►
From YouTube: Housing and Community Development Meeting 12-17-2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
Every
one
of
these
organizations
is
a
valued
community
partner
and
unfortunately,
we
just
are
in
a
situation
where,
as
in
most
years,
we
have
far
less
available
to
to
distribute,
then
the
then
the
needs
of
the
community
would
mandate,
but
with
that
we
just
have
to
kind
of
do
the
best
we
can
do
with
you
know
trying
to
set
the
set
the
priorities.
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
go
through
the
public
services
section.
First,
that's
tends
to
be
the
most
challenging,
but
we
have
a
spreadsheet
on
the
on
the
screen.
A
The
group
has
had
the
opportunity
to
kind
of
look
at
the
amounts
that
are
available
for
the
public
services.
We
do
have
a
cap
on
the
overall,
a
grant
funding
amount
of
15%
and
that
dollar
amount
is
a
subtotal
of
two
hundred
and
sixty
one
thousand
dollars,
and
we
have
four
hundred
and
sixty
five
thousand
dollars
worth
of
applications.
So,
as
you
might
guess
that
presents
challenges
and
coming
up
with
the
numbers,
but
to
kind
of
get
things
going,
I'd
open
up
to
the
floor.
B
D
D
B
A
So
I,
okay,
I,
will
start
from
the
bottom
up.
The
first
or
the
bottom.
Three
are
all
City
applications
and
for
city
programs,
I'm
gonna,
just
kind
of
throw
out
some
numbers
here:
I'm
gonna
suggest
maybe
seventeen
thousand
for
the
certificate
of
rehab,
eighteen
thousand
for
the
Youth
Employment,
Program
and
24
for
the
graffiti
removal,
and
you.
A
E
F
A
A
Again,
it's
not
to
be
a
commentary
on
the
value
of
the
worth
of
programs,
but
I
feel
this
year
a
little
bit
more
inclined
to
do
what
I
can
or
do
we
push
us
in
a
direction
that
we
can
give
more
money
to
the
community
partners,
and
you
know-
and
of
course
that
would
come
at
the
expense
of
some
of
our
own
internal
funding.
So
that's
kind
of
why
I've,
given
those
numbers
for
those.
C
G
The
are
we
gonna
have
a
discussion
line
item
by
line
item,
because
I
wanted
to
ask
that
we
increase
the
I
think
you
said
17
for
the
certificate
of
rehab
and
record
ceiling
and
I
would
ask
that
we
increased
that
to
20,000
as
we
work
to
support
our
community,
particularly
our
returning
citizens
that
have
many
barriers
to
employment
and
other
opportunities
that
could
help
us
to
reduce
our
recidivism
rate
here
in
Evanston
and
help
us
make
for
healthier
families.
So
I
think
the
ask
was
30
and.
B
H
Ask
are
you
okay,
with
reducing
than
graffiti
3,000,
just
so
that
we
keep
that
total
the
same,
because
I
agree
that
there
are
a
lot
of
organizations
non
city
organizations
that
are
gonna
need
a
lot
of
support
tonight
and
I.
Just
I
think
I
think
your
impulse
was
right,
Aldrin
Wilson,
on
keeping
these
numbers
right.
So
if
we're
gonna
go
plus
three,
there
can
we
go
minus
3
and
the
graffiti
and
then.
A
You
know
to
my
council,
colleagues
on
this
committee:
I
recognize
that
this
is
putting
more
burden
on
us
because
we're
gonna
have
to
figure
out.
You
know
how
we,
you
know,
make
sure
that
these
programs
get
get
the
coverage
and
the
funding
that
they
need.
So
it's
you
know
part
of
the
tough
choices,
but
again
we'll
have
to
make
up
for
that.
You
know
in
other
ways.
A
So
if
we,
if
we
short
those
I'm,
just
acknowledging
that
so
taking
on
that
responsibility
that
we're
gonna
have
to
make
make
up
for
that
and
make
sure
that
these
programs
are
funded
appropriately
so
that
they
are
as
effective
as
they
should
be
so,
okay.
So
let's
change
the
Twenty
twenty
one,
twenty
four
to
twenty
one
in
the
other
one,
seventeen
to
twenty.
I
I
had
a
concern
I'll
just
say
that
I
think
you
know
this
is
a
something
that
has
been
emphasized
to
us
by
staff
that
when
the
number
gets
below
5,000
that
we,
you
know
that
when
numbers
get
really
small
that
it
almost
eats
up
the
amount
with
the
administrative
work
that
has
to
be
done.
So
that's
a
concern
that
I
had
about.
I
A
H
B
J
Mean
I
think
the
reason
why
it
was
so
low
was
because
Evanston
residents
only
comprised
about
2.5
of
their
population
and,
however,
the
program
still
serves
62
residents.
So
it's
a
that's
basically
asking
to
support
a
full-time
case
manager,
dedicating
about
50%
of
their
time
with
Evanston
residents.
So
there
was
some
need
to
offer
something.
B
A
G
G
A
A
A
G
A
K
K
K
K
A
C
B
B
B
K
C
K
A
H
D
K
H
G
Specifics
on
grandparents
raising
their
grandchildren
have
the
additional
burden
of
doing
it,
usually,
while
on
a
fixed
income
themselves
and
the
additional
needs
of
the
average
child.
That,
for
whatever
reason
has
to
be
raised
by
their
grandparent
is
something
I
would
like
us
to
consider
and
lift
up
those
grandparents
and
support
them
as
much
as
we
can,
because
they
are
already
struggling
in
their
later
years
to
manage
schedules
of
busy
children
and
children
sometimes
having
emotional
needs,
and
there
are
organizations
in
town
that
are
also
supporting
grandparents.
G
L
J
A
A
G
M
K
G
F
B
B
C
H
C
A
C
K
A
B
K
L
K
K
B
B
C
G
G
Thank
you.
The
students
that
are
enjoying
the
programming
at
family
focus
are
also
those
that
are
exclusively
the
community,
that's
bust
out
of
their
Ward,
and
they
do
not
have
as
many
options
as
out
of
school
time
activities,
and
they
are
largely
in
the
lower
income
census
tract
in
the
community.
Therefore,
they
cannot
afford
other
out-of-school
time.
Activity
and
out-of-school
time
is
very
important
for
growth
in
world
view
in
socialization
and
therefore
their
academic
success.
G
As
we
look
to
bridge
our
academic
and
achievement
gap
in
the
community,
I
think
we
should
consider
out-of-school
time,
activity
and
programming
that
is
available
at
family
focus
as
a
priority
for
our
Louis
disparity
in
education
gap
and
income
gap,
and
so
on.
So
I
would
ask
that.
I
know
that
we
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
to
get
this
thing
balanced
out,
but
that
is
a
vulnerable
community
and
one
that
I'm
hoping
we
could
fight
for
a
little
bit
harder.
K
K
J
Actually,
push
back
I
would
support
alderman
Simmons,
because
if
you
look
at
this
particular
age
group,
there
isn't
much
to
support
them
with
after
school
in
Richmond,
whereas
the
title
one
schools
at
fifth
Ward
students,
you
know
residents,
do
not
attend.
They
have
y-o-u,
which
is
free
to
them
as
an
after-school
enrichment
program.
So
I
think
this
is
building
community
and
it's
further
enriching
with
steam
programming
and
not
just
sewing
and
Girl
Scouts
not
to
put
down
either
sewing
or
Girl.
K
K
G
G
Add
on
to
I'm
something
that
was
said
about
title
one,
schools
and
I
think
we
should
be
aware
of
what
that
means.
The
other,
the
other
Center,
the
other
Center
in
the
war,
does
not
support
programming.
After-School
programming.
They've
done
some
things:
to
try
to
be
more
inclusive
and
provide
programming
to
the
fifth
word
student,
but
their
funding
does
not
provide
the
same
level
of
service
and
programming
for
the
kids
in
the
neighborhood
in
which
their
building
is
located.
So
I
think
that's
something
that
we
should
give
some
serious.
Consider
raishin,
okay,.
K
A
C
I
C
L
F
B
B
H
F
A
E
C
G
G
A
A
F
A
So
well,
they
they've
been
applying
for
many
many
years
and
have
been
funded
for
many
years
and
are
you
familiar
with
the
program
at
all
or
okay?
So
it's
currently
located
on
Sherman
they're,
looking
to
a
partner
at
Robert,
Crown
I,
think
is
their
their
hope
and
their
plan.
They
have
a
number
of
community
partners.
Historically
I
think
they've
worked
with.
Why
are
you,
but
basically
the
the
general
concept
is
it's.
They
work
with
youth
and
sometimes
with
adults,
but
it's
I'll
call
it
like
our
therapy.
A
H
J
I
A
M
J
K
Well,
my
lights
not
going
on
I,
just
like
to
say
I,
I,
think
our
reputation
over
time
has
been
pretty
good
before
making
decisions
and
when
we
start
axing
programs
that
have
the
quality
and
the
production
of
youth
job
center,
I
I
get
very
nervous,
and
just
because
we've,
you
know,
we've
made
a
few
mistakes.
I
I
really
would
encourage
us
not
to
slice
youth
job
center
any
further
down
than
we
already
have
that.
That
just
sends
a
terrible
message
and.
K
G
K
N
K
G
A
G
E
C
F
M
M
I
C
G
D
D
D
L
M
Little
rationale
to
put
something
in
books
and
breakfast
instead,
I'm
thinking
we're
getting
at
the
start
of
building
a
young
person's
social
character,
their
moral
character,
how
they
fit
in
academically.
So
they
can
focus
on
more
than
just
the
academic
lesson
at
school
and
not
be
angry,
because
there's
no
way
you're
going
to
be
happy
every
day
as
a
child
going
to
school
and
you're
hungry.
L
M
K
D
K
D
B
E
Thank
you
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
it's
not
that
they're,
books
and
and
breakfast
is
not
worthy
of
more
money.
We
totally
understand
that,
but
that
be
saying
to
someone
who
is
less
privileged,
that
they're
really
not
deserving
off
any
of
our
money.
I
think
we're
we're
we're
at
a
point
here
on
the
budget
that
we
are
balanced.
Let's
leave
it
at
that.
We
have
some
time
to
digest
things
as
they
are
right
now.
E
A
Books
in
breakfast
program
too,
and
that's
really
addressing
a
need
for
kids,
who
are
at
schools
that
aren't
the
title
one
school
so
otherwise
they're
not
getting
the
same
kinds
of
resources
right
right
and,
and
they
really
need
that
and
it's
important
for
them
to
know
that
somebody's
there
for
them.
You
know
every
day
the
10,000
is
a
significant
increase
over
last
year,
and
so
hopefully
that
will
help
them
grow
and
but
it's
all
just
hard
I
mean
that's
the
thing.
That's
the
thing
that's
hard
and
you
know
the
other
thing
is
I
recognize.
A
J
Just
to
speak
about
a
little
bit
about
books
and
breakfast
I
remember
when
I
was
trying
to
clean
this
to
my
children.
My
daughter
said:
you
know
what,
if
the
only
meal
I
got
every
day
with
lunch,
I'd
be
hangry
all
morning,
and
then
it
made
me
think
about
when
they
were
presenting.
They
were
talking
about
the
middle
school
kids.
G
And
then
we
talked
about
impact
I,
think
that
was
mentioned
here
and
then
being
a
smaller
organization,
serving
a
very
targeted
community
running
a
lean
operation
without
much
overhead
intentionally
employing
local
residents
and
reaching
out
to
the
volunteer
community
locally.
So
they
are
developing
a
community
and
looking
to
expand
their
services
further.
A
I
C
N
G
We
are
we
balanced
now
because
15,000,
it's
gonna,
be
a
challenge
for
family-focused
to
provide
the
programming
that
they
need
to
provide
to
the
young
people
there
is:
is
there
any
sort
of
creative
math
or
something
that
I'm
overlooking
I'm,
asking
you
all
to
help
me
think
about
how
we
can
further
support
this
program
at
family
focus?
I,
don't
know,
okay,.
K
B
L
K
C
A
K
E
A
Okay,
that's
public
services,
and
you
know
again,
thanks
to
everybody,
this,
the
presentations
are
the
best
nights
of
the
year
and
tonight's,
the
worst
night
of
the
year
for
us.
So
you
know
I
just
regret
that
there
wasn't
more
available
to
to
do
what
we
really
feel
like.
We
need
to
do
so.
Thank
you,
everybody!
Thank
you,
housing
substance,
our
wait,
housing.
We
have
two
items:
the
rehab
administration
and
the
loan
repayments
programs.
A
F
L
G
L
F
A
A
So
I'm
gonna
suggest
we
hold
off
in
the
target
area
code
enforcement
number
because
it's
a
big
number
and
go
with
the
the
components
below
and
then
double
back
to
that
so
actually
miss
flax.
You
had
some
information,
of
course
regarding
or
even
early
learning
center
and
some
opportunities
that
they
might
have
one.
Could
you
step
up
to
the
microphone
and
fill
us
in
on
that.
N
Thank
You
chair
Wilson,
at
our
meeting,
where
we
reviewed
their
application,
which
was
the
fourth
of
December.
N
One
of
the
requests
that
the
committee
had
was
that
staff
work
with
our
water
department
and
figure
out
what
was
the
source
of
the
lead
in
the
water
there
and
make
sure
that
we
were
addressing
that
appropriately
and
so
Scott
Williams,
who
is
our
rehab
specialist,
worked
with
people
in
the
water
department
and
took
a
look
at
the
situation
and
what
could
be
creating
lead
in
the
water.
The
largest
issue
is
both
of
their
service
lines
from
the
city.
N
Water
mains
have
led
in
them,
and
that
was
not
something
that
was
covered
in
their
application,
which
is
not
surprising
because
most
of
us
think
about
our
what's
in
our
building,
but
that
is
actually
likely
the
biggest
source
of
lead
that
could
be
leeching
into
their
water.
So
what
the
city
looked
at?
The
information
from
DCFS
and
the
requirements
and
DCFS
allows
a
sort
of
two-step
process.
One
is
to
address
an
immediate
response,
and
the
rest
is
a
longer-term
response
to
make
sure
that
all
of
their
tested
water
gets
below
that
2.1.
N
Parts-Per-Billion
now
it's
really
hard,
but
let
is
really
which
is
the
measure
of
DCFS
DCFS
has
the
most
restrictive
measure,
which
is
important
because
lead
a
really
serious
issue,
especially
with
very
young
children,
but
that
they
understand
that
this
is
a
huge
you
know
to
get.
Everything
can
take
a
little
time.
Sometimes
they
had
won.
N
The
city's
portion
of
the
service
line
is
already
coppers,
so
there
is
only
a
partial,
copper
replacement
on
that
side
to
get
the
lead
out
of
that
water
supply.
So
the
city's
recommendation
is
Reba
has
some
money
that
they
mentioned,
that
they
haven't
spent
from
the
money
that
was
allocated
in
2017,
because
the
bathroom
rehab
was
more
expensive
than
they
had
planned.
N
So
we
recommend
allowing
the
immediate
fixing
of
that
need
the
the
replacement
of
that
water
line
and
the
North's
feed,
and
our
estimate
is
that's
going
to
be
about
eleven
thousand
five
hundred,
so
that
can
easily
be
done
with
the
funding
that
is
already.
In
fact,
they
don't
even
have
to
wait
for
the
2020
funding,
which
is
good.
It
can
be
done
immediately
and
then
we
agree
that
they
should
replace
all
of
the
piping,
because
the
rest
of
the
piping
in
the
building
is
old.
N
It's
galvanized,
so
it's
not
likely
to
be
a
huge
source
of
lead.
There
could
be
some
lead
soldering
and
things,
but
it
isn't
a
huge
source
of
lead,
but
at
the
same
time,
when
they're
doing
their
bathroom
they're,
replacing
fixtures
and
moving
fixtures.
So
it
makes
sense
to
upgrade
it
all
at
one
time
so
that
work
combined
with
the
bathroom.
N
Renovations
should
be
estimated
all
as
one
bid
they
had
two
separate
bids
and
that
concerns
us
I
mean
two
separate
separate
contractors,
because
it's
something
that
really
should
be
handled
by
a
general
so
that
everything
is
installed
and
lined
up
perfectly.
So
what
we
would
recommend
as
having
Scott
Williams
work
with
them,
make
sure
we
get
the
they've
they've
got
plans
and
everything
so
they've
done
a
lot
of
the
work
and
we
want
to
give
them
credit
for
that.
N
They've
really
worked
hard
on
this
get
put
together
a
bid
specification,
get
some
estimates
and
then,
if
we
get
additional
funding
this
year,
which
cross
our
fingers
were
hoping,
we
will
get.
We
estimate
conservatively.
If
the
committee
were
so
inclined,
we
could
say
there.
The
second
phase
would
be
prioritized
for
funding
from
that.
N
If
it
doesn't
work
out
with
that,
we
get
that,
then
they
would
have
a
ready
to
apply
project
for
the
2021
funding,
and
so
that
seemed
to
the
various
staff
working
on
it
to
be
the
best
way
of
addressing
and
DCFS
does
allow.
We
took
the
right
out
of
their
paperwork
that
the
two-step
process
to
get
this
really
done
and
I
do
want
people
to
understand
that
the
one
the
highest
lead
level
was
4.4
parts
per
billion
in
one
room.
The
next
highest
was
two
point,
six
eight.
N
N
Obviously
that
doesn't
matter
if
there's
lead
in
that
right
now,
but
then
the
South
water
line
would
ultimately
be
disconnected
when
the
main
renovation
is
done
and
then
all
of
their
water
would
come
from
the
north
water
line,
which
is,
would
be
copper
straight
from
the
main
and
all
of
the
potential
LED.
That
is
in
any
of
the
solder,
and
anything
like
that
would
be
taken
out,
as
we
would
also
recommend
upgrading
all
the
fixtures
not
just
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
LED
fixtures
before
1986
could
have
more
lead
in
them.
N
That
was
a
change
too,
but
we
also
could
then
make
sure
their
water
efficient
and
they're
getting
the
best
value,
because
that's
another
thing
that
we
want
to
do
with
cdbg,
which
is
to
reduce
water
consumption
from
old
water
fixtures
and
make
sure
that
they've
got.
You
know,
low-flow
toilets,
proper
low-flow
fixtures
with
the
aerators
that
make
them
work
just
as
well
all
that
stuff.
So
that's
the
staff
recommendation,
so
we
wouldn't
be
allocating
money
specifically
to
Reba
right
now.
They
would
have
carryover
money
to
spend
on
the
first
phase.
N
We'd
come
back
with
a
bid
on
the
second
phase
and
we
would
go
ahead
and
work
on
that.
Congress
may
make
their
funding
appropriations
by
Friday
by
Saturday,
or
else
we're
gonna
have
to
have
another
continuing
resolution.
If
they
do,
the
house
has
recommended
more
funding
for
CDBG
fingers
crossed
then
we
would
probably
at
least
have
what
we
had
last
year.
So
we
would
have
some
flexibility.
So
that's
our
staff
recommendation.
N
Well,
we
would
do
that.
We'd
start
working
on
that
immediately,
so
it
would
be
ready
and
we
would
have
that
information
what
it
would
cost
by
the
time
we're
gonna
be
doing
allocations,
because
even
if
we
get
our
grant
amount,
even
if
even
if
they
say
how
much
is
allocated
for
CDBG
overall,
you
know
nationwide
on
Friday
or
Saturday.
Hud
has
60
days
to
do
the
formulas,
so
it'll
be
60
days
before
we
get
our
grant
amounts.
So
we
would
have
that
information
ready
to
go
at
that.
A
Okay,
so
at
least
we
know
the
water
service
is
getting
addressed
right
away.
So
that's
important,
that's
probably
most
important
part
right
and
then
you
know
in
line
with
what
we
talked
about
as
we
look
at
the
possibility
of
getting
additional
funding,
we'll
go
back,
we'll
revisit
that
if
we
get
more
and
then
based
on
the
conversations
we've
had
we'll
have
Reba
and
family
focus,
as
the
did.
You
know
conversational
priorities
for
that
additional
funding,
and
you
know
if
it's
huge
amounts
which
would
be
awesome,
then
we
can
look
further
than
that
yeah.
A
K
A
Okay,
people,
okay
with
24,
then
yes,
okay
and
as
I
think
it
was
explained
to
us
with
regard
to.
We
have
two
alley
projects
and
the
smaller
of
the
two
alley
projects.
At
the
moment.
It's
not
it
doesn't
qualify.
So
there's
a
process
in
place
to
see
if
it
can
be
qualified
but
I
think
that's
risky
or
riskier
business.
So
I
think
it's
probably
safest
to
not
allocate
money
to
that
in
the
event
that
that
doesn't
play
out
just
the
one,
just
the
the
261.
I
I
A
K
H
G
H
A
So
I
see.
B
M
M
I
A
B
H
A
O
I
O
Could
we
could
hold
off
on
doing
the
lighting
or
look
to
see
if
there's
another
choice
for
lighting
funding,
although
I'd
have
to
look,
but
it
makes
sense
to
do
the
two
drainage
of
prices
together?
Ideally,
you
would
address
the
lighting
feet
just
because
every
time
we're
going
into
a
park
now
we're
trying
to
fix
the
lighting
issues
right
as
well,
because.
G
A
I
G
Just
furthermore,
just
the
park,
it
connects
twigs,
bat
Butler,
and
it
is
the
pathway
that
the
residents
largely
from
over
the
rainbow
used
to
get
around
the
city
and,
as
you
know,
mr.
angleman
shows
up
often
to
let
us
know
about
some
of
their
concerns
and
their
mobility
challenges.
And
if
we
could
do
anything
to
improve
that
pathway,
it
would
be
great
for
our
residents
that
are
not
ambulatory
and
in
wheelchairs
that
use
that
pathway
and.
O
A
J
A
H
N
Historically,
CDBG
has
covered
probably
close
to
half
of
the
property
standards
budget,
because
much
of
the
work
is
done
in
the
target
area,
which
is
areas
where
we're
really
looking
at
where
there
are
problems
with
maintaining
housing.
Most
of
it
is
the
routine.
Inspections
are
on
an
every
third
year
basis
in
the
target
area,
whereas
in
the
city
as
a
whole,
it's
every
fifth
year
and
of
course,
all
complaints
are
inspected.
N
Basically,
our
CDBG
funding
funding
is
focused
on
the
areas
where
we
have
our
lower
income
rental
and
the
most
code
enforcement
problems.
So
it
is
a
major
portion
of
our
way
of
trying
to
keep
the
quality
of
our
housing
for
our
low-income,
renters,
primarily
decent.
So
it
is
a
very
important
program.
People
are
referred
to
the
housing
rehab
program
and
things
like
that.
So,
okay,.
H
N
H
B
G
I
So
what
if
we
not
you
know
this
is
tough
choices,
but
if
we
reduced
economic
development
by
25,000
and
added
that
to
code
enforcement,
because
by
having
code
enforcement,
be
reduce
that
significantly
than
what
I
would
imagine,
is
the
following
year.
Code
enforcement
is
going
to
be
that
things
will
only
continue
to
get
worse
if
we
are
not
in
doing
as
much
code
enforcement
and
then
will
delayed
maintenance
is
expend
more
expensive
maintenance.
K
I
think
we
would
be
if
we
reduced
quote
code
enforcement
it
when
you
have
multifamily
buildings
and
you
do
not
stay
on
top
of
them
and
the
story
about
inspecting
them.
Every
three
years
is
almost
a
fallacy.
We
don't
get
to
every
single
unit
every
three
years.
Trust
me,
because
I
represent
a
ward
that
is
loaded
with
multifamily
buildings
and
they
just
don't
get
to
them,
and
now
that
the
movement
is
underway
to
d
converting
x'
we're
gonna
have
more
multifamily,
even
though
we
are
supposedly
having
a
moratorium
on
D
conversion.
K
There's
we
don't
inspect
condominiums,
but
we
do
inspect
multifamily
rentals
and
so
I
I.
Just
you
know,
one
of
the
worst
things
you
can
do
is
have
slums
and
if
we
don't
continue
to
inspect
rental
properties,
that's
what
you're
gonna
have,
because
all
a
landlord
needs
to
know
is
they're
gonna
get
away
with
murder,
and
they
they
start
eliminating
maintenance
people
instead
of
having
them
around
once
a
week.
They
have
them
around
once
a
month,
and
you
can
see
right
before
your
eyes.
The
deterioration
of
a
building
and
once
one
building
on
a
block
goes.
K
The
next
building
goes
and
it's
the
rotten
apple
theory
and
the
broken
window
theory
and
starts
the
deterioration
of
neighborhoods.
So
if
nothing
else
in
the
city
of
Evanston,
when
we
have
virtually
the
same
number
of
rentals
as
we
do
single
families,
we
need
to
be
very
serious
about
our
code
enforcement,
whether
it's
in
whether
it's
in
low-income
neighborhoods
or
in
that
you
know,
moderate
urban
middle
middle-class
neighborhoods.
We
need
to
be
really
serious
about
it
right
now.
K
F
K
N
Yes,
because
nothing
here
is
capped,
what'll
happen
is
if
we
get
more,
money
will
calculate
a
new
public
services.
Cap
that'll
allow
us
to
figure
out
how
much
more
we
can
put
into
public
services
and
historically,
we
have
maxed
out
everything
we
can,
because
that's
such
a
difficult
category
and
then
we
have
really
all
the
rest
of
the
categories.
We
generally
also
put
administration
at
percent
of
the
grant,
and
then
we
figure
everything
else
out
from
there.
N
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
when
we
did
our
goals
on
estimate
of
for
the
for
the
action
plan
that
we
had
to
do
this
year,
when
we
calculated
economic
development
at
the
average
percentage
of
you
know
over
the
years,
we
actually
as
two
percent
of
the
budget,
it
came
in
out
to
about
thirty
thousand
dollars.
Now
one
of
the
things
as
economic
development
money
is
rarely
allocated
all
at
once.
N
A
And
and
I
think
I
think
you
already
pointed
this
out.
My
understanding
is,
for
the
most
part,
most
part,
the
code
enforcement,
its
staff
salaries.
The
people
are
already
hired.
It's
not
like
we're
going
on
hiring
other
people
so
right
it
comes
out
of
the
general
fund
if
it
doesn't
come
out
of
here.
So
all.
A
I
A
L
K
Do
we
get
the
the
the
people
who
are
going
to
be
hurt
by
that?
Are
the
very
people
who
are
hurt
by
bad
buildings,
and
that
I
mean
we
could
never
do
things
like
the
corner
of
church
and
Dodge?
We
could
never
do
things
like
you
know
the
buildings
in
the
300
block
of
Howard
Street.
We
could
never.
We
could
never
do
those
small
businesses
on
Main
Street
or
on
Dempster,
where
we
get
so
much
kudos
for
helping
out.
K
K
B
G
The
the
folks
as
autumn
Irenaeus
saying
that
would
be
coming
that
we
could
support.
They
are
not
going
to
have
access
to
the
social
capital
fund.
It
themselves
are
not
going
to
have
access
to
any
sort
of
micro
lending
you're
gonna
have
all
kind
of
barriers
and
not
be
able
to
qualify
for
funds
in
any
other
way,
and
we
need
to
support
our
small
business
community.
You
know
I'm,
not
saying
anything
that
we
don't
agree
on.
G
G
C
K
A
K
E
C
O
F
G
A
A
C
G
G
A
Opposed
okay,
thank
you
very
much.
You
guys
hard
work.
I
appreciate
it.
It's
sometimes
emotional,
but
it's
a
challenge.
Alright,
we're
not
quite
at
the
end
of
our
agenda,
so
we
also
have
the
draft
consolidated
plan.
Well,
let's
see
nobody
signed
up
to
speak
to
the
action
plan.
Correct,
okay,
so
and
we
don't
have
to
have
a
public
hearing
correct,
so
we
just
call
that
all
right
is
there
any
further
discussion
on
recommendation
of
the
draft
consolidated
plan.
I'm.
Sorry,
the
2020,
through
2024,
consolidated
plan
and
draft
2020
action
plan
to
the
City
Council.
B
A
A
G
A
A
N
A
N
N
Targeted
code
enforcement
and
what
we
do
is
we
say
that
those
are
the
priorities,
but
that
doesn't
mean
an
absolute,
but
it
does
show
them
exactly
so.
We
will
then
hold
all
of
this
work
until
we
get
our
grant,
then
we'll
do
final
allocations
finalize
the
action
plan,
and
then
it
will
go
to
Council,
so
we're
kind
of
in
that
hurry-up-and-wait
mode
that
we
always
get
stuck
with.
N
Has
CDBG
entitlement
program
as
a
whole,
funded
at
three
point:
four
billion,
which
is
a
hundred
million
above
the
fiscal
year,
2019
enacted
level
of
3.3
billion,
so
we
estimated
conservatively.
So
our
estimate
is
below
our
2019
because
we
always
estimate
conservatively
so
I'm
fingers
crossed
if
they
actually
make
a
decision
about
funding
it
off.
It
looks
like
the
house
is
very
much
in
favor
of
increasing,
not
just
CDBG
about
some
other
domestic
spending.
They
actually
have
increases
for
hopup
programs,
choice,
neighborhoods,
public
housing,
capital
fund,
but
they've
increased.
N
The
public
housing
operating
fund
go
figure,
increase
for
housing
for
the
elderly,
which
is
the
section
202
program,
and
also
for
section
811,
which
is
housing
for
people
with
disabilities.
So
you
know,
there's
some
really
weird
stuff
going
on
in
Congress.
You
know
the
the
president
put
absolutely
nothing
for
CDBG
in
his
budget
and
absolutely
nothing
for
home
and
has
done
that
three
years
in
a
row
and
oddly
enough
then
Congress
has
come
back
and
funded
them
at
higher
levels.
K
N
It
it
they've
passed
it,
the
the
Senate
has
to
pass
or
make
any
modifications,
and
then
the
president
has
to
sign
it.
The
big
hang-up,
according
to
everything,
I've
heard,
is
I
believe,
certainly
the
house
but
I
think
even
the
Senate
is
trying
to
control
how
much
money
the
president
can
move
from
the
various
budgets
for
the
military
to
fund
the
wall,
which
has
been
something
he's
been
doing
in
the
last
couple
budget
years.
N
So
we
can
hopefully
be
optimistic
now,
whether
or
not
the
goal
of
many
of
the
Congress
members
of
Congress
is
to
actually
pass
a
budget,
because
if
they
do
another
continuing
resolution,
they
just
string
it
along
longer
and
then
the
leadership
wants
them
to
come
back
sooner
in
January
because
they
haven't
done
a
budget.
So
no
I,
don't
know
I.
Try
to
be
optimistic,
which
is
sometimes
hard,
but
you
know
that's.