with
equity
surveys,
and
so
similarly,
what
are
the
people
who
know
what
they're
doing
in
municipalities
doing
with
school
cards
the
challenge
always
with
these
scorecards?
Is
that
one
we
don't
want
to
just
say.
G
G
Right
sorry,
I've
seen
scorecards
where
it's
only
text,
so
people
fill
in
how
they
feel
about
it
and
there's
no
number
and
what
happens
is
that,
while
that
qualitative
response
is
great
for
context,
so
if
somebody
reading
it
could
understand
like
what
truly
are
the
problems,
because
somebody
took
the
time
to
write
it
out.
Often
people
don't
read,
and
so
I
have
found
it
best
to
have
both
the
qualitative
and
a
score.
G
So
if
somebody
does
put
a
six,
you
have
right
next
to
it
kind
of
why
they
were
feeling
it
was
sixish
and
normally
it's
out
of
five.
So
I
don't
know
why
she
was
six
but
whatever
so
you
know
there
are
places
in
here
where
things
are
red,
but
I'm
gonna
try
to
explain
and
I
don't
have
a
problem
emailing
it
up,
but
I
really
ask
this
is
not
shared
because
it
really
is
in
you
know
in
sort
of
a
working
document.
G
G
What
an
equity
score
card
is
and
kind
of
discuss
like
the
scoring
system
of
the
equity
scorecard,
so
you'd
be
giving
something
a
zero
if
we
think
it's
a
harmful
policy,
if
it's
a
broad-based
policy,
meaning
like
it
appears
to
be
race
neutral,
you
know
I
I
want
to
you
know,
treat
everybody
equally
and,
interestingly
enough,
I
chose
this
layout
just
the
main
layout
from
a
metro
transit
equity
document,
but
I
use
four
different
documents
that
I
kind
of.
Oh.
G
I
like
that
this
piece
of
this
I
like
the
way
they
handle
this.
They
had
a
better
description
of
this,
so
I
use
this.
This
layout
is
similar
to
what
they
did,
but
when
they
described
equity
at
the
beginning,
they
talked
about
treating
everybody
fairly
and
I'm
like
well
jesus,
I'm
sure
they
paid
some
consultation,
tons
of
money
and
it
starting
off.
G
We
don't
have
a
definition
like
they
don't
have
the
correct
definition
of
what
equity
is
so
then
I
chose
to
put
a
definition
here
of
what
equity
is
and
like
what
the
scorecard
is
useful
from
a
different
place,
but
so
yeah,
something
that
appears
to
be
race
neutral.
A
broad-based
policy
that
kind
of
leaves
things
kind
of
as
they
are,
so
it's
not
you
spending
all
this
money
to
go
out
with
whatever
this
policy
or
plan
is,
but
it's
not
really
going
to
change.
G
You
know
the
lack
of
equity
in
in,
in
whatever
field
it
touches,
and
then
at
least
half
the
policy
tag
targets
a
community
of
color
in
equitable
ways,
and
then
it's
a
five
where
the
entire
policy
is
committed
to
that.
So
again,
as
I
mentioned,
there's
going
to
be
sort
of
a
scoring
piece
of
it,
but
there's
also
going
to
be
an
analysis
piece
of
it,
and
this
is
kind
of
where
it
gets
trickier.
We
talk
about
who
here
who
should
use
the
scorecard?
G
I
do
have
a
question
here
about
whether
we
think
community
members
should
be
using
the
scorecards.
If
you
guys
can
envision
with
me,
this
scorecard
exists.
It's
out
there.
We
have
spoken
in
the
past
that
the
main
way
we
came
to
this
is
that
we
want
to
be
able
to
as
a
organized
equity,
the
equity
arm.
It
might
be
a
pinky,
it
might
be
a.
We
might
actually
be
a
mole,
not
really
a
pinky
as
the
equity
mole
of
evanston.
G
We
should
have
some
sort
of
way
to
weigh
in
on
policies
coming
down
the
pike
or
an
existing
policy
that
is
brought
to
attention
either,
because
we
somebody
this
group
we
decide
is
what
we
want
to
work
on,
because
there's
been
enough
of
a
public
uprising
about
it,
because
somebody
from
the
city
council
comes
to
us.
So
we
understand
that
we
will
be
using
this.
G
G
Ideally,
whether
it's
this
version
or
a
version
they
come
up
with
of
their
own
departments
in
the
city
should
be
doing
their
own
review
of
this
equity
scorecard
before
it
gets
to
us.
If
the
cake
is
half
baked
before
we
do
the
equity
thing,
the
truth
is,
we've
all
seen
it.
They
don't
continue
making
that
cake,
no
matter
what
we
say
right,
but
this
is
the
power
we
have
we're
trying
to
create
the
tool,
and
then
we
will
try
to
disseminate
it
as
much.
G
So
we
have
all
the
ways
of
how
the
government
planners
or
whatever
entities
should
use
it.
I
wondered
if
we
saw
a
situation
where
community
members
might
do
it
is
this
such
that
there's
a
policy
happening
or
there's
a
rumbling
of
a
policy,
and
let's
say
I'm
just
going
to
use
connections
just
because
affordable
housing
and
stuff
is
on
my
mind
and
connections,
because
they
work
with
homeless,
folks,
etc,
and
they
have
a
better
hold
of
that.
G
The
needs
of
that
population
besides
whoa
this
is
going
to
be
probiotic
and
connections,
could
sit
and
fill
this
out
and
send
it
to
who
I
don't
know,
maybe
send
it
to
us
as
the
eec.
So
I
mean
open
people
could
kind
of
get
off
mike
and
see
if
anybody
has
experience
with
this,
if
they
see
this
being
used
sort
of
from
the
community
turning
it
back
to
us
just
a
question.
C
G
Yeah,
it's
very
unlikely,
although
you
know
we're
all
sort
of
extra
here
in
evanston,
including
myself
and
everybody's
got
69
degrees.
So
maybe
like
not
that
you
have
to
be
a
genius
to
do
this,
but
it
does
take
a
little
bit
of
work
right,
an
effort.
So
yes,
there
are
some
people
who
will
pick
it
up
and
go
through
on
their
own.
G
But
I
see
it
more
likely
that
some
group-
it
could
be
a
parent
interest
group-
or
I
guess-
maybe
not
so
much
parent,
because
it's
not
school
related,
but
it
could
be
a
neighborhood
interest
group
of
some
sort,
but
I
just
kind
of
use
them
as
an
example.
But
I
will
add
and
organizations
there
because.
C
I
would
ask
I
would
actually
I
mean
at
first
at
my
first
glance.
I
would
actually
argue
that
the
community
members
would
be
community
organizations
just
because
they
would
have
the
hope
they
would
have
the
voice
of
the
community
instead
of
the
end,
because
members
with
community
members
would
open
it
up
to
anyone
who's.
Anyone
who
maybe
just
be-
and
this
sounds
awful
but
may
just
be
disgruntled-
but
not
have
the
the
background.
Knowledge
to
you,
know
yeah.
You
know
back
it
up.
C
So
at
that
point
like
you
know,
and
that
gets
touchy
because
you
want
to
hear
directly
from
the
community,
but
you
also
want
it
to
be
an
info
like
if
you
have
a
grievance,
she
wanted
to
be
an
informed
grievance,
not
just
because
you're
a
parking
space.
So
there's
like
one
picking
the
kids
up
in
the
in
the
line
to
get
your
kids.
You
know
car
lot
so
so
I
would
think
organizations
instead
of
individual
members.
G
And
I
could
say
I
mean
from
an
equity,
I
was
going
to
suggest
something
so
I'll
suggest
it,
but
then
poke
my
own
holes
in
it
with
this
idea
of
community
engagement
and
making
sure
that
community
has
a
voice
kind
of
always
in
every
way.
It
could
be
that
yes,
because
I
hear
you
right,
we
don't
want
to
give
ourselves.
G
We
don't
want
to
release
stuff
and
then
like
every
time
they
carry.
Sam
and
george
starts.
Turning
in
one
and
who's
got
to
review
the,
but
us
and
like
we
don't
have
the
back.
So
we
don't
want
to
set
something
in
motion
that
we
can't
truly
manage,
but
we
could
potentially
do
something
like
community
members
can
always
also
turn
it
in
if
it's
unco-signed
or
whatever
by
10
people
or
something
like
that.
G
But
then
I
poked
my
own
hole
in
that
because
I
was
like
that's
also
an
equity
thing,
because
you
know
who's
more
likely
to
have
networks
right
like
is
it
the
immigrant
person
who
you
know
just
moved
here
three
years
ago
or
is
it
the
guy?
You
know
who
lives
on
the
lake
who
can
get
his
friends
to
anyway.
That's
a
whole
different
story,
so
that
was
one
idea
I
came
up
with,
but
I
see
some
equity
issues
in
that
as
well.
A
I
just
you
know
what
I
I
think
you
know
this.
We
would
have
our
own
framework
attached
to
this
right,
so
the
idea
is
that
folks
are
using
the
scorecard,
along
with
the
framework
that
we
endorse
or
create
or
whatever,
so
that
the
criteria
that
is
used
is
already
provided
this
report
card,
so
it
doesn't
get
used
and
abused
right
so
that
they're
working
off
of
a
framework
that
our
commission
supports.
A
I
mean
because
I
this
could
be
used,
I
think
across
the
community,
like
I
wonder,
you
know
when
maybe
there's
a
development
that's
being
proposed
in
the
ward
that
I
live
in
right
and
maybe
you
know,
the
older
person
then
engages
in
a
you
know,
hosts
a
community
hearing
or
a
community
meeting,
and
then
this
scorecard
is
used,
but
it
would
be
attached
to
a
framework.
So
it's
not
like
people
would
just
use
their
own
opinion
right.
It
would
actually
they'd
be
using
a
framework
that.
G
We're
coming
into
we're
coming
to
kind
of
some
of
what
that
that
looks
like
okay,
but
also
to
the
point
that
you
just
made
the
other
piece
of
this
that
actually
comes
before
it,
but
we
started
here
is
we
we
talked
about
how
we
can't
review
just
starting
here,
which
should
never
start
here
right.
It
should
never
start
by
time.
We
hear
about
a
policy,
it's
half
baked
or
fully
right.
It
shouldn't
start
here,
but
this
is
what
we
got.
We
don't
we.
G
We
can't
be
in
the
business
of
reviewing
every
policy
that
comes
to
city
council
or
every
building
yeah
we,
but
we
just
we
said
we
would
do
some
sort
of
like.
Does
it
hit
these
criteria
and
if
it
hits
four
of
these
seven
or
five
of
these
seven,
we
don't
know
what
it's
going
to
look
like
yet,
but
there
would
be
criteria,
so
I
guess
that's
another
sort
of
like
it
would
have
to
hit
the
criteria
for
a
group
to
have
us
review
it.
G
So
right
yeah
so
contemplate
that
I
wasn't
sure
if
we
wanted
to
open
it
up
to
community
members
but
or
or
slash
organizations,
but
we
can
kind
of
define
that
I
don't.
I
will
create
the
final
steps
when
up
once
I'm
we're
done
with
it.
So
there's
an
initial
page
that
kind
of
just
is
sort
of.
What's
the
name
of
the
policy
who's
this
requesting
this
review,
sometimes
it's
going
to
be
us
doing
it.
Sometimes
the
count
city
council,
it's
going
to
some
things-
have
come
before
them.
G
They're
going
to
say
you
know
what
I'd
like
the
equity
committee
to
to
review
that
and
give
us
just
like
you
would
have
the
finance
guy
reviewed
from
a
budget
perspective
kind
of
have
us
review
it
or
an
organization
might
do
it
or
whatever
who's
leading.
It
was
the
contact,
because
we'll
have
questions
for
them
and
kind
of
describing
what
the
policy
is
big
picture
or
the
project
and
like
what's
the
community
pro
like?
Who
is
this
affecting
it's,
the
ninth
ward?
Is
it
whatever?
Is
it?
Is
it
a
housing
thing?
G
So
it's
for
you,
know
the
homeless,
population
or
people
who
need
more
affordable
housing,
so
that's
kind
of
just
all
the
kind
of
prep
free
stuff.
So
now
it
comes
to
the
actual
thing
that
gets
filled
out
now
the
two
things
I'm
going
to
start
with
the
more
general
one.
So
I'm
going
to
come
back
to
the
stuff
that
I'm
leaving
the
thing
about
creating
these
things
and
why
they
tend
to
be
very
vague
generally,
which
is
great
because
nobody
knows
what
kind
of
policies
coming
down
or
projects
coming
down
the
pikes.
G
It
has
to
be
kind
of
broad,
but
sometimes
when
it
gets
really
broad.
What
happens
is
that
people
could
just
their
way
through
it
because
they
didn't
ask
any
really
direct
questions
so
like
we're
in
this
kind
of
middle
space,
so
my
thought
again,
this
is
just
a
draft-
is
that
we
have
a
general
scorecard,
which
is
this
is
kind
of
an
attempt
to
be
so
whatever
the
issue
here
is,
let's
say
it
was
the
tiff
not
to
raffle
ruffle
anybody's
feathers
about
the
tiff
we'd
be
like
okay,
who
are
the
stakeholders?
G
Have
they
been
identified?
Have
the
meetings
been
had
with
them?
We
kind
of
like
so
have
you
identified
stakeholders
have
you
engaged
with
them?
Have
we
kind
of
looked
at
the
historicity,
which
is
a
huge
thing
in
equity?
We
could
sit
here
and
say
well.
Why
are
we
already
talking
about
black
people?
They're
broken
people
too,
and
like
asians
this
and
like
all
these
other
communities
matter?
G
If
we
have
limited
resources,
we
have
to
decide
who
is
most
in
you
know
like
who,
who
why
are
we
focusing
on
this
particular
group,
for
whatever
reason
like
the
historicity
is
very
important
when
we
talk
about
that
ex,
you
know,
so
these
two
are
kind
of
related.
I
was
thinking
of
thinking
those
like
what
are
the
causes
of
the
issue
that
we're
trying
to
address.
G
I
was
thinking
of
taking
out
that
one
considering
what
are
the
adverse
effects
of
this,
so
this
is
kind
of
just
analyzing
what
you
do
with
any
policy,
but
specifically
from
an
equity
lens.
So
this
is
kind
of
a
more
general
thing
where
essentially,
this
is
the
guide,
so
you
would
score
it
now.
We
have
scores
from
zero
to
to
five
right,
but
on
this
board
you
kind
of
write
in
here.
G
Why
I
think
I'm
giving
it
a
three,
but
you
might
give
it
a
three
or
a
four
and
write
it
in
here
or
you
might
give
it
here
a
four
or
five
and
write
it
in
here
instead
of
having
blocks
for
each
specific
one,
we
kind
of
just
do
every
other
one,
and
then
you
give
it
a
score.
So
you
explain
where
it
is.
This
is
just
kind
of
a
guide
of
like
well,
you
should
give
it
a
five.
If
this
is
happening,
you
should
give
it
a
three.
G
If
this
is
happening,
and
then
you
give
it
your
score
here,
that's
sort
of
the
general
scorecard
and
again
I
will
keep
molding
these
either
a
couple
of
them.
I
think
I
could
collapse
they
might.
We
have.
We
can
add
extra
questions,
but
this
is
kind
of
the
the
general
scorecard
and
I'll
take
comments
in
a
second
and
so
there's
more
questions
going
on
going
down
there
and
you
have
a
total
score.
G
That
being
said,
there
are
types
of
projects,
policies
that
given
our
emphasis
on
equity,
are
going
to
be
reoccurring,
right
and
reoccurring,
and
in
this
case,
when
I
told
you,
if
you
make
it
general,
then
people
can
kind
of
bs
and
kind
of
slip
through
and
not
really
get
to
the
heart
of
the
questions.
If
you
make
it
too
tight,
then
you
can't
use
it
across.
So
my
thought
is
that
we
have
this
general
one
if
we
have
a
project
that
doesn't
fit
into
one
of
the
categories,
people
use
this
general
one.
G
But
if
we
know
we
have
other
other
things
that
sorry
it's
my
reminder
to
drink
water,
other
things
that
happen
more
regularly,
so
I'll
use
the
housing
one.
For
example,
we
can.
We
can
ask
folks
to
fill
out
this
housing
related
scorecard
and
then
we're
asking
more
housing-related
questions
that
wouldn't
work
in
a
bubble,
because
if
something
has
nothing
to
do
with
housing,
it
wouldn't
work.
So
if
you
have
a
housing
related
thing,
you
come
in
and
use
the
housing
one.
G
I
so
far
I've
kind
of
identified
one
for
housing,
affordable,
housing.
There
is
a
community
engagement.
One
and
then
I
was
planning
on
doing
an
economic,
I'm
not
an
economic,
a
prod
like
a
physical
building
development
and
the
building
development
is
different
than
affordable
housing
because
when
they
decide
to
put
up
a
building
literally
affordable
housing
is
the
tax
they
pay
to
put
up
the
building.
The
goal
is
in
affordable
housing.
So
I
see
that
as
separate
from
like
some
big
high-rise
going
on.
G
So
I
plan
to
do
another
one
of
these
for
the
big
high
rise
so
far
in
terms
of
the
specialty
things
that
we
think
we
will
address
a
lot
affordable
housing.
Any
kind
of
community
outreach
practice
that
they're
embarking
on
similar
to
that
like,
for
instance,
this
survey
that
we're
we're
creating.
We
would
do
a
community
engagement,
let's
go
on
the
ser
to
make
sure
we're
kind
of
hitting
all
the
the
groups
that
we're
supposed
and
considering
all
the
things
we're
supposed
to
consider.
They
may
choose
to
look
at
the
summer.
G
The
city
has
a
budget
for
summer
things
all
the
movies
in
the
park
and
all
the
music
in
the
park
and
those
kind
of
things
they
may
choose
to
take
this
community
engagement
and
look
at
their
whole
bucket
of
summer
things
that
they
spend
whatever
exxon
on
a
budget
on
and
make
sure
that
they're
actually
creating
a
set
of
activities
that
serve
various.
You
know,
parts
of
the
community-
it's
not
just
like
well,
this
is
only
serving
like
certain
portions
of
the
community,
so
they
can
make
you
can
choose
to
do
it
like
that.
G
So
that's
really
what
I
have
I'll
shut
up
now
open
it
up
for
questions.
What
I
specific
questions
I
have
are
what
other
buckets
besides
community
engagement,
housing
practices
and
like
developments
like
physical
building
developments,
or
it
could
be
a
new
train,
stop
someday
right
like
it
doesn't
have
to
be
just
a
development,
is
not
just
a
building.
They
could
choose
to
put
in
a
new
train.
Stop,
and
you
know,
there'll
be
consequences
to
that
too.
What
are
the
specific
ones?
G
We
need
to
accompany
the
general
one
because
we're
not
gonna
have
a
bucket
for
everything.
That's
why
the
general
one
exists,
but
I
want
this
some
that
may
come
up
a
lot
and
it's
better
to
have
a
more
specific
all
right.
I'm
quiet
willing
to
take
comments,
questions
I
could
scroll
to
a
different
section.
If
somebody
wants
to
see
it
more
clearly,.
C
C
So
I
so
I
try
I'm
trying
to
practice,
not
always
speaking
first
because
to
give
other
people
a
time
to
process,
because
it
does
take
a
little
time.
So
I
have
a
question
and
it's
from
my
teacher
lens:
if
no
one
else
wants
to
start
go
ahead,
lachandra
all
right,
okay.
So
so
I
guess
just
because
you
know
rubrik's
rubrics,
and
this
is
a
you
know.
I
know
it's
a
scholarly
scorecard,
but
in
my
teacher
head
it's
a
rubric
because
it's
yeah,
it's
a
rubric
right.
C
C
G
A
C
Threat
needs
to
be
clear,
so
so,
if
the
bottom
one
is
the
master
rubric
that
any
other
side
rubrics
that
we
make
are
getting
to
the
same
points
to
be
pulling
directly
from
that
similar
language
and
then
what
ends
up
happening?
Let's
say
in
the
housing
one,
then
the
attributes
that
relate
to
housing
would
be,
for
example,
like
if
I'm
looking
at
identifying
equities
right.
G
That
makes
perfect
sense
and
that's
the
the
joy
of
now
trying
to
sort
of
after
pulling
some
different
areas,
because
I
felt
like
some
did
some
well,
it's
like
trying
to
make
sure
it
all
melts
together.
Well
and
then
the
question
that's
still
unanswered
in
my
head
that
relates
to
this
is:
if
you
have
a
housing
project,
do
you
fill
out
the
primary
we're.
E
G
C
Because
I
almost
see
this
as
the
the
this,
the
the
primary
scorecard
as
a
like,
I'm
self
scoring.
So
if
I'm
the
organization,
that's
half
this
built,
I'm
doing
built
I'm
building
this
this.
You
know
this
new
structure
or
what
have
you,
but
I'm
I'm
grading
myself
saying
I've
done
all
these
things.
So
here
you
go.
Yes,
I've
done
all
these
things.
I
feel
like
what
our
project
is
equitable
and
we
want
to
go
forward
and
then
I
almost
feel
like
then
they
would
in
some
way
an
outsider
like.
G
Not
and
just
so
we're
clear,
you're
speaking
perfect
world
here
generally,
these
are
created
for
organizations
or
entities
of
whatever
sort,
and
it's
for
them
to
do
as
they
bake
the
pie.
Yeah.
We
are
in
the
situation
where
we
are
not
inside
the
entity.
Yeah,
as
I
said,
we're
starting
here,
because
this
is
who
we
are,
and
this
is
how
we
can
start
the
goal
is
that
there
is
a
matching
one
to
this.
G
If
it's
coming
out
of
and
again
using,
maybe
the
slightly
different
criteria
of
when
it
gets
used,
because
it's
an
internal
thing
and
not
a
community-wide
thing,
when
it's
used
in
there
that
it
gets
baked
using
this
and
normally
it
would
be
a
self-reported
thing.
But
part
of
the
reason
is
that
you
have
the
contact
here.
Is
that
if
we
are
doing
it,
which
is
what
we
have
the
capacity
control
right
now?
Where
is
that
page?
Well?
Why
we
have
the
contact
here
is
that
I
would
call
who
was
a
tiff.
G
G
At
the
time
it
was
two
the
two
ones
we
were
going
to
kind
of
use
because
we
felt
were
positive
pieces
of
it.
I
ended
up
finding
on
another
one
since
then,
and
so
yes,
we
will
continue
to
work
as
a
committee.
Part
of
bringing
it
out
here
is
that,
like
as
we
build
it,
there
are
the
things
that
I
am
still
very
interested
in
and
jane.
G
G
A
No,
I
really
appreciate
this.
I
just
part
of
me
is
also
looking
thinking
about
some
of
the
rubrics
that
I
saw.
I
mean
I've
even
seen
like
the
d65
rubric.
They
just
they
use
the
same
five
or
six
questions,
so
they
can
be
used
for
anything
whether
it's
a
budgetary
decision,
a
policy
decision
right-
and
it
looks
like
like
this
sheet
you're
showing
you're
showing
like
who
looks
like
most
impacted.
A
G
G
G
This
is
not
the
last
time
we
will
see
this.
I
kind
of
want
to
show
the
direction
we
were
going.
We
will
continue
to
if
anybody
is
like
hey.
Can
I
have
a
copy
to
kind
of
review
on
my
own
and
read
them
all
detail,
great,
otherwise,
we'll
kind
of
go
back
to
the
table
and
tell
you
guys
where
we're
at
next
month
again
and
kind
of
keep
working
towards
it
in
that
way,.
A
D
D
D
So
I'm
really
wanting
to
see
how
this
happens,
how
this
gets
applied
to
specific
things
and,
as
you
suggested
carl,
it
could
be
everything
from
budget
which
I
kind
of
think
needs
its
own
appendix
rubric
it
being
such
a
project
and
so
complicated
and
yeah.
The
kind
of
land
use
decisions,
those
development
decisions,
whether
it's
housing
or
any
kind
of
property
development
needs
its
own.
Not
not.
All
developments
involve
housing.
G
Could
you
see
a
little
more
about
that?
I
mean
like
I
feel
like
that
might
be
a
relatively
narrow
thing
yeah
before,
but
if
we,
if
I
understood
a
little
more
about
why
you
think
there's
an
equity
issue
there,
because
I
don't
know
how
things
get
used
or
what
the
bladefront
is
used
for
or
whatever
besides
running,
I
might
be,
we
might
be
able
to
put
in
a
bigger
bucket.
So
can
you
explain
what
you're
seeing
there
that's.
D
And
so
that's
just
one
example
that
that
I
think
might
be
interesting,
even
hypothetically,
to
kind
of
test
our
scorecard
to
see
how
those
things
shake
out
and-
and
it's
a
more
discreet
issue-
that
we
could
all
easily
understand
without
having
to
read
a
500
page
budget
book.
For
example.
That
was
helpful.
Thank
you,
yeah
and
then
and
then
other
issues.
So
do
we
put
the
city's
decision
to
accept
a
fire
truck
from
northwestern
through
this
through
a
scorecard?
D
G
And
again
the
piece
that
comes
before
this,
but
we
started
here
and
then
we'll
work
back
is
there
is
there
has
to
be
some
sort
of
criteria?
I
mean
again
big
picture
goal.
Is
that
inside
the
city
there's
a
version
of
this
and
like
it
like
you,
can't
talk,
you
can't
bring
an
idea
from
whatever
department
of
the
city
followed
without
a
damn
budget.
Right,
like
you,
can't
sell
much
money
like
we
would
like
this
equity.
My
like
lens
to
be
like
the
budget.
You,
don't
you
don't
come
forward
with
something
without
a
budget.
G
You
don't
come,
follow
anything
without
this
equity,
like
evaluation
of
how
you're
approaching
it
we'd
love
to
get
there,
but
for
us
to
review
things.
There's
going
to
be
this
kind
of.
We
have
these
eight
points
and
if
it
meets
five
of
the
eight
or
whatever,
which
will
mean
some
things
get
done
and
not
and
we'll
start
there
and
then
we'll
open
it
up.
G
Maybe
if
we
have
resources
or
if
there,
if
the
city
hires
an
actual
equity
person,
who
knows
how
to
spell
equity,
because
we've
had
some
in
the
past,
then
this
becomes
an
internal
thing
for
them
a
paid
person
to
review,
and
then
they
could
open
up
the
scope
a
little
more.
But
I
made
a
note
jane
of
the
things
you
said
and
we'll
see
if
they're
kind
of
buckets,
we
can
put
those
things
into
this
cards
for
those.
C
Can
I
ask,
I
have
just
some
questions,
just
I
guess
it's
just
kind
of
general
the
way
things
work
inside
of
evanston
policies,
you
know
and
like
just
the
way
the
city
works
in
general.
You
know
what
I
and
I
don't
know.
If
this
is
a
question
matt
that
you
can
answer,
everyone
else
can
answer,
but
my
ques,
my
I
have
two
questions.
One
of
them
is
what
is
the?
C
What
is
the
policy
that
for
the
city,
for
I
know
how
politics
work
as
far
as
like
the
how
politics
work
as
far
as
the
hands
and
shaking
and
what
have
you,
but
what
is?
Is
their
city
policy
for
redirection
like,
for
example,
we
know
reparations
went
through
the
way
it
went
and
that
commission
did
what
it
did
and
we
have
what
we
have
what
we
have
right
now,
the
same
thing
with
the
tech.
We
know
that,
but
is
there?
Is
there
you
know
our
biggest?
C
C
I
was
voted
in
and
you
going
to
trust
me
in
my
work
and
I'm
going
to
do
what
I
want
to
do,
because
that's
really
how
politics
typically
work,
but
we're
a
smaller
town,
and
maybe
we
have
policies
because
we're
trying
so
hard
to
be
equitable.
Is
there
something
in
poli
and
in
our
city,
politic,
policies
that
say
you
know
what,
when
we
hit,
obviously
this
commission
was
committed
was
was
was
created
because
there
so
someone
saw
people
saw
a
need
for
them
to
get
to
be
equity
included
in
the
policy
making.
C
A
mole
you
know
what
I
mean
so
is
there
anything
even
in
the
fine
print
of
policy
that
allows
for
redirection?
If
we
are
saying
we,
this
is
not
working.
This
is
not
the
case.
I
mean
evidence
right
now
as
far
as
the
tip
and
reach
and
reparation
the
reparations
housing
program,
or
whatever
has
shown,
is
telling
me
that
no,
but
I'm
wondering
if
maybe
it
was
ignored.
So
that
was
my
first
question
and
then
my
other
question
is
what
is
like:
how?
C
How
can
we
or
what
is
their
policy
for
for
us
for
the
adoption
of
this
sport,
this
scorecard
to
be
a
part
of
policymaking
in
the
city
like
what,
for
any
any,
you
know
whether
it
be
our
scorecard
whether
it
be
whatever.
Is
there
a
a
way
in
which
that,
once
this
has
been
created,
you
know
we've
gone
through
our
pilots
we've
launched
it.
We've
done
that.
How
do
we
get
that
does
have
to
be
brought
to
a
vote?
Who
brings
to
a
vote
like?
C
How
does
it
work
where
we
can
get
this
look
guys
we're
we
can't
equity
cannot
be
once
the
cake
is
about
to
get
iced.
It
has
to
be
in
the
forefront
like
we've
been
saying,
so
how?
How
do
we
get
that
to
be
a
part
of
the
just
like
we
take
attendance,
you
know
in
the
role
we
got
to
have
a
quorum
before
they
have
a
meeting.
How
does
it
become
a
part
of
city
policy
where
a
equity
card
is
now
not
just
a
suggestion,
but
a
part
of
what
we
do
every
day?
G
I
don't
have
an
answer
for
number
one,
so
maybe
matt
bland
to
that
one.
But
I'll
give
you
my
idea
and
rules
in
me
don't
get
along
as
you
guys
notice
like
so,
but
you
know
the
man
has
told
me
repeatedly
if
we
ask
him
for
something
not
in
this
like
I'll
grant.
Your
wish
is
like
a
genie
right
like
but
like.
If
we
make
claire
official
ass
like
he
will
address
them,
so
I'll
just
say
address
not
like
grant
us
anything
we
want,
and
so
you
know
this
is
the.
G
G
G
If
somebody
else
a
us
is
just
going
to
evaluate
and
like
they'll
have
more
quote-unquote
information,
but
it
really
has
no
teeth
unless
it's
being
asked
for
by
somebody
on
the
city
council
and
what
they
may
have
said
to
me
at
one
point
in
time
like
what
he
would
love
to
see
here.
Is
that
in
the
same
way
people
might
say,
let's
just
say
no,
there
was
no
policy,
but
there's
an
issue
right.
G
Something
happened
that
forced
some
policy
to
the
forefront
that
wasn't
at
the
forefront
and
there's
a
process
by
which
somebody
in
the
city
council
can
see.
I
say
I
need
a
financial
review
of
that.
So
can
whatever
department
go
and
give
me
a
financial
review
and
we'll
come
back
the
next
time
he
wants
to
be
able
to
say
this
sounds
like
we.
G
Until
we
get
to
that
point,
you
know
we
again.
We
are
the
equity
mole
onto
the
city's
body,
but
I've
been
told,
make
it
make
a
request
and
it
will
be
reviewed.
So
that's
going
to
be.
They
continued
our
request
with
this
that
there
are
some
criteria
that
you
know
the
ways
it's
being
used
and
that
yeah
it
loves
to
get
the
point
where
decisions
aren't
made
unless
you
know,
or
certain
decisions
that
meet
the
criteria
right
aren't
made.
G
Unless
there's
a
review
for
this,
and
when
we
went
into
this
for
those
who
are
newer,
I
am
not
a
wish
full
thinker.
I
go
into
these
things,
eyes
wide
open
and
I
think
we
said
a
couple
times
when
we
started
this.
If
all
I
could
do
in
two
years
is
say:
look
I
have
turned
in
20
of
these
equity,
and
only
once
has
the
city
council
actually
fixed
change
modified
whatever
you
know,
one
of
the
issues
that
we
said
was
an
equity
issue.
G
I
am
quite
prepared
for
the
way
politics
works.
Did
that
to
me.
If
we
don't
measure
it,
we
can't
change
it.
So
this
is
our
attempt
to
start
measuring
it,
and
so,
if
nothing
else,
we
can
say
to
the
public,
hey,
look.
They
put
us
out
here
right,
we've
been
putting
these
out,
we've
been
scored
ain't,
nobody
like
if
that's
where
we
get,
which
I
think
is
closer
to
reality.
Maybe
we
end
up
somewhere
in
the
middle.
G
We
know
how
these
things
are,
but
if
we're
not
measuring
it
and
we're
not
scoring
it
in
a
way,
that's
separate
from
me
just
getting
up
in
front
or
alejandra,
getting
up
in
front
of
the
city
council
like
a
regular
citizen,
nothing's
wrong
with
regular
citizens,
but
like
if
this
body
doesn't
have
any
other
teeth.
Besides
a
citizen
stepping
in
front
the
board
at
the
council
at
public
comment,
then
you
know
what
are
we
even
doing
so
all
right.
C
I
want
to
say
a
road
map
to
teeth.
That's
what
I'm
looking
for
like
I
want.
I
want
to
know
what
is
that's
like
so
mad.
I
guess
that's
a
question
to
you
know.
Maybe
that's
the
answer,
the
one
that
you
can
answer,
but
that's
what
I'm
looking
for
like
I
I
want
to
be
I'm
with
you,
I'm
I'm
I
I
try
to
be
optimistic,
but
I
definitely
am
eyes
wide
open,
but
if,
if
you
know
even
if
it
is
five
years
from
now,
what
is
the
road
map
that
we
have?
C
What
is
that
roadmap
for
a
five-year
roadmap?
Then?
Okay,
then,
let's
what
it.
I
would
like
to
know
like
what
is
the
roadmap
for
us
to
have
teeth
so
that
we
can?
We
can
affect
change
and
everything
in
the
way
that
we
don't
feel
like
we're
optional,
because
I
feel
like
points
of
the
mayor
and
saying
we
want
to
request
this.
It's
it's
like
why
I
can
never
be
a
waitress.
I
respect
them,
but
I
can
never
depend
on
the
kindness
of
strangers
to
feed
me.
You
know
what
I
mean
like.
C
I
can't
do
that
to
put
put
money
in
my
pocket.
I
can't
do
that
because
it
all
depends
on
the
whim
that
day.
So
I
I
guess,
that's
what
I
would
like,
if
you
you
know
to
know
matt
from
you
or
whoever
the
powers
that
be
what's
our
roadmap
for
this
commission
to
have
teeth
yeah,
because
we
can
work
on
this.
We're
gonna,
keep
working
on
this
we're
going
to
keep
them
going.
All
this
keep
stuff
keeps
going,
but
at
the
same
time,
eventually
we
want
to
have
tea.
Yeah,
yeah.
A
And
I
so
appreciate
that
and
part
of
it,
I
think
is-
is
just
a
lesson
learned
for
someone
who's
been
engaged
in
policy
change.
You
think
that
you
just
get
the
new
policy
and
you're
done,
but
that's
you'd.
How
do
you
follow
up?
There's
got
to
be
like
reporting
or
monitoring
metrics
to
say:
did
it
do
what
it
was
supposed
to
do
and
it
needs
to
be
codified
right,
because
it's
great
that
we
have
a
mayor
right
now
that
seems
accessible,
but
it
really
needs
to
be
codified,
because
what?
G
G
B
Yeah
yeah
thank
you
and
I
will
try
and
have
a
better
answer
than
I
do
this
month
next
month,
which,
because
my
answer
right
now
is
I'm
not,
I
don't
think,
there's
any
policy
about
redirection
and
I
don't,
I
think,
what
carla
brought
up
as
building
an
ordinance.
I
think
that's
probably
a
great
way
to
give
this
commission
more
teeth.
B
A
Thank
you
all.
Thank
you
all.
So
we
are
finally
moving
to
the
fifth
point,
fifth
and
final
point
on
our
agenda,
which
is
communication,
and
we
have
two
pieces
on
this
agenda.
One
of
them
is
the
environmental
equity
planning
investigation
in
andy
schlichman's
boom
with
us
from
the
beginning.
So
he's
been
patiently
waiting
to
give
us
a
brief
presentation
on
what
the
what
the
environmental
equity
planning
investigation
is
and
andy.
We
know
we've
seen
you
before
you've
been
here.
F
Thank
you
very
much
alejandra
and
it's
pleasure
to
see
and
meet
all
of
you.
You
know
I
put.
I
provided
two
things.
I
provided
a
one-page
status
report,
that's
in
the
the
agenda
package
and
that's
accompanied
by
the
the
environmental
justice
resolution
that
the
council
passed
a
year
ago
september
and
that
sort
of
outlines,
I
guess,
the
the
key
things.
F
The
second
thing
is
we.
We
spoke
to
alejandra
about
making
a
more
in-depth
presentation
at
the
february
meeting.
I
was
you
know,
planning
on
only
spending
about
five
minutes
or
so
tonight,
just
giving
a
brief
introduction
to
to
what
we're
doing
we're
at
right
now.
But
if
anybody
has
any
questions,
you
know,
after
my
initial
comments
about
sort
of
the
substance
of
what
was
in
those.
F
F
Given
some
of
the
discussions
we've
been
having
with
some
council
members,
the
mayor
and
city
staff,
they've
asked
us
to
prepare
some
materials
or
we
are
preparing
some
materials
that
were
going
to
be
submitted
to
them
in
the
in
the
near
future.
Probably
before
your
february
meeting
that
flashes
out
a
little
bit
more,
what
this
environmental
investigation
would
involve
what
the
planning
process
would
be
like,
so
it
it
probably
would
be
very
good
to
have
a
more
in-depth
update
at
the
february
meeting.
F
Just
briefly,
you
know,
if
you
know
my
name
is
andy.
Schleckmann
I've
been
on
environmental
justice
evanston
for
about
the
last
two
years
I
live
in
the
third
ward,
and
you
know.
The
reason
I'm
here
is
is
environmental
justice.
Evanston
is
very
much
aware
that
the
work
we're
doing
is
very
closely
related
to
the
work
that
the
commission
is
doing.
That
became
more
and
more
clear
to
me
tonight,
as
I
listened
to
the
discussion
about
the
the
equity
survey
and
this
equity
review
scorecard
tool
very,
very
exciting
concepts
there.
F
F
Report
or
a
more
in-depth
report
come
february,
but
you
know
environmental
justice
evanston,
since
the
resolution
was
passed
has
been.
You
know,
giving
a
lot
of
thought
and
working
hard
on
the
environmental
justice
issue
and
especially
once
mayor
abus
came
into
office.
You
know
on
a
platform
that
supported
environmental
justice
and
we
had
an
opportunity
to
talk
to
him.
You
know
we
started.
F
We
really
do
want
to
coordinate
the
work
that
we're
doing
with
this
group.
It
occurred
to
me,
as
I
was
listening
to
this
tonight,
that
this
really
is.
You
know
two-way
street.
You
know
there
are
things
that
we're
thinking
about
doing
in
our
environmental
investigation
that
I
think,
could
really
be
helpful
for
the
work
that
this
commission
is
doing
and
just
turning
it
around
the
other
way.
There
may
be
very
good
opportunities.
F
You
know
for
the
commission
and
environmental
justice
evanston
through
this
environmental
investigation
to
accomplish
you
know
some
of
what
you're
trying
to
do
this.
This
discussion
about
the
scorecard
is
very
similar
to
some
of
the
things
we've
talked
about
it
in
a
little
bit:
more
narrow
focus
carla,
not
just
equity
generally,
or
what
have
you,
but
you
know
focusing
on
environmental
justice,
and
we
we
too
are
keenly
aware
that
it's
one
thing
to
have
the
information
in
a
policy,
but
it's
another
thing
to
have
an
actual
mechanism
by
which
you
know
it's.
F
It's
it's
acted
upon
or
enforced,
as
you
were
just
talking
about
at
the
end
of
that
discussion
there.
So
you
know
just
in
a
nutshell,
we're
looking
forward
to
a
collaborative
relationship
with
with
this
group.
Environmental
justice
evanston
has
asked
me
if
it's
okay
with
you
guys
to
act
as
a
liaison
between
eje
and
the
commission.
F
A
F
E
F
F
D
F
F
You
know
we
have
been
talking
to
the
mayor
and
some
city
officials
about
conducting
an
environmental
environmental
equity
investigation,
which
is
we
would
really
focus
on
what
is
what
are
the
real
facts
out
there
in
the
community
that
have
an
impact
on
environmental
justice
and
environmental
equity
issues,
as
we
have
worked
on
this,
the
last
couple
years
that
at
eje
you
know,
we've
developed
sort
of
a
lot
of
anecdotal
information.
We've
we've
talked
to
people,
we've
we've
been
into
a
couple
of
awards
and
taken
tours
and
we've.
F
You
know,
we've
heard
we've
heard
about
the
issues,
but
you
know
we
feel
that
probably
a
more
systematic
and
comprehensive
approach
to
understanding
what
it
is.
We
call
it
the
nature
and
extending
causes
of
environmental
injustice
in
evanston
that
that
that
needs
to
be
understood
before
we
go
too
far
and
recommending
steps
that
should
be
taken
to
correct
those
and
and
clearly
that
has
to
be
done.
So
that's
the
environmental
equity
investigation
that
we're
proposing
and
you
know
to
the
people
we've
talked
to
so
far.
We've
gotten,
you
know
very
favorable
reactions.
F
You
know
we've
gotten
questions,
they've
asked
for
more
information,
but
we
just
had
a
call.
Last
week
with
the
with
the
mayor,
the
new
sustainability
coordinator,
kara,
pratt
dave
stonebeck,
was
on
from
the
public
works
agency
and
kelly
gandursky
was
on
in
her
capacity.
As
you
know,
interim
city
manager,
and
we
had
about
you-
know
good
discussion
with
them.
They
asked
for
some
follow-up
information,
but
they
seem
generally
in
favor
of
you
know,
moving
forward
in
this
direction.
F
You
know
so
we've
thought
about
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
and
and
the
nature
of
sort
of
the
work
we
want
to
do
it's
it's
only
not
only
getting
out
into
the
community
and
talking
to
people,
but
it's
you
know,
developing
a
public
engagement
process
that
would
go
along
with
this
work.
It
would
result
in
an
analysis
once
we
have.
F
E
F
Are
the
options
for
me?
You
know
correcting
things
in
the
future
and
getting
to
the
points
that
were
just
being
discussed
right
now,
it's
always
great
to
identify
what
a
problem
is
and
identify
how
severe
it
is.
But
what
you
really
want
to
achieve
is
is
some
long-lasting
changes
where
institutionally
you
know
the
city
takes
the
stuff
into
account
and
makes
decisions.
Hopefully
the
right
decision
based
on
the
information
that
that
they
have
so
and
and
we've
actually
asked
that
some
arpathons
be
made
available
so
that
we
can.
F
Sure-
and
you
know
what
my
screen-
oh
there
we
go-
my
screen
throws
up
for
a
second,
the
the
resolution
specifically
calls
for
an
environmental
justice
mapping
tool.
I
think
it's
got
a
fancy
name
like
a
gis,
a
mapping
inventory
or
something
like
that,
but
that
would
be
a
a
tool
that
would
in
a
more
systematically
way
look
at
issues
relating
to
environmental
justice
in
the
city
and
actually
displayed
on
a
map.
F
You
know
involving
people
of
color
and
marginalized
neighborhoods
to
to
get
a
sense
from
them
what's
on
their
mind,
so
that,
as
we
plan
this
investigation,
you
know
we're
we're
not
going
in
any
wrong
direction
and
really
trying
to
address.
You
know
what
what
the
issues
really
are.
And
finally,
we
have
done
one
thing
called
an
environmental
justice
playbook,
which
is
a
sort
of
step-to-step
guide
for
community
members
to
actually
report
on
environmental
justice
issues.
They
may
personally
be
dealing
with
and
laying
out
the
steps
by
which
they
can.
F
You
know
pursue
that
both
with
with
city
staff
and
in
other
ways,
so
they
can
hopefully
try
to
get
some
sort
of
resolution.
So
we've
been
working
on
a
lot
of
stuff,
I'm
sorry
to
throw
so
much
information
to
you
at
the
end
of
a
long
meeting
like
this,
but
that's
what
we
covered
in
that
status
report
that
was
in
the
the
agenda
package.
A
Great
well
thanks
andy.
I
would
just
encourage
fellow
commissioners
to
check
it
out.
Andy
happy
to
have
you
join
us
next
month
to
be
able
to
answer
any
questions
that
my
fellow
commissioners
or
I
may
have
for
you,
but
in
the
interest
of
time,
we're
nearing
our
second
hour
here
thanks
for
coming
andy,
and
if
you
all
don't
mind,
writing
down
some
of
your
questions
or
comments,
so
we
can
bring
them
up
at
february.
A
We
have
one
last
agenda
item
tonight,
folks,
and
I
think
it
was
just
to
inform
everyone
that
our
enabling
ordinance
that
we
had
worked
on
passed
through
city
council
matthew.
I
was
told,
I
believe,
by
city
clerk
mendoza.
In
a
conversation
I
was
having-
or
maybe
it
was
older
person
fleming
that
are
enabling
ordinance
past
swiftly
with
no
questions
or
concerns,
and
so
the
edits
and
recommendations
we
made
into
the
language
were
all
accepted,
and
if
anyone
has
questions
this
isn't
the
language
that
we
developed
last
year.
A
I
think
we
started
in
the
third
quarter
of
2021
just
to
be
able
to
clarify
our
role,
our
purpose,
how
many
the
number
of
members
that
need
to
be
on
the
commission
etc,
and
so
I
just
like
to
say
I'm
you
know
satisfied
that
the
city
council
supported
it.
It
was
part
of
our
intent
to
clarify
and
to
put
to
clarify
what
we
felt
our
appropriate
purpose
and
role
was,
and
that
was
accepted,
and
so
with
that
we
have
gone
through
everything
on
our
agenda
jane.
I
see
your
hand
and
your
finger.
D
A
All
right,
commissioners,
if
that
is
everything
that
will
wrap
us
up
for
the
tonight
and
for
this
month's
meeting.
Thank
you
all
for
your
engagement
and
being
here
with
us
and
being
present
alrighty
on
our
on
carla.
My
behalf,
thank
you.
All
very
much
have
a
good
night
have
a
safe
rest
of
your
week
and
we'll
see
you
soon
absolutely
thank
you.